Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP3724198B2 - How to determine the car body for PBS - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP3724198B2 - How to determine the car body for PBS - Google Patents

How to determine the car body for PBS Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP3724198B2
JP3724198B2 JP16685798A JP16685798A JP3724198B2 JP 3724198 B2 JP3724198 B2 JP 3724198B2 JP 16685798 A JP16685798 A JP 16685798A JP 16685798 A JP16685798 A JP 16685798A JP 3724198 B2 JP3724198 B2 JP 3724198B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
pbs
car
weight value
vehicle body
vehicle
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP16685798A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH11348850A (en
Inventor
忠幸 中尾
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nissan Motor Co Ltd filed Critical Nissan Motor Co Ltd
Priority to JP16685798A priority Critical patent/JP3724198B2/en
Publication of JPH11348850A publication Critical patent/JPH11348850A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3724198B2 publication Critical patent/JP3724198B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Automatic Assembly (AREA)
  • Automobile Manufacture Line, Endless Track Vehicle, Trailer (AREA)

Description

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
この発明は、車両組立ラインの塗装工程と組立工程との間に位置する塗装済み車体ストレージ(ペインティッド・ボディー・ストレージ:PBS)に在席中の複数台の塗装済み車体のうちのどの車体を先に組立工程へ搬出するかを決定する方法に関するものである。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
自動車等の車両の組立ラインでは一般に、車体を塗装する塗装工程と、塗装済みの車体に部品(エンジンや変速機等)を組み付けて車両を組み立てる組立工程との間にPBSを設けて、組立工程の部品組付け作業の編成を考慮した車種の投入順序の調整(作業の平準化)と、組立工程で塗装済み車体に組み付ける部品の在庫管理とを行っている。
【0003】
ところで、PBSは通常、複数本の貯留レーンを並列に持っており、それらの貯留レーンには、PBS入口から入った塗装済み車体が順次振り分けられて通常複数台の塗装済み車体が在席する。そして組立工程にそれらの塗装済み車体のうちのどれを先に組立工程へ搬出するかは、従来は、その車体に組み付ける部品の在庫がある等の、成立しないと組立作業を行い得ない絶対条件の他、以下の三つの十分条件すなわち、(a) 複数種類の車種間の組立台数比率が設定比率を満たす(設定比率に対して所定許容差内に納まる)という比率条件と、(b) 搬出のための回送台数(貯留レーンの先頭にない車体をPBS出口に払い出すために先にPBS出口から回送レーンを通してPBS入口に戻す、その搬出する車体よりも貯留レーンの先頭側にある車体の台数)が所定台数以下である(従って短時間で搬出できる)という回送台数条件と、オフライン(工場からの出荷)の期日が近いというオフライン期日条件とを考慮し、それら三つの十分条件にそれぞれ重み値を設定して、先の絶対条件を満たす複数台の車体のうちからその重み付けに基づいて決定していた。
【0004】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
しかしながら上記従来の方法では、上記三つの十分条件の各々の重み値の設定が固定されていたため、車種間の組立台数比率の設定比率に対する差が所定許容差より大きくなってそれを補正するように先に搬出する車体を決定しようとしても他の十分条件に妨げられてそれができず、またPBSにオフライン期日が近い作業遅延車が多く在席していても他の十分条件に妨げられてそれができず、さらにPBSと組立(トリム)工程との間のトリムバッファに貯留されている車体台数が少なくなって回送台数の少ない車体を搬出しようとしても他の十分条件に妨げられてそれができないといった不都合があった。
【0005】
【課題を解決するための手段およびその作用・効果】
この発明は、上記三つの十分条件の各々の重みの設定を状況に応じて適切に変化させることで上記課題を有利に解決した搬出車体決定方法を提供することを目的とするものであり、この発明のPBS用搬出車体決定方法は、PBS出口からPBS入口への回送レーンを持つPBSと、トリムバッファと、組立工程とを順次に具える車両組立ラインにおいて、PBSに在席中の複数台の塗装済み車体のうちのどの車体を先に組立工程へ搬出するかを決定するに際し、前記PBSから車体を一台搬出する毎に、複数種類の車種間の組立台数比率に関する重み値を設定比率に対する実際の組立台数の比率のずれに基づいて求めるとともに、回送台数に関する重み値を前記PBSとその後の組立工程との間のトリムバッファの充填状況に基づいて求め、前記複数台の車体のうちの在庫部品の割り当てがありかつ他の所定の絶対条件を満たす搬出候補の車体のうちから、少なくとも前記組立台数比率に関する重み値および回送台数に関する重み値に基づいて、先に組立工程へ搬出する車体を決定することを特徴とするものである。
【0006】
かかる方法によれば、PBSから車体を一台搬出する毎に、組立台数比率に関する重み値および回送台数に関する重み値を求めて少なくともそれらの重み値に基づき、PBSに在席中の複数台の車体のうちの在庫部品の割り当てがありかつ他の所定の絶対条件を満たす搬出候補の車体のうちから、先に組立工程へ搬出する車体を決定するので、組立台数比率に関する重み値や回送台数に関する重み値の設定を流動化させて、組立工程での組立実績の状況やトリムバッファの充填状況に応じてそれらの値を適切に変化させることができ、従って、より適切な順列で、組立工程へ車体を搬出することができる。
【0007】
なお、この発明の方法においては、前記搬出候補の車体のうちから、少なくとも前記組立台数比率に関する重み値および回送台数に関する重み値に基づいて決定した車体を優先して搬出する際、その車体が複数台ある場合に、オフライン期日に関する重み値を、組立作業の着手の遅れの程度に基づいて車体毎に求め、そのオフライン期日に関する重み値に基づいて、前記複数台の車体のうちから先に組立工程へ搬出する車体を決定することとしても良い。
【0008】
このようにすれば、搬出決定した車体が複数台ある場合に、その複数台のなかでもオフライン期日の遵守のために優先すべき車体を、先にPBSから搬出することができる。
【0009】
さらに、この発明の方法においては、在庫部品の割り当てを行って前記搬出候補の車体を選出するに際し、前記PBSの各貯留レーンの先頭から、前記トリムバッファの充填状況に基づく台数分のみに在庫部品の割り当てを行うこととしても良い。
【0010】
従来のPBS在席車体への在庫部品の割り当ては、塗装工程を出た塗装済み車体がPBSに入る時点で行うか、各貯留レーンから出た塗装済み車体がトリムバッファと回送レーンとの分岐点であるPBS出口に来た時点で行うかしていたため、前者の場合には在庫数の限度から、搬出したい車体に在庫部品が割り当てられない場合があり、後者の場合には組立工程の部品組付け作業の編成を考慮した車種の投入順序で車体をPBS出口に移動させても在庫部品が割り当てられず回送レーンに移さざるをえない場合があった処、上記のようにしてトリムバッファの充填状況に基づき、各貯留レーンの先頭から、回送レーンに回送してもトリムバッファの貯留台数が不足しない台数分のみに在庫部品の割り当てを行えば、搬出可能な車体のみに在庫部品を割り当てることになるので、搬出したい車体に在庫部品が割り当てられないという不都合を限られた在庫数でも有効に防止でき、しかも搬出可能な車体には在庫部品が割り当てられているので、部品組付け作業の編成を考慮した車種の投入順序を守って車体を搬出することができる。
【0011】
【発明の実施の形態】
以下に、この発明の実施の形態を実施例によって、図面に基づき詳細に説明する。ここに、図1は、この発明のPBS用搬出車体決定方法を車両としての自動車の組立ラインのPBSに適用した一実施例の処理手順を示すフローチャート、図2は、その実施例の方法で搬出車体を決定するPBSを示すレイアウト図であり、この図2に示すPBSは、各々コンベヤラインで構成された複数本の貯留レーン1を並列に持ち、それらの貯留レーン1はPBS入口2の先でそれぞれ分岐するとともにPBS出口3の手前で合流しており、それらの貯留レーン1には、図示しない塗装工程からリフタ4で送られて来てコンベヤラインによりPBS入口2から入れられた塗装済み車体5が、在席数の少ない貯留レーン1から順に振り分けられて各貯留レーン1に先詰めで並べられることにより、複数台貯留されている。
【0012】
そして当該PBSのPBS出口3には、この例では四台の車体5を貯留可能なトリムバッファ6を介して、図示しない組立工程へ至るもう一台のリフタ7が接続されており、またそのPBS出口3には、トリムバッファ6へ向かうコンベヤラインと分岐して上記PBS入口2へ向かうコンベヤラインである回送レーン8が設けられている。
【0013】
しかしてここでは、図示しない組立ライン管理コンピュータが、図1に示す処理を実行し、そのステップ11では、シフト毎あるいは日毎の、変数の初期設定処理等の初期処理を行い、次のステップ12では、上記組立工程から塗装済み車体5の搬出要求があったか否かを判断する。
【0014】
そして搬出要求があった場合には、ステップ13に進んで、成立していないと組立作業ができなくなるため搬出にあたって成立していることが絶対必要な絶対条件、例えば組立工程での組立作業の編成を考慮した間隔台数(例えばサンルーフ仕様の車体は二台おき等)や連続台数(例えば自動変速機仕様の車体は連続四台まで等)となっていること、重要な在庫部品(エンジンや変速機等)の割り当てがあること、プレトリム作業(サンルーフ部品の予備組立等)が完了していること等をチェックして、PBSに貯留されている複数台の車体のうちからその絶対条件を満たす一または複数台の車体を搬出候補として選択する。
【0015】
なお、上記在庫部品の割り当てを行うに際し、この実施例では、PBSの各貯留レーン1の先頭から、トリムバッファ6の充填状況に基づく台数分のみに在庫部品の割り当てを行う。すなわち、ここにおけるトリムバッファ6は四台の車体5が貯留可能であるから、例えば図2に示すようにそこに二台の車体5が貯留されていて、その二台が組立工程に入るまでの間にPBSの貯留レーン1から多くても二台の車体5しか回送レーン8を通して回送することができないとすると、それら二台を回送したとして図2中二点鎖線で囲んで示す各貯留レーン1の先頭から三台目の車体5までの分が現時点で搬出可能な車体となり、ここではそれら先頭付近の車体5のみに、在庫部品の割り当てを行う。従って、上記搬出候補の車体はそれら先頭付近の車体5の何れかとなる。
【0016】
次のステップ14では、組立作業の平準化や出荷時期管理等のために最適となるように上記搬出候補中から先に搬出する車体を決定するために、従来と同様、以下の三つの十分条件すなわち、(a) 複数種類の車種間の組立台数比率が設定比率を満たす(設定比率に対して所定許容差内に納まる)という比率条件と、(b) 搬出のための回送台数(貯留レーンの先頭にない車体をPBS出口に払い出すために先にPBS出口から回送レーンを通してPBS入口に戻す、その搬出する車体よりも貯留レーンの先頭側にある車体の台数)が所定台数以下である(従って短時間で搬出できる)という回送台数条件と、(c) オフライン(工場からの出荷)の期日が近いというオフライン期日条件とをチェックして、それら三つの十分条件にそれぞれ重み値を設定し、それらの重み値による重み付けに基づいて、先に搬出する車体を決定する。
【0017】
但し、この実施例の方法では、上記各条件の重み値を固定とせず、上記ステップ11の初期処理で上記各条件の重み値をそれぞれ1.0 にリセットした後、図3のフローチャートに示すように、当該ステップ14の実行時点(現時点)の組立ラインの状況に基づいて随時求める。
【0018】
図3中のステップ21では、上記(a) の比率条件での順位付けを行い、その比率条件での順位付けは、従来既知のターリー計算によって行う。「ターリー計算」とは、出現確率を順次加算してゆき、1を越えたらその項目を選択してその項目の累計値から1を減算する、という処理を繰り返す計算方法であり、例えば、生産する車種がA,B,Cの三種類あって、その生産台数の比率がA車が2、B車が3、C車が5である場合には、出現確率はA車が2/(2+3+5)=0.2 、B車が3/(2+3+5)=0.3 、C車が5/(2+3+5)=0.5 となり、累積値は、最初はA車が0、B車が0、C車が0、一回加算後は、A車が0.2 、B車が0.3 、C車が0.5 、二回加算後は、A車が0.4 、B車が0.6 、C車が1.0 となる。従って、この時点で先ずC車を選択するとともにそのC車の累積値から1を引いて0とする。
【0019】
三回加算後は、A車が0.6 、B車が0.9 、C車が0.5 、四回加算後は、A車が0.8 、B車が1.2 、C車が1.0 となる。従って、この時点でB車とC車を選択するとともにそれらB車とC車の累積値から1を引いてそれぞれ0.2 および0とする。五回加算後は、A車が1.0 、B車が0.5 、C車が0.5 となる。従って、この時点でA車を選択するとともにそのA車の累積値から1を引いて0とする。六回加算後は、A車が0.2 、B車が0.8 、C車が1.0 となる。従って、この時点でC車を選択するとともにそのC車の累積値から1を引いて0とする。また、七回加算後は、A車が0.4 、B車が1.1 、C車が0.5 となる。従って、この時点でB車を選択するとともにそのB車の累積値から1を引いて0.1 とする。
【0020】
さらに八回加算後は、A車が0.6 、B車が0.4 、C車が1.0 となる。従って、この時点でC車を選択するとともにそのC車の累積値から1を引いて0とする。そして九回加算後は、A車が0.8 、B車が0.7 、C車が0.5 、十回加算後は、A車が1.0 、B車が1.0 、C車が1.0 となる。従って、この時点でA車とB車とC車を選択するとともにそれらA車とB車とC車の累積値から1を引いてそれぞれ0とする。これにより、搬出順序は、C車,B車,C車,A車,C車,B車,C車,A車,B車,C車の順となり、A車対B車対C車の比率は、上記設定された2対3対5となる。
【0021】
このようにして上記ステップ21では、搬出候補の複数台の車体5に、車種毎に搬出順位を付け、続くステップ22では、その比率条件自体の重み付けの計算を行い、この計算では、例えば当シフトあるいは当日の生産計画台数を基準として、先ず、その生産計画台数全体に対する各車種の生産計画台数の比率を求める。例えば生産計画台数全体が200 台で、そのうちA車が100 台、B車が50台、C車が30台、D車が20台とすると、A車は0.5 、B車は0.25、C車は0.15、D車は0.1 となる。これらの値を図4に示すように二次元グラフの軸上にそれぞれプロットして直線で結ぶと、計画領域Pとなる。次にここでは、現時点以前に組立工程に搬出した一定台数、例えば上記生産計画台数全体の200 台の車体5における各車種の台数の比率を求める。例えばA車が80台、B車が60台、C車が40台、D車が20台とすると、A車は0.4 、B車は0.3 、C車は0.2 、D車は0.1 となる。これらの値を上記二次元グラフの軸上にそれぞれプロットとして直線で結ぶと、実績領域Qとなる。そしてここでは、それら計画領域Pと実績領域Qとが重なっている図4中斜線を引いた部分Rの面積を、上記計画領域Pの面積で割って、面積比Bを求め(B<1.0 )、さらに元の比率の重み値1.0 をその面積比Bで割って、現時点での比率の重み値を求める。従って、計画比率に対して実績比率がずれる程、面積比Bが小さくなって、比率の重み値が1.0 よりも大きな値になる。
【0022】
次のステップ23では、上記(b) の回送台数条件での順位付けを行い、この順位付けは、上記在庫部品の割り当てを行った搬出候補の車体5のうちで、その車体5よりも貯留レーン1の先頭側に位置する車体5の台数が少ない程順位が高いものとする。従って、それよりも貯留レーン1の先頭側に位置する車体5の台数が同じ車体5は同じ順位とする。
【0023】
続くステップ24では、その回送台数条件自体の重み付けの計算を行い、この計算では、トリムバッファ6に現時点で在席している車体5の台数を、トリムバッファ6に設備的に貯留可能な車体5の台数で割って、トリムバッファ6の現時点での充填率Aを求め(A<1.0 )、さらに元の回送台数の重み値1.0 をその充填率Aで割って、現時点での回送台数の重み値を求める。従って、トリムバッファ6の在席台数が減る程、充填率Aが小さくなって、回送台数の重み値が1.0 よりも大きな値になる。例えば図2に示すように、トリムバッファ6が四台の車体5を貯留可能であって、例えばそこに二台の車体5が在席している場合は、充填率A=2/4=0.5 となり、回送台数の重み値=1.0 /0.5 =2.0 となる。
【0024】
次のステップ25では、上記(c) のオフライン期日条件での順位付けを行い、この順位付けは、図5に示すように、搬出候補の複数台の車体5のうち、生産計画に対して現時点で組立工程への搬出が遅れている車体5を対象として、それら搬出が遅れている車体5の各々の遅れ時間(分)を、それらの遅れ時間の合計で割って、各車体5の遅れ時間の重み値を求め、その重み値が大きい程順位が高いものとする。例えば図5中では、車体▲3▼の遅れ時間の重み値=車体▲3▼の遅れ時間/車体▲1▼〜▲4▼の遅れ時間の合計となり、車体▲4▼の遅れ時間の重み値=車体▲4▼の遅れ時間/車体▲1▼〜▲4▼の遅れ時間の合計となる。従ってここでは、その遅れ時間の重み値により、遅れの順番のみならず遅れの度合いを数値的に把握することが可能になる。
【0025】
続くステップ26では、そのオフライン期日条件自体の重み付けの計算を行い、この計算では、先にステップ22で求めた比率条件の重み値とステップ24で求めた回送台数条件の重み値との平均値を求めて、それをオフライン期日条件の重み値とする。これによりこの実施例では、比率条件の重み値と回送台数条件の重み値とが同一にならない限り常に、オフライン期日条件の重み値が二番目に大きな値となり、比率条件の重み値と回送台数条件の重み値との何れかが一番大きな重み値になる。
【0026】
最後のステップ27では、総合判定を行い、ここでは、搬出候補の複数台の車体5のうちから、上記比率条件と回送台数条件とのうちで重み値が大きい方に従って、先に組立工程へ搬出する車体5を仮決定する。そしてその仮決定した車体5が一台の場合には、それを先に組立工程へ搬出する車体5に決定し、またその仮決定した車体5が複数台の場合には、上記オフライン期日条件での順位付けに従って、それら複数台のうちのオフライン期日条件での順位が一番のものを、先に組立工程へ搬出する車体5に決定する。
【0027】
このようにして先に組立工程へ搬出する車体5に決定した後は、図1のステップ15で、その決定した車体を組立工程へ搬出するように、設備制御用PLC(プログラマブル・ロジック・コントローラ)への搬出車体指示信号の送信等の処理を行う。
【0028】
かくして上記実施例の方法によれば、PBSから車体5を一台搬出する毎に、(a) の組立台数比率に関する重み値および(b) の回送台数に関する重み値を求めて少なくともそれらの重み値に基づき、PBSに在席中の複数台の車体5のうちの在庫部品の割り当てがありかつ他の上記絶対条件を満たす搬出候補の車体5のうちから、先に組立工程へ搬出する車体5を決定するので、組立台数比率に関する重み値や回送台数に関する重み値の設定を流動化させて、組立工程での組立実績の状況やトリムバッファの充填状況に応じてそれらの値を適切に変化させることができ、従って、より適切な順列で、組立工程へ車体5を搬出することができる。
【0029】
しかも上記実施例の方法によれば、搬出候補の車体5のうちから組立台数比率に関する重み値および回送台数に関する重み値に基づいて決定した車体5を優先して搬出する際、その車体5が複数台ある場合に、オフライン期日に関する重み値を、組立作業の着手の遅れの程度に基づいて車体毎に求め、そのオフライン期日に関する重み値に基づいて、先に組立工程へ搬出する車体5を決定するので、搬出決定した車体5が複数台ある場合に、その複数台のなかでもオフライン期日の遵守のために優先すべき車体を、先にPBSから搬出することができる。
【0030】
そして上記実施例の方法によれば、在庫部品の割り当てを行って搬出候補の車体5を選出するに際し、PBSの各貯留レーン1の先頭から、トリムバッファ6の充填状況に基づき回送レーンに回送してもトリムバッファの貯留台数が不足しない台数分のみに在庫部品の割り当てを行うので、搬出可能な車体5のみに在庫部品を割り当てることができ、従って、搬出したい車体5に在庫部品が割り当てられないという不都合を限られた在庫数でも有効に防止でき、しかも搬出可能な車体5には在庫部品が割り当てられているので、部品組付け作業の編成を考慮した車種の投入順序を守って車体5を組立工程に搬出することができる。
【0031】
以上、図示例に基づき説明したが、この発明は上述の例に限定されるものでなく、例えば、上記絶対条件や十分条件として、さらに他の条件を加えても良く、また上記実施例では十分条件チェックで比率条件と回送台数条件とのうちの重み値が大きい方に基づいて先に組立工程へ搬出する車体5を決定したが、現時点での比率条件と回送台数条件とオフライン期日とのそれぞれの重み値に応じて、従来の固定された重み値の場合と同様にして先に組立工程へ搬出する車体5を決定しても良い。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】この発明のPBS用搬出車体決定方法を車両としての自動車の組立ラインのPBSに適用した一実施例の処理手順を示すフローチャートである。
【図2】上記実施例の方法で搬出車体を決定するPBSを示すレイアウト図である。
【図3】図1に示す上記実施例の方法における十分条件チェックの手順を示すフローチャートである。
【図4】図3に示す上記十分条件チェックにおける比率条件の重み付けの計算方法を示す説明図である。
【図5】図3に示す上記十分条件チェックにおけるオフライン期日条件での順位付けの計算方法を示す説明図である。
【符号の説明】
1 貯留レーン
2 PBS入口
3 PBS出口
4 リフタ
5 塗装済み車体
6 トリムバッファ
7 リフタ
8 回送レーン
[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a painted body storage (PBS) positioned between the painting process and the assembling process of a vehicle assembly line, which one of a plurality of painted car bodies is present. The present invention relates to a method for determining whether to carry out the assembly process first.
[0002]
[Prior art]
In the assembly line of vehicles such as automobiles, PBS is generally provided between the painting process of painting the car body and the assembly process of assembling the vehicle by assembling parts (engine, transmission, etc.) to the painted car body. The adjustment of the order of loading the vehicle types in consideration of the organization of the parts assembly work (leveling of the work) and the inventory management of the parts to be assembled to the painted car body in the assembly process are performed.
[0003]
By the way, the PBS usually has a plurality of storage lanes in parallel, and the painted bodies that have entered from the PBS inlet are sequentially distributed to the storage lanes, and usually a plurality of painted bodies are present. Which of these pre-painted car bodies is to be transported to the assembly process first in the assembly process is an absolute condition that the assembly work cannot be performed unless it has been established. In addition to the following three sufficient conditions, (a) the ratio condition that the ratio of the number of assembled vehicles among multiple types of vehicles satisfies the set ratio (contains within a predetermined tolerance with respect to the set ratio), and (b) unloading Number of vehicles on the front side of the storage lane from the PBS outlet to return to the PBS inlet through the forwarding lane in order to pay out the vehicle body not at the head of the storage lane to the PBS outlet ) Is less than the specified number (and therefore can be carried out in a short time), and the offline due date condition that the offline (shipment from the factory) date is near, and these three sufficient Set each weight value matter, it was determined on the basis of the weighting among the absolute satisfy a plurality of vehicle ahead.
[0004]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
However, in the above-mentioned conventional method, since the setting of the weight value of each of the above three sufficient conditions is fixed, the difference between the set number ratios of the number of assembled vehicles between the vehicle types is larger than a predetermined tolerance so that it is corrected. Even if you try to decide which car body you want to carry out first, you can't do it because it is hindered by other sufficient conditions. In addition, even if the number of vehicle bodies stored in the trim buffer between the PBS and the assembly (trim) process decreases and an attempt is made to carry out a vehicle body with a small number of forwarded vehicles, it cannot be prevented because of other sufficient conditions. There was inconvenience.
[0005]
[Means for solving the problems and their functions and effects]
An object of the present invention is to provide a method for determining a carry-out vehicle body that advantageously solves the above-described problem by appropriately changing the weight setting of each of the three sufficient conditions according to the situation. PBS for unloading vehicle determination method of the invention includes a PBS having a forwarding lane from PBS outlet to PBS inlet, and trim the buffer, in a vehicle assembly line sequentially comprises the assembly process, the plurality of in presence of PBS When deciding which of the painted car bodies to be transported to the assembly process first, each time one car body is transported from the PBS, a weight value for the ratio of the number of assembled cars among multiple types of car models is set against the set ratio. Based on the difference in the ratio of the actual number of units to be assembled, the weight value for the number of units to be transferred is determined based on the filling condition of the trim buffer between the PBS and the subsequent assembly process. From among the unloading candidate vehicle bodies that have stock parts assigned among the plurality of vehicle bodies and satisfy other predetermined absolute conditions, at least based on the weight value related to the assembly number ratio and the weight value related to the number of forwarded vehicles, The vehicle body to be carried out to the assembly process is determined first.
[0006]
According to such a method, each time one vehicle body is carried out from the PBS, a weight value related to the assembly number ratio and a weight value related to the number of transported vehicles are obtained, and based on at least those weight values, a plurality of vehicle bodies present in the PBS are present. Of these, the body to be transported to the assembly process is determined from among the unsuccessful car bodies that have been assigned inventory parts and satisfy other predetermined absolute conditions. It is possible to change the value settings according to the assembly performance status in the assembly process and the filling condition of the trim buffer, and to change the values to the assembly process in a more appropriate permutation. Can be carried out.
[0007]
In the method of the present invention, when carrying out with priority the vehicle body determined based on at least the weight value related to the assembly number ratio and the weight value related to the number of transported vehicles from among the carry-out candidate vehicle bodies, If there is a vehicle, a weight value related to the offline date is obtained for each vehicle body based on the degree of delay in starting the assembly work, and an assembly process is first performed among the plurality of vehicle bodies based on the weight value related to the offline date. It is also possible to determine the vehicle body to be carried out.
[0008]
In this way, when there are a plurality of vehicle bodies determined to be carried out, the vehicle body to be prioritized for compliance with the offline date can be carried out from the PBS first.
[0009]
Furthermore, in the method of the present invention, when selecting the carry-out candidate vehicle body by allocating the inventory parts, the inventory parts are only supplied from the head of each storage lane of the PBS based on the number of trim buffers filled. May be assigned.
[0010]
Allocation of stock parts to a conventional PBS seated car body is performed when the painted car body that has gone through the painting process enters the PBS, or the painted car body that comes out of each storage lane is a branch point between the trim buffer and the forwarding lane. In the former case, stock parts may not be allocated to the car body to be carried out due to the limit of the number of stocks. Filling the trim buffer as described above, even if the car body was moved to the PBS outlet in the order of loading the car model in consideration of the organization of the attaching work, there was a case where the stock parts were not allocated and moved to the forwarding lane. Based on the situation, if inventory parts are allocated only from the beginning of each storage lane to the number of trim buffer storage units that are forwarded to the forwarding lane, inventory parts can only be found in the vehicle that can be carried out. Since parts will be allocated, the inconvenience of not being able to allocate stock parts to the body to be carried out can be effectively prevented even with a limited number of stocks. The vehicle body can be carried out in accordance with the order in which the vehicle types are taken into account in consideration of the attachment work.
[0011]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of one embodiment in which the PBS carrying body determination method of the present invention is applied to a PBS of an automobile assembly line as a vehicle, and FIG. 2 is a carrying out method according to the embodiment. FIG. 3 is a layout diagram showing a PBS for determining a vehicle body. The PBS shown in FIG. 2 has a plurality of storage lanes 1 each constituted by a conveyor line, and these storage lanes 1 are located at the end of the PBS inlet 2. Each of them branches and merges before the PBS outlet 3, and in these storage lanes 1, a painted vehicle body 5 that is sent from a painting process (not shown) by a lifter 4 and entered from the PBS inlet 2 by a conveyor line. However, a plurality of units are stored by being sorted in order from the storage lane 1 with a small number of seats and arranged in advance in each storage lane 1.
[0012]
The PBS outlet 3 of the PBS is connected to another lifter 7 that leads to an assembly process (not shown) via a trim buffer 6 that can store four vehicle bodies 5 in this example. The outlet 3 is provided with a transfer lane 8 that is a conveyor line that branches from the conveyor line toward the trim buffer 6 and goes to the PBS inlet 2.
[0013]
Therefore, here, an assembly line management computer (not shown) executes the processing shown in FIG. 1. In step 11, initial processing such as variable initial setting processing is performed for each shift or each day. Then, it is determined whether or not there is a request for carrying out the painted vehicle body 5 from the assembly process.
[0014]
If there is a request for unloading, the process proceeds to step 13, and if it is not established, assembly work cannot be performed. Therefore, it is absolutely necessary that the condition is satisfied for unloading, for example, assembly of assembly work in the assembly process. (For example, every two sunroof specification bodies) or continuous numbers (for example, up to four automatic transmission specification bodies), important inventory parts (engines and transmissions, etc.) Etc.) and that pre-trim work (preliminary assembly of sunroof parts, etc.) has been completed, etc. Select multiple vehicle bodies as carry-out candidates.
[0015]
In addition, when allocating the inventory parts, in this embodiment, the inventory parts are allocated only from the head of each storage lane 1 of PBS to the number of units based on the filling state of the trim buffer 6. That is, since the trim buffer 6 can store four vehicle bodies 5, for example, as shown in FIG. 2, there are two vehicle bodies 5 stored therein, and until the two vehicles enter the assembly process. Assuming that only two vehicle bodies 5 can be sent through the forwarding lane 8 at most from the PBS storage lane 1 in the meantime, each of the storage lanes 1 surrounded by a two-dot chain line in FIG. From the beginning of the vehicle to the third vehicle body 5 is the vehicle body that can be carried out at the present time, and here, only the vehicle body 5 near the head is assigned the stock parts. Therefore, the above-mentioned carry-out candidate vehicle body is any one of the vehicle bodies 5 near the head.
[0016]
In the next step 14, in order to determine the body to be transported first from among the above candidates to be optimal for leveling of assembly work and shipping time management, the following three sufficient conditions are set as before: In other words, (a) a ratio condition that the ratio of the number of assembled vehicles among a plurality of types of vehicles satisfies the set ratio (contains within a predetermined tolerance with respect to the set ratio), and (b) the number of forwarded vehicles for unloading (of the storage lane In order to pay out the vehicle body that is not at the top to the PBS outlet, the number of the vehicle bodies on the front side of the storage lane from the PBS outlet is returned to the PBS inlet through the forwarding lane is less than the predetermined number (accordingly) setting a forwarding number provided that unloading can be) in a short time, the date is checked and offline date its proximity, each to their three sufficient conditions weight value (c) off-line (delivery from the factory) , Based on weighting by their weight values to determine the vehicle body for unloading above.
[0017]
However, in the method of this embodiment, the weight values of the respective conditions are not fixed, and the weight values of the respective conditions are reset to 1.0 in the initial process of the step 11, respectively, as shown in the flowchart of FIG. It is obtained as needed based on the state of the assembly line at the time of execution of step 14 (current time).
[0018]
In step 21 in FIG. 3, ranking is performed under the ratio condition (a) above, and ranking under the ratio condition is performed by a conventionally known Thali calculation. “Tully calculation” is a calculation method that repeats the process of sequentially adding appearance probabilities, selecting an item when 1 is exceeded, and subtracting 1 from the cumulative value of the item, for example, producing If there are three types of cars, A, B, and C, and the ratio of the number of vehicles produced is 2 for the A car, 3 for the B car, and 5 for the C car, the appearance probability is 2 / (2 + 3 + 5) for the A car. = 0.2, Car B is 3 / (2 + 3 + 5) = 0.3, Car C is 5 / (2 + 3 + 5) = 0.5. Cumulative values are 0 for Car A, 0 for Car B, 0 for Car C, and add once. After that, Car A is 0.2, Car B is 0.3, Car C is 0.5, and after adding twice, Car A is 0.4, Car B is 0.6, Car C is 1.0. Therefore, at this time, the C car is first selected and 1 is subtracted from the accumulated value of the C car to 0.
[0019]
After adding three times, Car A is 0.6, Car B is 0.9, Car C is 0.5, and after adding four times, Car A is 0.8, Car B is 1.2, Car C is 1.0. Therefore, at this time point, the B car and the C car are selected, and 1 is subtracted from the accumulated values of the B car and the C car to obtain 0.2 and 0, respectively. After adding 5 times, Car A will be 1.0, Car B will be 0.5, Car C will be 0.5. Therefore, at this time, the A car is selected and 1 is subtracted from the accumulated value of the A car to 0. After adding six times, the A car is 0.2, the B car is 0.8, and the C car is 1.0. Therefore, at this time, the C car is selected and 1 is subtracted from the accumulated value of the C car to be 0. In addition, after adding seven times, the A car is 0.4, the B car is 1.1, and the C car is 0.5. Therefore, at this time, the B car is selected and 1 is subtracted from the accumulated value of the B car to 0.1.
[0020]
After adding 8 times, the A car is 0.6, the B car is 0.4, and the C car is 1.0. Therefore, at this time, the C car is selected and 1 is subtracted from the accumulated value of the C car to be 0. After nine additions, the A car is 0.8, the B car is 0.7, the C car is 0.5, and after ten additions, the A car is 1.0, the B car is 1.0, and the C car is 1.0. Therefore, at this time point, the A car, the B car, and the C car are selected, and 1 is subtracted from the accumulated values of the A car, the B car, and the C car to be 0 respectively. Thus, the carry-out order is C car, B car, C car, A car, C car, B car, C car, A car, B car, C car, and the ratio of A car to B car to C car. Is 2 to 3 to 5 set as described above.
[0021]
In this way, in step 21 described above, the carry-out rank is assigned to each of the plurality of vehicle bodies 5 as carry-out candidates for each vehicle type, and in the following step 22, the weighting of the ratio condition itself is calculated. Alternatively, on the basis of the production planned number of the day, first, the ratio of the production planned number of each vehicle type to the entire production planned number is obtained. For example, if the total number of production units is 200, of which 100 are A, 50 are B, 30 are C, and 20 are D, A is 0.5, B is 0.25, and C is 0.15, and for D cars 0.1. When these values are plotted on the axes of the two-dimensional graph and connected with straight lines as shown in FIG. Next, here, the ratio of the number of each vehicle type in the 200 vehicle bodies 5 of the certain number of vehicles carried out in the assembly process before the present time, for example, the total number of the production planned above is obtained. For example, assuming that there are 80 cars A, 60 cars B, 40 cars C, and 20 cars D, car A is 0.4, car B is 0.3, car C is 0.2, car D is 0.1. When these values are connected with straight lines as plots on the axes of the two-dimensional graph, a result area Q is obtained. In this example, the area of the portion R in FIG. 4 where the plan area P and the actual area Q overlap is divided by the area of the plan area P to obtain the area ratio B (B <1.0). Further, the original ratio weight value 1.0 is divided by the area ratio B to obtain the current ratio weight value. Therefore, the area ratio B becomes smaller as the actual ratio deviates from the planned ratio, and the ratio weight value becomes larger than 1.0.
[0022]
In the next step 23, ranking is performed under the condition of the number of forwarded vehicles described in (b) above, and this ranking is based on the storage lane more than the vehicle body 5 among the vehicle bodies 5 to which the stock parts are assigned. It is assumed that the lower the number of vehicle bodies 5 located on the top side of 1, the higher the order. Accordingly, the vehicle bodies 5 having the same number of vehicle bodies 5 positioned on the front side of the storage lane 1 are given the same rank.
[0023]
In the subsequent step 24, the weighting of the forward vehicle number condition itself is calculated. In this calculation, the number of the vehicle bodies 5 currently seated in the trim buffer 6 is stored in the trim buffer 6 as a facility. To determine the current filling rate A of the trim buffer 6 (A <1.0), and further divide the original forwarding unit weight value 1.0 by the filling rate A to obtain the current forwarding unit weight value. Ask for. Therefore, as the number of seats in the trim buffer 6 decreases, the filling rate A decreases, and the weight value of the number of forwarded vehicles becomes a value greater than 1.0. For example, as shown in FIG. 2, when the trim buffer 6 can store four vehicle bodies 5 and, for example, two vehicle bodies 5 are present there, the filling rate A = 2/4 = 0.5. Thus, the weight value of the number of transported units = 1.0 / 0.5 = 2.0.
[0024]
In the next step 25, ranking is performed based on the offline date condition of (c) above. As shown in FIG. For each of the vehicle bodies 5 that are delayed to the assembly process, the delay time (minutes) of each of the vehicle bodies 5 that are unloaded is divided by the sum of the delay times to obtain the delay time of each vehicle body 5. The weight value is obtained, and the higher the weight value, the higher the ranking. For example, in FIG. 5, the weight value of the delay time of the vehicle body (3) = the delay time of the vehicle body (3) / the total delay time of the vehicle bodies (1) to (4). = Delay time of vehicle body (4) / Total delay time of vehicle bodies (1) to (4). Therefore, here, it is possible to grasp not only the order of delay but also the degree of delay numerically by the weight value of the delay time.
[0025]
In the subsequent step 26, the weighting of the offline due date condition itself is calculated, and in this calculation, the average value of the weight value of the ratio condition previously obtained in step 22 and the weight value of the number-of-feeds condition obtained in step 24 is calculated. Find it and use it as the weight value for the offline due date condition. Thus, in this embodiment, unless the weight value of the ratio condition and the weight value of the forwarding number condition are the same, the weight value of the offline date condition is always the second largest value, and the weight value of the ratio condition and the forwarding number condition Is the largest weight value.
[0026]
In the final step 27, a comprehensive determination is made. Here, out of a plurality of vehicle bodies 5 to be carried out, the vehicle is first carried out to the assembly process in accordance with the one having the larger weight value between the ratio condition and the number-of-forwarding-vehicle condition. The vehicle body 5 to be temporarily determined. When the provisionally determined vehicle body 5 is one, it is determined as the vehicle body 5 to be carried out to the assembly process first, and when the provisionally determined vehicle bodies 5 are plural, the offline date condition is satisfied. In accordance with the ranking, the vehicle body 5 that has the highest ranking in the offline due date condition among the plurality of units is determined as the vehicle body 5 to be carried out to the assembly process first.
[0027]
After determining the vehicle body 5 to be carried out first in the assembly process in this way, in step 15 of FIG. 1, the equipment control PLC (programmable logic controller) is arranged so that the decided vehicle body is carried out to the assembly process. Processing such as transmission of an unloading vehicle body instruction signal is performed.
[0028]
Thus, according to the method of the above embodiment, each time one vehicle body 5 is unloaded from the PBS, (a) the weight value related to the assembly number ratio and (b) the weight value related to the number of transported vehicles are obtained and at least those weight values are obtained. On the basis of the above, the vehicle body 5 that is assigned to inventory parts among the plurality of vehicle bodies 5 that are present in the PBS and that is to be carried out to the assembly process first is selected from among other vehicle bodies 5 that satisfy the above-mentioned absolute conditions. Since it is determined, fluidize the weight value setting for the assembly ratio and the weight value setting for the number of transported units, and change those values appropriately according to the assembly performance status in the assembly process and the trim buffer filling status. Therefore, the vehicle body 5 can be carried out to the assembly process with a more appropriate permutation.
[0029]
Moreover, according to the method of the above-described embodiment, when the vehicle body 5 determined based on the weight value related to the assembly number ratio and the weight value related to the number of transported vehicles among the carry-out candidate vehicle bodies 5 is preferentially carried out, a plurality of vehicle bodies 5 are provided. When there is a vehicle, a weight value related to the offline date is obtained for each vehicle body based on the degree of delay in starting assembly work, and the vehicle body 5 to be carried out to the assembly process is determined based on the weight value related to the offline date. Therefore, when there are a plurality of vehicle bodies 5 determined to be carried out, the vehicle body that should be prioritized for observing the offline date among the plurality of vehicles 5 can be first carried out from the PBS.
[0030]
According to the method of the above-described embodiment, when the stock parts are allocated and the car body 5 to be carried out is selected, the vehicle 5 is forwarded from the top of each PBS storage lane 1 to the forwarding lane based on the filling state of the trim buffer 6. However, since the inventory parts are allocated only to the number of trim buffers that do not run short, the inventory parts can be allocated only to the vehicle body 5 that can be carried out. Inventories can be effectively prevented even with a limited number of stocks, and in addition, stock parts are allocated to the car body 5 that can be carried out. It can be carried out to the assembly process.
[0031]
Although the present invention has been described based on the illustrated examples, the present invention is not limited to the above-described examples. For example, other conditions may be added as the absolute conditions or sufficient conditions. In the condition check, the vehicle body 5 to be carried out to the assembly process is determined based on the one with the larger weight value of the ratio condition and the number-of-forwarding-vehicles condition. Depending on the weight value, the vehicle body 5 to be carried out to the assembly process may be determined in the same manner as in the case of the conventional fixed weight value.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of an embodiment in which the PBS carry-out vehicle body determination method of the present invention is applied to a PBS of an automobile assembly line as a vehicle.
FIG. 2 is a layout diagram showing a PBS for determining a carry-out vehicle body by the method of the embodiment.
FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a procedure for a sufficient condition check in the method of the embodiment shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing a weighting calculation method for ratio conditions in the sufficient condition check shown in FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram illustrating a ranking calculation method based on an offline due date condition in the sufficient condition check illustrated in FIG. 3;
[Explanation of symbols]
1 Storage lane 2 PBS inlet 3 PBS outlet 4 Lifter 5 Painted car body 6 Trim buffer 7 Lifter 8 Forward lane

Claims (3)

PBS出口からPBS入口への回送レーンを持つPBSと、トリムバッファと、組立工程とを順次に具える車両組立ラインにおいて、PBSに在席中の複数台の塗装済み車体のうちのどの車体を先に組立工程へ搬出するかを決定するに際し、
前記PBSから車体を一台搬出する毎に、複数種類の車種間の組立台数比率に関する重み値を設定比率に対する実際の組立台数の比率のずれに基づいて求めるとともに、
回送台数に関する重み値を前記PBSとその後の組立工程との間のトリムバッファの充填状況に基づいて求め、
前記複数台の車体のうちの在庫部品の割り当てがありかつ他の所定の絶対条件を満たす搬出候補の車体のうちから、少なくとも前記組立台数比率に関する重み値および回送台数に関する重み値に基づいて、先に組立工程へ搬出する車体を決定することを特徴とする、PBS用搬出車体決定方法。
And PBS with forwarding lane to PBS inlet from PBS outlet, and trim the buffer, in a vehicle assembly line sequentially comprises the assembly process, previously which body of the plurality of painted car body in presence of PBS When deciding whether to carry out to the assembly process,
Each time a vehicle body is unloaded from the PBS, a weight value related to the assembly number ratio among a plurality of types of vehicles is obtained based on the deviation of the ratio of the actual assembly number to the set ratio,
A weight value relating to the number of forwarded units is obtained based on the filling state of the trim buffer between the PBS and the subsequent assembly process,
Based on at least a weight value related to the assembly number ratio and a weight value related to the number of forwarded vehicles, out of the candidate vehicle bodies for which inventory parts are allocated among the plurality of vehicle bodies and satisfy other predetermined absolute conditions, A method for determining an unloading vehicle body for PBS, comprising: determining a vehicle body to be unloaded to an assembly process.
前記搬出候補の車体のうちから、少なくとも前記組立台数比率に関する重み値および回送台数に関する重み値に基づいて決定した車体を優先して搬出する際、その車体が複数台ある場合に、
オフライン期日に関する重み値を、組立作業の着手の遅れの程度に基づいて車体毎に求め、
そのオフライン期日に関する重み値に基づいて、前記複数台の車体のうちから先に組立工程へ搬出する車体を決定することを特徴とする、請求項1記載のPBS用搬出車体決定方法。
When the vehicle body determined based on at least the weight value related to the assembly number ratio and the weight value related to the number of transported vehicles is preferentially carried out from among the carry-out candidate vehicle bodies, when there are a plurality of vehicle bodies,
A weight value for the offline date is determined for each vehicle body based on the degree of delay in starting assembly work.
2. The method of determining a carry-out vehicle body for PBS according to claim 1, wherein a vehicle body to be carried out first in an assembly process is determined from among the plurality of vehicle bodies based on a weight value relating to the offline date.
在庫部品の割り当てを行って前記搬出候補の車体を選出するに際し、
前記PBSの各貯留レーンの先頭から、前記トリムバッファの充填状況に基づく台数分のみに在庫部品の割り当てを行うことを特徴とする、請求項1または請求項2記載のPBS用搬出車体決定方法。
When assigning inventory parts and selecting the candidate car body to be carried out,
3. The method for determining the unloading vehicle body for PBS according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the inventory parts are allocated only from the head of each storage lane of the PBS to the number of units based on the filling state of the trim buffer.
JP16685798A 1998-06-15 1998-06-15 How to determine the car body for PBS Expired - Fee Related JP3724198B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP16685798A JP3724198B2 (en) 1998-06-15 1998-06-15 How to determine the car body for PBS

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP16685798A JP3724198B2 (en) 1998-06-15 1998-06-15 How to determine the car body for PBS

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH11348850A JPH11348850A (en) 1999-12-21
JP3724198B2 true JP3724198B2 (en) 2005-12-07

Family

ID=15838941

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP16685798A Expired - Fee Related JP3724198B2 (en) 1998-06-15 1998-06-15 How to determine the car body for PBS

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3724198B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100535385B1 (en) * 2002-12-13 2005-12-08 현대자동차주식회사 System for manufacturing automible
KR100494939B1 (en) * 2003-07-07 2005-06-13 현대자동차주식회사 Method for inserting empty pitch of vehicle sequence of vehicle conveyer line
JP6339935B2 (en) * 2014-12-29 2018-06-06 株式会社 日立産業制御ソリューションズ Work sequence planning device, work sequence planning method, and work sequence planning program

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH11348850A (en) 1999-12-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4958292A (en) Production control system for mixed production line
CN113743747B (en) Multi-AGV cooperative scheduling method and device in workshop environment
Nagi et al. Multiple routeings and capacity considerations in group technology applications
US5796936A (en) Distributed control system in which individual controllers executed by sharing loads
JP4308099B2 (en) Production planning method for parts
US7577485B2 (en) Automobile manufacturing line input order planning apparatus
CN112801483A (en) Mixed-flow assembly line material distribution method and system based on static semi-complete strategy
JP3724198B2 (en) How to determine the car body for PBS
CN112801484A (en) Material distribution scheduling method and system considering batching errors
US5664323A (en) Apparatus for producing vehicles
JP2023043147A (en) Method for operating part supply system, recording medium recording program for executing the same, and server for modifying part loading schedule
US20260050955A1 (en) Method, Medium, and System for Demand Planning
CN120196059B (en) Warehouse-in and warehouse-out scheduling method for linear reciprocating multi-RGV collaborative operation
CN120746455A (en) Storage management method and system based on Internet of things
US7212877B2 (en) Method for controlling a production sequence
JP2894116B2 (en) Permutation correction system for painted body storage
US7218982B1 (en) System and method for requesting delivery of sequenced parts
JP4303449B2 (en) production management system
JP3763209B2 (en) Production line work input method
US7110857B2 (en) Method for leaving an empty pitch in a vehicle conveyer line
JP3975504B2 (en) Jig transportation system in production line
JPH0479776B2 (en)
CN113869566B (en) Optimizing truck arrival time based on driver and factory satisfaction
CN110334872B (en) Destination allocation method and device
JP2004189349A (en) Loaded cargo group indicating device, indicating method and program therefor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20041020

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20041124

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20050124

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20050830

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20050912

R150 Certificate of patent (=grant) or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (prs date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090930

Year of fee payment: 4

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees