JP3283415B2 - Defect determination method for brazed part - Google Patents
Defect determination method for brazed partInfo
- Publication number
- JP3283415B2 JP3283415B2 JP01475196A JP1475196A JP3283415B2 JP 3283415 B2 JP3283415 B2 JP 3283415B2 JP 01475196 A JP01475196 A JP 01475196A JP 1475196 A JP1475196 A JP 1475196A JP 3283415 B2 JP3283415 B2 JP 3283415B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- gate
- echo
- defect
- reflected
- opened
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/04—Wave modes and trajectories
- G01N2291/044—Internal reflections (echoes), e.g. on walls or defects
Landscapes
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
【0001】[0001]
【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、一定の厚さを有す
る一対の部材どうしの境界面でのろう付け部の欠陥判別
方法に関し、特に鋳鉄管に環状体を外ばめして両者を境
界面でろう付けしたときのろう付け部の欠陥判別方法に
関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method for determining a defect in a brazing portion at a boundary between a pair of members having a constant thickness, and more particularly, to a method of fitting an annular body to a cast iron pipe by fitting an annular body to the boundary. The present invention relates to a method for judging a defect in a brazed portion when brazing is performed by the method described above.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】鋳鉄管の挿口の外周に突部を形成する際
には、その挿口の外周に環状体を圧入し、その後に加熱
してろう付けすることで、これら管の挿口と環状体とを
一体化することが行われている。その場合は、ろう付け
後に、そのろう付け部の全周を検査して欠陥判別するの
が好ましい。2. Description of the Related Art When a projection is formed on the outer periphery of an insertion port of a cast iron pipe, an annular body is press-fitted into the outer circumference of the insertion port, and then heated and brazed to form an opening of the pipe. And an annular body are integrated. In this case, after brazing, it is preferable to inspect the entire periphery of the brazed portion to determine a defect.
【0003】一般に、このような挿口と環状体との間の
ろう付け部の欠陥を判別する場合には、環状体の表面か
らろう付け部に向けて超音波を発射したうえで、反射エ
コーの大きさが一定の値よりも大きければ欠陥であると
判別している。この一定の値としては、表面エコーの半
分の値や底面エコーの半分の値などが採用されている。[0003] Generally, in order to determine the defect of the brazing portion between the opening and the annular body, an ultrasonic wave is emitted from the surface of the annular body toward the brazing section, and then the reflected echo is reflected. Is larger than a certain value, it is determined that the defect exists. As the constant value, a half value of the surface echo, a half value of the bottom surface echo, or the like is adopted.
【0004】[0004]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかし、実際はこのよ
うに反射エコーを単純に表面エコーの半分の値などと比
較しただけでは、満足な欠陥判別が困難であるという問
題点がある。これは、鋳鉄管には曲がりがあるために超
音波の入射角度が安定せず、また鋳鉄管の内面は凹凸の
ある粗い面であるとともに、環状体の外面はショットブ
ラスト処理された粗面であることから、超音波が散乱し
て部材内に均一に入射しづらいことが原因するためであ
る。However, there is a problem in that it is difficult to satisfactorily determine a defect simply by comparing the reflected echo with a half value of the surface echo. This is because the angle of incidence of ultrasonic waves is not stable because the cast iron tube has a bend, the inner surface of the cast iron tube is a rough surface with irregularities, and the outer surface of the annular body is a shot blasted rough surface. This is because ultrasonic waves are scattered and it is difficult to uniformly enter the inside of the member.
【0005】そこで本発明はこのような問題点を解決し
て、鋳鉄管の外周に環状体をろう付けしたような場合に
も確実にその欠陥を判別できるようにすることを目的と
する。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to solve such a problem and to make it possible to reliably determine the defect even when an annular body is brazed to the outer periphery of a cast iron pipe.
【0006】[0006]
【課題を解決するための手段】この目的を達成するため
本発明は、一定の厚さを有する一対の部材どうしの境界
面でのろう付け部の欠陥の有無を判別するに際し、一方
の部材の表面からろう付け部に向けて超音波を発射した
うえで反射エコーを検出できるようにして、表面エコー
の発生から一定時間を経過した後に第1の所定時間だけ
第1のゲートを開くとともに、その後に第2の所定時間
だけ第2のゲートを開いて、第1のゲートが開いている
ときの反射エコーのピーク値が第2のゲートが開いてい
るときの反射エコーのピーク値よりも大きく、かつ第1
のゲートが開いているときの反射エコーのピーク値が一
定のしきい値よりも大きいときに欠陥が存在すると判別
するものである。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a method for determining the presence or absence of a defect in a brazing portion at a boundary between a pair of members having a certain thickness. After emitting ultrasonic waves from the surface toward the brazing portion and detecting the reflected echo, the first gate is opened for a first predetermined time after a certain time has elapsed from the generation of the surface echo, and thereafter, The second gate is opened for a second predetermined time, and the peak value of the reflected echo when the first gate is open is larger than the peak value of the reflected echo when the second gate is open; And the first
When the peak value of the reflected echo when the gate is open is larger than a certain threshold value, it is determined that a defect exists.
【0007】このようにすると、単に反射エコーの大き
さをある一定値と比較するだけの場合と比べて、欠陥部
からのエコーを確実にピックアップすることが可能とな
って、より精度の高い欠陥判別が可能になる。In this way, it is possible to reliably pick up the echo from the defective portion as compared with the case where the magnitude of the reflected echo is simply compared with a certain fixed value, and the defect with higher accuracy can be obtained. Discrimination becomes possible.
【0008】[0008]
【発明の実施の形態】図2に示すように、一定の肉厚を
有する鋳鉄管1の一端の挿口2の外周には、所定の肉厚
の横断面矩形状の金属製の環状体3が圧入され、これら
挿口2と環状体3とは、その境界面の部分で互いにろう
付けされている。4はそのろう付け部である。ただし、
この図2のものでは、ろう付けの状態が悪く、隙間など
の欠陥が発生している。したがって、超音波探触子を用
いて環状体3の表面から超音波5を入射させると、この
超音波5はろう付け部4で反射し、欠陥エコー6が発生
する。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS As shown in FIG. 2, a metal ring 3 having a predetermined thickness and a rectangular cross section is provided on the outer periphery of an insertion opening 2 at one end of a cast iron pipe 1 having a certain thickness. Are inserted, and the insertion opening 2 and the annular body 3 are brazed to each other at a portion of a boundary surface thereof. 4 is the brazing part. However,
In FIG. 2, the brazing condition is poor, and defects such as gaps have occurred. Therefore, when the ultrasonic wave 5 is incident from the surface of the annular body 3 using the ultrasonic probe, the ultrasonic wave 5 is reflected by the brazing portion 4 and a defect echo 6 is generated.
【0009】図1は、図2に示す部分からの反射エコー
を図示したものである。横軸は探触子の受信電圧すなわ
ち反射エコーの大きさを示し、縦軸は超音波の伝播時間
を示す。この伝播時間は、伝播距離をも意味する。11は
表面エコーで、環状体3の表面からの反射波に相当する
ものであって、ろう付け部4における欠陥の有無につい
ての情報は含まない。12は欠陥エコー6の一次波であ
り、入射された超音波5がろう付け部4で反射したうえ
で探触子で受信されたものである。また13は欠陥エコー
6の二次波であり、ろう付け部4で反射した超音波が環
状体3の表面で再度反射し、かつ再びろう付け部4で反
射したうえで探触子で受信されたものである。同様に、
14は欠陥エコー6の三次波である。FIG. 1 illustrates a reflected echo from the portion shown in FIG. The horizontal axis indicates the received voltage of the probe, that is, the magnitude of the reflected echo, and the vertical axis indicates the propagation time of the ultrasonic wave. This propagation time also means the propagation distance. Reference numeral 11 denotes a surface echo, which corresponds to a reflected wave from the surface of the annular body 3, and does not include information on the presence or absence of a defect in the brazing portion 4. Reference numeral 12 denotes a primary wave of the defect echo 6, which is received by the probe after the incident ultrasonic wave 5 is reflected by the brazing portion 4. Numeral 13 is a secondary wave of the defect echo 6, and the ultrasonic wave reflected by the brazing portion 4 is reflected again by the surface of the annular body 3 and again reflected by the brazing portion 4 and received by the probe. It is a thing. Similarly,
Reference numeral 14 denotes the third wave of the defect echo 6.
【0010】これらのエコーの測定に際しては、図示の
ように、表面エコー11が発生した後の一定時間の経過後
に、第1の所定時間t1だけ第1のゲートを開き、その
ときの反射エコーのピーク値P1を求める。また第1の
所定時間t1の経過後に第2の所定時間t2だけ第2の
ゲートを開き、その時の反射エコーのピーク値P2を求
める。そして、第1のゲートが開いているときのピーク
値P1が第2のゲートが開いているときのピーク値P2
よりも大きく、かつ第1のゲートが開いているときのピ
ーク値P1が一定のしきい値Sよりも大きいときに、ろ
う付け部4に欠陥が存在すると判別する。すなわち、P
1>P2かつP1>Sであるときに、欠陥が存在すると
判別する。In measuring these echoes, the first gate is opened for a first predetermined time t1 after a lapse of a predetermined time after the generation of the surface echo 11, as shown in FIG. The peak value P1 is obtained. After the first predetermined time t1 has elapsed, the second gate is opened for the second predetermined time t2, and the peak value P2 of the reflected echo at that time is obtained. The peak value P1 when the first gate is open is the peak value P2 when the second gate is open.
If the peak value P1 is larger than the threshold value S1 and the peak value P1 when the first gate is open is larger than a certain threshold value S, it is determined that the brazing portion 4 has a defect. That is, P
When 1> P2 and P1> S, it is determined that a defect exists.
【0011】第1のゲートは、環状体3の肉厚とその内
部での音速とにもとづき、二次波13が探触子に戻ってく
ると思われる時刻に対応して開かれる。また第2のゲー
トは、同様に三次波14が探触子に戻ってくると思われる
時刻に対応して開かれる。ここで、一次波12に対応する
時刻にはゲートは開かないが、これは、実際には表面エ
コー11の時間幅が広いことから、一次波12がこの表面エ
コー11の悪影響を受ける可能性が高いためである。また
しきい値Sは、経験にもとづいて設定されることにな
る。The first gate is opened at a time when the secondary wave 13 is expected to return to the probe, based on the thickness of the annular body 3 and the speed of sound inside the annular body 3. The second gate is also opened at a time when the tertiary wave 14 is expected to return to the probe. Here, the gate is not opened at the time corresponding to the primary wave 12, but this is because the time width of the surface echo 11 is actually wide, so that the primary wave 12 may be adversely affected by the surface echo 11. Because it is expensive. The threshold value S is set based on experience.
【0012】第2のゲートを開く時刻を調節すれば、ろ
う付け部4が健全であることの確認を行うことも可能で
ある。すなわち、図4はろう付け部4が健全である場合
を示し、この場合には、超音波探触子から入射された超
音波5は、ろう付け部4では実質的には反射せず、管1
の内面7で主に反射されることになる。8はその底面エ
コーである。By adjusting the time at which the second gate is opened, it is possible to confirm that the brazing portion 4 is sound. That is, FIG. 4 shows a case where the brazing portion 4 is sound. In this case, the ultrasonic wave 5 incident from the ultrasonic probe is not substantially reflected by the brazing portion 4 and the 1
Is mainly reflected by the inner surface 7 of the lens. 8 is the bottom echo.
【0013】この場合は、図3に示すように、表面エコ
ー11が発生した後に時間をおいて発生する底面エコー8
が探触子によって受信される。そして、第2のゲートが
所定時間t2だけ開いているときにこの底面エコー8が
観測され、かつ第1のゲートが所定時間t1だけ開いて
いたときには実質的な反射エコーが観測されなかった場
合には、ろう付け部4が健全であることを確認すること
ができる。In this case, as shown in FIG. 3, the bottom echo 8 which is generated at a time after the generation of the surface echo 11 is generated.
Is received by the probe. When the bottom echo 8 is observed when the second gate is open for a predetermined time t2, and when substantially no reflected echo is observed when the first gate is open for a predetermined time t1, Can confirm that the brazing part 4 is sound.
【0014】[0014]
【発明の効果】以上のように本発明によると、表面エコ
ーの発生から一定時間を経過した後に第1の所定時間だ
け第1のゲートを開くとともに、その後に第2の所定時
間だけ第2のゲートを開いて、第1のゲートが開いてい
るときの反射エコーのピーク値が第2のゲートが開いて
いるときの反射エコーのピーク値よりも大きく、かつ第
1のゲートが開いているときの反射エコーのピーク値が
一定のしきい値よりも大きいときに欠陥が存在すると判
別するため、単に反射エコーの大きさをある一定値と比
較するだけの場合と比べて、欠陥部からのエコーを確実
にピックアップすることが可能となって、より精度の高
い欠陥判別を行うことができる。As described above, according to the present invention, the first gate is opened for a first predetermined time after a predetermined time has elapsed from the generation of the surface echo, and thereafter, the second gate is opened for a second predetermined time. When the gate is opened, the peak value of the reflected echo when the first gate is open is larger than the peak value of the reflected echo when the second gate is open, and the first gate is open When the peak value of the reflected echo is larger than a certain threshold value, it is determined that a defect exists, so the echo from the defective part is compared with a case where the magnitude of the reflected echo is simply compared with a certain value. Can be reliably picked up, and more accurate defect determination can be performed.
【図1】管の挿口の外周に環状体をろう付けした部分の
欠陥を本発明にもとづいて判別する方法を説明する図で
ある。FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining a method of determining a defect in a portion where an annular body is brazed to the outer periphery of an insertion opening of a pipe according to the present invention.
【図2】管の挿口の外周に環状体をろう付けした部分が
欠陥を有する場合の超音波の伝播の様子を示す図であ
る。FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a state of propagation of ultrasonic waves when a portion where an annular body is brazed to the outer periphery of a tube opening has a defect.
【図3】本発明にもとづき、管の挿口の外周に環状体を
ろう付けした部分が健全である場合の反射エコーの観測
結果を例示する図である。FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of an observation result of a reflection echo when a portion where an annular body is brazed to the outer periphery of an insertion opening of a pipe is sound according to the present invention.
【図4】管の挿口の外周に環状体をろう付けした部分が
健全である場合の超音波の伝播の様子を示す図である。FIG. 4 is a view showing a state of propagation of ultrasonic waves when a portion where an annular body is brazed to the outer periphery of a tube opening is sound.
11 表面エコー 13 二次波 14 三次波 P1 ピーク値 P2 ピーク値 S しきい値 11 Surface echo 13 Secondary wave 14 Tertiary wave P1 Peak value P2 Peak value S Threshold
───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 藤原 誠司 兵庫県尼崎市大浜町2丁目26番地 株式 会社クボタ武庫川製造所内 (56)参考文献 特開 昭58−68664(JP,A) (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.7,DB名) G01N 29/00 - 29/28 ────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continued on the front page (72) Inventor Seiji Fujiwara 2-26 Ohama-cho, Amagasaki City, Hyogo Prefecture Inside Kubota Mukogawa Works, Ltd. (56) References JP-A-58-68664 (JP, A) (58) Survey Field (Int.Cl. 7 , DB name) G01N 29/00-29/28
Claims (1)
境界面でのろう付け部の欠陥の有無を判別する方法であ
って、一方の部材の表面からろう付け部に向けて超音波
を発射したうえで反射エコーを検出できるようにして、
表面エコーの発生から一定時間を経過した後に第1の所
定時間だけ第1のゲートを開くとともに、その後に第2
の所定時間だけ第2のゲートを開いて、第1のゲートが
開いているときの反射エコーのピーク値が第2のゲート
が開いているときの反射エコーのピーク値よりも大き
く、かつ第1のゲートが開いているときの反射エコーの
ピーク値が一定のしきい値よりも大きいときに欠陥が存
在すると判別することを特徴とするろう付け部の欠陥判
別方法。1. A method for judging the presence or absence of a defect in a brazing portion at a boundary between a pair of members having a certain thickness, wherein ultrasonic waves are directed from the surface of one member toward the brazing portion. After launching, you can detect the reflected echo,
After a predetermined time has elapsed from the occurrence of the surface echo, the first gate is opened for a first predetermined time, and then the second gate is opened.
The second gate is opened for a predetermined time, and the peak value of the reflected echo when the first gate is open is larger than the peak value of the reflected echo when the second gate is open, and the first gate is opened. A method for determining the presence of a defect when the peak value of the reflected echo when the gate is open is greater than a certain threshold value.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP01475196A JP3283415B2 (en) | 1996-01-31 | 1996-01-31 | Defect determination method for brazed part |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP01475196A JP3283415B2 (en) | 1996-01-31 | 1996-01-31 | Defect determination method for brazed part |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH09210971A JPH09210971A (en) | 1997-08-15 |
| JP3283415B2 true JP3283415B2 (en) | 2002-05-20 |
Family
ID=11869822
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP01475196A Expired - Lifetime JP3283415B2 (en) | 1996-01-31 | 1996-01-31 | Defect determination method for brazed part |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP3283415B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3747266B2 (en) * | 1997-09-08 | 2006-02-22 | 大阪瓦斯株式会社 | Focused longitudinal wave ultrasonic probe for polymer material inspection |
| JP4444729B2 (en) | 2004-05-12 | 2010-03-31 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Method and apparatus for evaluating joints of electrical equipment windings |
-
1996
- 1996-01-31 JP JP01475196A patent/JP3283415B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH09210971A (en) | 1997-08-15 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2496370C (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detecting method and ultrasonic flaw detector | |
| JP5192939B2 (en) | Defect height estimation method by ultrasonic flaw detection | |
| US20020194916A1 (en) | Method for inspecting clad pipe | |
| CN109196350A (en) | Pass through the method for the defects of ultrasound detection material | |
| JP3283415B2 (en) | Defect determination method for brazed part | |
| JP4364031B2 (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection image processing apparatus and processing method thereof | |
| JP3759050B2 (en) | Ultrasonic probe holder, ultrasonic flaw detector, and ultrasonic flaw detection method for tubular body | |
| JP2000352563A (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detector for cladding tube | |
| JP5065846B2 (en) | Turbine generator end ring defect detection method | |
| JP2005274227A (en) | Ultrasonic flaw inspection method of pipe body | |
| JP3313470B2 (en) | Standard specimen for non-destructive inspection of piping | |
| JP2003222617A (en) | Method for judging harmful defect in ultrasonic flaw detection and method for using the judgment result | |
| JP5505806B2 (en) | Discrimination method of reflection echo | |
| JP2539019B2 (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection | |
| JPS6342744B2 (en) | ||
| JP4399325B2 (en) | Carburized layer detection method | |
| JPH05119027A (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection of thick-wall steel pipe | |
| JP2001221781A (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection method | |
| JPS5946553A (en) | Angle beam ultrasonic flaw inspection | |
| JPH0510844A (en) | Method for diagnosing seat surface of valve for leakage | |
| US8375795B2 (en) | Non-destructive inspection of high-pressure lines | |
| JPH07325070A (en) | Defect depth measurement method by ultrasonic method | |
| JPH08248011A (en) | Oblique ultrasonic inspection system | |
| JP2564558Y2 (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detector | |
| JP2000028588A (en) | Ultrasonic testing |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090301 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090301 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100301 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100301 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110301 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110301 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120301 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120301 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130301 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140301 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
| EXPY | Cancellation because of completion of term |