Just glancing at this - and the note from over a year ago with a implementation for windows.. with 5.0.0 and higher it would be simplier to just do something like......
<?
if (!function_exists('time_nanosleep')) {
function time_nanosleep($seconds, $nanoseconds) {
sleep($seconds);
usleep(round($nanoseconds/100));
return true;
}
}
?>
....off the top of my head - obviously simple enough there should be no mistakes.. but those are the ones that always seem to get ya :( .....
time_nanosleep
(PHP 5)
time_nanosleep — 秒およびナノ秒単位で実行を遅延する
説明
mixed time_nanosleep
( int $seconds
, int $nanoseconds
)
指定した seconds および nanoseconds の時間だけプログラムの実行を遅延させます。
パラメータ
- seconds
-
正の整数である必要があります。
- nanoseconds
-
十億よりも小さい正の整数である必要があります。
返り値
成功した場合に TRUE を、失敗した場合に FALSE を返します。
シグナルによって遅延処理が中断された場合、以下の要素からなる連想配列を返します。
- seconds - 残りの秒数
- nanoseconds - 残りのナノ秒数
例
Example#1 time_nanosleep() の例
<?php
// 注意! もし配列が返された場合、これはうまく動作しません
if (time_nanosleep(0, 500000000)) {
echo "0.5 秒遅延しました。\n";
}
// こちらのほうがよいでしょう
if (time_nanosleep(0, 500000000) === true) {
echo "0.5 秒遅延しました。\n";
}
// そしてこれが最良の方法です
$nano = time_nanosleep(2, 100000);
if ($nano === true) {
echo "2.1 秒遅延しました。\n";
} elseif ($nano === false) {
echo "遅延に失敗しました。\n";
} elseif (is_array($nano)) {
$seconds = $nano['seconds'];
$nanoseconds = $nano['nanoseconds'];
echo "シグナルによって中断しました。\n";
echo "残りの秒数は $seconds 秒と $nanoseconds ナノ秒です。";
}
?>
注意
注意: この関数は Windows 環境にはまだ実装されていません。
time_nanosleep
fantasysportswire at yahoo dot com
19-Dec-2006 08:27
19-Dec-2006 08:27
anybody (a) emuxperts.net
22-Aug-2006 08:03
22-Aug-2006 08:03
Documentation states that "seconds" must be positive. This is not correct, 0 is possible.
Rather, "seconds" must be non-negative.
m at kufi dot net
14-Aug-2005 06:03
14-Aug-2005 06:03
You should take into account, if you use the function replacement down here, the CPU will be in use of 99% for the time of execution...
(A little bit better in this situation is to let the 'full seconds' go by a normal sleep command (makes the thread sleep!, and uses minimum cpu))
<?php
//THIS IS THE FUNCTION WE ARE TALKIN ABOUT
function timeWait($microtime)
{
//optimizations added by me [start]
//sleep the full seconds
sleep(intval($microtime));
//set the microtime to only resleep the last part of the nanos
$microtime = $microtime - intval($microtime);
//optimizations added by me [end]
$timeLimit = $microtime + array_sum(explode(" ",microtime()));
while(array_sum(explode(" ",microtime())) < $timeLimit)
{/*DO NOTHING*/}
return(true);
}
//THIS IS HOW WE CAN USE IT
echo "Process started at " . date("H:i:s") . " and " . current(explode(" ",microtime())) . " nanoseconds.<br>";
timeWait(5.5); //With this call the system will wait 5 seconds and a half. You can use either integer or float.
echo "Process completed at " . date("H:i:s") . " and " . current(explode(" ",microtime())) . " nanoseconds.";
?>
tecnomaniac at ig dot com dot br
27-Jul-2005 07:04
27-Jul-2005 07:04
This is an alternative function to sleep_nanosecond that you can use with PHP versions below PHP 5.0. It is not very accurate if we talk about nanoseconds but the results are satisfatory. Enjoy!
<?php
//THIS IS THE FUNCTION WE ARE TALKIN ABOUT
function timeWait($microtime)
{
$timeLimit = $microtime + array_sum(explode(" ",microtime()));
while(array_sum(explode(" ",microtime())) < $timeLimit)
{/*DO NOTHING*/}
return(true);
}
//THIS IS HOW WE CAN USE IT
echo "Process started at " . date("H:i:s") . " and " . current(explode(" ",microtime())) . " nanoseconds.<br>";
timeWait(5.5); //With this call the system will wait 5 seconds and a half. You can use either integer or float.
echo "Process completed at " . date("H:i:s") . " and " . current(explode(" ",microtime())) . " nanoseconds.";
?>