Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4005583B2 - Method for extracting oxide inclusions in metal - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4005583B2 - Method for extracting oxide inclusions in metal - Google Patents

Method for extracting oxide inclusions in metal Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4005583B2
JP4005583B2 JP2004131884A JP2004131884A JP4005583B2 JP 4005583 B2 JP4005583 B2 JP 4005583B2 JP 2004131884 A JP2004131884 A JP 2004131884A JP 2004131884 A JP2004131884 A JP 2004131884A JP 4005583 B2 JP4005583 B2 JP 4005583B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
sio
solution
nitric acid
inclusions
oxide inclusions
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2004131884A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2005315648A (en
Inventor
世意 木村
朋子 杉村
修 萩原
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority to JP2004131884A priority Critical patent/JP4005583B2/en
Publication of JP2005315648A publication Critical patent/JP2005315648A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4005583B2 publication Critical patent/JP4005583B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating And Analyzing Materials By Characteristic Methods (AREA)

Description

本発明は、金属中の非金属系介在物、特に鉄鋼材料中に含まれる酸化物系介在物を有効に抽出する方法に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a method for effectively extracting nonmetallic inclusions in metal, particularly oxide inclusions contained in steel materials.

金属中の非金属介在物、特に鉄鋼材料に含まれる酸化物系介在物は、該材料の諸性質、例えば強度、靭性、加工性、表面性状等に多大な影響を及ぼしている。こうしたことから、酸化物系介在物の鋼中における存在個数、大きさなどを評価することは鉄鋼材料を扱う技術者にとって大きな関心事である。   Non-metallic inclusions in metals, particularly oxide inclusions contained in steel materials, have a great influence on various properties of the materials such as strength, toughness, workability, and surface properties. For these reasons, it is of great concern to engineers who handle steel materials to evaluate the number and size of oxide inclusions in steel.

酸化物系介在物を抽出する方法の一つとして、酸分解による抽出法(酸分解法)が知られている。この方法は、酸化物系介在物、特にAi23やSiO2およびこれらを主体とした複合酸化物を抽出する方法として、例えば非特許文献1には、酸性溶液を加熱しつつ酸化物系介在物を抽出する方法が示されている。また、用いる酸性溶液としては、硝酸水溶液(温硝酸法)や硫酸硫酸水溶液(温硫酸法)が挙げられている。このうち特に温硝酸法は、金属材料中の非金属介在物系介在物を抽出する方法として一般的に広く採用されている方法である。 As one method for extracting oxide inclusions, an extraction method by acid decomposition (acid decomposition method) is known. This method is known as a method for extracting oxide inclusions, particularly Ai 2 O 3 and SiO 2 and composite oxides mainly composed of these oxides. For example, Non-Patent Document 1 discloses an oxide system while heating an acidic solution. A method for extracting inclusions is shown. Moreover, as an acidic solution to be used, nitric acid aqueous solution (warm nitric acid method) and sulfuric acid sulfuric acid aqueous solution (warm sulfuric acid method) are mentioned. Among these, the warm nitric acid method is a method that is generally widely adopted as a method for extracting non-metallic inclusions in metal materials.

図1は、温硝酸法における基本的な手順を示す説明図である。まず、ビーカ1に硝酸水溶液2および試料3が入れられる[図1(a)]。次いでヒータ4によって硝酸水溶液2が加熱(例えば90℃程度)されて試料3が溶解され、試料3中に存在する酸化物系介在物が溶出される[図1(b)]。酸化物系介在物の溶出が完了した硝酸水溶液2は、冷却後、濾過され(メンブランフィルタ5、フィルタ台6および漏斗7)、硝酸水溶液3をフラスコ8に貯留してメンブランフィルタ5上に残渣として酸化物系介在物を抽出する[図1(c)]。尚、用いる硝酸水溶液2としては、硝酸:水=1:3の硝酸水溶液に少量の硫酸[例えば、硝酸水溶液450mL(ミリリットル)に対して3mL]を加えた水溶液が用いられる。   FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing a basic procedure in the warm nitric acid method. First, an aqueous nitric acid solution 2 and a sample 3 are placed in a beaker 1 [FIG. 1 (a)]. Next, the nitric acid aqueous solution 2 is heated by the heater 4 (for example, about 90 ° C.), the sample 3 is dissolved, and the oxide inclusions present in the sample 3 are eluted [FIG. 1 (b)]. The aqueous nitric acid solution 2 in which the elution of oxide inclusions has been completed is cooled and then filtered (membrane filter 5, filter base 6 and funnel 7), and the aqueous nitric acid solution 3 is stored in the flask 8 and remains as a residue on the membrane filter 5. Oxide inclusions are extracted [FIG. 1 (c)]. As the nitric acid aqueous solution 2 used, an aqueous solution obtained by adding a small amount of sulfuric acid [for example, 3 mL to 450 mL (milliliter) nitric acid aqueous solution] to nitric acid aqueous solution of nitric acid: water = 1: 3 is used.

上記の様な温硝酸法では、試料として通常の鉄鋼材料を用いた場合には、Al23、SiO2およびこれらを主体とした複合酸化物を問題なく抽出することができる。しかしながら、Si濃度が高い鉄鋼材料を用いた場合には、酸化物系介在物の溶出工程[前記図1(b)]において、SiO2の水和物[SiO2・nH2O]を主体とするゲル(以下、「SiO2ゲル」と呼ぶ)が生成することがある。こうしたSiO2ゲルが発生すると、本来SiO2系介在物として測定されるべきものが測定されず抽出後の介在物分析の防げとなるという問題がある。特に介在物がSiO2を主体として含むSiキルド鋼の場合には、SiO2ゲルが鋼材中のSiO2系介在物由来で生成したものか、SiO2介在物に由来せずに溶解工程で発生したものなのか、判別されにくい場合もある。いずれにしても、鋼中の介在物の形態を正確に把握することが困難になる。こうした状況は、酸性溶液として硝酸を用いた場合(温硝酸法)に限らず、硫酸を用いた場合(温硫酸法)であっても同様である。 In the warm nitric acid method as described above, when a normal steel material is used as a sample, Al 2 O 3 , SiO 2 and composite oxides mainly composed of these can be extracted without problems. However, when a steel material having a high Si concentration is used, the SiO 2 hydrate [SiO 2 .nH 2 O] is mainly used in the elution step of the oxide inclusions [FIG. 1 (b)]. (Hereinafter referred to as “SiO 2 gel”). When such SiO 2 gel occurs is not measured should be measured as originally SiO 2 inclusions, there is a problem that the prevent extraction after inclusion analysis. In particular, in the case of Si killed steel containing SiO 2 as the main component, the SiO 2 gel is generated from the SiO 2 inclusions in the steel, or it is not derived from the SiO 2 inclusions and is generated in the melting process. In some cases, it may be difficult to determine whether it has been made. In any case, it becomes difficult to accurately grasp the form of inclusions in the steel. Such a situation is not limited to the case where nitric acid is used as the acidic solution (warm nitric acid method), and the same applies to the case where sulfuric acid is used (warm sulfuric acid method).

上記のようなSiO2ゲルの発生を防止するという観点から、例えば非特許文献2に示すような技術も提案されている。この技術では、前記図1(b)と図1(c)の工程の間で、NaOHなどのアルカリ溶液を添加し、加熱してSiO2ゲルを溶解除去するものである。こうした工程は前記非特許文献1にも示唆されている。しかしながら、アルカリ溶液を用いる場合には、NaOH濃度や加熱温度に十分な注意を払わないと、本来抽出されるべきSiO2介在物およびこれを主体とする複合酸化物系が溶解されてしまい、好ましくない事態を招くことになる。 From the viewpoint of preventing the generation of the SiO 2 gel as described above, for example, a technique as shown in Non-Patent Document 2 has also been proposed. In this technique, an alkali solution such as NaOH is added between the steps shown in FIGS. 1B and 1C and heated to dissolve and remove the SiO 2 gel. Such a process is also suggested in Non-Patent Document 1. However, in the case of using an alkaline solution, unless sufficient attention is paid to the NaOH concentration and the heating temperature, the SiO 2 inclusion to be originally extracted and the complex oxide system mainly composed of this are preferably dissolved. Will lead to no situation.

また、いずれの抽出法を採用するにしても、ビーカ、メンブランフィルタ、漏斗等の抽出用器機には[前記図1参照]、酸に強く且つ安価なガラス製品が汎用されているが、ガラスはSiO2を主成分とするものであり、溶解工程或は抽出工程において、このガラスの一部が溶解液中に混入することがあり、抽出後の介在物分析の防げとなるという別の問題がある。
「鉄鋼便覧 IV(第3版)」、日本鉄鋼協会編、昭和50年10月30日、丸善発行、第329〜330頁 「鉄と鋼」第55巻(1969年)、前川ら、第393頁
In addition, regardless of which extraction method is used, extraction equipment such as beakers, membrane filters, and funnels [see FIG. 1] generally uses acid-resistant and inexpensive glass products. It has SiO 2 as the main component, and in the melting step or extraction step, a part of this glass may be mixed in the solution, and another problem is that it prevents the inclusion analysis after extraction. is there.
"Iron and Steel Handbook IV (Third Edition)", edited by the Japan Iron and Steel Institute, published October 30, 1975, Maruzen, pp. 329-330 "Iron and Steel" Volume 55 (1969), Maekawa et al., Page 393

本発明はこうした従来技術における課題を解決する為になされたものであって、その目的は、酸化物系介在物の抽出後の分析の妨げとなるSiO2ゲルの発生を極力防止することのできる方法、必要によって、濾過・抽出工程で混入してくるSiO2をできるだけ排除することのできる方法を提供することにある。 The present invention has been made to solve such problems in the prior art, and the object thereof is to prevent the generation of SiO 2 gel which hinders analysis after extraction of oxide inclusions as much as possible. It is an object of the present invention to provide a method that can eliminate SiO 2 mixed in in the filtration / extraction step as much as possible.

上記課題を解決することのできた本発明方法とは、温硝酸法または温硫酸法によって金属試料中の酸化物系介在物を抽出するに当たり、硝酸溶液または硫酸溶液を予め50℃以上に加熱してから、この溶液に金属試料を投入して溶解し、酸化物系介在物を濾過・抽出する点に要旨を有するものである。この方法を実施するに当たっては、酸化物系介在物は、少なくともSiO2を含むものであることが好ましい。 The method of the present invention that has been able to solve the above-mentioned problems is that the nitric acid solution or sulfuric acid solution is heated to 50 ° C. or higher in advance when extracting oxide inclusions in a metal sample by the warm nitric acid method or the warm sulfuric acid method. Therefore, the present invention has a gist in that a metal sample is poured into this solution and dissolved, and oxide inclusions are filtered and extracted. In carrying out this method, the oxide inclusions preferably contain at least SiO 2 .

この方法においては、前記溶解する工程およびそれに続く酸化物介在物の濾過・抽出工程において、溶液が接触する器機の材質を、SiO2を含有しないものとすることが好ましい。また、SiO2を含有しない材質として、ポリテトラフルオロエチレンが挙げられる。 In this method, it is preferable that the material of the device in contact with the solution does not contain SiO 2 in the dissolving step and the subsequent filtration and extraction step of oxide inclusions. Further, as a material not containing SiO 2, polytetrafluoroethylene.

本発明では、酸化物系介在物の抽出に用いる硝酸溶液または硫酸溶液を予め50℃以上に加熱するようにしたので、介在物分析の妨げとなるSiO2ゲルの発生を極力防止することができた。 In the present invention, since the nitric acid solution or sulfuric acid solution used for extraction of oxide inclusions is heated to 50 ° C. or higher in advance, the generation of SiO 2 gel that hinders inclusion analysis can be prevented as much as possible. It was.

本発明者らは、上記目的を達成するべく、SiO2ゲルの発生過程、および鋼中介在物以外からのSiO2の混入経路について検討した。その結果、SiO2ゲルの発生については、溶液の加熱方法、混入するSiO2については、器機の材質に原因があることを突き止めた。以下、本発明が完成された経緯を説明しつつ、本発明の作用効果について更に詳細に説明する。 In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, the present inventors studied the generation process of SiO 2 gel and the mixing route of SiO 2 from other than the inclusions in the steel. As a result, it was found that the generation of SiO 2 gel was caused by the heating method of the solution, and the mixed SiO 2 was caused by the material of the equipment. Hereinafter, the operation and effect of the present invention will be described in more detail while explaining how the present invention was completed.

SiO2ゲルは、Si濃度の高い鋼材試料を硝酸溶液に浸漬し、これを90℃まで加熱する際に発生する。しかしながら、試料を硝酸溶液に投入する際に、硝酸溶液を予め所定温度まで加熱しておき、この加熱硝酸溶液に試料を投入するようにすれば、SiO2ゲルの発生量が極力低減されることが判明した。 The SiO 2 gel is generated when a steel material sample having a high Si concentration is immersed in a nitric acid solution and heated to 90 ° C. However, when the sample is put into the nitric acid solution, if the nitric acid solution is heated to a predetermined temperature in advance and the sample is put into the heated nitric acid solution, the amount of generated SiO 2 gel can be reduced as much as possible. There was found.

図2は、本発明方法の基本的な手順を示す説明図である。まずビーカ1に硝酸水溶液2を入れ、ヒータ4によってこの硝酸水溶液を加熱(50℃以上)し[図2(a)]、加熱された硝酸水溶液に試料3を投入する。そして試料3が硝酸水溶液2によって溶解され、試料3中に存在する酸化物系介在物が溶出される[図2(b)]。溶解・溶出が完了した硝酸水溶液2は冷却後、濾過され(メンブランフィルタ5、フィルタ台6および漏斗7)、硝酸水溶液3をフラスコ8に貯留してメンブランフィルタ5上に残渣として酸化物系介在物を抽出する[図2(c)]。   FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing the basic procedure of the method of the present invention. First, the nitric acid aqueous solution 2 is put into the beaker 1, the nitric acid aqueous solution is heated (at 50 ° C. or higher) by the heater 4 [FIG. 2A], and the sample 3 is put into the heated nitric acid aqueous solution. And the sample 3 is melt | dissolved by the nitric acid aqueous solution 2, and the oxide type inclusion which exists in the sample 3 is eluted [FIG.2 (b)]. The aqueous nitric acid solution 2 after dissolution and elution is cooled and filtered (membrane filter 5, filter base 6 and funnel 7), the aqueous nitric acid solution 3 is stored in the flask 8, and oxide inclusions as residues on the membrane filter 5. [FIG. 2 (c)].

Siを1質量%含む鉄鋼試料を硝酸溶液に投入する際に、硝酸溶液の予め加熱(以下、「事前加熱」と呼ぶ)したときの温度を様々変化させたときのSiO2ゲルの発生状況を下記表1に示す。このときの、SiO2ゲルの発生状況の評価基準は次の通りである。 When a steel sample containing 1% by mass of Si is put into a nitric acid solution, the state of generation of SiO 2 gel when the temperature when the nitric acid solution is preheated (hereinafter referred to as “preheating”) is varied. Shown in Table 1 below. At this time, the evaluation criteria of the generation state of the SiO 2 gel are as follows.

(SiO2ゲルの発生状況)
×:ビーカ内、漏斗内、或はフィルタ上に、目視でSiO2ゲルが発生している
ことが確認できた。
△:目視ではSiO2ゲルが発生していることは確認できないが、フィルタ上の
残渣を顕微鏡で確認すると、SiO2ゲルの発生が確認され、酸化物形介在物
と見分けることができず、介在物の個数計測、組成分析が困難である。
○:フィルタ上の残渣を顕微鏡で観察すると、SiO2ゲルの発生が確認される
が、介在物と区別することが容易であり、介在物の個数計測、組成分析が困難
である。
◎:フィルタ上の残債を顕微鏡で観察しても、SiO2ゲルが認められない。
(Generation status of SiO 2 gel)
×: It was confirmed that SiO 2 gel was visually observed in the beaker, the funnel, or the filter.
Δ: Although it cannot be visually confirmed that SiO 2 gel is generated, when the residue on the filter is checked with a microscope, generation of SiO 2 gel is confirmed and cannot be distinguished from oxide inclusions. It is difficult to measure the number of objects and analyze the composition.
○: When the residue on the filter is observed with a microscope, generation of SiO 2 gel is confirmed, but it is easy to distinguish from inclusions, and it is difficult to measure the number of inclusions and to analyze the composition.
◎: even by observing the remaining debt on the filter under a microscope, SiO 2 gel is not observed.

Figure 0004005583
Figure 0004005583

この結果から明らかなように、SiO2ゲルの発生量を少なくするためには、事前加熱の温度は少なくとも50℃とする必要があり、好ましくは60℃以上とするのが良い。事前加熱の温度の上限については特に限定されるものではないが、90℃を超えると試料を高温溶液の投入した場合に突沸することがありので、作業上安全でない。こうした観点から、事前加熱の温度は、90℃以下とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは80℃以下とするのが良い。 As is clear from this result, in order to reduce the amount of generated SiO 2 gel, the preheating temperature needs to be at least 50 ° C., preferably 60 ° C. or more. The upper limit of the preheating temperature is not particularly limited. However, if the temperature exceeds 90 ° C., the sample may be bumped when a high-temperature solution is added, which is not safe for work. From this point of view, the preheating temperature is preferably 90 ° C. or lower, more preferably 80 ° C. or lower.

試料を投入する溶液を事前加熱することによって、SiO2ゲルの発生を極力低減できる理由については、その理論的根拠を解明し得た訳ではないが、おそらく鋼中のSiと溶液中の水が反応しやすい温度があり、この温度以上に急速加熱すれば、水和物をつくりにくくなると考えられる。 The reason why the generation of SiO 2 gel can be reduced as much as possible by preheating the solution to which the sample is charged has not been clarified, but probably the Si in the steel and the water in the solution There is a temperature at which reaction is likely to occur, and if it is heated rapidly above this temperature, it will be difficult to form hydrates.

次に、本発明者らは、ビーカ、漏斗等の器機の材質がSiO2発生に与える影響について調査した。前記図1、2に示したビーカ1、フィルタ台6および漏斗7の材質を全てガラスにした場合(メンブランフィルタ5の材質はナイロン製)と、これらの材質の全てまたは一部を耐熱性のポリテトラフルオロエチレン(PTFE:テフロン(登録商標))にした場合において、硝酸水溶液に鉄鋼試料を投入せずに前記図1に示した一連の作業(ブランク試験)を行い、フィルタ上の残渣をX線マイクロアナライザ(Electron Probe X-ray Micro Analyzer:EPMA)で、SiO2を含有する長径20μm以上の介在物粒子個数を計測した。その結果を、下記表2に示す。 Next, the present inventors investigated the influence of equipment materials such as beakers and funnels on the generation of SiO 2 . When the materials of the beaker 1, the filter base 6 and the funnel 7 shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 are all made of glass (the material of the membrane filter 5 is made of nylon), all or a part of these materials are made of a heat-resistant poly. When tetrafluoroethylene (PTFE: Teflon (registered trademark)) is used, the series of operations (blank test) shown in FIG. The number of inclusion particles having a major axis of 20 μm or more containing SiO 2 was measured with a micro analyzer (Electron Probe X-ray Micro Analyzer: EPMA). The results are shown in Table 2 below.

Figure 0004005583
Figure 0004005583

この結果から、次のように考察できた。鉄鋼材料を溶解していない場合には、通常フィルタ上には何ら残らないはずである。しかしながら、ビーカ、フィルタ台および漏斗の少なくともいずれか一つにガラス製のものを用いた場合には、SiO2を含有する粒子が検出されることが分かった。これに対して、ビーカ、漏斗、フィルタ台の全てにPTFE製のものを用いた場合には、SiO2を含有する粒子は検出されなかった。尚、廃液が入るフラスコについては、フィルタ上に残渣が抽出されるまでに、溶液は接触しないことからガラス製でよいものと判断できた。 From this result, we could consider as follows. If the steel material is not dissolved, there should normally be no residue on the filter. However, it was found that when at least one of the beaker, the filter base and the funnel is made of glass, particles containing SiO 2 are detected. In contrast, when all of the beaker, funnel, and filter base were made of PTFE, particles containing SiO 2 were not detected. In addition, about the flask in which a waste liquid enters, since the solution did not contact by the time a residue was extracted on a filter, it was judged that it may be glass.

上記の説明では、試料を溶解抽出する酸性溶液として、硝酸を用いる場合について説明したが、SiO2ゲルが発生する状況は硫酸を用い場合も同様である。即ち、溶解用溶液として硫酸を用いた場合であっても該溶液を事前加熱すれば(50℃以上)、上記と同様の効果が得られることが確認できた。 In the above description, the case where nitric acid is used as the acidic solution for dissolving and extracting the sample has been described. However, the situation where SiO 2 gel is generated is the same when sulfuric acid is used. That is, even when sulfuric acid was used as the solution for dissolution, it was confirmed that the same effect as described above could be obtained if the solution was preheated (50 ° C. or higher).

尚、本発明で対象とする金属材料については、少なくともSiO2を含むことが予想される鉄鋼材料が最適であるが、鉄鋼材料に限らず例えば銅合金やニッケル合金などにも適用できるものである。また、必ずしもSiO2を含むものに限らず、その有無を確認するという観点からして、含有する酸化物系介在物としてAl23を主体とすることが予想される金属材料であっても適用できるものである。 In addition, as the metal material to be used in the present invention, a steel material that is expected to contain at least SiO 2 is optimal, but is not limited to a steel material, and can be applied to, for example, a copper alloy or a nickel alloy. . In addition, it is not necessarily limited to those containing SiO 2, and from the viewpoint of confirming the presence or absence, even a metal material that is expected to mainly contain Al 2 O 3 as an oxide-based inclusion contained. Applicable.

以下、本発明を実施例によって更に詳細に説明するが、下記実施例は本発明を限定する性質のものではなく、前・後記の趣旨に徴して設計変更することはいずれも本発明の技術的範囲に含まれるものである。   Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail by way of examples. However, the following examples are not intended to limit the present invention, and any design changes in accordance with the gist of the preceding and following descriptions are technical aspects of the present invention. It is included in the range.

実施例1
C:0.01%,Mn:0.1%,P:0.005%,S:0.005%,Al;0.01%並びに他の不可避不純物を含有する鉄50kを実験質的に溶製・鋳造した。尚、この鉄材はAlキルド鋼であるので、生成する介在物の組成は、Al23を主体とするものである。この鋼塊の中心部から、酸溶解の試料(25g)を12個切り出した。
Example 1
C: 0.01%, Mn: 0.1%, P: 0.005%, S: 0.005%, Al; 0.01%, and iron 50k containing other inevitable impurities are experimentally dissolved. Made and cast. Since this iron material is Al killed steel, the composition of the inclusions produced is mainly Al 2 O 3 . Twelve acid-dissolved samples (25 g) were cut out from the center of the steel ingot.

切り出した試料を、前記図2に示した要領で溶解し、介在物を抽出した。溶解後は、硝酸(HNO3):250mL(ミリリットル)に水を加えて700mLとしたものに、硫酸を10mL加えたものを容量2Lのビーカに調整した。これに25gの鋼材試料を入れて溶解した。濾過の際に用いるメンブランフィルタとしては、孔径1μmのものを用いた。このフィルタ上の残渣をEPMAで分析し、Ai23またはSiO2を含有する長径20μm以上の介在物個数を計測した。このとき、比較例として、試料を溶液に入れる前に事前加熱を行わない方法(前記図1に示した方法)で、ビーカ、漏斗、フィルタ台等にガラスを用いた例、或は事前加熱は行ったが、ビーカ、漏斗、フィルタ台のずれか1つ以上にガラスを用いた例についても調査した。これらの結果を下記表3に一括して示す。 The cut sample was dissolved in the manner shown in FIG. 2 to extract inclusions. After dissolution, nitric acid (HNO 3 ): 250 mL (milliliter) was added with water to 700 mL, and 10 mL of sulfuric acid was added to a 2 L capacity beaker. A 25-g steel sample was put into this and melt | dissolved. A membrane filter having a pore diameter of 1 μm was used as a membrane filter used for filtration. The residue on the filter was analyzed by EPMA, and the number of inclusions containing Ai 2 O 3 or SiO 2 and having a major axis of 20 μm or more was counted. At this time, as a comparative example, an example in which glass is used for a beaker, a funnel, a filter stand, etc., or preheating is performed by a method in which preheating is not performed before the sample is put into the solution (the method shown in FIG. 1). Although it went, the example which used glass for the shift | offset | difference of one or more of a beaker, a funnel, and a filter stand was investigated. These results are collectively shown in Table 3 below.

Figure 0004005583
Figure 0004005583

この結果から、次のように考察できた。この実施例では、溶解した鋼材のSi濃度が比較的低いので、事前加熱の有無、加熱温度の高低に拘らずSiO2ゲルの発生はなかった。このうち、No.1〜7および12のものでは、ビーカ、漏斗、フィルタ台の全てにPTFEを用いた例であるが、いずれもSiO2は検出されず、介在物はAl23系だけであることが分かる。 From this result, we could consider as follows. In this example, since the Si concentration of the molten steel was relatively low, no SiO 2 gel was generated regardless of the presence or absence of preheating and the heating temperature. Of these, No. Examples of 1 to 7 and 12 are examples in which PTFE is used for all of the beaker, the funnel, and the filter base, but no SiO 2 is detected, and it can be seen that the inclusion is only Al 2 O 3 system. .

これに対して、No.8〜11にものでは、ビーカ、漏斗、フィルタ台のいずれか1箇所以上にガラスを用いたのであるが、これらでは鋼中で生成するはずのないSiO2が検出されており、溶解・抽出工程で混入してきたものと考えられた。 In contrast, no. In 8-11, glass was used in one or more of the beaker, funnel, and filter base, but these detected SiO 2 that could not be produced in the steel, and the dissolution / extraction process It was thought that it had been mixed in.

実施例2
C:0.01%,Mn:0.1%,P:0.005%,S:0.005%,Al;0.01%並びに他の不可避不純物を含有する鉄50kgを実験質的に溶製・鋳造した。尚、この鉄材はSiキルド鋼であるので、生成する介在物の組成は、SiO2を主体とするものである。この鋼塊の中心部から、酸溶解の試料(25g)を12個切り出した。
Example 2
C: 0.01%, Mn: 0.1%, P: 0.005%, S: 0.005%, Al; 0.01%, and 50 kg of iron containing other inevitable impurities are experimentally dissolved. Made and cast. Since this iron material is Si killed steel, the composition of the inclusions produced is mainly composed of SiO 2 . Twelve acid-dissolved samples (25 g) were cut out from the center of the steel ingot.

切り出した試料を用い、実施例1と同様にして、溶解、抽出および介在物計測を行った。硝酸(HNO3):250mLに水を加えて700mLとしたものに、硫酸を10mL加えたものを容量2Lのビーカに調整した。これに25gの鋼材試料を入れて溶解した。濾過の際に用いるフィルタとしては、孔径1μmのものを用いた。このとき、比較例として、試料を溶液に入れる前に事前加熱を行わない方法(前記図1に示した方法)で、ビーカ、漏斗、フィルタ台等にガラスを用いた例、或は事前加熱は行ったが、ビーカ、漏斗、フィルタ台のずれか1つ以上にガラスを用いた例についても調査した。これらの結果を下記表4に一括して示す。 Using the cut sample, dissolution, extraction, and inclusion measurement were performed in the same manner as in Example 1. Nitric acid (HNO 3 ): 250 mL of water was added to 700 mL, and 10 mL of sulfuric acid was added to a 2 L beaker. A 25-g steel sample was put into this and melt | dissolved. A filter having a pore size of 1 μm was used as the filter. At this time, as a comparative example, an example in which glass is used for a beaker, a funnel, a filter base, etc., or a preheating is performed by a method in which preheating is not performed before the sample is put into a solution (the method shown in FIG. 1). Although it went, the example which used glass for the shift | offset | difference of one or more of a beaker, a funnel, and a filter stand was investigated. These results are collectively shown in Table 4 below.

Figure 0004005583
Figure 0004005583

この結果から、次のように考察できた。この実施例では、溶解した鋼材のSi濃度が比較的高いので、事前加熱の無いNo.24、事前加熱温度が50℃未満のNo.13,14では、SiO2ゲルが発生してしまい、フィルタ上の介在物を計測することは不可能であった。 From this result, we could consider as follows. In this example, the Si concentration of the molten steel is relatively high, so 24, No. having a preheating temperature of less than 50 ° C In 13 and 14, SiO 2 gel was generated, and it was impossible to measure inclusions on the filter.

これに対して、No.15〜23のものでは、試料を入れる前に溶解溶液を加熱して50℃以上にしたので、SiO2ゲルの生成がないか、または極微量であり、フィルタ上の介在物を計測することが可能であった。このうち、No.20〜23のものでは、ビーカ、漏斗、フィルタ台のいずれか1箇所以上にガラスを用いた例であるが、ビーカ、漏斗、フィルタ台の全てにPTFEを用いたNo.15〜19のものに比べて、検出されたSiO2系介在物の個数が多くなっている。これは溶解、抽出工程で混入したSiO2が元来鋼中に存在していた介在物の個数に加えられたためと考えられた。 In contrast, no. In the case of 15 to 23, since the dissolved solution was heated to 50 ° C. or higher before putting the sample, there was no generation of SiO 2 gel or the amount was extremely small, and inclusions on the filter could be measured. It was possible. Of these, No. Examples of 20 to 23 are examples in which glass is used in one or more of the beaker, the funnel, and the filter base. The number of detected SiO 2 inclusions is larger than that of 15-19. This was thought to be because SiO 2 mixed in the melting and extracting steps was added to the number of inclusions originally present in the steel.

温硝酸法における基本的な手順を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows the basic procedure in a warm nitric acid method. 本発明方法の基本的な手順を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows the basic procedure of this invention method.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 ビーカ
2 硝酸水溶液
3 試料
4 ヒータ
5 メンブランフィルタ
6 フィルタ台
7 漏斗
8 フラスコ
1 Beaker 2 Nitric acid aqueous solution 3 Sample 4 Heater 5 Membrane filter 6 Filter base 7 Funnel 8 Flask

Claims (4)

温硝酸法または温硫酸法によって金属試料中の酸化物系介在物を抽出するに当たり、硝酸溶液または硫酸溶液を予め50℃以上に加熱してから、この溶液に金属試料を投入して溶解し、酸化物系介在物を濾過・抽出することを特徴とする金属中の酸化物系介在物の抽出方法。   In extracting the oxide inclusions in the metal sample by the warm nitric acid method or the warm sulfuric acid method, the nitric acid solution or the sulfuric acid solution is heated to 50 ° C. or more in advance, and then the metal sample is put into this solution to be dissolved. A method for extracting oxide inclusions in a metal, comprising filtering and extracting oxide inclusions. 酸化物系介在物は、少なくともSiO2を含むものである請求項1に記載の抽出方法。 The extraction method according to claim 1, wherein the oxide inclusions contain at least SiO 2 . 前記溶解する工程およびそれに続く酸化物介在物の濾過・抽出工程において、溶液が接触する器機の材質を、SiO2を含有しないものとする請求項1または2に記載の抽出方法。 The extraction method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein, in the dissolving step and the subsequent filtration and extraction step of oxide inclusions, the material of the device in contact with the solution does not contain SiO 2 . 前記器機の材質がポリテトラフルオロエチレンである請求項3に記載の抽出方法。
The extraction method according to claim 3, wherein the material of the device is polytetrafluoroethylene.
JP2004131884A 2004-04-27 2004-04-27 Method for extracting oxide inclusions in metal Expired - Fee Related JP4005583B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004131884A JP4005583B2 (en) 2004-04-27 2004-04-27 Method for extracting oxide inclusions in metal

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004131884A JP4005583B2 (en) 2004-04-27 2004-04-27 Method for extracting oxide inclusions in metal

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005315648A JP2005315648A (en) 2005-11-10
JP4005583B2 true JP4005583B2 (en) 2007-11-07

Family

ID=35443244

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004131884A Expired - Fee Related JP4005583B2 (en) 2004-04-27 2004-04-27 Method for extracting oxide inclusions in metal

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4005583B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5055251B2 (en) * 2008-12-01 2012-10-24 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Inclusion extraction evaluation method
CN103506018A (en) * 2012-06-27 2014-01-15 成都光明光电股份有限公司 Platinum-rhodium alloy dissolving reagent and method
JP6217932B2 (en) * 2014-10-01 2017-10-25 住友金属鉱山株式会社 Method for quantifying the amount of SiO2 contained in a Cu metal material

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2005315648A (en) 2005-11-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Van Ende et al. Formation and evolution of Al–Ti oxide inclusions during secondary steel refining
JP5098843B2 (en) Method for determining the solid solution content of the element of interest in a metal sample
Dekkers et al. Non-metallic inclusions in aluminium killed steels
RU2531333C2 (en) Method of extraction of platinoids from spent automotive catalysts
JP4005583B2 (en) Method for extracting oxide inclusions in metal
JP5223665B2 (en) Method for analyzing precipitates and / or inclusions in metal materials
WO2021015141A1 (en) Martensitic stainless steel pipe, and method for manufacturing martensitic stainless steel pipe
CN101684522A (en) Recovery method of zirconium based amorphous alloy
Sidorov et al. Removal of a sulfur impurity from complex nickel melts in vacuum
CN106153602A (en) A kind of gathering and measuring method of platinum, palladium, rhodium in auto-exhaust catalyst and process slag
JP5055251B2 (en) Inclusion extraction evaluation method
Cha et al. In-situ Observation of Inclusion Formation Behavior in Ultra-Low Carbon Steel with Al–Ti Complex Deoxidation
Batista et al. The effects of deoxidation practice on the quality of thin foil low-carbon steel
Subramanian et al. Recovery of niobium and tantalum from low grade tin slag-A hydrometallurgical approach
CN113252643A (en) Method for measuring content of non-metallic inclusion elements in molten steel
TWI551691B (en) Homogenization of Ru alloy containing Ru
Esmaily et al. a major loss in tensile strength of friction stir welded aluminum alloy joints resulting from atmospheric corrosion
JP2014513201A (en) Recovery method of hard material particles
Gillett et al. Cerium in Aluminium Alloys.
CN103926387B (en) A kind of separation and analysis method of tetravalent niobium and pentavalent niobium
Łagiewka et al. The porosity of Tin bronze castings
RU2521035C2 (en) Method of recovery of secondary platinum with radioactive plutonium contamination
CN116148121B (en) Method for measuring hafnium content in hafnium carbide
FR3154536A1 (en) Process for recovering technetium and other metals from an aqueous solution
CN109609766A (en) A method for removing iron and recovering copper from waste iron bronze

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A711 Notification of change in applicant

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A711

Effective date: 20060922

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20060925

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20060922

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20070725

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20070821

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20070823

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100831

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110831

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110831

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120831

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120831

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130831

Year of fee payment: 6

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees