Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
Paper page - Think Right: Learning to Mitigate Under-Over Thinking via Adaptive, Attentive Compression
[go: Go Back, main page]

https://github.com/joykirat18/TRAAC

\n","updatedAt":"2025-10-03T14:36:21.424Z","author":{"_id":"62ce26129f723d34cf1f595a","avatarUrl":"/avatars/8e305ac7c170d70fbf83c109789b40d9.svg","fullname":"Justin Chen","name":"dinobby","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.7868136763572693},"editors":["dinobby"],"editorAvatarUrls":["/avatars/8e305ac7c170d70fbf83c109789b40d9.svg"],"reactions":[],"isReport":false}},{"id":"68e07a7894278d4a80368802","author":{"_id":"63d3e0e8ff1384ce6c5dd17d","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1674830754237-63d3e0e8ff1384ce6c5dd17d.jpeg","fullname":"Librarian Bot (Bot)","name":"librarian-bot","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":318,"isUserFollowing":false},"createdAt":"2025-10-04T01:38:00.000Z","type":"comment","data":{"edited":false,"hidden":false,"latest":{"raw":"This is an automated message from the [Librarian Bot](https://huggingface.co/librarian-bots). I found the following papers similar to this paper. \n\nThe following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API \n\n* [Your Models Have Thought Enough: Training Large Reasoning Models to Stop Overthinking](https://huggingface.co/papers/2509.23392) (2025)\n* [Train Long, Think Short: Curriculum Learning for Efficient Reasoning](https://huggingface.co/papers/2508.08940) (2025)\n* [Sample More to Think Less: Group Filtered Policy Optimization for Concise Reasoning](https://huggingface.co/papers/2508.09726) (2025)\n* [BudgetThinker: Empowering Budget-aware LLM Reasoning with Control Tokens](https://huggingface.co/papers/2508.17196) (2025)\n* [Less is More Tokens: Efficient Math Reasoning via Difficulty-Aware Chain-of-Thought Distillation](https://huggingface.co/papers/2509.05226) (2025)\n* [Promoting Efficient Reasoning with Verifiable Stepwise Reward](https://huggingface.co/papers/2508.10293) (2025)\n* [Aware First, Think Less: Dynamic Boundary Self-Awareness Drives Extreme Reasoning Efficiency in Large Language Models](https://huggingface.co/papers/2508.11582) (2025)\n\n\n Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!\n\n If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout [this](https://huggingface.co/spaces/librarian-bots/recommend_similar_papers) Space\n\n You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: `@librarian-bot recommend`","html":"

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

\n

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

\n\n

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

\n

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

\n

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: \n\n@librarian-bot\n\t recommend

\n","updatedAt":"2025-10-04T01:38:00.351Z","author":{"_id":"63d3e0e8ff1384ce6c5dd17d","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1674830754237-63d3e0e8ff1384ce6c5dd17d.jpeg","fullname":"Librarian Bot (Bot)","name":"librarian-bot","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":318,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.7239082455635071},"editors":["librarian-bot"],"editorAvatarUrls":["https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1674830754237-63d3e0e8ff1384ce6c5dd17d.jpeg"],"reactions":[],"isReport":false}}],"primaryEmailConfirmed":false,"paper":{"id":"2510.01581","authors":[{"_id":"68dfdf1f73e20ab5778419e8","name":"Joykirat Singh","hidden":false},{"_id":"68dfdf1f73e20ab5778419e9","name":"Justin Chih-Yao Chen","hidden":false},{"_id":"68dfdf1f73e20ab5778419ea","name":"Archiki Prasad","hidden":false},{"_id":"68dfdf1f73e20ab5778419eb","name":"Elias Stengel-Eskin","hidden":false},{"_id":"68dfdf1f73e20ab5778419ec","user":{"_id":"64aba383fddf117e6e5ba818","avatarUrl":"/avatars/ee7d25d865b34be5902872d060ad9153.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Akshay Nambi","user":"akshaynambi","type":"user"},"name":"Akshay Nambi","status":"claimed_verified","statusLastChangedAt":"2025-11-27T10:17:42.133Z","hidden":false},{"_id":"68dfdf1f73e20ab5778419ed","name":"Mohit Bansal","hidden":false}],"publishedAt":"2025-10-02T02:00:20.000Z","submittedOnDailyAt":"2025-10-03T13:06:21.413Z","title":"Think Right: Learning to Mitigate Under-Over Thinking via Adaptive,\n Attentive Compression","submittedOnDailyBy":{"_id":"62ce26129f723d34cf1f595a","avatarUrl":"/avatars/8e305ac7c170d70fbf83c109789b40d9.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Justin Chen","user":"dinobby","type":"user"},"summary":"Recent thinking models solve complex reasoning tasks by scaling test-time\ncompute, but this scaling must be allocated in line with task difficulty. On\none hand, short reasoning (underthinking) leads to errors on harder problems\nthat require extended reasoning steps; but, excessively long reasoning\n(overthinking) can be token-inefficient, generating unnecessary steps even\nafter reaching a correct intermediate solution. We refer to this as\nunder-adaptivity, where the model fails to modulate its response length\nappropriately given problems of varying difficulty. To address under-adaptivity\nand strike a balance between under- and overthinking, we propose TRAAC (Think\nRight with Adaptive, Attentive Compression), an online post-training RL method\nthat leverages the model's self-attention over a long reasoning trajectory to\nidentify important steps and prune redundant ones. TRAAC also estimates\ndifficulty and incorporates it into training rewards, thereby learning to\nallocate reasoning budget commensurate with example difficulty. Our approach\nimproves accuracy, reduces reasoning steps, and enables adaptive thinking\ncompared to base models and other RL baselines. Across a variety of tasks\n(AIME, AMC, GPQA-D, BBEH), TRAAC (Qwen3-4B) achieves an average absolute\naccuracy gain of 8.4% with a relative reduction in reasoning length of 36.8%\ncompared to the base model, and a 7.9% accuracy gain paired with a 29.4% length\ndrop compared to the best RL baseline. TRAAC also shows strong generalization:\nalthough our models are trained on math datasets, they show accuracy and\nefficiency gains on out-of-distribution non-math datasets like GPQA-D, BBEH,\nand OptimalThinkingBench. Our analysis further verifies that TRAAC provides\nfine-grained adjustments to thinking budget based on difficulty and that a\ncombination of task-difficulty calibration and attention-based compression\nyields gains across diverse tasks.","upvotes":2,"discussionId":"68dfdf1f73e20ab5778419ee","githubRepo":"https://github.com/joykirat18/TRAAC","githubRepoAddedBy":"auto","ai_summary":"TRAAC, an online post-training RL method, improves model accuracy and efficiency by adaptively adjusting reasoning steps based on task difficulty using self-attention.","ai_keywords":["self-attention","long reasoning trajectory","adaptive","attentive compression","under-adaptivity","reasoning budget","task-difficulty calibration","TRAAC","Qwen3-4B","AIME","AMC","GPQA-D","BBEH","OptimalThinkingBench"],"githubStars":11},"canReadDatabase":false,"canManagePapers":false,"canSubmit":false,"hasHfLevelAccess":false,"upvoted":false,"upvoters":[{"_id":"65025370b6595dc45c397340","avatarUrl":"/avatars/9469599b176034548042922c0afa7051.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"J C","user":"dark-pen","type":"user"},{"_id":"686db5d4af2b856fabbf13aa","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/no-auth/6BjMv2LVNoqvbX8fQSTPI.png","isPro":false,"fullname":"V bbbb","user":"Bbbbbnnn","type":"user"}],"acceptLanguages":["*"],"dailyPaperRank":0}">
Papers
arxiv:2510.01581

Think Right: Learning to Mitigate Under-Over Thinking via Adaptive, Attentive Compression

Published on Oct 2, 2025
· Submitted by
Justin Chen
on Oct 3, 2025
Authors:
,
,
,
,

Abstract

TRAAC, an online post-training RL method, improves model accuracy and efficiency by adaptively adjusting reasoning steps based on task difficulty using self-attention.

AI-generated summary

Recent thinking models solve complex reasoning tasks by scaling test-time compute, but this scaling must be allocated in line with task difficulty. On one hand, short reasoning (underthinking) leads to errors on harder problems that require extended reasoning steps; but, excessively long reasoning (overthinking) can be token-inefficient, generating unnecessary steps even after reaching a correct intermediate solution. We refer to this as under-adaptivity, where the model fails to modulate its response length appropriately given problems of varying difficulty. To address under-adaptivity and strike a balance between under- and overthinking, we propose TRAAC (Think Right with Adaptive, Attentive Compression), an online post-training RL method that leverages the model's self-attention over a long reasoning trajectory to identify important steps and prune redundant ones. TRAAC also estimates difficulty and incorporates it into training rewards, thereby learning to allocate reasoning budget commensurate with example difficulty. Our approach improves accuracy, reduces reasoning steps, and enables adaptive thinking compared to base models and other RL baselines. Across a variety of tasks (AIME, AMC, GPQA-D, BBEH), TRAAC (Qwen3-4B) achieves an average absolute accuracy gain of 8.4% with a relative reduction in reasoning length of 36.8% compared to the base model, and a 7.9% accuracy gain paired with a 29.4% length drop compared to the best RL baseline. TRAAC also shows strong generalization: although our models are trained on math datasets, they show accuracy and efficiency gains on out-of-distribution non-math datasets like GPQA-D, BBEH, and OptimalThinkingBench. Our analysis further verifies that TRAAC provides fine-grained adjustments to thinking budget based on difficulty and that a combination of task-difficulty calibration and attention-based compression yields gains across diverse tasks.

Community

Paper submitter

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 2

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2510.01581 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2510.01581 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.