Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
EP1138488B2 - Procédé et dispositif pour éviter le dépassement d'un seuil dans une machine à imprimer des feuilles - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

EP1138488B2 - Procédé et dispositif pour éviter le dépassement d'un seuil dans une machine à imprimer des feuilles - Google Patents

Procédé et dispositif pour éviter le dépassement d'un seuil dans une machine à imprimer des feuilles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1138488B2
EP1138488B2 EP01104581A EP01104581A EP1138488B2 EP 1138488 B2 EP1138488 B2 EP 1138488B2 EP 01104581 A EP01104581 A EP 01104581A EP 01104581 A EP01104581 A EP 01104581A EP 1138488 B2 EP1138488 B2 EP 1138488B2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
values
sheets
limit
development trend
operator
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP01104581A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1138488B1 (fr
EP1138488A1 (fr
Inventor
Jürgen Dr. Rautert
Markus Gerstenberger
Burkhard Maass
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
Original Assignee
Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=7637158&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1138488(B2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG filed Critical Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
Publication of EP1138488A1 publication Critical patent/EP1138488A1/fr
Publication of EP1138488B1 publication Critical patent/EP1138488B1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1138488B2 publication Critical patent/EP1138488B2/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41F—PRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES
    • B41F33/00—Indicating, counting, warning, control or safety devices
    • B41F33/04—Tripping devices or stop-motions
    • B41F33/14—Automatic control of tripping devices by feelers, photoelectric devices, pneumatic devices, or other detectors

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for preventing limit crossings in sheet-fed printing machines, wherein values relevant to the printing process with respect to the individual sheets are detected and processed in such a way that predetermined limit values are maintained.
  • a device which monitors operations in machines.
  • the sensors can be attached to faulty positions in the machine and provide signals to the operator.
  • the signals show either the agreement with the setpoint or the positive or negative deviation from the setpoint. There is a given tolerance between the respective signals. Based on these signals, the operator can take appropriate action. In case of a threatening error, the machine will be shut down automatically.
  • the disadvantage of this device is that the operator can not recognize how the trend of the relevant values continues.
  • the invention is therefore based on the object of making available a method of the type mentioned at the beginning, by which wastepaper prints or interruption of the printing due to non-adhered values are largely prevented.
  • the object is achieved according to the invention by a method which is characterized in that the development trend of a relevant value is detected in the course of a sequence of sheets and measures are taken if the values change, and if the development trend continues predetermined number of sheets would lead to a limit violation.
  • the countermeasures can be taken as soon as values show a development tendency which is heading towards the limit value.
  • the achievement of the limit value is usually prevented because timely countermeasures against this trend can be made. In this way, neither useless waste printing nor a machine stop occurs. The productivity and thus the economic efficiency of the machine is increased.
  • the invention can be implemented in various ways.
  • One possibility is to inform the operator of the development trend of the values in good time before reaching the limit in order to initiate countermeasures.
  • suitable display options are proposed.
  • Another possibility is that a controller automatically counteracts such a development trend. The latter is particularly useful in high-speed machines, since the introduction of countermeasures must be relatively fast.
  • a further development of the method envisages that individual values shedding the development trend for the determination of the development trend are eliminated. There can always be individual single values that are shedding, which must be eliminated in order to determine the development trend in order to avoid a falsification of the result. Such shearing individual values can occur, for example, in that individual sheets have a defect with respect to their nature or dimensions.
  • the values at which a limit value violation is to be avoided by the method according to the invention may be the most varied values which are related to the individual sheets to be processed.
  • the values are the position of the sheets at a certain machine angle, the position of the sheet leading edges or a page offset of sheets.
  • the values represent errors in the correction within the machine, such as drawing errors with respect to the application of sheets to a page mark.
  • a skew of bends, registration errors, or other values related to the individual sheets may also be detected.
  • a particularly important application is the acquisition of values on the feeder of the sheetfed press, since the exact installation of the sheet are the prerequisite for trouble-free operation of the machine.
  • the recorded values can be displayed so that an operator can take countermeasures in good time. It is possible to suggest to the operator such countermeasures, or it may also be a Control to correct the values are controlled.
  • the representation of the values by the device may be visual or audible to cause an operator to take countermeasures, or it is possible that the evaluation device displays the sensed values by signals transmitted to a controller for automatically performing the countermeasures.
  • An expedient embodiment of the device provides that the representation takes place on at least one display, wherein the values of a predetermined number of a sequence of sheets which have passed the at least one sensor last, always supplemented by the value of the current sheet and as a sequence of Individual values are displayed in relation to the setpoint and to the limit values.
  • An operator can grasp the development trend at a glance on such a display and be able to take timely countermeasures to prevent the limit from being exceeded.
  • One way of presenting the display shows the values of the individual sheets as bars, with the end of the bars showing the position of the respective value in relation to the setpoint and limit values, which are represented by lines. In this way, for example, the values of 20 sheets can be displayed, and the operator immediately recognizes when a development trend is towards the limit.
  • Scattering individual values are also recognizable and can be ignored for taking countermeasures against the development trend.
  • a further representation provides that the display shows the values of the individual sheets as a curve, which represents the time evolution of the individual values in relation to the setpoint and limit values. This representation is expediently selected when, with fast-running machines, a very large number of individual values occur within a short period of time and thus the representation of the individual values is no longer possible. It is essential in the representations that a period of development can be detected in such a way that sufficient reaction time is possible to take the appropriate countermeasures.
  • a signaling device is activated by the evaluation as soon as a change in the values occurs, which leads to a limit violation in a further predetermined number of sheets in a continuation of the development trend would.
  • the signaling device may be an optical and / or acoustic signaling device.
  • the evaluation device In order for the operator to take the correct countermeasure in a short time, provision can be made for the evaluation device to actuate a further display in the case of the above-mentioned change of the values in order to display stored countermeasures in a readable manner.
  • the operator can be made aware of the error source or it is displayed directly, which change is to be made.
  • a plurality of displays for displaying a plurality of types of values are arranged on the control panel of the printing press.
  • the other display which displays information as text or symbol, can also be located there. This allows the operator to get an idea of the state of the machine at their primary location.
  • the representation of the detected values is effected by signals, wherein a control in such a change of the signals representing the values that would occur at a further predetermined number of sheets a continuation of the development trend, at least one actuator for changing the Development trends is driven.
  • This automatic evaluation and processing of the signals not only relieves the operator, it also makes it possible to take countermeasures in fractions of a second. For very fast-moving presses, this is often the only way to intercept a development trend before reaching the limit by appropriate countermeasures.
  • a particularly important application of the device is at the feeder of a sheet-fed press.
  • at least one sensor is arranged on the sheet feeder, and the evaluation device is used to ensure a sheet system in compliance with the specified limits.
  • the controller can also be designed such that various relevant data, such as the paper type, the paper weight or the format can be entered.
  • the basic setting is then automatically made by the controller, for example with regard to the feeder phase, the negative pressure in the feed table, the pulling force for aligning the sheets on the side mark, etc. In operation, this basic setting is corrected by recording the actual values achieved.
  • Fig. 1 shows a representation of the basic idea of the invention with reference to a series of values, wherein the x-axis shows the height of the values and the individual values are lined up in their temporal sequence along the time axis t.
  • 3 is the nominal value
  • 4 is the upper limit
  • 4 ' is the lower limit value.1 is the value of the last arc, 1' that of the penultimate, etc.
  • the detected values 1, 1 ', 1 ", 1' change.
  • Such a development trend 12 can, for example, move in the direction of the limit value 4 in a prognosis time point 11.
  • a prognosis is created for the initiation of countermeasures in which a certain number of values are used For example, the last four values may be used to predict a trend for the next three values, which are designated by reference numeral 12. If the values used for the forecast are more exasperating Single value 8, it will not be used for the forecast because it would falsify it. For the forecast time 11, as shown, k exceeding the limit value 4 and therefore no countermeasure is initiated. This is different in the forecast time 11 ', for which it follows that an exceedance of the limit value 4 must be expected after three further curves. Therefore, a countermeasure must be taken at forecast time 11 'in order to prevent the limit value being exceeded.
  • Fig. 2 shows a display device for an operator.
  • Another display 7 serves to convey readable information 14 to the operator. These can indicate the source of the error or recommend a countermeasure to the operator.
  • the display 2 indicates the sheet arrival, with a machine angle of 270 ° is the target value for the sheet arrival. Deviations of 10 ° are defined as the upper limit value 4 and as the lower limit value 4 '.
  • the setpoint 3, the lower limit value 4 'and the upper limit value 4 are indicated by lines 6 on the display 2.
  • the individual values 1, 1 ', 1 ", 1'", ... are represented by bars 5, where 1 is the value of the current arc. These values 1, 1 ', 1 ", 1'",. .. are always supplemented by the value of the current arc, so that the display 2 always moves with respect to the temporal display from right to left and thereby a certain number of values 1, 1 ', 1 ", 1' '', ...
  • a signal device 15 which emits an optical or acoustic signal when in a prognosis time, such as 11 ', is to be expected in exceeding the limit value 4 in the next sheet.
  • a readable countermeasure 14 can be displayed on the further display 7, as an example, the operator is here asked to check the air pressure of the suction belt.
  • the further display 2 ' indicates oblique arc, with an offset of the arc of plus or minus 5 mm as limit 4, 4' is located. Since the values 1, 1 ', 1 ", 1'",... Move in the direction of the limit value 4 on this display 2 ', an indication of the signal device 15 has been triggered.
  • the values can also be represented by means of a curve 16 instead of by individual bars 5.
  • Such a representation is to be preferred if the displayed time span comprises too many values 1, 1 ', 1 ", 1'",..., In order to be able to visually detect them with a bar graph.

Landscapes

  • Controlling Sheets Or Webs (AREA)
  • Inking, Control Or Cleaning Of Printing Machines (AREA)

Claims (11)

  1. Procédé pour éviter les dépassements de valeurs limites dans les machines à imprimer des feuilles, dans lequel des valeurs appropriées pour le processus d'impression concernant les feuilles individuelles sont détectées et traitées de telle manière que des valeurs limites prédéterminées soient respectées, caractérisé en ce que la tendance du développement d'une valeur appropriée est détectée au cours d'une séquence de feuilles et des mesures sont prises lorsqu'une variation apparaît dans les valeurs qui, en cas de poursuite de la tendance du développement avec un autre nombre prédéterminé de feuilles, conduirait à un dépassement des valeurs limites.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que les valeurs individuelles s'écartant de la tendance du développement sont éliminées pour la détermination de la tendance du développement.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce que les valeurs sont la position des feuilles selon un angle de machine déterminé.
  4. Procédé selon la revendication 3, caractérisé en ce que c'est la position des arêtes avant des feuilles.
  5. Procédé selon la revendication 3 ou 4, caractérisé en ce que c'est un déport latéral des feuilles.
  6. Procédé selon la revendication 5, caractérisé en ce que ce sont des défauts de traction concernant la pose de feuilles sur un taquet latéral.
  7. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 3 à 6, caractérisé en ce que c'est une position en biais des feuilles.
  8. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 7, caractérisé en ce qu'il s'applique au margeur de la machine à imprimer des feuilles.
  9. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 8, caractérisé en ce qu'un affichage des valeurs est réalisé.
  10. Procédé selon la revendication 9, caractérisé en ce que des contre-mesures sont proposées à un opérateur.
  11. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 10, caractérisé en ce que des commandes sont générées par la correction des valeurs.
EP01104581A 2000-03-31 2001-03-06 Procédé et dispositif pour éviter le dépassement d'un seuil dans une machine à imprimer des feuilles Expired - Lifetime EP1138488B2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10016107 2000-03-31
DE10016107A DE10016107A1 (de) 2000-03-31 2000-03-31 Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Verhinderung von Grenzwertüberschreitungen bei Bogendruckmaschinen

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1138488A1 EP1138488A1 (fr) 2001-10-04
EP1138488B1 EP1138488B1 (fr) 2007-01-31
EP1138488B2 true EP1138488B2 (fr) 2013-01-30

Family

ID=7637158

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01104581A Expired - Lifetime EP1138488B2 (fr) 2000-03-31 2001-03-06 Procédé et dispositif pour éviter le dépassement d'un seuil dans une machine à imprimer des feuilles

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US6535789B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP1138488B2 (fr)
JP (1) JP4782300B2 (fr)
AT (1) ATE353051T1 (fr)
DE (2) DE10016107A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102005002004A1 (de) * 2005-01-15 2006-07-27 Landen, Franz J. Technik und Verfahrenstechnik für die Lagekontrolle bei Druckbögen

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0444427A2 (fr) † 1990-02-22 1991-09-04 MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG Procédé pour établir le diagnostic de fonctionnement d'une presse en fonction de la rémission des témoins plein-ton et tramés
DE4140051A1 (de) † 1991-12-05 1993-06-09 Leuze Electronic Gmbh + Co, 7311 Owen, De Einrichtung zum ueberwachen der ankunft von bogen am einlass bogenverarbeitender maschinen
EP0741029A2 (fr) † 1995-05-04 1996-11-06 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Aktiengesellschaft Procédé de réglage d'encrage dans une machine à imprimer

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DD237282A1 (de) * 1985-05-14 1986-07-09 Polygraph Leipzig Einrichtung zur anzeige, registrierung und auswertung von ursachen fuer maschinenstillstaende
DE4103574A1 (de) * 1991-02-06 1992-08-13 Grapho Metronic Gmbh & Co Verfahren zur bestimmung von farbfehlern
US5313253A (en) * 1992-08-17 1994-05-17 Xerox Corporation Paper path signature analysis apparatus
JP3173626B2 (ja) * 1992-11-19 2001-06-04 京セラミタ株式会社 画像形成装置用給紙装置
JPH0885671A (ja) * 1994-09-16 1996-04-02 Toshiba Corp 画像形成装置
US5528347A (en) * 1995-04-17 1996-06-18 Xerox Corporation Adaptive jam detection windows
US6042111A (en) * 1997-08-18 2000-03-28 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for detecting slip in a sheet transport system
JPH11232063A (ja) * 1998-02-09 1999-08-27 Canon Inc 情報処理装置、情報処理方法及び情報処理システム

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0444427A2 (fr) † 1990-02-22 1991-09-04 MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG Procédé pour établir le diagnostic de fonctionnement d'une presse en fonction de la rémission des témoins plein-ton et tramés
DE4140051A1 (de) † 1991-12-05 1993-06-09 Leuze Electronic Gmbh + Co, 7311 Owen, De Einrichtung zum ueberwachen der ankunft von bogen am einlass bogenverarbeitender maschinen
EP0741029A2 (fr) † 1995-05-04 1996-11-06 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Aktiengesellschaft Procédé de réglage d'encrage dans une machine à imprimer

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1138488B1 (fr) 2007-01-31
EP1138488A1 (fr) 2001-10-04
JP4782300B2 (ja) 2011-09-28
US6535789B2 (en) 2003-03-18
DE10016107A1 (de) 2001-10-04
DE50111986D1 (de) 2007-03-22
ATE353051T1 (de) 2007-02-15
JP2001315996A (ja) 2001-11-13
US20020140163A1 (en) 2002-10-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE3220360A1 (de) Einrichtung zur beeinflussung der farbgebung an druckmaschinen
EP3147089A1 (fr) Procede de reglage automatise d'un interstice, installation de commande correspondante et dispositif d'estampage
DE102012221458B3 (de) System zur automatischen Formatverstellung einer Anlage mit Automatik-unterstütztem Formatwechsel
EP1172317B1 (fr) Dispositif de contrôle pour l'alimentation en feuilles d'une machine à traiter des feuilles et procédé de contrôle de la formation d'un courant de feuilles
DE102005003254B4 (de) Optoelektronischer Sensor und Konfigurationsverfahren
EP1138488B2 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour éviter le dépassement d'un seuil dans une machine à imprimer des feuilles
EP0453909B1 (fr) Procédé pour le positionnement et le réglage d'une plieuse
EP1184177B1 (fr) Machine d'impression rotative
DE3230605A1 (de) Zusammentragmaschine
EP0799783A2 (fr) Dispositif pour contrÔler le moteur de l'élévateur de pile d'une machine à imprimer des feuilles
DE102004049017B4 (de) Verfahren zur Steuerung des Beginns eines Markier- und Schneidevorganges einer Lasereinheit von Feldern aus einer Materialbahn
EP0513482B1 (fr) Inspection des marques latérales et des chevauchements dans une press rotative pour feuilles
EP0844201A1 (fr) Dispositif pour l'alimentation des produits imprimés
DE102006062980B3 (de) Detektor zur Schließpunkterfassung im Farbkasten
DE69519415T2 (de) Vorrichtung zum Schweissen von Gittermatten, und hergestellte Gittermatte dafür
EP2919993B2 (fr) Système de surveillance pour l'orientation de groupes d'impression d'une machine à imprimer en ligne
DE19956100A1 (de) Steuervorrichtung für ein ohne Halt arbeitendes Abgabe-Abzugssystem für eine Bogendruckmaschine
DE2445999A1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zum schneiden und sortieren von fotografischen aufzeichnungstraegern
DE10303374B4 (de) Verfahren zum Steuern einer papierverarbeitenden Maschine
DE3135094C1 (de) "Mit einer Messerwalze ausgestattete Maschine zum Bearbeiten von Häuten, Fellen u.dgl."
EP3017922A1 (fr) Procede de surveillance du compartiment d'une machine d'usinage, de preference d'une machine a fraiser, et machine d'usinage, en particulier machine a fraiser, destinee a executer un tel procede
EP2386389B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif destinés la perforation longitudinale d'une bande de matériau déroulante
DE102008020536B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Betrieb eines Stapelwenders
DE102006054006B4 (de) Verschleißdetektor für Farbkastenfolien
DE19748415A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Detektion und Identifizierung von Fehlern in Bahn- oder Strangpfaden von Rotationsdruckmaschinen

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20010905

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: RAUTERT, JUERGEN, DR.

Inventor name: MAASS, BURKHARD

Inventor name: GERSTENBERGER, MARKUS

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20050614

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: GERSTENBERGER, MARKUS

Inventor name: MAASS, BURKHARD

Inventor name: RAUTERT, JUERGEN, DR.

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070131

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070131

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070131

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 50111986

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20070322

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070512

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 20070424

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070702

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: KOENIG & BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

Effective date: 20071030

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: KOENIG & BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

Effective date: 20071030

Opponent name: MAN ROLAND DRUCKMASCHINEN AG

Effective date: 20071030

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070331

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: MAN ROLAND DRUCKMASCHINEN AG

Opponent name: KOENIG & BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070306

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: KOENIG & BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

Effective date: 20071030

Opponent name: MANROLAND AG

Effective date: 20071030

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: KOENIG & BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

Opponent name: MANROLAND AG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070306

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070131

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20110330

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20110322

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20110328

Year of fee payment: 11

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN A.G.

Effective date: 20120331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20121001

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20130130

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: AELC

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: AELC

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120306

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R102

Ref document number: 50111986

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121001

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20150319

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20150319

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20160328

Year of fee payment: 16

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20160306

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160306

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160331

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20171130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170331

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20180331

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 50111986

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191001