Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP3662143B2 - Manufacturing condition determination device - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP3662143B2 - Manufacturing condition determination device - Google Patents

Manufacturing condition determination device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP3662143B2
JP3662143B2 JP13507499A JP13507499A JP3662143B2 JP 3662143 B2 JP3662143 B2 JP 3662143B2 JP 13507499 A JP13507499 A JP 13507499A JP 13507499 A JP13507499 A JP 13507499A JP 3662143 B2 JP3662143 B2 JP 3662143B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
case
design
requirement specification
requirement
manufacturing conditions
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP13507499A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2000330620A (en
Inventor
俊彦 渡辺
研吾 安部
孝一 樋口
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority to JP13507499A priority Critical patent/JP3662143B2/en
Publication of JP2000330620A publication Critical patent/JP2000330620A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3662143B2 publication Critical patent/JP3662143B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • General Factory Administration (AREA)

Description

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は,製造条件決定装置に係り,詳しくは,例えば圧延,鍛造,押し出し,鋳造等で製造する工業用材料に対して,需要家から出された要求仕様に応じた製造条件を決定する製造条件決定装置に関するものである。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
工業用材料の製造に際しては,需要家からの要求仕様や公的な製造規格に規定された仕様を充足するよう,材料の成分や通過工程,製造方法などの製造条件を決定する必要がある。上記要求仕様等から製造条件を決定する技術は,例えば特開平8−335230号公報に記載されている。
上記公報に記載の「製品品質設計装置」では,製品の複数の用途,加工工程別に,製品特性及び管理項目が第1のテーブルにまとめられ,各製品特性と管理項目に対応した品質設計規則が第2のテーブルにまとめられている。要求された製品仕様に対して,第1のテーブルから製品特性と管理項目とが決定され,第2のテーブルから品質設計規則が選定され,製造条件が決定される。
【0003】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
上記公報に記載の技術では,要求仕様が,製品の規格や社内標準に則した規定通りの内容であれば,製造条件の決定が可能であるが,それ以外の特別な内容の要求に対しては,過去の経験や固有のノウハウを用いて人手により製造条件が設定されていた。この場合には,製造条件を設定する担当者によって製造条件にばらつきが生じ,妥当でない製造条件が設定される恐れもある。
また,上記のような例外的な要求仕様も,上記第1のテーブルや第2のテーブルに組み入れることも不可能ではないが,その場合にはルールベースが肥大化して,システムのメンテナンスコストが増大してしまうという問題があった。
本発明は,このような従来の技術における課題を解決するために,製造条件決定装置を改良し,例外的な要求仕様が需要家からあっても,過去の実績(設計事例)を組み合わせて妥当な製造条件を生成し,またメンテナンスも容易な製造条件決定装置を提供することを目的とするものである。
【0004】
【課題を解決するための手段】
上記目的を達成するために,請求項1に係る発明は,需要家の要求仕様を入力するための要求仕様入力部と,過去の要求仕様とその製造条件が対となった設計事例が蓄積された事例ベースと,上記要求仕様入力部を用いて入力された上記需要家からの要求仕様に基づいて,上記事例ベースを探索し,当該要求仕様と類似の要求仕様を有する設計事例を抽出する要求仕様マッチング部と,上記需要家からの要求仕様に対応して,実際に採用された実績製造条件を上記事例ベースに登録するための事例登録部とを具備してなる製造条件決定装置において,上記要求仕様マッチング部が,上記事例ベースに蓄積された単独の設計事例によって上記需要家からの要求仕様が満足されない場合に,上記事例ベースから上記需要家からの要求仕様を満足するような複数の設計事例を抽出するものであって,上記要求仕様マッチング部により抽出された複数の設計事例の製造条件を合成し,上記需要家からの要求仕様を満足する合成製造条件を生成する合成製造条件生成部を具備し,上記事例登録部が,上記合成製造条件に基づいた上記実績製造条件とそれに対応する要求仕様とからなる蓄積候補事例を生成する蓄積候補事例生成部と,上記蓄積候補事例生成部により生成された蓄積候補事例の製造条件と上記事例ベースに蓄積されている設計事例の製造条件とを比較し,上記蓄積候補事例の要求仕様と等価な要求仕様を有する上記設計事例が上記事例ベースに既に存在する場合には,上記要求仕様の等価な既存の設計事例の製造条件を上記蓄積候補事例の製造条件に置き換え,上記蓄積候補事例の要求仕様と等価な要求仕様を有する上記設計事例が上記事例ベースに存在しない場合には,上記蓄積候補事例を新規の上記設計事例として上記事例ベースに登録する比較判定部とを含むものであることを特徴とする製造条件決定装置として構成されている。
また,上記製造条件決定装置において,上記合成製造条件生成部が,上記要求仕様マッチング部により複数抽出された各設計事例の製造条件に含まれる項目間に競合があるか否かを判別し,各設計事例の製造条件に含まれる項目間に競合がある場合には,所定の規則に従って競合を解消した上で,上記合成製造条件を生成するものであることをその要旨とする。
【0005】
記製造条件決定装置では,需要家からの要求仕様が上記事例ベースに蓄積された単独の設計事例によって満足されない場合に,上記需要家からの要求仕様を満足するような複数の設計事例が上記事例ベースから抽出される。上記抽出された複数の設計事例の製造条件は,当該製造条件に含まれる項目間に競合がある場合には競合が解消された上で合成され,合成製造条件が生成される。また,実際に採用された実績製造条件とそれに対応する要求仕様とが対となった蓄積候補事例が必要に応じて生成され,上記蓄積候補事例の要求仕様と等価な要求仕様を有する上記設計事例が上記事例ベースに既に存在する場合には,上記要求仕様の等価な既存の設計事例の製造条件が上記蓄積候補事例の製造条件に置き換えられ,上記蓄積候補事例の要求仕様と等価な要求仕様を有する上記設計事例が上記事例ベースに存在しない場合には,上記蓄積候補事例が新規の上記設計事例として上記事例ベースに登録される。
即ち,上記請求項1に記載の製造条件決定装置によれば,例外的な要求仕様が需要家からあり,事例ベースに蓄積された単独の設計事例によって需要家からの要求仕様が満足されない場合でも,過去の設計事例が複数組み合わされて妥当な製造条件が生成される。このため,使用者の経験等に左右されない安定したシステムを提供することができる。また,例外的な要求仕様にあわせて,事例ベースに設計事例を登録しておく必要もないので,事例ベースのメンテンナンスは容易なものとなる。しかも,上記事例ベースに新たな事例を追加する場合には,当該新たな事例と等価な要求仕様を有する設計事例がないときにのみ,上記新たな事例の追加登録が許可され,当該新たな事例と等価な要求仕様を有する設計事例が存在するときには,既存の設計事例の製造条件が当該新たな事例のものに置き換えられるため,事例ベースが肥大化し,メンテナンス性が低下するのを防止することができる。
【0006】
【発明の実施の形態】
以下,添付図面を参照して,本発明の実施の形態につき説明し,本発明の理解に供する。尚,以下の実施の形態は,本発明の具体的な一例であって,本発明の技術的範囲を限定する性格のものではない。ここに,図1は本発明の一実施の形態に係る装置の概略構成を示す図である。
本発明の一実施の形態に係る製造条件決定装置は,例えば圧延,鍛造,押し出し,鋳造等で製造する工業用材料に関し,需要家から出された要求仕様に応じた製造条件を決定する製造条件決定装置として具体化されるものである。
上記製造条件決定装置は,図1に示す如く,需要家の要求仕様を入力するための要求仕様入力部1と,過去の要求仕様とその製造条件が対となった設計事例が蓄積された事例ベース2と,上記要求仕様入力部1を用いて入力された上記需要家からの要求仕様に基づいて,上記事例ベース2を探索し,当該要求仕様と類似の要求仕様を有する設計事例を抽出する要求仕様マッチング部3と,上記需要家からの要求仕様に対応して,実際に採用された実績製造条件を上記事例ベース2に登録するための事例登録部ADとを具備する点で従来装置と同様である。
一方,上記製造条件決定装置が,従来装置と異なるのは,上記要求仕様マッチング部3が,上記事例ベース2に蓄積された単独の設計事例によって上記需要家からの要求仕様が満足されない場合に,上記事例ベース2から上記需要家からの要求仕様を満足するような複数の設計事例を抽出するものであって,上記要求仕様マッチング部3により抽出された複数の設計事例の製造条件に含まれる項目間に競合がある場合には,所定の規則に従って競合を解消した上で上記抽出された複数の設計事例の製造条件を合成し,上記需要家からの要求仕様を満足する合成製造条件を生成する競合解消部4(合成製造条件生成部に相当)と,上記競合解消部4により生成された上記合成製造条件を表示するための製造条件表示部5を具備し,上記事例登録部ADが,上記合成製造条件に基づいた上記実績製造条件とそれに対応する要求仕様とからなる蓄積候補事例を生成する設計事例登録部(蓄積候補事例生成部に相当)6と,上記設計事例登録部6により生成された蓄積候補事例の製造条件と上記事例ベースに蓄積されている設計事例の製造条件とを比較し,上記蓄積候補事例の要求仕様と等価な要求仕様を有する上記設計事例が上記事例ベース2に既に存在する場合には,上記要求仕様の等価な既存の設計事例の製造条件を上記蓄積候補事例の製造条件に置き換え,上記蓄積候補事例の要求仕様と等価な要求仕様を有する上記設計事例が上記事例ベース2に存在しない場合には,上記蓄積候補事例を新規の上記設計事例として上記事例ベース2に登録する比較判定部7とを含む点である。
【0007】
以下,上記製造条件決定装置の詳細について説明する。ここに,図2は上記製造条件決定装置の動作を説明するためのフローチャートであり,図3は上記競合解消部における競合項目の解消動作を説明するための図である。
上記製造条件決定装置では,まず要求仕様入力部1を用いて,例えば圧延,鍛造,押し出し,鋳造等で製造する工業用材料に関し,需要家から出された要求仕様が入力される(S1)。
上記要求仕様入力部1を用いて入力された需要家からの要求仕様は,要求仕様マッチング部3において,事例ベース2に蓄積されている設計事例の要求仕様と比較される(S2)。
上記事例ベース2に蓄積されている設計事例は,過去の要求仕様とそれに対応した製造条件とが対になったものである。上記要求仕様部1を用いて入力されたり,上記事例ベース2に蓄積された過去の要求仕様には,例えば工業用材料の規格名や,用途などに関する複数の項目が含まれている。また,上記要求仕様と対となって上記事例ベース2に蓄積される上記製造条件には,例えば成分や,製造法,品質などに関する複数の項目が含まれている。
ところで,需要家からの要求仕様が,製品の規格や社内標準に則した規定通りのものであれば,上記要求仕様と等価な要求仕様を有する唯一又は極少数の設計事例のみが上記需要家からの要求仕様に対応することになるが,需要家からの要求仕様が,製品の規格や社内標準に則していない例外的なものであればあるほど,多くの設計事例が上記需要家からの要求仕様に対応することになる。
上記要求仕様マッチング部3では,比較の結果,上記需要家からの要求仕様を満足する単独の設計事例は上記事例ベース2に存在していないことが判別されると,上記需要家からの要求仕様を満足するような複数の設計事例が上記事例ベース2から抽出される。上記需要家からの要求仕様を満足するか否かは,例えば上記需要家からの要求仕様に含まれる項目が,上記事例ベース2に蓄積されている設計事例に含まれているか否かを基準に判別する。
また,上記需要家からの要求仕様と上記事例ベース2の設計事例の要求仕様との比較は,類似度演算に基づいて行われる。より具体的には,上記要求仕様入力部1を用いて入力された需要家からの要求仕様の各項目と,上記事例ベースに蓄積されている設計事例の要求仕様との各項目との間で,調和距離が演算され,上記調和距離に基づいた類似度が高い設計事例が上記事例ベース2から抽出される。
また,上記要求仕様に含まれる項目のうち,例えば規格名などが必須の項目とされている場合には,その必須の項目が合致していることが前提となり,
設計事例の要求仕様⊆需要家からの要求仕様
という条件を満たす設計事例のみが抽出される。
【0008】
上記要求仕様マッチング部3により抽出された,これら複数の設計事例は,上記競合解消部4に供給され,上記競合解消部4において,上記複数の設計事例の製造条件に含まれる項目間の競合が所定の規則に従って解消された上で,各製造条件が合成される(S3)。
例えば図3に示す如く,上記事例ベース2に蓄積されている設計事例(要求仕様X,製造条件Y)から,上記要求仕様マッチング部3により(A,α)と,(B,β)という2つの設計事例が抽出され,上記競合解消部4にその2つの設計事例が供給されると,上記競合解消部4において,まず上記複数の設計事例の製造条件の比較が行われる。特に,需要家からの要求が例外的なものであれば,各設計事例の製造条件に含まれる項目間で競合が生じる可能性が高い。各設計事例の製造条件に含まれる項目間で競合が生じている場合には,当該項目については,上記複数の設計事例のうちのある設計事例に対応した項目の値が所定の規則に従って選択され,上記競合が解消される。
図3の例では,需要家からの要求仕様の全体集合Xに対応するものとして,要求仕様の集合Aを有する設計事例と,要求仕様の集合Bを有する設計事例が抽出されているが,要求仕様の集合Aと要求仕様の集合Bには干渉する部分(項目)があり,それぞれに対応する製造条件の集合α,βにおいて,γ=α∩βなる部分(項目)に競合が生じている。
この競合を解消するための上記所定の規則は,上記競合が生じた項目が,検査レベルなどの順序関係を定義することができる項目である場合には,当該項目に関しては,検査レベルがより高い方を選択するなど,需要家側に安全となるような選択を行わせるものである。
また,上記競合が生じた項目が,上記順序関係を定義できる項目でなかったり,全く矛盾するような競合が生じている場合には,当該項目に関しては,上記需要家からの要求仕様との類似度が高い要求仕様を有する設計事例のものが優先的に選択される。
この所定の規則に従って,上記競合のある項目γについては,上記製造条件の集合α又は上記製造条件の集合βのいずれかの値が選択される。
そして,上記競合のある項目γについて上記製造条件の集合α,βのいずれかの値が選択された上で,上記製造条件の集合α∪βから,上記需要家からの要求仕様に対応した製造条件の全体集合Y(合成製造条件)が合成される。
上記競合解消部4により生成された上記合成製造条件は,上記製造条件表示部5に表示され,使用者に提示される(S4)。このとき,使用者により,その合成製造条件に修正が必要であると判断された場合には,入力装置によりデータの修正が行われる。そして,上記合成製造条件は,生産計画システムに転送されたり,指示書として各工程へ送られ,製品の製造が行われる(S5)。
実際の製品の製造等に採用された上記合成製造条件,又は修正された上記合成製造条件(実績製造条件)は,使用者等の判断により,上記事例ベース2に設計事例として蓄積することができる。使用者等の判断により新規の設計事例として上記事例ベース2に蓄積することが判断された場合(S6),上記実績製造条件は,設計事例登録部6に供給される。
上記設計事例登録部6では,上記実績製造条件を,上記需要家からの入力された要求仕様と対にした蓄積候補事例が生成され,生成された上記蓄積候補事例が,比較判定部7に供給される。
上記比較判定部7では,上記蓄積候補事例の要求仕様と上記事例ベース2に既に蓄積されている設計事例の要求仕様との間でマッチング演算が行われ,上記蓄積候補事例の要求仕様と等価な要求仕様を有する設計事例が上記事例ベース2に既に蓄積されているか否かが探索される(S7)。
上記蓄積候補事例の要求仕様と等価な要求仕様を有する設計事例が上記事例ベース2に既に蓄積されている場合には,当該設計事例の製造条件を上記蓄積候補事例の製造条件に置き換えるなどして,上記蓄積候補事例の製造条件と競合しないように当該設計事例の製造条件が修正される。一方,上記蓄積候補事例の要求仕様と等価な要求仕様を有する設計事例が上記事例ベース2に蓄積されていない場合には,新規の設計事例として上記蓄積候補事例が上記事例ベース2に蓄積される(S8)。
このように,本発明の一実施の形態に係る製造条件決定装置では,例外的な要求仕様が需要家からあり,事例ベースに蓄積された単独の設計事例によって需要家からの要求仕様が満足されない場合でも,過去の設計事例が複数組み合わされて妥当な製造条件が生成される。このため,使用者の経験等に左右されない安定したシステムを提供することができる。また,例外的な要求仕様にあわせて,事例ベースに設計事例を登録しておく必要もないので,事例ベースのメンテンナンスは容易なものとなる。しかも,上記事例ベースに新たな事例を追加する場合には,当該新たな事例と等価な要求仕様を有する設計事例がないときにのみ,上記新たな事例の追加登録が許可され,当該新たな事例と等価な要求仕様を有する設計事例が存在するときには,既存の設計事例の製造条件が当該新たな事例のものに置き換えられるため,事例ベースが肥大化し,メンテナンス性が低下するのを防止することができる。
【0009】
【実施例】
上記実施の形態では,上記実績製造条件を上記事例ベース2に登録するか否かは,使用者等が判断するようにしたが,これに限られるものではなく,上記実績製造条件は自動的に上記事例ベース2に登録するようにしてもよい。
また,上記要求仕様入力部1,事例ベース2,要求仕様マッチング部3,競合解消部4,製造条件表示部5,設計事例登録部6,比較判定部7は,同一装置内に設ける必要はなく,上記事例ベース2に対応する記憶装置や,上記要求仕様入力部1や製造条件表示部5などのインターフェースは別々に設けるようにしてもよい。
【0010】
【発明の効果】
以上説明した通り,上記請求項1に記載の製造条件決定装置によれば,例外的な要求仕様が需要家からあり,事例ベースに蓄積された単独の設計事例によって需要家からの要求仕様が満足されない場合でも,過去の設計事例が複数組み合わされて妥当な製造条件が生成される。このため,使用者の経験等に左右されない安定したシステムを提供することができる。また,例外的な要求仕様にあわせて,事例ベースに設計事例を登録しておく必要もないので,事例ベースのメンテンナンスは容易なものとなる。しかも,上記事例ベースに新たな事例を追加する場合には,当該新たな事例と等価な要求仕様を有する設計事例がないときにのみ,上記新たな事例の追加登録が許可され,当該新たな事例と等価な要求仕様を有する設計事例が存在するときには,既存の設計事例の製造条件が当該新たな事例のものに置き換えられるため,事例ベースが肥大化し,メンテナンス性が低下するのを防止することができる。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】 本発明の一実施の形態に係る製造条件決定装置の概略構成を示す機能ブロック図。
【図2】 上記製造条件決定装置の動作を説明するためのフローチャート。
【図3】 上記製造条件決定装置が備える競合解消部における競合解消を説明するための図。
【符号の説明】
1…要求仕様入力部
2…事例ベース
3…要求仕様マッチング部
4…競合解消部
5…製造条件表示部
6…設計事例登録部
7…比較判定部
[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a manufacturing condition determination device, and more specifically, manufacturing that determines manufacturing conditions according to required specifications issued by customers for industrial materials manufactured by rolling, forging, extrusion, casting, and the like. The present invention relates to a condition determining device.
[0002]
[Prior art]
When manufacturing industrial materials, it is necessary to determine manufacturing conditions such as material composition, passing process, and manufacturing method so as to satisfy the specifications required by customers and the specifications stipulated in official manufacturing standards. A technique for determining manufacturing conditions from the above required specifications is described in, for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 8-335230.
In the “product quality design device” described in the above publication, product characteristics and management items are grouped in a first table for each of a plurality of uses and processing processes of the product, and quality design rules corresponding to each product characteristic and management item are set. It is summarized in the second table. For the requested product specifications, product characteristics and management items are determined from the first table, quality design rules are selected from the second table, and manufacturing conditions are determined.
[0003]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
In the technology described in the above publication, the manufacturing conditions can be determined if the required specifications are as specified in accordance with the product standards and internal standards. The manufacturing conditions were manually set using past experience and unique know-how. In this case, the manufacturing condition varies depending on the person in charge of setting the manufacturing condition, and an inappropriate manufacturing condition may be set.
In addition, it is not impossible to incorporate the exceptional requirement specifications as described above into the first table and the second table, but in that case, the rule base is enlarged and the maintenance cost of the system is increased. There was a problem of doing.
In order to solve such problems in the conventional technology, the present invention improves the manufacturing condition determination device, and even if there are exceptional requirement specifications from customers, it is appropriate to combine past results (design examples). An object of the present invention is to provide a manufacturing condition determining apparatus that generates simple manufacturing conditions and is easy to maintain.
[0004]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
In order to achieve the above object, the invention according to claim 1 has accumulated a requirement specification input section for inputting a requirement specification of a consumer, and a design example in which a past requirement specification and its manufacturing conditions are paired. A request to search for the case base based on the requested case base and the requirement specification input from the customer using the requirement specification input unit, and to extract a design case having a requirement specification similar to the requirement specification In a manufacturing condition determining apparatus, comprising: a specification matching unit; and a case registration unit for registering actual manufacturing conditions actually adopted in accordance with the requirement specifications from the customer in the case base. The requirement specification matching unit satisfies the requirement specification from the customer from the case base when the requirement specification from the customer is not satisfied by the single design case accumulated in the case base. A plurality of design cases are extracted, and the production conditions of the plurality of design cases extracted by the requirement specification matching unit are synthesized to generate a synthesis production condition that satisfies the requirement specifications from the consumer. A composite manufacturing condition generation unit, and the case registration unit generates a storage candidate case that includes the actual manufacturing conditions based on the composite manufacturing conditions and the corresponding requirement specifications, and the storage Compare the manufacturing conditions of the stored candidate cases generated by the candidate case generation unit with the manufacturing conditions of the design cases stored in the above case base, and the above design cases having the required specifications equivalent to the required specifications of the above stored candidate cases Is already in the case base, the manufacturing conditions of the existing design case equivalent to the required specifications are replaced with the manufacturing conditions of the storage candidate case, and the storage candidate case is Wherein the design case with the required specifications equivalent requirement specifications in the absence of the above case base are those comprising a comparison section for registering in the case based on the accumulation candidate case as a novel of the design case It is comprised as a manufacturing condition determination apparatus.
Further, in the above production condition determining apparatus, the synthetic manufacturing condition generating unit, to determine whether there is a conflict between the items included in the production conditions of each design case in which a plurality extracted by the required specifications matching section, each If there is a conflict between items included in the manufacturing conditions of the design example, the gist is that the above-mentioned synthetic manufacturing conditions are generated after the conflict is resolved according to a predetermined rule.
[0005]
Above SL Manufacturing condition determining device, when the required specifications from the customer is not satisfied by the design case of a single stored in the case base, a plurality of design case so as to satisfy the required specifications from the customer Extracted from the above case base. The manufacturing conditions of the plurality of extracted design examples are synthesized after the conflict is resolved when there is a conflict between items included in the manufacturing condition, and a combined manufacturing condition is generated. In addition, the above-mentioned design example having a requirement specification equivalent to the requirement specification of the above-mentioned accumulation candidate case is generated as needed by the accumulation candidate case in which the actual production conditions actually adopted and the corresponding requirement specification are paired. Is already present in the case base, the manufacturing conditions of the existing design case equivalent to the required specification are replaced with the manufacturing conditions of the storage candidate case, and the required specification equivalent to the required specification of the storage candidate case is changed. In a case where the design case possessed does not exist in the case base, the accumulation candidate case is registered in the case base as a new design case.
That is, according to the manufacturing condition determining apparatus according to claim 1, exceptional requirement specifications there from customers, even if the required specifications from customers through the design case of a single accumulated in the case base is not satisfied Thus, a plurality of past design cases are combined to generate an appropriate manufacturing condition. Therefore, it is possible to provide a stable system that is not affected by the user's experience. In addition, it is not necessary to register the design case in the case base according to the exceptional requirement specifications, so case-based maintenance becomes easy. In addition, when a new case is added to the case base, additional registration of the new case is permitted only when there is no design case having the required specifications equivalent to the new case. When there is a design case with the required specifications equivalent to the above, the manufacturing conditions of the existing case are replaced with that of the new case. This prevents the case base from becoming bloated and degrading maintainability. it can.
[0006]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings for understanding of the present invention. The following embodiment is a specific example of the present invention, and is not of a nature that limits the technical scope of the present invention. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a schematic configuration of an apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.
The manufacturing condition determining apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention relates to an industrial material manufactured by, for example, rolling, forging, extrusion, casting, etc., and manufacturing conditions for determining manufacturing conditions according to required specifications issued by consumers. It is embodied as a determination device.
As shown in FIG. 1, the manufacturing condition determination apparatus includes a requirement specification input unit 1 for inputting a requirement specification of a customer, and a case in which design examples in which past requirement specifications and production conditions are paired are accumulated. The case base 2 is searched based on the base 2 and the requirement specification from the customer input using the requirement specification input unit 1, and a design example having a requirement specification similar to the requirement specification is extracted. A conventional apparatus in that it includes a required specification matching unit 3 and a case registration unit AD for registering actual production conditions actually employed in the case base 2 in response to the required specifications from the customer. It is the same.
On the other hand, the manufacturing condition determination device is different from the conventional device when the requirement specification matching unit 3 does not satisfy the requirement specification from the customer by a single design case stored in the case base 2. A plurality of design cases that satisfy the requirement specifications from the customer are extracted from the case base 2 and items included in the manufacturing conditions of the plurality of design cases extracted by the requirement specification matching unit 3 If there is a conflict between them, the conflict is resolved according to a predetermined rule, and then the manufacturing conditions of the plurality of extracted design examples are synthesized to generate a synthetic manufacturing condition that satisfies the required specifications from the customer. Competing resolution unit 4 (corresponding to a synthetic manufacturing condition generation unit) and a manufacturing condition display unit 5 for displaying the synthetic manufacturing conditions generated by the competitive resolution unit 4 are provided. A design case registration unit (corresponding to a storage candidate case generation unit) 6 for generating an accumulation candidate case composed of the actual production condition based on the synthetic production condition and a requirement specification corresponding to the AD, and the design case registration unit 6 is compared with the manufacturing conditions of the design cases stored in the case base, and the design case having the required specifications equivalent to the required specifications of the storage candidate cases is If the base 2 already exists, the manufacturing conditions of the existing design case equivalent to the required specification are replaced with the manufacturing conditions of the storage candidate case, and the design having the required specification equivalent to the required specification of the storage candidate case When the case does not exist in the case base 2, it includes a comparison / determination unit 7 that registers the accumulation candidate case in the case base 2 as a new design case.
[0007]
The details of the manufacturing condition determining apparatus will be described below. Here, FIG. 2 is a flowchart for explaining the operation of the manufacturing condition determining apparatus, and FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining the conflict item resolution operation in the conflict resolution unit.
In the manufacturing condition determining apparatus, first, the required specification input from the customer is input with respect to the industrial material manufactured by, for example, rolling, forging, extrusion, casting, etc. using the required specification input unit 1 (S1).
The requirement specification from the customer input using the requirement specification input unit 1 is compared with the requirement specification of the design case stored in the case base 2 in the requirement specification matching unit 3 (S2).
The design examples stored in the case base 2 are a combination of past requirement specifications and corresponding manufacturing conditions. The past requirement specifications input using the requirement specification section 1 or accumulated in the case base 2 include, for example, a plurality of items relating to standard names of industrial materials, applications, and the like. The manufacturing conditions stored in the case base 2 in pairs with the required specifications include, for example, a plurality of items relating to components, manufacturing methods, quality, and the like.
By the way, if the required specifications from customers are as specified in accordance with product standards and internal standards, only one or a very small number of design examples that have the required specifications equivalent to the above-mentioned required specifications are received from the above customers. However, as the requirement specifications from customers are exceptional ones that do not conform to the product standards and internal standards, more design examples are It corresponds to the required specification.
In the requirement specification matching unit 3, if it is determined as a result of comparison that there is no single design case that satisfies the requirement specification from the customer in the case base 2, the requirement specification from the customer is obtained. A plurality of design cases satisfying the above are extracted from the case base 2. Whether or not the requirement specification from the customer is satisfied is determined based on whether or not the item included in the requirement specification from the customer is included in the design case stored in the case base 2, for example. Determine.
Further, the comparison between the requirement specification from the customer and the requirement specification of the design example of the case base 2 is performed based on the similarity calculation. More specifically, between each item of the requirement specification from the customer input using the requirement specification input unit 1 and each item of the requirement specification of the design case stored in the case base. The harmonic distance is calculated, and a design example having a high similarity based on the harmonic distance is extracted from the case base 2.
In addition, among the items included in the above required specifications, for example, when the standard name is an indispensable item, it is assumed that the indispensable item matches.
Only the design examples that satisfy the requirement specification of the design case 要求 the requirement specification from the customer are extracted.
[0008]
The plurality of design examples extracted by the requirement specification matching unit 3 are supplied to the conflict resolution unit 4, and in the conflict resolution unit 4, contention among items included in the manufacturing conditions of the plurality of design examples occurs. Each manufacturing condition is synthesized after being resolved according to a predetermined rule (S3).
For example, as shown in FIG. 3, from the design case (required specification X, manufacturing condition Y) stored in the case base 2, the required specification matching unit 3 uses (A, α) and (B, β) 2 When two design cases are extracted and the two design cases are supplied to the conflict resolution unit 4, the conflict resolution unit 4 first compares the manufacturing conditions of the plurality of design cases. In particular, if the demand from the customer is exceptional, there is a high possibility of competition between items included in the manufacturing conditions of each design case. If there is a conflict between items included in the manufacturing conditions of each design case, the value of the item corresponding to a design case from among the multiple design cases is selected according to a predetermined rule. , The above conflict is resolved.
In the example of FIG. 3, a design example having a requirement specification set A and a design example having a requirement specification set B are extracted as corresponding to the total set X of requirement specifications from the customer. There are interfering parts (items) in the specification set A and the requirement specification set B, and there is a conflict in the parts (items) where γ = α∩β in the corresponding set of manufacturing conditions α and β. .
The predetermined rule for resolving this conflict is that if the item in which the conflict has occurred is an item that can define an order relationship such as an inspection level, the inspection level is higher for the item. This makes it possible for the consumer to make a safe selection.
In addition, if the item in which the conflict occurs is not an item for which the order relationship can be defined or there is a conflict that completely contradicts, the item is similar to the requirement specification from the customer. A design example having a high requirement specification is preferentially selected.
In accordance with this predetermined rule, for the item γ with the competition, either the value of the manufacturing condition set α or the manufacturing condition set β is selected.
Then, after the value of either of the production conditions set α, β is selected for the item γ with the competition, the production corresponding to the required specification from the customer is made from the production condition set α∪β. An overall set Y of conditions (synthetic manufacturing conditions) is synthesized.
The synthetic manufacturing conditions generated by the conflict resolution unit 4 are displayed on the manufacturing condition display unit 5 and presented to the user (S4). At this time, if the user determines that the synthetic manufacturing conditions need to be corrected, the input device corrects the data. Then, the synthetic manufacturing conditions are transferred to the production planning system or sent as instructions to each process, and the product is manufactured (S5).
The above-mentioned synthetic manufacturing conditions adopted in actual product manufacturing or the modified synthetic manufacturing conditions (actual manufacturing conditions) can be stored as design examples in the above-described case base 2 at the discretion of the user or the like. . When it is determined by the user or the like that the new design case is stored in the case base 2 (S6), the actual manufacturing conditions are supplied to the design case registration unit 6.
In the design case registration unit 6, an accumulation candidate case in which the actual production conditions are paired with the requirement specification input from the customer is generated, and the generated accumulation candidate case is supplied to the comparison determination unit 7. Is done.
The comparison / determination unit 7 performs a matching operation between the requirement specification of the accumulation candidate case and the requirement specification of the design case already accumulated in the case base 2, and is equivalent to the requirement specification of the accumulation candidate case. It is searched whether or not design cases having the required specifications are already stored in the case base 2 (S7).
If a design example having a requirement specification equivalent to the requirement specification of the accumulation candidate case has already been accumulated in the case base 2, the manufacturing condition of the design case is replaced with the production condition of the accumulation candidate case. Therefore, the manufacturing conditions of the design example are corrected so as not to compete with the manufacturing conditions of the accumulation candidate examples. On the other hand, when the design example having the requirement specification equivalent to the requirement specification of the accumulation candidate case is not accumulated in the case base 2, the accumulation candidate case is accumulated in the case base 2 as a new design case. (S8).
As described above, in the manufacturing condition determining apparatus according to the embodiment of the present invention, there is an exceptional requirement specification from the customer, and the requirement specification from the customer is not satisfied by the single design case stored in the case base. Even in this case, a suitable manufacturing condition is generated by combining a plurality of past design cases. Therefore, it is possible to provide a stable system that is not affected by the user's experience. In addition, it is not necessary to register the design case in the case base according to the exceptional requirement specifications, so case-based maintenance becomes easy. In addition, when a new case is added to the case base, additional registration of the new case is permitted only when there is no design case having the required specifications equivalent to the new case. When there is a design case with the required specifications equivalent to the above, the manufacturing conditions of the existing case are replaced with that of the new case. This prevents the case base from becoming bloated and degrading maintainability. it can.
[0009]
【Example】
In the above embodiment, whether or not to register the actual production conditions in the case base 2 is determined by the user or the like, but is not limited to this, and the actual production conditions are automatically determined. You may make it register to the said case base 2. FIG.
The required specification input unit 1, case base 2, required specification matching unit 3, conflict resolution unit 4, manufacturing condition display unit 5, design case registration unit 6, and comparison determination unit 7 do not need to be provided in the same apparatus. The storage device corresponding to the case base 2 and the interfaces such as the required specification input unit 1 and the manufacturing condition display unit 5 may be provided separately.
[0010]
【The invention's effect】
As described above, according to the manufacturing condition determination apparatus according to claim 1 , the exceptional requirement specification is from the customer, and the requirement specification from the customer is satisfied by the single design case stored in the case base. Even if it is not performed, a suitable manufacturing condition is generated by combining a plurality of past design cases. Therefore, it is possible to provide a stable system that is not affected by the user's experience. In addition, it is not necessary to register the design case in the case base according to the exceptional requirement specifications, so case-based maintenance becomes easy. In addition, when a new case is added to the case base, additional registration of the new case is permitted only when there is no design case having the required specifications equivalent to the new case. When there is a design case with the required specifications equivalent to the above, the manufacturing conditions of the existing case are replaced with that of the new case. This prevents the case base from becoming bloated and degrading maintainability. it can.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram showing a schematic configuration of a manufacturing condition determining apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a flowchart for explaining the operation of the manufacturing condition determining apparatus.
FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining conflict resolution in a conflict resolution unit included in the manufacturing condition determining apparatus.
[Explanation of symbols]
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Required specification input part 2 ... Example base 3 ... Required specification matching part 4 ... Conflict resolution part 5 ... Manufacturing condition display part 6 ... Design case registration part 7 ... Comparison determination part

Claims (1)

需要家の要求仕様を入力するための要求仕様入力部と,
過去の要求仕様とその製造条件が対となった設計事例が蓄積された事例ベースと,
上記要求仕様入力部を用いて入力された上記需要家からの要求仕様に基づいて,上記事例ベースを探索し,当該要求仕様と類似の要求仕様を有する設計事例を抽出する要求仕様マッチング部と,
上記需要家からの要求仕様に対応して,実際に採用された実績製造条件を上記事例ベースに登録するための事例登録部とを具備してなる製造条件決定装置において,
上記要求仕様マッチング部が,上記事例ベースに蓄積された単独の設計事例によって上記需要家からの要求仕様が満足されない場合に,上記事例ベースから上記需要家からの要求仕様を満足するような複数の設計事例を抽出するものであって,
上記要求仕様マッチング部により抽出された複数の設計事例の製造条件を合成し,上記需要家からの要求仕様を満足する合成製造条件を生成する合成製造条件生成部を具備し,該合成製造条件生成部が,上記要求仕様マッチング部により複数抽出された各設計事例の製造条件に含まれる項目間に競合があるか否かを判別し,各設計事例の製造条件に含まれる項目間に競合がある場合には,所定の規則に従って競合を解消した上で,上記合成製造条件を生成するものであり,
上記事例登録部が,上記合成製造条件に基づいた上記実績製造条件とそれに対応する要求仕様とからなる蓄積候補事例を生成する蓄積候補事例生成部と,上記蓄積候補事例生成部により生成された蓄積候補事例の製造条件と上記事例ベースに蓄積されている設計事例の製造条件とを比較し,上記蓄積候補事例の要求仕様と等価な要求仕様を有する上記設計事例が上記事例ベースに既に存在する場合には,上記要求仕様の等価な既存の設計事例の製造条件を上記蓄積候補事例の製造条件に置き換え,上記蓄積候補事例の要求仕様と等価な要求仕様を有する上記設計事例が上記事例ベースに存在しない場合には,上記蓄積候補事例を新規の上記設計事例として上記事例ベースに登録する比較判定部とを含むものであることを特徴とする製造条件決定装置。
A requirement specification input unit for inputting a requirement specification of a consumer;
A case base in which design cases in which past requirement specifications and manufacturing conditions are paired are accumulated,
A requirement specification matching unit that searches the example base based on the requirement specification input from the customer using the requirement specification input unit and extracts a design example having a requirement specification similar to the requirement specification;
In a manufacturing condition determination apparatus comprising a case registration unit for registering the actual manufacturing conditions actually adopted in the above-mentioned case base in response to the required specifications from the customer,
When the requirement specification matching unit does not satisfy the requirement specification from the customer by the single design case accumulated in the case base, a plurality of requirements specification matching units satisfying the requirement specification from the customer from the case base. To extract design cases,
A synthetic manufacturing condition generation unit is provided for synthesizing manufacturing conditions of a plurality of design cases extracted by the required specification matching unit, and generating a synthetic manufacturing condition satisfying the required specifications from the customer, and generating the synthetic manufacturing condition Determines whether there is a conflict between items included in the manufacturing conditions of each design case extracted by the requirement specification matching unit, and there is a conflict between items included in the manufacturing conditions of each design case. In this case, the above-mentioned synthetic manufacturing conditions are generated after the conflict is resolved according to a predetermined rule.
The case registration unit generates an accumulation candidate case that includes the actual production conditions based on the synthetic production conditions and the corresponding requirement specifications, and the accumulation generated by the accumulation candidate case generation unit. When the manufacturing conditions of the candidate case and the manufacturing conditions of the design case stored in the case base are compared, and the design case having the required specification equivalent to the requirement specification of the stored candidate case already exists in the case base In the case base, the manufacturing conditions of the existing design case equivalent to the above requirement specification are replaced with the manufacturing conditions of the above storage candidate case, and the above design case having the requirement specification equivalent to the requirement specification of the above storage candidate case exists in the above case base. If not, the production conditions determined, characterized in that those comprising a comparison section for registering in the case based on the accumulation candidate case as a novel of the design case Apparatus.
JP13507499A 1999-05-17 1999-05-17 Manufacturing condition determination device Expired - Fee Related JP3662143B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP13507499A JP3662143B2 (en) 1999-05-17 1999-05-17 Manufacturing condition determination device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP13507499A JP3662143B2 (en) 1999-05-17 1999-05-17 Manufacturing condition determination device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2000330620A JP2000330620A (en) 2000-11-30
JP3662143B2 true JP3662143B2 (en) 2005-06-22

Family

ID=15143247

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP13507499A Expired - Fee Related JP3662143B2 (en) 1999-05-17 1999-05-17 Manufacturing condition determination device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3662143B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007199748A (en) * 2004-02-18 2007-08-09 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Manufacturing system management support device and manufacturing system
JP6699311B2 (en) * 2016-04-13 2020-05-27 大同特殊鋼株式会社 Manufacturing support system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2000330620A (en) 2000-11-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20060080274A1 (en) Dynamic product association
US20090313088A1 (en) Patriotic American Shopping Network
US9716766B2 (en) Method and distributed system server for instant information push
EP2711850A1 (en) Review text output system, review text output method, program and computer-readable information storage medium
KR101707660B1 (en) An e-commerce system based on interest category using related keywords
EP1983493B1 (en) Shop scale for processing purchases
JP2002528796A5 (en)
JP5155290B2 (en) Purchase stage determination apparatus and purchase stage determination method
JP3662143B2 (en) Manufacturing condition determination device
US10445793B2 (en) Review text output system and review text output method
JP6422544B1 (en) Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and information processing program
CN104933149A (en) An information search method and device
KR102057321B1 (en) Method, system and non-transitory computer-readable recording medium for augmenting product information
JP2009199397A (en) Inventory management device, inventory management method and computer program
Alves de Oliveira Soler et al. Optimization models for a lot sizing and scheduling problem on parallel production lines that share scarce resources
KR20230000687A (en) Customized fashion information provision system using online clothing related search information
JP2022131718A (en) Vehicle component distribution support apparatus and vehicle component distribution support method
JP5793799B1 (en) Trademark support system
JP5056801B2 (en) Information providing server and information providing method
US20090299879A1 (en) Catalog Builder with an Expert System
US20180308147A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Providing a Ranked Product or Service Listing for Products at a Convention
KR20180119448A (en) Monitoring and changing system for stock management of open market
JP2550211B2 (en) Device for judging the toughness characteristics of steel products
WO2022185449A1 (en) Information processing system, information processing method, and program
JP2018190016A (en) Trademark support system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20041210

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20050106

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20050225

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20050322

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20050322

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080401

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090401

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100401

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100401

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110401

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120401

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130401

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130401

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140401

Year of fee payment: 9

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees