AU669014B2 - Dual status thin-film EAS marker - Google Patents

Description

JIl _s I~-L 47284AUS7A DUAL STATUS THIN-FILM EAS MARKER Background of the Invention Field of the Invention The invention relates to reversibly reactivatable dual status markers useful in magnetic-type electronic article surveillance (EAS) systems. When an article bearing one of those markers is passed through an interrogation zone of alternating magnetic fields, the magnetization state of the marker is periodically reversed, and a remotely detectable characteristic response (here sometimes called "an alarm signal") is produced. The invention also relates to the manufacture of such markers and to a product that can be used as a control element to afford dual status to a marker of the prior art.

Description of the Related Art 20 Magnetic-type EAS systems are widely used to inhibit the theft of merchandise such as clothing, books, and cassettes. Markers used in such systems typically have comprised elongated ribbons of metal foil that exhibit high permeability and low coercive force to enable their state of magnetization to reverse in the relatively low intensity alternating magnetic fields typically associated with magnetic-type EAS systems. Those fields have average peak intensities of a few Oersteds, typically ranging from about one 30 Oersted at the center to about 20 Oersteds at the edges of the interrogation zone of an EAS system.

li In coassigned U.S. Patent No. 3,765,007 (Elder), a remanently magnetizable layer is laminated to such a ribbon and acts as a control element to afford dual status to the marker. It has a passive status when the remanently magnetizable layer is magnetized to prevent the marker from producing an alarm signal when an -1r \k article to which it is attached is carried through an interrogation zone of an EAS system. It has a sensitized status when the remanently magnetizable layer is demagnetized, thus enabling the marker to produce an alarm signal. The Elder patent also suggests that a disc-shaped marker, which is sufficiently thin, can have a useful demagnetization factor.

Coassigned U.S. Patent Nos. 4,710,754 and 4,746,908 (both Montean) disclose markers of low coercive force, high permeability material such as permalloy foil that can be the size of postage stamps.

The foil of Montean '754 is shaped to have at least one switching section and flux collectors proximate to each end of each switching section. When it has at least two switching sections that extend in substantially different directions, the marker can be detected regardless of its orientation. Such a marker can be called "bi-directional" in contrast to the unidirectional markers of the Elder patent. When a sensitized unidirectional marker is passed through an interrogation zone with its easy axis perpendicular to all components of the alternating magnetic fields, the ,*magnetization of its signal-producin- foil might not be reversed and thus fail to produce an alarm signal.

The marker of Montean '908 also can be bidirectional. It has a specially shaped foil which bears a remanently magnetizable layer that, when magnetized in a predetermined pattern, permits the S 30 marker to produce an alarm signal in an interrogation zone. When the remanently magnetizable layer is demagnetized, the marker will not produce an alarm signal.

Markers of Montean '754 and '908 are currently being marketed as QuadraTag T EAS markers by the company to which this application is assigned.

-2- U.S. Patent No. 4,960,651 (Pettigrew et al.) points out that a marker, when sensitized, should have low demagnetization factors to permit low intensity interrogation fields to be used, and that metal ribbons such as ribbons of permalloy foil must be quite long to achieve low demagnetization factors. The Pettigrew patent concerns a marker that has low demagnetization factors and is made by depositing onto a substrate a i magnetic thin-film of low coercive force and high permeability that preferably is from 1 to 5 Aim in i thickness. As compared to markers of metal ribbons which are relatively thick (generally over 10 Am and often about 25 Am in thickness), the Pettigrew thinfilm marker can be quite thin and more mechanically flexible and hence more robust. By being thin, it can be less conspicuous. Also, it can have a more convenient shape such as the dimension and shape of a price label and can be square or circular.

The Pettigrew marker can be made to have dual status by applying a deactivation layer of semi-hard magnetic material to change the effective magnetic properties of the magnetic thin-film of low coercive force so that it is not recognized in an interrogation *zone. In each of the examples of the Pettigrew patent, the deactivation layer employed a thin sheet (col. line 9) or a foil, slurry, needles, or steel wool or ":mesh (col. 16, lines 15-24). The Pettigrew patent does suggest: "The deactivating material may be fabricated by thin film processes" (col. 6, lines 62-64) but 30 includes no enabling disclosure, instead referring to disclosure for fabricating the magnetic thin-films of low coercivity.

Still others have sought to provide markers utilizing thin-films. Thus, for example, Fearon, U.S.

Pat. No. 4,539,558 (col. 16, lines 2-14), has proposed that an elongated marker may be formed of a strip of alternating sputtered layers of ferromagnetic -3- Vi i 1~F

~I

ii i' ii i i t materials. In that construction, each layer is separated by an evaporated coating of, for example, aluminum oxide. Fearon still emphasizes the necessity of an elongated shape and the subsequent need for appropriate orientation in an interrogation field. See also U.S. Pat. No. 4,682,154 (Fearon).

The marker of coassigned U.S. Patent No. 5,083,112 (Piotrowski et al.) comprises a laminate of a plurality of magnetic thin-films deposited on a flexible 10 substrate with an ultrathin nonmagnetic thin-film interposed between adjacent magnetic thin-films. Each of the magnetic thin-films exhibits high permeability and a coercive force sufficiently low so as not to retain any given magnetization state and less than the average intensity of magnetic fields encountered in an interrogation zone, such that upon exposure to such fields, the magnetization state of the marker is periodically reversed and an alarm signal is produced.

When the easy axis of one of the magnetic thin-films extends in a direction different from that of another (as in Fig. 3) or a magnetic thin-film has more than one easy axis, the marker is bi-directional.

The Piotrowski patent demonstrates that a plurality of magnetic thin-films permit the markers to be smaller and yet produce sharper, more intense signals than was possible in the prior art. Its five examples employ from 7 to 15 pairs of magnetic thinfilms Ni-Fe) and nonmagnetic thin-films SiOx). To provide dual status, the Piotrowski marker 30 can include a layer of remanently magnetizable material such as a thin foil of magnetic stainless steel or vicalloy or a dispersion of gamma iron oxide particles.

Summary of the Invention The invention provides a reversibly reactivatable dual status marker for use with a magnetic-type EAS system that produces, in an interrogation zone, I t ~I

I

Wa: -4- -i slo I s alternating magnetic fields having average peak intensities of a few Oersteds. The dual status marker of the invention should be as economical to manufacture as any prior marker, and should be at least as small in area and thilner, more flexible, and more durable than any above-discussed marker without any reduction in performance. The novel marker should function well at thicknesses that are so thin that it can be virtually undetectable when hidden between layers of some garments. As was pointed out in the Montean Patent No.

4,746,908, "potential thieves have been known to carry a small permanent magnet in attempts to magnetize, desensitize the markers to thereby thwart detection" (col. 1, lines 51-54), but this would be difficult if the markers could not be found.

Briefly, the dual status marker of the invention has a substrate and, supported by the substrate, a signal-producing layer and a signal-blocking layer.

The signal-producing layer includes at least one 20 magnetic thin-film having high permeability and a coercive force less than the minimum peak intensity encountered in said zone, such that upon exposure to S.fields of an interrogation zone, the magnetization state of said at least one magnetic thin-film is periodically reversed and a remotely detectable characteristic response an alarm signal) is produced. Said at least one magnetic thin-film should have a total thickness of from 200 to 1000 nm. At S: total thicknesses substantially below 200 nm, a marker 30 might fail to produce an alarm signal in some magnetictype EAS systems, while total thicknesses substantially above 1000 nm would increase the cost of the marker without significant benefit.

The signal-blocking layer of the novel marker includes at least one remanently magnetizable thin-film having a total thickness at least equal to the total thickness of said at least one magnetic thin-film of 5- -1

I

I-

the signal-producing layer. The signal-blocking layer should be in substantial contact with and extend over an area of the signal-producing layer and should have a size and coercivity sufficient to prevent the signalproducing layer from producing an alarm signal in the interrogation zone when the signal-blocking layer is magnetized.

Because the signal-producing layer and the signalblocking layer can be created sequentially on the same 10 equipment at one time, the novel marker can be produced at reasonable cost.

Preferably the coercivity of the signal--locking layer does not exceed 100 oersteds so that it can be demagnetized by a magnetic field that is weak enough not to damage any article to which a marker may be attached, not to erase any data on the magnetic tape of a cassette. Preferably the coercivity of the signal-blocking layer is at least 25 Oersteds to guard against accidental demagnetization or remagnetization.

The signal-blocking layer of the novel marker should have adequate thickness to provide enough magnetic flux, when magnetized, to saturate adjacent portions of the signal-producing layer. To ensure this, the total thickness of said at least one remanently magnetizable thin-film preferably is from two to five times the total thickness of said at least one magnetic thin-film of the signal-producing layer.

For economy of manufacture, said at least one magnetic thin-film preferably has a total thickness of from 200 to 500 nm, and said at least one remanently magnetizable thin-film is from 800 to 1200 nm in total thickness. At total thicknesses substantially greater than 1200 nm, electrically conductive, remanently magnetizable thin-films could propagate eddy currents when subjected to interrogating fields of high frequency, and so might have an undesirable shielding effect when demagnetized. Interrogating fields of -6higher frequency enable a signal-producing layer of the novel.marker to produce alarm signals of greater amplitude.

Although a single remanently magnetizable thinfilm should be sufficient, a plurality of remanently magnetizable thin-films and interposed nonmagnetic thin-films enables the signal-blocking layer to have a squarer B-H loop and hence greater remanent flux density at the surfaces of the signal-blocking layer.

Such a signal-blocking layer, when magnetized, more reliably disables the signal-producing layer. To afford equal assurance against false alarms, a single i,,ianently magnetizable thin-film might need to be so thick, and hence so difficult and expensive to manufacture, as to make the marker uneconomical.

Preferably, the signal-blocking layer has from 3 to 11 pairs of remanently magnetizable thin-films and interposed nonmagnetic thin-films.

When its signal-producing layer comprises a single 20 magnetic thin-film, the novel marker can produce a signal that is sufficiently sharp and intense to produce alarm signals in most magnetic-type EAS systems now on the market. However, when (as in the Piotrowski Spatent) the signal-producing layer comprises a.

plurality of magnetic thin-films and interposed nonmagnetic thin-films, the novel marker can produce a sharper, more intense and hence more reliable signal.

Preferred magnetic thin-film materials for the signalproducing layer include permalloy, "Sendust," and 30 amorphous magnetic alloys such as are listed in Re.

32,427 (Gregor et al.) at col. 6, lines 11-18.

Ideally, the signal-blocking layer is in intimate contact with the signal-producing layer so that when the signal blocking layer is magnetized, its magnetic flux is efficiently shunted through the signalproducing layer. However, to guard against any chemical reaction or undesirable magnetic exchange -7coupling between the materials of the signal-blocking and signal-producing layers, it may be desirable to interpose an ultrathin nonmagnetic thin-film layer.

Any such ultrathin nonmagnetic thin-film that is either interposed between the signal-producing and signalblocking layers, or is interposed between a plurality of magnetic thin-films of the signal-producing layer, should be thinner than the thin-films it is separating and should be as thin as possible, such as from 5 to nm.

Remanently magnetizable materials that have been most effective for the signal-blocking layer are Fe-Cr alloys having a Cr content up to about 20 atomic percent. Preferably, the Cr content is from 1 to atomic percent to afford a coercivity of from 25 to 100 Oersteds. Other useful remanently magnetizable materials include Fe-Co-Cr, Fe-Ni-Cr, and Ni-Co alloys Sand partially oxidized Ni-Fe alloys.

Ultrathin nonmagnetic thin-films may be readily formed from an oxide of silicon, aluminum, or the like.

Each of the nonmagnetic thin-films, magnetic thinfilms of the signal-producing layer, and remanently :magnetizable thin-films of the signal-blocking layer can be formed by evaporation, sputtering, sublimation, etc.

The signal-blocking layer of the thin-film of the novel dual status marker preferably is discontinuous or, if continuous, is magnetized in an alternating pole pattern by a device such as that of Fig. 23 of Montean 30 Pat. No. 4,746,908, thus better ensuring deactivation of said.at least one magnetic thin-film. A discontinuous signal-blocking layer allows the novel marker to be magnetized in any magnetic-type EAS system now on the market, whereas a continuous signal-blocking layer might not become sufficiently demagnetized in apparatus of an EAS system that deactivates a marker by translating it across a unidirectional magnetic field.

-8r

MW

A'continuous signal-blocking layer can be made discontinuous by scoring, or a discontinuous thin-film or thin-films can be applied through masks. Suitable discontinuous patterns are those of the magnetizable material 86 of Fig. 5 of the Piotrowski patent and the magnetizing elements 44 of Fig. 4 of the Gregor patent.

Preferably, the segments of a discontinuous pattern are of substantially uniform size and shape and each has a area of from 1 to 100 mm 2 The substrate of the novel marker preferably is flexible, a polyimide or high-temperatureresistant polyester web from 25 to 50 gm thick. While polyimide has superb mechanical properties, including stability at elevated temperatures, it is highly hygroscopic, retaining about 1 percent by weight of :i water. It is necessary to outgas such films prior to deposition. Such outgassing has been obtained by passing the substrate films within a vacuum chamber lthree times at a rate of approximately 60 cm per minute over a roller heated to 315°C. For some applications, thin metallic foils of nonmagnetic sta'nless lteel, aluminum, and copper can also be used.

The substrate can either become a permanent part of the novel marker, or the thin-films can be transferred from substrates to articles which are to be 'protected against theft, to the shell of a cassette. Upon doingso, it may be desirable to apply an opaque coating to make the marker invisible.

As in the Pettigrew patent, the novel marker can i 30 have a variety of shapes, such as the size and shape of a price label, and it can be square or circular. In order tc produce a readily detectable alarm signal, its area preferably is at least 1 cm 2 more preferably from 2 to 10 cm 2 For the same reason, said at least one magnetic thin-film preferably has a maximum differential permeability of at least 5,000 and a coercive force no grcater that 5 Oersteds.

i-9i 3- I~--SP~81141 R~ Brief Description of the Drawing The invention may be more easily understood in reference to the drawing, of which FIGS. 1-3 are schematic. In the drawing: FIG. 1 is an edge view of a dual status EAS marker of the invention; FIG. 2 is a plan view of the marker of FIG. 1; FIG. 3 is an edge view of a second dual status EAS marker of the invention; and FIG. 4 is a graph showing coercivities of various Fe-Cr alloys that can be used as the signal-blocking layer of an EAS marker of the invention.

Description of the Preferred Embodiments Referring to FIG. 1, a dual status EAS marker has a flexible substrate 12 bearing a magnetic thinfilm 14 that has high permeability and low coercive Sforce, permalloy, and serves as a signalproducing layer. In contact and coterminous with the magnetic thin-film 14 is a remanently magnetizable thin-film 16 that serves as a signal-blocking layer.

As seen in FIG. 2, the remanently magnetizable thinfilm 16 has a discontinuous pattern of squares 18.

FIG. 3 shows a second dual status EAS marker that has a flexible substrate 22 on which is deposited a signal-producing layer 23 including a plurality of magnetic thin-films 24, such as permalloy, and ultrathin nonmagnetic thin-films 25, such as SiO, with an ultrathin nonmagnetic thin-film 25 interposed S 30 between adjacent magnetic thin-films 24. In contact and coterminous with the outermost magnetic thin-film 24 is a nonmagnetic thin-film 26 which is covered by a continuous ramanently magnetizable thin-film 27 that serves as a signal-blocking layer.

In FIG. 4, a line 30 indicates approximate coercivities of Fe-Cr alloys based on test values 32 on thin-films.

Ij-lOs'I g~ -r I: c- Example 1 A dual status marker as shown in FIG. 3 was prepared using an ion beam sputtering/deposition unit and a glass substrate. Onto the glass substrate was deposited a coterminous thin-film of amorphous Co-based alloy to a thickness of 350 nm. This was then annealed at 350'C for 30 minutes in a unidirectional magnetic field having an intensity of 5 Oe along the plane of the thin-film. In an alternating magnetic field of kHz and an amplitude of 2 Oe, a sample 2.5 cm square had

B

m 7647 G Br/B m 0.74

H

c 0.21 Oe dBI 32581 dHH

HC

20 Onto this signal-producing layer was deposited an ultrathin Si thin-film over which a signal-blocking layer was applied by depositing five thin-films of an Fe 90 -Cr 10 alloy interposed with four nonmagnetic Si thin-films, all of which were coterminous with the substrate. The remanently magnetizable Fe-Cr thin films afforded dual status to the resulting marker.

Each of the Fe-Cr thin-films was 70 nm in thickness, and each of the ultrathin Si.thin-films was 10 nm in thickness. The Fe-Cr thin-films together-provided a S 30 continuous signal-blocking layer having a coercivity of about 100 Oersteds with a squareness of about 0.9.

The signal-blocking layer was then magnetized to have 12 rows per inch (4.7 rows/cm) of oppositelydirected magnetized regions, thus preventing the marker i 35 from producing an alarm signal when exposed to the aforementioned magnetic field. In that field, the hysteresis curve of the signal-producing layer became a minor loop, resulting in a signal too low in harmonic content to be recognized as an alarm.

-11- "1 5845/2 Si- The dual status marker was tested in 3M's Model 3300B magnetic-type EAS system. When its signalblocking layer was magnetized, the marker was passive and did not produce an alarm signal in the interrogation zone of the EAS system. When the signalblocking layer was demagnetized, the magnetization state of the signal-producing layer was periodically reversed to produce an alarm signal.

Example 2 Onto a high-temperature-resistant poly(ethyleneterephthalate) film, 50 gm in thickness, were deposited seven layer pairs of seven magnetic thin-films of Ni-Fe alloy (each 50 nm in thickness applied by electron-beam evaporation), and seven nonmagnetic thin-films of Sio x (each 10 nm in thickness applied by sublimation) to create a signal-producing layer having Ni-Fe at the surface. In an alternating magnetic field of 10 kHz and an amplitude of 2 Oe, a sample 2.5 cm square had Bm 9899 G Br/B m 0.76 He 0.34 Oe dB i 45829 SdHI In a separate operation, a single remanently 30 magnetizable thin-film of Fegg-Cr 2 alloy having a thickness of 2 Am was deposited by e-beam evaporation onto a polyimide ("Kapton") film 50 Am in thickness.

The resulting laminate was cut into squares, each 4.2 Smm on a side. Using a pressure-sensitive adhesive transfer film 25 Am in thickness, the exposed faces of the squares were bonded to the outermost Ni-Fe thinfilm of the signal-producing layer in the pattern of FIG. 2 of the drawing with a spacing of 2.1 mm between adjacent squares.

-12- -4 The segmented Fe-Cr signal-blocking layer of the resulting dual-status marker was magnetized by translating it across a unidirectional magnetic field.

When tested in an EAS system as in Example 1 while its signal-blocking layer was magnetized, the marker was passive and did not produce an alarm signal in the interrogation zone. When the signal-blocking layer was demagnetized, the magnetization state of the signalproducing layer was periodically reversed to produce an alarm signal.

Example 3 A dual status marker was prepared as disclosed in Example 2 except as indicated. Onto a polyimide ("Kapton") film were sequentially deposited eleven layer pairs of magnetic thin-films of Ni-Fe alloy (each nm in thickness) and nonmagnetic thin-films of SiO x (each 10 nm in thickness). In an alternating magnetic field of 10 kHz and an amplitude of 2 Oe, a sample 20 -cm square had Bm 9899 G Br/Bm 0.89 He 0.55 Oe dB

I

44055 S 5 dHIH

H,

Onto the exposed Ni-Fe thin-film layer were 30 deposited four layer pairs of remanently magnetizable thin-films of Fe 9 0 Crl0 (each 100 nm in thickness) and nonmagnetic thin-films of CrO x 'each 10 nm in thickness applied by reactive sputtering).

The continuous signal-blocking layer of the resulting dual-status marker was then magnetized as in Example 1, thus preventing the marker from producing an alarm signal when exposed to the aforementioned magnetic field.

The dual status marker was tested in 3M's Model 3300B magnetic-type EAS system. When its signal- -13i and did not produce an alarm signal in the interrogation zone of the EAS system. When the signalblocking layer was demagnetized, the magnetization state of the signal-producing layer was periodically reversed to produce an alarm signal.

ia ii

I

1i -14- 4 I s IU~

Claims (11)

1. A control element which affords dual status to a marker having a signal-producing layer that produces an alarm signal when the marker is passed through an interrogation zone of a magnetic-type electronic article surveillance system, the control element comprising: a plurality of remanently magnetizable thin-films having coercivity above Oe and providing magnetic flux such that, when placed in substantial contact with the signal-producing layer, the signal-producing layer is prevented from producing the alarm signal in the interrogation zone when the plurality of remanently magnetizable thin-films are magnetized.

2. A control element as defined in claim 1 wherein the plurality of remanently magnetizable thin-films comprises an Fe-Cr alloy having a Cr content up to about 20 atomic percent.

3. A control element as defined in claim 1 wherein the plurality of remanently magnetizable thin-films has a total thickness from 2 to 5 times the total thickness of the signal-producing layer.

4. A control element as defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein the total thickness of the plurality of remanently magnetizable thin-films is from 0.8 to 1.2Am.

5. A control element as defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein the plurality of remanently magnetizable thin-films are discontinuous. pu r' t6. A control element as defined in claim 5 wherein discontinuities of the plurality of remanently magnetizable thin-films are segments of substantially uniform size and shape.

7. A dual status marker for use with a magnetic-type electronic article surveillance system, which system produces in an interrogation zone alternating magnetic fields having average peak intensities of less than 20 Oersteds, the dual status marker comprising: a signal-producing layer having a differential permeability above 5000 and a coercive force less than the average peak intensities encountered in the interrogation zone, such that upon exposure to the alternating magnetic fields, the magnetization state of the signal-producing layer is periodically reversed thus producing an alarm signal; and a signal-blocking layer in substantial contact with the signal-producing layer, the signal-blocking layer comprised of a control element as defined in any one of the preceding claims.

8. A dual status marker as defined in claim 7 wherein the signal-blocking layer further comprises alternating layers of remanently magnetizable thin-films and A, non-magnetic thin-films. i i Ir~-nnrr~

9. A dual status marker as defined in claims 7 or 8 further including a substrate adapted to support the signal-producing layer and the signal-blocking layer. A dual status marker as defined in claim 9 wherein the substrate is a flexible web.

11. A dual status marker as defined in claim 9 wherein the substrate comprises an article that is to be protected against theft.

12. A dual status marker as defined in any one of claims 7 to 11 wherein the marker has an area of from 2 to 10 cm 2

13. A dual status marker, substantially as described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings and/or any one of the Examples. DATED this Eleventh Day of March 1996 Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company Patent Attorneys for the Applicant SPRUSON FERGUSON S c;\9 4%: N; i DUAL STATUS THIN-FILM EAS MARKER Abstract A dual status marker (10) for use with a magnetic-type EAS system has a signal-producing layer including at least one magnetic thin-film (14) of high permeability and low coercive force such as permalloy, and a signal-blocking layer including at least one remanently magnetizable thin-film (16) such as an Fe-Cr alloy. The remanently magnetizable thin-film (16) or thin-films should have a total thickness at least equal K to, and preferably at least twice, the total thickness of the magnetic thin-film (14) or thin-films of high permeability. By doing so, the marker is more reliably deactivated when the signal-blocking layer (16) Sis magnetized. For even greater assurance of deactivation, the signal-blocking layer (16) should include more than one remanently imagnetizable thin-film thus giving it a squarer B-H loop and I l t15 greater assurance against false alarms. Figure 1 KMH/467T