JP3367566B2 - Large heat input single-sided submerged arc welding method - Google Patents
Large heat input single-sided submerged arc welding methodInfo
- Publication number
- JP3367566B2 JP3367566B2 JP11800193A JP11800193A JP3367566B2 JP 3367566 B2 JP3367566 B2 JP 3367566B2 JP 11800193 A JP11800193 A JP 11800193A JP 11800193 A JP11800193 A JP 11800193A JP 3367566 B2 JP3367566 B2 JP 3367566B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- distance
- poles
- plate thickness
- welding
- thickness
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Landscapes
- Arc Welding In General (AREA)
- Butt Welding And Welding Of Specific Article (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
【0001】
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、板厚50〜80mmの
厚鋼板の大入熱片面1パスサブマージアーク溶接方法に
関する。
【0002】
【従来の技術】ボックス柱の角継ぎ手溶接などの極厚鋼
板の溶接は2電極サブマージアーク溶接法を用いて板厚
50mmまで1パス溶接を行うのが一般的となってい
る。しかし、50mmを超える板厚ではCO2 溶接など
の下盛り溶接を行い、1〜2パスのサブマージアーク溶
接で仕上げる方法が通常である。
【0003】しかし、ビルの高層化が進行し、また溶接
の高能率化に対する要望が高まってきたため、50mm
以上の極厚鋼板の高能率溶接法として3電極サブマージ
アーク溶接法による1パス溶接方法が検討されている。
ところで多電極を用いた片面サブマージアーク溶接法に
おいて電極間の距離は耐割れ性、スラグ巻き込み防止等
の溶接欠陥防止の観点から非常に重要であり、上記項目
を防止するために種々の検討および提案がなされてい
る。
【0004】多電極片面一層サブマージアーク溶接法に
おいて1つの溶融池を形成する電極または電極群の距離
を300mm以上にすることにより溶接入熱量を分散
し、靱性の劣化を防止する方法が特公昭56ー3998
9号公報に提案されている。また3電極サブマージアー
ク溶接において1電極と2電極の距離を150〜290
mm、2電極と3電極の距離を30mm以下とし、靱性
劣化とスラグ巻き込みなどの溶接欠陥を防止する方法が
特開昭61ー189876号公報に提案されている。し
かし、対象としている溶接入熱は実施例において最高1
50kJ/cmである。板厚50mmの片面一層溶接に
必要な溶接入熱は約400kJ/cmであるため、上記
方法とは溶融金属の凝固時間や、凝固形態、あるいは溶
接現象が異なり、板厚50mm以上の片面一層サブマー
ジアーク溶接に適用し、溶接欠陥を防止することは困難
である。
【0005】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】本発明は、先行電極に
直流電源を用いた極厚鋼板の3電極片面1パスサブマー
ジアーク溶接法におけるスラグ巻き込み、溶け込み不
足、溶接割れ、アンダーカットなどの溶接欠陥の問題を
解決することを目的とするものである。
【0006】
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は、板厚50〜8
0mmの厚鋼板の片面1パス溶接における、先行極(以
下Lと記す)に直流電源を用い、中間極(以下Mと記
す)および後行極(以下Tと記す)に交流電源を用い、
板厚が50mm以上60mm以下の場合下記の条件1の
範囲内の極間距離に、板厚60mm以上70mm以下の
場合下記条件2の範囲内の極間距離に、板厚70mm以
上80mm以下の場合下記条件3の範囲内の極間距離に
設定して溶接することを特徴とする大入熱片面サブマー
ジアーク溶接方法である。
【0007】記
板厚を横軸に、極間距離を縦軸にとり、板厚とL−M極
間距離の関係、および板厚とM−T極間距離の関係につ
いてそれぞれグラフを描いた場合、条件1は板厚50m
mのときL−M極間距離が40mmと160mm、M−
T極間距離が90mmと150mmと、板厚が60mm
のときL−M極間距離が50mmと180mm、M−T
極間距離が100mmと160mmとで囲まれる条件範
囲、条件2は板厚が60mmのときL−M極間距離が5
0mmと180mm、M−T極間距離が100mmと1
60mmと、板厚が70mmのときL−M極間距離が6
0mmと190mm、M−T極間距離が110mmと1
80mmとで囲まれる条件範囲、条件3は板厚70mm
のときLーM極間距離が60mmと190mm、M−T
極間距離が110mmと180mmと、板厚が80mm
のときL−M極間距離が70mmと200mm、M−T
極間距離が120mmと190mmとで囲まれる条件範
囲。
【0008】なお、極間距離とは電極間の距離を開先底
部で測定した値とする。
【0009】
【作用】本発明者らは極厚鋼板の3電極片面一層サブマ
ージアーク溶接について総合的な検討を行い、次のよう
な知見を得た。まず耐割れ性の観点から各電極による溶
融池が完全に分離しないように各電極を配置する必要が
ある。すなわち、先行電極による溶接金属凝固方向を後
行極による上部加熱効果で上方に修正し、溶接金属凝固
会合部にできる凝固割れを防止するためである。またL
極溶接金属は幅に対して溶け込み方向の長さがかなり長
い形状となるため溶接金属上部に凝固割れが生じやす
い。この割れを溶解するのもM極の重要な役割である。
【0010】またL−M極の極間距離が短くなるとアー
クは溶融金属に発生し、溶け込み深さが浅くなり、溶け
込み不足を生じる可能性がある。またM−T極の極間距
離の減少に伴い、ビード幅が狭くなり、アンダーカット
を生じる危険があることが判明した。そこで上記溶接欠
陥を生じないような極間距離の適正な設定が必要であ
る。以下に極間距離限定の理由を詳細に説明する。
【0011】L−M極の極間距離が短いときは上記理由
からアークが溶融金属に発生し、溶け込み不足が発生し
やすい。またスラグの吹き上げが激しくなり、溶接作業
性が著しく損なわれる。L−M極の極間距離が長くなる
とM極位置においてL極溶融金属の凝固が進むため、L
極溶接金属上部に生じる溶接金属凝固割れをM極が溶解
しきれずに図3に示すように割れとして残ってしまう。
またL極スラグの凝固が進むためスラグ巻き込みが発生
しやすくなり、M極アークの発生も凝固スラグの影響を
受けて不安定になり、溶接作業性が劣化する。板厚が増
加すると投入される溶接入熱も増大するため極間距離も
図1に示すように板厚にあわせて設定する必要がある。
【0012】M−T極間距離が短くなるとビード幅が狭
くなり、アンダーカット発生の可能性が増大する。また
M極溶融池とT極溶融池とが1プールを形成し、T極に
よる上部加熱効果が得られなくなるため、図4に示すよ
うな凝固割れを生じやすくなる。さらにスラグの吹き上
げが増大し、溶接作業性が劣化する。M−T極間距離が
長ければM極によるスラグが凝固してしまうのでスラグ
巻き込みが発生しやすく、T極アークの発生が不安定に
なり溶接作業性が劣化する。M−T極間距離も板厚の増
加に合わせて図2に示すように設定する必要がある。
【0013】このようなことからL−M極間距離および
M−T極間距離を適正な範囲に調整することが、欠陥の
ない溶接をするための必須条件であることを発見した。
すなわち、50、60、70、および80mmの各板厚
におけるL−M極間距離と欠陥の関係を図1に、M−T
極間距離と欠陥の関係を図2に示したが、板厚50mm
のときはL−M極間距離を40〜160mm、M−T極
間距離を90〜150mm、板厚60mmのときはL−
M極間距離を50〜180mm、M−T極間距離を10
0〜160mm、板厚70mmのときはL−M極間距離
を60〜190mm、M−T極間距離を110〜180
mm、板厚80mmのときはL−M極間距離を70〜2
00mm、M−T極間距離を120〜190mmとする
ことによって欠陥のない健全なビードを有する溶接が可
能である。
【0014】また先行極に直流電源を用いるのは直流は
交流に比較して溶け込みが深く、アーク安定性も良好で
あるためであり、中間極、後行極に直流電源を用いない
のは先行極の直流電流と後方の直流電流が生ずる磁場に
よるアークの磁気吹きを避けるためである。
【0015】
【実施例】本発明に基づいた実施例についての溶接条件
と溶接結果について表1に示す。表1で開先角度の単位
はdeg、ルートフェース(RF)はmm、電流はV、
極間距離はmmである。本発明の実施により健全な溶接
ビードが得られた。
【0016】
【表1】【0017】表2に示されたケースは、極間距離が本発
明の範囲よりはずれた条件を用いた比較例である。L−
M極間距離が短いものは溶け込み不足が生じ、M−T極
間距離が短いものはアンダーカットが生じている。L−
M極間距離が長いものについては割れが生じ、M−T極
間距離が長いものはスラグ巻き込みが生じている。また
比較例13は、極間距離は本発明の範囲に入っているが
先行極の電源に交流を使用しているため溶け込み不足を
生じている。
【0018】
【表2】【0019】
【発明の効果】本発明による溶接法を用いることによ
り、板厚50〜80mmの片面1パス溶接を欠陥なく行
うことが可能となり、溶接後の手直しが不要となって溶
接作業の能率が飛躍的に向上した。Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a single-pass, single-pass, single-pass submerged arc welding method for a steel plate having a thickness of 50 to 80 mm. 2. Description of the Related Art It is a common practice to weld extremely thick steel plates such as box joint corner joints by one-pass welding to a thickness of 50 mm using a two-electrode submerged arc welding method. However, the plate thickness of more than 50mm performed under layer welding, such as CO 2 welding, a method of finishing by submerged arc welding of 1-2 path is normal. However, as the height of the building has been increased and the demand for higher welding efficiency has been increasing, 50 mm
As a high-efficiency welding method for the extremely thick steel plate, a one-pass welding method using a three-electrode submerged arc welding method is being studied.
By the way, in the single-sided submerged arc welding method using multiple electrodes, the distance between the electrodes is very important from the viewpoint of crack resistance, prevention of welding defects such as slag entrainment, and various studies and proposals for preventing the above items. Has been made. A method of dispersing the heat input and preventing the deterioration of toughness by increasing the distance between the electrodes or electrode groups forming one molten pool in the multi-electrode single-sided, single-layer submerged arc welding method to 300 mm or more is disclosed in Japanese Patent Publication No. Sho 56. -3998
No. 9 has been proposed. In the three-electrode submerged arc welding, the distance between one electrode and two electrodes is set to 150 to 290.
Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 61-189876 proposes a method in which the distance between the two electrodes and the three electrodes is set to 30 mm or less to prevent toughness deterioration and welding defects such as slag entrapment. However, the target welding heat input was up to 1 in the examples.
It is 50 kJ / cm. Since the welding heat input required for single-sided single-layer welding with a plate thickness of 50 mm is about 400 kJ / cm, the solidification time, solidification form, or welding phenomenon of the molten metal differs from the above method, and the single-sided single-sided submerged plate with a plate thickness of 50 mm or more is different. It is difficult to apply to arc welding and prevent welding defects. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to slag entrainment, insufficient penetration, weld cracking, undercut, etc. in a three-electrode single-sided, one-pass, one-pass submerged arc welding method for a very thick steel plate using a DC power supply as a leading electrode. The purpose of the present invention is to solve the problem of welding defects. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention is directed to a plate having a thickness of 50 to 8 mm.
In one-sided single-pass welding of a 0 mm thick steel plate, a DC power supply is used for a leading electrode (hereinafter, referred to as L), and an AC power supply is used for a middle electrode (hereinafter, referred to as M) and a following electrode (hereinafter, referred to as T).
When the plate thickness is 50 mm or more and 60 mm or less The distance between the poles within the range of the following condition 1 is used. When the plate thickness is 60 mm or more and 70 mm or less. This is a large heat input single-sided submerged arc welding method, characterized in that welding is performed with the distance between the electrodes set within the range of the following condition 3. When the thickness of the sheet is plotted on the abscissa and the distance between the poles is plotted on the ordinate, graphs are drawn for the relationship between the plate thickness and the distance between the LM poles and the relationship between the plate thickness and the distance between the MT poles. , Condition 1 is 50m thickness
m, the distance between the LM poles is 40 mm and 160 mm,
T pole distance is 90mm and 150mm, plate thickness is 60mm
When the distance between LM poles is 50 mm and 180 mm, MT
The condition range in which the distance between the poles is surrounded by 100 mm and 160 mm, and the condition 2 is that when the plate thickness is 60 mm, the distance between the LM poles is 5
0mm and 180mm, distance between MT pole is 100mm and 1
60 mm, and when the plate thickness is 70 mm, the distance between the LM poles is 6
0mm and 190mm, distance between MT pole is 110mm and 1
A condition range surrounded by 80 mm, and a condition 3 is a plate thickness of 70 mm.
When the distance between LM poles is 60 mm and 190 mm, MT
The distance between the poles is 110mm and 180mm, and the plate thickness is 80mm
When the distance between the LM poles is 70 mm and 200 mm, the MT
Condition range in which the distance between the poles is surrounded by 120 mm and 190 mm. The distance between the electrodes is a value obtained by measuring the distance between the electrodes at the bottom of the groove. The present inventors have conducted a comprehensive study on three-electrode one-sided one-sided submerged arc welding of an extremely thick steel plate, and have obtained the following findings. First, from the viewpoint of crack resistance, it is necessary to arrange the electrodes so that the molten pool formed by the electrodes does not completely separate. That is, the solidification direction of the weld metal by the leading electrode is corrected upward by the upper heating effect by the trailing electrode to prevent solidification cracks formed at the weld metal solidification association portion. Also L
Since the pole weld metal has a shape in which the length in the penetration direction is considerably longer than the width, solidification cracks are easily generated at the upper portion of the weld metal. Melting this crack is also an important role of the M pole. When the distance between the LM poles is reduced, an arc is generated in the molten metal, the penetration depth is reduced, and there is a possibility that the penetration is insufficient. In addition, it has been found that the bead width becomes narrower with a decrease in the distance between the MT poles, and there is a danger that undercut may occur. Therefore, it is necessary to properly set the distance between the electrodes so as not to cause the welding defect. The reason for limiting the gap distance will be described in detail below. When the distance between the LM poles is short, an arc is generated in the molten metal for the above-described reason, and insufficient penetration is likely to occur. In addition, slag blow-up becomes severe, and welding workability is significantly impaired. When the distance between the LM poles is increased, solidification of the L-pole molten metal proceeds at the M-pole position.
As shown in FIG. 3, the solidification crack of the weld metal generated above the pole weld metal remains as a crack as shown in FIG.
Further, the solidification of the L-pole slag proceeds, so that slag entrainment is likely to occur, and the generation of the M-pole arc becomes unstable due to the influence of the solidified slag, thereby deteriorating welding workability. As the plate thickness increases, the input welding heat input also increases. Therefore, the distance between the electrodes needs to be set according to the plate thickness as shown in FIG. When the distance between the MT poles is reduced, the bead width is reduced, and the possibility of undercut is increased. Further, since the M-pole weld pool and the T-pole weld pool form one pool, the upper heating effect by the T pole cannot be obtained, so that solidification cracking as shown in FIG. 4 is likely to occur. Further, the blow-up of slag increases, and welding workability deteriorates. If the distance between the MT poles is long, the slag by the M poles is solidified, so that the slag is likely to be entrained, the generation of the T pole arc becomes unstable, and the welding workability deteriorates. The distance between the MT poles also needs to be set as shown in FIG. 2 according to the increase in the plate thickness. From the above, it has been found that adjusting the distance between the LM poles and the distance between the MT poles to an appropriate range is an essential condition for performing defect-free welding.
That is, FIG. 1 shows the relationship between the LM pole-to-pole distance and the defect at each plate thickness of 50, 60, 70, and 80 mm.
FIG. 2 shows the relationship between the distance between the poles and the defect.
When the distance between the LM poles is 40 to 160 mm, the distance between the MT poles is 90 to 150 mm, and when the plate thickness is 60 mm, L-
The distance between M poles is 50 to 180 mm, and the distance between MT poles is 10
When the thickness is 0 to 160 mm and the thickness is 70 mm, the distance between the LM poles is 60 to 190 mm, and the distance between the MT poles is 110 to 180.
mm, the thickness between the LM poles is 70 to 2 when the plate thickness is 80 mm.
By setting the distance between the poles to 00 mm and the distance between the MT poles to 120 to 190 mm, welding having a sound bead without defects is possible. The reason why a DC power supply is used for the leading electrode is that DC has a deeper penetration than AC and has good arc stability, and the DC power supply is not used for the intermediate and trailing electrodes. This is to avoid magnetic blowing of the arc due to the magnetic field generated by the DC current at the pole and the DC current at the rear. EXAMPLES Table 1 shows welding conditions and welding results for examples according to the present invention. In Table 1, the unit of the groove angle is deg, the root face (RF) is mm, the current is V,
The distance between the poles is mm. The practice of the present invention resulted in a sound weld bead. [Table 1] The case shown in Table 2 is a comparative example using the condition that the distance between the poles is out of the range of the present invention. L-
If the distance between the M poles is short, insufficient penetration occurs, and if the distance between the MT poles is short, undercutting occurs. L-
If the distance between the M poles is long, cracks occur, and if the distance between the MT poles is long, slag entrainment occurs. In Comparative Example 13, although the distance between the electrodes was within the range of the present invention, the penetration was insufficient due to the use of alternating current as the power supply for the leading electrode. [Table 2] By using the welding method according to the present invention, it is possible to perform one-sided single-pass welding of a plate thickness of 50 to 80 mm without defects, and it is not necessary to perform rework after welding, thereby improving the efficiency of welding work. Has improved dramatically.
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】M−T極間距離を120mmに固定したときの
L−M極間距離と欠陥との関係を示す特性図である。
【図2】L−M極間距離を120mmに固定したときの
M−T極間距離と欠陥との関係を示す特性図である。
【図3】L−M極の極間距離が長い場合における溶接金
属凝固割れを示す説明図である。
【図4】M−T極間距離が短い場合における溶接金属凝
固割れを示す説明図である。BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a characteristic diagram showing a relationship between a distance between an LM pole and a defect when a distance between an MT pole is fixed to 120 mm. FIG. 2 is a characteristic diagram showing a relationship between a distance between the MT poles and a defect when the distance between the LM poles is fixed to 120 mm. FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing weld metal solidification cracking when the distance between LM poles is long. FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing weld metal solidification cracking when the distance between MT electrodes is short.
───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (56)参考文献 特開 平4−210874(JP,A) 特開 平2−52174(JP,A) 特開 平4−266482(JP,A) 特開 昭58−135766(JP,A) (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.7,DB名) B23K 9/18 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continuation of front page (56) References JP-A-4-210874 (JP, A) JP-A-2-52174 (JP, A) JP-A-4-266482 (JP, A) JP-A-58- 135766 (JP, A) (58) Field surveyed (Int. Cl. 7 , DB name) B23K 9/18
Claims (1)
スサブマージアーク溶接における、先行極(以下Lと記
す)に直流電源を用い、中間極(以下Mと記す)および
後行極(以下Tと記す)に交流電源を用い、板厚が50
mm以上60mm以下の場合下記の条件1の範囲内の極
間距離に、板厚60mm以上70mm以下の場合下記条
件2の範囲内の極間距離に、板厚70mm以上80mm
以下の場合下記条件3の範囲内の極間距離に設定して溶
接することを特徴とする大入熱片面サブマージアーク溶
接方法。 記 板厚を横軸に、極間距離を縦軸にとり、板厚とL−M極
間距離の関係、および板厚とM−T極間距離の関係につ
いてそれぞれグラフを描いた場合、 条件1は板厚50mmのときL−M極間距離が40mm
と160mm、M−T極間距離が90mmと150mm
と、板厚が60mmのときL−M極間距離が50mmと
180mm、M−T極間距離が100mmと160mm
とで囲まれる条件範囲、 条件2は板厚が60mmのときL−M極間距離が50m
mと180mm、M−T極間距離が100mmと160
mmと、板厚が70mmのときL−M極間距離が60m
mと190mm、M−T極間距離が110mmと180
mmとで囲まれる条件範囲、 条件3は板厚70mmのときLーM極間距離が60mm
と190mm、M−T極間距離が110mmと180m
mと、板厚が80mmのときL−M極間距離が70mm
と200mm、M−T極間距離が120mmと190m
mとで囲まれる条件範囲。なお、極間距離とは電極間の
距離を開先底部で測定した値とする。(57) [Claims 1] In a single-sided one-pass submerged arc welding of a thick steel plate having a thickness of 50 to 80 mm, a DC power supply is used for a leading electrode (hereinafter referred to as L) and an intermediate electrode (hereinafter referred to as M). ) And a trailing electrode (hereinafter referred to as T) using an AC power source and having a thickness of 50
In the case of not less than 60 mm and 60 mm or less, the distance between the poles within the range of the following condition 1 is used.
In the following case, a large heat input single-sided submerged arc welding method is performed in which welding is performed with the distance between the electrodes set within the range of the following condition 3. When the thickness of the sheet is plotted on the horizontal axis and the distance between the poles is plotted on the vertical axis, graphs are drawn for the relationship between the plate thickness and the LM pole distance and the relationship between the plate thickness and the MT pole distance, respectively. Is the distance between the LM poles is 40 mm when the plate thickness is 50 mm
And 160mm, the distance between MT poles is 90mm and 150mm
When the plate thickness is 60 mm, the distance between the LM poles is 50 mm and 180 mm, and the distance between the MT poles is 100 mm and 160 mm.
Condition 2 is that the distance between the LM poles is 50 m when the plate thickness is 60 mm.
m and 180 mm, the distance between MT poles is 100 mm and 160
mm, and when the plate thickness is 70 mm, the distance between the LM poles is 60 m.
m and 190 mm, the distance between MT poles is 110 mm and 180
and Condition 3 is that the distance between the LM poles is 60 mm when the plate thickness is 70 mm.
And 190mm, the distance between MT poles is 110mm and 180m
m, and when the plate thickness is 80 mm, the distance between the LM poles is 70 mm.
And 200mm, the distance between MT poles is 120mm and 190m
Condition range surrounded by m. The distance between the electrodes is a value obtained by measuring the distance between the electrodes at the bottom of the groove.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP11800193A JP3367566B2 (en) | 1993-05-20 | 1993-05-20 | Large heat input single-sided submerged arc welding method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP11800193A JP3367566B2 (en) | 1993-05-20 | 1993-05-20 | Large heat input single-sided submerged arc welding method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH06328254A JPH06328254A (en) | 1994-11-29 |
| JP3367566B2 true JP3367566B2 (en) | 2003-01-14 |
Family
ID=14725599
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP11800193A Expired - Lifetime JP3367566B2 (en) | 1993-05-20 | 1993-05-20 | Large heat input single-sided submerged arc welding method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP3367566B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN100463756C (en) * | 2007-04-30 | 2009-02-25 | 上海冠达尔钢结构有限公司 | Three-wire submerged arc welding method for low-alloy high-strength steel in thick plate |
| CN102198559A (en) * | 2011-04-08 | 2011-09-28 | 胜利油田龙玺石油钢管有限公司 | Dissimilar steel welding technology |
| JP6383319B2 (en) * | 2015-03-31 | 2018-08-29 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Multi-electrode single-sided single layer submerged arc welding method |
| KR102089932B1 (en) * | 2015-06-10 | 2020-03-17 | 제이에프이 스틸 가부시키가이샤 | Multi-electrode submerged arc welding method, weld joint, and weld joint manufacturing method |
| CN112846447B (en) * | 2021-02-07 | 2022-08-12 | 哈尔滨焊接研究院有限公司 | Arc stabilization method for multi-arc eutectic pool welding of thick plates |
-
1993
- 1993-05-20 JP JP11800193A patent/JP3367566B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH06328254A (en) | 1994-11-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP5225962B2 (en) | Multi-electrode gas shielded arc welding method | |
| JP3367566B2 (en) | Large heat input single-sided submerged arc welding method | |
| JP5283306B2 (en) | Submerged arc welding method for steel | |
| JPH11138266A (en) | Tandem submerged arc welding method | |
| JP4957441B2 (en) | Gas shield arc welding method | |
| KR20230021579A (en) | One-side submerged arc welding method for multielectrode | |
| JPH0729206B2 (en) | High-speed submerged arc welding method using multiple electrodes | |
| JP2007268564A (en) | Multi-electrode submerged arc welding method | |
| CN111683780B (en) | Single-side submerged arc welding method and single-side submerged arc welding device | |
| JP6383319B2 (en) | Multi-electrode single-sided single layer submerged arc welding method | |
| JPH08281436A (en) | Two-electrode horizontal fillet latent arc welding method for T-joint | |
| JPH10211578A (en) | Two electrode submerged arc welding method for square joint | |
| JPH0428472B2 (en) | ||
| JP3808213B2 (en) | Submerged arc welding method for thick steel plate | |
| JP5672697B2 (en) | Submerged arc welding method for steel | |
| JP4038003B2 (en) | Column-welding method for extra-thick H-section steel | |
| JPH07256456A (en) | One-side submerged arc welding | |
| JPS6340633B2 (en) | ||
| JP6607677B2 (en) | Four-electrode single-sided single-layer submerged arc welding method | |
| JPS61222683A (en) | Narrow gap submerged arc welding method | |
| JP3186885B2 (en) | Single-sided submerged arc welding method | |
| JP3120907B2 (en) | Single-sided submerged arc welding method | |
| JPH091343A (en) | 3-electrode submerged arc welding method | |
| JP3836071B2 (en) | Single electrode single-sided submerged arc welding method | |
| CN216758558U (en) | High-impact-value electroslag welding T-shaped joint |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| S111 | Request for change of ownership or part of ownership |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313113 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081108 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081108 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091108 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091108 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101108 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111108 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121108 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131108 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| EXPY | Cancellation because of completion of term |