AU752942B2 - Comb copolymers for regulating cell-surface interactions - Google Patents
Comb copolymers for regulating cell-surface interactions Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU752942B2 AU752942B2 AU35564/99A AU3556499A AU752942B2 AU 752942 B2 AU752942 B2 AU 752942B2 AU 35564/99 A AU35564/99 A AU 35564/99A AU 3556499 A AU3556499 A AU 3556499A AU 752942 B2 AU752942 B2 AU 752942B2
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- cell
- side chains
- comb
- binding
- copolymer
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
- 229920001577 copolymer Polymers 0.000 title claims abstract description 260
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 title claims description 227
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 title claims description 18
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 title description 14
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 179
- 230000027455 binding Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 124
- 239000003446 ligand Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 122
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 45
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 41
- 230000005754 cellular signaling Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 229920001600 hydrophobic polymer Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 239000003102 growth factor Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 239000004816 latex Substances 0.000 claims description 80
- 229920000126 latex Polymers 0.000 claims description 80
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 54
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims description 49
- 239000007943 implant Substances 0.000 claims description 31
- 229920001223 polyethylene glycol Polymers 0.000 claims description 25
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 claims description 25
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000012598 cell culture matrix Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 229920006254 polymer film Polymers 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 229920003171 Poly (ethylene oxide) Polymers 0.000 claims description 5
- 125000000524 functional group Chemical group 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920002307 Dextran Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002202 Polyethylene glycol Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 210000002569 neuron Anatomy 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920002125 Sokalan® Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000000663 muscle cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000004738 parenchymal cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004584 polyacrylic acid Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000004927 skin cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 240000007594 Oryza sativa Species 0.000 claims 1
- 235000007164 Oryza sativa Nutrition 0.000 claims 1
- 210000002449 bone cell Anatomy 0.000 claims 1
- 210000003321 cartilage cell Anatomy 0.000 claims 1
- HPNSNYBUADCFDR-UHFFFAOYSA-N chromafenozide Chemical compound CC1=CC(C)=CC(C(=O)N(NC(=O)C=2C(=C3CCCOC3=CC=2)C)C(C)(C)C)=C1 HPNSNYBUADCFDR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims 1
- 239000011859 microparticle Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 235000009566 rice Nutrition 0.000 claims 1
- 210000001520 comb Anatomy 0.000 abstract description 59
- 230000036755 cellular response Effects 0.000 abstract description 34
- 230000002209 hydrophobic effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 24
- 239000000178 monomer Substances 0.000 abstract description 24
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 abstract description 22
- 239000012620 biological material Substances 0.000 abstract description 19
- 238000012377 drug delivery Methods 0.000 abstract description 14
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 abstract description 9
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 abstract description 8
- 229920001477 hydrophilic polymer Polymers 0.000 abstract description 8
- 238000003887 surface segregation Methods 0.000 abstract description 8
- 238000012674 dispersion polymerization Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 150000003254 radicals Chemical class 0.000 abstract description 3
- 229920000229 biodegradable polyester Polymers 0.000 abstract 1
- 239000004622 biodegradable polyester Substances 0.000 abstract 1
- 229940124447 delivery agent Drugs 0.000 abstract 1
- 239000010408 film Substances 0.000 description 90
- -1 poly(lactide) Polymers 0.000 description 87
- IYMAXBFPHPZYIK-BQBZGAKWSA-N Arg-Gly-Asp Chemical compound NC(N)=NCCC[C@H](N)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(O)=O IYMAXBFPHPZYIK-BQBZGAKWSA-N 0.000 description 47
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 38
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 30
- YXFVVABEGXRONW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Toluene Chemical compound CC1=CC=CC=C1 YXFVVABEGXRONW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 27
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 27
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 26
- VBEQCZHXXJYVRD-GACYYNSASA-N uroanthelone Chemical compound C([C@@H](C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)CC)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C2=CC=CC=C2NC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C2=CC=CC=C2NC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(O)=O)C(C)C)[C@@H](C)O)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1NC=NC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CCSC)NC(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)CNC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](CC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H]1N(CCC1)C(=O)[C@H](CS)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H]1N(CCC1)C(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CC(N)=O)C(C)C)[C@@H](C)CC)C1=CC=C(O)C=C1 VBEQCZHXXJYVRD-GACYYNSASA-N 0.000 description 25
- 102400001368 Epidermal growth factor Human genes 0.000 description 23
- 101800003838 Epidermal growth factor Proteins 0.000 description 23
- 229940116977 epidermal growth factor Drugs 0.000 description 23
- WYURNTSHIVDZCO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Tetrahydrofuran Chemical compound C1CCOC1 WYURNTSHIVDZCO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 20
- 108010044426 integrins Proteins 0.000 description 17
- 102000006495 integrins Human genes 0.000 description 17
- 238000004113 cell culture Methods 0.000 description 16
- 229920000747 poly(lactic acid) Polymers 0.000 description 16
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-M Acrylate Chemical compound [O-]C(=O)C=C NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 15
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 15
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 15
- 230000021164 cell adhesion Effects 0.000 description 14
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 13
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 13
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 12
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 12
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 12
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 12
- 230000009477 glass transition Effects 0.000 description 11
- 239000004626 polylactic acid Substances 0.000 description 11
- CXCHEKCRJQRVNG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,2,2-trifluoroethanesulfonyl chloride Chemical compound FC(F)(F)CS(Cl)(=O)=O CXCHEKCRJQRVNG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 10
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 10
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 10
- YLQBMQCUIZJEEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N tetrahydrofuran Natural products C=1C=COC=1 YLQBMQCUIZJEEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N acrylic acid group Chemical group C(C=C)(=O)O NIXOWILDQLNWCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000005345 coagulation Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000015271 coagulation Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 9
- LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I dipotassium trisodium dihydrogen phosphate hydrogen phosphate dichloride Chemical compound P(=O)(O)(O)[O-].[K+].P(=O)(O)([O-])[O-].[Na+].[Na+].[Cl-].[K+].[Cl-].[Na+] LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I 0.000 description 9
- 125000002887 hydroxy group Chemical group [H]O* 0.000 description 9
- 239000002953 phosphate buffered saline Substances 0.000 description 9
- RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Diethyl ether Chemical compound CCOCC RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000005204 segregation Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000007480 spreading Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000003892 spreading Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000004793 Polystyrene Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000006116 polymerization reaction Methods 0.000 description 7
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 7
- 238000004528 spin coating Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000029663 wound healing Effects 0.000 description 7
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- CERQOIWHTDAKMF-UHFFFAOYSA-M Methacrylate Chemical compound CC(=C)C([O-])=O CERQOIWHTDAKMF-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 6
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- ZMANZCXQSJIPKH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Triethylamine Chemical compound CCN(CC)CC ZMANZCXQSJIPKH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000000137 annealing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004581 coalescence Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004108 freeze drying Methods 0.000 description 6
- 108010053299 glycyl-arginyl-glycyl-aspartyl-seryl-proline Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 6
- 210000003494 hepatocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- JJTUDXZGHPGLLC-UHFFFAOYSA-N lactide Chemical compound CC1OC(=O)C(C)OC1=O JJTUDXZGHPGLLC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 229920000058 polyacrylate Polymers 0.000 description 6
- 238000001179 sorption measurement Methods 0.000 description 6
- NTEDOEBWPRVVSG-XUXIUFHCSA-N (2s)-1-[(2s)-2-[[(2s)-2-[[2-[[(2s)-2-[(2-aminoacetyl)amino]-5-(diaminomethylideneamino)pentanoyl]amino]acetyl]amino]-3-carboxypropanoyl]amino]-3-hydroxypropanoyl]pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid Chemical compound NC(N)=NCCC[C@H](NC(=O)CN)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N1CCC[C@H]1C(O)=O NTEDOEBWPRVVSG-XUXIUFHCSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 102000016359 Fibronectins Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108010067306 Fibronectins Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 5
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 102000005962 receptors Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108020003175 receptors Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 108060006698 EGF receptor Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000001301 EGF receptor Human genes 0.000 description 4
- BRLQWZUYTZBJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Epichlorohydrin Chemical compound ClCC1CO1 BRLQWZUYTZBJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- LYCAIKOWRPUZTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethylene glycol Chemical compound OCCO LYCAIKOWRPUZTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- AEMRFAOFKBGASW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycolic acid Chemical compound OCC(O)=O AEMRFAOFKBGASW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- VVQNEPGJFQJSBK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methyl methacrylate Chemical compound COC(=O)C(C)=C VVQNEPGJFQJSBK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 125000003277 amino group Chemical group 0.000 description 4
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000003054 catalyst Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000010261 cell growth Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000002612 dispersion medium Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 125000001495 ethyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])([H])* 0.000 description 4
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000012091 fetal bovine serum Substances 0.000 description 4
- 210000002950 fibroblast Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000003208 petroleum Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229920003229 poly(methyl methacrylate) Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 229920002223 polystyrene Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000007151 ring opening polymerisation reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- DAEPDZWVDSPTHF-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium pyruvate Chemical compound [Na+].CC(=O)C([O-])=O DAEPDZWVDSPTHF-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000002344 surface layer Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 4
- RYHBNJHYFVUHQT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,4-Dioxane Chemical compound C1COCCO1 RYHBNJHYFVUHQT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- UHOVQNZJYSORNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N Benzene Chemical compound C1=CC=CC=C1 UHOVQNZJYSORNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 108091003079 Bovine Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000008186 Collagen Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010035532 Collagen Proteins 0.000 description 3
- YMWUJEATGCHHMB-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dichloromethane Chemical compound ClCCl YMWUJEATGCHHMB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 108010009202 Growth Factor Receptors Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000009465 Growth Factor Receptors Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 3
- 102000003923 Protein Kinase C Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108090000315 Protein Kinase C Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 239000007983 Tris buffer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 102000019997 adhesion receptor Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010013985 adhesion receptor Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 239000003570 air Substances 0.000 description 3
- 108010072041 arginyl-glycyl-aspartic acid Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000006065 biodegradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229920001436 collagen Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 239000008367 deionised water Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910021641 deionized water Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001125 extrusion Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000001650 focal adhesion Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 239000012737 fresh medium Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000012510 hollow fiber Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000007654 immersion Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000003999 initiator Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000004807 localization Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229920001427 mPEG Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 3
- 125000002496 methyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])* 0.000 description 3
- VLKZOEOYAKHREP-UHFFFAOYSA-N n-Hexane Chemical compound CCCCCC VLKZOEOYAKHREP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000004745 nonwoven fabric Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000000269 nucleophilic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005191 phase separation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000004926 polymethyl methacrylate Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000003672 processing method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000013557 residual solvent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229920006126 semicrystalline polymer Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 238000009987 spinning Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001954 sterilising effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004659 sterilization and disinfection Methods 0.000 description 3
- RKDVKSZUMVYZHH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione Chemical compound O=C1COC(=O)CO1 RKDVKSZUMVYZHH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- CSCPPACGZOOCGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetone Chemical compound CC(C)=O CSCPPACGZOOCGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 102000010834 Extracellular Matrix Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010037362 Extracellular Matrix Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- CEAZRRDELHUEMR-URQXQFDESA-N Gentamicin Chemical compound O1[C@H](C(C)NC)CC[C@@H](N)[C@H]1O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](NC)[C@@](C)(O)CO2)O)[C@H](N)C[C@@H]1N CEAZRRDELHUEMR-URQXQFDESA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229930182566 Gentamicin Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 108060003393 Granulin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrochloric acid Chemical group Cl VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N L-glutamine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229930182816 L-glutamine Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 239000004472 Lysine Substances 0.000 description 2
- KDXKERNSBIXSRK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Lysine Natural products NCCCCC(N)C(O)=O KDXKERNSBIXSRK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 102000043136 MAP kinase family Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108091054455 MAP kinase family Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 208000034530 PLAA-associated neurodevelopmental disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 229920001305 Poly(isodecyl(meth)acrylate) Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920002319 Poly(methyl acrylate) Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920001397 Poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920002732 Polyanhydride Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920000954 Polyglycolide Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920000331 Polyhydroxybutyrate Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920001710 Polyorthoester Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012644 addition polymerization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 125000000217 alkyl group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 125000002947 alkylene group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 150000001412 amines Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- ROOXNKNUYICQNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N ammonium persulfate Chemical compound [NH4+].[NH4+].[O-]S(=O)(=O)OOS([O-])(=O)=O ROOXNKNUYICQNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003115 biocidal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920001400 block copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000001680 brushing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 125000000484 butyl group Chemical group [H]C([*])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])[H] 0.000 description 2
- 235000011089 carbon dioxide Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 125000003178 carboxy group Chemical group [H]OC(*)=O 0.000 description 2
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910010293 ceramic material Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003431 cross linking reagent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012258 culturing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229940039227 diagnostic agent Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000000032 diagnostic agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003618 dip coating Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007598 dipping method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 125000003438 dodecyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])* 0.000 description 2
- 230000003828 downregulation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010556 emulsion polymerization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002255 enzymatic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003797 essential amino acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000020776 essential amino acid Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 210000002744 extracellular matrix Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005189 flocculation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000016615 flocculation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 125000004051 hexyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])* 0.000 description 2
- 229920001519 homopolymer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000036571 hydration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006703 hydration reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000033444 hydroxylation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005805 hydroxylation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 125000000959 isobutyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C([H])(C([H])([H])[H])C([H])([H])* 0.000 description 2
- LRDFRRGEGBBSRN-UHFFFAOYSA-N isobutyronitrile Chemical compound CC(C)C#N LRDFRRGEGBBSRN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- JVTAAEKCZFNVCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N lactic acid Chemical compound CC(O)C(O)=O JVTAAEKCZFNVCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000000155 melt Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010899 nucleation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012038 nucleophile Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 125000001997 phenyl group Chemical group [H]C1=C([H])C([H])=C(*)C([H])=C1[H] 0.000 description 2
- 229920001308 poly(aminoacid) Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920001084 poly(chloroprene) Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920000212 poly(isobutyl acrylate) Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920000184 poly(octadecyl acrylate) Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920001042 poly(δ-valerolactone) Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920001610 polycaprolactone Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920000197 polyisopropyl acrylate Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920002959 polymer blend Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000002861 polymer material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920002689 polyvinyl acetate Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000011118 polyvinyl acetate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920000915 polyvinyl chloride Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000004800 polyvinyl chloride Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920001290 polyvinyl ester Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920001289 polyvinyl ether Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920001291 polyvinyl halide Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 150000003141 primary amines Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 230000035755 proliferation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000069 prophylactic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 125000006239 protecting group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229940054269 sodium pyruvate Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229960005322 streptomycin Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001225 therapeutic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- ZIIUUSVHCHPIQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,4,6-trimethyl-N-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]benzenesulfonamide Chemical compound CC1=CC(C)=CC(C)=C1S(=O)(=O)NC1=CC=CC(C(F)(F)F)=C1 ZIIUUSVHCHPIQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- JBARCTHFPUHCED-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-(1h-imidazol-2-yl)guanidine Chemical group NC(=N)NC1=NC=CN1 JBARCTHFPUHCED-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- MUZDXNQOSGWMJJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-methylprop-2-enoic acid;prop-2-enoic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C=C.CC(=C)C(O)=O MUZDXNQOSGWMJJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000010146 3D printing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108010017384 Blood Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004506 Blood Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- KXDHJXZQYSOELW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbamic acid Chemical group NC(O)=O KXDHJXZQYSOELW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000016289 Cell Adhesion Molecules Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010067225 Cell Adhesion Molecules Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000000844 Cell Surface Receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010001857 Cell Surface Receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000006820 DNA synthesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108010002156 Depsipeptides Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000037408 Device failure Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000931304 Eriachne Species 0.000 description 1
- IAYPIBMASNFSPL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethylene oxide Chemical compound C1CO1 IAYPIBMASNFSPL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108050007372 Fibroblast Growth Factor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000018233 Fibroblast Growth Factor Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 239000004471 Glycine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 102000003886 Glycoproteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000288 Glycoproteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000851181 Homo sapiens Epidermal growth factor receptor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000002841 Lewis acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- AFVFQIVMOAPDHO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanesulfonic acid Chemical class CS(O)(=O)=O AFVFQIVMOAPDHO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- TVEKMYMNZFIOBT-UHFFFAOYSA-N O.CCCCCCCC[Al](CCCCCCCC)CCCCCCCC Chemical compound O.CCCCCCCC[Al](CCCCCCCC)CCCCCCCC TVEKMYMNZFIOBT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910019142 PO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 102000011420 Phospholipase D Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000553 Phospholipase D Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000015439 Phospholipases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010064785 Phospholipases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000004698 Polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulphide Chemical group [S-2] UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108010073929 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000005789 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010019530 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000004833 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002378 acidificating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920006397 acrylic thermoplastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001298 alcohols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 125000005250 alkyl acrylate group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 229910001870 ammonium persulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000008064 anhydrides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 125000000129 anionic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000975 bioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920002988 biodegradable polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004621 biodegradable polymer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001222 biopolymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004204 blood vessel Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000001124 body fluid Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000010839 body fluid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000000988 bone and bone Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- DQXBYHZEEUGOBF-UHFFFAOYSA-N but-3-enoic acid;ethene Chemical compound C=C.OC(=O)CC=C DQXBYHZEEUGOBF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 150000001720 carbohydrates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 210000000845 cartilage Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000004956 cell adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012578 cell culture reagent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000024245 cell differentiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003915 cell function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000170 cell membrane Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000012292 cell migration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 125000003636 chemical group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 125000001309 chloro group Chemical group Cl* 0.000 description 1
- 230000012085 chronic inflammatory response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007398 colorimetric assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013270 controlled release Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920006237 degradable polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000007857 degradation product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000572 ellipsometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007071 enzymatic hydrolysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006047 enzymatic hydrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003628 erosive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002148 esters Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000005038 ethylene vinyl acetate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000029142 excretion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001605 fetal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940126864 fibroblast growth factor Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000006260 foam Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000004676 glycans Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 150000002334 glycols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N gold Chemical compound [Au] PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000010931 gold Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052737 gold Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229920000578 graft copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 125000001475 halogen functional group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 244000144980 herd Species 0.000 description 1
- 125000000623 heterocyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 239000000017 hydrogel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000001261 hydroxy acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000002513 implantation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008316 intracellular mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000031146 intracellular signal transduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960000448 lactic acid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 235000014655 lactic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004310 lactic acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011968 lewis acid catalyst Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000007517 lewis acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920002521 macromolecule Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000000696 magnetic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002207 metabolite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000000896 monocarboxylic acid group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000004660 morphological change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001537 neural effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002241 neurite Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- QJGQUHMNIGDVPM-OUBTZVSYSA-N nitrogen-15 Chemical compound [15N] QJGQUHMNIGDVPM-OUBTZVSYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 231100000252 nontoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000003000 nontoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000039446 nucleic acids Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108020004707 nucleic acids Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 150000007523 nucleic acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 150000002894 organic compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 150000002905 orthoesters Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000006320 pegylation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003408 phase transfer catalysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K phosphate Chemical compound [O-]P([O-])([O-])=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 239000010452 phosphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001200 poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate) Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229940065514 poly(lactide) Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229920001281 polyalkylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000728 polyester Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000573 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920006381 polylactic acid film Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000003505 polymerization initiator Substances 0.000 description 1
- 102000040430 polynucleotide Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091033319 polynucleotide Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920001282 polysaccharide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000005017 polysaccharide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001296 polysiloxane Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920005553 polystyrene-acrylate Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004814 polyurethane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920002635 polyurethane Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002451 polyvinyl alcohol Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000002924 primary amino group Chemical group [H]N([H])* 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010526 radical polymerization reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012857 radioactive material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008521 reorganization Effects 0.000 description 1
- OHRURASPPZQGQM-GCCNXGTGSA-N romidepsin Chemical compound O1C(=O)[C@H](C(C)C)NC(=O)C(=C/C)/NC(=O)[C@H]2CSSCC\C=C\[C@@H]1CC(=O)N[C@H](C(C)C)C(=O)N2 OHRURASPPZQGQM-GCCNXGTGSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000001878 scanning electron micrograph Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013545 self-assembled monolayer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000005266 side chain polymer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009870 specific binding Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920003002 synthetic resin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000000057 synthetic resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- ISXSCDLOGDJUNJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N tert-butyl prop-2-enoate Chemical compound CC(C)(C)OC(=O)C=C ISXSCDLOGDJUNJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 125000005931 tert-butyloxycarbonyl group Chemical group [H]C([H])([H])C(OC(*)=O)(C([H])([H])[H])C([H])([H])[H] 0.000 description 1
- 239000002407 tissue scaffold Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000005490 tosylate group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000008648 triflates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- YFHICDDUDORKJB-UHFFFAOYSA-N trimethylene carbonate Chemical compound O=C1OCCCO1 YFHICDDUDORKJB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000004881 tumor cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920003176 water-insoluble polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000009736 wetting Methods 0.000 description 1
- PAPBSGBWRJIAAV-UHFFFAOYSA-N ε-Caprolactone Chemical compound O=C1CCCCCO1 PAPBSGBWRJIAAV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
- A61K47/50—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates
- A61K47/51—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent
- A61K47/56—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent the modifying agent being an organic macromolecular compound, e.g. an oligomeric, polymeric or dendrimeric molecule
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
- A61K47/50—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K31/00—Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
- A61K31/74—Synthetic polymeric materials
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
- A61K47/50—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates
- A61K47/51—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent
- A61K47/62—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent the modifying agent being a protein, peptide or polyamino acid
- A61K47/64—Drug-peptide, drug-protein or drug-polyamino acid conjugates, i.e. the modifying agent being a peptide, protein or polyamino acid which is covalently bonded or complexed to a therapeutically active agent
- A61K47/641—Branched, dendritic or hypercomb peptides
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
- C08G—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED OTHERWISE THAN BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING UNSATURATED CARBON-TO-CARBON BONDS
- C08G81/00—Macromolecular compounds obtained by interreacting polymers in the absence of monomers, e.g. block polymers
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
- C08G—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED OTHERWISE THAN BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING UNSATURATED CARBON-TO-CARBON BONDS
- C08G81/00—Macromolecular compounds obtained by interreacting polymers in the absence of monomers, e.g. block polymers
- C08G81/02—Macromolecular compounds obtained by interreacting polymers in the absence of monomers, e.g. block polymers at least one of the polymers being obtained by reactions involving only carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
- C08G81/024—Block or graft polymers containing sequences of polymers of C08C or C08F and of polymers of C08G
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Materials For Medical Uses (AREA)
- Medicinal Preparation (AREA)
- Polyesters Or Polycarbonates (AREA)
- Other Resins Obtained By Reactions Not Involving Carbon-To-Carbon Unsaturated Bonds (AREA)
- Immobilizing And Processing Of Enzymes And Microorganisms (AREA)
- Paints Or Removers (AREA)
Abstract
Synthetic comb copolymers which elicit controlled cellular response, methods of applying these polymers to various surfaces, and methods of using the polymers for modifying biomaterial surfaces, in tissue engineering applications and as drug delivery devices are provided. The comb copolymers are comprised of hydrophobic polymer backbones and hydrophilic, non-cell binding side chains which can be end-capped with cell-signaling ligands that guide cellular response. By mixing non-cell binding combs with ligand-bearing combs, the surface concentration and spatial distribution of one or more types of ligands, including adhesion peptides and growth factors, can be tuned on a surface to achieve desired cellular response. In one embodiment, the combs are used as stabilizing agents for dispersion polymerization of latexes. The comb-stabilized latexes can be applied to substrates by standard coating operations to create a bioregulating surface, or used as drug delivery agents. In another embodiment, the combs can be blended in small quantities to a hydrophobic matrix polymer and processed to affect the surface segregation of the comb. The comb copolymers are formed in one embodiment by providing a biodegradable polyester backbone that includes reactive groups, and reacting the reactive groups in the backbone with reactive chain ends on a low molecular weight hydrophilic polymer. In another embodiment, non-biodegradable comb copolymers are formed by free radical synthesis of a hydrophobic monomer and a hydrophilic macromonomer. In all of the above embodiments, a portion of the hydrophilic polymer side chains can be covalently coupled to cell-signaling ligands such as adhesion peptides or growth factors to control cellular response.
Description
WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 COMB COPOLYMERS FOR REGULATING CELL-SURFACE INTERACTIONS Background of the Invention The United States government has certain rights in this invention by virtue of National Science Foundation grant No. DMR-9400334, OSP Project No. 6227 to Anne M. Mayes, and National Science Foundation Grant No.
BES 9632714 to L. G. Griffith.
This application claims priority to U.S.S.N. 60/081,596 filed April 13, 1998.
Polymeric materials that elicit controlled cell responses, and have good mechanical, optical and/or biodegradation properties, are disclosed for use in biomedical applications. Processing methods by which such polymers can be localized at a biomaterial surface are also disclosed.
Polymers currently in use for biomedical applications generally tend to be hydrophobic. As defined herein, hydrophobic refers to a material that repels water, exhibits a static contact angle with water greater than degrees at 20 0 C, and has a water permeability P less than 3x10-'o cm 3
(STP)
cm/(cm 2 s Pa). This can give rise to uncontrolled interactions between cells and adsorbed proteins at the surface of the material, which can result in a chronic inflammatory response that can lead to failure of implants and even promote tumorigenecity (Warson, The Applications of Synthetic Resin Emulsions, Benn, London (1972)). Metal or ceramic materials used in implant applications similarly can elicit undesirable cell responses.
For tissue engineering applications, it is essential that the polymeric material used to form a biodegradable scaffold for cells promote cell adhesion, migration, growth and differentiation while providing adequate structural support. Though commonly used synthetic scaffold materials such as poly(lactide), poly(glycolide), etc., and copolymers thereof, have suitable mechanical, processing and biodegradation properties, their hydrophobic nature leads to protein adsorption and denaturing on the material surface which elicits uncontrolled cell response.
WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 The ideal surface for many biomaterials applications would resist protein adsorption while providing cells with specific chemical signals to guide adhesion, survival, growth, migration and differentiation. As used herein, the term "biomaterial" refers to a nonviable material used in a medical device intended to interact with biological systems. Polymer surfaces modified with poly(ethylene oxide) have been studied in recent years for the reduction of protein adsorption at the surface of biomaterials (Paine et al.
Macromolecules, 23:3104 (1990)). The objective of these surface modification schemes is the elimination of nonspecific interactions of cells with implant materials. One way in which specific chemical signals can be relayed to cells at a surface is through tethered ligands for cell surface receptors (Barret, Brit. Polym. J. 5:259 (1973)). Delivery of signals in this manner has advantages over the addition of soluble factors, as the signal is presented in a very localized manner at a controlled dose without diffusive loss (Kuhl and Griffith, Nature Medicine, 2:1002 (1996)). In addition, tethered ligands may provide more constant stimulation to cells by avoiding the down-regulation present when soluble ligands are internalized by cells.
Control over spatial distribution of ligands on surfaces may also be key to guiding cell behavior. Thus systems which will allow spatial control of local ligand density, or the creation of clusters of ligands on a surface, in addition to providing control over the average surface density of ligands, are highly desirable (Kornberg et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88:8392 (1991)).
Integrins, dimeric adhesion receptors including one of approximately ten known alpha chains paired with one of approximately six known beta chains, mediate a wide range of interactions between cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) and control cell behaviors as diverse as migration, growth, and differentiation, providing a permissive environment for the action of growth factors. For many integrins, the specificity of integrin binding to matrix proteins has been mapped to small, discrete peptide domains and new sites continue to be elucidated (Rouslahti, Ann.Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol., 12: 697 (1996); Hynes, Cell, 48:549 (1987)). The prototypical example of such WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 specificity is the RGD site first identified in fibronectin and subsequently identified in other matrix proteins. The RGD peptide enables complete replacement of adhesive function of fibronectin for cells expressing certain integrins.
Much data supports the idea that both occupancy and clustering of integrins are required to elicit full cellular responses mediated by integrins (Clark and Brugge, Science, 268:233 (1995)). For example, full EGFR activation of MAP kinase requires integrin clustering and occupancy (Miyamoto et al, J. CellBiol., 135:1633 (1996)). Thus, the spatial presentation of ligand in the environment, whether ligands are spaced closely enough to afford clustering ofligand-bound integrins, may influence cellular behaviors governed by integrins. Indeed, spacing of synthetic RGD ligand covalently linked to the substrate has been shown to have an influence on cell adhesion and spreading (Massia and Hubbell, J. Cell Biol., 114:1089 (1991)). At the same time, the surface concentration of an adhesion ligand such as fibronectin has been shown to have a substantial influence on integrinmediated behaviors such as migration (DiMilla et al, J. Cell Biol., 122:729 (1993)). A recent study using self-assembled monolayers patterned in one micron adhesive/nonadhesive domains demonstrated the role of cell spreading and receptor occupancy on cell survival (Chen et al, Science, 276:1425 (1997). The length scale in that study was approximately that of a focal adhesion complex (or larger), but it is likely that clustering over much smaller length scales (3-10 integrins) is also physiologically relevant. Indeed, data suggests strongly that RGD clustering on the less than 100 nm length scale has profound effects on the integrin-mediated behavior of migration. Since both the concentration and spatial distribution of ligand influence cell response, it is desirable to have a means to vary these two parameters independently, and over a broad range of length scales (nanometers to micrometers), in order to guide cell response.
Integrins can initiate intracellular signaling cascades that overlap with those of growth factors such as epidermal growth factor (EGF). Cross- WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 communication between adhesion and growth factor receptors may occur by direct physical association within the focal adhesions. Both types of receptors are concentrated in these structures (Miyamoto et al, J. Cell Biol., 135:1633 (1996); Plopper et al, Mol. Biol. Cell, 6:1349 (1995)), and both receptors can stimulate some of the same down-stream effect on molecules such as MAP kinase. Close proximity of adhesion and growth factor receptors in the focal adhesion complex provides for a free flow of both positive and negative regulatory signals between the two. A number of signaling molecules have been proposed as forming this linkage; one intracellular mechanism of transmodulation is via protein kinase C (PKC)-mediated attenuation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). It is also likely that PKC activity secondary to phospholipase Cy or phospholipase D activation by EGFR alters integrin-based substratum connections (Welsh et al, J. Cell Biol., 114:533 (1991); Ando et al, J. Cell. Physiol., 156:487 (1993)). It is thus desirable to have a method by which two or more types of signaling ligands, such as adhesion peptides and growth factors, can be simultaneously located at the surface of a biomaterial in controlled quanitity and spatial distribution.
To date, few if any model systems are able to meet both protein resistance and cell signaling surface requirements, while approaches using clinically-applicable materials have focused on hydrogels (Hem and Hubbell, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 39:266 (1998)), which have limited physical strength and are not suitable for many applications. Other approaches for modifying the surfaces of hydrophobic polymeric materials or other biomaterials to achieve a more desirable surface composition for biomedical applications include adsorption of block copolymers, chemical grafting of polymers to the surface, and plasma deposition of an overlying film. Each of these methods suffers various disadvantages. For example, adsorbed block copolymers can be rearranged actively by cells, grafted polymers are difficult to apply at high density on a surface, and plasma deposition results in a gel-like surface structure poorly suited for controlled cell signaling. None of these methods provides a means for modifying the surface of complex three-dimensional WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 structures such as fibrous or sponge-like tissue scaffolds, or for creating clustered ligand distributions of variable concentration and spacing on biomaterial surfaces.
It would be advantageous to provide polymer materials and processing methods that overcome the disadvantages of other biomaterials surface modification approaches. It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide polymer materials that elicit controlled cell-surface interactions by inhibiting protein adsorption, and, where appropriate, presenting controlled concentrations and spatial distributions of cell-signaling ligands on biomaterial surfaces. It is further an object of the present invention to provide processing methods by which such polymers can be placed at a biomaterial surface. It is further the object of the present invention to provide polymeric materials which can be used to create discrete nanometer- to micrometer-sized domains on a biomaterial surface that present two or more different types of ligands for regulating cellular response.
Summary of the Invention Comb-type copolymers that elicit controlled cellular response, methods by which such polymers can be localized at a surface, and methods of using such polymers for modifying the surfaces of biomedical devices are disclosed.
The polymers include a hydrophobic, water-insoluble backbone and low molecular weight, hydrophilic, non-cell binding side chains. As defined herein, non-cell binding refers to materials which exhibit no observable cell attachment after standard cell culturing assays in serum containing media for 24 hours. The molecular weight of the hydrophilic side chains is preferably above 200 Daltons and below 2000 Daltons. The backbone can be biodegradable or non-biodegradable, depending on the intended application.
Biodegradable backbones are preferred for most tissue engineering, drug delivery and wound healing device applications, while non-biodegradable backbones are desirable for permanent implant, biofiltration, and cell culture plate applications. A portion of the non-cell binding side chains can be end- WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 capped with cell-signaling ligands to control the degree of cell adhesion, or other cell response, elicited by the polymer surface. In the preferred embodiment, the overall comb copolymer should have a molecular weight sufficiently high as to confer good mechanical properties to the polymer in the melt state through chain entanglements. That is, its molecular weight should be above the entanglement molecular weight, as defined by one of ordinary skill in the art. The overall molecular weight of the comb copolymer should thus be above about 10,000 Daltons, more preferably above 20,000 Daltons, and more preferably still above 30,000 Daltons.
The density of the hydrophilic side chains along the backbone of the copolymers depends on the length of the side chains and the water-solubility characteristics of the final polymer. The total percentage by weight of the hydrophilic side chains is between 20 and 60 percent of the total copolymer composition, preferably around 40 percent by weight. For combs incorporating hydrophilic side chains with a molecular weight of about 350 Daltons, the mole percent of segments of the backbone carrying hydrophilic side chains can be as high as 30 percent. For hydrophilic side chains with a molecular weight of about 2000 Daltons, the mole percent of segments of the backbone carrying hydrophobic side chains can be as low as 2 percent. In the preferred embodiment, the overall comb copolymer is not water-soluble. As defined herein, the term water-soluble refers to materials having a solubility in aqueous solutions of greater than 1 gram per liter. When in contact with aqueous solutions, the hydrophilic side chains swell and form a hydrated layer which repels proteins and hence resists cellular adhesion.
The non-cell binding side chains of the comb copolymer can be endcapped with cell-signaling chemical ligands in order to elicit controlled cell responses. Ligands such as adhesion peptides or growth factors can be covalently or ionically attached to the ends of the side chains using known chemistries to provide specific chemical signals to cells. A defined fraction of ligand-bearing side chains can be obtained by using appropriate stoichiometric control during the coupling of the ligands to the polymers, by protecting the WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 end-groups on those side chains which are not to be end-capped with ligands, or by combinations of these approaches. For applications where it is desirable to cluster ligands on the length scale of nanometers or tens of nanometers on a biomaterial surface, more than one ligand (on average) can be covalently attached to a single comb copolymer chain. In applications where it is desirable to incorporate two or more types of ligands in a single cluster on a biomaterial surface on the size scale of nanometers to tens of nanometers, one or more of each of the ligand types (for example, an adhesion peptide and growth factor) can be attached to a single comb copolymer chain through its side chains using known chemistries.
When adhesion peptides are coupled to the comb copolymer side chains, cells attach and spread readily on the comb copolymer surface. The amount of cell spreading and proliferation on the surface therefore can be controlled by mixing adhesion peptide-bearing comb copolymers with noncell binding comb copolymers, for example, so that less than 20% of the combs bear an adhesion peptide. Similarly, the spatial distribution of ligand clusters on the biomaterial surface can be controlled by mixing non-cell binding comb copolymers with comb copolymers in which each chain on average has more than one ligand attached to its side chains. In this case, the size of the ligand clusters the spatial area in which the ligands are localized) is dictated by the characteristic size of the ligand-bearing comb copolymer, and can be approximated from the comb copolymer's radius of gyration, RG, which can be calculated or experimentally determined by one of ordinary skill in the art. The comb copolymer radius of gyration can range typically between nanometers and several tens of nanometers, depending on total molecular weight, length of side chains, and environment surrounding the polymer chain, for example, other polymer chains or water molecules G. deGennes, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics, Cornell University Press, 1979). Thus the size of the ligand clusters, as well as the number and type of ligands per cluster, can be controlled by the synthesis conditions of the ligandbearing comb copolymers. For example, a comb copolymer with RG 4 nm WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 would have an area per cluster of 7RG 2 or approximately 50 nm 2 The number of clusters on the surface per unit surface area (on average) can be controlled by the ratio of ligand-bearing to non-cell binding combs at the surface. To achieve a surface separation distance between ligand clusters of d, where d 2RG, the concentration of ligand-bearing combs should be approximately Vchai./(2RG where Vchain is the volume occupied by a single comb copolymer chain. For example, to achieve a cluster-to-cluster distance of 20 nm with a comb copolymer which has RG 4 nm and Vchain =48 nm 3 the estimated fraction of ligand-bearing combs required is 1.5 vol%.
A cluster-to-cluster distance of 10 nm would require 6 vol% of the ligandbearing comb.
Numerous methods can be used to apply the comb copolymers, or their mixtures, to various biomaterial surfaces. These methods include dip coating, spray coating, brush coating, roll coating, or spin casting a film onto the substrate, typically followed by mild heating to promote adhesion to the surface. Solid free form processes such as three dimensional printing techniques (3DP), or freeze drying methods could be used to create complex three-dimensional structures, including porous structures. In all of these processing approaches a suitable crosslinking agent might be incorporated to enhance the mechanical rigidity of the film or device.
In applications where it is desirable to use only small amounts of copolymer to modify the surface of a second, hydrophobic or non-cell regulating polymer, the comb copolymers can be added in small quantities to the second polymer and processed to achieve segregation of the comb copolymer to the surface. In preferred embodiments, the comb copolymer would comprise less than 10 wt% of the polymer mixture. Processing steps to achieve segregation include heating the mixture under a vacuum, in air, water, water vapor, CO 2 or other environment which favors the comb component at the surface, at temperatures sufficiently above the glass transitions of the polymer components to provide mobility for achieving surface segregation. In the case where the second polymer component is a -8- WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 semicrystalline polymer, the annealing temperature should be above the glass transition but below the melting point of the polymer, to ensure that the desired shape of the device is retained. In preferred embodiments, surface segregation is achieved during a standard processing step in the manufacture of a biomedical device, such as during an extraction, autoclaving or sterilization process. In other embodiments, segregation is accomplished in an additional annealing step in a controlled environment (water, etc), after device fabrication. Such processing steps create a surface layer approximately 2RG in thickness that contains almost exclusively the comb copolymer. The observable surface properties of such annealed mixtures are substantially identical to those of the pure comb copolymers. In preferred embodiments, the comb copolymer is miscible with the second polymer to avoid phase separation in the bulk device, which might lead to poor mechanical or optical properties.
In other cases, the localization of the comb polymer to the surface of a device primarily comprised of a second, hydrophobic or non-cell regulating polymer can be accomplished during other steps of device manufacture. For example, precise placement of the comb copolymer at the surface of a device made from a second polymer can be accomplished by 3DP methods.
Likewise, differences in viscosity between the comb copolymer and a second polymer when blended together can be exploited to locate the comb to the surface during melt extrusion of fibers, films or other devices. Porous or nonporous membranes, films, fibers or hollow fibers in which the comb copolymer resides at the surfaces can be prepared by phase inversion casting.
In this method, a solution of the comb copolymer, the second polymer, and a mutual solvent is cast into an aqueous-based coagulation bath to form the device. During the casting process, favorable interactions between the comb and the coagulation bath medium induce segregation of the comb copolymer to exterior surfaces of the film, fiber, or membrane. Cell-regulating microporous biodegradable membranes useful as temporary barrier devices in wound-healing applications can be prepared in this fashion. Cell-regulating WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 biodegradable sutures can similarly be prepared by spinning fibers from solution into an aqueous-based coagulation bath. Such surface-modified fibers can also be prepared from biodegradable or nonbiodegradable materials and fashioned into nonwoven fabric articles for biomedical applications including cell-regulating temporary barrier devices and biofiltration devices.
Hollow nanoporous fibers can be prepared which have cell-regulating interior surfaces. By encapsulating cells in a portion of such a fiber, a long-term drug delivery implant could be prepared which secretes desirable products of cells in quantities regulated wholly or in part by tethered signals on the fiber inner surface. Cell-regulating biodegradable microporous scaffolds with a surface excess of comb copolymers can be prepared by freeze-drying methods by choosing a sublimating solvent which has preferential affinity to the comb copolymer component as compared to the second polymer component which forms the bulk of the device.
In all cases described above where comb copolymers are used in conjunction with a second polymer to prepare a device, the comb copolymers can be non-cell binding combs, ligand-bearing combs, or a mixture of these to achieve a desired cell response as previously described.
A further method by which the comb copolymers can be used for controlling cell response in biomedical applications is through the preparation of polymer latexes that incorporate the comb copolymers on the latex particle surfaces. Such latexes are prepared by dispersion or emulsion polymerization methods in a water-containing medium, using the comb copolymers as a stabilizing agent. The polymerization is achieved by dissolving or mixing the desired monomer, comb stabilizer and initiator in a water-containing medium.
The polymer is initiated, for example, by applying heat to the solvent. The dispersion medium is a good solvent for the comb copolymer but a poor solvent for the growing polymer. The hydrophobic comb backbone is chosen to be compatible with the polymer being synthesized, and thus anchors to the surface of the growing polymer particles, while the hydrophilic side chains stabilize the particles against flocculation. Upon completion of the latex WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 synthesis, the resulting latex particles are in the range of 0.1 to 10 pm in size, typically dispersed at 20-70% polymer solids by weight in the dispersion medium. These systems can be employed in a variety of ways to control cell response through the comb copolymers that remain anchored to the particle surfaces.
Films or coatings can be prepared from the latex dispersions by usual methods such as dipping, brushing, rolling or casting the latex onto any surface. For coatings applied to permanent implants to control cell response, nonbiodegradable latex particles are preferred, such as acrylics. Opaque coatings may be prepared that elicit controlled cell response by employing any of the standard coating methods used to form latex films by those skilled in the art, such as those just mentioned. Alternatively, by heat-treating films at a temperature well above the glass transition of the polymer particles, the particles will coalesce into a smooth, transparent film in which the comb copolymers reside at the surface. The comb copolymers remain localized at the surface upon coalescence due either to an energetic tendency to remain at the surface, or because there is insufficient mobility for comb diffusion into the bulk of the coalesced latex film, for example, if the film is cooled below its glass transition shortly after coalescence. The latex films exhibit surface properties akin to the comb copolymers themselves, but have the advantages that only small quantities of the comb copolymer are used (typically below 1 wt% of the total latex), coatings can be easily applied from water-based suspensions, and the film-forming properties can be tailored to adhere to the substrate by judicious choice of the film-forming polymer. For example, an acrylic latex stabilized by non-cell binding comb copolymers could be used to prepare transparent acrylic coatings on acrylic intraocular lenses in order to render them resistant to cell attachment, and hence less subject to clouding over time. Acrylic latexes could also be used in applications where controlled cell response is desired at the surface of permanent metal, glass or ceramic implants or other devices, including cell culture apparatus, since a high degree of adhesion is often found between oxide surfaces and acrylic polymers. For polystyrene cell culture plates or other apparatus, a cell-regulating PS latex could be used to prepare a transparent, cell-regulating coating in the manner described above.
In all cases described above where latexes are stabilized by comb copolymers, the comb copolymers might be non-cell binding combs, ligand-bearing combs, or a mixture of these to achieve a desired cell response as previously described above. Alternatively, mixed latex dispersions can be used to prepare films which contain clustered ligand regions on a surface of sizes from 0.1 to micrometers. This can be achieved by mixing together dispersions of latex particles coated with non-cell binding combs and those coated with ligandbearing combs and creating films of these mixed dispersions as described above. The size of the ligand clusters is approximately the diameter of the latex particles coated with ligand-bearing combs, while the number of clusters on the surface per unit surface area can be controlled by the ratio of ligand-bearing to non-cell binding latex particles in the mixed dispersion.
In a first aspect of the present invention provides a cell-regulating, combtype copolymer comprising: a) a hydrophobic polymer backbone; b) non-cell binding hydrophilic polymeric side chains grafted to the polymer backbone, wherein the side chains have a molecular weight between 200 and 2000 Daltons, wherein between zero and 100% of the non-cell binding, hydrophilic side chains are end-capped with cell-binding or cell-signaling ligands to form short cell-binding copolymer side chains and wherein the side chains comprise less than 60% of the total copolymer :weight.
12a In a second aspect of the present invention provides a method for making a tissue engineering matrix, cell culture matrix, implant or biomedical device with regulated cellular adhesion or response comprising coating or forming the matrix, implant or device with a comb copolymer comprising: a) a hydrophobic polymer backbone; b) non-cell binding hydrophilic polymeric side chains grafted to the polymer backbone, wherein the side chains have a molecular weight between 200 and 2000 Daltons; wherein between zero and 100% of the non-cell binding, hydrophilic side chains are end-capped with cell-binding or cell-signaling ligands to form short cell-binding copolymer side chains and wherein the side chains comprise less than 60% of the total copolymer weight.
In a third aspect of the present provides a method for engineering tissue °'°comprising growing cells on a tissue-engineering matrix formed of or coated S with the cell-regulating, comb-type copolymer comprising: a) a hydrophobic polymer backbone; b) non-cell binding hydrophilic polymeric side chains grafted to the polymer backbone, wherein the side chains have a molecular weight between 200 and 2000 Daltons; *°°ooo 30 wherein between zero and 100% of the non-cell binding, hydrophilic side chains are end-capped with cell-binding or cell-signaling ligands to form short cell-binding copolymer side chains and wherein the side chains comprise less than 60% of the total copolymer weight, wherein the comb copolymer is effective in regulating cellular adhesion or response to the surface.
In a fourth aspect of the present invention provides a polymer latex comprising polymer particles dispersed in aqueous-containing media stabilized by cell-regulating, comb-type copolymer comprising: a) a hydrophobic polymer backbone; b) non-cell binding hydrophilic polymeric side chains grafted to the polymer backbone, wherein the side chains have a molecular weight between 200 and 2000 Daltons; wherein between zero and 100% of the non-cell binding, hydrophilic side chains are end-capped with cell-binding or cell-signaling ligands to form short cell-binding copolymer side chains and wherein the side chains comprise less than 60% of the total copolymer weight.
In a fifth aspect of the present invention provides a polymer latex comprising polymer particles dispersed in aqueous-containing media stabilized by cell-regulating, comb-type copolymer comprising: a) a hydrophobic polymer backbone; b) non-cell binding hydrophilic polymeric side chains grafted to the polymer backbone, wherein the side chains have a molecular weight between :3 200 and 2000 Daltons; wherein between zero and 100% of the non-cell binding, hydrophilic side chains are end-capped with cell-binding or cell-signaling ligands to form short cell-binding copolymer side chains and wherein the side chains comprise less than 60% of the total copolymer weight.
In a sixth aspect of the present invention provides polymer coatings and films that regulate cell behavior prepared by casting a polymer latex comprising polymer particles dispersed in aqueous-containing media stabilized by cellregulating, comb-type copolymers comprising: a) a hydrophobic polymer backbone; b) non-cell binding hydrophilic polymeric side chains grafted to the polymer backbone, wherein the side chains have a molecular weight between 200 and 2000 Daltons; wherein between zero and 100% of the non-cell binding, hydrophilic side chains are end-capped with cell-binding or cell-signaling ligands to form short cell-binding copolymer side chains and wherein the side chains comprise less than 60% of the total copolymer weight.
20 In a seventh aspect of the present invention provides a method of :i :making polymer coatings and films that regulate cell behavior comprising :casting a polymer latex comprising polymer particles dispersed in aqueouscontaining media stabilized by cell-regulating, comb-type copolymers comprising: a) a hydrophobic polymer backbone; o* b) non-cell binding hydrophilic polymeric side chains grafted to the polymer backbone, wherein the side chains have a molecular weight between 30 200 and 2000 Daltons; wherein between zero and 100% of the non-cell binding, hydrophilic side chains are end-capped with cell-binding or cell-signaling ligands to form short cell-binding copolymer side chains and 12d wherein the side chains comprise less than 60% of the total copolymer weight.
For applications where a biodegradable film is preferred, biodegradable latexes can be prepared using comb stabilizers with biodegradable backbones. Such biodegradable latexes could also be employed as drug delivery vehicles as described below.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Comb-type copolymers that elicit regulated cellular response, methods by which such polymers can be localized at a surface, and methods of using such polymers for modifying the surfaces of biomedical devices are disclosed. These polymers are characterized by properties that are a function of the type and ratio of hydrophilic side chains to hydrophobic backbone polymers, type and number of tethered cell-signaling ligands, molecular weight, and processing conditions.
I. Polymer Composition A. Polymer Architecture *The polymers are comb-type copolymers, with a backbone formed of The polymers are comb-type copolymers, with a backbone formed of S. S S So S.o .o555 WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 a hydrophobic, water-insoluble polymer and side chains formed of short, hydrophilic non-cell binding polymers, having a molecular weight of between 200 and 2000 Daltons. The hydrophobic backbone can be biodegradable or non-biodegradable, depending on the desired application. The overall comb copolymer should have a molecular weight sufficiently high in the melt state as to confer good mechanical properties to the polymer through chain entanglement, that is, its molecular weight should be above the entanglement molecular weight, as defined by one of ordinary skill in the art. The overall molecular weight of the comb copolymer should thus be above about 10,000 Daltons, more preferably above 20,000 Daltons, and more preferably still above 30,000 Daltons. The comb copolymers can be prepared by copolymerizing a hydrophilic macromonomer which contains a polymerizable chain end with a second hydrophobic monomer. Alternatively, a hydrophobic monomer can be copolymerized with a second monomer that includes suitable reactive groups through which the hydrophilic side chains can be grafted to the backbone. Alternatively, a hydrophobic monomer with a suitable reactive side group can be polymerized and a fraction of those reactive side groups can be modified by grafting hydrophilic side chains. A defined percentage of the non-cell binding side chains can be end-capped with a suitable ligand to elicit a specific cellular response.
B. Hydrophobic Polymer Backbones 1. Biodegradable Hydrophobic Polymers Hydrophobic polymers used to impart biodegradable properties to the backbones of the comb copolymers are preferably hydrolyzable under in vivo conditions. Suitable biodegradable polymeric units include hydroxy acids or other biologically degradable polymers that yield degradation products that are non-toxic or present as normal metabolites in the body. These include poly(amino acids), poly(anhydrides), poly(orthoesters), and poly(phosphoesters). Polylactones such as poly(epsilon-caprolactone), poly(delta-valerolactone), poly(gamma-butyrolactone)and poly (beta-hydroxybutyrate), for example, are also useful. Preferred poly(hydroxy WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 acid)s are poly(glycolic acid), poly(DL-lactic acid) and poly(L-lactic acid), or copolymers of poly(glycolic acid and poly(lactic acid). In general, these materials degrade in vivo by both non-enzymatic and enzymatic hydrolysis, and by surface or bulk erosion.
Biodegradable regions can be constructed from monomers, oligomers or polymers using linkages susceptible to biodegradation, such as ester, peptide, anhydride, orthoester, and phosphoester bonds.
2. Non-Biodegradable Hydrophobic Polymers Representative non-biodegradable, hydrophobic polymers that could be incorporated into the backbone of the comb copolymers include polyalkylenes such as polyethylene and polypropylene, polychloroprene, polyvinyl ethers, polyvinyl esters such as poly(vinyl acetate), polyvinyl halides such as poly(vinyl chloride), polysiloxanes, polystyrene, polyurethanes and copolymers thereof, polyacrylates, such as poly(methyl (meth)acrylate), poly(ethyl (meth)acrylate), poly(butyl(meth)acrylate), poly(isobutyl (meth)acrylate), poly(hexyl(meth)acrylate), poly(isodecyl (meth)acrylate), poly(lauryl (meth)acrylate), poly(phenyl (meth)acrylate), poly(methyl acrylate), poly(isopropyl acrylate), poly(isobutyl acrylate), and poly(octadecyl acrylate) (jointly referred to herein as "polyacrylates"), and copolymers and mixtures thereof. The polymers include useful derivatives, including polymers having substitutions, additions of chemical groups, for example, alkyl groups, alkylene groups, hydroxylations, oxidations, and other modifications routinely made by those skilled in the art.
Preferred non-biodegradable polymers include ethylene vinyl acetate, polyacrylates, poly(chloroprene), and copolymers and mixtures thereof.
C. Non-cell Binding Hydrophilic Side Chains The non-cell binding side chains are preferably water-soluble when not attached to the backbone, and, more preferably, are non-ionic. Suitable polymeric blocks include those prepared from poly(ethylene glycol), poly(ethylene oxide), partially or fully hydrolyzed poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(vinylpyrrolidone), and dextran. Preferably, the side chains are made WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 from poly(ethylene glycol), poly(ethylene oxide), or poly(acrylic acids).
The hydrophilic side chains may be intrinsically biodegradable or may be poorly biodegradable or effectively non-biodegradable in the body. In the latter two cases, the side chains should be of sufficiently low molecular weight to allow excretion. The preferred molecular weight range is below about 2000 Daltons, more preferably below 1000 Daltons, and most preferably, below about 500 Daltons. When the polymer is polyethylene glycol, it is preferred that the number of ethylene oxide monomeric units is between about 4 and When double-bond containing monomers are used to prepare the polymer backbone, a preferred method for incorporating the hydrophilic side chains is to use a hydrophilic macromonomer with a reactive double bond at one end which can be randomly incorporated during free radical or other addition polymerization. An example of such a macromonomer is PEGmethacrylate. The density of the non-cell binding, hydrophilic side chains along the polymer backbone is controlled by controlling the relative amounts of the PEG-methacrylate or other suitable macromonomeric unit used.
In those embodiments in which the side groups are end capped with cell-signaling ligands, appropriate functional groups, such as -NH 2 -OH, or COOH are included on the ends of the macromonomers.
D. Monomers with Reactive Functional Groups In many of the embodiments described herein, the monomers used to form the polymer backbone include only two reactive groups, both of which are reacted in order to form the polymer. For example, lactic acid includes two reactive groups, a hydroxy group and a carboxy group. -OH is the preferred reactive group. Although the ends of a polylactic acid polymer include a hydroxy group and a carboxy group, there are no reactive groups along the backbone in the final polymer chain that can be used to form a comb copolymer.
Monomers which contain one or more additional reactive groups need to be incorporated into the polymer backbone, preferably in a random fashion, WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 in order to form the comb-type copolymers when monomers that do not include these reactive groups are used to prepare the polymer backbone.
Examples of these types of monomers are well known to those of skill in the art.
The requirements for a suitable reactive monomer are that it can be incorporated in the growing polymer chain by participating in the same types of chemical reactions as the growing polymer chain. For example, when lactide is being polymerized using a Lewis acid catalyst, a depsipeptide (cyclic dimer of an amino acid) can be prepared from lysine, in which the epsilon amine group is protected, for example, with a t-boc protecting group. The lysine is incorporated into the polymer, and the protecting group can be removed. The resulting amine groups are reactive with hydrophilic polymers which include leaving groups such as tosylates, tresylates, mesylates, triflates and other leaving groups well known to those of skill in the art.
Alternatively, the reactive monomer can include a leaving group that can be displaced with a nucleophilic group on a hydrophilic polymer. For example, epichlorohydrin can be used during the polymerization step. The monomer is incorporated into the polymer backbone, and the chloride group is present on the backbone for subsequent reaction with nucleophiles. An example of a suitable hydrophilic polymer containing a nucleophilic group is a PEG with a terminal amine group. PEG-NH 2 can react with the chloride groups on the polymer backbone to provide a desired density of PEG-ylation on the polymer backbone. Using the chemistry described herein, along with the general knowledge of those of skill in the art, one can prepare polymer backbones which include suitable leaving groups or nucleophiles for subsequent coupling reactions with suitably functionalized hydrophilic polymers.
E. Ligands for Controlling Cell Response A number of molecules are known to promote cell adhesion. These can be amino acids, peptides or glycoproteins. Exemplary cell-binding ligands include peptides possessing an Arginine-Glycine-Aspartic acid (RGD) amino WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 acid sequence or a Tyrosine-Isoleucine-Serine-Arginine-Glycine
(YISRG).
The RGD sequence, present in proteins such as fibronectin, has been shown to be active in promoting cell adhesion and growth (Massia, S. P. and Hubbell, J. J. Cell. Biol., 114:1089 (1991)). Incorporation of RGD sequences at the ends of the copolymer side chains thus can enhance cell adhesion and growth. This is particularly useful when a substrate is not adhesive, for example, a polyester to which cells such as hepatocytes show poor adhesion, which is then modified with the comb copolymer to promote cellular adhesion in a controlled manner.
Biologically active molecules may also be incorporated into the copolymer to promote the adhesion and growth of a particular cell type in vivo. Many growth factors are known and can be obtained from commercial sources such as Sigma Chemical Co, St. Louis, MO, for example, growth factors including epidermal growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, etc.
F. Relative Ratios of Comb Components 1. Ratio of Hydrophilic to Hydrophobic Units The density of the hydrophilic side chains along the polymer backbone depends in part on the molecular weight of the side chains. The total percent of the hydrophilic units to the hydrophobic units in the comb copolymers is between 20 and 60 percent by weight, preferably around 40 percent by weight. For hydrophilic side chains with a molecular weight of about 350, the mole percent of backbone segments carrying hydrophilic side chains can be as high as about 30 percent. For hydrophilic side chains with a molecular weight of about 2000, the mole percent can be as low as about 2 percent.
The relevant consideration when determining an appropriate ratio of hydrophilic to hydrophobic units in the comb copolymers is that the overall polymer, when the hydrophilic side chains are not end-capped with cellsignaling ligands, has the defined non-cell binding properties and preferably is not water-soluble. A relatively high density of very short (MW 500 or less) hydrophilic side chains can provide the same degree of resistance to cellular adhesion as a lower density of higher molecular weight (for example, a MW -17- WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 between 1500 and 2000) side chains. Those of skill in the art can adjust the molecular weight and density of the polymers taking these factors into consideration.
2. Density of Tethered Ligands The non-cell binding side chains of the comb copolymers can be endcapped with cell-signaling chemical ligands in order to elicit specific cell responses. Ligands such as adhesion peptides or growth factors can be covalently or ionically attached to the ends of the side chains using known chemistries to provide specific chemical signals to cells. A defined fraction of ligand-bearing side chains can be obtained by using appropriate stoichiometric control during the coupling of the ligands to the ends of the side chains, by protecting the end-groups on those side chains which are not to be endcapped with ligands, or by combinations of these approaches. For applications where it is desirable to cluster ligands on the length scale of nanometers or tens of nanometers on a biomaterial surface, more than one ligand (on average) can be attached to each comb copolymer chain. In applications where it is desirable to incorporate two or more types of ligands in a single cluster on a biomaterial surface on the size scale of nanometers to tens of nanometers, one or more of each of the ligand types (for example, an adhesion peptide and growth factor) can be attached to each comb copolymer chain (on average) using known chemistries. Presentation of the ligand (or ligands) at the surface can thus be tailored in terms of overall surface density by exploiting the multi-branch nature of the comb molecule, in terms of local density, by the number of ligands attached to the same comb. The ability of the polymers to control cellular adhesion or other cell function can be adjusted by controlling the density of the cell-signaling ligands presented at the surface.
H. Polymer Mixtures A. Mixtures of Comb Copolymers When adhesion peptides are coupled to the comb copolymer side chains, cells attach and spread readily on the comb copolymer surface. The WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 amount of cell spreading and proliferation on the surface therefore can be controlled by mixing adhesion peptide-bearing comb copolymers with noncell binding comb copolymers, for example, so that less than 20%, more typically less than of the combs bear an adhesion peptide. Similarly, the spatial distribution of ligand clusters on the biomaterial surface can be controlled by mixing non-cell binding comb copolymers with comb copolymers in which each chain on average has more than one ligand attached to its side chains.
The size of the ligand clusters the spatial area in which the ligands are localized) is dictated by the characteristic size of the ligandbearing comb copolymer, and can be approximated from the comb copolymer's radius of gyration, RG, which can be calculated or experimentally determined by one of ordinary skill in the art. The comb copolymer radius of gyration can range typically between nanometers and several tens of nanometers, depending on total molecular weight, length of side chains, and environment surrounding the polymer chain, for example, other polymer chains or water molecules. Thus the size of the ligand clusters, as well as the number and type of ligands per cluster, can be controlled by the synthesis conditions of the ligand-bearing comb copolymers. For example, a comb copolymer of Rc, would have an area per cluster of 7tRG 2 The number of clusters on the surface per unit surface area (on average) can be controlled by the ratio of ligand-bearing to non-cell binding combs at the surface. To achieve a surface separation distance between ligand clusters of d, where d 2RG, the concentration of ligand-bearing combs should be approximately 4 Vchaji/(2RG c 2 where Vchain is the volume occupied by a single comb copolymer chain.
B. Mixtures of Comb Copolymers and Other Polymers The copolymers described herein can be blended with other polymers that do not elicit controlled cell responses. In applications where it is desirable to use the comb copolymer to modify the surface of a second, hydrophobic or non-cell regulating polymer, the comb copolymer can be WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 added in small quantities to the second polymer and processed to achieve comb segregation to the surface. Blends of the comb copolymers with other polymers include those containing between 1 and 99% by weight of the comb copolymers, preferably less than 20 wt% of the comb copolymers, and more preferably less than 10 wt% of the comb copolymers. Processing steps to achieve comb surface segregation include heating the mixture under vacuum, in air, water, water vapor, supercritical CO 2 or other environment that favors the comb component at the surface, at temperatures sufficiently above the glass transitions of the polymer components (the matrix polymer and the comb copolymer additive) to provide mobility for achieving surface segregation. In the case where the second polymer component is a semicrystalline polymer, the annealing temperature should be above the glass transition but below the melting point of the polymer, to ensure that the desired shape of the device is retained.
In preferred embodiments, surface segregation is achieved during a standard processing step in the manufacture of a biomedical device, such as during an extraction, autoclaving or sterilization process. In other embodiments, segregation is accomplished in an additional annealing step in a controlled environment (water, etc), after device fabrication. Such processing steps create a surface layer approximately 2RG in thickness that contains almost exclusively the comb copolymer. The observable surface properties of such annealed mixtures are substantially identical to those of the pure comb copolymers. In preferred embodiments, the comb copolymer is miscible with the second polymer to avoid phase separation in the bulk device, which might lead to poor mechanical or optical properties.
In other cases, the localization of the comb polymer to the surface of a device primarily comprised of a second, hydrophobic or non-cell regulating polymer can be accomplished during other steps of device manufacture. For example, precise placement of the comb copolymer at the surface of a device made from a second polymer can be accomplished by 3DP methods.
Likewise, differences in viscosity between the comb copolymer and a second WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 polymer when blended together can be exploited to locate the comb to the surface during melt extrusion of fibers, films or other devices. Porous or nonporous membranes, films, fibers or hollow fibers in which the comb copolymer resides at the surfaces can be prepared by phase inversion casting.
In this method, a solution of the comb copolymer, the second polymer, and a mutual solvent is cast into an aqueous-based coagulation bath to form the device. During the casting process, favorable interactions between the comb and the coagulation bath medium induce segregation of the comb copolymer to exterior surfaces of the film, fiber, or membrane. Cell-regulating microporous biodegradable membranes useful as temporary barrier devices in wound-healing applications can be prepared in this fashion. Cell-regulating biodegradable sutures can similarly be prepared by spinning fibers from solution into an aqueous-based coagulation bath. Such surface-modified fibers can also be prepared from biodegradable or nonbiodegradable materials and fashioned into nonwoven fabric articles for biomedical applications including cell-regulating temporary barrier devices and biofiltration devices.
Hollow nanoporous fibers can be prepared which have cell-regulating interior surfaces. By encapsulating cells in a portion of such a fiber, a long-term drug delivery implant could be prepared which secretes desirable products of cells in quantities regulated wholly or in part by tethered signals on the fiber inner surface. Cell-regulating biodegradable microporous scaffolds with a surface excess of comb copolymers can be prepared by freeze-drying methods by choosing a sublimating solvent which has preferential affinity to the comb copolymer component as compared to the second polymer component which forms the bulk of the device.
In all cases described above where comb copolymers are used in conjunction with a second polymer to prepare a device, the comb copolymers can be non-cell binding combs, ligand-bearing combs, or a mixture of these to achieve a desired cell response as previously described. The observable surface properties of the device are substantially identical to those of the comb copolymer or comb copolymer mixture itself.
WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 IH. Latexes Prepared with Comb Copolymers A. Latex Synthesis A further method by which the comb copolymers can be used for controlling cell response in biomedical applications is through the preparation of polymer latexes that incorporate the comb copolymers on the latex particle surfaces. Such latexes can be prepared by dispersion or emulsion polymerization methods in a water-containing medium, using the comb copolymers as a stabilizing agent. The polymerization is achieved by dissolving the desired monomer, comb stabilizer and initiator in a watercontaining medium. The polymer is initiated, for example, by applying heat to the solvent. The dispersion medium is a good solvent for the comb copolymer but a poor solvent for the growing polymer. The hydrophobic comb backbone is chosen to be compatible with the polymer being synthesized, and thus anchors to the surface of the growing polymer particles, while the hydrophilic side chains stabilize the particles against flocculation.
Upon completion of the latex synthesis, the resulting latex particles are in the range of 0.1 to 10 utm in size, typically dispersed at 20-70% polymer solids by weight in the dispersion medium. These systems can be employed in a variety of ways to control cell response through the comb copolymers that remain anchored to the particle surfaces.
Polymers which might be synthesized as latex particles for nonbiodegradable applications include polyvinyl ethers, polyvinyl esters such as poly(vinyl acetate), polyvinyl halides such as poly(vinyl chloride), polystyrene, and polyacrylates, such as poly(methyl (meth)acrylate), poly(ethyl (meth)acrylate), poly(butyl(meth)acrylate), poly(isobutyl (meth)acrylate), poly(hexyl(meth)acrylate), poly(isodecyl (meth)acrylate), poly(lauryl (meth)acrylate), poly(phenyl (meth)acrylate), poly(methyl acrylate), poly(isopropyl acrylate), poly(isobutyl acrylate), and poly(octadecyl acrylate), and copolymers and mixtures thereof, as well as useful derivatives of these polymers, including polymers having substitutions, additions of chemical WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 groups, for example, alkyl groups, alkylene groups, hydroxylations, oxidations, and other modifications routinely made by those skilled in the art.
Polymers which might be synthesized as latex particles for biodegradable applications include poly(amino acids), poly(anhydrides), poly(orthoesters), and poly(phosphoesters), polylactones such as poly(epsilon-caprolactone), poly(delta-valerolactone), poly(gamma-butyrolactone)and poly (beta-hydroxybutyrate), and poly(hydroxy acid)s such as poly(glycolic acid), poly(DL-lactic acid) and poly(L-lactic acid), or copolymers of poly(glycolic acid and poly(lactic acid).
B. Latex Films Films or coatings can be prepared from the latex dispersions by usual methods such as dipping, brushing, rolling or casting the latex onto any surface. For coatings applied to permanent implants to control cell response, non-biodegradable latex particles prepared with non-biodegradable comb stabilizers are preferred. For applications where a biodegradable film is preferred, biodegradable latexes can be prepared using comb stabilizers with biodegradable backbones. Opaque coatings may be prepared that elicit controlled cell response by employing any of the standard coating methods used to form latex films, such as those just mentioned. Alternatively, by heattreating films at a temperature well above the glass transition of the polymer particles, the particles will coalesce into a smooth, transparent film in which the comb copolymers reside at the surface. The comb copolymers remain localized at the surface upon coalescence due either to an energetic tendency to remain at the surface, or because there is insufficient mobility for comb diffusion into the bulk of the coalesced latex film, for example, if the film is cooled below its glass transition shortly after coalescence.
The latex films exhibit surface properties of the comb copolymers themselves, but have the advantages that only small quantities of the comb copolymer are required (typically below 1 wt% of the total latex), coatings can be easily applied from water-based suspensions, and the film-forming properties can be tailored to adhere to the substrate by judicious choice of the -23- WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 film-forming polymer. For example, an acrylic latex stabilized by non-cell binding comb copolymers could be used to prepare transparent acrylic coatings on acrylic intraocular lenses in order to render them resistant to cell attachment, and hence less subject to clouding over time. Acrylic latexes could also be used in applications where controlled cell response is desired at the surface of permanent metal, glass or ceramic implants or other devices, including cell culture apparatus, since a high degree of adhesion is often found between oxide surfaces and acrylic polymers. For polystyrene cell culture plates or other apparatus, a cell-regulating PS latex could be used to prepare a transparent, cell-regulating coating in the manner described above.
In all cases described above where latexes are stabilized by comb copolymers, the comb copolymers might be non-cell binding combs, ligandbearing combs, or a mixture of these to achieve a desired cell response as previously described above. Alternatively, mixed latex dispersions can be used to prepare films that contain clustered ligand regions on a surface of sizes from 0.1 to 10 micrometers. This can be achieved by mixing together dispersions of latex particles coated with non-cell binding combs and those coated with ligand-bearing combs and creating films of these mixed dispersions as described above. The size of the ligand clusters is approximately the diameter of the latex particles coated with ligand-bearing combs, while the number of clusters on the surface per unit surface area can be controlled by the ratio of ligand-bearing to non-cell binding latex particles in the mixed dispersion.
IV. Polymer Preparation Methods for preparing hydrophobic polymers including reactive monomeric units are known. Typical reactions are ring opening polymerization (for monomers such as lactide, glycolide, and other cyclic monomeric units), free radical polymerization (for double bond-containing monomeric units such as methyl methacrylate), and anionic or other addition polymerizations.
The monomers used to prepare the hydrophobic polymer backbone, WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 for example, lactide, glycolide, caprolactone, and trimethylene carbonate, can be reacted with various polymerization initiators, for example, alcohols such as ethylene glycol and ethanol, water, and amines, in the presence of a suitable catalyst such as a Lewis acid, as described, for example, in Kricheldorf, H. R. in Models of Biopolymers by Ring-Opening Polymerization, Penczek, Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1990, Chapter 1; Kricheldorf, H. R. a-Aminoacid-N-Carboxy-Anhydrides and Related Heterocycles, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987; and Imanishi, Y. in Ring-Opening Polymerization, Ivin, K. J. and Saegusa, Eds., Elsevier, London, 1984, Volume 2, Chapter 8.
The cell-binding polymer side chains grafted onto the polymer backbone are preferably hydrophilic polymers, such as polyethylene glycol, polyethylene oxide, polyacrylic acid, dextran and mixtures thereof, which can be modified to include reactive functional groups such as amino, carboxylic acid, halo, sulfide, guanidino, imidazole and hydroxyl groups. These groups can react with various reactive groups on the polymer backbone in routine nucleophilic displacement reactions to graft the hydrophilic polymers to the backbone. The side chain polymers can be end-capped with cell binding ligands through standard covalent or ionic coupling reactions.
V. Surface Coatings and Devices Incorporating Comb Copolymers Numerous methods can be used to apply the comb copolymers, comb copolymer mixtures, or mixtures of comb copolymers and other polymers to surfaces. These methods include dip coating, spray coating, brush coating, roll coating, or spin casting a film onto the substrate followed by mild heating to promote adhesion to the surface. Solid free form processes such as 3DP, or freeze drying methods could be used to create complex three-dimensional structures, including porous structures. In all of these processing approaches a suitable crosslinking agent might be incorporated to enhance the mechanical rigidity of the coating or device.
In applications where mixtures of comb copolymers with other polymers are desirable, processing steps to achieve comb surface segregation WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 include heating the mixture under vacuum, in air, water, water vapor, supercritical CO 2 or other environment that favors the comb component at the surface, at temperatures sufficiently above the glass transitions of the polymers to provide the combs with the necessary mobility. In the case where the second polymer component is a semicrystalline polymer, the annealing temperature should be above the glass transition but below the melting point of the polymer, to ensure that the desired shape of the device is retained.
Surface segregation could be achieved preferably during a standard processing step in the manufacture of a biomedical device, such as during an extraction, autoclaving or sterilization process, or could be accomplished in a separate annealing step after the device has been manufactured. This type of processing creates a surface layer on the device that contains almost exclusively the comb copolymer. In other cases, the localization of the comb polymer to the surface of a device primarily comprised of a second polymer can be accomplished during other steps of device manufacture. For example, differences in viscosity between the comb copolymer and a second polymer when blended together can be exploited to locate the comb to the surface during melt extrusion of fibers, films or other devices. Porous or nonporous membranes, films, fibers or hollow fibers in which the comb copolymer resides at the surfaces can be prepared by phase inversion casting. In this method, a solution of the comb copolymer, the second polymer, and a mutual solvent is cast into an aqueous-based coagulation bath to form the device.
During the casting process, favorable interactions between the comb and the coagulation bath medium induce segregation of the comb copolymer to exterior surfaces of the film, fiber, or membrane. Cell-regulating microporous biodegradable membranes useful as temporary barrier devices in woundhealing applications can be prepared in this fashion. Cell-regulating biodegradable sutures can similarly be prepared by spinning fibers from solution into an aqueous-based coagulation bath. Such surface-modified fibers can also be prepared from biodegradable or nonbiodegradable materials and fashioned into nonwoven fabric articles for biomedical applications WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 including cell-regulating temporary barrier devices and biofiltration devices.
Hollow nanoporous fibers can be prepared which have cell-regulating interior surfaces. By encapsulating cells in a portion of such a fiber, a long-term drug delivery implant could be prepared which secretes desirable products of cells in quantities regulated wholly or in part by tethered signals on the fiber inner surface. Cell-regulating biodegradable microporous scaffolds with a surface excess of comb copolymers can be prepared by freeze-drying methods by choosing a sublimating solvent which has preferential affinity to the comb copolymer component as compared to the second polymer component which forms the bulk of the device.
V. Biomedical Applications The comb-type copolymers described herein may be used in a variety of biomedical applications, such as in scaffolds and supports for cell growth in tissue engineering, coatings for biomedical implants such as intraocular lenses or other permanent implants made from polymeric, metal, glass, or ceramic materials, and coatings for cell culture apparatus such as cell culture plates, pipets, etc.. The comb-type copolymers may be used for modifying the surface properties of sutures, temporary barrier films or fabrics in woundhealing applications, artificial hearts and blood vessels, catheters, filters for blood or other body fluids, and targeted controlled-release drug delivery vehicles and encapsulated cell drug delivery systems. The materials are preferably biodegradable when used for tissue engineering, wound healing, and targeted drug delivery applications, and are preferably non-degradable when used to modify implants, cell culture apparatus, filtration devices, and other devices intended for long term use or implantation.
A. Tissue Engineering For use in tissue engineering applications, the comb copolymers may be derivatized by the attachment to the ends of the hydrophilic side chains biologically active molecules that promote favorable cell-polymer interactions, such as cell adhesion molecules and growth factors. Matrices suitable for seeding or ingrowth of cells can be formed which incorporate the comb WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 copolymers, or a matrix formed of a material such as stainless steel, collagen, or another polymer can be coated with the comb copolymers. The matrix is then either seeded with cells and implanted, or the matrix implanted for tissue ingrowth to occur. These materials can be tailored to fit the particular needs of a variety of cell types through changes in the type and density of cell adhesion peptides attached to the copolymers. Cell types which can be seeded on the matrices include parenchymal cells such as hepatocytes, uroendothelial cells, skin cells, muscle cells, nerve cells and bone and/or cartilage forming cells. Normal cells, fetal cells or genetically engineered cells can be seeded onto the matrices B. Drug Delivery and Imaging The comb copolymers also may be formed into matrices for use as drug delivery systems or for imaging purposes. Biodegradable latexes coated with the comb copolymers be can be used for targeted delivery of a therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic agent. Hollow nanoporous fibers can be prepared which have cell-regulating interior surfaces comprised of comb copolymers or comb copolymer mixtures. By encapsulating cells in a portion of such a fiber, a long-term drug delivery implant could be prepared which secretes desirable products of cells in quantities regulated wholly or in part by tethered signals on the fiber inner surface.
For use in drug delivery, a therapeutic or prophylactic agent, such as an amino acid, bioactive peptide or protein, carbohydrate, sugar, or polysaccharide, nucleic acid or polynucleic acid, synthetic organic compound, or metal may be attached to through the end groups of the hydrophilic side chains of the comb copolymer using methods available in the art. The comb copolymers may be modified to increase the level of the incorporated agent.
Agents which provide greater stability for the agent to be delivered may be covalently or ionically attached to the copolymer. The comb copolymers may be functionalized with a specific binding moiety, an antibody, which targets the latex particle for delivery to a particular site within the body.
Hydrophilic, hydrophobic, acidic, basic or ionic side chains also may be WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 attached to the copolymers to expand their use as delivery devices for drugs.
Matrices of the modified drug-containing comb copolymer may be administered to an animal orally or parenterally to deliver the drug to the animal in vivo at a site in the animal where it is needed.
Diagnostic agents include radioactive materials, fluorescent materials, enzymatic materials, gases, and magnetic materials.
C. Use of the Materials to Provide Cell Repulsive Surfaces It is often desirable to minimize cell and tissue interactions with biomedical implants, such as intraocular lenses. These interactions are minimized when the surface of an implant is coated with the non-cell binding copolymers. It is preferred that the copolymer be non-degradable in some applications. For example, when intraocular lenses are implanted, they are intended to remain in place for extended periods of time and biodegradability is to be avoided.
A preferred non-biodegradable polymeric material is a copolymer of an alkyl acrylate methyl methacrylate) and PEG-methacrylate. A preferred method to place this coating at the surface is through the formation of a latex film.
The present invention will be further understood by references to the following non-limiting examples, in which the following materials and equipment were utilized.
Example 1: Preparation, Processing, and Evaluation of Biodegradable Comb Copolymers and Their Blends Comb Polymer Synthesis Lactide, epichlorohydrin, poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether (MPEG, Mw 350 g/mole), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG, Mw 400 g/mole), and anhydrous toluene (all from Aldrich Chemical Co.) were used as received.
Tetrahydrofuran (Aldrich Chemical Co.) was distilled prior to use. Lactide and epichlorohydrin (Aldrich Chemical Co.) were copolymerized by ring opening polymerization (Shen et al. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 31:1393 (1993)) at 1000 C in toluene with a trioctyl aluminum-water catalyst.
WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 The in situ AlOct 3 :0.5H 2 0 catalyst was prepared using a modification of a literature procedure. Briefly, AlOct 3 (25 wt% in hexane, Aldrich Chemical Co.) and distilled THF were stirred in a sealed flask under nitrogen and allowed to equilibrate at -68° C in a dry ice/acetone bath. H 2 0 was added to the mixture to give a 1:0.5 molar ratio between AlOct 3 and water. The mixture was stirred vigorously at -68° C for 15 minutes, then removed from the dry ice bath and allowed to return to room temperature over 30 minutes.
The catalyst solution was then injected into a sealed reaction flask containing lactide, epichlorohydrin, and toluene under nitrogen and allowed to react 16 hours at 100° C. The resulting LA-EO copolymer was purified by repeated precipitation in petroleum ether.
Grafting of MPEG and PEG to the LA-EO copolymer was performed by phase transfer catalysis (Ober, Makromol. Chem., Macromol. Symp.
35:36-87(1990)) reacting the terminal hydroxyls of the ethylene glycol chains with the pendant chlorine groups of the backbone copolymer. The LA-EO copolymer was dissolved in methylene chloride. PEG, MPEG, and pH 8 aqueous NaHCO 3 were then added with vigorous stirring. The mixture was allowed to react overnight. Unreacted glycols were removed from the polymer by repeated precipitations in methanol. The final non-cell binding comb copolymer had a molecular weight of approximately 40,000 Daltons, was insoluble in water, and incorporated approximately 40% by weight hydrophilic PEG side chains.
A pentamer amino acid sequence, Gly-Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser-Pro (GRGDSP from Gibco, referred to herein as RGD), was used to create adhesion ligand-bearing comb copolymers by tethering the RGD to functionalized ends of PEG side chains. RGD interacts specifically with receptors known as integrins on the surface of cell membranes, and RGDintegrin coupling mediates adhesion of cells to their surroundings in vivo.
RGD was coupled to the non-cell binding comb copolymers via primary amines using known tresyl chloride chemistry (Obel, et al. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Lett. Ed. 23:103 (1985)). Comb copolymers were activated with WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 tresyl chloride groups in solution and stored at -20° C until use. RGD was coupled to the combs by immersion in PBS solutions of RGD (25 p.g/mL, pH 7.4) at 50 C for 3 hours. Systems were multiply rinsed with PBS to remove unreacted RGD.
Film Processing Mixtures of the activated comb copolymers and the non-cell binding comb copolymers were prepared in various ratios, and cast from solution in toluene onto glass slides. Films were subsequently dried under vacuum for 24 hours to remove residual solvent. RGD was subsequently subsequently coupled to the exposed activated comb polymers at the surface of the films in the manner described above. For mixtures containing 100 wt%, 25 wt% and tresyl-activated comb copolymer, surface RGD densities of 9.5 pg/cm 2 pg/cm 2 and 0.5 pg/cm 2 were achieved, respectively.
Mixtures of polylactide, PLA, homopolymer and small amounts of the non-cell binding or RGD-bearing comb copolymers (10 wt% or less relative to PLA) were dissolved in toluene, and cast as films on glass. Films were subsequently dried under vacuum for 24 hours to remove residual solvent.
Some of the comb/PLA films were subsequently annealed 96 hours in a 70° C water bath. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies showed significant enrichments of the comb copolymer at the surface of annealed blends by volume comb copolymer at the surface for a 10% bulk concentration).
Advancing/receding contact angle measurements similarly indicate that the annealed blend films have substantially lower water contact angles than PLA and exhibit a large hysteresis indicative of PEG side chain reorientation/hydration at the surface when in contact with water.
Cell Culture NR6 fibroblasts were cultured in serum-containing media onto the mixed comb films, the comb/PLA blends, and a PLA control film. Polymer films were first sterilized by immersion in ethanol. Wild-type NR6 fibroblasts were seeded on polymer film surfaces in Modified Eagle's Medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum. Cells were cultured for 24 hours, WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 media was aspirated, and fresh media applied before phase contrast photomicrographs were taken.
Films of the non-cell binding combs were completely resistant to cell adhesion over 24 hour time periods, even in the presence of serumsupplemented medium. This is believed to be due to the formation of a dense hydrated layer of PEG side chains at the film surface. In the mixed comb films, increasing surface densities of RGD increased the adhesion and spreading of cells on the film surface. Variation in the weight fraction of RGD-coupled combs in films with unfunctionalized combs from 0 to 100% allowed a change in the adhesive response of cells to the surfaces. At 0% RGD-combs, no cells adhered, at 5% RGD-combs cells stuck but retained a rounded morphology, and at 100% RGD-combs cells were strongly adhered and spread on the surfaces.
This result demonstrates that comb mixtures can provide some level of tunable ligand presentation and control over cell adhesion. The RGD-bearing surfaces supported cell adhesion and spreading even in the absence of serum.
In addition, soluble RGD added to media abrogated the spreading of cells and detached them from the surfaces. These results indicate that the effects seen are due to specific interactions between cellular integrins and RGD and not interactions between integrins and serum proteins adsorbed on RGD.
On the surface of annealed PLA/non-cell binding comb blends, no cell adhesion was found due to the formation of the comb-enriched surface layer which resists protein adsorption. By comparison, cell adhesion was observed on unmodified PLA and, to a lesser degree, on the unannealed blend, which both allowed cells to stick and spread in an uncontrolled fashion. Cell culture studies on annealed PLA/RGD-bearing comb blends showed significant controlled cell attachment through the RGD ligands, even in the absence of serum.
Modulation of the degree of cell adhesion was also demonstrated in cell culture experiments with primary rat hepatocytes. The cells were plated at a density of 30,000 cell/cm 2 on substrates containing either 1% or 100% WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 RGD-bearing comb in a 10% comb/PLA blend film, prepared and annealed as described above. Hepatocytes remain highly spread on substrates containing 100% RGD combs, but aggregate and assume a spheroidal morphology on blends in which only 1% of the combs were RGD-bearing.
Example 2: Preparation of Biodegradable Devices from Comb/PLA Blends Porous Scaffold Biodegradable PLA/comb copolymer microporous scaffolds that might be used as substrates for tissue engineering applications were prepared by freeze drying solutions of 10% wt/vol polymer in dioxane. Blends containing of the biodegradable, non-cell binding comb copolymer and PLA were dissolved in dioxane and frozen in liquid nitrogen, causing the phase separation of the polymer and solvent. Upon sublimating the dioxane, a porous biodegradable foam was obtained, which could be further treated, for example, by autoclaving or heat-treating in deionized (DI) water at 90 0 C, to achieve a high coverage of the comb copolymer on the pore exterior surfaces.
Temporary Barrier Membrane Biodegradable PLA/comb copolymer microporous membranes that might be used as temporary barriers in wound healing applications were prepared by phase inversion casting from solutions of 10-20% polymer in N,Ndimethylformamide (DMF). Blends containing 10wt% of the biodegradable, non-cell binding comb copolymer and 90wt% PLA were dissolved in DMF and cast using a doctor blade onto a cleaned glass substrate. The substrate was immediately immersed in a bath of deionized (DI) water at 90 0 C to create a porous membrane structure during the precipitation of the insoluble polymer. Once formed, the membranes were removed and rinsed in a second DI bath at 90 0 C to remove trace solvent impurities.
Example 3: Preparation and Evaluation of Non-Biodegradable Comb Copolymers and Their Mixtures Comb Synthesis Non-biodegradable comb polymers were synthesized by free radical WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) with either methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (MPEGMA) or poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (PEGMA) or a mixture of these initiated in toluene at 700 C by azo(bis)isobutyronitrile. After 12-16 hours the reaction was terminated, and the polymer precipitated in petroleum ether. The resulting comb polymer has a PMMA backbone with PEO side chains nearly randomly distributed along the backbone, and a molecular weight of approximately 20,000 g/mole. The PEGMA macromonomers provide side chains end-capped with a hydroxyl group which can be derivatized for covalent linkage of the peptides, while the MIPEGMA units provide non-reactive methoxy-terminated PEG side chains.
Combs containing -40% PEG side chains by weight are insoluble in water but form very hydrophilic, protein- and cell-resistant surfaces, and thus are considered non-cell binding.
To obtain adhesion ligand-bearing non-biodegradable combs, the RGD peptide was attached to hydroxyl end groups of the PEG side chains. The combs were dissolved in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF), followed by addition of triethylamine and tresyl chloride, and reacted for 90 minutes. The activated polymer was recovered by precipitation in anhydrous methanol, and stored at -70° C until use. RGD was coupled through primary amines to the activated combs by first dissolving the combs in dry THF, followed by addition of peptide solution (1 mg/mL GRGDSP in phosphate buffered saline (PBS)) at a ratio of 10:1 THF:PBS. Coupling was allowed to proceed with stirring for 3 hours at 5°C. The resulting RGD-comb polymer was recovered by precipitation/washing with deionized water.
Film Preparation and Cell Culture Films for cell culture were prepared by spin-coating the comb polymers onto glass substrates from anhydrous toluene. Purely cell-resistant surfaces were prepared by spin-coating solutions of the non-cell binding combs, while ligand-bearing surfaces were made by spin-coating solutions containing both non-cell binding combs and RGD-bearing combs.
NR6 fibroblasts transfected with the wild-type human epidermal -34- WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 growth factor receptor (WT NR6) were cultured in modified Eagle's medium alpha (MEM-ca) supplemented with 7.5% fetal bovine serum, L-glutamine, non-essential amino acids, sodium pyruvate, penicillin-streptomycin, and gentamycin antibiotic. Cell were seeded at 20,000 cells/cm 2 onto comb copolymer films for 24 hours, followed by aspiration to remove unattached cells and application of fresh medium. Morphology/adhesion of cells to films was then assessed using a Zeiss Axiovert 100 phase contrast microscope.
No cell adhesion was observed on films of non-cell binding combs. In contrast, films of the RGD-bearing combs supported adhesion and produced cell morphologies comparable to that observed on fibronectin.
Example 4: Preparation and Evaluation of EGF-Tethered Comb Films Film Preparation To obtain non-biodegradable combs with tethered epidermal growth factor ligands, non-cell binding combs with PMMA backbones and PEG side chains were prepared as described in Example 3. EGF was attached to hydroxyl end groups of the PEG side chains by first activating the side chains with tresyl chloride following the procedure described above.
Films of the tresyl-activated comb were spin-coated at 1000 rpm from 0.01 g/ml toluene solutions. Films were subsequently dried under vacuum to remove residual solvent, then sterilized by UV exposure for 1 hour. EGF was coupled to surfaces by incubating 5 pLg/ml sterile PBS solutions (100 mM phosphate) of EGF on the films for 3 hours at 5 0 C. Solutions were aspirated and samples were blocked with 100mM pH7 sterile tris solutions 1 hour at 200 C. Controls were hydrolyzed in the presence of tris, thereby capping all the tresyl sites with tris instead of EGF. One hydrolyzed control was exposed to an EGF solution under conditions simulating the EGF coupling step to check for nonspecific adosrption of EGF. Samples were multiply rinsed with sterile PBS. This protocol provided 1.0±0.3 ng/cm 2 tethered EGF on the film surface.
Cell Culture PC12 cells were seeded (medium: RMPI 1640 with 5% FBS, 10% horse WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 serum heat-inactivated donor herd, and supplemented with pennicilinstreptomycin) on surfaces and cultured 3 days. To keep the PC 12 cells attached to the surface in this experiment, prior to culturing, surfaces were exposed to 0.5 mg/ml rat tail collagen solutions overnight at 50 C. PC12s are an adrenyl tumor cell type which differentiates into a neuronal phenotype under certain conditions. This differentiation is similar to that of neuronal cells in general, morphologically characterized by the formation and extension of neurites. PC 12 cells cultured in the presence of soluble EGF are reported to undergo a morphological change induced by the growth factor signal- cells round up on adhesive surfaces, likely due either to down-regulation of integrins or changes in integrin-ECM affinity induced by EGF signals. The EGF-bearing comb films are non-adhesive to cells and the collagen treatment leads to only weakly cell-adhesive surfaces. PC 12 cells were cultured as described for several weeks. At 3 days initial evidence of differentiation was observed, which became very clear after two weeks. No differentiation was observed on controls.
Example 5: Preparation of Surfaces Presenting Multiple Ligand Types Non-cell binding comb copolymers with PMMA backbones and methoxyor hydroxyl-terminated PEO side chains were prepared as described in Example 3. The combs were subsequently used to create substrates which present co-tethered epidermal growth factor (EGF) and RGD. First, RGDbearing combs were prepared in the manner described in Example 3. The RGD-bearing combs were solvated in THF along with non-cell binding combs activated with tresyl chloride, and films were cast onto cleaned glass substrates using standard spin-coating procedures. Films were dried under vacuum for 24 hrs to remove remaining solvent. The substrate was then exposed to an EGF solution, enabling the covalent attachment of EGF to the activated comb side chains at the surface through the terminal amine group of the EGF. Solutions of 10 ng/mL EGF in PBS were incubated on surfaces containing the activated combs mixed with the RGD combs, or with controls containing unactivated combs. The amount of EGF covalently linked to the .36- WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 substrates under these conditions was 8.5+ 1.5 ng/cm 2 For comparison, maximum DNA synthesis response in primary rat hepatocytes cultured on tethered EGF occurred at a density of less than 1 ng/cm 2 (1000 EGF molecules/gm 2 and the approximate density of receptors on the cell surface of hepatocytes or WT NR6 is 100 400 molecules/m 2 Thus the amount of EGF which can be covalently linked on the RGD-bearing substrate is sufficient for influencing cell response. Further, the amount of nonspecifically adsorbed EGF on the comb surfaces, 0.9± 0.3 ng/cm 2 is negligible relative to the amount that is covalently coupled. WT NR6 fiberblasts were cultered for 24 hours as previously described on the EGF/RGD substrates. Cells were observed to adhere and spread on the mixed ligand surface.
Example 6. Comb Copolymer-Stabilized Latexes Comb Synthesis Comb polymer stabilizer was synthesized free-radically in solution.
Methyl methacrylate (MMA), methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (MPEGMA), and poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate (PEGMA) were added to benzene in equal weight fractions of the two PEG macro-monomers, for a total monomer concentration of 0.6 M. Azo(bis)iso-butyronitrile was added at a molar ratio of 20:1 [monomer]: [initiator]. The solution was degassed under nitrogen 15 minutes, followed by polymerization at 600 C for 16 hours.
The comb polymer was purified by repeated precipitation in petroleum ether.
In order to obtain latex beads with protein-resistant surfaces, the ratio of PEGMA/MPEGMA units to MMA units in the comb stabilizer copolymers was first optimized. Initial studies found that combs containing 40 wt% of the PEGMA/MPEGMA units formed films that were cell resistant in the presence of serum and simultaneously resistant to dissolution in water-based media. Combs of this composition were soluble in 50/50 water/ethanol, and thus served as an ideal stabilizer for preparation of the polymer latexes.
Combs with greater PEG fractions (-50 wt% or more) were water soluble over time. The comb stabilizer had a total molecular weight, prior to peptide attachment, of approximately 23,000 Daltons.
-37- WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 To obtain adhesion ligand-bearing latexes, RGD-bearing combs were first prepared by solution coupling GRGDSP (Gibco) to the ends of the PEGMA units of the comb. Coupling was accomplished through the reaction of tresyl chloride-activated combs and the N-terminal amine of the peptide.
The hydroxyl ends of the PEGMA units of the comb were activated by reaction with 2,2,2-trifluoroethanesulfonyl chloride (tresyl chloride) in tetrahydrofuran. The comb copolymer (150 mg) was dissolved in 25 ml dry THF at 5° C. Triethylamine (200 tl) and tresyl chloride (250 pl) were added and the reaction was allowed to proceed 3 hours. The activated polymer was then recovered by filtration and precipitation in petroleum ether. GRGDSP peptide was coupled to the activated polymer by adding 150 .1 GRGSP solution (1 mg/ml in pH 7.4 phosphate buffered saline) to 2.5 ml of activated comb solution (0.02 g/ml in THF) at 50 C and stirring for 3 hours. The RGDcoupled comb was recovered by overnight precipitation in deionized water.
Amounts of peptide coupled were determined by a colorimetric assay (microBCA, Pierce Chemical RGD content was found to be 0.3 wt% (1 RGD peptide per -10 comb polymer molecules).
Acrylic Latex Syntheses Methacrylate- and acrylate-based polymer latexes were synthesized by dispersion polymerization employing the comb polymers as stabilizing agents.
Latexes of four different compositions were prepared in this study: pure poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(methyl methacrylate-co-butyl acrylate), poly(ethyl methacrylate-co-methyl acrylate), and poly(ethyl methacrylate-cobutyl methacrylate). In addition, one cell-interactive poly(methyl methacrylate) latex was prepared using the RGD-comb stabilizer. Comb stabilizer was dissolved in a 1:1 mixture by volume of ethanol and water, followed by addition of methacrylate/acrylate monomers and 0.57 g ammonium persulfate. Reactions were allowed to proceed 18 hours at 600 C with stirring. Reactions began as one phase, clear solutions, and became opaque white dispersions during polymerization. After completion of the syntheses, all latexes were purified by repeated centrifugation and WO 99/52560 PCTIUS99/08031 redispersion in water/ethanol. Suspensions were stable over greater than 24 hour periods and could be resuspended after extended storage via ultrasonic mixing. All latexes were ultrasonically treated for at least 30 minutes prior to use. Molecular weights of the polymers comprising the latex particles ranged from approximately 400,000 Daltons to 1 millon Daltons. Glass transition temperatures of the particles ranged from -26 0 C to 105 0 C, depending on the monomer constistuents used in the polymerization.
Morphology of the latex beads was assessed by examining beads cast on substrates using a JEOL 6320 field emission scanning electron microscope operating at a 4.0 kV accelerating voltage. Samples were shadowed with gold prior to imaging. Average particle diameters were measured from SEM micrographs, with at least 300 particles measured for each sample. Average particle sizes ranged from 0.2 to 1.8 micrometers. All of the latexes had size polydispersities below 1.06. In each case, the comb stabilizer comprised below I wt% of the total latex bead composition.
Latex Film Preparation and Characterization Films were prepared from the latex suspensions by spin-coating the particles (0.02-0.03 g/ml in water/ethanol) at 1000 rpm onto cleaned glass substrates. To form contiguous films from the cast particles, short heat treatments (30 60 seconds) were applied to the samples by a heat gun set at 800-900° C. Coalescence of the particles was confirmed by examining the surfaces in a light microscope. For cell culture and contact angle experiments, poly(methyl methacrylate) homopolymer (not a latex) served as a control substrate. PMMA (Polysciences, 68K g/mole, Mw/MN 1.07) films were spincoated from a 0.03 g/ml toluene solution onto clean glass coverslips at 1000 rpm, followed by drying in vacuo at 70°C 24 hours.
Contact angles of water on coalesced latex film surfaces, films of the non-cell binding comb, and on the PMMA control film were measured using a VCA2000 video contact angle system (AST Inc.). Advancing/receding contact angles were measured by capturing digital images of deionized water droplets placed by syringe on virgin surfaces and measuring angles from the WO 99/52560 PCT/US99/08031 images. In all cases but the control, the advancing contact angles are seen to be relatively constant and independent of drop volume, while the receding angles show significant changes in contact angle with drop size. All of the latex films showed hysteresis of 250 or more in these measurements, while pure PMMA displayed only a -100 change. Though contact angle hysteresis can occur for a number of reasons, the likeliest explanation for the contact angle hysteresis observed here is the reorganization/hydration of the PEG side chains at the surface of the films upon wetting. That the comb copolymer is not water-soluble was confirmed by ellipsometry measurements of dried latex and comb film thicknesses before and after water immersion, which showed no detectable loss of polymer. These results provide a strong indication that the comb stabilizer remains at the surface once the latex particles coalesce into a homogeneous film.
Cell Culture All cell culture reagents were purchased from Gibco. NR6 fibroblasts transfected with the wild-type human epidermal growth factor receptor (WT NR6) were cultured in modified Eagle's medium alpha (MEM-cxt) supplemented with 7.5% fetal bovine serum, L-glutamine, non-essential amino acids, sodium pyruvate, penicillin-streptomycin, and gentamycin antibiotic.
Cell attachment studies were performed by seeding 20,000 cells/cm 2 onto the non-cell binding comb copolymer films, coalesced PMMA latex films, and two controls: tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) and pure PMMA films. Cell were seeded in 1.5 ml serum-containing growth medium for 24 hours, followed by aspiration to remove unattached cells and application of fresh medium. Morphology/adhesion of cells to latex films was then assessed using a Zeiss Axiovert 100 phase contrast microscope.
After 24 hours, cells are attached and spread on both controls, presumably via protein layers adsorbed onto these surfaces. However, the PEG side chains of the comb copolymer stabilizer provide complete cell resistance for the comb film under these stringent conditions. Likewise, the PMMA latex film presents a surface with essentially equivalent cell-resistant capacity, although the comb stabilizer comprises only .about.1 wt of the total polymer film. This observation is further evidence that the combs remain localized to the film surface during coalescence.
Films coalesced from the RGD-bearing PMMA latex were prepared and seeded with WT NR6 cells as before. In contrast to latexes stabilized with the non-cell binding combs, coalesced films of the RGD-bearing latex elicited cell attachment and spreading. Apparently, surface densities of RGD ligand obtained for these latex films are comparable to the pure RGD-linked comb, although the latex film contains 1/100 as much total peptide. Specificity of the adhesion of cells to the RGD-bearing surface was confirmed by adding excess soluble GRGDSP (45 mM) to the culture media. All cells were observed to detach within 1 hour of soluble RGD administration.
Throughout this specification the word "comprise", or variations such as "comprises" or "comprising", will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated element, integer or step, or group of elements, integers or steps, but not the exclusion of any other element, integer or step, or group of elements, 20 integers or steps.
:Any discussion of documents, acts, materials, devices, articles or the like which has been included in the present specification is solely for the purpose of providing a context for the present invention. It is not to be taken as an admission that any or all of these matters form part of the prior art base or were common general knowledge in the field relevant to the present invention as it :existed in Australia before the priority date of each claim of this application.
Modifications and variations of the present invention will be obvious to those 30 skilled in the art from the foregoing detailed description. Such modifications and variations are intended to come within the scope of the following claims.
0 0:
Claims (41)
1. A cell-regulating, comb-type copolymer comprising: a) a hydrophobic polymer backbone; *9 9 9 9 *9 .9 9 b) non-cell binding hydrophilic polymeric side chains grafted to the polymer backbone, wherein the side chains have a molecular weight between 200 and 2000 Daltons, wherein between zero and 100% of the non-cell binding, hydrophilic side chains are end-capped with cell-binding or cell-signaling ligands to form short cell-binding copolymer side chains and wherein the side chains comprise less than 60% of the total copolymer weight.
2. The comb copolymer of claim 1 having a total molecular weight of greater than 10,000 Daltons.
3. The comb copolymer of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the backbone is biodegradable.
4. The copolymer of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the backbone is non- biodegradable.
5. The copolymer of any one of the preceding claims wherein the side chains are less than 500 Daltons and constitute less than 60% of the total copolymer weight.
6. The copolymer of any one of the preceding claims wherein the mole percentage of backbone segments attached to hydrophilic side chains is between 2 and
7. The copolymer of any one of the preceding claims wherein the percent of hydrophilic side chains which include functional groups capable of o 9* *ooo• oooo *oo ooo ofouoo being covalently or ionically attached to a cell-binding or cell-signaling ligand is between 1 and
8. The copolymer of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the non-cell binding side chains are selected from the group consisting of polyethylene glycol, polyethylene oxide, polyacrylic acid and dextran.
9. The copolymer of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the ligands are selected from the group consisting of adhesion peptides, cell- signaling peptides and growth factors.
The copolymer of any one of the preceding claims in a mixture further comprising non-cell-binding comb copolymers whose side chains are not end-capped with cell-binding or cell-signaling ligands.
11. The comb copolymer mixture of claim 10 wherein less than 20% of the comb copolymers comprise side chains that are end-capped with cell- binding or cell-signaling ligands. 20
12. A tissue engineering matrix, cell cultre matric, biomedical device or implant formed of or coated with the comb copolymer of any one of claims 1 11, wherein the comb copolymer is effective in regulating cellular adhesion or response to the surface. S
13. The tissue engineering matrix, cell culture matrix, biomedical device or implant of claim 12 seeded with cells selected from the group consisting of parenchymal cells, skin cells, muscle cells, cartilage cells, nerve cells and bone cells. :**Soo 0000 30
14. The tissue engineering matrix, cell culture matrix, biomedical device or implant of claim 12 or claim 13 wherein the cell-regulating, comb-type copolymer comprises defined mixtures of non-cell binding and ligand-modified cell-regulating, comb-type copolymers.
15. The tissue engineering matrix, cell culture matrix, biomedical device or implant of claim 14, wherein the surface presents discrete nanodomains or clusters of a single ligand type against a background of non-cell binding hydrophilic side chains.
16. The tissue engineering matrix, cell culture matrix, biomedical device or implant of claim 15, wherein each nanodomain or cluster contains between 2 and 50 cell-signaling ligands in an area of 0.0001-0.01 microns square, with the overall spacing between the edges of such domains in the range 3-200 nm.
17. The tissue engineering matrix, cell culture matrix, biomedical device or implant of claim 14, wherein the surface presents discrete nanodomains or clusters of two or more ligand types against a background of non-cell binding hydrophilic side chains.
18. The tissue engineering matrix, cell culture matrix, biomedical device or implant of claim 17, wherein each nanodomain or cluster contains between 2 and 50 cell-signaling ligands in an area of 0.0001-0.01 microns square, with the overall spacing between the edges of such domains in the range 3-200 nm.
19. A method for making a tissue engineering matrix, cell culture matrix, implant or biomedical device with regulated cellular adhesion or response comprising coating or forming the matrix, implant or device with a comb copolymer comprising: a) a hydrophobic polymer backbone; *2 b) non-cell binding hydrophilic polymeric side chains grafted to the polymer backbone, wherein the side chains have a molecular weight between 200 and 2000 Daltons; wherein between zero and 100% of the non-cell binding, hydrophilic side chains are end-capped with cell-binding or cell-signaling ligands to form short ooo* cell-binding copolymer side chains and wherein the side chains comprise less than 60% of the total copolymer weight.
The method of making a tissue engineering matrix, cell culture matrix, biomedical device or implant of claim 19 in which non-cell binding side chains of the comb copolymers at the surface are end-capped with ligands after the coating, matrix, device or implant is formed.
21. A method for engineering tissue comprising growing cells on a tissue-engineering matrix formed of or coated with the cell-regulating, comb- type copolymer comprising: a) a hydrophobic polymer backbone; b) non-cell binding hydrophilic polymeric side chains grafted to the polymer backbone, wherein the side chains have a molecular weight between 200 and 2000 Daltons; wherein between zero and 100% of the non-cell binding, hydrophilic side chains are end-capped with cell-binding or cell-signaling ligands to form short cell-binding copolymer side chains and wherein the side chains comprise less than 60% of the total copolymer weight, *.ooo 2 o wherein the comb copolymer is effective in regulating cellular adhesion or response to the surface. 0
22. A polymer latex comprising polymer particles dispersed in aqueous- containing media stabilized by cell-regulating, comb-type copolymer comprising: 30 a) a hydrophobic polymer backbone; b) non-cell binding hydrophilic polymeric side chains grafted to the polymer backbone, wherein the side chains have a molecular weight between 200 and 2000 Daltons; 46 wherein between zero and 100% of the non-cell binding, hydrophilic side chains are end-capped with cell-binding or cell-signaling ligands to form short cell-binding copolymer side chains and wherein the side chains comprise less than 60% of the total copolymer weight.
23. The polymer latex of claim 22 wherein the comb copolymers serve as a stabilizing agent during the latex synthesis.
24. The polymer latex of claim 22 or 23 whereby the comb copolymer comprises less than 1% of the latex dry weight.
The polymer latex of any one of claims 22 to 24 further comprising non-cell-binding comb copolymers whose side chains are not end-capped with cell-binding or cell-signaling ligands:
26. The polymer latex of any one of claims 22 to 25 further comprising latex particles stabilized by non-cell binding comb copolymers to achieve a defined mixture of non-cell binding and ligand-modified cell-regulating latex particles.
27. The polymer latex of any one of claims 22 to 24 in which non-cell binding side chains of the comb copolymers at the surface of the particles are end-capped with ligands after the latex particles are synthesized.
28. Polymer coatings and films that regulate cell behavior prepared by S, casting a polymer latex comprising polymer particles dispersed in aqueous- containing media stabilized by cell-regulating, comb-type copolymers comprising: a) a hydrophobic polymer backbone; b) non-cell binding hydrophilic polymeric side chains grafted to the polymer backbone, wherein the side chains have a molecular weight between 200 and 2000 Daltons; 47 wherein between zero and 100% of the non-cell binding, hydrophilic side chains are end-capped with cell-binding or cell-signaling ligands to form short cell-binding copolymer side chains and wherein the side chains comprise less than 60% of the total copolymer weight.
29. The polymer films and coatings of claim 28 prepared by casting a mixed latex of microparticles stabilized with the non-cell binding comb copolymers to achieve a defined mixture of non-cell binding and ligand- modified cell-regulating latex particles.
The polymer films and coatings of claim 28 or 29 comprising discrete domains of a single type of cell-signaling ligand against a background of non-cell binding hydrophilic side chains, where the domain size is on the order of the latex particles.
31. The polymer films and coatings of claim 30 wherein the domain size is between 0.1 and 10 microns in diameter.
The polymer films and coatings of claim 28 comprising discrete domains of multiple cell-signaling ligands against a background of non-cell binding hydrophilic side chains, wherein the domain size is on the order of the latex particles.
33. The polymer films and coatings of claim 32 where the domain size is between 0.1 and 10 microns in diameter.
34. The polymer film or coating of any one of claims 28 to 33 in which non-cell binding side chains of the comb copolymers at the surface of the applied film or coating are end-capped with ligands after the coating or film is prepared.
35. A method of making polymer coatings and films that regulate cell behavior comprising casting a polymer latex comprising polymer particles 48 dispersed in aqueous-containing media stabilized by cell-regulating, comb-type copolymers comprising: a) a hydrophobic polymer backbone; b) non-cell binding hydrophilic polymeric side chains grafted to the polymer backbone, wherein the side chains have a molecular weight between 200 and 2000 Daltons; wherein between zero and 100% of the non-cell binding, hydrophilic side chains are end-capped with cell-binding or cell-signaling ligands to form short cell-binding copolymer side chains and wherein the side chains comprise less than 60% of the total copolymer weight.
36. The method of making polymer film or coatings of claim 35 wherein non-cell binding side chains of the comb copolymers at the surface are end- capped with ligands after the coating or film is prepared.
37. A cell-regulating, comb-type copolymer according to any one of .mclaims 1 to 11 substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the examples.
38. A tissue engineering matrix, cell culture matrix, biomedical device or implant of any one of claims 12 to 18 substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the examples.
39. A method of making a tissue engineering matrix, cell culture matrix, implant or biomedical device according to any one of claims 19 to 21 substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the examples.
:40. A method for engineering tissue comprising growing cells on a tissue-engineering matrix formed of or coated with the cell-regulating, comb- type copolymer substantially as herein before described with reference to the examples. 49
41. A polymer latex comprising polymer particles dispersed in aqueous-containing media stabilized by cell-regulating, comb-type copolymer substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the examples. Dated this eleventh day of July 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Patent Attorneys for the Applicant: F B RICE CO 0 0000 0 000 0 0 0 0 *0 00 00000 00000 0 *0*
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US8159698P | 1998-04-13 | 1998-04-13 | |
| US60/081596 | 1998-04-13 | ||
| PCT/US1999/008031 WO1999052560A1 (en) | 1998-04-13 | 1999-04-13 | Comb copolymers for regulating cell-surface interactions |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| AU3556499A AU3556499A (en) | 1999-11-01 |
| AU752942B2 true AU752942B2 (en) | 2002-10-03 |
Family
ID=22165144
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU35564/99A Ceased AU752942B2 (en) | 1998-04-13 | 1999-04-13 | Comb copolymers for regulating cell-surface interactions |
Country Status (8)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (3) | US6150459A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP1071467B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP2002511496A (en) |
| AT (1) | ATE275977T1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU752942B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2328436C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69920198T2 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1999052560A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (148)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATE400352T1 (en) | 1996-08-26 | 2008-07-15 | Massachusetts Inst Technology | PRODUCTION OF POLYMER OBJECTS WITH HYDROPHILIC SURFACE |
| US20030198825A1 (en) * | 1996-08-26 | 2003-10-23 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Polymeric membranes and other polymer articles having desired surface characteristics and method for their preparation |
| JP2002511179A (en) | 1996-10-11 | 2002-04-09 | マサチューセッツ・インスティテュート・オブ・テクノロジー | Solid electrolytes, intercalation compounds and electrodes for batteries |
| JP2002515932A (en) * | 1997-04-18 | 2002-05-28 | カリフォルニア インスティチュート オブ テクノロジー | Multifunctional polymeric tissue coating |
| US6893877B2 (en) | 1998-01-12 | 2005-05-17 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Methods for screening substances in a microwell array |
| DE69920198T2 (en) | 1998-04-13 | 2005-09-22 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology, Cambridge | CAMM POLYMERS FOR REGULATING CELL SURFACE INTERACTION |
| US6541022B1 (en) * | 1999-03-19 | 2003-04-01 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Mineral and cellular patterning on biomaterial surfaces |
| US6767928B1 (en) | 1999-03-19 | 2004-07-27 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Mineralization and biological modification of biomaterial surfaces |
| AU756982B2 (en) | 1999-03-19 | 2003-01-30 | Life Technologies Corporation | Multi-through hole testing plate for high throughput screening |
| US7083777B1 (en) * | 1999-04-02 | 2006-08-01 | The Brigham And Women's Hospital, Inc. | Immunomodulating polymers |
| DE60041255D1 (en) * | 1999-04-28 | 2009-02-12 | Eidgenoess Tech Hochschule | POLYIONIC COATINGS FOR ANALYTICAL AND SENSOR DEVICES |
| WO2001060912A2 (en) | 2000-02-17 | 2001-08-23 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Pressure processable polymer compositions |
| US20020151040A1 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2002-10-17 | Matthew O' Keefe | Apparatus and methods for parallel processing of microvolume liquid reactions |
| WO2001061054A2 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2001-08-23 | Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Apparatus and methods for parallel processing of micro-volume liquid reactions |
| US7163712B2 (en) | 2000-03-03 | 2007-01-16 | Duke University | Microstamping activated polymer surfaces |
| ATE466042T1 (en) * | 2000-03-08 | 2010-05-15 | Lab Internat Barbados Srl | COLLOIDAL NANOPARTICULAR CARRIER CONTAINING CHARGED OR UNCHARGED WATER-SOLUBLE COMB POLYMERS AND THEIR USE FOR MUCOSAL APPLICATION |
| US6616944B2 (en) * | 2000-03-08 | 2003-09-09 | Medinnova Gesellschaft Fur Medizinsche Innovationen Aus Adkademischer Forschung Mbh | Self-assembling colloidal carriers for protein delivery |
| EP1142596A1 (en) * | 2000-04-03 | 2001-10-10 | Universiteit Gent | Compositions of crosslinkable prepolymers for use in therapeutically active biodegradable implants |
| KR100433614B1 (en) * | 2000-06-16 | 2004-05-31 | 주식회사 태평양 | Transdermal Preparation Containing Hydrophilic or Salt-form Drug |
| DE10036907B4 (en) * | 2000-07-28 | 2012-03-22 | Xantec Bioanalytics Gmbh | Process for the preparation of a coating on a gold vapor-deposited glass substrate, coating produced by this process and their use |
| CN1469892A (en) | 2000-09-11 | 2004-01-21 | ��ʡ��ѧԺ | Graft copolymers, methods of grafting hydrophilic chains onto hydrophobic polymers, and articles thereof |
| US6649138B2 (en) * | 2000-10-13 | 2003-11-18 | Quantum Dot Corporation | Surface-modified semiconductive and metallic nanoparticles having enhanced dispersibility in aqueous media |
| SV2003000753A (en) | 2000-12-05 | 2003-06-16 | Brigham & Womens Hospital | USE OF ZWITTERIONIC POLYSACARIDS FOR THE SPECIFIC MODULATION OF IMMUNE PROGRESS |
| AUPR259301A0 (en) * | 2001-01-18 | 2001-02-15 | Polymerat Pty Ltd | Polymers having co-continuous architecture |
| DE10104991A1 (en) * | 2001-02-03 | 2002-08-08 | Clariant Gmbh | Microencapsulated biologically active ingredients containing a water-soluble or water-dispersible comb polymer |
| US20050177237A1 (en) * | 2001-04-12 | 2005-08-11 | Ben Shappley | Spinal cage insert, filler piece and method of manufacturing |
| WO2002083194A1 (en) | 2001-04-12 | 2002-10-24 | Therics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for engineered regenerative biostructures |
| US7524513B2 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2009-04-28 | Mao Hai-Quan | Biofunctional fibers |
| JP3515570B2 (en) * | 2001-07-31 | 2004-04-05 | 三菱レイヨン株式会社 | Hollow fiber, gel-filled hollow fiber, and fiber array flake with comb-shaped polymer introduced on the inner wall |
| GB0130608D0 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2002-02-06 | Psimedica Ltd | Medical fibres and fabrics |
| US20030215626A1 (en) * | 2002-03-22 | 2003-11-20 | Hiller Jeri?Apos;Ann | Nanoporous coatings |
| US20060199260A1 (en) * | 2002-05-01 | 2006-09-07 | Zhiyu Zhang | Microbioreactor for continuous cell culture |
| CA2483661A1 (en) * | 2002-05-03 | 2003-11-13 | Pall Corporation | Blended polymer membrane media for treating aqueous fluids |
| EP1534755B1 (en) | 2002-05-10 | 2011-10-12 | Bio-Layer Pty Limited | Generation of surface coating diversity |
| AU2003258986A1 (en) * | 2002-07-05 | 2004-01-23 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Graft copolymers |
| US20040226620A1 (en) * | 2002-09-26 | 2004-11-18 | Daniel Therriault | Microcapillary networks |
| US7053125B2 (en) * | 2002-11-14 | 2006-05-30 | The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois | Controlled dispersion of colloidal suspension by comb polymers |
| US6761651B2 (en) * | 2002-11-22 | 2004-07-13 | Chin-Dong Pai | Aluminum tennis racket |
| US20040121339A1 (en) * | 2002-12-19 | 2004-06-24 | Jizhong Zhou | Special film-coated substrate for bio-microarray fabrication and use thereof |
| AU2003302264A1 (en) | 2002-12-20 | 2004-09-09 | Biotrove, Inc. | Assay apparatus and method using microfluidic arrays |
| US20040127818A1 (en) * | 2002-12-27 | 2004-07-01 | Roe Steven N. | Precision depth control lancing tip |
| WO2004063271A2 (en) * | 2003-01-07 | 2004-07-29 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Structured baroplastic materials |
| US6982298B2 (en) * | 2003-01-10 | 2006-01-03 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Hydroxyphenyl cross-linked macromolecular network and applications thereof |
| US8138265B2 (en) * | 2003-01-10 | 2012-03-20 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Hydroxyphenyl cross-linked macromolecular network and applications thereof |
| US8137688B2 (en) * | 2003-01-10 | 2012-03-20 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Hydroxyphenyl cross-linked macromolecular network and applications thereof |
| US7465766B2 (en) * | 2004-01-08 | 2008-12-16 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Hydroxyphenyl cross-linked macromolecular network and applications thereof |
| WO2004089407A2 (en) | 2003-03-31 | 2004-10-21 | The Brigham And Women's Hospital, Inc. | Zwitterionic immunomodulators for the treatment of asthma and allergy |
| US20050014670A1 (en) * | 2003-05-20 | 2005-01-20 | Arch Uk Biocides | Composition and use |
| US7141617B2 (en) * | 2003-06-17 | 2006-11-28 | The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois | Directed assembly of three-dimensional structures with micron-scale features |
| US7157275B2 (en) * | 2003-08-15 | 2007-01-02 | Becton, Dickinson And Company | Peptides for enhanced cell attachment and growth |
| US20050063937A1 (en) * | 2003-09-16 | 2005-03-24 | Cheng Li | Multiple-arm peptide compounds, methods of manufacture and use in therapy |
| US20050085922A1 (en) * | 2003-10-17 | 2005-04-21 | Shappley Ben R. | Shaped filler for implantation into a bone void and methods of manufacture and use thereof |
| AU2004296412B2 (en) * | 2003-12-12 | 2011-03-10 | Anteo Technologies Pty Ltd | A method for designing surfaces |
| EP1735097B1 (en) | 2004-03-12 | 2016-11-30 | Life Technologies Corporation | Nanoliter array loading |
| US9498563B2 (en) | 2004-04-23 | 2016-11-22 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Medical articles having therapeutic-agent-containing regions formed from coalesced polymer particles |
| US7446131B1 (en) | 2004-06-10 | 2008-11-04 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Porous polymeric matrices made of natural polymers and synthetic polymers and optionally at least one cation and methods of making |
| US7285595B2 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2007-10-23 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Synergistic fluorochemical treatment blend |
| US20060003154A1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2006-01-05 | Snowden Hue S | Extruded thermoplastic articles with enhanced surface segregation of internal melt additive |
| WO2006002472A1 (en) | 2004-07-02 | 2006-01-12 | Bio-Layer Pty Ltd | Use of metal complexes |
| US7713539B2 (en) * | 2004-07-19 | 2010-05-11 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Medical devices containing radiation resistant block copolymer |
| US20060105453A1 (en) | 2004-09-09 | 2006-05-18 | Brenan Colin J | Coating process for microfluidic sample arrays |
| US12070731B2 (en) | 2004-08-04 | 2024-08-27 | Life Technologies Corporation | Methods and systems for aligning dispensing arrays with microfluidic sample arrays |
| WO2006037022A2 (en) * | 2004-09-24 | 2006-04-06 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Microbioreactor for continuous cell culture |
| JP2006087396A (en) * | 2004-09-27 | 2006-04-06 | National Institute For Environmental Studies | Cell culture substrate and method for producing the same |
| US20060088571A1 (en) * | 2004-10-21 | 2006-04-27 | Medtronic Vascular, Inc. | Biocompatible and hemocompatible polymer compositions |
| EP1754731A1 (en) * | 2005-08-16 | 2007-02-21 | Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast-Natuuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek TNO | Method of modifying materials surfaces |
| DE102005047786A1 (en) * | 2005-10-05 | 2007-04-19 | Urs Isler | Method for handling authentication authentication and authentication apparatus |
| US20090306342A1 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2009-12-10 | Bio-Layer Pty Limited | Binding of molecules |
| AU2006336311B2 (en) | 2006-01-19 | 2013-01-24 | Allexcel, Inc. | Solubilization and targeted delivery of drugs with self-assembling amphiphilic polymers |
| US8206726B2 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2012-06-26 | The Brigham And Women's Hospital, Inc. | Zwitterionic polysaccharides for promotion of immune system maturation and health |
| US20070254006A1 (en) * | 2006-02-15 | 2007-11-01 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Medical Devices and Coatings with Non-Leaching Antimicrobial Peptides |
| US8545865B2 (en) * | 2006-03-24 | 2013-10-01 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Medical devices having polymer brushes |
| US8505745B2 (en) | 2006-04-11 | 2013-08-13 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Fouling resistant membranes formed with polyacrylonitrile graft copolymers |
| US8092818B2 (en) | 2006-05-17 | 2012-01-10 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Medical devices having bioactive surfaces |
| EP2682456A3 (en) * | 2006-05-24 | 2014-03-05 | Agency for Science, Technology and Research | Bioactive surface |
| DE102006060340B4 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2012-12-13 | Leibniz-Institut Für Polymerforschung Dresden E.V. | Use of a durable coating of metal or glass surfaces to inhibit and / or prevent icing |
| FI119513B (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2008-12-15 | Dextech Medical Ab | Modified hydroxy polymer conjugates having lethal effect on tumor cells |
| US7956102B2 (en) | 2007-04-09 | 2011-06-07 | The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois | Sol-gel inks |
| US8093039B2 (en) * | 2007-04-10 | 2012-01-10 | The Trustees Of The Stevens Institute Of Technology | Surfaces differentially adhesive to eukaryotic cells and non-eukaryotic cells |
| CN105561324A (en) * | 2007-07-19 | 2016-05-11 | 阿列克斯塞尔公司 | Self-assembly amphiphilic polymer used as anticancer agent |
| DE102007049013A1 (en) * | 2007-10-11 | 2009-04-16 | Endress + Hauser Conducta Gesellschaft für Mess- und Regeltechnik mbH + Co. KG | Sensor with long-term stability for organic processes |
| US20090149673A1 (en) * | 2007-12-05 | 2009-06-11 | Semprus Biosciences Corp. | Synthetic non-fouling amino acids |
| US20090155335A1 (en) * | 2007-12-05 | 2009-06-18 | Semprus Biosciences Corp. | Non-leaching non-fouling antimicrobial coatings |
| EP2249891B1 (en) | 2008-02-13 | 2016-05-25 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Molecular enhancement of extracellular matrix and methods of use |
| US8410180B2 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2013-04-02 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Methods to treat urinary incontinence |
| EP2294118B1 (en) | 2008-05-30 | 2012-07-04 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Method of making ligand functionalized substrates |
| JP2011523965A (en) * | 2008-05-30 | 2011-08-25 | スリーエム イノベイティブ プロパティズ カンパニー | Ligand functionalized substrate |
| CN101684174B (en) * | 2008-07-09 | 2012-04-25 | 天津大学 | Amphiphilic biologically degradable polyester comb-grafted copolymer and temperature-sensitive situ-gel system thereof |
| WO2010033807A1 (en) * | 2008-09-19 | 2010-03-25 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Ligand graft functionalized substrates |
| US7922939B2 (en) | 2008-10-03 | 2011-04-12 | The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois | Metal nanoparticle inks |
| US8187500B2 (en) | 2008-10-17 | 2012-05-29 | The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois | Biphasic inks |
| WO2010065960A2 (en) * | 2008-12-05 | 2010-06-10 | Semprus Biosciences Corp. | Non-fouling, anti-microbial, anti-thrombogenic graft-from compositions |
| EP2352796A1 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2011-08-10 | Semprus Biociences Corporation | Layered non-fouling, antimicrobial, antithrombogenic coatings |
| US8497356B2 (en) | 2009-02-17 | 2013-07-30 | Duke University | Biomolecule polymer conjugates and methods for making the same |
| CN101530753B (en) * | 2009-03-30 | 2011-11-30 | 浙江大学 | PEG grafted polysulphone or polyether sulphone hollow fibrous membrane, preparation method and application thereof |
| US9295760B2 (en) | 2009-04-09 | 2016-03-29 | The University Of Queensland | Block copolymer blends |
| WO2011156596A2 (en) | 2010-06-09 | 2011-12-15 | Semprus Biosciences Corp. | Articles having non-fouling surfaces and processes for preparing the same including pretreatment of substrates |
| CA2799786A1 (en) | 2010-06-09 | 2011-12-15 | Semprus Biosciences Corp. | Non-fouling, anti-microbial, anti-thrombogenic graft compositions |
| AU2011264834B2 (en) | 2010-06-09 | 2015-03-12 | Semprus Biosciences Corp. | Non-fouling, anti-microbial, anti-thrombogenic graft-from compositions |
| ES2571735T3 (en) * | 2010-10-20 | 2016-05-26 | Dsm Ip Assets Bv | Biodegradable compositions that support hanging hydrophilic group and related devices |
| MY161859A (en) | 2011-01-03 | 2017-05-15 | Avm Biotechnology Llc | Personalized production of biologics and method for reprogramming somatic cells |
| AU2012256403B2 (en) | 2011-03-17 | 2016-10-20 | Corning Incorporated | Synthetic coating for cell culture |
| US8487017B2 (en) | 2011-06-27 | 2013-07-16 | Covidien Lp | Biodegradable materials for orthopedic devices based on polymer stereocomplexes |
| US9539281B2 (en) | 2011-07-12 | 2017-01-10 | The Brigham And Women's Hospital, Inc. | Lipid-containing PSA compositions, methods of isolation and methods of use thereof |
| US8414654B1 (en) * | 2011-11-23 | 2013-04-09 | Amendia, Inc. | Bone implants and method of manufacture |
| TWI487543B (en) * | 2011-12-12 | 2015-06-11 | Ind Tech Res Inst | Brush polymer and medical use thereof |
| US9120119B2 (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2015-09-01 | Semprus Biosciences Corporation | Redox processes for contact lens modification |
| CA2859195C (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2016-09-27 | Semprus Biosciences Corp. | Imbibing process for contact lens surface modification |
| US9000063B2 (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2015-04-07 | Semprus Biosciences Corporation | Multistep UV process to create surface modified contact lenses |
| CA2858730C (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2017-07-18 | Semprus Biosciences Corp. | Surface modified contact lenses |
| WO2013090790A1 (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2013-06-20 | Semprus Biosciences Corp. | Silicone hydrogel contact lens modified using lanthanide or transition metal oxidants |
| US9480747B2 (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2016-11-01 | Bvw Holding Ag | Class of anti-adhesion hydrogels with healing aspects |
| BR112014019157B1 (en) | 2012-02-02 | 2022-02-22 | Corning Incorporated | SYNTHETIC BINDING MEDIUM FOR CELL CULTURE |
| WO2014070769A1 (en) | 2012-10-29 | 2014-05-08 | The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill | Methods and compositions for treating mucosal tissue disorders |
| FR3003764B1 (en) * | 2013-03-27 | 2015-05-01 | Maco Pharma Sa | LEUCOCYTES FILTRATION UNIT WITH REDUCED PLATELET ADHESION |
| WO2014194244A1 (en) | 2013-05-30 | 2014-12-04 | Duke University | Enzyme-catalyzed synthesis of site-specific and stoichiometric biomolecule-polymer conjugates |
| US10364451B2 (en) | 2013-05-30 | 2019-07-30 | Duke University | Polymer conjugates having reduced antigenicity and methods of using the same |
| US10392611B2 (en) | 2013-05-30 | 2019-08-27 | Duke University | Polymer conjugates having reduced antigenicity and methods of using the same |
| US9228044B2 (en) | 2014-04-02 | 2016-01-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Versatile, facile and scalable route to polylactic acid-backbone graft and bottlebrush copolymers |
| US9458268B2 (en) | 2014-04-02 | 2016-10-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Lactide-functionalized polymer |
| US9505858B2 (en) | 2014-10-21 | 2016-11-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Polylactic acid (PLA) with low moisture vapor transmission rates by grafting through of hydrophobic polymers directly to PLA backbone |
| US9187597B1 (en) | 2014-10-21 | 2015-11-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Flame-retardant polylactic acid (PLA) by grafting through of phosphorus-containing polymers directly to PLA backbone |
| US9193818B1 (en) | 2014-10-29 | 2015-11-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Toughened polylactic acid (PLA) by grafting through of impact-modifying polymers directly to PLA backbone |
| US10385115B2 (en) | 2015-03-26 | 2019-08-20 | Duke University | Fibronectin type III domain-based fusion proteins |
| EA037478B1 (en) | 2015-08-04 | 2021-04-01 | Дьюк Юниверсити | Genetically encoded intrinsically disordered stealth polymers for delivery and methods of using same |
| JP6918365B2 (en) | 2015-08-19 | 2021-08-11 | プレジデント アンド フェローズ オブ ハーバード カレッジ | Lipidized PSA Compositions and Methods |
| US11752213B2 (en) | 2015-12-21 | 2023-09-12 | Duke University | Surfaces having reduced non-specific binding and antigenicity |
| WO2017112826A2 (en) | 2015-12-21 | 2017-06-29 | Duke University | Polymer conjugates having reduced antigenicity and methods of using the same |
| US11246924B2 (en) | 2016-04-01 | 2022-02-15 | Duke University | Alpha-helical peptide nanofibers as a self-adjuvanting vaccine platform |
| TWI841843B (en) | 2016-05-03 | 2024-05-11 | 瑞士商Bvw控股公司 | Multiphase gel |
| WO2017210476A1 (en) | 2016-06-01 | 2017-12-07 | Duke University | Nonfouling biosensors |
| US11491181B2 (en) | 2016-07-15 | 2022-11-08 | President And Fellows Of Harvard College | Glycolipid compositions and methods of use |
| WO2018053201A1 (en) | 2016-09-14 | 2018-03-22 | Duke University | Triblock polypeptide-based nanoparticles for the delivery of hydrophilic drugs |
| JP2020500150A (en) | 2016-09-23 | 2020-01-09 | デューク ユニバーシティ | Non-repetitive and non-structural polypeptides with lower critical solution temperature behavior |
| WO2018132732A1 (en) | 2017-01-12 | 2018-07-19 | Duke University | Genetically encoded lipid-polypeptide hybrid biomaterials that exhibit temperature triggered hierarchical self-assembly |
| WO2018165194A1 (en) * | 2017-03-06 | 2018-09-13 | University Of Washington | Engineered cells and agent compositions for therapeutic agent delivery and treatments using same |
| US20200405881A1 (en) * | 2017-03-06 | 2020-12-31 | University Of Washington | Cell based methods and compositions for therapeutic agent delivery and treatments using same |
| WO2018213320A1 (en) | 2017-05-15 | 2018-11-22 | Duke University | Recombinant production of hybrid lipid-biopolymer materials that self-assemble and encapsulate agents |
| WO2019006374A1 (en) | 2017-06-30 | 2019-01-03 | Duke University | Order and disorder as a design principle for stimuli-responsive biopolymer networks |
| WO2019147954A1 (en) | 2018-01-26 | 2019-08-01 | Duke University | Albumin binding peptide-drug (aibiped) conjugates and methods of making and using same |
| WO2019178288A2 (en) * | 2018-03-13 | 2019-09-19 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Virus-like nanocapsid for oral delivery of insulin |
| US11857634B2 (en) * | 2018-04-20 | 2024-01-02 | University of Pittsburgh—of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education | Cationic amphiphilic polymers for codelivery of hydrophobic agents and nucleic acids |
| EP3788343B1 (en) | 2018-04-30 | 2024-03-27 | Duke University | Stimuli-responsive peg-like polymer-based drug delivery platform |
| US11649275B2 (en) | 2018-08-02 | 2023-05-16 | Duke University | Dual agonist fusion proteins |
| US12594347B2 (en) | 2018-09-07 | 2026-04-07 | Duke University | Nanoparticulate drug delivery systems |
| US11512314B2 (en) | 2019-07-12 | 2022-11-29 | Duke University | Amphiphilic polynucleotides |
| US12290603B2 (en) | 2019-09-27 | 2025-05-06 | Duke University | Tabletization of peptide self-assemblies and methods of making and using the same |
| WO2022271183A1 (en) * | 2021-06-25 | 2022-12-29 | Allexcel Inc. | Self-assembling amphphlic polymers as anti-covid-19 agents |
Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO1998001228A2 (en) * | 1996-07-08 | 1998-01-15 | Corning Incorporated | Rayleigh-breakup atomizing devices and methods of making rayleigh-breakup atomizing devices |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA2226299A1 (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 1997-02-27 | Dendritech, Inc. | Hyper comb-branched polymer conjugates |
| ES2317657T3 (en) * | 1996-09-19 | 2009-04-16 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | POLYMERS CONTAINING POLYSACARIDS SUCH AS ALGINATES OR MODIFIED ALGINATES. |
| DE19706667A1 (en) * | 1997-02-20 | 1998-08-27 | Merck Patent Gmbh | Bone replacement material with a surface covering with peptides with RGD amino acid sequence |
| DE69920198T2 (en) * | 1998-04-13 | 2005-09-22 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology, Cambridge | CAMM POLYMERS FOR REGULATING CELL SURFACE INTERACTION |
-
1999
- 1999-04-13 DE DE69920198T patent/DE69920198T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1999-04-13 AT AT99917442T patent/ATE275977T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-04-13 WO PCT/US1999/008031 patent/WO1999052560A1/en not_active Ceased
- 1999-04-13 AU AU35564/99A patent/AU752942B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1999-04-13 EP EP99917442A patent/EP1071467B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-04-13 JP JP2000543170A patent/JP2002511496A/en active Pending
- 1999-04-13 CA CA002328436A patent/CA2328436C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1999-04-13 US US09/290,140 patent/US6150459A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2000
- 2000-08-08 US US09/634,095 patent/US6207749B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2001
- 2001-03-26 US US09/817,887 patent/US6399700B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO1998001228A2 (en) * | 1996-07-08 | 1998-01-15 | Corning Incorporated | Rayleigh-breakup atomizing devices and methods of making rayleigh-breakup atomizing devices |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2002511496A (en) | 2002-04-16 |
| AU3556499A (en) | 1999-11-01 |
| US6150459A (en) | 2000-11-21 |
| US6399700B2 (en) | 2002-06-04 |
| CA2328436A1 (en) | 1999-10-21 |
| CA2328436C (en) | 2008-08-05 |
| US20010027237A1 (en) | 2001-10-04 |
| EP1071467B1 (en) | 2004-09-15 |
| US6207749B1 (en) | 2001-03-27 |
| WO1999052560A1 (en) | 1999-10-21 |
| DE69920198D1 (en) | 2004-10-21 |
| DE69920198T2 (en) | 2005-09-22 |
| ATE275977T1 (en) | 2004-10-15 |
| EP1071467A1 (en) | 2001-01-31 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| AU752942B2 (en) | Comb copolymers for regulating cell-surface interactions | |
| Sun et al. | α-Amino acid containing degradable polymers as functional biomaterials: rational design, synthetic pathway, and biomedical applications | |
| Schakenraad et al. | In vivo and in vitro degradation of glycine/DL‐lactic acid copolymers | |
| Kutikov et al. | Biodegradable PEG-based amphiphilic block copolymers for tissue engineering applications | |
| EP0975691B1 (en) | Multifunctional polymeric coatings | |
| EP0805678B1 (en) | Surface-modified nanoparticles and method of making and using same | |
| US7722896B2 (en) | Polyarylates for drug delivery and tissue engineering | |
| AU605172B2 (en) | Polyesters containing alkylene oxide blocks as drug delivery systems | |
| Chun et al. | The use of injectable, thermosensitive poly (organophosphazene)–RGD conjugates for the enhancement of mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation | |
| JP5671024B2 (en) | Process for making polymers, preferably (alkyl) acryloyl polycarbonates, resulting polymers and (alkyl) acryloyl polycarbonates, and biodevices comprising the same | |
| Feng et al. | Progress in depsipeptide‐based biomaterials | |
| US6703477B2 (en) | Acid end group poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) copolymers with high glycolide content | |
| JP2008056925A (en) | Copolymer of tyrosine-based polycarbonate and poly (alkylene oxide) | |
| WO2009137715A2 (en) | Versatile biodegradable elastic polymers featured with dual crosslinking mechanism for biomedical applications | |
| JP2013530235A (en) | Compositions and methods for improving delivery of nucleic acids | |
| Ohya et al. | Cell attachment and growth on films prepared from poly (depsipeptide‐co‐lactide) having various functional groups | |
| CN113906057A (en) | Triblock copolymer and nanofiber gelation microspheres comprising same | |
| Sosnowski et al. | Synthesis of bioerodible poly (ε-caprolactone) latexes and poly (D, L-lactide) microspheres by ring-opening polymerization | |
| CN1194704C (en) | Polyester with its main train having amino acid and contg. active drug, and its prepn. method | |
| WO2007058539A2 (en) | Modular supramolecular materials for biomedical uses | |
| Chu | Biodegradable hydrogels as drug controlled release vehicles | |
| Radha et al. | Polyhydroxybutyrate-based nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery | |
| Yui et al. | Biodegradable Polymers | |
| Li et al. | Bioresponsive Hydrogels and Microgels | |
| Behravesh | Synthesis of an injectable biodegradable biomimetic macroporous hydrogel scaffold for bone tissue engineering |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGA | Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent) |