NZ617674B2 - Method for operating a wind energy plant in icing conditions - Google Patents
Method for operating a wind energy plant in icing conditions Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- NZ617674B2 NZ617674B2 NZ617674A NZ61767412A NZ617674B2 NZ 617674 B2 NZ617674 B2 NZ 617674B2 NZ 617674 A NZ617674 A NZ 617674A NZ 61767412 A NZ61767412 A NZ 61767412A NZ 617674 B2 NZ617674 B2 NZ 617674B2
- Authority
- NZ
- New Zealand
- Prior art keywords
- ice
- wind power
- power installation
- wind
- temperature
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 32
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 claims description 122
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- -1 ice ion Chemical class 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000008014 freezing Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000007710 freezing Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 27
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002035 prolonged effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000003197 Byrsonima crassifolia Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000001546 Byrsonima crassifolia Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010248 power generation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010257 thawing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036962 time dependent Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F03D—WIND MOTORS
- F03D7/00—Controlling wind motors
- F03D7/02—Controlling wind motors the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
- F03D7/026—Controlling wind motors the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor for starting-up
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F03D—WIND MOTORS
- F03D7/00—Controlling wind motors
- F03D7/02—Controlling wind motors the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
- F03D7/0264—Controlling wind motors the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor for stopping; controlling in emergency situations
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- F03D—WIND MOTORS
- F03D80/00—Details, components or accessories not provided for in groups F03D1/00 - F03D17/00
- F03D80/40—Ice detection; De-icing means
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
- F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
- F05B2270/00—Control
- F05B2270/30—Control parameters, e.g. input parameters
- F05B2270/303—Temperature
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
- F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
- F05B2270/00—Control
- F05B2270/30—Control parameters, e.g. input parameters
- F05B2270/32—Wind speeds
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
- F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
- F05B2270/00—Control
- F05B2270/30—Control parameters, e.g. input parameters
- F05B2270/325—Air temperature
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
- Y02E10/70—Wind energy
- Y02E10/72—Wind turbines with rotation axis in wind direction
Abstract
The present invention relates to a method for operating a wind energy plant (1), comprising a nacelle (2) having an electric generator for generating electric current, and an aerodynamic rotor (3) having one or more rotor blades (4), the rotor being coupled to the generator. The method comprises the steps of operating the wind energy plant (1) if ice build-up on the rotor blades (4) can be safely ruled out, and of stopping the wind energy plant (1), if ice build-up on the rotor blades (4) is detected, and time-delayed stopping and/or preventing a restart of the wind energy plant (1), if an ice build-up was not detected but is to be expected, and/or time-delayed restart of the wind energy plant (1) if a stop condition, which led to a shut-down of the wind energy plant (1), no longer applies, and an ice build-up was not detected, and an ice build-up or the formation of an ice build-up is not to be expected. steps of operating the wind energy plant (1) if ice build-up on the rotor blades (4) can be safely ruled out, and of stopping the wind energy plant (1), if ice build-up on the rotor blades (4) is detected, and time-delayed stopping and/or preventing a restart of the wind energy plant (1), if an ice build-up was not detected but is to be expected, and/or time-delayed restart of the wind energy plant (1) if a stop condition, which led to a shut-down of the wind energy plant (1), no longer applies, and an ice build-up was not detected, and an ice build-up or the formation of an ice build-up is not to be expected.
Description
Method for ing a Wind Energy Plant in Icing Conditions
A problem with wind power installations is in particular the danger
due to ice falling or being thrown off. In operation of a wind power
installation with iced rotor blades the fact of pieces of ice being flung off
can result in danger to the close proximity. When a wind power installation
is stopped the danger due to snow and pieces of ice being detached from
the wind power installation does not differ substantially from the danger
involved with other high structures.
A method of operating a wind power installation having regard to the
possibility of icing is described in German laid—open specification DE 103 23
785 A1. Therein ing parameters such as for example the power of
the wind power installation in dependence on a boundary condition such as
wind speed are lly compared to reference values which occur at the
respective wind speed. From deviations between the detected operating
parameter and the reference operating parameter it is le to infer ice
accretion and suitable protective measure can be initiated, in particular that
including ge of the wind power lation.
That procedure is based on the realisation that ice accretion at the
rotor blades influences the namics of the blades and thus the rotor,
thereby giving deviations in the performance of the installation. They are
recognised and evaluated by the described comparison of the ing
parameters.
A problem in that respect is that this kind of detection presupposes a
mode of operation of the wind power lation, which is as steady as
possible, stable and as uniform as possible.
However such ideal conditions frequently do not prevail in the case of
light wind which is assumed approximately at wind speeds below 3 or 4 ,
m/s. In the case of strong wind which is mostly assumed at wind speeds
from 20 m/s or 25 m/s the sensitivity of such known s is often
inadequate. Accordingly, any ice accretion evaluations are not very reliable
or are even impossible.
A similar problem arises if the wind power installation has come to a
stop e, in the stopped condition, no operating parameters can be
meaningfully compared to predetermined operating parameters. In that
case the wind power installation can have come to'a stop for entirely
different reasons. They include a, stoppage because of excessively light
wind, stoppage because of excessively strong wind, stoppage for
nance es and also stoppage due to network failure of the
connected electric power supply network into which the wind power
installation feeds and from which the wind power installation draws
energy
for maintaining its operational management. Moreover, stoppage of the
wind power installation because of a detected ice accretion is also
considered.
Therefore the object of the present invention is to address at least
one of the above-mentioned problems. In particular the invention seeks to
improve ice accretion detection or icing detection so that ice accretion
detection can be carried out even outside a previously secure recognition
range of a wind power installation. The invention at least seeks to provide
an alternative uration.
According to the invention therefore there is proposed a method of
operating a wind power installation according to claim 1.
Accordingly the method is based on a wind power installation
comprising a pod having an electric generator for generating electric
current and an aerodynamic rotor coupled to a generator and having
one or
more rotor blades.
Such a wind power installation is operated in a basically known
fashion, wherein more ically the rotor rotates if ice accretion on the
rotor blades can be reliably excluded. That is the case in ular when
the ambient temperature is high and in particular is markedly above +2°C.
r, ice accretion is excluded even at low temperatures around
ng point if the operating‘parameters in operation of the wind power
installation are of the respective value to be ed. That means in
particular that, in the part—load range, when therefore there is not sufficient
3O wind for operating the wind power installation at its l power, the
power ed by the wind power installation corresponds to the power
expected at the prevailing wind speed. In the oad range, when
therefore the wind power installation can be operated at nominal power
with the prevailing wind, this means that, in the case of a pitch-regulated
wind power installation, the set rotor blade angle corresponds to the rotor
blade angle to be expected at the prevailing wind speed.
If in contrast ice ac‘cretion on the rotor blades is detected the wind
power installation is d. Ice ion is detected for example in that,
at an ambient temperature which made ice accretion possible, more
specifically in particular at an ambient temperature below +2°C, there are
deviations between the actual and the expected power or deviations
between the actual and the expected rotor blade angle, which indicate ice
accretion. In the part—load range that is usually the case when the actual
power is markedly below the expected power, because it is to be assumed
that the ice accretion is ng the efficiency of the wind power
installation. That is to say the ratio of the electric power generated by the
wind power installation to the power afforded in the prevailing wind.
Another detection method for ice accretion is for e monitoring the'
natural frequency of the rotor blades in operation. Even that is based on
preconditions which do not always adequately occur. Still further methods ‘
are known which can also come up t their limiting s. They
include, to give a further example, an optical method which is poor for use
in fog or at night.
If now ice accretion has not been detected but is to be expected and
is therefore not to be excluded, it is proposed that the wind power
installation be stopped in time—delayed relationship. When ice accretion is
detected was described above. It is to be expected in particular when the
ambient temperature is below a limit temperature, in ular below
+2°C. Admittedly still no ice may form at +2°C, but in order to exclude
risks due to not detecting or not taking account of a possible ice accretion,
it is proposed that that relatively high value of +2°C be taken as a basis.
That also takes account of the fact that measurement uncertainties can
3O occur, that the ature measurement is not effected directly at the
potential location of icing and also that the temperature is nced by
flow conditions. Alternatively it is also possible to use another value, in
particular a limit value of +1°C or +3°C or +4°C.
According to the invention it was recognised thatrstopping the wind
power installation in the case of an ice accretion which is not detected but
which is to be expected or not to be excluded increases the safety factor for
people and s in the region of the wind power lation, in which
respect the ing losses of yield turn out to be comparatively slight,
measured against the total annual power of the wind power installation.
That is due in particular to the fact that such a stoppage occurs at very
high wind speeds which however occur rarely, or at very low wind speeds
at which in any caselittle yield can be afforded.
According to the invention it was also recognised that individual
pieces of ice are flung off only at greater thicknesses of ice and therefore
stoppage of the wind power installation or preventing it from starting up
again does not have to be effected immediately but rather can be effected
in time-delayed relationship. That reduces any losses of yield, and
sometimes even significantly reduces them.
In that case stopping the wind power installation and preventing it
from starting up again can be effected under the same preconditions.
elayed prevention of restarting of the wind power installation can
mean in that respect that a stopped wind power installation is lly not
prevented from starting up again, because of the time delay. It therefore
starts up again and then ~ within the time delay — possibly comes to a
working point at which it is possible for ice accretion to be ed reliably,
in particular more reliably than '
in the stopped condition. If in that case the
method is successful in reliably detecting that there is no ice accretion, that
time delay, as a consequence, has had the result that‘the wind power
installation has started again and is operating normally and is producing
corresponding output. Without a time delay there would have been the
danger that the installation does not start up, freedom from ice would not
be detected, and the installation would thus initially remain ently in
a stopped condition.
In the present application the expression stoppage of a wind power
lation — unless it is clearly specified differently — is used to mean that
the installation stops the rotor, or if need be allows it to run in a coasting
mode. In that case however the operational management system s
in ion, unless further disturbances occur such as for example a
network failure, which ts the’operational management system from
being maintained. In the event of a network failure state data are stored
until the network is restored.
The time delay can start for example from the moment in time or
can take account of that moment in time, at which ice accretion was to be
expected or could not be excluded. In particular the time delay can begin
at the moment when the ambient ature falls below a limit
ature.
Additionally or alternatively it is proposed that a stopped wind power
installation starts up again in time-delayed relationship when a ge
condition — for example because a shadow is thrown, because of oscillation
monitoring or also manually such as for example for maintenance - which
lead to stoppage of the wind power installation has ceased again and ice
accretion was neither detected nor is it to be expected or not excluded.
The time delay begins in particular at the time or takes account of such a
time at which the condition occurs, that ice accretion was not detected and
is not to be expected. That can mean that, before that moment in time, ice
accretion was to be expected or even occurred. It can however also mean
that, prior to that moment in time, it was not clear what kind of situation is
prevailing. The time delay is ore ed to take account of the fact
that, although ice accretion was not detected and is not be expected, there
could still be residual ice. Sometimes the observed conditions only indicate
that the formation of ice accretion is not to be expected, but information
about the presence of an ice accretion can be afforded only with difficulty
or not at all. In particular such a condition occurs when ambient
temperatures are above and in particular are slightly above a limit
temperature such as for example 2°C. At a higher temperature, in
3O particular above 2°C, ice formation is not to be reckoned with. If however
ice accretion occurred until a short time ago, that can possibly still be
present at least in part. Particularly in that case the result of the time
delay is that any ice ion residues can thaw.
In an embodiment it is proposed that stopping or ting
restarting of the wind power installation and also or alternatively causing
the wind power installation to start again is effected in dependence on a ice
predictive indicator. The ice tive indicator which can also simply be
referred to as the tor forms a measurement in respect of the
probability of ice accretion and is riately determined or altered. In
that respect the ice predictive indicator is so ined or altered that it
can give an indication to the probability or is so used without having to
represent a probability value in the mathematical sense. The ice predictive
indicator is in particular described hereinafter in such a way that a high
value points to a high probability of ice accretion and a low value points to
a low ility of ice accretion. On the basis of the teaching according to
the invention the man skilled in the art can equally. well provide that and
implement it in reverse.
The ice predictive indicator is preferably determined in dependence
on operating parameters and/or ambient conditions and can also be altered
in dependence thereon. ably time is taken into consideration. It is
thus desirable if the ice predictive indicator is so altered that it depends on
previous values and how far back in time they ed and/0r how long
they have already lasted.
In an ment the ice predictive indicator is in the form of a
counter. That includes in particular a configuration in which the ice
predictive indicator is in the form of les which are implemented in a
process computer and which basically can increase and reduce their value
in any way within predetermined limits.
Accordingly in an embodiment it is provided that the ice predictive
indicator alters its value in a first direction and in particular increases it
when ambient conditions and/or operating conditions of the wind power
installation favour ice accretion and/or point to ice accretion, in particular if
3O the ambient temperature is below a limit value. That tion takes place
in particular in time-dependent relationship so that the value alters
successively or continuously with increasing time. If therefore in particular
the ambient temperature is below a limit temperature like +2°C, then that
value progressively increases with time until it has reached such a high
value which can be stored as a limit value and which can be referred to as
a stoppage limit value, at which the wind power installation is stopped and
at which the wind power installation is prevented from starting up again. If
the wind power installation for example is in a condition in which, on the
basis of past , it is to be assumed that there is no ice accretion and if
the overall situation changes to conditions at which ice accretion can no
longer be excluded, then the counter begins slowly to increase. Until it has
d the stoppage limit value ~ if it reaches it at all — the time elapsed
also depends on the rate of increase of that counter.
onally or alternatively it is proposed that the counter changes
its values into a second direction, in particular reduces them, when ambient
conditions or operating conditions of the wind power installation favour or
indicate that ice accretion is not t or is reducing, in particular if the
ambient temperature is above the limit temperature.
If therefore for example the situation is one in which an ice accretion
is to be assumed to be t or that ice accretion has been detected, or if
the situation is unclear and if the situation changes to one in which ice
accretion or at least ice accretionoccurrence can be excluded, then the
value of the ice predictive indicator, that is to say the counter value,
gradually reduces with time. It is reduced until a lower counter limit value
is reached, in particular a restart limit value.
The above-described processes in increasing or reducing the ice
predictive counter can last for some hours to up to 10 hours or even
longer. In that time a situation which points to the possibility of icing and
which results in an se in the counter can change to a situation in
which it is possible to assume that there is a reduction in ice ion, in
particular thawing, or in which there are reliable values which e ice
ion. The value of the ice predictive indicator or the counter is in that
3O case reduced again. Equally a reverse situation can occur, in which the
counter counts up again. Due to the situation ed therefore the
direction in which the value of the ice predictive indicator changes alters.
That takes account of the respective past situation. Therefore preferably
one and the same counter is used for the increase and the reduction.
In a further ment it‘ is proposed that an tion in the
value, that is to say the value of the ice predictive indicator in the form of a
counter, is effected at a speed which is dependent on the ambient
conditions and/or the wind power installation ing conditions.
Accordingly therefore the value does not always increase or reduce in the
same way with time, but also takes account of a differentiated way of
ering the ling conditions.
Preferably in that respect, with a prevailing light wind, that is to say
in particular a wind involving wind speeds below 4 m/s, the value is
increased more slowly than when a strong wind prevails, more specifically
in particular at wind speeds of over 20 m/s if the installation is being
operated. That is based on the realisation that, at very high afflux speeds
at the rotor blade, due to operation of the installation at high wind speeds,
ice accretion can form more rapidly and thus the time until the wind power
installation is stopped should be shorter. That can be taken into account by
more rapidly increasing the value of the ice predictive indicator which thus
rapidly reaches a stoppage limit value. However there is also the possibility
of implementing a greater time delay with a prevailing light wind in some
other fashion than by the ice predictive indicator in the form of the counter,
like for example by means of a reference table or look-up table.
Preferably an increase in the value of the ice tive indicator is
also effected more slowly than in ion of the installation with a
prevailing strong wind, if the wind power lation was stopped because
of an automatic installation stop as in the event of shutdown due to shadow
casting or because of a lack of wind or in the event of a manual installation
stop such as for example for maintenance, independently of the prevailing
wind speed.
3O A further ment proposes, additionally or atively,
reducing the value of the ice predictive indicator in the form of a counter
more slowly, the lower the ambient temperature is, and in particular
. reducing the value proportionally to an integral formed from time over a
difference in the ambient ature relative to the limit ature.
That gives a time delay which is correspondingly shorter, the higher
the ambient temperature is. In other words, the wind power installation
can start up again correspondingly , the warmer that it is. Causing
the wind power installation to start up again with a correspondingly r
time delay, the higher the t ature is, can also be
implemented otherwise than by using the ice predictive indicator as the
counter. For example a table, a so—called look-up table, can be provided,
which specifies the time delay values for given ambient temperatures.
A further embodiment is characterised in that the wind power
installation is coupled to an electric network and is stopped in the event of
a network failure while, upon network restoration, that is to say when the
network failure is cured, the wind power installation is started up again in
dependence on a measurement temperature which depends on the ambient
temperature at the network failure and the ambient temperature at the
network restoration. That is based on the notion that, for the duration of
the network failure, more ically from the beginning thereof to network
restoration, information ng to operating parameters and t
conditions and in particular ambient temperature are not available or are
only limitedly available. In order to be able to better estimate the
possibility of ice accretion after the end of the network failure, this
procedure adopts a temperature value for the ambient temperature which
depends on the temperature at network restoration, that is to say the
tly prevailing temperature, and the last detected ambient
temperature prior to or at the beginning of the network failure.
Preferably the ement temperature is calculated as a mean
value from the ambient temperature at the beginning of the network failure
and the ambient temperature upon network restoration, if the network
3O failure is not more than a first failure time, in particular not more than two
hours. Here the underlying ation is that the ambient temperature
does not change too rapidly and at short failure times consideration
of the
ambient temperature prior to and after the network failure can already
supply meaningful information about the ility of ice accretion. If for
example the ambient ature at netWork restoration is 2°C, ice
accretion is probable if the ambient temperature at the ing of the
network failure was markedly below that, whereas ice accretion is
improbable if the ambient temperature at the beginning of the k
failure was markedly higher.
It is desirable, in the event of a longer network failure, to provide a
ature safety value for determining the ement temperature
which can also be referred to as the calculated temperature. Thus it is
ed that the measurement temperature be reduced by 2 K in the case
of a longer network e, in particular a network failure of over two
hours.
In an embodiment the wind power installation is arranged in a wind
park and is stopped if at least one further wind power installation of the
wind park is stopped because of ice accretion or predictive suspicion
thereof. That is based on the realisation that wind power installations
behave rather similarly at any event in respect of ice accretion, in the same
wind park, because in particular the ambient parameters such as ambient
temperature, air humidity and wind speed are similar. However that is also
based on the realisation that ice accretion of a wind power installation in
the park admittedly does not have to necessarily signify that all other wind
power installations in the park also involve ice accretion, but that the
probability of ice accretion on the other wind power installations of the
same park is high. ect prognoses should therefore occur only rarely
and should thus scarcely influence the overall yield of the wind power
installation over the course of the year, while the safety aspect, mainly
preventing ice from being flung off, can sometimes be icantly
increased.
Preferably a wind power installation which was stopped because of a
3O detected ice accretion or suspicion thereof will orient its pod in such a way
that a spacing which is as great as possible in relation to regions
ered by falling ice, in particular traffic routes and objects, is
maintained. In that way not only is the risk due to ice being flung off
reduced, but also the danger due to ice purely falling, as can basically also
occur in relation to other high building structures.
Preferably a wind power installation is used, which has a heatable
wind sensor for measuring the wind speed and heats it at least in the event
of a ion of ice accretion. For example it is possible to use a so—called
ultrasonic anemometer. Thus, even for the situation involving ice
formation which can occur not just on the rotor blades but for example also
on the anemometer, that is also intended to provide for wind speed
measurement which is still le. Accordingly ice accretion detection
means which require a reliable wind speed can then still be used.
Preferably it is proposed that an ice sensor be used, which directly
measures ice accretion on the wind power installation, in particular on one
or more of the rotor blades. Such measurement can supplement the
above-described ice detection modes. It is to be noted that the use of an
ice sensor firstly involves ponding capital investment costs. They can
possibly be quickly amortised if clear information from such an ice sensor
that there is no ice accretion means that the wind
power lation can be
operated without it having to be otherwise stopped, as a precautionary
measure.
Preferably it can be provided in a wind park that only some or one of
the wind power installations is fitted with such an ice sensor and
information obtained therefrom about ice accretion is itted to other
wind power installations in the park, that do not have an ice sensor. In
that way the costs of an ice sensor can be distributed among
a plurality of
installations. Preferably information ed by an ice sensor about an ice
accretion is evaluated and in particular stored together with the
respectively ling ambient and/or operating conditions of the
respective wind power installation in order to improve tion of ice
accretion, in particular to individualise same for the tive wind power
3O installation. Ice accretion detection can thus be respectively adapted to the
type of lation and the place of erection thereof, in particular by a
suitable learning programme.
The invention is described in greater detail hereinafter by way of
e by means of embodiments with reference to the accompanying
Figures.
Figure 1 shows a perspective view of a wind power,
Figure 2 shows the pattern of an ice predictive indicator for different
wind speeds,
Figure 3 shows the pattern of an ice predictive indicator for two
different ambient temperatures, and
Figure 4 diagrammatically illustrates the n of an ice predictive
indicator of an embodiment in dependence on a temperature pattern by
way of example.
Figures 1 shows a wind power installation 1 comprising a pod 2, an
aerodynamic rotor 3, rotor blades 4, a spinner 5 and a pylon 6.
Figures 2 plots the pattern of the ice predictive indicator, namely its
value, in relation to time for two examples. In accordance therewith a
distinction is drawn between prevailing wind speeds which can be identified
as strong wind on the one hand and those which can be identified as a light
wind on the other hand. In both examples Figure 2 concerns the ion
where the wind power installation is in ion and the rotor of the
installation is rotating and therefore the installation is not stopped. At the
time t1 = 0 an event occurs, which rs upward counting of the ice
predictive indicator. That can be for example that the ambient temperature
falls below a limit temperature. It is however for example also considered
that the temperature is already below the limit temperature and the
prevailing wind speed drops to a value such that it must be assumed that
there is a light wind situation, or the prevailing wind speed rises to a value
such that it must be assumed that there is a strong wind situation.
The value of the ice tive indicator prior to the time t1 is not
important. That can be for example of the value 0 or a value is first
3O attributed at all to the ice tive tor at the time t1.
The initial value of the ice predictive indicator can also be viewed as
a value which leads to the wind power installation starting up again in
another case. That is not involved in the case shown in Figure 2 however
so that the value "start" is only shown in brackets.
At any event at the time t1 'there is a condition, by virtue of which
the ice predictive indicator is continuously increased with time. The
increase is effected for the prevailing strong wind more rapidly than for a
prevailing light wind. Thus, with a prevailing strong wind, the ice predictive
tor already reaches a value at which the wind power installation is
stopped, at the time t2. That value is identified in by the 2
, Figure
horizontal broken line noted as Stop. In the example, with a ling
strong wind, the ice predictive indicator reaches the criterion for stoppage
of the wind power installation after 2 hours. In the case of a light wind the
criterion for stoppage of the wind power installation is only reached at the
time t3 which in the example is 10 hours.
Figure 2 is a simplified view which is essentially based on the fact
that the prevailing ry conditions are substantially steady—state.
Figure 3 also shows two patterns by way of example of the ice
predictive indicator, but for the situation where the wind power installation
is stopped. At the time t1 which for simplification is specified as 0, there
are criteria which have the result that the ice predictive indicator is
d. Here too its initial value is firstly not important and it can
correspond to the situation in which the installation was stopped, from
which reason the "Stop" at the ordinate is shown in brackets. The
reduction which can also be referred to an downward ng of the ice
predictive indicator is dependent on a differential temperature, namely the
current ambient temperature in on to a limit temperature, n the
ambient temperature must be greater than the limit temperature. That
differential temperature is specified as AT in Figure 3. The illustration is
based on the tion that steady—state conditions prevail, namely that
the differential temperature AT in the one case is constant at 3 K while in
3D the other illustrated case it is nt at 1 K.
The value of the ice predictive indicator as shown in Figure 3 is
reduced in accordance with the integral of the differential temperature
over
time. In the illustrated examples in Figure 3 the differential temperature is
avfl.
thus a constant temperature value, namely 3 K in one case or 1 K in the
other case, which is integrated over time. In the case of the greater
temperature difference of 3 K therefore the ice predictive indicator already
reaches the value at which the installation is started again at the time t2,
as is shown by the word "Start". In the illustrated example the lation
is thus started again after 2 hours.
In the case of the smaller ature difference of only 1 K the ice
predictive indicator only reaches the value at which the lation can be
started again at t3. As the temperature difference here is only one third of
the first example, t3 is reached after 6 hours.
With the illustrated patterns an integration time nt is used,
which s on the prevailing wind situation. That integration time
constant is greater in the case of a prevailing strong wind, more specifically
in the illustrated example by the factor of 3, than with a prevailing light
wind. Correspondingly, the ice predictive indicator reaches the value at
which the installation starts up again, three times as quickly in the case of
a strong wind. Those values are specified as t2‘ 40 minutes for a
temperature difference AT = 3 K and t3' = 2 hours for a temperature
difference of AT = 1 K in Figure 3.
Referring to Figure 4, this shows in an example how the ambient
temperature influences the pattern of the ice predictive indicator of an
embodiment. For that purpose the upper view in Figure 4 shows the
pattern of the ice tive indicator, initially based on an installation
operating in an uncertain ice detection range. The illustration
correspondingly also applies if the lation is stopped. The lower view
shows a notional pattern of the ambient temperature. The illustrated
n of ambient temperature was selected for the purposes of clear
illustration and does claim to be able to correspond to a possible real
ature pattern of an ambient temperature.
3O The present example takes a limit temperature of TG - 2°C as its
basis. The actual temperature is firstly about 4°C and is thus above the
limit temperature. As the ice predictive indicator is firstly not yet set or
involves a start value and the wind power installation is in operation and its
rotor is rotating the temperature Initially has no effect on the illustrated
pattern of the ice predictive indicator.
At time t1 the temperature reaches the value of the limit
temperature and falls further. There is thus basically the risk of ice
accretion and the ice predictive indicator thus begins to rise from the time
At the time t2 the temperature is below the limit temperature and
now rises again. That initially however has no influence on the pattern of
the ice predictive indicator and it rises further.
At the time t3 the temperature exceeds the limit ature and
rises further continuously. The ice predictive indicator thus does not rise
any further from the time t3 e ice accretion or the ence of’ice
accretion is no longer to be assumed. Rather, the ice predictive indicator is
now d again. e the temperature and therewith also the
differential temperature rise that gives an integral thereover, basically a
second-order configuration.
At the time t4 the temperature is at a value markedly above the limit
ature and initially retains that value. Accordingly there is a
reduction in the ice predictive indicator in the form of a linear portion.
At the time t5 the temperature continuously falls and the ice
predictive indicator is correspondingly only reduced still more and more
slowly.
At the time t6 the temperature reaches the limit temperature again
and falls r. Thus the ice predictive indicator is further increased as
from the time t6.
At the time t7 the ature rises again but remains below the
limit temperature. The ice predictive indicator thus further increases
unchanged.
At the time t8 the temperature is still below the limit temperature.
3O Here however the ice predictive indicator has reached the value which leads
to stoppage of the wind power lation. That is identified on the
ordinate by the word "Stop".
From the time t8 the temperature admittedly r rises but it
initially remains below the limit ature. As the installation is already
stopped the ice predictive indicator’is not r altered, which is indicated
in Figure 4 by a constant value in the upper part.
At the time t9 the temperature has reached the temperature limit
value and rises further. The ice predictive indicator is now reduced again
but the installation remains stopped. If the ice predictive indicator now
reduces further until it reaches the value start which is shown just above
the abscissa it can start again, which however is no longer further shown
Figure 4.
Expressed in simplified terms the modes of operation for increasing
the ice predictive indicator as shown in Figure 2 and for reducing the ice
predictive indicator as shown in Figure 3 are combined in Figure 4. Thus
those relationships are combined in Figure 4, which corresponds to one
embodiment. In principle however the relationships or modes of operation
in Figure 2 on the one hand and Figure 3 on the other hand can also be
used separately from each other.
In an embodiment it is thus possible to expand ice detection or ice
accretion detection by an operating status which can be referred
to as ice
suspicion or ice prediction. By way f the operating ions in
which icing that possibly occurs would not be
reliably ised are to be
detected. In principle ice accretion detection is effected by monitoring the
operating characteristics of the wind power installation and it can thus be
limited to the operating range of the wind power installation with power
generation. If the wind power installation is not generating any power no
compensation with the operating teristics or the management
map is
also le. Ice accretion detection can thus only limitedly function,
under certain conditions.
Those d conditions are now also taken into
eration.
They include:
- Light wind: here ice detection in the case of operation during very
low wind speeds, in particular below about 3 to 4 m/s, by
monitoring
the operating characteristics is not reliably possible.
— Strong wind: in the case of operation during high wind speeds over
about 20 to 25 m/s the sensitivity of the previous detection method
falls and/or often cannot, be verified by existing operational
experiences.
- Installation ge with the installation ready for operation.
- Network failure.
Thus the previous detection range in respect of ice accretion
detection in operation, which can also be referred to as the certain
detection range, is limited to wind speeds of between about 4 m/s and 20
m/s, having regard to a safety margin.
Residence durations at low temperatures, mainly ambient
temperature below +2°C, increase the icing prediction or ion. At
temperatures above +2°C in contrast the suspicion or prediction of icing is
reduced again. Likewise in operation of the wind power installation in the
certain ice accretion detection range the prediction or suspicion of icing can
be d.
The proposed methods e in particular a method which less
proposes certain ice ion, but which rather takes account of the
possibility of ice occurrence.
Preferably, for operation at wind speeds below 4 m/s, it is assumed
that a critical thickness of ice could have formed only within 10 hours.
Accordingly that is taken into account in Table 1 hereinafter under the
heading Mode 1.
For operation with a strong wind, because of the higher afflux speeds
at the rotor blade, it is assumed that a critical layer of ice could already
have formed within 2 hours. Those onships are correspondingly taken
into eration in the Table hereinafter as Mode II.
In the case of an automatic installation ge, as occurs for
example e of a slight wind or because of shadow—casting shutdown,
or in the case of a manual installation stoppage as for example for
maintenance purposes, it is assumed that a critical thickness of the layer of
ice could have formed within 10 hours. Accordingly that is also taken into
consideration in the Table hereinafter under the heading Mode I.
With a network failure, it is often not possible for any wind and
temperature data to be recorded by the installation control system.
Howeverfthe last data prior to the network e and the data upon
network restoration are available. ng counter states in respect of ice
accretionfdetection, in particular the value of the ice prediction indicator,
also remain available. The times with network failure are taken into
account as follows, in dependence on the duration thereof.
Network failure times of up to 2 hours are taken into account with
the mean value from the temperature at the ing of the network
failureand the ature upon network restoration in accordance with
Mode I as described in the Table below. Therefore with that mean
temperatUre value which was also referred to as the determination
temperature, an ice predictive indicator is increased or counted upwards if
that meah temperature value is below a limit temperature. If it is above
that limit temperature the ice predictive indicator is correspondingly
reduced. That is correspondingly ed for the on of the network
e time, as the underlying time involved.
Network failure times of between 2 and 10 hours are taken into
account to cover falls in ature in the meantime, with the mean value
from theltemperature at the beginning of the network failure and the
temperatLire upon network ation, less 2 K, in accordance with Mode I
describedjin the Table hereinafter.
In the case of network failure times for example of over 10 hours, it
is assumed that reliable information about the past period of time is not
possiblefl: For that purpose, having regard to a safety margin, at all
temperatures below +5°C, upon network restoration, it is assumed that
there is a? suspicion of icing. The wind power installation therefore initially
remains stopped until icing can be excluded.
Implementation for the described Modes I and II is effected by way
3O of a counter which can also be referred to as the ice predictive counter or
the predictive counter and which counts upwards upon a prediction or
suspicion of icing and counts down again t that suspicion. In that
' 20
case, the times n Mode I and Mode II are different, according to the
situation in terms of icing suspicion.
With 30 minutes of operation without ice detection in the certain
detection range in respect of ice accretion detection, that is to say upon
detection using a power curve method in which the measured power curve
is compared to a curve to be expected, the suspicion of
icing is d. If
therefore certain detection applies, 30 minutes
are sufficient, irrespective of
the mode used.
In an embodiment, at outside temperature above +2°C, the
difference ing +2°C in respect of the currently prevailing outside
temperature in relation to time is summed or integrated. Restarting is then
effected only after the expiry of a differential temperature-time integral.
Thus for example restarting is effected at 360°Cmin. That can mean for
example that restarting is effected after 6 hours at an ambient temperature
of +3°C or after 2, hours at an ambient temperature
of +5°C. In Mode II
restarting is y effected for that case after in.
Mode I/duration Mode II/duration
Icing suspicion 600 min 120 min
(upward countingL
Operation in the certain l
detection range
(downward counting) 30 min 30 min
Differential
temperature—time
360°Cmin
integral for outside in
temperature >2°C
(downward counting) i
The times specified in the foregoing Table correspond to those for
complete increase and reduction respectively in terms of the tive
suspicion of icing. Intermediate stages are suitably proportionally
evaluated.
At the transition from
operation of the wind power installation with
the rotating rotor to the stopped condition and vice-versa the counter
states for ice accretion ion and for the predictive ion of icing
are suitably transferred or ed. That is intended to ensure that wind
power installations are stopped or automatic ting can be prevented
even in the case of a prolonged residence time outside a detection range,
which is assumed to be certain, in respect of the usual ice accretion
detection, because of an uncertain icing condition with a suspicion or
prediction of icing. Such a prolonged residence duration es for
example one of 10 hour or more under prevailing wind conditions below 4
m/s or a residence duration of 2 hours or more under prevailing wind
speeds of over 20 m/s.
Claims (16)
1. A method of operating a wind power installation comprising a pod with an ic generator for ting electric current and an aerodynamic rotor coupled to the generator and having one or more rotor blades, including the steps: - operating the wind power installation when ice accretion on the rotor blades can be certainly excluded, and - stopping the wind power installation when ice accretion on the rotor blades is ed, and - delaying the restarting of the wind power installation when an ice accretion was not detected but is to be expected or cannot be excluded, or - delaying the resumption of operation of the wind power installation until the ice accretion which led to the stoppage of the wind power installation has disappeared and further ice accretion is not detected and ice accretion or the ion of further ice accretion is not to be expected.
2. A method according to claim 1 characterised in that stoppage or prevention of restarting of the wind power installation and/or tion of operation of the wind power installation is effected in dependence on an ice predictive indicator which is determined or altered as a ement in respect of the probability of ice accretion.
3. A method according to any one of the preceding claims characterised in that the or an ice tive indicator is in the form of a counter and - alters its value in a first direction when t ions and/or operating conditions of the wind power installation favour ice ion and/or indicate ice accretion when the ambient temperature is below a limit temperature, and/or - alters its value in a second direction, when ambient conditions and/or operating conditions of the wind power installation promote and/or indicate that ice accretion is not present or is reduced when the ambient temperature is above the limit temperature, and - the limit temperature is just above freezing point and in particular the temperature is in the range of 1 to 4oC, preferably about 2oC.
4. A method according to claim 3 characterised in that a change in the value is effected at a rate dependent on the ambient conditions and/or ing conditions of the wind power installation, and that - the value with a prevailing light wind is increased more slowly than with a prevailing strong wind when the installation is in operation, and/or - the wind power installation with a prevailing light wind is stopped after a greater time delay than with a prevailing strong wind, and/or - the value in each case is reduced more slowly the lower the ambient temperature, wherein the value is proportional to an integral of time over the difference in the t temperature to the limit temperature, and/or - the time delay after which the wind power installation starts up again is shorter, the higher the ambient temperature is.
5. A method according to any one of the preceding claims characterised in that the wind power installation is coupled to an ic k and is stopped in the case of a network failure and upon network restoration restarting of the wind power lation is effected in dependence on a ement temperature dependent on the ambient temperature at the beginning of the network failure and the ambient temperature upon network restoration.
6. A method according to claim 5 terised in that - the measurement temperature is calculated as a mean value from the ambient temperature at the beginning of the network failure and the ambient temperature upon k restoration if the network failure is not more than a first failure time and/or - the measurement ature is calculated as the mean value from the ambient temperature at the beginning of the network failure and the ambient temperature upon network restoration less a temperature safety value, if the network failure was longer than the first failure time.
7. A method according to claim 6 wherein the first failure time is not more than 2 hours.
8. A method according to claim 6 or 7 wherein the temperature safety value is 2 K Kelvin.
9. A method according to any one of the preceding claims characterised in that the wind power installation is arranged in a wind park and is stopped when at least one further wind power installation of said wind park is stopped because of ice accretion or suspicion of ice accretion.
10. A method according to one of the preceding claims characterised in that the wind power installation which is stopped because of detected ice accretion or suspicion of ice accretion s its pod in such a way that a spacing which is as great as possible in relation to s ered by ice fall is maintained.
11. A method according to any one of the preceding claims characterised in that the wind power installation has a heatable wind sensor for measuring the wind speed and the wind sensor is heated when an ice ion was detected and/or when an ice accretion cannot be ed.
12. A method according to claim 11 wherein the heatable wind sensor is an ultrasonic anemometer.
13. A method according to any one of the preceding claims characterised in that the wind power installation has an ice sensor and ice accretion is detected by direct measurement by means of the ice sensor.
14. A wind power installation sing a pod with an electric generator for generating ic current and an aerodynamic rotor coupled to the generator and having one or more rotor blades, wherein the wind power installation is prepared for operation with a method according to any one of the preceding claims.
15. A wind park sing at least one wind power installation according to claim 14.
16. A method of operating a wind power installation substantially as herein before described with reference to accompanying
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE102011077129.8 | 2011-06-07 | ||
| DE102011077129A DE102011077129A1 (en) | 2011-06-07 | 2011-06-07 | Method for operating a wind energy plant |
| PCT/EP2012/059769 WO2012168089A1 (en) | 2011-06-07 | 2012-05-24 | Method for operating a wind energy plant in icing conditions |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| NZ617674A NZ617674A (en) | 2015-12-24 |
| NZ617674B2 true NZ617674B2 (en) | 2016-03-30 |
Family
ID=
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2835532C (en) | Method for operating a wind energy plant in icing conditions | |
| Seifert et al. | Risk analysis of ice throw from wind turbines | |
| CN102817780B (en) | Icing control device and control method for wind power generating set | |
| US20150292486A1 (en) | Wind turbine blade ice accretion detector | |
| US20120226485A1 (en) | Methods for predicting the formation of wind turbine blade ice | |
| US10240580B2 (en) | Adjusting a rotor blade pitch angle | |
| EP1939445A2 (en) | Method for predicting a power curve for a wind turbine | |
| US20170241405A1 (en) | Turbine over-rating using turbulence prediction | |
| US11879437B2 (en) | Method for controlling heating of rotor blades of a wind turbine | |
| EP3853474B1 (en) | Ice detection method and system for a wind turbine | |
| CN113574272B (en) | Method for detecting ice accumulation on a wind energy installation | |
| CN118242238A (en) | Anti-icing method, device and system for fan blade | |
| CN117605633B (en) | Fan blade deicing method, system, terminal and storage medium | |
| Ronsten et al. | State-of-the-art of Wind Energy in Cold Climates | |
| KR20170125394A (en) | How to operate a wind turbine | |
| NZ617674B2 (en) | Method for operating a wind energy plant in icing conditions | |
| CN115059587A (en) | Internet of things real-time monitoring and early warning system based on 5G communication | |
| Cattin et al. | Two Years of Monitoring of a Wind Turbine under Icing Conditions | |
| Holttinen et al. | The state-of-the-art of wind turbines in icing and cold climates | |
| CN121808456A (en) | Fan icing state prediction method, device and storage medium | |
| CN121719687A (en) | Wind turbine generator set linkage control method and system suitable for extreme environment |