JP2986172B2 - Screening test method for semiconductor integrated circuit - Google Patents
Screening test method for semiconductor integrated circuitInfo
- Publication number
- JP2986172B2 JP2986172B2 JP2089145A JP8914590A JP2986172B2 JP 2986172 B2 JP2986172 B2 JP 2986172B2 JP 2089145 A JP2089145 A JP 2089145A JP 8914590 A JP8914590 A JP 8914590A JP 2986172 B2 JP2986172 B2 JP 2986172B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- integrated circuit
- semiconductor integrated
- evaluation area
- test method
- evaluation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Landscapes
- Tests Of Electronic Circuits (AREA)
- Testing Or Measuring Of Semiconductors Or The Like (AREA)
- Testing Of Individual Semiconductor Devices (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】 [発明の目的] (産業上の利用分野) 本発明は半導体集積回路のスクリーニング試験方法に
関し、特にMOS構造の酸化膜−Si基板界面の信頼性評価
に使用するものである。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Object of the Invention] (Field of Industrial Application) The present invention relates to a screening test method for a semiconductor integrated circuit, and more particularly to a method for evaluating the reliability of an interface between an oxide film having a MOS structure and a Si substrate. is there.
(従来の技術) 一般に電子部品の故障率は、第4図の曲線aのように
ある一つの定まった傾向を示す。これを三つの期間に分
けて、初期故障期,偶発故障期(定常期),摩耗故障期
といっている。半導体製品はこれまで経験された範囲で
は、第4図の曲線bのように偶発故障期にも故障率の漸
減現像が見られ、また摩耗期にいたる時間は通常の使用
期間よりずっと長く、特に過酷な条件での使用以外は問
題とならないため、一般に初期故障期間および偶発故障
期間が検討の対象となる。製品出荷時のスクリーニング
(良品を取り出す)の対象となるのは、故障発生率の高
い初期故障期である。通常は、バーンインとよばれるス
クリーニング法が広く行なわれている。バーンインは通
常150℃程度の一定温度の雰囲気で連続的に動作試験を
行う方法である。具体的にはMOS型半導体装置等の製品
本体に対して、故障要因を加速する温度あるいは電圧条
件で動作させて、初期不良を強制的に発生させ、スクリ
ーニングする。(Prior Art) Generally, the failure rate of an electronic component shows a certain fixed tendency as shown by a curve a in FIG. This is divided into three periods, called an initial failure period, a random failure period (stationary period), and a wear failure period. In the range experienced so far, the failure rate gradually decreases during the accidental failure period as shown by the curve b in FIG. 4, and the time to the abrasion period is much longer than the normal use period. Since there is no problem except for use under severe conditions, the initial failure period and the random failure period are generally considered. The target of screening (excluding non-defective products) at the time of product shipment is the early failure period when the failure rate is high. Usually, a screening method called burn-in is widely used. Burn-in is a method of continuously performing an operation test in an atmosphere at a constant temperature of about 150 ° C. Specifically, a product body such as a MOS semiconductor device is operated at a temperature or voltage condition that accelerates a failure factor to forcibly generate an initial failure and perform screening.
(発明が解決しようとする課題) 初期不良の項目としては、MOS構造の酸化膜破壊、あ
るいは酸化膜中の電荷に基づく不安定性によるスレッシ
ョルド電圧などの特性変動があり、高信頼性のスクリー
ニング試験をするのに当該温度、電圧に対して初期故障
期を超える充分な時間が求められている。しかしながら
スクリーニング試験時間が長すぎると一種の破壊テスト
となり、故障率の低い偶発故障期をテストによって食い
つくすことになり、メモリーなどの比較的単純な動作タ
イミングの集積回路でも適切な時間条件の設定は難かし
い。(Problems to be solved by the invention) Items of initial failure include oxide film destruction of the MOS structure and characteristic fluctuations such as threshold voltage due to instability based on charges in the oxide film. In order to do so, a sufficient time for the temperature and voltage to exceed the initial failure period is required. However, if the screening test time is too long, it will be a kind of destructive test, and the random failure period with a low failure rate will be eaten by the test, and even for integrated circuits with relatively simple operation timing such as memory, setting appropriate time conditions is not possible. Difficult.
またCPUあるいはランダムロジックにおいては、集積
回路中の各MOS構造が集積回路の動作中に、実際どれだ
けの時間電界がかかるかは場合によって異なっている
為、必要なスクリーニング時間が各MOS構造に対して同
一に設定しにくい。各MOS構造に対して充分な時間をか
けた場合、ある特定回路のMOS構造は他のMOS構造より非
常に長いストレス時間を受け、スクリーニング試験では
なく、かえって摩耗期まで入る破壊テストになってい
る。現状では一番ストレス時間が長いMOS構造を仮定し
て、それに合せたスクリーニング動作時間を設定してい
る。したがって各MOS構造に対して初期不良をスクリー
ニングしてるとは言えず、長時間化する傾向にあった。Also, in CPUs or random logic, the actual screening time required for each MOS structure in an integrated circuit during the operation of the integrated circuit differs depending on the case. It is difficult to set the same. If sufficient time is given to each MOS structure, the MOS structure of one specific circuit will undergo much longer stress time than the other MOS structure, and it is not a screening test, but rather a destructive test that enters the wear phase. . At present, a MOS structure having the longest stress time is assumed, and the screening operation time is set according to the MOS structure. Therefore, it cannot be said that screening for initial failure is performed for each MOS structure, and the time tends to be longer.
一方、当然の事ながらバーンインの様なスクリーニン
グ試験は、炉、集積回路動作電源などの設備も必要とす
る為、メモリーに於いてもコストアップを招き、問題と
なっていた。On the other hand, naturally, a screening test such as burn-in also requires facilities such as a furnace and an integrated circuit operating power supply.
本発明は、初期不良品を除去するために行なわれるス
クリーニング手法において、本体集積回路を劣化に導く
ストレスを与える事なくスクリーニングを行うことが目
的である。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to provide a screening method for removing an initial defective product, which performs screening without giving a stress leading to deterioration of the main body integrated circuit.
[発明の構成] (課題を解決するための手段と作用) 本発明は、 (1) 半導体集積回路を試験するために、半導体ウエ
ハ上に前記半導体集積回路といっしょに少なくとも一部
がMOS構造を有する評価領域を設け、この評価領域のみ
に放射線あるいは紫外線を照射し、かつその後1MV/cm以
上の電界を1秒以上与え、前記評価領域のMOS構造に含
まれるゲート酸化膜のリーク電流が2桁以上変化した評
価領域に隣接する半導体集積回路を不良と見なすことに
より、前記半導体集積回路の信頼性を予測することを特
徴とする半導体集積回路のスクリーニング試験方法であ
る。[Structure of the Invention] (Means and Action for Solving the Problems) The present invention provides: (1) In order to test a semiconductor integrated circuit, at least a part thereof has a MOS structure on a semiconductor wafer together with the semiconductor integrated circuit. A radiation or ultraviolet ray is applied only to this evaluation area, and then an electric field of 1 MV / cm or more is applied for 1 second or more, and the leakage current of the gate oxide film included in the MOS structure of the evaluation area is two digits. A screening test method for a semiconductor integrated circuit characterized by predicting the reliability of the semiconductor integrated circuit by regarding the semiconductor integrated circuit adjacent to the changed evaluation area as defective.
また本発明は、 (2) 半導体集積回路を試験するために、半導体ウエ
ハ上の前記半導体集積回路に隣接して設けられ、少なく
とも一部がMOS構造の評価領域のみを50℃以上に加熱
し、かつ同時に1MV/cm以上の電界を1秒以上与え、前記
評価領域のMOS構造に含まれるゲート酸化膜のリーク電
流が2桁以上変化した評価領域に隣接する半導体集積回
路を不良と見なすことにより、前記半導体集積回路の信
頼性を予測することを特徴とする半導体集積回路のスク
リーニング試験方法である。Further, the present invention provides: (2) for testing a semiconductor integrated circuit, the semiconductor integrated circuit is provided adjacent to the semiconductor integrated circuit on a semiconductor wafer, and at least a part thereof is heated only to an evaluation region of a MOS structure to 50 ° C. or more; At the same time, an electric field of 1 MV / cm or more is applied for 1 second or more, and a semiconductor integrated circuit adjacent to the evaluation area where the leakage current of the gate oxide film included in the MOS structure of the evaluation area has changed by two digits or more is regarded as defective. A screening test method for a semiconductor integrated circuit, wherein reliability of the semiconductor integrated circuit is predicted.
また本発明は、 (3) 前記評価領域を半導体集積回路と一部同一構造
に形成し、かつ該評価領域を半導体集積回路の通常動作
電源電圧以上で1分以上連続動作させ、不良となった評
価領域に近接した半導体集積回路を不良と見なすことを
特徴とする請求項(1)または(2)に記載の半導体集
積回路のスクリーニング試験方法。Further, according to the present invention, (3) the evaluation region is partially formed to have the same structure as the semiconductor integrated circuit, and the evaluation region is continuously operated for 1 minute or more at a normal operating power supply voltage or higher of the semiconductor integrated circuit, resulting in a failure. 3. The screening test method for a semiconductor integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the semiconductor integrated circuit close to the evaluation area is regarded as defective.
また本発明は、 (4) 前記加熱には、レーザまたはハロゲンランプま
たは赤外線ランプを用いることを特徴とする請求項
(2)に記載の半導体集積回路のスクリーニング試験方
法。(4) The screening test method for a semiconductor integrated circuit according to (2), wherein: (4) a laser, a halogen lamp, or an infrared lamp is used for the heating.
即ち本発明は、MOS構造等の半導体集積回路をスクリ
ーニング試験する際に、ウエハ上に本体集積回路と同時
に製造され、一部がMOS構造の評価領域(Test Element
Group略してTEG)を設け、この評価領域のみに放射線あ
るいは紫外線を照射して評価部を加速的に劣化させ、か
つその後1MV/cm以上の電界を1秒以上与え、上記評価領
域のMOS構造に含まれるゲート酸化膜のリーク電流が2
桁以上変化した評価領域に隣接する半導体集積回路を不
良と見なすことにより、半導体集積回路の電界ストレス
による信頼性を予測するものである。これによって、本
体の半導体集積回路に対しては電気的ストレスを与える
ことなく、電界ストレスに対する信頼性を予測できる。
また本発明は、MOS構造等の半導体集積回路をバーンイ
ンによってスクリーニング試験する際に、半導体集積回
路に近接して形成された評価デバイスのみを50℃以上に
加熱し、かつ同時に1MV/cm以上の電界を1秒以上与えて
上記評価領域のMOS構造に含まれるゲート酸化膜のリー
ク電流が2桁以上変化した評価領域に隣接する半導体集
積回路を不良と見なすことにより、本体の半導体集積回
路に余分な負担を与えず、良好な試験結果が得られるよ
うにしたものである。That is, in the present invention, when performing a screening test on a semiconductor integrated circuit having a MOS structure or the like, a semiconductor integrated circuit is manufactured on a wafer at the same time as a main body integrated circuit, and a part of the evaluation region (Test Element) of the MOS structure is used.
Group is abbreviated as TEG), radiation or ultraviolet rays are applied only to this evaluation area to accelerate the deterioration of the evaluation section, and then an electric field of 1 MV / cm or more is applied for 1 second or more, and the MOS structure in the evaluation area is applied to the evaluation area. Leakage current of the included gate oxide film is 2
The reliability of the semiconductor integrated circuit due to the electric field stress is predicted by regarding the semiconductor integrated circuit adjacent to the evaluation area that has changed by an order of magnitude or more as defective. This makes it possible to predict the reliability with respect to electric field stress without applying electric stress to the semiconductor integrated circuit of the main body.
Also, the present invention provides a method for screening a semiconductor integrated circuit having a MOS structure or the like by performing a burn-in test by heating only an evaluation device formed in close proximity to the semiconductor integrated circuit to 50 ° C. or more, and simultaneously, applying an electric field of 1 MV / cm or more. And the leakage current of the gate oxide film included in the MOS structure of the evaluation area is considered as defective by giving it for 1 second or more. Good test results can be obtained without burden.
(実施例) 本発明の第1例は、(イ)半導体ウエハ上に本体集積
回路といっしょに評価領域(TEG)を設け、この評価領
域のみに放射線あるいは紫外線を照射しかつ電界ストレ
スを与えて前記評価領域の電気特性の変動を評価するこ
とにより、前記集積回路の信頼性を予測することであ
る。(Embodiment) A first embodiment of the present invention is to provide (a) an evaluation area (TEG) provided together with a main body integrated circuit on a semiconductor wafer, and irradiating only this evaluation area with radiation or ultraviolet rays and applying an electric field stress. Estimating the reliability of the integrated circuit by evaluating a change in the electrical characteristics of the evaluation area.
第1図は上記(イ)項を実現する一手段で、1はUV
(紫外線)ランプ,2は半導体ウエハ,3は本体IC(集積回
路)が形成されるチップ領域,4はその本体ICといっしょ
に形成された評価領域(TEG)である。ここで評価領域
4,…のみは露出され、他(本体IC等)は紫外線が照射さ
れないようにカバーされている。FIG. 1 shows one means of realizing the above item (a).
An (ultraviolet) lamp, 2 is a semiconductor wafer, 3 is a chip area where a main body IC (integrated circuit) is formed, and 4 is an evaluation area (TEG) formed together with the main body IC. Evaluation area here
Only... Are exposed, and others (such as the main body IC) are covered so as not to be irradiated with ultraviolet rays.
第2図は評価領域4の構造例を、第3図はその製造工
程例を示す。領域は第1ゲート、領域は第2ゲー
ト、領域は第1ゲートと第2ゲートの重なり部に対応
するゲート酸化膜の信頼性を評価する部分である。FIG. 2 shows an example of the structure of the evaluation region 4, and FIG. 3 shows an example of the manufacturing process. The region is the first gate, the region is the second gate, and the region is a portion for evaluating the reliability of the gate oxide film corresponding to the overlapping portion of the first gate and the second gate.
製造工程は、第3図(a)のように半導体基板41上
に、フィールド酸化膜42と200Åの第1ゲート酸化膜43
を形成した。次に第3図(b)の如く第1ポリシリコン
層44を堆積形成後、その上にレジスト膜45を形成し、こ
れを写真食刻法でパターニングした。次に第3図(c)
のようにレジスト45をマスクにポリシリコン層44をエッ
チング除去した。次に第3図(d)のようにレジスト除
去後、第3図(e)のように第1ゲート酸化膜46を形成
した。次に第3図(f)のように第2ゲートポリシリコ
ン層47を積層形成し、パターニングした。その後CVD層4
8を堆積し、Al配線49を施こし、第2図で示されるよう
な3種類のMOS構造を形成した。In the manufacturing process, a field oxide film 42 and a 200 ° first gate oxide film 43 are formed on a semiconductor substrate 41 as shown in FIG.
Was formed. Next, as shown in FIG. 3 (b), after depositing and forming a first polysilicon layer 44, a resist film 45 was formed thereon, and this was patterned by photolithography. Next, FIG. 3 (c)
As described above, the polysilicon layer 44 was removed by etching using the resist 45 as a mask. Next, after removing the resist as shown in FIG. 3 (d), a first gate oxide film 46 was formed as shown in FIG. 3 (e). Next, as shown in FIG. 3 (f), a second gate polysilicon layer 47 was formed by lamination and patterned. Then CVD layer 4
8 was deposited and Al wiring 49 was applied to form three types of MOS structures as shown in FIG.
本発明の実施例として、デザインルール(1.2μm)
と、総素子数(25万個/チップレベル)のほぼ同じ、し
かも2層ポリシリコンゲート構造を有するMOSメモリー
を製作した。またチップの一部に第2図で示されるのと
同じ評価領域を有するものと、本体と同じ構造を有しか
つ素子数が1万個の評価領域を有するものを形成した。
これらのチップに対して、様々なスクリーニング法を適
用して本発明の有効性を検証した。As an embodiment of the present invention, a design rule (1.2 μm)
A MOS memory having almost the same total number of elements (250,000 devices / chip level) and having a two-layer polysilicon gate structure was manufactured. A chip having a part of the chip having the same evaluation area as that shown in FIG. 2 and a chip having the same structure as the main body and having an evaluation area of 10,000 elements were formed.
The effectiveness of the present invention was verified by applying various screening methods to these chips.
まず従来法として、ダイソート後良品を組み立て、12
5℃、6V電源(通常使用条件5V)で128時間動作させ、再
度メモリー動作テストを行なって良品をスクリーニング
した。First, as a conventional method, a good product is assembled after die sorting, and 12
The device was operated for 128 hours at 5 ° C. and 6V power supply (normal operating condition: 5V), and a memory operation test was performed again to screen non-defective products.
次に本発明の実施例(本発明1という)として、ウエ
ーハ状態でダイソート後、第1図の評価領域4以外を3
μmのレジストで覆い、露出している評価領域にUV光を
200mw/cm2、10秒間照射した。その後レジストを除去し
てダイソート良品を組み立てる。各評価領域4内のキャ
パシタ構造に6Vの電圧をかけた状態で125℃の温度に64
時間放置して、リーク電流が増大している素子は不良と
みなしてスクリーニングした。Next, as an embodiment of the present invention (referred to as present invention 1), after die-sorting in a wafer state, the area other than the evaluation area 4 in FIG.
Cover with a μm resist and apply UV light to the exposed evaluation area
Irradiation was performed at 200 mw / cm 2 for 10 seconds. After that, the resist is removed and a good die sort product is assembled. When a voltage of 6 V is applied to the capacitor structure in each evaluation area 4, a temperature of 125 ° C.
After leaving for a while, the element in which the leak current was increased was regarded as defective and screened.
また他の方法(本発明2という)として、上記紫外線
照射後、ウエーハ状態のまま、同評価領域のみレーザ光
によって50℃加熱している状態で、多点プローブを開い
て6Vでキャパシタ(第2図参照)のリーク電流を評価し
た。しかしてウエーハ状態で本体メモリー動作テストを
行なった上で、かつ評価部動作の変動のない良品のみ組
み立てを行なった。ただし上記評価部動作の判断基準と
しては、キャパシタ部に1MV/cm以上の電界を少くとも1
秒以上かけ、ゲート酸化膜のリーク電流が2桁以上変化
するか否かとするか、または評価領域を本体集積回路の
通常動作電圧以上(ここでは6V)で少くとも2分以上連
続動作させ、動作に異常がないことを判断基準とした。
前記良品の組み立て後、再度メモリー動作テストを行な
ってスクリーニングする。As another method (referred to as Invention 2), a multipoint probe is opened and a capacitor (6th volt) is opened at a temperature of 50 ° C. with laser light only in the same evaluation region in a wafer state after the above-mentioned ultraviolet irradiation. (See the figure). Then, after a memory operation test of the main body was performed in a wafer state, a non-defective product having no change in the operation of the evaluation section was assembled. However, as a criterion for the operation of the evaluation section, an electric field of 1 MV / cm or more should be applied to the capacitor section for at least one.
It takes at least two seconds to determine whether the leakage current of the gate oxide film changes by two digits or more, or by operating the evaluation region continuously for at least two minutes or more at the normal operating voltage of the main integrated circuit (here, 6 V). No abnormality was used as a criterion.
After assembling the non-defective product, a memory operation test is performed again to perform screening.
以上の従来のバーンイン法、本発明1方式、本発明2
方式のスクリーニングされた良品各10000個について500
0時間動作後の故障率を調査したところ、いずれのスク
リーニング法においても、1個以下の不良であった。そ
れに対して全く初期特性のみのチェックで、上記バーン
イン他のスクリーニングを行なっていない場合には、20
個以上の不良が発生した。The above conventional burn-in method, the present invention 1 method, the present invention 2
500 for each 10,000 good products screened by the method
When the failure rate after 0-hour operation was investigated, no more than one defect was found in any of the screening methods. On the other hand, if only the initial characteristics are checked and the above-mentioned burn-in or other screening is not performed, 20
More than one defect occurred.
本発明によって、従来とバーンインに対応するスクリ
ーニング法が開発され、しかも評価領域のみに対してだ
け電気的ストレスを与え、本体に対して電気的なストレ
スを与えないことから、従来技術の問題点であった「ス
クリーニングが一種の破壊テストになっている」点が回
避された。更に本体を用いないことから、当然、本体が
メモリーであろうとランダムロジックであろうと同様の
スクリーニング効果が期待される。更に本発明1では、
単純な直流的なストレスを与えればよく、装置コストの
低減化がはかれる。また本発明2では、ウエーハ状態で
スクリーニングすることにより組み立てコストが高価な
場合にはコスト低減となる。According to the present invention, a screening method corresponding to the prior art and burn-in has been developed, and furthermore, an electric stress is applied only to the evaluation region only and no electric stress is applied to the main body. The point that "screening is a kind of destructive test" was avoided. Further, since the main body is not used, the same screening effect can be expected regardless of whether the main body is a memory or a random logic. Further, in the present invention 1,
It is sufficient to apply a simple DC stress, so that the cost of the apparatus can be reduced. According to the second aspect of the present invention, screening is performed in a wafer state, thereby reducing the cost when the assembly cost is high.
なお本発明は上記実施例のみに限られず種々の応用が
可能である。例えば実施例では紫外線を用いてストレス
加速を行なったが、高エネルギーの放射線を用いても同
様な結果が得られた。The present invention is not limited to the above embodiment, but can be applied to various applications. For example, in the example, stress acceleration was performed using ultraviolet rays, but similar results were obtained using high-energy radiation.
[発明の効果] 以上説明した如く本発明によれば、評価領域にのみか
つ短時間試験のためのストレスを与えるものであるか
ら、製品の信頼性向上、コスト低減化が可能となるもの
である。[Effects of the Invention] As described above, according to the present invention, stress for a short-time test is applied only to the evaluation area, so that it is possible to improve product reliability and reduce costs. .
第1図は本発明の一実施例の説明図、第2図はその一部
構成図、第3図はその製造工程図、第4図は製品の故障
発生率−経過時間を示す特性図である。 1……紫外線ランプ、2……ウエーハ、3……チップ領
域、4……評価領域(TEG)、41……半導体基板、42…
…フィールド酸化膜、43,46……ゲート酸化膜、44……
第1ゲートポリシリコン層、47……第2ゲートポリシリ
コン層、49……Al配線。FIG. 1 is an explanatory view of one embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 2 is a partial configuration diagram thereof, FIG. 3 is a manufacturing process diagram thereof, and FIG. 4 is a characteristic diagram showing a product failure rate-elapsed time. is there. DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... UV lamp, 2 ... Wafer, 3 ... Chip area, 4 ... Evaluation area (TEG), 41 ... Semiconductor substrate, 42 ...
… Field oxide film, 43,46 …… Gate oxide film, 44 ……
First gate polysilicon layer, 47... Second gate polysilicon layer, 49... Al wiring.
Claims (4)
ウエハ上に前記半導体集積回路といっしょに少なくとも
一部がMOS構造を有する評価領域を設け、この評価領域
のみに放射線あるいは紫外線を照射し、かつその後1MV/
cm以上の電界を1秒以上与え、前記評価領域のMOS構造
に含まれるゲート酸化膜のリーク電流が2桁以上変化し
た評価領域に隣接する半導体集積回路を不良と見なすこ
とにより、前記半導体集積回路の信頼性を予測すること
を特徴とする半導体集積回路のスクリーニング試験方
法。1. A test area for testing a semiconductor integrated circuit, wherein at least a part of the evaluation area having a MOS structure is provided on a semiconductor wafer together with the semiconductor integrated circuit, and only this evaluation area is irradiated with radiation or ultraviolet light. And then 1MV /
by applying an electric field of at least 1 cm to the semiconductor integrated circuit adjacent to the evaluation area in which the leakage current of the gate oxide film included in the MOS structure of the evaluation area has changed by two digits or more, A screening test method for a semiconductor integrated circuit, which predicts reliability of a semiconductor integrated circuit.
ウエハ上の前記半導体集積回路に隣接して設けられ、少
なくとも一部がMOS構造の評価領域のみを50℃以上に加
熱し、かつ同時に1MV/cm以上の電界を1秒以上与え、前
記評価領域のMOS構造に含まれるゲート酸化膜のリーク
電流が2桁以上変化した評価領域に隣接する半導体集積
回路を不良と見なすことにより、前記半導体集積回路の
信頼性を予測することを特徴とする半導体集積回路のス
クリーニング試験方法。2. A semiconductor integrated circuit for testing a semiconductor integrated circuit, the semiconductor integrated circuit being provided adjacent to the semiconductor integrated circuit on a semiconductor wafer, at least partially heating only an evaluation region of a MOS structure to 50 ° C. or higher, and at the same time, 1 MV. The semiconductor integrated circuit adjacent to the evaluation area where the leakage current of the gate oxide film included in the MOS structure of the evaluation area has changed by two digits or more is regarded as defective by applying an electric field of at least / cm or more for 1 second or more. A screening test method for a semiconductor integrated circuit, comprising predicting circuit reliability.
構造に形成し、かつ該評価領域を半導体集積回路の通常
動作電源電圧以上で1分以上連続動作させ、不良となっ
た評価領域に近接した半導体集積回路を不良と見なすこ
とを特徴とする請求項(1)または(2)に記載の半導
体集積回路のスクリーニング試験方法。3. The evaluation area is formed to have a partly the same structure as the semiconductor integrated circuit, and the evaluation area is continuously operated for one minute or more at a normal operating power supply voltage or higher of the semiconductor integrated circuit. 3. The screening test method for a semiconductor integrated circuit according to claim 1, wherein the adjacent semiconductor integrated circuit is regarded as defective.
プまたは赤外線ランプを用いることを特徴とする請求項
(2)に記載の半導体集積回路のスクリーニング試験方
法。4. The screening test method for a semiconductor integrated circuit according to claim 2, wherein a laser, a halogen lamp, or an infrared lamp is used for the heating.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2089145A JP2986172B2 (en) | 1990-04-05 | 1990-04-05 | Screening test method for semiconductor integrated circuit |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2089145A JP2986172B2 (en) | 1990-04-05 | 1990-04-05 | Screening test method for semiconductor integrated circuit |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH03288459A JPH03288459A (en) | 1991-12-18 |
| JP2986172B2 true JP2986172B2 (en) | 1999-12-06 |
Family
ID=13962702
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2089145A Expired - Fee Related JP2986172B2 (en) | 1990-04-05 | 1990-04-05 | Screening test method for semiconductor integrated circuit |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP2986172B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US10634797B2 (en) * | 2017-07-07 | 2020-04-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Real time X-ray dosimeter using diodes with variable thickness degrader |
-
1990
- 1990-04-05 JP JP2089145A patent/JP2986172B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH03288459A (en) | 1991-12-18 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6795952B1 (en) | System and method for product yield prediction using device and process neighborhood characterization vehicle | |
| Pease et al. | Characterization of enhanced low dose rate sensitivity (ELDRS) effects using gated lateral PNP transistor structures | |
| Mangir | Sources of failures and yield improvement for VLSI and restructurable interconnects for RVLSI and WSI: Part I—Sources of failures and yield improvement for VLSI | |
| US12313675B2 (en) | Method and device for wafer-level testing | |
| US6476597B1 (en) | Ionizing dose hardness assurance technique for CMOS integrated circuits | |
| He | Advanced Burn-In-an optimized product stress and test flow for automotive microcontrollers | |
| JP3274924B2 (en) | Semiconductor device screening method | |
| KR970003725B1 (en) | Test method of gate oxide on semiconductor | |
| Jensen | Component failures based on flaw distributions | |
| JP2986172B2 (en) | Screening test method for semiconductor integrated circuit | |
| Snyder et al. | Novel self-stressing test structures for realistic high-frequency reliability characterization | |
| Takeda et al. | VLSI reliability challenges: from device physics to wafer scale systems | |
| Gomez et al. | Experimental validation of a compact pinhole latent defect model for MOS transistors | |
| Khalil et al. | High-voltage stress test paradigms of analog CMOS ICs for gate-oxide reliability enhancement | |
| Tsao et al. | Applying dynamic voltage stressing to reduce early failure rate | |
| Chang et al. | SHOrt voltage elevation (SHOVE) test | |
| Tang | New burn-in methodology based on IC attributes, family IC burn-in data, and failure mechanism analysis | |
| Drum et al. | Yield Model with Critical Geometry Analysis for Yield Projection from Test Sites on a Wafer Basis with Confidence Limits | |
| Turner | A step-by-step method for elimination of burn-in as a necessary screen | |
| Green | PMOS Dynamic RAM Reliability= A Case Study | |
| JPH07106386A (en) | Semiconductor device screening method | |
| Okada et al. | Reliability Driven Design Rules | |
| Sheng et al. | Complementary Incentives of Yield and Reliability for Ensuring Defect Detections in Wafer-Manufacturing | |
| Khalil | Stress tests of analog CMOS ICs for gate-oxide reliability enhancement | |
| Buehler et al. | Product assurance technology for procuring reliable, radiation-hard, custom LSI/VLSI electronics |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |