Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP3742001B2 - Impeller for desulfurization - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP3742001B2 - Impeller for desulfurization - Google Patents

Impeller for desulfurization Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP3742001B2
JP3742001B2 JP2001368178A JP2001368178A JP3742001B2 JP 3742001 B2 JP3742001 B2 JP 3742001B2 JP 2001368178 A JP2001368178 A JP 2001368178A JP 2001368178 A JP2001368178 A JP 2001368178A JP 3742001 B2 JP3742001 B2 JP 3742001B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
refractory
impeller
core
anchor
metal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2001368178A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2003166011A (en
Inventor
榮造 前田
公治 會田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Priority to JP2001368178A priority Critical patent/JP3742001B2/en
Publication of JP2003166011A publication Critical patent/JP2003166011A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3742001B2 publication Critical patent/JP3742001B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Structures Of Non-Positive Displacement Pumps (AREA)
  • Refinement Of Pig-Iron, Manufacture Of Cast Iron, And Steel Manufacture Other Than In Revolving Furnaces (AREA)

Description

【0001】
【発明が属する技術分野】
本発明は、冶金分野における溶銑脱硫処理用に用いられる脱硫用インペラに関するものである。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
KR法による溶銑脱硫は、溶銑鍋に溶銑を入れて上方からインペラを浸漬させ、脱硫剤を投入しつつインペラを高速で回転させることにより、脱硫剤を溶銑中に懸濁させて効率よく脱硫を行う方法である。インペラの浸漬時間は、処理設備および処理条件によって多少変化するが、およそ10〜15分である。
【0003】
一般にこのインペラ1は、図1のように鉄製の芯金2の上にアンカー3を取り付け、流し込み材を流し込み施工して製作する。インペラ1の耐火物4は、加熱冷却が繰り返されるため、耐熱スポーリング性に優れるアルミナ・シリカ・炭化珪素系の流し込み材が多く使用される。耐食性はあまり問題にならず、通常軸部5よりも羽根部6の耐火物4の表面剥離がインペラの寿命を決める。
【0004】
これは、溶銑7への浸漬と放冷待機とが繰り返されるため大きな熱衝撃が加わって、特に形状が複雑な羽根部6で剥離が起こるためである。耐火物寿命を上げるために、より耐熱衝撃性の高い耐火物が使用されてきた。
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
【0005】
しかし、一日当たりの処理回数が多く(例えば1日に50チャージ)なると、軸部の芯金から耐火物が剥がれ落ちて芯金が溶損し、インペラ先端部が脱落するという問題が発生した。この現象に対して高強度流し込み材を適用したが、これを防止するに至らなかった。
【0006】
発明者らは、一日当たりの処理回数が多くなると、芯金から耐火物が剥がれ落ちて芯金が溶損し、インペラ先端部が脱落するという問題の原因について、次のように分析した。
(1)一日当たりの処理回数が多くなると、一つの処理と次の処理の間の間隔が短くなるために、冷却される時間が少なくなって、芯金温度が上昇する。
【0007】
(2)芯金表面は、耐火物と接触しているため、境界部では両者の温度は同一であるが、耐火物に比べて芯金(鉄)の熱膨張係数は大きいために芯金の方の膨張量が大きくなり、耐火物に引張り応力がかかる。
(3)一日の処理量が少ない場合にも、ある程度芯金温度が上がり、同様な引っ張り応力が発生するが、応力が小さいために耐火物でその応力が吸収できたものと考えられる。
【0008】
(4)耐火物は、圧縮応力には強いが、引張り応力には弱い性質があり、芯金温度が高くなり、芯金およびアンカーから受ける引張り応力が大きくなると、耐えきれずに亀裂が発生する。
(5)発生した亀裂に溶銑が浸透し、芯金およびアンカーを溶融し、ついには軸部耐火物を芯金から剥離脱落させ、損傷が著しい場合には先端部の羽根の脱落に至る。
【0009】
【課題を解決するための手段】
本発明は、かかる課題に鑑み、一日当たりの処理回数が多い条件下でも、安定して使用できることを目的とし、溶銑脱硫用のインペラの芯金とこの芯金のまわりの耐火物との間、および芯金に取り付けるアンカーとこのまわりの耐火物との間に、芯金およびアンカーとこれらの耐火物の熱衝撃による膨張差を吸収する微小空隙をそれぞれ設けるようにしたことを特徴とする脱硫用インペラを提供するものである。
【0010】
【発明の実施の形態】
本発明の脱硫用インペラは、溶銑脱硫用のインペラの芯金とこの芯金のまわりの耐火物との間、および芯金に取り付けるアンカーとこのまわりの耐火物との間に、芯金およびアンカーとこれらの耐火物の熱衝撃による膨張差を適切に吸収する微小空隙をそれぞれ設けるようにしたことを特徴としている。
【0011】
インペラ1の芯金2およびアンカー3と耐火物4の間に、高温時に消失するような消失材料8を設置することにより、図2のように使用前または使用中に芯金2及びアンカー3と耐火物4の間に微小空隙9、10が生成し、この微小空隙9、10によって芯金2と耐火物4との膨張差を吸収するようにするものである。
【0012】
芯金2の径方向の膨張を考えた場合、芯金2の直径の膨張に比べて耐火物4の直径の膨張は小さい。芯金2と耐火物4の膨張差がこの微小空隙9、10の厚さより大きくなると、耐火物4側に圧縮応力がかかる。
【0013】
微小空隙9、10の厚さは必ずしも膨張差よりも大きい必要はない。それは、一日当たりの処理回数が少ない場合にも膨張差が有るものの、それがインペラ先端部の脱落にはつながらないことから、ある程度の膨張差を吸収できるからである。
【0014】
これらより、芯金直径をaとしたときに、高温時に消失する材料の軸部5での軸部芯金部における厚さtsは、0.2×10-3a≦ts≦4×10-3aとすることが好ましい。0.2×10-3aより小さければ膨張分の吸収の効果が十分でない。一方、4×10-3aより大きい場合、微小空隙9が大きすぎて耐火物4と軸部5の芯金2の間に高温で隙間ができて、インペラ1の回転等により隙間を起因とした破壊が起こる可能性が高くなるために好ましくない。より好ましくは、0.4×10-3 a≦ts≦2×10-3aである。
【0015】
また、芯金直径をaとしたときに、高温時に消失する材料のアンカー3における厚さta は、0.6×10-3a≦ta≦8×10-3aとすることが望ましい。軸部芯金と耐火物4の間の隙間tsよりも、アンカー3と耐火物4の間の隙間taの方が大きいことが望ましい。これはインペラ1の軸を考えた場合、軸方向長さが径方向長さより大きいためである。軸方向の膨張差は、主としてアンカー3を通じて耐火物4に応力として伝達され、径方向の膨張差は主として芯金2から直接耐火物4に応力として伝達されるからである。
【0016】
taが0.6×10-3aより小さければ、軸方向の膨張分の吸収の効果が十分でない。一方、12×10-3aより大きい場合、微小空隙10が大きすぎて耐火物4とアンカー3の間に高温で隙間ができて、アンカー3の役目を果たすことができず、インペラ1の回転等により隙間を起因とした破壊が起こる可能性が高くなるために好ましくない。より好ましくは、1.2×10-3a≦ta ≦6×10-3aである。
【0017】
一方、羽根部6での羽根部芯金における厚さは、前述の軸部剥離とは直接的には関係しない。しかし、羽根部6でも同様な熱膨張差による応力が発生するのだから、これを抑制するためには同様な空隙を作ることがより好ましい。この部位での厚さは、アンカー3部での厚さtaと同程度でよい。差があったとしても何ら問題はない。
【0018】
一日の処理回数が多くなった場合、軸部にのみ著しい損傷が現れる理由は必ずしも明らかではないものの、使用中のインペラの観察から次のように考えられる。すなわち、使用中の羽根部の根元部には著しい地金の付着が認められる。これは、溶銑が耐火物によって冷却されて凝固したものと考えられる。軸部と同様な亀裂が発生したとしても、耐火物表面には地金がついており、そのために地金は浸透しないことになる。その結果、亀裂の発生が直接耐火物の寿命には影響しない。
【0019】
しかし、羽根部の地金の付着の無い部分では、軸部と同様な地金浸透、耐火物剥離、芯金溶損等が起こるため、この部分でも同様な空隙を持たせることで、耐火物の損傷を抑制し、寿命を上げる効果が期待できる。
【0020】
芯金およびアンカーと耐火物の間に高温時に消失するような消失材料には、各種の有機物が利用できる。高温で完全に消失する必要は必ずしも無く、多少の灰分、炭素等が残留したとしても、強度はなく応力を受けた際に簡単に破壊するような状態のもので有れば何ら差し支えない。
【0021】
具体的には、材料の形態としては、繊維、テープ、布、塗料、膜等のシート状のものが利用できる。また、材質としては、各種のプラスチック、高分子、有機繊維等のものも利用できる。設置方法も特には限定されない。例えば、テープを巻き付ける、塗料を塗る、被膜をスプレーコーティングするなどの手段がとれる。
【0022】
芯金およびアンカーに消失材料を設置後、不定形耐火物の流し込み材をその周囲に流し込み施工できる。この施工方法は特に限定されないが、型枠を設置して流し込み施工する方法が一般的である。この際、棒状バイブレータや型枠バイブレータを使用しても差し支えない。
【0023】
【実施例】
KR法の脱硫インペラにおいて、芯金2およびアンカー3と耐火物4の間に高温時に消失するような材料8を設置した場合と、設置しない場合について損傷状態と寿命を比較した。インペラ1の大きさは軸部5で、芯金径a=300mm、耐火物外径600mm、長さ1200mmである。その下側に羽根が4枚設置され、羽根は各300×500×120mmの芯金2の上に耐火物4の外寸で400×850×600mmの大きさである。芯金2にはアンカーが取り付けられている。
【0024】
使用した耐火物4はアルミナ・シリカ・炭化珪素質の流し込み材であり、化学組成はAl2O3 が65%、SiO2 が25%、SiCが11%であった。実施例では芯金2およびアンカー3にプラスチックを塗布し、ts=0.3mm=1.0×10-3a、ta=1.0mm=3.3×10-3aとした。その上に、耐火物4を流し込み施工した。一方、比較例では、芯金およびアンカーの上に直接耐火物を流し込み施工した。
【0025】
一日当たりの処理量が30〜33チャージで処理した場合、何れの場合も寿命は220〜250チャージであり、損傷状態も大きな変化はなかった。一方、一日当たりの処理量が48〜50チャージとなった場合、実施例の寿命は、250〜265チャージであり、寿命を決定する損傷は羽根部の欠損であった。しかし、比較例の場合寿命は150〜165チャージに低下し、寿命を決定する損傷は軸部の欠損による羽根部の脱落であった。このように、本発明の優位性が確認された。
【0026】
なお、上記のように脱硫用のインペラの微小空隙は、脱硫処理時に消失するようにするのがエネルギーの節約がはかれて好ましいが、予め別途に高温に熱して消失することもできるものである。
【0027】
【発明の効果】
以上のように本発明にあっては、溶銑脱硫用のインペラの芯金とこの芯金のまわりの耐火物との間、および芯金に取り付けるアンカーとこのまわりの耐火物との間に、芯金およびアンカーとこれらの耐火物の熱衝撃による膨張差を吸収する微小空隙をそれぞれ設けるようにしたので、KR法等の脱硫において1日当たりの処理数が多い場合にも、インペラの芯金やアンカー部での耐火物との膨張差を吸収でき、インペラの耐火物に亀裂が入って溶銑が浸透して耐火物が脱落するのを防止できて、インペラの耐久性を向上させることができる。
【0028】
そして、脱硫用のインペラの芯金およびアンカーと耐火物との間にシート、テープ、塗料などの薄状形成材を配設して、高温時に消失してシート厚、テープ厚、塗料膜厚による熱衝撃の膨張差を吸収する微小空隙を設けるようにすることによって、脱硫用のインペラの芯金およびアンカーと耐火物との間に容易に均一な微小空隙を設けることができ、上記のように効果を挙げることができる。
【0029】
なお、上記のように脱硫用のインペラの微小空隙は、脱硫処理時に消失するようにするのがエネルギーの節約がはかれて好ましいが、予め別途に高温に熱して消失することもできるものである。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】脱硫用インペラの溶銑に浸漬させた状態の説明用断面図、
【図2】本発明の芯金、アンカー、耐火物部の拡大断面図。
【符号の説明】
1…インペラ 2…芯金 3…アンカー 4…耐火物
5…軸部 6…羽根部 8…消失材料 9、10…微小間隙
[0001]
[Technical field to which the invention belongs]
The present invention relates to a desulfurization impeller used for hot metal desulfurization treatment in the metallurgical field.
[0002]
[Prior art]
Hot metal desulfurization by the KR method is performed by putting hot metal into a hot metal ladle, immersing the impeller from above, and rotating the impeller at high speed while introducing the desulfurizing agent, so that the desulfurizing agent is suspended in the hot metal and efficiently desulfurized. How to do it. The impeller immersion time varies depending on the processing equipment and processing conditions, but is approximately 10 to 15 minutes.
[0003]
In general, the impeller 1 is manufactured by attaching an anchor 3 on an iron cored bar 2 as shown in FIG. Since the refractory 4 of the impeller 1 is repeatedly heated and cooled, an alumina / silica / silicon carbide-based casting material having excellent heat-resistant spalling properties is often used. Corrosion resistance does not matter so much, and the surface peeling of the refractory 4 on the blade portion 6 rather than the shaft portion 5 usually determines the impeller life.
[0004]
This is because the immersion in the hot metal 7 and the stand-by for cooling are repeated, so that a large thermal shock is applied and peeling occurs particularly in the blade portion 6 having a complicated shape. In order to increase the refractory life, refractories with higher thermal shock resistance have been used.
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
[0005]
However, when the number of treatments per day is large (for example, 50 charges per day), the refractory is peeled off from the shaft core, the core is melted, and the impeller tip is dropped. A high-strength casting material was applied to this phenomenon, but this could not be prevented.
[0006]
The inventors analyzed the cause of the problem that when the number of treatments per day is increased, the refractory is peeled off from the cored bar, the cored bar is melted and the tip of the impeller is dropped off as follows.
(1) When the number of processes per day increases, the interval between one process and the next process decreases, so the cooling time decreases and the core metal temperature rises.
[0007]
(2) Since the surface of the metal core is in contact with the refractory, the temperature of both is the same at the boundary, but the coefficient of thermal expansion of the metal core (iron) is larger than that of the refractory, so This increases the expansion amount, and tensile stress is applied to the refractory.
(3) Even when the daily processing amount is small, the core metal temperature rises to some extent and a similar tensile stress is generated, but it is considered that the stress was absorbed by the refractory because the stress was small.
[0008]
(4) Refractories are resistant to compressive stress but weak to tensile stress. If the core metal temperature rises and the tensile stress received from the core metal and anchor increases, the refractory material cannot withstand and cracks occur. .
(5) The hot metal penetrates into the cracks that have occurred, melts the cored bar and the anchor, and finally peels off the shaft refractory from the cored bar. If the damage is significant, the blades at the tip end fall off.
[0009]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
In view of such problems, the present invention aims to be able to be used stably even under conditions where the number of treatments per day is high , and between a core metal of an impeller for hot metal desulfurization and a refractory around the core metal, In addition, for the desulfurization, a small gap is provided between the anchor attached to the core metal and the refractory around the core metal and the anchor and the refractory to absorb a difference in expansion due to thermal shock . Impeller is provided.
[0010]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
An impeller for desulfurization according to the present invention includes a metal core and an anchor between a core metal of an impeller for hot metal desulfurization and a refractory around the metal core, and between an anchor attached to the metal core and a refractory around the metal core. And a small gap that appropriately absorbs the difference in expansion due to thermal shock of these refractories .
[0011]
By installing a disappearing material 8 that disappears at a high temperature between the core metal 2 and anchor 3 of the impeller 1 and the refractory 4, the core metal 2 and anchor 3 and the core metal 2 and anchor 3 are used before or during use as shown in FIG. Microscopic gaps 9 and 10 are generated between the refractory 4, and the microscopic gaps 9 and 10 absorb the difference in expansion between the metal core 2 and the refractory 4.
[0012]
When the expansion of the core metal 2 in the radial direction is considered, the expansion of the diameter of the refractory 4 is smaller than the expansion of the diameter of the core metal 2. When the difference in expansion between the metal core 2 and the refractory 4 becomes larger than the thickness of the micro gaps 9 and 10, compressive stress is applied to the refractory 4 side.
[0013]
The thickness of the minute gaps 9 and 10 is not necessarily larger than the difference in expansion. This is because although there is a difference in expansion even when the number of treatments per day is small, it does not lead to the drop of the impeller tip, so that a certain amount of expansion difference can be absorbed.
[0014]
Accordingly, when the diameter of the cored bar is a, the thickness ts of the shaft cored bar portion of the shaft 5 of the material that disappears at high temperature is 0.2 × 10 −3 a ≦ ts ≦ 4 × 10 −. 3 a is preferable. If it is smaller than 0.2 × 10 −3 a, the effect of absorbing the expansion is not sufficient. On the other hand, if it is larger than 4 × 10 −3 a, the minute gap 9 is too large, and a gap is formed at a high temperature between the refractory 4 and the cored bar 2 of the shaft portion 5. This is not preferable because the possibility of the occurrence of destruction is increased. More preferably, 0.4 × 10 −3 a ≦ ts ≦ 2 × 10 −3 a.
[0015]
Further, when the diameter of the core bar is a, the thickness ta of the anchor 3 of the material that disappears at a high temperature is preferably 0.6 × 10 −3 a ≦ ta ≦ 8 × 10 −3 a. It is desirable that the gap ta between the anchor 3 and the refractory 4 is larger than the gap ts between the shaft core and the refractory 4. This is because when the axis of the impeller 1 is considered, the axial length is larger than the radial length. This is because the axial expansion difference is mainly transmitted as stress to the refractory 4 through the anchor 3, and the radial expansion difference is mainly transmitted as stress from the core metal 2 directly to the refractory 4.
[0016]
If ta is smaller than 0.6 × 10 −3 a, the effect of absorbing the amount of expansion in the axial direction is not sufficient. On the other hand, if it is larger than 12 × 10 −3 a, the minute gap 10 is too large and a gap is formed between the refractory 4 and the anchor 3 at a high temperature, so that the role of the anchor 3 cannot be achieved. It is not preferable because there is a high possibility that destruction due to the gap occurs due to the above. More preferably, 1.2 × 10 −3 a ≦ ta ≦ 6 × 10 −3 a.
[0017]
On the other hand, the thickness of the blade cored bar at the blade 6 is not directly related to the above-described shaft peeling. However, since the stress due to the difference in thermal expansion is also generated in the blade portion 6, it is more preferable to create a similar gap in order to suppress this. The thickness at this part may be approximately the same as the thickness ta at the anchor 3 part. Even if there is a difference, there is no problem.
[0018]
When the number of treatments per day increases, the reason why significant damage appears only in the shaft portion is not necessarily clear, but it is considered as follows from observation of the impeller in use. That is, remarkable adhesion of the metal is recognized at the root part of the blade part in use. This is considered that the hot metal was cooled and solidified by the refractory. Even if a crack similar to that of the shaft portion occurs, the surface of the refractory has a bare metal, so that the bare metal does not penetrate. As a result, the occurrence of cracks does not directly affect the life of the refractory.
[0019]
However, in the part where the metal part of the blade part is not attached, the same metal infiltration, refractory material peeling, core metal melting, etc. as in the shaft part occur. The effect of suppressing the damage and increasing the service life can be expected.
[0020]
Various organic substances can be used as the disappearing material that disappears at high temperatures between the core metal and the anchor and the refractory. It is not always necessary to completely disappear at a high temperature, and even if some ash, carbon, etc. remain, there is no problem as long as it has no strength and can be easily destroyed when subjected to stress.
[0021]
Specifically, as the form of the material, a sheet-like material such as fiber, tape, cloth, paint, or film can be used. As materials, various plastics, polymers, organic fibers and the like can be used. The installation method is not particularly limited. For example, a means such as winding a tape, applying a paint, or spray coating a film can be taken.
[0022]
After the disappearance material is installed on the cored bar and the anchor, the casting material for the irregular refractory can be poured around it. Although this construction method is not particularly limited, a method in which a mold is installed and cast is generally used. At this time, a rod-shaped vibrator or a formwork vibrator may be used.
[0023]
【Example】
In the desulfurization impeller of the KR method, the damage state and the life were compared between the case where the material 8 disappearing between the core metal 2 and the anchor 3 and the refractory 4 was installed and the case where the material 8 was not installed. The impeller 1 has a shaft portion 5 having a core metal diameter a = 300 mm, a refractory outer diameter of 600 mm, and a length of 1200 mm. Four blades are installed on the lower side, and each blade has a size of 400 × 850 × 600 mm on an outer dimension of the refractory 4 on a core metal 2 of 300 × 500 × 120 mm. An anchor is attached to the cored bar 2.
[0024]
The refractory 4 used was a casting material of alumina / silica / silicon carbide, and the chemical composition was 65% for Al 2 O 3 , 25% for SiO 2 , and 11% for SiC. In the example, plastic was applied to the core metal 2 and the anchor 3 so that ts = 0.3 mm = 1.0 × 10 −3 a and ta = 1.0 mm = 3.3 × 10 −3 a. On top of that, a refractory 4 was poured and applied. On the other hand, in the comparative example, the refractory was poured directly onto the cored bar and the anchor.
[0025]
When the treatment amount per day was 30 to 33 charges, the life was 220 to 250 charges in any case, and the damage state was not significantly changed. On the other hand, when the processing amount per day was 48 to 50 charges, the life of the example was 250 to 265 charges, and the damage that determined the life was a loss of blades. However, in the case of the comparative example, the life decreased to 150 to 165 charge, and the damage that determines the life was dropping of the blade portion due to the loss of the shaft portion. Thus, the superiority of the present invention was confirmed.
[0026]
As described above, it is preferable that the fine voids of the desulfurizing impeller disappear during the desulfurization treatment, in order to save energy, but it can also disappear by heating to a high temperature separately in advance. .
[0027]
【The invention's effect】
As described above, in the present invention, the core between the impeller core for hot metal desulfurization and the refractory around the core, and between the anchor attached to the core and the refractory around the core, Since the micro-gap that absorbs the difference in expansion due to thermal shock between the gold and anchor and these refractories is provided , even when the number of treatments per day is large in desulfurization such as the KR method, It is possible to absorb the difference in expansion from the refractory at the section, to prevent the refractory of the impeller from cracking and to prevent the molten metal from penetrating and dropping off the refractory, and to improve the durability of the impeller.
[0028]
Then, a thin forming material such as a sheet, tape, or paint is disposed between the core bar and anchor of the desulfurizing impeller and the refractory, and disappears at a high temperature , depending on the sheet thickness, tape thickness, and paint film thickness . By providing a minute gap that absorbs the thermal shock expansion difference , a uniform minute gap can be easily provided between the core and anchor of the desulfurizing impeller and the refractory, as described above. An effect can be given.
[0029]
As described above, it is preferable that the fine voids of the desulfurizing impeller disappear during the desulfurization treatment, in order to save energy, but it can also disappear by heating to a high temperature separately in advance. .
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view illustrating a state in which a desulfurization impeller is immersed in hot metal,
FIG. 2 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a metal core, an anchor, and a refractory part according to the present invention.
[Explanation of symbols]
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Impeller 2 ... Core metal 3 ... Anchor 4 ... Refractory 5 ... Shaft part 6 ... Blade | wing part 8 ... Vanishing material 9, 10 ... Micro gap

Claims (2)

溶銑脱硫用のインペラの芯金とこの芯金のまわりの耐火物との間、および芯金に取り付けるアンカーとこのまわりの耐火物との間に、芯金およびアンカーとこれらの耐火物の熱衝撃による膨張差を吸収する微小空隙をそれぞれ設けるようにしたことを特徴とする脱硫用インペラ。Thermal shock of the core metal and the anchor and these refractories between the core metal of the impeller for hot metal desulfurization and the refractory around the core metal, and between the anchor attached to the core metal and the refractory around the core metal An impeller for desulfurization, characterized in that a micro-gap that absorbs the difference in expansion caused by each is provided. 脱硫用のインペラの芯金およびアンカーとこれらのまわりの耐火物との間にシート、テープ、塗料などの薄状形成材を配設して、高温時に消失してシート厚、テープ厚、塗料膜厚による熱衝撃の膨張差を吸収する微小空隙を設けるようにした請求項1に記載の脱硫用インペラ。A thin forming material such as a sheet, tape, or paint is disposed between the core bar and anchor of the impeller for desulfurization and the refractory around them, and the sheet thickness, tape thickness, paint film disappears at high temperatures. The impeller for desulfurization according to claim 1, wherein a minute gap that absorbs a difference in expansion of thermal shock due to thickness is provided.
JP2001368178A 2001-12-03 2001-12-03 Impeller for desulfurization Expired - Fee Related JP3742001B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2001368178A JP3742001B2 (en) 2001-12-03 2001-12-03 Impeller for desulfurization

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2001368178A JP3742001B2 (en) 2001-12-03 2001-12-03 Impeller for desulfurization

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2003166011A JP2003166011A (en) 2003-06-13
JP3742001B2 true JP3742001B2 (en) 2006-02-01

Family

ID=19177807

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2001368178A Expired - Fee Related JP3742001B2 (en) 2001-12-03 2001-12-03 Impeller for desulfurization

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3742001B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5611621B2 (en) * 2010-03-10 2014-10-22 東京窯業株式会社 Impeller for molten metal stirring
KR101543573B1 (en) * 2013-11-26 2015-08-13 한국내화 주식회사 Impeller for molten iron agitation
CN112892264B (en) * 2021-01-21 2022-06-03 武汉钢铁有限公司 Efficient and stable mixing stirrer in full-service process

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2003166011A (en) 2003-06-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8062581B2 (en) Refractory crucibles capable of managing thermal stress and suitable for melting highly reactive alloys
US7761969B2 (en) Methods for making refractory crucibles
JP3742001B2 (en) Impeller for desulfurization
JPWO2003086684A1 (en) Joining structure of refractory sleeve for nozzle inner hole for continuous casting
JPS63157747A (en) Submerged nozzle for continuous casting
JP2009091204A (en) Casting refractory for molten metal treatment
JP3393829B2 (en) Immersion nozzle
JP5745433B2 (en) Injection tube
JP2004035957A (en) Impeller device for desulfurization
JPH10141869A (en) Lining structure of induction heating device
JP2003039139A (en) Scum dam of twin drum continuous casting machine
JP5611621B2 (en) Impeller for molten metal stirring
JP4648506B2 (en) Refractories for continuous casting
JP7695530B2 (en) Twin roll continuous casting method
JPS59133954A (en) Immersion type molten metal charging nozzle
JP2013188764A (en) Nozzle for casting
JP3580212B2 (en) Method of manufacturing stave cooler
JP2001009558A (en) Tundish injection tube
JP7222262B2 (en) Protective Refractory for Induction Heating Coil and Electromagnetic Induction Heating Method
JPH0744363Y2 (en) Inner coating injection pipe for tundish
JPH08290239A (en) Mold for continuous casting
JPH04294847A (en) Nozzle for continuous casting
KR20090067839A (en) Oxygen Lance Attachment Prevention Device
KR810001379B1 (en) Non-chilled method for centrifugal casting
JPH06254663A (en) Intermediate nozzle with insulating layer for continuous casting

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20040427

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20050524

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20050531

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20050617

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20050712

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20050809

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20050916

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20050916

A911 Transfer of reconsideration by examiner before appeal (zenchi)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911

Effective date: 20050929

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20051101

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20051109

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees