Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP3834788B2 - Power consignment management method and management system - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP3834788B2 - Power consignment management method and management system - Google Patents

Power consignment management method and management system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP3834788B2
JP3834788B2 JP2002106658A JP2002106658A JP3834788B2 JP 3834788 B2 JP3834788 B2 JP 3834788B2 JP 2002106658 A JP2002106658 A JP 2002106658A JP 2002106658 A JP2002106658 A JP 2002106658A JP 3834788 B2 JP3834788 B2 JP 3834788B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
power
power generation
facility
demand
load
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP2002106658A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2003304642A (en
Inventor
陽 大澤
美雄 佐藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Ltd
Priority to JP2002106658A priority Critical patent/JP3834788B2/en
Publication of JP2003304642A publication Critical patent/JP2003304642A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3834788B2 publication Critical patent/JP3834788B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04SSYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S10/00Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y04S10/50Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications

Landscapes

  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Description

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は、電力系統に接続された発電設備と負荷設備との間で同時同量を満たして売電する電力託送管理方法及び管理システムに係り、特に、収益率を改善する電力託送管理に関する。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
自由化された電力市場では、発電事業者、電力消費者、これらを仲立ちする中間業者(以下マーケッタと称す)により市場が構成され、これらの構成員により種々の形態で電力が取引される。なお、市場の構成員は、これらの形態に限られるものではなく、発電設備を所有するマーケッタや、電力消費者ともなる発電事業者なども存在する。
【0003】
このような電力市場では、市場構成員のそれぞれが、自己の収益を最大にするように活動する。つまり、発電事業者はできるだけ高く電力を売ろうとし、マーケッタは電力をできるだけ安く購入してできるだけ高く売ろうとし、消費者はできるだけ安く電力を購入しようとする。
【0004】
一方で、これらの市場構成員は、長期的な収益の安定性をも重要視する。例えば、発電事業者は、短期的な収入が最大になる可能性があるが変動が予想される売電先よりも、単価が比較的安くても長期間供給量と価格が保証される安定した契約を選ぶ傾向にある。
【0005】
このような自由化された電力取引に対応して、発電事業者の収益を最大にする発電設備の運用決定法が、例えば特開2001−86645号公報に提案されている。これによれば、複数の市場価格を予測し、最も価格の高い市場に向けて電力を売るように意思決定し、収益を最大にするように発電設備の運用を決めるようにしている。また、消費者側の収益を最大にする買電法が、例えば特開2000−78747号公報に提案されている。
【0006】
一般に、自由化された電力市場における取引の大部分は、相対取引または店頭外取引と呼ばれる、発電事業者と消費者の一対一の中長期契約であり、短期のスポット市場は多くても全需要の20%程度であると予想されている。したがって、取引量の点からも、市場構成員にとっては、短期のスポット市場を上手く利用する手法も重要であるが、最適な中長期契約を締結することの方がより重要である。
【0007】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
ところで、発電事業者又はマーケッタ(以下、発電事業者と総称する。)は、自己が発電又は調達した電力を一般電気事業者(いわゆる電力会社)の電力系統を利用して消費者に売電することが多い。このように、電力会社の送電網を経由して売電する方式を、一般に電力託送と称し、一定の託送料を電力会社に支払うようになっている。電力託送契約は、一般に、契約対象の発電設備と負荷設備をそれぞれ1箇所で電力系統に接続し、その接続点において監視する電力の需給が一定の許容範囲以内で一致しなければならない、いわゆる同時同量の制約がある。つまり、発電量と消費量が同一時に、同一量であることが前提で、これに違反した場合は一定のペナルティが課せられる。
【0008】
したがって、同時同量の制約を守り、しかも収益が安定し、かつ最大にできる売電契約をすることが、自由化市場における発電事業者にとって最も重要な課題である。
【0009】
しかし、従来の技術においては、同時同量の制約を考慮していないという問題があった。すなわち、同時同量の制約を守るために、発電設備は負荷設備の需要(以下、デマンドと称する。)に対応して追従制御により過不足なく発電しなければならない。ところが、中長期契約の場合、当初は予想できなかった事由や、消費者側の事情によって、デマンドが発電設備の運用制限に近づき、あるいは制限を超えることがある。ここで、運用制限とは、例えば、発電設備に最低負荷制限が設定され、発電出力がこれを下回ると発電設備を停止させなければならない場合がある。その理由は、低負荷では環境規制を守れないためであったり、火力発電所の場合は安定な燃焼が保持できない場合等である。
【0010】
したがって、デマンドが発電設備の最低負荷制限を下回った場合における発電設備の選択枝は、発電設備の停止又は最低負荷の保持のいずれかになる。しかし、いずれの場合も、同時同量を守れなくなるから、需給差に応じて電力会社にペナルティを支払う必要があり、発電事業者にとっては大きな損失となる。また、発電設備を停止する場合は、起動停止に伴うエネルギー損失も生ずる。
【0011】
一方、電力託送に関する約款で、逆潮流、即ち供給量が消費量を上回ることが禁止されている場合は、逆潮流が発生すると系統管理者である電力会社の指令によって、発電設備側の遮断機を開き、強制的に発電を停止させられることがある。
【0012】
本発明は、電力託送における同時同量の制約を満たす電力託送管理方法及び管理システムを実現することを第1の課題とする。
【0013】
また、本発明は、第1の課題に加えて、収益率を改善できる電力託送管理方法及び管理システムを実現することを第2の課題とする。
【0014】
【課題を解決するための手段】
第1の課題を解決する本発明の電力託送管理は、一の電力託送契約に係る発電設備の電力供給先の負荷設備と、他の電力託送契約に係る発電設備の電力供給先の負荷設備とを組替えて、電力託送に係る同時同量の制約を満足させることを特徴とするものであり、コンピュータを用いて実現することができる。
【0015】
すなわち、本発明は、発電事業者が契約に基づいて電力消費者に電力を託送する際に、託送契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の需給関係を組替えることにより、発電業者全体の収益が例えば最大になるように、電力託送を管理する。例えば、中長期の電力託送契約を結んでいる発電事業者と消費者の複数の契約について、一の発電事業者の発電設備が運用制限を受ける可能性がある場合、他の発電事業者の発電設備の売電契約先の負荷設備と一時的に交換することにより、運用制限を回避して損失を低減することを特徴とするものである。
【0016】
ところで、契約先を交換することによって、一の発電事業者の損失は低減できるが、他の発電事業者の収益は必ずしも増加しないことがある。この場合は、契約先の交換に伴う損益の減少分または利益の増加分を原資にして、全体として増加した収益を分け合う清算をすることで、双方にメリットが発生するようにする。
【0017】
また、本発明の電力託送管理方法は、複数の電力託送契約に係る各負荷設備の需要の変動を記録するとともに、将来の一定期間における需要を予測し、該予測された需要に対応する発電設備の前記一定期間における出力を予測し、該予測された出力が当該発電設備の運用制限を超えるか否か判断し、この判断結果が前記運用制限を超える場合には、前記複数の電力託送契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の組合せを替えれば前記運用制限を回避できるか否か判断し、この判断結果が前記運用制限を回避できる場合は、当該組替えに従って前記電力託送契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の組替えを前記一定期間について実行するようにすることができる。
【0018】
第2の課題は、前記組替えを実行するに際し、組替えを実行した場合と実行しない場合の前記複数の電力託送契約に係る収益を比較し、該収益が増加する場合に前記組替えを実行することにより解決できる。また、前記運用制限を回避できる組替えが複数ある場合は、最も収益が高い組替えを選択することが好ましい。さらに、前記組替えにより増加した収益を、当該組替えに係る複数の発電設備間で分配することが好ましい。
【0019】
また、本発明の電力託送契約の管理システムは、電力系統に接続された複数の発電設備と複数の負荷設備との間で締結された複数組の電力託送契約に従って、前記各負荷設備の需要に応じて契約に係る発電設備の出力を追従制御する電力託送契約の管理システムであって、前記各負荷設備の需要変動データを収集して記録する記録手段と、前記各負荷設備の需要変動データに基づいて、将来の一定期間における需要を予測する需要予測手段と、該予測された需要の負荷設備に対応する発電設備の前記一定期間における出力を予測する出力予測手段と、該予測された出力が当該発電設備の運用制限を超えるか否か判断する手段と、この判断結果が前記運用制限を超える場合に、前記複数の電力託送契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の組合せを替えて、前記運用制限を回避できるか否か判断する手段と、この判断結果が前記運用制限を回避できる場合に、当該組替えに従って前記電力託送契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の組替え指令を前記一定期間について出力する組替え手段とを備えてなることを特徴とする。
【0020】
【発明の実施の形態】
以下、本発明を実施の形態に基づいて説明する。図1に本発明の電力託送管理方法に係る一実施形態のフローチャートを示し、図2に本発明の電力託送管理システムを適用してなる電力託送システムの全体構成図を示す。
【0021】
図2に示すように、複数系統の発電設備10N(N=a〜n)は、それぞれ図示していない変電設備を介して電力系統70に接続されている。また、複数系統の負荷設備60N(N=a〜n)も、それぞれ図示していない変電設備を介して電力系統70に接続されている。電力系統70はいわゆる電力会社が所有する送電網である。図において、太線は電力の流れを示し、点線は情報の流れを示している。また、図中の添え字a〜nは、同一の添え字を有する発電設備と負荷設備同士が、電力託送の基本契約を締結している関係にあることを示している。なお、図示を省略したが、電力系統70には電力会社の発電所及び他の消費者の負荷設備が接続されている。
【0022】
発電設備10Nで発生した電力は、それぞれ変電設備で昇圧されて電力系統70に出力される。一方、負荷設備60Nで消費する電力は、電力系統70からそれぞれ変電設備により降圧されて供給される。発電設備10Nから電力系統70に供給される電力量は、接続点AN(N=a〜n)において計測され、同時同量制御手段80N(N=a〜n)に入力されている。また、電力系統70から負荷設備60Nに出力される電力量は、接続点BN(N=a〜n)において計測され、切替器95を介して同時同量制御手段80Nに入力されている。同時同量制御手段80Nは、それぞれ入力されるAN点における電力供給量と、BN点における電力需要量とを比較し、それらの供給と需要の差が設定された一定時間内で、制限範囲以内に収まるように、対応する発電設備10Nの出力を制御するようになっている。つまり、発電設備10Nの出力は、それぞれ託送関係にある負荷設備60Nの電力需要に、一定の制限内で一致していなければならないという、同時同量の制約を遵守するようになっている。
【0023】
一方、電力託送管理システム100は、管理制御装置101と、データベース102と、入出力装置103を有して構成され、コンピュータにより形成されている。管理制御装置101は、入出力装置103を介して、接続点BNにおける需要量の時系列データを取り込み、データベース101に需要変動データとして保存する。さらに、入出力装置103を介して気象状況や経済動向などの需要変動要因データを取り込みデータベース101に格納する。また、入出力装置103を介して発電設備10Nの運転状態データ及び特性データ等を取り込み、データベース101に発電設備データとして保存するようになっている。なお、外部とやりとりするデータは、入出力装置103を介して、例えばインターネット等の通信網を介して送受することができる。
【0024】
次に、図1を用いて、管理制御装置101における処理及び制御手順を説明する。図1のフローチャートは、所定の期間ごとに起動され、ステップS1で接続点BNにおける負荷設備60Nの需要DNを取り込み、データベース102に記録する。次いで、ステップS2において、データベース102に保存されている需要履歴データと、気象状況や経済動向などの負荷変動要因データと、現在の需要DNとに基づいて、将来の一定期間(i)における負荷設備60Nの需要(デマンド)DNiを予測する。そして、ステップS3において、予測デマンドDiと現在の契約組合せに基づいて、各負荷設備60Nに対応する発電設備10Nの発電出力PNiを予測する。ステップS4において、予測された発電出力PNiがその発電設備に定められた負荷運用制限の最低負荷制限LNiを下回るか否か、最高負荷制限HNiを上回るか否か判断する。つまり、PNi<LNi 又はPNi>HNiかを判断する。その判断が、いずれも否定(NO)のときは、処理を終了する。
【0025】
この判断が肯定(YES)のとき、つまり負荷運用制限に抵触するときは、ステップS5に進み、基本契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の組合せを入替えることができる組替え案を抽出する。例えば、図3の(a)に示すように、負荷設備60aの予測需要Daiが減少し、時刻T1において発電設備10aの最低負荷制限Laを下回る予測のときは、データベース102を検索して、その予測需要Daiよりも低い最低負荷制限を有する発電設備の有無を探す。そして、同図の(b)に示すように、発電設備10bの最低負荷制限Lbが予測需要Daiよりも低く、かつ一定期間(i)における発電設備10bに対するデマンドDbiが、発電設備10aの運用制限Lai及びHaiを満たしている場合、契約の組替えによる対応が可能である。なお、この場合、最低負荷制限LNよりも高い余裕を持ったしきい値LNsを基準にすることが好ましい。また、発電設備10Nに対応する負荷設備60N以外の所内電力等の負荷がある場合は、それらを考慮して発電出力PNiを予測する。このようにして、組替え可能な案を全て抽出し、1組でも組替え案が抽出された場合は、契約組替えによる対応可能と判断する。
【0026】
ステップS5における判断が否定のときは処理を終了する。つまり、発電設備10aと負荷設備60aの契約に係る同時同量を満たす対応索はないことになる。この場合は、従来と同様に、発電設備10aを停止するか、最低負荷制限Laによる運転継続を行なう。
【0027】
一方、ステップS5における判断が肯定のときは、ステップS6に進み、組替え可能な全ての組替え案について、収益性を評価する。つまり、発電出力の変化に応じて発電効率が変化すること、発電効率が変化すると燃料費用が変化することから、発電費用が増減する。また、同時同量のペナルティを免れることができる利益がある。したがって、組替え後の発電設備と負荷設備の組合せについてそれぞれ需給予測を実行し、発電費用の増減、免れ得る同時同量のペナルティ、その他の収益を考慮して、総合的な収益性を評価する。
【0028】
次いで、ステップS7において、ステップS6における評価に基づいて、収益性が改善される組替え案の有無を判断し、無ければ処理を終了する。収益性が改善される組替え案があれば、ステップS8に進んで最も収益性が高い組替え案を選択する。そして、一定期間(i)のタイミングに合わせて選択した組替え案に係る組合せに基づいて、入出力装置103を介して切替器95に切替指令を出力する。これにより、例えば、発電設備10aの同時同量制御手段80aには負荷設備60bの接続点Bbにおいて計測される需要Dbが入力され、発電設備10bの同時同量制御手段80bには負荷設備60aの接続点Baにおいて計測される需要Daが入力され、電力託送契約の組替えが行なわれる。
【0029】
その結果、発電設備10aは停止又は最低負荷運用を免れ、発電設備10bは負荷設備60aの負荷低減に追従して、同時同量の制約を満た運用を行なうことができる。
【0030】
また、管理制御装置101は、サブルーチンS20を実行して、組替えを行なった一定期間(i)における組替えに係る発電設備と負荷設備の需給関係、発電量、等の収益に関係する実績データを収集し、予め定めた清算ルールに従って、清算処理を実行する。
【0031】
このように構成される実施形態の効果について、次に説明する。比較のため、従来方式の電力託送管理について説明する。図2において切替器95がない場合、例えば、発電設備10aと負荷設備60a、発電設備10bと負荷設備60bが、それぞれ同時同量制御しなければならない。すなわち、同時同量制御手段80aは、接続点Aaと接続点Baの電力量を比較し、それらが同量になるように発電設備10aの出力を調節する。また、同時同量制御手段80bは、接続点Abと接続点Bbの電力量を比較し、それらが同量になるように発電設備10bの出力を調節する。
【0032】
このように制御していた場合、図4に示すように、時刻T1において何らかの理由により負荷設備60aのデマンドDaが、発電設備10aの最低負荷制限Laよりも下回ることがある。この最低負荷制限は、これ以下の出力では、例えば環境規制が守られないとか、火力発電設備の場合は燃焼の安定性が保証できないなどの理由から設定される。したがって、デマンドDaが発電設備10aの最低負荷制限Laを下回った場合、(1)速やかに発電設備10aを停止させる実運用Iを選択するか、(2)発電設備10aを最低負荷制限Laで保持する実運用IIのいずれかを選択することになる。しかし、いずれの場合も、同時同量を守れないので、図中斜線の(a)または(b)の領域に相当する需給差に応じてペナルティを支払うことになる。一方、発電設備10bの最低負荷制限Lbは、負荷設備60aのデマンドDaよりも低く、かつ負荷設備60bのデマンドDbは発電設備10aの最低負荷制限Laよりも高い状態にある。
【0033】
本来的には、一般に一年単位の中長期売電契約は、図4のような運用にならないように締結される。しかし、契約期間中に消費者側の事情が変わることがしばしばあるため、想定していなかった低負荷運用を強いられるケースが発生する。このような場合に、発電設備10aは、他の短期的な売電先を探して対応することも考えられる。しかし、スポット市場や店頭市場が成立しなければ、そのような短期需要を見つけることは困難である。また、例え市場があったとしても、一般的に発電効率が低い中間負荷で発電された電力は、単価が高いことから、短期市場で売れる保証はない。
【0034】
本実施形態は、そのような問題を解決するものであり、例えば発電設備10aと負荷設備60aの電力託送契約と、別の発電設備10bと負荷設備60bの電力託送契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の組合せを、契約期間中ならば任意に交換できるという前提に立つものである。
【0035】
すなわち、本実施形態において、発電設備10a、10bの運用に問題が生じない通常時においては、切替器95は同時同量制御手段80a、80bに基本契約の負荷設備に係る接続点Ba、Bbの需要Da、Dbを入力している。これに対し、図3における時刻T1以降のように、負荷設備60aのデマンドDaが発電設備10aの最低負荷制限Laを下回る場合は、管理制御手段101からの指令により、切替器95は接続点Baの計測値を同時同量制御手段80bに渡し、接続点Bbの計測値を同時同量制御手段80aに渡すように動作する。
【0036】
なお、実際には負荷設備60aのデマンドが、発電設備10aの最低出力制限Laを下回る時刻T1になってから契約の組替えをすると、自動運転されている発電設備10aは停止か、最低負荷保持のどちらかを選択しなければならなくなる。そこで、本実施形態では、前述したように需要予測に基づいて判断し、最低出力制限Laを下回る前に売電契約を交換するようにしている。すなわち、図3に示すように、最低負荷制限Laに近いところにしきい値Lsを設け、負荷設備60aの予測デマンドDaiが低下してしきい値Lsを下回ったときに、契約の組替えを実施するようにしている。
【0037】
その結果、発電設備10aの出力Paは、より高い負荷設備60bのデマンドDbに従って推移するため、最低負荷制限Laを下回らずに運転を継続できる。一方、発電設備10bは、負荷設備60aの低いデマンドDaに対しても最低負荷制限Lbまで余裕があるから、通常の運転を継続できる。
【0038】
このようにして契約の組替えを行なうことにより、発電設備10aの停止又は最低負荷保持運転による損失を回避することができる。例えば、停止した場合に比べると、図3の斜線部(b)、(c)の領域に相当する発電による収益が上げられる。一方、発電設備10bは、領域(c)分の出力を下げなければならないから、発電量(c)に相当する損失が発生する。そこで、契約組替えを実施するに当たり、発電設備10aから発電設備10bに対して、相応の対価が支払われなければならない。その対価は最低でも、発電設備10bが図4のように運転を継続できた場合の収益を保証できる金額でなければならない。ここで、発電設備の発電効率は、一般的に出力の関数になっており、高出力ほど高く、低出力ほど低い。したがって、上記の損失および収益の計算には、この発電効率の非線形性も考慮する必要がある。
【0039】
ここで、図1のサブルーチンS20において行なう契約交換に伴う対価の清算処理について説明する。契約組替えに伴う対価は、契約に組合せを交換する時点で一定の対価を支払う事前清算方式と、組替え運用中の実際の収支をある期間にわたって積算し、組替えを行なわなかった場合に推定される収支と比較して差益を計算し、その差益に基づいて清算する事後清算方式が考えられる。後者の事後清算方式における対価は比較的簡単な方法で計算できる。これは契約の組替えによって収益が低下する側の発電設備に対して、その収益低下分を保障する額を基本として、これに組替えそのもののプレミアムを加算する方法が考えられる。このプレミアムは、例えば契約交換をしなかった場合に発生したはずの損益に対して一定の比率を乗じて求める方法がある。
【0040】
一方、前者の事前清算方式における対価の計算は、例えば事後清算方式と同様な計算を、出力予測に基づいて事前に実施する方法が考えられる。また、組替えは金融工学のオプションとみなすことも出来るので、オプション価格理論に基づいて事前に対価(ここでは契約の価格)を決定することができる。すなわち、発電設備10aは、消費者60aの出力を変動要因として、消費者60aのデマンドが発電設備10aの最低負荷を下回った場合に、受給契約を交換する権利を、発電設備10bから購入する。これはコールオプションであり、ヨーロピアンオプションのオプション価格決定方法に基づいて、オプションプレミアムを決定することができる。
【0041】
次に、図1のステップS2において行なう負荷設備のデマンド予測方法について説明する。一般的に、変動する需要や価格の予測には、ニューラルネットによるパターン推定や、重回帰分析及び最小二乗推定などの統計による予測など、いくつかの方法が知られている。これらは、確定的なパターンを推定する方法である。この他に、確率的な予測方法として、確率微分方程式で変動する需要をモデル化し、将来における需要の期待値と分散を求める方法がある。
【0042】
ステップS2においては、いずれの予測方法によって予測デマンドを算出してもよい。ただし、確定的予測方法と、確率的予測方法では、結果の取り扱いが異なる。確定的予測値を使う場合は、予測値又は予測された需要曲線について、しきい値との関係を計算すればよい。しかし、確率的予測値、すなわち確定分の他にその分散も考慮する場合は、予測値に標準偏差の何倍かを加算または減算した値と、設定したしきい値との関係を評価する必要がある。また、需要の分散を考慮した全体の経済評価にも、分散が現れる。
【0043】
ところで、上述の実施形態においては、発電設備10Nが最低負荷制限を下回ることが予測された場合、及び発電設備10Nが最高負荷制限を上回ることが予測された場合の処理を例に説明したが、これに限らず、次の条件で契約の組替え処理による電力託送の管理をすることにより、電力託送契約の群管理により収益向上を期待することができる。
(1)ある発電設備が緊急停止した場合
(2)運用制限にかかわらず、全体の収益予測を実施して、契約を交換した場合のほうが収益の向上が見込まれる場合
なお、発電設備の出力の変動が大きいと、契約組替え後の組合せによっては、同時同量の制約を守れなくなる場合がある。そこで、契約の組替えに基づく同時同量制御の切替えの成立条件として、契約組替えを実施する発電設備同士の出力差が一定範囲以内にあることを加味することにより、同時同量の制約を守りやすくなる。
(変形例)
発電設備10Nは、1系統の発電装置からなる場合に限らず、並列された複数の発電装置を備えて構成される場合にも適用できる。この場合は、複数の発電装置を1系統の発電設備として取扱えば良い。
【0044】
また、発電設備10Nが、変電設備を介して電力系統70に電力を送出する上流側に、発電設備10Nとは独立に内部で電力を消費する負荷設備(以下、内部需要設備という。)を有する場合は、電力の内部需要についても予測が必要になる。そこで、負荷設備60Nについての需要予測と同様に、内部需要設備の需要予測を行なう。内部需要設備の需要について負荷設備と同様に、需要の変動を計測してデータベース101に記録する。そして、管理制御装置101に、内部需要予測の機能を追加し、図1のステップS2における負荷需要予測と同様の計算を実施する。そして、発電設備10Nの出力にその内部需要分を加算して、ステップS3以降の処理を実施する。内部需要の予測手法及び記録内容は、負荷設備60Nに関する場合と同様である。
【0045】
また、図1の実施形態においては、ステップS4において運用制限が問題にならない場合は、契約組替え処理は実行しないで、そのときの組合せに基づく電力託送を継続する例について説明した。しかし、運転制約条件が問題にならない場合でも、本発明の契約組替えによる収益改善を図る管理方法を適用することができる。すなわち、図1のフローチャートにおけるステップS4、S5を省略し、ステップS3から直接ステップS6に進んで、全ての組替え案について収益性を評価する。そして、実施形態1の場合と同じく、最も収益性が高い組合せを選択して、その予測期間についての契約組替えに基づき切替指令を切替器95に出力する。また、一方で、組替された契約に基づいて、サブルーチンS20の清算処理を行なうことはいうまでもない。
【0046】
【発明の効果】
以上述べたように、本発明によれば、電力託送における同時同量の制約を満たして、収益率を改善できる。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】本発明の一実施形態の電力託送管理方法の処理手順を示すフローチャートである。
【図2】本発明の一実施形態の電力託送管理システムを適用してなる電力託送システムの全体構成図である。
【図3】本発明の契約組替えによる同時同量の効果を説明するための線図である。
【図4】図3と比較のため同時同量の制約による従来の問題点を説明するための線図である。
【符号の説明】
10a、10b、…10n 発電設備
60a、60b、…60n 負荷設備
70 電力系統
80a、80b、…80n 同時同量制御手段
95 切替器
100 電力託送管理システム
101 データベース
103 入出力装置
[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a power consignment management method and a management system that sell power while satisfying the same amount between a power generation facility and a load facility connected to an electric power system, and more particularly to power consignment management that improves a profit rate.
[0002]
[Prior art]
In the liberalized electric power market, the electric power generation company, the electric power consumer, and an intermediate trader (hereinafter referred to as “marketer”) that mediates these are configured, and electric power is traded in various forms by these members. The members of the market are not limited to these forms, and there are marketers who own power generation facilities, power generation companies that are also power consumers, and the like.
[0003]
In such a power market, each of the market members works to maximize their profits. In other words, power generators try to sell power as high as possible, marketers want to buy power as cheaply as possible and sell as high as possible, and consumers try to buy power as cheaply as possible.
[0004]
On the other hand, these market members also attach importance to long-term earnings stability. For example, generators are more stable in terms of long-term supply and price, even if the unit price is relatively cheaper than the power sellers whose short-term income may be the largest but expected to fluctuate. Tend to choose contracts.
[0005]
In response to such liberalized power transactions, a method for determining the operation of a power generation facility that maximizes the profit of a power generation company has been proposed in, for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2001-86645. According to this, a plurality of market prices are predicted, a decision is made to sell power to the market with the highest price, and the operation of the power generation equipment is determined so as to maximize the profit. Further, for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2000-78747 proposes a power purchase method that maximizes the profit on the consumer side.
[0006]
In general, the majority of transactions in the liberalized electricity market are one-to-one medium- to long-term contracts between power producers and consumers, referred to as relative or off-the-counter transactions, and the short-term spot market is at most full demand. Is expected to be around 20%. Therefore, from the point of view of transaction volume, it is important for market members to make good use of the short-term spot market, but it is more important to conclude an optimal medium- to long-term contract.
[0007]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
By the way, a power generation company or marketer (hereinafter collectively referred to as a power generation company) sells electric power generated or procured by itself to consumers using a power system of a general electric company (so-called electric power company). There are many cases. In this way, a method of selling power via a power company's power transmission network is generally referred to as power consignment, and a fixed commission is paid to the power company. In general, a power consignment contract is a so-called simultaneous method in which the power generation equipment and load equipment to be contracted are connected to the power system at one location, and the power supply and demand monitored at that connection point must be within a certain tolerance. There are the same amount of constraints. In other words, when the power generation amount and the consumption amount are the same, it is assumed that they are the same amount, and if this is violated, a certain penalty is imposed.
[0008]
Therefore, it is the most important issue for power generation companies in the liberalized market to keep the same amount of restrictions and make a power sale contract that can stabilize and maximize profits.
[0009]
However, the conventional technique has a problem in that it does not consider the same amount of restrictions. In other words, in order to keep the same amount of restrictions, the power generation facility must generate power without excess or deficiency by following control corresponding to the demand of the load facility (hereinafter referred to as demand). However, in the case of medium- to long-term contracts, the demand may approach or exceed the operating limit of the power generation facility due to reasons that could not be expected at the beginning and the circumstances of the consumer. Here, the operation restriction may be, for example, that the minimum load restriction is set for the power generation equipment, and the power generation equipment must be stopped when the power generation output falls below this. The reason is that environmental regulations cannot be observed at low loads, or that stable combustion cannot be maintained in the case of thermal power plants.
[0010]
Therefore, when the demand falls below the minimum load limit of the power generation facility, the choice of the power generation facility is either to stop the power generation facility or to keep the minimum load. In either case, however, the same amount cannot be observed at the same time, so it is necessary to pay a penalty to the electric power company in accordance with the supply-demand difference, which is a big loss for the power generation company. In addition, when the power generation equipment is stopped, energy loss is also accompanied by the start and stop.
[0011]
On the other hand, if the contract relating to power consignment prohibits reverse power flow, that is, the supply amount exceeds consumption, when the reverse power flow occurs, the power system breaker will be May be forced to stop power generation.
[0012]
This invention makes it the 1st subject to implement | achieve the electric power consignment management method and management system which satisfy | fill the restrictions of the same amount in electric power consignment.
[0013]
Moreover, this invention makes it the 2nd subject to implement | achieve the electric power consignment management method and management system which can improve a profit rate in addition to a 1st subject.
[0014]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
The power consignment management of the present invention that solves the first problem includes a load facility of a power supply destination of a power generation facility according to one power consignment contract, and a load facility of a power supply destination of a power generation facility according to another power consignment contract To satisfy the restriction of the same amount related to the power consignment, and can be realized using a computer.
[0015]
That is, according to the present invention, when a power generation company consigns power to a power consumer based on a contract, the profit of the entire power generator can be obtained by rearranging the supply-demand relationship between the power generation equipment and the load equipment related to the consignment contract, for example. Manage power consignment to maximize. For example, if there is a possibility that one power generation facility's power generation facilities may be subject to operational restrictions for multiple contracts between a power generation company and a consumer who have a medium- to long-term power consignment contract, the power generation of another power generation company It is characterized in that the loss is reduced by avoiding operational restrictions by temporarily exchanging with the load equipment of the power sales contractor of the equipment.
[0016]
By the way, by exchanging contractors, the loss of one power generation company can be reduced, but the profits of other power generation companies may not necessarily increase. In this case, both the profits will be generated by liquidating the increased revenue as a whole by using the decrease in profit or loss or the increase in profit associated with the exchange of contractors as the source.
[0017]
Further, the power consignment management method of the present invention records fluctuations in demand of each load facility related to a plurality of power consignment contracts, predicts demand in a certain period in the future, and generates power generation equipment corresponding to the predicted demand Predicting the output during the predetermined period of time, determining whether the predicted output exceeds the operation limit of the power generation facility, and if the determination result exceeds the operation limit, the plurality of power consignment contracts It is determined whether or not the operation restriction can be avoided by changing the combination of the power generation equipment and the load equipment. If the determination result can avoid the operation restriction, the power generation equipment and the load equipment according to the power consignment contract according to the replacement. The rearrangement can be executed for the certain period.
[0018]
The second problem is that, when executing the reclassification, by comparing the revenues related to the plurality of power consignment contracts when the reclassification is performed and when not performing the reclassification, and performing the reclassification when the revenue increases can be solved. In addition, when there are a plurality of rearrangements that can avoid the operation restriction, it is preferable to select the rearrangement with the highest profit. Furthermore, it is preferable to distribute the profit increased by the recombination among a plurality of power generation facilities related to the recombination.
[0019]
The power consignment contract management system according to the present invention can meet the demand of each load facility according to a plurality of sets of power consignment contracts concluded between a plurality of power generation facilities and a plurality of load facilities connected to the power system. A power consignment contract management system for following and controlling the output of the power generation equipment according to the contract, and recording means for collecting and recording demand fluctuation data of each load equipment, and demand fluctuation data of each load equipment Based on the demand forecasting means for forecasting demand in a certain period in the future, output forecasting means for forecasting the output in the certain period of the power generation equipment corresponding to the load facility of the forecasted demand, and the forecasted output A means for determining whether or not the operation limit of the power generation facility is exceeded, and when the determination result exceeds the operation limit, the combination of the power generation facility and the load facility related to the plurality of power consignment contracts is changed. A means for determining whether or not the operation restriction can be avoided, and if the determination result can avoid the operation restriction, a restructuring instruction for the power generation equipment and the load equipment related to the power consignment contract according to the reassignment for the certain period And a recombination means for outputting.
[0020]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Hereinafter, the present invention will be described based on embodiments. FIG. 1 shows a flowchart of an embodiment of a power consignment management method of the present invention, and FIG. 2 shows an overall configuration diagram of a power consignment system to which the power consignment management system of the present invention is applied.
[0021]
As shown in FIG. 2, a plurality of systems of power generation equipment 10N (N = a to n) are connected to the power system 70 through substation equipment not shown. A plurality of systems of load facilities 60N (N = a to n) are also connected to the power system 70 via substation facilities not shown. The electric power system 70 is a transmission network owned by a so-called electric power company. In the figure, the thick line indicates the flow of power, and the dotted line indicates the flow of information. In addition, the subscripts a to n in the figure indicate that the power generation equipment and the load equipment having the same subscript have a relationship in which a basic contract for power consignment is concluded. Although illustration is omitted, the power system 70 is connected to a power plant of an electric power company and load facilities of other consumers.
[0022]
The electric power generated in the power generation facility 10N is boosted by the substation facility and output to the power system 70. On the other hand, the electric power consumed by the load facility 60N is supplied from the power system 70 by being stepped down by the substation facility. The amount of power supplied from the power generation facility 10N to the power system 70 is measured at the connection point AN (N = a to n) and input to the simultaneous same amount control means 80N (N = a to n). Further, the amount of power output from the power system 70 to the load facility 60N is measured at the connection point BN (N = a to n), and is input to the simultaneous same amount control means 80N via the switch 95. The simultaneous same amount control means 80N compares the input power supply amount at the AN point and the power demand amount at the BN point, and within a limited range within a set time in which the difference between the supply and demand is set. So that the output of the corresponding power generation facility 10N is controlled. In other words, the output of the power generation facility 10N is designed to comply with the same amount of restrictions that the power demand of the load facility 60N that is in a consignment relationship must match within a certain limit.
[0023]
On the other hand, the power consignment management system 100 includes a management control device 101, a database 102, and an input / output device 103, and is formed by a computer. The management control device 101 takes in the time-series data of the demand amount at the connection point BN via the input / output device 103 and stores it in the database 101 as demand fluctuation data. Further, demand fluctuation factor data such as weather conditions and economic trends is taken in via the input / output device 103 and stored in the database 101. In addition, operating state data and characteristic data of the power generation facility 10N are taken in via the input / output device 103 and stored in the database 101 as power generation facility data. Note that data exchanged with the outside can be transmitted and received via the input / output device 103, for example, via a communication network such as the Internet.
[0024]
Next, processing and control procedures in the management control apparatus 101 will be described with reference to FIG. The flowchart of FIG. 1 is activated every predetermined period, captures the demand DN of the load facility 60N at the connection point BN at step S1, and records it in the database 102. Next, in step S2, load facilities in a certain period (i) in the future based on the demand history data stored in the database 102, load fluctuation factor data such as weather conditions and economic trends, and the current demand DN. Predict the demand DNi of 60N. In step S3, the power generation output PNi of the power generation facility 10N corresponding to each load facility 60N is predicted based on the predicted demand Di and the current contract combination. In step S4, it is determined whether or not the predicted power generation output PNi is below the minimum load limit LNi of the load operation limit set for the power generation facility or above the maximum load limit HNi. That is, it is determined whether PNi <LNi or PNi> HNi. If all the determinations are negative (NO), the process ends.
[0025]
When this determination is affirmative (YES), that is, when the load operation restriction is violated, the process proceeds to step S5, and a recombination plan that can replace the combination of the power generation facility and the load facility according to the basic contract is extracted. For example, as shown in FIG. 3 (a), when the predicted demand Dai of the load facility 60a decreases and is predicted to fall below the minimum load limit La of the power generation facility 10a at time T1, the database 102 is searched, The power generation facility having a minimum load limit lower than the predicted demand Dai is searched for. And as shown in (b) of the figure, the minimum load restriction Lb of the power generation facility 10b is lower than the predicted demand Dai, and the demand Dbi for the power generation facility 10b in a certain period (i) is the operation restriction of the power generation facility 10a. When Lai and Hai are satisfied, it is possible to deal with the change of contracts. In this case, the threshold value LNs having a higher margin than the minimum load limit LN is preferably used as a reference. When there is a load such as in-house power other than the load facility 60N corresponding to the power generation facility 10N, the power generation output PNi is predicted in consideration of such loads. In this way, all the plans that can be rearranged are extracted, and if even one set of rearrangement proposals is extracted, it is determined that it is possible to deal with contract rearrangement.
[0026]
If the determination in step S5 is negative, the process ends. That is, there is no corresponding cable that satisfies the same amount related to the contract between the power generation facility 10a and the load facility 60a. In this case, as in the conventional case, the power generation facility 10a is stopped or the operation is continued with the minimum load limit La.
[0027]
On the other hand, when the determination in step S5 is affirmative, the process proceeds to step S6, and the profitability is evaluated for all the rearrangement proposals that can be rearranged. That is, since the power generation efficiency changes according to the change in the power generation output, and the fuel cost changes when the power generation efficiency changes, the power generation cost increases or decreases. There is also the benefit of avoiding the same amount of penalty. Therefore, supply and demand forecasts are executed for each combination of power generation equipment and load equipment after reclassification, and overall profitability is evaluated in consideration of increase / decrease in power generation costs, the same amount of penalty that can be avoided, and other revenues.
[0028]
Next, in step S7, based on the evaluation in step S6, it is determined whether or not there is a recombination plan that improves profitability. If there is a rearrangement plan that improves profitability, the process proceeds to step S8, and the rearrangement plan with the highest profitability is selected. Then, a switching command is output to the switching device 95 via the input / output device 103 based on the combination according to the rearrangement plan selected in accordance with the timing of the certain period (i). Thereby, for example, the demand Db measured at the connection point Bb of the load facility 60b is input to the simultaneous equal amount control means 80a of the power generation facility 10a, and the simultaneous equal amount control means 80b of the power generation facility 10b is input to the load facility 60a. The demand Da measured at the connection point Ba is input, and the power consignment contract is rearranged.
[0029]
As a result, the power generation facility 10a can avoid the stop or the minimum load operation, and the power generation facility 10b can follow the load reduction of the load facility 60a and perform the operation satisfying the same amount of constraints simultaneously.
[0030]
In addition, the management control device 101 executes the subroutine S20 and collects performance data related to profits such as the supply and demand relationship of the power generation equipment and the load equipment related to the rearrangement in the fixed period (i) in which the rearrangement is performed, the power generation amount, and the like. Then, the clearing process is executed according to a predetermined clearing rule.
[0031]
Next, effects of the embodiment configured as described above will be described. For comparison, the conventional power consignment management will be described. In the case where there is no switching device 95 in FIG. 2, for example, the power generation facility 10a and the load facility 60a, and the power generation facility 10b and the load facility 60b must simultaneously control the same amount. That is, the simultaneous equal amount control means 80a compares the electric energy of the connection point Aa and the connection point Ba, and adjusts the output of the power generation equipment 10a so that they become the same amount. Moreover, the simultaneous equal amount control means 80b compares the electric energy of the connection point Ab and the connection point Bb, and adjusts the output of the electric power generation equipment 10b so that they may become the same amount.
[0032]
In such a control, as shown in FIG. 4, the demand Da of the load facility 60a may fall below the minimum load limit La of the power generation facility 10a for some reason at time T1. This minimum load limit is set for reasons that, for example, environmental regulations are not observed at an output below this level, or that the stability of combustion cannot be guaranteed in the case of a thermal power generation facility. Accordingly, when the demand Da falls below the minimum load limit La of the power generation facility 10a, (1) the actual operation I for quickly stopping the power generation facility 10a is selected or (2) the power generation facility 10a is held at the minimum load limit La One of the actual operations II will be selected. However, in either case, since the same amount cannot be observed, a penalty is paid according to the supply-demand difference corresponding to the shaded area (a) or (b) in the figure. On the other hand, the minimum load limit Lb of the power generation facility 10b is lower than the demand Da of the load facility 60a, and the demand Db of the load facility 60b is higher than the minimum load limit La of the power generation facility 10a.
[0033]
Basically, a medium- to long-term power sale contract for one year is generally concluded so as not to operate as shown in FIG. However, since the situation on the consumer side often changes during the contract period, there is a case where a low-load operation that was not expected is forced. In such a case, the power generation facility 10a may be able to respond by searching for other short-term power sales destinations. However, it is difficult to find such short-term demand unless a spot market or a store market is established. In addition, even if there is a market, there is no guarantee that the electric power generated with an intermediate load with generally low power generation efficiency will be sold in the short-term market because the unit price is high.
[0034]
The present embodiment solves such a problem. For example, a power generation facility and a load facility related to a power consignment contract for the power generation facility 10a and the load facility 60a, and a power consignment contract for another power generation facility 10b and the load facility 60b. These combinations are based on the premise that they can be arbitrarily exchanged during the contract period.
[0035]
That is, in the present embodiment, in a normal time when there is no problem in the operation of the power generation facilities 10a and 10b, the switching device 95 connects the connection points Ba and Bb related to the load facility of the basic contract to the simultaneous and equal amount control means 80a and 80b. The demands Da and Db are input. On the other hand, when the demand Da of the load facility 60a falls below the minimum load limit La of the power generation facility 10a as after time T1 in FIG. 3, the switch 95 is connected to the connection point Ba by a command from the management control means 101. The measured value is transferred to the simultaneous and same amount control means 80b, and the measured value at the connection point Bb is transferred to the simultaneous and same amount control means 80a.
[0036]
Actually, when the contract is changed after the time T1 when the demand of the load facility 60a falls below the minimum output limit La of the power generation facility 10a, the automatically operated power generation facility 10a is stopped or the minimum load holding state is maintained. You will have to choose either. Therefore, in the present embodiment, as described above, the determination is made based on the demand prediction, and the power sale contract is exchanged before the minimum output limit La is exceeded. That is, as shown in FIG. 3, the threshold value Ls is provided near the minimum load limit La, and the contract is rearranged when the predicted demand Dai of the load facility 60a falls below the threshold value Ls. I am doing so.
[0037]
As a result, the output Pa of the power generation facility 10a changes according to the demand Db of the higher load facility 60b, so that the operation can be continued without falling below the minimum load limit La. On the other hand, the power generation facility 10b can continue normal operation because there is a margin up to the minimum load limit Lb even for the demand Da of the load facility 60a.
[0038]
By reclassifying the contract in this way, it is possible to avoid a loss due to the stop of the power generation facility 10a or the minimum load holding operation. For example, as compared with the case where the vehicle is stopped, the profit from power generation corresponding to the shaded areas (b) and (c) in FIG. 3 is increased. On the other hand, since the power generation facility 10b has to reduce the output for the region (c), a loss corresponding to the power generation amount (c) occurs. Therefore, when executing the contract reclassification, a corresponding price must be paid from the power generation facility 10a to the power generation facility 10b. The price must be at least an amount that can guarantee profit when the power generation facility 10b can continue operation as shown in FIG. Here, the power generation efficiency of the power generation facility is generally a function of the output, and the higher the output, the lower the output. Therefore, it is necessary to consider this non-linearity of power generation efficiency in the above-mentioned calculation of loss and profit.
[0039]
Here, the clearing process of the value accompanying the contract exchange performed in the subroutine S20 of FIG. 1 will be described. Consideration for the reclassification of the contract is the prepaid settlement method that pays a certain amount at the time the combination is exchanged for the contract and the balance that is estimated when the actual balance during the reclassification operation is accumulated over a period of time and the reclassification is not performed. It is possible to consider a post-clearing method in which the profit is calculated in comparison with that and the liquidation is performed based on the profit. Consideration in the latter post-clearing method can be calculated by a relatively simple method. This can be done by adding the premium of the reclassification itself to the power generation facilities whose profits will decline due to the reclassification of the contract, based on the amount that guarantees the decline in earnings. For example, there is a method in which this premium is obtained by multiplying a certain ratio with respect to the profit / loss that should have occurred when the contract is not exchanged.
[0040]
On the other hand, for the calculation of the value in the former pre-clearing method, for example, a method of performing the same calculation as in the post-clearing method in advance based on output prediction can be considered. In addition, since the reclassification can be regarded as an option of financial engineering, the consideration (here, the price of the contract) can be determined in advance based on the option price theory. That is, the power generation facility 10a purchases the right to exchange the receiving contract from the power generation facility 10b when the demand of the consumer 60a falls below the minimum load of the power generation facility 10a using the output of the consumer 60a as a fluctuation factor. This is a call option, and the option premium can be determined based on the option price determination method of the European option.
[0041]
Next, a load facility demand prediction method performed in step S2 of FIG. 1 will be described. In general, several methods are known for predicting fluctuating demands and prices, such as pattern estimation using a neural network and prediction based on statistics such as multiple regression analysis and least square estimation. These are methods for estimating a deterministic pattern. In addition to this, as a probabilistic prediction method, there is a method of modeling demand fluctuating with a stochastic differential equation and obtaining an expected value and variance of demand in the future.
[0042]
In step S2, the predicted demand may be calculated by any prediction method. However, the deterministic prediction method and the probabilistic prediction method handle the results differently. When using a deterministic predicted value, the relationship between the predicted value or the predicted demand curve and the threshold value may be calculated. However, when considering the variance in addition to the probabilistic predicted value, that is, the definite amount, it is necessary to evaluate the relationship between the value obtained by adding or subtracting several times the standard deviation to the predicted value and the set threshold value. There is. In addition, dispersion appears in the overall economic evaluation that takes into account demand dispersion.
[0043]
By the way, in the above-mentioned embodiment, although the case where it was predicted that the power generation facility 10N would fall below the minimum load limit and the case where the power generation facility 10N was predicted to exceed the maximum load limit were described as examples, However, the present invention is not limited to this, and it is possible to expect an improvement in profits by group management of power consignment contracts by managing power consignment by contract reassignment processing under the following conditions.
(1) When a certain power generation facility is brought to an emergency stop
(2) Regardless of operational restrictions, if the overall revenue forecast is implemented and contracts are exchanged, revenue is expected to improve
In addition, if the output fluctuation of the power generation facility is large, there may be a case where the restriction of the same amount cannot be obeyed depending on the combination after the contract change. Therefore, by considering that the output difference between power generation facilities that implement contract reclassification is within a certain range as a condition for establishing simultaneous same-quantity control switching based on contract recombination, it is easy to follow the restrictions on the same amount. Become.
(Modification)
The power generation facility 10N is not limited to the case where the power generation facility 10N is composed of one system of power generation devices, and can also be applied to a case where a plurality of power generation devices arranged in parallel are provided. In this case, a plurality of power generators may be handled as one system of power generation equipment.
[0044]
In addition, the power generation facility 10N has a load facility (hereinafter referred to as an internal demand facility) that consumes power inside the power generation facility 10N independently of the power generation facility 10N on the upstream side that sends power to the power system 70 via the substation facility. In this case, it is necessary to predict the internal demand for electricity. Therefore, the demand forecast for the internal demand equipment is performed in the same manner as the demand forecast for the load equipment 60N. As with the load equipment, the demand fluctuation of the internal demand equipment is measured and recorded in the database 101. Then, an internal demand prediction function is added to the management control apparatus 101, and the same calculation as the load demand prediction in step S2 of FIG. 1 is performed. Then, the internal demand is added to the output of the power generation facility 10N, and the processes after step S3 are performed. The internal demand prediction method and the recorded contents are the same as those for the load facility 60N.
[0045]
Further, in the embodiment of FIG. 1, an example has been described in which the contract reassignment process is not executed when the operation restriction is not a problem in step S4 and the power consignment based on the combination at that time is continued. However, even when the driving constraint condition does not become a problem, the management method for improving the profit by reorganizing the contract according to the present invention can be applied. That is, steps S4 and S5 in the flowchart of FIG. 1 are omitted, and the process proceeds directly from step S3 to step S6 to evaluate the profitability of all the rearrangement proposals. As in the case of the first embodiment, the combination having the highest profitability is selected, and a switching command is output to the switch 95 based on the contract reassignment for the prediction period. On the other hand, it goes without saying that the settlement process of the subroutine S20 is performed based on the reassigned contract.
[0046]
【The invention's effect】
As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to satisfy the restriction of the same amount in the power consignment and improve the profit rate.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of a power consignment management method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is an overall configuration diagram of an electric power consignment system to which an electric power consignment management system according to an embodiment of the present invention is applied.
FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining the effect of the same amount by reordering the contract according to the present invention.
4 is a diagram for explaining a conventional problem due to the restriction of the same amount for comparison with FIG. 3; FIG.
[Explanation of symbols]
10a, 10b, ... 10n Power generation equipment
60a, 60b, ... 60n Load equipment
70 Power system
80a, 80b,... 80n Simultaneous and same amount control means
95 selector
100 Electric power consignment management system
101 database
103 I / O device

Claims (6)

一の電力託送契約に係る発電設備の電力供給先の負荷設備と、他の電力託送契約に係る発電設備の電力供給先の負荷設備とを組替えて、電力託送に係る同時同量の制約を満足させることを特徴とする電力託送管理方法。The load facility of the power supply destination of the power generation facility related to one power consignment contract and the load facility of the power supply destination of the power generation facility related to another power consignment contract are rearranged to satisfy the same amount of restrictions related to power consignment A power consignment management method characterized in that 複数の電力託送契約に係る各負荷設備の需要の変動を記録するとともに、将来の一定期間における需要を予測し、該予測された需要に対応する発電設備の前記一定期間における出力を予測し、該予測された出力が当該発電設備の運用制限を超えるか否か判断し、この判断結果が前記運用制限を超える場合には、前記複数の電力託送契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の組合せを替えれば前記運用制限を回避できるか否か判断し、この判断結果が前記運用制限を回避できる場合は、当該組替えに従って前記電力託送契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の組替えを前記一定期間について実行する電力託送管理方法。Recording demand fluctuations of each load facility related to a plurality of power consignment contracts, forecasting demand in a certain period in the future, forecasting output in the certain period of power generation equipment corresponding to the forecasted demand, It is determined whether the predicted output exceeds the operation limit of the power generation facility. If the determination result exceeds the operation limit, the combination of the power generation facility and the load facility related to the plurality of power consignment contracts is changed. It is determined whether or not the operation restriction can be avoided, and if the determination result can avoid the operation restriction, the power consignment for executing the reconfiguration of the power generation facility and the load facility according to the power consignment contract according to the recombination for the certain period of time. Management method. 前記組替えを実行するに際し、該組替えを実行した場合と実行しない場合の前記複数の電力託送契約に係る収益を比較し、該収益が増加する場合に前記組替えを実行することを特徴とする請求項2に記載の電力託送管理方法。When the reclassification is executed, the revenues related to the plurality of power consignment contracts when the reclassification is executed and not executed are compared, and the reclassification is executed when the revenue increases. 2. The power consignment management method according to 2. 前記運用制限を回避できる組替えが複数ある場合は、最も収益が高い組替えを選択することを特徴とする請求項3に記載の電力託送管理方法。The power transfer management method according to claim 3, wherein when there are a plurality of rearrangements that can avoid the operation restriction, the rearrangement having the highest profit is selected. 前記組替えにより増加した収益を、当該組替えに係る複数の発電設備間で分配することを特徴とする請求項3又は4に記載の電力託送管理方法。The power consignment management method according to claim 3 or 4, wherein the profit increased by the reclassification is distributed among a plurality of power generation facilities related to the reclassification. 電力系統に接続された複数の発電設備と複数の負荷設備との間で締結された複数組の電力託送契約に従って、前記各負荷設備の需要に応じて契約に係る発電設備の出力を追従制御する電力託送契約の管理システムであって、
前記各負荷設備の需要変動データを収集して記録する記録手段と、
前記各負荷設備の需要変動データに基づいて、将来の一定期間における需要を予測する需要予測手段と、
該予測された需要の負荷設備に対応する発電設備の前記一定期間における出力を予測する出力予測手段と、
該予測された出力が当該発電設備の運用制限を超えるか否か判断する手段と、
この判断結果が前記運用制限を超える場合に、前記複数の電力託送契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の組合せを替えて、前記運用制限を回避できるか否か判断する手段と、
この判断結果が前記運用制限を回避できる場合に、当該組替えに従って前記電力託送契約に係る発電設備と負荷設備の組替え指令を前記一定期間について出力する組替え手段とを備えてなる電力託送管理システム。
According to a plurality of sets of power consignment contracts concluded between a plurality of power generation facilities connected to the power system and a plurality of load facilities, the output of the power generation facilities according to the contract is tracked and controlled according to the demand of each load facility. A management system for power consignment contracts,
Recording means for collecting and recording demand fluctuation data of each load facility;
Demand forecasting means for forecasting demand in a certain period in the future based on demand fluctuation data of each load facility;
Output predicting means for predicting the output of the power generation equipment corresponding to the predicted load equipment of the demand in the predetermined period;
Means for determining whether the predicted output exceeds an operation limit of the power generation facility;
Means for determining whether or not the operation restriction can be avoided by changing the combination of the power generation equipment and the load equipment related to the plurality of power consignment contracts when the determination result exceeds the operation restriction;
A power consignment management system comprising: a power generation facility related to the power consignment contract according to the recombination and a recombination means for outputting a load facility recombination command for the predetermined period when the determination result can avoid the operation restriction.
JP2002106658A 2002-04-09 2002-04-09 Power consignment management method and management system Expired - Lifetime JP3834788B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002106658A JP3834788B2 (en) 2002-04-09 2002-04-09 Power consignment management method and management system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002106658A JP3834788B2 (en) 2002-04-09 2002-04-09 Power consignment management method and management system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2003304642A JP2003304642A (en) 2003-10-24
JP3834788B2 true JP3834788B2 (en) 2006-10-18

Family

ID=29390913

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2002106658A Expired - Lifetime JP3834788B2 (en) 2002-04-09 2002-04-09 Power consignment management method and management system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3834788B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5103368B2 (en) * 2008-12-18 2012-12-19 コスモ石油株式会社 Retail power supply control method, computer program therefor, and retail power supply system
JP5795611B2 (en) 2013-06-20 2015-10-14 ヤフー株式会社 Electric power retail management apparatus and electric power retail management method
CN106485605B (en) * 2016-12-05 2023-05-16 华北电力大学 Clean energy electricity stepped electricity price pre-purchase platform and control method
CN117077986B (en) * 2023-10-16 2024-01-30 华中科技大学 Situation awareness methods and related equipment for extreme operation risk scenarios of power systems

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2003304642A (en) 2003-10-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Mansour-lakouraj et al. Comprehensive analysis of risk-based energy management for dependent micro-grid under normal and emergency operations
Wu et al. Cost of reliability analysis based on stochastic unit commitment
US10770899B2 (en) Resource control by probability tree convolution production cost valuation by iterative equivalent demand duration curve expansion (aka. tree convolution)
US8880231B2 (en) Enterprise energy automation
Rahimi et al. Effective market monitoring in deregulated electricity markets
JP3631967B2 (en) Surplus power management system and control method thereof
Fumagalli et al. Quality of service provision in electric power distribution systems through reliability insurance
Wolak The role of efficient pricing in enabling a low-carbon electricity sector
Ma et al. Demand response and energy storage integration study
JP2020036503A (en) Power demand adjustment system and method
Wilson et al. Strategic industries surging: driving US power demand
KR101543303B1 (en) Reliability Evaluation of Power System Considering Reliability Model of Demand Response
Tahmasebi et al. Self-scheduling of wind power generation with direct load control demand response as a virtual power plant
Azimi et al. Aggregate impact analysis of demand response programs, electric vehicles, and combined heat and power units on integrated management of industrial virtual power plant
JP3834788B2 (en) Power consignment management method and management system
Junlakarn et al. Provision of differentiated reliability services under a market-based investment decision making
Chawda et al. Risk‐based retailer profit maximization: Time of Use price setting for elastic demand
Nozarian et al. Hydro thermal unit commitment involving demand response resources: A MILP formulation
JP3880471B2 (en) Power generation planning method
MohammadGholiha et al. Optimal reserve determination considering demand response in the presence of high wind penetration and energy storage systems
JP4434634B2 (en) Power generation facility operation support system
US20040225486A1 (en) System for generating a resultant model for a power system
Bagemihl et al. A market-based smart grid approach to increasing power grid capacity without physical grid expansion
Hanif et al. Managing the techno-economic impacts of partial string failure in multistring energy storage systems
Feng et al. Iterative approach to generator maintenance schedule considering unexpected unit failures in restructured power systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20040810

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20060614

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20060620

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20060714

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 3834788

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100804

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110804

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120804

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130804

Year of fee payment: 7

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term