JP2587726B2 - Sewage treatment method - Google Patents
Sewage treatment methodInfo
- Publication number
- JP2587726B2 JP2587726B2 JP2331237A JP33123790A JP2587726B2 JP 2587726 B2 JP2587726 B2 JP 2587726B2 JP 2331237 A JP2331237 A JP 2331237A JP 33123790 A JP33123790 A JP 33123790A JP 2587726 B2 JP2587726 B2 JP 2587726B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- tank
- sewage
- aerobic
- anaerobic
- aeration
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Landscapes
- Purification Treatments By Anaerobic Or Anaerobic And Aerobic Bacteria Or Animals (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】 (産業上の利用分野) 本発明は、下水や産業廃水等の小規模な汚水の硝化一
脱窒処理に適した、単槽方式による汚水の処理方法に関
し、特に間欠曝気の効果的な制御方法に関するものであ
る。Description: TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a single-tank type wastewater treatment method suitable for nitrification and denitrification of small-scale wastewater such as sewage and industrial wastewater. The present invention relates to an effective method for controlling aeration.
(従来の技術) 汚水を硝化一脱窒処理する方法としては、好気状態ま
たは嫌気状態に維持される各反応槽に交互に汚水を流入
させて、硝化一脱窒処理を行なう回分法や、反応槽を隔
壁によって仕切り、一方を好気状態、他方を嫌気状態と
して槽内水を循環させることにより、硝化一脱窒処理を
行なう循環変法、或は、反応槽を長くして曝気装置の供
給酸素量を調節することにより、反応槽を一周する方向
に沿って好気状態と嫌気状態の部分を作り出し、反応槽
内を回流させることにより、硝化一脱窒処理を行なうOD
法が広く知られている。(Prior Art) As a method for nitrifying and denitrifying sewage, a batch method in which sewage is alternately flown into each reaction tank maintained in an aerobic state or an anaerobic state to perform nitrifying and denitrifying treatment, The reaction tank is partitioned by partition walls, one is aerobic, the other is anaerobic, and the water in the tank is circulated to perform a nitrification-denitrification process. By adjusting the amount of supplied oxygen, an aerobic state and an anaerobic state part are created along the direction of the reaction tank, and the nitriding and denitrification treatment is performed by circulating the inside of the reaction tank.
The law is widely known.
しかし、回分法は、複数の反応槽を必要とするため、
設置面積が広くなるばかりでなく、汚水の流入量が変動
すると処理が不安定となるため、調整槽を設けて流量を
調整しなければならないという欠点がある。また、循環
変法は、仕切られた反応槽内を別々に管理しながら槽内
水を循環させる必要があり、制御が複雑で高価となる欠
点がある。また、OD法は、反応槽内に好気状態でも嫌気
状態でもない中間的な境界部が生じ、その境界部は硝化
にも脱窒にも寄与しないため無駄なスペースとなり、不
経済であるという欠点がある。However, the batch method requires multiple reaction vessels,
Not only the installation area becomes large, but also if the inflow of sewage fluctuates, the treatment becomes unstable. Therefore, there is a drawback that an adjustment tank must be provided to adjust the flow rate. In addition, the modified circulation method requires circulating the water in the tank while separately managing the partitioned reaction tanks, and has a disadvantage that the control is complicated and expensive. In addition, the OD method produces an intermediate boundary in the reaction tank that is neither aerobic nor anaerobic, and the boundary does not contribute to nitrification or denitrification, resulting in wasted space and is uneconomical. There are drawbacks.
そこで、広い設置面積を必要とせず、単一の反応槽で
汚水を効率よく硝化一脱窒処理することができ、操作も
容易で、特に小規模な汚水の硝化一脱窒処理に適用して
有効な、汚水処理方法として、特開平1-310798号公報に
記載の方法が提案され、実験により他方式に対する優位
性が認められている。この方法は反応槽の内部に撹拌装
置と曝気装置とを併設し、撹拌装置により反応槽内の汚
水を連続的に撹拌しながら、曝気装置により間欠的に曝
気して、所要時間ごとに同一反応槽内を嫌気状態と好気
状態とに交互に切換えることにより、汚水を硝化一脱窒
処理するものである。Therefore, the wastewater can be efficiently nitrified and denitrified in a single reaction tank without requiring a large installation area, and the operation is easy. As an effective sewage treatment method, a method described in JP-A-1-310798 has been proposed, and an advantage over other methods has been recognized by experiments. In this method, a stirrer and an aeration device are installed inside the reaction tank, and while the sewage in the reaction tank is continuously stirred by the stirrer, the aeration device is intermittently aerated, and the same reaction is performed every required time. By alternately switching the inside of the tank between an anaerobic state and an aerobic state, sewage is subjected to nitrification and denitrification.
この方法の実験では、これまで、嫌気、好気は、あら
かじめ、タイマーにより設定した時間に従い、ブロワー
の運転停止、稼動を繰返すことによりサイクリックに行
ってきた。In experiments using this method, anaerobic and aerobic have been performed cyclically by repeatedly stopping and operating the blower according to a time set in advance by a timer.
(発明が解決しようとする課題) ところが、実際の汚水処理では、負荷変動により、実
質的な好気時間と嫌気時間とは、タイマーに設定時間と
大きくくい違うことがある。例えば、夜間、流入水が少
なく負荷が小さい場合は、DOが高くなりすぎ、ブロワー
を停止しても曝気槽内が無酸素状態となるまでの時間を
多く要し、結果的に嫌気時間が僅かとなって、窒素除去
の効果が低下するなどの現象がみられた。このような状
況から、実施設の汚水処理においては、流入汚水の負荷
変動に対応した制御を如何にするかに問題点のあること
が判かった。(Problems to be Solved by the Invention) However, in actual sewage treatment, the actual aerobic time and the anaerobic time may differ greatly from the set time of the timer due to load fluctuation. For example, at night, when the inflow is small and the load is small, the DO becomes too high, and even if the blower is stopped, it takes much time until the inside of the aeration tank becomes anoxic even if the blower is stopped. Thus, phenomena such as a decrease in the effect of removing nitrogen were observed. From such a situation, it has been found that there is a problem in the sewage treatment of the actual facility in how to control the load fluctuation of the inflow sewage.
本発明は、このような従来技術の問題点を解決し、汚
水を効果的に処理することができる新規な汚水処理方法
を提供しようとするものである。An object of the present invention is to solve the problems of the related art and to provide a novel sewage treatment method capable of effectively treating sewage.
(課題を解決するための手段) 本発明者は、上記問題点を解決するため、鋭意研究を
重ねた結果、間欠曝気の1サイクルにおける好気レベル
時間に対する嫌気レベル時間の比を所定の範囲とするこ
とにより、良好な処理成績が得られることを見出し、本
発明を形成するに至った。(Means for Solving the Problems) The present inventor has conducted intensive studies in order to solve the above problems, and as a result, has set the ratio of the anaerobic level time to the aerobic level time in one cycle of intermittent aeration to a predetermined range. By doing so, it was found that good processing results could be obtained, and the present invention was formed.
即ち、本発明の汚水処理方法は、単一の反応槽内にお
いて、汚水を連続的に撹拌しながら間欠的に曝気し、該
槽内を嫌気状態と好気状態とに交互に切換えることによ
り汚水を処理する方法において、間欠曝気の1サイクル
における、槽内混合液のDOが0.2mg/l以下となる嫌気レ
ベル時間Aと、同じくDOが0.5mg/l以上となる好気レベ
ル時間Bとの割合であるA/B比が0.6〜1.0の範囲内とな
るように運転することを特徴とするものである。That is, in the sewage treatment method of the present invention, in a single reaction tank, the sewage is intermittently aerated while continuously stirring the sewage, and the sewage is alternately switched between an anaerobic state and an aerobic state in the tank. In one method of intermittent aeration, the anaerobic level time A when the DO of the mixed solution in the tank is 0.2 mg / l or less and the aerobic level time B when the DO is 0.5 mg / l or more in one cycle of intermittent aeration The operation is performed such that the A / B ratio, which is the ratio, is in the range of 0.6 to 1.0.
本発明においては、間欠曝気槽に混合撹拌と酸素供給
とを行なう装置、例えば水中エアレーダを設置するとと
もに、DO計及びこれと関連して動作するタイマーを設置
し、タイマーのON,OFFにより嫌気状態、好気状態を形成
できるものとし、嫌気時にはコンプレッサーからの空気
供給を停止して撹拌のみ、好気時には混合撹拌と同時に
酸素供給が行えるようにする。In the present invention, a device for performing mixing and agitation and oxygen supply, such as an underwater air radar, is installed in an intermittent aeration tank, and a DO meter and a timer that operates in conjunction with the DO meter are installed. An aerobic state can be formed, and when anaerobic, the supply of air from the compressor is stopped and only stirring is performed. In an aerobic state, oxygen supply can be performed simultaneously with mixing and stirring.
間欠曝気方式によって、効果的な窒素除去を促す必要
条件は、曝気サイクルによって無酸素状態と好気状態で
の反応時間を適正に保持し、それを繰り返すことであ
り、1サイクルにおける好気レベル時間に対する嫌気レ
ベル時間の比が重要である。The necessary condition to promote effective nitrogen removal by the intermittent aeration method is to properly maintain the reaction time in the anoxic state and the aerobic state by the aeration cycle, and to repeat the reaction. The ratio of anaerobic level time to is important.
上記の嫌気レベル時間Aを混合液のDOが0.2mg/l以下
の時とし、好気レベル時間Bを混合液のDOが0.5mg/l以
上の時として、このA/B比とKje−N除去率、処理水中の
N0x−N濃度、T−N除去率の各関係について多くの実
験を行ってきたが、第2〜4図に示すような結果が得ら
れた。それによると、A/B比が増加する、すなわち嫌気
レベル時間が増えるにつれて硝化反応が抑制され、第3
図に示すように、Kje−N除去率が低下して行くことに
なる。一方、A/B比が小さい、すなわち嫌気時間は短く
なると脱窒反応が阻害され、第4図に示すように、処理
水中のN0x−N濃度が高くなる。また、T−N除去率を
示した第5図からみると、A/B比が小さいと、脱窒が不
十分でT−N除去率が低下し、逆にA/B比が高すぎると
硝化が不十分となり、同様にT−N除去率が減少する。Above the anaerobic level time A DO of the mixture was as in the following 0.2 mg / l, as when the aerobic level time B DO of the mixed liquid is not less than 0.5 mg / l, the A / B ratio and K je - N removal rate, in treated water
Many experiments have been performed on the relationship between the N 0x -N concentration and the TN removal rate, and the results shown in FIGS. 2 to 4 were obtained. According to this, the nitrification reaction is suppressed as the A / B ratio increases, that is, as the anaerobic level time increases,
As shown in the figure, the K je -N removal rate decreases. On the other hand, when the A / B ratio is small, that is, when the anaerobic time is short, the denitrification reaction is inhibited, and the N 0x -N concentration in the treated water increases as shown in FIG. Also, from FIG. 5 showing the TN removal rate, when the A / B ratio is small, the denitrification is insufficient and the TN removal rate decreases, and when the A / B ratio is too high, Insufficient nitrification results in similarly reduced TN removal rates.
上記のKje−N除去率、処理水中の残存N0x−N濃度及
びT−N除去率より総合的に判断すると、好気レベル時
間に対する嫌気レベル時間の比、すなわちA/B比は、0.6
〜1.0の範囲が適当であり、好気レベル時間と嫌気レベ
ル時間が等しいか、好気レベル時間の若干長いほうが良
好な結果が得られることになる。Comprehensively judging from the K je -N removal rate, the residual N 0x -N concentration in the treated water and the TN removal rate, the ratio of the anaerobic level time to the aerobic level time, that is, the A / B ratio is 0.6.
The range of ~ 1.0 is appropriate, and better results are obtained when the aerobic level time and the anaerobic level time are equal or slightly longer.
上記の曝気サイクルは、一般的な生下水の場合につい
て長短各種の時間で実験を行ったが、処理の安定性、除
去性能から120分程度が妥当と判断される。例えば、曝
気サイクル120分(曝気60分、曝気停止60分)の時、最
大DO(曝気停止直前)が2〜3mg/lになるように風量調
整を行えば、この時の酸素消費速度から、無酸素状態、
好気状態の明瞭な運転が可能である。In the above-mentioned aeration cycle, experiments were conducted for various types of general raw sewage for various lengths of time, but from the viewpoint of treatment stability and removal performance, about 120 minutes is considered appropriate. For example, when the aeration cycle is 120 minutes (aeration 60 minutes, aeration stop 60 minutes), if the air volume is adjusted so that the maximum DO (immediately before the stop of aeration) becomes 2-3 mg / l, the oxygen consumption rate at this time is Anoxic,
Clear driving in an aerobic state is possible.
(作用) 上記構成の本発明の方法では、反応槽内に連続的に流
入した汚水は、曝気、撹拌装置により連続的に撹拌され
ながら間欠的に曝気され、所定の好気状態と嫌気状態と
が繰返されることにより、硝化、脱窒や脱リン処理が効
果的に行われることになる。(Operation) In the method of the present invention having the above-described configuration, the sewage continuously flowing into the reaction tank is intermittently aerated while being continuously agitated by the aeration and agitating devices. Is repeated, nitrification, denitrification and dephosphorization are effectively performed.
(実施例) 次に、本発明の実施例を、添付した図面を参照して説
明する。(Example) Next, an example of the present invention will be described with reference to the attached drawings.
第1図は装置のフローシートを示したもので、1は反
応槽として使用する間欠曝気槽で、その内部の中央下部
には、水中エアレータ2が設置されており、コンプレッ
サCからの空気を供給すると、槽1内は好気状態とな
り、停止すると撹拌のみが行われ、槽1内は嫌気状態と
なるようになされており、空気の供給、停止は、図示を
略したDO計の所定値により動作するタイマーのON-OFFに
より行われるようになっている。そして、この反応槽1
に隣接して沈澱槽3が設けられ、反応槽1から排出され
る処理汚水を受入れ固液分離する。沈澱槽3の底部に沈
澱した汚泥4の一部は汚泥ポンプPにより返送管4aを通
って反応槽1に返送され、残余の汚泥は余剰汚泥として
排出4bされる。そして、処理水は、沈澱槽3の上部より
放流5されることになる。また、流入下水は原水貯留槽
6に入り、そこから原水供給ポンプPにより反応槽1に
連続的に供給される。FIG. 1 shows a flow sheet of the apparatus, wherein 1 is an intermittent aeration tank used as a reaction tank, and a submersible aerator 2 is installed in the lower center of the tank to supply air from a compressor C. Then, the inside of the tank 1 is in an aerobic state, and when stopped, only stirring is performed, and the inside of the tank 1 is in an anaerobic state. The supply and stop of air are performed by a predetermined value of a DO meter (not shown). It is performed by turning on and off the operating timer. And this reaction tank 1
A sedimentation tank 3 is provided adjacent to and receives treated sewage discharged from the reaction tank 1 and performs solid-liquid separation. A part of the sludge 4 settled at the bottom of the settling tank 3 is returned to the reaction tank 1 by the sludge pump P through the return pipe 4a, and the remaining sludge is discharged 4b as surplus sludge. Then, the treated water is discharged 5 from the upper part of the settling tank 3. The inflow sewage enters the raw water storage tank 6, from which it is continuously supplied to the reaction tank 1 by the raw water supply pump P.
実験は窒素除去を主目的したもので、実験に使用した
反応槽(間欠曝気槽)における実験条件は表−1のとお
りである。The experiment was performed mainly for nitrogen removal, and the experimental conditions in the reaction tank (intermittent aeration tank) used in the experiment are as shown in Table 1.
また、この実験における供試原水及び処理水の水質を
示すと表−2のとおりである。 Table 2 shows the quality of raw test water and treated water in this experiment.
この実験での反応槽1内のDOとORPの経時変化の一例
を第2図に示す。これは曝気サイクル120分(曝気60
分、停止60分)の時のものである。曝気サイクルの曝気
開始後、槽内のDOは急激に上昇し始め、曝気停止ととも
に汚泥の呼吸に伴う酸素消費により減少する。この場
合、DOが零になる時間は、DOの最大値と混合液の酸素消
費速度によって異なる。この図にみられるように、間欠
曝気プロセスでは嫌気、好気状態が時間的に交互に繰返
される。また、ORPは酸素(空気)の供給停止と連動し
て酸化還元状態の変化をよく反映している。 FIG. 2 shows an example of changes over time of DO and ORP in the reaction tank 1 in this experiment. This is an aeration cycle 120 minutes (aeration 60
Minute, stop 60 minutes). After the start of aeration in the aeration cycle, DO in the tank starts to rise sharply, and decreases due to oxygen consumption accompanying the respiration of sludge as the aeration stops. In this case, the time when DO becomes zero depends on the maximum value of DO and the oxygen consumption rate of the mixture. As shown in this figure, in the intermittent aeration process, the anaerobic and aerobic states are alternately repeated temporally. ORP also reflects changes in the oxidation-reduction state in conjunction with the supply of oxygen (air) being stopped.
この実験では、処理水のBODはそのすべてが8mg/l以下
であり、また、90%が6mg/l以下を示し、良好な処理水
質が得られた。BOD-VSS負荷でみると0.05〜0.30Kg/VSS-
Kg・日の範囲内でBOD除去率90%以上、処理水BOD6mg/l
以下が得られた。また、処理水T−Nはすべてが7mg/l
以下であり、T−N5mg/l以下の異積頻度も80%と高く、
安定した窒素除去性能が得られた。また、Kje−N除去
率も高く、特にBOD-VSS負荷が0.15Kg/VSS-Kg・日以下で
は、概ね85〜95%のKje−N除去率が安定して得られ
た。In this experiment, all of the BOD of the treated water was 8 mg / l or less, and 90% of the BOD was 6 mg / l or less, and good treated water quality was obtained. BOD-VSS load 0.05 ~ 0.30Kg / VSS-
BOD removal rate of 90% or more within the range of Kg / day, treated water BOD 6mg / l
The following was obtained: All of the treated water TN is 7 mg / l
And the frequency of heterogeneity with T-N5mg / l or less is as high as 80%
Stable nitrogen removal performance was obtained. In addition, the K je -N removal rate was high, and particularly, when the BOD-VSS load was 0.15 kg / VSS-Kg · day or less, the K je -N removal rate of about 85 to 95% was stably obtained.
上記の実験結果によれば、間欠曝気プロセスでは窒素
除去に関し、曝気条件が重要な操作因子となっているこ
とが判かる。According to the above experimental results, it is understood that in the intermittent aeration process, aeration conditions are an important operating factor for nitrogen removal.
(発明の効果) 以上説明したように、本発明方法によれば、次のよう
に優れた効果を奏するものである。(Effects of the Invention) As described above, according to the method of the present invention, the following excellent effects can be obtained.
(1) 間欠曝気の1サイクルにおける曝気レベル時間
と好気レベル時間との設定により、無酸素状態と好気状
態での反応時間が適正に保持され、その繰返しによっ
て、めりはりのついた嫌気・好気運転ができ、特に窒素
除去は高効率で安定して行える。(1) By setting the aeration level time and the aerobic level time in one cycle of intermittent aeration, the reaction time in the anoxic state and the aerobic state is properly maintained, and by repeating the cycle, the anaerobic with the swelling・ Aerobic operation is possible, and nitrogen removal can be performed with high efficiency and stability.
(2) 有機物及びSSの除去率も良好である。(2) Organic and SS removal rates are also good.
(3) 同一の反応槽で嫌気・好気を繰返して処理する
ので、広い設置面積を必要とせず、施設費が安く、特に
小規模な汚水処理に適している。(3) Since anaerobic and aerobic treatments are repeatedly performed in the same reaction tank, a large installation area is not required, facility costs are low, and the method is particularly suitable for small-scale sewage treatment.
第1図は本発明の一実施例による装置のフローシート
図、第2図は反応槽内のDO,ORPの経時変化を示した図、
第3図は1サイクルにおける好気レベル時間に対する嫌
気レベル時間の比とKje−N除去率との関係を示した
図、第4図は同処理水N0x−N濃度との関係を示した
図、第5図は同T−N除去率との関係を示した図であ
る。 1……反応槽,2……水中エアレータ,3……最終沈澱池FIG. 1 is a flow sheet diagram of an apparatus according to one embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a change over time of DO and ORP in a reaction tank,
FIG. 3 shows the relationship between the ratio of the anaerobic level time to the aerobic level time in one cycle and the K je -N removal rate, and FIG. 4 shows the relationship between the treated water N 0x -N concentration. FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the relationship with the TN removal rate. 1… Reaction tank, 2… Aerator underwater, 3… Final sedimentation basin
───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (56)参考文献 特開 平1−310798(JP,A) 特開 昭61−54296(JP,A) ────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuation of the front page (56) References JP-A-1-310798 (JP, A) JP-A-61-54296 (JP, A)
Claims (1)
撹拌しながら間欠的に曝気し、該槽内を嫌気状態と好気
状態とに交互に切換えることにより汚水を処理する方法
において、間欠曝気の1サイクルにおける、槽内混合液
のDOが0.2mg/l以下となる嫌気レベル時間Aと、同じくD
Oが0.5mg/l以上となる好気レベル時間Bとの割合である
A/B比が0.6〜1.0の範囲内となるように運転することを
特徴とする、汚水処理方法。A method for treating sewage by intermittently aerating sewage in a single reaction tank while continuously stirring the sewage and alternately switching the tank between an anaerobic state and an aerobic state. In one cycle of intermittent aeration, the anaerobic level time A at which the DO of the mixed solution in the tank becomes 0.2 mg / l or less, and D
It is the ratio with the aerobic level time B when O becomes 0.5 mg / l or more.
A sewage treatment method characterized by operating so that the A / B ratio is in the range of 0.6 to 1.0.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2331237A JP2587726B2 (en) | 1990-11-29 | 1990-11-29 | Sewage treatment method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2331237A JP2587726B2 (en) | 1990-11-29 | 1990-11-29 | Sewage treatment method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH04197497A JPH04197497A (en) | 1992-07-17 |
| JP2587726B2 true JP2587726B2 (en) | 1997-03-05 |
Family
ID=18241433
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2331237A Expired - Lifetime JP2587726B2 (en) | 1990-11-29 | 1990-11-29 | Sewage treatment method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP2587726B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3302227B2 (en) * | 1995-09-06 | 2002-07-15 | シャープ株式会社 | Wastewater treatment device and wastewater treatment method |
| US8002986B2 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2011-08-23 | Daniel R. Miklos | Apparatus and methods for control of waste treatment processes |
| US7854842B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2010-12-21 | Daniel Robert Miklos | Apparatus and methods for control of waste treatment processes |
| US7850850B2 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2010-12-14 | Daniel Robert Miklos | Apparatus and methods for control of waste treatment processes |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS6154296A (en) * | 1984-08-24 | 1986-03-18 | Suido Kiko Kk | Treatment of sewage |
| JPH01310798A (en) * | 1988-06-07 | 1989-12-14 | Kinichiro Azuma | Treatment of sewage |
-
1990
- 1990-11-29 JP JP2331237A patent/JP2587726B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH04197497A (en) | 1992-07-17 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5266200A (en) | Sequence continuous reaction in complete mix activated sludge systems | |
| US6426004B1 (en) | Continuous flow completely mixed waste water treatment method | |
| JP2587726B2 (en) | Sewage treatment method | |
| JPH07100486A (en) | Wastewater treatment method | |
| JPH1110193A (en) | Method and apparatus for nitrification denitrification reaction with carrier | |
| JP4579450B2 (en) | Operation control method of oxidation ditch | |
| JPH05154496A (en) | Controlling method for operation in anaerobic and aerobic activated sludge treating equipment | |
| KR100527172B1 (en) | A method and apparatus for nitrogenous waste water of nitrogen and sewage | |
| JP2841131B2 (en) | Activated sludge treatment method for sewage | |
| JP2971662B2 (en) | Sewage treatment method | |
| JP2668467B2 (en) | Sewage treatment method | |
| JP3293218B2 (en) | Biological nitrification denitrification treatment method | |
| JPH0615288A (en) | Sewage treatment apparatus and method therefor | |
| JPH0148834B2 (en) | ||
| JP2587726C (en) | ||
| JP2987103B2 (en) | Intermittent aeration | |
| KR100195903B1 (en) | Nitrogen and phosphorus removal method of organic wastewater and its apparatus | |
| JPS6154295A (en) | Denitrifying and dephosphorizing method of sewage | |
| JP3376905B2 (en) | Intermittent aeration activated sludge treatment equipment | |
| JPH05237495A (en) | Sewage treatment method | |
| JPH0550093A (en) | Treatment of sewage | |
| JP3634403B2 (en) | Denitrification and dephosphorization methods in oxidation ditch | |
| KR100198028B1 (en) | Nitrogen Removal Method of High Concentration Organic Sewage in Liquid Corrosion Method | |
| KR100357771B1 (en) | The advanced wastewater treatment method and equipment using the circular oxidation ditch of intermittent aeration method to improve the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus | |
| JPH04193399A (en) | Operating method of aeration stirrer of single tank type anaerobic and aerobic activated sludge method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081205 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081205 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091205 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091205 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101205 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
| EXPY | Cancellation because of completion of term |