Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP3740108B2 - Blast furnace hearth structure - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP3740108B2 - Blast furnace hearth structure - Google Patents

Blast furnace hearth structure Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP3740108B2
JP3740108B2 JP2002274391A JP2002274391A JP3740108B2 JP 3740108 B2 JP3740108 B2 JP 3740108B2 JP 2002274391 A JP2002274391 A JP 2002274391A JP 2002274391 A JP2002274391 A JP 2002274391A JP 3740108 B2 JP3740108 B2 JP 3740108B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
wear
hearth
side wall
refractory
blast furnace
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2002274391A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2004107760A (en
Inventor
昭彦 篠竹
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP2002274391A priority Critical patent/JP3740108B2/en
Publication of JP2004107760A publication Critical patent/JP2004107760A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3740108B2 publication Critical patent/JP3740108B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Waste-Gas Treatment And Other Accessory Devices For Furnaces (AREA)

Description

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は、高炉の炉床構造に関し、特に、高炉改修時に使用する耐火物の選択に特徴を有する高炉の炉床構造に関する。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
周知のように、高炉の炉床部は常に高温にさらされるため、鉄皮の内側に耐火物を張って構築されている。
従来から高炉を構築あるいは改修する際には、炉床部の全体に対して、同一の溶銑耐食性を有する耐火物を円周方向に均一に使用していた。
ところで、高炉を構築するための耐火物には、溶銑耐食性および耐熱衝撃性が異なる種々のものが存在するが、高炉を構築する際には、特に、高温にさらされる炉床部に対して溶銑耐食性および耐熱衝撃性に優れた耐火物を使用することが好ましい。
【0003】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
しかしながら、溶銑耐食性および耐熱衝撃性に優れた耐火物は、それだけ価格が高くなる為、炉床部全体をこのような耐火物で構築すると、コストが上昇するという問題があった。 このため、従来の高炉の炉床構造では、コストの上昇を抑えるためには耐久性を犠牲にせざるをえず、一方、耐久性を追求するとコストが上昇し、両者の均衡を図ることが困難であった。
そこで、耐久性と低コスト化の両立を図るため、耐火物の損耗状態をシミュレーションし、その結果に基づいて、溶銑耐食性および耐熱衝撃性に優れた耐火物を配設する箇所を規定する方法が考えられる。しかしながら、シミュレーション結果と実際の損耗状態とが常に一致するとは限らず、実際には高炉毎に損耗が激しい箇所が異なっている場合が多い。
本発明は、上述した事情に鑑み提案されたもので、コストの上昇を抑えつつ、耐久性に優れた高炉の炉床構造を提供することを目的とする。
【0004】
【特許文献1】
特開平11−222615号公報
【0005】
【課題を解決するための手段】
本発明に係る高炉の炉床構造は、上述した目的を達成するため、以下の特徴点を備えている。
すなわち、本発明に係る高炉の炉床構造は、高炉の内容積およびプロフィルを大きく変更することなく改修を行う際に、耐火物中に埋設した温度計を用いて測定した温度分布履歴に基づき炉床側壁部の損耗実績を推定し、かつ改修前の炉代における炉内側の溶銑流以外の特殊要因により前記炉床側壁部が損耗したことが明らかな場合に、当該寄与分を推定して、該炉床側壁部の損耗実績を補正し、該炉床側壁部の損耗実績に応じて、改修後の炉代を構成する炉床側壁部の耐火物として、改修前の炉代において損耗が大きかった部位ほど熱伝導率が高い材料を使用することを特徴とするものである。
【0006】
本発明に係る高炉の炉床構造は、上述した構成を備えているため、炉床側壁部のうち、耐火物の損耗が大きかった部位における耐久性を高めることができる。また、耐火物の損耗がそれほど大きくない部位に対して低コストの耐火物を使用することができるので、コストの上昇を抑えることができる。
また、耐火物中に埋設した温度計を用いて測定した温度分布履歴に基づいて、容易に炉床側壁部の損耗実績を推定することができる。
更に、炉床側壁部における実際の調査結果あるいは特殊要因を考慮して、炉床側壁部の損耗実績を補正することにより、さらに正確な損耗実績を得ることができる。このため、的確な改修を行うことにより、さらに耐久性を高めることができるとともに、低コスト化を図ることができる。
【0007】
【発明の実施の形態】
以下、図面に示す具体的な実施例に基づいて、本発明に係る高炉の炉床構造の実施形態を説明する。
<損耗実績の推定>
本発明の実施形態に係る高炉の炉床構造では、高炉の内容積およびプロフィルを大きく変更することなく改修を行う際に、炉床側壁部の損耗実績に応じて、改修後の炉代を構成する炉床側壁部の耐火物の材料を選択する。
炉床側壁部の損耗実績は、耐火物中に埋設した温度計を用いて測定した温度分布履歴に基づいて推定することができる。温度計は、詳細には図示しないが、炉床側壁部の適宜箇所に複数個埋設される。
【0008】
図5は、耐火物中に埋設した温度計を用いて計測した温度分布履歴から吹き止め時の損耗プロフィルを推定した図である。(a)は高さ方向の格段の最大損耗部位、(b)は高さ方向で最も損耗が激しかった高さ9段の円周方向の損耗分布を示している。
ここで、炉床側壁部における耐火物損耗量の推定は、以下のようにして行った。炉床側壁部の耐火物内に埋設されている温度計の指示値から耐火物の熱伝導率を用いて耐火物内の温度分布が計算できる。各部位において温度形の指示値が過去最高温度に達した時点が最後に損耗が進んだ時期と考えてその時点での温度分布から、溶銑の凝固点である1150℃の温度位置を耐火物の残存厚と推定した。
図5に示すように、炉床側壁部において、高さ方向では出銑口の1〜2m下側の8〜9段付近が最も損耗しており、円周方向では、1,2,3号出銑口の近傍が他の部位に比べて大きく損耗している。中でも3号出銑口近傍の損耗が最大である。出銑口からみて20度の範囲内の損耗が大きい。4号出銑口近傍はあまり損耗していない。
本実施形態に係る高炉の炉床構造では、損耗実績の推定結果に基づいて、改修後の炉代を構成する炉床側壁部の耐火物として、改修前の炉代において損耗が大きかった部位ほど熱伝導率が高い材料を使用する。
【0009】
<実施例1>
図1,2は、本発明の実施例1に係る高炉の炉床構造を示す模式図であり、図1は高炉を横断面とした模式図、図2は高炉を側面からみた状態の模式図である。
実施例1に係る高炉の炉床構造では、上記損耗実績の推定結果に基づいて、図1,2に示すように、炉床側壁部10を構築する際に、出銑口20よりも下側であって、かつ出銑口20を中心として左右それぞれ20度の範囲内に対して、他の部位に使用する耐火物30Aと比較して熱伝導率が高く溶銑耐食性および耐熱衝撃性に優れた耐火物30Bを使用する。
具体的には、炉床側壁部10の大部分には、熱伝導率が20W/mKあるいは15W/mK以上の耐火物30Aを使用し、出銑口20を中心とした特定の範囲には、熱伝導率が25W/mK以上の耐火物30Bを使用する。
【0010】
<実施例2>
図3,4は、本発明の実施例2に係る高炉の炉床構造を示す模式図であり、図3は高炉を横断面とした模式図、図4は高炉を側面からみた状態の模式図である。
実施例2に係る高炉の炉床構造では、耐火物の損耗が激しい範囲を二分して、より一層損耗が激しいと推定される範囲に対して、さらに熱伝導率が高く溶銑耐食性および耐熱衝撃性に優れた耐火物を使用する。
すなわち、実施例2に係る高炉の炉床構造では、図3,4に示すように、炉床側壁部10を構築する際に、出銑口20よりも下側であって、かつ出銑口20を中心として左右それぞれ30度の範囲内に対して、他の部位に使用する耐火物30Aと比較して熱伝導率が高く溶銑耐食性および耐熱衝撃性に優れた耐火物30Bを使用する。
さらに、出銑口20から下側に向かって1m以上3m以下であって、かつ出銑口20を中心として左右それぞれ15度の範囲内に対して、さらに熱伝導率が高く溶銑耐食性および耐熱衝撃性に優れた耐火物30Cを使用する。
具体的には、炉床側壁部10の大部分には、熱伝導率が15W/mK以上の耐火物30Aを使用し、出銑口20を中心とした特定の範囲のうち、周辺部分には熱伝導率が20W/mKの耐火物30Bを使用し、中心部分には熱伝導率が25W/mK以上の耐火物30Cを使用する。
【0011】
<他の実施形態>
上述した実施例1,2では、耐火物中に埋設した温度計を用いて計測した温度分布履歴に基づいて、耐火物の損耗実績を推定している。この際、改修前の解体調査によって実際の損耗実績が判明した場合は、この方がより正確であるから推定値を補正することができる。ただし、改修前の炉代における炉内側の溶銑流以外、例えば羽口破損による水の炉内侵入などの特殊要因により炉床側壁部10が損耗したことが明らかな場合には、当該寄与分を推定して損耗実績を補正すること、すなわち当該特殊要因による推定損耗分を差し引くことが好ましい。このような補正を行うことにより、損耗実績の推定がより確実なものとなり、的確な改修を行うことが可能になる。
なお、実施例1,2において示した具体的な数値は、本発明に係る高炉の炉床構造における一例であり、高炉の炉床径、内容積、操業実績等、種々の要因に応じて適宜な数値を選択して実施することができる。
【0012】
【発明の効果】
本発明に係る高炉の炉床構造は、上述した構成を備えているため、以下の効果を奏することができる。
すなわち、本発明に係る高炉の炉床構造によれば、耐火物の損耗実績に応じて改修を行うので、耐火物の損耗が大きかった部位における耐久性を高めて、高炉全体の耐久性を高めることができる。また、耐火物の損耗がそれほど大きくない部位に対して低コストの耐火物を使用することができるので、高炉全体として低コスト化を図ることができる。
また、耐火物中に埋設した温度計を用いて測定した温度分布履歴に基づいて炉床側壁部の損耗実績を推定することにより、損耗実績の推定を容易に行うことができる。
また、炉床側壁部における実際の調査結果あるいは特殊要因を考慮して、炉床側壁部の損耗実績を補正することにより、正確な損耗実績に基づく的確な改修を行うことができ、さらに耐久性を高めるとともに、低コスト化を図ることができる。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】本発明の実施例1に係る高炉の炉床構造を示す模式図(横断面)である。
【図2】本発明の実施例1に係る高炉の炉床構造を示す模式図(側面からみた状態)である。
【図3】本発明の実施例2に係る高炉の炉床構造を示す模式図(横断面)である。
【図4】本発明の実施例2に係る高炉の炉床構造を示す模式図(側面からみた状態)である。
【図5】耐火物中に埋設した温度計を用いて計測した温度分布履歴に基づいた耐火物損耗プロフィルを示す模式図である。
【符号の説明】
10 炉床側壁部
20 出銑口
30A,B,C 耐火物
[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a blast furnace hearth structure, and more particularly, to a blast furnace hearth structure characterized by selection of a refractory used for blast furnace renovation.
[0002]
[Prior art]
As is well known, the hearth part of a blast furnace is always exposed to high temperatures, and thus is constructed with a refractory inside the iron skin.
Conventionally, when constructing or refurbishing a blast furnace, a refractory having the same hot metal corrosion resistance is uniformly used in the circumferential direction for the entire hearth.
By the way, there are various types of refractories for constructing a blast furnace, which have different hot metal corrosion resistance and thermal shock resistance. However, when constructing a blast furnace, particularly for a hot metal floor part exposed to high temperatures. It is preferable to use a refractory having excellent corrosion resistance and thermal shock resistance.
[0003]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
However, since the price of a refractory excellent in hot metal corrosion resistance and thermal shock resistance increases, there is a problem that if the entire hearth is constructed of such a refractory, the cost increases. For this reason, in the conventional blast furnace hearth structure, in order to suppress the increase in cost, durability must be sacrificed. On the other hand, pursuing durability increases cost and it is difficult to balance the two. Met.
Therefore, in order to achieve both durability and cost reduction, a method of simulating the wear state of the refractory and defining the location where the refractory excellent in hot metal corrosion resistance and thermal shock resistance is arranged based on the result is provided. Conceivable. However, the simulation result and the actual wear state do not always coincide with each other, and in fact, there are many cases where the places where the wear is severe differ for each blast furnace.
This invention is proposed in view of the situation mentioned above, and it aims at providing the hearth structure of the blast furnace excellent in durability, suppressing the raise in cost.
[0004]
[Patent Document 1]
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-222615
[Means for Solving the Problems]
The hearth structure of a blast furnace according to the present invention has the following features in order to achieve the above-described object.
That is, the hearth structure of the blast furnace according to the present invention is based on the temperature distribution history measured using a thermometer embedded in the refractory when refurbishing without greatly changing the internal volume and profile of the blast furnace. When the wear of the floor side wall is estimated, and when it is clear that the hearth side wall is worn due to a special factor other than the hot metal flow inside the furnace in the furnace cost before the repair, the contribution is estimated, correcting the wear performance of the furnace floor side wall portion, in accordance with the wear performance of the hearth side wall, as refractory hearth sidewall portion constituting the furnace allowance after renovation, the wear in the furnace allowance before refurbishment greater This is characterized in that a material having a higher thermal conductivity is used for the part.
[0006]
Since the hearth structure of the blast furnace according to the present invention has the above-described configuration, it is possible to improve the durability in the portion of the hearth side wall where the wear of the refractory is large. Moreover, since a low-cost refractory can be used with respect to the site | part to which the wear of a refractory is not so large, the raise of cost can be suppressed.
Moreover, based on the temperature distribution history measured using the thermometer embedded in the refractory, the wear record of the hearth side wall can be easily estimated.
Furthermore, more accurate wear record can be obtained by correcting the wear record of the hearth side wall part in consideration of the actual investigation result or special factors in the hearth side wall part. For this reason, it is possible to further increase the durability and to reduce the cost by carrying out appropriate repairs.
[0007]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Hereinafter, an embodiment of a hearth structure of a blast furnace according to the present invention will be described based on specific examples shown in the drawings.
<Estimation of actual wear>
In the hearth structure of the blast furnace according to the embodiment of the present invention, when refurbishing without greatly changing the internal volume and profile of the blast furnace, the cost of the furnace after refurbishment is configured according to the wear record of the hearth side wall. Select the refractory material for the hearth side wall.
The actual wear of the side wall of the hearth can be estimated based on the temperature distribution history measured using a thermometer embedded in the refractory. Although not shown in detail, a plurality of thermometers are embedded at appropriate locations on the hearth side wall.
[0008]
FIG. 5 is a diagram in which a wear profile at the time of blowing is estimated from a temperature distribution history measured using a thermometer embedded in a refractory. (A) shows a remarkable maximum wear portion in the height direction, and (b) shows a wear distribution in the circumferential direction with a height of 9 steps where the wear was most severe in the height direction.
Here, the estimation of the amount of refractory wear in the side wall of the hearth was performed as follows. The temperature distribution in the refractory can be calculated from the indicated value of a thermometer embedded in the refractory on the side wall of the hearth using the thermal conductivity of the refractory. Considering that the point at which the indicated value of the temperature type reached the highest temperature in each region is the time when wear finally progressed, the temperature distribution at that point is the temperature position of 1150 ° C, which is the freezing point of the hot metal, and the refractory remains. Estimated thickness.
As shown in FIG. 5, in the hearth side wall portion, the vicinity of the 8th to 9th steps 1 to 2 m below the taphole is most worn in the height direction, and Nos. 1, 2 and 3 in the circumferential direction. The vicinity of the spout is greatly worn compared to other parts. In particular, the wear near No. 3 dock is the largest. The wear within a range of 20 degrees as viewed from the spout is large. There is not much wear around the No. 4 dock.
In the hearth structure of the blast furnace according to the present embodiment, as the refractory material of the hearth side wall part constituting the furnace cost after the repair based on the estimation result of the wear results, the part where the wear was large in the furnace cost before the repair. Use materials with high thermal conductivity.
[0009]
<Example 1>
1 and 2 are schematic views showing a hearth structure of a blast furnace according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention, FIG. 1 is a schematic view showing the blast furnace as a cross section, and FIG. 2 is a schematic view of the blast furnace viewed from the side. It is.
In the hearth structure of the blast furnace according to the first embodiment, as shown in FIGS. In addition, the thermal conductivity is high and the hot metal corrosion resistance and the thermal shock resistance are excellent compared to the refractory 30A used for other parts with respect to the range of 20 degrees on each of the left and right sides with respect to the spout 20. Use refractory 30B.
Specifically, the refractory 30A having a thermal conductivity of 20 W / mK or 15 W / mK or more is used for most of the hearth side wall 10, and a specific range centering on the tap outlet 20 is A refractory 30B having a thermal conductivity of 25 W / mK or more is used.
[0010]
<Example 2>
FIGS. 3 and 4 are schematic views showing the hearth structure of the blast furnace according to the second embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 3 is a schematic view showing the blast furnace as a cross section, and FIG. 4 is a schematic view of the blast furnace viewed from the side. It is.
In the hearth structure of the blast furnace according to Example 2, the range in which the wear of the refractory is severely divided into two, and the range in which the wear is estimated to be even more severe, the thermal conductivity is higher and the hot metal corrosion resistance and the thermal shock resistance. Use an excellent refractory.
That is, in the hearth structure of the blast furnace according to the second embodiment, as shown in FIGS. 3 and 4, when constructing the hearth side wall portion 10, it is located below the taphole 20 and the taphole. A refractory 30B having a high thermal conductivity and excellent hot metal corrosion resistance and thermal shock resistance is used as compared with the refractory 30A used for other parts within a range of 30 degrees on each of the left and right sides with 20 as the center.
Furthermore, the heat conductivity is higher and the hot metal corrosion resistance and the thermal shock are within 1 to 3 m from the spout 20 to the lower side and within the range of 15 degrees to the left and right of the spout 20. Use refractory 30C with excellent properties.
Specifically, the refractory 30A having a thermal conductivity of 15 W / mK or more is used for most of the hearth side wall 10, and in a specific range centering on the taphole 20, A refractory 30B having a thermal conductivity of 20 W / mK is used, and a refractory 30C having a thermal conductivity of 25 W / mK or more is used in the central portion.
[0011]
<Other embodiments>
In the above-described Examples 1 and 2, the wear history of the refractory is estimated based on the temperature distribution history measured using the thermometer embedded in the refractory. At this time, if the actual wear record is found by the dismantling investigation before refurbishment, the estimated value can be corrected because this is more accurate. However, if it is clear that the hearth side wall 10 has been worn out due to special factors such as intrusion of water into the furnace due to the tuyere breakage other than the hot metal flow inside the furnace before the repair, the contribution is It is preferable to estimate and correct the wear record, that is, to subtract the estimated wear due to the special factor. By performing such correction, it is possible to more reliably estimate the wear record and to perform appropriate repairs.
In addition, the specific numerical value shown in Examples 1 and 2 is an example in the hearth structure of the blast furnace according to the present invention, and is appropriately selected according to various factors such as the hearth diameter of the blast furnace, the internal volume, the operation results, and the like. It is possible to carry out by selecting an appropriate numerical value.
[0012]
【The invention's effect】
Since the hearth structure of the blast furnace according to the present invention has the above-described configuration, the following effects can be achieved.
That is, according to the hearth structure of the blast furnace according to the present invention, since the repair is performed according to the wear record of the refractory, the durability in the portion where the wear of the refractory is large is increased, and the durability of the entire blast furnace is increased. be able to. In addition, since a low-cost refractory can be used for a portion where the wear of the refractory is not so great, the cost of the entire blast furnace can be reduced.
Moreover, the wear record can be easily estimated by estimating the wear record of the hearth side wall based on the temperature distribution history measured using the thermometer embedded in the refractory.
In addition, by taking into account actual survey results or special factors in the hearth side wall, by correcting the wear level of the hearth side wall part, it is possible to perform accurate repairs based on the accurate level of wear and durability. In addition, the cost can be reduced.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a schematic view (cross section) showing a hearth structure of a blast furnace according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram (seen from the side) showing the hearth structure of a blast furnace according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a schematic view (cross section) showing a hearth structure of a blast furnace according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a schematic view showing a hearth structure of a blast furnace according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention (as viewed from the side).
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram showing a refractory wear profile based on a temperature distribution history measured using a thermometer embedded in the refractory.
[Explanation of symbols]
10 hearth side wall 20 tap outlet 30A, B, C refractory

Claims (2)

高炉の内容積およびプロフィルを大きく変更することなく改修を行う際に、耐火物中に埋設した温度計を用いて測定した温度分布履歴に基づき炉床側壁部の損耗実績を推定し、かつ改修前の解体による調査結果に基づいて該炉床側壁部の損耗実績を補正し、該炉床側壁部の損耗実績に応じて、改修後の炉代を構成する炉床側壁部の耐火物として、改修前の炉代において損耗が大きかった部位ほど熱伝導率が高い材料を使用することを特徴とする高炉の炉床構造。When refurbishing without greatly changing the internal volume and profile of the blast furnace, the wear history of the hearth side wall is estimated based on the temperature distribution history measured using a thermometer embedded in the refractory, and before refurbishment. correcting the wear performance of the furnace floor side wall portion on the basis of the findings by the demolition of, in response to the wear performance of the hearth side wall, as refractory hearth sidewall portion constituting the furnace allowance after renovation, refurbishment A blast furnace hearth structure in which a material having higher thermal conductivity is used in a portion where wear was greater in the previous furnace cost. 高炉の内容積およびプロフィルを大きく変更することなく改修を行う際に、耐火物中に埋設した温度計を用いて測定した温度分布履歴に基づき炉床側壁部の損耗実績を推定し、かつ改修前の炉代における炉内側の溶銑流以外の特殊要因により前記炉床側壁部が損耗したことが明らかな場合に、当該寄与分を推定して、該炉床側壁部の損耗実績を補正し、該炉床側壁部の損耗実績に応じて、改修後の炉代を構成する炉床側壁部の耐火物として、改修前の炉代において損耗が大きかった部位ほど熱伝導率が高い材料を使用することを特徴とする高炉の炉床構造。When refurbishing without greatly changing the internal volume and profile of the blast furnace, the wear history of the hearth side wall is estimated based on the temperature distribution history measured using a thermometer embedded in the refractory, and before refurbishment. When it is clear that the hearth side wall is worn due to a special factor other than the hot metal flow inside the furnace at the furnace cost, the contribution is estimated and the wear record of the hearth side wall is corrected, Depending on the actual wear of the hearth side wall, use a material with higher thermal conductivity as the refractory of the hearth side wall constituting the furnace cost after the refurbishment in the part where the wear was greater in the furnace cost before refurbishment. Blast furnace hearth structure characterized by
JP2002274391A 2002-09-20 2002-09-20 Blast furnace hearth structure Expired - Fee Related JP3740108B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002274391A JP3740108B2 (en) 2002-09-20 2002-09-20 Blast furnace hearth structure

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002274391A JP3740108B2 (en) 2002-09-20 2002-09-20 Blast furnace hearth structure

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2004107760A JP2004107760A (en) 2004-04-08
JP3740108B2 true JP3740108B2 (en) 2006-02-01

Family

ID=32270876

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2002274391A Expired - Fee Related JP3740108B2 (en) 2002-09-20 2002-09-20 Blast furnace hearth structure

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3740108B2 (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2004107760A (en) 2004-04-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2003250046B2 (en) Cooling plate for metallurgic furnaces
US6330269B1 (en) Heat exchange pipe with extruded fins
EA020127B1 (en) Method for producing a cooling element for pyrometallurgical reactor and the cooling element
JP5482615B2 (en) Blowing control method in converter
EP2673386B1 (en) Stave cooler for a metallurgical furnace
WO2018037957A1 (en) Furnace body protection stave
JP3740108B2 (en) Blast furnace hearth structure
JP4119620B2 (en) In-furnace situation estimation method for blast furnace
CN206618263U (en) A kind of alloy smelting stove
JP2669279B2 (en) Blast furnace operation method
JP2932977B2 (en) Stave cooler
JPH0967607A (en) Blast furnace bottom monitoring method
CN103045794A (en) Water cooling furnace mouth and converter
JP3635779B2 (en) Blast furnace wall cooling plate
JP2932985B2 (en) Stave cooler
JP2011208219A (en) Stave cooler
JPH07278627A (en) Blast furnace bottom cooling pipe and blast furnace bottom cooling method
JP2002060821A (en) Blast furnace wall structure and blast furnace operation method
KR101585808B1 (en) Stave and method for delaying abrasion of same
JP5369716B2 (en) Blast furnace body cooling structure
JP4598710B2 (en) Blast furnace brick wear prevention method
JP2008127619A (en) Method for deciding whether repair of refractory in molten iron ladle is needed or not
JP3385831B2 (en) Estimation method of hearth erosion line and hearth structure
JPH0586411A (en) Method for assuming eroded line in furnace bottom of blast furnace
JP2011157565A (en) Stave for cooling furnace body of shaft furnace type metallurgical furnace

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20041217

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20050418

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20050427

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20050817

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20050930

A911 Transfer of reconsideration by examiner before appeal (zenchi)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911

Effective date: 20051005

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20051026

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20051104

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081111

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091111

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101111

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101111

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111111

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111111

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121111

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121111

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131111

Year of fee payment: 8

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131111

Year of fee payment: 8

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131111

Year of fee payment: 8

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees