JP3064645B2 - Sample dispensing confirmation method - Google Patents
Sample dispensing confirmation methodInfo
- Publication number
- JP3064645B2 JP3064645B2 JP4058422A JP5842292A JP3064645B2 JP 3064645 B2 JP3064645 B2 JP 3064645B2 JP 4058422 A JP4058422 A JP 4058422A JP 5842292 A JP5842292 A JP 5842292A JP 3064645 B2 JP3064645 B2 JP 3064645B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- sample
- stabilizer
- blood
- reaction
- amount
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Landscapes
- Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
- Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
- Automatic Analysis And Handling Materials Therefor (AREA)
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、凝集反応による感染症
検査や交差適合試験、或いはアレルギー試験のように血
漿または血清等の体液に由来する検体試料の分析方法に
関する。より具体的には、これら検体試料を反応容器に
分注し、分析用試薬と反応させて分析を行う際に、前記
検体試料の分注が正しく行われたか否かを確認する方法
に関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for analyzing a specimen sample derived from a body fluid such as plasma or serum, such as an infectious disease test by agglutination, a cross-match test, or an allergy test. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method for dispensing these sample samples into a reaction vessel and reacting the sample with an analysis reagent to perform analysis, and confirming whether or not the sample sample has been correctly dispensed.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】従来、感染症の予防上或いは治療上の有
用な指標とする観点から、凝集反応を利用した感染症検
査又は交差適合性試験等の生化学的分析、或いは酵素免
疫測定法(EIA)等の免疫学的分析が行われている。
一般に、これらの分析は、分析装置の反応容器内に体液
等の検体試料及び分析用試薬を分注し、混合して反応さ
せることによって行われる。しかし、これらの分析法自
体がいかに高精度であっても、検体試料の分注が期待通
り正しく行われなければ、結果としては判定ミスを生ず
ることになる。例えば健常者が低値異常と判定された
り、感染症陽性者(非健常者)が感染症陰性者(健常
者)と判定されたり、或いは血液型が不適合にもかかわ
らず適合と判定されたりする。このような判定ミスが頻
繁に発生すると、感染症の伝播、或いは血液型不適合に
よる輸血ミス等を引き起こすことになる。従って、この
ような検査においては、検体が反応容器中に正確に分注
されたか否かを確認することが重要である。2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, from the viewpoint of a useful index for prevention or treatment of infectious diseases, biochemical analysis such as infectious disease inspection or cross-compatibility test utilizing agglutination reaction, or enzyme immunoassay ( Immunological analysis such as EIA) has been performed.
Generally, these analyzes are performed by dispensing a specimen sample such as a body fluid and an analysis reagent into a reaction vessel of an analyzer, mixing and reacting. However, no matter how accurate these analytical methods are, if the dispensing of the specimen sample is not performed correctly as expected, a determination error may result. For example, a healthy person is determined to be abnormally low, an infectious disease-positive person (non-healthy person) is determined to be an infectious disease-negative person (normal person), or a blood group is determined to be compatible despite being incompatible. . Frequent occurrence of such a determination error may lead to transmission of an infectious disease or blood transfusion error due to blood group incompatibility. Therefore, in such a test, it is important to confirm whether or not the sample has been accurately dispensed into the reaction container.
【0003】血漿或いは血清を検体とする分析において
は、分注確認の困難性が特に問題となっている。例え
ば、ABO式血液型検査には、血球を検査対象としたオ
モテ検査と血漿を検査対象としたウラ検査とがあり、血
球を対象としたオモテ試験では、凝集反応の結果の判定
時に血球が分注されているか否かの判断は容易にでき
る。しかし、血漿が検査対象であるウラ検査では、この
ような血漿分注の確認はできない。また、同様に血漿を
検体として行われる感染症等の検査でも、検体分注の確
認ができないために、常に偽陰性の発生を考えて検査を
する必要がある。従って、特に血漿または血清を検体と
する分析においては、検体分注の適否の判別を確実に行
い得る方法の開発が望まれている。[0003] In an analysis using plasma or serum as a sample, the difficulty of dispensing confirmation is particularly problematic. For example, ABO blood group tests include a frontal test for blood cells and a back test for plasma. In the frontal test for blood cells, blood cells are separated when agglutination is determined. It is easy to determine whether or not it has been injected. However, such a plasma dispensing cannot be confirmed by a back test in which plasma is a test target. Similarly, in the case of an infectious disease test using plasma as a sample, the dispensing of the sample cannot be confirmed. Therefore, it is necessary to always perform a test in consideration of the occurrence of false negative. Therefore, especially in the analysis using plasma or serum as a sample, it is desired to develop a method capable of reliably determining whether or not sample dispensing is appropriate.
【0004】従来の検体分注確認方法としては、まず、
特開昭59−17161号に記載された、光電的に分注
を確認する方法が公知である。これはPK7000シリ
ーズの血液型検査及び感染症検査時に、検体の分注を確
認するための方法の1つとして考案されたものである。
しかし、この方法は、検体の前処理である希釈工程にお
いて検体の分注量を確認するものであるため、実際に反
応に関わった検体量を知ることはできない。また、特願
平3−211736号(本願出願時には未公開)には、
検体自身の持つpH緩衝能を利用する分注確認方法が記
載されている。この方法は体液の緩衝能が比較的大きい
ことを利用したもので、pH指示薬の希釈液を反応前の
反応容器中に所定量加えると、検体が分注されていれ
ば、希釈液のpHが変化し、指示薬の色が変化すること
に基づいて分注不良を検知するものである。しかし、こ
の方法は、例えば感染症検査等のように、検体よりも大
きなpH緩衝能を有する希釈液を用いる分析には適用が
困難である。[0004] As a conventional sample dispensing confirmation method, first,
A method for photoelectrically confirming dispensing described in JP-A-59-17161 is known. This was devised as one of the methods for confirming the dispensing of a specimen at the time of PK7000 series blood group test and infectious disease test.
However, in this method, the amount of the sample to be dispensed is confirmed in the dilution step which is the pretreatment of the sample, and therefore, the amount of the sample actually involved in the reaction cannot be known. Japanese Patent Application No. 3-217736 (not disclosed at the time of filing the present application)
A dispensing confirmation method using the pH buffering ability of the specimen itself is described. This method takes advantage of the relatively large buffering capacity of body fluids, and when a predetermined amount of a diluent of a pH indicator is added to a reaction vessel before the reaction, if the sample has been dispensed, the pH of the diluent will increase. It detects the dispensing failure based on the change and the change of the color of the indicator. However, this method is difficult to apply to an analysis using a diluent having a larger pH buffer capacity than a specimen, such as an infectious disease test.
【0005】一方検体が蛋白質を含んでいることに基づ
けば、蛋白質を指標として分注量を確認することも可能
ではある。しかし、免疫学的分析にはおいては、試薬成
分中に抗原ないし抗体蛋白を含んでいるため、検体と試
薬とを混合した後に、蛋白量を指標として分注量を確認
するのは不適当である。また、検体の分注量を確認する
目的で、別途指標物を添加するのも経済的ではない。[0005] On the other hand, based on the fact that the specimen contains protein, it is possible to confirm the dispensed amount using the protein as an index. However, in immunological analysis, it is inappropriate to confirm the dispensed volume using the protein amount as an index after mixing the sample and the reagent because the reagent component contains antigen or antibody protein. is there. Also, it is not economical to separately add an indicator for the purpose of confirming the dispensed amount of the sample.
【0006】[0006]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】従って、本発明の課題
は、血清または血漿等の体液に由来する検体試料中に必
然的に含まれる成分を指標とすることにより、検体また
は試薬成分の影響を受けずに検体分注の適否を確認する
方法を提供することにある。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to reduce the influence of a sample or reagent component by using, as an index, a component that is necessarily contained in a sample derived from a body fluid such as serum or plasma. It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for confirming the suitability of sample dispensing without receiving it.
【0007】[0007]
【課題を解決するための手段】上記課題を解決するため
に、本発明は、体液から調製した検体試料では、一般に
その変性を防止するために添加が必要とされる安定化剤
を指標とし、分析が終了した後に、この安定化剤を検出
することで分注確認を行うこととした。Means for Solving the Problems To solve the above-mentioned problems, the present invention uses, as an index, a stabilizing agent which is generally required to be added to a sample sample prepared from a body fluid to prevent its denaturation, After the analysis was completed, it was decided to confirm the dispensing by detecting this stabilizer.
【0008】すなわち、本発明によれば、体液に由来す
る検体試料を反応容器に分注し、これを分析用試薬と反
応させることによって検体試料中の分析対象物を分析す
るに際し、前記検体試料の分注の適否を確認する方法に
おいて、前記検体試料に予め安定化剤を添加する工程
と、前記反応が終了した後に安定化剤検出試薬を用いて
前記安定化剤の有無及び/又は量を測定する工程とを具
備することを特徴とする検体分注確認方法が提供され
る。以下、本発明を詳細に説明する。That is, according to the present invention, a sample sample derived from a body fluid is dispensed into a reaction container and reacted with an analysis reagent to analyze an analyte in the sample sample. In the method for confirming the suitability of dispensing, a step of adding a stabilizer to the specimen sample in advance, and the presence or absence and / or amount of the stabilizer using a stabilizer detection reagent after the reaction is completed. A sample dispensing confirmation method, comprising the steps of: Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail.
【0009】まず、本発明の分注確認方法を行う前提と
なる検体試料の分析について簡単に説明する。この分析
には、分析装置の反応容器内に体液由来の検体試料及び
これを分析するための分析用試薬を分注し、混合して反
応させることによって行われるすべての種類の分析が含
まれる。例えば、凝集反応による感染症検査、交差適合
試験及びアレルギー試験、或いは免疫学的試験等であ
る。First, the analysis of a specimen sample on which the method for confirming dispensing of the present invention is based will be briefly described. This analysis includes all types of analysis performed by dispensing a sample sample derived from a body fluid and an analysis reagent for analyzing the sample in a reaction container of the analyzer, and mixing and reacting. For example, an infectious disease test by agglutination, a cross-match test and an allergy test, or an immunological test, etc.
【0010】前記分析における検体試料としては、体液
中に存在する成分のいずれも用いることができ、その例
としては、血球、血漿、血清及び尿などが挙げられる。
しかし、本発明の利点の1つとして、従来は不可能であ
った血漿或いは血清の分注確認を正確に行い得ることが
挙げられるから、血漿或いは血清を用いた場合に、本発
明の効果が顕著である。[0010] Any of the components present in the body fluid can be used as the specimen sample in the above analysis, and examples thereof include blood cells, plasma, serum, and urine.
However, one of the advantages of the present invention is that it is possible to accurately confirm the dispensing of plasma or serum, which was not possible in the past. Therefore, when plasma or serum is used, the effect of the present invention can be reduced. Notable.
【0011】前記分析における分析用試薬は特に限定さ
れず、分析の目的に応じて種々の試薬が用いられる。例
えば、輸血前検査の1つである交差適合試験において
は、血液型を調べるために抗A抗体、抗B抗体が用いら
れる。また、後述の実施例に示すようには、B型肝炎ウ
イルス検査では抗HB抗体を用いる。The analytical reagent used in the above analysis is not particularly limited, and various reagents are used depending on the purpose of the analysis. For example, in a cross-matching test which is one of the pre-transfusion tests, an anti-A antibody and an anti-B antibody are used to examine a blood type. Further, as shown in Examples described later, an anti-HB antibody is used in the hepatitis B virus test.
【0012】前記分析における反応は特に限定されず、
例えば凝集反応或いは酵素免疫測定法(EIA)等の従
来用いられている反応はいずれも用いることができる。
好ましい分析反応は、凝集反応である。凝集反応には、
主に直接凝集反応、間接凝集反応、又は直接受身凝集反
応の3つに分類され、その他にも免疫粘着血球凝集反応
や、後述の実施例で用いた逆受身凝集反応(以下「RP
HA」と呼ぶ)等がある。これらの凝集反応は、いずれ
も本発明に用いる分析反応として好ましいものである。The reaction in the above analysis is not particularly limited.
For example, any conventionally used reaction such as an agglutination reaction or an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) can be used.
A preferred analytical reaction is an agglutination reaction. For the agglutination reaction,
It is mainly classified into three types: direct agglutination reaction, indirect agglutination reaction, and direct passive agglutination reaction. In addition, immunoadhesive hemagglutination reaction and reverse passive agglutination reaction (hereinafter referred to as "RP
HA ”). All of these agglutination reactions are preferable as the analysis reaction used in the present invention.
【0013】本発明の特徴は、上記分析において、検体
試料の分注が正確に行われているか否かを確認するため
の指標として、前記検体試料に予め添加されている安定
化剤を用い、前記反応が終了した後に該安定化剤の有無
及び/又は量を測定することにある。以下、本発明の検
体分注確認方法を詳細に説明する。まず、検体試料を反
応容器に分注する前に、該検体試料に安定化剤を添加す
る。A feature of the present invention is that, in the above analysis, a stabilizing agent added in advance to the sample sample is used as an index for confirming whether or not the sample sample is correctly dispensed. It is to measure the presence and / or amount of the stabilizer after the completion of the reaction. Hereinafter, the sample dispensing confirmation method of the present invention will be described in detail. First, a stabilizer is added to the sample before dispensing the sample into the reaction container.
【0014】本発明における安定化剤は、検体試料の物
理的或いは化学的変性を防止するために添加されるもの
であるが、所期の安定化作用を有することに加えて、以
下に述べる3つの要求を満たすものであればいずれも用
いることが可能である。まず第一に、体液中には、全く
含有されていないか、或いは含有されているとしても、
個体差による含有量の変動がないもの、又はその添加量
と比較して遥かに微量であるものでなければならない。
第二に、体液成分に対し、不活性であり、かつ成分分析
に対しても影響を与えないものでなければならない。そ
して第三に、その物質を特異的に分析できる方法が存在
しなければならない。The stabilizer in the present invention is added to prevent physical or chemical denaturation of the sample, and has the following stabilizing effect in addition to having the intended stabilizing action. Any one that satisfies the two requirements can be used. First of all, in the body fluid, it is not contained at all, or even if it is contained,
It must be free from variations in the content due to individual differences, or must be much smaller than the amount added.
Second, it must be inert to body fluid components and have no effect on component analysis. And third, there must be a way to specifically analyze that substance.
【0015】以上の見地から、本発明の安定化剤とし
て、血液凝固阻害剤が好ましく用いられる。血液凝固阻
害剤は、上記3つの要求を満たす安定化剤であり、血球
を採取して血漿を得るために通常は当然に必要とされる
ものだからである。In view of the above, a blood coagulation inhibitor is preferably used as the stabilizer of the present invention. This is because a blood coagulation inhibitor is a stabilizer that satisfies the above three requirements, and is naturally required to collect blood cells to obtain plasma.
【0016】血液凝固阻害剤としては、ヘパリン、キレ
ーターであるEDTA(エチレンジアミン四酢酸)、或
いは種々のクエン酸塩類などを用いることができる。中
でも、安価で、かつ取扱いが容易なEDTAやクエン酸
塩類を用いることが好ましい。As a blood coagulation inhibitor, heparin, EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) which is a chelator, or various citrates can be used. Especially, it is preferable to use EDTA and citrate which are inexpensive and easy to handle.
【0017】本発明において特に好ましく用いられるの
は、クエン酸[HO・C・(COOH)・(CH2 CO
OH)2 ]であり、特にその血液の寿命をも考慮しなけ
ればならない検体において好ましく用いられる。クエン
酸は一般に、自然界に広く存在し、ヒトの血液中にはク
エン酸イオンの形で13〜27μg/ml含有されてい
る(クエン酸イオンには、理論的には3種類のものが考
えられるが、以下これを総称してクエン酸類と呼ぶ)。In the present invention, citric acid [HO.C. (COOH). (CH 2 CO 3)
OH) 2 ], which is preferably used particularly in a sample in which the life of the blood must be considered. In general, citric acid exists widely in nature and is contained in human blood in the form of citrate ion in the form of 13 to 27 μg / ml (three kinds of citrate ions are theoretically considered. However, these are hereinafter collectively referred to as citric acids).
【0018】クエン酸類は、主に、これを主成分とする
ACD液、或いは現在血液銀行や赤十字等の輸血前検査
において頻繁に用いられているCPD液等の抗凝固液
(血液凝固阻害剤の混合液)の形態で用いられる。クエ
ン酸類は、血液凝固防止のために、血液中の含有量より
遥かに多い量が必要である。抗凝固液の血液に対する量
的割合は決められており、その割合は血液100容量部
に対してCPD液14容量部である。この割合は一般的
に推奨されており、多くの診療機関がその比率を厳守し
ているものである。次に、検査試料の分析が終了した
後、安定化剤検出試薬を用いて安定化剤の有無、及び/
又は量を測定する。Citric acids are mainly used as an anticoagulant (such as an anticoagulant) such as an ACD solution containing the above as a main component or a CPD solution which is frequently used in pre-transfusion tests such as blood banks and the Red Cross. (Mixture). Citric acids require a much larger amount than blood to prevent blood coagulation. The quantitative ratio of anticoagulant to blood is determined, and the ratio is 14 parts by volume of CPD solution to 100 parts by volume of blood. This ratio is generally recommended, and many clinics adhere to it. Next, after the analysis of the test sample is completed, the presence or absence of a stabilizer is determined using a stabilizer detection reagent, and / or
Or measure the amount.
【0019】安定化剤の有無、及び/又は量を測定する
ための方法、並びに安定化剤検出試薬を用いる場合の当
該試薬は、用いられた安定化剤の種類に依存して異な
る。例えば、安定化剤としてクエン酸を用いる場合は、
後述の実施例に記載されているように、グリシルグリシ
ン緩衝液に、リンゴ酸脱水素酵素(MDH)、乳酸脱水
素酵素(LDH)、及び還元型のニコチンアミドジヌク
レオチド(NADH)を含有させた第一試薬、及びグリ
シルグリシン緩衝液にクエン酸リアーゼを含有させた第
二試薬の2つが用いられる。The method for measuring the presence and / or amount of the stabilizer, and the use of the reagent for detecting the stabilizer, differ depending on the type of the stabilizer used. For example, when using citric acid as a stabilizer,
As described in Examples below, a glycylglycine buffer solution contains malate dehydrogenase (MDH), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and reduced nicotinamide dinucleotide (NADH). And a second reagent containing citrate lyase in a glycylglycine buffer.
【0020】この安定化剤検出試薬は、調製後直ぐに以
下の測定に用いてもよく、また保存しておくことも可能
である。保存は、試薬の安定性を考慮し、低温で行われ
ることが好ましい。This reagent for detecting a stabilizer may be used for the following measurement immediately after preparation or may be stored. The storage is preferably performed at a low temperature in consideration of the stability of the reagent.
【0021】上記第一試薬及び第二試薬を用いることに
より、安定化剤として用いたクエン酸の有無及び量を測
定する方法は、安定化剤の量をNADH量に置き換え
て、このNADH量を測定するものである。すなわち、
分析反応後に第一及び第二試薬を加え、クエン酸分解酵
素の作用によりクエン酸の分解反応を行うと、この酵素
反応の進行度に応じてNADHの量が減少する。すなわ
ち、安定化剤として含有されているクエン酸の量は、N
ADHの減少量に置き換わることになる。従って、分解
酵素による反応の前後においてUVメーターを用いて3
40nmの吸光度値を測定し、吸光度変化量を求めて検
量線を作成する方法によってNADHの減少量、すなわ
ち、クエン酸の含有量を測定することができる。前記酵
素による反応は、37℃、或いは室温等一定の温度で行
われることが好ましい。酵素反応の反応速度が温度変化
により多少影響を受けるためである。A method for measuring the presence or absence and the amount of citric acid used as a stabilizer by using the first reagent and the second reagent is to replace the amount of the stabilizer with the amount of NADH and to reduce the amount of NADH. It is to be measured. That is,
When the first and second reagents are added after the analysis reaction and the decomposition reaction of citric acid is performed by the action of citrate-degrading enzyme, the amount of NADH decreases according to the degree of progress of the enzyme reaction. That is, the amount of citric acid contained as a stabilizer is N
It will be replaced by the decrease in ADH. Therefore, before and after the reaction by the decomposing enzyme, 3
The amount of decrease in NADH, that is, the content of citric acid, can be measured by a method of measuring the absorbance value at 40 nm and calculating the amount of change in absorbance to prepare a calibration curve. The reaction with the enzyme is preferably performed at a constant temperature such as 37 ° C. or room temperature. This is because the reaction rate of the enzyme reaction is somewhat affected by the temperature change.
【0022】また、NADH変化量を、ジアホラーゼ、
やフェナジンメトサルフェート(PMS)等を用いて、
テトラゾリウム塩であるホルマザンに変化させる方法を
適用することもできる。この方法の利点は、NADH量
を目視で確認できることである。The NADH change amount is determined by diaphorase,
And phenazine methosulfate (PMS)
A method of changing to formazan which is a tetrazolium salt can also be applied. The advantage of this method is that the amount of NADH can be confirmed visually.
【0023】なお、酵素免疫測定法(EIA)における
測定の場合は、反応終了後の検液をを上記測定に供する
のではなく、血漿サンプルを反応させた後、抗体と結合
した標識抗原と遊離の標識抗原の分離(B/F分離)を
行う直前の検液を用いて測定を行う必要がある。以上の
方法により、検体試料が正確に分注されているか否かを
確認することができる。In the case of the enzyme immunoassay (EIA), the test solution after completion of the reaction is not subjected to the above-mentioned measurement, but the plasma sample is reacted, and then the labeled antigen bound to the antibody is released. It is necessary to perform measurement using the test solution immediately before the separation of the labeled antigen (B / F separation). By the above method, it is possible to confirm whether or not the specimen sample has been accurately dispensed.
【0024】[0024]
【作用】本発明の方法により、従来確認が不可能であっ
た血清或いは血漿の分注を正確に確認できる。また、検
体中に必然的に含まれる成分を指標としているため、い
ずれの分析用試薬を用いる場合にも適用でき、かつ経済
性にも優れている。According to the method of the present invention, the dispensing of serum or plasma, which could not be confirmed conventionally, can be accurately confirmed. In addition, since the components inevitably contained in the sample are used as an index, the method can be applied to the case where any analysis reagent is used, and is excellent in economical efficiency.
【0025】[0025]
【実施例】以下実施例を詳細に説明する。 実施例1 B型肝炎ウイルス検査の1つであるRPHA
法に適用した例 1)CPD液の調製The embodiments will be described in detail below. Example 1 RPHA, one of the hepatitis B virus tests
Example 1) Preparation of CPD solution
【0026】クエン酸[HO・C・(COOH)・(C
H2 COOH)2 ]0.33g、クエン酸三ナトリウム
[HO・C・(COONa)・(CH2 COON
a)2 ]2.63g、及びグルコース[C6 H12O6 ]
2.32gを精製水に溶解した。全量を100mlにし
た後、pHを測定し、pH5.4〜5.8であることを
確認した。(ここで、pHがこの範囲内でなければ、ク
エン酸、または水酸化ナトリウムでpHの調整を行
う。) 2)CPD含有血漿の調製Citric acid [HO.C. (COOH). (C
H 2 COOH) 2 ], 0.33 g, trisodium citrate [HO.C. (COONa). (CH 2 COON)
a) 2 ] 2.63 g and glucose [C 6 H 12 O 6 ]
2.32 g was dissolved in purified water. After adjusting the total amount to 100 ml, the pH was measured, and it was confirmed that the pH was 5.4 to 5.8. (If the pH is not within this range, the pH is adjusted with citric acid or sodium hydroxide.) 2) Preparation of CPD-containing plasma
【0027】上記1)で調製したCPD溶液1.4ml
を含む試験管に、採取直後の血液10.0mlを添加し
た。十分転倒混和した後、1,500rpm、10分で
遠心し、液体部分(CPD含有血漿)を得た。 3)RPHA法の実施1.4 ml of the CPD solution prepared in 1) above
10.0 ml of blood immediately after collection was added to a test tube containing. After thoroughly mixing by inversion, the mixture was centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 10 minutes to obtain a liquid portion (CPD-containing plasma). 3) Implementation of RPHA method
【0028】上記2)で得られたCPD含有血漿をRP
HA用緩衝液で4倍に希釈した。この希釈血漿25μ
l、及び抗HB抗体感作血球浮遊液25μlをマイクロ
プレートに滴下し、プレートミキサーにより攪拌した。
約2時間放置した後、感作血球のプレート底面での血球
像を観察し、凝集していればHB抗原陽性、凝集してい
なければHB抗原陰性と判断した。 4)クエン酸検出試薬の調製The CPD-containing plasma obtained in the above 2) is converted to RP
Diluted 4-fold with HA buffer. This diluted plasma 25μ
1 and 25 μl of the anti-HB antibody-sensitized blood cell suspension were dropped on a microplate, and stirred with a plate mixer.
After standing for about 2 hours, a blood cell image of the sensitized blood cells on the bottom of the plate was observed, and it was determined that HB antigen was positive if aggregated, and HB antigen negative if not aggregated. 4) Preparation of citric acid detection reagent
【0029】グリシルグリシン[CH2 (NH2 )CO
NHCH2 COOH]13.2gを1,000mlの精
製水に溶解し、0.1Mグリシルグリシン溶液を作成し
た。また、水酸化ナトリウムNaOH4gを1,000
mlの精製水に溶解し、0.1M水酸化ナトリウム溶液
を作成した。両者をpHが7.8になるように混合し、
0.1Mグリシルグリシン緩衝液を作成した。この緩衝
液100mlにリンゴ酸脱水素酵素(MDH)約380
単位、乳酸脱水素酵素(LDH)約780単位、及び還
元型のニコチンアミドジヌクレオチド(NADH)約1
6mgを添加し、試薬(i)を調製した。また、0.1
Mグリシルグリシン緩衝液10mlに、約400単位の
クエン酸リアーゼを溶解し、試薬(ii)を調製した。 5)クエン酸の定量方法 a)測定方法Glycylglycine [CH 2 (NH 2 ) CO
NHCH 2 COOH] was dissolved in 1,000 ml of purified water to prepare a 0.1 M glycylglycine solution. Also, 4 g of sodium hydroxide NaOH was added to 1,000 g
This was dissolved in ml of purified water to prepare a 0.1 M sodium hydroxide solution. Both are mixed so that the pH becomes 7.8,
A 0.1 M glycylglycine buffer was made. About 100 ml of malate dehydrogenase (MDH) is added to 100 ml of this buffer.
Unit, about 780 units of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and about 1 unit of reduced nicotinamide dinucleotide (NADH)
6 mg was added to prepare a reagent (i). Also, 0.1
Approximately 400 units of citrate lyase was dissolved in 10 ml of M glycylglycine buffer to prepare reagent (ii). 5) Citric acid determination method a) Measurement method
【0030】上記4)で調製した試薬(i)1mlに、
上記3)のRPHA法によるHB抗原測定終了後の上清
液25μlを加え、1分間放置した後、UVメーターを
用いて340nmにおける吸光度値(E1 )を測定し
た。更に、試薬(ii)10μlを添加して素早く攪拌
し、5分間放置した後の吸光度値(E2 )を測定した。
試薬(ii)添加直前の吸光度値(E1 )から試薬(i
i)添加5分後の吸光度値(E2 )を減算することによ
って吸光度変化量(E1 −E2 )を求めた。 (b)検量線の作成In 1 ml of the reagent (i) prepared in 4) above,
After completion of the measurement of HB antigen by the RPHA method in 3) above, 25 μl of the supernatant was added, and the mixture was allowed to stand for 1 minute. Then, the absorbance value (E 1 ) at 340 nm was measured using a UV meter. Further, 10 μl of the reagent (ii) was added, the mixture was rapidly stirred, and the absorbance (E 2 ) was measured after standing for 5 minutes.
From the absorbance value (E 1 ) immediately before the addition of the reagent (ii), the reagent (i)
i) The amount of change in absorbance (E 1 −E 2 ) was determined by subtracting the absorbance value (E 2 ) 5 minutes after the addition. (B) Preparation of calibration curve
【0031】同様に、上記a)において、上清液をそれ
ぞれ5、10、15、20、又は30μl添加した場合
の吸光度変化量を求めた。その結果を下記の表1に示
す。なお、クエン酸0.4g/lを含有する標準液の吸
光度変化量を測定したところ0.3862であった。Similarly, in a) above, the amount of change in absorbance when 5, 10, 15, 20, or 30 μl of the supernatant was added was determined. The results are shown in Table 1 below. The change in the absorbance of a standard solution containing 0.4 g / l of citric acid was 0.3862.
【0032】[0032]
【表1】 また、図1に示すように、上記結果より、上清液量と吸
光度変化量の関係を表す検量線を作成した。図1の検量
線を用いると、RPHA法実施後の上清液量から、この
RPHA法において実際に使用された希釈検体量を知る
ことができる。本実施例は凝集法による感染症検査にお
ける本発明の適用例を示したが、本発明の適用はこれに
限られるものではない。[Table 1] Further, as shown in FIG. 1, a calibration curve representing the relationship between the amount of the supernatant liquid and the amount of change in absorbance was created from the above results. By using the calibration curve of FIG. 1, the amount of the diluted sample actually used in the RPHA method can be known from the amount of the supernatant liquid after the RPHA method is performed. Although the present embodiment shows an application example of the present invention in an infectious disease test by the agglutination method, the application of the present invention is not limited to this.
【0033】[0033]
【発明の効果】本発明の検体分注確認方法は、いずれの
体液の分注をも正確に確認することができるため、サン
プルの分注不良に起因する感染症検査での偽陰性発生
や、交差適合試験における判定ミス等を防止することが
できる。従って、感染症の伝播或いは血液型不適合によ
る輸血ミスなどを防ぐことができる。また、本発明の検
体分注確認方法は、検体中に必然的に含まれる成分を指
標としているため、経済性にも優れている。The specimen dispensing confirmation method of the present invention can accurately confirm the dispensing of any body fluid, and can generate false negatives in infectious disease tests due to poor dispensing of samples, It is possible to prevent a determination error or the like in the cross matching test. Therefore, it is possible to prevent transmission of an infectious disease or blood transfusion error due to blood group incompatibility. In addition, the method for confirming sample dispensing of the present invention is excellent in economical efficiency because the component necessarily contained in the sample is used as an index.
【図1】本発明の一実施例において、RPHA法実施後
の上清液量及び吸光度変化量の関係から得られた検量線
を示す図。FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a calibration curve obtained from the relationship between the amount of supernatant and the amount of change in absorbance after the RPHA method in one example of the present invention.
Claims (3)
注し、これを分析用試薬と反応させることによって検体
試料中の分析対象物を分析するに際し、前記検体試料の
分注の適否を確認する方法において、前記検体試料に予
め安定化剤を添加する工程と、前記反応が終了した後に
安定化剤検出試薬を用いて前記安定化剤の有無及び/又
は量を測定する工程とを具備することを特徴とする検体
分注確認方法。When a sample sample derived from a body fluid is dispensed into a reaction vessel and reacted with an analysis reagent to analyze an analyte in the sample sample, it is determined whether or not the sample sample is dispensed. The method for confirming comprises a step of adding a stabilizer in advance to the specimen sample and a step of measuring the presence and / or amount of the stabilizer using a stabilizer detection reagent after the reaction is completed. A method for confirming sample dispensing, comprising:
する血液凝固阻害剤であり、前記検体試料が、少なくと
も血液を構成する成分を含む請求項1記載の検体分注確
認方法。2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the stabilizer is a blood coagulation inhibitor containing citric acids as a main component, and the sample sample contains at least components constituting blood.
100容量部に対して血液凝固阻害剤14容量部を添加
混合する請求項2記載の検体分注確認方法。3. The method according to claim 2, wherein blood is used as the sample, and 14 parts by volume of a blood coagulation inhibitor is added to 100 parts by volume of the blood and mixed.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP4058422A JP3064645B2 (en) | 1992-03-16 | 1992-03-16 | Sample dispensing confirmation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP4058422A JP3064645B2 (en) | 1992-03-16 | 1992-03-16 | Sample dispensing confirmation method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH05264414A JPH05264414A (en) | 1993-10-12 |
| JP3064645B2 true JP3064645B2 (en) | 2000-07-12 |
Family
ID=13083949
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP4058422A Expired - Fee Related JP3064645B2 (en) | 1992-03-16 | 1992-03-16 | Sample dispensing confirmation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP3064645B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP4763160B2 (en) * | 2001-06-18 | 2011-08-31 | 日立アロカメディカル株式会社 | Dispensing pass / fail judgment device |
-
1992
- 1992-03-16 JP JP4058422A patent/JP3064645B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH05264414A (en) | 1993-10-12 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Doumas et al. | Candidate reference method for determination of total bilirubin in serum: development and validation. | |
| JPH02263163A (en) | Test agent for measuring density of seram fructosamine in sample derived from blood sample or blood | |
| US20110165608A1 (en) | Blood component measurement method utilizing hemolyzed whole blood, and kit for the method | |
| CN102680698A (en) | Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) assay kit (latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetry) | |
| CN113884687B (en) | Dissociation agent for detecting content of 25-hydroxy vitamin D and preparation method thereof | |
| Bhargava et al. | The hemolyzed sample: To analyse or not to analyse | |
| Chromy et al. | Photometric determination of total protein in lipemic sera | |
| CN106596968A (en) | Dot gold infiltration kit for detecting urine microalbumin, and application of dot gold infiltration kit | |
| JP3064645B2 (en) | Sample dispensing confirmation method | |
| JP4580180B2 (en) | Measurement value decrease inhibitor for immunoassay and immunoassay using the same | |
| JP5294257B2 (en) | Hemoglobin measurement method and measurement kit | |
| JP3228791B2 (en) | Measuring method of antigen or antibody in sample | |
| JP2963793B2 (en) | Body fluid component analysis method | |
| EP1835284B1 (en) | Substrates and methods for assaying deubiquitinating enzymes activity | |
| JP2007240163A (en) | Measuring method of protein in sample and measuring reagent | |
| Lehane et al. | Colorimetric quantitation of albumin in microliter volumes of serum | |
| EP4459291A1 (en) | Method for measuring element of hemocyte component and element of non-hemocyte component in minute amount of blood, device, and pipette cartridge | |
| Kelley et al. | B-030 Establishment of Concentration-Specific Hemolysis Thresholds for the New Roche Bilirubin Direct Gen. 2 Assay and Investigation of Dilution as a Possible Mitigation Strategy for Hemolyzed Specimens | |
| Weissman et al. | Evaluation of the Corning 940 calcium titrator for use with serum and urine | |
| Men | SpurIous BIcarbonate Result wIth the Kodak Ektachem | |
| EP3951389A1 (en) | Immunoassay reagent and immunoassay method | |
| Islam | B-028 Absorbance vs. Chemiluminescent: A Comparison of Two Different Enzyme-Immunoassay Methods of Digoxin Measurement | |
| JP4515733B2 (en) | Urinary total hemoglobin quantitative reagent | |
| CN108152177B (en) | Method for rapidly detecting hematocrit | |
| WO2025053810A1 (en) | Glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase kit |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20000328 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080512 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090512 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100512 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100512 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100512 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| S111 | Request for change of ownership or part of ownership |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313113 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100512 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110512 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |