JP3407540B2 - High carbon steel sheet with excellent workability and hardenability - Google Patents
High carbon steel sheet with excellent workability and hardenabilityInfo
- Publication number
- JP3407540B2 JP3407540B2 JP12858396A JP12858396A JP3407540B2 JP 3407540 B2 JP3407540 B2 JP 3407540B2 JP 12858396 A JP12858396 A JP 12858396A JP 12858396 A JP12858396 A JP 12858396A JP 3407540 B2 JP3407540 B2 JP 3407540B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- ferrite
- carbide
- less
- hardenability
- high carbon
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Landscapes
- Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
- Heat Treatment Of Sheet Steel (AREA)
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、耐摩耗性などが要
求され、かつ複雑な形状に加工されるギヤーに代表され
る変速機部品等などの素材として用いられる加工性と焼
入性に優れた高炭素薄鋼板に関する。
【0002】
【従来の技術】ギヤーやクラッチカバー等の変速機部
品、あるいはラチェット等に使用される高炭素薄鋼板に
は、高い加工性と焼入性が要求される。焼入性について
は、焼入れ後の高度確保の点はもとより、近年は焼入れ
作業の低コスト化が要求されている。焼入れ作業のコス
ト低減には、加熱温度の低温化と均熱保持時間の短時間
化が有効であり、低温短時間保持で十分に焼きが入る材
料が望まれている。成分一定の場合、焼入性を左右する
のは均熱保持中に固溶する炭化物量であり、短時間保持
でより多くの炭化物を固溶させるには炭化物の大きさを
微細にすることが有効である。このような炭化物の微細
化による焼入性の向上については、特公昭57−436
21号公報、特開平2−259013号公報に開示され
ている。さらに、特開平1−25812号公報には、炭
化物の球状微細化による機械的性質向上を狙った製造方
法が開示されている。
【0003】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかし、これらの製造
方法により製造された高炭素薄鋼板においても、焼入れ
前の伸び(%)は高々15%程度であり、十分な加工性
を持つとはいえない。特に最近は、加工工程の簡略化の
動きがあり、従来にも増して高炭素薄鋼板の加工性への
要求が厳しくなっている。
【0004】本発明はかかる事情に鑑みてなされたもの
であって、加工性と焼入性の両方に優れた高炭素鋼を提
供することを目的とする。
【0005】
【課題を解決するための手段】従来、熱間圧延および冷
間圧延された高炭素薄鋼板の加工性に影響を及ぼす因子
は炭化物の形状と大きさであり、上述のように炭化物の
球状微細化が重要であると考えられてきたため、まず焼
入性の向上を目指して炭化物の微細化を行い、その炭化
物をなるべく微細なまま球状化して加工性を付与させる
試みがなされてきた。しかし、このような炭化物の球状
微細化のみでは十分な加工性は得られていないのが現状
である。
【0006】そこで、本発明者らは、冷間圧延されてコ
イル状に巻き取られる厚さ数ミリの高炭素薄鋼板の加工
性を向上させるべく鋭意研究を重ねた結果、球状微細な
炭化物の大きさや分布のみでは加工性を向上させること
はできないこと、および、フェライト粒径と同程度から
その1/10程度の球状炭化物の存在下でフェライト径
がある特定の範囲内にあるときのみ、急激に延性が良好
になることを見出した。そして、炭化物粒径とフェライ
ト粒径を調整することにより、加工性と焼入性の両者に
優れた高炭素薄鋼板を得ることができることを見出し
た。
【0007】本発明は、このような本発明者らの知見に
基づいてなされたものであり、冷間圧延された冷延鋼板
からなる高炭素薄鋼板であって、重量%でCを0.2%
以上2%以下含み、フェライトと炭化物の混合組織であ
り、炭化物粒径が1.3μm以下、フェライト粒径が1
μm超4μm以下であることを特徴とする、加工性と焼
入性に優れた高炭素薄鋼板を提供するものである。
【0008】
【発明の実施の形態】本発明の高炭素鋼は、重量%でC
を0.2%以上含み、フェライトおよび炭化物を主体と
し、炭化物粒径が1.3μm以下、フェライト粒径が1
μm超4μm以下である。
【0009】以下、本発明におけるC含有量、炭化物粒
径およびフェライト粒径の限定理由について説明する。
【0010】(1)C含有量
Cは、鋼中で炭化物を形成し、本発明で重要な役割を担
うフェライト粒界とフェライト粒内への、あるいはフェ
ライト−炭化物界面への歪みの分配を引き起こすととも
に、鋼に焼入性を付与する重要な元素である。その含有
量が重量%で0.2%未満であると炭化物量が少なくな
り焼入れ後の硬さが低下してしまうことから0.2%以
上とする。一方、炭素を過剰に添加した場合には焼入れ
時に過剰に硬化し、焼き割れを生じるおそれがあること
から2%以下とする。
【0011】(2)炭化物粒径
炭化物粒径は、低温短時間保持条件下における焼入性
と、後述する歪み分配へ大きく影響を及ぼす。焼入性に
ついては、均熱時間内に速やかに炭化物がオーステナイ
トに固溶することが、低温短時間保持条件下において良
好な焼入性を有する条件である。炭化物がオーステナイ
トに速やかに固溶するためには、炭化物が微細であるこ
とが望ましい。すなわち、鋼中に炭化物を微細に析出さ
せることにより、炭化物の全体積に対する表面積が大き
くなり、加熱保持中に炭化物の固溶が促進される。
【0012】以下、このことを実証する実験について説
明する。
【0013】炭素量約0.65%の連続鋳造スラブを1
230℃に加熱し、仕上げ温度850℃、巻取温度40
0〜750℃の条件で熱間圧延を行い、次に冷延率10
〜70%で冷間圧延し、600〜740℃で焼鈍を行っ
て板厚1.2mmの高炭素薄鋼板を作製した。なお、焼
入性は板厚に依存することから、板厚を統一する必要が
ある。よって、必要に応じて、研削により板厚を1.2
mmとした。
【0014】このようにして製造した鋼板を50×10
0mmの大きさに切断後、加熱炉で750℃に昇温し、
10秒間保持後に約10℃の菜種油中へ焼入れした。な
お、加熱温度については、JIS G4401におい
て、760〜820℃と規定されているが、本実験にお
いては焼入性の優劣を明確にするためにJISで規定さ
れている下限値よりも10℃低い温度に保持した。
【0015】このようにして焼入れた後の試験片の板面
における硬さを、ロックウェルCスケール(HRC)で
測定し、焼入性を評価した。焼入性の評価はJISおよ
び需要家のニーズ等を考慮して、HRC63以上を◎、
63未満59以上を○、59未満55以上を△、55未
満を×とした。この際の炭化物粒径と焼入性の評価結果
とを表1に示す。
【0016】
【表1】【0017】表1に示すように、炭化物粒径がおよそ2
μm以下であれば焼入性が良好である。さらに良好な焼
入性を得るためには0.8μm以下が好ましい。
【0018】(3)フェライト粒径
フェライト粒径は、特定の炭化物粒径のもとで伸び(E
L)の向上をもたらす本発明で最も重要なパラメータで
ある。すなわち、炭化物粒径が1.3μm以下で、フェ
ライト粒径が1μm超4μm以下である場合にELが著
しく向上する。この理由については必しも明らかになっ
ているわけではないが、フェライト地に炭化物が分散し
ている組織においては、炭化物やフェライトの粒径によ
り加工時の亀裂発生箇所が変化する。
【0019】まず、炭化物が1.3μmを超える場合、
歪はフェライト−炭化物界面に集中し、その界面より亀
裂が発生する。フェライト−炭化物界面は、フェライト
粒界やフェライト粒内よりも亀裂が発生する限界の歪量
が小さいため、加工性は低い。
【0020】次に、炭化物粒径が1.3μm以下の場
合、歪の集中位置はフェライト粒径により変化する。フ
ェライト粒径が4μmを超える場合、歪はフェライト粒
界に集中してフェライト粒界より亀裂が発生する。ま
た、フェライト粒径が1μm以下の場合、歪みはフェラ
イト粒内に集中し、亀裂がフェライト粒内より発生す
る。これらの場合には、フェライト−炭化物界面に歪が
集中した場合よりも加工性は良好になるものの、加工性
が著しく向上するほどではない。一方、フェライト粒径
が1μm超4μm以下の範囲に存在する場合、歪みがフ
ェライト粒界とフェライト粒内とに適正に分配されるも
のと考えられ、亀裂が発生するまでの全歪み量は、歪み
がフェライト粒界またはフェライト粒内のどちらか一方
に集中した場合よりも著しく増大し、その結果顕著に加
工性が向上する。
【0021】以下、このことを示す実験結果について説
明する。
【0022】重量%で、C≒0.60%、Si≒0.0
1%、Mn≒0.2%、P≒0.015%、S≒0.0
08%の組成を有する連続鋳造スラブを1150℃に加
熱し、仕上げ温度850℃、巻取温度400〜700℃
の条件で熱間圧延を行い、次に一次冷間圧延および68
0×40時間の焼鈍を行った後、冷延率10〜95%で
二次冷間圧延を行い、500〜740℃で焼鈍を行って
板厚1.5mmの高炭素薄鋼板を作製した。
【0023】このように製造した鋼板のフェライト粒径
と炭化物粒径を測定し、さらに加工性を評価するために
引張試験によりELを測定した。引張試験はJIS Z
2241に準拠し、試験片はJIS Z 2201の
5号試験片を用いた。
【0024】その評価結果を図1に示す。図中、黒丸は
EL<15%であり、亀裂の90%以上がフェライト−
炭化物界面で発生したもの、黒四角は15%≦EL<2
0%であり、亀裂の90%以上がフェライト粒内で発生
したもの、黒菱形は20%≦EL<25%で、亀裂の9
0%以上がフェライト粒界で発生したもの、白丸は25
%≦ELであり、亀裂の60〜80%がフェライト粒
界、30〜20%がフェライト粒内で発生したものであ
る。
【0025】この図から、炭化物粒径が1.3μmを超
えると、亀裂はフェライト−炭化物粒界で発生し、EL
は低いことが導かれる。また、炭化物粒径が1.3μm
以下であっても、フェライト粒径が1μm以下ではフェ
ライト粒内破断、4μm超ではフェライト粒界破断とな
ってやはりELが低いことが導かれる。これに対して、
炭化物粒径が1.3μm以下で、フェライト粒径が1μ
m超4μm以下の範囲で亀裂発生がフェライト粒界と粒
内の双方となり、ELが向上することが確認された。
【0026】上述したように、焼入性の観点のみでは炭
化物粒径がおよそ2μm以下であればよいが、上の実験
結果を考慮して、本発明では焼入性および加工性の両者
に優れた範囲として、炭化物粒径1.3μm以下および
フェライト粒径1μm超4μm以下と規定した。
【0027】なお、本発明では鋼の組織はフェライトと
炭化物の混合組織であるが、炭化物によりフェライト粒
界が明確に観察されない場合があり、実際のフェライト
粒径が明確にならないことがある。そこで、本発明では
フェライト粒径を以下のように定義する。
【0028】(1) フェライト粒界が炭化物によりとぎれ
ず観察されるものについては、その粒界で囲まれた範囲
をフェライト粒の粒径と定義する。
【0029】(2) 炭化物によりフェライト粒界が観察さ
れない場合には、図2に示すようにフェライト粒界およ
び炭化物粒界によって囲まれた範囲をフェライト粒の占
める面積とし、その面積と等価な円の直径をフェライト
粒径と定義する。
【0030】(3) 図3に示すように、フェライト粒内に
炭化物が存在する場合には、その炭化物の面積はフェラ
イト粒の占める面積に含まない。
【0031】(4) 図4に示すように、炭化物がフェライ
ト粒を横切り、フェライト粒界と接している場合、炭化
物により分けられたフェライト粒部分はそれぞれ独立し
たフェライト粒とする。
【0032】炭化物粒径についても同様に、等価な面積
を持つ円の直径を炭化物粒径と定義する。
【0033】フェライト粒径および炭化物粒径の測定方
法については特に限定されるものではないが、サンプル
の板厚断面を研磨・腐食後、1500〜5000倍の走
査型電子顕微鏡写真を撮影し、その写真からフェライト
粒径および炭化物粒径を測定することが望ましい。実際
にサンプルのフェライト粒径を求めるに際しては、写真
に全体が撮影されている粒の粒径の平均をもってその視
野の粒径とし、これを2視野以上行った後にさらにそれ
らの平均をとり、これをサンプルのフェライト粒径とす
る。炭化物の粒径も同様にして求める。写真撮影に関し
ては、少なくとも30個以上の粒が存在する倍率となる
ように行うことが望ましい。また、腐食液としては、フ
ェライト粒径を測定する場合にはナイタール腐食液を、
炭化物粒径を測定する場合にはピクラール腐食液を用い
るのがよい。測定結果の一例を図5に示す。図5はナイ
タール腐食液で腐食したものであり、この図におけるフ
ェライト粒径は1.94μmであり、炭化物粒径は1.
04μmである。
【0034】なお、本発明は、重量%でCを0.2%以
上含み、上記特定の範囲の粒径を有するフェライトおよ
び炭化物を主体とする組織であれば所期の効果を発揮す
るものであり、他の成分については特に規定する必要は
なく、Mn、Si、P、S、Al、Nなどの元素が通常
の範囲で含有されていても問題はない。ただし、Mnは
炭化物の固溶抑制効果による焼入性低下を引き起こす傾
向があることから2%以下が望ましい。また、Siにつ
いては、炭化物を粗大化し、焼入性を阻害する傾向があ
ることから2%以下が望ましい。P、Sについては、過
剰に含有すると延性が低下するため、ともに0.03%
以下が望ましい。Alについては、過剰に含有すると焼
入性を低下させるため、0.08%以下が望ましい。N
についても、過剰に含有した場合には延性の低下をもた
らすため、0.01%以下が望ましい。また、目的に応
じて、通常添加される範囲でB、Cr、Cu、Ni、M
o、Ti、Nb、W、V、Zrなど各種元素を添加して
もよい。これら元素は本発明の効果になんら影響を及ぼ
さない。また、製造過程でSn、Pbなどの各種元素が
不純物として混入する場合があるが、このような不純物
も本発明の効果になんら影響を及ぼすものではない。
【0035】次に、本発明に係る高炭素鋼の好ましい製
造方法について説明する。
【0036】まず、本発明範囲内の成分に調整された溶
鋼を、造塊後分塊処理または連続鋳造によってスラブと
する。
【0037】次に熱間圧延を行うが、その際のスラブ加
熱温度は、スケール発生による表面状態の変化の点から
1250℃以下が適正であり、仕上げ温度は加工性の点
からAr3 以上とするのが望ましい。巻取温度は炭化物
の微細析出のために600℃以下とし、冷圧負荷の点か
ら400℃以上とすることが望ましい。
【0038】冷延板として使用する場合には、その後、
冷間圧延を行うが、その際の冷圧率は、焼鈍時の炭化物
を微細化するために20%以上であることが好ましい
が、圧延率が過剰であると圧延後のフェライト粒が微細
になりすぎるため85%以下が好ましい。
【0039】その後の焼鈍については、フェライト粒を
適度に成長させるため600℃以上であることが必要で
あるが、炭化物の過剰な成長を抑制するために(Ac3
−30)℃以下とする。焼鈍方法は連続焼鈍でも箱焼鈍
でも問題はない。なお、冷間圧延と焼鈍を2回以上組合
わせてもよい。
【0040】その後、必要に応じて調質圧延を行うが、
調質圧延については焼入性に影響を及ぼさないことか
ら、その条件に制限はない。
【0041】なお、本発明鋼の成分調整には、転炉およ
び電気炉のどちらも使用可能であり、熱間圧延時に粗圧
延を省略して仕上げ圧延を行っても全く問題はない。ま
た、連続鋳造スラブをそのまま、または温度低下を抑制
する目的で保温処理を行って圧延する直送圧延であって
もよい。さらに、本発明鋼は熱延鋼板でも冷延鋼板でも
よく、いずれの場合にも本発明の効果を同様に奏するこ
とができる。
【0042】
【実施例】以下本発明の実施例について説明する。
【0043】(第1実施例)
表2に示す組成の炭素量約0.5%の連続鋳造スラブを
1080℃に加熱し、仕上げ温度870℃、巻取温度3
50〜700℃の条件で熱間圧延を行い、酸洗後に冷延
率10〜95%で冷間圧延し、350〜740℃で55
時間の箱焼鈍を行って板厚1mmの高炭素薄鋼板を作製
した。それぞれの薄鋼板に対し引張試験および焼入れ試
験を行い、加工性と焼入性とを評価した。試験条件を以
下に示す。
【0044】〈引張試験〉引張試験はJIS Z 22
41に準拠して行い、試験片はJIS Z 2201の
5号試験片を用いた。評価はELで行い、ELが25%
以上で○、25%未満15%以上で△、15%未満で×
とした。
【0045】〈焼入性試験〉上記鋼板を50×100m
mの大きさに切断後、加熱炉で800℃に昇温し、10
秒間保持後に約10℃の菜種油中へ焼入れした。焼入れ
後の試験片の板面における硬さを、ロックウェルCスケ
ール(HRC)で測定し、焼入性を評価した。評価はH
RC57以上を◎、57未満53以上を○、53未満4
9以上を△、49未満を×とした。
【0046】これら引張試験および焼入性試験の結果を
表3に示した。
【0047】
【表2】
【0048】
【表3】【0049】表3に示すように、炭化物粒径が1.3μ
m以下、フェライト粒径が1μm超4μm以下の範囲で
加工性と焼入性の両者に優れた高炭素鋼を得ることがで
きることが確認された。
【0050】(第2実施例)
表4に示す組成の炭素量約0.35%の連続鋳造スラブ
を1180℃に加熱し、仕上げ温度845℃、巻取温度
400〜700℃の条件で熱間圧延を行った。酸洗後に
一次冷間圧延および640℃で箱焼鈍を行い、さらに冷
延率10〜95%で二次冷間圧延し、500〜770℃
で連続焼鈍を行って板厚2mmの高炭素薄鋼板を作製し
た。それぞれの薄鋼板に対し引張試験および焼入れ試験
を行い、加工性と焼入性とを評価した。
【0051】これらの試験条件は基本的に第1実施例と
同様としたが、第1実施例とは成分系が異なるため評価
基準は第1実施例と異なり、引張試験の評価はELが3
0%以上で○、30%未満20%以上で△、20%未満
で×とし、焼入性試験の評価はHRC50以上を◎、5
0未満46以上を○、46未満42以上を△、42未満
を×とした。
【0052】これら引張試験および焼入性試験の結果を
表5に示した。
【0053】
【表4】【0054】
【表5】【0055】表5からも、炭化物粒径が1.3μm以
下、フェライト粒径が1μm超4μm以下の範囲で加工
性と焼入性の両者に優れた高炭素鋼を得ることができる
ことが確認された。
【0056】(第3実施例)
表6に示す組成の炭素量約0.65%の連続鋳造スラブ
を1200℃に加熱し、仕上げ温度845℃、巻取温度
350〜700℃の条件で熱間圧延を行った。酸洗後に
一次冷間圧延および640℃で箱焼鈍を行い、さらに冷
延率15〜95%で二次冷間圧延し、550〜740℃
で連続焼鈍を行って板厚1.6mmの高炭素薄鋼板を作
製した。それぞれの薄鋼板に対し引張試験および焼入れ
試験を行い、加工性と焼入性とを評価した。
【0057】これらの試験条件は基本的に第1実施例と
同様とし、引張試験の評価基準も第1実施例と同様とし
たが、焼入性試験の評価基準は第1実施例と異なり、H
RC63以上を◎、63未満59以上を○、59未満5
5以上を△、55未満を×とした。
【0058】これら引張試験および焼入性試験の結果を
表7に示した。
【0059】
【表6】【0060】
【表7】【0061】表7からも、炭化物粒径が1.3μm以
下、フェライト粒径が1μm超4μm以下の範囲で加工
性と焼入性の両者に優れた高炭素鋼を得ることができる
ことが確認された。
【0062】
【発明の効果】以上説明したように、本発明によれば、
焼入性に注目して炭化物を微細にするのみならず、加工
性(延性)がフェライト粒に大きく影響を受けることに
着目してフェライト粒径を1μm超4μm以下に制御す
るとともに炭化物粒径を1.3μm以下に制御するの
で、加工性と焼入性の両方に優れた高炭素薄鋼板を提供
することができる。このように本発明に係る高炭素薄鋼
板は加工性と焼入性に優れることから、ギヤーに代表さ
れる変速機部品等を安価でかつ安定した品質で製造する
ことができる。Description: BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention is typified by a gear that is required to have abrasion resistance and the like and is processed into a complicated shape.
The present invention relates to a high carbon thin steel sheet having excellent workability and hardenability used as a material for transmission parts and the like . [0002] High carbon thin steel sheets used for transmission parts such as gears and clutch covers, and ratchets, etc., are required to have high workability and hardenability. Regarding hardenability, in addition to securing high altitude after quenching, in recent years, cost reduction of quenching work has been required. In order to reduce the cost of the quenching operation, it is effective to lower the heating temperature and shorten the soaking time, and a material that can be sufficiently quenched by holding the material at a low temperature for a short time is desired. When the components are constant, the hardenability is affected by the amount of carbide that forms a solid solution during soaking, and in order to make more carbide form a solid solution during holding for a short time, the size of the carbide must be fine. It is valid. Regarding the improvement of hardenability due to such refinement of carbides, Japanese Patent Publication No. 57-436
21 and JP-A-2-25913. Furthermore, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 1-25812 discloses a manufacturing method aiming at improving mechanical properties by making the carbide spherical finer. [0003] However, even in the high carbon thin steel sheets manufactured by these manufacturing methods, the elongation (%) before quenching is at most about 15% and has sufficient workability. Not really. Particularly, recently, there has been a movement to simplify the working process, and the demand for workability of a high carbon thin steel sheet has become more severe than ever. [0004] The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances, and has as its object to provide a high carbon steel excellent in both workability and hardenability. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Conventionally, hot rolling and cold rolling
Factors that affect the workability of the hot-rolled high carbon steel sheet are the shape and size of the carbide, and as described above, it has been thought that the spherical refinement of the carbide is important, Attempts have been made to reduce the size of carbides with the aim of improving the quality and to make the carbides as spherical as possible to provide workability. However, at present, sufficient workability has not been obtained only by making the carbides spherical and fine. [0006] Therefore, the present inventors have conducted cold rolling and
As a result of intensive studies to improve the workability of high-carbon thin steel sheets with a thickness of several millimeters that are wound into an il shape, it is impossible to improve the workability only by the size and distribution of spherical fine carbides, and It has been found that the ductility is rapidly improved only when the ferrite diameter is within a certain range in the presence of a spherical carbide having the same size as the ferrite particle size and about 1/10 thereof. And it has been found that by adjusting the carbide grain size and the ferrite grain size, a high carbon thin steel sheet excellent in both workability and hardenability can be obtained. [0007] The present invention has been made based on such findings of the present inventors, and comprises a cold-rolled cold-rolled steel sheet.
High carbon steel sheet consisting of 0.2% by weight C
And a mixed structure of ferrite and carbide, having a carbide grain size of 1.3 μm or less and a ferrite grain size of 1% or less.
An object of the present invention is to provide a high carbon steel sheet excellent in workability and hardenability, characterized in that the thickness is more than 4 μm and less than 4 μm. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The high carbon steel of the present invention contains C
, Mainly containing ferrite and carbide, having a carbide particle size of 1.3 μm or less and a ferrite particle size of 1 μm or less.
It is more than μm and 4 μm or less. The reasons for limiting the C content, carbide grain size and ferrite grain size in the present invention will be described below. (1) C content C forms carbides in steel and causes strain distribution to ferrite grain boundaries and ferrite grains, which play an important role in the present invention, or to a ferrite-carbide interface. In addition, it is an important element that imparts hardenability to steel. If the content is less than 0.2% by weight, the amount of carbides is reduced and the hardness after quenching is reduced. On the other hand, when excessively added carbon is excessively hardened during hardening, 2% or less since there is a risk of causing quenching cracks. (2) Carbide Particle Size The carbide particle size greatly affects the hardenability under low-temperature and short-time holding conditions and the strain distribution described later. Regarding the hardenability, it is a condition that the carbide is rapidly dissolved in the austenite within the soaking time so that the hardenability is good under the condition of holding at a low temperature for a short time. In order for the carbide to rapidly dissolve into austenite, it is desirable that the carbide is fine. That is, by precipitating carbides finely in the steel, the surface area with respect to the total volume of the carbides increases, and the solid solution of the carbides is promoted during heating and holding. An experiment for verifying this will be described below. A continuous cast slab having a carbon content of about 0.65%
Heat to 230 ° C, finish temperature 850 ° C, winding temperature 40
Hot rolling is performed under the condition of 0 to 750 ° C.
Cold rolling was performed at ~ 70%, and annealing was performed at 600 to 740 ° C to produce a 1.2 mm thick high carbon thin steel sheet . Since the hardenability depends on the plate thickness, it is necessary to unify the plate thickness. Therefore, if necessary, the thickness is reduced to 1.2 by grinding.
mm. The steel plate manufactured in this way is 50 × 10
After cutting to a size of 0 mm, the temperature was raised to 750 ° C in a heating furnace,
After holding for 10 seconds, it was quenched into rapeseed oil at about 10 ° C. The heating temperature is specified to be 760 to 820 ° C. in JIS G4401, but in this experiment, it is lower by 10 ° C. than the lower limit specified in JIS in order to clarify the superiority of hardenability. The temperature was maintained. The hardness of the test piece after quenching in this manner was measured on a Rockwell C scale (HRC) to evaluate hardenability. The evaluation of hardenability is ◎, HRC63 or more, taking into account JIS and customer needs, etc.
Less than 63 and 59 or more were evaluated as ○, less than 59 and 55 as Δ, and less than 55 as ×. Table 1 shows the carbide particle size and the hardenability evaluation results at this time. [Table 1] As shown in Table 1, the carbide particle size is about 2
If it is not more than μm, the hardenability is good. In order to obtain more favorable hardenability, the thickness is preferably 0.8 μm or less. (3) Ferrite grain size The ferrite grain size increases under a specific carbide grain size (E
L) is the most important parameter in the present invention that leads to the improvement of L). That is, when the carbide particle size is 1.3 μm or less and the ferrite particle size is more than 1 μm and 4 μm or less, EL is remarkably improved. Although the reason for this is not necessarily clarified, in a structure in which carbides are dispersed in a ferrite ground, the location of a crack at the time of processing changes depending on the grain size of the carbides and ferrite. First, when the carbide exceeds 1.3 μm,
The strain is concentrated at the ferrite-carbide interface, and cracks occur at the interface. At the ferrite-carbide interface, the workability is low because the limit strain at which cracks occur is smaller than at the ferrite grain boundaries or within the ferrite grains. Next, when the carbide grain size is 1.3 μm or less, the strain concentration position changes depending on the ferrite grain size. When the ferrite grain size exceeds 4 μm, the strain concentrates on the ferrite grain boundaries and cracks are generated from the ferrite grain boundaries. When the ferrite grain size is 1 μm or less, the strain is concentrated in the ferrite grains, and cracks are generated from the ferrite grains. In these cases, although the workability is better than when strain is concentrated at the ferrite-carbide interface, the workability is not so much improved. On the other hand, when the ferrite grain size is in the range of more than 1 μm and 4 μm or less, it is considered that the strain is appropriately distributed between the ferrite grain boundary and the inside of the ferrite grain. Is significantly increased as compared with the case where it is concentrated on either the ferrite grain boundary or the inside of the ferrite grain. As a result, the workability is remarkably improved. Hereinafter, experimental results showing this fact will be described. By weight%, C ≒ 0.60%, Si ≒ 0.0
1%, Mn ≒ 0.2%, P ≒ 0.015%, S ≒ 0.0
A continuous cast slab having a composition of 08% is heated to 1150 ° C, a finishing temperature of 850 ° C, and a winding temperature of 400 to 700 ° C.
Hot rolling is performed under the following conditions, followed by primary cold rolling and 68
After annealing for 0 × 40 hours, secondary cold rolling was performed at a cold rolling reduction of 10 to 95%, and annealing was performed at 500 to 740 ° C. to produce a high carbon thin steel sheet having a thickness of 1.5 mm. The ferrite grain size and the carbide grain size of the steel sheet thus manufactured were measured, and the EL was measured by a tensile test in order to evaluate the workability. JIS Z for tensile test
The test piece used was a No. 5 test piece of JIS Z 2201 in accordance with 2241. FIG. 1 shows the evaluation results. In the figure, the black circles indicate EL <15%, and 90% or more of the cracks were ferrite.
Those generated at the carbide interface, black square: 15% ≦ EL <2
0%, 90% or more of cracks occurred in ferrite grains, black diamonds: 20% ≦ EL <25%, 9% of cracks
0% or more occurred at the ferrite grain boundary.
% ≦ EL, where 60 to 80% of the cracks are formed in the ferrite grain boundaries and 30 to 20% are formed in the ferrite grains. From this figure, it can be seen that when the carbide particle size exceeds 1.3 μm, cracks occur at the ferrite-carbide grain boundary, and EL
Is low. Also, the carbide particle size is 1.3 μm
If the ferrite grain size is 1 μm or less, the ferrite grain fracture occurs, and if the ferrite grain size exceeds 4 μm, the ferrite grain boundary fracture occurs, which also leads to a low EL. On the contrary,
Carbide particle size is 1.3μm or less and ferrite particle size is 1μ
In the range of more than m and 4 μm or less, cracks occur in both ferrite grain boundaries and in the grains, and it was confirmed that EL was improved. As described above, the carbide particle size may be about 2 μm or less from the viewpoint of hardenability alone. However, in consideration of the above experimental results, the present invention is excellent in both hardenability and workability. The range was specified as a carbide particle diameter of 1.3 μm or less and a ferrite particle diameter of more than 1 μm and 4 μm or less. In the present invention, the structure of the steel is a mixed structure of ferrite and carbide, but the ferrite grain boundary may not be clearly observed due to the carbide, and the actual ferrite grain size may not be clear. Therefore, in the present invention, the ferrite grain size is defined as follows. (1) In the case where ferrite grain boundaries are observed without being interrupted by carbide, the range surrounded by the grain boundaries is defined as the grain size of ferrite grains. (2) When no ferrite grain boundaries are observed due to carbides, the area surrounded by the ferrite grain boundaries and the carbide grain boundaries is defined as the area occupied by ferrite grains as shown in FIG. Is defined as the ferrite grain size. (3) As shown in FIG. 3, when carbide is present in the ferrite grains, the area of the carbide is not included in the area occupied by the ferrite grains. (4) As shown in FIG. 4, when the carbide traverses the ferrite grains and is in contact with the ferrite grain boundaries, the ferrite grains divided by the carbides are each independent ferrite grains. Similarly, the diameter of a circle having an equivalent area is defined as the carbide particle size. The method for measuring the ferrite grain size and the carbide grain size is not particularly limited. However, after the thickness section of the sample is polished and corroded, a scanning electron microscope photograph of a magnification of 1500 to 5000 times is taken. It is desirable to measure the ferrite grain size and the carbide grain size from the photograph. When actually determining the ferrite grain size of a sample, the average of the grain sizes of the grains that are photographed as a whole is taken as the grain size of the field of view, and after performing this for two or more fields, the average of those is further taken. Is the ferrite grain size of the sample. The particle size of the carbide is determined in the same manner. It is preferable that the photographing is performed so that the magnification is such that at least 30 grains exist. In addition, as a corrosive liquid, when measuring ferrite particle size, a nital corrosive liquid is used.
When measuring the carbide particle size, it is preferable to use a picral etchant. FIG. 5 shows an example of the measurement result. FIG. 5 shows the result of corrosion by the nital etchant. In this figure, the ferrite particle size is 1.94 μm, and the carbide particle size is 1.94 μm.
04 μm. It should be noted that the present invention exerts the desired effect as long as it contains 0.2% or more of C by weight and has a grain size in the above specific range and is mainly composed of ferrite and carbide. There is no need to particularly define other components, and there is no problem even if elements such as Mn, Si, P, S, Al, and N are contained in a normal range. However, Mn is desirably 2% or less because it tends to cause a decrease in hardenability due to an effect of suppressing solid solution of carbide. Further, the content of Si is desirably 2% or less because carbides tend to be coarsened and hardenability tends to be impaired. As for P and S, if they are contained excessively, the ductility is reduced.
The following is desirable. If Al is contained excessively, the hardenability decreases, so 0.08% or less is desirable. N
Also, if contained excessively, the ductility is reduced, so that the content is preferably 0.01% or less. Depending on the purpose, B, Cr, Cu, Ni, M
Various elements such as o, Ti, Nb, W, V, and Zr may be added. These elements have no effect on the effects of the present invention. Further, various elements such as Sn and Pb may be mixed as impurities in the manufacturing process, but such impurities do not affect the effect of the present invention at all. Next, a preferred method for producing the high carbon steel according to the present invention will be described. First, molten steel adjusted to the composition within the range of the present invention is made into a slab by ingot slab treatment or continuous casting. Next, hot rolling is performed. The slab heating temperature at that time is appropriately 1250 ° C. or less from the viewpoint of change in the surface state due to scale generation, and the finishing temperature is Ar 3 or more from the viewpoint of workability. It is desirable to do. The winding temperature is preferably set to 600 ° C. or lower for fine precipitation of carbides, and is preferably set to 400 ° C. or higher from the viewpoint of cold pressure load. When used as a cold rolled sheet,
Cold rolling is performed, and the cold pressure ratio at that time is preferably 20% or more in order to refine carbide during annealing. However, if the rolling ratio is excessive, ferrite grains after rolling become fine. 85% or less is preferable because it becomes too much. In the subsequent annealing, the temperature must be 600 ° C. or higher in order to grow ferrite grains appropriately, but in order to suppress excessive growth of carbide (Ac 3
-30) C. or less. Regarding the annealing method, there is no problem whether continuous annealing or box annealing is performed. In addition, you may combine cold rolling and annealing twice or more. Thereafter, temper rolling is performed if necessary.
Since the temper rolling does not affect the hardenability, the conditions are not limited. In addition, both the converter and the electric furnace can be used for adjusting the composition of the steel of the present invention, and there is no problem at all even if the rough rolling is omitted during the hot rolling and the finish rolling is performed. Further, the direct casting rolling may be performed by rolling the continuous casting slab as it is or by performing a heat retaining treatment for the purpose of suppressing a temperature decrease. Further, the steel of the present invention may be a hot-rolled steel sheet or a cold-rolled steel sheet, and in each case, the effects of the present invention can be similarly exhibited. Embodiments of the present invention will be described below. Example 1 A continuously cast slab having a composition shown in Table 2 and having a carbon content of about 0.5% was heated to 1080 ° C., and finished at a temperature of 870 ° C. and a coiling temperature of 3.
Hot rolling is performed at 50 to 700 ° C, cold rolling is performed at a cold rolling rate of 10 to 95% after pickling, and 55 to 350 ° C to 740 ° C.
By performing box annealing for a long time, a high carbon thin steel sheet having a sheet thickness of 1 mm was produced. A tensile test and a quenching test were performed on each of the thin steel sheets to evaluate workability and hardenability. The test conditions are shown below. <Tensile test> The tensile test was conducted according to JIS Z22.
The test was performed in accordance with No. 41, and the test piece used was a No. 5 test piece of JIS Z 2201. Evaluation is performed by EL, EL is 25%
Above: ○, less than 25% 15% or more △, less than 15% ×
And <Hardenability test> The above steel sheet was 50 × 100 m
m, cut to 800 ° C in a heating furnace,
After holding for 2 seconds, it was quenched into rapeseed oil at about 10 ° C. The hardness of the test piece after quenching on the plate surface was measured on a Rockwell C scale (HRC) to evaluate hardenability. Evaluation is H
RC 57 or more: ◎, less than 57 53 or more: ○, less than 53 4
9 or more was evaluated as Δ, and less than 49 was evaluated as ×. The results of the tensile test and the hardenability test are shown in Table 3. [Table 2] [Table 3] As shown in Table 3, the carbide particle size was 1.3 μm.
It was confirmed that a high carbon steel excellent in both workability and hardenability can be obtained in the range of m or less and the ferrite particle size in the range of more than 1 μm and 4 μm or less. (Second Example) A continuously cast slab having a composition shown in Table 4 and having a carbon content of about 0.35% was heated to 1180 ° C, and hot-worked at a finishing temperature of 845 ° C and a winding temperature of 400 to 700 ° C. Rolling was performed. After pickling, primary cold rolling and box annealing at 640 ° C are performed, and secondary cold rolling is performed at a cold rolling reduction of 10 to 95%, and 500 to 770 ° C.
To perform a continuous annealing to produce a high carbon thin steel sheet having a thickness of 2 mm. A tensile test and a quenching test were performed on each of the thin steel sheets to evaluate workability and hardenability. These test conditions were basically the same as those of the first embodiment. However, since the component system was different from that of the first embodiment, the evaluation criteria were different from those of the first embodiment.
で at 0% or more, Δ at less than 30% 20% or more, × at less than 20%
Less than 46 or less than 0 was evaluated as ○, less than 42 or more as Δ, and less than 42 as ×. Table 5 shows the results of the tensile test and the hardenability test. [Table 4] [Table 5] From Table 5, it is confirmed that a high carbon steel excellent in both workability and hardenability can be obtained when the carbide particle size is 1.3 μm or less and the ferrite particle size is more than 1 μm and 4 μm or less. Was. (Third Example) A continuously cast slab having a composition shown in Table 6 and having a carbon content of about 0.65% was heated to 1200 ° C, and hot-rolled at a finishing temperature of 845 ° C and a winding temperature of 350 to 700 ° C. Rolling was performed. After pickling, primary cold rolling and box annealing are performed at 640 ° C., and secondary cold rolling is performed at a cold rolling reduction of 15 to 95%, and 550 to 740 ° C.
To produce a high carbon thin steel sheet having a thickness of 1.6 mm. A tensile test and a quenching test were performed on each of the thin steel sheets to evaluate workability and hardenability. The test conditions were basically the same as in the first embodiment, and the evaluation criteria for the tensile test were the same as those in the first embodiment. However, the evaluation criteria for the hardenability test were different from those in the first embodiment. H
RC 63 or more: 、, less than 63 59 or more: ○, less than 59 5
5 or more was evaluated as Δ, and less than 55 was evaluated as ×. Table 7 shows the results of the tensile test and hardenability test. [Table 6] [Table 7] From Table 7, it is confirmed that a high carbon steel excellent in both workability and hardenability can be obtained when the carbide particle size is 1.3 μm or less and the ferrite particle size is more than 1 μm and 4 μm or less. Was. As described above, according to the present invention,
The ferrite grain size is controlled to more than 1 μm and 4 μm or less by focusing not only on hardenability but also on making carbide finer and also on workability (ductility) being greatly affected by ferrite grains.
In addition, since the carbide particle size is controlled to 1.3 μm or less, a high carbon thin steel sheet excellent in both workability and hardenability can be provided. Thus, the high carbon thin steel according to the present invention
Since the plate is excellent in workability and hardenability, transmission parts and the like represented by gears can be manufactured at low cost and with stable quality.
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】炭化物粒径およびフェライト粒径のELに対す
る影響を示す図。
【図2】本発明でいうフェライト粒径を説明するための
模式図。
【図3】本発明でいうフェライト粒径を説明するための
模式図。
【図4】本発明でいうフェライト粒径を説明するための
模式図。
【図5】フェライト粒径および炭化物粒径の測定結果の
一例を示す顕微鏡写真。BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the influence of carbide particle size and ferrite particle size on EL. FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram for explaining ferrite grain size according to the present invention. FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram for explaining a ferrite grain size according to the present invention. FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram for explaining a ferrite grain size according to the present invention. FIG. 5 is a micrograph showing an example of a measurement result of a ferrite grain size and a carbide grain size.
───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (56)参考文献 特開 平5−202445(JP,A) 特開 平5−271861(JP,A) 特開 平8−73985(JP,A) 特開 平6−322479(JP,A) (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.7,DB名) C22C 38/00 - 38/60 C21D 8/00 - 8/10 C21D 9/46 - 9/48 ────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuation of front page (56) References JP-A-5-202445 (JP, A) JP-A-5-271861 (JP, A) JP-A-8-73985 (JP, A) 322479 (JP, A) (58) Field surveyed (Int. Cl. 7 , DB name) C22C 38/00-38/60 C21D 8/00-8/10 C21D 9/46-9/48
Claims (1)
薄鋼板であって、重量%でCを0.2%以上2%以下含
み、フェライトと炭化物の混合組織であり、炭化物粒径
が1.3μm以下、フェライト粒径が1μm超4μm以
下であることを特徴とする、加工性と焼入性に優れた高
炭素薄鋼板。(57) [Claims] [Claim 1] High carbon made of cold-rolled cold-rolled steel sheet
A thin steel sheet containing 0.2% or more and 2% or less by weight of C, having a mixed structure of ferrite and carbide, having a carbide particle diameter of 1.3 μm or less and a ferrite particle diameter of more than 1 μm and 4 μm or less. High carbon thin steel sheet with excellent workability and hardenability.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP12858396A JP3407540B2 (en) | 1996-05-23 | 1996-05-23 | High carbon steel sheet with excellent workability and hardenability |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP12858396A JP3407540B2 (en) | 1996-05-23 | 1996-05-23 | High carbon steel sheet with excellent workability and hardenability |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH09316532A JPH09316532A (en) | 1997-12-09 |
| JP3407540B2 true JP3407540B2 (en) | 2003-05-19 |
Family
ID=14988352
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP12858396A Expired - Fee Related JP3407540B2 (en) | 1996-05-23 | 1996-05-23 | High carbon steel sheet with excellent workability and hardenability |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP3407540B2 (en) |
-
1996
- 1996-05-23 JP JP12858396A patent/JP3407540B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH09316532A (en) | 1997-12-09 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP2465963B1 (en) | High strength spring steel and steel wire | |
| JP6787522B1 (en) | High-strength steel sheet and its manufacturing method | |
| JP7010418B1 (en) | High-strength hot-rolled steel sheet and its manufacturing method | |
| JP6460287B1 (en) | Steel sheet for hot stamping | |
| CN107208206A (en) | High-strength hot-dip zinc-coated steel sheet and its manufacture method | |
| KR20210095189A (en) | High-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and manufacturing method thereof | |
| KR20190060805A (en) | Carbon steel sheet for carburizing and method of manufacturing steel sheet for carburizing | |
| WO2021045168A1 (en) | Steel sheet | |
| CN109963959A (en) | Steel sheet for carburizing and method for producing steel sheet for carburizing | |
| JP6769576B1 (en) | High-strength galvanized steel sheet and its manufacturing method | |
| CN117396624B (en) | Cold-rolled steel sheet, steel member, method for producing cold-rolled steel sheet, and method for producing steel member | |
| CN113227415B (en) | Steel sheet, member, and method for producing same | |
| JP3255296B2 (en) | High-strength steel for spring and method of manufacturing the same | |
| EP4279618A1 (en) | Martensite-based stainless steel material and method for producing same | |
| WO2023135983A1 (en) | High-strength steel sheet and method for producing same | |
| JP2000265240A (en) | Carbon steel sheet excellent in fine blankability | |
| CN119137299A (en) | Hot rolled steel plate | |
| JP2021172838A (en) | High strength steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same | |
| JPH08337843A (en) | High carbon hot rolled steel sheet excellent in punching workability and its production | |
| JP7444097B2 (en) | Hot rolled steel sheet and its manufacturing method | |
| JP7400707B2 (en) | Steel plate and its manufacturing method | |
| JP2022064241A (en) | Steel sheet and its manufacturing method, and members | |
| JP3407540B2 (en) | High carbon steel sheet with excellent workability and hardenability | |
| JP3269384B2 (en) | High carbon steel with excellent punchability and hardenability | |
| JP2000265239A (en) | High carbon steel sheet excellent in blankability |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080314 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090314 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100314 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100314 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110314 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120314 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130314 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130314 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140314 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |