Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
Paper page - Large Language Model Reasoning Failures
[go: Go Back, main page]

\"overview\"

\n","updatedAt":"2026-02-09T20:50:10.547Z","author":{"_id":"649c5cf5c1ae48cf4d7dda34","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/649c5cf5c1ae48cf4d7dda34/bSJXATqkqBn8ypUy0OezY.jpeg","fullname":"Peiyang Song","name":"p-song1","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":6,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.7957891821861267},"editors":["p-song1"],"editorAvatarUrls":["https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/649c5cf5c1ae48cf4d7dda34/bSJXATqkqBn8ypUy0OezY.jpeg"],"reactions":[{"reaction":"🔥","users":["barryhpr","keyangx3"],"count":2}],"isReport":false}},{"id":"698a496af5fc192115ddef6f","author":{"_id":"687ebb87416fcff56959d817","avatarUrl":"/avatars/8f13090dd6179bb18e8c8d205fd20131.svg","fullname":"Keyang Xuan","name":"keyangx3","type":"user","isPro":true,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":4,"isUserFollowing":false},"createdAt":"2026-02-09T20:54:02.000Z","type":"comment","data":{"edited":false,"hidden":false,"latest":{"raw":"Good Work!","html":"

Good Work!

\n","updatedAt":"2026-02-09T20:54:02.226Z","author":{"_id":"687ebb87416fcff56959d817","avatarUrl":"/avatars/8f13090dd6179bb18e8c8d205fd20131.svg","fullname":"Keyang Xuan","name":"keyangx3","type":"user","isPro":true,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":4,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.5816421508789062},"editors":["keyangx3"],"editorAvatarUrls":["/avatars/8f13090dd6179bb18e8c8d205fd20131.svg"],"reactions":[{"reaction":"❤️","users":["p-song1","shizhuo2"],"count":2},{"reaction":"🤯","users":["shizhuo2"],"count":1}],"isReport":false}},{"id":"698a8d04d1963da4cb351cac","author":{"_id":"63d3e0e8ff1384ce6c5dd17d","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1674830754237-63d3e0e8ff1384ce6c5dd17d.jpeg","fullname":"Librarian Bot (Bot)","name":"librarian-bot","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":318,"isUserFollowing":false},"createdAt":"2026-02-10T01:42:28.000Z","type":"comment","data":{"edited":false,"hidden":false,"latest":{"raw":"This is an automated message from the [Librarian Bot](https://huggingface.co/librarian-bots). I found the following papers similar to this paper. \n\nThe following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API \n\n* [Scaling Reasoning Hop Exposes Weaknesses: Demystifying and Improving Hop Generalization in Large Language Models](https://huggingface.co/papers/2601.21214) (2026)\n* [Evaluating Frontier LLMs on PhD-Level Mathematical Reasoning: A Benchmark on a Textbook in Theoretical Computer Science about Randomized Algorithms](https://huggingface.co/papers/2512.13978) (2025)\n* [Unmasking Reasoning Processes: A Process-aware Benchmark for Evaluating Structural Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs](https://huggingface.co/papers/2602.00564) (2026)\n* [Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models](https://huggingface.co/papers/2601.12538) (2026)\n* [Exploring the Vertical-Domain Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models](https://huggingface.co/papers/2512.22443) (2025)\n* [Reasoning in a Combinatorial and Constrained World: Benchmarking LLMs on Natural-Language Combinatorial Optimization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2602.02188) (2026)\n* [Reasoning Models Generate Societies of Thought](https://huggingface.co/papers/2601.10825) (2026)\n\n\n Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!\n\n If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout [this](https://huggingface.co/spaces/librarian-bots/recommend_similar_papers) Space\n\n You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: `@librarian-bot recommend`","html":"

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

\n

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

\n\n

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

\n

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

\n

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: \n\n@librarian-bot\n\t recommend

\n","updatedAt":"2026-02-10T01:42:28.782Z","author":{"_id":"63d3e0e8ff1384ce6c5dd17d","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1674830754237-63d3e0e8ff1384ce6c5dd17d.jpeg","fullname":"Librarian Bot (Bot)","name":"librarian-bot","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":318,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.7180482149124146},"editors":["librarian-bot"],"editorAvatarUrls":["https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1674830754237-63d3e0e8ff1384ce6c5dd17d.jpeg"],"reactions":[],"isReport":false}}],"primaryEmailConfirmed":false,"paper":{"id":"2602.06176","authors":[{"_id":"698a479d1b2dc6b37d61ae76","user":{"_id":"649c5cf5c1ae48cf4d7dda34","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/649c5cf5c1ae48cf4d7dda34/bSJXATqkqBn8ypUy0OezY.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Peiyang Song","user":"p-song1","type":"user"},"name":"Peiyang Song","status":"claimed_verified","statusLastChangedAt":"2026-02-09T21:07:00.512Z","hidden":false},{"_id":"698a479d1b2dc6b37d61ae77","user":{"_id":"664263ea8b2d38e53f04079c","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/664263ea8b2d38e53f04079c/_7og0ggbPpEHcH6g__DF0.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Pengrui Han","user":"barryhpr","type":"user"},"name":"Pengrui Han","status":"claimed_verified","statusLastChangedAt":"2026-02-11T22:17:03.428Z","hidden":false},{"_id":"698a479d1b2dc6b37d61ae78","name":"Noah Goodman","hidden":false}],"publishedAt":"2026-02-05T20:29:26.000Z","submittedOnDailyAt":"2026-02-09T18:20:10.537Z","title":"Large Language Model Reasoning Failures","submittedOnDailyBy":{"_id":"649c5cf5c1ae48cf4d7dda34","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/649c5cf5c1ae48cf4d7dda34/bSJXATqkqBn8ypUy0OezY.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Peiyang Song","user":"p-song1","type":"user"},"summary":"Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable reasoning capabilities, achieving impressive results across a wide range of tasks. Despite these advances, significant reasoning failures persist, occurring even in seemingly simple scenarios. To systematically understand and address these shortcomings, we present the first comprehensive survey dedicated to reasoning failures in LLMs. We introduce a novel categorization framework that distinguishes reasoning into embodied and non-embodied types, with the latter further subdivided into informal (intuitive) and formal (logical) reasoning. In parallel, we classify reasoning failures along a complementary axis into three types: fundamental failures intrinsic to LLM architectures that broadly affect downstream tasks; application-specific limitations that manifest in particular domains; and robustness issues characterized by inconsistent performance across minor variations. For each reasoning failure, we provide a clear definition, analyze existing studies, explore root causes, and present mitigation strategies. By unifying fragmented research efforts, our survey provides a structured perspective on systemic weaknesses in LLM reasoning, offering valuable insights and guiding future research towards building stronger, more reliable, and robust reasoning capabilities. We additionally release a comprehensive collection of research works on LLM reasoning failures, as a GitHub repository at https://github.com/Peiyang-Song/Awesome-LLM-Reasoning-Failures, to provide an easy entry point to this area.","upvotes":11,"discussionId":"698a479e1b2dc6b37d61ae79","githubRepo":"https://github.com/Peiyang-Song/Awesome-LLM-Reasoning-Failures","githubRepoAddedBy":"user","ai_summary":"Large language models exhibit significant reasoning failures that can be categorized into embodied and non-embodied types, with fundamental, application-specific, and robustness-related subtypes, requiring systematic analysis and mitigation strategies.","ai_keywords":["large language models","reasoning capabilities","reasoning failures","embodied reasoning","non-embodied reasoning","informal reasoning","formal reasoning","fundamental failures","application-specific limitations","robustness issues"],"githubStars":120,"organization":{"_id":"672c672dcf09d152f4da04c4","name":"StanfordUniversity","fullname":"Stanford University","avatar":"https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/68e396f2b5bb631e9b2fac9a/vJI0POlzGMXL2878t1vz2.jpeg"}},"canReadDatabase":false,"canManagePapers":false,"canSubmit":false,"hasHfLevelAccess":false,"upvoted":false,"upvoters":[{"_id":"649c5cf5c1ae48cf4d7dda34","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/649c5cf5c1ae48cf4d7dda34/bSJXATqkqBn8ypUy0OezY.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Peiyang Song","user":"p-song1","type":"user"},{"_id":"664263ea8b2d38e53f04079c","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/664263ea8b2d38e53f04079c/_7og0ggbPpEHcH6g__DF0.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Pengrui Han","user":"barryhpr","type":"user"},{"_id":"62c68fe4d9bb7ca028dc7323","avatarUrl":"/avatars/5114e6102c68da7ef367e63e61ce47dc.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Wenkai Li","user":"wenkai-li","type":"user"},{"_id":"687ebb87416fcff56959d817","avatarUrl":"/avatars/8f13090dd6179bb18e8c8d205fd20131.svg","isPro":true,"fullname":"Keyang Xuan","user":"keyangx3","type":"user"},{"_id":"6270324ebecab9e2dcf245de","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/6270324ebecab9e2dcf245de/cMbtWSasyNlYc9hvsEEzt.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Kye Gomez","user":"kye","type":"user"},{"_id":"6342796a0875f2c99cfd313b","avatarUrl":"/avatars/98575092404c4197b20c929a6499a015.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Yuseung \"Phillip\" Lee","user":"phillipinseoul","type":"user"},{"_id":"620783f24e28382272337ba4","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/620783f24e28382272337ba4/zkUveQPNiDfYjgGhuFErj.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"GuoLiangTang","user":"Tommy930","type":"user"},{"_id":"64834b399b352597e41816ac","avatarUrl":"/avatars/63d9d123bffa90f43186a0bdc4455cbd.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Shaobai Jiang","user":"shaobaij","type":"user"},{"_id":"63082bb7bc0a2a5ee2253523","avatarUrl":"/avatars/6cf8d12d16d15db1070fbea89b5b3967.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Kuo-Hsin Tu","user":"dapumptu","type":"user"},{"_id":"65e249e3774c93c2bc7a9088","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/65e249e3774c93c2bc7a9088/QIin4DQDqWpsIc8wqgOhX.png","isPro":false,"fullname":"Kenan Tang","user":"kenantang","type":"user"},{"_id":"642b8add48f67b6f21d4eb20","avatarUrl":"/avatars/f15025b39248daa19a18e6ccb2eaaa0c.svg","isPro":true,"fullname":"Dylan","user":"shizhuo2","type":"user"}],"acceptLanguages":["*"],"dailyPaperRank":0,"organization":{"_id":"672c672dcf09d152f4da04c4","name":"StanfordUniversity","fullname":"Stanford University","avatar":"https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/68e396f2b5bb631e9b2fac9a/vJI0POlzGMXL2878t1vz2.jpeg"}}">
Papers
arxiv:2602.06176

Large Language Model Reasoning Failures

Published on Feb 5
· Submitted by
Peiyang Song
on Feb 9
Authors:

Abstract

Large language models exhibit significant reasoning failures that can be categorized into embodied and non-embodied types, with fundamental, application-specific, and robustness-related subtypes, requiring systematic analysis and mitigation strategies.

AI-generated summary

Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable reasoning capabilities, achieving impressive results across a wide range of tasks. Despite these advances, significant reasoning failures persist, occurring even in seemingly simple scenarios. To systematically understand and address these shortcomings, we present the first comprehensive survey dedicated to reasoning failures in LLMs. We introduce a novel categorization framework that distinguishes reasoning into embodied and non-embodied types, with the latter further subdivided into informal (intuitive) and formal (logical) reasoning. In parallel, we classify reasoning failures along a complementary axis into three types: fundamental failures intrinsic to LLM architectures that broadly affect downstream tasks; application-specific limitations that manifest in particular domains; and robustness issues characterized by inconsistent performance across minor variations. For each reasoning failure, we provide a clear definition, analyze existing studies, explore root causes, and present mitigation strategies. By unifying fragmented research efforts, our survey provides a structured perspective on systemic weaknesses in LLM reasoning, offering valuable insights and guiding future research towards building stronger, more reliable, and robust reasoning capabilities. We additionally release a comprehensive collection of research works on LLM reasoning failures, as a GitHub repository at https://github.com/Peiyang-Song/Awesome-LLM-Reasoning-Failures, to provide an easy entry point to this area.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

LLMs show strong reasoning abilities but still fail in surprisingly simple situations. In this work, we systematically examine those failures, introducing a framework that categorizes reasoning types (embodied, informal, and formal) and classifies failure modes (fundamental, application-specific, and robustness-related). It analyzes root causes, reviews existing research, and outlines mitigation strategies to guide the development of more reliable and robust reasoning systems.
overview

Good Work!

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2602.06176 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2602.06176 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2602.06176 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 3