AU609005B2

AU609005B2 - Method for grinding roll

Info

Publication number: AU609005B2
Application number: AU52304/90A
Authority: AU
Inventors: Tomio Azumi; Kanji Hayashi; Osamu Kishi; Shozo Yokota
Original assignee: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Current assignee: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Priority date: 1989-05-19
Filing date: 1990-03-28
Publication date: 1991-04-18
Anticipated expiration: 2010-03-28
Also published as: AU5230490A; JPH02303612A; BR9001481A; EP0397993A3; CN1047241A; CN1018345B; EP0397993A2; JPH0675730B2

Description

301:3907 18 0/S/90 6691A:rk it Iffk~l I1IIPV-- I 60905 4, t COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PATENTS ACT 1952 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR OFFICE USE Form Short Title: Int. C1: Application Number: Lodged: Complete Specification-Lodged: Accepted: Lapsed: Published: Priority: IThis documrnent contains the alCeI1nd!fus mde und-r Related Art: jr Lw' t(C(

((CC

00 o 00 0 0 0 0 0 0o 0 0 0 0 00 0 O00 o 00 a 0 0 000 0 sa TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 0000 0 0 0000 Go 0 00 00 0 0 0 00 a a 00 0 0 0 0 o0 00 0 0 o0 0a 0 0 00 Name of Applicant: MITSUBISHI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA Address of Applicant: 5-1 Marunouchi 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku, TOKYO, JAPAN Actual Inventor: Tomio Azumi; Osamu Kishi; Kanji Hayashi and Shozo Yokota Address for Service: GRIFFITH HACK CO 71 YORK STREET SYDNEY NSW 2000 Complete Specification for the invention entitled: METHOD FOR GRINDING ROLL The foll-wing statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to us:- 9991-DY:DJH:RK 6691A:rk METHOD FOR GRINDING ROLL BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION: Field of the Invention: The present invention relates to a method for grinding a rotating roll, and more particularly to a method for remediably grinding a roll on an on-line basis in the event that the roll wears during a rolling work as is the case with a work roll in a rolling mill. In addition, the subject method is also applicable to on-line .1o0 grinding of a pinch roll equipped in front of a downcoiler 00o0oo0 0""0 as well as grinding of work rolls and backup rolls in 0 0 0 0 o' 0 various kinds of rolling mills.

a 00 o00 Description of the Prior Art: Regarding a hot rolling mill or the like for rolling iron sheets, in order to achieve improvements in 0o a production efficiency as well as improvements in quality 0o 0 of rolled sheet materials, development and practical use of an on-line grinding apparatus for grinding a roll surface into a desired profile while rolling with the o o20 grinding apparatus directly mounted to the rolling mill °o o o00 o have been desired.

Fig. 8 shows one example of such on-line roll grinding system, in which a surface of a work roll 1 is ground into a desired profile by pressing an unrotating grinder 3 such as a grind stone against the surface of 1Athe work roll 1 while the wo'rk roll 1 is being rotated and also moving the grinder 3 in the axial direction of the roll, that is, in the direction perpendicular to the plane of the sheet of the figure. In addition, Fig. 9 shows another example, which is a method for grinding by pressing a revolving grinding belt 3' against a rotating work roll 1 similarly to the preceding example and moving it in the axial direction of the roll.

Sc In the above-described apparatus of the' system 10 shown in Fig. 8, although the structure is simple because re of absence of a rotary driving device for the grinder 3, o since the surface portion of the grinder 3 coming into S contact with the work roll 1 is always the same surface oo 0 portion, clogging would arise on the surface portion, and 15 so, there is a shortcoming that a grinding performance is .degraded. Furthermore, for the grinder 3 normally a St€ C rectangular block-shaped grind stone is used, and a grind- *ing apparatus in which a plurality of such grind-stones are arrayed along the axial direction of the roll to enhance a grinding efficiency by a broadened grinding I C 7ll1s]-2- Ir I~ -i i surface, has been used. However, in this case there is a shortcoming that a corner portion 3a of the grinder 3 is liable to be broken and damaged due to grinding resistance and the like.

On the other hand, in the apparatus of the system shown in Fig. 9, there is a merit that clogging on the surface of the grinder 3' can be prevented and a grinding performance can be maintained because during grinding always a fresh grinding surface of the grinder o0 10 3' comes into contact with the work roll 1 as the grinder 0000oooo o 0

S

00 0 is revolving. In addition, since normally a belt- 00 00 o0 0o 0 a shaped grind-stone is often used as the grinder 3' in 00 0 0o 0 this case, the breaking damage of the corner portion as ooo is the case with the above-mentioned rectangular blockshaped grind-stone can be also prevented. However, in oooo this case although not shown, since a rotary driving S0000 oooo ooo device for rotating the grinder 3' is necessitated, the structure becomes complicated, an installation expense is 00 00 0 0 high, also as the installation place is narrow, maintenance and inspection of the installation becomes extremely 0 00 0 0oo0 difficult, and also, due to a large space occupied by the l00 0 0 0 0 o o0 rotary driving device, a number of the grinder heads is reduced (normally reduced to only one head), so that a grinding capability in the case of grinding an entire roll is lowered.

3 I A method proposed for resolving the above mentioned problems is the non-drive type on-line grinding apparatus.

This method was characteristic in that since the grinder can achieve grinding while rotating in association with the roll even without a forcible driving device for the grinder, a stable grinding performance can be obtained. However, when a rolling mill roll was practically ground within an existing rolling mill installation according to this method, buzzing vibration was generated in the grinder, and the problem that a grinding performance became unstable and also an outer circumferential surface of the grinder was broken and damaged, arose.

TC

cC

€CC

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 15 It is an aim of the present invention to provide a C C novel method for grinding a rotating roll on an on-line o 0 basis, which ameliorates the disadvantages in the prior art.

a, 0 According to one aspect of the present invention, S0 there is provided a method for grinding a roll, wherein the oo o roll can be ground without forcibly driving grinders by arraying along the axial direction of the roll a plurality 0 of grinder holders adapted to press grinders mounted to 5 their tip end portions against the roll surface within a DID frame which can reciprocate along the roll axis, mounting 0 ,25 the grinders within the holders with their rotary axes o inclined in the axial direction of the roll with respect to normal lines of the roll surface, and also displacing the rotary axes of the grinders by a given offset amount H with c respect to the rotary axis of the roll, which method is .00: •30 improved in that the relations between the offset amount H and dimensions DG and dG of the grinders are preset in the range defined by the following formulae: 0.1 H/DG 0.4 and 0.1 dG/DG 4

J

where H represents an offset amount between a grinder rotary axis and a roll rotary axis, dG represents an inner diameter of the grinder and DG represents an outer diameter of the grinder.

An advantage of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is to provide a method for grinding a rotating roll, in which clogging on a grinder does not occur and hence degradation of a grinding performance in use would not arise.

Another advantage is that the present invention may provide a method for grinding a rotating roll, in which o breaking damage of a circumferential portion of a grinder *000 0 oooo would not occur.

0000 A further advantage of a preferred embodiment is that 00 a method for grinding a rotating roll is provided in which neither buzzing vibrating nor seizure of a grinder woula o00 0 0 o0 occur.

0 0 o 0 0 O Yet another advantage of a preferred embodiment of oo 4 the present invention is to provide a method for grinding a rotating roll, which does not necessitate to complicate a structure of a grinding apparatus nor to increase an oo installation expense of the apparatus.

0000 Sooo £As a result of setting of the offset amount H given between the grinder rotary axis and the roll rotary axis at 25 the above-specified values, the direction of a relative slip 1 S velocity V S occurring at the contact portion between the t grinder and the roll to be ground would become proper, so SC: that vibration and breaking damage of the grinder can be prevented. In addition, by selecting the inner diameter of the grinder at the aforementioned values, the direction of a relative slip velocity would not coincide with a contact line, and so, seizure and clogging of the grinder can be precluded.

IT

Il rC M I I: The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent by reference to the following description of one preferred embodiment of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

0

C

015 0 00 014 0 *I 8274S/KLS -6 I 1 I- BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS: In the accompanying drawings: Fig. 1 is a plan view of a roll grinding apparatus according to one preferred embodiment of the present invention; Fig. 2 is a cross-section view taken along line A-A in Fig. 1 as viewed in the direction of arrows; Fig. 3 is a partial side view for explaining a principle of a roll grinding method according to the 00«0 present invention; 06 LID J Fig. 4 is a partial front view for explaining o the principle of the same roll grinding method; 04 0 d Fig. 5 is a diagram of grinding test results o 0a o" showing relations between grinding conditions and grinding performances; o L 1: 420 0 .4 0 4 o 04 0 0 4 I I C Figs. 6(D) and 6(E) are diagrams showing one example of a result of theoretical analysis of a contact condition and a relative slip velocity between a grind-stone and a roll according to the present invention; Figs. 7(b) and 7(c) are partial crosssection views and a diagram showing proper relations between a grind-stone offset H and grind-stone dimensions

D

G and d G as claimed in this patent application; and Figs. 8, 9 are schematic partial cross- 7- 1 section views showing operation principles of some examples of a roll grinding apparatus in the prior art.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT: In the following, the feature and advantage'of the present invention will be described in greater detail on the basis of one preferred embodiment illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Fig. 1 is a plan view showing 0000 one example of a roll grinding apparatus embodying the 0000 °ooo grinding method according to the present invention as 00 00 0 0 0 o o °oo o10 applied, by way of example, to a work roll in a four- 0 00 o 00 stage rolling mill, and Fig. 2 is a cross-section view oo0 0 taken along line A-A in Fig. 1.

As shown in these figures, the rolling mill o00: 0 operates to roll a sheet material 15 to be rolled by means 0000 of a work roll 1, and the work roll 1 is reinforced by a 00 0 600 back-up roll 2. Grinders 3 such as ring-shaped grind- 0 0 stone arrayed in multiple along the axial direction of the work roll 1 are rotatably supported individually at tip end portions of grinder holders 6 respectively via 0 shafts 4 and bearings 5. In the following description, the grinder 3 will be described as "grind-stone and the grinder holder 6 will be described as "grind-stone holder 6".

Each grind-stone holder 6 forms a plunger, its rear portion is connected to a pressing device 8 consisting -8i of a plunger 8a and a cylinder 8b, and it is fitted and mounted in a casing 9 so as to be able to advance and retreat in the direction of arrows X. Each pressing device 8 is mounted to the inside of a rear cover 9a of the casing 9, and it can press the grind-stone 3 against the surface of the work oll 1 by feeding working fluid into the cylinder 8b through a hole 10 via a hydraulic control valve not shown.

0000 0 0 0 0 pO00 0000 0 fe In addition, in the casing 9 is provided a fluid 0 00 °10 feed port 12 for feeding fluid into a pull-back cylinder oo0 0 C 0 0 o 00 chamber 11 for the grind-stone holder. The respective o 00 0 0 0 o° o grind-stones 3 are mounted within the casing 9 with their rotary axes O G inclined in the axial direction of the roll by an arbitrary set angle a with respect to normal lines 0000 o a 0000 15 N of the outer circumferential surface of the work roll 1 o0000 0 0 00 0 as shown in Fig. 1, and by moving the casing 9 vertically 09 00 00 a o 0 by means of an elevator device 13 it is possible to make the rotary axes O G of the grind-stones 3 offset to the 000oo upper or lower side with respect to the work roll axis O

R

0o 0 00 °Qo 2 0 The illustrated example is the case where the rotary axes

O

G are made to offset by a set value H to the upper side.

Fig. 3 is a partial side view showing a contact state between a grinder and a roll, and if the grind-stone rotary axis O G is made to offset with respect to the work roll axis OR' during grinding, a contact portion between 9 Mul I i~r~ -i ii ;il- i a tip end surface of the grind-stone 3 and the work roll 1, that is, a grinding surface becomes line contact k as shown in Fig. 4.

Under such a contact state, if the work roll 1 rotates at a circumferential velocity VR, then the grindstone 3 rotates at a circumferential velocity VG, and at this time between the grind-stone 3 and the roll 1 is oae generated a relative slip velocity V

S

The surface of 0000o the roll 1 is ground due to this slip velocity Vs.

o000o l0 On the other hand, when a roll is ground, what o 0 00 0 a 0 is most important is that breaking damage or seizure of o0 00 0a. 0 the grind-stone does not occur but a stable grinding performance can be maintained. It has become obvious in the step of trying a practical machine test that to that 0000 0 0 15 end the direction of the above-described slip velocity V

S

0 0 0 00 is extremely important. More particularly, if the offset 00 0s so amount of the grind-stone becomes small, buzzing vibration and breaking damage of the grind-stone become liable to 'cc, occur, and on the contrary, if it becomes too large, J 20 seizure of the grind-stone becomes liable to occur, and so, in either case normal grinding was impossible.

As a result of execution of a practical machine test and theoretical analysis in order to resolve these problems, it has been discovered that important relations exist between the offset amount H and the grind-stone 10 .i c c i-

I~

I I ogle 0000 0 0 a 09 0 0 o00 a 0O0 0 sizes DG (outer diameter) and dG (inner diameter).

Fig. 5 shows data obtained by analyzing grinding performances when a roll was ground while the offset amount H (normalized by taking a proportion H/D G relative to the grind-stone outer diameter) and the inner diameter of the grind-stone dG (normalized by taking a proportion

-G

dG/DG relative to the grind-stone diameter). The grinding conditions at this time are as follows: roll material: nickel grain cast iron 0 roll outer diameter: DW 0600 mm roll circumferential velocity: 800 m/min grind-stone material: GC320K grind-stone outer diameter: D 0240 mm The ordinate of the diagram in Fig. 5 indicates a grinding L5 ratio G which is defined by the following formula: G ground volume of roll abraded volume of grind-stone It is meant that as the grinding ratio G is larger, abrasion of a grind-stone is smaller and a life of the grind-stone is longer.

Accordingly it is desirable to grind under a condition having a high grinding ratio G, and if one observes Fig. 5 from such view point, it is seen that it is preferable to make d /DG small and to make H/DG large.

However, if dG/DG is made to be small, that is, if the inner diameter of the grind-stone is made to be 0000 0 t a 0006 a 04 4.

A rt t C C

C

4 C 4; C 11 small for a given outer diameter, seizure would be generated in the proximity of the inside of the grind stone, hence a grinding performance would become very unstable, and if it is reduced to d /D 0.1, then seizure cannot be prevented for any value of the grind-stone offset amount (H/DG).

On the other hand, in the case where the grindstone offset amount (indicated by H/D in Fig. 5) is 099 e enlarged, also seizure would be generated, in this case o .'10 also seizure is generated on the side of the inner cira cumference of the grind-stone, and in order to prevent seizure it is necessary to reduce the offset amount to H/DG 0.4.

Next, explanation will be made on the reasons o 9 15 and causes why such seizure of a grind-stone is liable to be generated on the side of the inner circumierence of a u 99 grind-stone and why it is influenced by dG and H. In Fig. 6 are shown results of vector analysis of the abovedescribed slip velocities V under various grinding "9 ,:20 conditions.

In this figure, slip velocities V S at any arbitrary points on the contact line between the grindstone and the roll are displayed in terms of vectors, and it is seen that the direction of the slip velocity V S is greatly varied depending upon the grind-stone offset 12 i amount H and the grind-stone inner diameter dG.

-G"

More particularly, in Figs. 6(B) and 6(E) corresponding to a fixed value of d G/DG when the grindstone offset amount H is increased in the sequence of (A) in the inside portion of the grind-stone, the direction of the slip velocity V S would become to overlap on the contact line Z.

In the portion where the slip velocity V and o*00 the contact line coincides with each other as described above, seizure would be generated because heat generated 0 a"oo by grinding would be accumulated in this portion.

o o00 0,0 a Accordingly, in order to prevent seizure of the grind-stone, it is, necessary to make the slip velocity V

S

not coincide with the contact line Z, and as a measure 0000 .000015 for that purpose, setting of a proper grind-stone offset 0000 0o value becomes essentially necessary.

0. On the other hand, in the case of successively enlarging the inner diameter of the grind-stone, that is, S successively increasing d /DG while maintaining the offset 2 0 amount H constant (Fig. 6(B) Fig. 6(C) Fig. comparing the respective data, while the directions of the slip velocities V S would not vary largely, as a result of enlargement of the grind-stone inner diameter, the inside portion of the grind-stone where the slip velocities VS coincide with the contact line L disappears, and so, 13

I

enlargement of the inner diameter of the grind-stone is advantageous for preventing seizure of the grind-stone.

As described above, from the viewpoint of preventing seizure, it is preferable to reduce the offset value H/DG to minimum, but if it is reduced excessively, buzzing vibration of the grind-stone would be generated.

In Fig. 5 is shown the relation between the buzzing vibration and the grinding conditions. That is, if the offset amount H/DG becomes 0.1 or less, buzzing vibration becomes .0 liable to occur, and if the offset amount H/DG is further reduced, breaking damage of the grind-stone would be induced.

art I* I 03 0 a 00 r C 0 00 o 00 oo 0oo 0 The cause of occurrence of such buzzing vibration as well as breaking damage of the grind-stone is also shown in Fig. 6. It can be explained as follows on the 00oo0 o00 basis n a difference in the direction of the slip velocity 0014% V

S

The reason why buzzing vibration of the grind-stone is liable to occur when the offset amount H is small, is because the direction of the slip velocity V S differs 0 Ic I 20 greatly between the inside portion and the outside portion r t of the grind-stone. More particularly, in the case of Fig. 6(A) where the offset amount H is small, the slip velocity V S in the inside portion is directed downwards, but the slip velocity V S in the outside portion is directed upwards, and thus the directions are greatly different.

14 1iA- S Whereas in the case of Fig. 6(B) or 6(E) where the offset amount H is large, the slip velocity V S is directed downwards both in the inside portion and in the outside portion. As described above, when the offset amount is small, buzzing vibration would occur, because the direction of the slip velocity V S would become reversed in the inside portion and the outside portion of the grind-stone, the oo0O direction of the external forces (grinding resistant 0000 °°°o0000 forces) acting upon the rotary axis of the grind-stone 0000 0O 00 o 1ol0 would distribute over a broad range, and its deformation S°o mode becomes complicated.

S00o 0e In addition, when the directions of the relative slip velocities V S in the outer circumferential portion of the grind-stone are directed to the radially 0eoo 0000°°°°15 outward directions (the normal line directions), the 0000 0 00 00 0 grind-stone becomes liable to be broken and damaged.

00 00 o a More particularly, at any arbitrary point on the contact line Z of the roll, grinding resistant forces in the oox direction of the slip velocites would act upon the grind- ~0 stone. In the inside portion of the contact line Z, they are resistant forces directed downwards, and so, they are not relevant to breaking damage of the grind-stone.

Whereas, in the outer circumferential portion, a mechanical strength of the grind-stone is weak, and the grind-stone would be broken and damaged relatively easily even by small 15 external forces. In this case, as the directions of the resistant forces exerted by the roll, that is, the direction of the slip velocities are directed closer to the radially outward direction, breaking damage is liable to occur.

Oat 0Gt t~ a C 0 tart Of tC 0 0( a0 C *i C 88 C 8 00a 0 0 9 0 a D a 0t a C V 9 Ca 00 9

,$CC(

t C C C,

CE

'Pt C CCI

C

OOC

C 10 Accordingly, in order to prevent breaking damage of the grind-stone, it is necessary to prevent the direction of the slip velocity from being directed in the radially outward direction as much as possible, and as a countermeasure for that purpose, it is important to select a proper value of H/DG.

Summarizing the above-mentioned relations between seizure, buzzing vibration and breaking damage of the grind-stone and an offset amount and an inner diameter of the grind-stone, and diagrammatically showing a range of proper values, it becomes as shown in Fig. 7. The proper range is, as best seen in Fig. 0.1 H/D G 0.4 and 0.1 dG/DG- With the grinding method according to the present 20 invention, even without a forcive rotary driving device for a grinder, stable grinding can be achieved directly within an installation such as a rolling mill without causing breaking damage, buzzing vibration nor seizure of grind-stones, hence an efficiency of a rolling work is improved, and at the same time quality of the rolled ;j

I~

16 I t products can be improved.

While a principle of the present invention has been described above in connection to one preferred embodiment of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above-description and illustrated in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted to be illustrative and not in a limiting sense.

000 ow0 oa 0 r 0 0 O eo 06 0.

0 0 800 G 0 0 0 0 *108 8 0 0 :t.

8 8 i8 48 t t.* *1

Claims

1. A method for grinding a roll, wherein said roll can be ground without forcibly driving grinders by arraying along the axial direction of the roll a plurality of grinder holders adapted to press grinders mounted to their tip end portion against the roll surface within a frame which can reciprocate along the roll axis, mounting said grinders within said holders with their rotary axes inclined in the axial direction of the roll with respect to normal lines of the roll surface, and also displacing the rotary axes of the grinders by a given offset amount H with respect to the rotary axis of said roll; character- ized in that the relations between said offset amount H and dimensions D G and dG of said grinders are preset in G -G the range defined by the following formulae: 0.1 H/DG 0.4; and 0.1 dG/DG where H: an offset amount between a grinder rotary axis and a roll rotary axis, d an inner diameter of the grinder, DG: an outer diameter of the grinder.

2. A method for grinding a roll substantially as herein described with reference to figures 1 to 7(c) of the accompanying drawings. Dated this 28th day of March 1990 MITSUBISHI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA By their Patent Attorney GRIFFITH HACK CO. -18-