Each project group should hand in three copies of their report on Wednesday 23/5. The one copy is given to Ulrik (or Aino), the two other copies are distributed as described by the table below. All reviews must be returned at the last class one week later, Tuesday 30/5, or be returned personally beforehand.
The reviews should only address the presentation of material, not whether the material is correct or relevant! For example, layout problems, spelling errors, and incomprehensible phrases should all be commented on, as should organisational problems. However, the review should not try to correct what appears to be a faulty understanding of the subject, nor should it correct errors in program code, or anything like that!
Here is the table describing the report distribution:
| Project group | Should give the two other copies of their report to |
| Jan | Sara, Peter Ahé |
| Sara, Mette | Kasper, Jesper |
| Peter Ahé, Kasper, Allan, Bent | Anders, Kim Dalsgaard, (optionally) Lene |
| Jesper, Anders | Kim Burgaard, Helge |
| Kim x3, Lene | Peter Brinkler, Toke |
| Helge, Peter Brinkler | Søren, Jan |
| Toke | Mette, Allan |
| Søren | Bent, Kim Falk Jørgensen |