NZ725766B2 - System and method for assessing animals considering auscultation and evaluation of physiological responses in various environments - Google Patents
System and method for assessing animals considering auscultation and evaluation of physiological responses in various environments Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- NZ725766B2 NZ725766B2 NZ725766A NZ72576615A NZ725766B2 NZ 725766 B2 NZ725766 B2 NZ 725766B2 NZ 725766 A NZ725766 A NZ 725766A NZ 72576615 A NZ72576615 A NZ 72576615A NZ 725766 B2 NZ725766 B2 NZ 725766B2
- Authority
- NZ
- New Zealand
- Prior art keywords
- animal
- animals
- cpr
- values
- ratio
- Prior art date
Links
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 233
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 35
- 238000002555 auscultation Methods 0.000 title claims description 32
- 230000006461 physiological response Effects 0.000 title claims description 5
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title description 6
- 210000004072 lung Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 64
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 230000002612 cardiopulmonary effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 230000000241 respiratory effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 230000029058 respiratory gaseous exchange Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 230000001800 adrenalinergic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 230000002889 sympathetic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 29
- 230000000747 cardiac effect Effects 0.000 claims description 23
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 claims description 20
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000002685 pulmonary effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000003115 biocidal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000003242 anti bacterial agent Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 235000016709 nutrition Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000035764 nutrition Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 208000010444 Acidosis Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000007950 acidosis Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 208000026545 acidosis disease Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000282414 Homo sapiens Species 0.000 claims 12
- 208000007976 Ketosis Diseases 0.000 claims 1
- 206010037660 Pyrexia Diseases 0.000 claims 1
- 230000004140 ketosis Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 abstract description 18
- 208000037656 Respiratory Sounds Diseases 0.000 abstract description 9
- 235000019786 weight gain Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 9
- 230000004584 weight gain Effects 0.000 abstract description 9
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000001010 compromised effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 208000009378 Low Cardiac Output Diseases 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 22
- 230000003902 lesion Effects 0.000 description 21
- 230000035882 stress Effects 0.000 description 20
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 19
- 230000036387 respiratory rate Effects 0.000 description 19
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 13
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 11
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 11
- 230000002503 metabolic effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000007170 pathology Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000001447 compensatory effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 7
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000001154 acute effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000003862 health status Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 244000144993 groups of animals Species 0.000 description 5
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 5
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000005856 abnormality Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000036760 body temperature Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000013632 homeostatic process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000002604 ultrasonography Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229940088710 antibiotic agent Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001771 impaired effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000013517 stratification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009423 ventilation Methods 0.000 description 3
- UCTWMZQNUQWSLP-VIFPVBQESA-N (R)-adrenaline Chemical compound CNC[C@H](O)C1=CC=C(O)C(O)=C1 UCTWMZQNUQWSLP-VIFPVBQESA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000015278 beef Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000021051 daily weight gain Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002526 effect on cardiovascular system Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005823 lung abnormality Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006609 metabolic stress Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 208000023504 respiratory system disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000003938 response to stress Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 2
- 208000024891 symptom Diseases 0.000 description 2
- UCTWMZQNUQWSLP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Adrenaline Natural products CNCC(O)C1=CC=C(O)C(O)=C1 UCTWMZQNUQWSLP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000031295 Animal disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- ZCBJDQBSLZREAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Bisoxatin acetate Chemical compound C1=CC(OC(=O)C)=CC=C1C1(C=2C=CC(OC(C)=O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC2=CC=CC=C2O1 ZCBJDQBSLZREAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000024172 Cardiovascular disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000017667 Chronic Disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000032170 Congenital Abnormalities Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000018522 Gastrointestinal disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 101100194706 Mus musculus Arhgap32 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000035415 Reinfection Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010039101 Rhinorrhoea Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000001871 Tachycardia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 101100194707 Xenopus laevis arhgap32 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000003187 abdominal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037328 acute stress Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940102884 adrenalin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000021052 average daily weight gain Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000003542 behavioural effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 244000309466 calf Species 0.000 description 1
- 150000003943 catecholamines Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 210000000038 chest Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001684 chronic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013481 data capture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006735 deficit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000005911 diet Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000021045 dietary change Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000378 dietary effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 208000021760 high fever Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000036571 hydration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006703 hydration reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000014674 injury Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010801 machine learning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000030159 metabolic disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000010753 nasal discharge Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004789 organ system Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000010412 perfusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035479 physiological effects, processes and functions Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009894 physiological stress Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004202 respiratory function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002345 respiratory system Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000011268 retreatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013077 scoring method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002820 sympathetic nervous system Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002195 synergetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006794 tachycardia Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000008203 tachypnea Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010043089 tachypnoea Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000000115 thoracic cavity Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008733 trauma Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B2503/00—Evaluating a particular growth phase or type of persons or animals
- A61B2503/40—Animals
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/02—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the cardiovascular system, e.g. pulse, heart rate, blood pressure or blood flow
- A61B5/0205—Simultaneously evaluating both cardiovascular conditions and different types of body conditions, e.g. heart and respiratory condition
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/02—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the cardiovascular system, e.g. pulse, heart rate, blood pressure or blood flow
- A61B5/024—Measuring pulse rate or heart rate
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/08—Measuring devices for evaluating the respiratory organs
- A61B5/0816—Measuring devices for examining respiratory frequency
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/48—Other medical applications
- A61B5/4884—Other medical applications inducing physiological or psychological stress, e.g. applications for stress testing
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/72—Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/7271—Specific aspects of physiological measurement analysis
- A61B5/7275—Determining trends in physiological measurement data; Predicting development of a medical condition based on physiological measurements, e.g. determining a risk factor
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B7/00—Instruments for auscultation
- A61B7/003—Detecting lung or respiration noise
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B7/00—Instruments for auscultation
- A61B7/02—Stethoscopes
Abstract
The invention includes a system and method for predicting the performance of production animals by analysis of heart and lung sounds to determine likelihoods the animals will develop BRD or other diseases or ailments. Vital signs of animals are recorded during an adrenergic sympathetic "flight or fight" situation. A cardio-pulmonary rate ratio is determined for each animal by dividing a normalized adjusted heart rate value by a normalized adjusted respiratory value. From the ratios calculated for each animal in a group, a ratio range is established. Ratio values at a lower end of the ratio range indicate higher relative respiration rates and poor lung performance due to disease. Ratio values at an upper end of the range may indicate low cardiac output and an inability to tolerate rapid weight gain. Ratio values at either end of the range may indicate compromised cardio- pulmonary function. Animals can be further classified by weight, and the ratio values within weight classes are used to generate probabilities for BRD or other diseases. ght" situation. A cardio-pulmonary rate ratio is determined for each animal by dividing a normalized adjusted heart rate value by a normalized adjusted respiratory value. From the ratios calculated for each animal in a group, a ratio range is established. Ratio values at a lower end of the ratio range indicate higher relative respiration rates and poor lung performance due to disease. Ratio values at an upper end of the range may indicate low cardiac output and an inability to tolerate rapid weight gain. Ratio values at either end of the range may indicate compromised cardio- pulmonary function. Animals can be further classified by weight, and the ratio values within weight classes are used to generate probabilities for BRD or other diseases.
Description
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING ANIMALS CONSIDERING
TATION AND EVALUATION OF LOGICAL
RESPONSES IN VARIOUS ENVIRONMENTS
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §ll9(e) to US.
Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 61/985,935 filed April 29, 2014, which is
incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention generally relates to non—invasive evaluations of
animals for indications of tolerance to stress or y of disease or trauma as
measured by cardio-pulmonary function. More ularly, to a system and
method for predicting: the performance of production animals, the capacity of
activities for all animals, and the likelihood of morbidity and mortality by analysis
of thoracic heart and lung sounds.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, and gastrointestinal diseases
have been distinguished according to sounds auscultated from the body of a
patient. Based upon measurements taken of the different sounds, medical
tioners have been able to diagnose diseases and proceed with ents.
In order to make a precise diagnosis of an ailment based upon auscultated
sounds, extensive empirical knowledge of various and diverse forms of auscultated
sounds is necessary. Until recently, auscultation was more art than science since
making a sis was based mainly upon the trained ear of a caregiver and not
based upon objectively measured data from recorded sounds.
With the advent of digital/electronic stethoscopes, auscultated sounds can
be recorded in digital form, and computer ms manipulate the data to analyze
characteristics of the recording. From this analysis, more precise diagnoses can be
made based upon objective criteria and not just upon the d ear of the
attending caregiver.
It is well known to measure auscultated sounds from humans in order to
make diagnoses of ved pathology. However, tation for animals such
as cattle is used infrequently. There have been very few efforts made to gather
data from auscultated sounds for purposes of making conclusions as to the type of
disease that may be ing in a s of animal.
Particularly in a feed yard where it is necessary for cattle to be maintained
at an optimum state of health for maximum weight gain to occur, it is al that
sick cattle be identified early for effective treatment and to contribute to
biosecurity. The true state of health for cattle can be difficult to measure using
traditional techniques such as observation of symptoms to include temperature,
posture and visual signs (e.g. nasal discharge, depression, and abdominal fill.). In
the example of the bovine species, case definitions for BRD traditionally include a
minimally ive but objective rectal temperature and a subjective clinical score.
Clinical trials indicate that objective lung scores provide stronger correlations than
rectal atures to ultimate case fatality rates, retreatment rates, and therefore
treatment costs. Cattle are visually evaluated when they first arrive at the feed
yard, and the surge of adrenalin associated with ng, along with prey
defensive mechanisms, can often mask e symptoms. Stethoscopic evaluation
of bovine heart and lung sounds can be used to te the cardio-pulmonary
efficiency or potential efficiency of cattle during various stages of arrival
processing. However, because of the lack of current data in objectively
categorizing animal heart and lung sounds, there is a need for developing an
automated system and method that can assist a caregiver in assessing these sounds
and making timely diagnoses.
Bovine respiratory disease is complex and is particularly difficult to
accurately diagnose in the harsh environments where the animal’s health
assessment takes place; noisy with uncooperative ts at best ing server
restraint. The thick musculature that surrounds the thorax of cattle, the heavy hide
and layers of fat renders the use of a stethoscope lt to obtain sounds that can
be interpreted for purposes of making an accurate diagnosis. Because of the
difficulties encountered to effectively gather auscultated sounds from cattle, and a
general lack of knowledge in the cattle industry as to how to interpret these sounds,
the cattle industry has been slow in developing automated stic processes that
can ively use data generated through auscultation.
Production animals are intentionally metabolically stressed to promote
rapid weight gain in the feed yard. Nutrition technology and health management
protocols strive to maximize daily weight gain, but weight gain itself can push the
physiological limits of production animals beyond their ability to mount a
compensatory se to; metabolic nges, disease, weather environmental,
and behavioral es. Determining the physiological capacity for stress of each
production animal would allow for matching of the animal to an optimal
production management strategy protocol. This optimization would enhance the
production process causing a higher rate of return by minimizing valuable asset
loss due to animal variations in abilities to handle physiological stress. If an
animal’s compensatory capabilities could be ted prior to exposing the animal
to the stresses inherent in production, then optimal production procedures could be
implemented for each animal given its unique physiological profile and thus
maximizing each animal’s potential and minimizing each animals risks.
Cardiac performance/efficiency is ed by the cardiac output (C0) of
an animal and is defined as heart rate (HR) multiplied by the stroke volume (SV)
thus this relationship can be expressed as CO = V). The heart rate of an
animal will typically increase at times of acute stress (both al and
psychological) due to increased automaticity (and therefore an increased rate)
caused by catecholamine release during a sympathetic adrenergic response to
stress. For production animals such as beef cattle, processing actions such as
experienced in transporting the animals to and g the animals within a feed
yard can be a series of very stressful events that predictably drive up the heart rates
of the animals due to positive tropic effects of the sympathetic nervous
system.
Respiratory performance/efficiency of an animal is the ability of the
pulmonary system to adequately exchange gases allowing for metabolic variations
while maintaining optimal functioning of vital organs. Part of the mechanism for
handling the variations of metabolic s is through perfusion matching with
ventilation. Ventilation or respiratory drive, can in part be measured by respiratory
rate.
When either the cardiac on or respiratory function is ed, the
other system may respond through satory mechanisms that attempt to
maintain tasis for the animal. Maintaining homeostasis becomes more
challenging if an animal is placed in stressfiil environments. Maintaining
homeostasis under an impaired condition will consume organ system resources,
and the animal may not be able to maintain homeostasis. The compromised state
of an animal in this condition causes a reduction in the efficiencies of the animal’s
metabolic system, which in turn manifest in consequences such as a decreased
daily weight gain or observable ses in morbidity.
Therefore, in the case of the bovine, in addition to an acute lung score for
lung pathology detection, there is a need to ine which tion animals
may be prone to not tolerating metabolic stress or may be inefficient in adapting to
lic stresses that could result in poor performance over time. The poor
performance can range from inadequate weight gain to acute morbidity and/or
mortality.
While there may be some known methods and s that account for
cardiac performance in determining the health status of animals, there is a r
need to e new ways of determining when animals that are not capable of
tolerating metabolic stress so that very early predictions can be made about the
performance potential of an animals.
Y OF THE INVENTION
According to the invention, Vital signs of an animal are recorded in a stress
inducing situation or environment that would likely elicit an adrenergic
sympathetic “flight or fight” reaction. This environment maximizes the likelihood
of anomaly detect. The vital signs recorded include the heart and ation rates.
The vital signs are analyzed to determine whether compensatory changes may
reflect on the animal’s ability to tolerate stresses that some conditions may place
on the health of the animal. From the compensatory changes ed, various
conclusions can be made regarding better treatments that can be pursued for sick
animals and for more accurately predicting outcomes for those animals in terms of
whether an animal can reach production standards, or whether the animal may
e excessive treatment and costs to reach production standards.
One e of an environment or situation that may elicit adrenergic
sympathetic reactions is actions that take place during processing beef cattle at a
feed yard upon arrival to the feed yard. In this situation, the animals are typically
agitated and therefore show -pulmonary signs of sympathetic adrenergic
stress reactions including tachycardia (rapid heart rate) and tachypnea (rapid
breathing). In another example, the invention contemplates use of a controlled
stress producing event which is known to generate adrenergic responses in
animals. The purpose of this controlled stress producing event is to normalize the
effects on a group of animals so there is less of a likelihood of random stress
responses with the events that could disproportionately influence a ed few
animals.
The invention as described in more detailed below is a result of fiarther
observations and conclusions regarding cardiac and pulmonary (cardio-pulmonary)
subsystems of an animal. These cardio-pulmonary subsystems of an animal can
conceptually be described as subsystems that work together to create a synergistic
e that maintains homeostasis within a given animal. In normal physiology,
these subsystems respond to the needs of the animal maintaining a nt relative
relationship of efficiencies and mance. That is, in times of high metabolic
demands both cardiac and pulmonary systems will increase fiinctional output to
accommodate the change in lism. This is best observed during physical
exercise. If metabolic demands drop to a basal level, then correspondingly so will
the level of performance for each component of the cardio-pulmonary system.
These high and basal metabolic fluctuations in rates for a normal functioning
cardio-pulmonary systems can describe a relatively constant ratio between cardiac
output and ary performance. However, if either the cardiac output or
pulmonary performance is inefficient, then this relative ratio will be altered
especially as the metabolic demands se or in times of stress both physical
and psychological. So it is with this ratio (Cardio-Pulmonary Ratio or CPR) that
we can observe relative differences in subsystem efficiencies. These ences
can manifest in terms of compensatory s to the heart rate and breath rate
which allow for any deficits in efficiencies to be mitigated. Changes in either the
cardiac or pulmonary system efficiencies can occur due to disease (acute and
chronic) or congenital defects. The t of the cardio-pulmonary ratio (CPR)
of the present invention is focused on the relative relationship between the heart
rate and breath rate and not their absolute . For example; an animal with a
high fever and normal cardio-pulmonary fiinction will have elevations in both heart
rate and breath rate thus maintaining the onship between the two systems in
the context of high absolute values on the rates of each subsystem. An animal with
impaired organ function in the cardio—pulmonary system will likely need to
sate for the impaired organ’s inefficiencies and produce a discordant rate
drive in either the cardiac or pulmonary system. The compensation can result in a
normal appearing animal but will leave the animal less adaptable fiinctional
performance room in the face of stressors such as disease or weight gain or
weather and hydration.
According to the invention, an assumption is made that there is generally a
linear relationship between heart rate and respiratory rate. Thus the higher the
heart rate, the proportionately higher the respiratory rate must be to match
ventilation requirements. Anomalies can be detected when the relationship
deviates from an expected linear trend. Thus higher heart rates with
disproportionately lower respiratory rates or lower heart rates with
disproportionately higher respiratory rates may indicate cardio—pulmonary
performance abnormalities.
The linear trends can be expressed in terms of data points normalized with
values plotted as curves on a graph. -pulmonary performance abnormalities
can therefore be shown as curve ions that may indicate heightened risks for
diseases such as; BRD, acidosis, s, or Brisket e at lower elevations.
These deviations can be numerically fied and correlated to odds or chances
that a particular animal has or will develop the condition or disease. The cardio-
pulmonary status of an observed animal can be expressed as a cardio-pulmonary
rate ratio profile, and animals can then be sorted by their cardio-pulmonary rate
ratio profiles to place the s in an optimized management program given their
capacities or lack thereof to tolerate .
Cardiopulmonary data can be obtained using an electronic stethoscope,
such as sed in the US application Serial No. 13/442,569 entitled System and
Method for Diagnosis of Bovine Diseases Using Auscultation Analysis, this
application being incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. One minor
change that could be incorporated within the electronic stethoscope disclosed in
that US ation is that normally, the cardio generated sounds are filtered to
therefore amplify and clarify respiratory sounds. However in the present case, the
electronic stethoscope is used to obtain simultaneous data on both the respiration
rate and heart rate of the observed animal; accordingly, cardio sounds do not
require ing.
The detected anomalies for deviations in the linear relationship between
respiration rate and heart rate can be mathematically expressed by first applying a
formula to ed heart rates and respiration rates to place the corresponding
rates on a normal or bell shaped curve created by sampling a large set of lung
sounds. For this ion, 70,000 sounds were used to generate the averages and
distributions. This gives relevance to the rates now expressed with a value
between 0 and 1 representing their position on the bell shaped curve. The cardio-
pulmonary rate ratio is then determined by dividing the final ized adjusted
heart rate value by the final normalized adjusted respiratory value. From the
values calculated for each of the sample animals and their heart and respiratory
rates, a usage range is ished on both curves which indicates the lower and
upper bounds of values used in the calculated ratio. This calculated cardio
pulmonary rate ratio is then also normalized to a value of 0 to l on the bell shaped
curve.
The cardio pulmonary rate ratios (CPR) may be expressed as cal
scores, and these scores may be divided into categories that generally characterize
the compensatory responses of the animals evaluated. The first category is
respiratory compensating (CPR-R) which corresponds to those animals that
lly compensate or respond to induced stresses by changes in respiration
rates. The second ry is cardiac compensating (CPR-C) which corresponds to
the animals that the generally compensate or respond to induced stresses by
changes in heart rates. A third category is normal or non-compensating (CPR—N),
which corresponds to those animals that do not exhibit suspect or out of range
responses to induced stresses. A fourth category combines s from both the
respiratory compensating and cardiac compensating groups into one group of
compensators as some disease etiologies can induce either a cardiac or respiratory
compensatory response (CPR-RC). Accordingly, this group represents those
animals that have either a respiratory or a cardiac compensating response.
CPR ratio values found at the lower end of the ratio range can be those
ratios having a value of .15 or less. These ratios indicate higher relative respiration
rates therefore indicating respiratory compensation due to disease or other
logical ies. Accordingly, this range of values can be categorized as
respiratory compensating )..
At the highest end of the calculated CPR curve (0.85 or greater), this range
of values corresponds to those animals that may have a portionately higher
heart rate given their atory rate. It is possible that these animals are
compensating for a low cardiac output (CO) which could impact their ability to
tolerate rapid weight gain. Accordingly, this range of values can be categorized as
cardiac compensating (CPR—C). Either end of the spectrum of ratios may indicate
compromised cardio-pulmonary on and therefore compensating animals that
fall within the designated compensating categories are considered suspicious for
normal cardio-pulmonary fimction.
CPR ratio values found between .15 and .85 can be categorized as normal
or non-compensating (CPR-N). Unless other observations are made with animals
having CPR ratio values within this range, there is a l presumption that these
animals are not symptomatic for any particular ailment or anomaly.
Early detection of -pulmonary compensating animals may e
overall production and reduce production costs by sorting those animals with
icant inefficiencies into better suited production management programs.
Using a CPR analysis for companion animals may assist in defining appropriate
activities or direct treatments that improve the quality of life for the animal.
The present invention in broad terms provides CPR values for individual
animals in which a particular animal’s CPR value or score can be placed within a
normalized curve of data points for a population of animals within that specie and
wherein each animal within the population of animals have tive CPR scores
that were measured within the same stressed environment. Since the population
has measured data points within the same nmental conditions as a particular
animal being evaluated, this ses the hood that the conclusions made
about the particular animal are te predictions regarding the future health of
the animal, and its ability to reach production goals, or to otherwise perform
according to expected standards.
One other aspect of the invention is that while respiratory rates do
expectedly correlate positively and significantly with animal body temperature,
computed CPR values or scores are “body temperature neutral” g there is
no required measured parameter that ates CPR values with body temperature.
Accordingly, the CPR values can provide new information about the health
condition of an animal without having to obtain an animal’s temperature. Further,
the CPR value provides new information about the health condition of an animal
without having to obtain separate or additional data on auscultation, whether the
auscultation is expressed in terms of a lung score or some other calculated value.
According to another aspect of the invention, the use of the CPR values can
be used in conjunction with auscultation data in order to identify non-BRD
pathology by fining animals t presumptive BRD from auscultation data, but
who are rized as respiratory compensating (CPR-R). As further discussed in
the detailed description, the non-BRD pathology analysis is yet r feature of
the invention that can be derived from CPR values. From this analysis, predictive
information can be obtained ing morbidity and mortality outcomes. One
type of auscultation analysis that is particularly useful with CPR values of the
present invention is a lung scoring method sed in the above mentioned US
Application Serial No. 13/442,569 hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
According to the invention disclosed in this US application, a system and method
are described for sis of animal respiratory es using auscultation
techniques. Animal lung sounds are recorded and digitized. Lung sounds are
ed by an electronic digital stethoscope or a wireless audio digital recording
unit. The sounds are stored as digital data, and one or more algorithms are applied
to the data for producing an output to the user indicative of the health of the
animal. Acoustic characteristics of the sound are compared with baseline data in
the algorithms. One embodiment includes a digital stethoscope with an integral
display. Another ment provides a system for gathering ation about
an animal to include not only auscultation data, but also information from other
field devices such as temperature probes or weigh scales. The combined
information can be analyzed by system software to generate detailed information to
a user to include a diagnosis and recommended ent options. According to a
method disclosed in this US Application Serial No. 13/442,569, it includes a
method for diagnosing animal diseases using auscultation analysis, said method
comprising: (i) ing auscultated sounds from an animal by an electronic
digital stethoscope and converting the sounds to digital data; (ii) converting the
digital data to data in a frequency domain; (iii) separating data in the frequency
domain into predetermined desired groups of amplitudes and frequencies forming
converted data; (iv) applying an algorithm to the converted data to generate at
least one of a value or visual tion that corresponds to a state of health of the
animal; (iv) providing an integral y on the digital stethoscope; and (v)
generating an output on the display for observation by a user indicating to the user
a status of health of the animal.
According to another method disclosed in this US Application Serial No.
13/442,569, it includes a system for gathering ation regarding an animal and
using the information for determining a state of health of the animal, said system
comprising: (i) a wireless electronic digital stethoscope for recording auscultated
lung sounds obtained from the animal in the form of digital sound data; (ii) a
processor for processing the digital sound data; (iii) computer coded instructions
for manipulating the digital sound data through incorporation of at least one
algorithm used to calculate a value, said algorithm ing selected frequencies of
the tated sounds, said algorithm generating a first set of data; (iii) said first
set of data recorded in a database of said processor and said first set of data
reflective of a sis that corresponds to the values obtained from the
algorithm; (iv) a user display incorporated on the digital stethoscope for
ying information reflective of a state of health of the animal corresponding to
the diagnosis and to additional health information; (v) at least one field device
ssly communicating with the scope, said field device including at least
one of a weigh scale, an RFID reader, a diagnostic device, and a temperature
probe; and (vi) a second set of data obtained from the field device as prompted by
a polling command from the stethoscope, wherein the second set of data
corresponds to additional data obtained from the field device for the animal, and
the first and second data sets collectively are provided to the user display
corresponding to the additional health information. With respect to use of the
stethoscope, the device may include a health status indicator in the form of a
plurality of health indicator lights. These tor lights may represent a lung
score, or may ent some other tion as to the health of the animal. In one
ment of the stethoscope, they may be numbered for example, from 1-5.
The illumination of one of the lights or a group of lights indicates a lung score or
some other health status for the animal. For example, light number one (1), if
illuminated, could indicate a normal condition for the animal. Light number two
(2), if illuminated, could indicate a mild, acute condition. Light number three (3),
if illuminated, could indicate a moderate acute condition. Light number four (4), if
nated, could indicate a severe acute condition, and light number five (5), if
illuminated, could indicate a chronic condition. As filI‘thGI' discussed in the
detailed description, the non—BRD pathology is is yet another feature of the
invention that can be derived from CPR values in conjunction with the auscultation
data.
According to yet another feature of the invention, use of the CPR values
with tation data or information can be provided to generate improved risk
stratification of BRD cases with categorized lung score groups from the
auscultation data. For example, use of the CPR values can produce predictive
information for morbidity and mortality outcomes based on lung score groups or
categories.
According to yet r aspect of the invention, the use of CPR values can
be used to detect abnormalities in the lungs of an animal, such as lung lesions that
impact cardiovascular mance and may therefore indicate a long—term
se in production performance of the animal. One particularly advantageous
aspect of the ion is that a simple analysis of only respiratory rate and heart
rate will not allow a reasonable conclusion to be made regarding lung
abnormalities such as lung lesions, since there is no identifiable pattern of
association between absolute heart and breath rates. Through CPR, which
transforms the absolute rate values into clinically meaningfial information, an
association between the animal’s vital sign rates and lung lesions is nt and
predictable.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, the use of CPR values can
be used to predict performance metrics or performance measurements, such as the
average daily weight gain of an animal in a feedlot. CPR values may be used in
conjunction with other rics to drive real-time best choice antibiotic and
dietary treatment programs at point of care.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, it can be used for a
clinical decision making algorithm to drive treatment options based on predicted
outcomes of on-going analysis using digitized bio-metric data like CPR values of
the present invention. CPR values may be used as vital indicators of the overall
health status of an animal and can contribute to diagnostic information by
transferring real-time data to a repository cloud database for ng treatment
efflcacies. From the modeling, probable outcomes for animal performance can be
created including economic impact assessments that direct optimal disease
management gies such as best choice of antibiotic and dietary changes. CPR
values combined with a lung scoring algorithm and other animal health data such
as health history, body temperature, previous drug treatments, weight changes,
weather reports, and ity and ity rates can allow the creation of
combinatorial optimization treatment suggestions to animal vers. A system
of health data capture ing to this aspect of the invention can drive analytical
models that deliver evidence based medicine and adjust treatment
recommendations from real-time feedback-loop information. Capturing
physiological information on animals and sending it immediately to a cloud server
for insertion into a machine learning module that communicates immediately back
to the point of care decision for treatment may bly shift morbidity and
mortality tories, and at the same time minimize costs. This method of realtime
feedback regarding preferred treatments for individual animals may be
particularly advantageous with respect to use of antibiotics selected for treatment.
r, this method may enhance clinical decision making of veterinarians on a
day-to-day basis as they will have information immediacy and al relevance
not available from prior systems or methods. The use of CPR values in this method
is ideal because CPR values incorporate diagnostic information that is applicable to
the health of the whole animal and across multiple disease spectrums.
Considering the above features and attributes of the ion, the invention
can be filrther defined as a method for assessing animals considering physiological
responses to stress, comprising: (a) exposing an animal to a controlled environment
known to induce sympathetic adrenergic stress reactions; (b) recording heart and
ation rates of an animal during said reactions; (0) determining a
pulmonary rate ratio for the animal expressed as the heart rate divided by the
respiration rate; (d) ining a range of ratios for a plurality of animals within
an observed population of animals; (e) determining a group of first values for ratios
indicating respiratory compensating responses (CPR-R); (f) ining a group of
second values for ratios indicating cardiac sating responses (CPR-C); (g)
determining a group of third values for ratios indicating normal compensating
responses (CPR-N); (h) determining a likelihood an animal will develop a disease
taking into account said ratios within said first, second, or third groups of values;
and (i) providing treatment to the animal corresponding to the likelihood the
animal will develop the disease. Other aspects of the invention can be defined
ing to this method for ing animals to further include any one of or any
combination of: (a) determining a weight for the animal and then determining a
likelihood an animal will develop a disease taking into the weight of the animal (b)
wherein the cardiopulmonary rate ratio is determined by dividing a final
normalized adjusted heart rate value by a final normalized adjusted respiratory
value (c) the cardiopulmonary rate ratio is determined by dividing a final
ized adjusted heart rate value by a final ized adjusted respiratory
value ((1) conducting an auscultation analysis for each animal and providing
treatment to the animal fiirther considering results of said auscultation is (e)
wherein the auscultation analysis filrther includes designation of a lung score for
the results corresponding to the analysis and (f) said treatment includes at least one
of administration of an antibiotic, administration of a selected nutrition program, or
ations f.
Further considering the above features and attributes of the invention, the
ion can be further defined as a method of establishing a CPR value for at
least one animal within a tion of similarly situated animals in a selected
environment considering physiological responses to stress therein and using the
CPR value for treatment, said method comprising:
(a) convert empirical distributions of breath and heart rates of an animal
into a standard normal distribution curve by: (i) recording breath and heart rates of
a large sample of similar animals; similar in breed, weight and health status: (ii) for
breath rates, transform the empirical distribution into a standard normal
distribution for use to determine an animal’s breath rate location on a cumulative
normal density curve giving a value n 0 and 1; (iii) for heart rates; transform
the cal distribution into a standard normal distribution for use to determine
an animal’s heart rate location on a tive normal density curve giving a value
between 0 and l;
(b) develop CPR norms by: (i) calculating a raw CPR value from a value
of a corresponding normalized heart rate divided by a value of the breath rate and
applied only to animals with values greater than 0 on both normalized breath and
normalized heart rates; and (ii) taking the raw CPR values calculated and transform
the empirical distribution of the raw CPR values into a standard normal
distribution for use to determine an animal’s CPR value as a location on a
cumulative normal density curve giving a value between 0 and l;
(c) generate CPR norms by: (i) capture an animal’s breath and heart rate;
(ii) ate a normalized breath rate cumulative density value (0 to 1) using the
transformation determined; (iii) calculate a normalized heart rate cumulative
density value (0 to 1) using the ormation determined; (iv) calculate a ratio of
the heart rate normalized value to a breath rate normalized value; (V) calculate a
normalized CPR value cumulative density value (0 to 1) using the transformation
equation determined; and (Vi) assign a CPR category from a value using category
determiners as s:
i. If equal to or less than 0.15, then animal is categorized as a
atory compensator );
ii. If equal to or greater than 0.85, then animal is categorized as a
cardiac compensator (CPR-C); and
iii. If greater than 0.15 and less than 0.85, then animal is categorized as
a non-compensator/normal (CPR-N).
(d) reviewing determined CPR categories for animals selected for
treatment; and
(e) conducting treatment for the selected animals.
Yet further considering the above features and attributes of the invention,
the invention can be further defined as a method for assessing animals considering
physiological responses to stress, comprising: exposing an animal to a controlled
environment known to induce hetic adrenergic stress reactions; recording
heart and respiration rates of an animal during said reactions; determining a
cardiopulmonary rate ratio for the animal expressed as the heart rate divided by the
respiration rate; determining a range of ratios for a plurality of animals within an
ed population of animals; and providing treatment to the animal
corresponding to a likelihood the animal will develop the disease by ing the
cardiopulmonary rate ratio. Other aspects of the invention can be defined
according to this method for assessing animals to fiirther include any one of or any
combination of: determining a group of first values for ratios indicating respiratory
compensating responses (CPR-R); determining a group of second values for ratios
indicating cardiac sating responses (CPR-C); determining a group of third
values for ratios ting normal sating responses (CPR-N); and
determining a likelihood an animal will p a e taking into t said
ratios within said first, second, or third groups of values.
The above features of the inventions and others will become more apparent
from a review of the following detailed description, along with the attached
figures.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure l is a visual depiction of example data points on a graph which
rate how CPR values of the present invention can be used with auscultation
data to identify non—BRD pathology;
Figure 2 is another depiction of example data points on a graph which
illustrate how CPR values of the present invention can be used with auscultation
data to identify risk stratification of BRD as classified according to lung score
groups;
Figure 3 is a visual ion of example data points g lung lesions
identified through sonography plotting by absolute values of heart and
atory rates, and more particularly illustrating why lung ailments such as lung
lesions cannot be identified simply by recording such data;
Figure 4 is another visual depiction of example data points of lung lesions
identified through ultransonography which illustrates plotting of heart and
respiratory rates, but in which the rates for each axis are normalized to a bellshaped
curve, in which ization as a component of CPR values of the present
invention assist to better separate suspect animals in terms of those having lung
abnormalities such as lung lesions and those without such abnormalities;
Figure 5 is yet another visual depiction of example data points of lung
s identified by ultrasonography which illustrates plotting of heart and
respiratory rates ing to Figure 4, with further information added to the graph
including separation of the graph into zones corresponding to CPR-R, CPR-N, and
CPR-C categories, and the relative abundance (more than twice the rate) of lung
lesions in the CPR-R zone compared to the zones for CPR-N and CPR-C;
Figure 6 is another visual depiction of example data points on a graph that
illustrates how knowing the tage of CPR-C categorized animals upon arrival
to a location such as a feed yard can provide a more accurate prediction as to
performance of s group within a pen within the feed yard.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The creation of CPR values for the present invention is optimized if large
samples of data are used to establish norms that indicate true high and low values
of vital signs within a species for a given environment. CPR values can be
determined for any species of animal in which preferably large samples of data are
used to establish norms, and in which a preferred protocol for obtaining respiration
and cardiac rates are to be taken from the same type of stress—induced environment
for each animal. More specifically, the CPR values are more reliable when each
animal of the population is exposed to the same or similar stress induced
environment.
Set forth below is an example method/protocol of the invention for
ishing a CPR formula or mathematical sion for a species, such as a
bovine species:
1. Convert empirical distribution of breath and heart rates of a given species
and breed into standard normal distribution curves ~N(u=0,o=l).
a. Determine or capture the breath and heart rates of a large sample of
similar animals; similar in breed, weight and health status.
Preferably obtain captured data for many animals.
b. For breath rates; using the data in step la, transform the empirical
distribution into a standard normal distribution ~N(u=0,6=l) which
can be used to ine an animal’s breath rate location on a
cumulative normal density curve giving a value between 0 and l.
c. For heart rates; using the data in step la, orm the empirical
distribution into a standard normal distribution ~N(u=0,6=l) which
can be used to ine an animal’s heart rate location on a
cumulative normal density curve giving a value between 0 and l.
2. Develop CPR norms.
a. For each animal in the sample; a raw CPR value is calculated from
the value of their normalized heart rate (step lc) divided by the
value of the breath rate (step 1b). This is applied only to those
s with values greater than zero on both the normalized breath
and normalized heart rates.
b. Taking the ratio values created in step 2a, transform the empirical
distribution of the raw ratio values into a standard normal
distribution ~N(u=0,o=l) which can be used to determine an
’s CPR score or value as a location on a cumulative normal
density curve giving a value between 0 and l.
3. Utilization of CPR norms
a. Capture an animal’s breath and heart rate.
WO 68341
b. Calculate the normalized breath rate cumulative y value (0 to
1) using the transformation equation determined in step lb.
0. ate the normalized heart rate cumulative density value (0 to
1) using the transformation equation determined in step lc.
(1. Calculate the ratio of the heart rate normalized value (step 3c) to the
breath rate normalized value (step 3b).
e. Calculate the normalized CPR value cumulative density value (0 to
1) using the transformation equation determined in step 2b.
f. Assign the CPR category from value in step 3e using the following
ination cut-off points.
i. If equal to or less than 0.15, then animal is a categorized as a
atory compensator (CPR—R).
ii. If equal to or greater than 0.85, then animal is categorized as
a cardiac compensator (CPR-C).
iii. If greater than 0.15 and less than 0.85, then animal is
rized as a non-compensator/normal (CPR-N).
Based upon the foregoing explanation, one example formula to describe a
CPR score or value may be expressed as follows:
CPR = eA(-(-10 + (ASINH(((eA(-(0.6 + (1."< LN(((LN(HeartRate)-
4))/((6 - LN(HeartRate)) ) )))A2/2)/eA(—(0.3 + LN(((BreathRate -
3))/((100 - BreathRate) )))A2/2) + /0.00001)))A2/2)/V21:
Referring now to the Figures, Figure 1 is a Visual ion of data points
on a graph which illustrate how CPR values of the present invention can be used
with auscultation data to identify D pathology. More specifically, Figure 1
shows example data concerning classification of CPR scores or values for a group
of observed animals. The background information on the s is that they
arrived to a location, such as a feedlot, and each animal in the group was
previously treated with antibiotics. The number of animals in the
population/observed group is 1,069 animals. Each of the animals were evaluated
in terms of obtaining auscultation data, such as a corresponding lung score as
disclosed in the above mentioned US Application Serial No. 13/442,569. Each of
the animals were also evaluated by generating corresponding CPR scores, and
specific data points shown in the graph correspond to groups of animals within the
population that had the ponding CPR scores. As further shown in the graph,
the two general categories of CPR evaluations recorded include CPR-N and CPR-
C. On the right side of the graph along a lung score of 4, as expected, there was a
fairly high case fatality rate for those s which had a high lung score and
which were determined as having respiratory compensating or cardiac
compensating CPR scores. However, the graph also shows a high case fatality rate
for one group of animals on the left side of the graph along a lung score of 1.
Although these s had presumably healthy respiratory systems because of the
low lung score, there was still a high fatality rate that cannot be explained by just
an evaluation of auscultation data. This elevated case fatality rate is only
observable as a function of the ination of CPR scores for this group of
animals, and it can therefore be deduced that that relatively high fatality rate was
due to non-BRD pathology. These animals may also have been observed as not
responding to antibiotic use; however, a determination of potential other diseases is
simply not possible with auscultation analysis. ore, one proposed or prudent
treatment that could take place for this group of animals is to withdraw the animals
from any antibiotics, and to memorize the animal from other conditions which may
contribute to something other than BRD, such as a metabolic disorder. In
summary, Figure l is ore intended to illustrate that although an animal may
have a favorable lung score, increased fatality rates for these types of animals can
be difficult to predict unless there’s some type of other measurement parameter
which may provide a ver, a more thorough and comprehensive diagnostic
is of the state of health of the animal.
Referring to Figure 2, another graph shows how CPR values of the present
invention can be used with auscultation data to identify risk stratification of BRD
as classified according to lung score groups. As reflected in this figure, the data
points correspond to a study of groups of animals terized as either CPR —N
or CPR - R, and the population or sample was 15,937 head of cattle. There are few
conclusions that can be drawn from a review of these recorded data points. First,
the graph shows that there was an sed fatality rate for animals across all
ranges of the lung scores when comparing animals classified as CPR—R versus
CPR—N. In other words, the fatality rate increased for animals having a respiratory
sating response as d to those animals that did not have a respiratory
compensating response, and this increase occurred even with animals having low
lung scores, that is, those animals in which ptive diagnoses could be made
regarding BRD by review of only auscultation data. As shown in the graph, for
observed animals having a lung score of 1, there was a 64.8% increase in mortality
rates when comparing CPR—R versus CPR—N; for observed animals having a lung
score of 2, there was a 37.6% increase in mortality rates when comparing CPR — R
versus CPR— N; for observed animals having a lung score of 3, there was a 11.5%
increase in mortality rates when comparing CPR— R versus CPR—N; for observed
animals having a lung score of 4, there was a 55.5% increase in mortality rates
when ing CPR-R versus CPR—N; and for observed s having a lung
score of 5, there was a 75.4% increase in mortality rates when ing CPR—R
versus CPR—N. Another general conclusion that can be drawn from the data
shown in this graph is that some animals classified in one lung score with CPR-R
should be considered for a different treatment protocol because the increased
mortality rate places or qualifies him for consideration for ent in a different
lung score/category. More specifically, the s categorized as CPR-R with a
lung score of 2 had a slightly higher mortality rate than those animals classified as
CPR-N and a lung score of 3. ore, a caregiver may wish to alter the
treatment protocol for these animals to correspond to the treatment being given for
animals having a lung score of 3.
Referring to Figure 3, this graph provides a visual depiction of data points
which illustrates plotting of heart and respiratory rates, and more particularly
illustrates why lung ailments such as lung lesions cannot be identified simply by
ting heart and respiratory rates. More cally, Figure 3 illustrates heart
and respiratory rate data for a group of animals that were studied to detect the
presence of lung lesions. The presence of lung lesions negatively impacts
cardiovascular performance and typically corresponds to long-term decreases in
production performance. The study ed 210 cow calves under 150 pounds,
and the animals were analyzed to obtain both lung scores and CPR scores. The
ce of lung lesions in the animals were verified by conducting ultrasounds
giving CPR a diagnostic sensitivity for lung lesions of 0.82 at a peripheral lung
depth of 2cm or more. The animals with lung lesions as compared to those without
lung s were indistinguishable in terms of identifiable differences in heart or
respiration rates. In other words, by review of only heart and respiratory rates, no
sions could be made as to differences between the animals. Therefore, it is
apparent that a traditional auscultation analysis could not assist in easily
distinguishing animals for purposes of detecting lung lesions.
Referring to Figure 4, another visual depiction of data points is shown on a
graph illustrating plotting of heart and respiratory rates; however, respiratory rates
are normalized to a bell-shaped curve, and normalization of the respiratory rates
provides an improved indication as to how to distinguish between animals that may
have lung lesions. In summary, Figure 4 illustrates that normalizing the data for
the breath rates produces a bell-shaped curve which can be used as more useful
information regarding the impact of lung lesions because it can be seen that the
lung s are much more prevalent in the top 50% of the bell curve as compared
to the bottom 50% area. By normalizing the absolute rates, meaningful
relationships can be defined between breath rate values beyond their absolute
ences. That is; a breath rate difference between 65/min and 55/min is lO/min
but the same difference between, for example, 95/min and 85/min is a much rarer
occurrence as 95/min is at the tail end of the upper distribution and can be
considered almost a statistical outlier. In summary, respiratory rates above a value
of .50 show much greater density in terms of the number of animals who were
detected having lung lesions according to the results of the verifying ultrasound
procedures. Normalization is a component of ining CPR values of the
present invention and therefore, normalization in this figure indicates that by
placing ve frequencies of breath rate occurrences, interpretation of the
information is fundamentally d by adding a new dimension to the data.
Referring to Figure 5, this is yet r visual depiction of data points on a
graph which illustrates plotting of heart and respiratory rates according to Figure 4,
with r information added to the graph including separation of the graph into
zones corresponding to CPR-R, CPR-N, and CPR-C categories. More specifically,
Figure 5 shows a distribution mum lesion depths (2.0 cm) as measured by
the confirmatory ultrasounds in which a tion of the graph into the zones
provides valuable information regarding those animals that should be targeted for
ent. The dotted line extending from the origin in an upwards manner to
imately 0.20 on the horizontal axis separates data points for those animals
classified as CPR-R and CPR-N. The data points for the group of animals to the
left of this line are classified as CPR—R, while the data points for the group of
s to the right of this line are classified as CPR-N. The dotted line extending
WO 68341
from the origin in a more fiat manner and terminating near 1.0 on the horizontal
axis separates data points for the animals classified as CPR—N and CPR-C. The
data points for the group of animals above and to the left of this line are the
animals classified as CPR-N, while the data points for the group of animals below
and to the right of this line are the animals classified as CPR-C. One general
conclusion that can be made from the use of CPR data in this graph is a prediction
of lung lesions known to be associated with lower performance and higher
morbidity, and this group of animals correspond to those classified in CPR-R. As
shown, the animals classified in this group have more than twice the rate of lung
lesions than the other two fied groups of animals. Accordingly, these animals
could be selectively treated on arrival to minimize infection spread and minimize
re-infection rates. Use of this ent approach supports best treatment practices
to include good antibiotic stewardship and judicious use only for those animals
with a diagnosis. Other treatment approaches may be adopted ering other
diseases that can be diagnosed early by classification of animals from
corresponding CPR categories.
Figure 6 is another graph that illustrates how knowing the percentage of
CPR-C rized animals upon arrival to a location such as a feed yard can
provide a more accurate tion as to performance of animals group within a
pen within the feed yard. More specifically, Figure 6 illustrates that CPR is
e of predicting closeout e daily gain (ADG) by evaluating, for
example, a pen lot considering animals characterized as CPR-C. This figure shows
to groups of animals, , steers and mixed. The vertical axis shows average
daily gain at closeout, and the effect of more pronounced cardiac compensating
response animals which have a lower average daily gain as compared to those
animals which have less pronounced c compensating responses. This figure
also shows the difference between steers and mixed, and the overall increased
ability for steers to gain weight as ed to mixed animals across a large range
of CPR-C values. From an economic standpoint, the linear relationships that can
be seen in the graph for both steers and mixed in terms of average daily gain, one
may more accurately predict when groups of animals may actually attain desired
weight gain goals. Therefore, a more accurate prediction in terms of closeout dates
can provide numerous advantages.
It should be understood that the method of the invention can be executed
within a data processing system in which the mathematical calculations conducted
for the CPA scores and other mathematical calculations relating to auscultation
data are manipulated, stored, and made available to a user in various user interface
displays. For storage and calculation of data, this can be achieved on a data
processing network or within respective lone data computer systems,
depending upon how a user may wish to use and secure the data. It is further
contemplated that functionality associated with ying the results of CPA
scores and corresponding auscultation data can be presented to a user on
conventional user interface displays, such as screen displays on personal
computers, screen displays on mobile s, and others. Figures 1-6 represent
exemplary graphs that may be used as displays for data to a user to evaluate and
compare groups of s ing to s observed characteristics, to
include not only CPR and auscultation data, but any other measured parameters
such as animal weight, days on feed, days on antibiotic, and others.
Claims (6)
1. A method for assessing non-human animals considering physiological responses to stress, comprising: exposing a non-human animal to a controlled environment known to induce sympathetic adrenergic stress ons; recording heart and ation rates of a non-human animal during said reactions; determining a pulmonary rate ratio for the man animal expressed as the heart rate divided by the respiration rate; ining a range of ratios for a plurality of non-human animals within an observed population of non-human animals; determining a group of first values for ratios indicating respiratory compensating responses (CPR-R); determining a group of second values for ratios indicating cardiac compensating responses (CPR-C); determining a group of third values for ratios indicating normal compensating responses (CPR-N); determining a likelihood a man animal will develop a disease taking into account said ratios within said first, , or third groups of values; and providing treatment to the non-human animal corresponding to the likelihood the animal will develop the disease, wherein the disease includes Bovine atory disease, acidosis, ketosis, or Brisket disease at lower elevations.
2. A method, as d in claim 1, further including: determining a weight for the non-human animal; and determining a likelihood an animal will develop a disease taking into the weight of the non-human animal.
3. A method, according to claim 1, wherein: said cardiopulmonary rate ratio is determined by dividing a final normalized adjusted heart rate value by a final normalized adjusted respiratory value.
4. A method, according to claim 1, further including: conducting an auscultation analysis for each non-human animal; and providing ent to the non-human animal further considering results of said auscultation analysis.
5. A method, according to claim 4, wherein: said auscultation analysis further includes designation of a lung score for the results corresponding to the analysis.
6. A method, according to claim 1, wherein: said ent includes at least one of administration of an antibiotic, administration of a selected nutrition program, or ations thereof. S WERE MASS TREATED AND MANY WERE PLACED EN PEN-RUN TREATMENTS AS WELLAS HEAVYANTEEEQTEC USE AT TEME 0F PULL. NUMBER OF ANEMALS EVALUATED WERE 1,069 HEAD. RATE N:QTE NO ONARREVAL FEVERS CPRRC FATALETY 26% —6%OFDEATH LOSS 47% OF PULLS -.= CASE LUNG SCQRE N CPR-N £3 GER—RC FEGfl SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) CASE FATALETY RATES QN 15,93? HEAD OF CATTLE: LUNG SCQRE & CPR NORMAL VS ATGRY COMPENSATENG {FiRST 30 DAYS 0N FEED}. RATE “a; MORTALETY is 55.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US201461985935P | 2014-04-29 | 2014-04-29 | |
| US61/985,935 | 2014-04-29 | ||
| PCT/US2015/028373 WO2015168341A1 (en) | 2014-04-29 | 2015-04-29 | System and method for assessing animals considering auscultation and evaluation of physiological responses in various environments |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| NZ725766A NZ725766A (en) | 2021-10-29 |
| NZ725766B2 true NZ725766B2 (en) | 2022-02-01 |
Family
ID=
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US12193837B2 (en) | System and method for assessing animals considering auscultation and evaluation of physiological responses in various environments | |
| Kim et al. | Comparison of artificial intelligence to the veterinary radiologist's diagnosis of canine cardiogenic pulmonary edema | |
| US10064580B2 (en) | System and method for determining antibiotic effectiveness in respiratory diseased animals using auscultation analysis | |
| Abutarbush et al. | Evaluation of the diagnostic and prognostic utility of ultrasonography at first diagnosis of presumptive bovine respiratory disease | |
| Begic et al. | FROM HEART MURMUR TO ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY CONGENITAL HEART DEFECTS DIAGNOSTICS USING MACHINELEARNING ALGORITHMS | |
| Kodaira et al. | Reliability of ultrasound findings acquired with handheld apparatuses to inform urgent obstetric diagnosis in a high‐volume resource‐limited setting | |
| Ryu et al. | iApp: an autonomous inspection, auscultation, percussion, and palpation platform | |
| US10813586B2 (en) | System and method for determining antibiotic effectiveness in respiratory diseased animals using auscultation analysis | |
| NZ725766B2 (en) | System and method for assessing animals considering auscultation and evaluation of physiological responses in various environments | |
| CN116665894A (en) | Bone age monitoring system, method, electronic device and storage medium | |
| Rollas et al. | The interrater reliability of inferior vena cava ultrasonography performed by intensive care fellows | |
| McCartney | Computer analysis of the fetal heart rate | |
| Sh et al. | THE IMPORTANCE OF ULTRASOUND IN DETECTING EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENTAL ANOMALIES IN THE EARLY STAGES OF PREGNANCY (5–10 WEEKS) | |
| Turner et al. | The long‐term outcome and changes in tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient in dogs diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension and Angiostrongylus vasorum infestation | |
| Margaliot | AI Application in Biomedical Signal and Image Analysis | |
| SKOWROŃSKI et al. | A review of modern diagnostic methods for the detection of bovine respiratory diseases | |
| Lee et al. | Fetal Health Prediction Using Bio-Signal Cardiotocography Empowered with Blockchain Technology and Federated Machine Learning | |
| CN120187356A (en) | Cardiotocography Scan Session Duration | |
| CN120203581A (en) | Large-scale screening device, method and medium for depression based on objective symptoms on the surface of the body | |
| Goh et al. | Comparison of small animal general practitioners’ and emergency veterinarians’ behaviours and attitudes to the use of veterinary triage tools | |
| Ibrahim et al. | Point of Care Ultrasound as Initial Diagnostic Tool in Acute Dyspnea Patients in the Emergency Department of A Tertiary Care CENTER |