JP2518155B2 - Parts information system - Google Patents
Parts information systemInfo
- Publication number
- JP2518155B2 JP2518155B2 JP15649693A JP15649693A JP2518155B2 JP 2518155 B2 JP2518155 B2 JP 2518155B2 JP 15649693 A JP15649693 A JP 15649693A JP 15649693 A JP15649693 A JP 15649693A JP 2518155 B2 JP2518155 B2 JP 2518155B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- procurement
- parts
- information
- easiness
- unit
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 claims 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 108010014172 Factor V Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000282414 Homo sapiens Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008571 general function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003908 quality control method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008685 targeting Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は部品情報システムに関
し、特に装置組立事業における技術情報管理の一環とし
ての設計技術者向けの部品情報システムに関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a parts information system, and more particularly to a parts information system for design engineers as part of technical information management in a device assembly business.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】従来の部品情報システムとしては、例え
ば、平成3年11月26日・27日に「ホテルマリナー
ズコート東京」にて開催の、社団法人日本能率協会主催
の「資材購買部門における組織活性化シンポジウム」で
発表された“設計支援体制としての「推奨材料情報シス
テム」”(藤井)がある。この推奨材料情報システムを
簡単に図示したものが、図3に示す従来の部品情報シス
テムのシステム関連図である。この部品情報システム
は、部品の品目ごとの仕様と単価と推奨部品情報とを管
理し、設計技術者に提供している。そして、推奨部品情
報は、品質管理担当者と資材管理担当者とが別途設けて
ある調達管理システムを検索し、推奨部品のランクを設
定するというプロセスで生成されている。2. Description of the Related Art As a conventional parts information system, for example, an organization in the material purchasing department sponsored by the Japan Management Association held at "Hotel Mariners Court Tokyo" on November 26th and 27th, 1991. There is a "Recommended Material Information System" (Fujii), which was announced at the "Activation Symposium." This recommended material information system is a simple illustration of the conventional parts information system shown in Fig. 3. This part information system manages the specifications, unit price, and recommended part information for each item of parts and provides them to the design engineer, and the recommended part information is provided to the quality control personnel. It is generated by the process of searching the procurement management system separately provided by the person in charge of material management and setting the rank of recommended parts.
【0003】[0003]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】上述した従来の部品情
報システムは、推奨部品情報生成の過程に、人間が関与
するので生成作業に時間を要し、このため更新サイクル
が長くなるという問題点がある。更に、この更新サイク
ルの長くなることが、推奨部品情報の精度の低下にもつ
ながり、生産段階において部品収集のばらつきが発生
し、生産計画通りの生産ができないことの一つの要因に
もなるという問題点もある。In the above-mentioned conventional parts information system, since human beings are involved in the process of creating the recommended parts information, it takes time for the creation work, which causes a problem that the update cycle becomes long. is there. Furthermore, the lengthening of this update cycle leads to a decrease in the accuracy of recommended component information, which causes variations in component collection at the production stage, which is one of the reasons that production cannot be performed according to the production plan. There are also points.
【0004】本発明の目的は、推奨部品情報の更新サイ
クルを短縮し、調達容易性情報の精度を向上することで
設計段階での原価低減の機会を増加し、生産段階での部
品収集のばらつきを抑え、計画通りの生産の実現に寄与
することができる部品情報システムを提供することにあ
る。The object of the present invention is to shorten the update cycle of recommended component information and improve the accuracy of procurement easiness information to increase the chances of cost reduction in the design stage, and to improve the dispersion of component collection in the production stage. It is to provide a parts information system that can contribute to the realization of production as planned by suppressing the above.
【0005】本発明の部品情報システムは、複数の部品
の注文および納品管理を行う調達管理システムと接続し
前記部品の品目ごとの調達情報を収集する調達情報収集
部と、前記調達情報収集部の収集した調達情報に基づき
すべての前記部品の品目を単位として複数の調達容易性
要素ごとの値を算出し、この各調達容易性要素とこれに
対応して予め定める調達容易性標準値との比に重み付け
した各要素ごとの値を積算して前記部品の品目ごとの調
達の容易性を示す調達容易性インデックスとして出力す
る調達容易性計算部と、前記部品の品目ごとに部品の仕
様および前記調達容易性計算部の算出した調達の容易性
のデータを管理し出力する部品情報管理部とを有し、前
記調達情報収集部の収集する調達情報が、前記部品の品
目を単位とした発注先ごとの発注まとめ単位および前記
発注まとめ単位別の単価と、受入検査品質と、調達リー
ドタイムの実績推移と、納期遵守率実績推移とを含む構
成である。The parts information system of the present invention is connected to a procurement management system for ordering and managing a plurality of parts and collects procurement information for each item of the parts, and a procurement information collection part. Based on the collected procurement information
Multiple easiness of procurement for each item of all the above parts
Calculate the value for each element,
Corresponding weight is given to the ratio with the standard value of procurement ease
And a specification of a part for each item of the parts, and a value for each part of the parts is added to output as a procurement easiness index indicating the easiness of procurement for each item of the part. and the procurement manages the ease of data procurement calculated ease calculation unit possess a component information management unit for outputting, prior to
The procurement information collected by the procurement information collection unit is
Order summary unit for each supplier based on eyes and the above
Unit price per order summary unit, acceptance inspection quality, procurement
It is a structure that includes a change in the actual result of the dead time and a change in the actual result of the delivery date compliance rate .
【0006】[0006]
【実施例】次に、本発明の実施例について図面を参照し
て説明する。Embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the drawings.
【0007】図1は本発明の一実施例のブロック図であ
る。FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an embodiment of the present invention.
【0008】本発明の部品情報システム1は、調達情報
収集部2が、調達情報として、既に稼働している別途設
けられた調達管理システム10から、部品の品目を単位
としたメーカーごとの発注まとめ単位および発注まとめ
単位別の単価と、受入検査品質と、調達リードタイムの
実績推移と、納期遵守率実績推移とを収集する。この場
合の収集期間については、過去1ヶ月,6ヶ月など部品
品目単位および部品区分単位に設定する機能を持つ。調
達容易性計算部3は、調達情報収集部2が収集したデー
タを基に、調達容易性を指数化した調達容易性インデッ
クスを算出する機能を持つ。部品情報管理部4は、別途
設ける端末装置5との間で対話型の検索機能を持ち、調
達容易性インデックスを基に、特定の部品あるいは1つ
の機能を構成する複数の部品を対象とした調達容易性の
データを出力する。In the parts information system 1 according to the present invention, the procurement information collecting unit 2 collects, as the procurement information, an order summary for each manufacturer from the separately provided procurement management system 10 in units of parts items. Units and order summary Collect unit price by unit, acceptance inspection quality, procurement lead time record, and delivery date compliance rate record. In this case, the collection period has a function of setting it in parts item units and parts classification units such as the past one month and six months. The procurement easiness calculation unit 3 has a function of calculating a procurement easiness index, which is an index of procurement easiness , based on the data collected by the procurement information collection unit 2. The component information management unit 4 has an interactive search function with a separately provided terminal device 5, and based on the procurement easiness index, procurement targeting a specific component or a plurality of components constituting one function. Outputs easiness data.
【0009】次に動作について説明する。Next, the operation will be described.
【0010】調達情報収集部2の動作は、コンピュータ
の一般的な機能である記憶担体からのデータの読出し動
作であるので説明は省略する。次に、調達容易性計算部
3の動作について説明する。図2は調達容易性計算部の
動作の流れ図である。調達容易性計算部3は、ステップ
(以下Sと記す)1で調達情報収集部2の収集した調達
情報を読込む。次に、S2で先に読込だ調達情報を用い
て調達容易性要素P1 〜P10を算出する。ここで、調達
容易性要素P1 〜P10の内容について説明する。これら
は、すべて部品の品目を単位として P1 :1/メーカーの数 P2 :購入単価の平均値 P3 :最小発注まとめ量 P4 :発注まとめ傾斜指数 =最大発注まとめ量における単価/最小発注まとめ量に
おける単価 P5 :受入検査不良率の平均値 P6 :受入検査不良率の標準偏差 P7 :調達リードタイムの平均値 P8 :調達リードタイムの標準偏差 P9 :納期遅れ率の平均値 P10:納期遅れ率の標準偏差 前述の値を算出する。Since the operation of the procurement information collecting unit 2 is a data reading operation from a storage carrier which is a general function of a computer, its explanation is omitted. Next, the operation of the procurement easiness calculation unit 3 will be described. FIG. 2 is a flowchart of the operation of the procurement easiness calculation unit. The procurement easiness calculation unit 3 reads the procurement information collected by the procurement information collection unit 2 in step (hereinafter referred to as S) 1. Next, the procurement easiness factors P1 to P10 are calculated using the procurement information previously read in S2. Here, the contents of the procurement easiness elements P1 to P10 will be described. These are all in terms of parts items P1: 1 / number of manufacturers P2: average purchase unit price P3: minimum order summary amount P4: order summary gradient index = unit price at maximum order summary amount / unit price at minimum order summary amount P5: Average of defective rate of incoming inspection P6: Standard deviation of defective rate of incoming inspection P7: Average value of procurement lead time P8: Standard deviation of procurement lead time P9: Average value of late delivery rate P10: Standard deviation of late delivery rate Calculate the above values.
【0011】これらの調達容易性要素P1 〜P10につい
ては、予め、部品の仕様の類似性による分類であるスペ
ック区分ごとに、それぞれ調達容易性標準値P01 〜P
010を設定する。本実施例の場合は、各々の調達容易性
要素の過去12ヶ月平均をとり調達容易性標準値P01
〜P010とする。又、調達容易性計算部3は、調達容易
性標準値に対する対話型の修正機能を持ち、算出した平
均値を修正することが可能であるので、S3で標準値の
訂正が必要であるか否かを判別し、必要であればS4で
調達容易性標準値の修正値を入力し、続いてS5で調達
容易性要素P1〜P10から調達容易性インデックス(以
下数式上ではPPと記す)を算出する。又、S3で標準
値の修正が必要なければ直接S5で調達容易性インデッ
クスを算出する。ここで、調達容易性インデックスの算
出方法について説明する。Regarding these procuring easiness elements P1 to P10, the procuring easiness standard values P01 to P10 are preliminarily set for each specification category which is a classification based on the similarity of specifications of parts.
Set 010. In the case of this embodiment, the average of the past 12 months of each procurement easiness factor is taken and the procurement easiness standard value P01
~ P010. Further, since the procurement easiness calculation unit 3 has an interactive correction function for the procurement easiness standard value and can correct the calculated average value, whether or not the standard value needs to be corrected in S3 If necessary, the correction value of the standard value of the easiness of procurement is input in S4, and then the easiness of procurement index (hereinafter, referred to as PP in the mathematical formula) is calculated from the easiness of procurement elements P1 to P10 in S5. To do. If it is not necessary to correct the standard value in S3, the procurement easiness index is directly calculated in S5. Here, a method of calculating the procurement easiness index will be described.
【0012】調達容易性インデックスは、下記に示す1
式により算出する。The easiness of procurement index is 1 as shown below.
Calculate by formula.
【0013】 PP=Σmi ×Pi/P0i ………………………………………1式 ここで、mi は、調達容易性要素Pi の重み付けを示す
値(mi =0〜1)を示す。mi は、事業のタイプにに
より重視すべき調達容易性要素が異なることを考慮する
ためのものである。例えば、多品種少量の組立事業で、
繰り返し性が極端に低い事業においては、発注まとめ傾
斜指数P4 よりも最小発注まとめ量P3を重視しなけれ
ばならない。次に、S5で算出した調達容易性インデッ
クスは、部品情報管理部4に出力して調達容易性計算部
3の処理を終了する。PP = Σmi × Pi / P0i …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1 where mi is a value indicating the weighting of the procurement easiness factor Pi (mi = 0 to 1). Indicates. mi is to take into consideration that the procurement easiness factors to be emphasized differ depending on the type of business. For example, in a high-mix low-volume assembly business,
In projects with extremely low repeatability, the minimum order volume P3 must be emphasized over the order summary slope index P4. Next, the procurement easiness index calculated in S5 is output to the parts information management unit 4, and the processing of the procurement easiness calculation unit 3 is ended.
【0014】続いて部品情報管理部から設計技術者に提
供する調達容易性情報の内容について説明する。Next, the contents of the procurement easiness information provided from the parts information management unit to the design engineer will be described.
【0015】部品情報管理部4は、端末装置5との間に
スペックによる対話型の検索機能を持ち、一次的な検索
機能として、品名・単価とともに、調達容易性インデッ
クスを同時に提供する。又、二次的な検索機能として、
指定スペックの複数部品の調達容易性要素の検索機能を
持つ。さらに、1つの設計単位ごと、例えばプリント板
の実装設計単位ごとに、該当の設計単位で使用している
全ての部品の調達容易性インデックスの平均値,調達容
易性要素の平均値,調達リードタイムの分布を検索し表
示する機能を持つ。The parts information management unit 4 has an interactive search function according to the specifications with the terminal device 5, and simultaneously provides the item name / unit price and the procurement easiness index as a primary search function. Also, as a secondary search function,
It has a search function for the element of easiness of procurement of multiple parts with specified specifications. Further, for each design unit, for example, for each printed circuit board mounting design unit, the average value of the easiness of procurement index, the average value of the easiness of procurement element, and the procurement lead time of all the components used in the corresponding design unit. With the function to search and display the distribution of.
【0016】[0016]
【発明の効果】以上説明したように、本発明は、複数の
部品の注文および納品管理を行う調達管理システムと接
続し部品の品目ごとの調達情報を収集する調達情報収集
部と、調達情報収集部の収集した調達情報に基づき予め
定める計算式を用いて部品の品目ごとの調達の容易性を
算出する調達容易性計算部と、部品の品目ごとに部品の
仕様および調達容易性計算部の算出した調達の容易性の
データを管理し出力する部品情報管理部とを備えること
により、推奨部品情報の更新サイクルを短縮し、調達容
易性情報の精度を向上することで設計段階での原価低減
の機会を増加し、生産段階での部品収集のばらつきを抑
え、計画通りの生産の実現に寄与することができるとい
う効果が有る。As described above, the present invention is connected to a procurement management system for ordering and managing delivery of a plurality of parts and collects procurement information for each item of parts, and a procurement information collection part. The procurement easiness calculation unit that calculates the procurement easiness for each item of parts using a predetermined formula based on the procurement information collected by the department, and the calculation of the parts specification and procurement easiness calculation unit for each item of parts By providing a parts information management unit that manages and outputs the data of the procured easiness, the cycle of updating the recommended parts information is shortened, and the accuracy of the procured easiness information is improved to reduce the cost at the design stage. This has the effect of increasing opportunities and suppressing variations in parts collection at the production stage, and contributing to the achievement of production as planned.
【図1】本発明の一実施例のブロック図である。FIG. 1 is a block diagram of one embodiment of the present invention.
【図2】調達容易性計算部の動作の流れ図である。FIG. 2 is a flowchart of the operation of a procurement easiness calculation unit.
【図3】従来の部品情報システムの一例を示すシステム
関連図である。FIG. 3 is a system-related diagram showing an example of a conventional parts information system.
1 部品情報システム 2 調達情報収集部 3 調達容易性計算部 4 部品情報管理部 5 端末装置 10 調達管理システム 1 Parts Information System 2 Procurement Information Collection Department 3 Procurement Ease Calculation Department 4 Parts Information Management Department 5 Terminal 10 Procurement Management System
Claims (2)
調達管理システムと接続し前記部品の品目ごとの調達情
報を収集する調達情報収集部と、前記調達情報収集部の
収集した調達情報に基づきすべての前記部品の品目を単
位として複数の調達容易性要素ごとの値を算出し、この
各調達容易性要素とこれに対応して予め定める調達容易
性標準値との比に重み付けした各要素ごとの値を積算し
て前記部品の品目ごとの調達の容易性を示す調達容易性
インデックスとして出力する調達容易性計算部と、前記
部品の品目ごとに部品の仕様および前記調達容易性計算
部の算出した調達の容易性のデータを管理し出力する部
品情報管理部とを有し、前記調達情報収集部の収集する
調達情報が、前記部品の品目を単位とした発注先ごとの
発注まとめ単位および前記発注まとめ単位別の単価と、
受入検査品質と、調達リードタイムの実績推移と、納期
遵守率実績推移とを含むことを特徴とする部品情報シス
テム。1. A procurement information collecting unit that is connected to a procurement management system for ordering and managing delivery of a plurality of parts and collects procurement information for each item of the parts, and based on the procurement information collected by the procurement information collecting unit. Items for all of the above parts
Calculate the value for each of the multiple procurement ease factors as
Each easiness of procurement element and corresponding easiness of procurement determined in advance
The value for each element is weighted to the ratio with the
Procurement easily exhibit ease of procurement of each item of the component Te
Possess the procurement easiness calculating unit for outputting as an index, and a component information managing unit for outputting to manage the ease of data calculated procurement of the components of the component specifications for each material and the procurement easiness calculation unit, Collected by the procurement information collection section
Procurement information for each supplier based on the item of the parts
Unit price for each order summary unit and the order summary unit,
Receipt inspection quality, procurement lead time performance transition, delivery date
A parts information system characterized in that it includes a compliance rate result transition .
話型の検索機能を持ち、特定の部品あるいは1つの機能
を構成する複数の部品を対象とした調達容易性のデータ
を出力することを特徴とする請求項1記載の部品情報シ
ステム。 2. The parts information management unit has an interactive search function with an external device, and outputs data of easiness of procurement for a specific part or a plurality of parts constituting one function. The parts information system according to claim 1, wherein:
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP15649693A JP2518155B2 (en) | 1993-06-28 | 1993-06-28 | Parts information system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP15649693A JP2518155B2 (en) | 1993-06-28 | 1993-06-28 | Parts information system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH0737007A JPH0737007A (en) | 1995-02-07 |
| JP2518155B2 true JP2518155B2 (en) | 1996-07-24 |
Family
ID=15629030
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP15649693A Expired - Lifetime JP2518155B2 (en) | 1993-06-28 | 1993-06-28 | Parts information system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP2518155B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3794044B2 (en) * | 1995-10-26 | 2006-07-05 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Parts information output method and parts selected by the parts information output method |
| JP2001084020A (en) * | 1999-09-09 | 2001-03-30 | Fujitsu Ten Ltd | Design process management device |
| TW573270B (en) * | 2002-09-13 | 2004-01-21 | Asiatek Inc | Multiple constrains planning and scheduling system |
| JP2012022563A (en) * | 2010-07-15 | 2012-02-02 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Automatic replacement part candidate selecting device, automatic replacement part candidate selecting method and automatic replacement part candidate selecting program |
| JP5588898B2 (en) * | 2011-03-08 | 2014-09-10 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Similar design case search device |
| JP6036475B2 (en) * | 2013-03-28 | 2016-11-30 | 富士通株式会社 | Information management method and information management system |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2995482B2 (en) * | 1989-12-27 | 1999-12-27 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Production management device |
| JPH05134714A (en) * | 1991-11-13 | 1993-06-01 | Nec Corp | Production control system |
-
1993
- 1993-06-28 JP JP15649693A patent/JP2518155B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH0737007A (en) | 1995-02-07 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5224034A (en) | Automated system for generating procurement lists | |
| US20240177095A1 (en) | Information coordination system for handling information of greenhouse gas emissions, information processing apparatus, and program | |
| US7529688B2 (en) | Baseline cost savings analysis | |
| US20070226075A1 (en) | Transaction Method of Reusable Parts | |
| JP2518155B2 (en) | Parts information system | |
| US8326712B2 (en) | Method and system for technology consumption management | |
| WO2003083608A2 (en) | Method for integration and reconciliation of electronic documents | |
| US20170004265A1 (en) | Encounter management | |
| US11062293B2 (en) | Method and system for negotiating, generating, documenting, and fulfilling vendor financing opportunities | |
| US20020010600A1 (en) | System, method and storage medium for mediating between users and manufacturers via a network | |
| CN114549127A (en) | Order object replacing method and device, electronic equipment and computer storage medium | |
| US8510197B2 (en) | Financial instrument position and subposition management | |
| JP2020201775A (en) | Transaction price processing device, transaction price processing program, transaction price processing method, and transaction system | |
| JP7482013B2 (en) | Progress information management evaluation system, progress information management evaluation method, and progress information management evaluation program | |
| JP2004258717A (en) | Cost management system and method | |
| RU2699068C1 (en) | System for guaranteed return of goods in retail sales network | |
| JP2002024648A (en) | Parts procurement system | |
| JP3949909B2 (en) | Purchaser evaluation system, program, and media | |
| JP7776810B1 (en) | Multi-seller product matching method for malls | |
| US20040088240A1 (en) | Estimating forecast value method, system, and program | |
| JP2001266046A (en) | Method and system for applying for bidding | |
| Dolmetsch et al. | Electronic commerce in the procurement of indirect goods | |
| CN118691385B (en) | Data verification method, device and electronic equipment | |
| JP2818279B2 (en) | IC order development decision support system | |
| JP2013020495A (en) | Electronic component sales system by business-to-business electric commerce |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 19960319 |