Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
AU595207B2 - Coated front copy paper - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

AU595207B2 - Coated front copy paper - Google Patents

Coated front copy paper Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU595207B2
AU595207B2 AU58807/86A AU5880786A AU595207B2 AU 595207 B2 AU595207 B2 AU 595207B2 AU 58807/86 A AU58807/86 A AU 58807/86A AU 5880786 A AU5880786 A AU 5880786A AU 595207 B2 AU595207 B2 AU 595207B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
paper
protein
coating
composition according
soybean protein
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU58807/86A
Other versions
AU5880786A (en
Inventor
Adrian George Wright
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
North Broken Hill Ltd
Original Assignee
North Broken Hill Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by North Broken Hill Ltd filed Critical North Broken Hill Ltd
Publication of AU5880786A publication Critical patent/AU5880786A/en
Priority to US06/873,974 priority Critical patent/US4762868A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU595207B2 publication Critical patent/AU595207B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08LCOMPOSITIONS OF MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS
    • C08L89/00Compositions of proteins; Compositions of derivatives thereof
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41MPRINTING, DUPLICATING, MARKING, OR COPYING PROCESSES; COLOUR PRINTING
    • B41M5/00Duplicating or marking methods; Sheet materials for use therein
    • B41M5/124Duplicating or marking methods; Sheet materials for use therein using pressure to make a masked colour visible, e.g. to make a coloured support visible, to create an opaque or transparent pattern, or to form colour by uniting colour-forming components
    • B41M5/132Chemical colour-forming components; Additives or binders therefor
    • B41M5/155Colour-developing components, e.g. acidic compounds; Additives or binders therefor; Layers containing such colour-developing components, additives or binders
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08HDERIVATIVES OF NATURAL MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS
    • C08H1/00Macromolecular products derived from proteins

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)

Description

I
SAUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIA
Form PATENTS ACT 1952 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION
(ORIGINAL)
FOR OFFICE USE Short Title: Int. CI: Application Number; Lodged: 59520 This doCu ment contains the arneldnic 1 its made Under setion 49 and iscorc r printing. cortfr 59 7/~o ~Ccrplete Specification-Lodged: Accepted: Lapsed: Published: Pricrity: Related Art: PA T OFFICE, I allotr of Public ony 11
I
t
'I
''l4Jtme of Applicant: Aldress of Applicant: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT NORTH BROKEN HILL LIMIT'ED 971 BURKE ROAD CAMBERWELL VICTORIA
AUSTRALIA
3124 Actual Inventor: Address fQr Service; CLEMENT HACK CO., 601 St. Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
Comp,'-,te Specification for the Invention entitled: "'COATED FRONT COPY PAPER"' The following statement Is a full description of this itivention, including the best method of performing it known to me:- PF/CPIF/2/80 i: 000
C
0d S00 00 *I 0 0 0 0 V.09 00 0 00 0~
'VOW
Ooo.
0 0 COATED FRONT COPY PAPER 5 This invention relates to the manufacture of coated front papers for carbonless copy sets.
The need to make available in one operation one or more copies of any document has led to the development of various types of carbon papers in which a sheet of paper having one side coated with a coloured pigment, such as carbon black, is inserted between an original and a blank sheet of paper in such a manner that the transfer of pigment to the blank sheet of paper is accomplished by mechanical means.
This system has the disadvantages of:necessitating the insertion of the pigment-containing paper to cover exactly the blank paper which is to become the copy, 2 (ii) producing easily-smudged copies, (iii) limitation on the number of copies that can be made, (iv) ease of pigment transfer to clothes and skin during handling.
As a result of the aforementioned disadvantages National Cash Register Corporation developed a pressure sensitive system designated as 'no carbon required' or carbonless copy paper.
In this system, Australian Patent No. 413,452) encapsulated colour precursors are coated on to the back of a record sheet. The coated side of the sheet is placed in intimate contact with a record sheet, the top of which has been coated with an acidic material such as phenolic resin or Sacid clays. The application of pressure to the top sheet 15 ruptures the capsules containing the colourless dye, with the latter migrating to the coated second sheet where the acid clay or phenolic resin reacts with the carbonless dye to o develop an image.
0 -This particular system is superior to the carbon paper system in that it has minimised or eliminated some of the disadvantages of that system. If the 'no carbon required' system could be developed to its maximum potential then the ,following parameters and concepts would apply:- Maximisation of the number of copies available, 25 because the medium on to which the dye and reactive 0000 coatings are applied would be of a nature that does not retard transmittance of impact force due to absorption by air pockets.
Substantial lowering of the cost of the reactive coating by reduction of the amounts of binder and I reactive material (acid clay or phenolic resin) required and an overall reduction in the total amount of reactive coating applied.
3-- Minimisation of the coating substrate grammage without impairing its barrier qualities, which are necessary to prevent reaction between the reactive coating and the encapsulated dye coating of coated front and back (CFB) sheets.
Maximisation of the resistance to image fading.
Maximisation of image intensity.
Reduction of wicking tendency in subsequent copies.
Maximisation of resistance of the image to aging.
Avoidance of premature colour development caused by bleeding of the colour precursor on the CFB sheet I through to the reactive coated front (CF) coating.
We have now found that a particular preparaltion of Scarboxylated soybean protein, when added to the coating mixture produces a coating with improved properties compared to those produced by the prior art methods.
Although we do not wish to be limited by any ihypothetical or postulated mechanism for the observed Sbeneficial effects, we believe that the carboxylated soybean i 20 protein binds to the clay in the coating, causing cross-linking of the clay particles and hence an increase in the void volume of the clay when dry. The coating does not i penetrate into the substrate web, because the cross-linked clay particles are larger than the pore size of the substrate.
This results in an improvement in image sharpness and intensity, since the larger void volume in the dried coating results in greater penetration of the dye lactone, as well as providing a greater surface area for reaction with the lactone.
We have also unexpectedly found that the presence of protein in the composition prevents the composition from gelling at high temperatures, contrary to experience with normal high solids formulations. For the purposes of this specification, we define "high solids" as having a solids content of greater than 45%. It appears that the presence of protein causes the composition to have a low viscosity at high 4 solids content, even at elevated temperature. Thus no heating of the composition is required before application to the paper web.
Although carboxylated soybean protein, pretreated by a different method, has been used for double-sided coating of paper for offset printing (Whalen-Shaw and Coco., Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry of America, 1984), the compositions used in these studies did not contain any phenolic resin component, and there is no suggestion of this paradoxical viscosity property.
H The CF formulation of the present invention provides the following advantages over the prior art in production of I CF sheets: greater image clarity, i.e. less spread.
greater image resistance to aging.
greater image resistance to fading.
greater rapidity of image formation.
reduced phenolic resin requirement and hence Sreduced cost.
reduced coat weight application and hence Sreduced cost.
reduced viscosity at low temperature, hence no necessity to heat composition and reduction in cost.
i 25 According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a coating composition comprising treatqd carboxylated soybean protein, which, together withjJno'w ingrodint such as kaolin and carbpnate pigments, binder, a O' o I(\<9-\orkA- 0rw ye&v'iwee ves\y% phenolic resin and defoamer, and optionally including a modified starch and a coating lubricant will, when applied to one side of a thin flexible substrate, produce a CF sheet characterized by the improved properties described above.
Suitable phenolic resins for use in the coating composition include Bakelite 844 (Union Carbide Corp.), resin emulsions HRJ 4023 or HRJ 2270 (Schenectady Chemicals Inc.), ~~17 C-U II~ *-C
V-
i: 5 para-phenyl phenol CKM-5254 or para-tert-butyl phenol PTBB (Mitsubishi Australia Ltd.) or resin RBE-40 (Abel Lemon and Co. Pty. Ltd.), or melamine formaldehyde resin.
Suitable coating lubricants include calcium stearate, hydroxy-substituted triols such as Pluradot (BASF) or Monolan PC (Diamond Shamrock (Australia) Pty. Ltd.).
Suitable defoamers include DNF 122 N.S. (Diamond Shamrock (Australia) Pty. Ltd.).
The wheat, corn or potato starch may be modified, for example by acid cutting, addition of hydroxy groups, oxidation e.g. by treatment with ethylene oxide or hydroxyethylation, prior to use. Preferably the starch has not been treated with enzymes such as alpha-amylase. It may be possible to omit starch from the coating composition.
Suitable latexes include Acronal S360D (BASF), other acrylonitrile butylacrylate copolymers, and styrene butadiene latexes.
.,I
When the resin used is HRJ 4023, a dispersant is included in the coating composition.
Suitable pigments include No. 1 type coating clay, such as Ultrawhite 90 (Engelhard Minerals) or Hydragloss (Huber Corporation), and ultr fine ground carbonate or precipitated carbonate.
Preferably the pigment slurry is prepared in the presence of a dispersing agent. Suitable dispersing agents for use with clays include sodium polyacrylates such as Dis'ex (Allied Colloids) or Polysalt (BASF), sodium hexametaphosphate, Poise 520 or Coatex P90 (Societe d'Exploitation des Procedes). Slurries of ultra fine ground 30 carbonate are prepared preferably with Coatex P90 or Poise 520 as dispersing agent.
Other additives commonly used in the preparation of coating compositions, such as optical brighteners, may also be included.
Preferably the coating composition is prepared as follows: to the coating clay and/or carbonate is added sufficient water to give a final solids content of 40-55%, 1-- 6 -6preferably 45-50%, and ammonia to give a final pH in the mixture of 8.5-9.5. Then the following components are added: solubilized soybean protein, latex, starch, phenolic resin, lubricant, and defoamer. Alternatively the defoamer may be added immediately after the water.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of preparation of the carboxylated jI soybean protein, characterized by the steps of Adding carboxylated soybean protein to water in a i10 mixer.
Continuing mixing to achieve an even dispersion.
i Heating the dispersion to a temperature of 58-65 0
°C
while continuing mixing.
Adding sufficient ammonia solution to neutralize the carboxylic acid igroups in the protein.
Maintaining the temperature in the range 58-65 0
°C
until the reaction is complete as indicated by pH, or by complete dissolution of the protein, and J Adding defoamer and mixing by gentle agitation.
Preferably in step the concentration of solids is between 15 and 25% W/W.
Preferably in step the heating is by live steam injection.
Preferably in step the weight ratio of I 25 concentrated ammonia solution to protein is 12-15%.
Preferably in step the time required is in the range 15-20 minutes.
Preferred embodiments of the invention will be further illustrated by the following non-limiting examples, with reference to the accompanying figures, in which: Figure 1 represents a comparison of image intensity versus time between a prior art CF paper and papers coated with compositions according to the invention; and Figure 2 represents measurements of viscosity versus temperature of the composition according to the invention.
I_ O 7 Example 1 Preparation of Solubilized Protein Samples of modified (carboxylated) soybean protein polymer (Prseee\240) were obtained from the manufacturer, Ralston Purina Corp., for laboratory evaluation in blade coating formulations.
The manufacturer suggested to solubilize this protein by dispersing it in hot water (62 C) and adding concentrated ammonia to the dispersion to give a final ammonia concentration of 20% of the weight of the polymer.
This was found to be unsatisfactory, due to emission of a sulphurous odour shortly after preparation, and rapid darkening of the ammonia-treated soybean polymer. Prepared in this way, the material was unusable after 24 hours storage.
After experimentation we found that a satisfactory 15 product was produced using concentrated ammonia of a weight ratio to the polymer of 10% although some darkening was still evident.
As a result of further investigations we found that a lighaer coloured material of greater storage potential could be obtained if, instead of dispersing the protein in water at 62 0 C initially and re-heating to 62°C as recommended by the 4 ra o manufacturer, the soybean protein was dispersed in cold water and heated prior to neutralization.
Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment of the 25 invention, a solubilized preparation of the carboxylated soybean protein which was suitable for use in coating compositions is prepared by: Adding carboxylated soybean protein to water in a mixer to a concentration of 15-25% at ambient temperature.
Continuing mixing to achieve an even dispersion.
Heating the dispersion to a temperature of 58-65°C while continuing mixing.
Adding sufficient ammonia solution to neutralize the carboxylic acid groups in the protein (Weight ratio of ammonia solution to protein 12-15%) 1., 8 i Maintaining the temperature in the range 58-65°C until the reaction is complete as indicated by pH or by complete dissolution of the protein. The end-point pH is in the range 8.8 9.2.
The resulting solution of the soybean protein is then ready for use in coating compositions.
Example 2 Laboratory-scale Blade Coating Composition A coating mixture for laboratory trials was prepared, with the following composition as ca ilated by weight on an oven-dry basis: Parts No. 1 type coating clay Parts Ultra fine ground carbonate (Hydrocarb *oa 7 Parts Soybean polymer (ammonia-treated S 15 as in Example 1) o. 27 Parts Phenolic resin HRJ 2270 8 Parts Acronal S360D Latex 'o 1 Part Monolan PC 0.1 Part Defoamer W 122 NS 4« o 20 Paper coated in the laboratory using this composition showed no improvement in CF characteristics.
SHowever, the laboratory-scale coater employs low shear rates and hydrodynamic forces. Therefore the reaction of the soybean protein with the clay particles to create larger void 25 spaces and improved coating holdout by controlled clay 4 flocculation was occurring, but the desired result in terms of paper coating properties was not observed.
Example 3 Mill Trial Using Trailing Blade Coater In order to test whether coating at high shear rates would produce the desired effect, the following composition was used (all components calculated by weight on an oven-dry basis): 9 Parts Ultrawhite 90 clay (A no. 1 type brightness clay) Parts Hydragloss clay (A no. 1 high gloss clay) 3 Parts Soybean protein, solubilized as in Example 1 8 Parts Acronal S360D latex .3 Parts Co-binder latex (Acrosol .2 Parts Melamine formaldehyde res.n 175 Parts Monolan PC 0 1 0.3 0.7 Parts Optical brightening agent (Tinopal ABP) Formulation Solids: 9 4 9 9 9.9 o *9 9. 4 4C 9 99 OR 9 4949 94I 99 9 9O 9 4 99 9 4I 9 4 The standard formulation used as a control in the blade coating trial was, on an oven dry basis: 30 Parts 70 Parts 0.2 Parts Parts 5.5 Parts 1.2 Parts 0.375 Parts 0.7 Parts 0.375 Parts Ultrawhite 90 clay Hydragloss clay Carboxymethyl cellulose (Finnfix 300) Enzyme converted wheat starch (In house conversion) Acronal S360D latex Melamine formaldehyde resin Monolan PC Optical brightening agent Primal ASE 60 (An alkali swellable latex used for viscosity control) Formulation Solids: In both cases the substrate used was a production quality light weight paper, a combination of refiner ground wood produced from Pinus radiata, semi-chemical pulp produced from eucalypt, and long-fibre kraft pulp.
~-~Lllirmru~as 10 The total binder content in the coating mixture was 11.3 parts in the trial mixture (latex protein) and 13 parts in the control (latex starch). The total coat weight addition in both cases was 15 gm/m 2 Results were assessed by measurements of paper gloss and ink gloss, measured on both the felt side and the wire side of the coated paper web. These results are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1 Composition containing modified soybean protein Control composition Felt Side Wire Side Paper gloss 52 48.2 56.3 49 39.9 48.6 Felt Side 42 34.7 31.1 38.1 40.6 43.1 45.1 Wire Side 41 31,1 37.0 41.5 48.4 46.2 49.6 Ink gloss a 1 c The improvement in gloss qualities was maintained, even when the coat weight was reduced by 3 gm/m 2 or by 29%. These results are illustaSted in Table 2. Both paper gloss and ink gloss are comparable to or superior to those Sobtained with the control mpsition at 15 gm/m 2 25 obtained with the control composition at 15 gm/m 1 11 TABLE 2 Reduction in Composition containing coab weight Measurement modified soybean protein Felt Side Wire Side 20% (3gm/m2) Paper gloss 47.0 40.0 Ink gloss 50.4 47.2 29% Paper gloss 44.6 33.3 Ink gloss 50.7 34.1 The results of this experiment demonstrated that at the same coat weight addition but lower binder content a soybean protein-containing formulation achieved improved coating holdout, resulting in significant increase in fibre coverage, and reduced coating pits and hence higher ink gloss.
2 Indicative of the improved coating holdout was the fact that the coat weight was reduced by 29%, but the coverage achieved was equal to that obtained without the soybean protein.
The results obtained on the blade coater were considered in the context of CF coating formulations for the gate roll size press to achieve superior image properties and/or cost advantages compared to products prepared by previously known processes.
Example 4 Scanning Electron Microscopy of Coated Papers Previously known CF formulations penetrate the substrate to some degree and leave fibres on or near the 25 coated surface. On drying, pitting occurs due to coating shrinkage. The colourless dye, once released from the coated back (CB) coat, migrates to this pitted surface, and on contact forms an image which is distorted by surface 12 irregularities. Excessive absorption into macro pores, or along hygroscopic structures such as cellular fibres, will reduce the image intensity.
We have found that coating compositions containing our solubilized soybean protein produce a coating which does not significantly penetrate the substrate surface, and which shows reduced pitting compared to previously known compositions.
SScanning electron micrographs taken using an ISI Super IIIA electron microscope at magnification x70, and tilt angle 450 showed that paper coated with the control coating composition of Example 3, containing no soybean protein, at coat weight 15 gm/m had numerous pits in the coating, and fibres protruding from the surface. In contrast, paper coated with a composition containing the solubilized soybean protein prepared as in Example 2, using the same coat weight as for the control, showed a marked reduction in the number of pits t and visible fibres.
Paper coated as for the first experiment, but at a coat weight reduced by 3 gm/m or with a reduction in coat weight of 29% compared to the first experiment, showed that despite the reduction in coat weight, the quality of the S coating is largely maintained. The significantly improved coating holdout obtained during mill trials presents a more ;j 25 even coated surface of more uniform microporosity, and hence the colourless dye from the CB coat is less distorted by dye loss into coating pits or through wicking along fibres at or I near the coated surface.
Xn addition, the controlled increase of coating void volume allows greater surface area for reaction of the CF coat with the dye; hence intensity of the image is increased and/or the quantity of reactive phenolic resin can be reduced along with a CF coat weight reduction.
i I- rrr~ 13 Example 5 Mill Trial Using Gate Roll Size Press Yroduction-scale trials were also performed on a gate roll size press, utilizing a standard formulation for use on that machine with the addition of solubilized soybean protein prepared as in Example 1. Improved coating was observed, similar to that found in Example 3.
Example 6 Mill Trial Using Blade Coater A production scale coating trial was performed at applicant's Wesley Vale mill. The coating composition contained phenolic resin HRJ 4023.
Webs from O/N 9322 and 9323 were coated at No. 1 head with CF coat Lab. No. 3662 (One 56% batch was used).
Fieldsize 6360 containing polyurethane was applied to the 2nd head at a rate of 2 gsm O.D.
15 Samples were obtained from each web No. for image intensity testing.
gu Tables 1 and 2 show paper properties of the CF paper Sa'o* obtained ex Paper Machine.
Porosity of O/N 9323 ex Coater was 70 points higher than standard while O/N 9322 was up 40 points.
O/N 9322 was 2.1 O.D. gsm higher than standard at No. 1 head.
Other paper properties were within the standard 1 range.
The image intensity of copies produced using CF paper thus prepared was measured as follows: 1. 20 cm x 3 cm strips are cut out of the test sample (usually 6 sample strips are obtained).
2. The coated sides of these samples are placed in contact with a standard CB coated, 20 cm x 3 cm strip.
3. The samples are held together with the CB coated strip on top of the test strip and both are clamped under the 'emulsion masher' image marking wheel.
4. Image marking pressure is set to 150 psi and sample is now ready for imaging.
-14- At this stage the Minolta reflectance meter is calibrated and set to the Yxy mode for reflectance measuring.
6. After calibration, imaging of the sample may be carried out by simply switching mach2ne on. The length of the sample strip passes under imaging wheel. Care should be taken in making sure that an unimaged area is alsc present on the sample.
7. Once the sample has passed through the imaging process, 1 minute should elapse before the reflectance reading is taken. The sample must be unclamped before removal from the 'emulsion masher' o *o and the CB sheet separated from the test strip.
I o 8. After one minute, two Yxy readings are taken on 15 the white unimaged area of the sample, followed by a *a S9 three Yxy readings on the imaged area.
I 9. The two white readings are averaged and the three image readings averaged.
Average of image readings Image Intensity is given as xAverage 100 Average of white readings 20 Improved image intensity was noted with all web numbers except web No. 1-602 of O/N 93?3. Average image intensity over the 5 reels was 1.4 points lower than the 0; commercially accepted standard of 51.3. This indicates a better image intensity compared to prior art CF papers.
Note: This average includes the higher reading of 1 ,0 52.8 obtained on reel.
O/N 9322 base (barrier coated) has a lower porosity S" but higher smoothness than reel 1-602 O/N 9321 (water leaf base). O/N 9322 also has a better image intensity than reel 1-602 O/N 9323 which suggests that base smoothness plays an ~important role in determining image intensity.
Web No. 2/143 ex O/N 9323 was used to prepare a CFB sheet. The CF precoated paper ex Wesley Vale was coated with coated back (CB) coating, oven dry Coat weight pickup (O.D.
CWPU) of 4.5 gsm.
The CF paper was within standard specification for image intensity and handling specification for image intensity.
and handling characteristics (calender and scuff) see Table 4.
The unacceptable image intensity of paper produced on O/No. 9322 is considered to result from an out of standard base paper smoothness, i.e. the base was rougher than those previously used.
a C I
*I
S
I I
II
II 1 11 ii 16 TABLE 1 Paper Properties Ex No. 11 Paper Machine O/N 9323 and O/N 9322 O/N 9323 Test Standard (2/143) O/N 9322 Grammage (gsm) 50 45.3 52.4 Thickness (ur) 310 316 309 Density (g/mL) 0.65 0.58 0.68 Residue ex Reel 12.4 6.5 11.5 Moisture at Reel 6.5 6.0 7.6 Cobb (gsm) 20 30 44 34 Smoothness 130 320 115 (mls/10 min) W/S max. 240 135 Opacity 88.5 85.1 89.8 Porosity (SP) 150 195 105 Formation Grading B+ B B Hunterlab L 85.8 89.1 85.8 a 1.2 1.3 0.6 b 4.1 4.4 4.4 Size Press Pick-Up (gsm) 3.0 4.0 Nil not tested Target Wax Pick 11/12
I
U
t 20 7 ,~Th k 17 TABLE 2 Paper Properties Ex Coater CD 15 0/N 9323 and 0/N 9322 #4 a C 444 4.4, 4,44
C
C C C 4 4* #4
C.
4#
*C
4 be. S 4 #4 C C
C.
4 C
I*
CC
4 4 4444 4444
C
Test Standard 0/N 9323 0/N 9322 Grainmage (gsm) 54.0, 59.0 54.5 58.5 Thickness (urn) -285 293 Density -0.78 0.80 Sheffield Finish 60 90 -T/s 70 T/S (MIS/10 min) W/S 100 W/S 105 Porosity 25 45 117/82 88/56 Opacity 92 min. 92 92 Brightness 68 min. 74.7 71.9 Moisture 7.0 6.9 7.2 O.D. CWPU (gsm) Head 1 6.5 7.0 8.6 Head 2 TABLE 3 Image Intensity for 0/N 9322 and 0/N 9323 0 t Order Number Web No. Image Intensity Standard -51.3 0/N 9322 1-717 49.3 0/N 9322 1-718 49.7 0/N 9323 1-602 52.8 0/N 9323 2-143 48.7 0/N 9323 2-144 49.1 18 TABLE 4 Wesley Vale CFB Coated (CF Precoated) Trial Paper Properties ii ii
I
r4 10 r r E ei C Wesley Vale CF Test Standard Precoated Paper Calender Max. 63, Target 58 (Image Intensity) CB/CFS 56.1 CF/CBS 58.3 Scuff (Handling) CB/CFS 80 min. 85.4 CF/CBS 78 min.
Moisture 5.7 6.3 Coat Weight Pick Up 4.6 Curl 4" k" Base Moisture 6.6 Base Grammage 47.7 Coated Grammage 54.2 Brightness -A 72.1 B 66.5 Hunterlab L -A 89.0 B 87.6 a A B 0.8 b -A B 1.1. I~llrUCllg~l-- 19 Example 7 Optimization of Image Intensity In order to optimize conditions for coating of the paper in terms of eventual image production, papers coated in the laboratory under various conditions were compared with a standard prior art CF paper, Omna (Nashua), using a standard prior art CB paper. Image intensity was assessed.
Parameters tested were: Paper type, grade of paper, presence or absence of barrier coat between base paper and CP coating, amount of modified carboxylated soybean protein, presence or absence of sulphite in the barrier coat, type and amount of phenolic resin, varying O.D. CWPU, base paper smoothness, clay content 0 tI*" of coating composition, latex type, and carbonate pigment type ,00 and amount.
It was found that significant variation in the image intensity could be obtained by changing the method of feeding i the paper samples into the crusher. If the crusher is closed on both paper samples at the same time a much higher image intensity value is obtained (as much as 10 15% difference) in comparison to closing the clamp on the CB paper and feeding the CF coated sheet through af'ter turning on the motor. A further difference is also obtained if the clamp is closed i without any paper in the gap and both sheets are fed through after turning on the motor.
The following did not significantly affect image intensity or colour: amount of soybean protein, O.D. CWPU, II base paper smoothness.
The presence of sulphite in the barrier coat did not I jaffect image intensity, but it did reduce the tendency of the image to have a greenish hue.
w No significant difference in the colour of the image was found when different types of paper base were used for coating. The colour of the base sheet appears to have an overriding effect.
The grade of paper, presence of a barrier coating resin type and possibly amount, clay and latex, and pigment quantity all affected the image, as follows: 1 I I ii- ;1 1 20 Several grades of paper were coated with Wesley Vale CF coating, Lab. No. 3544 CWPU 6 7 gsm), and subjected to the standard image intensity test.
Imported Japanese base for NCR paper 5 Unsized Twincote Sheet 60 gsm Australcote Base 66.5 gsm Burnie Woodfree Base 85 gsm None of the base papers tested resulted in an image as dense as that achieved by using the standard Omna CF and standard CB.
TABLE CF Coated Base Paper SI t CF Coat Image Minolta Porosity Sample O.D CWPU Intensity 3/4" I.D L a b CF Std. 53.3 66.0 -2.1 +2.7 Japanese 5.3 60.0 72.1 -4.4 +1.9 140 Burnie W/F 6.7 73.2 76.7 -4.4 +4.4 270 Australcote 6.5 70.4 73.9 -4.3 +5.5 32 Twincote 6.6 70.4 74.7 -4.2 +4.7 241 (unsized) Note: The lower the image intensity value the image.
darker the Each of the above base papers were then coated, first with 2 3 gsm O.D. CWPU Barrier Coating using Graphsize A with Fieldsize 6360 followed by 6 7 gsm O.D. CWPU of the standard CF coating, Lab. No. 3544. Each of the coated papers was then subjected to the standard image intensity test.
-21- The addition of the barrier coat to the base paper before the addition of the CF coat improved the density of the image but they still did not approach the image density of the control CF paper.
TABLE 6 Barrier Coated CF Coated Base *a~r 4 0O *440 0 *r 4 0 94 O 4i 44 0L 4F *4 4r 4 4*11 444.
Barrier CF Coat Image Minolta Sample Coat OD CWPU Intensity 10 OD CWPU L a b CF Std. 52.9 63.7 -0.1 +1.3 Japanese 2.6 5.9 60.0 73.6 -3.2 Burnie W/F 2.6 5.5 70.5 75.0 -2.7 +2.9 15 Australcote 3.2 6.5 67.3 72.3 -2.1 +3.4 Twincote 2.4 5.8 68.1 72.5 -2.4 +4.8 Base paper smoothness did not affect the image intensity.
The use of HRJ 4023 resin resulted in a much darker image 51.2% compared to 60.0 using the resin HRJ 2270.
The coating composition contained 30 parts of resin.
Increasing the amount of clay in the CF coat by five parts resulted in a much poorer image 66.5% compared to 60.0% for the standard CF coat using HRJ 2270.
j "nt"~ ~u~ 22 TABLE 7 The Effect of Base Paper Smoothness, Resin Type And Amount of Clay Used.
4tt 0 1 0 Image Sample Description CWPU Finish Intensity 1. Std. CF Coat on Std. Base 6.7 253.2 60.1 Std. CF Coat on S/Cal CF Base 5.92 108 66.5 Std. CF Coat on S/Cal CF Base using 2270 Resin 5.45 97 68.5 2. CF Coat HRJ 4023 Std. Base 6.85 251.7 51.2 3. CF Coat 90 parts Spray Satin 10 parts Hydrocarb 90 Std.
Base using 2270 Resin 7.21 260.0 66.5 P*r; The use of modified Dow 670 latex (styrene butadiene latex) in place of Acronal S360D latex (acrylic latex) resulted in a much darker image in comparison to the control using the resin HRJ 4023, i.e. 43.2% compared to 51.2%.
Dow 670 latex was found to be unstable when used with the gate roll size press. The formulation of the latex was modified by Dow in order to increase its mechanical stability; the modified latex is known as Dow 670 W.
Replacing the Hydrocarb 90 with standard carbonate pigment resulted in an equivalent image intensity in comparison to the control, i.e. 50.9% compared to 51.2%.
1 23 Increasing the amount of Hydrocarb 90 by parts to 20 parts in the formulation also resulted in a poorer image, 57.3% compared to 51.2%.
TABLE 8 The Effect of Different Latex and Varying the Amount and Type of Carbonate.
44 4.
I #4% 'It.e r 4 -I
I
1f 4 ,i 4, a 1 i% Image L a b Values Sample Description CWPU Intensity L a b 1. CF Coat using Dow 670 (HRJ 4023 Resin) 9.3 43.2 63.3 -1.9 2. CF Coat using Carbonate instead of Hydrocarb (HRJ 4023 Resin) 9.5 50.9 67.8 -2.1
I,
44 4 4*4% 4 Ii 44 4 4 i, 20 3.
4 .4 I 444$ CF Coat using parts Hydrocarb (HRJ 4023 Resin) 9.3 57.3 71.2 -2.4 +2.7 The effect of using Modified Dow 670 latex in place of Acronal S360D and the effect of using the resin HRJ 4023 in place of HRJ 2270 was re-assessed following the findings on the effect of the method of feeding the paper samples into the crusher.
From these results it appears that the use of the resin 4023 in conjunction with either modified Dow 670 or Acronal S360D gave an acceptable image intensity in comparison to the control Omna standard.
24 TABLE 9 Ij 1
I
ii Brookfield Image Sample Solids pH Viscosity O.D. CWPU Intensity Description (mPaS) Acronal S360D Std. Carbonate 52.3 8.8 1040 8.5 9.5 61.3 Resin HRJ 2270 Modified Dow 670 Std. Carbonate 52.0 8.7 1160 8.5 9.5 60.4 Resin HRJ 2270 Acronal S360D Std. Carbonate 52.1 8.6 1000 8.5 9.5 50.9 Resin HRJ 4023 Modified Dow 670 Std. Carbonate 52.7 8.6 1290 8.5 9.5 52.9 Resin HRJ 4023 Std.
Omna 55.1 The greenish hue of the image was largely overcome by using the resin HRJ 4023 in place of the resin HRJ 2270.
The Japanese base paper did not show a significant improvement in image density after applying the barrier coat before the CF coat. This is most probably due to predominant starch sizing on the surface and also the results of its very good formation, relatively high density and good finish.
It appears that the use of Modified Dow 670 latex in the CF coat results, at the least, in an equivalent image intensity to the coating utilizing Acronal S360D latex.
Also the use of standard carbonate in place of Hydrocarb 90 results in an equivalent image intensity which would result in a considerable cost saving.
The O.D. CWPU, parts of PP240 and parts of resin does not appear to have a significant influence on the image intensity over the ranges tested.
The use of the resin HRJ 4023 results in a darker image in comparison to the image obtained using the resin HRJ 2270.
We conclude that a suitable CF formulation having optimum image properties could contain modified carboxylated soybean protein prepared as described above,,modified Dow 670 ~latex, 15 parts of standard carbonate, and 33 parts of resin 9 HRJ 4023.
S 15 Our mill trials have shown PP 240 to have a S significant effect on coated paper properties when used either o0 at the gate roll size press or the blade coater, whereas laboratory work indicated no benefits at all as has the abovementioned laboratory work on CF coating.
20 It should also be pointed out that mill trials using o* ~the CF coat have shown that increasing the amount of phenolic resin HRJ 2270 in the CF coating has led to an improved image intensity. Furthermore, increasing the O.D. CWPU has led to improved image intensity which again is not consistent with S 25 the laboratory results.
Example 8 Rheology of the CF Coating The rheological properties of the coating formulation selected as optimal in the previous example were tested. The results are shown below. Viscosity was measured after one hour stirring in a Kaltec viscometer. The coating composition contained standard carbonate 15 parts, HRJ 4023 resin 33 parts, PP240 soybean protein 7 parts, and modified Dow 670 latex 8 parts. Total solids comprised 52.6%.
26 26 Temperature 25 0
C
pH 9.1 Apparent Newtonian 1000 viscosity (mPaS) Example 9 Change in Image Intensity with Time The effect of time on image intensity was assessed by comparing 'results obtained with a standard prior art CF paper, Omna (Nashua), and papers coated according to the present invention, O/N 9322 1-718 and O/N 9323 2-144. Image intensity was assessed at 30 sec 48 hour after image formation. The results are shown in FiLure 1. Curve (a) Oan< represents Omna, curves and the papers according to the invention. It is clear that image development is faster in curve O/N 9322 1-718 than in the standard, with a 04 a 15 plateau being reached by one hour compared to approximately 24 0 hours with Omna. 0/N 9322 2-144 shows a flatter curve, but still reaches a plateau by 2 hours. Thus both samples 0 0according to the invention show more rapid image formation than the prior art standard.
9 0 20 Example 10 Viscosity-Temperature Relationship 0 The application of coatings using a Gate Roll Size Press is significantly affected by the viscosity of the a A material being applied. The experience with conventional precoat formulations used on No. 11 machine is that an 25 increase in temperature to around 70°C will reduce viscosity and hence help to minimise film split pattern.
To ensure that the experimental CF formulation is applied at minimum viscosity for the required solids content of 52.5%, a series of temperature viscosity determinations was undertaken.
The viscosity temperature relationship was measured for formulation 3662 at 52.5 0 C. The results are shown in Figure 2(a).
27 This demonstrated that contrary to expectations the viscosity increases with increasing temperature. This behaviour was reversible, i.e. on cooling the viscosity decreased according to the same relationship.
Temperature viscosity curves at 51% and 49% solids showed a similar reversible temperature viscosity relationship as for the 52.5% solids coating. This is shown in Figures 2 and This particular formulation differs from prior art precoat formulations in that it contains a carboxylated protein and phenolic resin. To identify the material causing the unexpected temperature viscosity relationship formulations were prepared in which: the protein was replaced with starch and latex 15 in the same ratio as for the prior art (3662a).
protein was deleted with no replacement (3662b) Results are shown in Table The viscosity of 3662a at 35 0 C was 2,200 mPaS. On 0* '20 heating to 50°C the coating jelled. After cooling to 30 0 C the viscosity was high at 30,000 mPaS.
The behaviour of formulation 3662b was similar to o 3662a. At 25 0 C viscosity was 1460 mPaS but the formulation jelled at 50 0 C. This coating remained in a jelled form after cooling.
It is reasonable to conclude from these observations I that the phenolic resin causes this inverse temperature relationship, but the inclusion of the carboxylated protein minimises the effect, and, contrary to current practice, the formulation should be run at 20 30 0 C at 50% solids for the X J gate roll size press application.
j tm 28 TABLE CF Formulations
I
1a 4 tS4 4 SI a *t 4141 a .t4 3662 3662a 3662b Std. Clay 85 85 Std. Carbonate 15 15 Modified Starch 3.5 7.0 Latex 3.5 7.0 Phenolic Resin 33.0 33.0 33.0 Lubricant 1.1..0 Optical Brightening Agent 0.25 0.25 0.25 Protein 7.0 Solids 52.5 52.5 52.5 Thus the formulations of the present invention can be used at high solid content bit relatively low temperature, i.e. the coating composition need not be preheated before application to the paper.
It will be clearly understood that the invention in its general aspects is not limited to the specific details referred to hereinabove.

Claims (13)

1.i 29 THE CLAIMS DEFINING THE INVENTION ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. A coating composition for coated front copy papers comprising pre-treated carboxylated soybean protein, pigment, binder, a phenolic resin or a melamine formaldehyde resin, and defoamer, wherein the carboxylated soybean protein is pre-treated by the steps of: adding carboxylated soybean protein to water in a mixer, continuing mixing to achieve an even dispersion, heating the dispersion to a temperature of 58 to 65 0 C while continuing mixing, adding sufficient ammonia solution to neutralize the carboxylic acid groups in the protein, and maintaining the temperature in the range 58 to 0 C until the reaction is complete as indicated by pH, or by complete dissolution of the protein, and adding defoamer and mixing by gentle agitation.
2. A composition according to Claim 1, wherein the pigment is kaolin or a carbonate.
3. A composition according to Claim 1 or Claim 2, wherein the resin is selected from the group consisting of novolac resins and melamine formaldehyde resins.
4. A composition according to any one of Claims 1 to 3, wherein the binder is a latex. r 30 A composition according to any one of Claims 1 to 4, which additionally incorporates a dispersant.
6. A composition according to any one of Claims 1 to wherein the binder is modified starch.
7. A composition according to Claim 6, wherein the modified starch is a wheat, corn or potato starch treated by acid hydrolysis, addition of hydroxy groups, oxidation, or hydroxyethylation.
8. A method for preparing a coating composition according to Claim 1, comprising the steps of: adding sufficient water to the pigment to give i a final solids content of 40 to adding ammonia to give a final pH in the mixture of 8.5 to 9.5 and adding the following components: solubilized soybean protein, binder and phenolic resin, wherein defoamer is added after step or in S' step
9. A method for pre-treatment of carboxylated soybean protein, comprising the steps of: adding carboxylated soybean protein to water in a mixer, continuing mixing to achieve an even dispersion, heating the dispersion to a temperature of 58 to 650C while continuing mixing, adding sufficient ammonia solution to neutralize the carboxylic acid groups in the protein, Si 31 maintaining the temperature in the range 58 to until the reaction is complete as indicated by pH, or by complete dissolution of the protein, and adding defoamer and mixing by gentle agitation. A method according to Claim 9, wherein in step (a) the concentration of solids is between 15 and 25% w/w.
11. A method according to Claim 9 or Claim 10, wherein the heating in step is by live steam injection. t 12. A method according to any one of Claims 9 to 11, wherein in step the weight ratio of concentrated ammonia solution to protein is 12 to
13. A method according to any one of Claims 9 to 12, wherein in step the time required is in the range to 20 minutes.
14. Coated front paper prepared using a composition according to any one of Claims 1 to 7. Carboxylated soybean protein prepared according to any one of Claims 9 to 13.
16. A method for coating paper wherein a high solids composition according to any one of Claims 1 to 7 is applied to the paper without preheating of the composition. :i 32
17. Coated front paper prepared by the method of Claim 16. DATED this 28th day of December 1989 NORTH BROKEN HILL LIMITED By Its Patent Attorneys: GRIFFITH HACK CO. Fellows Institute of Patent Attorneys of Australia. i t .B .I A) Li, ip
AU58807/86A 1985-06-13 1986-06-10 Coated front copy paper Ceased AU595207B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06/873,974 US4762868A (en) 1985-06-13 1988-06-13 Coated front copy paper

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AUPH101685 1985-06-13
AUPH1016 1985-06-13

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU5880786A AU5880786A (en) 1986-12-18
AU595207B2 true AU595207B2 (en) 1990-03-29

Family

ID=3771145

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU58807/86A Ceased AU595207B2 (en) 1985-06-13 1986-06-10 Coated front copy paper

Country Status (3)

Country Link
AU (1) AU595207B2 (en)
CA (1) CA1252238A (en)
NZ (1) NZ216479A (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU514209B2 (en) * 1977-06-21 1981-01-29 Appleton Papers Inc. Copy receiving coated sheet
AU521717B2 (en) * 1978-01-17 1982-04-29 Mead Corporation, The Production of pressure-sensitive carbonless record sheets
US4602264A (en) * 1982-08-25 1986-07-22 Kanzaki Paper Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Recording materials

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU514209B2 (en) * 1977-06-21 1981-01-29 Appleton Papers Inc. Copy receiving coated sheet
AU521717B2 (en) * 1978-01-17 1982-04-29 Mead Corporation, The Production of pressure-sensitive carbonless record sheets
US4602264A (en) * 1982-08-25 1986-07-22 Kanzaki Paper Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Recording materials

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA1252238A (en) 1989-04-04
AU5880786A (en) 1986-12-18
NZ216479A (en) 1988-10-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4867844A (en) Method for treating paper to improve the holdout characteristics of printing inks
CA2768292C (en) Print media for high speed, digital inkjet printing
EP0747235B1 (en) Paper suitable for ink-jet or electrophotographic printing
KR100489984B1 (en) Roll printing paper suitable for cold set printing and its manufacturing method
CA2006362C (en) Newsprint
GB2050868A (en) Method of producing medium-grade coated paper for rotogravure printing
CA2271417C (en) Porous coating pigment and a method for its production
KR19990008087A (en) Matte coated paper and its manufacturing method
JPH11200293A (en) Coated web recording paper having suitability for cold set
US4762868A (en) Coated front copy paper
US5800870A (en) Size press coating method
KR100923225B1 (en) Coated Paper for Printing
AU595207B2 (en) Coated front copy paper
JP2004256958A (en) Coated paper for printing
US5985367A (en) Process for preparing coated printing paper
JP2002173892A (en) Coated paper for gravure printing
JPH11286894A (en) Newsprint paper
GB2284829A (en) Filler and coating composition for paper
FI98235C (en) Printing paper, method of making it and its use
TWI747577B (en) Transfer printing and dyeing paper and transfer printing and dyeing method
JP2004293003A (en) Slightly coated paper
JP4385629B2 (en) Coated paper for printing
JP2003247195A (en) Printing paper and printing method using the same
JP2008031603A (en) One-side gross craft paper and method for producing the same
JP2834782B2 (en) Manufacturing method of coated paper