Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP3369011B2 - Quantitative analysis method of weight composition ratio of element in depth direction of metal material in glow discharge emission spectroscopy - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP3369011B2 - Quantitative analysis method of weight composition ratio of element in depth direction of metal material in glow discharge emission spectroscopy - Google Patents

Quantitative analysis method of weight composition ratio of element in depth direction of metal material in glow discharge emission spectroscopy

Info

Publication number
JP3369011B2
JP3369011B2 JP27504094A JP27504094A JP3369011B2 JP 3369011 B2 JP3369011 B2 JP 3369011B2 JP 27504094 A JP27504094 A JP 27504094A JP 27504094 A JP27504094 A JP 27504094A JP 3369011 B2 JP3369011 B2 JP 3369011B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
composition ratio
quantitative analysis
weight composition
depth direction
depth
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP27504094A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH08136460A (en
Inventor
剛 井上
省一 荒谷
普康 山本
鈴木  茂
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP27504094A priority Critical patent/JP3369011B2/en
Publication of JPH08136460A publication Critical patent/JPH08136460A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3369011B2 publication Critical patent/JP3369011B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Investigating And Analyzing Materials By Characteristic Methods (AREA)
  • Investigating, Analyzing Materials By Fluorescence Or Luminescence (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 【0001】 【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、金属材料の表面分析を
行うときに用いられるグロー放電発光分光分析法におけ
る深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率の定量解析方法に関す
るものである。特に、鉄鋼材料の製造に使用される熱間
圧延加工ロールのような炭化物と金属マトリックスが不
均質に分散した材料や、さらに母材と導電性や発光特性
の異なる酸化膜などの皮膜が表面に形成された材料を、
皮膜と母材を同時に連続してグロー放電発光分光分析を
行うときの深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率の定量解析方
法に関するものである。 【0002】 【従来の技術】グロー放電発光分光分析法では、不活性
ガスを用いたスパッタリングによって材料表面から放出
(発光)される元素を検出する表面分析法の一つであ
る。この分析法は、不活性ガス(アルゴンガスなど)を
イオン化させて材料の表面に衝突させて、表面から放出
(発光)される(スパッタリングされる)元素の発光強
度を、各元素毎に設けられた専用検出器によって、一定
時間連続して測定する。そして、得られた発光強度をあ
る手法を用いて各元素の重量組成比率と表面からの深さ
の関係を解析する。このときのグロー放電発光分光分析
法における深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率を定量的に解
析する手段としては以下の方法が知られている。まず、
標準試料を用いて、グロー放電発光分光分析で測定され
る発光強度を元素の重量組成比率及び深さに変換するの
に必要な各元素の発光収率を求めておく。そして、それ
を用いて種々の材料について、深さ方向の元素の重量組
成比率を計算で求める定量解析方法がよく知られている
(「グロー放電発光分光法による酸化皮膜の深さ方法定
量分析」:鉄と鋼,Vol.77,(1991),p25
3)。 【0003】 【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、従来の
深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率の定量解析方法では、グ
ロー放電を利用して測定する材料の発光特性が、標準試
料の発光特性と同じであれば正確な深さ方向の元素の重
量組成比率の定量解析が可能であるが、標準試料の発光
特性と異なる正確な定量解析ができない。しかも、材料
の発光特性は、材料と装置のアノード電極との間隙長さ
や、表面の清浄度、組成などによって大きく異なる場合
が多い。特に、鉄鋼製造プロセスで使用される熱間圧延
ロールのように、炭化物と金属マトリックスとが不均質
に分散している材料では、同じ組成でも発光特性が大き
く異なる場合がある。その上、表面に黒皮と呼ばれる酸
化膜が形成したロールでは、黒皮と母材とで発光特性が
大きく異なる。黒皮は生成したときの条件によって、黒
皮組成や気孔率などが変化する。従って、予め発光収率
を求めておいて解析する従来の方法では、このような材
料の深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率の正確な定量解析は
困難である。 【0004】一方、断面観察用の試料を作成し、断面観
察によって深さ方向の定量解析を行う方法もあるが、ロ
ール材のような高価な材料をその都度切り出すことは、
分析コストや研究開発コストの増大を招き、効率的な実
験は困難である。グロー放電発光分光分析法で上記の熱
延ロールのような材料の分析を行うには、材料の発光特
性の違いを考慮した、精度の高い深さ方向の元素の重量
組成比率の定量解析方法が必要である。 【0005】本発明は、予め求めておいた発光収率を利
用して、材料の発光特性の違いに応じて、測定毎に発光
収率を補正することによって、グロー放電発光分光分析
法による精度の高い深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率の定
量解析方法を提供する。 【0006】 【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は、グロー放電発
光分光分析法における金属材料の深さ方向の元素の重量
組成比率の定量解析を行う際に、各元素の発光収率をR
n 〔(Volt/kg)・m2・sec 〕、発光収率Rn を用いて
深さ方向の元素の組成重量比率の定量解析で得られたス
パッタリング痕の深さをda 〔μm〕、実測したスパッ
タリング痕の深さをdr 〔μm〕とするとき、式(1)
によって得られる補正発光収率Rn ′〔(Volt/kg)・m
2 ・sec 〕を用いて再び深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率
の定量解析を行うことを特徴とする。 Rn ′=Rn ・(dr /da ) ………(1) 【0007】 【作用】グロー放電発光分光分析法における深さ方向の
元素の重量組成比率の定量解析精度を向上させるには、
測定した発光強度を重量組成比率を解析するための発光
収率という係数を材料に応じて正確に決定することが重
要である。 【0008】従来の分析方法では、測定前にほぼ同じ組
成で、しかも組成が明らかになっている標準試料を用意
し、予め発光収率を求めておく、発光収率を求めるに
は、通常のグロー放電発光分光分析法によって標準試料
の発光強度の測定を行う。次に、元素の放出(発光)に
よって形成される測定部のくぼみ(スパッタリング痕と
いう)の重量減量を測定し、測定時間(スパッタリング
時間という)と測定部のくぼみの面積で除することによ
って、単位時間・単位面積当たりの材料の重量減量(質
量スパッタリング速度という)を決定する。そして、各
元素の発光強度、材料組成の重量比率、質量スパッタリ
ング速度から式(2)によって、各元素の発光収率を決
定する。そして、以後の定量解析では、ここで求めた発
光収率を用いて、深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率の定量
解析を行うものである。 Rn =In /Vm ・Cn ………(2) ここで、Vm 〔kg/(m2 ・sec)〕は質量スパッタリン
グ速度、Cn は材料組成比率〔−〕、In 〔Volt〕は発
光強度、Rn 〔(Volt/kg)・m2 ・sec 〕は元素nの発
光収率である。 【0009】次に、発光収率を用いて深さ方向の元素の
重量組成比率の定量解析を従来の方法で行う場合、測定
した発光強度からある時間t〔sec 〕からt+Δt〔se
c 〕の間にスパッタリングによって取り除かれた部分の
元素nの組成比率ΔCn 〔−〕を求めるには式(3)を
用い、その部分の深さΔd〔μm〕を求めるには式
(4)を用いる。 【0010】 【数1】 ここで、In ′〔Volt〕は発光収率を求めたときの標準
試料の発光強度、Cn ′〔−〕は標準試料の元素nの重
量組成比率、Vm ′〔kg/(m2 ・sec)〕はそのときの
質量スパッタリング速度である。式(3)から元素の重
量組成比率を求める場合、式(3)に質量スパッタリン
グ速度の項がないことから、発光収率を求めるときと実
際の測定のときとで質量スパッタリング速度が異なって
も(標準試料と実際の測定材料とで発光特性が異なって
も)、元素の重量組成比率の定量解析結果に影響を及ぼ
さないことがわかる。しかし、式(4)から発光によっ
て材料が除去されて形成されるくぼみの深さを求める場
合、発光収率を求めるときと実際の測定のときとで質量
スパッタリング速度が異なると、正確な深さの定量解析
結果が得られない。従って、深さ方向の元素の重量組成
比率の定量解析を正確に行うには、予め求めておいた発
光収率を用いるのでなく、測定材料の発光特性に応じて
補正した発光収率を用いなければならない。 【0011】本発明は、予め標準試料で求めた発光収率
(Rn 〔(Volt/kg)・m2 ・sec 〕)を、測定する材料
の発光特性に応じて補正し、精度の高い深さ方向の定量
解析を行う方法を考案したものである。すなわち、材料
の発光強度(In 〔Volt〕)を測定し、発光収率(Rn
〔(Volt/kg)・m2 ・sec 〕)を用いて定量解析したス
パッタリング痕の深さ(da 〔μm〕)と、実際に材料
に形成されたくぼみ部分の深さ(スパッタリング痕の深
さ)を表面粗度計などによって実測したスパッタリング
痕の深さ(dr 〔μm〕)とが一致するように、(dr
/da )を発光収率(Rn )にかけて補正発光収率(R
n ′〔(Volt/kg)・m2 ・sec 〕)を得て、再び補正発
光収率(Rn ′)を用いて測定した発光強度(In )か
ら深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率を定量解析する方法を
考えた。 Rn ′=Rn ・(dr /da ) ………(1) ここで、(Rn 〔(Volt/kg)・m2 ・sec 〕)は予め標
準試料を用いて求めた発光収率、da 〔μm〕は発光収
率Rn を用いて求めたスパッタリング痕の深さの計算
値、そしてdr 〔μm〕は実測したスパッタリング痕の
深さ、Rn ′〔(Volt/kg)・m2 ・sec 〕は補正発光収
率である。 【0012】本発明では、式(1)で定義したRn ′用
いて、再び式(3)及び(4)により元素の深さ方向の
重量組成比率を解析する。この方法を使用すると、標準
試料と実際に測定する材料の発光特性が異なっても、発
光収率の違いは式(1)によって補正され、材料の発光
特性に応じた発光収率で深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率
の定量解析が正確に行える。 【0013】熱延ロールのような表層に酸化膜が形成さ
れている材料について、表層の酸化膜とロール母材を同
時に連続して深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率を定量解析
する場合、酸化膜と母材とでは発光特性が異なるため、
本来酸化膜と母材とでは別々の発光収率を用いて定量解
析しなければならない。しかし、熱延ロールの酸化膜は
通常複数の酸化物で構成されている上に、生成したとき
の摩擦条件によってその構成比も異なる。つまり酸化膜
が生成した条件によって酸化膜の発光特性が異なるた
め、このような酸化膜の発光収率を予め求めておくこと
は困難である。しかし、本発明の方法を用いると、黒皮
の発光収率がわからなくても、実測したスパッタリング
痕の深さと解析によるスパッタリング痕の深さとが一致
するように発光収率の値を補正して、黒皮のところにも
適用できる発光収率が得られるので、正確な深さ方向の
元素の重量組成比率の定量解析が可能である。 【0014】 【実施例】熱間圧延ロール材を用いて、グロー放電発光
分光分析法による深さ方向の元素重量組成比率の定量解
析を実施した。熱間圧延ロール材の化学組成は表1に示
す。 【0015】 【表1】 【0016】熱間圧延ロール材の試料は表1に示すA,
Bの2種類用意した。試料Aは黒皮と呼ばれる酸化膜が
存在しないもので、試料Bは黒皮が存在するものであ
る。黒皮が存在する試料Bについては、試料を切断して
断面観察を行い、黒皮の膜厚を測定した結果、6.3μ
mであった。なお、X線回折分析で、黒皮を構成する酸
化物を調査したところ、Fe3 4 が主であった。この
2つの試料を使って、従来の方法と本発明の方法の定量
解析結果の比較を実施した。スパッタリング時間は60
0秒とし、発光電圧は200V、アルゴンガスを毎分2
00cc流しながら測定を実施した。但し、黒皮が存在す
る試料については、スパッタリング時間を100秒とし
た測定も実施した。試料Aは標準試料として用い、この
試料の発光強度の測定結果から従来の方法で用いられて
いる発光収率(Rn )を式(2)を使って求めた。但
し、酸素の発光収率については、標準試料から求めるこ
とができないので、黒皮のある試料Bで、スパッタリン
グ時間を100秒とした定量解析結果から、鉄と酸素の
発光収率(Rn )を求めた。スパッタリング時間を10
0秒としたのは、スパッタリング時間が100秒ではス
パッタリング痕の深さが黒皮の膜厚より小さく母材まで
到達しないので、黒皮部だけの発光強度を用いて、鉄と
酸素の発光収率を求めることができるからである。求め
た発光収率の値を表2に示す。 【0017】 【表2】 【0018】次に、標準試料(試料A)から求めた発光
収率(表2)を用いて、黒皮が存在する試料Bの深さ方
向の元素の重量組成比率の定量解析を実施した。スパッ
タリング時間を600秒としたときの発光強度の測定結
果から、式(3)及び式(4)を使用して、従来の方法
で深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率を定量解析した結果を
図1に示す。また、このとき測定後に試料スパッタリン
グ痕の深さを表面形状測定装置で測定したところ、1
2.0μmであった。 【0019】図1に示した従来の方法による重量組成比
率の定量解析結果では、スパッタリング痕の深さが2
6.5μmとなり、実測で求めた12.0μmというス
パッタリング痕の深さと大きく食い違っている。また、
鉄と酸素のプロフィールから、母材と黒皮の界面の深さ
(黒皮膜厚)を求めると約13μmであり、実測した
6.3μmと全く異なり、深さ方向の元素の重量組成比
率が正確にわからない。 【0020】そこで、試料Bについて本発明の方法であ
る。式(1)を用いて補正発光収率を求めた定量解析を
実施した。そのときの補正発光収率(Rn ′)を表3に
示し、得られた補正発光収率を使って再び式(3),
(4)により求めた深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率を図
2に示す。 【0021】 【表3】 【0022】定量解析で求めたスパッタリング痕の深さ
と表面形状測定装置で測定したスパッタリング痕の深さ
はよく一致した。また、鉄と酸素のプロフィールから母
材と黒皮の界面の深さ(黒皮膜厚)を求めると約6.5
μmであり、実測値の6.3μmとほぼ一致した。ま
た、各元素の母材領域の重量組成比率もほぼ表1の試料
の化学組成とほぼ一致し、従来の方法よりも深さ方向の
精度の高い定量解析が可能である。 【0023】 【発明の効果】本発明を用いることにより、従来の方法
では困難であった深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率の高精
度な定量解析が可能になった。
Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to the determination of the weight composition ratio of elements in the depth direction in glow discharge optical emission spectroscopy used for analyzing the surface of a metal material. It relates to the analysis method. In particular, materials such as hot rolling rolls used in the manufacture of steel materials, in which carbides and metal matrix are dispersed inhomogeneously, and coatings such as oxide films with different conductivity and luminescent properties from the base material are applied to the surface. The formed material,
The present invention relates to a method for quantitatively analyzing the weight composition ratio of elements in the depth direction when glow discharge emission spectroscopy is performed simultaneously and continuously on a coating and a base material. 2. Description of the Related Art Glow discharge emission spectroscopy is one of surface analysis methods for detecting elements emitted (emitted) from the surface of a material by sputtering using an inert gas. In this analysis method, an inert gas (such as an argon gas) is ionized to collide with the surface of the material, and the emission intensity of the element emitted (emitted) (sputtered) from the surface is set for each element. Measurement for a certain period of time by the dedicated detector. Then, the relationship between the weight composition ratio of each element and the depth from the surface is analyzed using the obtained emission intensity using a certain method. The following methods are known as means for quantitatively analyzing the weight composition ratio of elements in the depth direction in the glow discharge emission spectroscopy at this time. First,
Using a standard sample, the emission yield of each element required to convert the emission intensity measured by glow discharge emission spectroscopy into the weight composition ratio and the depth of the element is determined. Quantitative analysis methods for calculating the weight composition ratio of elements in the depth direction for various materials by using the same are well known (“Quantitative analysis of oxide film depth by glow discharge emission spectroscopy”). : Iron and Steel, Vol. 77, (1991), p25
3). [0003] However, in the conventional quantitative analysis method of the weight composition ratio of the elements in the depth direction, the light emission characteristics of a material measured using glow discharge are different from those of a standard sample. If it is the same as above, accurate quantitative analysis of the weight composition ratio of the element in the depth direction is possible, but accurate quantitative analysis different from the emission characteristics of the standard sample cannot be performed. In addition, the luminescent characteristics of the material often differ greatly depending on the length of the gap between the material and the anode electrode of the device, the cleanliness of the surface, the composition, and the like. In particular, in the case of a material in which a carbide and a metal matrix are heterogeneously dispersed, such as a hot-rolling roll used in a steel manufacturing process, the light emission characteristics may be significantly different even with the same composition. In addition, in a roll having an oxide film called black scale formed on the surface, the light emission characteristics of the black scale and the base material are significantly different. The composition and porosity of the black scale change depending on the conditions under which the black scale is formed. Therefore, it is difficult to accurately analyze the weight composition ratio of the element in the depth direction of such a material by the conventional method of obtaining and analyzing the luminescence yield in advance. On the other hand, there is a method of preparing a sample for cross-sectional observation and performing quantitative analysis in the depth direction by cross-sectional observation. However, it is necessary to cut out an expensive material such as a roll material each time.
This leads to an increase in analysis costs and R & D costs, making efficient experiments difficult. In order to analyze materials such as the above-mentioned hot rolls by glow discharge optical emission spectroscopy, a highly accurate quantitative analysis method of the weight composition ratio of elements in the depth direction in consideration of the difference in the light emission characteristics of the materials is required. is necessary. According to the present invention, the accuracy of glow discharge emission spectroscopy is improved by using the emission yield determined in advance and correcting the emission yield for each measurement in accordance with the difference in the emission characteristics of the materials. To provide a method for quantitative analysis of the weight composition ratio of elements in the depth direction with a high density. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides a method for glow discharge optical emission spectroscopy, in which the luminous yield of each element is reduced when quantitative analysis of the weight composition ratio of the element in the depth direction of the metal material is performed. R
n [(Volt / kg) · m 2 · sec], the depth of the sputtering mark obtained by quantitative analysis of the composition weight ratio of the element in the depth direction using the luminescence yield R n is d a [μm], When the actually measured depth of the sputtering mark is dr [μm], equation (1)
Correction emission yield obtained by R n '[(Volt / kg) · m
2 · sec], and quantitative analysis of the weight composition ratio of the element in the depth direction is performed again. To improve the R n '= R n · ( d r / d a) ......... (1) [0007] [action] Quantitative analysis accuracy of the weight composition ratio of the depth direction in the glow discharge optical emission spectroscopy element Is
It is important to accurately determine the coefficient of luminous yield for analyzing the measured luminous intensity and the weight composition ratio according to the material. In the conventional analysis method, a standard sample having substantially the same composition and a known composition is prepared before measurement, and the luminescence yield is determined in advance. The emission intensity of the standard sample is measured by glow discharge emission spectroscopy. Next, by measuring the weight loss of the dent (sputtering trace) of the measurement part formed by the emission (emission) of the element, and dividing by the measurement time (sputtering time) and the area of the dent of the measurement part, a unit is obtained. The weight loss of the material per time and unit area (referred to as mass sputtering rate) is determined. Then, the luminous yield of each element is determined by equation (2) from the luminous intensity of each element, the weight ratio of the material composition, and the mass sputtering rate. Then, in the subsequent quantitative analysis, the quantitative analysis of the weight composition ratio of the element in the depth direction is performed using the emission yield obtained here. R n = I n / V m · C n (2) where V m [kg / (m 2 · sec)] is a mass sputtering rate, C n is a material composition ratio [−], I n [ [Volt] is the emission intensity, and R n [(Volt / kg) · m 2 · sec] is the emission yield of element n. Next, when a quantitative analysis of the weight composition ratio of the element in the depth direction is performed by the conventional method using the light emission yield, t + Δt [se] from a certain time t [sec] based on the measured light emission intensity.
Equation (3) is used to determine the composition ratio ΔC n [−] of the element n in the part removed by sputtering during c], and Equation (4) is used to determine the depth Δd [μm] of the part. Is used. [0010] Here, I n '[Volt] emission intensity of a standard sample when the determined light emission yield, C n' [-] is the weight composition ratio of the element n of the standard sample, V m '[kg / (m 2 .Sec)] is the mass sputtering rate at that time. When calculating the weight composition ratio of the element from the equation (3), since there is no term of the mass sputtering rate in the equation (3), even if the mass sputtering rate is different between the time of obtaining the emission yield and the time of the actual measurement. (Even if the emission characteristics differ between the standard sample and the actual measurement material), it is understood that it does not affect the quantitative analysis result of the weight composition ratio of the element. However, when the depth of the pit formed by removing the material by light emission is obtained from Equation (4), if the mass sputtering rate is different between when the luminescence yield is obtained and when the actual measurement is performed, the accurate depth is obtained. No quantitative analysis results can be obtained. Therefore, in order to accurately perform the quantitative analysis of the weight composition ratio of the elements in the depth direction, it is necessary to use the luminescence yield corrected according to the luminescence characteristics of the measurement material instead of using the luminescence yield determined in advance. Must. According to the present invention, the luminescence yield (R n [(Volt / kg) · m 2 · sec]) previously determined for a standard sample is corrected in accordance with the luminescence characteristics of the material to be measured, and a highly accurate depth is obtained. A method for performing quantitative analysis in the vertical direction has been devised. That is, the luminescence intensity (I n [Volt]) of the material is measured, and the luminescence yield (R n
[(Volt / kg) · m 2 · sec]) and the depth (d a [μm]) of the sputtering trace quantitatively analyzed using the depth of the hollow part (depth of the sputtering trace) actually formed in the material. is) the surface roughness meter measured the sputtering mark depth or the like (d r as [μm]) and match, (d r
/ D a ) multiplied by the luminescence yield (R n ) to obtain the corrected luminescence yield (R
n ′ [(Volt / kg) · m 2 · sec]), and the weight composition ratio of the element in the depth direction from the luminescence intensity (I n ) measured again using the corrected luminescence yield (R n ′). We considered a method of quantitative analysis of. In R n '= R n · ( d r / d a) ......... (1) wherein, (R n [(Volt / kg) · m 2 · sec ]) is luminous yield obtained in advance using the standard sample Rate, d a [μm] is the calculated value of the depth of the sputtering mark obtained using the luminescence yield R n , and d r [μm] is the actually measured depth of the sputtering mark, R n ′ [(Volt / kg ) · M 2 · sec] is the corrected luminescence yield. In the present invention, the weight composition ratio of the element in the depth direction is analyzed again by the equations (3) and (4) using R n 'defined by the equation (1). When this method is used, even if the emission characteristics of the standard sample and the material to be actually measured are different, the difference in the emission yield is corrected by Equation (1), and the emission yield according to the emission characteristics of the material is increased in the depth direction. Quantitative analysis of the weight composition ratio of the elements can be accurately performed. In the case of a material having an oxide film formed on a surface layer such as a hot-rolled roll, when the oxide composition of the surface layer and the roll base material are simultaneously and continuously analyzed quantitatively for the weight composition ratio of elements in the depth direction, the oxidation Since the light emission characteristics differ between the film and the base material,
Essentially, the oxide film and the base material must be quantitatively analyzed using different luminescence yields. However, the oxide film of the hot-rolled roll is usually composed of a plurality of oxides, and its composition ratio varies depending on the friction conditions when it is formed. That is, since the light emission characteristics of the oxide film vary depending on the conditions under which the oxide film is formed, it is difficult to obtain the light emission yield of such an oxide film in advance. However, using the method of the present invention, even if the luminescence yield of the black scale is unknown, the value of the luminescence yield is corrected so that the actually measured depth of the sputtering trace matches the depth of the sputtering trace by analysis. In addition, since a luminescence yield applicable to black scale is obtained, accurate quantitative analysis of the weight composition ratio of elements in the depth direction is possible. EXAMPLES Using a hot-rolled roll material, quantitative analysis of the element weight composition ratio in the depth direction was performed by glow discharge emission spectroscopy. Table 1 shows the chemical composition of the hot-rolled roll material. [Table 1] Samples of the hot-rolled roll material are shown in Table 1,
Two types of B were prepared. Sample A had no oxide film called black scale, and sample B had black scale. As for the sample B having the black scale, the sample was cut, the cross section was observed, and the thickness of the black scale was measured.
m. When an oxide constituting black scale was examined by X-ray diffraction analysis, it was mainly Fe 3 O 4 . These two samples were used to compare the results of quantitative analysis between the conventional method and the method of the present invention. Sputtering time is 60
0 seconds, emission voltage 200 V, argon gas 2 min / min
The measurement was performed while flowing 00 cc. However, with respect to the sample having black scales, the measurement was performed with the sputtering time set to 100 seconds. The sample A was used as a standard sample, and the luminescence yield (R n ) used in the conventional method was obtained from the measurement result of the luminescence intensity of this sample using the equation (2). However, since the luminescence yield of oxygen cannot be determined from the standard sample, the luminescence yield of iron and oxygen (R n ) was obtained from the quantitative analysis result of the sample B with black scale with a sputtering time of 100 seconds. I asked. Sputtering time is 10
The reason for setting the time to 0 second is that when the sputtering time is 100 seconds, the depth of the sputtering mark is smaller than the thickness of the black scale and does not reach the base material. This is because the rate can be obtained. Table 2 shows the obtained values of the luminescence yield. [Table 2] Next, using the luminescence yield (Table 2) obtained from the standard sample (sample A), quantitative analysis of the weight composition ratio of elements in the depth direction of sample B where black scale was present was carried out. From the measurement results of the luminescence intensity when the sputtering time is set to 600 seconds, the results of quantitative analysis of the weight composition ratio of the elements in the depth direction by the conventional method using Equations (3) and (4) are shown. It is shown in FIG. After the measurement, the depth of the sample sputtering mark was measured with a surface shape measuring device.
It was 2.0 μm. According to the quantitative analysis result of the weight composition ratio according to the conventional method shown in FIG.
This is 6.5 μm, which is largely different from the depth of the sputtering mark of 12.0 μm obtained by the actual measurement. Also,
The depth of the interface between the base material and the black scale (black film thickness) was found to be about 13 μm from the profiles of iron and oxygen, which was completely different from the actually measured 6.3 μm, and the weight composition ratio of the elements in the depth direction was accurate. I do not know. Therefore, the method of the present invention is used for sample B. Quantitative analysis was performed to determine the corrected luminescence yield using equation (1). The corrected luminescence yield (R n ′) at that time is shown in Table 3, and using the obtained corrected luminescence yield, the formula (3),
FIG. 2 shows the weight composition ratio of the element in the depth direction obtained by (4). [Table 3] The depth of the sputtering mark obtained by the quantitative analysis and the depth of the sputtering mark measured by the surface shape measuring device were in good agreement. The depth (black film thickness) of the interface between the base material and the black scale is calculated from the profiles of iron and oxygen, and is about 6.5.
μm, which almost coincided with the actually measured value of 6.3 μm. In addition, the weight composition ratio of the base material region of each element substantially coincides with the chemical composition of the sample shown in Table 1, and quantitative analysis with higher precision in the depth direction than the conventional method is possible. By using the present invention, a high-precision quantitative analysis of the weight composition ratio of elements in the depth direction, which has been difficult with the conventional method, has become possible.

【図面の簡単な説明】 【図1】黒皮のないロール材を標準試料とし、従来の方
法による発光収率で定量解析した深さ方向の元素の重量
組成比率の結果である。 【図2】黒皮のあるロール材を本発明による方法で定量
解析した深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率の結果である。
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 shows the results of the weight composition ratio of elements in the depth direction, which was quantitatively analyzed by a conventional method using a roll material without black scale as a standard sample and by a luminescence yield according to a conventional method. FIG. 2 is a result of a weight composition ratio of elements in a depth direction obtained by quantitatively analyzing a roll material having a black scale by a method according to the present invention.

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 鈴木 茂 千葉県富津市新富20−1 新日本製鐵株 式会社 技術開発本部内 (56)参考文献 特開 昭60−179633(JP,A) 特開 昭60−185143(JP,A) 特開 平3−176646(JP,A) 特開 平6−18418(JP,A) 特開 平6−117998(JP,A) (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.7,DB名) G01N 21/62 - 21/74 G01N 33/20 JICSTファイル(JOIS)──────────────────────────────────────────────────の Continued on the front page (72) Inventor Shigeru Suzuki 20-1 Shintomi, Futtsu-shi, Chiba Nippon Steel Corporation Technology Development Division (56) References JP-A-60-179633 (JP, A) JP-A-60-185143 (JP, A) JP-A-3-176646 (JP, A) JP-A-6-18418 (JP, A) JP-A-6-117998 (JP, A) (58) Int.Cl. 7 , DB name) G01N 21/62-21/74 G01N 33/20 JICST file (JOIS)

Claims (1)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】 【請求項1】 グロー放電発光分光分析法を用いて、金
属材料の深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率の定量解析を行
うときに、各元素の発光収率をRn 〔(Volt/kg)・m2
・sec 〕、発光収率Rn を用いて各元素の重量組成比率
の定量解析で得られたスパッタリング痕深さをda 〔μ
m〕、実測したスパッタリング痕深さをdr 〔μm〕と
するとき、 Rn ′=Rn ・(dr /da ) ………(1) によって得られる補正発光収率Rn ′〔(Volt/kg)・m
2 ・sec 〕を用いて再び深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率
を解析することを特徴とするグロー放電発光分光分析法
における金属材料の深さ方向の元素の重量組成比率の定
量解析方法。
(57) [Claims 1] When performing quantitative analysis of the weight composition ratio of elements in the depth direction of a metal material using glow discharge emission spectroscopy, the luminescence yield of each element To R n [(Volt / kg) · m 2
· Sec], emission yield using R n quantitative analysis obtained in sputtering mark depth weight composition ratio of each element d a
m], and when the actually measured depth of the sputtering mark is dr [μm], the corrected luminescence yield R n ′ obtained by R n ′ = R n · (d r / d a ) (1) (Volt / kg) ・ m
2 · sec], wherein the weight composition ratio of the element in the depth direction is analyzed again, and the quantitative analysis method of the weight composition ratio of the element in the depth direction of the metal material in glow discharge emission spectroscopy.
JP27504094A 1994-11-09 1994-11-09 Quantitative analysis method of weight composition ratio of element in depth direction of metal material in glow discharge emission spectroscopy Expired - Fee Related JP3369011B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP27504094A JP3369011B2 (en) 1994-11-09 1994-11-09 Quantitative analysis method of weight composition ratio of element in depth direction of metal material in glow discharge emission spectroscopy

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP27504094A JP3369011B2 (en) 1994-11-09 1994-11-09 Quantitative analysis method of weight composition ratio of element in depth direction of metal material in glow discharge emission spectroscopy

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH08136460A JPH08136460A (en) 1996-05-31
JP3369011B2 true JP3369011B2 (en) 2003-01-20

Family

ID=17550032

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP27504094A Expired - Fee Related JP3369011B2 (en) 1994-11-09 1994-11-09 Quantitative analysis method of weight composition ratio of element in depth direction of metal material in glow discharge emission spectroscopy

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3369011B2 (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH08136460A (en) 1996-05-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Berneron et al. Surface analysis by glow discharge
JP4165797B2 (en) Method and apparatus for real-time determination of the composition of a solid sample as a function of depth within the sample
Oxley et al. Quantitative depth analysis using microsecond pulsed glow discharge atomic emission spectrometryPresented at the 2000 Winter Conference on Plasma Spectrochemistry, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, January 10–15, 2000.
JP3369011B2 (en) Quantitative analysis method of weight composition ratio of element in depth direction of metal material in glow discharge emission spectroscopy
Bengtson et al. Depth profiling of thin films using a Grimm-type glow discharge lamp
Ohashi et al. Modified glow discharge spectroscopy for surface analysis of steels
JPH07270130A (en) Oxide film thickness measurement method
JPH09273992A (en) Quantitative analysis method of oxide layer on metal surface
JP3671600B2 (en) Method for measuring particle size distribution of oxide inclusions in metals
JPH08304035A (en) Determination method for film thickness using colorimetery
Suzuki et al. Quantitative GDOS analysis of oxide films on steels
JP2803982B2 (en) Quantitative method of glow discharge emission spectrometry
JPH11160239A (en) Quantitative determination method for very small inclusion in iron and steel
JP3369918B2 (en) X-ray fluorescence analysis method and apparatus
JP2819716B2 (en) X-ray spectroscopy for thin film determination and film thickness measurement
RU2826163C1 (en) Method of coating thickness measurement during plasma-electrolytic oxidation process
KR102447193B1 (en) Multi-gap electrochemical sensor and quantitative analysis method using same
CN118293803A (en) A method for measuring the thickness of aluminum-zinc-magnesium coating
JP3318393B2 (en) Measuring method of element concentration on surface of alloy
JPH10104178A (en) Oxide film thickness measurement method
JP2001059818A (en) Quantitative analysis method by automatic judgment of multilayer film in glow discharge emission spectroscopy
Sewell et al. X-ray studies related to coating thickness measurements
RU2229116C1 (en) Method of layer-by-layer analysis of thin films
JP2001281176A (en) High-precision analysis method for carbon in steel
JP3220429B2 (en) Glow discharge emission spectroscopy method and apparatus

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20021001

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees