AU725467B2 - An implement for automatically milking animals - Google Patents

Description

AUSTRALIA

Patents Act COMPLETE SPECIFICATION

(ORIGINAL)

Class Int. Class Application Number: Lodged: Complete Specification Lodged: Accepted: Published: Priority Related Art: Name of Applicant: Maasland N.V.

Actual Inventor(s): Olaf Van Der Lely Address for Service: PHILLIPS ORMONDE FITZPATRICK Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys 367 Collins Street Melbourne 3000 AUSTRALIA Invention Title: AN IMPLEMENT FOR AUTOMATICALLY MILKING ANIMALS Our Ref 593350 POF Code: 1556/253487 The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to applicant(s): -1la AN IMPLEMENT FOR AUTOMATICALLY MILKING ANIMALS The present application is a divisional application from Australian patent application number 66014/98, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

The present invention relates to a method for automatically milking animals, such as cows.

The method is to be implemented in a loose housing system or posture where the animals are allowed to move about freely and are able to report at any time at a milking parlour in order to be milked there, whilst they have been possibly lured by the fact that they may be given concentrates, there is a need for criteria which must be met in order that an animal which reports at the milking parlour can actually be milked. For it is not intended to milk an animal when it has been milked shortly before. Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a method for automatically milking animals such that there are included criteria which indicate when an animal, after her last milking, is allowed to be milked again.

It is feasible to make use of a criterion to decide whether an animal is to be milked or not.

According to the invention there is provided a method of automatically milking animals which are allowed to move about freely in a dwelling area, such as a cowhouse or a pasture, and which are individually allowed to go to a milking .parlour provided with a milking robot including identifying the animal, milking the animal provided a time has elapsed which time is determined by data on the 25 animal including physical condition and/or quality of the milk previously produced by the animal.

In other words, the decision whether or not an animal reporting at or near the milking parlour is to be milked, is made conditional on the passage of time which, although variable, is defined again and again, in dependency on data concerning the animal's physical condition and/or the milk quality, -so that the distinctive features of each individual animal can be taken into account in making the decision.

SPreferably, the said time is determined, at least in part, by the course of the lactation period recorded in a computer.

W:\tonia'BF\SpeclN1122-99.doc 2 It is further preferred said time is determined, at least in part by historyrecorded data on the milk yield stored in a computer.

It is further preferred said time is determined, at least in part by the degree of activity of the animal as defined by means of an activity meter.

It is further preferred said time is determined at least in part by the course of the oestrous period recorded in the computer.

It is further preferred said time is determined, at least in part by history data on the conductivity of milk stored in the computer.

It is further preferred said time is determined, at least in part by the milk temperature recorded in the computer.

It is further preferred said time is determined, at least in part by the course :of the somatic cell count as recorded in the computer.

It is further preferred said time is determined, at least in part by the frequency at which the animal goes to the milking parlour.

It is further preferred said time is determined by a plurality of the said categories of data on the physical condition of the animal and/or the milk quality, with a weighting factor being assigned to each category.

It is further preferred said time is calculated as soon as an animal leaves the milking parlour.

0.0 20 The invention will now be further explained with reference to the a accompanying drawing, which shows a schematic representation of the system according to the invention.

The drawing shows a loose housing system 1, in which there is disposed a milking parlour 2 and a selection box 3 along one of the short sides thereof. The loose housing 1 has been divided into two parts segregated by a feeding passage 4. Through doors 5 and 6, animal feedstuffs can be put into a manger or feed troughs along the sides of the feed passage. Furthermore, in the loose housing there may be optionally provided cow cubicles e.g. along the longitudinal sides of the loose housing system. It should be noticed that these cow cubicles are not included in the drawing.

The selection box 3 has an entry door 7, a first exit door 8 giving access to the milking parlour 2, and a second exit door 9 giving access to that part of the CM\WlNWORD\TONIA\BF'SPECM8OI4.DOC 3 loose housing system 1 to which is also given access by the exit door 10 of the milking parlour 2. When the selection box 3 is free, an animal may enter it. Due to the fact that in the selection box 3 there is disposed a sensor which communicates with a (non-shown) computer system, and also that each animal bears a transponder attached to a neck strap, which transponder operates in conjunction with the sensor arranged in the selection box 3, an identification signal can be generated by the sensor and sent to the computer system, so that the animal can be identified. The combination of the transponder on the neck of each of the animals, the sensor in the selection box and the computer system constitutes a known per se animal recognition system. In the computer system, a criterion should be included which is determinative of the C:\WINWORDTONIABF\SPECnBB014.DOC issue whether an animal in the milking parlour is to be milked or, in other words, whether an animal may be admitted from the selection box 3 to the milking parlour 2 to be milked there or that she is to be sent directly through the second exit door 9 to that part of the loose housing system to which the.animal is also sent after its milking turn. When the animal passes through the second exit door 9 of the selection box 3 or the exit door 10 of the milking parlour, the animal should walk round the loose housing before she is able to report again at the selection box 3, whereby an animal not yet eligible for milking is prevented from again reporting immediately at the entrance of the selection box and re-entering it. For an animal may tend to do so, when she is given concentrates in the selection box or in the milking parlour.

The number of animals that has been milked since the latest milking turn of the animal reporting at the milking parlour may be taken as a criterion for being :i eligible for milking. This number which can be kept count of in the computer system is compared there against a predetermined numerical value. When the recorded number of animals exceeds this numerical value, the computer system issues a signal which denotes that the animal is allowed to be milked.

This signal produced by the computer system consequently 25 determines that the door 8 from the selection box to the milking parlour can be opened, provided that the milking parlour is free. When the recorded number of animals does not exceed the numerical value, the animal has reported too soon at the selection box and is not eligible for milking. The animal should then be sent away from the selection box through the exit door 9. This will take place on account of a different signal generated by the computer system, which signal is issued by the computer system in case that the recorded number of animals does not excee6 the numerical value. The quantity of produced milk which has been obtained since the latest milking turn of the animal which has reported at the milking parlour may apply as a second criterion for making the decision whether an animal is eligible for milking or not. Again, when this quantity exceeds a predetermined numerical value, so many other animals have been milked since the latest milking turn of the relevant animal that the animal which reported herself is eligible for milking. Then, too, the first signal produced by the computer system makes that the exit door 8 from the selection box to the milking parlour is released, provided that the milking parlour is unoccupied.

The two criteria given here are of major importance when in the milking parlour there is provided a milking machine which is suitable for automatically connecting teat cups to the teats of an animal, for automatically milking the animal, and for automatically disconnecting the teat cups from the animal. Just in such a system, the farmer has no influence on the order in which the animals, which are indeed .15 allowed to walk freely about in the loose housing system, go to the selection box in order to be directed from there to the milking parlour and to be milked there. Due to the fact that the animals can receive concentrates in the selection box or possibly in the milking parlour, too, the animals are lured towards the selection box or the milking parlour. On the other hand, the animals are not allowed to report again at the selection box for admission to the milking parlour within too short a time after they have been milked. By including one of the two mentioned criteria or both criteria in the computer system, a desired circulation of the animals through the loose housing system, the selection box and the milking parlour is realized.

The milking control system set forth hereinbefore is adaptable to the individual animals. When the number of animals milked after the latest milking turn of the animal reporting at the milking box is taken as a criterion, it is feasible by means of a suitably chosen numerical value, against which this number is compared, as explained before, to determine the limit as to which extent a certain animal can be milked more frequently than the other animals. On one hand, this numerical value may be fixed e.g. at a proportion of the number of animals which should be milked in the milking parlour in the ordinary course of events. The smaller this proportion is taken, the greater the probability of certain animals being milked more frequently than other animals. When it is intended to milk only particular animals more frequently than other animals, the numerical value can also be made dependent on a given animal and, more particularly, dependent on the stage of the lactation period in which the animal is.

As a rule it applies that an animal which has calved recently can be milked more frequently than otherwise. The numerical value, against which the recorded number of animals is compared to check whether the newly calved-down animal is allowed to be milked, can then be fixed at a lower figure.

In this method, a first criterion of importance in deciding whether an animal is allowed to be milked is the course of the lactation period. For each animal, the lactation period can be recorded in a computer. It will be obvious that, when the milk production is optimal during the progress of the lactation period, an animal can be milked more frequently than when the animal is at a point in the lactation period where the milk production is substantially less.

A second criterion in deciding whether an animal is allowed to be milked can lie in the volume of the milk yield Each time when an animal is milked, the amount of milk obtained is determined and the milk yield is recorded in the computer. The milk yielded to be expected can be found from the history record data on the milk yield stored in the computer; this milk yield to be expected may ee oo** have an effect on deciding whether or not an animal is to be milked, i.e. in the sense that, with a gradual increase in the milk yield, the time which should have elapsed since the last milking can be gradually shorter.

~A third criterion useable in deciding whether an animal is allowed to be milked can be the degree of activity of the animal. This animal activity can be determined by means of an activity meter. Such an activity meter is often a step counter, which is attached to the animal and is read-out as soon as she passes by a sensor placed in the cowhouse, preferably near or at the milking parlour.

When such an activity meter is also provided with a memory, into which the counter reading is automatically stored every time when a fixed period of e.g. five minutes, a quarter of an hour, half an hour or any other desired period of time has elapsed, all these counter readings stored in the memory can be retrieved when the animal passes the sensor, and thus there can be obtained a highly accurate C WINWORDTONIABFISPECK 8 14MDOC 7 picture of the animal activity in the last period, i.e. the period elapsed since the last time when the animal called at the milking parlour. When the animal, upon being milked, moves about, grazes or takes food and subsequently ruminates, and the animal activity during the respective times taken up is measured, then it is practicable to decide whether or not to milk the animal when it reports, on the basis of the course of activity determined. After rumination, the number of movements will be relatively lesser, due to the fact that the udder is heavy and the animal is troubled by this, and the animal is allowed to be milked. On the other hand, when it appears from the course of activity that the animal reports herself at the milking parlour without having had a period of rumination, it can be decided that the animal is not allowed to be milked yet on account of the course of activity.

A fourth criterion suitable for application in deciding whether or not the animal is allowed to be milked can be the course of the oestrous period. For each animal, this, too, is recorded in the computer. Particularly, it applies that the milk production will be lower in the period of fertility, during which period people may want to inseminate the animal. In the period of fertility it will often be possible to establish also that the animal activity is slightly higher than before; moreover, this also applies to the animal's temperature. Hence, the temperature •.00 20 of the animal may be mentioned as a fifth criterion of importance in deciding whether an animal is allowed to be milked; this temperature, which may be i measured on the milk immediately or almost immediately after it has been extracted from the udder, is again and again recorded in the computer, so that for this animal an average temperature course can be found.

A sixth criterion of importance in deciding whether or not the animal is allowed to be milked will be the conductivity of milk. This, too, is determined and stored into the computer during milking. From the history data on the conductivity of milk, the course of this conductivity can be indicated and in a very early stage it can be signalized whether there is question of a (latent) mastitis, in which case the animal should be milked at relatively shorter intervals. In this connection, the course of the somatic cell count of the milk as recorded in the computer may also be mentioned as a criterion.

SC:\%WNWORDMTONIABFSPECfO14.DOC 8 Finally, it should be mentioned that the frequency at which the animal goes to the milking parlour can be of importance as a criterion in deciding whether or not an animal is allowed to be milked. A higher frequency of calls at the milking parlour is to be expected when the animal is in heat. When the animal goes more frequently to the milking parlour just during this period, it will happen more often that it is decided not to milk the animal yet.

Of course, it is not necessary to use all these criteria at the same time. It is possible to decide whether or not to milk the animal on the basis of only a limited number of criteria. So, it is practicable to determine for each animal, on account of a number of criteria, the time which should have elapsed since the preceding milking turn of the respective animal for a new milking turn to be possible. In other words, this time is determined by a plurality of the said categories of data on the physical condition of the animal and/or the milk quality. Besides, a certain weighting factor can be assigned to each criterion or to each category of data on the physical condition of the animal and/or the milk quality. As soon as an animal has been milked and leaves the milking parlour, this time can be calculated, so that the time which should have elapsed before the animal can be milked again is immediately fixed.

The application of all kinds of criteria in deciding whether or not an animal 20 can be milked is particularly of importance with a fully automated milking implement, wherein not only the milking itself is automated, but wherein also the cleaning or any other pre-treatment of at least the teats of an animal as well as .i the connection of the teat cups to, and their disconnection from, the animal's teats are performed automatically.

The invention is by no means limited to the exemplary embodiment of the invention set forth here, but it also relates to all kinds of modifications thereto, of course, as far as falling within the scope of the accompanying claims.

cr-kw1NW0RDT0A\XAF1SPECM8I4.OOC

Claims (12)

1. A method of automatically milking animals which are allowed to move about freely in a dwelling area, such as a cowhouse or a pasture, and which are individually allowed to go to a milking parlour provided with a milking robot including identifying the animal, milking the animal provided a time has elapsed which time is determined by data on the animal including physical condition and/or quality of milk previously produced by the animal.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said time is determined, at least in part, by the course of the lactation period recorded in a computer.

3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said time is determined, at least in part by history-recorded data on the milk yield stored in a computer.

S4. Amethod according to any one of claims 1to 3, wherein said time is determined, at least in part by the degree of activity of the animal as defined by means of an activity meter.

5. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein said time is determined at least in part by the course of the oestrous period recorded in a computer.

6. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein said time is e° 25 determined, at least in part by history data on the conductivity of milk stored in a computer.

7. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein said time is determined, at least in part by the milk temperature recorded in a computer.

8. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein said time is determined, at least in part by the course of the somatic cell count as recorded .N in a computer. W: tania'BF\Spec41122-99.doc 4 N.*

9. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein said time is determined, at least in part by the frequency at which the animal goes to the milking parlour.

10. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein said time is determined by a plurality of the said categories of data on the physical condition of the animal and/or the milk quality, with a weighting factor being assigned to each category.

11. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein said time is calculated as soon as an animal leaves the milking parlour. i b

12. A method of automatically milking animals substantially as herein before described and illustrated. DATED: 23 July 1999 PHILLIPS ORMONDE FITZPATRICK Attorneys for: MAASLAND N.V. O' 0 CAWNWORDTONIABSPECMl04.DOC