AU673758B2 - The production of ferronickel from nickel containing laterite ores - Google Patents

Description

P/00/011 Regulation 3.2

AUSTRALIA

PATENTS ACT 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR A STANDARD PATENT

ORIGINAL

4.

*i *4 9r TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 4.

4 4 9 Name of Applicant: Actual Inventors: Address for Service: Invention Title: Herman Lagendijk; Albert Francois Simon Schoukens; Peter Smith; Peter William Ennis Blom CALLINAN LAWRIE, 278 High Street, Kew, 3101, Victoria, Australia THE PRODUCTION OF FERRONICKEL FROM NICKEL CONTAINING LATERITE ORE.S

MINTEK

The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me:- -1 II I 2 THE PRODUCTION OF FERRONICKEL FROM NICKEL CONTAINING LATERITE FIELD OF THE INVENTION

A

THIS INVENTION relates to the production of ferronickel from nickel containing laterite and, more particularly, is concerned with a process ft whereby it may be possible to utilise laterite O~, fines and dust, large quantities Lf which have been stockpiled over the years as feedstock.

Possibly more importantly, the invention relates to L -I I I III 3 a process in which production costs can be decreased with the added consequence that processing of previously uneconomical ore bodies may become viable.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The 'oxidised' ores of nickel constitute by far the world's largest known reserves of this metal. The term 'oxidised' is meant to include not only the true laterites, in which the nickel oxide is intimately associated with limonitic iron oxide, but also the silicate ores which often contain the mineral garnierite. These oxidised ores are found in regions of the world where tropical weathering occurs, or where at least sub-tropical conditions have prevailed in geological times.

S S Mined laterite ore, being of a porous nature, can hold a large content of free moisture, commonly to 30 percent H 2 0, although it can contain as much as 40 percent or more. Moreover, combined water, which is not driven off until a temperature of 700 to 800 0 C is reached, can amount to up to 15 per j I I 4 cent based on the dry ore weight. This indicates the necessity of drying and preferably calcining the ore before smelting.

ore^ Because of the friable nature of laterite run-of-mine ore is normally screened as the first step of a ferronickel operation. In the screening operation alone, up to 50 percent undersize particles may be screened out because of the difficulties in effecting a physical separation of wet laterite at a lower size than 6 to 8mm. This o material would then require some form of agglomeration sintering or pelletising) before further processing. It is conceivable that the material could be dried before screening to say S 15 1 or 2mm prior to calcining.

*o However, fines and dust are generated in the drying process and dust generation in the calcining step is also increased. In the drying/calcining step large amounts of fines/dust are generated which are unsuitable for smelting in a conventional electric arc furnace. Once again, these fines need to be extracted and, if they are to be utilised, need to

W-

I I 5 be agglomerated at considerable expense. If dusts are captured in a wet scrubber and returned with the fresh ore to the drier, the dust recycle load in the circuit would increase with a consequent increase in the energy requirements for drying.

Added to this problem is one of the chemical composition of the laterite. The composition usually varies considerably and often one body of ore will have an undesirably high Si:Mg ratio. A normal electric furnace is difficult to operate ore bodies have an iron content of greater than by weight, and such high iron contents are unworkable in a normal furnace as it tends to cause slag foaming.

The solution employed at present to the problems associated with the chemical composition of the ore is to blend different ores to provide an acceptable 4 feedstock for a normal furnace. This is, to say the least, inconvenient and costly.

I I 6 It is the object of this invention to provide a process for the thermal reduction and smelting of nickel-containing laterite ores in which the disadvantages outlined above are, at lest to a significant extent, obviated.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with this invention there is provided a process for the reduction and smelting of nickel containing laterite ores, or dust, to yield an unrefined ferronickel product and wherein at least 20% by weight of the laterite ore has a size of minus 10mm, the process comprising feeding feed material, either in the form of pre-reduced nickel containing laterite or as nickel containing laterite, simultaneously with a carbonaceous reductant downwardly onto the top surface of the central region of the molten bath of a cylindrical furnace of d.c. arc furnace type having one or more electrodes situated in the roof acting as cathode and the molten bath acting as an anode, and wherein the feeding of the furnace is on a continuous basis; and periodically or continuously

SS

0o

S

S

269/96VSAI'7856P.SIE,24 I I I I- 7 withdrawing nickel depleted slag and ferronickel from the furnace.

Further features of the invention provide for a frozen lining to be maintained between the molten bath and the refractory lining by controlling the power and feedratesupplied to the furnace and optionaly water-cooling the furnace sidawalls; for the electrodes situated in the roof of the furnace to be graphite electrodes; for there to be only one such electrode which is located centrally; for the one or more electrodes to be hollow in which case reactants are preferably introduced into the furnace by way of the bore of such hollow electrode Sor electrodes; for air to be substantially excluded from the interior of the furnace in which case enhancement of the exclusion of air may be achieved by operating the furnace at a slightly positive pressure; and for the furnace to be a 4*)4 plasma d.c. arc furnace.

Still further features of the invention provide for the recovery of energy by using the thermal calorific value of the off-gases from the furnace, 4^ d^ I I~-11 I I II 8 optionally after cleaning, to dry, calcine, preheat or pre-reduce the feed material; for the feed material to be composed of at least 50% having a particle size of minus 10mm; and for the feed material to include recycled slag produced in a downstream converter for purifying the unrefined ferronickel product produced in the process of the invention.

The invention still further provides, as one, o alternative thereof, for the laterite to be pre-reduced to meet a required final ferronickel specification, prior to introduction into the *furnace. In such a case the laterite ore is preferably dried first followed by dry milling; and calcining at 0om 700 to 800 0 C in a fluidised calciner. The calcined laterite is then pre-reduced in a fluidised reduction reactor at .e rOvv 800-850°C prior to feeding to the furnace bath as defined above.

This variant of the process of the invention has even greater advantages in cases where the Sio 2 :MgO ratio is what would normally be regarded as I I- I 9 excessively high. No Sio 2 would be reduced in the pre-reduction step and accordingly does not appear in the molten metal produced in the furnace. Also, by selective pre-reduction of NiO and Fe 2 03 in the pre-reduction step the ratio of Ni to Fe in the metal can be effectively controlled. A smaller furnace, by comparison, is thus foreseen in such a variant of the invention since melting requires less energy than smelting, especially if sio 2 were also to be reduced to some extent in the smelting process.

00* Clearly, in all cases the feed rate of materials .and the energy input into the furnace are adjusted to achieve and maintain desired bath and tapping 15 temperatures of both slag and molten metal as well as, where required, the protective freeze lining to protect the furnace lining against excessive wear.

Such a protective lining is regarded as essential 00 to the protection of the furnace in all cases where 20 the SiO 2 to MgO ratio is greater than 0 Preferably, the carbonaceous reductant is employed in such quantities that the nickel content of the I I I I 10 slag is below 0,1 percent and to ensure that oxygen in the off-gases is substantially in the form of carbon monoxide and the temperature of the furnace is controlled to between 1500 and 1600°C.

Probably the most important feature of the invention is the fact that a wide range of laterite ores can be processed. This is due to the fact that in the d.c. transferred arc plasma furnace the electrical resistance is mainly in the arc and to a lesser extent in the open-bath slag. In particular the advantages are illustrated in the examples below. Example 1 demonstrates the smelting of laterite ore fines and dusts (even 100%<100Am); the smelting of partially calcined laterite ores; 15 and, the smelting of nickel-containing slags; which can be recycled from a subsequent converter or refining step.

4 4 In example 2, there is illustrated the smelting of or laterite types over a wide range of SiO 2 /MgO ratios, ie. 1,2 to 3,0; and, the smelting of lateritetypes over a wide range of Fe contents ie.

14 to 20%. Additional advantages with respect to I Il I 11 the open bath smelting technology include i) the control of the bath temperature to control slag foaming with high iron containing slags, and ii) effective control of the reductant requirement since there is no contact between the graphite electrode and the melt.

Although, in the examples mentioned above, feed materials were not pre-reduced, the above features would make it possible to conduct a final reductant trimming addition to the furnace if pre-reduced materials were to be smelted. Since the d.c.

S* plasma furnace can smelt fine materials, a fluid bed reactor can be linked up with the plasma furnace as in the case of example 2. Although in the example feed materials were only preheated with liquid petroleum gas, one could conduct pre-reduction using a carbonaceous reductant (solid or gaseous) or alternatively, and preferably, furnace off gases to effect .0 preheating/pre-reduction. Preferably, the carbonaceous reductant is employed in such quantities that the nickel content of the slag is below 0,1%.

'0P I I- 12 In order that the invention may be more fully understood, examples thereof will now be described in greater detail. In the description of example 2 reference will be made to the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS In the drawings:- FIG. 1 is a schematic sectional elevation of a furnace; and, FIG. 2 is a similar view of a fluidised bed.

0 i 0 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLES OF THE INVENTION

*SUU

EXAMPLE 1 In this example tests were conducted in a 100 kVA 1. 0 furnace manufactured by the applicant. The furnace was of a known d.c. plasma-arc furnace type employing a single graphite electrode located centrally above the furnace bath. A direct current power supply was employed in which the molten bath II II II-I- 13 formed, in use, the anode, while the graphite electrode formed the cathode.

The furnace which had an outside diameter of (O0mm and a refractory lining thickness of 114mm, was lined with a refractory material wherein the MgO content was approximately 96 percent. The hearth was lined with a chrome-magnesite rammable materiel to a thickness of 310mm and a number of mild steel rods were used to make the d.c. (anode) electrical connection from the molten bath through the hearth refractory to the anode cable. The molten bath in the furnace was heated to the desired operating temperature, with an initial metal charge.

a.

The feed materials consisted of calcined laterite 15 dust (<100pm) from an industrial rotary kiln calciner (Tests A and -6mm laterite ore fines calcined at 250 0 C (Tests B and D) and -4mm charcoal (all four tests), having the compositions de ailed in Table 1. The feed materials were passed through a feed port in the furnace roof into the reaction zone and the liquid products were tapped intermittently from the furnace. For Test D a 14 somewhat smaller furnace shell, with water-cooling of the sidewalls, was used on the 100 kVA power supply, to increase the number of samples obtainable at the scale of operation.

Results of the smelting tests showing metal, and slag compositions are given in Table 2.

TABLE 1 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FEED MATERIALS (MASS 0..Component Laterite fines Laterite dust Charcoal 00go (calcined 250 0 C) *sea 0 1,96 2,45 1 0 Fe 2

O

3 39,1 36,8 MgO 12,2 17,5 0,2 00S10 2 30,7 34,4 4,3 OA1 2 0 3 5,60 3,83 0,8 o *CaO 0,50 0,25 0,4 0*e15MnO 0,69 0,58 Cr 2 0 3 2,51 1,15 *gos Fixed Carbon 0,79 64,0 $fees: Moisture 9,17 2,0 5,6 Volatilos 23,3 m .15 TABLE 2A SMELTING OF FERRONICKEL FROM LATERITE FINES AND DUST Test Batch Mild Laterite Char- Slag Ferro- Slag Series Steel Fines Dust coal nickel (kg) (kg) (kg) (kg) A Start 1.50 1 5.90 0.51 2 7.00 0.52 4.30 3 7.00 0,44 0.22 9.50 4 7.00 0.44 0.12 8.30 5 7.00 0.37 1.86 16.60 B 1 7.00 0.60 2 7M0 0.52 3 7.00 0.44 5.10 4 7,00 0.44 4.20 10.00 0.63 8.60 6 7.00 0.37 ____27.50 C Start 6.00 1.00 1 10.00 0,63 3 0.63 0.08 21.40 Furnace -Contents 8.60 D Start 1 0.11 4.90 0.20 2.30 2 0.11 4.00 0.78 2.50 3 0.12 5.00 2.10 4 5.00 0.70 3.30 5 5.00 0.70 0.27 2.60 I 5,00 0.84 8 2.0 *.et o U

U.

U

U.

U U

U.

U@

IU U U U I- I 16 TABLE 2B METAL ANALYSES (MASS Test Tap Ni Fe Si Cr P S C A 3 0.06 99.10 0.15 0,08 4 0.21 99,60 0.11 0.05 14.70 84.30 0.05 0.06 0,02 0.10 0.05 C 3 7.82 90.50 0,18 0.04 0,10 Digout 8.43 90.90 0.02 0.05 0.22 0.02 D 5 23.30 72.80 0.75 0,20 6 16.60 83,10 0.05 0,40 *.q 9 TABLE 2C SLAG ANALYSES (MASS 9* *9

S

Test Tap NiO FeO Si02 Cr203 MgO CaO MnO A1203 A 2 0.11 43.10 20.30 5.45 27.60 0.21 0.52 4.67 3 0.06 42.08 21.40 4.98 27.00 0.02 0.53 3.99 4 0.04 41.90 23.20 4.88 27.00 0.02 0.53 4,05 5 0.19 40.20 17.70 6.23 30.90 0.02 0.47 4.72 B 3 1.37 36.70 25.40 4,74 26,50 0.40 0.57 5,89 4 1.35 37.90 24.90 4.69 24,80 0.46 0.60 5.80 1.04 38,50 26.80 3.70 24.30 0.49 0.63 6.14 6 1.18 37.30 28.00 4.12 25,30 0.40 0.59 5.55 C 3 0.15 29.90 29.30 4.09 28.30 0.39 0.65 4.73 D 1 0.24 32.30 25,00 3.73 29,30 0.55 0.96 7.10 2 0.88 33.10 24.80 4.21 29.80 0.55 0.72 6,43 3 0,01 33.40 26.50 3.13 28.30 0.64 0,74 6.93 4 0.03 23.00 34.10 3,83 28.40 0.70 1.12 8,51 0.71 26,00 34.30 2.85 27,40 0.76 1.00 8,16 6 0.19 16.50 36.70 3.55 32.90 0,70 0.95 8.83 I ___IJI 17 From the above it will be seen that even extremely fine (<100 pm) nickel-containing laterite can be utilised effectively in a d.c. plasma-arc furnace.

Nickel levels could be stripped from the produced slag to less than when laterite fines and dusts were smelted as well as when nickel-containing slags were processed.

EXAMPLE 2 A 200 kVA d.c. transferred arc plasma facility was used in this example. The furnace, as shown in 10 Fig. 1 comprised a water-cooled refractory lined shell 1 and conical roof 2, a graphite electrode and an anode configuration comprising various pins 3 protruding the hearth refractory 4. Sidewall and hearth refractories were of a high quality magnesite type. The internal diameter of the furnace was 760mm. There were two tapholes ie. a se bottom taphole 5 for metal product and a top taphole 6 for slag drainage. The two taphole system ensured efficient metal/slag separation.

Four ports 7 were located in the furnace roof, namely an electrode entry port 7a a view port (not shown), a gas extraction port 7b and a feed port

I

_I ~Jr L L. I 18 7c. Not shown are ancillaries namely the power supply, control system, gas cleaning system and water circuits. Fig. 2 shows the LPG heated fluid bed reactor which had been used to preheat the 0O calcined laterite feed to about 600°C prior to smelting the preheated materials in a few cases in test 2 (FBR). The FBR had an inlet 8 for laterite, and an outlet 9 opposite the inlet, a lower inlet for fluidising air and liquid petroleum gas (LPG) and an off gas outlet 11. A change in diameter of the interior of the reactor and located between the material inlet 8 and outlet 9, forms the region in which the solids become less fluidised, to limit fines carry over to the off gas 11.

The laterite when dried, had a loss on ignition (LOI) value of 11,5%. Prior to the smelting testwork, the laterite ores were calcined to a residual LOI of The smelting campaign was conducted on a continuous basis over a period of 7 days, and about 7,2 tons total material was smelted. Table 3 summarises on I I I 19 a tap-to-tap basis, the Ni content of the metal and slag, as well as the SiO 2 /MgO ratios and iron contents in the lateriteand the slag.

For the purposes of all tests that were conducted

OM

by feeding the laterite directly to the furnace, OKt the lateritek was screened to a particle size of minus 8mm. In the case of heating at 600C (in a fluidised bed reactor (see tests indicated by FBR in Table prior to feeding to the furnace the feed material was screened to minus 2mm.

t* to o0 t* oer g* a S.

I

20 TABLE 3 a a.

a. a a a.

a.

a Test Tap Laterite Coal Fixed N i NiO Desgn Actual Fe Fe No No Batch Batch carbon in in SiO2/ Si02/ in in kg kg Metal Slag MgO MgO Laterite Slag Ratio Ratio____ Warm Warm up up 1 1 96.2 2.10 0.96 4.34 0,04 1.51 1.56 17.25 78.60 1 2 62.6 10.00 6.22 6.10 0.04 1.51 1.44. 17.25 21.80 1 3 100 10.00 4.10 5.69 0.13 1,51 1,44 17.25 11.90 1 4 100 10.00 4.10 0,52 1.51 1.41 18.37 16.90 1 5 26.2 10.00 12.47 0,17 1.51 1.31 18.37 16,10 1 6 100 10.00 4.10 7.82 0.04 1,51 1,47 17.80 7.50 1 7 100 10.00 4.10 9.07 0.09 1.51 1.45 17.31 10.20 1 8 100 10.00 4.10 1,78 0.09 1.51 1.51 17.56 10.00 1 9 100 7.00 2.95 12.50 0.22 1,51 1,51 16,91 10.20 1 10 100 5.00 2.15 0,86 1,51 1.52 16.82 20.00 1 11 100 5.00 2.15 0.80 1.51 1.46 16,77 28.90 1 12 100 7.00 2.95 0.26 1.51 1.36 16.85 29.80 1 13 100 7.00 2,95 3.58 0.11 1.51 1,39 17.15 30.80 1 14 100 8.50 3.54 1.23 0.16 1.51 1,52 17,56 21.30 1 15 100 8.50 3.54 0,90 0,07 1.51 1.66 17,56 17.80 1 16 100 7.00 2.95 0.04 1.51 1,32 17.74 17.10 1 17 100 7.50 3,15 19.90 0.04 1.51 1.41 15.95 15.40 1 18 100 7.50 3.15 0.06 1.51 1,38 16.57 26.40 2 19 100 7.50 3.15 1.21 14.47 18.90 2 20 50 3.75 3.15 1.21 14.61 2 21 50 3.75 3.15 20.70 0.04 1.21 1.13 15.03 2 22 200 15.00 3.15 1.21 15.03 16.50 2 23 100 7.50 3.15 17M9 0.04 1.21 1.25 15.83 2 24 100 7.50 3.15 1.21 14.94 13.50 2 25 150 11.25 3.15 0.07 1.21 1,20 14.94 2 26 50 3.75 3.15 17.80 0.04 1.21 1.20 14.92 11.30 2 27 100 7.30 3.07 1,21 14.96 10.90 2 28 150 10.95 3.07 0.04 1.21 1.21 15.00 2 29 50 3.65 3.07 16.40 0.04 1.21 1.21 1I. 65 15.30 2 30 100 7,30 3.07 1.21 14.72 13.50 2 31 150 10,95 3.07 0.04 1.21 1.14 14.49 2 32 50 3.65 3.07 16.30 0.07 1.21 1.19 14,69 9.80 2 33 100 7.00 2.95 1.21 14.87 12.90 2 34 150 10.50 2.95 0.07 1.21 1.20 14.77 2 35 50 3.50 2.95 1.21 14.53 13.10 2 36 50 3.50 2.95 15.70 0.12 1.21 1.14 14.63 a.

a S o a.

a a.

a a kg Carbon/ 100 kg feed material 21 TABLE 3 Cont 46*4 *.6:4 a d 0 oB o..

0440 m 4 S...o o* S S Test Tap Laterite Coal Fixed Ni NiO Desgn Actual Fe Fe No No Batch Batch carbon in in SiO2/ Si02/ in in kg kg Metal Slag MgO MgO Laterite Slag Ratio Ratio FBR 37 250 16.25 2.76 16,80 0.08 1.21 1.36 14.61 13.5 FBR 38 250 16.25 2.76 16.40 0.51 1,21 1.24 15.03 17.9 FBR 39 250 16.25 2.76 18.10 0.36 1.21 1.32 14.98 17.80 FBR 40 169.3 9.29 2.35 18.90 0.65 1.21 1.25 14.99 22.30 3 41 100 6.50 2.76 1.50 19.05 21.60 3 42 150 9.75 2.76 0.11 1.50 1.29 19.60 3 43 50 3.25 2.76 16.10 0.11 1.50 1.31 19.54 14.90 3 44 100 6.50 2.76 22.60 0.51 1.50 1.40 19,56 16.40 3 45 150 9.00 2.56 1.50 19.49 24.20 3 46 100 6.00 2.56 0.10 1,50 1.52 19.22 3 47 50 3.00 2,56 19.90 011 1.50 1.51 19.71 24.50 3 48 100 6.00 2.56 1.50 19.12 26.80 3 49 150 9,00 2.56 0.09 1.50 1.41 19.07 3 50 50 3.00 2.56 21.30 0.16 1.50 1.44 19.31 26.00 3 51 100 6.00 2.56 1.50 20.62 26.60 3 52 150 9.00 2.56 0.15 1.50 1,40 18.97 3 53 50 3.00 2.56 23.30 0.27 1.50 1.43 19.01 27.00 4 54 100 6.00 2.56 1.71 14.80 27.70 4 55 150 9.00 2.56 0.06 1.71 1.52 14.77 4 56 50 3.00 2.56 22.10 0.18 1.71 1.56 14.84 19.90 4 57 100 6.00 2.56 1.71 14.93 19,20 4 58 150 9.00 2.56 0.10 1.71 1.71 14.82 4 59 50 3.00 2.56 23.20 0,07 1.71 1.69 15.96 20.50 4 60 100 6.00 2.56 1.71 15.29 20.90 4 61 150 9.00 2.56 0.06 1,71 1.54 15.00 4 62 50 3.00 2.56 21.50 0.25 1.71 1.59 15.29 16.10 5 63 100 6.00 2.56 3.00 19.83 17.10 5 64 150 9.00 2.56 0.09 3.00 2.18 19.61 65 50 3.00 2.56 21.70 0.10 .3.00 2.14 20,69 20.20 66 100 6.00 2.56 3100 20.69 18.20 67 150 9,00 2.56 3.00 20.69 68 50 3.00 2.56 20,20 0 3.00 2.37 20.69 kg Carbon/ 100 kg feed mater.: 1 -I I I 22 It is envisaged that an extremely effective and economic process is provided by this invention in that in addition to the smelting of a wider range of conventional laterite blends, laterite ores (crushed or uncrushed, dried or undried, calcined or uncalcined) and dusts can also be utilised directly in the production of ferronickel.

It is also envisaged that the process of this invention can be combined with various other processes or operations to form a variety of combined processes. These include processes in which a fraction or all of the reductant in added in a reactor and any remainder is added to the furnace; processes in which a conventional process process applied to coarse laterite A and the process of the invention is applied in parallel, to the •e fines which may even be constituted by a waste stream (eg. kiln dust); and processes in which the invention is included in to a conventional arrangement having conventional upstream processing steps as well as downstream refining steps (drying, calcining/prereduction) to lower P,S,C and Si, and Cr contents of the ferronickel produced.

Claims (17)

1. A process for the reduction and smelting of nickel containing laterite ores, or dust, to yield an unrefined ferronickel product and wherein at least by weight of the laterite ore has a size of minus 10mm, the process comprising feeding feed material, either in the form of a pre-reduced nickel containing laterite or as nickel containing laterite, simultaneously with a carbonaceous reductant downwardly onto the top surface of the central region of the molten bath of a cylindrical furnace of d.c. arc furnace type having one or more electrodes situated in the roof acting as cathode and the molten bath acting as an anode, and wherein the feeding of the furnace is on a continuous basis; and periodically or continuously withdrawing nickel depleted slag and ferronickel from the furnace.

2. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which a frozen lining is maintained between the molten e C. o09o t CC ,0 C 26W6V8SAIMP1P.2 V~ II-1 II I I- I 24 bath and the refractory lining by controlling the power and feedrate supplied to the furnace, and optionally by water cooling the furnace sidewalls.

3. A process as claimed in either of claims 1 or 2 in which the feed material is composed of at least 50% by mass of sizes minus

4. A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims in which the feed material is *b 10 dried, calcined, preheated, or pre-reduced, in any combination thereof.

A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims in which the feed material includes recycle slag produced in a downstream converting or refining step for upgrading the S unrefined ferronickel product produced by this SS. process.

6. A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims in which the laterite feed A I I I Sb 25 material is dried and calcined prior to being fed to the furnace.

7. A process as claimed in claim 6 in which the feed material is milled prior to or following calcining and the milled feed material is subjected to pre-reduction prior to being fed to the furnace.

8. A process as claimed in claim 7 in which the pre-reduction is carried out to an extent at 10 which a portion or substantially all of the Ni is reduced and an incomplete reduction of iron o oxides is achieved.

9. A process as claimed in either of claims 7 or *o 8 in which the prereduction is carried out in 15 a fluidised reduction reactor using gaseous reductants or gases generated from solid reductants combusted in the reactor.

A process as claimed in any one of claims 6 to 9 in which drying is carried out at a temperature of bloub 150°C; calcining at JroW T 26 700 800 0 C, and prereduction at a temperature of tovvv 800 850°C.

11. A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims in which the electrodes situated in the roof of the furnace are graphite electrodes.

12. A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims in which there is only one centrally located electrode in the roof of the .5 10 furnace.

13. A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims in which one or more electrodes situated in the roof of the furnace 06 is or are hollow and feed material is fed to 15 the molten bath by way of such electrode or electrodes. *6

14. A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims in which air is excluded in the interior of the furnace and the furnace is 4I 27 operated at a slight positive pressure to enhance such exclusion.

A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims in which the furnace is a plasma d.c arc furnace.

16. A process as claimed in claim 1, substantially as herein described with reference to any one of the examples.

17. A process as claimed in claim 1, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings. DATED this 17th Day of July 1996. MINTEK By their Patent Attorneys: CALLINAN LAWRIE S.. o I 1 s* S 0 l7TW VSAI'78A.SPI,27 ABSTRACT A process for the production of ferronickel from nickel containing laterite is provided wherein the laterite includes at least a proportion of relatively fine material of size less than The feed material may also be composed substantially or entirely of laterite fines or a. dust and also partially treated dust arising from conventional treatment routes, and may be S pre-reduced, optionally after drying. The 10 laterite is fed to the central region of the molten bath of a circular furnace in which at least one electrode in the roof acts as cathode, and the molten bath itself acts as anode. The OS process can be used to economically treat fine 15 laterite ore previously discarded and stockpiled S. S and even formerly non-viable deposits of laterite, and fines or dust arising from conventional treatment plants.