Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP3341338B2 - Continuous casting method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP3341338B2 - Continuous casting method - Google Patents

Continuous casting method

Info

Publication number
JP3341338B2
JP3341338B2 JP04890093A JP4890093A JP3341338B2 JP 3341338 B2 JP3341338 B2 JP 3341338B2 JP 04890093 A JP04890093 A JP 04890093A JP 4890093 A JP4890093 A JP 4890093A JP 3341338 B2 JP3341338 B2 JP 3341338B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
slab
roll
reduction
center
segregation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP04890093A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH06262320A (en
Inventor
正樹 新田
進 石黒
研三 綾田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority to JP04890093A priority Critical patent/JP3341338B2/en
Publication of JPH06262320A publication Critical patent/JPH06262320A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3341338B2 publication Critical patent/JP3341338B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Continuous Casting (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は鋳片中心部の偏析やセン
ターポロシティを可及的に減少させることのできる連続
鋳造方法に関するものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a continuous casting method capable of minimizing segregation and center porosity at the center of a slab.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】連続鋳造方法においては、鋳片中心部に
生じる偏析やセンターポロシティを如何に軽減するかと
いうことが重要課題の一つとなっている。偏析防止に関
しては、電磁撹拌技術の適用や低温鋳造の実施、或は不
均一核生成促進物質の添加等に代表される偏析分散技術
が実用化され、更には溶鋼内不純物濃度の低減を図る為
の高度清浄化技術の導入、更には鋳片引抜工程中のバル
ジング防止技術の導入等が実施され、相当の成果が挙げ
られている。
2. Description of the Related Art In a continuous casting method, one of the important issues is how to reduce segregation and center porosity generated in the center of a slab. Regarding segregation prevention, segregation dispersion technology represented by application of electromagnetic stirring technology, implementation of low-temperature casting, or addition of a heterogeneous nucleation promoting substance has been put to practical use, and in order to reduce the impurity concentration in molten steel. In addition, the introduction of advanced cleaning technology and the introduction of a bulging prevention technology during the slab drawing process have been implemented, and considerable results have been obtained.

【0003】しかしながら凝固末期の凝固収縮に伴う溶
鋼流動によって惹起される偏析、或は該凝固収縮の直接
的結果であるセンターポロシティの形成については、十
分な解決策が確立されていないというのが実情である。
[0003] However, a sufficient solution has not yet been established for the segregation induced by the flow of molten steel accompanying the solidification shrinkage at the end of solidification or the formation of center porosity which is a direct result of the solidification shrinkage. It is.

【0004】そこで近年の連続鋳造技術においては、鋳
片引抜工程における終盤過程に多数の圧下用ロールを設
け、中心部に未凝固部を残している凝固末期鋳片を低圧
化率で圧下することが提案されている。この様な低率圧
下を与えると、前記溶鋼流動を抑制して偏析の防止に寄
与すると共に、凝固収縮に対する補償が行なわれてセン
ターポロシティの生成が防止され、鋳造欠陥のない連続
鋳造製品を提供することが可能となる。
[0004] Therefore, in recent continuous casting technology, a large number of rolling rolls are provided in the final stage of the slab drawing process, and a late solidified slab having an unsolidified portion left in the center is reduced at a low pressure reduction rate. Has been proposed. When such a low rate reduction is applied, the flow of the molten steel is suppressed to contribute to the prevention of segregation, and at the same time, the compensation for solidification shrinkage is performed to prevent the generation of center porosity, thereby providing a continuous casting product without casting defects. It is possible to do.

【0005】この様な低率圧下付与技術としては、特公
昭59−16862号、特公平3−8863号、同3−
8864号、同3−6855号、同4−20696号、
同4−22664号各公報に記載のものが知られてい
る。これらの公知技術は、低率圧下を行う位置(引抜工
程の終盤過程において、鋳片中心部の未凝固状態を考慮
して低率圧下を開始してから終了するまでの区間の意
味、以下同じ)について一応の統一概念(中心部の固相
率を基準とする考え方)を提示しているが、圧下の程度
については、例えば圧下率(1.5%以下)、割合
(0.5〜2.5mm/分)、単位時間の圧下量0.6ξ
〜1.1ξ(ξは偏平比の1/4)といった種々の概念
が提示されており、未だ確定的な概念には至っていない
様である。
[0005] Such low-rate reduction application techniques are disclosed in Japanese Patent Publication Nos. 59-16682, 3-8663, and 3-8663.
No. 8864, No. 3-6855, No. 4-20696,
The ones described in JP-A-4-22664 are known. These known techniques are defined as a position where low-rate reduction is performed (the meaning of a section from the start to the end of low-rate reduction in the final stage of the drawing process in consideration of the unsolidified state of the slab center, hereinafter the same). ), A tentatively unified concept (a concept based on the solid phase ratio at the center) is presented. For the degree of reduction, for example, the reduction ratio (1.5% or less) and the ratio (0.5 to 2) .5 mm / min), 0.6 mm reduction per unit time
Various concepts such as ξ1.1ξ (ξ is 4 of the flattening ratio) have been presented, and it seems that the concept has not yet reached a definitive concept.

【0006】一方上記の様な低率圧下を行う為の具体的
装置技術としては、例えば特開昭50−55529号や
特公昭54−38978号の各公報に記載されている様
に、鋳片幅と同一か、又はより長い実効長さを有するロ
ール(一般にフラットロールと称される)を用いて圧下
を加える方法と、例えば特公平2−56982号公報に
開示されている様にロールの長さ方向中央部の径を、鋳
片幅寸法より短い範囲で大きく(ロール両端部の径より
大きく)したロール(本明細書では中太ロールと称す)
を用いて圧下する方法が知られている(図5参照:図に
おいて、1は中太ロール、2は鋳片、3は未凝固部、4
は軸を夫々示す)。これら従来技術に対する評価として
は、まずフラットロールにより鋳片の全幅を圧下する前
者の技術では、鋳片の両側面から中央方向へ向けて成長
したシェルが高剛性を示すため圧下抵抗が大きく(特に
偏平比の小さいブルーム鋳片の場合に顕著)、中心の未
凝固部断面積の縮小に効く効率(圧下効率)が悪い為、
偏析防止の為には大きな圧下量が必要になってロールに
かかる付加が増大し、ロールや軸受けの摩耗が激しくな
るという問題が指摘されている。また必要圧下量に対応
する為の設備コストや運転コストも高くなる。一方後者
の方法では、ロール両端部より大径にされた中央部分の
みで鋳片に対する実効的な圧下が加えられるため、前記
シェルによる圧下抵抗が少なく、従って圧下効率が向上
し、比較的小さい圧下量でも偏析やセンターポロシティ
の防止効果が高いと評価されている。尚本願出願人はこ
の様な中太ロールを更に改善した短幅ロールについて別
途特許出願を行っている(特願平5−5958号:後記
図3,4参照)。この短幅ロールについては追って説明
する。
On the other hand, as a specific apparatus technology for performing the above-described low-rate reduction, for example, as described in JP-A-50-55529 and JP-B-54-38978, cast slabs are disclosed. A method of applying a reduction by using a roll having an effective length equal to or longer than the width (generally called a flat roll), and a method of applying a roll length as disclosed in Japanese Patent Publication No. 2-56982. A roll whose diameter at the center in the length direction is larger (larger than the diameter at both ends of the roll) in a range shorter than the width of the slab (referred to as a medium roll in this specification).
(See FIG. 5: 1 is a medium-sized roll, 2 is a slab, 3 is an unsolidified portion, 4
Indicate the axes, respectively). As for the evaluation of these conventional techniques, first, in the former technique in which the entire width of the slab is reduced by a flat roll, the shell grown from both sides of the slab toward the center shows high rigidity, so that the reduction resistance is large (particularly, This is notable for bloom cast slabs with a small aspect ratio), and the efficiency (reduction efficiency) of reducing the cross-sectional area of the unsolidified portion at the center is poor.
It has been pointed out that a large amount of reduction is required to prevent segregation, the load applied to the roll is increased, and the wear of the roll and the bearing becomes severe. In addition, equipment costs and operating costs for responding to the required reduction amount also increase. On the other hand, in the latter method, since the effective reduction of the slab is applied only at the central portion having a diameter larger than the both ends of the roll, the reduction resistance by the shell is small, and therefore, the reduction efficiency is improved, and the reduction is relatively small. It is evaluated that the effect of preventing segregation and center porosity is high even in the amount. The applicant of the present application has separately filed a patent application for a short-width roll obtained by further improving such a medium-thick roll (Japanese Patent Application No. 5-5958: see FIGS. 3 and 4 described later). The short width roll will be described later.

【0007】[0007]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】上記した様に従来の低
率圧下技術では、例えば圧下の程度をどの様に規定する
かという角度からの検討が混沌としており、未解決課題
として残されている。例えば圧下によって内部割れを生
じ易い高炭素鋼を対象とする場合をも含めた適正圧下条
件を確立することが望まれている。
As described above, in the conventional low-rate rolling reduction technique, for example, it is chaotic to study how to define the degree of reduction, and it remains as an unsolved problem. . For example, it is desired to establish appropriate rolling conditions including a case where high-carbon steel, which is liable to cause internal cracks by rolling, is targeted.

【0008】また前記中太ロールの使用に関しては、実
効ある偏析防止効果やセンターポロシティ解消効果を発
揮するに必要な圧下量が小さくても済むという利点はあ
るが、鋳片からの熱的影響によるロールの熱反りを極力
少なくして圧下精度を保持しようとすれば、ロール両端
側の直径が結構大きいロールでなければならず、勢い中
央部の直径が大きくなり、従って鋳片引抜方向に隣接し
ている短幅ロールとの間隔(ロールピッチ)も大きくな
り、鋳片のバルジング(ロール間隔で生じる鋳片の膨
張)が大きくなって偏析やセンターポロシティの防止効
果が失われるという問題がある。従って短幅ロールを用
いる場合においてもこの様な問題を生じない様な圧下条
件の確立が望まれている。
The use of the above-mentioned medium-sized roll has the advantage that the amount of reduction required for exhibiting an effective segregation preventing effect and a center porosity eliminating effect can be reduced, but the roll due to the thermal influence from the slab. In order to maintain the rolling accuracy by minimizing the warpage of the roll as much as possible, the roll must have a fairly large diameter at both ends of the roll. There is also a problem that the interval (roll pitch) between the roll and the short width roll becomes large, the bulging of the slab (expansion of the slab caused by the roll interval) becomes large, and the effect of preventing segregation and center porosity is lost. Therefore, it is desired to establish a rolling condition that does not cause such a problem even when a short width roll is used.

【0009】[0009]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は上記の様な事情
に鑑みてなされたものであって、前記中太ロールに代っ
て短幅ロールを採用すると共に、圧下勾配なる新しい概
念を導入することにより、上記課題を達成したものであ
る。即ち本発明の連続鋳造方法とは、鋳片幅の0.2 〜0.
8 倍の実効長さを有する圧下ロールを、該鋳片の上下両
方から又はいずれか一方から作用させ、該鋳片の中心固
相率が多くとも0.05の時点から圧下を開始し、且つ中心
固相率0.8 までの範囲を、単位時間当りの鋳片厚みに対
する圧下勾配が0.06〜0.25%/min となる様に圧下する
ことを要旨とするものである。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned circumstances, and uses a short width roll in place of the above-mentioned middle roll and introduces a new concept of a draft gradient. By doing so, the above object has been achieved. That is, the continuous casting method of the present invention means that the slab width is 0.2 to 0.
A rolling roll having an effective length of eight times is acted on from above or below or from either of the slabs, and starts rolling from the point where the center solid fraction of the slab is at most 0.05, and The gist of the invention is to reduce the range up to a phase ratio of 0.8 so that the reduction gradient with respect to the slab thickness per unit time is 0.06 to 0.25% / min.

【0010】[0010]

【作用】図3,4は本発明における短幅ロールの使用概
念を示す説明図であり、図中11は短幅ロール、2は鋳
片、3は未凝固部、4は軸、5はフラットロールを示
す。図3は鋳片の上下から同一寸法の短幅ロールを作用
させた場合を示し、図4は鋳片の上側から短幅ロールを
作用させ、下側はフラットロール5で支持した場合を示
す。この短幅ロール11は既に特願平5−5958号に
おいてその詳細を説明しているが、要は短幅ロール11
の軸方向長さWが鋳片2の幅寸法W’より実質的に短い
ものであって、本発明では特に下記の関係を満足するも
のが用いられ、本明細書ではこのWを実効長さと称して
いる。 0.2W’≦ W ≦ 0.8W’ (1) 尚より好ましいのは 0.3W’≦ W ≦ 0.7W’ (2) の関係を満たすものである。
3 and 4 are explanatory views showing the concept of using a short width roll in the present invention. In the figure, 11 is a short width roll, 2 is a slab, 3 is an unsolidified portion, 4 is a shaft, and 5 is a flat. Indicates a role. FIG. 3 shows a case where short width rolls of the same size are applied from above and below the slab, and FIG. 4 shows a case where short width rolls are applied from the upper side of the slab and the lower side is supported by flat rolls 5. The short width roll 11 has already been described in detail in Japanese Patent Application No. 5-5958.
Is substantially shorter than the width dimension W ′ of the slab 2, and in the present invention, those satisfying the following relationship are used. In the present specification, W is defined as an effective length. Is called. 0.2 W ′ ≦ W ≦ 0.8 W ′ (1) More preferably, the relationship of 0.3 W ′ ≦ W ≦ 0.7 W ′ (2) is satisfied.

【0011】本発明では上記した実効長さ条件を満足す
る様なロールスタンドを用いることをポイントの1つと
している。即ち本発明の圧下用ロールは軸方向長さが短
いので、殊更大きい径としなくとも十分な剛性を発揮す
る。従ってロール径を小さくすることができ、ロールピ
ッチの短縮化が図れるから、中太ロールを使用していた
従来技術の欠点であるバルジングを抑えることが可能と
なった。尚バルジング防止の観点から、ロールピッチは
350mm以下とすることが推奨される。
In the present invention, one of the points is to use a roll stand that satisfies the above-described effective length condition. That is, since the rolling roll of the present invention has a short axial length, it exhibits sufficient rigidity without having a particularly large diameter. Therefore, the roll diameter can be reduced and the roll pitch can be shortened, so that it is possible to suppress bulging which is a drawback of the conventional technique using a medium-thick roll. From the viewpoint of preventing bulging, it is recommended that the roll pitch be 350 mm or less.

【0012】また図3,4から明らかである様に、本発
明の短幅ロールは未凝固部3の存在する鋳片中心部を効
率よく集中的に圧下できるので、偏析防止やセンターポ
ロシティ防止の為の必要圧下量も少なくて済み、運転コ
ストを低減できる。またロール表面やロール軸の摩擦も
少なくなるので設備のメンテナンスコストも低減可能で
ある。尚図3の配置構成では鋳片の両側から鋳片中心部
を圧下しており、また図4の配置構成では鋳片の上側か
ら鋳片中心部を圧下しているが、後述する様な圧下勾配
条件を満足する様な低率圧下を行う限り、偏析防止やセ
ンターポロシティ防止効果は両者において実質的な差異
はない。
As is clear from FIGS. 3 and 4, the short width roll of the present invention can efficiently and intensively reduce the central portion of the slab where the unsolidified portion 3 exists, thereby preventing segregation and center porosity. The amount of reduction required for the operation is small, and the operating cost can be reduced. In addition, since the friction between the roll surface and the roll shaft is reduced, the maintenance cost of the equipment can be reduced. In the arrangement of FIG. 3, the center of the slab is lowered from both sides of the slab, and in the arrangement of FIG. 4, the center of the slab is lowered from the upper side of the slab. As long as the low pressure reduction that satisfies the gradient condition is performed, there is no substantial difference between the segregation prevention and the center porosity prevention effects.

【0013】上記(1)式を満足しない場合、例えばW
が0.2W’より小さくなると、未凝固部3をその全幅
に亘って圧下することができないので、偏析防止等の所
期の効果は達成できなくなる。一方Wが0.8W’を超
えると、凝固シェルによる圧下抵抗を受けるので、低率
圧下では偏析防止等を達成することができない。尚、本
発明の短幅ロールは前記した図3,4の配置構成例で示
す様に、鋳片2の上下両方から圧下する様な配置や、上
または下のいずれか一方のみを本発明の短幅ロールと
し、反対側を前記したフラットロールとして圧下する様
に構成するが、鋳片引抜方向全長に亘って全てを同一配
置構成としなければならない訳ではなく、例えば図3,
4の配置構成を交互に採用するといった設計変更は全て
本発明の技術的範囲に包含される。次に上記した様なロ
ール構成およびロール配置で低率圧下を施す位置につい
ては、以下の計算式によって求められる中心固相率に基
づいて定めるものとする。
If the above expression (1) is not satisfied, for example, W
Is smaller than 0.2 W ', the unsolidified portion 3 cannot be rolled down over its entire width, and the desired effects such as segregation prevention cannot be achieved. On the other hand, if W exceeds 0.8 W ', the rolling resistance is reduced by the solidified shell, so that segregation prevention or the like cannot be achieved at a low rate of pressure. The short-width roll according to the present invention is, as shown in the arrangement example of FIGS. 3 and 4 described above, arranged so as to be pressed down from both the upper and lower sides of the slab 2, or only one of the upper and lower parts of the present invention. Although it is configured to be a short width roll and the other side is reduced as the flat roll described above, it is not necessary that the entire arrangement be the same arrangement over the entire length of the slab drawing direction.
All design changes such as alternately adopting the four arrangements are included in the technical scope of the present invention. Next, the position where the low rate reduction is performed in the roll configuration and the roll arrangement as described above is determined based on the central solid phase ratio obtained by the following formula.

【0014】[0014]

【数1】 式中 T:鋳片中心部温度 %C:鋳片のC濃度(Equation 1) Where T: slab center temperature% C: slab C concentration

【0015】即ち上記計算式によって求められる中心固
相率が多くとも0.05の位置[換言すれば鋳片中心部
において固相率が0.05の値を示す位置より上流側
(鋳型側)の位置]から低率圧下を開始する。そしてそ
れより下流側において中心固相率が次第に増大していく
間は低率圧下を継続し、鋳片中心部に残されている未凝
固物の凝固が進んで流動性を示す限界となる様な中心固
相率0.8に至るまでは必らず前記低率圧下を継続す
る。
That is, the position where the center solid phase ratio obtained by the above formula is at most 0.05 [in other words, the position upstream of the position where the solid phase ratio shows a value of 0.05 in the center of the slab (on the mold side). ), The low rate reduction is started. Then, while the center solid fraction gradually increases downstream, the low rate reduction is continued, and the solidification of the unsolidified material remaining in the center of the slab proceeds to reach the limit showing fluidity. The low rate reduction is continued without fail until the central solid phase ratio reaches 0.8.

【0016】もし中心固相率が0.05を超えてから低
率圧下を開始する様なことになると、低率圧下の開始が
遅過ぎて、その時点では既に凝固末期部分における凝固
収縮が始まって溶鋼流動を惹起し、それによる偏析を生
じる。一方流動相限界固相率である0.8となる以前に
低率圧下を中止すると、凝固収縮による溶鋼流動を生じ
る状態で低率圧下を解除したことになるので、偏析の形
成は回避できない。また凝固収縮に対する補償が行なわ
れないこととなるので、センターポロシティが形成され
てしまう。
If the low rate reduction starts after the center solid phase ratio exceeds 0.05, the low rate reduction starts too late, and at that time, the coagulation contraction in the last stage of solidification has already started. In this way, molten steel flows and segregation occurs. On the other hand, if the low-rate reduction is stopped before reaching the fluid phase limit solid phase ratio of 0.8, the low-rate reduction is canceled in a state where molten steel flows due to solidification shrinkage, so that segregation cannot be avoided. Further, since compensation for coagulation shrinkage is not performed, center porosity is formed.

【0017】最後に本発明のもっとも重要な条件である
低率圧下の程度については、%/minの単位で与えられる
圧下勾配の概念に従って制御を行う。この概念は毎分当
たり鋳片厚み方向に対してどの程度の圧下比率で圧下を
行うかを数値化して示すものであり、本発明では0.0
6〜0.25%/min 、好ましくは0.06〜0.13
%/min の圧下勾配で行うことを定めた。0.06%/
min より少ない圧下勾配では十分な圧下と言えず、偏析
改善効果は殆んど得られない。一方0.25%/min を
超える大きな圧下を与えると、却って逆V偏析を生じる
ことがあり、中心偏析の悪化を招く。この様な圧下勾配
条件を守って低率圧下を行った場合は、偏析およびセン
ターポロシティ等の欠陥は殆んど無視し得る程度まで改
善された。特に0.06〜0.13%/min の範囲で低
率圧下を加えたものでは内部が割れが皆無となり、ほぼ
完全な鋳造製品が得られた。また本発明は中・低炭素鋼
から高炭素鋼に至るまで幅広く適用でき、いずれの場合
も、期待通りの効果が得られることが分かった。
Finally, the degree of low rate reduction, which is the most important condition of the present invention, is controlled according to the concept of reduction gradient given in the unit of% / min. This concept numerically indicates at what reduction ratio the rolling reduction is performed per minute in the slab thickness direction.
6 to 0.25% / min, preferably 0.06 to 0.13
% / Min. 0.06% /
With a reduction gradient smaller than min, it cannot be said that the reduction is sufficient, and the effect of improving segregation is hardly obtained. On the other hand, when a large reduction exceeding 0.25% / min is applied, reverse V segregation may occur on the contrary, leading to deterioration of center segregation. When the rolling at a low rate was performed while maintaining such a rolling gradient condition, defects such as segregation and center porosity were improved to a level that could be almost ignored. In particular, when a low rate reduction was applied in the range of 0.06 to 0.13% / min, there was no internal cracking, and a nearly perfect cast product was obtained. In addition, the present invention can be widely applied from a medium / low carbon steel to a high carbon steel, and in any case, it was found that the expected effect was obtained.

【0018】[0018]

【実施例】C濃度0.7〜1.20%の各種鋼種を用い
(表1参照)、鋳片サイズ380×600(mm)、鋳造
速度0.6m/min 、鋳型内電磁攪拌併用として連続鋳
造を実施した。
EXAMPLE Using various steel types having a C concentration of 0.7 to 1.20% (see Table 1), a slab size of 380 × 600 (mm), a casting speed of 0.6 m / min, and continuous use of electromagnetic stirring in a mold. Casting was performed.

【0019】[0019]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0020】鋳片中心部に鋳片厚みの20〜40%厚み
の等軸晶域を形成させた段階から、上方側より300mm
幅の短幅圧下ロール(直径:300mm、ロールピッチ:
320mm)を作用させ、下方側はフラットロール(直
径:300mm、ロールピッチ:320mm)を用いて低率
圧下を施した(図4の配置構成)。
From the stage where an equiaxed crystal region having a thickness of 20 to 40% of the slab thickness is formed at the center of the slab, 300 mm from the upper side
Roll of short width reduction (diameter: 300mm, roll pitch:
320 mm), and the lower side was subjected to low rate reduction using a flat roll (diameter: 300 mm, roll pitch: 320 mm) (arrangement configuration in FIG. 4).

【0021】図1は未凝固域(鋳片中心部の固相率0.
05〜流動限界固相率0.8)における圧下勾配と内部
割れまたは中心偏析度の関係を示すグラフである。中心
偏析度は、5mmφドリルを用い鋳片中心部より鋳造方向
に向って10mmピッチで連続的に採取した30サンプル
におけるC分析値の最大値で示した。図から明らかであ
る様に、圧下勾配が低過ぎる領域では最大中心偏析度が
顕著に悪化し、一方圧下勾配が高過ぎると逆V偏析に基
づく最大中心偏析度が増大するだけでなく、内部割れ個
数が顕著に増大した。
FIG. 1 shows an unsolidified region (solid fraction of 0.1% at the center of the slab).
10 is a graph showing the relationship between the reduction gradient and the degree of internal cracking or center segregation at a flow rate of 0.05 to a flow limit solid phase ratio of 0.8). The degree of center segregation was represented by the maximum value of C analysis values in 30 samples continuously collected at a pitch of 10 mm from the center of the slab toward the casting direction using a 5 mm φ drill. As is clear from the figure, the maximum center segregation degree is remarkably deteriorated in the region where the reduction gradient is too low, while the maximum center segregation degree based on the reverse V segregation is increased when the reduction gradient is too high, and the internal cracking is also increased. The number increased significantly.

【0022】図2は圧下勾配を0.10%/min に固定
して中心固相率0.8まで圧下した場合において、圧下
開始時の固相率を種々変化させたときの中心偏析度の変
化を示す。図から明らかである様に中心固相率0.05
以下の時点から低率圧下を開始したものは偏析レベルが
低位で安定していることが分かる。
FIG. 2 shows the degree of center segregation when the solid phase ratio at the start of rolling is variously changed when the rolling gradient is fixed to 0.10% / min and the center solid phase ratio is reduced to 0.8. Indicates a change. As is clear from the figure, the central solid phase ratio is 0.05.
It can be seen that the segregation level is low and stable when the low rate reduction is started from the following points.

【0023】[0023]

【発明の効果】本発明は上記の様に構成されているの
で、ロール摩耗や軸摩耗を生じない様な低率圧下によ
り、中心偏析、センターポロシティ、内部割れ等のない
鋳片を連続鋳造法によって製造することが可能となっ
た。特にブルーム連鋳の様に鋳造欠陥を生じ易いものに
対しても優れた効果を発揮できることが確認された。ま
たバルジングを生じない為、中心偏析が安定的に解消さ
れることとなった。
Since the present invention is constructed as described above, it is possible to continuously cast a slab having no center segregation, center porosity, internal cracks, etc. under a low rate of pressure that does not cause roll wear or shaft wear. It became possible to manufacture. In particular, it has been confirmed that an excellent effect can be exerted even on a casting which is liable to produce a casting defect such as bloom continuous casting. In addition, since no bulging occurs, the center segregation is stably eliminated.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】圧下勾配の観点から本発明の効果を示すグラ
フ。
FIG. 1 is a graph showing the effect of the present invention from the viewpoint of a rolling gradient.

【図2】圧下開始時点の中心固相率の観点から本発明の
効果を示すグラフ。
FIG. 2 is a graph showing the effect of the present invention from the viewpoint of the center solid fraction at the start of rolling.

【図3】本発明における短幅ロールの使用概念説明図。FIG. 3 is an explanatory view of the concept of using a short width roll in the present invention.

【図4】本発明における短幅ロールの他の使用概念説明
図。
FIG. 4 is an explanatory view of another usage concept of the short width roll in the present invention.

【図5】従来の中太ロールの説明図。FIG. 5 is an explanatory view of a conventional medium-sized roll.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 中太ロール 2 鋳片 3 未凝固部 5 フラットロール 11 短幅ロール DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Medium roll 2 Cast piece 3 Unsolidified part 5 Flat roll 11 Short width roll

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 綾田 研三 兵庫県加古川市尾上町池田字池田開拓 2222番地1株式会社神戸製鋼所 加古川 研究地区内 (56)参考文献 特開 昭60−121054(JP,A) 特開 昭61−132247(JP,A) 特公 平4−22664(JP,B2) (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.7,DB名) B22D 11/128 350 B22D 11/20 ────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuing on the front page (72) Inventor Kenzo Ayata 2222-1, Ikeda, Ikeda-cho, Onoe-cho, Kakogawa-shi, Hyogo Prefecture Kobe Steel, Ltd. Kakogawa Research Area (56) References JP-A-60-121054 (JP) (A) JP-A-61-132247 (JP, A) JP-B-4-22664 (JP, B2) (58) Fields investigated (Int. Cl. 7 , DB name) B22D 11/128 350 B22D 11/20

Claims (2)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】 連続鋳造法の鋳片引抜工程における終盤
過程で該引抜中の鋳片に対して圧下力を加える方法であ
って、鋳片幅の 0.2〜 0.8倍の実効長さを有する圧下ロ
ールを、該鋳片の上下両方から又はいずれか一方から作
用させ、該鋳片の中心固相率が多くとも0.05の時点から
圧下を開始し、且つ中心固相率0.8 までの範囲を、単位
時間当りの鋳片厚みに対する圧下勾配が0.06〜0.25%/
min となる様に圧下することを特徴とする連続鋳造方
法。
1. A method of applying a rolling force to a slab being drawn in a final stage in a slab drawing step of a continuous casting method, comprising a reduction having an effective length of 0.2 to 0.8 times a slab width. The roll is acted on from above and below or from either one of the slabs, rolling starts from the point where the center solids fraction of the slab is at most 0.05, and the range up to the center solids ratio of 0.8 is defined as a unit. The rolling gradient with respect to the slab thickness per hour is 0.06-0.25% /
A continuous casting method characterized by reducing the pressure to a minimum value.
【請求項2】 0.06〜0.13%/min の圧下勾配で圧下す
る請求項1に記載の連続鋳造方法。
2. The continuous casting method according to claim 1, wherein the reduction is performed at a reduction gradient of 0.06 to 0.13% / min.
JP04890093A 1993-03-10 1993-03-10 Continuous casting method Expired - Fee Related JP3341338B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP04890093A JP3341338B2 (en) 1993-03-10 1993-03-10 Continuous casting method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP04890093A JP3341338B2 (en) 1993-03-10 1993-03-10 Continuous casting method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH06262320A JPH06262320A (en) 1994-09-20
JP3341338B2 true JP3341338B2 (en) 2002-11-05

Family

ID=12816147

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP04890093A Expired - Fee Related JP3341338B2 (en) 1993-03-10 1993-03-10 Continuous casting method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3341338B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2809186B2 (en) * 1996-02-19 1998-10-08 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Continuous casting method
JP5030385B2 (en) * 2005-02-10 2012-09-19 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Support roll unit replacement method and continuous casting method
JP5683061B2 (en) * 2008-04-04 2015-03-11 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Continuous casting method for thick plate
JP6075336B2 (en) * 2014-07-15 2017-02-08 Jfeスチール株式会社 Steel continuous casting method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH06262320A (en) 1994-09-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2814958B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP2809186B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP3341338B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP3341340B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP2980006B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP2015009264A (en) Continuous casting method of steel
JPH08238550A (en) Continuous casting method for steel
JP3341339B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JPH078421B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP3215573B2 (en) Continuous casting method of nickel-containing steel
JP2561180B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP7273307B2 (en) Steel continuous casting method
EP4527521A1 (en) Steel continuous casting method
JP3488656B2 (en) Steel continuous casting method
JP2000237855A (en) Billet continuous casting method
JPS6228056A (en) Continuous casting method
JP3055462B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP3147803B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP2640399B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JPH0256982B2 (en)
JP3615482B2 (en) Light reduction method in billet caster
JP3063533B2 (en) Continuous casting of wide thin cast slabs
JP3342774B2 (en) Mold powder for continuous casting
JP3312609B2 (en) Continuous casting of thin slabs
JP2593386B2 (en) Continuous casting method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20020723

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20070823

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080823

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080823

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090823

Year of fee payment: 7

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees