Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP2724364B2 - Blast furnace operation method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP2724364B2 - Blast furnace operation method - Google Patents

Blast furnace operation method

Info

Publication number
JP2724364B2
JP2724364B2 JP14980888A JP14980888A JP2724364B2 JP 2724364 B2 JP2724364 B2 JP 2724364B2 JP 14980888 A JP14980888 A JP 14980888A JP 14980888 A JP14980888 A JP 14980888A JP 2724364 B2 JP2724364 B2 JP 2724364B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
furnace
operating conditions
return
stability
condition
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP14980888A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH01319615A (en
Inventor
満 木口
政明 佐藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Kawasaki Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kawasaki Steel Corp filed Critical Kawasaki Steel Corp
Priority to JP14980888A priority Critical patent/JP2724364B2/en
Publication of JPH01319615A publication Critical patent/JPH01319615A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP2724364B2 publication Critical patent/JP2724364B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21BMANUFACTURE OF IRON OR STEEL
    • C21B5/00Making pig-iron in the blast furnace
    • C21B5/006Automatically controlling the process

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture Of Iron (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 産業上の利用分野 本発明は高炉の操業方法に係り、詳しくは、高炉操業
中、炉況に異常事態が生じた時、その異常事態に対応し
て送風量の減少やコークス比の増加等のアクションを実
施した際に、この操業条件を元の操業条件に復旧させる
戻しアクションを円滑かつ自動的に行なう高炉の操業方
法に係る。
Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method of operating a blast furnace, and more particularly, to a method of operating a blast furnace, in which, when an abnormal condition occurs in the furnace condition during operation, the amount of air blown is reduced in response to the abnormal condition. The present invention relates to a method for operating a blast furnace, which smoothly and automatically performs a return action for restoring the operating conditions to the original operating conditions when an action such as an increase in the coke ratio is performed.

従来の技術 従来から、計算機によって高炉炉熱をコントロールす
る方法の一つとして、本出願人の開発に係る、所謂、Go
-Stopシステムと云われる高炉管理システムが提案実施
されている。このシステムは高炉の異常事態を検知し、
その回復に必要なアクションを提示する面では、ある程
度の効果が達成できる。しかしながら、炉熱の予測精度
が低く、異常事態の連続した場合には、連続的に必要な
アクションが提示できず、利用範囲が狭い。
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, as one method of controlling blast furnace heat by a computer, a so-called Go
A blast furnace management system called -Stop system has been proposed and implemented. This system detects abnormalities in the blast furnace,
In terms of presenting the actions necessary for the recovery, a certain effect can be achieved. However, when the accuracy of furnace heat prediction is low and abnormal situations continue, necessary actions cannot be presented continuously, and the range of use is narrow.

このため、近頃では人工知能を用いて、このシステム
に高炉操業者のノウハウを盛込んだり、炉操業に必要な
炉熱の予測精度を高めたりすることが開発されつつあっ
て、このところから、特開昭62-270708号公報や、特開
昭62-270712号公報に示される如く、計算機を用いた炉
熱制御、炉況検出システムが提案されている。前者の公
報に示すシステムは、炉熱レベルを溶銑温度、羽口なら
びにスラグの観察等の人間判断ルールによって判定する
と同時に、各種センサーからの情報によって炉熱推移を
推定し、これら炉熱レベルならびに炉熱推移をもとに炉
熱制御のアクションを出すものである。また、後者の公
報に示すシステムも同様のものであるが、スリップや吹
抜け等の診断ができるところに特徴がある。
For this reason, artificial intelligence has recently been used to incorporate the know-how of blast furnace operators into this system and to improve the accuracy of predicting the furnace heat required for furnace operation. As disclosed in JP-A-62-270708 and JP-A-62-270712, furnace heat control and furnace condition detection systems using a computer have been proposed. The system disclosed in the former publication determines the furnace heat level based on human judgment rules such as hot metal temperature, tuyere and slag observation, and at the same time, estimates the furnace heat transition based on information from various sensors, and determines the furnace heat level and furnace temperature. The action of furnace heat control is issued based on the heat transition. The system disclosed in the latter publication is similar, but is characterized in that a diagnosis such as slippage or blow-through can be made.

しかしながら、これらシステムは、いずれも現時点に
おける異常事態を検出し、この異常事態の回避を目的と
しているが、異常事態回避のために必要処理がとられる
と、その状態を元の正常操業に復旧させる必要があるの
にも拘らず、このところまでを含めた高炉操業法はいま
のところ提案も実施されていない。
However, these systems all detect an abnormal situation at the present time and aim to avoid the abnormal situation, but when necessary processing is taken to avoid the abnormal situation, the state is restored to the original normal operation. Despite the necessity, no blast furnace operation method including this has been proposed so far.

すなわち、高炉操業の異常事態は直ちに処理して回避
する必要があり、これを放置すると炉冷え等長期にわた
る炉況不調に到ることから、異常事態からの回避が主眼
とされる。また、異常事態からの回避は、過去の異常炉
況時の各種データや経験をもとにすると、ある程度判定
でき、これら過去のデータや経験に基づき従来では、高
炉操業の熟練者により、最近では人工知能を用いた計算
機処理により行なわれている。一方、異常事態の回避処
理をとると、正常状態に戻す戻し操業が必要になる。こ
の戻し操業は元来炉況の安定後徐々に行なわれるもので
あり、直ちに処理置することが必要な異常時の操業に較
べると、時間的余裕がある。このため、戻し操業は、異
常回避の操業に較べてあまり顧みられることがなかっ
た。しかし、復旧が遅れると、正常時に較べて低出銑の
状況が継続され、経済的損失は多大なものになり、大き
な問題を残している。
That is, it is necessary to immediately treat and avoid abnormal situations in the blast furnace operation, and if left untreated, a long-term inconsistency in the furnace conditions such as furnace cooling will occur. Also, avoidance from an abnormal situation can be determined to some extent based on various data and experiences at the time of abnormal furnace conditions in the past, and based on these past data and experiences, conventionally, skilled blast furnace operators have recently It is performed by computer processing using artificial intelligence. On the other hand, if an abnormal situation avoidance process is performed, a return operation to return to a normal state is required. The return operation is originally performed gradually after the furnace condition is stabilized, and has a margin in time as compared with the operation at the time of abnormality which requires immediate treatment. For this reason, the return operation was not much respected as compared with the operation for abnormal avoidance. However, if the recovery is delayed, the situation of low tapping will be continued compared to the normal time, and the economic loss will be enormous, leaving a major problem.

発明が解決しようとする課題 本発明はこれらの問題を解決することを目的とし、具
体的には、従来例の高炉操業管理システムでは、炉内の
異常に対応した操業条件を採った後、状況の安定を待っ
て元の操業条件に復旧させる戻し操業に対応できないこ
と、また、このような問題を解決するための研究、開発
が行なわれていないなどの問題を解決することを目的と
する。
Problems to be Solved by the Invention The present invention aims to solve these problems, and specifically, in a conventional blast furnace operation management system, after taking operation conditions corresponding to abnormalities in the furnace, It is an object of the present invention to solve the problem that it is impossible to cope with a return operation for restoring the original operating conditions after waiting for stability, and that research and development for solving such a problem have not been performed.

課題を解決するための手段ならびにその作用 すなわち、本発明方法は、高炉操業中、炉内の異常事
態に対応する操業条件をとったときに、この操業条件を
元の操業条件に戻す戻し操業を行なうに当り、この元の
操業条件に復旧させるコークス比の各減荷レベルにおけ
る炉熱状態、炉況の安定度ならびに直近の減荷戻しアク
ションからの経過時間に基づいてコークス比−変更ピッ
チを設定し、このピッチ毎の戻しアクションの可否を炉
熱状態ならびに炉況の安定度で判定してから、戻しアク
ションを行なって元の操業条件に復旧させることを特徴
とする。
Means for Solving the Problems and Their Actions That is, the method of the present invention performs a return operation to return the operating conditions to the original operating conditions when operating conditions corresponding to an abnormal situation in the furnace during blast furnace operation. In doing so, set the coke ratio-change pitch based on the furnace heat state at each unloading level, the stability of the furnace condition, and the elapsed time from the most recent unloading return action at the coke ratio at which the coke ratio is restored to the original operating conditions. Then, it is characterized in that whether or not the return action for each pitch is possible is determined based on the furnace heat state and the stability of the furnace condition, and then the return action is performed to restore the original operating conditions.

また、本発明方法は、高炉操業中、炉内の異常に対応
する操業条件をとったときに、この操業条件を元の操業
条件に戻す戻し操業を行なうに当り、この元の操業条件
に復旧させる送風量の各変更レベルにおける炉熱状態、
炉況の安定度、直近の風圧変化ならびに出銑バランスに
基づいて風量変化ピッチを設定し、このピッチ毎に戻し
アクションの可否を炉熱状態ならびに炉況の安定度で判
定してから、戻しアクションを行なって元の操業条件に
復旧させることを特徴とする。
Further, according to the method of the present invention, when operating conditions corresponding to abnormalities in the furnace are taken during the operation of the blast furnace, the operating conditions are restored to the original operating conditions upon returning the operating conditions to the original operating conditions. Furnace heat state at each change level of air flow to be
Based on the stability of the furnace condition, the latest wind pressure change, and the tapping balance, the air volume change pitch is set, and the feasibility of the return action is determined for each pitch based on the furnace heat state and the stability of the furnace condition, and then the return action is performed. To restore the original operating conditions.

さらに、本発明方法は、高炉操業中、炉内の異常に対
応する操業条件をとったときに、この操業条件を元の操
業条件に戻す際に、戻し操業を行なうに当り、コークス
比の各減荷レベルにおける炉熱状態、炉況の安定度なら
びに直近の減荷戻しアクションからの経過時間に基づい
て元の操業条件に復旧させるコークス比変更ピッチを設
定する一方、送風量の各変更レベルにおける炉熱状態、
炉況の安定度、直近の風圧変化ならびに出銑バランスに
基づいて元の操業条件に復旧させる風量変化ピッチを設
定し、シャフト圧力、炉頂ガス組成、溶銑温度、炉下部
の熱バランスをもとに炉熱、炉況の安定度を判定し、前
記設定範囲の中で減荷レベルの変更及び増風条件をそれ
ぞれ独立に選択して高炉操業の復旧操業を行なうことを
特徴とする。
Further, during the blast furnace operation, when operating conditions corresponding to abnormalities in the furnace are taken during the operation of the blast furnace, when returning the operating conditions to the original operating conditions, in performing the return operation, each of the coke ratios While setting the coke ratio change pitch to restore the original operating conditions based on the furnace heat state at the unloading level, the stability of the furnace condition, and the elapsed time since the last unloading action, Furnace heat state,
Based on the stability of the furnace condition, the latest wind pressure change, and the tapping balance, the air volume change pitch to restore the original operating conditions is set, and the shaft pressure, furnace gas composition, hot metal temperature, and heat balance at the bottom of the furnace are set. In addition, the heat of the furnace and the stability of the furnace condition are determined, and the change of the unloading level and the wind increasing condition are independently selected from the set ranges, and the blast furnace operation is restored.

そこで、これらの手段たる構成ならびにその作用につ
いて、更に詳しく説明すると、次に通りである。
Therefore, the configuration as these means and the operation thereof will be described in more detail as follows.

まず、本発明者等は、高炉操業において異常事態に対
するアクションをとられたときに、それの戻しアクショ
ンをシステムとして適正に決定する条件について、調査
研究し、その条件を求めたところ、次の通りであった。
First, the present inventors investigated and studied the conditions for properly determining the return action of the system when an action was taken for an abnormal situation in the blast furnace operation, and obtained the conditions as follows. Met.

(1)炉内の異常事態に対し、例えば、コークス比の減
荷や減風等のアクションがとられたときに、その後の戻
しアクションとして例えば増荷、増風が可能が否かを判
定し、その上で、戻すべきアクション量が指示できるこ
と、 (2)これらコークス比(CR)ならびに風量(BV)の戻
しのアクションは、減荷量(コークス比)や減風量に応
じて、各目標値との差をベースとし、しかも、炉熱状
態、荷下り状態、状況の安定度、出銑バランス、直近に
実施した戻しアクションやそのときからの経過時間等を
考慮したものであること、 (3)各戻しアクションは複雑にならないように、例え
ばコークス比の戻しと風量の戻しとは独立させてコント
ロールすること、 なお、上記のところで戻しアクションとして主とし、
コークス比や風量の戻しを示したが、この理由は、高炉
の異常事態に対して採られる代表的アクションが減荷、
減風であり、これら2つのアクションが高炉内部に与え
る影響が最も大きいからである。従って、本発明ではこ
れらアクション以外のアクション、例えば、送風温度、
送風湿度等の変更は副次的なものとして考慮する。
(1) In response to an abnormal situation in the furnace, for example, when an action such as reducing the load of the coke ratio or reducing the wind is taken, it is determined whether or not it is possible to increase the load or increase the wind as a subsequent return action. (2) The action of returning the coke ratio (CR) and the air volume (BV) is determined by the target value according to the unloading amount (coke ratio) and the amount of wind reduction. (3) taking into account the furnace heat state, the unloading state, the stability of the situation, the tapping balance, the most recent return action and the elapsed time since that time, ) Each return action should be controlled independently of the return of the coke ratio and the return of the air volume, for example, so as not to be complicated.
The coke ratio and the air volume were returned because the typical actions taken in the event of an abnormal blast furnace were reduced load,
This is because these two actions have the greatest effect on the inside of the blast furnace. Therefore, in the present invention, actions other than these actions, for example, blast temperature,
The change of the ventilation humidity etc. is considered as a secondary matter.

そこで、(1)、(2)ならびに(3)の条件を満足
させるように、コークス比の戻しと風量の戻しは、次に
示すように、個別かつ独立して定められて戻しアクショ
ンとして行なわれる。
Therefore, the return of the coke ratio and the return of the air volume are individually and independently determined and performed as a return action so as to satisfy the conditions (1), (2) and (3) as follows. .

すなわち、コークス比の戻しを行なう際には、どれ程
の減荷(コークス比アップ)をした状態にあるかに応
じ、炉熱状態、炉況の安定度、直近のコークス比アップ
からの経過時間、直近のコークス比ダウンからの経過時
間等を考慮し、コークス比の戻し巾を定める。なお、コ
ークス比の戻しが遅れた場合には別途戻しアクションを
定める。
That is, when returning the coke ratio, the furnace heat state, the stability of the furnace condition, and the time elapsed since the most recent increase in the coke ratio depend on how much the load has been reduced (increased coke ratio). The coke ratio return width is determined in consideration of the elapsed time from the most recent coke ratio reduction. If the return of the coke ratio is delayed, a separate return action is determined.

これに対し、風量の戻しを行なう際には、どれ程の減
風(送風量ダウン)をした状態にあるかに応じ、炉熱状
態、炉況の安定度、直近の風圧上昇の程度、出銑バラン
ス等減風要因の解消状況を考慮して、戻し操業における
増風量を決定し、この増風量にしたがって戻し操業を行
なう。
On the other hand, when returning the air flow, the furnace heat state, the stability of the furnace condition, the degree of the latest wind pressure increase, The amount of wind increase in the return operation is determined in consideration of the elimination of the wind reduction factors such as the pig balance, and the return operation is performed in accordance with the amount of increase in wind.

また、このように戻し操業をする場合には、操業安定
の確認後に行なう必要があり、このため、一定時間をと
ってから、各戻し操業をするのが好ましい。
Further, when performing the return operation in this manner, it is necessary to perform the operation after confirming the stability of the operation. Therefore, it is preferable to perform each return operation after a certain period of time.

次に、以上の通りに構成される本発明法について第1
図によって説明すると、次の通りである。
Next, the first method of the present invention configured as described above is described.
This will be described with reference to the drawings.

まず、第1図は本発明方法によって高炉操業する際の
フローシートであって、Yは“Yes"、Nは“No"を示
す。第1図に示すように、異常炉況に対して適当なアク
ションとして減荷(コークス比のアップ)あるいは減風
を行なって炉況を安定化させた。炉況安定化後、そこ
で、入力された各操業データや判定条件に基づいて戻し
操業の可否が判定され、戻し操業が可と判定されたとき
には、判定結果に基づいて、先の異常事態に対する各ア
クションに対応して減荷レベルの戻し(コークス比の戻
し)あるいは風量の戻しのいずれかのアクションの指示
が行なわれる。この戻し操業の可否は、第1図に示す通
り、炉熱状態、炉況の安定度の判定をもとに行なわれ、
可、つまり、Yesのときには、アクション項目である風
量、コークス比の別にそれぞれ菱形枠内に示される項目
を含め、戻し操業の決定が行なわれ、戻し操業で採るべ
き戻し量が設定される。また、否、つまり、Noのときに
は、現操業が継続され、可否の判定が繰返される。ま
た、戻し操業で採るべき戻し量は後記の如く区分して各
区分した戻し量についても、第1図で示すフローに従っ
て、順次、上記判定が繰返され、徐々に正常操業への復
旧がなされる。
First, FIG. 1 is a flow sheet when a blast furnace is operated by the method of the present invention, where Y indicates “Yes” and N indicates “No”. As shown in FIG. 1, the furnace condition was stabilized by reducing the load (increase the coke ratio) or reducing the wind as an appropriate action for the abnormal furnace condition. After the reactor condition stabilization, whether or not the return operation is possible is determined based on the input operation data and determination conditions.When it is determined that the return operation is possible, based on the determination result, each of the previous abnormal situations is determined. In response to the action, an instruction is given to return the unloading level (return the coke ratio) or return the air volume. Whether the return operation is possible or not is determined based on the determination of the furnace heat state and the stability of the furnace condition, as shown in FIG.
If the answer is Yes, that is, if Yes, the return operation is determined, including the items shown in the diamond-shaped frames for each of the action items of the air volume and the coke ratio, and the return amount to be taken in the return operation is set. When the result is NO, that is, when the result is NO, the current operation is continued, and the determination as to whether or not the operation is possible is repeated. In addition, the return amount to be taken in the return operation is divided as described below, and the above determinations are sequentially repeated for the respective return amounts according to the flow shown in FIG. 1 to gradually restore the normal operation. .

そこで、以上の通りに行なわれる戻し操業について、
減荷(コークス比)レベレの戻しから、順次かつ更に具
体的に説明すると、次の通りである。
So, about the return operation performed as described above,
The following is a more detailed description, sequentially and more specifically, from the return of the reduced load (coke ratio) level.

まず、戻し量としての減荷量は複数に区分し、減荷の
各区分量毎に戻しアクションの可否、つまり、“Yes"か
“No"かの判定条件を設定する。この判定条件は、第1
図に示す如く、戻し操業の可否に用いる高炉炉況を示
す、例えば、炉熱状態、炉況の安定度等の項目のほか
に、直近に実施した減荷アクションを含み、直近にとっ
た減荷アクションからの判定時までの経過時間を考慮す
る。換言すると、減荷の各区分量毎に戻しアクションを
とる場合、直近のアクションが炉況に与えた影響が安定
する状況を待って、次の戻しアクションの可否判定を行
なう。この場合、複数に区分した減荷の区分量毎に対応
するアクション指示量を設定しておき、指示量に従って
徐々に復旧させて行くもので、そのため、アクション指
示量は区分した減荷の各区分量を超えない範囲で設定し
ておくことが好ましい。また、高炉炉況を示す項目とし
ても炉熱状態は代表的なものは出銑温度、炉況の安定度
は、第1表で判定条件の一例で表示する通り、代表的に
は風圧変動、CO/CO2変動ならびにスリップ頻度であっ
て、これらをもとにして、例えば、ランク1、2、3、
4、5の如く、ランク分けして減荷レベルと対応づけを
行なう。
First, the unloading amount as the return amount is divided into a plurality of parts, and the return action is set for each of the reduced amounts, that is, a determination condition of “Yes” or “No” is set. This determination condition is the first
As shown in the figure, the blast furnace condition used to determine whether or not a return operation is possible is shown.For example, in addition to items such as the furnace heat state and the stability of the furnace condition, the most recent Consider the elapsed time from the loading action to the time of determination. In other words, when a return action is taken for each of the reduced quantities of the load, a determination is made as to whether or not the next return action is possible after waiting for a situation in which the effect of the latest action on the reactor condition has stabilized. In this case, an action instruction amount corresponding to each of the divided unloading amounts is set, and the operation is gradually restored in accordance with the instruction amount. Is preferably set within a range not exceeding. Also, as an item indicating the blast furnace condition, the furnace heat state is typically a tapping temperature, and the stability of the furnace condition is typically represented by a wind pressure fluctuation, CO / CO 2 fluctuation and slip frequency. Based on these, for example, ranks 1, 2, 3,
As shown in 4 and 5, the items are ranked and associated with the unloading level.

なお、第1表においては、A>B>Cで(kg/t−p)
で示され、Y1……Y4はA、B、C……の減荷レベルを越
えない範囲で設定し、(−kg/t−p)で示され、X1……
X4は各減荷アクションが炉況に与える影響時間を加味し
た時間(例えば6時間、10時間の如く)とする。
In Table 1, A>B> C (kg / tp)
, And Y 1 ... Y 4 are set within a range that does not exceed the unloading level of A, B, C..., And are indicated by (−kg / tp), and X 1.
X 4 is a time each decompression action in consideration of the influence time which gives the furnace status (e.g. 6 hours, as 10 hours).

また、炉熱は、第1表に示す如く、通常、判定時の
(溶銑温度−目標温度)で評価でき、炉熱の予測は炉下
部の熱バランスの変化を用いることができこれらを組合
せて用いることもできる。
Also, as shown in Table 1, the furnace heat can be usually evaluated by (hot metal temperature-target temperature) at the time of determination, and the furnace heat can be predicted by using the change in the heat balance at the bottom of the furnace. It can also be used.

また、このように炉熱の判定に用いる溶銑温度と、熱
バランスに基づいた炉熱予測とは次のように求めること
ができる。
Further, the hot metal temperature used for the determination of the furnace heat and the furnace heat prediction based on the heat balance can be obtained as follows.

溶銑温度について、 (1)出銑開始時 (1−1)前回出銑のその時の出銑を代表する溶銑温度
を今回出銑の代表溶銑温度とする。
Regarding the hot metal temperature, (1) at the start of tapping (1-1) The hot metal temperature representing the current tapping of the previous tapping is defined as the representative hotplate temperature of the current tapping.

(1−2)前回又は前々回出銑が今回出銑開始後、出銑
止めとなれば、出銑止時点で今回の代表溶銑温度と前回
又は前々回代表溶銑温度と比較し、高い方を今回の代表
溶銑温度とする。
(1-2) If the last or second-last hot metal tapping is started after the current tapping is started, then the current representative hot metal temperature at the time of tapping is compared with the previous or previous or previous representative hot metal temperature, and the higher one is the current hot metal temperature. The representative hot metal temperature is used.

(2)溶銑温度測定時 (2−1)初回出銑(過去一定時間(例えば24時間)に
その出銑口を使ったかどうか)を判断する。
(2) At the time of measuring hot metal temperature (2-1) First tapping (whether or not the tapping port has been used in the past fixed time (for example, 24 hours)) is determined.

(I)初回出銑であれば、代表溶銑温度はそのままとす
る。
(I) If it is the first tapping, the representative hot metal temperature is kept as it is.

(II)初回出銑でなければ次の処理を行なう。(II) If it is not the first tapping, perform the following processing.

(2−2)出銑開始から一定時間(例えば90分)経って
いるかを判断する。
(2-2) It is determined whether a certain time (for example, 90 minutes) has passed since the start of tapping.

(I)一定時間以上の測定値を代表溶銑温度とする。(I) The measured value over a certain time is defined as a representative hot metal temperature.

(II)一定時間以内の測定値がその時の代表溶銑温度以
上である時のみ、測定値を代表溶銑温度とする。
(II) Only when the measured value within a certain time is equal to or higher than the representative hot metal temperature at that time, the measured value is regarded as the representative hot metal temperature.

(3)判断 (3−1)ラップ出銑時(2つの出銑口から出銑)、各
出銑の代表溶銑温度で高い方を評価用溶銑温度とする。
(3) Judgment (3-1) When tapping laps (tapping from two tap holes), the higher of the representative hot metal temperatures of each tapping is set as the hot metal temperature for evaluation.

(3−2)出銑口偏差時(2つ以上の出銑口使用時) (3−2−1)[今回の代表溶銑温度−前回代表溶銑温
度]>一定値(15℃) (3−2−3)[炉熱指数(今回)−炉熱指数(前
回)]<一定値(15℃) 以上3条件が満足されれば偏差有りと判断し、偏差有
りの場合のみ 評価用溶銑温度=0.5×(今回代表温度+前回代表温
度) (3−3)その他 評価用溶銑温度=その時の代表溶銑温度 以上のように、溶銑温度を定義したデータを用いるこ
とにより、従来、バッチでしか行なわれなく、かつ、種
々の外乱を含む溶銑温度の測温結果を高炉の炉熱の状態
を判断する評価用溶銑温度に変換することが可能とな
り、このようにすると、計算機によっての炉熱の連続的
(定周期)処理ができる。
(3-2) When tap hole deviation (when two or more tap holes are used) (3-2-1) [Representative hot metal temperature-previous representative hot metal temperature]> Constant value (15 ° C) (3-2-3) [furnace heat index (current)-furnace heat index (previous)] <constant value (15 ° C) If the above three conditions are satisfied, it is determined that there is a deviation, and only when there is a deviation, it is used for evaluation. Hot metal temperature = 0.5 x (present representative temperature + previous representative temperature) (3-3) Others Hot metal temperature for evaluation = representative hot metal temperature at that time By using the data defining hot metal temperature as described above, the conventional However, it is possible to convert the hot metal temperature measurement result including various disturbances into an evaluation hot metal temperature for judging the state of the furnace heat of the blast furnace. (Constant period) processing can be performed.

炉熱の予測について 炉熱の予測は炉下部の熱バランスの変化から求め、次
のようにして行なう。
About furnace heat prediction Furnace heat prediction is obtained from changes in the heat balance at the bottom of the furnace, and is performed as follows.

(1)炉熱予測(ΔTQランク) (1−1)TQ(jo)の定義は次のように示される。(1) Furnace heat prediction (ΔTQ rank) (1-1) The definition of TQ (jo) is shown as follows.

TQ:900℃を基準にした炉下部の熱バランスである。TQ: Heat balance at the bottom of furnace based on 900 ° C.

TQ=Q1+Q2−(Q3+Q4+Q5)(103kcal/t・p) Q1:送風顕熱(900℃基準) Q2:羽口先でのコークスの燃焼熱(CO基準) Q3:送風湿分の分解熱 Q4:ソルロス反応 Q5:ステーブ抜熱(炉下部) Q1=BV′×(BT-900)×0.335(比熱Kcal/ Nm3‐air)×10-3+BV′×Moist× 10-3×(BT-900)×22.4/18×0.449 (H2O(g)の比熱×10-3 Q2=BV′×(0.21+EO2(O2富化率))× 12/11.2+BV′×Moist×10-3× 12/18)×2450(Cの燃焼熱Kcal/kg −C)×10-3 Q3=BV′×Moist×10-3×3185(分解熱 Kcal/kg H2O)×10-3 Q4=Csol×3230(ソルロス反応熱 Kcal/kg−c) Q5=ΔQ(ステーブ抜熱103Kcal/H)× 103/60/Pig(造銑スピードt/Min) C1+炉下部の抜熱割合。TQ = Q1 + Q2-(Q3 + Q4 + Q5) (10 3 kcal / tp) Q1: Sensible heat of blast (at 900 ° C) Q2: Heat of combustion of coke at the tuyere tip (based on CO) Q3: Heat of decomposition of blast moisture Q4: Sorurosu reaction Q5: staves heat extraction (furnace bottom) Q1 = BV '× (BT -900) × 0.335 ( specific heat Kcal / Nm 3 -air) × 10 -3 + BV' × Moist × 10 -3 × (BT-900) × 22.4 / 18 × 0.449 (Specific heat of H 2 O (g) × 10 -3 Q2 = BV ′ × (0.21 + EO 2 (O 2 enrichment rate)) × 12 / 11.2 + BV ′ × Moist × 10 -3 × 12 / 18) × 2450 (combustion heat of Kcal / kg-C) × 10 -3 Q3 = BV '× Moist × 10 -3 × 3185 (heat of decomposition Kcal / kg H 2 O) × 10 -3 Q4 = Csol × 3230 (Sorurosu reaction heat Kcal / kg-c) Q5 = ΔQ ( stave heat removal 10 3 Kcal / H) × 10 3/60 / Pig ( Zozuku speed t / Min) heat extraction rate of the C 1 + furnace bottom.

BV′;送風原単位(N m3/t−p(EO2含む) BT;送風温度(℃) Moist;送風湿分(g/N m3) Csol:ソルロスC(kg/t−p) (2)ΔTQ(jo)の定義は次のように示される。BV '; Unit air intensity (N m 3 / t-p (including EO 2 ) BT; Air temperature (° C) Moist; Air humidity (g / N m 3 ) Csol: Sollos C (kg / t-p) ( 2) The definition of ΔTQ (jo) is shown as follows.

ただし、jo、jo-a……;炉熱判断タイミング このように求めたΔTQの大きさを区分するこよによっ
て、炉熱を判定する指標として用いる。なお、好ましく
は、ΔTQをバラツキに応じ、さらに細分化し、炉熱予測
を行なうことで、より精度を向上させることができる。
このバラツキはRΔTQを求めることにより行なわれる。
However, jo, jo-a ...: furnace heat judgment timing By dividing the magnitude of ΔTQ obtained in this way, it is used as an index for judging furnace heat. Preferably, the accuracy can be further improved by further dividing ΔTQ according to the variation and performing furnace heat prediction.
This variation is performed by obtaining RΔTQ.

(3)RΔTQ(jo)の定義は次のように示される。(3) The definition of RΔTQ (jo) is shown as follows.

また、炉況の安定度は、上記の如く、風圧変動CO/CO2
変動、スリップ頻度等の各項目について大きさを評価
し、その組合せから安定度を検知してランク分けする
が、これは次の通りに行なう。
In addition, the stability of the reactor condition is determined by the wind pressure fluctuation CO / CO 2
The magnitude is evaluated for each item such as fluctuation, slip frequency, etc., and the stability is detected from the combination to rank the items. This is performed as follows.

例えば、(I)風圧変動 大、中、小 (II)CO/CO2変動 大、中、小 (III)スリップ頻度 大、中、小 と区分し、大、中、小の組合せをもとに安定度を予めラ
ンク分けして定めておく。
For example, (I) Wind pressure fluctuation large, medium, small (II) CO / CO 2 fluctuation large, medium, small (III) Slip frequency Classified as large, medium, small, and based on the combination of large, medium, and small The degree of stability is determined in advance by ranking.

また、直近に採ったアクションの経過時間とは、直近
に採ったアクションによって変更したコークス比の変更
部分が、炉内に残留しているかどうかを考慮するもの
で、残留なしの場合には、そのときに戻し操業を開始す
る。すなわち、コークスの場合、炉内に残留している限
り、この装入コークスの影響が炉内に反映される。従っ
て、炉熱、炉況からの判定のみでは、前回の直近に採っ
た減荷アクションによるものか区分できず、そのために
経過時間を戻し操業の判定基準にする。
In addition, the elapsed time of the most recently taken action is to consider whether or not the changed part of the coke ratio changed by the most recently taken action remains in the furnace. Sometimes return operation starts. That is, in the case of coke, as long as the coke remains in the furnace, the effect of the charged coke is reflected in the furnace. Therefore, it is not possible to classify only the judgment based on the furnace heat and the furnace condition based on the latest unloading action taken, and the elapsed time is returned to the operation criterion.

次に、風量の戻しについて具体的に説明する。 Next, the return of the air volume will be specifically described.

この場合も、上記の減荷レベル(コークス比)の戻し
と同様であって、減風のレベルを複数に区分して、各区
分毎に戻しアクション可否の判定条件を設定する。炉熱
状態、炉況の安定度は減荷レベルの戻しと同じようにし
て判定すると共に、直近の風圧上昇及びPigバランスを
もとにして戻し可否判定を行ない、減風の前記区分毎に
戻す風量を例えば第2表に示す如く、段階的に定めてお
く。
In this case as well, similar to the above-described return of the unloading level (coke ratio), the level of wind reduction is divided into a plurality of levels, and the condition for determining whether or not the return action is possible is set for each section. The furnace heat state and the stability of the furnace condition are determined in the same manner as when the unloading level is returned, and the possibility of return is determined based on the latest wind pressure increase and Pig balance, and the return is performed for each of the above categories of reduced wind. The air volume is determined stepwise, for example, as shown in Table 2.

送風流量の変更の場合、炉況には短時間で、その影響
が反映されるため、直近の風圧上昇、Pigバランスは、
直近時間の30分〜1時間の直近状況をもとに判定ができ
る。なお、アクション量(増風量)は、減風レベル毎に
設定し、増風ピッチに制約を設けて復旧操業を順調に実
現する。なお、異常からの戻し開始は直近状況の減風の
炉に対する影響を含めて行ない、風圧上昇、Pigバラン
スと同様30分〜1時間の経過時間を待って行なう。
In the case of a change in the air flow rate, the effect is reflected in the furnace condition in a short time, so the latest wind pressure rise and Pig balance
Judgment can be made based on the most recent situation of 30 minutes to 1 hour. Note that the action amount (wind increase amount) is set for each wind reduction level, and the restoration operation is smoothly implemented by providing a restriction on the wind increase pitch. In addition, the start of the recovery from the abnormality is performed including the influence of the wind reduction in the latest situation on the furnace, and is performed after an elapsed time of 30 minutes to 1 hour as in the case of the wind pressure rise and the Pig balance.

実施例 操業中に風圧が異常に上昇したために、送風量を7000
Nm3/分から6000Nm3/分まで1000Nm3/分減風した。
Example Due to an abnormal increase in wind pressure during operation,
Nm 3 / min to up to 6000Nm 3 / minute was 1000Nm 3 / minute, down wind.

その後、この減風分1000Nm3/分を増風して、送風条
件を元の状態に戻すために、この減風分ベル1000Nm3
分を100Nm3/分に区分して、本発明法によって増風し
て、第1図に示す如く、戻し操業を行なった。
Then, in order to increase the amount of the reduced wind 1000 Nm 3 / min and return the blowing condition to the original state, the reduced wind bell 1000 Nm 3 / min.
The fraction was divided into 100 Nm 3 / min, and the wind was increased by the method of the present invention, and a return operation was performed as shown in FIG.

すなわち、第1図は本発明法によって送風量の戻し操
業を行なったときの送風量の経時的推移を示すグラフで
あって、この操業を分けると、(a)、(b),(c)
ならびに(d)の各区間から成っている。
In other words, FIG. 1 is a graph showing the change over time in the amount of air blown when the operation of returning the amount of air blow is performed according to the method of the present invention. The operations are divided into (a), (b), and (c).
And each section of (d).

(a)区間:この区間は、風圧上昇のために、1000Nm3
/分の減風を行なった区間であって、減風の影響を見る
ため45分間の操業継続後判定した。すなわち、この5分
の減風操業継続後、戻し操業の可否を判定し、“可”、
つまり、“Yes"と判定されたため、次の通り、戻し操業
を開始した。
(A) Section: In this section, 1000Nm 3
/Min./min./min. That is, after the continuation of the wind reduction operation for 5 minutes, it is determined whether or not the return operation is possible.
That is, since it was determined to be “Yes”, the return operation was started as follows.

(b)区間;この区間から戻し操業を開始し、まず、風
量レベルR(=現在風量/目標風量)<0.9で判定を行
なった。
(B) Section: Return operation was started from this section, and determination was first made at an air volume level R (= current air volume / target air volume) <0.9.

炉況安定度ランクは3以下、炉熱レベルは3、直近風
圧上昇は<0.015、出銑バランスは≧−300tの戻し条件
で、戻し操業を行なった。この際の増風は、増風単位は
100Nm3/分、15分間隔、増風ピッチは300Nm3/60分とし
た。
The return operation was performed under the condition that the furnace condition stability rank was 3 or less, the furnace heat level was 3, the latest wind pressure rise was <0.015, and the tapping balance was ≧ -300 t. In this case, the unit of wind increase is
100Nm 3 / minute, 15-minute intervals, increasing wind pitch was 300Nm 3/60 minutes.

(c)区間;風量レベルR<0.95の区間であって、この
区間に達したため、R<0.95のレベルで判定を行なっ
た。
(C) Section: a section with an airflow level R <0.95, and since this section was reached, judgment was made at a level of R <0.95.

炉況安定度はランクは2以下、炉熱レベルは4、直近
風圧上昇は<0.010、出銑バランスは≧−300tの戻し条
件で戻しを行なった。この際の増風は、増風単位は100N
m3/分、15分間隔、増風ピッチは200Nm3/60分とした。
The furnace condition stability was rank 2 or less, the furnace heat level was 4, the latest wind pressure rise was <0.010, and the tapping balance was returned under the return condition of ≧ -300t. In this case, the wind increase unit is 100N
m 3 / min, 15 minutes, increasing wind pitch was 200 Nm 3/60 min.

(d)区間;この区間は風量レベルR≧0.95で判定し
た。
(D) Section: This section was determined at an air volume level R ≧ 0.95.

炉況安定度はランク1は以下、炉熱レベルは5、直近
風圧上昇は<0.010、出銑バランスは≧−300tの戻し条
件で戻し操業を行なった。この際の増風は、増風単位は
100Nm3/分、25分間隔、ピッチは200Nm3/60分とした。
The furnace condition stability was ranked 1 or lower, the furnace heat level was 5, the latest wind pressure rise was <0.010, and the tapping balance was ≧ -300 t. In this case, the unit of wind increase is
100 nm 3 / min, 25 minute intervals, the pitch was 200 Nm 3/60 min.

〈発明の効果〉 以上詳しく説明した通り、本発明方法は、高炉操業中
に生じる異常事態に対応する操業条件をとったときに、
操業条件を元の状態に復旧させる戻し操業を行なう方法
であって、コークス比の減荷レベルを、その各レベルで
の炉熱、炉況の安定度、直近の減荷アクションからの経
過時間をもとにして設定する一方、減風レベルを、その
各レベルでの炉熱、炉況の安定度、直近の風圧上昇、出
銑バランスをもとにして設定し、各レベルのアクション
の可否を炉熱ならびに炉況の安定度を判定してから復旧
操業を行なうものである。
<Effects of the Invention> As described in detail above, the method of the present invention, when operating conditions corresponding to the abnormal situation that occurs during the operation of the blast furnace,
This is a method of performing a return operation to restore the operating conditions to the original state, in which the unloading level of the coke ratio is determined by the furnace heat at each level, the stability of the furnace condition, and the elapsed time from the last unloading action. On the other hand, the wind reduction level is set based on the furnace heat at each level, the stability of the furnace condition, the latest wind pressure rise, and the tapping balance. Recovery operation is performed after judging the furnace heat and the stability of the furnace condition.

従って、本発明法は、高炉操業における減風、減荷後
の風量やコークス比等の戻しアクションを的確に定める
ようにしたため、戻しアクションに対しても高炉の操業
管理システムの適用が可能となった。
Accordingly, the method of the present invention accurately determines the return action such as the wind reduction in the blast furnace operation, the air volume after the unloading, the coke ratio, and the like, so that the operation management system of the blast furnace can be applied to the return action. Was.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

第1図は本発明方法を実施する際に用いられる操業管理
システムのフローシート、第2図は本発明方法の実施例
の一例に係る時間と風量との関係を示すグラフである。
FIG. 1 is a flow sheet of an operation management system used in carrying out the method of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a graph showing the relationship between time and air flow according to an example of the embodiment of the method of the present invention.

Claims (3)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】高炉操業中、炉内の異常事態に対応する操
業条件をとったときに、この操業条件を元の操業条件に
戻す戻し操業を行なうに当り、この元の操業条件に復旧
させるコークス比の各減荷レベルにおける炉熱状態、炉
況の安定度ならびに直近の減荷戻しアクションからの経
過時間に基づいてコークス比−変更ピッチを設定し、こ
のピッチ毎の戻しアクションの可否を炉熱状態ならびに
炉況の安定度で判定してから、戻しアクションを行なっ
て元の操業条件に復旧させることを特徴とする高炉の操
業方法。
When operating conditions corresponding to an abnormal situation in the furnace are taken during operation of the blast furnace, the operating conditions are restored to the original operating conditions, and the original operating conditions are restored. The coke ratio-change pitch is set based on the furnace heat state at each unloading level of the coke ratio, the stability of the furnace condition, and the elapsed time from the most recent unloading return action, and the furnace determines whether the return action can be performed for each pitch. A method for operating a blast furnace, characterized in that a return action is performed to restore the original operating conditions after a judgment is made based on the thermal state and the stability of the furnace condition.
【請求項2】高炉操業中、炉内の異常に対応する操業条
件をとったときに、この操業条件を元の操業条件に戻す
戻し操業を行なうに当り、この元の操業条件に復旧させ
る送風量の各変更レベルにおける炉熱状態、炉況の安定
度、直近の風圧変化ならびに出銑バランスに基づいて風
量変化ピッチを設定し、このピッチ毎の戻しアクション
の可否を炉熱状態ならびに炉況の安定度で判定してか
ら、戻しアクションを行なって元の操業条件に復旧させ
ることを特徴とする高炉の操業方法。
2. When operating conditions corresponding to an abnormality in the furnace are taken during the operation of the blast furnace, when the operating conditions are returned to the original operating conditions, a return operation to restore the original operating conditions is performed. Based on the furnace heat state at each change level of the air flow, the stability of the furnace condition, the latest wind pressure change and the tapping balance, a pitch for changing the air volume is set. A method for operating a blast furnace, comprising: performing a return action after a determination based on stability to restore the original operating conditions.
【請求項3】高炉操業中、炉内の異常に対応する操業条
件をとったときに、この操業条件を元の操業条件に戻す
際に、戻し操業を行なうに当り、コークス比の各減荷レ
ベルにおける炉熱状態、炉況の安定度ならびに直近の減
荷戻しアクションからの経過時間に基づいて元の操業条
件に復旧させるコークス比変更ピッチを設定する一方、
送風量の各変更レベルにおける炉熱状態、炉況の安定
度、直近の風圧変化ならびに出銑バランスに基づいて元
の操業条件に復旧させる風量変化ピッチを設定し、シャ
フト圧力、炉頂ガス組成、溶銑温度、炉下部の熱バラン
スをもとに炉熱、炉況の安定度を判定し、前記設定範囲
の中で減荷レベルの変更及び増風条件をそれぞれ独立に
選択して高炉操業の復旧操業を行なうことを特徴とする
高炉の操業方法。
3. During the operation of the blast furnace, when operating conditions corresponding to abnormalities in the furnace are taken, when the operating conditions are returned to the original operating conditions, when the return operation is performed, each reduction in the coke ratio is performed. While setting the coke ratio change pitch to restore the original operating conditions based on the furnace heat state at the level, the stability of the furnace condition, and the elapsed time from the last unloading action,
Based on the furnace heat state at each change level of the blown air volume, the stability of the furnace condition, the latest wind pressure change and the tapping balance, set the air volume change pitch to restore the original operating conditions, shaft pressure, furnace gas composition, Judging the furnace heat and the stability of the furnace condition based on the hot metal temperature and the heat balance in the lower part of the furnace, restoring the blast furnace operation by independently selecting the unloading level change and the wind increase condition within the set range A method of operating a blast furnace, which comprises operating the furnace.
JP14980888A 1988-06-17 1988-06-17 Blast furnace operation method Expired - Fee Related JP2724364B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP14980888A JP2724364B2 (en) 1988-06-17 1988-06-17 Blast furnace operation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP14980888A JP2724364B2 (en) 1988-06-17 1988-06-17 Blast furnace operation method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH01319615A JPH01319615A (en) 1989-12-25
JP2724364B2 true JP2724364B2 (en) 1998-03-09

Family

ID=15483163

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP14980888A Expired - Fee Related JP2724364B2 (en) 1988-06-17 1988-06-17 Blast furnace operation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2724364B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2017128805A (en) * 2016-01-19 2017-07-27 Jfeスチール株式会社 Blast furnace operation method
JP6870694B2 (en) * 2018-04-03 2021-05-12 Jfeスチール株式会社 Blast furnace condition condition determination device, blast furnace operation method, and blast furnace condition condition determination method
JP6870693B2 (en) * 2018-04-03 2021-05-12 Jfeスチール株式会社 Blast furnace condition condition determination device, blast furnace operation method, and blast furnace condition condition determination method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH01319615A (en) 1989-12-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4976780A (en) Blast furnace operation management method and apparatus
JPH049843B2 (en)
Trofimov Automated expert systems in blast-furnace process control
JP7502626B2 (en) Method for judging the condition of a blast furnace
JP2724364B2 (en) Blast furnace operation method
Agrawal et al. Advances in thermal level measurement techniques using mathematical models, statistical models and decision support systems in blast furnace
US4857106A (en) Method for controlling operation of a blast furnace
JP2696114B2 (en) Blast furnace operation management method
JP2724365B2 (en) Blast furnace operation method
JP7751188B2 (en) Action amount determination method for blast furnace operation, action amount determination program, action amount determination system, and blast furnace operation method
CN117369263A (en) Intelligent combustion control method for hot blast stove based on reinforcement learning and attention mechanism
KR100286670B1 (en) Apparatus and method for diagnosing heat level of blast furnace using expert system
JPH01136912A (en) Blast furnace furnace thermal automatic control system
JPH1180820A (en) Operation support apparatus and method when blast furnace condition is abnormal
JPH0637650B2 (en) Blast furnace blast flow control method
JP7384150B2 (en) Operation guidance method, blast furnace operation method, hot metal production method and operation guidance device
JPH01205010A (en) Blast furnace operation management and control equipment
JP2737136B2 (en) Blast furnace heat control system
JPH0637647B2 (en) Blast furnace operation management system
JPH01205008A (en) Apparatus for controlling furnace heat in blast furnace
JPH0971782A (en) Control method for operation of coke dry fire extinguishing equipment
JP2024034492A (en) Process control method, blast furnace operating method, hot metal production method, and process control device
JPH079010B2 (en) Blast furnace operation management system
JP2003201507A (en) Blast furnace heat estimation method
JPH04103703A (en) Method and device for controlling heat of blast furnace

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees