NZ616917B2 - Apparatus and method for cure monitoring and process control in glass fiber forming operation - Google Patents
Apparatus and method for cure monitoring and process control in glass fiber forming operation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- NZ616917B2 NZ616917B2 NZ616917A NZ61691712A NZ616917B2 NZ 616917 B2 NZ616917 B2 NZ 616917B2 NZ 616917 A NZ616917 A NZ 616917A NZ 61691712 A NZ61691712 A NZ 61691712A NZ 616917 B2 NZ616917 B2 NZ 616917B2
- Authority
- NZ
- New Zealand
- Prior art keywords
- oven
- zones
- zone
- temperature
- cure
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 59
- 238000004886 process control Methods 0.000 title description 14
- 239000003365 glass fiber Substances 0.000 title description 10
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title description 9
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 61
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 38
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 239000002826 coolant Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 72
- 238000001723 curing Methods 0.000 description 39
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 36
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 28
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 17
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 13
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000009413 insulation Methods 0.000 description 12
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 12
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 12
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 11
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 9
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000012913 prioritisation Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004806 packaging method and process Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229920001187 thermosetting polymer Polymers 0.000 description 5
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002557 mineral fiber Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000006060 molten glass Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 2
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007664 blowing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 239000004020 conductor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000011152 fibreglass Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003116 impacting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- -1 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910000809 Alumel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chromium Chemical compound [Cr] VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910001006 Constantan Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000257303 Hymenoptera Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000004698 Polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 240000004922 Vigna radiata Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000002378 acidificating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002547 anomalous effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010382 chemical cross-linking Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001179 chromel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011651 chromium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000567 combustion gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000110 cooling liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003085 diluting agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003292 diminished effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010494 dissociation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005593 dissociations Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008020 evaporation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012467 final product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000010006 flight Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008240 homogeneous mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000000842 isoxazolyl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 1
- WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L manganese(2+);methyl n-[[2-(methoxycarbonylcarbamothioylamino)phenyl]carbamothioyl]carbamate;n-[2-(sulfidocarbothioylamino)ethyl]carbamodithioate Chemical compound [Mn+2].[S-]C(=S)NCCNC([S-])=S.COC(=O)NC(=S)NC1=CC=CC=C1NC(=S)NC(=O)OC WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011368 organic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001139 pH measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013618 particulate matter Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920000728 polyester Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000573 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920005594 polymer fiber Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000002952 polymeric resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003908 quality control method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007493 shaping process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002893 slag Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000004441 surface measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003746 surface roughness Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002459 sustained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920003002 synthetic resin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- YLJREFDVOIBQDA-UHFFFAOYSA-N tacrine Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(N)=C(CCCC3)C3=NC2=C1 YLJREFDVOIBQDA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960001685 tacrine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000012956 testing procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920001169 thermoplastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004416 thermosoftening plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920002554 vinyl polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C03—GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
- C03C—CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
- C03C25/00—Surface treatment of fibres or filaments made from glass, minerals or slags
- C03C25/10—Coating
- C03C25/12—General methods of coating; Devices therefor
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/84—Systems specially adapted for particular applications
- G01N21/85—Investigating moving fluids or granular solids
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/84—Systems specially adapted for particular applications
- G01N21/88—Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination
- G01N21/95—Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination characterised by the material or shape of the object to be examined
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B11/00—Automatic controllers
- G05B11/01—Automatic controllers electric
- G05B11/32—Automatic controllers electric with inputs from more than one sensing element; with outputs to more than one correcting element
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/048—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators using a predictor
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D23/00—Control of temperature
- G05D23/19—Control of temperature characterised by the use of electric means
- G05D23/1919—Control of temperature characterised by the use of electric means characterised by the type of controller
Abstract
Apparatus for controlling the cure status of binder applied to a fibrous product manufactured in a manufacturing line comprises a curing oven having at least two zones with blowers for circulating heated gas through the oven zones, manipulative controls for varying at least one operating parameter of the manufacturing line; a first sensor for generating a first signal indicative of the cure status of the fibrous product, and a distinct second sensor for generating a distinct second signal indicative of the cure status of the fibrous product and a processor for receiving the first and second signals from the first and second sensors and generating at least one control signal for adjusting at least one of the manipulatable controls of the manufacturing line in response to the first and second signals indicative of the cure status. A method for controlling the cure status of binder in a fibrous product manufactured on a manufacturing line including a curing oven having at least two zones with blowers for circulating heated gas through the oven zones and manipulatable controls for the at least operating parameters of the manufacturing line is also disclosed. f the manufacturing line; a first sensor for generating a first signal indicative of the cure status of the fibrous product, and a distinct second sensor for generating a distinct second signal indicative of the cure status of the fibrous product and a processor for receiving the first and second signals from the first and second sensors and generating at least one control signal for adjusting at least one of the manipulatable controls of the manufacturing line in response to the first and second signals indicative of the cure status. A method for controlling the cure status of binder in a fibrous product manufactured on a manufacturing line including a curing oven having at least two zones with blowers for circulating heated gas through the oven zones and manipulatable controls for the at least operating parameters of the manufacturing line is also disclosed.
Description
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CURE MONITORING AND
PROCESS CONTROL IN GLASS FIBER FORMING OPERATION
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims the t of co—owned US. patent application serial
number 13/089,457 filed April 19, 2011; co—owned US. patent ation serial number
13/116,611 filed May 26, 2011; and co—owned US. patent application serial number
13/288,302 filed November 3, 2011, all of which are incorporated in their ties by
reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention s in general to a method and apparatus for making bindered
insulation ts from fibrous minerals like glass and, in particular, to quality control
methods for determining the cure , i.e. whether the binder is undercured, overcured or
properly cured within specifications and process control limits, and optimizing the process if
it is not within control limits.
s glass insulation products generally comprise randomly—oriented glass
fibers bonded together by a cured thermosetting polymeric binder material. Molten streams
of glass are drawn into fibers of random lengths and blown into a forming chamber or hood
where they are randomly ted as a pack onto a porous, moving conveyor or chain. The
fibers, while in transit in the forming chamber and while still hot from the drawing operation,
are sprayed with an aqueous sion or solution of binder. The residual heat from the
glass fibers and combustion gases, along with air flow during the forming operation, are
sufficient to vaporize and remove much of the sprayed water, thereby trating the binder
dispersion and depositing binder on the fibers as a viscous liquid with high solids content.
Ventilating blowers create negative pressure below the conveyor and draw air, as well as any
particulate matter not bound in the pack, through the conveyor and eventually exhaust it to the
here. The uncured fibrous pack is transferred to a drying and curing oven where a gas,
heated air for example, is blown through the pack to dry the pack and cure the binder to
rigidly bond the glass fibers together in a random, three—dimensional structure, usually
2012/034234
referred to as a “blanket.” Sufficient binder is applied and cured so that the fibrous pack can
be compressed for packaging, storage and shipping, yet regains its thickness — a process
known as “loft recovery” — when compression is d.
While manufacturers strive for rigid process controls, the degree of binder cure
throughout the pack may not always be uniform for a y of reasons. Irregularities in the
moisture of the uncured pack, non—uniform cross—machine weight distribution of glass,
irregularities in the flow or convection of drying gasses in the curing oven, uneven thermal
conductance from adjacent equipment like the conveyor, and non—uniform applications of
binder, among other reasons, may all contribute to areas of over— or under— cured binder.
Thus it is desirable to test for these areas in final product to assure quality, and to adjust the
process controls, if necessary, to maintain the process within the control limits.
U. S. patent 3,539,316 to Trethewey and U.S. patent 4,203,155 to Garst both
describe curing ovens in which a thermocouple is installed inside the curing oven and is used
to e feedback to the heater control to make adjustments if the sensed temperature is not
at a predetermined setpoint. While , this approach has drawbacks in that the
couple senses the generalized oven air temperature and gives no ation about the
pack temperature where the binder is located, and therefore no information about cure status.
U.S. patent 7,781,512 to Charbonneau, et al, describes two mechanisms for
ring the cure status of formaldehyde—free glass fiber products. In the first embodiment,
one or more spectrographic sensors, such as an ed sensor, detect the radiant energy from
the pack upon exit from the oven. In a second embodiment, thermocouples are placed directly
into the pack prior to entering the oven, and the signals are led by wires to an external device
or to a transportable storage device such as a M.O.L.E® er (although the term “oven
mole” is often used generically). Upon exit, data collected in the storage device is uploaded
and in all cases, the measured temperatures are compared to standard values to determine
cure.
These methods also have drawbacks. While a “mole” provides a good te of
the actual pack temperature, it has several disadvantages. First, it measures the temperature at
only one location of the pack, testing only a sampling of the product. Second, it must be
inserted prior to the oven and removed after the oven, and this involves a labor ive
manual s. Third, it does not provide real—time data; the storage device is removed and
evaluated, but this is long after the pack has emerged so the data cannot effectively be used
as a means to adjust any process parameters. Finally, it provides data only for as long as the
pack is in the oven. In other words, the data it provides is not continuous. On the other hand,
infrared surface measurements may be continuous, but are less useful as process controls
when measured after exit from the oven, and when taken from just a single (top usually)
The present invention seeks to overcome these disadvantages and to provide a
means to maintain the s within control limits. Alternatively, the invention seeks to at
least provide the public with a useful alternative.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention s to an apparatus and ed methods for continuously
monitoring cure status of binder on a fibrous product and controlling the operation parameters or
variables within defined control limits to e product outcomes. In one aspect, the invention
in an apparatus for controlling the cure status of binder applied to a fibrous product manufactured
in a manufacturing line, the apparatus comprising:
a curing oven having at least two zones with blowers for circulating heated gas through
the oven zones, manipulatable controls for varying at least one operating parameter of the
manufacturing line;
a first sensor for generating a first signal indicative of the cure status of the fibrous
product, and a distinct second sensor for generating a distinct second signal indicative of the
cure status of the s product;
a processor for receiving the first and second signals from the first and second sensors
and generating at least one control signal for ing at least one of the manipulatable
controls of the manufacturing line in response to the first and second signals indicative of the
cure status.
In another aspect, the invention is a method for controlling the cure status of
binder in a s product manufactured on a manufacturing line ing a curing oven and
manipulatable ls for the operating ters of the manufacturing line, the method
comprising:
g at least one first control variable indicative of the cure status of the fibrous
product, and generating a first signal indicative of the cure status;
sensing at least one distinct second control variable indicative of the cure status of the
fibrous product, and generating a distinct second signal indicative of the cure status;
inputting the first and second s to a MPC processor—optimizer capable of solving
for optimal control conditions, given predetermined constraints for the control variables and
an optimizing function; and
generating at least one output l signal from the MPC processor—optimizer to
adjust at least one of the latable controls of the manufacturing line in response to the
optimal ion.
The optional features described in this paragraph may be t in either or both
the apparatus and the method aspect of the invention. The manipulatable controls may be
selected from oven zone fan speeds, oven zone setpoint temperatures and coolant water flow.
Either or both of the first and second sensors may independently be a couple for
sensing a ature, or an image capture system for capturing an image such as a color
value. There may be more than just two sensors; indeed there may be a plurality of sensors.
For example, there may be le thermocouples disposed throughout the various zones of
an oven as described in detail herein, some entry, some egress; some inlet, some outlet; some
top, some bottom. There may be multiple regions of st (ROI) from which color values
may be taken, and the color values may be any of those described herein, such as a color B
value. The signals generated by any combination of similar sensors may be manipulated by
processors or comparators to form average or ential values, for both temperatures and/or
color values from an image capture system, regardless of the location of the sensor. The
system may further comprise a ramp height sensor at a location prior to ng a first oven
zone, and this information may also be input to the (MPC) processor for consideration in the
optimization procedure.
In at least one embodiment, the apparatus comprises a plurality of sensors,
each generating a respective signal indicative of the cure status of the fibrous t, and
wherein: at least one sensor comprises a thermocouple; at least one sensor comprises an
image capture system; and at least one sensor comprises a ramp height sensor. And in at least
one method, each of these three (or more) signals is input to the MPC optimizer to generate a
2012/034234
control signal for a manipulatable variable, such as oven zone fan speeds, oven zone setpoint
atures and coolant water flow
A y feature of the t invention is to provide “continuous” or “on—line”
measurements of feedback variables that represent cure status, and to utilize those measured
variables to maintain “control” over the process for g a bindered fibrous product. By
“online” is meant that the ements can be taken without removing a sample of the
fibrous product from the manufacturing line. Online measurements are continuous in the case
of thermocouples and video images, and essentially continuous for captured images in that
every batt can be sampled if desired without destruction or loss of line speed; although each
captured image remains a still photo or snapshot.
So that the MPC processor—optimizer can receive thermal signal inputs
corresponding to cure status, the invention also provides an apparatus and method for
continuous thermal monitoring of cure status. In one aspect, the invention provides an
apparatus for ring the cure status of binder in a fibrous product comprising:
a curing oven having at least two zones with s for circulating heated gas
through the oven zones, and a conveyor defining a fibrous product path for carrying a fibrous
product through the oven zones;
at least two couples for generating a signal corresponding to the temperature of
the gas circulating in the oven zones, wherein at least one thermocouple is an outlet
couple in a first oven zone and at least one other thermocouple is selected from an
outlet thermocouple or an inlet thermocouple in either of the at least two oven zones; and
a processor for receiving the signals from the thermocouples and generating a binder
cure status based on the signals from the at least two thermocouples.
In another aspect, the invention provides a method for monitoring the cure status
of binder in a fibrous product as the s product passes through an oven, the method
comprising:
ing a first outlet temperature in at least one first zone of a curing oven having at
least two zones, each zone having a blower for circulating heated gas through the zone and a
conveyor for carrying a fibrous product through the oven zones, the fibrous product having a
thermosetting binder to be cured;
measuring a second inlet or outlet temperature in either of the at least two zones of the
oven;
comparing the first outlet ature to at least one of a second inlet temperature, a
second outlet temperature or a standard temperature to generate a comparative differential
temperature; and
determining binder cure status based on the comparative differential ature.
In these latter "thermal cure ring aspects," the thermocouples are the
sensors that provide the signals indicative of cure status. As described above and elsewhere
, the thermocouples may be at one or more of several locations: e.g. inlet, outlet, entry or
egress and in close proximity to the fibrous product path in an oven zone or e. Generally
le thermocouples are used, and comparator circuitry may be provided for steps of
calculating ature differences, averages, differences of averages, and similar arithmetic
manipulations.
Another feature is the ability to select which les to control for and to
prioritize them for consideration by a dynamic optimizer processor.
Other advantages and features are evident from the following detailed description.
[0018a] Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and claims
the terms “comprise”, “comprising” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense, as
opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense. That is, in the sense of “including, but not d
to”.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The accompanying drawings, incorporated herein and forming a part of the
specification, illustrate the present invention in its several s and, together with the
description, serve to n the principles of the invention. In the drawings, the thickness of the
lines, layers, and regions may be rated for clarity.
Fig. 1 is a partially sectioned side elevation view of a forming hood component of
a manufacturing line for manufacturing fibrous products;
Fig. 2 is a schematic illustration representing the curing oven and its several zones
and locations of thermocouples in the oven zones for one embodiment;
Fig. 3 is a schematic illustration representing two oven zones, a processor, and
thermocouple locations and nomenclature for one embodiment;
Fig. 4A is a front view of a camera system led over a manufacturing line;
Figure 4B is a side view of this system;
2012/034234
Fig. 5 is a block diagram representing the steps of one process ment
according to the invention;
Fig. 6 is schematic representation of the steps of involved in using a MPC
processor for dynamic optimization of a manufacturing process; and
Figs 7A and 7B are graphs of data described in more detail in the examples.
Various aspects of this ion will become apparent to those skilled in the art
from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, when read in light of the
accompanying drawings.
ED DESCRIPTION
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the
same meaning as ly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the
invention belongs. gh any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those
described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present ion, the preferred
methods and als are described herein. All references cited herein, including books,
journal articles, published U.S. or foreign patent ations, issued U.S. or foreign patents,
and any other references, are each incorporated by nce in their entireties, including all
data, tables, figures, and text ted in the cited references.
Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers sing ranges of magnitudes, such as
angular degrees or web speeds, quantities of ingredients, properties such as lar weight,
reaction conditions, dimensions and so forth as used in the specification and claims are to be
understood as being modified in all instances by the term "about." Accordingly, unless
otherwise indicated, the numerical properties set forth in the specification and claims are
approximations that may vary depending on the desired properties sought to be obtained in
embodiments of the present invention. Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and
parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical
values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical
values, however, inherently contain certain errors necessarily resulting from error found in
their respective measurements. All numerical ranges are understood to include all possible
incremental sub—ranges within the outer boundaries of the range. Thus, a range of 30 to 90
degrees ses, for example, 35 to 50 degrees, 45 to 85 degrees, and 40 to 80 degrees, etc.
rs” are well known in the industry to refer to thermosetting organic agents
or chemicals, often polymeric resins, used to adhere glass fibers to one another in a three—
dimensional structure that is ssible and yet regains its loft when compression is
removed. “Binder delivery” refers to the mass or quantity of “binder chemical” e.g. “binder
solids” delivered to the glass fibers. This is typically measured in the industry by loss on
ignition or “LOI,” which is a measure of the organic material that will burn off the fibrous
mineral. A fibrous pack is weighed, then ted to extreme heat to burn off the organic
binder chemical, and then reweighed. The weight difference divided by the initial weight (x
100) is the % L01.
As solids, rate of binder delivery is properly considered in mass/time units, e.g.
grams/minute. However, binder is typically delivered as an aqueous dispersion of the binder
chemical, which may or may not be soluble in water. “Binder dispersions” thus refer to
mixtures of binder als in a medium or vehicle and, as a practical matter, delivery of
binder “dispersions” is given in flow rate of /time. e.g. liters/minute or LPM of the
dispersion. The two delivery expressions are correlated by the mass of binder per unit
volume, i.e. the concentration of the binder sion. Thus, a binder sion having X
grams of binder chemical per liter flowing at a delivery rate of Z liters per min delivers X*Z
minute of binder chemical. Dispersions include true solutions, as well as ds,
emulsions or suspensions.
References to “acidic binder” or “low pH binder” mean a binder having a
dissociation constant (Ka) such that in an aqueous dispersion the pH is less than 7, generally
less than about 6, and more typically less than about 4.
Fibrous products are products made from a plurality of randomly oriented fibers.
The fibers are lly bound in place by binders, described above. “Mineral fibers” refers
to any mineral material that can be melted to form molten mineral that can be drawn or
attenuated into fibers. Glass is the most commonly used mineral fiber for fibrous insulation
purposes and the g description will refer primarily to glass fibers, but other useful
mineral fibers include rock, slag and basalt. Polymer fibers are fibers of any thermoplastic
2012/034234
materials, for example as polyvinyls or polyesters like polyethylene, polypropylene and their
terephalate derivatives.
“Product properties” refers to a battery of testable physical properties that insulation
batts possess. These may e at least the following common properties:
ery” — which is the ability of the batt or blanket to resume it’ s original or
designed thickness following release from compression during packaging or storage.
It may be tested by ing the post—compression height of a product of known or
intended nominal thickness, or by other suitable means.
“Stiffness” or “sag” — which refers to the ability of a batt or blanket to remain rigid
and hold its linear shape. It is measured by draping a fixed length section over a
m and measuring the angular extent of bending deflection, or sag. Lower values
indicate a stiffer and more desirable product property. Other means may be used.
“Tensile Strength” — which refers to the force that is required to tear the fibrous
product in two. It is typically measured in both the e direction (MD) and in the
cross machine direction (“CD” or “XMD”).
“Lateral weight distribution” (LWD or “cross weight”) — which is the relative
uniformity or homogeneity of the product throughout its width. It may also be thought
of as the uniformity of y of the product, and may be measured by sectioning the
product longitudinally into bands of equal width (and size) and weighing the band, by
a nuclear density gauge, or by other suitable means.
“Vertical weight distribution” (VWD) — which is the relative mity or
homogeneity of the product throughout its thickness. It may also be thought of as the
uniformity of density of the product, and may be measured by sectioning the product
horizontally into layers of equal thickness (and size) and weighing the layers, by a
nuclear density gauge, or by other suitable means.
Of course, other product properties may also be used in the evaluation of final
t, but the above t properties are ones found important to consumers of insulation
products.
General Fiberizing Process
Fig. 1 illustrates a glass fiber insulation t manufacturing line including a
forehearth 10, forming hood component or section 12, a ramp or section 14 and a
curing oven 16. Molten glass from a furnace (not shown) is led through a flow path or
channel 18 to a plurality of fiberizing stations or units 20 that are arranged serially in a
machine direction, as indicated by arrow 19 in Fig. 1. At each fiberizing n, holes 22 in
the flow channel 18 allow a stream of molten glass 24 to flow into a spinner 26, which may
optionally be heated by a burner (not shown). Fiberizing spinners 26 are rotated about a shaft
28 by motor 30 at high speeds such that the molten glass is forced to pass h tiny holes
in the circumferential sidewall of the spinners 26 to form primary fibers. Blowers 32 direct a
gas stream, lly air, in a substantially downward direction to impinge the fibers, turning
them downward and attenuating them into secondary fibers that form a veil 60 that is forced
rdly. The fibers are distributed in a cross—machine direction by mechanical or
pneumatic “lappers” (not shown), eventually forming a fibrous layer 62 on a porous conveyor
64. The layer 62 gains mass (and typically thickness) with the deposition of additional fiber
from the serial fiberizing units, thus becoming a fibrous “pack” 66 as it travels in a machine
direction 19 through the forming area 46.
One or more cooling rings 34 spray coolant liquid, such as water, on veil 60 to
cool the fibers within the veil. Other coolant sprayer configurations are possible, of course,
but rings have the age of delivering coolant liquid to fibers throughout the veil 60 from
a multitude of directions and angles. Flow of coolant water through an applicator or spray
device such as the rings 34 is one example of a latable le as described in more
detail below. A binder dispensing system includes binder sprayers 36 to spray binder onto
the fibers of the veil 60. Illustrative coolant spray rings and binder spray rings are disclosed
in US Patent Publication 2008—0156041 Al, to Cooper. Each fiberizing unit 20 thus
comprises a spinner 26, a blower 32, one or more cooling liquid sprayers 34, and one or more
binder sprayers 36. Fig. 1 depicts three such fiberizing units 20, but any number may be used.
For insulation products, lly from two to about 15 units may be used in one forming
hood component for one line.
The forming area 46 is r defined by side walls 40 and end walls (one each
shown) to enclosed a forming hood. The side walls 40 and end walls are each conveniently
WO 45500
formed by a continuous belt that rotates about rollers 44 or 50, 80 respectively. The terms
"forming hoodwall", “hoodwall” and "hood wall" may be used interchangeably herein.
Inevitably, binder and fibers accumulate in localized clumps on the hoodwalls and,
occasionally, these clumps may fall into the pack and cause anomalous dense areas or “wet
spots” that are ult to cure.
The conveyor chain 64 contains numerous small openings (encompassing e.g.
approximately 50% of the area) ng the air flow to pass through while links t the
growing fibrous pack. A suction box 70 connected via duct 72 to fans or s (not shown)
are additional production components located below the conveyor chain 64 to create a
negative pressure and remove air injected into the forming area. As the conveyor chain 64
s around its rollers 68, the uncured pack 66 exits the forming section 12 under exit roller
80, where the absence of downwardly directed airflow and negative pressure (optionally aided
by a pack lift fan, not shown) allows the pack to regain its natural, uncompressed height or
thickness s. A subsequent supporting conveyor or “ramp” 82 leads the fibrous pack toward an
oven 16 and between another set of porous compression conveyors 84 for shaping the pack to
a desired thickness for curing in the oven 16.
Upon exit from the oven 16, the cured pack or et” is conveyed downstream
for cutting and packaging steps. For many products, the t is sectioned or “split”
longitudinally into multiple pieces or lanes of rd width ion, for example, 14.5
inch (37 cm) widths and 22.5 inch (57 cm) are standardized to fit in the space between 2x4
studs placed on 16 inch or 24 inch centers, respectively. Other standard widths may also be
used. A blanket may be 4 to 8 feet (1.2 to 2.4 m) in width and produce multiple such standard
width .
Blankets are typically also sectioned or “chopped” in a direction transverse to the
machine direction for packaging. erse chopping divides the blanket lanes into shorter
segments known as “batts” that may be from about 4 feet (1.2 m) up to about 12 feet (3.6 m)
in length; or into longer, rolled segments that may be from about 20 feet (6.1 m) up to about
175 feet (53 m) or more in length. These batts and rolls may eventually be bundled for
packaging. A faster—running takeup conveyor separates one batt from another after they are
chopped to create a space between sectioned batt ends. If longitudinal “lanes” are desired,
they generally are split prior to chopping into shorter lengths.
Oven Zones and Thermocouples
The curing oven applies heated gas, typically air, and circulates it through the
fibrous pack to dry and cure it. When fibrous products are formed with anying
moisture, the moisture must be removed (i.e. the product must be dried) before it will reach
the critical temperature ary to cure binder. iently, the oven may be divided into
at least two zones, a drying zone and a curing zone, and each of these may be further
subdivided into subzones. Each “zone” or “subzone” as used herein will have separate and
distinct controls for temperature setpoints and blower or fan speeds. As discussed in more
detail below, both the temperature and the flow rate of the heated gas (air) are manipulatable
variables. Figures 2 and 3 are schematic representations of ovens with zones and/or subzones.
Figure 2 is a schematic diagram representing an oven 16 which typically may
include four distinct (sub)zones, Z1, Z2, Z3 and Z4. The zones are designed to carry out
multiple processes. In zones #1 and #2, fans 90, 91 blow a stream of warmed air upwards
through the pack 66; while in zones #3 and #4, fans 92, 93 blow a stream of warmed air
downwards through the pack 66. Zones #1 and #2 may be t of as “drying” subzones,
while zones #3 and #4 may be t of as “curing” subzones. The choice of up— versus
down draft is a matter of preference, but upward is often used first to help counteract the
downward suction force present in the g hood.
The air is heated by any suitable means, such as gas burners (not shown)
ated with each zone to a ature in the range of from about 400 F (204 C) to about
600 F (315 C). In some embodiments, drying (sub)zones (e.g. zones #1 and #2) are generally
heated to a temperature setpoint of about 400 F (204 C) to about 450 F (232 C), while curing
(sub)zones (e.g. zones #3 and #4) are generally heated to a temperature setpoint from about
430F (221 C) to about 550 F (288 C).
Oven controls include controls (not shown) for increasing or decreasing the
temperature and/or fan speed of each oven zone independently. In order to monitor the
temperature of the oven, couples may be installed to compare the actual oven
temperature to the setpoint.
The present invention goes beyond this however, to provide an apparatus and
method for uously monitoring temperatures at various locations throughout the oven,
and manipulating these measurements to obtain useful information about the pack temperature
and cure state. While some of these are approximations of the pack temperature, good
correlation has been found to exist with empirical data. Moreover, these measurements are
delivered continuously in real time, so they can be used for process control. This latter point
is a key advantage.
In order to cure thermosetting binder in a fibrous pack, the pack must reach a
certain critical temperature to initiate and complete the chemical crosslinking or thermoset
curing reaction. While the specific al temperature may vary depending on the nature of
the binder, the thickness of the product and other factors, it is generally in the range of from
about 200 OF (93 C) to about 400 OF (204 C). Energy is put into the pack in the form of
heated gas, typically heated air. But so long as moisture exists in the pack, a great deal of the
input energy is used up evaporating the water and drying the pack rather than raising its
temperature toward the critical temperature. Pack temperature changes little during this
drying phase. Once the pack is mostly dry — a point known as “drying time” or “drying
distance” — additional energy input does begin to raise the pack temperature toward the
critical temperature and the chemical binder begins to crosslink or “cure” in this curing phase.
Applicants have found that, by placing multiple couple sensors in various ons in
the oven zones, they can obtain useful signals indicative of temperature information from
which the timing and status of the drying phase and curing phase can be estimated.
The location of the thermocouple sensors in the ovens is important and some
specific terminology is developed to describe the location. Initially, one may fy the
zone in which the thermocouple is . There are at least two zones, e.g. a drying zone
and a curing zone, designated (D) and (C) respectively. If they are divided into subzones,
they may be designated by a l, e.g. D1, D2, D3. . .Dn or C1, C2, C3. . . .Cn.
Alternatively, when the distinction between a drying zone and a curing zone is not
identifiable, multiple zones of subzones may be designated Z1, Z2, Z3. . . .Zn, The four
subzones in Fig 2 are thus d Z1, Z2, Z3 and Z4. However, in the description and
claims, references to “first”, d”, “one”, and “another” oven zones or subzones serves
only to differentiate one zone from any other zone and does not refer to any particular ordinal
position and is explicitly not d to specific zones #1 and #2. Descriptors like “previous”,
prior79 6‘
, nt”, “later” or “subsequent” do refer to the relative order of zones, but not to
any ic unit or position. When a specific oven zone is referenced, the Dn/Cn (or Zn)
designation is used.
Within each oven zone, the conveyor 84 — often in top and bottom ns —
defines a path along which the fibrous pack is carried. The conveyor 84 is again a foraminous
web and may be approximately 50% porous and have a thickness of about 0.2 to about 6
inches (0.5 to 15.2 cm). The conveyor 84 and the fibrous pack path it defines enter each oven
zone at an “entry” and leave each oven zone at an “egress.” Thermocouples may be placed in
each zone near the entry, near the egress, or at any intermediate or middle locations along the
path between the entry and egress. These locations are given shorthand notations “N” for
entry, “G” for egress, and “M” for middle positions. In some embodiments, the
thermocouples are relatively linear in the machine ion and approximately along the
cross—machine center line of the zone, although they might also be placed non—linearly or in
arrays with cross—machine spacing between thermocouples. It should also be tood that
in some zones the conveyor chain itself can carry significant heat from a previous zone, and
this can compound the analysis of the temperature of the pack near the entries.
Furthermore, thermocouples may be placed above or on top of the conveyor path
(T), below the path (B), or both above and below the path (T/B). While ‘above’ and ‘below’
have meaning in the context of gravity, the direction of airflow in any given zone is a more
relevant consideration, so it is more useful to think of the couples as being located
upstream or ream of the pack path, sensing an inlet (designated “1”) or outlet
(designated “0”) temperature, respectively. For example in upflow zones, thermocouples
below the pack sense an “inlet” ature of the air “upstream” of the pack (i.e. before the
air passes through the pack); and couples above the pack sense an “outlet” temperature
of the air “downstream” of the pack (i.e. after the passes through the pack). In downflow
zones, the reverse is true, the thermocouples above the pack sense inlet ature while the
thermocouples below the pack sense outlet temperatures. In the context of the energy content
of the air, upstream or inlet (I) thermocouples always sense higher energy inlet air
temperatures, and downstream or outlet (0) thermocouples sense lower temperatures after the
pack has absorbed the energy from the heated air.
Thus, the location of each thermocouple may be specified by a series of designator
letters (or numbers) that indicated its location in the oven. For a linear array, three
designators suffice, although a fourth may be useful for non linear . Since redundant
thermocouples may be used at any location for accuracy and , a subscript numeral may
be added. Table A below indicates some of the possible location designators, although all
potential permutations are possible.
Table A: Illustrative Location Designators
Designator Location description
DlNI at the entry of the first drying zone and upstream of the path
(inlet side)
D1N01, D1N02, a pair of thermocouples both at the entry of a first drying zone
and downstream of the path (outlet side)
D2G11, DZGIZ, a trio of thermocouples at the egress of a second drying zone
D2GI3 and upstream of the path (inlet side)
ZZGOl, ZZGOZ, a pair of thermocouples both at the egress of a second
(unspecified) zone and downstream of the path (outlet side)
C2NI at the entry of a second curing zone and upstream of the path
(inlet side)
D2M01, D2M02 a pair of thermocouples at the middle of a second drying zone
and downstream of the path (outlet side)
C2G01, C2G02 a pair of thermocouples both at the egress of a second curing
zone and ream of the path (outlet side)
Z4GOl, Z4G02, a t of thermocouples both at the egress of a fourth
Z4GO3, Z4GO4 (unspecified) zone and downstream of the path (outlet side)
Z3NI at the entry of the third (unspecified) zone and upstream of the
path (inlet side)
Z3MIT at the middle of a third (unspecified) zone and upstream of the
path (inlet side) which happens to be on top of the path
indicating an downflow zone
DlNOTl, a pair of thermocouples both at the entry of a first drying zone
DlNOTz, and downstream of the path (outlet side) which happens to be
on top of the path ting an upflow zone
a pair of thermocouples both at the egress of a fourth
(unspecified) zone and downstream of the path (outlet side)
which s to be on bottom of the path indicating an
downflow zone
A final location consideration is how far the thermocouples are placed above or
below the fibrous pack path . In general, thermocouples are placed in close proximity to
the pack. “Close proximity” as used herein means within a distance that is close enough to
differentiate the temperature of the s pack from the temperature of the essentially
homogeneous mixture gas (air) within the portion of the oven zone above or below the pack
path. Typically this “close proximity” distance is less than about 24 inches (61 cm), more
likely less than about 18 inches (46 cm) or 12 inches (30.5 cm), or even less than about 9,
inches (23 cm), 6 inches (15.2 cm) or 3 inches (7.6 cm). The thickness of the conveyor itself
plus a margin for mechanical safety will constrain how close a thermocouple can be to fibrous
pack.
Thus, as shown in Fig. 2, thermocouples 95A — 98A may be installed in the oven
above the pack 66, and/or thermocouples 95B — 98B may be installed below the pack 66. In
each case the thermocouples are in close ity to the pack 66 and its path along the
or 84. Although Figure 2 represents 2— 4 thermocouples above and below the pack 66
in each zone, the number may vary from 1 to about 30 in each zone, depending on the cross—
nal area and/or length of the zone.
By placing thermocouples in sets, some above (A) and some below (B) the pack, it
is possible to understand how much energy is absorbed by the pack in evaporating the
moisture from it or in carrying out the drying and curing reaction. This is advantageous over
a mole thermocouple in that real—time pack temperature data is available on a continuous
basis. In oven zones #1 and #2, which are depicted as upflow zones, the lower thermocouples
95B and 96B are “upstream” or “inlet” thermocouples since they monitor the inlet
ature of air as it enters the pack; while upper thermocouples 95A and 96A are
tream” or “exit” thermocouples (in zones #1 and #2) since they monitor the
temperature of air as it exits the pack. Conversely, e the flow is reversed in zones 3
and 4, lower thermocouples 97B and 98B can be thought of as “downstream” or “exit”
thermocouples and upper thermocouples 97A and 98A can be thought of as eam” or
“inlet” couples. Furthermore, it can be observed that in zone #1, the outlet
thermocouples 95A are near the entry of zone #1, while in zone #2, the outlet thermocouples
are near the egress of zone #2.
An embedded thermocouple or “mole” is depicted at 94.
The actual thermocouples used may be any of a wide variety designed to operate at
the temperatures of the curing ovens. Suitable thermocouples include those made of alloys of
metals, primarily nickel, copper, aluminum and chromium (some with minor amounts of
silicon and/or manganese, for example chromel, alumel and constantan) having sensitivities
varying from about 40 uV to about 60 [N per OC change. Thermocouples are generally
WO 45500 2012/034234
graded with a letter ting type. Types K and J have been found le, J having
generally higher sensitivity.
Temperature variables
Figure 3 schematically illustrates an oven with two zones: a drying zone 1 (100)
and curing zone 2 (102). Drying zone 1 is an upflow zone as shown by arrow 104; and curing
zone 2 is a downflow zone as shown by arrow 106. A series of couples are shown in
each oven zone, each thermocouple being fied using the location designation
nomenclature described above. Thermocouple conductor leads 108 connect the
thermocouples to a processer unit 110. For clarity, the conductor leads 108 are shown only
for thermocouples located above the path 112, it being understood that thermocouples below
the path 112 are similarly connected to the processor 110. An input device 114, such as a
keyboard, ad, touchscreen, mouse or the like, may optionally be provided to program
or provide other information to the processor. An output device 116, such as a printer, display
monitor, speaker or the like, may also be connected to the processor. The input device 114
and output device 116 are adapted to provide aces, for example, visual, audible, tactile
or other aces.
While absolute temperatures may be useful, comparisons are typically more
useful. Processor circuitry and components suitable for comparing the thermocouple outputs
are standard in the industry and need not be described in detail . In general, two types
of isons are useful: ature averages and temperature difference, which includes
the difference between an absolute temperature and a standard. However, the information
gleaned from these will vary depending on the location of thermocouples whose outputs are
compared. With reference to Figures 3—5, Table B describes some averaging comparisons
and some difference comparisons that have proven useful.
Table B: Illustrative Thermocouple Comparisons
Comparison Interpretation/ Explanation
Averages
DnN01 and DnNOZ averaging two or more thermocouples in the same
or location provides redundancy safety and greater accuracy
DnG01 and DnGOZ due to potential miscalibrations; this may also be useful
or in non—linear arrays having multiple temperature readings
CnG01 and CnGOZ in a cross machine direction.
DnNO and DnGO averaging two or more couples in different linear
and optionally with positions across the same zone or subzone provides
DnMO information about the average pack temperature across the
zone; this may be useful in comparison to the oven zone
setpoint or as used in differences (see below)
Diflerences
DlNI and DlNO differences in temperature from upstream (inlet) side to
or downstream t) side provide information about the
DnGI and DnGO moisture content in the drying zones or subzones; the
or more moisture, the greater the amount of evaporation and
Dan and DnGO the greater the temperature difference. This may be
compared at any linear position or across the entire zone
or subzone. It is especially useful at the first entry
position, giving a measure of the initial pack moisture.
DnNO and DnGO outlet differences from entry to egress in a drying zone or
or especially subzone suggest the extent of drying. Generally, outlet
DlNO and D2GO temperature rises gradually across a zone or subzone as
more moisture is removed. This is also useful across
multiple drying zones, or in multiple iterations as a
temperature profile from a starting point
Can and CnGO differences in temperature from upstream (inlet) side to
downstream (outlet) side in the curing zone or subzone
provide information about the extent of curing; generally
this ence is fairly small compared to differences in
the drying zones/subzones
CnNO and CnGO, outlet differences from entry to egress in a curing zone or
C3NO and C4GO subzone suggest the extent of curing. If there is a
or substantial difference here, it could indicate some drying
DlNO to C4GO is still taking place.
Additionally, the entire differential profile throughout the
oven, e.g. from D1 to Cn is useful for monitoring cure as
it es assurance of adequate pack cure temperature
sustained for an adequate on of time.
CnGO and a standard It has been found that if a particular temperature is
temperature achieved for a sufficient duration of time in a curing zone
determined from or subzone, the t will be well cured. This
empirical work temperature depends on the particular manufacturing line
and t (e.g. R—value, thickness, density, binder type
and load, etc) but can be determined empirically.
As noted in Table B above, ants have found that ence between the
outlet temperature in zone #1 near the entry and the outlet ature in zone #2 near the
egress (delta T) can be used to infer moisture drying rate in the pack. This is an important one
of l possible temperature variables. A second useful temperature variable is derived
from the entry temperatures (inlet and outlet) in zone #1. For a given inlet entry temperature
the ant outlet entry temperature is tive of how much initial moisture is present in
the pack to absorb energy; the greater this difference, the higher the moisture level. A third
possible temperature variable is the difference between inlet and outlet thermocouple pairs
throughout the drying phase or drying distance (typically zones #1 and #2) and also
hout the curing phase, (e.g. zones #3 and #4). Within each zone the paired
thermocouple difference generally diminishes moving from entry to egress as moisture is
evaporated. When this difference reaches a sufficiently small threshold value, one may
conclude the pack is essentially dried and the remaining energy absorption is attributed to the
chemical curing reaction. This is another inference of drying distance. Another useful
temperature variable is the outlet ature in the oven zone, which can be used to estimate
the pack temperature once the pack is dry.
While each comparison described in Table B above is binary, compound
isons are also encompassed. For example, taking the difference of two averaged
readings, or ing the initial inlet—outlet difference with the egress outlet
ences in a complex comparison. Of course, it is to be understood that all such
arithmetic manipulations of two or more signals or values is arily encompassed by the
step of sensing “at least one” variable, since at least two must be sensed for comparisons.
Methods of use of the present invention involve taking the couple signals
(or the temperatures they represent) during a manufacturing run and comparing them in
various ways as described above to assess the cure status of the fibrous blanket. This method
is described in more detail below. Furthermore, the thermal information obtained from the
oven thermocouples may be used alone or in combination with other measurements to assess
cure. Some other possible measurements include, for example, tactile, visual and pH
measurements.
Color value variables and detection system
r variable useful for monitoring cure is a color value as part of a color
system as disclosed in application serial No. 13/089457 filed April 19, 2011, which is
incorporated herein by reference. A color system variable may be monitored continuously by
capturing video or sequential images of cut ns of the blanket as it proceeds down the
2012/034234
line from oven to packaging. The image capture system constitutes a sensor that generates a
signal indicative of sure .
Blankets of glass fiber products exiting the oven may be cut or “sectioned” into
multiple pieces. As used herein, the term “section” is any cut into the interior of the blanket
and in most cases is a straight or planar cut. However, the term “section” (and its tives
like “sectioned” or “sectioning”, etc.) es cuts in any direction, including cuts that are
parallel to the planes d by the conventional orthogonal axes (X=machine direction,
Y=cross—machine direction, and Z=height) and cuts that are not. A sectioned face that lies
generally in the X—Z plane is also known as a longitudinal ” and generally defines the
“lanes” of specific width. In contrast, a section that lies generally in the Y—Z plane is also
known as a “chopped” section. The term “end face” encompasses either the leading or
al face of a d blanket. For completeness, a section may also include cuts in the
X—Y plane or in planes not aligned with the XYZ axes.
As further described in application serial No. 13/089457, any section can be
“virtually” divided into multiple regions of interest (“ROIs), potentially in a grid format. For
example, in an end—face chopped section, three ROIs in the Z direction might be designated T,
M and B for top, middle and bottom; and four ROIs in the Y direction (designated, for
e, L1, L2, L3 and L4) may, but do not have to, correspond to udinal lanes as
described above. Thus, each ROI may be described using row/column coordinates, much like
a spreadsheet. In addition to the twelve ROIs ed by the exemplary description above,
there may be two side or edge s, perhaps designated 81 on the left and 82 on the right
of the blanket. It is generally desirable to cut away and recycle side edges like this. Any
number of ROIs may be utilized.
Many different color system variables are suitable for use with the invention. Due
to physiological idiosyncrasies of the eye (sensitivity is not uniform across all wavelengths)
there have been many different attempts to quantify color as humans perceive it, the details of
which are not essential to the invention. However, some of the useful color space systems
and the color system variables they utilize are set forth in the following table C.
TABLE C: Color Systems, Variables and Descriptors
Name Description Color system variables
RGB Color encoding scheme red, green and blue (RGB) color
HSL Color encoding scheme Hue, Saturation, and nce
HSV Color encoding scheme Hue, Saturation, and Value
HSI Color encoding scheme Hue, Saturation, and, Intensity
Hunter Color encoding scheme based on L (perceived sity); A (color
LAB knowledge that eye reacts more to position between red/magenta and
luminance than hue green); and B (color on between
yellow and blue)
CHE XYZ Color encoding scheme that X 2 corresponding to hue, chroma
, y,
transforms RGB system to one and lumnosity
using only positive values
CHE Color encoding scheme that L or L* (perceived luminosity); A or
L>"a>"b>’< or modifies Hunter according to the a* (color position between
CHELAB human vision system by red/magenta and green); and B or b*
mimicking the logarithmic (color position between yellow and
response of the eye blue)
CHE Color encoding scheme that L* (perceived luminosity); u*
L>"u>"v>’< or classifies colors ing (chroma); and v* (hue); like XYZ
CHELUV proportional tual
differences
YIQ For TV broadcasting, linear Y is similar to perceived nce, I
transform of RGB assigning and Q carry color information and
greater bandwidth to luminance some luminance information
CIE stands for Commission internationale de l’éclairage, or the ational Commission
on Illumination.
Many if not all of the color system variables for above systems can be
mathematically derived from the values of other systems. This facilitates measurements,
since only one set of values need be measured, for example RGB, and many of the other color
system les can be calculated. Multiple measurements may take into consideration all
the color system variables of the system or a subset of all the values. The LAB systems have
been found particularly useful, and one can measure and use all three values: L (perceived
luminosity); A (a color position between red/magenta and green); and B (a color on
between yellow and blue); just one value, such as the L, A or B value; or a ation of
two values.
Figures 4A and 4B illustrate an image capture system 200 for capturing the image
mentioned above. Upon exit from the oven 16, the cured blanket 67 is led past this image
capture system 200, typically under it. As noted above, longitudinal splits may divide the
t in to multiple lanes as represented by lanes 202A, 202B, and 202C. A mounting
bracket 204 is suspended from a horizontal rail 206 extending over the manufacturing line.
The bracket 204 has two ends. A first end (to the right in Figure 4B) includes a camera arm
210, on which are secured illumination lights 212 and at least one camera 214. A second end
of the mounting t 204 includes a calibration arm 220 on which is mounted a calibration
plate 222 having a calibration surface 224 facing the camera 214. Either the camera arm 210
or the calibration plate 222, or both, is pivotably d so that it is permitted to swing
upward/downward to place the calibration surface 224 into the view of the camera 214 for
calibrating the camera. In figure 4B, a pivot bracket 216 is pivotably mounted to the camera
arm 210 and pivots about pivot shaft 218, so that the camera 214 can swing upward to capture
a calibration image from the calibration plate e 224. Motor 230 and gear box 232 are
coupled to pivot shaft 218 to cause the rotation that pivots the cameras 214. The angle of
view of each camera is represented by lines 234 extending from the camera lens which,
depending on the thickness of the blanket 67, may p as shown.
Although a single camera is shown in Figure 4B and described , the image
capture system 200 may se an array of multiple cameras arranged side by side in the Y
direction, as shown in Figure 4A to capture the image of the sectioned face 203 across the
entire width of the blanket 67 in the Y direction, as well as the entire height in the Z direction.
For example, a blanket of 4—6 feet (1.2 to 1.8 m) in width may utilize 3 to 6 cameras, with
sufficient lights 212 to capture a suitable image. Support towers 236 elevate the image
system 200 above the manufacturing line as needed, and a control panel 238 may be installed
on one side or the other. Additional brackets, arms and calibration plates may be added as
needed to support the cameras and lights. The ng brackets and arms may be any
suitable material, such as stainless steel or aluminum, for suspending the required equipment.
d on the bracket 204 (shown behind a cutaway section of support strut) is a
laser height sensor 240. This detects the height of the blanket, which may vary depending on
the desired R value, and sends a binary (on/off) signal to a processor (not shown). When the
height of the blanket is above a preset threshold, the sensor 240 sends the “on” signal; but
when the height drops below the threshold (e.g. to zero relative to the conveyor, as when a
’ signal to the
gap between chopped batts is encountered), the sensor 240 sends an “off
processor. Either change (from off to on, or from on to off) can be used to trigger the camera
2012/034234
214 to capture an image, depending on the camera configuration. The end face 203 may be
the trailing edge of a batt that has already passed, for which the on—to—off sensor signal change
triggers the camera. atively, the end face 203 may be the leading edge of a batt that is
about to pass as depicted in Figure 4B, and the sensor off—to—on signal change triggers the
. In either case, the angle of the camera 214 and the distance of the height sensor 240
from the t are coordinated to ensure that the camera captures an image of the sectioned
end face 203. Any suitable gap or height or interruption sensor could be used in place of a
laser sensor 240.
The nating lights 212 may se any means of illumination, including
but not limited to incandescent, fluorescent and light emitting diodes (LED). They may be
configured to be constantly on or they can be configures to flash or “strobe” in combination
with the camera trigger. The color of “white” light is very subjective, thus the need for
“white balancing” or color calibration of the cameras. However, it is desirable for the
illumination to remain as constant as possible over time and temperature to minimize
recalibration. The more the color or intensity shifts, the more frequently the cameras must be
calibrated. Suitable illumination was obtained from Model L300 Linear Connect—a—Light
available from Smart Vision Lights, Muskegon, MI; or from model number HBR—LW16,
white LED light made by CCS America, Burlington, MA. In some cases, one or two light
bars were utilized. In some embodiments, the lights pivot with the camera, while in other
embodiments, the lights are stationary.
The camera 214 in some embodiments is a charge coupled device (CCD) digital
color camera. Resolution is not critical; sful operation was achieved with resolutions of
480 X 640 as well as 1024 X 760, 1296 X 966, and 1392 X 1040. Manufacturers of suitable
s include Sony, Hitachi, , Toshiba, Teledyne Dalsa, and JAI.
Various image processing software packages are commercially available and it is
ed that many would be suitable for use with the invention. EXemplary image processing
software programs include those from CogneX, Matr0X, National Instrument, and Keyence.
The generalized steps that the software may m are set forth in a portion of the block
diagram of Figure 5. As mentioned above and represented by block 130, the blanket, or
longitudinal slices thereof, are sectioned transversely to create leading and trailing end faces.
The gap in blanket height triggers the camera or cameras to capture an image of the end face,
block 132. This image is fed to a processor represented by block 134 where the software
performs a suitable analysis of the image. If necessary, the processor es multiple
images into one mic view (block 136). If longitudinal sections are already cut into the
blanket, the processor can identify the edges of the longitudinal sections and create
boundaries of the image that correspond to the longitudinal lanes. The processor also
overlays a grid of regions of interest (ROIs) onto the image, block 138. There should be at
least 2 al ROIs for comparison, and preferably at least 3 ROIs in a al or Z
direction. Horizontally (i.e. in the Y direction) there may be one or more ROIs. The Y—
direction bounds of the ROI may correspond exactly to the segmented lanes, or there may be a
plurality of horizontal ROIs per lane of the image.
The processor then analyzes each R01 to obtain a value for at least one color
system variable, block 140. A wide variety of color system variables are useful and some are
described below. The B—value is one color system variable that has been found suitable for
monitoring the cure state of fibrous insulation products and is described herein as one
example; although a variety of other color system variables might also be used. At least one
color system variable is obtained for each ROI. If desired, the color system variable values
from each ROI may be combined mathematically to find average, differential or d
values for larger areas, block 142. For example, in some embodiments, a color system
variable value is ated for all horizontal ROIs as a group, producing an average top color
value, average middle color value and e bottom color value. Examining the ctive
difference n these helps assess whether the blanket is curing evenly top to bottom.
Similarly, all vertical ROIs of a single lane may be averaged to assess the evenness of cure
from right lanes to left lanes. Finally, in some embodiments, it may be useful to combine all
ROIs together to assess an average cure of the entire end face. It is to be understood that any
process performing such arithmetic lations of two or more signals or values is
arily encompassed by the step of sensing “at least one” variable, since at least two must
be sensed for comparisons.
A key feature of the invention is the ability to see inside the pack to a “sectioned”
or interior face on a continuous basis to examine cure state within the pack. This is very
different from existing online systems that look only at the or surface, and from existing
offline visual or color systems that cannot be performed on a continuous basis.
Many software es will also provide statistical measures of the variability of
the data collected, such as minimum, maximum, range, mean, median, standard deviation, etc.
It is assumed for discussion that only one color system variable is measured. While that may
be sufficient, in some ments it may be desirable to measure from each ROI le
color system variables (such as but not d to L, A and B, see below) and statistical
information for each value. All the color value data is examined by a processor, which can
report the existence and location of areas that may be undercured (or overcured), block 144.
Subsequently, the process controls may be adjusted to improve the cure status, block 146.
Corrective actions and MPC Processor/Optimizer control
Corrective actions to adjust process ls are made in reaction to a particular
cure status situation or circumstance. For example, right—to—left or side—to side variations
(cross machine or Y direction) in cure might warrant adjustment of the pneumatic lappers to
achieve a more uniform lateral weight distribution. The bottom layer is sometimes more
cured due to a variety of possible reasons, ing, e.g. upward convection of high
temperature air in zones 1 and 2 of the oven and tion of additional heat from the
conveyor chain 64 as the pack traverses the oven. Undercured top areas ive to middle
or bottom) may suggest higher temperatures or higher fan speeds in zones 3 and 4 (which
have downdraft airflow) or, conversely, by reducing the temperature or airflow in zones 1 and
2. Undercure in the middle ROI (relative to top and bottom) might suggest reducing moisture
at middle forming units. Additional le corrective actions that might be taken in
response to various cure status ions are identified in Example 7, below.
Such tive actions may be made manually, but an automated system for
maintaining the operations of the forming hood and oven within specified control limits is
more ble. Proportional—Integral—Derivative (PID) llers may offer suitable control
solutions for simpler operations processes. These are well known in the art and need no
further description. They are frequently used for single—loop feedback control systems.
Model Predictive Control (MPC) systems are also well known tools for more
complex and dynamic plant operations process management. See, for example, Zheng (Ed.)
Model Predictive Control, Sciyo, 2010 (downloadable at:
htt ://www.intecho en.confibooks/show/title/model— redictive—control ) or Badgwell & Qin,
Industrial Model Predictive Control — An d Overview, presentation March 9, 2002
(cited at:
htingaymzaz13Liam.1.=3,925.;a»::2::3.1iskaaggjgresemati9:15.923:99“hassign:23l[£21122;.siarygrmhamigggrzrii as
of October 11, 2011), both incorporated by reference in their entireties. MPC originated in
the chemical industry and provides an iterative means to monitor multiple dependent and
independent variables sampled periodically from the operating process, and to predict the
effect on dependent variables of adjusting the independent variables. This is generally done
over a limited time horizon in a dynamic fashion so as to optimize an economic or cost
variable. re systems for implementing MPC are available from a wide variety of
suppliers, ing AspenTech, Honeywell, Shell Global Systems, Invensys, Continental
Controls, and Pavillion/Rockwell. Various MPC algorithms are employed by ent
providers, the details of which are not essential. In general, the algorithms use either linear or
non—linear programming; and empirical data or “first principles” theories (such as
vation and e of energy and/or mass) to make predictions as to the adjustments.
In some embodiments of the invention, the MPC optimizer algorithm involves two steps. In a
first step, it solves a steady—state optimization problem using linear programming (LP) to
identify an m operating point. Then, in a second step using dynamic optimization, the
optimal steady—state operating condition from the first step is imposed on the control problem.
Figure 6 shows a schematic diagram of a general fibrous product operation 150,
including a forming hood or section 12 and an oven 16. Disturbances 152 are shown
impacting the ion 150 at arrow 154, and they may impact the forming hood 12 or the
oven 16 or both. As used herein, “disturbances” 152 refer to the input variables that are not
easily controlled in the process. They may be measured or unmeasured, dependent or
independent. For example, in a typical manufacturing plant for fibrous products, the ambient
temperature and humidity are ndent and not easily controlled. Similarly, for a given
product ication, the fiber diameter and glass pull—through (glass flow rate to zers)
are not easily lled. Occasionally, one or more fiberizer units may have to be taken off—
line for cleaning, adjustment, or repair, so the numbers of fiberizer units in operation (relative
to planned number for the given product run) is not controllable. Finally, certain ties of
the pack on the ramp between forming hood and oven are dependent, but not directly
controllable. These include the pack’s re content and its thickness or “ramp height”
(which are dependent on the water inputs and humidity) and its weight distribution vertically
(which is dependent on binder application and glass pull—through at each fiberizer unit). All
the above variables, and those similarly not easily controlled, are disturbances 152. Although
the pack moisture and thickness may be considered bances from the standpoint of oven
ls, they may also be considered control variables in the larger context of the overall
forming operation, where flows of liquids are controllable and have an indirect impact on
ramp height and moisture. Pack moisture affects drying distance, which can be determined by
the delta T measure described above in connection with Table B. Within the constraints of
oven fan speed limits, the oven optimizer control can control delta T to reject unmeasured
bances of pack moisture.
The independent variables that can be ed easily are the “manipulatable”
variables 156 as used herein. These are the so—called “knobs” and “levers” that can be
adjusted to impact the operation 150. In the case of a fibrous product forming operation, the
manipulatable les 156 include the oven or zone fan speeds, the oven or zone set point
temperatures, the coolant water flow rate and, optionally, the binder diluent flow rate (which
adds additional water without impacting binder delivery). Binder flow rates, while
controllable, are dictated by the desired loading rate (LOI) and product properties and are not
ered “manipulatable” variables 156 for this reason.
Variables that are dependent on the input variables and can be measured in an on—
line or “continuous” fashion are potential “control variables” 158. These are the process
les whose values the operator and the MPC seek to maintain within specified acceptable
limits. Important “Control les” 158 are r described in Table D, below.
TABLE D: Potential Control Variables
Short Name Description
Surface Roughness The finish, uniformity and smoothness of the or surface
of the pack.
Cured pack thickness Also known as “machine height” this is the thickness of the
blanket after it eXits the oven.
Oven/zone inlet temp. The temperature sensed by the inlet thermocouples that are
upstream of the drying/curing media in the oven or in a
particular zone of the oven. These will generally be close to
the oven zone temperature setpoint, once steady state is
achieved after an adjustment is made.
2012/034234
one outlet temp. The ature sensed by the outlet thermocouples that are
downstream of the drying/curing media in the oven or in a
particular zone of the oven. Depending on the location in the
oven, these may not be very close to the oven zone
temperature setpoint, due to energy absorption by the moisture
in the drying pack.
Oven/zone temp. differences The difference n the temperatures sensed by any two
thermocouples located anywhere in any zone, as explained in
more detail above in the section “Temperature variables.”
Oven/zone temp. averages The average temperatures sensed by any two or more
thermocouples located anywhere in any zone, as explained in
more detail above in the section “Temperature variables.”
Color values A color value measured from any section as a variable of a
color system, such as the LAB or other s described
above in the section “Color value variables and detection
system”.
Color value differences The difference between two measured color values as
described above in the section “Color value les and
ion system”.
Color value averages The average of two or more measured color values as
described above in the section “Color value variables and
detection system”.
Ramp height The thickness of the pack as it enters the oven. This can be
viewed as a disturbance from the viewpoint of oven controls,
but it does respond to levels of coolant water flow, so it can be
thought of as controlled indirectly when coolant flow is
manipulatable.
Total Energy Usage The total energy used by the system in BTU or lent
units, generally expressed per unit time or per quantity or units
of production.
Sensors 160 sense and measure one or more of the control variables 158. le
exemplary sensors 160 are described above as the thermocouples 95—98 and image capture
system 200. Sensors 160 produce signals 162 that may be processed through comparators or
other processors 164A, 164B, such as the thermal processor 110 or the image sor 134
already bed. Processors 164A, 164B then output signals 166 that are input to the MPC
system 168. After processing according to its algorithm and variable prioritization (described
below) the MPC processor outputs one or more control signals 170 to the one or more of the
manipulatable variables 156, which lead to controls of the operation via signals 172 and 174.
As shown in Figure 6, signals 172 l forming hood manipulatable variables 156, while
signals 174 control oven manipulatable variables 156. For simplicity, only one control signal
line is shown (at 170, 172, and 174), but it should be tood that multiple signal lines
may be required depending on the number of variables measured or controlled. Two sensor
signals 162, and two comparator sor output signals 166 are shown representing the
minimum for a multivariable process control, gh more than two signals are used in
many embodiments.
Any one or more of these control variables 158 may be selected for process control
to be maintained within predetermined limits. For e, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more,
6 or more, 8 or more, or 10 or more les may be selected for controlling. Typically at
least one is selected for optimization once all identified control variables are within their
limits. Typically, the optimization variable is one representing cost or other economic
benefit. In the present invention, the total energy used is a useful proxy for cost and the MPC
processor will choose conditions that minimize total energy (maximize economic t)
once all variables are in control.
If two or more potential control les are selected to be controlled by the MPC,
they may be ranked in terms of priority for maintaining within their respective limits. This
may be necessary as the limits for multiple control les could impose so many
constraints on the operation that there may be no feasible solution that satisfies all constraints.
Therefore, prioritization of the control variables may be useful to tell the MPC zer
which control limits may be sacrificed in favor of maintaining other control variables within
their . Control variables may be ranked in strict ordinal fashion, or grouped into two or
more tiers ranging from most important, through lesser importance to least ant. While
many prioritization schemes may be useful for manufacturing fibrous products like insulation,
applicants have found the prioritization of table E useful. Other options are illustrated in the
examples.
TABLE E: Illustrative Control Variable Prioritization
Highest priority 0 Color values, such as color B values and average color B
values
0 Ramp height
Intermediate Priority 0 Color value differences, such as the B value difference
between top and bottom ROIs of a section, or between edge
and interior lane ROIs of a section
0 Zone ature differences, such as the difference
between downstream entry of zone 1 and downstream
egress of zone 2 (delta T) in a four zone oven
0 Zone outlet temperatures, especially at curing zones, such as
zones 3 and 4 in a four zone oven
0 Ramp height
-0vengas/energyusage
The ion has been described above in terms of many of its embodiments and
options. The following examples serve to further rate specific embodiments of the
ion, but the scope of the invention should not be construed as limited to these examples.
EXAMPLES
Examples 1-3: Exemplary MPC optimization
A MPC optimizer from AspenTech is programmed to monitor and control the
variables shown in Table 1, below, in a four zone oven using the manipulated variables of: (1)
fan speeds in zones 1—4, and (2) setpoint temperatures in zones 1—4. In each case, total energy
use is selected for optimization, once selected variables are in control.
Table 1— Selected Optimization Schemes
Example No. Controlled variables Prioritization to:
. Color B value Color B value
. Average of multiple pack outlet
atures at entry location of each
of zones 1—4
. Average of multiple pack outlet
temperatures at egress on of
each of zones 1—4
. Color B value Color B value
. Average of multiple pack outlet
temperatures at egress location of
each of zones 1—4
. Color B value Color B value
. Average of pack outlet ature at
egress location of zones 1, 3 and 4
. Difference between inlet and outlet
temperatures at egress location of
zone 2 (i.e. Z2GI — Z2GO)
1. Color B value Color B value
2. Average of pack outlet temperature at
egress location of zones 1,3 and 4
3. Difference between temperatures at
zone 1 entry outlet and zone 2 egress
outlet (i.e. Z2GO —Z1NO)
Examples 5-6: Exemplary MPC optimization
A MPC optimizer from AspenTech is programmed to monitor and control the
variables shown in Table 2, below, in a four zone oven using the manipulated variables of: (1)
fan speeds in zones 1—4, (2) setpoint temperatures in zones 1—4; and (3) coolant water flow
into the forming hood. In each case, total energy use is selected for optimization, once
selected variables are in control except, in Example 5, Color B difference was selected as a
secondary optimization le in addition to total energy use.
Table 2 — Selected Optimization Schemes
e No. Controlled variables Prioritization to:
. Ramp height Color B difference
. Difference between inlet and outlet
temperatures at egress location of
zone 2 (i.e. Z2GI — Z2GO)
. Average of multiple pack outlet
temperatures at egress location of
each of zones 2—4
. Overall color B value
. ence in color B values
n top and bottom ROIs of a
section
. Color B value order listed
. Ramp height
. Difference in color B values
between top and bottom ROIs of a
section
. Difference between inlet and outlet
temperatures at egress on of
zone 2 (i.e. Z2GI — Z2GO)
. Average of multiple pack outlet
temperatures at egress location of
each of zones 2—4
Example 7: ed Corrective actions
The following Action Tables set forth some corrective actions to take in given
situations depending on the cure status of various sampled locations. Many of these can be
automated using continuous, online measurements and a dynamic MPC processor.
s Issue: Bright Pink Areas in Interior batts (under cure)
Ensure proper weight distribution across all lanes
Look for plugged areas on the Oven Flights
Look for sources of excess moisture on the Forming Chain
Look for sources of excess moisture from the fiberizing area
Ensure that Oven fan speeds are optimized: run each fan as fast as
possible without blowing craters in the surface (updraft zones) or
degrading machine thickness (downdraft zones).
Process Issue: Interior Top Is Under Cured
Check for plugged areas on top oven chain
Verify Ramp Height is at target
Increase temperature in last two oven zones by 5° each (react zone) or
° each (reject zone)
Increase fan speeds in last two oven zones by 50 rpm each — ensure that
pack is still touching top oven chain at discharge end and e y
is not affected
Process Issue: Interior Bottom Is Under Cured
Action
Look for sources of excess moisture from the fiberizing area; ally
on initial units that from the ”bottom” of pack.
Look for sources of excess re on forming chain— i.e. under chain
sprays, leaking hoses, etc.
Look for overflowing catch pans or hoodwall troughs
Ensure proper operation of forming chain cleaner sprayer
Ensure proper operation of forming flight dryer
Check for plugged areas on bottom oven chain
Verify Ramp Height is at target
Increase temperature in first two oven zones by 5° each (react zone) or
° each (reject zone)
Increase fan speeds in first two oven zones by 50 rpm each — ensure that
e y is not degraded (blowing holes in pack) and pack is still
touching top oven chain at discharge
Process Issue: Edge Is Under Cured
Action
Ensure hoodwalls are rotating and squeegees are drying the belt
|f edge sprays are being used, reduce flow or turn off
Check for plugged area on top and bottom oven chains, especially the
edges
Ensure that pack is centered on the oven chain. If not, air will bypass
the pack through the open chain, ng cure on that edge of the
pack.
Verify Ramp Height is at target
Verify deckles are in correct position (if applicable)
se temperature in first two oven zones by 5° each (react zone) or
° each (reject zone) Note that this will also increase cure throughout
the pack, so ensure that this move will not create an over-cured
condition elsewhere!
] Process Issue: Interior Top Is Over Cured
Action
Verify Ramp Height is at target
Decrease ature in last two oven zones by 5° each (react zone) or
° each (reject zone)
Process Issue: Interior Bottom Is Over Cured
Verify Ramp Height is at target
Decrease temperature in first two oven zones by 5° each (react zone) or
° each (reject zone)
Process Issue: Edge Is Over Cured
Action
Ensure that pack is centered on the oven chain
Verify Ramp Height is at target
Verify deckles are in correct position (if applicable)
Decrease temperature in first two oven zones by 5° each. Note that this
will also se cure results for the other areas of the pack, so ensure
that this move will not create an under-cured condition elsewhere!
Ensure proper edge trim width
Product Issue: All Regions Under Cured
Action
Verify Ramp Height is at target
Increase all Oven Zone temps by 5° each (react zone) 10° each (react
zone)
If oven changes do not result in increased cure, verify ramp moisture
is in acceptable range for the line. Extreme ambient conditions may
result in the inability to properly cure product, at which time it is
recommended to change jobs.
Product Issue: All Regions Over Cured
Action
Verify Ramp Height is at target
Increase all Oven Zone temps by 5° each (react zone) 10° each (react
zone)
Example 8: Temperature profiles
Trials were conducted in a plant by installing multiple thermocouples in each
oven zone of a four zone curing oven. Various fiberglass insulation test products were
produced, including insulation blankets having R—Value designations R—l 1, R13, R—19, R—25
and R—30. The temperatures (OF) sensed by the thermocouples were recorded to generate the
temperature profiles shown in Fig. 7A. A temperature difference was also calculated between
the inlet and outlet temperatures at each thermocouple location and this is also shown in Fig.
7A. In each case the data points represent the e of 60 minutes of readings for each
position; and the x—axis represents the position of the couples along the four zone oven
path.
The profiles are instructive. The set temperature and fan speed conditions
vary from one zone to the next, so transitions between zones can cause abrupt s. But
within the ions of a particular zone, the temperature will begin to rise gradually once
the moisture is ated, a point known as “drying time” or g distance”. In Fig. 7A,
this can be observed near the end of zone #2 for each product. In addition, the outlet
difference diminished greatly but does not quite disappear since energy is still being absorbed
by the fibrous product to effect the cure reaction. By the end of zone #4, the inlet and outlet
temperatures are nearly equal (i.e. the difference in nearly zero) so that the outlet temperature
of zone #4 is a fair measure of the pack temperature. Provided the profile shows a sufficiently
high exit temperature for a sufficient time period, cure status is confirmed.
] It is observed that each product thickness (R—value) generates a distinct profile.
As one might expect, the profiles are somewhat ordered with greater inlet—outlet differences
for the higher R—values (thicker and presumably ning more moisture), however this is
not ely so due to other production factors such as coolant or binder adjustments, or oven
temp or fan speed, that may confound the expected e.
Example 9: ison of thermocouples to oven mole
In a plant where thermocouples had been installed and where inlet and outlet
temperatures were being measured for each oven zone. Figure 7B shows the data recorded
over time from individual inlet and outlet thermocouples in zone 4. The inlet temperature at
each thermocouple fell between 450 and 500 OF 60 C). The outlet or “exit”
temperatures all fell between 420 and 440 oF 27 C). An oven mole was inserted into
the pack and transmitted through the oven during the times of these ings for comparison
purposes. Upon exit, it was learned that the mole recorded an average temperature of 439.3
OF (226 C) while in zone 4 during its t. This can be correlated fairly well with the outlet
temperatures, which average about 430 oF (221 C) and all fall within a range from about 420
°F to 440 °F (215-227 C).
In addition, the relatively stable average temperature of about 430 OF (221 C)
indicates — based on empirical, historical evidence — that this particular product (Australian R—
3.5 fiberglass insulation) is fully cured.
Example 10: Use of continuous thermal measurements
With at least one thermal measurement of cure assessment in hand, the cure
status of the pack or batt is known with a higher degree of accuracy, including ation
about the degree or magnitude of undercure or overcure, if any. This provides the
manufacturer with valuable and actionable data with which to adjust the process controls as
needed. For e, manufacturers have predetermined product specifications and product
not falling within those ranges is said to be “out of spec” and must generally be scrapped or
recycled. Moreover, most manufacturers have process controls and set predetermined limits
to the variability of their processes. These parameters are summarized in the following Table
Table 3: Manufacturing Limits
Abbreviation Term and meaning
USL Upper Specification Limit — the value above which product
is out of spec and must be discarded or scrapped.
UCL Upper Control Limit — the value above which t is
outside of the preset limits of acceptable process variability,
although it may still be within spec.
LCL Lower Control Limit — the value below which product is
outside of the preset limits of acceptable process ility,
although it may still be within spec.
LSL Lower ication Limit — the value below which product
is out of spec and must be discarded or scrapped.
Knowing the cure status quantitatively in relation to these limits has significant
consequences for the manufacturer. As noted above, product that is “out of spec” is generally
scrapped or recycled. But if the only information available to the manufacturer is that the
product is undercured — then a manufacturer may scrap product unnecessarily if it was low but
still above a LSL. More specifically, product testing outside the USL and LSL still must be
ed, but product testing between the USL and UCL, or between the LCL and LSL may
still be used and not scrapped. This is valuable information, since the manufacturer will
incorrectly scrap good product less frequently.
s even more importantly, the manufacturer now gains quantitative
ation about how far the product is from any of the limits mentioned above. Previously,
if product was within specification it was retained and the process was deemed acceptable and
not necessarily ed. Product testing outside the Control Limits (i.e. >UCL or <LCL) but
still within spec (i.e. >LSL and <USL) gives the manufacturer the opportunity to adjust
process controls to try to bring the process back under tighter control. And knowing the test
result tatively provides information about how much to adjust the process controls. In
other words, the quantitative result provides information not only about the ion of a
process change, but also about the magnitude of such a process change. None of this is
possible with simple, qualitative testing procedures.
The foregoing description of the various aspects and embodiments of the
present invention has been presented for purposes of ration and description. It is not
intended to be exhaustive, or to identify all embodiments, or to limit the invention to the
specific aspects disclosed. Obvious modifications or variations are possible in light of the
above ngs and such modifications and variations may well fall within the scope of the
invention as determined by the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the
breadth to which they are fairly, legally and equitably entitled.
Claims (19)
1. Apparatus for controlling the cure status of binder applied to a fibrous product ctured in a manufacturing line, the apparatus comprising: a curing oven having at least two zones with blowers for ating heated gas through the oven zones, manipulative controls for varying at least one operating parameter of the manufacturing line; a first sensor for ting a first signal indicative of the cure status of the s product, and a distinct second sensor for generating a distinct second signal indicative of the cure status of the s product; a processor for receiving the first and second signals from the first and second sensors and generating at least one control signal for adjusting at least one of the manipulatable controls of the manufacturing line in response to the first and second signals indicative of the cure status.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the manipulatable controls are selected from oven zone fan speeds, oven zone setpoint temperatures and coolant water flow.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the first and second sensors are independently selected from a thermocouple and an image e system.
4. The apparatus of claim 3 further comprising a plurality of sensors, each ting a respective signal indicative of the cure status of the fibrous product.
5. The apparatus of claim 1 further sing a comparator for subtracting or averaging first and second signals to form a temperature difference or ature average.
6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein at least one sensor comprises an image capture system generating a signal representing a color value of the fibrous product.
7. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein at least one sensor is an image capture system generating multiple signals representing color values from multiple ROIs of the fibrous product, and further sing a processor for subtracting one color value from another to form a color differential signal.
8. The apparatus of claim 1 r comprising a plurality of sensors, each generating a respective signal indicative of the cure status of the fibrous t, and wherein: at least one sensor comprises a thermocouple; at least one sensor comprises an image capture system; and at least one sensor comprises a ramp height sensor.
9. A method for controlling the cure status of binder in a fibrous product ctured on a manufacturing line ing a curing oven having at least two zones with blowers for circulating heated gas through the oven zones and manipulatable controls for at least operating parameter of the manufacturing line, the method comprising: sensing at least one first control variable indicative of the cure status of the fibrous product, and generating a first signal indicative of the cure status; sensing at least one distinct second control variable indicative of the cure status of the fibrous product, and generating a distinct second signal indicative of the cure status; inputting the first and second signals to a MPC processor-optimizer e of solving for l control conditions, given predetermined constraints for the control variables and an optimizing function; and generating at least one output control signal from the MPC processor-optimizer to adjust at least one of the manipulatable controls of the cturing line in response to the optimal condition.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the manipulatable controls are selected from oven zone fan speeds, oven zone set point temperatures and coolant water flow.
11. The method of claim 9 wherein the first and second sensing steps are done with sensors independently selected from a thermocouple for sensing a temperature and an image capture system for sensing an image.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein at least two sensing steps are done with a thermocouple positioned to sense an outlet temperature, and further sing subtracting the two s to form a temperature difference.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein the subtracting to form a temperature difference further comprises at least one of: subtracting an outlet temperature from an inlet ature in the same oven zone; subtracting an outlet temperature from an inlet temperature in different oven zones; subtracting an egress temperature from an entry temperature in the same oven zone; and subtracting an egress ature from an entry temperature in different oven zones.
14. The method of claim 11 wherein at least two g steps are done with a thermocouple, and further comprising averaging the first and second s to form an average temperature.
15. The method of claim 11 wherein at least one of the first and second sensing steps is done with an image capture system for generating a signal representing a color value of the fibrous product.
16. The method of claim 15 wherein the color value is selected from L, L*, A, a*, B and
17. The method of claim 15 n the sensing step further comprises generating le signals representing color values from multiple ROIS of the fibrous product, and subtracting one color value from another to form a color differential value.
18. Apparatus for controlling the cure status of a binder applied to a fibrous product manufactured in a manufacturing line substantially as herein described with reference to any one of the embodiments shown in the drawings.
19. Method for controlling the cure status of a binder in a s product manufactured on a manufacturing line including a curing oven having at least two zones with blowers for circulating heated gas h the oven zones substantially as herein described with reference to any one of the embodiments shown in the drawings.
Applications Claiming Priority (7)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US13/089,457 | 2011-04-19 | ||
| US13/089,457 US9128048B2 (en) | 2010-12-09 | 2011-04-19 | Method for online determination of cure status of glass fiber products |
| US13/116,611 US8718969B2 (en) | 2011-04-19 | 2011-05-26 | Apparatus and method for continuous thermal monitoring of cure status of glass fiber products |
| US13/116,611 | 2011-05-26 | ||
| US13/288,302 US20120271445A1 (en) | 2011-04-19 | 2011-11-03 | Multivariable predictive control optimizer for glass fiber forming operation |
| US13/288,302 | 2011-11-03 | ||
| PCT/US2012/034234 WO2012145500A1 (en) | 2011-04-19 | 2012-04-19 | Apparatus and method for cure monitoring and process control in glass fiber forming operation |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| NZ616917A NZ616917A (en) | 2015-08-28 |
| NZ616917B2 true NZ616917B2 (en) | 2015-12-01 |
Family
ID=
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| AU2012245484B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for cure monitoring and process control in glass fiber forming operation | |
| CN103502812B (en) | Method for online determination of cure status of glass fiber products | |
| US7354538B2 (en) | Container manufacturing inspection and control system | |
| US20120144870A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for controlling moisture in the manufacture of glass fiber insulation | |
| CA2820870A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for controlling moisture in the manufacture of glass fiber insulation | |
| JP2019531425A5 (en) | ||
| US8660682B2 (en) | Air wipe and sheet guide temperature control on paper and continuous web scanners | |
| NZ616917B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for cure monitoring and process control in glass fiber forming operation | |
| US20120146252A1 (en) | Control method for determining cure status of glass fiber products | |
| US8718969B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for continuous thermal monitoring of cure status of glass fiber products | |
| CN115950237A (en) | An online moisture adjustment system and method for a belt dryer | |
| WO1992021958A1 (en) | Method and apparatus in the manufacture of a fibre felt |