Next follows some partial study of the influence of Estonian, Finnish and Latvian computer scientists in terms of how much they have been cited. It started off as a table for Estonians only, to which I added Latvians (since I know many Latvians personally, and wanted to get some comparative material). Later, when I moved to Finland, I also decided to add Finns.
These tables are based on two freely accessible sources, CiteSeer and Scholar. They both cite of online papers (it is not fully automatic, it's a good idea to submit your own papers to them). Google Scholar since it finds most of the papers automatically and also includes many papers that are not available on-line (at least not free). Therefore, Scholar usually (but not always) returns more citations; this is partially also because Scholar returns all citations, including the self-citations, while the CiteSeer numbers do not include self-citations. However, Google has draconian terms of service (e.g., they do not allow remining of their outputs) and thus it is not as easy to use their service. I have not used ISI: ISI only includes some papers (they ignore ACM and IEEE), and is very difficult to use. For example, as of 04.01.05, I have 102 ISI citations, or 38 ISI citations if I only take into account citations to my papers that are in ISI. If we interpolate it then there should be 102/38*102=273 citations on any papers that cite any of my papers. This is not too much off compared to Scholar/Citeseer, but still...
Disclaimer: I do not have any connections with CiteSeer or Google. All data is given on ``as is'' basis.
For final comparison, according to the CIA World Factbook, the number of population in Estonia, Finland and Latvia is 1.43, 5.17 and 2.40 millions, resp. Note that I have considered a person x to be Estonian/Finnish/Latvian, if (s)he is either born in the corresponding country, or has the corresponding nationality, or has been working in this country for a considerable period of time. (So, Grigori Mints is considered to be Estonian, Hartmanis is considered to be Latvian and Rissanen is considered to be Finnish. In particular, I have added myself to both Finnish and Estonian tables.)
See these links for detailed information about every computer scientist:
Citeseer: Last update is from 04.08.05 (not all of the pages are yet updated). The previous update was in 02.04.05. Scholar included to the system on 01.05.05.
All following numbers on this page come from CiteSeer only (mostly because CiteSeer provides more sorting fascilities).
A researcher has h-index h if he has exactly h papers that are all cited at least h times (clearly, h-index is well defined). See here for the origin of this measure. It recommends that tenue (associate professorship) should be typically given when h is 12, and full professorship when h is 20. (This does not work here: computer scientists seem to be much less cited than physicists.) m is equal to h divided the number of years from the first paper of an author, original paper stated that m=1 for successful scientist and m=2 for outstanding scientist (employed only by top universities and labs). Nc,tot is the total number of citations, and a is defined as a=Nc,tot/h2. The next is a manual collection of some Estonian researchers's h-indexes (03.09.05, I used scholar.google.com, and only looked at the top of every page; it also contains some top Finnish/Latvian researchers):
| Name | h | 1st publ | m | Nc,tot | a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teuvo Kohonen | 42 | 1971 | 1.24 | 12569 | 7.13 |
| Heikki Mannila | 34 | 1982 | 1.48 | 4771 | 4.13 |
| Tuomas Sandholm | 35 | 1991 | 2.50 | 3124 | 2.55 |
| Erkki Oja* | 34 | 1974 | 1.10 | 5049 | 4.37 |
| Tommi Jaakkola* | 29 | 1997 | 3.63 | 946 | 1.12 |
| Jorma Rissanen | 28 | 1973 | 0.88 | 4193 | 5.35 |
| Arto Salomaa | 25 | 1960 | 0.56 | 2910 | 4.66 |
| Hannu Toivonen | 23 | 1993 | 1.92 | 3620 | 6.84 |
| Esko Ukkonen | 22 | 1976 | 0.76 | 1885 | 3.89 |
| Alvis Brazma | 19 | 1986 | 1.00 | 2056 | 5.70 |
| Ora Lassila | 19 | 1987 | 1.06 | 3967 | 10.99 |
| Aapo Hyvärinen | 18 | 1996 | 2.00 | 3251 | 10.03 |
| Johan Back* | 17 | 1978 | 0.63 | 992 | 3.43 |
| Andris Ambainis | 16 | 1994 | 1.45 | 860 | 3.36 |
| Antti Valmari | 18 | 1988 | 1.06 | 1169 | 3.61 |
| Ilkka Niemelä* | 16 | 1994 | 1.45 | 1421 | 5.55 |
| Jaak Vilo | 14 | 1992 | 1.08 | 1541 | 7.86 |
| Pekka Orponen | 13 | 1983 | 0.59 | 494 | 2.92 |
| Grigori Mints | 12 | 1982 | 0.52 | 524 | 3.64 |
| Kaisa Nyberg* | 12 | 1980 | 0.48 | 693 | 4.81 |
| Kalle Karu | 10 | 1995 | 1.00 | 547 | 5.47 |
| Raimund Ubar | 10 | 1994 | 0.91 | 409 | 4.09 |
| Tanel Tammet | 10 | 1991 | 0.71 | 397 | 3.97 |
| Margus Veanes | 10 | 1993 | 0.83 | 357 | 3.57 |
| Helger Lipmaa | 10 | 1998 | 1.43 | 330 | 3.30 |
| Toomas Timpka | 9 | 1990 | 0.60 | 380 | 4.69 |
| Malle Tagamets | 9 | 1984 | 0.43 | 268 | 3.31 |
| Enn Tyugu | 8 | 1971 | 0.24 | 254 | 3.97 |
| Peeter Ellervee | 8 | 1994 | 0.73 | 220 | 3.44 |
| Peeter Laud* | 8 | 1998 | 1.14 | 172 | 2.69 |
| Mihhail Matskin | 7 | 1995 | 0.70 | 173 | 3.53 |
| Tarmo Uustalu | 7 | 1992 | 0.54 | 168 | 3.43 |
| Jaan Raik | 7 | 1998 | 1.00 | 155 | 3.16 |
| Varmo Vene | 7 | 1998 | 1.00 | 80 | 1.63 |
| Ahto Buldas | 6 | 1997 | 0.75 | 153 | 4.25 |
| Ago Kuusik | 6 | 1996 | 0.67 | 143 | 3.97 |
| Mati Pentus | 6 | 1993 | 0.50 | 129 | 3.58 |
| Erich Mikk | 6 | 1995 | 0.60 | 184 | 5.11 |
This table is for Estonians only: the number shows how many times their total (ns)citation count has grown up from 31.12.2001. Included are only people with ≥15 (ns)citations at the current moment. The intermediate values in -> correspond to the end of year 2002, and to the end of the year 2003. (The latter is equal to the state of the citeseer databas in 01.09.03 - 30.06.04.)
Percentual change:
@Peeter Laud 450.0% [ 40.6% per year] ( 26-> 43-> 53-> 111-> 137-> 143,+ 117)
@Helger Lipmaa 430.5% [ 39.6% per year] ( 59-> 94-> 129-> 212-> 234-> 313,+ 254)
@Jan Willemson 392.3% [ 37.5% per year] ( 13-> 25-> 30-> 56-> 63-> 64,+ 51)
@Ahto Buldas 272.7% [ 30.1% per year] ( 33-> 51-> 59-> 114-> 121-> 123,+ 90)
@Varmo Vene 171.4% [ 22.1% per year] ( 14-> 18-> 19-> 36-> 36-> 38,+ 24)
@Kalle Karu 165.6% [ 21.6% per year] ( 32-> 45-> 53-> 75-> 85-> 85,+ 53)
@Raimund Ubar 133.3% [ 18.5% per year] ( 12-> 15-> 20-> 21-> 21-> 28,+ 16)
@Margus Veanes 129.8% [ 18.1% per year] ( 47-> 80-> 88-> 106-> 107-> 108,+ 61)
@Jaak Vilo 123.9% [ 17.5% per year] ( 46-> 69-> 80-> 101-> 101-> 103,+ 57)
@Mihhail Matskin 85.7% [ 13.2% per year] ( 14-> 17-> 18-> 23-> 26-> 26,+ 12)
@Kalev Kask 87.5% [ 13.4% per year] ( 24-> 28-> 30-> 44-> 44-> 45,+ 21)
@Tarmo Uustalu 88.1% [ 13.5% per year] ( 42-> 47-> 50-> 72-> 72-> 79,+ 37)
@Peeter Ellervee 81.0% [ 12.6% per year] ( 21-> 21-> 25-> 33-> 35-> 38,+ 17)
@Erich Mikk 51.1% [ 8.6% per year] ( 45-> 58-> 60-> 68-> 68-> 68,+ 23)
@Grigori Mints 45.6% [ 7.8% per year] ( 239-> 265-> 278-> 342-> 346-> 348,+ 109)
@Mati Pentus 34.1% [ 6.0% per year] ( 44-> 45-> 48-> 57-> 57-> 59,+ 15)
@Tanel Tammet 32.5% [ 5.8% per year] ( 163-> 176-> 187-> 216-> 216-> 216,+ 53)
@Enn Tõugu 14.1% [ 2.7% per year] ( 99-> 109-> 110-> 111-> 113-> 113,+ 14)
@George Rebane 8.3% [ 1.6% per year] ( 24-> 26-> 26-> 26-> 26-> 26,+ 2)
Absolute growth:
+ 254 ( 59-> 94-> 129-> 212-> 234-> 313) @Helger Lipmaa
+ 117 ( 26-> 43-> 53-> 111-> 137-> 143) @Peeter Laud
+ 109 ( 239-> 265-> 278-> 342-> 346-> 348) @Grigori Mints
+ 90 ( 33-> 51-> 59-> 114-> 121-> 123) @Ahto Buldas
+ 61 ( 47-> 80-> 88-> 106-> 107-> 108) @Margus Veanes
+ 57 ( 46-> 69-> 80-> 101-> 101-> 103) @Jaak Vilo
+ 53 ( 163-> 176-> 187-> 216-> 216-> 216) @Tanel Tammet
+ 53 ( 32-> 45-> 53-> 75-> 85-> 85) @Kalle Karu
+ 51 ( 13-> 25-> 30-> 56-> 63-> 64) @Jan Willemson
+ 37 ( 42-> 47-> 50-> 72-> 72-> 79) @Tarmo Uustalu
+ 24 ( 14-> 18-> 19-> 36-> 36-> 38) @Varmo Vene
+ 23 ( 45-> 58-> 60-> 68-> 68-> 68) @Erich Mikk
+ 21 ( 24-> 28-> 30-> 44-> 44-> 45) @Kalev Kask
+ 17 ( 21-> 21-> 25-> 33-> 35-> 38) @Peeter Ellervee
+ 14 ( 99-> 109-> 110-> 111-> 113-> 113) @Enn Tõugu
+ 15 ( 44-> 45-> 48-> 57-> 57-> 59) @Mati Pentus
+ 12 ( 14-> 17-> 18-> 23-> 26-> 26) @Mihhail Matskin
To compare, some of the Finnish people (this list is definitely incomplete):
Pekka Nikander 273.8% [ 30.2% per year] ( 42-> 63-> 76-> 146-> 149-> 157,+ 115)
N. Asokan 194.1% [ 24.1% per year] ( 187-> 267-> 350-> 505-> 505-> 550,+ 363)
Tuomas Sandholm 160.5% [ 21.1% per year] ( 425-> 568-> 732->1092->1095->1107,+ 682)
Aapo Hyvärinen 127.9% [ 17.9% per year] ( 391-> 479-> 588-> 840-> 840-> 891,+ 500)
Jussi Rintanen 113.3% [ 16.4% per year] ( 83-> 110-> 131-> 177-> 177-> 177,+ 94)
Samuel Kaski 101.4% [ 15.0% per year] ( 218-> 291-> 346-> 435-> 435-> 439,+ 221)
Patrik Simons 92.5% [ 14.0% per year] ( 293-> 377-> 405-> 553-> 553-> 564,+ 271)
Ilkka Niemelä 81.9% [ 12.7% per year] ( 454-> 554-> 613-> 811-> 811-> 826,+ 372)
Hannu Toivonen 76.6% [ 12.0% per year] ( 931->1170->1300->1654->1650->1644,+ 713)
Tommi Jaakkola 67.9% [ 10.9% per year] ( 555-> 683-> 749-> 906-> 919-> 932,+ 377)
Erkki Oja 49.1% [ 8.3% per year] ( 995->1162->1247->1534->1479->1484,+ 489)
Antti Valmari 38.3% [ 6.7% per year] ( 527-> 609-> 630-> 711-> 725-> 729,+ 202)
Heikki Mannila 18.0% [ 3.4% per year] (1355->1594->1594->2382->1613->1599,+ 244)
Only Estonia. Also, Estonian Cryptographers.
Certainly it is interesting to know how different statistics (like citation indeces) evolve. Currently I have only produced a backup for 2001.