Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP3054752B2 - Reduction method of pressure wave caused by equipment pit in tunnel - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP3054752B2 - Reduction method of pressure wave caused by equipment pit in tunnel - Google Patents

Reduction method of pressure wave caused by equipment pit in tunnel

Info

Publication number
JP3054752B2
JP3054752B2 JP8112902A JP11290296A JP3054752B2 JP 3054752 B2 JP3054752 B2 JP 3054752B2 JP 8112902 A JP8112902 A JP 8112902A JP 11290296 A JP11290296 A JP 11290296A JP 3054752 B2 JP3054752 B2 JP 3054752B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
tunnel
equipment
equipment pit
pressure wave
pit
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP8112902A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH09268900A (en
Inventor
浩二 中谷
廣道 大戸
一男 内田
剛 井手
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Railway Technical Research Institute
West Japan Railway Co
Original Assignee
Railway Technical Research Institute
West Japan Railway Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Railway Technical Research Institute, West Japan Railway Co filed Critical Railway Technical Research Institute
Priority to JP8112902A priority Critical patent/JP3054752B2/en
Publication of JPH09268900A publication Critical patent/JPH09268900A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3054752B2 publication Critical patent/JP3054752B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Special Wing (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、トンネル内に設け
た器材坑を列車が270km/h前後以上の高速で通過
する際に発生する5〜15Hzの低周波の圧力波が、ト
ンネル出口側における家屋の建具(固有振動数)と共振
することにより振動を与えるので、これを防止すべく、
器材坑における圧力波の発生を低減させるようにした方
法に関するものである。
The present invention relates to a low frequency pressure wave of 5 to 15 Hz generated when a train passes at a high speed of about 270 km / h or more through an equipment pit provided in a tunnel. Vibration is given by resonating with the fittings (natural frequency) of the house, so to prevent this,
The present invention relates to a method for reducing generation of a pressure wave in an equipment pit.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】通常、列車等が高速でトンネルへ突入す
ると、トンネル内に圧縮波が発生する。この圧縮波は、
トンネル内を音速で伝播してトンネル出口側より外部へ
放射され、放射される時にドーンという破裂音(空気圧
音)を発生させ、近辺の建物の窓や戸を振動させるとい
う問題がある。この空気圧音の問題は、従来からよく知
られており、トンネル出口側に到達する圧縮波の波面の
圧力勾配が大きい程、音も大きくなるという性質があ
り、しかも、圧縮波の波面の圧力勾配は、列車がトンネ
ル内へ突入する速度Vの3乗に比例するという性質があ
ることも既知である。
2. Description of the Related Art Generally, when a train or the like enters a tunnel at a high speed, a compression wave is generated in the tunnel. This compression wave
There is a problem that the light propagates through the tunnel at the speed of sound and is radiated to the outside from the tunnel exit side, and when radiated, generates a popping sound (pneumatic sound) called a dawn and vibrates windows and doors of a nearby building. The problem of the pneumatic noise has been well known in the past, and the larger the pressure gradient of the wavefront of the compression wave arriving at the tunnel exit side, the larger the sound becomes. Is also known to have the property of being proportional to the cube of the speed V at which the train enters the tunnel.

【0003】そのため、従来では、トンネル入口側に、
開口面積の大きさがトンネル断面積よりも大きく、トン
ネル微気圧波の低減の大きさに応じて長さが10〜50
m程度のトンネルと同じような形状の覆体(通常は、ト
ンネル緩衝工と称している)を設置し、該覆体の側面中
央部に、覆体の開口の断面積と長さ及び突入する列車形
状から決められた最適面積を有する窓部を開設してい
る。そして、列車がトンネル内へ突入した時に発生する
圧縮波の一部を前記窓部から逃がし、圧縮波の波面の圧
力勾配をゆるやかなものにすることにより、該圧縮波が
トンネル内を音速で伝播してトンネル出口側で放射され
る際に生じる空気圧音を低減させるようにしている。
For this reason, conventionally, at the tunnel entrance side,
The size of the opening area is larger than the cross-sectional area of the tunnel, and the length is 10 to 50 depending on the magnitude of reduction of the tunnel micro-pressure wave.
A cover (usually referred to as a tunnel buffer) having the same shape as a tunnel of about m is installed, and the cross-sectional area and length of the opening of the cover and the center of the side of the cover are inserted. A window with an optimal area determined by the train shape has been opened. Then, part of the compression wave generated when the train enters the tunnel is released from the window, and the pressure gradient of the wave front of the compression wave is made gentle, so that the compression wave propagates through the tunnel at the speed of sound. In this way, air pressure noise generated when radiated at the tunnel exit side is reduced.

【0004】[0004]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】ところが、覆体を設け
た空気圧音の低減対策をしているにも拘らず、新幹線の
列車が270Km前後以上の高速でトンネル内を走行す
ると、これに伴ってトンネル出口側における家屋の建具
が振動を起こすという問題があった。
However, in spite of taking measures to reduce the pneumatic noise provided with a cover, when a Shinkansen train travels in a tunnel at a high speed of about 270 km or more, it is accompanied by this. There was a problem that the fittings of the house at the exit of the tunnel vibrate.

【0005】[0005]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は、列車がトンネ
ル内へ突入したときに発生する圧縮波とは異なる空気圧
音の原因を解明し、その低減を実現することのできる方
法を提供せんとするものである。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention is to provide a method capable of clarifying the cause of pneumatic noise different from the compression wave generated when a train enters a tunnel and reducing the noise. Is what you do.

【0006】而して、前記課題を解決するために本発明
が採用した請求項1の手段は、トンネル内に、列車走行
に関して使用する器材を設置するための器材坑を進行方
向に対して直行する方向のトンネル壁面に設けたものに
おいて、前記器材坑にその出入口を閉塞するための閉塞
部材を設置することで、列車が高速で器材坑を通過する
際に発生する低周波の圧力波を低減させるようにしたこ
とを特徴とするトンネル内器材坑に起因する圧力波の低
減方法である。
According to the first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a device pit for installing equipment to be used for running a train in a tunnel at right angles to a traveling direction. By installing a blocking member for closing the entrance in the equipment pit, the low-frequency pressure wave generated when the train passes through the equipment pit at high speed is reduced in the equipment provided on the tunnel wall in the direction of This is a method of reducing pressure waves caused by equipment pits in a tunnel, characterized in that the pressure waves are reduced.

【0007】前記課題を解決するために本発明が採用し
た請求項2の手段は、前記低周波の圧力波は、断面積が
7.1m器材坑を、列車が265km/h以上の速度
で通過したときに発生する5〜15Hzの間の周波数成
分であることを特徴とする前記請求項1に記載のトンネ
ル内器材坑に起因する圧力波の低減方法である。
According to a second aspect of the present invention, the low frequency pressure wave is formed through a 7.1 m 2 equipment pit and a train at a speed of 265 km / h or more. 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the frequency component is a frequency component between 5 and 15 Hz generated when passing through the tunnel.

【0008】[0008]

【発明の実施の形態】以下に、本発明の構成を図面に示
す発明の実施の形態に基づいて説明すると次の通りであ
る。本発明者らは、列車がトンネル内へ突入するときに
発生する圧縮波とは異なる空気圧音の発生原因につい
て、実際の営業運転を行っている新幹線の走行におい
て、繰り返し測定してこれを解析した結果、その発生原
因がトンネル内に設けた器材坑にあることを突き止め
た。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The configuration of the present invention will be described below with reference to the embodiments of the invention shown in the drawings. The present inventors have repeatedly measured and analyzed the cause of the generation of air pressure noise different from the compression wave generated when the train enters the tunnel during the actual operation of the Shinkansen. As a result, it was found that the cause was the equipment pit installed in the tunnel.

【0009】しかも、その発生は、230km/h以下
で走行する新幹線及び250km/h前後で走行する新
幹線では顕著に現れず、270km/h前後で走行する
新幹線のぞみ号の場合及び300km/h前後で実験走
行中のWIN350等の高速新幹線の場合に限り発生す
るものであること、空気圧音の周波数が5〜15Hzと
いう極めて低周波の空気圧音であること及び器材坑の奥
行きが5mのものである場合に限り前記低周波の空気圧
音が発生することを解明した。
[0009] Furthermore, the occurrence does not appear remarkably on the Shinkansen running at 230 km / h or less and the Shinkansen running at about 250 km / h, and in the case of the Shinkansen Nozomi running at about 270 km / h and at around 300 km / h. It is generated only in the case of a high-speed Shinkansen such as WIN350 during experimental driving, the frequency of the air pressure noise is extremely low frequency air pressure of 5 to 15 Hz, and the depth of the equipment pit is 5 m It has been clarified that the low-frequency air pressure noise is generated only when:

【0010】図4に示すように、山陽新幹線の広島駅と
新岩国駅との間の長さが5132mの岩国トンネルで
は、前記器材坑2及び1は奥行きが5mのものと、2m
のものとが設けられており、奥行きが5mの器材坑2は
トンネル3の左右の壁面側に、およそ500mの間隔ご
とに設けられており、その途中に奥行き2mの器材坑1
が設けられている。またこれらの器材坑2及び1は、図
1〜図3に示すように、出入口(開口部)の幅が3m
で、高さが1.8mの矩形状部の上に円弧状部が形成さ
れた蒲鉾型を呈しており、その断面積は7.1mであ
る。
As shown in FIG. 4, in the Iwakuni Tunnel with a length of 5132 m between Hiroshima Station and Shin-Iwakuni Station on the Sanyo Shinkansen, the equipment pits 2 and 1 have a depth of 5 m and 2 m.
The equipment pit 2 having a depth of 5 m is provided on the left and right wall sides of the tunnel 3 at intervals of about 500 m, and the equipment pit 1 having a depth of 2 m is provided on the way.
Is provided. As shown in FIGS. 1 to 3, these equipment pits 2 and 1 each have an entrance (opening) width of 3 m.
It has a rectangular shape with a height of 1.8 m and a circular arc shape formed on a rectangular shape, and has a sectional area of 7.1 m 2 .

【0011】而して、これらの器材坑2及び1のうち、
問題となるのは奥行きが5mの器材坑2である。それは
図5に示す測定結果から明らかである。この図5は、山
陽新幹線の広島駅と新岩国駅との間の長さが5132m
の岩国トンネルを新幹線のぞみ号が272km/hで走
行したときの通過状況と、民家の家屋内ガラス戸の振動
の度合いとを示す図面である。
Thus, of these equipment pits 2 and 1,
The problem is the equipment pit 2 having a depth of 5 m. This is clear from the measurement results shown in FIG. This figure shows that the length between Hiroshima Station and Shin-Iwakuni Station on the Sanyo Shinkansen is 5132 m.
3 is a drawing showing the passing situation when the Shinkansen Nozomi travels at 272 km / h in the Iwakuni tunnel of Iwakuni, and the degree of vibration of the glass door inside the house of a private house.

【0012】図5の図(a)に示すように、新幹線列車
は、トンネル3内を新大阪方面(東口)から博多方面
(西口)へ向かって走行しており、先頭車両がトンネル
3内へ突入してからおよそ68秒後にトンネル西口側を
通過している。新幹線列車の後端側は先頭車両から約
6.6秒遅れて通過している。図(a)の縦軸はトンネ
ル3の入口側から出口側までの距離と器材坑2の位置と
の関係を示すものであり、横軸は時間を示している。
As shown in FIG. 5A, the Shinkansen train travels in the tunnel 3 from Shin-Osaka (East Exit) to Hakata (West Exit), and the leading vehicle moves into the tunnel 3. Approximately 68 seconds after the rush, the car is passing the tunnel west exit. The rear end of the Shinkansen train passes about 6.6 seconds behind the leading car. The vertical axis of FIG. 3A shows the relationship between the distance from the entrance side to the exit side of the tunnel 3 and the position of the equipment pit 2, and the horizontal axis shows time.

【0013】つまり、図5の図(a)は、新幹線列車の
トンネル内通過状況を示す距離−時間ダイヤグラムであ
り、これと同図の図(b)の圧力波測定結果とを照らし
合わせて見れば、新幹線列車が器材坑2を通過したとき
に、圧力波が発生し、この圧力波が音速でトンネル出口
(西口)から放射されるときに、家屋内のガラス戸とに
大きな振動を与えていることがわかる。このことから、
奥行きが5mの器材坑2を新幹線が270km/h前後
(最小値は、少なくとも265km/h)の高速で通過
したときに、トンネル出口側の家屋のガラス戸を振動さ
せる低周波の圧力波が発生していることが明らかになっ
た。
That is, FIG. 5 (a) is a distance-time diagram showing the situation of the Shinkansen train passing through the tunnel, and can be seen by comparing this with the pressure wave measurement result shown in FIG. 5 (b). For example, when a Shinkansen train passes through the equipment pit 2, a pressure wave is generated, and when this pressure wave is emitted from the tunnel exit (west exit) at the speed of sound, a large vibration is given to the glass door in the house. You can see that there is. From this,
When the Shinkansen passes through the equipment pit 2 with a depth of 5 m at a high speed of about 270 km / h (minimum value is at least 265 km / h), a low-frequency pressure wave is generated that vibrates the glass door of the house on the exit side of the tunnel. It became clear that we were doing.

【0014】なお、このトンネル出口側の家屋のガラス
戸を振動させる圧力波の周波数帯については、全く不明
であり、予測もできないでいた。そのため、ガラス戸の
振動に影響を与える周波数帯を割り出すために、本発明
者らはいろいろな周波数帯の帯域フィルターを用いて数
多くの測定データを収集し、これを解析することで明ら
かにすることとした。このようにして集めたデータを解
析した結果、前記家屋のガラス戸を振動させる圧力波
は、低周波の帯域でしかも建具の固有振動数帯域に一致
するものであることがわかった。この図5の図(b)に
示す場合は、10〜13Hzを通過させる帯域フィルタ
ーを用いて測定したものである。
The frequency band of the pressure wave that vibrates the glass door of the house on the exit side of the tunnel is completely unknown and cannot be predicted. Therefore, in order to determine the frequency band that affects the vibration of the glass door, the present inventors collect a large number of measurement data using band filters of various frequency bands, and clarify by analyzing this data. And As a result of analyzing the data collected in this way, it was found that the pressure wave for vibrating the glass door of the house was a low-frequency band and also coincided with the natural frequency band of the fitting. In the case shown in FIG. 5B, the measurement is performed using a bandpass filter that passes 10 to 13 Hz.

【0015】従って、器材坑2を新幹線列車が通過する
ことに起因して発生した圧力波が、トンネル出口側の近
傍の家屋内のガラス戸に振動を与えていることは明らか
であり、次に本発明者らはその対策を検討することにし
た。本発明者らがその対策を採るに当たって着目したの
は、同じトンネル3内に設置した断面積が共に7.1m
の器材坑2と器材坑1とでは、器材坑2でのみトンネ
ル出口側の家屋のガラス戸を振動させる低周波の圧力波
が発生するものの、器材坑1によってはトンネル出口側
のガラス戸を振動させる程の低周波の圧力波は発生して
いないという事実である。器材坑2と器材坑1とでは、
前述した通り、その奥行き寸法が異なるだけであり、器
材坑2が奥行き5mであるのに対し、器材坑1は奥行き
2mである。
Therefore, it is apparent that the pressure wave generated due to the passage of the Shinkansen train through the equipment pit 2 is giving vibration to the glass door in the house near the tunnel exit side. The present inventors have studied the countermeasures. The present inventors have paid attention to taking the countermeasures, assuming that the cross-sectional areas installed in the same tunnel 3 are both 7.1 m.
In the equipment pit 2 and the equipment pit 1, a low-frequency pressure wave that vibrates the glass door of the house on the tunnel exit side is generated only in the equipment pit 2. The fact is that pressure waves of low frequency enough to vibrate are not generated. In equipment pit 2 and equipment pit 1,
As described above, only the depth dimension is different, and the equipment pit 2 is 5 m in depth, while the equipment pit 1 is 2 m in depth.

【0016】このことから、器材坑2の奥行きは長くて
も2mにすれば、家屋のガラス戸を振動させる程の低周
波の圧力波は発生しなくなることが予測され、図1〜図
3のそれぞれの図(a)及び図(b)に示すように、既
設の器材坑2にこれを閉塞するための閉塞部材4を設け
て奥行くが5mの器材坑2を奥行きが2m以下のものに
改造し、どの程度の閉塞部材4であれば問題となる低周
波の圧力波の低減効果が十分であるかを確認した。
From this, it is predicted that if the depth of the equipment pit 2 is at most 2 m, a pressure wave of a low frequency enough to vibrate the glass door of the house will not be generated, as shown in FIGS. As shown in each figure (a) and (b), the existing equipment pit 2 is provided with a closing member 4 for closing the same, and the equipment pit 2 having a depth of 5 m is reduced to a depth of 2 m or less. It was remodeled, and it was confirmed how much the closing member 4 had a sufficient effect of reducing the low-frequency pressure wave, which was a problem.

【0017】その結果は、図6の図(a)及び図(b)
に示す通りである。この試験は、図4及び図6の図
(a)に示すように、岩国トンネル3の東口から3番目
の器材坑2に図1に示す形状のType1の閉塞部材4
を設置し、東口から4番目の器材坑2に図2に示す形状
のType2の閉塞部材4を設置し、東口から5番目の
器材坑2に図3に示す形状のType3の閉塞部材4を
設置して行った。図1に示すType1の閉塞部材4
は、器材坑2を全閉したものであり、図2に示すTyp
e2の閉塞部材4は、開閉自在な扉5を設置したもの
で、図3に示すType3の閉塞部材4は、下部側に開
口部6を設けたものである。
The results are shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B.
As shown in FIG. In this test, as shown in FIGS. 4 and 6 (a), the third equipment pit 2 from the east exit of the Iwakuni tunnel 3 was provided with a closing member 4 of Type 1 having the shape shown in FIG.
Is installed in the fourth equipment pit 2 from the east exit, and a Type 2 closing member 4 having the shape shown in FIG. 2 is installed in the fourth equipment pit 2 from the east entrance, and a Type 3 closing member 4 having the shape shown in FIG. I went. The closing member 4 of Type 1 shown in FIG.
Is the one in which the equipment pit 2 is completely closed, and Typ shown in FIG.
The closing member 4 of e2 is provided with a door 5 that can be opened and closed, and the closing member 4 of Type 3 shown in FIG. 3 has an opening 6 on the lower side.

【0018】そして、試験は、図6の図(b)に示すよ
うに、これらの閉塞部材4を設置する以前と、対策を施
した後の1日目と、対策を施した後の2日目の都合3回
のデータを測定した。しかも、対策1日目のType1
では、閉塞部材4と器材坑2との間にコーキング材を施
さずに行い、対策2日目のType1ではコーキング材
を施して完全密封した後行った。また対策1日目のTy
pe2では、閉塞部材4と器材坑2との間にコーキング
材をした上、扉5を完全に閉塞して行ったが、対策2日
目のType2では、コーキング材はそのままにして、
扉5を27%だけ開放して行った。更に、対策1日目の
Type3では、閉塞部材4と器材坑2との間にコーキ
ング材を施さずに行ったが、対策2日目のType3で
はコーキング材を施して行った。
As shown in FIG. 6 (b), the test was conducted before the closing members 4 were installed, on the first day after the countermeasures were taken, and on the two days after the countermeasures were taken. Data were measured three times for convenience. Moreover, Type 1 of the first day of measures
In this case, the test was performed without applying a caulking material between the closing member 4 and the equipment pit 2, and in Type 1 on the second day of the measures, the caulking material was applied and the sealing was performed completely. Ty on the first day of measures
In pe2, a caulking material was provided between the closing member 4 and the equipment pit 2, and the door 5 was completely closed. However, in Type2 on the second day of the measure, the caulking material was left as it was,
The door 5 was opened by 27%. Further, in Type 3 on the first day of the measure, the caulking material was applied between the closing member 4 and the equipment pit 2, but in Type 3 on the second day of the measure, the caulk material was applied.

【0019】更にまた、同図の図(b)における対策前
の測定のときの新幹線列車の走行速度は270km/h
であり、対策後1日目の測定のときの走行速度は272
km/hであり、対策後2日目の測定のときの走行速度
は267km/hであった。なお、圧力波の測定は、ト
ンネル出口(西口)側の覆体(緩衝工)から65m離れ
た地点において、10〜15Hzの低周波のみを通す帯
域フィルター(BPF)を用いて行った。これは、それ
までの測定試験結果から、測定対象とする家屋のガラス
戸の固有振動数が11Hz付近であったことに基づき、
相関関係の最も大きいと考えられる周波数帯を設定した
ものである。
Furthermore, the running speed of the Shinkansen train at the time of the measurement before the countermeasure in FIG. 4B is 270 km / h.
The running speed at the time of the measurement on the first day after the countermeasure is 272.
km / h, and the running speed at the time of measurement on the second day after the countermeasure was 267 km / h. The pressure wave was measured using a bandpass filter (BPF) that passes only low frequencies of 10 to 15 Hz at a point 65 m away from the cover (buffer) on the tunnel exit (west exit) side. This is based on the fact that the natural frequency of the glass door of the house to be measured was around 11 Hz,
A frequency band that is considered to have the largest correlation is set.

【0020】これらの測定条件で行った試験結果につい
ては、図6の図(a)及び図(b)に示す通りである。
対策前の測定では、トンネル3内へ新幹線列車が270
km/hの高速度で突入したときに発生する圧力波(ト
ンネル微気圧波と称している)と共に、トンネル3内の
各器材坑2を新幹線列車が前記速度で通過するたびに、
10〜15Hzの低周波の大きな圧縮波が顕著に現れて
おり、この圧力波が家屋内のガラス戸等の建具と共振し
てこれにガタツキを与えている。
The test results performed under these measurement conditions are as shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B.
In the measurement before the countermeasures, the number of Shinkansen trains in tunnel 3 was 270
Along with a pressure wave (called a tunnel micro-pressure wave) generated when the vehicle enters at a high speed of km / h, each time a Shinkansen train passes through each equipment pit 2 in the tunnel 3 at the speed described above,
A large compression wave having a low frequency of 10 to 15 Hz appears remarkably, and this pressure wave resonates with a fitting such as a glass door in a house and gives a rattling to the fitting.

【0021】また対策後1日目の測定波形では、トンネ
ル入口側から1番目と2番目の本願発明に係る対策を施
していない器材坑2にあっては、トンネル3内へ新幹線
列車が272km/hの高速度で突入したときに発生す
る圧力波と共に、家屋内の建具の振動原因となる圧力波
が発生している。一方、図1及び図2に示す本願発明に
係るType1及びType2の対策を施したトンネル
入口側から3番目及び4番目の器材坑2にあっては、低
周波の圧力波は測定されておらず、閉塞部材4によっ
て、この場合10〜15Hzの低周波の発生が抑制され
ていることが明らかである。ところが、本願発明に係る
図3に示すType3の対策を施したトンネル入口側か
ら5番目の器材坑2にあっては、家屋内の建具の振動原
因となる低周波の圧力波が発生しており、閉塞部材4の
開口率が大きいとその低減効果がなくなることがわかっ
た。
In the measurement waveform on the first day after the countermeasure, in the first and second equipment pits 2 from which the countermeasures according to the present invention are not taken from the entrance side of the tunnel, the Shinkansen train enters the tunnel 3 at 272 km / km. In addition to the pressure wave generated when the vehicle enters at a high speed of h, a pressure wave that causes vibration of a fitting in the house is generated. On the other hand, in the third and fourth equipment pits 2 from the tunnel entrance side where the measures of Type 1 and Type 2 according to the present invention shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 were taken, low-frequency pressure waves were not measured. It is apparent that the closing member 4 suppresses the generation of the low frequency of 10 to 15 Hz in this case. However, in the fifth equipment pit 2 from the tunnel entrance side where the measures of Type 3 shown in FIG. 3 according to the present invention were taken, a low-frequency pressure wave that caused vibration of the fittings in the house was generated. It has been found that if the opening ratio of the closing member 4 is large, the reduction effect is lost.

【0022】次に、対策後2日目の測定波形では、トン
ネル入口側から1番目と2番目の無対策の器材坑2にあ
っては、やはり家屋内の建具の振動原因となる圧力波が
発生しているが、トンネル入口側から3番目の図1に示
すType1の対策を施した器材坑2にあっては、低周
波の圧力波は測定されなかった。またトンネル入口側か
ら4番目の図2に示すType2の対策を施した器材坑
2であって、閉塞部材4の扉5を開放した場合は、若干
の低周波の圧力波が測定されている。更に、図3に示す
Type3の対策を施したトンネル入口側から5番目の
器材坑2にあっては、対策後1日目の場合と同様に低周
波の圧力波が測定されている。
Next, in the measurement waveform on the second day after the countermeasure, in the first and second non-measurement equipment pits 2 from the tunnel entrance side, the pressure wave which also causes vibration of the fittings in the house is generated. Although generated, the pressure wave of the low frequency was not measured in the equipment pit 2 in which the measures of Type 1 shown in FIG. Further, when the door 5 of the closing member 4 is opened in the equipment pit 2 in which the countermeasure for Type 2 shown in FIG. 2 that is the fourth from the tunnel entrance side is opened, a slight low-frequency pressure wave is measured. Further, in the fifth equipment pit 2 from the tunnel entrance side where the measure of Type 3 shown in FIG. 3 was taken, a low-frequency pressure wave was measured as in the case of the first day after the measure.

【0023】このように器材坑2にType1又はTy
pe2の閉塞部材4を設置した場合は、家屋内の建具の
振動原因となる低周波の圧力波は測定されず、十分に低
減効果があることがわかった。また扉5を設けた場合
は、これを閉じておけば問題ないことも明らかとなっ
た。ただType3のように閉塞部材4の開口率が大き
くなると、圧力波の低減効果はほとんどなくなってい
る。更にまた、コーキング材によって閉塞部材4と器材
坑2との間をシールしても明白な差は現れなかった。要
するに、器材坑2に設置する閉塞部材4は、少しの隙間
は許されるもののできる限り全閉にする方が望ましいも
のである。
As described above, Type 1 or Ty
When the closing member 4 of pe2 was installed, the low-frequency pressure wave which caused the vibration of the fittings in the house was not measured, and it was found that there was a sufficient reduction effect. Also, when the door 5 was provided, it became clear that there was no problem if the door 5 was closed. However, when the opening ratio of the closing member 4 is increased as in Type 3, the effect of reducing the pressure wave is almost eliminated. Furthermore, even if the sealing member 4 and the equipment pit 2 were sealed with the caulking material, no obvious difference appeared. In short, it is desirable that the closing member 4 installed in the equipment pit 2 be fully closed as much as possible, though a small gap is allowed.

【0024】なお、本発明は上述した実施の形態に限定
されるものではなく、特に周波数の値は、家屋の建具自
体の固有振動数にバラツキがあるため特定は困難であ
る。厳密には、建具共振による周波数とすべきである。
今回の測定結果では、民家のガラス戸の場合、固有振動
数が11Hzであり、類似する一般的な家屋の建具で
は、5〜15Hzの範囲内であると予測できるので、こ
の範囲をカバーできれば十分であると考えられる。また
奥行き2mの器材坑1については、トンネル出口側にお
ける家屋のガラス戸を振動させる程の低周波の圧力波は
発生していないことから、器材坑2に設置する閉塞部材
4の奥行き寸法は、器材坑2の入口から2m以内であれ
ば十分である。
The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment. In particular, it is difficult to specify the value of the frequency because the natural frequency of the fitting itself in the house varies. Strictly speaking, it should be a frequency due to fitting resonance.
According to the measurement results of this time, in the case of a glass door of a private house, the natural frequency is 11 Hz, and in the case of a similar general house fitting, it can be predicted that the range is 5 to 15 Hz. It is considered to be. In addition, as for the equipment pit 1 having a depth of 2 m, since a pressure wave of a low frequency enough to vibrate the glass door of the house at the tunnel exit side is not generated, the depth dimension of the closing member 4 installed in the equipment pit 2 is: It is sufficient if the distance is within 2 m from the entrance of the equipment pit 2.

【0025】更に、新幹線がトンネル内の器材坑2を通
過するときに問題となる低周波を発生させる速度は、図
6の図(b)に示す対策後2日目の測定時の速度が26
7km/hであり、このときに10〜15Hzの低周波
が発生しているので、最小値は少なくともこの267k
m/hは含まれることになり、およそ265km/h以
上であれば問題となる低周波が発生するであろうことは
容易に予測がつくところである。
Further, the speed at which the low frequency which is a problem when the Shinkansen passes through the equipment pit 2 in the tunnel is 26 as measured at the second day after the countermeasure shown in FIG.
7 km / h, and a low frequency of 10 to 15 Hz is generated at this time.
m / h will be included, and it is easy to predict that at or above about 265 km / h, low frequencies of interest will be generated.

【0026】更にまた、前記270km/h前後で走行
する新幹線列車(のぞみ号)が器材坑2を通過する場合
に発生する低周波の圧力波の主成分は、10〜15Hz
であったのに対し、300km/hで試験走行中のWI
N350の場合の主成分は5〜10Hzであり、列車の
先頭形状と通過速度とにより、多少の周波数のバラツキ
があることがわかっている。
Furthermore, the main component of the low-frequency pressure wave generated when the Shinkansen train (Nozomi) running at about 270 km / h passes through the equipment pit 2 is 10 to 15 Hz.
WI during test running at 300 km / h
In the case of N350, the main component is 5 to 10 Hz, and it is known that there is some frequency variation depending on the head shape and passing speed of the train.

【0027】[0027]

【発明の効果】以上説明したように本発明にあっては、
トンネル内に設けられた器材坑に、その出入口を閉塞す
るための閉塞部材を設置するようにしたから、列車が高
速で器材坑を通過する際に発生する低周波の圧力波を低
減させることが可能であり、低周波の圧力波に起因して
トンネル出口側近辺の家屋の建具に発生していたガタツ
キ等の振動を防止することが可能である。
As described above, in the present invention,
The equipment pit provided in the tunnel is provided with a closing member for closing the entrance, so it is possible to reduce low-frequency pressure waves generated when the train passes through the equipment pit at high speed. It is possible, and it is possible to prevent vibration such as rattling that has occurred in a fitting of a house near the tunnel exit side due to a low-frequency pressure wave.

【0028】従って、新幹線列車等の265km/h以
上の高速度で走行する列車がトンネル内を通過した場合
であっても、トンネル出口側近辺の民家の建具等が振動
するようなことはなく、列車の高速化を実現することが
可能である。
Therefore, even when a train running at a high speed of 265 km / h or more, such as a Shinkansen train, passes through the tunnel, the fittings of the private house near the tunnel exit side do not vibrate. It is possible to increase the speed of the train.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明に係るType1の閉塞部材を示すもの
であり、図(a)は器材坑の正面図、図(b)は縦断面
側面図である。
FIG. 1 shows a closing member of Type 1 according to the present invention. FIG. 1 (a) is a front view of an equipment pit, and FIG. 1 (b) is a longitudinal sectional side view.

【図2】本発明に係るType2の閉塞部材を示すもの
であり、図(a)は器材坑の正面図、図(b)は縦断面
側面図である。
FIGS. 2A and 2B show a closing member of Type 2 according to the present invention. FIG. 2A is a front view of an equipment pit, and FIG.

【図3】本発明に係るType3の閉塞部材を示すもの
であり、図(a)は器材坑の正面図、図(b)は縦断面
側面図である。
3A and 3B show a closing member of Type 3 according to the present invention, wherein FIG. 3A is a front view of an equipment pit, and FIG. 3B is a vertical sectional side view.

【図4】山陽新幹線の岩国トンネルにおける器材坑の位
置を示す概略平面図である。
FIG. 4 is a schematic plan view showing the positions of equipment pits in the Iwakuni tunnel of the Sanyo Shinkansen.

【図5】図(a)は新幹線列車のトンネル内通過状況を
示す距離−時間ダイヤグラムであり、図(b)はトンネ
ル内の器材坑を新幹線列車が通過するときに発生する圧
力波と、トンネル出口側の家屋の建具の振動との相関関
係を示す図である。
FIG. 5 (a) is a distance-time diagram showing a situation in which a Shinkansen train passes through a tunnel, and FIG. 5 (b) is a diagram showing a pressure wave generated when the Shinkansen train passes through an equipment pit in the tunnel; It is a figure which shows the correlation with the vibration of the fittings of the house of an exit side.

【図6】本発明に係る測定試験データを示すものであ
り、図(a)は新幹線列車のトンネル内通過状況を示す
距離−時間ダイヤグラム、図(b)はそのときのトンネ
ル出口側で測定された圧力変動を示す図である
6A and 6B show measurement test data according to the present invention. FIG. 6A is a distance-time diagram showing a situation of a Shinkansen train passing through a tunnel, and FIG. 6B is a diagram measured at the tunnel exit side at that time. FIG.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1…奥行き2mの器材坑 2…奥行き5mの器材坑 3…トンネル 4…閉塞部材 5…扉 DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Equipment pit 2m in depth 2 ... Equipment pit 5m in depth 3 ... Tunnel 4 ... Closure member 5 ... Door

フロントページの続き (72)発明者 内田 一男 大阪市北区芝田二丁目4番24号 西日本 旅客鉄道株式会社内 (72)発明者 井手 剛 大阪市北区芝田二丁目4番24号 西日本 旅客鉄道株式会社内 (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.7,DB名) E21F 1/00 Continuing from the front page (72) Kazuo Uchida 2-4-24 Shibata, Kita-ku, Osaka-shi West Japan Railway Company (72) Inventor Tsuyoshi Ide 2-4-2-4 Shibata, Kita-ku, Osaka West Japan Railway Company In-company (58) Field surveyed (Int.Cl. 7 , DB name) E21F 1/00

Claims (2)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】トンネル内に、列車走行に関して使用する
器材を設置するための器材坑を進行方向に対して直行す
る方向のトンネル壁面に設けたものにおいて、前記器材
坑にその出入口を閉塞するための閉塞部材を設置するこ
とで、列車が高速で器材坑を通過する際に発生する低周
波の圧力波を低減させるようにしたことを特徴とするト
ンネル内器材坑に起因する圧力波の低減方法。
An equipment pit for installing equipment used for running a train in a tunnel is provided on a tunnel wall surface in a direction perpendicular to a traveling direction. A method of reducing pressure waves caused by equipment tunnels in tunnels, characterized by reducing the low-frequency pressure waves generated when a train passes through equipment tunnels at high speed by installing a closing member of .
【請求項2】前記低周波の圧力波は、断面積が7.1m
の器材坑を、列車が265km/h以上の速度で通過
したときに発生する5〜15Hzの間の周波数成分であ
ることを特徴とする前記請求項1に記載のトンネル内器
材坑に起因する圧力波の低減方法。
2. The low-frequency pressure wave has a sectional area of 7.1 m.
2. The equipment pit in the tunnel according to claim 1, wherein the frequency component is a frequency component between 5 and 15 Hz generated when the train passes through the second equipment pit at a speed of 265 km / h or more. How to reduce pressure waves.
JP8112902A 1996-03-28 1996-03-28 Reduction method of pressure wave caused by equipment pit in tunnel Expired - Fee Related JP3054752B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP8112902A JP3054752B2 (en) 1996-03-28 1996-03-28 Reduction method of pressure wave caused by equipment pit in tunnel

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP8112902A JP3054752B2 (en) 1996-03-28 1996-03-28 Reduction method of pressure wave caused by equipment pit in tunnel

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH09268900A JPH09268900A (en) 1997-10-14
JP3054752B2 true JP3054752B2 (en) 2000-06-19

Family

ID=14598363

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP8112902A Expired - Fee Related JP3054752B2 (en) 1996-03-28 1996-03-28 Reduction method of pressure wave caused by equipment pit in tunnel

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3054752B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101358906B1 (en) * 2011-12-07 2014-02-06 한국과학기술원 Tunnel structure for reducing micro pressure wave in tunnel

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH09268900A (en) 1997-10-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Kumar et al. A study of noise in various modes of transport in Delhi
JP3054752B2 (en) Reduction method of pressure wave caused by equipment pit in tunnel
Petniunas et al. Door system design for improved closure sound quality
Hothersall et al. Prediction of the attenuation of road traffic noise with distance
KR100331955B1 (en) Hood by train tunnel
JP3475267B2 (en) Opening structure of tunnel entrance buffer
CN213323072U (en) Vibration and noise reduction screen door for urban rail transit station platform
JP2556439B2 (en) Method of reducing air pressure noise at tunnel exit
Saito et al. Countermeasure for reducing micro-pressure wave emitted from railway tunnel by installing hood at the exit of tunnel
Zhang et al. Theoretical and experimental investigations on coherence of traffic noise transmission through an open window into a rectangular room in high-rise buildings
Reinhall et al. Modular expansion joint noise mitigation study
JPH04182502A (en) Method of reducing air pressure sound at tunnel exit
RU2098290C1 (en) Drop window glass sealing unit of vehicle door
Mongeau et al. Laboratory method for evaluating the sound transmission characteristics of primary bulb body seals
KR100387520B1 (en) Hood by train tunnel
JP3802438B2 (en) Active silencer
Mukkera et al. A Test Methodology for Vehicle Wind Noise Reduction and Acoustic Quality Improvement
KR100377553B1 (en) Hood by train tunnel
JP7213118B2 (en) Sound insulation construction method for tunnel soundproof door and sound insulation structure for tunnel soundproof door
Maeda Micropressure waves radiating from a Shinkansen tunnel portal
Mercker et al. On the induced noise of test sections in different wind tunnels and in the cabin of a passenger car
Watts In situ method for determining the transmission loss of noise barriers
JPH041311A (en) Interference type sound proof device
CN120636457A (en) Method and device for detecting noise of train
King et al. ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFICIENCY OF A WHISTOP DIFFRACTOR FOR ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE ABATEMENT

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100414

Year of fee payment: 10

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110414

Year of fee payment: 11

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120414

Year of fee payment: 12

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120414

Year of fee payment: 12

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120414

Year of fee payment: 12

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130414

Year of fee payment: 13

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees