JP3143095B2 - Job evaluation device - Google Patents

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a job evaluation apparatus using a computer. In particular, the present invention relates to an improvement in a suitable job evaluation technique that enables accurate job evaluation by utilizing data evaluated for the type of job in which a person who is actually employed is employed.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art Hitherto, there has been a service in which a subject answers a plurality of questions prepared in the form of a suitable job evaluation questionnaire, and based on the answers, examines a suitable job for the subject. This job evaluation questionnaire is created by a service provider, and determines the suitability of the character for each job type and collates the job of the subject from the behavioral style and character.

[0003]

However, according to the above-mentioned conventional method for evaluating employment, only suitable employment is specified from the general theory, and the reliability of employment selection, which is one of the important choices in life, is low. Was something. In other words, the conventional employment evaluation method is not an evaluation based on feedback on how a person who actually works in each occupation evaluates the occupation and feels worthwhile.

[0004] For example, many of the questions provided in the job evaluation questionnaire do not have any context with each other, and the items that can be read from the answers to such questions are simply whether or not the subject's personality is open or bright. There was only. Since the evaluation result was compared with the general image of each occupation to determine the occupation, the characteristics of the subject may not actually match the suitability required for the occupation. Particularly in recent years, new occupations have emerged one after another, and due to the promotion of computerization, the suitability for a specific occupation has changed every day. There was a risk.

[0005] On the other hand, even if a person who is actually working is evaluated for job employment and attempts to associate it with the result of the subject, the occupation in the sample group does not fit the skin and is Since many people do not work with value, correct evaluation cannot be performed.

In view of the above problems, the inventor of the present application has made a technical assessment that, after properly assessing the suitability of a person who actually works, compares the result with the evaluation result of the subject to make an appropriate job evaluation. I came to thought.

[0007]

That is, the first object of the present invention is to evaluate the appropriateness of the population actually working by scoring the aptitude of the population actually working and comparing it with the aptitude of the test subject. It is to provide a device.

[0008] A second object of the present invention is to provide an appropriate job evaluation method for accurately evaluating the appropriate job by scoring the aptitude of the population actually working and comparing it with the aptitude of the subject.

An employment evaluation apparatus which solves the first problem is an employment evaluation apparatus which evaluates an occupation suitable for a subject based on answer information to a group of evaluation questions of the subject . Answer information for the evaluation question group
The degree of conformity to the job type to be evaluated based on the
Engage in a first qualified group of members and certain occupations
Based on the information of the members of the group
Is a member with a high degree of conformity to the job type to be evaluated
And a second suitable group consisting of:
Determination means; 2) the first suitable group and the first suitable group determined by the suitable group determination means;
And the response rate of the second qualified group, respectively,
Difference for calculating the difference between the qualified group of the subject and the second qualified group
Min calculation means, 3) the difference difference calculation means has calculated a predetermined range Ward
By digitizing according to the minute, the point matrix
Point matrix data creation means for creating data , 4) created by this point matrix data creation means
The first to store point matrix data by job type
A database, 5) a second database storing the average and standard deviation of the scores calculated based on the point matrix data and the answer information to the evaluation question group of the population for each occupation, and 6) suitable for the subject. When evaluating the type of job to be performed, the raw score of the subject is calculated for each type of job in association with the point matrix data stored in the first database, and the average and standard deviation stored in the second database are calculated. A processing device configured to calculate a deviation value of the raw score for each occupation based on the occupation type, and to evaluate the degree of conformity of the subject for each occupation in accordance with the degree of the deviation value.

[0010] Here, the "population" refers to a group of persons who actually work in a certain occupation, sampled in advance regardless of occupation. It is sufficient for the population to be composed of samples (members) that can reflect the average image of the nation, and it is preferable that the population includes workers in a wide range of occupations.
If there is a bias in the sample occupations, it is preferable that the occupation is selected so as to match the composition of the entire nation. It may also be a population of people who are deemed to be worthwhile for the occupation in which they are employed. The “evaluation question group” refers to a bunch of questions composed of options that can represent the test subject's personality, behavioral style, and thinking style in various aspects and that indicate the degree of matching in a stepwise manner. "Processing equipment"
Is a general-purpose computer device, which has a stand-alone configuration and may be provided as a LAN or WAN server. The comparison between the occupation type and the answer information is made by indirectly referring to the occupation type file that associates gender and occupation name with the occupation type code, and the question file that associates the position information of the evaluation question with the question number. There may be. The average and the standard deviation may be stored separately.

[0011] Here, when the point matrix data for a certain job type is generated, the processing device refers to the answer content of a group of questions set to be able to evaluate the degree of conformity to the job type and evaluates the answer content. Can be extracted as a group suitable for the job type. According to this device, only a sample working with value can be used as basic data, so that it is possible to determine whether or not a job is suitable in comparison with a person who conforms to the current state of the occupation. Become like "Questions set to be able to evaluate the degree of relevance to the occupation type" include, for example, questions directly asking whether or not they are worthy of the current job, and indirect questions asking the consciousness of the subject. May be configured.

[0012] For example, when the point matrix data for a certain job type is generated, the processing device tallies the response rates of the group and the population that are engaged in the job type for each of a plurality of options set for each evaluation question. Calculates the difference between the response rate of the group engaged in the occupation and the response rate of the population, and assigns a score according to the difference in the response rate, so that each option that composes the evaluation question corresponds to the score The generated matrix data is generated for each job type and stored in the first database.

For example, when the point matrix data is generated, the processing unit converts the value of the response rate into a range calculated and set statistically and converts the score into a point. Specifically, the range division is statistically determined in consideration of the balance of the response rate.
For example, if there are three choices and the top 5% of the entire distribution is set to +1 point, the response rate of the top 5% is set as the boundary of the range division. The same applies to the range division for the lower distribution. If the response rates of the top 5% and the bottom 5% were + 16% and -16%, respectively, the response rate of + 16% or more was +1 point, and the points within ± 16% were 0 and-.
The range is divided so that 16% or less is -1 point. The program designer may arbitrarily determine the distribution ratio at which the score boundary is determined.

For example, when calculating the average and the standard deviation in a certain occupation, the above processing apparatus compares the answer information to the options for each evaluation question with the point matrix data and assigns a score to each member of the population. Then, the scores given to all the evaluation questions are totaled, and the average and the standard deviation are calculated based on the distribution of the total scores for each member.

For example, the processing apparatus refers to the point matrix data for each occupation type when evaluating the occupation type suitable for the subject, and assigns a score according to which option is answered for each evaluation question. Calculate raw scores by summing the scores given to all evaluation questions.

For example, the above processing apparatus calculates a deviation value according to a ratio of a difference between a raw score and an average score of a population to a standard deviation when evaluating a job type suitable for a subject. Specifically, an appropriate calculation logic is calculated according to the distribution of points. For example, if the distribution is close to the normal distribution, ((subject's raw score-population mean score) x 10 / standard deviation)
Calculate according to a deviation value calculation method such as +50. If there is a bias in the distribution, for example, calculate the deviation of the subject (percentage of the distribution in the whole) on the point distribution, and refer to the deviation value in the normal distribution to determine the value of the deviation. Can be considered as a deviation value.

For example, the above-mentioned processing apparatus is configured so that, when evaluating the occupation suitable for the subject, the one having the highest calculated deviation value can be evaluated as the occupation suitable for the subject. Further, in order to clarify the degree of suitability of a suitable job, the suitable job may be enumerated in correspondence with the deviation value and printed or displayed on a screen.

For example, the evaluation question group is associated in advance with a specific evaluation index, and the processing apparatus associates response information from the subject with the evaluation index when evaluating a job type suitable for the subject. Attribute analysis. The "evaluation index" is a parameter that can evaluate, for example, "decision-making style", "degree of dependency tendency", "tolerance to uncertainty", "complexity preference", "career orientation", "lifestyle" and the like. A group.

For example, the processing device further includes a third database for storing information related to the evaluation question. Then, when evaluating a job type suitable for the subject, the information on the evaluation question stored in the third database can be presented to the subject in a referable manner. “Presently available” refers to an output mode in which the evaluation result is printed out or displayed on a screen.

[0020] For example, the processing apparatus further includes a fourth database for storing information on the job type. Then, when evaluating a job type suitable for the subject, information corresponding to the job type specified to be suitable for the subject is read from the fourth database and presented to the subject for reference. Here, the “information on the occupation” refers to information that is suitable for the occupation and other information useful for the subject, such as messages and image information. "Show visible"
Has the same meaning as described above.

Further, in the present invention, the above-mentioned processing apparatus comprises:
It may be configured to be connectable to a terminal device via a line. And when the job evaluation is requested from the terminal device,
Based on the answer information input from the terminal device, the occupation suitable for the subject operating the terminal device can be evaluated. Here, "line" refers to a WAN such as a subscriber line or a dedicated line. "Presentation" includes generating, transferring, and storing a file in a hypertext format that can be browsed from a terminal device using browser software in a storage area on the server or the server of the provider.

The job evaluation method that solves the second problem is a job evaluation method that evaluates a job suitable for a subject based on answer information to a group of evaluation questions of the subject. First, set a person who is engaged in any occupation as a population in advance,
Among the evaluation questions given to the population, referencing the contents of the question set to be able to evaluate the degree of conformity to the occupation, the group whose answer was positive was matched to the occupation It is extracted as a group, and the characteristic tendency of the group suitable for the occupation is quantified in the comparison between the entire group suitable for each occupation and the group suitable for each occupation. Then, when evaluating the occupation that fits the subject, digitize the tendency that the answer information has for the evaluation question group of the subject, and compare it with the numerical value indicating the tendency of the group that is suitable for each occupation,
Evaluate the degree of fitness of each subject for each occupation.

The present invention relates to a job evaluation method for evaluating an occupation suitable for a subject on the basis of information on the subject's response to the evaluation question group. 1) Answer information for members of the population to the evaluation question group
The degree of conformity to the job type to be evaluated based on the
Engage in a first qualified group of members and certain occupations
Based on the information of the members of the group
Is a member with a high degree of conformity to the job type to be evaluated
And a second suitable group consisting of:
A determination step; 2) a first suitability set determined by the suitability group determination step
The response rates of the group and the second qualified group, respectively,
Calculating a difference between a first qualified group and the second qualified group
3) a difference calculated by the difference calculating step,
By quantifying the response rate according to the box division,
Point to create point matrix data for each job type
Doo matrix data creation step, 4) This point matrix data creation step to create
Point matrix data to the first database
Storing, 5) storing in the second database the mean and standard deviation of the number that is calculated based on the response information for the evaluation questions group of the said point matrix data population in job units, 6) Calculating a raw score of the subject for each type of job corresponding to the point matrix data stored in the first database when evaluating the type of job suitable for the subject; and 7) storing the score in the second database. 8) calculating a deviation value of the raw score for each occupation based on the average and the standard deviation, and 8) evaluating a degree of conformity of the subject for each occupation according to the degree of the deviation value.

According to the present invention, the number of times the subject
Based on the answer information, let the subject evaluate the occupation that fits
This is a recording medium on which a program for recording is recorded.

The recording medium is a medium on which information (mainly digital data and programs) is recorded by some physical means, and performs a predetermined function on a processing device such as a computer or a dedicated processor. That can be done. In short, any method may be used as long as the program is downloaded to the computer by some means and a predetermined function is executed. For example, flexible disk, fixed disk, magnetic tape, magneto-optical disk, C
D, CD-ROM, CD-R, DVD-RAM, DVD
Including -ROM, DVD-R, PD, MD, DCC, ROM cartridge, RAM memory cartridge with battery back-up, flash memory cartridge, a nonvolatile RAM cartridge or the like.

[0026]

Next, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. Embodiment 1 (Configuration) Embodiment 1 of the present invention relates to a stand-alone type job evaluation apparatus. As shown in FIG. 1, the job evaluation apparatus according to the first embodiment includes a processing device 1, a point matrix database 2, an average / standard deviation database 3, a reading device 4, an input device 5, a display device 6, and a printer 7. I have.

The processing device 1 has a configuration as a general-purpose computer device. Specifically, the processing device 1
Fixed disk 100, CPU 101, RAM 102, R
OM103, interface circuits 104, 105, 1
06, video display circuit (VDP) 107 and CD-R
An OM drive device 108 is provided.

The CPU 101 can execute the program transferred from a recording medium such as a CD-ROM to a fixed disk (not shown) after transferring the program to the RAM 102, thereby causing the processing apparatus to function as the job evaluation apparatus of the present invention. Is configured. For example, when the processing device operates on an operating system (OS), C
The PU 101 first executes the IPL of the ROM 103 to
The S program is transferred to the RAM 102 and operates according to the OS. When the user operates the input device 5 to support the execution of the job evaluation program, the CPU 101 is configured to transfer the corresponding job evaluation program from the fixed disk to the RAM 102 and execute the program. The job evaluation program
It is supplied by an external recording medium such as FD, CD-ROM or DVD. When the CPU 101 executes the installation program (installer) stored in the recording medium, the job evaluation program is transferred to the fixed disk in an executable manner. This suitable job evaluation program may be in the form of an executable file, or may be in the form of a macro program executed in a general-purpose database application. If provided in the form of a macro program, after the corresponding database application is executed,
The macro program is configured to be executed.

The RAM 102 stores the application programs and the OS storage area and the CPU 101 as described above.
In addition to the operation area, output data in the job evaluation program is stored. ROM 103 is I
PL is stored. The interface circuit 104 receives data from the reading device 4, the interface circuit 105 receives operation data from the input device 5, and the interface circuit 106 outputs print data to the printer 7. Video display circuit 107
Can output a video signal in a format that can be displayed on the display device 6 in accordance with the character data and image data transferred from the CPU 101. CD-ROM drive device 10
Reference numeral 8 denotes a CD-ROM mounted according to the control of the CPU 101.
Data can be transferred from the ROM or the like to the RAM 102 or the fixed disk 100.

The fixed disk 100 has a point matrix database 2, an average / standard deviation database 3,
The question database 8 and the explanation database 9
Stored together with the job evaluation program.

The point matrix database 2 can store point matrix data calculated in a procedure to be described later for each job type. The point matrix data is referred to by the job type code.
The average / standard deviation database 3 can store the average value and the standard deviation of the scores for the population calculated in a procedure described later for each occupation. The point matrix data and the average / standard deviation may be generated by the processing device 1 and stored on the fixed disk 100, or may be generated in advance by a manufacturer and supplied as a database. That is, a configuration may be adopted in which a predetermined database is read from a CD-ROM or the like and transferred to the fixed disk 100.

The question database 8 stores evaluation question information for job evaluation. The explanation database 9 stores comments on the contents and suitability of the job type in association with the job type.

The reading device 4 is required when the processing device 1 calculates the point matrix data and the average / standard deviation. The reading device 4 can read the evaluation question answer sheet collected from the population and refer to it from the CPU 101. Is to be entered. The device is required when reading answer information from the answer sheet, and is not an essential component for the processing of the present invention. However, this reading device 4 is necessary when the subject is asked to answer the job evaluation question using the answer sheet. The input device 5 can input operation data corresponding to the operation of the subject, such as a mouse and a keyboard. The display device 6 is a display means such as a general-purpose CRT or a liquid crystal panel. The printer 7 is a general-purpose printing device capable of printing in accordance with print data.

(Database Creation Process) Next, a database creation procedure of the present invention will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. Prior to this processing, it is necessary to set a population and make members of the population respond to an evaluation question answer sheet for evaluating appropriate employment. The population is preferably composed of samples (members) approximating the average occupational balance of the nation, and preferably includes all occupations to be evaluated as suitable. The evaluation question does not need to be the same as the question used at the time of job evaluation, and is preferably composed of various question items so that the suitability for each job type can be emphasized.

For example, in order to accurately determine the attributes of members of a population, a group of attribute questions for asking detailed questions about gender, educational background, age, occupation, etc .; , An activity / motivation evaluation question group that evaluates behavioral style, thinking style, motivation and the like in three levels, for example. In particular, it is important to establish a group of aptitude questions that can determine the value of spending on the occupation. The aptitude question group is a group of questions that can be evaluated for the degree of relevance to the occupation.For example, the aptitude question group is composed of questions directly asking whether or not the current job is worthwhile. Are you able to demonstrate your abilities? "
"Is there any joy in my work?""Is it fun to work in the workplace?""Is it inspired by people in the workplace?"
It may be composed of indirect questions such as "whether you can do what you want to do in the workplace" or "whether your company's products and services are highly evaluated from the outside."

The answer sheet answered by the members is
The options that are read from the reading device 4 and selected for each evaluation question for each member are recorded, stored as a database on a fixed disk, and stored. Note that the answer sheet may be read and converted into data by another device, and the data may be used by the appropriate job evaluation device. These evaluation questions may be configured to be individually input by operating the processing device 1, for example. However, in order to obtain a large number of population data at the same time, it is convenient to input data using an answer sheet that can request and collect answers from employees extracted from each job type.

Point value calculation (S10): Now CPU
101 extracts data for each job type from population data based on answer information corresponding to an attribute question group. Then, the extracted group is further evaluated based on the suitability question group, and the groups considered to be suitable for the job type are narrowed down (S101). For example, if each item of the aptitude question is given the option of "I want to do", "I want to do it", or "I do not want to do", "I want to do" or "I want to do"
It is determined that the job type corresponding to the item is suitable in the order of “I do not want to do”. Members marked as "I do not want to do" are judged to be working in this occupation but not feeling worthwhile, so this member is excluded from the group to be narrowed down. Since there are misunderstandings in the answers of the members, it is preferable to assign a plurality of items for one occupation and determine the suitability based on the plurality of answers. By the above processing, only the group which feels worthwhile for each occupation every day and is considered to be suitable for that occupation is extracted. The group that can be determined to be working in a suitable job for each occupation is referred to as a “suitable group”. However, in the following processing, it is of course also possible to use the original population itself that matches the occupational balance of the people instead of the appropriate population.

After the appropriate group is extracted, as shown in Table 1, the response rate (A) of the appropriate group is determined for each evaluation question.
Are counted (S102). For example, if there are three choices, “like”, “dislike”, and “neither”, if 60% of the members in the suitability group have marked “like” for question Q1, the answer rate will be 60%.

[0039]

[Table 1]

Next, for the entire population which is not narrowed down by occupation type, a sample (member) who is working in a suitable job is extracted based on the answer information as described above (S10).
3). By this extraction, a population N (N is a natural number equal to or less than the total population M) extracted from the general public who is considered to be relatively suitable. Then, for this population, the response rate (B) is tabulated as shown in Table 2 in the same procedure as described above (S104). However, the response rate of the original population without performing the processing in S103 may be totaled.

[0041]

[Table 2]

Next, the difference between the response rate (A) of the qualified group working in the occupation type A and the response rate (B) of the population is calculated for each option constituting each evaluation question, as shown in Table 3. A table is created for each job type (S105).

[0043]

[Table 3]

By this processing, it becomes clear that the person who occupies the occupation type A should have a particularly remarkable tendency. In other words, if the difference in response rate is large and positive, there is a tendency to strongly select the option. Conversely, if the difference is large and negative, there is a tendency not to select that option. This means that there is no difference between employment and non-employee of occupation type A. Therefore, if the tendency to become significantly positive and the tendency to become significantly negative can be scored as a tendency to characterize this occupation type A, valuable job employment judgment data will be obtained.

Then, the CPU 101 calculates the number of points according to the magnitude and sign of the difference between the response rates (S10).
6). The result is point matrix data. For example, in a distribution of scores, a deviation (for example, upper 5%, lower 5%) of a group to be divided into points is determined, and a response rate corresponding to the deviation is obtained. Based on the response rate difference table in Table 3, the response rate is +16 when the top 5% of the distribution is +1 point.
%, And the response rate is -16% or less when the lower 5% is -1 point. The range between them is zero. As a result, point matrix data for the job type A as shown in Table 4 is obtained. The calculated point matrix data is stored in the point matrix database 2 corresponding to the job type. These processes (S101 to S1)
06) is performed as long as there is a job type (S107; YES).

[0046]

[Table 4]

Point processing for the population (S11):
When the point matrix data is generated, the population extracted in S103 is scored for each member with reference to the data (S111). That is, a point defined by the point matrix data is assigned in correspondence with the option selected by each member. This scoring is a pre-process for obtaining statistics of the average and standard deviation of the scores for the population. By scoring, for example, a point table as shown in Table 5 is obtained for each job type. "Sample" indicates a member of the population.

[0048]

[Table 5]

The above scoring process is performed as long as there are members of the population to be sampled (S112; YES). When the scoring process is completed for all members for one occupation (S112; NO), the same scoring process is performed using point matrix data of another occupation (S11).
1, S112) is continued (S113; YES). If the scoring process is completed for all occupations and a point table for each occupation has been created (S113; NO), the average
The process proceeds to the standard deviation calculation process (S12).

Average / Standard Deviation Calculation Processing (S12): Next, the CPU 101 extracts and totals the points for each point table, calculates their average points, and calculates the standard deviation based on their distribution ( S121). That is, the tendency of those who are generally considered to be suitable for the occupation is scored. The calculation of the standard deviation is based on a commonly used formula. This table of average and standard deviation is
For example, as shown in Table 6, it is calculated in association with the job type.

[0051]

[Table 6]

The calculation of the average / standard deviation is performed as long as there is a point table for the uncalculated job (S122; Y
ES) When the calculation of the average / standard deviation is completed for all the occupations (S122; NO), the calculated average / standard deviation table is stored in the average / standard deviation database 3, and the CPU 101 performs the pre-processing. finish.

(Appropriate Job Evaluation Process) It is assumed that the point matrix data and the average / standard deviation table calculated as described above are stored on a fixed disk. In addition,
In the suitability evaluation process, the subject is configured to execute and execute the suitability evaluation program on a stand-alone computer. However, the configuration may be such that the subject answers the answer sheet and the answer sheet is read by the reading device 4 and executed. Good. The user instructs the processing device 1 to execute the job evaluation program from the input device 5. The CPU 101 reads the corresponding job evaluation program from the fixed disk 100 into the RA.
Transfer to M102 and execute.

Subject's Response Processing (S201): By executing the suitable job evaluation program, screens as shown in FIGS. 4 to 11 are sequentially displayed on the display device 6. First, FIG.
A menu screen as shown in is displayed. The user uses the input device 5 to select the “START” icon.
Next, the CPU 101 refers to the question database 8 and displays a question input screen for employment evaluation.

First, the user selects one of the icons "I want to do", "I want to do", or "I do not want to do" for the suitability question group as shown in FIG. To move to the next screen, select the "NEXT" icon.

Next, an activity evaluation question group as shown in FIG. 7 is displayed following the notice screen of FIG. When the user answers all of the questions and selects the next screen, a note as shown in FIG. 8 and a motivation evaluation questions as shown in FIG. 9 are displayed. The user also selects one of the icons and answers this question group.

Point Value Calculation Processing: When the user answers all the question groups and selects the next screen, the CPU 101 executes internal processing based on the subject's answer information. First C
The PU 101 calculates a point value for one job using point matrix data corresponding to the job (S202). That is, the CPU 101 successively refers to the option selected for each question and the point matrix data created in the above-described processing for the job type, and creates a point table as shown in Table 7, for example (S202).

[0058]

[Table 7]

After all the questions have been scored, the total value (primary score) is also calculated, and the total scores (primary scores) are calculated from the respective point tables and tabulated as shown in Table 8, for example. This process is a pre-process for converting the content of the answer into a score so that the answer can be compared with the population. The calculated raw score table is temporarily stored in a memory such as the RAM 102.

[0060]

[Table 8]

When the scoring for one occupation is completed,
The same scoring process is continued for other occupations (S20).
3; YES, S202). When the scoring process is completed for all occupations (S203; NO), the process proceeds to the deviation value calculation process.

The CPU 101 calculates a deviation value related to the score for each occupation of the subject based on the raw score table for the subject calculated in S202 and the average / standard deviation table stored in the average / standard deviation database 3. (S204). That is, when the score distribution approximates the normal distribution, the CPU 101 calculates the difference between the raw score for one occupation of the subject and the average point of the population in the same occupation, and the ratio of the difference to the standard deviation. Calculate the deviation value according to. Specifically, ((subject raw score-population average score) x 10 / standard deviation)
The deviation value is calculated according to a deviation value calculation method such as +50.
If there is a bias in the point distribution, for example, calculate the deviation of the subject on the point distribution (the ratio of the total distribution), and refer to the deviation value in the normal distribution to see how much the deviation value is. A method of using the deviation value of the subject can be considered. The calculated deviation value for each job type is stored in the RAM 1 as a table associated with the job type, for example, as shown in Table 9.
02 and the like.

[0063]

[Table 9]

As long as there is another job (S205; YE
S), the above-described deviation value calculation (S204) is continued, and when the deviation value calculation is completed for all occupations (S205; NO),
The CPU 101 shifts to an output process.

When the deviation value table is calculated, the CPU 1
01 sorts occupations in ascending order of deviation value. Then, for example, a suitable job evaluation graph as shown in FIG. 10 is generated and image-displayed on the output device 6 (S206). The job evaluation graph may be formed by grouping job types according to their attributes, grouping the job types for each group, and sorting and displaying the job types in descending order of the deviation value within the group. By arranging in this way, it is possible for the user to grasp the suitability for the job type in group units. The job evaluation graph may be configured to be printable by the user's selection (S207).

Note that it is desirable to display a boundary on the suitable job evaluation graph to clearly indicate the standard of conformity. For example, if a boundary line is drawn at a high deviation value (deviation value 60 or the like), it is possible to indicate that the occupation with a deviation value higher than this is a very suitable occupation. By drawing a boundary at a low deviation value (deviation value 40 or the like), it can be shown that occupations with a deviation value smaller than this are occupations that should be avoided.

Since the occupation with the highest deviation value is determined to be the most appropriate occupation for the subject, the CPU 101 refers to the explanation database 9 to display a screen such as that shown in FIG.

Further, as shown in FIG.
May have an evaluation index corresponding to the content of the user's response. This evaluation index is associated in advance with the above-described evaluation question group. There are several types of evaluation indices, and FIG. 11 shows an ambiguous preference index and an environment-dependent index. The CPU 101 associates the subject's answer information with the evaluation index, sums up the points of the question previously associated with each index, and calculates the fitness of the index corresponding to the total point. For example, if there are many positive answers to some questions associated with the ambiguous preference index, the ambiguous preference index is evaluated as being high and displayed on the screen. With the above screen display, the job evaluation process ends.

When the subject is asked to answer on the answer sheet, the answer sheet collected from the subject is read by the reading device 4.
Then, after the above-mentioned job evaluation is performed by the job evaluation device, the evaluation result may be printed out and passed to the subject.

As described above, the first embodiment has the following advantages. 1) According to the present embodiment, a population is set, and the population is made to answer questions that can determine suitability for the job type. Then, by examining the answer information, a sample that seems to be clearly worthwhile to work was configured to be used as basic data, so that the subjects were compared with those who are actually adapted to the job type. Whether or not the job type is suitable can be determined, and accurate job evaluation can be performed.

2) According to the present embodiment, members who are working in all kinds of occupations constitute the population by approximating the occupational balance of the people, so that a wide range of job evaluations can be made.

3) According to the present embodiment, since the difference between the population and the group satisfied with a specific job type is calculated, it is possible to directly extract a characteristic characteristic of the job type.

4) According to the present embodiment, the response rate showing the tendency characteristic of the occupation is digitized according to a simpler range division, so that it is possible to cope with high-speed calculations. For this reason, a more appropriate job evaluation based on a larger number of questions can be performed than in the case where processing is performed based on the response rate.

5) According to the present embodiment, since the average point and the standard deviation of the population satisfied with the occupation are used as the basic data, the tendency of the answer for each occupation can be clearly characterized. it can.

6) According to the present embodiment, since the deviation value is used as the degree of fitness based on the raw score of the subject, the subject can compare and evaluate the suitability of a plurality of occupations as numerical values.

7) According to the present embodiment, several evaluation indices are configured to be able to be evaluated together with the degree of conformity, so that it is possible to objectively show the subject his / her behavior style and properties.

8) According to the present embodiment, the CD-ROM
Since the suitable job evaluation program can be provided on a recording medium such as the above, it is possible to perform a suitable job evaluation by installing the suitable job evaluation program on a general-purpose computer.

Embodiment 2 Embodiment 2 of the present invention relates to a configuration for implementing a job evaluation apparatus having functions similar to those of Embodiment 1 in a network. FIG. 12 shows a configuration diagram of the job evaluation apparatus of the present embodiment. As shown in FIG. 12, the suitable job evaluation device includes a processing device 1, a modem 10, a line 11, and a server 2.
0, a point matrix database 2, an average / standard deviation database 3, a question database 21, and an explanation database 22.

The modem 10 is a communication device capable of mediating the communication between the processing device 1 and the server 20, and is configured to be capable of two-way communication in accordance with whether the line is a subscriber line or an ISDN and the communication speed. Have been.

The line 11 is a public line or a dedicated line, and is configured such that a communication path can be set between the server 10 and the modem 10 separated via a trunk line and a repeater.

The server 20 is a general-purpose computer device, has a communication function, and is capable of generating a hypertext format file based on the job evaluation program of the present invention. The file in the hypertext format can be transferred to a fixed disk of the server 20 (not shown) or a fixed disk of a communication server connected to a line. By designating a network address from the processing device 1, the file can be referred to. In the server 20, the databases 2, 3, 8 stored on the fixed disk 100 in FIG.
And 9 are stored.

The other configuration of the processing apparatus 1 is the same as that of the first embodiment, and the description is omitted. However, the processing device 1
Is configured to execute browsing software.

In the above configuration, first, the user causes the processing apparatus 1 to execute network browsing software. Next, in the browsing software, the network address (URL or the like) of the server 20 is specified. Thus, the file stored in the storage area of the server specified by the network address can be referred to by the viewing software of the processing device 1. The file corresponding to the homepage is configured to be able to display a menu screen as shown in FIG. 4, for example. Link information is set for each icon on this menu screen, and can be connected to other corresponding hypertext format files. Therefore, each time the user selects an icon on the screen displayed by the viewing software from the processing device 1, it is possible to connect to a new file one after another and display a new screen. If link information is set in a file displaying each screen so that the screens as shown in FIGS. 4 to 11 are displayed in the same order as in the first embodiment, Input processing on the screen can be performed.

In the job evaluation process of the present invention, a file for inputting the last question is displayed, the user selects an icon for all questions, and the connection to the next file is designated. Under the condition. The job evaluation process is the same as the process described in the first embodiment (FIG. 3). The server 20 uses a suitable job fit graph (FIG. 10).
Is output as a file in a hypertext format and stored in the processing device 1 so as to be browsed. The optimum job type display (FIG. 11) is also generated as a file in the hypertext format and stored so as to be viewable from the processing device 1. With the above processing, the job evaluation method of the present invention can be executed even in a WAN such as the Internet via a network.

Incidentally, the connection between the processing apparatus 1 and the server 20 may be temporarily cut off in batch processing. That is, a file related to a question is temporarily transferred to the processing device 1 using FTP, and the subject is answered off-line. Then, the post-response processing device 1 and the server 20 are connected again via a line, and the file after the response is transferred to the server to perform the job evaluation process. With this configuration, it is possible to reduce a long-time line usage fee during which data is not transmitted and received in response to a question.

According to the second embodiment, the same effects as those of the first embodiment can be obtained. In addition, since it is not necessary to install a suitable job evaluation program on each computer using a network, it can be widely used by users. It is.

Further, since the contents of each database can be updated as appropriate, it is possible to maintain and maintain a job evaluation based on the latest data matched with the times.

Other Modifications The present invention is not limited to the above embodiment, but can be applied in various modifications. For example, in the above-described embodiment, the database is fixed, but the database may be configured to be updated including the data of the subject every time the subject uses the database.

That is, the occupation in which the subject is employed is configured to be input at the time of the job evaluation of the subject, and when it is determined that the subject is employed in the appropriate job in the aptitude question group, the subject is added to the population to obtain a point. What is necessary is just to comprise so that matrix data and average / standard deviation data may be updated. By adopting such a configuration, the number of samples can be increased and the certainty of data can be increased as it is used.

In the above embodiment, after calculating point data for all occupations, deviation values for all occupations are calculated next. However, calculation of point data and deviation value calculation for one occupation are performed. You may comprise so that it may be performed continuously and it may transfer to calculation of another occupation.

[0091]

According to the invention of the present application, the suitability of the population actually working is scored and compared with the suitability of the subject, so that there is provided a suitable job evaluation apparatus and method for performing accurate job evaluation. be able to.

In particular, according to the present invention, the average and the standard deviation are calculated for the suitability of the population actually working and the suitability of the subject can be evaluated by the deviation value. It is possible to provide a suitable job evaluation device and method capable of accurately grasping the degree of a suitable job.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram of a job evaluation apparatus according to a first embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a procedure for calculating point matrix data and an average / standard deviation.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart for explaining a job evaluation procedure for a subject.

FIG. 4 is a menu display example.

FIG. 5 is a display example of a question I;

FIG. 6 is a display example of transition to a question II.

FIG. 7 is a display example of a question II.

FIG. 8 is a display example of transition to a question III.

FIG. 9 is a display example of a question III.

FIG. 10 is a display example of a degree of conformity.

FIG. 11 is a display example of a suitable job message.

FIG. 12 is a configuration diagram of a suitable job evaluation system according to a second embodiment.

[Explanation of symbols]

 1. Processing unit 2. Point matrix database 3. Average / standard deviation database

──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continued on front page (58) Field surveyed (Int.Cl. ⁷ , DB name) G06F 17/60

Claims (13)

(57) [Claims] Claims: 1. Answer information to an evaluation question group of a subject
Appropriate occupation evaluation device that evaluates occupations that match subjects based on
AndBased on the information of the members of the population
Members who have a high degree of conformity to the job type to be evaluated
A first qualified group consisting of: and a group engaged in a predetermined occupation
Based on the answer information of the members of the
Start with members who have a high degree of conformity to the job being evaluated.
And a second suitable group to be determined.
Means, The first suitability group determined by the suitability group determination means and the
The response rates of the two eligible groups are totaled, and
A difference meter for calculating a difference between a sex group and the second suitability group
Arithmetic means, The difference calculated by the difference calculation means is divided into predetermined range divisions.
Therefore, by digitizing, point matrix data
Point matrix data creation means for creating data, Poi created by this point matrix data creation means
First data that stores job matrix data by job type
A base,  The point matrix data and the population evaluation question
Of the score calculated based on the answer information for the group
The second data that stores the average and standard deviation for each job type
When evaluating the base and the occupation that fits the subject, the first data
Supports point matrix data stored in the database
Then, the raw score of the subject is calculated for each occupation, and the second
Based on the mean and standard deviation stored in the database
The deviation value of the raw score is calculated for each job type, and the deviation value
Depending on the type of job, the degree of conformity of the subject is evaluated.
And a processing unit configured to be
Appropriate job evaluation device. 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein, when generating the point matrix data for a certain job type, the suitability group determining unit refers to an answer to a question group set to be able to evaluate the degree of suitability for the job type. The job evaluation apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the group whose answer content is positive is extracted as a group suitable for the job type. 3. The point matrix data creating means.
For each of the multiple options set for each of the evaluation questions , the response rates of the group and the population engaged in the occupation are aggregated, and the response rate of the group engaged in the occupation and the response rate of the population are calculated. claim the difference calculated by subjecting a score corresponding to the difference between the response rate, which is characterized by generating a matrix data that associates a score for each of the option of configuring the evaluation questions job unit 2. The job evaluation device according to item 1. 4. The processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said average and standard deviation in a certain occupation are compared with said point matrix data for each of said evaluation questions in units of a population. 2. The job evaluation apparatus according to claim 1, wherein points are assigned, points assigned to all evaluation questions are totaled, and an average and a standard deviation are calculated based on a distribution of the total points for each member. 5. The processing device refers to the point matrix data for each occupation type when evaluating a occupation type suitable for a subject, and assigns a score according to which option is answered for each evaluation question. The job evaluation apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the raw score is calculated by adding up the scores given to all the evaluation questions. 6. The processing device according to claim 1, wherein the processing unit calculates the deviation value according to a ratio of a difference between the raw score and an average score of the population to the standard deviation when evaluating a job type suitable for the subject. 2. The job evaluation device according to item 1. 7. The processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the processing device is configured to be able to evaluate a job having the highest calculated deviation value as a job suitable for the subject when evaluating a job suitable for the subject. Job evaluation device. 8. The evaluation question group is associated in advance with a specific evaluation index, and the processing apparatus, when evaluating a job type suitable for the subject, compares the response information from the subject with the evaluation index. 2. The job evaluation apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the apparatus is configured to be able to analyze attributes in association with each other. 9. The processing apparatus further comprises a third database storing information on the evaluation question, and when evaluating a job type suitable for a subject, information on the evaluation question stored in the third database. The suitable job evaluation device according to claim 1, which is configured to be able to present a reference to the subject. 10. The processing apparatus further comprises a fourth database for storing explanation information on the occupation, and when evaluating a occupation which is suitable for the subject, the explanation information corresponding to the occupation specified as being suitable for the subject is evaluated. The job evaluation apparatus according to claim 8 , wherein the apparatus is read from the fourth database and presented so as to be referred to the subject. 11. The processing device is configured to be connectable to a terminal device via a line, and when a job type evaluation is requested from the terminal device, the processing device is connected to the terminal device based on answer information input from the terminal device. The job evaluation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein a job type suitable for a subject who operates the apparatus can be evaluated. 12. The response information to the test subject's evaluation question group
Job Evaluating Method to Evaluate Job Type Suitable for Subjects Based on
AndBased on the information of the members of the population
Members who have a high degree of conformity to the job type to be evaluated
A first qualified group consisting of: and a group engaged in a predetermined occupation
Based on the answer information of the members of the
Start with members who have a high degree of conformity to the job being evaluated.
And a second suitable group to be determined.
Steps and The first suitable group determined by the suitable group determination step
And the response rate of the second qualified group, respectively,
Difference for calculating the difference between the qualified group of the subject and the second qualified group
A minute calculation step; A difference calculated by the difference calculation step and a predetermined range
By quantifying the response rate according to minutes,
Point matrix that creates point matrix data in units
Trix data creation step, This point matrix data creation step created
Store point matrix data in the first database
Steps to  The point matrix data and the population evaluation question
Of the score calculated based on the answer information for the group
Averages and standard deviations in a second database for each job type
Storing the first job and the first job when evaluating the job type suitable for the subject.
Supports point matrix data stored in the database
Calculating the raw score of the subject for each job type
And the average and standard deviation stored in the second database.
Calculating the deviation value of the raw score for each job type based on the difference
Of the subject in terms of job type according to the difference
Evaluating the degree of
Job evaluation method. 13. The response information to the test subject's evaluation question group
A program for assessing occupations that fit subjects based on
A recording medium on which a program is recorded, wherein the program comprises:Based on the information of the members of the population
Members who have a high degree of conformity to the job type to be evaluated
A first qualified group consisting of: and a group engaged in a predetermined occupation
Based on the answer information of the members of the
Start with members who have a high degree of conformity to the job being evaluated.
And a second suitable group to be determined.
Features and The first suitability group determined by this suitability group determination function
And the response rates of the second qualified group
Calculating the difference between the first fit group and the second fit group
Difference calculation function, The difference calculated by the difference calculation function and a predetermined range
By quantifying the response rate according to the classification,
Points for creating point matrix data in seed units
Matrix data creation function, Created by this point matrix data creation function
Stored point matrix data in the first database.
Function to deliver,  The point matrix data and the population evaluation question
Of the score calculated based on the answer information for the group
Calculations and standard deviations for each job type in the second database
When evaluating the occupation that fits with the function to be stored and the subject, the first data
Supports point matrix data stored in the database
The subject's raw score is calculated for each job type,
Based on the mean and standard deviation stored in the database
The deviation value of the raw score is calculated for each job type, and the
Evaluate the degree of conformity of the subject for each job type
Recording a program characterized by having a function to perform
Recording medium.