AU602911B2

AU602911B2 - Wall construction and resilient runner therefor

Info

Publication number: AU602911B2
Application number: AU77029/87A
Authority: AU
Inventors: Richard Edwin Slager
Original assignee: United States Gypsum Co
Current assignee: United States Gypsum Co
Priority date: 1986-07-01
Filing date: 1987-07-01
Publication date: 1990-11-01
Anticipated expiration: 2007-07-01
Also published as: GB2200671A; WO1988000266A1; GB2200671B; GB8804019D0; AU7702987A; JPH01500604A

Description

WALL CONSTRUCTION AND RESILIENT RUNNER THEREFOR

This invention relates to a new and improved thin gauge, buckle resistant, resilient runner for the construction of wallboard partitions which reduce the transmission of sound between rooms separated by those partitions.

The use of resilient runners as support surfaces for wallboards in such partitions has been known for many years. In 1963, U.S. 3,090,164 (Nelsson) taught a runner having a base flange in a first plane, a wallboard support flange in a second, parallel plane, and an inclined Web connecting them. The placing of the web between the support flange and the base flange which was to be affixed to the framework of the partition imparted resiliency to the runner. Further resiliency was imparted by openings spaced apart in the web. The runner 8 of Nelsson has become well known in the building trade as the RC-1 channel sold by the United States Gypsum Company. There has long been a desire, however, to reduce the cost of manufacture of the RC-1 channel and to improve its resiliency so that sound transmission by party wall partitions could be reduced still further. Another problem with the RC-1 channel is that it must be handled with care to prevent it from buckling. The slots in the web of the RC-1 channel have very narrow boundaries between them and the two flanges. It is. in these weakened locations, that buckling of the runner occurs, if the channel is picked up near its midpoint. The cost of the runner could be reduced and its. resiliency could be increased by using a thinner sheet of metal in its fabrication but that, without doing more, would only aggravate the buckling problem. It is an object of this invention, therefore to provide a buckle resistant, resilient runner which, is fabricated from sheet metal which is as thin as it can be and still be capable of anchoring a wallboard fastening screw. It is a another object of this invention to provide a wallboard partition having a high, sound transmission coefficient in which the wallboards are separated from the framework by a low cost, lightweight resilient runner.

These and other objects of this invention which, will become apparent are achieved by the resilient runner and partition which are described below with reference to the drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a fragmentary perspective view of a preferred embodiment of the resilient runner of this invention.

FIG. 2 is a sectional view taken along the line 2-2 of FIG. 1. FIG. 3 is an elevational view of a portion of a partition 6f this invention.

IN FIGS. 1 and 2, the elongate resilient runner 10 is made from sheet metal and consists of the base flange 12 which is connected to the wallboard support flange 14 by the stays 15 of the scalloped web 16 which is integral with and inclined at an oblique angle to both the flange 12 and the flange 14. Resiliency is imparted to the runner 10 by said inclination of the web and by the arcuate, elongated notches 18 which interrupt the boundary between the flange 12 and the web 16. The stop flange 20 extends toward the plane of the flange 12 at an acute angle to the plane of the web 16 from the edge of the flange 14 opposite the juncture of said flange and the web 16. The dimension "y" is substantially equal to or greater than the dimension "x". The tabs 22 are residue from the piercing and hreaking of flat sheet metal stock in the forming of the scalloped web 16 and the base flange 12. The tabs 22 on the runner 10 provide a wider field on the base flange 12 for the placement and driving of fasteners. The dimples 24, which are convenient markers for the placement of screws, are spaced apart longitudinally along the flange 12 in alignment with the lateral centerline of each arcuate notch 18. tn FIG. 3, the partition 26 is illustrated to show the relationship of the runners 10, the ceiling plate 28, the floor plate 30, the wood studs 32 which connect said plates, and the wallhoard 34. The opposing wallboard 36 is fastened directly to the studs 32 and the sound attenuation blankets 38 are stapled inside the cavities. In the construction of the partition 26, the resilient runners 10 are secured transversely to the studs 32 in spaced, parallel relationship to the plates 28 and 30. The runners 10 are preferably oriented so that the support flanges 14 project upwardly from the base flanges 12. Spacing of the runners 10 is appropriately about 2 feet when the conventional 4 x 8 foot gypsum wallboards are used but the spacing may be varied to accommodate other kinds and sizes of wallboards such as the currently popular 3 x 5 foot cement boards which are used as tile backer boards. In any event, the runners are placed so that adjacent wallboards 34 can be fastened to a common support flange 14.

Resiliency is enhanced by the removal of the maximum amount of metal from the web 16 by the arcuate notches 18 that is consistent with the retention of the strength required in the web to resist buckling when the runner is picked up and also to bear the load imposed on the webs 16 of each runner in FIG. 3 when the wallboard 34 is installed. The arcuate, elongated notches 18 minimize the area of the web 16 wherein short paths are provided for sound waves from the flange 14 to the stud 32 yet the amount of metal between the apogee of each arcuate notch and the flange 14 provides sufficient strength to the web 16 to resist buckling. Another advantage of the arcuate shape of the notch 18 is that the concentration of stress at specific points on the web 16 is avoided because of the absence of abrupt changes in the cross section of the notch.

The arcuate, elongated shape of the notch 18 is defined in terms of the ratio of the length of the chord subtended by the arc and the length of the perpendicular line from the chord to the apogee of the arc. A preferred ratio for the purposes of this invention is about 16:1. For example, in a preferred embodiment of the runner 10 wherein the flange 12 (excluding the tab 22) is about 0.3 inch wide, the web 16 (including the notch 18) is about 0.56 inch, wide, the flange 14 is. about 1.25 inches wide, and y = x = 0.375 inch, the span of each notch 18 is about 3 inches and the s.pacing of the notches is about 4 inches, o.c. The width of the sheet metal blank from which the preferred runner 10 is formed is only about 2.5 inches and the galvanized steel sheet is only about 0.017-0.020 inch (0.016 inch minimum before galvanizing). Thus, the cost of material for the preferred runner 10 is much less than for the well known RC-1 channel which is formed from 3 inch wide or wider blanks which are from 0.021 to 0.025 inch thick after galvanizing. The overall width of the runners 10 may be greater and the metal may be thicker but the extra cost of the material will not buy better performance.

It is important that, regardless of the other dimensions of the runner of this invention, the minimum distance from the flange 14 to the notch 18 is at least substantially equal to or greater than the width of the stop flange 20, e.g., y = x. Galvanizing of the sheet steel before forming is preferred. The metal blank is drawn through a powered rotary tool which comprises an upper roll having a plurality of lancing tools having the arcuate shape of the notches 18 and a lower roll having a like number of cutting edges which are in register with the lancing tools. The lancing and cutting tools are spaced apart on their respective rolls in order to slit the flat metal at the desired intervals. The dimples 24 may also be stamped into the metal in the same operation. The slit metal strip is then fed into a roll forming machine in which the lower die is routed out to allow the tabs 22 of the base flange 12 to separate from the web portion of the metal along the arcuate slits, as the oblique angle between the base flange and the web stays 15 is formed by the upper die alone. The scalloped web 16, the flat tabs 22, and the dimples 24 are thus formed without giving rise to scrap. In the construction of the partition 26 for a sound transmission loss test, the preferred runners 10 were spaced apart 24" o.c. on one side of commercial, nominally 2" x 4" wood studs 32 which were spaced at 16" o.c. intervals. The runners were 0.019 to 0.020" thick. The sound attenuation blankets 38 were 3.5" thick THERMAFI.BER mineral fiber, blankets having a density of 2.5 Iba./cu. ft.. The wallboards 34 and 36 were 5/8" thick SHEETROCK. brand FIRECODE gypsum panels and were attached with USG Type S Bugle Head screws at 12" o.c. intervals. The joints between the panels were taped and the perimeter of the partition was sealed on both sides with a single bead of USG Acoustical Sealant. The partition had an FSTC of 53 according to the test which was conducted in general accordance with the ASTM E336-84 Standard Method of Test for "Measurement of Airborne Sound Insulation in Buildings". The FSTC was determined from the test results in strict accordance with the ASTM E413-73 Standard Classification for "Determination of Sound Transmission Class".

The stiffness or resistance to buckling of the preferred runner 10 was compared with that of the well known RC-1 channel. The runner 10 had a thickness of 0.019" and the RC-1 channel was 0.021" thick. An 18" span of each was incrementally loaded at its midpoint until buckling occurred. The ultimate load on the runner 10 was 22.8% greater than that which buckled the RC-1 channel even though the runner 10 was 10% thinner.

Although the invention has thus far been described with reference to the use of the runners on wooden support members for walls it will be understood that the runners may be used in like manner in ceilings. The runners may also be used effectively on sub-structures such as concrete or masonry walls for the same purpose.

While a specific embodiment of the invention has been described in detail, it is understood that various modifications thereof may be made within the spirit and scope of the claimed invention.

Claims

The subject matter claimed is:

1. An elongate runner for the resilient attachment of wallboard to a support, said runner comprising a base flange lying in a first plane; a resilient web lying in a second plane inclined at an angle to the first plane and having a first longitudinal edge which is intermittently joined to the base flange; a support flange, substantially parallel to the first plane, joined to the web opposite the base flange; and a stop flange joined to the support flange opposite, the web, said stop flange approaching the first plane at an acute angle to the second plane; said web having a plurality of elongate notches along its first edge, the minimum distance between a notch and the support flange being at least substantially equal to the width of the stop flange.

2. The runner of claim 1 wherein the notches have arcuate edges opposite the base flange.

3. The runner of claim 2 wherein the ratio of the length of a chord subtended by an arcuate edge to the length of a perpendicular line between the chord and the apogee of the arcuate edge is about 16:1.

4. The runner of claim 1 characterized further by a tab co-planar with and projecting from the base flange under each notch.

5. The runner of claim 1 characterized further by a thickness of from about 0.017 inch to 0.020 inch.

6. A wall construction comprising: a substantially planar sub-structure; an elongate runner for resiliently attaching wallboard to said sub-structure, said runner comprising: a base flange attached to the sub-structure in a first plane substantially parallel to the plane of said sub-structure; a resilient web lying in a second plane inclined at an angle to the first plane and having a first longitudinal edge which is intermittently joined to the base flange; a support flange, substantially parallel to the first plane, joined to a second longitudinal edge of the web, opposite the base flange; and a stop flange joined to the support flange opposite the web and approaching the sub-structure at an acute angle to the second plane; said web having a plurality of elongate notches along its. first edge, the minimum distance between a notch and the support flange being at least equal to the width of the stop flange; and a wallboard attached to the support flange of the runner.

7. The wall construction of claim 6 wherein the notches in the web have arcuate edges opposite the base flange.

8. The construction of claim 7 wherein the ratio of the length of a chord subtended by an arcuate edge to the length of a perpendicular line beteen the chord and the apogee of the arcuate edge is about 16:1.

9. The construction of claim 6 characterized further by a plurality of tabs on the base flange in alignment with the web notches and substantially parallel to the sub-structure.

10. The construction of claim 6 characterized further in that the runner is from about 0.017 inch to about 0.020 inch thick.