Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
AU2003266819B2 - Vector magnetic data processing - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

AU2003266819B2 - Vector magnetic data processing - Google Patents

Vector magnetic data processing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2003266819B2
AU2003266819B2 AU2003266819A AU2003266819A AU2003266819B2 AU 2003266819 B2 AU2003266819 B2 AU 2003266819B2 AU 2003266819 A AU2003266819 A AU 2003266819A AU 2003266819 A AU2003266819 A AU 2003266819A AU 2003266819 B2 AU2003266819 B2 AU 2003266819B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
data
aircraft
magnetic
survey
effect
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU2003266819A
Other versions
AU2003266819A1 (en
Inventor
Asbjorn Norlund Christensen
Mark Dransfield
Guimin Liu
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
CGG Data Services AG
Original Assignee
CGG Data Services AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by CGG Data Services AG filed Critical CGG Data Services AG
Priority to AU2003266819A priority Critical patent/AU2003266819B2/en
Publication of AU2003266819A1 publication Critical patent/AU2003266819A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2003266819B2 publication Critical patent/AU2003266819B2/en
Assigned to FUGRO FINANCE AG reassignment FUGRO FINANCE AG Request for Assignment Assignors: BHP BILLITON INNOVATION PTY LTD
Assigned to CCG DATA SERVICES AG reassignment CCG DATA SERVICES AG Request for Assignment Assignors: FUGRO FINANCE AG
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01VGEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V3/00Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
    • G01V3/15Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation specially adapted for use during transport, e.g. by a person, vehicle or boat
    • G01V3/165Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation specially adapted for use during transport, e.g. by a person, vehicle or boat operating with magnetic or electric fields produced or modified by the object or by the detecting device

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geophysics (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
  • Measuring Magnetic Variables (AREA)

Description

WO 2004/031808 PCT/AU2003/001297 1 Title Vector Magnetic Data Processing 5 Technical Field This invention concerns airborne geophysical surveys and the processing of vector magnetic data from those surveys to remove the aircraft effect, 10 background Art Magnetic total field surveys have been used in airborne mineral exploration for many decades. Only a single component of the total magnetic field is measured at any survey point. The measurement has to be corrected to remove the aircraft effect. It is known 15 that the aircraft effect includes three types of contribution: the permanent magnetic effect due to permanent magnets (hard-iron materials) on the aircraft, the induced magnetic field due to soft-iron materials of the aircraft induced in the earth's field, and the eddy-current magnetic field due to electromagnetically induced electric currents in the metal aircraft frame. There are a number of techniques (Leliak, 1961; Tolles, 1954; 20 Tolles, 1955; Passier, 1970) that remove these effects from the data. Although it is considered desirable to measure three-component magnetic data in airborne surveys and they are routinely recorded in total field magnetic surveys in the aircraft coordinate system, they are only used to calculate the aircraft attitude for the 25 compensation of the total field. It had not been possible to rotate the three components of the magnetic field from the aircraft frame to the earth's coordinate system without independent measurements of the aircraft attitude angles. In magnetic surveys for mineral exploration, the aircraft attitude is in general not measured directly. 30 However, a technique (Assous and Petillon, 1997) was developed that uses gyroscopic aircraft attitude measurements to correct the magnetic field measurements for the purpose of correcting heading angle drift in aircraft navigation. Summary of the Invention 35 WO 2004/031808 PCT/AU2003/001297 2 The invention is a method of airborne geophysical surveys and the processing of vector magnetic data from those surveys to remove the aircraft effect, comprising the steps of: conducting a calibration flight in the survey area, comprising four straight line segments at constant attitude in different directions, and measuring the aircraft attitude 5 and the total magnetic field relative to the heading angle, elevation angle and bank angle of the aircraft in each segment; calculating coefficients representing the permanent magnetic effect in the heading angle direction, elevation angle direction and bank angle direction from the calibration flight data assuming the earth's main field is constant; 10 calculating coefficients representing the induced magnetic effect in the heading angle direction, elevation angle direction and bank angle direction from the calibration flight data assuming the earth's main field is constant; conducting an airborne geophysical survey, and measuring the total magnetic field relative to the heading angle, elevation angle and bank angle of the aircraft in each 15 segment; then, removing the permanent magnetic effect, which is independent of aircraft attitude, from the survey flight data, by subtracting the magnetic field components calculated using the coefficients representing the permanent magnetic effect from each of the components of the total magnetic field vector relative to the heading angle, 20 elevation angle and bank angle of the aircraft; removing the induced magnetic effect, which is dependent on the dimension, shape and susceptibility of the parts of the aircraft body, but independent of the orientation of the aircraft, from the survey flight data, by subtracting the magnetic field components calculated using the coefficients representing the induced magnetic effect 25. from each of the components of the total magnetic field vector relative to the heading angle, elevation angle and bank angle of the aircraft; rotating the corrected survey flight data into the NED coordinate system; computing a coefficient tensor for the eddy-current magnetic effect by data regression applied to each line of the survey flight, computing the eddy-current 30 magnetic effect at each point by multiplying the tensor by the inducing time-derivative field, and then subtracting the component of the eddy-current effect from the survey data in the NED coordinate system, This method has the advantage that it is dynamic in time since eddy-current correction 35 coefficients are obtained for every survey line in the earth's coordinate system rather WO 2004/031808 PCT/AU2003/001297 3 than using constant coefficients in the airafts coordinate system derived from a calibration flight. The formulas for removing the permanent magnet effect, induced magnetic effect and 5 eddy-current magnetic effect of the aircraft may be derived from the model of Leliak (1961), which is similar in concept to the techniques presented in Assous and Petillon (1997, US Patent 5,654,635), and Rice, Jr. (1993, US Patent 5,182,514). A number of additional steps may be performed to minimise noise in the survey data. 10 These steps include: Removal of residual aircraft attitude dependence by applying a further regression step to the corrected data on the aircraft attitude for each survey line, to further reduce data noise on each survey line. Further removal of residual aircraft attitude dependence by applying a moving 15 window regression of the data on the aircraft attitude angles and their time derivatives along each survey line. The window is in the range 10 to 100 seconds. The use of International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) for reference in the calculation of correction coefficients to overcome errors in the calibration constants of magnetometers, 20 Line levelling using total magnetic intensity (TMI) data rather than data from magnetic component sensors to correct the mean levels of the North, East and Down components on each line, And, Amplitude correction using TMI data rather than data from magnetic component sensors to correct the North, East and Down components so that the magnitude of the 25 vector is the same as the TMI value at every station. The final corrected NED components of the vector residual magnetic data and its magnitude (the vector residual magnetic intensity or VRMI) are all included in the output data that may be written to the survey database. 30 Use of the invention provides a significant reduction of the noise in the vector magnetic data. Preliminary data processing results show excellent performance of the new technique in noise reduction. This indicates that delivery of the vector magnetic data as a standard product can be achieved in the near future. 35 WO 2004/031808 PCT/AU2003/001297 4 The time-derivatives may be calculated using finite-difference of the magnetic data in the aircraft frame, instead of angle changes used by Assous et al (1997). Brief Description of the Drawings 5 An example of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: Fig. 1 is a diagram illustrating the relationship between the aircraft-based LTV coordinate system, the world-based NED coordinate system, and the aircraft attitude 10 variables (heading angle, elevation angle and bank angle). Fig. 2(a) is graph comparing the North component of raw data using the new and old techniques for removing the aircraft effect; Fig. 2(b) is graph comparing the Down component of raw data using the new and old techniques for removing the aircraft effect; and Fig. 2(c) is graph comparing the East component of raw data using 15 the new and old techniques for removing the aircraft effect. Fig. 3(a) and Fig. 3(b) are plots of Vector Mag Residual intensity (VMRI) data using the new and'old techniques. for removing the aircraft effect. Best Modes of the Invention 20 The method first requires a calibration flight at high altitude in the survey area. The flight path is roughly a square with a side length of a few kilometres. The correction coefficients for the permanent and induced magnetic effects are calculated from the calibration flight data. These coefficients are then subsequently used in the correction 25 of vector magnetic survey data. The measured magnetic field M is composed of the earth's field H, including any ore body effect, the permanent magnet field of the aircraft A, the induced magnetic field of the aircraft I, and the eddy-current magnetic field E. Hence 30 M=H+A+I+E In the aircraft reference frame, there are three equations at each observation point fbr the three magnetic field components, 35 ML = HL + AL + IL + ET (1) WO 2004/031808 PCT/AU2003/001297 5 MT = HT + A+ IT + Br (2) My=Hv+ Av + Iy + Ey (3) As illustrated in Fig. 1, here the subscript L denotes the component in the Longitudinal 5 direction of the aircraft, T the transverse direction, and V the vertical direction. For the calibration flight data, the earth's main field is assumed to be a constant and is the known International Geomagnetic Reference Field (GRF) field in the earth's North, East, Down (NED) reference frame. Thus, the LTV components Ht, HT, and HV can be calculated by rotation with the known aircraft attitude data (pitch, roll and yaw). 10 The pennanent magnet field components AL, A, and Ay are constants that are independent of aircraft attitude. The L component of the induced magnetic field of the aircraft at the sensor is 15 IL=HL;LL+ HTTL + HvVL (4) where LL is the magnetic field in L direction due to induced magnetic dipoles in the L direction for an unit inducing field, TL is the magnetic field in L direction due to 20 induced magnetic dipoles in the T direction for an unit inducing field, and VL is the magnetic field in L direction due to induced magnetic dipoles in the V direction for an unit inducing field. LL, TL and VL are essentially geometrical factors that are independent of the aircraft attitude variations. 25 Similarly, the T component of the induced magnetic ield of the aircraft at the sensor is IT = HL;LT+ H'rTT + Hv-VT (5) and the V component of the induced magnetic field of the aircraft at the sensor is 30 Iv= H:LV+ HITTV + HvVV (6) Here, (LL, TL, VL, LT, TT, VT, LV, TV, VV) are only dependent on the dimension, shape, and susceptibility of the parts of the aircraft body, but independent of the 35 orientation of the aircraft.
WO 2004/031808 PCT/AU2003/001297 6 The eddy-current magnetic field is produced by eddy currents in the aircraft body. A change of magnetic flux through a conducting loop will generate a current proportional to the time derivative of the flux in the loop. This current will produce a secondary magnetic field opposing the change in the magnetic flux, As the aircraft hull effectively 5 consists of conducting loops of aluminium, these loops will experience a change in magnetic flux as the aircraft changes direction in the earth's magnetic field. These current loops will generate a secondary magnetic field measurable as the eddy-current field at the sensor. The L component of the eddy-current field can be written as 10 E L = 2 .ll+ 7 -t+ 8H- -- v (7) &t t at where 11 is the magnetic field in L direction due to eddy-current magnetic dipoles in the L direction for an unit inducing field, tl is the magnetic field in L direction due to eddy current magnetic dipoles in the T direction for an unit inducing field, and VL is the 15 magnetic field in L direction due to eddy-current magnetic dipoles in the V direction for an unit inducing field, Similarly, 20 ET = 2!!Lt+t t vt at at Ot 0 Here, (11, tl, v, it, t, 4, lv, tv, vy) aro only dependent on the dimension, shape, and electrical conductivities of the parts of the aircraft body forming the conductive loops, 25 but independent of the orientation of the aircraft. Substituting equations (4)-(9) into equations (1), (2) and (3), we obtain Hz+AL+HL-LL+Hr-TL+HV.L+ Ll+ -tl+ -vl=M (10) at 6t(10) 30 HrA+zL+yT+ ,V+H 1+ -t v= (11) & t at Hr +Av +HL LV+HT TV+HvVV+ -Iv+ _ -tv+ (12) at at WO 2004/031808 PCT/AU2003/001297 7 We need to solve for (AL, AT, AY), (LL, TL, VL, LT, TT, VT, LV, TV, VV), and (1, ti, v, It, %t, vt lv, tv, vy) 21 unknown coefficients. 5 From the calibration flight data, we can set up the above three equations at each data point. So we end up with a linear system of equations to solve for the coefficients. If the attitude angles of the aircraft are constant on a straight-line segment of the flight path, there are only three independent linear equations on this segment under the assumption the earth's magnetic field is constant on a calibration flight covering a 10 small area. Since there are four straight-line segments with different head angles in the calibration flight path, there are a total of 12 independent linear equations, So it is an under-determined problem to solve for the 21 unknown coefficients. However, the magnitude of eddy-current magnetic field is much smaller than the permanent magnetic and induced magnetic fields and we can first ignore the eddy-current terms and solve 15 for the 12 (AL, A, Av) and (LL, TL, VL, LT, TT, VT, LV, TV, VV) factors fbr the permanent magnet and induced magnetic dipoles. The eddy-current coefficients (11, t, v, It, tt, vt, lv, tv, vv) are calculated by regression dynamically line-by-line on the survey data. 20 For normal survey data, the correction algorithm first removes the permanent and induced magnetic effects of the aircraft using the coefficients calculated from the calibration flight data. This is done in the LTV coordinate system. The corrections formulas are as follows: 25 HL=ML-A-ML-LL-Mr*TL-M,.-VL (13) Hr =MT -A. -M r-LT-M. TT-Mv -VT (14) Hv =Mv -Av -ML -LV.-Mr -TV-M4 -VV (15) 30 The corrected data are then rotated into the NED coordinate system. After this, a coefficient tensor (11, tl, v, It, tt, vt, lv, tv, vv) for the eddy-current magnetic effect of the aircraft is computed from the data by regression on a line-by-line basis. The eddy current magnetic effect is then computed at each point by multiplying the inducing time-derivative field with the eddy-current coefficient tensor and subtracted from the 35 data.
WO 2004/031808 PCT/AU2003/001297 8 There are then a number of additional steps for survey data correction: Removal of residual aircraft attitude effect After the correction of the permanent, induced and eddy-current magnetic effects of the 5 aircraft, a regression of the corrected data on the aircraft attitude is done on each survey line and the residual effect of the aircraft attitude is removed from the data. Moving-window reduction of noise After the removal of residual aircraft attitude effect, it was noted that the three 10 component magnetic data were still correlated with the aircraft attitude angles and their time derivatives in some portions of a survey line. Therefore a moving-window regression of the data on the aircraft attitude angles and their time derivatives is done along each survey line to reduce noise. The window size is a parameter in the range of 10 to 100 seconds. 15 Levelling vector magnetic data line-by-line using TMI data If the magnetic component sensors are less accurate than the TMI sensor, one may wish to corect the mean levels of the North, East and Down components on each line to those calculated from TMI data to remove stripes in the component data. The 20 processing algorithm has an option to do this if desired for noise reduction. Vector magnitude correction If the magnetic component sensors are less accurate than the TMI sensor, one may wish to correct the North, East'and Down components so that the magnitude of the vector is 25 the same as the TMI value at every station. The processing algorithm has an option to do this if desired for noise reduction. Vector Residual Magnetic Intensity (VRMI) The algorithm also calculates the vector residual magnetic data by the subtraction of a 30 constant vector magnetic field. This constant field is often the average earth's main field in the survey area or the IGRF field if required. The NED components of the vector residual magnetic data and its magnitude (the vector residual magnetic intensity or VRMI) are all included in the output. 35 Of course, other parameters such as inclination and declination of the vector residual data can also be calculated and used in data interpretation.
WO 2004/031808 PCT/AU2003/001297 9 Fig. 2 shows a comparison of the data using the new and old techniques to remove the aircraft effect. A visual inspection suggests a noise reduction improvement of a factor between 3 to 10. It should be noted that there is also a difference in the low frequency 5 component in the corrected data in some cases (e.g. top of Fig. 2). This may be because the assumption of a sine head angle correction may not be strictly valid although it is a good approximation. Fig. 3 shows a comparison of the Vector Magnetic Residual Intensity (VMRI) of data 10 using the new and old techniques to remove the aircraft effect. The VMRI is the magnitude of the residual magnetic vector after subtracting the vector IGRF earth field from the data. The improvement using the new technique for vector magnetic data processing is illustrated clearly in Fig. 3. 15 It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that numerous variations and/or modifications may be made to the invention as shown in the specific embodiments without departing 11om the spirit or scope of the invention as broadly described. The present embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and 20 not restrictive. 25 References Assous, E. C., and Petillon, J., 1997, Method and device for simultaneous identification and correction of errors due to magnetic perturbations and to misalignments in the measurements of a magnetometer, US Patent 5654635. 30 Leliak, P., 1961, Identification and evaluation of magnetic field sources of magnetic airborne detector equipped aircraft, IRE Transactions on Aerospace and Navigation Electronics. 35 Passier, F. A., 1970, Aircraft magnetometer system with means to compensate said system for disturbing magnetic field generated by the aircraft, US Patent 3,530,375. Rice, J. A. Jr., 1993, Automatic compensator for an airborne magnetic anomaly detector, US Patent 5,182,514. 40 WO 2004/031808 PCT/AU2003/001297 10 Tolles, W. E., 1954, Compensation of aircraft magnetic fields, US Patent 2,692,970. Tolles, W. E., 1955, Magnetic field compensation system, US Patent 2,706,801. 5 van Leeuwen, E.H., 2000, BHP develops airborne gravity gradiometer for mineral exploration: The Leading Edge, Vol. 19, No 12, 1296-1297. 10

Claims (8)

1. A method of airbone geophysical surveys and the processing of vector magnetic data from those surveys to remove the aircraft effect, comprising the steps of: 5 conducting a calibration flight in the survey area, comprising straight line segments at constant attitude in different directions, and measuring the aircraft attitude and the total magnetic field relative to the heading angle, elevation angle and bank angle of the aircraft in each segment; calculating coefficients representing the pennanent magnetic effect in the 10 heading angle direction, elevation angle direction and bank angle direction from the calibration flight data assuming the earth's main field is constant; calculating coefficients representing the induced magnetic effect in the heading angle direction, elevation angle direction and bank angle direction from the calibration flight data assuming the earth's main field is constant; 15 conducting an airborne geophysical survey, and measuring the total magnetic field relative to the heading angle, elevation angle and bank angle of the aircraft in each segment; then, removing the permanent magnetic effect from the survey flight data by subtracting the magnetic field components calculated using the coefficients 20 representing the permanent magnetic effect from each of the components of the total magnetic field vector relative to the heading angle, elevation angle and bank angle of the aircraft; removing the induced magnetic effect from the survey flight data by subtracting the magnetic field components calculated using the coefficients representing the 25 induced magnetic effect from each of the components of the total magnetic field vector relative to the heading angle, elevation angle and bank angle of the aircraft; rotating the corrected survey flight data into the NED coordinate system; computing a coefficient tensor for the eddy-current magnetic effect by data regression applied to each line of the survey flight, computing the eddy-current 30 magnetic effect at each point by multiplying the tensor by the inducing time-derivative field, and then subtracting the components of the eddy-current effect from the survey data in the NED coordinate system.
2. The method according to claim 1, comprising the further step of applying a 35 further regression step to the corrected data on the aircraft attitude for each survey line. WO 2004/031808 PCT/AU2003/001297 12
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, comprising the further step of applying a moving-window regression of the data on the aircraft attitude angles and their time derivatives along each survey line. 5
4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the window is in the range 10 to 100 seconds.
5. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) is used for reference in the calculation of 10 correction coefficients.
6. A method according to any preceding claim, comprising the further step of using total magnetic intensity (TMI) data to correct the mean levels of the North, East and Down components on each line. 15
7. A method according to any preceding claim, comprising the further step of using TMI data to correct the North, East and Down components so that the magnitude of the vector is the same as the TMI value at every station. 20
8. A method according to any preceding claim, comprising the further step of outputting corrected NED components of the vector residual magnetic data, or its. magnitude (the vector residual magnetic intensity or VRMI), or both, to the survey database. 25
AU2003266819A 2002-10-04 2003-10-03 Vector magnetic data processing Ceased AU2003266819B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2003266819A AU2003266819B2 (en) 2002-10-04 2003-10-03 Vector magnetic data processing

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2002951919A AU2002951919A0 (en) 2002-10-04 2002-10-04 Vector magnetic data processing
AU2002951919 2002-10-04
PCT/AU2003/001297 WO2004031808A1 (en) 2002-10-04 2003-10-03 Vector magnetic data processing
AU2003266819A AU2003266819B2 (en) 2002-10-04 2003-10-03 Vector magnetic data processing

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2003266819A1 AU2003266819A1 (en) 2004-04-23
AU2003266819B2 true AU2003266819B2 (en) 2009-10-29

Family

ID=28679550

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2002951919A Abandoned AU2002951919A0 (en) 2002-02-12 2002-10-04 Vector magnetic data processing
AU2003266819A Ceased AU2003266819B2 (en) 2002-10-04 2003-10-03 Vector magnetic data processing

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2002951919A Abandoned AU2002951919A0 (en) 2002-02-12 2002-10-04 Vector magnetic data processing

Country Status (3)

Country Link
AU (2) AU2002951919A0 (en)
CA (1) CA2501121C (en)
WO (1) WO2004031808A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104808250B (en) * 2015-05-03 2018-03-13 国家深海基地管理中心 A kind of aeromagnetics detection device and method based on unmanned plane
EP3690491B1 (en) * 2017-09-30 2025-03-26 Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences Magnetic compensation method based on aeromagnetic compensation correction model
CN113074752B (en) * 2021-03-11 2022-09-20 清华大学 Dynamic calibration method and system for vehicle-mounted geomagnetic sensor
CN114184988B (en) * 2021-11-11 2022-10-11 北京大学 Aeromagnetic compensation method and device containing compensation platform current magnetic interference
CN119022965A (en) * 2024-09-13 2024-11-26 中航贵州飞机有限责任公司 A method for air calibration of aviation celestial navigation equipment

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2692970A (en) * 1944-09-02 1954-10-26 Walter E Tolles Compensation of aircraft magnetic fields
US5182514A (en) * 1974-11-19 1993-01-26 Texas Instruments Incorporated Automatic compensator for an airborne magnetic anomaly detector
US5654635A (en) * 1994-12-19 1997-08-05 Eurocopter France Method and device for simultaneous identification and correction of errors due to magnetic perturbations and to misalignments in the measurements of a magnetometer

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2706801A (en) * 1944-08-08 1955-04-19 Walter E Tolles Magnetic field compensation system
US3530375A (en) * 1968-10-22 1970-09-22 Us Navy Aircraft magnetometer system with means to compensate said system for disturbing magnetic field generated by the aircraft

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2692970A (en) * 1944-09-02 1954-10-26 Walter E Tolles Compensation of aircraft magnetic fields
US5182514A (en) * 1974-11-19 1993-01-26 Texas Instruments Incorporated Automatic compensator for an airborne magnetic anomaly detector
US5654635A (en) * 1994-12-19 1997-08-05 Eurocopter France Method and device for simultaneous identification and correction of errors due to magnetic perturbations and to misalignments in the measurements of a magnetometer

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2501121C (en) 2013-06-25
CA2501121A1 (en) 2004-04-15
WO2004031808A1 (en) 2004-04-15
AU2002951919A0 (en) 2002-10-24
AU2003266819A1 (en) 2004-04-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2003202323B2 (en) Airborne vector magnetic surveys
EP3690491B1 (en) Magnetic compensation method based on aeromagnetic compensation correction model
US8229688B2 (en) Method and apparatus for detection using magnetic gradient tensor
Munschy et al. Magnetic mapping for the detection and characterization of UXO: Use of multi-sensor fluxgate 3-axis magnetometers and methods of interpretation
Pang et al. Integrated compensation of magnetometer array magnetic distortion field and improvement of magnetic object localization
US10338262B2 (en) Electromagnetic receiver tracking and real-time calibration system and method
ZA200403526B (en) Airborne geophysical measurements
AU2002328690A1 (en) Airborne geophysical measurements
JPH08229017A (en) Method of determination of space field and measuring device
Mu et al. Small signal magnetic compensation method for UAV-borne vector magnetometer system
Calou et al. Airborne magnetic surveying with a drone and determination of the total magnetization of a dipole
Pang et al. The component compensation of geomagnetic field vector measurement system
AU2003266819B2 (en) Vector magnetic data processing
Birsan Inversion of magnetic dipole parameters using a scalar field gradiometer
Yuan et al. Enhanced aeromagnetic compensation models for magnetic anomaly target detection
JP3635092B2 (en) Method for stabilizing the direction indication by a magnetic compass
Liu et al. A modified aeromagnetic compensation method robust to in-cabin obe interferences
Koch et al. Room temperature three sensor magnetic field gradiometer
Cowan et al. Aeromagnetic gradiometers-a perspective
Desvignes et al. The determination of the depth of magnetic anomaly sources
Dransfield et al. Airborne vector magnetics mapping of remanently magnetized banded iron formations at Rocklea, Western Australia
Christense et al. Airborne Vector Magnetometry Over Banded Iron-Formations.
Wołoszyn Analysis of aircraft magnetic interference
Le Maire et al. 2D potential theory using complex algebra: New equations and visualization for the interpretation of potential field data
US3928801A (en) Method and apparatus for sensing rate of angular displacement

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)
PC Assignment registered

Owner name: FUGRO FINANCE AG

Free format text: FORMER OWNER WAS: BHP BILLITON INNOVATION PTY LTD

PC Assignment registered

Owner name: CCG DATA SERVICES AG

Free format text: FORMER OWNER WAS: FUGRO FINANCE AG

TH Corrigenda

Free format text: IN VOL 29 , NO 48 , PAGE(S) 7385 UNDER THE HEADING ASSIGNMENTS REGISTERED UNDER NAME CCG DATA SERVICES AG, APPLICATION NO. 2003266819, UNDER INID (71) CORRECT THE APPLICANT NAME TO CGG DATA SERVICES AG

MK14 Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired