JP3764939B2 - Method for determining lance installation position for blast furnace pulverized coal injection - Google Patents
Method for determining lance installation position for blast furnace pulverized coal injection Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP3764939B2 JP3764939B2 JP03537398A JP3537398A JP3764939B2 JP 3764939 B2 JP3764939 B2 JP 3764939B2 JP 03537398 A JP03537398 A JP 03537398A JP 3537398 A JP3537398 A JP 3537398A JP 3764939 B2 JP3764939 B2 JP 3764939B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- pulverized coal
- lance
- blast furnace
- tuyere
- tip
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 title claims description 71
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 13
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 title claims description 4
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 title claims description 4
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 title description 3
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000007664 blowing Methods 0.000 description 16
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009413 insulation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012159 carrier gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003610 charcoal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000155 melt Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Landscapes
- Blast Furnaces (AREA)
Description
【0001】
【産業上の利用分野】
本発明は、高炉の羽口から微粉炭を吹込む方法に係るもので、特に微粉炭吹込用ランス(またはPCランス)の取付け位置を調整することにより微粉炭に由来する灰分が耐火物リングに付着するのを防止する高炉微粉炭吹込み用ランス取付け位置決定方法に関するものである。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
近年の高炉操業においては、燃料原単位の低減、炉況安定化のために、微粉炭粉末燃料を高炉に吹込む方法が実用化されている。図6は従来の微粉炭燃料の吹込み方法の一例を示す模式図であり、羽口1に連結されたブローパイプ2の壁を貫通して該羽口内に挿入した吹込みランス3より、微粉炭燃料をキャリアガス(主に空気)と共に高炉内に吹込む方法が一般的である。 該羽口内面には送風温度低下の抑制および羽口風速の調整を目的として断熱性の耐火物リング4を装着している。
【0003】
しかし、このような方法で微粉炭燃料を吹込む方法では、微粉炭に由来する灰分が1000〜1300℃の高温雰囲気における燃焼熱等で溶融すること、および断熱と羽口風速調整用の耐火物リングが微粉炭中灰分に似た成分構成であることがもとで、灰分が溶解物5の状態で耐火物リングの内周面に付着・溶損する現象があり、耐火物リングの寿命を著しく低下させていた。時には、高炉の連続稼働約数カ月間毎に実施する補修の予定休風日前にリングが破損し、リング装着効果のない状態のまま高炉を稼働せざるをえないこともしばしば見受けられた。このため、耐火物リングによる羽口断熱効果が得られず大きなエネルギーロスになるばかりでなく、羽口風速の調整が崩れて炉円周方向のアンバランスが発生し、その結果として炉況悪化をまねく等の問題があった。
【0004】
かかる対策として、灰分の耐火物リング(または羽口内周面)に付着するのを防止するために下記のような従来技術が提案されている。(1)特開昭58−171509号公報では、吹込みランスから羽口先端間での微粉炭燃焼率を低下させるようにランス先端部の位置を調整するもの、(2)特開平1-259110号公報では、羽口内周面に高圧気体を吹き付けて灰分付着を防止するもの、(3)特開平4-268002号公報では、ランス先端部をブローパイプの長手方向に平行に曲げるとともに、ブローパイプの軸芯と一致する位置にセットして吹込まれる微粉炭の流れを熱風の中心部で流れに沿うようにするもの、等が提案されている。
【0005】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
しかるに前記の方法は、次のような問題点がある。前記の(1)の適用条件は、耐火物リングを装着せず、かつブローパイプと羽口の内径が同一で段差のない条件において、ブローパイプ内径が 130〜180 mmで、かつ羽口とブローパイプの境界位置から 100〜350 mm上流側にランス先端部をセットするとあり、送風温度低下の抑制以外に羽口風速の調整を目的としてリングを装着する場合は問題を解決できていない。例えば、低圧損を指向した内径 180mmのブローパイプと連結した羽口の内径を、リング装着により 110mmまで絞って著しい段差が生じた場合には、該段差部で気流の停滞域が生じるため灰分付着はさほど抑制できていない。
(2)では別途付着防止手段を採るため、ブローパイプ内で圧損をきたし、かつ隆起部に損耗を生じるのでかえって問題となる。(3)ではランス内での微粉炭詰まりにより一旦閉塞させた場合、ランスを引き抜いて取替えることができないため、休風して羽口を取り外さない限り正常な状態に回復できない大きな欠点がある。
本発明は前記従来技術の問題を解消し、灰分の付着を防止させ、微粉炭吹込み高炉の羽口内面に、送風温度低下の抑制と羽口風速の調整を目的とした断熱性の耐火物リングを装着できる高炉微粉炭吹込み用ランス取付け位置決定方法を提供するものである。
【0006】
【課題を解決するための手段】
前記目的を達成するための本発明は、耐火物リングを内装した高炉羽口孔に先端部を突出して設ける微粉炭吹込用ランスの取付け位置を、前記ランスの先端部がリング長手方向の範囲内とし、かつリング内周面から下記(1)式の条件を満足する値の距離だけ離れた位置とすると共に、微粉炭各種銘柄の揮発分含有量に応じて、ランスから噴出する微粉炭の広がり角度θを下記(2)式から算出し、得られた算出値に基づいて微粉炭吹込用ランスの取付け位置を厳密に調整できることを特徴とするものである。
X≧L・tanθ ・・・(1)
但し、X:微粉炭吹込用ランス先端部の軸芯〜耐火物リング内周面の最短距離(mm)
L:羽口先端部〜ランス先端部までの距離(mm)
θ:ランスから噴出する微粉炭の広がり角度(°)
θ= [ 揮発分含有量35重量%時の微粉炭の広がり角度 ] −0.233× [ %VM ] +0.00667× [ %VM ] 2 ・・・(2)
但し、 [ %VM ] :微粉炭の揮発分含有量(重量%)であり、20重量%〜45重量%の範囲とする。
【0008】
【実施の形態】
ランスから吹込まれた微粉炭は送風ガスの流れにより加速され、追従する形で羽口の長手方向へと飛行するに伴い、断面方向にも徐々に拡散されてゆく。図1はランスから吹込まれた微粉炭流れと拡散の状態を模式的に表したものである。ここで、ランスから噴出される微粉炭の広がり角度θが重要となるが、この値は例えば実際の高炉の羽口を対象にし、ランスの取付け位置を様々変えた条件で耐火物リングへの灰分付着状況を調べることで確認できる。
【0009】
したがって、送風ガス流に異常な流れの発生しない耐火物リング長手方向の範囲内にランス先端部が位置するようランス取付けの調整を行うとともに、ランスから噴出する微粉炭の広がり角度を考慮した分だけ、ランス先端部と耐火物リング内周面との距離を十分にとるようにすれば、微粉炭吹込み高炉においても送風温度低下の抑制と羽口風速の調整を目的とした断熱性の耐火物リングを安心して装着することが可能になる。
【0010】
【実施例】
以下では、内容積2650m3 の高炉羽口10本を対象とした試験結果をもとにランスから噴出する微粉炭の広がり角度θを調査し、耐火物リングへの灰分付着が生じない条件を求めた際の内容について説明する。
この高炉の試験期間における平均の送風条件と微粉炭吹込み条件は次のとおりである。
<送風条件>
送風量 :3900Nm3 /min
送風温度 :1160℃
羽口風速 :230m/s
フローハイフ内径:180mm
リング内径:110mm
<微粉炭吹込み条件>
微粉炭吹込み流量:41t/h(PC比:165kg/t)
微粉炭粒度 :200mesh以下の粒度のものを70重量%以上
ランス挿入角度 :11°
ちなみに、各高炉メーカーでは羽口内面または羽口リング内面への灰分付着対策などの目的でランス挿入角度を小さくし、より炉内側へランスの先端を伸長するなどの手段がとられてきたが、設計上での限界から、一般的な高炉ではランス角度が10〜12°とほぼ同一の仕様となり、国内の高炉メーカー間での差は認められない。 また国内の高炉の大部分は、羽口内での熱風の風速も平均 210〜245m/sと高流速側の範囲内で調整が行なわれ、高炉間での羽口風速に関する格差もさほど大きくない。
したがって、上記2項目の変数が微粉炭の広がり角度θにおよぼす影響の調査は割愛し、本実炉試験では一定とした。
【0011】
実炉試験では、10本の羽口にランス取付け条件であるXとLの関係[図1参照]がそれぞれ異なるように外径19.4mmのランスを取付けた。耐火物リングへの灰分付着状況は羽口内状況を観察するためにブローパイプ長手方向の炉外側片端に設けられた覗き窓からの目視、あるいは覗き窓に取付けた羽口カメラにより確認を行った。得られた結果を整理したものが図2である。ここで使用した微粉炭は最も使用頻度の高い代表的な銘柄のもので、成分は揮発分=35重量%,灰分=9重量%である。図中の結果より、灰分付着の有無の結果を微粉炭の広がり角度θ=5°とした境界線で層別すればよいことがわかる。
ただし例外的に、耐火物リングの炉外側片端より上流の位置においては、すべての条件で灰分付着を生じる現象がみられた。
【0012】
また最近では微粉炭銘柄毎の需給変動を解消する目的で、複数銘柄の炭種を使用せざる負えないというハード面での問題がある。したがって、上記の代表的な銘柄以外の高揮発分含有の微粉炭使用にも対応する必要がある。特に高揮発分含有の微粉炭を使用した場合には、ランス先端近傍での急激な揮発分の放出によって、羽口断面方向への分散が低揮発分含有微粉炭に比べて大きくなる。
微粉炭の広がり角度θに関し、低揮発分と高揮発分の各代表銘柄2種についても実炉試験を行った。それぞれの炭種での揮発分は20重量%と45重量%であり、実炉試験結果を図3、図4に示す。同図をもとに、微粉炭の広がり角度θを求めると、前者は3°で後者は8°であった。また他の種々の揮発分含有量の微粉炭による試験結果も合わせて得られた広がり角度θの結果を整理すれば、θは揮発分含有量VMの関数とした次の式の関係により表現される。
θ=[揮発分含有量35重量%時の微粉炭の広がり角度]−0.233 ×[%VM] +0.00667 ×[%VM]2
【0013】
図5はランス先端が従来の位置の場合と、本発明のランス取付け条件を満足する位置の場合と、微粉炭吹込みを行わなかった場合における耐火物リングの平均寿命を示したものである。同図より、従来の位置にランス先端がある場合のリング平均寿命は45日程度であるのに対して、本発明の取付け条件を満足する場合には300日以上にも延長され、微粉炭吹込みを行わない場合に匹敵する長寿命が得られることがわかる。
【0014】
【発明の効果】
以上説明したように本発明の方法によれば、ランスから噴出する微粉炭の広がり角度を考慮した分だけ、ランス先端部と耐火物リング内周面との距離を十分にとると共に微粉炭各種銘柄の揮発分含有量に応じて算出した微粉炭の広がり角度に基づいてランス取付け位置を調整するため、微粉炭吹込み高炉においても送風温度低下の抑制と羽口風速の調整を目的とした断熱性の耐火物リングを安心して装着することが可能となり、微粉炭吹込みを行わない場合に匹敵する寿命まで延長できた。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】ランスから吹込まれる微粉炭流れと拡散の状態を模式的に表した図である。
【図2】揮発分含有量35重量%の微粉炭を使用した場合に、様々なランス取付け位置毎の灰分付着の有無を調査した試験結果の図である。
【図3】揮発分含有量20重量%の微粉炭を使用した場合に、様々なランス取付け位置毎の灰分付着の有無を調査した試験結果の図である。
【図4】揮発分含有量45重量%の微粉炭を使用した場合に、様々なランス取付け位置毎の灰分付着の有無を調査した試験結果の図である。
【図5】耐火物リングの平均寿命を示す線図である。
【図6】従来の微粉炭粉体燃料の吹込み方法の一例を示す概略図である。
【符号の説明】
1:羽口 2:ブローパイプ 3:微粉炭吹込みランス 4:耐火物リング
5:微粉炭中灰分に由来する付着物
X:微粉炭吹込用ランス先端部の軸芯から耐火物リング内周面までの最短距離
L:羽口先端部からランス先端部までの距離
θ:ランスから噴出する微粉炭の広がり角度[0001]
[Industrial application fields]
The present invention relates to a method for injecting pulverized coal from a tuyere of a blast furnace, and in particular, by adjusting the mounting position of a pulverized coal injecting lance (or PC lance), ash derived from the pulverized coal is added to the refractory ring. The present invention relates to a method for determining a lance mounting position for injecting blast furnace pulverized coal to prevent adhesion.
[0002]
[Prior art]
In recent blast furnace operations, a method of blowing pulverized coal powder fuel into a blast furnace has been put into practical use in order to reduce the fuel consumption rate and stabilize the furnace conditions. FIG. 6 is a schematic view showing an example of a conventional method for injecting pulverized coal fuel. From the injecting
[0003]
However, in the method of injecting pulverized coal fuel by such a method, the ash derived from pulverized coal is melted by combustion heat in a high temperature atmosphere of 1000 to 1300 ° C., and the refractory for heat insulation and tuyere wind speed adjustment Based on the fact that the ring has a composition similar to that of ash in pulverized coal, there is a phenomenon that the ash adheres to the inner surface of the refractory ring in the state of the
[0004]
In order to prevent the ash from adhering to the refractory ring (or tuyere inner peripheral surface), the following conventional techniques have been proposed as countermeasures. (1) In Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 58-171509, the position of the tip of the lance is adjusted so as to reduce the pulverized coal combustion rate from the blowing lance to the tip of the tuyere, (2) Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 1-259110 In the publication No. 4, the high pressure gas is blown to the inner peripheral surface of the tuyere to prevent ash from adhering. (3) In Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 4-26802, the tip of the lance is bent parallel to the longitudinal direction of the blow pipe, There has been proposed a method in which the flow of pulverized coal set in a position coincident with the axial center of the gas is aligned with the flow at the center of the hot air.
[0005]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
However, the above method has the following problems. The application condition of (1) is that the inner diameter of the blow pipe and the tuyere is the same and there is no step and the inner diameter of the blow pipe is 130 to 180 mm and the tuyere and blow The tip of the lance is set 100 to 350 mm upstream from the pipe boundary, and the problem cannot be solved when a ring is attached for the purpose of adjusting the tuyere wind speed in addition to the suppression of the air temperature drop. For example, when the inner diameter of a tuyere connected to a blow pipe with an inner diameter of 180 mm that is suitable for low-pressure loss is reduced to 110 mm by attaching a ring, a stagnant area of airflow occurs at the step, causing ash adhesion. It has not been suppressed so much.
In (2), since a separate adhesion preventing means is employed, pressure loss occurs in the blow pipe, and wear occurs in the raised portions, which is rather problematic. In (3), once clogged by pulverized coal in the lance, the lance cannot be pulled out and replaced. Therefore, there is a major disadvantage that the normal state cannot be recovered unless the wind is stopped and the tuyere is removed.
The present invention eliminates the problems of the prior art, prevents the adhesion of ash, and on the inner surface of the tuyeres of a pulverized coal blowing blast furnace, is a heat-insulating refractory for the purpose of suppressing a decrease in blowing temperature and adjusting the tuyere wind speed. The present invention provides a lance mounting position determination method for blowing blast furnace pulverized coal to which a ring can be attached.
[0006]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a mounting position of a pulverized coal blowing lance provided with a tip protruding from a blast furnace tuyere hole with a refractory ring installed, and the tip of the lance is within the range of the ring longitudinal direction. And the position of the ring inner peripheral surface separated by a distance satisfying the condition of the following formula (1), and the spread of pulverized coal ejected from the lance according to the volatile content of various pulverized coal brands The angle θ is calculated from the following equation (2), and the mounting position of the pulverized coal blowing lance can be strictly adjusted based on the obtained calculated value.
X ≧ L · tan θ (1)
X: shortest distance (mm) between the axis of the tip of the lance for injecting pulverized coal to the inner peripheral surface of the refractory ring
L: Distance from the tuyere tip to the lance tip (mm)
θ: Spread angle of pulverized coal ejected from the lance (°)
θ = [ Spread angle of pulverized coal when volatile content is 35% by weight ] −0.233 × [ % VM ] + 0.00667 × [ % VM ] 2 (2)
However, [ % VM ] : The volatile content (% by weight) of pulverized coal, and the range is from 20% to 45% by weight.
[0008]
Embodiment
The pulverized coal blown from the lance is accelerated by the flow of the blown gas, and gradually diffuses in the cross-sectional direction as it flies in the longitudinal direction of the tuyere in a follow-up manner. FIG. 1 schematically shows the pulverized coal flow blown from the lance and the state of diffusion. Here, the spread angle θ of the pulverized coal ejected from the lance is important, but this value is for example the actual tuyere of the blast furnace, and the ash content to the refractory ring under various conditions of changing the mounting position of the lance. This can be confirmed by examining the adhesion status.
[0009]
Therefore, the lance mounting is adjusted so that the tip of the lance is positioned within the longitudinal range of the refractory ring where no abnormal flow occurs in the blast gas flow, and the spread angle of the pulverized coal ejected from the lance is taken into account. If a sufficient distance between the tip of the lance and the inner peripheral surface of the refractory ring is taken, a heat-insulating refractory aimed at suppressing a decrease in the blowing temperature and adjusting the tuyere wind speed even in a pulverized coal blowing blast furnace It becomes possible to attach the ring with peace of mind.
[0010]
【Example】
Below, the spread angle θ of pulverized coal ejected from the lance is investigated based on the test results for 10 blast furnace tuyere with an internal volume of 2650 m 3 , and the conditions under which ash does not adhere to the refractory ring are obtained. The contents of the case will be described.
The average blowing conditions and pulverized coal blowing conditions during the blast furnace test period are as follows.
<Blower condition>
Air flow: 3900 Nm 3 / min
Air temperature: 1160 ° C
Tuyere wind speed: 230m / s
Flow height inner diameter: 180mm
Ring inner diameter: 110mm
<Pulverized coal blowing conditions>
Pulverized coal injection flow rate: 41 t / h (PC ratio: 165 kg / t)
Pulverized coal particle size: 70% by weight or more with a particle size of 200 mesh or less Lance insertion angle: 11 °
By the way, each blast furnace manufacturer has taken measures such as reducing the lance insertion angle and extending the tip of the lance further to the inside of the furnace for the purpose of measures against ash adhesion to the inner surface of the tuyere or tuyere ring, Due to design limitations, the lance angle for a typical blast furnace is almost the same as 10-12 °, and there is no difference between domestic blast furnace manufacturers. In most blast furnaces in Japan, the average wind speed of hot air in the tuyere is adjusted within the range of 210 to 245 m / s, which is on the high flow rate side, and there is not much difference in the tuyere wind speed between blast furnaces.
Therefore, the investigation of the effect of the above two variables on the spread angle θ of pulverized coal was omitted, and it was assumed to be constant in this actual furnace test.
[0011]
In the actual furnace test, lances with an outer diameter of 19.4 mm were attached to 10 tuyere so that the relationship between the lance attachment conditions X and L (see FIG. 1) was different. The state of ash adhesion to the refractory ring was confirmed by visual observation from a viewing window provided at one end of the furnace outside in the longitudinal direction of the blowpipe or by a tuyere camera attached to the viewing window in order to observe the situation inside the tuyere. FIG. 2 summarizes the obtained results. The pulverized coal used here is a representative brand most frequently used, and the components are volatile matter = 35% by weight and ash content = 9% by weight. From the results in the figure, it can be seen that the result of the presence or absence of ash adhesion may be stratified by a boundary line where the spread angle θ of pulverized coal is 5 °.
However, in exceptional cases, ash deposits were observed under all conditions at a position upstream of one end of the refractory ring outside the furnace.
[0012]
In recent years, there has been a problem in terms of hardware that it is inevitable to use multiple types of coal for the purpose of eliminating fluctuations in supply and demand for each pulverized coal. Therefore, it is necessary to cope with the use of pulverized coal containing a high volatile content other than the above representative brands. In particular, when pulverized coal having a high volatile content is used, the dispersion in the tuyere cross-sectional direction becomes larger than that of the low volatile content pulverized coal due to a rapid release of the volatile content near the tip of the lance.
With respect to the spread angle θ of the pulverized coal, an actual furnace test was also conducted for two representative brands of low volatile content and high volatile content. The volatile content of each coal type is 20% by weight and 45% by weight, and the actual furnace test results are shown in FIG. 3 and FIG. Based on this figure, the spread angle θ of the pulverized coal was found to be 3 ° for the former and 8 ° for the latter. Moreover, if the results of the spread angle θ obtained by combining the test results of pulverized coal with various other volatile contents are arranged, θ is expressed by the relationship of the following equation as a function of the volatile content VM. The
θ = [Spread angle of pulverized coal when volatile content is 35% by weight] −0.233 × [% VM] + 0.00667 × [% VM] 2
[0013]
FIG. 5 shows the average life of the refractory ring when the tip of the lance is at a conventional position, when it is a position that satisfies the lance mounting conditions of the present invention, and when pulverized coal is not blown. From the figure, the ring average life when the tip of the lance is at the conventional position is about 45 days, whereas it is extended to more than 300 days when the installation conditions of the present invention are satisfied, It can be seen that a long life comparable to that obtained when the process is not performed is obtained.
[0014]
【The invention's effect】
As described above, according to the method of the present invention, a sufficient distance between the tip of the lance and the inner peripheral surface of the refractory ring is taken in consideration of the spread angle of the pulverized coal ejected from the lance, and various brands of pulverized coal. In order to adjust the lance installation position based on the spread angle of the pulverized coal calculated according to the volatile content of the pulverized coal, heat insulation for the purpose of suppressing air temperature drop and adjusting the tuyere wind speed even in the pulverized coal blowing blast furnace The refractory ring can be installed with peace of mind, and the life can be extended to the same level as when pulverized coal is not injected.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a diagram schematically showing a pulverized coal flow blown from a lance and a state of diffusion.
FIG. 2 is a diagram of test results for investigating the presence or absence of ash adhesion at various lance attachment positions when pulverized coal with a volatile content of 35% by weight is used.
FIG. 3 is a diagram of test results for examining the presence or absence of ash adhesion at various lance attachment positions when pulverized coal having a volatile content of 20% by weight is used.
FIG. 4 is a diagram of test results for examining the presence or absence of ash adhesion at various lance mounting positions when pulverized coal with a volatile content of 45% by weight is used.
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the average life of a refractory ring.
FIG. 6 is a schematic view showing an example of a conventional method for injecting pulverized coal powder fuel.
[Explanation of symbols]
1: tuyere 2: blow pipe 3: pulverized coal blowing lance 4: refractory ring 5: deposit X derived from ash in pulverized coal X: refractory ring inner peripheral surface from the shaft core of the lance for pulverized coal blowing Shortest distance L: Distance from tuyere tip to lance tip θ: Spread angle of pulverized coal ejected from lance
Claims (1)
X≧L・tanθ ・・・(1)X ≧ L · tan θ (1)
但し、X:微粉炭吹込用ランス先端部の軸芯〜耐火物リング内周面の最短距離(mm)X: shortest distance (mm) between the axis of the tip of the lance for injecting pulverized coal to the inner peripheral surface of the refractory ring
L:羽口先端部〜ランス先端部までの距離(mm)L: Distance from the tuyere tip to the lance tip (mm)
θ:ランスから噴出する微粉炭の広がり角度(°)θ: Spread angle of pulverized coal ejected from the lance (°)
θ=θ = [[ 揮発分含有量35重量%時の微粉炭の広がり角度Spread angle of pulverized coal when volatile content is 35% by weight ]] −0.233×-0.233x [[ %VM% VM ]] +0.00667×+ 0.00667x [[ %VM% VM ]] 22 ・・・(2) ... (2)
但し、However, [[ %VM% VM ]] :微粉炭の揮発分含有量(重量%)であり、20重量%〜45重量%の範囲とする。: The volatile content (% by weight) of pulverized coal, and the range is from 20% to 45% by weight.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP03537398A JP3764939B2 (en) | 1998-02-03 | 1998-02-03 | Method for determining lance installation position for blast furnace pulverized coal injection |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP03537398A JP3764939B2 (en) | 1998-02-03 | 1998-02-03 | Method for determining lance installation position for blast furnace pulverized coal injection |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH11222613A JPH11222613A (en) | 1999-08-17 |
| JP3764939B2 true JP3764939B2 (en) | 2006-04-12 |
Family
ID=12440106
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP03537398A Expired - Fee Related JP3764939B2 (en) | 1998-02-03 | 1998-02-03 | Method for determining lance installation position for blast furnace pulverized coal injection |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP3764939B2 (en) |
-
1998
- 1998-02-03 JP JP03537398A patent/JP3764939B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH11222613A (en) | 1999-08-17 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| TWI494436B (en) | Tuyere stock arrangement of a blast furnace | |
| EP2871247B1 (en) | Method for operating blast furnace | |
| JP2003286511A (en) | Method for improving the flammability of low volatile pulverized coal in a blast furnace | |
| JPS62263906A (en) | Method for blowing pulverized coal from blast furnace tuyere | |
| CN205115511U (en) | A air -cooled iron mouthful oxygen rifle system for blast furnace blow -on | |
| JP3764939B2 (en) | Method for determining lance installation position for blast furnace pulverized coal injection | |
| JP3796021B2 (en) | Method of blowing pulverized coal from blast furnace tuyere and blowing lance | |
| JP2006312757A (en) | Lance for blowing gas reducing material, blast furnace and blast furnace operating method | |
| JP3770358B2 (en) | Method for determining lance installation position for blast furnace pulverized coal injection | |
| JP4506337B2 (en) | Pulverized coal blowing burner for metallurgical furnace and method for blowing pulverized coal into metallurgical furnace | |
| JP2901998B2 (en) | How to inject pulverized coal into the blast furnace | |
| CN212431775U (en) | Smelting furnace nozzle device | |
| JPH0215105A (en) | Pulverized coal injection method for blast furnace | |
| JP3493937B2 (en) | How to blow pulverized coal into the blast furnace | |
| JP3561982B2 (en) | Blast furnace operation method | |
| JP4127032B2 (en) | Blast furnace pulverized coal injection burner and pulverized coal injection method into blast furnace | |
| JP2006312756A (en) | Lance for blowing gas reducing material, blast furnace and blast furnace operating method | |
| JPH0621284B2 (en) | Blast furnace tuyere | |
| JP2699778B2 (en) | Thermal spray repair equipment | |
| JPH1150113A (en) | Method of injecting pulverized coal into blast furnace | |
| JP2000192122A (en) | Structure of auxiliary fuel blowing tuyere in blast furnace | |
| TWI792906B (en) | Burner with imaging device, electric furnace equipped with the same, and method of manufacturing molten iron using the same | |
| CN216473301U (en) | A tuyere coal injection gun for Ouye furnace | |
| JP2921414B2 (en) | Lance position determination method for pulverized coal injection | |
| JPH1121605A (en) | How to install double pipe straight burner for blast furnace pulverized coal injection |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20050203 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20050920 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20051003 |
|
| A521 | Written amendment |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20051201 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20051221 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20051226 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090203 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100203 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100203 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110203 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110203 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120203 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |