Objection by Creditorsとは 意味・読み方・使い方

(4) When the rehabilitation debtor has submitted a proposed rehabilitation plan that specifies special clauses on home loan and it has resulted in any of the cases set forth in the items of paragraph (2), the provision of paragraph (2) shall also apply to an objection made in an investigation of rehabilitation claims, by the time specified in the respective items, by a rehabilitation creditor who holds a home loan claim prescribed in Article 198(1) and does not hold any rehabilitation claim except for said home loan claim or by a guarantee company that does not hold any rehabilitation claim except for a right of exoneration based on the guarantee for the debt for a home loan claim. In this case, the person who has made such objection shall not be subject to the effect of the relevant statements in the schedule of rehabilitation creditors that shall be the same as a final and binding judgment under the provisions of Article 104(3) and Article 180(2).発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

４　再生債務者により住宅資金特別条項を定めた再生計画案が提出され、かつ、第二項各号のいずれかに該当することとなったときは、当該各号に定める時までに第百九十八条第一項に規定する住宅資金貸付債権を有する再生債権者であって当該住宅資金貸付債権以外に再生債権を有しないもの又は保証会社であって住宅資金貸付債権に係る債務の保証に基づく求償権以外に再生債権を有しないものが再生債権の調査において述べた異議についても、第二項と同様とする。この場合においては、当該異議を述べた者には、第百四条第三項及び第百八十条第二項の規定による確定判決と同一の効力は、及ばない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 759(2) and (3) (Effectuation of Absorption-Type Company Split Which Cause Succession of Rights and Obligations by a Stock Company), Article 761(2) and (3) (Effectuation of Absorption-Type Company Split Which Cause Succession of Rights and Obligations by a Membership Company), Article 764 (2) and (3) (Effectuation of Incorporation-type Company Split by Which a Stock Company is Established) and Article 766 (2) and (3) (Effectuation of Incorporation-type Company Split by Which a Membership Company is Established) of the Companies Act shall not apply to Depositors, etc. or any other creditors specified by a Cabinet Order to which the notice for objection is not be required to be given under the preceding paragraph.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第七百五十九条第二項及び第三項（株式会社に権利義務を承継させる吸収分割の効力の発生等）、第七百六十一条第二項及び第三項（持分会社に権利義務を承継させる吸収分割の効力の発生等）、第七百六十四条第二項及び第三項（株式会社を設立する新設分割の効力の発生等）並びに第七百六十六条第二項及び第三項（持分会社を設立する新設分割の効力の発生等）の規定は、前項の規定により催告をすることを要しないものとされる預金者等その他政令で定める債権者には、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the Insurance Company shall attach the documents specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, such as documents showing the reason why the Modification of Contract Conditions is inevitable, documents showing a forecast of the business and property situation after the Modification of Contract Conditions is effected, documents showing matters regarding funding and the handling of debts against creditors other than Insurance Policyholders, etc., and documents showing matters related to management responsibility (in cases where there is a policy pursuant to the provisions set forth in Article 240-5, paragraph (4), including documents showing the content of the policy). Moreover, the Insurance Company shall attach a supplementary note to the effect said persons who are Policyholders Subject to Modify who have an objection should raise their objections within a set period of time.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

２　前項の場合においては、契約条件の変更がやむを得ない理由を示す書類、契約条件の変更後の業務及び財産の状況の予測を示す書類、基金及び保険契約者等以外の債権者に対する債務の取扱いに関する事項を示す書類、経営責任に関する事項を示す書類その他の内閣府令で定める書類（第二百四十条の五第四項に規定する方針がある場合にあっては、その方針の内容を示す書類を含む。）を添付し、変更対象契約者で異議がある者は、一定の期間内に異議を述べるべき旨を、前項の書面に付記しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 119 (1) The court, with regard to a bankruptcy claim which is filed or for which a change is made to any filed matter after the period for filing proofs of claims has expired but before the ordinary period for investigation expires or the ordinary date of investigation ends, shall specify a period for conducting an investigation of such claim (hereinafter referred to as a "special period for investigation"); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, with regard to such bankruptcy claim, a bankruptcy trustee states, in the statement of approval or disapproval submitted pursuant to the provision of Article 117(3), his/her approval or disapproval of the whole or part of the matters listed in the items of paragraph (1) of said Article, or no objection is made by a bankruptcy trustee or any bankruptcy creditors against conducting an investigation on the ordinary date of investigation.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第百十九条　裁判所は、債権届出期間の経過後、一般調査期間の満了前又は一般調査期日の終了前にその届出があり、又は届出事項の変更があった破産債権について、その調査をするための期間（以下「特別調査期間」という。）を定めなければならない。ただし、当該破産債権について、破産管財人が第百十七条第三項の規定により提出された認否書に同条第一項各号に掲げる事項の全部若しくは一部についての認否を記載している場合又は一般調査期日において調査をすることについて破産管財人及び破産債権者の異議がない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 122 (1) The court, with regard to a bankruptcy claim which is filed or for which a change is made to any filed matter after the period for filing proofs of claims has expired but before the ordinary period for investigation expires or the ordinary date of investigation ends, may specify a date for conducting an investigation of such claim (hereinafter referred to as a "special date of investigation"), when it finds it necessary; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, with regard to such bankruptcy claim, a bankruptcy trustee states, in the statement of approval or disapproval submitted pursuant to the provision of Article 117(3), his/her approval or disapproval of the whole or part of the matters listed in the items of paragraph (1) of said Article, or no objection is made by any bankruptcy trustee or bankruptcy creditors against conducting an investigation on the ordinary date of investigation.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第百二十二条　裁判所は、債権届出期間の経過後、一般調査期間の満了前又は一般調査期日の終了前に届出があり、又は届出事項の変更があった破産債権について、必要があると認めるときは、その調査をするための期日（以下「特別調査期日」という。）を定めることができる。ただし、当該破産債権について、破産管財人が第百十七条第三項の規定により提出された認否書に同条第一項各号に掲げる事項の全部若しくは一部についての認否を記載している場合又は一般調査期日において調査をすることについて破産管財人及び破産債権者の異議がない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Part IV, Chapter III (excluding Article 715 and Article 740, paragraph (3)) (Bondholders' Meeting), Part VII, Chapter II, Section 7 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Payment, etc by Bond-Issuing Company.), Article 868, paragraph (3) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (x) to (xii) inclusive) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company issues bonds. In this case, the term "bond-issuing company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "bond-issuing mutual company"; the term "under Article 705, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive, and under Articles 708 and 709" in Article 737, paragraph (2) (Execution of Resolutions of Bondholders' Meetings) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "of Article 61-7, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive of the Insurance Business Act, and the provisions of Articles 708 and 709 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 61-7, paragraph (8) of that Act"; and the term "the provisions of Article 449, Article 627, Article 635, Article 670, Article 779 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 781), Article 789 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 793), Article 799 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 802) or Article 810 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 813)" in Article 740, paragraph (1) (Special provisions on objection procedures for creditors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 17 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)) of the Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 57, paragraph (4) of that Act, and Articles 88 and 165-17 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-20 of that Act) of that Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第四編第三章（第七百十五条及び第七百四十条第三項を除く。）（社債権者集会）、第七編第二章第七節（社債発行会社の弁済等の取消しの訴え）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第十号から第十二号までに係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、相互会社が社債を発行する場合について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「社債を発行した相互会社」と、同法第七百三十七条第二項（社債権者集会の決議の執行）中「第七百五条第一項から第三項まで、第七百八条及び第七百九条」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の七第一項から第三項までの規定並びに同法第六十一条の七第八項において準用する第七百八条及び第七百九条」と、同法第七百四十条第一項（債権者の異議手続の特則）中「第四百四十九条、第六百二十七条、第六百三十五条、第六百七十条、第七百七十九条（第七百八十一条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第七百八十九条（第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第七百九十九条（第八百二条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）又は第八百十条（第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）」とあるのは「保険業法第五十七条第四項において準用する同法第十七条（第一項ただし書を除く。）の規定並びに同法第八十八条及び第百六十五条の十七（同法第百六十五条の二十において準用する場合を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム