AU659108B2 - Al base - Mg-Mn alloy sheet for manufacturing drawn and ironed container bodies - Google Patents
Al base - Mg-Mn alloy sheet for manufacturing drawn and ironed container bodies Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU659108B2 AU659108B2 AU87562/91A AU8756291A AU659108B2 AU 659108 B2 AU659108 B2 AU 659108B2 AU 87562/91 A AU87562/91 A AU 87562/91A AU 8756291 A AU8756291 A AU 8756291A AU 659108 B2 AU659108 B2 AU 659108B2
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- sheet
- weight percent
- aluminium alloy
- alloy
- percent
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims description 23
- 229910000914 Mn alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 title 1
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 83
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 claims description 83
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 49
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 49
- 229910000838 Al alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 45
- 239000011777 magnesium Substances 0.000 claims description 38
- FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Magnesium Chemical compound [Mg] FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 36
- 229910052749 magnesium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 36
- 239000011572 manganese Substances 0.000 claims description 36
- 229910052748 manganese Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 33
- PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Manganese Chemical compound [Mn] PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 32
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 25
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000004411 aluminium Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000005097 cold rolling Methods 0.000 description 36
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 31
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 description 24
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 24
- 238000000137 annealing Methods 0.000 description 12
- 239000000155 melt Substances 0.000 description 9
- 238000005098 hot rolling Methods 0.000 description 8
- 235000013361 beverage Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 235000013405 beer Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 239000011651 chromium Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010409 ironing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 3
- WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L manganese(2+);methyl n-[[2-(methoxycarbonylcarbamothioylamino)phenyl]carbamothioyl]carbamate;n-[2-(sulfidocarbothioylamino)ethyl]carbamodithioate Chemical compound [Mn+2].[S-]C(=S)NCCNC([S-])=S.COC(=O)NC(=S)NC1=CC=CC=C1NC(=S)NC(=O)OC WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000010936 titanium Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 3
- VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chromium Chemical compound [Cr] VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 101100456896 Drosophila melanogaster metl gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 230000018199 S phase Effects 0.000 description 2
- CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sodium Carbonate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-]C([O-])=O CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titanium Chemical compound [Ti] RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 235000014171 carbonated beverage Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000005069 ears Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005482 strain hardening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 2
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000005275 alloying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003467 diminishing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003973 paint Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010422 painting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 102220253765 rs141230910 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22F—CHANGING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF NON-FERROUS METALS AND NON-FERROUS ALLOYS
- C22F1/00—Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working
- C22F1/04—Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of aluminium or alloys based thereon
- C22F1/047—Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of aluminium or alloys based thereon of alloys with magnesium as the next major constituent
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C21/00—Alloys based on aluminium
- C22C21/06—Alloys based on aluminium with magnesium as the next major constituent
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
- Metal Rolling (AREA)
- Containers Having Bodies Formed In One Piece (AREA)
- Rigid Containers With Two Or More Constituent Elements (AREA)
Description
4 r, 9 1 OPI DATE 30/03/92 AOJP DATE 14/05/92 APPLN. ID 87562 91 PCT NUMBER PCT/US91/06374
I
INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (51) International Patent Classification 5 (11) International Publication Number: WO 92/04476 C22C 21/06, C22F 1/04 Al (43) International Publication Date: 19 March 1992 (19.03.92) (21) International Application Number: PCT/US91/06374 (81) Designated States: AT, AT (European patent), AU, BB, BE (European patent), BF (OAPI patent), BG, BJ (OAPI (22) International Filing Date: 5 September 1991 (05.09.91) patent), BR, CA, CF (OAPI patent), CG (OAPI patent), CH, CH (European patent), CI (OAPI patent), CM (OAPI patent), CS, DE, DE (European patent), DK, Priority data: DK (European patent), ES, ES (European patent), F1, 577,880 5 September 1990 (05.09.90) US FR (European patent), GA (OAPI patent), GB, GB (Eu- 754,930 4 September 1991 (04.09.91) US ropean patent), GN (OAPI patent), GR (European patent). HU, IT (European patent), JP, KP, KR, LK, LU, LU (European patent), MC, MG, ML (OAPI patent), (71)Applicant: GOLDEN ALUMINUM COMPANY [US/ MN, MR (OAPI patent), MW, NL, NL (European pa- US];.3A fi^ldt Site 230 l 8A25 tent), NO, PL, RO, SD, SE, SE (European patent), SN //00oo y"C, '.iS Svr-s/ S'o /7p (OAPI patent), SU+,TD (OAPI patent), TG (OAPI pac' 8foVo/-/ P2. C4 tent).
(72) Inventors: MARSH, Ivan, M. 1551 Larimer Place, Unit 1501, Denver, CO 80202 McAULIFFE, Donald, C. 3060 Alkire, Golden, CO 80401 Published With international search report.
(74)Agents: DOCKERY, David, F. et al.; Sheridan Ross McIntosh, One United Bank Center, 1700 Lincoln Street, Floor, Denver, CO 80203 (US).
(54) Title: ALUMINUM ALLOY SHEET STOCK (57) Abstract Do0/foC1 6IO.r1t KrIq 4rp/l .PE U61ioil Hl-0 rJILt- A)-JF.IAL An aluminum sheet is provided. The strip stock is suitable for the fabrication of both container ends and con- I. I OL-kJ cUP E-PALINC tainer bodies in thinner 47 2.
gauges than are typically em- 4, 4.t ployed, has low earing characteristics and may be de- 45 17 .6 rived from recycled alumi- 44.67 1,7 num scrap. An alloy particuarly suited to the fabrication 45 -I of the aluminum sheet prefer- I1 1, ably has a magnesium con- 4 -41.
centration of from about 1.9 1 41. to about 2.8 weight percent and a manganese concentra- 40 12.
tion of from about 0.9 to about 1.6 weight percent. A 9e.b4 7 I. I process particularly suited to I the fabrication of the alumi- K-Ito R.-22. U-0 C -IO num sheet preferably in- C "T dUL U L eludes continuous chill block casting the alloy metl into a Y-L strip, hot rolling the strip to a U T
YI
L D
AI
first thickness, annealing the hot rolled strip and then cold rolling the annealed strip to a final thickness. Cold rolling preferably includes two stages with an intermediate anneal step between the two stages. The process increases tensile and yield strength while decreasing earing percentage, even in very thin gauges, such as 0.010 inches.
See back of page WO 92/04476 PCT/US91/06374 -1- ALUMINUM ALLOY SHEET STOCK Technical Field of the Invention This invention relates to the production of aluminum sheet stock having reduced earing and improved strength which is suitable for conversion into useful products, such as container ends and container bodies.
Background of the Invention In recent years, substantial effort has been made to produce an aluminum alloy which is suitable without modification for the manufacture of both container bodies and container ends. Aluminum beverage containers are generally made in two pieces, one piece forming the container sidewalls and bottom (collectively referred to herein as "container body") and a second piece forming the container top. Using methods well known in the art, a container body is formed by cupping a circular blank of aluminum sheet and then drawing and ironing the cupped sheet by subsequently extending and thinning the sidewalls by passing the cup through a series of dies with diminishing bores. The result is an integral body with sidewalls thinner than the bottom. A common alloy used to produce container bodies is AA 3004 (an alloy registered with the Aluminum Association) whose characteristics are appropriate for the drawing and ironing process due primarily to low magnesium (Mg) and manganese (Mn) concentrations.
However, alloys such as AA 3004 having low magnesium content usually possess insufficient strength to be used WO 92/04476 PCT/US91/06374 -2for the fabrication of container ends with easy open "ring pulls" or the like. Therefore, alloys with a higher magnesium concentration, such as AA 5082 or AA 5182 alloys, are used for container ends. Table 1 provides a comparison of the major components of alloys AA 3004, 5082 and 5182, as well as other alloys discussed herein.
Ea..; TABLE 1 (WEIGHT Alloy AA 3004 AA 5082 A.A 5182 US Pat No 3,560,269 AA 5017 Melt: 3004 5182 Adjusted Melt US Pat No 3,787,248 Mn 1.0-1.5 0.15 0. 20-0. 50 0.2-0.7 0.8-1.3 4.0-5.0 4.0-5.0 4-5.5 Si 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.3 Cu 0.25 0.15 0.15 0.2 Fe 0.70 0.35 0.35 0.3 0.3-0.7 0.4 Ti 0.10 0.10 0.1 Cr 0.15 0.10 0.2 Zn 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.6-0.8 1.3-2.2 0.15-0.4 0.18-0.28 0.8 1.5 0.2 0.1 0.04 0-0.2 0.4-1.0 1.3-2.5 0.1-1.0 0.05-0.4 0.1-0.9 0.5-2.0 0.4-2.0 5 5 0 1 2 The remainder being aluminum.
WO 92/04476 PCT/US91/06374 -4- A completed container (a body together with an end) must be able to withstand an internal pressure of at least about 60 psi if it is to contain unpasteurized beer and at least about 90 psi if it is to contain pasteurized beer, soda pop, or any beverage having similarly high carbonation levels. Currently, containers fabricated from AA 3004 body alloy and AA 5082 end stock are able to withstand 90 psi of internal pressure if fabricated from aluminum sheet having a gauge of about 0.0116 inches. Containers made from thinner gauges employ less sheet material than those made from thicker gauges and are therefore less expensive to produce. However, containers made from thinner gauge stock, such as 0.0110 inches, have not been sufficiently strong to withstand 90 psi of internal pressure or have not been sufficiently strong to survive the rigors encountered during long distance transportation.
Another desirable characteristic of an aluminum alloy sheet which is to be drawn and ironed is that the sheet have a low earing percentage. As used herein, the term "earing percentage" (also referred to herein as "earing") refers to the 450 earing or 450 rolling texture. Thi.
value is determined by measuring the height of ears which stick up in a drawn cup minus the height of valleys between the ears. This difference is divided by the height of the valleys times 100 to convert to a percentage. The 450 earing is measured at 450 to the longitudinal axis of the strip. Due to this earing, the rim of the shell often becomes deformed and takes on a scalloped appearance.
-I 1 WO 92/04476 PCT/US91/06374 Because this earing must be removed before the container body is completed, waste occurs. Furthermore, excessive earing, greater than about 2 percent as measured by the Olsen cup test, may also interfere with the drawing apparatus. Minimizing earing helps to minimize waste and simplifies the production process.
One step that has been used to reduce earing is to reduce the cold work percentage (or the percent thickness reduction during the step of cold rolling an alloy sheet).
As illustrated in Figure 1, when AA 5017 alloy is employed, earing decreases as the cold work percentage decreases.
However, as further illustrated in Figure 1, the yield strength also decreases as the cold work percentage decreases. Therefore, increasing the cold work to form stock with thinner gauges or greater strength produces unacceptably high earing. Conversely, reducing the earing by reducing the cold work results in thicker stock with relatively low strength.
Aluminum alloys may be produced by direct chill casting of molten alloy into ingots which are then rolled into strips or may be produced by a continuous strip casting process. Apparatus for continuous strip block casting is described in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,709,281, 3,744,545, 3,747,666, 3,759,313 and 3,774,670. Although there exist numerous variations of the continuous block casting process, all of the processes generally include the steps described hereinbelow.
i WO 92/04476 PCT/US91/06374 -6- Molten aluminum alloy is injected through a nozzle or distributor tip into a cavity formed between two sets of oppositely rotating chilled blocks. While in the cavity, the alloy cools and solidifies to form an aluminum sheet.
The aluminum sheet then passes between rollers to further reduce the thickness of the strip. This is typically referred to as hot rolling.
As the continuous strip comes out of the hot rolling step, it is coiled and allowed to cool. The cooled coil is then cold rolled to reduce its thickness still further.
Often, the strip will be cold rolled in several passes with an intermediate annealing step between each cold rolling pass.
When the alloy strip has been reduced to its final thickness, it can be cut into appropriate shapes for the production of useful products, such as container bodies or container ends. Typically, at various stages of the process, scrap is produced (plant scrap).
Several patents pertain to low earing aluminum alloys or processes for their production. For example, U.S.
Patent No. 4,238,248 by Gyongyos et al., issued on December 9, 1980, discloses a process for producing a low earing Saluminum alloy. A melt of 3004 alloy, or an alloy in which the combined concentration of manganese and magnesium is between 2 percent and 3.3 percent (unless otherwise indicated, all percentages will be weight percent) and in which the ratio of magnesium:manganese is between 1.4:1 and 4.4:1, is cast and then held for 2 to 15 minutes between i. I-- WO 92/04476 PCr/US91/06374 -7- 400 0 °C and the alloy's liquidus temperature (the temperature at which the alloy's phase changes between a liquid state and a solid/liquid state, in this case, approximately 600 0 It is then hot rolled at a temperature between 300°C and the non-equilibrium solidus temperature (the temperature at which the alloy's phase changes between the solid/liquid state and a completely solid state), coiled and cooled to room temperature. A first cold rolling stage reduces the thickness by at least 50 percent and is followed by a flash annealing stage at 350 0 °C to 500 0 C for less than 90 seconds. A second cold rolling stage :-.ults in further reduction of up to 75 percent.
U.S. Patent No. 3,560,269 by Anderson et al., issued on February 2, 1971, discloses an aluminum alloy, the composition of which is set forth in Table 1. An ingot is cast by direct chill casting, heated to 800 0 F, and held at that temperature for 24 hours. The ingot is hot rolled and the resulting strip is annealed at 700°F. A first cold rolling stage reduces the thickness by at least 85 percent and is followed by annealing at 6000F. An optional second cold rolling stage provides further reduction of at least percent to a final thickness. The resulting sheet is described as having earing of not more than 3 percent, an amount which, according to the inventors, is acceptable.
As noted above, the required characteristics of alloy for container ends differ from those of container bodies; i melting recycled aluminum containers (a combination of ends and bodies) produces a melt which may be unsatisfactory for WO 92/04476 PCT/US91/06374 -8the production of either container bodies or container ends. The weight percents of the components of a typical melt of recycled aluminum comprising approximately percent container ends and 75 percent container bodies are shown in Table 1. Efforts have been made to produce an alloy from recycled aluminum containers which is suitable for both container bodies and container ends.
U.S. Patent Nos. 4,411,707 by Brennecke et al., issued on October 25, 19t3; 4,282,044 by Robertson et al., issued on August 4, 1981; 4,269,632 by Robertson et al. issued on May 26, 1981; 4,260,419 by Robertson et al. issued on April 7, 1981; and 4,235,646 by Neufeld et al. issued on November 1980 disclose related methods for processing recycled aluminum containers. All begin with an initial melt of approximately 25 weight percent container ends and approximately 75 weight percent container bodies, as shown in Table 1. The initial melt is then adjusted, generally by the addition of pure aluminum, to form an alloy whose composition is also shown in Table 1. The combined concentration of manganese and magnesium is within the range of 2.0 to 3.3 percent and the ratio magnesium:manganese is within the range of 1.4:1 to 4.4:1.
The differences among the foregoing patents occur in the way the alloy is cast and processed after being adjusted to the desired composition.
U.S. Patent Nos. 4,235,646, 4,260,419 and 4,282,044 each disclose a continuous strip casting process in which the alloy strip (having the composition previously i- L C WO 92/04476 PCT/US91/06374 -9described) is held at a temperature between 400 0 C and 600 C for 2 to 15 minutes after it has been cast. It is then hot rolled for a thickness reduction of at least 70 percent, coiled and allowed to cool to room temperature. The strip is then uncoiled and cold rolled to a final thickness in either one or two steps. If cold rolling occurs in two steps, the first results in a reduction of at least percent and is followed by a flash anneal in which the alloy is heated to between 350 0 C and 500 0 C and then cooled down to room temperature, all within a period not exceeding seconds. The alloy is cold rolled a second time producing additional reduction of 75 percent or less.
U.S. Patent No. 4,269,632 and 4,260,419 disclose direct chill casting methods of the melt described above in which the resulting cast ingot is held at a temperature between 550 0 C and 600 0 C for 4 to 6 hours and then allowed to cool. It is hot rolled when its temperature is between 450 0 C and 510°C producing a thickness reduction of between percent and 96 percent. The resulting strip is hot rolled a second time for an additional reduction of between percent and 96 percent. The strip is coiled and then annealed in one of two ways. It may be flash annealed for 30 to 90 seconds between 350 0 C and 500 0 C or, it may be annealed for 2 to 4 hours between 315°C and 400 0 C. After annealing, the strip is allowed to cool and is then cold rolled in one or more stages to produce a total reduction of approximately 89 percent in thickness. After each cold c rJIoLLII; LuiIuE-Sea bu ignaory SCO 1 206 1 18 APR94 rolling stage, the alloy is annealed using either a flash or conventional method.
U.S. Patent No. 4,411,707 discloses a process for producing container ends from the previously described scrap melt using a variation of the continuous chill roll casting method. The molten alloy, between 682 0 C and 710 0
C,
is cast to a thickness between 0.23 and 0.28 inches and then rolled to reduce the thickness to approximately percent. The strip is coiled and allowed to cool to room temperature after which it is cold rolled in at least two stages. In the first, a reduction of at least 60 percent in thickness occurs and in the second, a reduction of at least 85 percent occurs. The alloy is annealed for approximately 2 hours at 440 0 C to 483 0 C between the two cold rolling stages. Additional cold rolling/annealing stages can be used if desired.
U.S. Patent No. 3,787,248 by Setzer et al., issued on January 22, 1974, also discloses a process for producing an alloy from a melt of recycled aluminum containers which is suitable for both container ends and container bodies. The composition of the alloy is set forth in Table 1. Any conventional casting method may be used (although a preference is stated for direct chill casting) after which the alloy is homogenized for 2 to 24 hours between 850 0
F
and 1150°F. The metal is then hot rolled at least twice, the first time achieving at least a 20 percent reduction in thickness at a temperature between 650°F and 950 0 F and the second, also achieving at least a 20 percent reduction, 7. An aluminium alloy sheet as claimed in any one or claims 1 to 6 wherein said sheet has a 450 earing percentage of less than 1.8 percent. i 8. An aluminium alloy sheet as claimed in any one of ./2 WO 92/04476 PCT/US91/06374 -11between 400°F and 800°F. A third rolling operation (comparable to cold rolling), at a temperature less than 400°F, achieves at least' a 20% reduction to the final thickness. The alloy is then annealed between 200 0 F and 450 0 F for a period greater than 5 seconds (preferably between 30 minutes and 8 hours). Instead of a single cold rolling step, the aluminum strip may be cold rolled and annealed two or three times to obtain the final thickness.
U.S. Patent No. 4,318,755 by Jeffrey et al., issued on March 9, 1982 discloses an aluminum alloy, the composition of which is set forth in Table 1, suitable for container bodies made from recycled containers using continuous strip casting methods. The strip exits the caster at 380 0 C to 450 0 C and is hot rolled to reduce the thickness between 72 percent and 82 percent; the strip exits the hot roller between 150 0 C and 200 0 C and is coiled. The strip is then cold rolled to its final thickness and is either annealed for 2 hours between 400 0 C and 420 0 C or flash annealed.
It would be useful to provide an aluminum alloy sheet which has a low earing percentage, which possesses good strength characteristics in thinner gauges than are presently employed and which is suitable for use in the production of both container bodies and container ends. It would also be useful to provide such a sheet from an alloy which can be produced substantially from recycled aluminum containers.
J
from 0.13 to 0.25 weight percent silicon; from 0.25 to 0.4 weight percent iron; and from 0.15 to 0.28 weight percent copper; J2FM 01 -12- According to one aspect of the invention there is provided an aluminium alloy sheet suitable for manufacturing drawn and ironed container bodies, said sheet having a yield strength greater than 42 ksi and a 450 earing percentage of less than 2 percent, said aluminium alloy including: a) from 2.0 to 2.8 weight percent magnesium; and b) from 0.9 to 1.6 weight percent manganese.
The aluminium sheet of the present invention provides the technical advantage of having low earing and being suitable for fabrication of both container ends and container bodies in thinner gauges than are possible using prior known sheets. The present invention has the further technical advantage of permitting the aluminium alloy stock to be derived from aluminium scrap. Throughout the specification the words aluminum and aluminium have the same meaning.
In order that the invention may be more readily understood and put into practical effect, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings in which:- Fig. 1 is a graph illustrating relationships between yield strength and cold work, and earing and cold work;
I
iY~~j *~o ,oo e• c. .1 -I 1 4 i: WO 92/04476 PCT/US91/06374 -13- Figures 2 and 2a are a flowchart of embodiments of a process useful for the fabrication of aluminum sheet of the present invention; Figure 3 is a chart illustrating the effect of altering the manganese and magnesium concentrations on strength and earing characteristics of aluminum sheets of the present invention; and Figure 4 is a chart illustrating the affect of cold work on the earing percentage of a direct cast prior art alloy and a block cast alloy of the present invention.
Detailed Description of the Invention In accordance with the present invention, an aluminum strip or sheet stock is provided. As used herein, the term "sheet" refers to a cast piece of aluminum having a length and width substantially longer than the thickness, and includes coils, strips, flat stock, can blanks and lid stock. The sheet stock has a reduced earing percentage and improved strength in thinner gauges than aluminum sheet that is presently fabricated. The sheet stock can be fabricated from an alloy having a composition which can be derived, at least in part, from recycled aluminum scrap.
The sheet stock can be fabricated using a process which includes the steps of casting, hot rolling, annealing and cold rolling. The aluminum sheet of the present invention is especially suitable for use in the fabrication of deep drawn and ironed articles, such as beverage container bodies, as well as beverage container ends.
num sheet preieratly in- A-1 LJuM'tE..
eludes continuous chill block casting the alloy metl into a strip, hot rolling the strip to a -YILD i IL first thickness, annealing the hot rolled strip and then cold rolling the annealed strip to a final thickness. Cold rolling preferably includes two stages with an intermediate anneal step between the two stages. The process increases tensile and yield strength while decreasing earing percentage, even in very thin gauges, such as 0.010 inches.
See back of page 1 t -14- According to the present invention, an aluminum alloy composition especially suitable for the manufacture of aluminum sheet of the present invention preferably includes at least 0.9 weight percent manganese, more preferably from 1.1 weight percent to 1.6 weight percent manganese, and most preferably from 1.1 weight percent to 1.2 weight percent manganese. The alloy composition further includes from 1.9 weight percent to 2.8 weight percent magnesium, preferably from 2.0 weight percent to 2.6 weight percent magnesium.
Certain narrower embodiments within these ranges are preferred, as will be discussed hereinbelow.
In addition to the manganese and magnesium, the aluminum alloy preferably includes: from 0.13 weight percent to 0.25 weight percent silicon, more preferably from 0.15 weight percent to 0.20 weight percent silicon; from 0.15 weight percent to 0.28 weight percent copper, more preferably from 0.20 weight percent to 0.25 weight percent copper; and from 0.25 weight percent o 0.40 weight percent iron, more preferably from 0.30 weight percent to 0.35 weight percent iron; the balance being essentially :,.uiminum.
The foregoing constitute the primary alloying elements r r"e of the aluminum alloy. In addition to these primary aluminum rrr e r r i Salloying agents, traces of other elements, such as titanium, chromium and zinc, may be present in the composition. It is preferred that the level of zinc not exceed 0.12 weight percent, that the level of titanium not exceed 0.03 weight percent and that the total chromium not exceed 0.05 weight A/ percent. It is preferable that any additional impurities do
-L;
concentrations.
However, alloys such as AA 3004 having low magnesium content usually possess insufficient strength to be used I" I Irr
I
ii
I
"t' I I.ii~ I 4 -16magnesium to manganese within these ranges. Accordingly the ration of magnesium to manganese is preferably less than 3.2:1, more preferably less than 2.2:1. It has been found that decreasing the ratio of magnesium to manganese (that is, increasing the amount of manganese relative to the magnesium, or decreasing the amount of magnesium relative to the manganese) permits a hot rolled strip of the present alloy to tolerate greater cold work, thus increasing the strength and reducing the thickness, without increasing the earing.
While not wishing to be bound to theory, it is believed that each 0.1 weight percent increase in the concentration of manganese increase the yield strength of the aluminum sheet formed from the alloy by approximately 660 psi (4.5 MPa).
Increasing the cold work percentage during processing may also increase the yield strength; however, cold working also tends to increase the earing percentage when an alloy blank is drawn and ironed into a beverage container. Figure 1 graphically illustrates these relationships for an AA 5017 alloy. The strip stock produced from the alloy and process 20 of the present invention can advantageously provide increased yield strength by increasing the amount of manganese in the alloy, but maintains a low earing percentage.
The alloy used to fabricate the aluminum sheet of the present invention may be obtained my melting the primary constituents together or may be obtained by adjusting the composition of a melt of scrap aluminum. As used herein, the term scrap aluminum refers to aluminum that may comprise plant, container and consumer scrap in which container body
-U-
a I Ii a a
III
a I II I I I i I IlS
SS
I.,
I I ~1 I Vr/c( c
I
-17alloy, e.g. AA 3004, and container end alloy, e.g. AA 5082 and AA 5182, are present in a weight ratio of approximately 3:1. As previously noted, such a scrap melt will typically have a ranganese content of approximately 0.8 weight percent and a magnesium content of approximately 1.5 weight percent.
Adjustment to provide the composition of the present invention can involve the addition of unalloyed aluminum, manganese, magnesium or combinations of the three.
The aluminum sheet of the present invention can be fabricated from aluminum alloy compositions utilizing any means known in the art, for example, direct chill casting, ingot casting, or block casting. According to the present invention, it is preferable to utilize a block casting technique. A block casting technique is shown graphically in the flowchart of Figures 2 and 2a. The block caster is preferably of the type disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos.
3,709,281; 3,744,545; 3,747,666; 3,759,313 and 3,774,670.
Once the proper alloy composition is formed, the melt is preferably cast through a nozzle, for example with a 16 20 millimetre tip. The melt is cast in a casting cavity formed by opposite pairs of rotating blocks, preferably to a thickness of less than 0.8 inches (20 mm), and more preferably from 0.6 to 0.8 inches (15.2 mm to The strip of metal cools as it travels and solidifies 25 along with the chilling blocks until the strip exits the casting cavity where the chilling blocks separate from the cast strip and travel to a cooler where the chilling blocks \are cooled. The rate of cooling as the cast strip passes
I
I I
I
IL L I I I I ,I~s I
I
o ;i i -18through the casting cavity of the chill block casting machine is controlled by various process and product parameters.
These parameters include the composition of the material being cast, the strip gauge, the chill block material, the length of the casting cavity, the casting speed and the efficiency of the chill block cooling system.
It is preferred that the cast strip be as thin as possible. This minimizes subsequent working of the strip.
Normally, a limiting factor in obtaining minimum strip thickness is the size of the distributor tip of the caster.
In the preferred embodiment of the present inv.-tion, the strip is cast at a thickness from 0.6 to 0.8 inches (15.2 mm to 20 mm). However, thinner strip can be cast.
The cast strip normally exits the block caster in the temperature range from 850 F to 1100 0 F (4500°C to 595 0 Upon exiting the caster, the cast strip is then subjected to a hot rolling operation in a hot mill.
The cast strip preferably enters the first hot rollers at a temperature in the range from 880OF to 1000 F 20 (4700°C to 5400°C), and more preferably in the range from 900OF to 975 0 F (4800°C to 5250°C). The hot rollers preferably reduce the thickness of the strip by at least percent. It is preferred to maximize the percentage reduction in the hot mill.
It has been unexpectedly found that strip product having improved properties can be obtained if, in addition to the other process steps indicated herein, the temperatures of the strip exiting the hot mill is minimized. To obtain the 44 I 4 I
I
4 4 11 4.
Ie.
L it i I 1 c 1 desired product properties, the exit temperature from the hot mill should be no more than 660 0 F (3450°C), and is preferably from 630 0 F to 660°F (3300°C to 2450°C).
However, while this temperature is preferably minimized, an increased percentage hot mill reduction will lead to higher exit temperatures.
The strip is preferably held at the hot mill exit temperature for a period of time, coiled and then annealed (also known as heat treatment). It is believed that this annealing step is critical to reducing the earing in the final strip stock. Preferably, the coiled strip is annealed for at least three hours, preferably at a temperature from 820 0 F to 830 0 F (4350°C to 4450C). The coiled strip can be annealed for less than 3 hours at a temperature from 775 0 °F to 830 0 F (4100°C to 445°0C). The temperature of the coil upon exiting the annealing step is preferably 500OF (2600C), and it is allowed to cool to ambient temperature.
Alternatively, if the strip has sufficient mass, such 20 as greater than 13,000 pounds, it may be self-annealed by coiling the strip very tightly and allowing it to cool slowly to ambient temperature. This process may take as long as two days or more, but is advantageous since no additional heat is necessary to anneal the strip and thus energy costs are reduced.
After the annealed coil has cooled to ambient temperature, it is cold rolled to a final gauge in at least one stage of cjld roll passes, and preferably in two stages.
I
I
.4 4 5 4 4.
*4 Iw In the first cold rolling stage, the thickness is preferably reduced by 40 percent to 80 percent.
The first cold rolling stage can include a single cold roll pass. Preferably, at least two cold roll passes are employed, the first pass causing a thickness reduction of up to 40 percent and the second cold roll pass causing an additional reduction of 35 percent to 70 percent. It has been found that cold rolling using at least two cold roll passes in the first cold rolling stage produces a cast strip having better uniformity.
The temperature of the strip upon its exit from each cold rolling pass is from 150 F to 220°F (650°C to 950°C) due to the friction of the rollers on the alloy strip.
Following the first cold rolling stage, the strip is preferably annealed for 3 hours at from 650OF to 700°F I (3400°C to 3750), more preferably at from 670 0 F to 680°F (3550°C to 3600°C). This intermediate anneal improves the formability and earing characteristics of the 20 final strip.
After the cold rolled and annealed strip has cooled to S: ambient temperature, it goes through a second cold rolling stage in which the thickness is further reduced. The final cold rolling stage is a significant factor in controlling the earing of the product. The amount of reduction in thickness needed in the final cold roll stage, the final cold work percentage, determines the amount of reduction in thickness required in the first cold rolling stage.
:t
'L
_1 i; i r.L: -21- The preferred final cold work percentage is that point at which the optimum balance between the yield strength and earing is obtained. This point can be readily determined for a particular alloy composition by plotting each of the yield strength and earing values against the cold work percentage.
Once this preferred cold work percentage is determined for the final cold rolling stage, the gauge of the strip during the intermediate annealing stage and, consequently, the cold working percentage for the initial cold roll stage can be determined.
The final cold work percentage required to minimize earing is dependent upon the composition of the particular alloy. It is expected that aluminum alloys with higher magnesium content have higher cold-work percentages.
According to the present invention, the thickness is reduced in the second cold rolling stage by 35 percent to 70 percent, preferably by 45 percent to 65 percent, and more preferably by 50 percent to 60 percent, to a final gauge of, for example, less than 0.0116 inches (0.29 mm). The second stage can include a single cold rolling pass for can include two or more passes, and the final gauge can be, for example, 0.010 inches (0.254 mm).
The second cold rolling stage can preferably include stabilizing the cold rolled strip by employing a water-based rolling emulsion during the cold rolling process. The amount of reduction which is possible during cold rolling utilizing an oil-based emulsion is limited by the flash point of the emulsion. Greater reduction creates greater friction which
I*
I
*1*
S
S.
I 50 :i' :i
T
.r -u i- -22increases the exit temperature of the strip. If the temperature rises above the flash point of the emulsion, a fire can occur. Consequently, the reduction must be limited such that the heat generated remains below the flash point of the oil-based emulsion.
By contrast, stabilizing during cold rolling by utilizing a water-based rolling emulsion reduces the chance of a fire. Therefore, greater thickness reductions may occur in each pass with temperatures as high as 30O0F to 350 0
F
(1450C to 1800C), temperatures which are much greater than would be safely possible with an oil-based emulsion. By stabilizing, the mechanical properties will be reduced during cold rolling so that the aluminum sheet will not experience any substantial decrease in strength during subsequent processing.
After the final cold rolling pas, the strip can be subjected to a tension levelling step to achieve a more uniform flatness. This is accomplished by pulling or stretching the strip between rollers.
20 The aluminum alloy sheet produced according to the present invention is useful for a number of applications.
These applications include, but are not limited to, cable sheathing, venetian blind stock, and other building products.
The alloy sheet produced according to the present invention is particularly useful for drawn and ironed container bodies and for container tops. When the aluminum alloy sheet is to be fabricated into container tops, the intermediate anneal step is preferably not performed.
I I I I I I
II
I *S I S S I. I SI I 9* I
S
I 5 $4 4
I
nh
II
I -i -23- Before baking or stabilization, the as-rolled alloy sheet has a yield strength greater than 38 ksi (262 MPa), preferably greater than 42 ksi (290 MPa) and more preferably greater than 44 ksi (304 MPa). The as-rolled alloy sheet preferably has a tensile strength preferably greater than 46 ksi (318 MPa) and more preferably greater than 48 ksi (331 MPa).
To produce drawn and ironed container bodies, the aluminum alloy sheet is cut into substantially circular blanks. The blanks are then shaped with a die to form a cup.
The cup is drawn and ironed into a container body by forcing the cup through a series of dies having progressively smaller diameters.
Typically, after the container has been drawn and ironed, it is washed to remove any impurities. After washing, the container body is typically placed in a drying oven to remove moisture. The drying oven will typically be at a temperature of approximately 400OF (2040C) and the container will typically stay within the oven for about minutes. Following the drying step, the container can be internally coated and painted on the exterior. After coating and painting, the container is again subjected to baking for about 3.5 minutes ac about 400 0 F (2040C) to cure the paint and the coating.
A technique useful for measuring the strength of a container body is to measure the dome strength of the container. The dome strength is the internal pressure that a container can withstand before the dome at the bottom of the
I
I *9*
I
of approximately 89 percent in thickness. After each cold 0.31 mm), have a minimum dome strength of at least 90 psi -24container yields, or deforms. Containers formed from a sheet thickness from 0.0110 inches to 0.0123 inches (0.28 mm to 0.31 mm), have a minimum dome strength of at least 90 psi (0.62 MPa), more preferably at least 96 psi (0.66 MPa) and most preferably at least 100 psi (0.69 MPa).
To produce a 90 psi container, suitable for soda and other highly carbonated beverages, it is preferable that the container maintain a yield strength of between 38 ksi (262 MPa) and 42 ksi (290 MPa) after the final baking process described above.
The aluminum alloy sheet according to the present invention preferably have a tensile strength greater than 38 ksi (262 MPa) after baking and more preferably between 42 ksi (290 MPa) and 46 ksi (318 MPa) after baking.
Additionally, the alloy sheet according to the present invention preferably has a 450 earing percentage of less than 2 percent, more preferably less than 1.8 percent, and i' most preferably less than 1.7 percent. This low earing characteristic facilitates the manufacture of drawn and ironed container bodies, reduces the labor required during the drawing and ironing, and minimizes plant scrap.
o* i ri i i s~ i f
EXAMPLES
Example 1: As an example of the production of aluminum sheet of the present invention, a melt derived from scrap aluminum was adjusted to have a manganese concentration of 1.0 weight percent and a magnesium concentration of 2.8 weight-
I
It I I I II *s S ft
S.
9 '95559 I' .4.
r- -r WO 92/04476 PCT/US91/06374 -26percent. The resulting alloy composition was cast as a strip in a continuous chill block caster through a 16 mm distributor tip. Hot rolling reduced the cast strip to a gauge of 0.085 inches (2.16 mm) with an exit temperature of from 620 0 F to about 640"F (325 0 C to 340 0 The hot rolled strip was subsequently annealed (heat treated) for about three hours at 825°F (440°C).
Following the annealing were two cold rolling stages.
The first stage included two cold roll passes, the first pass reducing the strip to a gauge of 0.055 inches (1.40 mm) and the second reducing the strip to a gauge of 0.017 inches (0.43 mm). The cold rolled strip was then intermediate annealed at 650°F to 700°F (340 0 C to 375 0
C)
and cold rolled in a second stage, comprising a single pass, to a final gauge of 0.0110 inches (0.28 mm).
Testing of the rer'vcing strip stock demonstrated a tensile strength of 46.5 to 51.3 ksi (320 Mpa to 355 MPa), a yield strength of 43.6 to 46.8 ksi (300 MPa to 323 MPa) and a percent elongation of 2 to 4 percent. The 450 earing percentage was 2.2 percent and the dome strength was 97 psi.
Example 2: Table 3 illustrates the results of tests showing the effect of increasing the final cold work percentage on ultimate tensile strength (UTS), yield tensile strength (YTS) and 45° earing percentage of a sheet fabricated from i .II WO 92/04476 PCT/US91/06374 -27- Alloy A in accordance with the process of the present invention: TABLE 3 Cold UTS YTS Earing Work (ksi) (ksi) 46.5 44.4 1.8 49.5 45.9 2.4 Increasing the cold work increases the strength but also increases the earing. By comparison, a sheet fabricated from Alloy C in accordance with the process of the present invention with cold work of 55 percent has a tensile strength of about 48.7 ksi (336 MPa), a yield strength of about 46.1 ksi (318 MPa) and a 450 earing percentage of about 1.7 percent.
Example 3: Figure 3 graphically illustrates the effect of changes in the amounts of manganese and magnesium on ultimate tensile strength (UTS), yield strength and earing percentage in aluminum alloy sheets fabricated in accordance with the present invention.
The alloys identified as R-16, R-22 and U-03 are AA 5017 alloys and the alloy identified as C-10 is Alloy A of the present invention (from Table 2 above). The concentrations of manganese and magnesium in each of the alloys is set forth in Table 4: WO 92/04476 PCT/US91/06374 -28- TABLE 4 (weight percent) R-16 R-22 U-03 Mn 0.75 0.70 0.67 1.05 Mg 1.85 1.83 2.1 2.8 It can be seen that increasing the manganese and magnesium concentrations from the amounts in the AA 5017 alloys to the amounts in the C-10 alloy causes an increase in both tensile strength and yield strength. It also causes Ssome increase in earing, although the earing percentage does not exceed the desirable 2 percent limit.
Example 4: The following example illustrates the high strength of containers fabricated from aluminum sheet of the present invention.
Aluminum alloy sheets were produced using Alloy A, having 1.0 weight percent manganese and 2.8 weight percent magnesium, in accordance with the process of the present invention. During the process, some of the sheets were stabilized during cold rolling, while the others were not.
The sheets were cold rolled to three gauges and fabricated into two-piece aluminum beverage containers which were then subjected to dome strength testing to measure the maximum internal pressure which a sealed container can withstand.
The results are shown in Table r 1 U WO 92/04476 PCT/US91/06374 -29- TABLE Gauge Dome Strength (psi) (inches) Average 3 Sigma Low 0.110 as rolled 97 92 stabilized 98 94 0.114 as rolled 102 98 stabilized 102 99 0.116 as rolled 104 100 stabilized 102 98 The term "3 sigma low" in Table 5 refers to three standard deviations and indicates the lowest dome strength statistically predictable.
As indicated in Table 5, containers fabricated from aluminum sheet of the present invention employing the preferred process described hereinabove have sufficient strength to withstand the internal pressures generated by pasteurized beer and other highly carbonated beverages even in thin gauges.
Example As an example of the production of aluminum sheet of the present invention, a melt derived from scrap aluminum is adjusted to have a manganese concentration of 1.0 weight percent and a magnesium concentration of 2.5 weight percent. The resulting alloy composition is cast as a strip in a continuous chill block caster. Hot rolling reduces the cast strip to a gauge of about 0.085 inches (2.16 mm) with an exit temperature of from 620°F to about 640 0 F (325 0 C to 340°C). The hot rolled strip is i 1 WO 92/04476 PCT/US9i/06374 subsequently annealed (heat treated) for about three hours at 825 0 F (440 0
C).
The percentage of cold work on the hot rolled strip is varied and the results are plotted in Figure 4. The results are plotted against a direct cast alloy having a composition comprising 1.1 percent magnesium and 0.8 percent manganese.
As can be seen in Figure 4, a cold work percentage of less than about 62 percent on the alloy of the present invention results in an earing of less than about 1.8 percent. To achieve a 450 earing of less than about 1.8 percent on the direct cast alloy requires a cold work percentage of greater than 80 percent.
Example 6: Table 6 lists the manganese and magnesium concentrations for two examples of prior art alloys, and three examples of alloys according to the present invention. Example A is an AA 5017 alloy, Example B is an AA 3104 alloy, and Examples C, D E are according to the present invention.
Table 7 shows the results of block casting these compositions. As can be seen from Table 7, the block caster produced sheets of 5017 and 3104 alloys that have an after bake yield strength below the 38 ksi minimum required to meet the minimum average 90 psi buckle strength for beverage cans. The Example D alloy exhibits excellent strength, and is useful for manufacturing can bodies.
wo 92/044-76 PCT/US9 1/06374 -31- Examples C and E according' to the present invention are most preferred since they fall within the desired mti chanical property limits after stabilization and baking.
TABLE 6 Example A* Example B* Example C Example D Example E *Prior Art 1.8% 1.4% 2.5% 2.8% 2 .0% Mn 0.7% 0.9% 1.05% TABLE 7 Cold Work As Rolled TS YS After Bake TS YS Example A Example B Example C Examole D 7Exam~ple E 41 41 46 49 45.5 Stabilized and After Bake TS YS Earing Percentaae Example A Example B Example C Example D Example E 40.5 42.5 38.5 4 4 4 4 41 4*~I44 4 TS Tensile strength (ksi) ys Yield strength (ksi)
Claims (11)
1. An aluminium alloy sheet suitable for manufacturing drawn and ironed container bodies, said sheet having a yield strength greater than 42 ksi and a 450 earing percentage of less than 2 percent, said aluminum alloy comprising from 1.9 to 2.8 weight percent magnesium and from 0.9 to 1.6 weight percent manganese.
2. An aluminium alloy sheet as claimed in claim 1, wherein said sheet is formed from an alloy composition which includes: a) from 2.0 to 2.8 weight percent magnesium; and b) from 0.9 to 1.6 weight percent manganese.
3. An aluminium alloy sheet as claimed in claim 1, wherein said sheet is formed from an alloy composition which includes: a) from 2.0 to 2.1 weight percent magnesium; and b) from 1.5 to 1.6 weight percent manganese.
4. An aluminium alloy sheet as claimed in claim 1, wherein said sheet is formed from an alloy composition which includes: a) from 2.6 to 2.8 weight percent magnesium; and b) from 0.9 to 1.0 weight percent manganese. An aluminium alloy sheet as claimed in claim 1, wherein said sheet is formed from an alloy composition which includes: a) from 2.6 to 2.8 weight percent magnesium; and b) from 1.3 to 1.5 weight percent manganese.
6. An aluminium alloy sheet as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein said sheet has a yield strength greater ;~PII -33- than 44 ksi.
7. An aluminium alloy sheet as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein said sheet has a 450 earing percentage of less than 1.8 percent.
8. An aluminium alloy sheet as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein at least a portion of said sheet is derived from aluminium container scrap. 2. An aluminium alloy sheet as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8 wherein said sheet has a thickness of less than 0.0115 inches. An aluminium alloy sheet as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 9 wherein said sheet has an elongation of at least two percent. I 11. An aluminium alloy sheet au claimed in any one of claims 1 to 10 wherein said sheet has an as-rolled tensile strength of at least 46 ksi. r" 12. An aluminium alloy sheet which includes: a) from 1.9 to 2.8 weight percent magnesium; b) from 0.9 to 1.6 weight percent manganese; c) from 0.13 to 0.25 weight percent silicon; S. d) from 0.25 to 0.4 weight percent iron; and e) from 0.15 to 0.28 weight percent copper.
13. An aluminium alloy sheet as claimed in claim 12 wherein i I said sheet has a yield strength of at least 38 ksi and a 450 earing percentage of less than 2 percent.
14. An aluminium alloy sheet as claimed in claim 12, i wherein said aluminium alloy sheet is capable of being formed into aluminium container bodies and ends. :i ~I b i -34- 4 0 I I i .!I i An aluminium alloy sheet, which includes: a) from 1.9 to 2.8 weight percent magnesium; b) from 0.9 to 1.6 weight percent manganese; c) from 0.13 to 0.25 weight percent silicon; d) from 0.25 to 0.4 weight percent iron; and e) from 0.15 to 0.28 weight percent copper; wherein said aluminium alloy sheet has a yield strength of at least 42 ksi and a 450 earing percentage of less than 1.8 percent.
16. An aluminium alloy sheet suitable for manufacturing drawn and ironed container bodies substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to Examples 2 to DATED this 14th day of February, 1995. I GOLDEN ALUMINIUM COMPANY Patent Attorneys for the Applicant: PETER MAXWELL ASSOCIATES e
41. I'L i\
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US07/577,880 US5104465A (en) | 1989-02-24 | 1990-09-05 | Aluminum alloy sheet stock |
| US577880 | 1990-09-05 | ||
| US75493091A | 1991-09-04 | 1991-09-04 | |
| US754930 | 1991-09-04 | ||
| PCT/US1991/006374 WO1992004476A1 (en) | 1990-09-05 | 1991-09-05 | Aluminum alloy sheet stock |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| AU8756291A AU8756291A (en) | 1992-03-30 |
| AU659108B2 true AU659108B2 (en) | 1995-05-11 |
Family
ID=27077367
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU87562/91A Ceased AU659108B2 (en) | 1990-09-05 | 1991-09-05 | Al base - Mg-Mn alloy sheet for manufacturing drawn and ironed container bodies |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP0547175A4 (en) |
| JP (1) | JPH06501057A (en) |
| AU (1) | AU659108B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2091187A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1992004476A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA2091184A1 (en) * | 1990-09-05 | 1992-03-06 | Ivan M. Marsh | Process of fabrication of aluminum sheet |
| CA2096366C (en) * | 1992-06-23 | 2008-04-01 | Gavin F. Wyatt-Mair | A method of manufacturing can body sheet |
| BR9611416A (en) * | 1995-09-18 | 1999-02-23 | Kaiser Aluminium Chem Corp | Processes for the manufacture of tabs and can tops for aluminum alloy containers of tab material and can tops for aluminum alloy containers and aluminum alloy sheet material lid or tin tab for aluminum alloy containers and material for lid or can tab for aluminum alloy containers |
| US6120621A (en) * | 1996-07-08 | 2000-09-19 | Alcan International Limited | Cast aluminum alloy for can stock and process for producing the alloy |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AU8510591A (en) * | 1990-09-05 | 1992-03-30 | Golden Aluminum Company | Al base - Mn-Mg alloy for the manufacture of drawn and ironed container bodies |
| AU8851391A (en) * | 1990-09-05 | 1992-03-30 | Golden Aluminum Company | Aluminum alloy composition |
| AU639688B2 (en) * | 1989-03-04 | 1993-08-05 | Scapa Group Plc | Improvements in or relating to papermakers and like fabrics |
Family Cites Families (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS6035424B2 (en) * | 1976-03-03 | 1985-08-14 | 三菱アルミニウム株式会社 | Manufacturing method of aluminum alloy plate for drawing forming |
| US4238248A (en) * | 1978-08-04 | 1980-12-09 | Swiss Aluminium Ltd. | Process for preparing low earing aluminum alloy strip on strip casting machine |
| JPS56158854A (en) * | 1980-05-12 | 1981-12-07 | Mitsubishi Alum Co Ltd | Manufacture of aluminum alloy sheet for deep drawing with low earing ratio |
| US4318755A (en) * | 1980-12-01 | 1982-03-09 | Alcan Research And Development Limited | Aluminum alloy can stock and method of making same |
| CH657546A5 (en) * | 1982-12-16 | 1986-09-15 | Alusuisse | METHOD FOR PRODUCING A TAPE SUITABLE FOR THE PRODUCTION OF CAN LIDS. |
| JP2584615B2 (en) * | 1986-02-07 | 1997-02-26 | スカイアルミニウム 株式会社 | Method of manufacturing hard aluminum alloy rolled sheet for forming |
| JP2521330B2 (en) * | 1988-07-12 | 1996-08-07 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Manufacturing method of high formability aluminum alloy hard plate |
| US4929285A (en) * | 1989-05-04 | 1990-05-29 | Aluminum Company Of America | Aluminum sheet product having reduced earing and method of making |
| EP0504077B1 (en) * | 1991-03-14 | 1996-10-09 | Pechiney Rhenalu | Strong, formable, isotropic aluminium alloys for deep drawing |
-
1991
- 1991-09-05 EP EP19910918743 patent/EP0547175A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1991-09-05 WO PCT/US1991/006374 patent/WO1992004476A1/en not_active Ceased
- 1991-09-05 AU AU87562/91A patent/AU659108B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1991-09-05 CA CA002091187A patent/CA2091187A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1991-09-05 JP JP3517839A patent/JPH06501057A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AU639688B2 (en) * | 1989-03-04 | 1993-08-05 | Scapa Group Plc | Improvements in or relating to papermakers and like fabrics |
| AU8510591A (en) * | 1990-09-05 | 1992-03-30 | Golden Aluminum Company | Al base - Mn-Mg alloy for the manufacture of drawn and ironed container bodies |
| AU8851391A (en) * | 1990-09-05 | 1992-03-30 | Golden Aluminum Company | Aluminum alloy composition |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP0547175A1 (en) | 1993-06-23 |
| AU8756291A (en) | 1992-03-30 |
| CA2091187A1 (en) | 1992-03-06 |
| WO1992004476A1 (en) | 1992-03-19 |
| JPH06501057A (en) | 1994-01-27 |
| EP0547175A4 (en) | 1993-09-08 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5106429A (en) | Process of fabrication of aluminum sheet | |
| US5104465A (en) | Aluminum alloy sheet stock | |
| US5110545A (en) | Aluminum alloy composition | |
| US4318755A (en) | Aluminum alloy can stock and method of making same | |
| US4235646A (en) | Continuous strip casting of aluminum alloy from scrap aluminum for container components | |
| US4260419A (en) | Aluminum alloy composition for the manufacture of container components from scrap aluminum | |
| US4282044A (en) | Method of recycling aluminum scrap into sheet material for aluminum containers | |
| US5833775A (en) | Method for making an improved aluminum alloy sheet product | |
| US4269632A (en) | Fabrication of aluminum alloy sheet from scrap aluminum for container components | |
| US4637842A (en) | Production of aluminum alloy sheet and articles fabricated therefrom | |
| US20080041501A1 (en) | Aluminum automotive heat shields | |
| US4517034A (en) | Strip cast aluminum alloy suitable for can making | |
| US5618358A (en) | Aluminum alloy composition and methods of manufacture | |
| US5469912A (en) | Process for producing aluminum alloy sheet product | |
| US5616190A (en) | Process for producing a thin sheet suitable for making up constituent elements of cans | |
| WO1992004477A1 (en) | Aluminum alloy composition | |
| AU659099B2 (en) | Al base - Mn-Mg alloy for the manufacture of drawn and ironed container bodies | |
| US4019931A (en) | Thread plate process | |
| AU659108B2 (en) | Al base - Mg-Mn alloy sheet for manufacturing drawn and ironed container bodies | |
| EP0099739B1 (en) | Aluminum alloy and process for manufacture | |
| US6533877B1 (en) | Process of manufacturing high strength aluminum foil | |
| US3960607A (en) | Novel aluminum alloy, continuously cast aluminum alloy shapes, method of preparing semirigid container stock therefrom, and container stock thus prepared | |
| JPS6339655B2 (en) | ||
| US4163665A (en) | Aluminum alloy containing manganese and copper and products made therefrom | |
| EP0282162A1 (en) | Aluminium alloy can ends and method of manufacture |