Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP2965716B2 - Piping life diagnosis - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP2965716B2 - Piping life diagnosis - Google Patents

Piping life diagnosis

Info

Publication number
JP2965716B2
JP2965716B2 JP1760991A JP1760991A JP2965716B2 JP 2965716 B2 JP2965716 B2 JP 2965716B2 JP 1760991 A JP1760991 A JP 1760991A JP 1760991 A JP1760991 A JP 1760991A JP 2965716 B2 JP2965716 B2 JP 2965716B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
pipe
stress
life
shape
hardness
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP1760991A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH04256825A (en
Inventor
關 崇 司 井
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toshiba Corp
Original Assignee
Toshiba Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toshiba Corp filed Critical Toshiba Corp
Priority to JP1760991A priority Critical patent/JP2965716B2/en
Publication of JPH04256825A publication Critical patent/JPH04256825A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP2965716B2 publication Critical patent/JP2965716B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は配管寿命診断法に係り、
特に発電プラント等の配管溶接継手部の内面形状の不連
続部を考慮して配管寿命を精度よく評価するための配管
寿命診断法に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a pipe life diagnosing method,
In particular, the present invention relates to a pipe life diagnostic method for accurately evaluating the life of a pipe in consideration of a discontinuous portion of an inner surface shape of a pipe welding joint of a power plant or the like.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】わが国の電力需要は高度成長にともない
急速に増加し、この需要に対応するように火力発電所等
の各種発電プラントはその規模を拡大しながら今日に至
っている。特に、火力発電所はその出力向上のために高
温、高圧化が進むとともに大容量化が果たされ、電力供
給において主要な役割を占めている。一方、このような
状況のもとで火力発電所の各ユニットは、原子力発電の
出力との兼ね合いや昼夜の電力需給バランスを調整する
ために長時間にわたり連続使用される等過酷な運転条件
下に置かれている。このため長時間にわたり使用される
火力発電設備の信頼度を維持向上していくために発電施
設の各設備の経年劣化対策を計画的に実施していくこと
が必要となってきている。設備の経年劣化対策のひとつ
として主要部品の劣化状態を予め判断し、部材更新時期
を適切に決定する目的で主要部品の余寿命を把握する方
法がとられている。また、火力発電設備のうち蒸気ター
ビン、ボイラー等は指針等により、その点検部位、点検
項目および点検間隔などが明記されている。一方、この
指針では運用において、対象となる汽力設備の累積運転
時間が10万時間を越えるかあるいは累積起動回数が2
500回を越える場合には対象の汽力設備の主要部位の
余寿命診断が適切に行われており、主要部位の経年数が
その診断結果を踏まえて算定された余寿命に達していな
いという条件を満たせば所定の定期検査の時期を延長す
ることができるとしている。さらに上述の余寿命診断の
実施に関しても指針があり、この指針では寿命診断の初
回実施時期、対象部位、劣化要因及び手法、余寿命診断
の方法、余寿命診断方法、余寿命診断の再実施時期、余
寿命診断結果に基づく定期点検時期変更等の種々の運用
についての要領が示されている。
2. Description of the Related Art Electric power demand in Japan is rapidly increasing with rapid growth, and various power generation plants such as thermal power plants have been expanding to meet this demand. In particular, thermal power plants have been increasing in temperature and pressure in order to increase their output, and have achieved large capacities, thus playing a major role in power supply. On the other hand, under such circumstances, each unit of the thermal power plant is subject to severe operating conditions such as continuous use over a long period of time to balance with the output of nuclear power generation and adjust the power supply and demand balance between day and night. It has been placed. Therefore, in order to maintain and improve the reliability of the thermal power generation equipment used for a long time, it is necessary to systematically implement measures for aging deterioration of each equipment of the power generation equipment. As one of measures against aging deterioration of equipment, a method of judging a deterioration state of a main part in advance and grasping a remaining life of the main part for the purpose of appropriately determining a member renewal time has been adopted. In addition, for the steam turbine, the boiler, and the like among the thermal power generation facilities, the inspection site, the inspection item, the inspection interval, and the like are specified by a guideline or the like. On the other hand, in this guideline, in operation, the cumulative operation time of the target steam equipment exceeds 100,000 hours or the cumulative
If the number exceeds 500, the remaining life of the main parts of the target steam equipment has been properly diagnosed, and the age of the main parts has not reached the remaining life calculated based on the diagnosis results. It is stated that if it is satisfied, the period of the predetermined periodic inspection can be extended. In addition, there is a guideline regarding the above-mentioned remaining life diagnosis, and in this guideline, the first time of the life diagnosis, the target part, the deterioration factor and method, the remaining life diagnosis method, the remaining life diagnosis method, the re-execution time of the remaining life diagnosis In addition, there is shown a point of various operations such as a change of a periodic inspection time based on a result of the remaining life diagnosis.

【0003】ところで、火力発電設備のうちで最も厳し
い設計条件が設定されている対象部位はボイラー設備で
はボイラー管、ボイラー管寄、ボイラー管寄管台部が、
またタービン設備ではタービン車室、タービン車軸、タ
ービン動翼が挙げられる。これらの部位の余寿命を知る
ことは特に重要であり、各部位の劣化要因に応じて種々
の余寿命診断の方法が提案されている。これらの部材の
劣化要因としてはクリープと疲労とが知られており、と
もに経過時間に依存して劣化が進行する。クリープ現象
は常に一定の応力下にような部位に現れ、部材は変形を
生じて時間の経過にともない最終的にはクリープ破断に
至る。一方、疲労現象は繰返し応力が作用するような部
位に現れやすい。
In the case of boiler equipment, boiler pipes, boiler pipes, and boiler pipe stubs are the target parts of the thermal power generation equipment where the strictest design conditions are set.
The turbine equipment includes a turbine casing, a turbine axle, and a turbine rotor blade. It is particularly important to know the remaining life of these parts, and various methods for diagnosing remaining life have been proposed according to the deterioration factors of each part. Creep and fatigue are known as factors of deterioration of these members, and both of them deteriorate depending on elapsed time. Creep phenomena always appear at such a part under a certain stress, and the member is deformed and eventually leads to creep rupture over time. On the other hand, the fatigue phenomenon is likely to appear in a portion where a repeated stress acts.

【0004】上述のクリープと疲労とに起因するクリー
プ寿命と疲労寿命とに対し、余寿命診断法がそれぞれ確
立されており、その診断方法に基づいて余寿命の判断を
することが可能である。
[0004] The remaining life diagnosis method has been established for the creep life and fatigue life caused by the above-described creep and fatigue, and it is possible to judge the remaining life based on the diagnosis method.

【0005】クリープ寿命に対する余寿命診断方法とし
ては破壊検査法、硬度測定法、組織検査法等がある。
[0005] As methods for diagnosing the remaining life with respect to the creep life, there are a destructive inspection method, a hardness measurement method, a texture inspection method and the like.

【0006】破壊検査法とは、使用材から試料を採取
し、3種類程度の応力条件下あるいは温度条件下で各々
3本の試験片を用意し、クリープ破断試験を行い、その
試験結果をもとに代表的な外挿法パラメータであるラー
ソンミラーパラメータP P=T(C+log t ) ここにT:絶対温度、C:材料定数、t :時間 を利用して外挿回帰曲線を求め、99%信頼区間の下限
線を作成して未使用材曲線と比較し、消費寿命と推定余
寿命とを算出する検査法である。
In the destructive inspection method, a sample is taken from a used material, three test pieces are prepared under approximately three kinds of stress conditions or temperature conditions, and a creep rupture test is performed. An extrapolation regression curve is calculated using the Larson Miller parameter PP = T (C + log t) where T: absolute temperature, C: material constant, and t: time. This is an inspection method in which a lower limit line of a confidence interval is created and compared with an unused material curve to calculate a consumption life and an estimated remaining life.

【0007】また硬度測定法とは部材の高温部あるいは
高応力部を選び、9点以上の位置のビッカース硬度(H
V)を測定し、9点以上の測定結果より99%信頼区間
の硬度の下限値を求め、この硬度に応じた破断応力とラ
ーソンミラーパラメータPとの外挿曲線に99%信頼区
間の下限線を作成して未使用材の同曲線と比較し、消費
寿命と推定余寿命とを算出する測定法である。
[0007] The hardness measurement method is to select a high temperature portion or a high stress portion of a member, and to measure Vickers hardness (H) at nine or more points.
V) was measured, and the lower limit of the hardness of the 99% confidence interval was determined from the measurement results of 9 or more points, and the lower limit line of the 99% confidence interval was plotted on the extrapolation curve between the rupture stress according to this hardness and the Larson Miller parameter P. This is a measurement method for calculating the consumption life and the estimated remaining life by comparing with the same curve of an unused material.

【0008】さらに組織検査法ではクリープ損傷と部材
の組織内に生じる微小な空孔の量とはAパラメータ(単
位面積中の粒界数に占めるボイドが生成した粒界の割
合)とクリープ寿命消費率とに相関があるので、空孔量
を実測することでクリープ寿命消費量を推定する方法で
ある。
Further, in the microscopic examination method, the creep damage and the amount of minute voids generated in the structure of the member are defined as the A parameter (the ratio of the grain boundaries formed by voids to the number of grain boundaries per unit area) and the creep life consumption. This is a method of estimating the creep life consumption by measuring the amount of vacancies since there is a correlation with the rate.

【0009】一方、疲労寿命に対する余寿命診断の方法
には破壊検査法、硬度測定法、解析法等がある。
On the other hand, methods for diagnosing the remaining life with respect to the fatigue life include a destructive inspection method, a hardness measuring method, and an analyzing method.

【0010】破壊検査法とは、使用材から試料を採取
し、3種類程度の応力条件下で各々3本の試験片を用意
し、低サイクル疲労試験を行い、応力振幅と亀裂発生回
数との関係図上にラーソンミラーパラメータを利用して
外挿回帰曲線を求め、99%信頼区間の下限線を作成し
て未使用材の同曲線と比較し、消費寿命と推定余寿命と
を算出する検査法である。
In the destructive inspection method, a sample is taken from a used material, three test pieces are prepared under about three kinds of stress conditions, and a low cycle fatigue test is performed. Inspection to calculate extrapolation regression curve using Larson Miller parameter on relational diagram, draw lower limit line of 99% confidence interval, compare with unused material same curve, and calculate consumption life and estimated remaining life Is the law.

【0011】硬度測定法とは部材の高温部あるいは高応
力部を選び、9点以上の位置のビッカース硬度(HV)
を測定し、9点以上の測定結果より99%信頼区間の硬
度の下限値を求め、この硬度に応じた応力振幅と亀裂発
生回数との外挿曲線に99%信頼区間の下限線を作成し
て未使用材の同曲線と比較し、消費寿命と推定余寿命と
を算出する測定法である。
[0011] The hardness measurement method is to select a high temperature part or a high stress part of a member and to measure Vickers hardness (HV) at nine or more points.
Is measured, and the lower limit value of the hardness of the 99% confidence interval is determined from the measurement results of 9 or more points, and a lower limit line of the 99% confidence interval is created on an extrapolation curve of the stress amplitude and the number of times of crack generation according to this hardness. This is a measurement method for calculating the consumption life and the estimated remaining life by comparing with the same curve of an unused material.

【0012】解析法とは運転時の変動応力と起動回数の
履歴とから解析計算を行い、その結果から余寿命を推定
する方法である。
The analysis method is a method of performing an analytical calculation from the fluctuation stress during operation and the history of the number of startups, and estimating the remaining life from the result.

【0013】このように経年劣化した火力発電設備の主
要部品の余寿命診断の方針は種々提案されているが、実
際には各配管部品の固有の余寿命診断をそれぞれ行う必
要がある。ここで例えば診断の対象をボイラーからター
ビンに至る主蒸気管、再熱蒸気管等の高温高圧蒸気管と
すると、上記方法のうち、破壊検査法、硬度測定法、組
織検査法を適用することができる。
Although various policies have been proposed for diagnosing the remaining life of the main components of the thermal power plant which have deteriorated over time, in practice, it is necessary to individually perform the diagnosing of the remaining life of each piping component. Here, for example, if the diagnosis target is a main steam pipe from a boiler to a turbine, and a high-temperature and high-pressure steam pipe such as a reheat steam pipe, the destructive inspection method, the hardness measurement method, and the tissue inspection method can be applied. it can.

【0014】[0014]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、上述の
各検査法の対象となる配管部は一般にボイラー、タービ
ン、バルブ等に接続される部品であり、この部品は定期
検査時でもごく狭い範囲しか分解して内部を点検できな
い。このためこれら高温高圧蒸気管の点検、検査は現場
で管の外面から行うのが通常であり、内部の状況を考慮
できないという問題がある。
However, the piping section to be subjected to each of the above-mentioned inspection methods is generally a part connected to a boiler, a turbine, a valve, and the like. And cannot inspect the inside. For this reason, inspection and inspection of these high-temperature and high-pressure steam pipes are usually performed on site from the outside of the pipes, and there is a problem that the internal conditions cannot be considered.

【0015】また、高温高圧蒸気管の最も損傷しやすい
部位のひとつに管溶接継手部の内面溶接部近傍の形状が
不連続な部分がある。上述の硬度測定法や組織検査法で
は直接管の内面を検査できず、管外面での検査から内部
状態を推定するしかなく、高い局部応力が生じる管内面
の形状不連続部の推定寿命を過少評価してしまうおそれ
がある。したがって、管内面の劣化状態を把握するには
破壊検査法等により配管部材から試験片を直接採取する
必要がある。しかし、管の一部から試験片を除去してし
まうので、部材強度が低下するという問題がある。そこ
で、本発明の目的は上述した従来の技術が有する問題点
を解消し、高い局部応力が生じる管内面の形状不連続部
の寿命を適正に推定するとともに、その他の因子を考慮
して配管部材の寿命診断をより高い精度で予測する配管
寿命診断方法を提供することにある。
One of the most susceptible parts of the high-temperature and high-pressure steam pipe is a discontinuous part in the vicinity of the inner weld of the pipe weld joint. The hardness measurement method and histological inspection method described above cannot directly inspect the inner surface of the pipe, and the only way is to estimate the internal state from inspection on the outer surface of the pipe, and the estimated life of the shape discontinuity on the inner surface of the pipe where high local stress occurs is too short. There is a risk of evaluation. Therefore, in order to grasp the state of deterioration of the inner surface of the pipe, it is necessary to directly collect a test piece from the pipe member by a destructive inspection method or the like. However, since the test piece is removed from a part of the tube, there is a problem that the strength of the member is reduced. Therefore, an object of the present invention is to solve the above-mentioned problems of the prior art, appropriately estimate the life of the shape discontinuous portion of the pipe inner surface where high local stress occurs, and consider other factors in the piping member. It is an object of the present invention to provide a piping life diagnosing method for predicting the life diagnosing of a pipe with higher accuracy.

【0016】[0016]

【課題を解決するための手段】上記目的を達成するため
に、本発明は管内面の測定部位の形状を計測し、この計
測結果を用いて解析形状モデルを作成して応力解析を行
い、上記部位の局部応力値を算出するとともに、管外面
の硬度測定を行い、この硬度をもとに管応力値と外挿パ
ラメータとの関係を示す外挿曲線を作成し、この外挿曲
線上に上記局部応力値をプロットして管の消費寿命を推
定するようにしたことを特徴とするものである。
In order to achieve the above object, the present invention measures the shape of a measurement site on the inner surface of a pipe, creates an analysis shape model using the measurement results, and performs stress analysis. While calculating the local stress value of the part, the hardness of the outer surface of the tube is measured, and an extrapolation curve showing the relationship between the tube stress value and the extrapolation parameter is created based on the hardness. It is characterized in that the consumption life of a pipe is estimated by plotting local stress values.

【0017】[0017]

【作用】本発明による作用を図1を参照して説明する。
図1は高温高圧状態にある配管の寿命診断の処理フロー
を示しており、この処理フローに沿って説明する。
The operation of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG.
FIG. 1 shows a processing flow of life diagnosis of a pipe in a high-temperature and high-pressure state, and will be described along this processing flow.

【0018】まず、診断の対象となる配管部位の内面の
形状寸法を測定する。この計測により管内面、特に管溶
接継手での余盛部等の内面形状の不連続部分の寸法を正
確に計測することができ、この計測結果をもとに解析計
算用の形状モデルを作成し、所定の解析条件を考慮して
応力解析計算を行う。この応力解析計算により解析モデ
ルの各部位の応力、変位等を知ることができ、併せて各
部位での応力を比較して最大局部応力を算出でき、管内
面の最大応力を高精度で求めることができる。
First, the shape and dimensions of the inner surface of a pipe portion to be diagnosed are measured. By this measurement, it is possible to accurately measure the dimensions of the inner surface of the pipe, especially the discontinuous portion of the inner surface shape such as the excess portion at the welded joint of the pipe, and create a shape model for analytical calculation based on this measurement result. The stress analysis calculation is performed in consideration of predetermined analysis conditions. With this stress analysis calculation, the stress, displacement, etc. of each part of the analysis model can be known, and at the same time, the maximum local stress can be calculated by comparing the stress at each part, and the maximum stress on the inner surface of the pipe can be obtained with high accuracy. Can be.

【0019】一方、管外面の所定測定点において硬度測
定を行い、この硬度をもとにクリープ破断強さと低サイ
クル疲労限界等の管強度特性と外挿パラメータとの関係
から管の材料劣化状態を示す外挿曲線を作成する。この
外挿曲線と未使用材料の材料強度特性を示す曲線上に上
記解析計算から求まった局部応力値をプロットし、曲線
との交点位置から管の消費寿命を算出することができ
る。
On the other hand, the hardness is measured at a predetermined measurement point on the outer surface of the pipe, and based on the hardness, the deterioration state of the material of the pipe is determined from the relation between the creep rupture strength and the pipe strength characteristics such as low cycle fatigue limit and the extrapolation parameters. Create the extrapolated curve shown. The local stress value obtained from the above analytical calculation is plotted on the extrapolation curve and a curve showing the material strength characteristics of the unused material, and the consumption life of the pipe can be calculated from the position of the intersection with the curve.

【0020】[0020]

【実施例】以下本発明による配管寿命診断法の一実施例
を添付図面を参照して説明する。
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is an exploded perspective view showing an embodiment of the present invention;

【0021】図1は高温高圧状態にある配管の寿命診断
を行う処理フローを示したものである。図1において、
本診断法は大きく4個の処理ブロックから構成されてい
る。第1ブロック100では計測・計測結果処理を行
う。すなわち配管の形状や硬度を計測し、その計測結果
データを解析処理して応力解析に使用する解析モデルを
作成したり、診断評価のための回帰曲線を算出する。
FIG. 1 shows a processing flow for performing a life diagnosis of a pipe in a high temperature and high pressure state. In FIG.
This diagnostic method is roughly composed of four processing blocks. In the first block 100, measurement and measurement result processing are performed. That is, the shape and hardness of the pipe are measured, and the measurement result data is analyzed to create an analysis model used for stress analysis or to calculate a regression curve for diagnostic evaluation.

【0022】第2ブロック200ではプラントの運転条
件の調査を行う。この調査では第3ブロック300で行
われる応力解析計算のための入力データ(運転時の配管
圧力、運転時の管内温度及び温度履歴、各部位での温度
分布)や第4ブロック400で行われる配管の寿命診断
・評価の運転条件データ(運転実績、起動停止回数、運
転時間等)を収集する。
In a second block 200, the operating conditions of the plant are investigated. In this investigation, input data for the stress analysis calculation performed in the third block 300 (piping pressure during operation, temperature and temperature history in the pipe during operation, temperature distribution in each part) and the piping performed in the fourth block 400 Collects operating condition data (operation results, number of start / stops, operation time, etc.) for life assessment / evaluation of the system.

【0023】第3ブロック300では第1ブロック10
0で作成された解析形状モデルを使用した応力解析計算
を行う。この応力解析計算はコンピュータを使用し、有
限要素法解析(FEM)等により2次元あるいは3次元
モデルを作成して行う。この際、解析形状モデルの形状
データ及び材質データは第1ブロック100及び第2ブ
ロック200であらかじめ計測あるいは設定されたもの
を使用する。応力解析は運転時圧力等の各種の設計条件
に対応した作用荷重に対する応力解析と、第2ブロック
200で行った温度分布解析により求まった熱応力によ
る熱応力解析とについて行う。
In the third block 300, the first block 10
A stress analysis calculation is performed using the analysis shape model created in step S0. This stress analysis calculation is performed by using a computer to create a two-dimensional or three-dimensional model by finite element method analysis (FEM) or the like. At this time, as the shape data and material data of the analysis shape model, those measured or set in advance in the first block 100 and the second block 200 are used. The stress analysis includes a stress analysis for an applied load corresponding to various design conditions such as an operating pressure, and a thermal stress analysis based on a thermal stress obtained by the temperature distribution analysis performed in the second block 200.

【0024】第4ブロック400では計測結果から求め
た外挿回帰曲線をもとに、第3ブロック300で算出し
た局部最大応力、運転条件データ、今後のプラント運転
計画等を加味して配管の余寿命等を推定し、評価を行
う。
In a fourth block 400, based on the extrapolated regression curve obtained from the measurement results, the local maximum stress calculated in the third block 300, operating condition data, a future plant operation plan, and the like are taken into consideration. Estimate lifetime and evaluate.

【0025】以上の評価を行い、最終的には以上のデー
タをもとに発電設備の定期検査、部材の取換え時期の計
画、決定を行うようになっている。
The above evaluation is performed, and finally, based on the above data, the periodic inspection of the power generation equipment and the planning and determination of the replacement time of the members are performed.

【0026】次に上述の第1ブロック100の計測等の
処理手順についてその詳細を説明する。火力発電設備に
おいて、ボイラーから蒸気タービンに至る管路系統には
主蒸気管、主蒸気リード管等が配置されており、これら
の管には通常シームレス管が使用されている。これらシ
ームレス管は直管、曲り管、エルボ、ティ(T)等の形
状の部材に加工され、これらを適宜組み合わせて溶接接
合し、所定形状の配管ルートを構成するようになってい
る。通常これら配管の溶接継手の形状不連続部分が損傷
の起点となるので、この部位に着目して所定を計測を行
う。
Next, the processing procedure of the first block 100, such as measurement, will be described in detail. In a thermal power plant, a main steam pipe, a main steam lead pipe, and the like are arranged in a pipeline system from a boiler to a steam turbine, and a seamless pipe is usually used for these pipes. These seamless pipes are processed into members having a shape such as a straight pipe, a bent pipe, an elbow, and a tee (T), and these are appropriately combined and welded to form a piping route having a predetermined shape. Usually, the discontinuity in the shape of the welded joint of these pipes is the starting point of the damage, so that a predetermined measurement is performed by focusing on this portion.

【0027】図2は溶接継手部の管内面形状不連続部の
形状を計測する一実施例を示したものである。この配管
1は溶接開先をとるために機械加工により管端部1aに
所定角度のテーパ2が設けられている。また、ルート3
には余盛部4が形成されている。これらテーパ2と余盛
部4とにより、溶接継手部5の管内面は凹凸のある形状
不連続部分6が形成され、応力集中が起こりやすくなっ
ている。この形状不連続部分の形状を正確に計測するた
めに本実施例ではパテ型取り法を採用している。 この
パテ型取り法について図2を用いて説明する。図2にお
いて、符号5は管溶接継手部を示しており、この溶接継
手部5の近傍の管表面には小口径座7が穿設されてい
る。この小口径座7は配管溶接継手部5を放射線検査す
るための図示しないガンマ線発生装置を挿入するために
設けられた小孔である。この小口径座7は検査後は図示
しないプラグにより密栓されている。本実施例ではこの
小口径座7を利用して管内面の形状不連続部分6の形状
計測を行っている。すなわちこの小口径座7を経由して
型取り装置8が管内に挿入されている。この型取り装置
8は形状不連続部分6のパテ型を取るための装置で、装
置先端には、図示しない電磁石が内蔵された皿状のパテ
押え9が備えられている。また、このパテ押え9の一面
には型取り用のパテ10が貼り付けられており、パテ押
え9自身はリンク機構で組み立てられ、小口径座7から
容易に挿入できるようになっている。さらにパテ押え9
にはリンク機構を自在に操作可能なワイヤ状の操作ガイ
ドフレーム11が取り付けられている。この操作ガイド
フレーム11の手元側には操作ハンドル12が接続され
ており、パテ押え9を管内面の所定位置に固着させる動
作を手元で行えるようになっている。また、パテ押え9
のパテ10の取付けられた側の反対面にはパテ押え9を
管内面に押圧するための加圧部13が設けられており、
この加圧部13は操作ガイドフレーム11の内部に延設
された送気管14に接続されている。
FIG. 2 shows an embodiment for measuring the shape of the discontinuity in the inner surface of the pipe of the welded joint. This pipe 1 is provided with a taper 2 having a predetermined angle at a pipe end 1a by machining to obtain a welding groove. Route 3
Is formed with a spare part 4. Due to the taper 2 and the excess portion 4, a shape discontinuous portion 6 having irregularities is formed on the inner surface of the pipe of the welded joint portion 5, and stress concentration is likely to occur. In order to accurately measure the shape of the shape discontinuity portion, the present embodiment employs a putty molding method. This putty molding method will be described with reference to FIG. In FIG. 2, reference numeral 5 denotes a pipe welding joint, and a small-diameter seat 7 is formed in a pipe surface near the welding joint 5. The small-diameter seat 7 is a small hole provided for inserting a gamma ray generator (not shown) for performing a radiation inspection of the pipe welding joint portion 5. After the inspection, the small-diameter seat 7 is sealed with a plug (not shown). In this embodiment, the shape measurement of the shape discontinuous portion 6 on the inner surface of the pipe is performed by using the small diameter seat 7. That is, the molding device 8 is inserted into the pipe via the small-diameter seat 7. The molding device 8 is a device for removing the putty of the shape discontinuity portion 6 and has a dish-shaped putty press 9 having a built-in electromagnet (not shown) at the end of the device. A putty 10 for molding is attached to one surface of the putty presser 9, and the putty presser 9 itself is assembled by a link mechanism so that the putty presser 9 can be easily inserted from the small-diameter seat 7. Further putty presser 9
Is mounted with a wire-shaped operation guide frame 11 that can freely operate the link mechanism. An operation handle 12 is connected to a hand side of the operation guide frame 11, so that an operation of fixing the putty presser 9 at a predetermined position on the inner surface of the tube can be performed at hand. Also, putty holder 9
A pressurizing portion 13 for pressing the putty presser 9 against the inner surface of the tube is provided on the surface opposite to the side where the putty 10 is attached,
The pressure unit 13 is connected to an air supply pipe 14 extending inside the operation guide frame 11.

【0028】次に上述の型取り装置8を使用して管内面
の形状不連続部分6の形状を計測する方法について簡単
に説明する。まず、あらかじめ小口径座7を介して図示
しないファイバースコープにより管内面の状態を観察し
て計測すべき形状不連続部分6の位置を確認する。そし
て型取り装置8を小口径座7から挿入し、操作ガイドフ
レーム11を操作ハンドル12で操作してパテ押え9を
計測位置に誘導し、パテ押え9が所定位置に達したら、
内蔵された電磁石を作動させてパテ押え9を管内面に固
着する。次いで送気管14を介して圧縮空気を加圧部1
3に送り、パテ押え9内部のパテ10を形状不連続部分
6の表面に押圧して型取りする。型取り後、パテ押え9
部分を管内部から取り出し、型取りしたパテ10を3次
元計測器等にかけ、立体形状をトレースして寸法計測す
る。そして計測された寸法をもとに有限要素法等の応力
解析のための解析形状モデルを作成する。
Next, a method of measuring the shape of the shape discontinuous portion 6 on the inner surface of the pipe by using the above-described molding device 8 will be briefly described. First, the condition of the shape discontinuous portion 6 to be measured is confirmed by observing the state of the inner surface of the tube with a fiber scope (not shown) via the small-diameter seat 7 in advance. Then, the molding device 8 is inserted from the small-diameter seat 7, the operation guide frame 11 is operated by the operation handle 12, and the putty presser 9 is guided to the measurement position, and when the putty presser 9 reaches the predetermined position,
The putty presser 9 is fixed to the inner surface of the tube by operating the built-in electromagnet. Next, compressed air is supplied to the pressurizing section 1 through the air supply pipe 14.
Then, the putty 10 inside the putty presser 9 is pressed against the surface of the shape discontinuous portion 6 to form a mold. After molding, putty holder 9
The part is taken out from the inside of the pipe, the putty put is put on a three-dimensional measuring device or the like, and the three-dimensional shape is traced to measure the dimensions. Then, an analysis shape model for stress analysis such as a finite element method is created based on the measured dimensions.

【0029】一方、管外面の硬度は内面の形状を採取し
た位置の近傍を含めるようにして所定計測位置を選定し
て試験を行う。本実施例ではビッカース硬度試験(H
V)により硬度を求める。さらにこの硬度をもとにクリ
ープ破断強さと低サイクル疲労限界等の管強度特性と外
挿パラメータとの関係から管の材料劣化状態を示す外挿
回帰曲線を作成する。この外挿回帰曲線は外挿法パラメ
ータであるラーソンミラーパラメータPを利用して求め
るが、このパラメータPは次式で表される。 P=T(C+log t ) ここにT:絶対温度、C:材料定数、t :時間 また、この外挿回帰曲線の99%信頼区間の下限線を作
成するとともに、併せて未使用材曲線も設定する。この
とき、クリープ損傷評価に対するベースとしてクリープ
破断強さ特性を考慮し、疲労損傷評価に対するベースと
して低サイクル疲労特性を考慮している。
On the other hand, the hardness of the outer surface of the tube is tested by selecting a predetermined measurement position so as to include the vicinity of the position where the shape of the inner surface is sampled. In this embodiment, the Vickers hardness test (H
The hardness is determined by V). Further, based on this hardness, an extrapolation regression curve showing the material deterioration state of the pipe is created from the relation between the extrapolation parameters and the pipe strength characteristics such as creep rupture strength and low cycle fatigue limit. The extrapolation regression curve is obtained using a Larson-Miller parameter P which is an extrapolation method parameter, and this parameter P is expressed by the following equation. P = T (C + log t) where T: absolute temperature, C: material constant, t: time In addition, a lower limit line of the 99% confidence interval of the extrapolated regression curve is created, and an unused material curve is also set. I do. At this time, creep rupture strength characteristics are considered as a base for creep damage evaluation, and low cycle fatigue characteristics are considered as a base for fatigue damage evaluation.

【0030】次に第3ブロック300の応力解析計算結
果の一例について説明する。図3は有限要素法による形
状不連続部分近傍の管応力解析結果を図出力の形式で示
したもので、各要素の応力値を比較して等応力値を結ん
だ等応力線図である。矢印で示したように形状不連続部
分6で応力集中を生じていることが分かる。この部位で
の局部応力値を第4ブロック400での診断に使用す
る。
Next, an example of the result of the stress analysis calculation of the third block 300 will be described. FIG. 3 shows the results of pipe stress analysis in the vicinity of the discontinuous shape by the finite element method in the form of a diagram output, and is an iso-stress diagram obtained by comparing stress values of respective elements and connecting iso-stress values. It can be seen that stress concentration occurs at the shape discontinuity portion 6 as indicated by the arrow. The local stress value at this location is used for diagnosis in the fourth block 400.

【0031】図4は第1ブロック100で作成した外挿
回帰曲線(実線)と未使用材曲線(破線)を示してい
る。これらの曲線に対して縦軸の応力値σをプロットし
て各部位の消費寿命を推定することができる。このと
き、σ1 は形状不連続部分6を考慮した場合の局部最大
応力を示しており、σ2 は形状不連続部分6を考慮しな
い場合の局部応力を示している。σ1 の場合の方が消費
寿命が大きく、余寿命が小さいことが分かる。この結果
から形状不連続部分6を考慮することにより部材の評価
を安全側に見積もることができ、より精度の高い配管寿
命診断が可能になる。
FIG. 4 shows an extrapolated regression curve (solid line) and an unused material curve (dashed line) created in the first block 100. The consumption life of each part can be estimated by plotting the stress value σ on the vertical axis against these curves. At this time, σ 1 indicates a local maximum stress when the shape discontinuity 6 is considered, and σ 2 indicates a local stress when the shape discontinuity 6 is not considered. It can be seen that the case of σ 1 has a longer consumption life and a shorter remaining life. From this result, by considering the shape discontinuity portion 6, the evaluation of the member can be estimated on the safe side, and more accurate pipe life diagnosis can be performed.

【0032】また、管内面の形状不連続部分6の形状を
計測するにはパテ型取り法の他、超音波肉厚測定器によ
り所定位置の肉厚を測定したり、放射線検査による溶接
形状結果とを併用したりすることも可能である。さら
に、余寿命を推定するためのデータとして熱電対を取付
け、運転起動時及び通常運転時の温度記録を計測するこ
ともできる。
In order to measure the shape of the shape discontinuous portion 6 on the inner surface of the pipe, in addition to the putty molding method, the thickness of a predetermined position is measured by an ultrasonic thickness measuring device, or the welding shape result by radiation inspection is measured. It is also possible to use together. Further, a thermocouple can be attached as data for estimating the remaining life, and the temperature records at the time of starting operation and at the time of normal operation can be measured.

【0033】[0033]

【発明の効果】以上の説明から明らかなように、本発明
によれば、管内面の形状不連続部分を直接計測し、応力
解析を行って局部応力を非破壊状態で正確に把握できる
とともに、外挿法により配管の余寿命を精度良く評価
し、配管寿命に対して適切な診断を行える等の効果を奏
する。
As is apparent from the above description, according to the present invention, it is possible to directly measure the shape discontinuity of the inner surface of the pipe and perform a stress analysis to accurately grasp the local stress in a non-destructive state. The extra life is obtained by accurately evaluating the remaining life of the pipe by the extrapolation method and performing an appropriate diagnosis on the life of the pipe.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明による配管診断方法の一実施例を示した
処理フロー図。
FIG. 1 is a processing flowchart showing one embodiment of a piping diagnosis method according to the present invention.

【図2】本発明に使用される形状測定装置の一実施例を
示した概略側面図。
FIG. 2 is a schematic side view showing one embodiment of a shape measuring device used in the present invention.

【図3】応力解析計算結果の一例を示した等応力線図。FIG. 3 is an iso-stress diagram showing an example of a stress analysis calculation result.

【図4】外挿パラメータと応力との関係を示した線図。FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a relationship between extrapolation parameters and stress.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 管 5 溶接継手部 6 形状不連続部分 8 型取り装置 100 第1ブロック(計測・計測処理ブロック) 200 第2ブロック(運転条件調査ブロック) 300 第3ブロック(応力解析計算ブロック) 400 第4ブロック(配管寿命診断評価ブロック) DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Pipe 5 Weld joint part 6 Discontinuity part 8 Modeling device 100 1st block (measurement / measurement processing block) 200 2nd block (operation condition investigation block) 300 3rd block (stress analysis calculation block) 400 4th block (Piping life diagnosis evaluation block)

Claims (1)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】管内面の測定部位の形状を計測し、この計
測結果を用いて解析形状モデルを作成して応力解析を行
い、上記部位の局部応力値を算出するとともに、管外面
の硬度測定を行い、この硬度をもとに管応力値と外挿パ
ラメータとの関係を示す外挿曲線を作成し、この外挿曲
線上に上記局部応力値をプロットして管の消費寿命を推
定するようにしたことを特徴とする配管寿命診断法。
1. A method for measuring the shape of a measured portion on the inner surface of a pipe, creating an analytical shape model using the measurement results, performing stress analysis, calculating a local stress value of the portion, and measuring the hardness of the outer surface of the pipe. Perform an extrapolation curve showing the relationship between the pipe stress value and the extrapolation parameter based on this hardness, and estimate the consumption life of the pipe by plotting the local stress value on the extrapolation curve. A pipe life diagnosis method characterized by the following.
JP1760991A 1991-02-08 1991-02-08 Piping life diagnosis Expired - Fee Related JP2965716B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1760991A JP2965716B2 (en) 1991-02-08 1991-02-08 Piping life diagnosis

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1760991A JP2965716B2 (en) 1991-02-08 1991-02-08 Piping life diagnosis

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH04256825A JPH04256825A (en) 1992-09-11
JP2965716B2 true JP2965716B2 (en) 1999-10-18

Family

ID=11948630

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP1760991A Expired - Fee Related JP2965716B2 (en) 1991-02-08 1991-02-08 Piping life diagnosis

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2965716B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003207489A (en) * 2001-11-09 2003-07-25 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Damage evaluation method and apparatus for metallic material

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6430220B2 (en) * 2014-11-18 2018-11-28 株式会社東芝 Structure life diagnosis method and structure life diagnosis apparatus
CN106769531B (en) * 2017-03-10 2019-07-30 江苏方天电力技术有限公司 A Method for Establishing the Extrapolation Function of Persistence Curve for Low Hardness P91 Pipe Fittings
CN110245391B (en) * 2019-05-28 2023-07-18 上海发电设备成套设计研究院有限责任公司 A Method of Life Prediction by Hardness Based on Artificial Neural Network
JP2025111867A (en) * 2024-01-18 2025-07-31 三菱重工業株式会社 Creep life prediction method, and creep life prediction device

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003207489A (en) * 2001-11-09 2003-07-25 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Damage evaluation method and apparatus for metallic material

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH04256825A (en) 1992-09-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2003090506A (en) Method and device to diagnose damage of boiler heat transfer pipe different material joint welding part
CN111597740B (en) A Harvester Health Monitoring Method Based on Mesoscale Ultrasonic Abnormal Narrow Band
JP2004132245A (en) Turbine inspection and diagnosis method and inspection and diagnosis device
JP2965716B2 (en) Piping life diagnosis
Garzillo et al. A technique for the residual life assessment of high temperature components based on creep-rupture testing on welded miniature specimens
JPH09195795A (en) Method and apparatus for evaluating remaining life of gas turbine stationary blade
JP6254033B2 (en) Life evaluation method and life evaluation apparatus
JPH06300667A (en) Valve rod abnormality detection method and its detection device
JPH1123776A (en) Combined diagnostic system for reactor equipment
JP2804701B2 (en) Gas turbine coating blade deterioration diagnosis method and apparatus
JPH04282455A (en) Method and apparatus for maintenance control of structure part
JP2000234986A (en) System and method for evaluating crack development
JP2003065921A (en) Structural material integrity evaluation method and program
CN108107111A (en) A kind of heat-resisting steel part nonlinear ultrasonic detection method
JP3151682B2 (en) Small bore pipe fatigue strength evaluation system
JPH075086A (en) Method for estimating superimposed damage of creep and fatigue of high temperature structural materials
JPH0875107A (en) Method for estimating life time of high temperature pressure resistant part
Viswanathan Residual life techniques for plant life extension
JPH08160035A (en) Gas turbine high temperature component life management method and apparatus
JP2627925B2 (en) Remaining life evaluation method for metallic materials
JP2002168853A (en) Method for evaluating life of metal material
Osorio et al. Long-Term Behaviour of Welded Connections Of Martensitic/Bainitic Steels and Nickel-Based Alloys Under Near-To-Service Loading
JPH08145864A (en) Method for measuring creep life consumption rate of material of high-temperature device
JPH11287888A (en) Material deterioration evaluation test method for structural materials inside furnaces
Peters et al. Case Study on the Remaining Life Analysis of a Power Generation Valve

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees