Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4027905B2 - Defect classification apparatus and defect classification method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4027905B2 - Defect classification apparatus and defect classification method - Google Patents

Defect classification apparatus and defect classification method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4027905B2
JP4027905B2 JP2004108179A JP2004108179A JP4027905B2 JP 4027905 B2 JP4027905 B2 JP 4027905B2 JP 2004108179 A JP2004108179 A JP 2004108179A JP 2004108179 A JP2004108179 A JP 2004108179A JP 4027905 B2 JP4027905 B2 JP 4027905B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
defect
section
exposure
image
sections
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2004108179A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2005291953A (en
Inventor
大和 神田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Olympus Corp
Original Assignee
Olympus Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Olympus Corp filed Critical Olympus Corp
Priority to JP2004108179A priority Critical patent/JP4027905B2/en
Publication of JP2005291953A publication Critical patent/JP2005291953A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4027905B2 publication Critical patent/JP4027905B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
  • Image Processing (AREA)
  • Image Analysis (AREA)

Description

本発明は、欠陥分類装置及び欠陥分類方法に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a defect classification device and a defect classification method.

半導体ウェハ等の製造工程では、成膜、レジスト塗布、露光、現像、エッチング、レジスト剥離といったプロセスを複数回繰り返すことで、多層の配線パターンを形成していく。非常に多くのプロセスを経て完成する製品の歩留まりを向上するためには、欠陥の早期発見や製造工程の最適化が必須項目である。   In a manufacturing process of a semiconductor wafer or the like, a multilayer wiring pattern is formed by repeating a process such as film formation, resist coating, exposure, development, etching, and resist peeling a plurality of times. Early detection of defects and optimization of the manufacturing process are indispensable items in order to improve the yield of products completed through a great number of processes.

このため、実際のパターンが形成されるエッチング工程の前に被検体表面を目視検査し、欠陥の検出、不良品の選別を行うと共に、欠陥の種類を判別することで発生プロセスを特定し、製造工程を最適化しようとする取り組みが従来からなされている。   For this reason, the surface of the specimen is visually inspected before the etching process in which the actual pattern is formed, and defects are detected and defective products are identified. Traditional efforts have been made to optimize the process.

しかしながら、目視検査は、検査員への負担が大きく、個人差があり統一した結果が得られないという問題がある。そこで、このような表面検査を光学装置により実現することが試みられている。   However, the visual inspection has a problem that the burden on the inspector is large, and there is a difference between individuals and a uniform result cannot be obtained. Therefore, it has been attempted to realize such surface inspection using an optical device.

本発明人による特開2003-168114号公報は、画素分解能が100〜150μmという比較的低分解能の画像を用いて被検体表面を検査するマクロ検査により、欠陥を分類する方法を開示している。   Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2003-168114 by the present inventor discloses a method of classifying defects by macro inspection in which a surface of a subject is inspected using a relatively low resolution image having a pixel resolution of 100 to 150 μm.

以下に図22を参照してこの欠陥分類方法の原理について説明する。まず被検体表面の干渉、回折像を検査画像700(図22の(A))として取得する。被検体表面にムラ、キズ、ショット(露光機起因の欠陥)等がある場合には、これらは検査画像700内にムラ701、ショット702、キズ703として捕らえられる。これを基準となる良品ウェハの干渉、回折像である良品画像704(図22の(B))と比較する。あるいは、被検体表面の干渉、回折像内で同一パターンとなる区画単位で比較してもよい。これにより、検査画像700と良品画像704との差分画像705(図22の(C))が得られる。これを2値化すると良品画像704との輝度差が大きい画素からなる欠陥領域が欠陥抽出画像706(図22の(D))として得られる。   The principle of this defect classification method will be described below with reference to FIG. First, interference and diffraction images of the subject surface are acquired as an inspection image 700 ((A) in FIG. 22). When there are unevenness, scratches, shots (defects caused by the exposure machine), etc. on the surface of the object, these are captured as unevenness 701, shots 702, and scratches 703 in the inspection image 700. This is compared with a non-defective image 704 (FIG. 22B), which is a standard non-defective wafer interference and diffraction image. Alternatively, the comparison may be made in the unit of section having the same pattern in the interference and diffraction images of the subject surface. Thereby, a difference image 705 ((C) in FIG. 22) between the inspection image 700 and the non-defective image 704 is obtained. When this is binarized, a defect area composed of pixels having a large luminance difference from the non-defective image 704 is obtained as a defect extraction image 706 ((D) in FIG. 22).

この抽出した欠陥領域の形状情報、特に露光機起因の代表欠陥であるショット欠陥は、その外形が露光区画形状と類似するため、露光区画形状を示すテンプレート707との相関値(対応画素間の輝度の差分絶対値の総和など)を算出し、この相関値を基に抽出領域の欠陥種を分類している(図22の(E))。
特開2003-168114号公報
Since the outer shape of the extracted defect area shape information, particularly the shot defect, which is a representative defect caused by the exposure machine, is similar to the exposure section shape, the correlation value with the template 707 indicating the exposure section shape (the luminance between corresponding pixels) The sum of the absolute difference values of the difference is calculated, and the defect type of the extraction region is classified based on this correlation value ((E) of FIG. 22).
JP 2003-168114 A

しかしながら、前述の方法では図23(A)に示すようにショット欠陥が連続した場合、その内部の欠陥領域についてはムラ701の内部の欠陥領域と同程度の相関値しか得ることができず、両者を明確に分類することが困難である(図23(B)参照)。このような課題に対して、従来、有効な解決策を示した欠陥分類装置及び欠陥分類方法は提案されていなかった。   However, in the above-described method, when shot defects are continuous as shown in FIG. 23A, only the same correlation value as the defect area inside the unevenness 701 can be obtained for the defect area inside the shot defect. Is difficult to clearly classify (see FIG. 23B). Conventionally, a defect classification apparatus and a defect classification method that showed an effective solution to such a problem have not been proposed.

本発明はこのような課題に着目してなされたものであり、その目的とするところは、連続する露光機起因の欠陥に対しても精度の高い欠陥分類が可能な欠陥分類装置及び欠陥分類方法を提供することにある。   The present invention has been made paying attention to such a problem, and the object of the present invention is to provide a defect classification apparatus and a defect classification method capable of accurately classifying defects even for defects caused by successive exposure machines. Is to provide.

上記の目的を達成するために、本発明の第1の態様は、配線パターンを形成するための露光が行われた被検体における欠陥を分類する欠陥分類装置において、前記露光が行われた後の前記被検体表面の画像を撮像する撮像手段と、前記画像より欠陥領域を抽出する欠陥領域抽出手段と、前記抽出した欠陥領域をモルフォロジー処理によって連結欠陥領域として連結する欠陥領域連結手段と、前記連結欠陥領域の輪郭のうち前記画像内での位置が予め設定されている露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を連結した各連結欠陥領域について算出する露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段と、前記割合を基に欠陥を分類する分類手段と、を具備する。 In order to achieve the above object, according to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a defect classification apparatus for classifying defects in a subject subjected to exposure for forming a wiring pattern, after the exposure is performed. Imaging means for picking up an image of the object surface, defect area extracting means for extracting a defect area from the image, defect area connecting means for connecting the extracted defect area as a connected defect area by morphological processing, and the continuous Yuiketsu Recessed exposure compartment depends contour ratio calculating means for calculating for each connection defect region position are linked to the ratio of the contour along the exposure compartment side is set in advance within the image of the contour of the region, based on the ratio And classifying means for classifying defects.

また、本発明の第2の態様は、第1の態様に係る欠陥分類装置において、前記欠陥領域連結手段での連結は、隣接チップ間の幅より大きなサイズの構造要素を用いたモルフォロジー処理による。 According to a second aspect of the present invention, in the defect classification apparatus according to the first aspect , the connection by the defect region connecting means is based on a morphological process using a structural element having a size larger than the width between adjacent chips.

また、本発明の第3の態様は、配線パターンを形成するための露光が行われた被検体における欠陥を分類する欠陥分類装置において、前記露光が行われた後の前記被検体表面の画像を撮像する撮像手段と、前記画像より欠陥領域を抽出する欠陥領域抽出手段と、前記抽出した欠陥領域を露光区画を細分した区画に集約する欠陥領域集約手段と、前記欠陥領域を集約した欠陥区画のうち隣接する欠陥区画連結欠陥区画として連結する欠陥区画連結手段と、前記連結欠陥区画の輪郭のうち前記画像内での位置が予め設定されている露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を連結した各連結欠陥区画について算出する露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段と、前記割合を基に欠陥を分類する分類手段と、を備える。 According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a defect classification apparatus for classifying defects in a subject that has been exposed to form a wiring pattern, wherein an image of the surface of the subject after the exposure is performed. imaging means for imaging a defect region extracting means for extracting a defective area from the image, a defect area aggregation means for aggregating the extracted defect regions compartment subdivided exposure section, the defect compartment aggregating the defective area among the defects section connecting means for connecting the adjacent defective sections as connecting defect compartment was connected the proportion of the contour along the communication Yuiketsu Recessed exposure compartment side position in the image of the contour of the partition is set in advance Exposure section dependent contour ratio calculating means for calculating each connected defect section ; and classifying means for classifying defects based on the ratio.

また、本発明の第4の態様は、配線パターンを形成するための露光が行われた被検体における欠陥を分類する欠陥分類装置において、前記露光が行われた後の前記被検体表面の画像を撮像する撮像手段と、前記画像を露光区画を細分した区画単位で検査し、欠陥が存在する区画を欠陥区画として検出する欠陥区画検出手段と、前記欠陥区画のうち隣接する欠陥区画を連結欠陥区画として連結する欠陥区画連結手段と、前記連結欠陥区画の輪郭のうち前記画像内での位置が予め設定されている露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を連結した各連結欠陥区画について算出する露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段と、前記割合を基に欠陥を分類する分類手段と、を具備する。 The fourth aspect of the present invention, Te defect classification apparatus odor classifying defects in a subject exposed is performed to form a wiring pattern, before SL after the exposure has been performed of the subject surface An image capturing means for capturing an image, a defect section detecting means for inspecting the image in units of subdivisions of the exposure section, and detecting a section where a defect exists as a defect section, and an adjacent defect section among the defect sections are connected Defect section connecting means to be connected as a defect section, and exposure for calculating each connected defect section in which the ratio of the contours along the exposure section side whose position in the image is set in advance among the contours of the connected defect sections is connected Compartment-dependent contour ratio calculation means, and classification means for classifying defects based on the ratio.

また、本発明の第5の態様は、第3または第4の態様に係る欠陥分類装置において、前記露光区画を細分した区画をチップ区画に合わせる。 According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, in the defect classification apparatus according to the third or fourth aspect , a section obtained by subdividing the exposure section is matched with a chip section.

また、本発明の第6の態様は、配線パターンを形成するための露光が行われた被検体における欠陥を分類する欠陥分類方法において、前記露光が行われた後の前記被検体表面の画像を撮像し、前記画像より欠陥領域を抽出し、前記抽出した欠陥領域をモルフォロジー処理によって連結欠陥領域として連結し、前記連結欠陥領域の輪郭のうち前記画像内での位置が予め設定されている露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を連結した各連結欠陥領域について算出し、前記割合を基に欠陥を分類する。 According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, in the defect classification method for classifying defects in a subject that has been exposed to form a wiring pattern, an image of the surface of the subject after the exposure is performed. captured, the image from the extracted defect regions, wherein the extracted defect regions linked as a connecting defect area by morphology processing, exposure position in the image of the contour of the communicating Yuiketsu Recessed region is set in advance The ratio of the contours along the partition sides is calculated for each connected defect area, and the defects are classified based on the ratio.

また、本発明の第7の態様は、第6の態様に係る欠陥分類装置において、前記抽出した欠陥領域の連結は、隣接チップ間の幅より大きなサイズの構造要素を用いたモルフォロジー処理による。 According to a seventh aspect of the present invention, in the defect classification device according to the sixth aspect , the extracted defect regions are connected by a morphological process using a structural element having a size larger than the width between adjacent chips.

また、本発明の第8の態様は、配線パターンを形成するための露光が行われた被検体における欠陥を分類する欠陥分類方法において、前記露光が行われた後の前記被検体表面の画像を撮像し、前記画像より欠陥領域を抽出し、前記抽出した欠陥領域を露光区画を細分した区画に集約し、前記欠陥領域を集約した欠陥区画のうち隣接する欠陥区画を連結欠陥区画として連結し、前記連結欠陥区画の輪郭のうち前記画像内での位置が予め設定されている露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を連結した各連結欠陥区画について算出し、前記割合を基に欠陥を分類する。 Further, an eighth aspect of the present invention, Te defect classification method odor classifying defects in a subject exposed is performed to form a wiring pattern, before SL after the exposure has been performed of the subject surface An image is picked up, a defect area is extracted from the image, the extracted defect area is aggregated into sections obtained by subdividing exposure sections, and adjacent defect sections among the defect sections obtained by consolidating the defect areas are connected as connected defect sections. Then, a calculation is performed for each connected defect section in which the proportions of the contours along the exposure section side where the position in the image is set in advance among the contours of the connected defect sections are connected, and the defects are classified based on the ratio. .

また、本発明の第9の態様は、配線パターンを形成するための露光が行われた被検体における欠陥を分類する欠陥分類方法において、前記露光が行われた後の前記被検体表面の画像を撮像し、前記画像を露光区画を細分した区画単位で検査し、欠陥が存在する区画を欠陥区画として検出し、前記欠陥区画のうち隣接する欠陥区画連結欠陥区画として連結し、前記連結欠陥区画の輪郭のうち前記画像内での位置が予め設定されている露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を連結した各連結欠陥区画について算出し、前記割合を基に欠陥を分類する。 According to a ninth aspect of the present invention, in the defect classification method for classifying defects in a subject that has been exposed to form a wiring pattern, an image of the subject surface after the exposure is performed. captured, the image is examined in section units obtained by dividing the exposure compartment to detect a compartment there is a defect as a defect section, connected as a coupling defect compartment defects adjacent sections of the defect compartment Recessed the communication Yuiketsu Of the contours of the sections, calculation is performed for each connected defect section obtained by connecting the proportions of the contours along the exposure section side where the position in the image is set in advance, and the defects are classified based on the ratio.

また、本発明の第10の態様は、第または第態様に係る欠陥分類方法において、前記露光区画を細分した区画をチップ区画に合わせる。
According to a tenth aspect of the present invention, in the defect classification method according to the eighth or ninth aspect , a section obtained by subdividing the exposure section is matched with a chip section.

本発明によれば、露光機起因の欠陥に対してより精度の高い分類を行うことができる。   According to the present invention, it is possible to classify the defects caused by the exposure machine with higher accuracy.

以下、図面を参照して本発明の実施形態を詳細に説明する。   Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

(第1実施形態)
図1は、本発明の第1実施形態に係る欠陥分類装置の構成を示す図である。第1実施形態の欠陥分類装置は、被検体111を照明する照明器101と、照明器101からの照明光の波長を制限する帯域通過フィルタ102と、被検体111からの反射光を結像させるためのレンズ103と、結像した被検体像を電気信号に変換する撮像手段としてのCCDカメラ104と、CCDカメラ104からの出力信号を画像として取り込むための画像入力ボード105と、画像データの保持、及び後述の各手段の処理に用いるためのメモリ106と、取得した画像データから欠陥領域を抽出する欠陥領域抽出手段107と、抽出した欠陥領域を連結する欠陥領域連結手段108と、連結した連結領域の輪郭のうち露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を算出する露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段109と、前記算出した割合を基に欠陥を分類する分類手段110とから構成される。
(First embodiment)
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the configuration of the defect classification apparatus according to the first embodiment of the present invention. The defect classification apparatus according to the first embodiment forms an image of the illuminator 101 that illuminates the subject 111, the band-pass filter 102 that limits the wavelength of illumination light from the illuminator 101, and the reflected light from the subject 111. Lens 103, CCD camera 104 as an imaging means for converting the formed subject image into an electrical signal, an image input board 105 for capturing an output signal from the CCD camera 104 as an image, and retention of image data , And a memory 106 used for processing of each means described later, a defect area extracting means 107 for extracting a defect area from the acquired image data, a defect area connecting means 108 for connecting the extracted defect areas, and a connected connection An exposure section-dependent contour ratio calculating unit 109 that calculates the ratio of the contour along the exposure section side of the contour of the area, and a defect based on the calculated ratio. It consists classification means 110. similar.

上記構成のうち、メモリ106と、欠陥領域抽出手段107と、欠陥領域連結手段108と、露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段109と、分類手段110とは、PC120により実現される。ここで、メモリ106はPC120内のメモリとして具現化され、欠陥領域抽出手段107と、欠陥領域連結手段108と、露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段109と、分類手段110とはPC120内のCPUとして具現化される。   Of the above configuration, the memory 106, the defect area extraction means 107, the defect area connection means 108, the exposure section dependent contour ratio calculation means 109, and the classification means 110 are realized by the PC 120. Here, the memory 106 is embodied as a memory in the PC 120, and the defect area extraction means 107, the defect area connection means 108, the exposure section dependent contour ratio calculation means 109, and the classification means 110 are embodied as a CPU in the PC 120. It becomes.

以下に、本実施形態に係る欠陥分類方法の詳細を図面を参照して説明する。本欠陥分類装置は、照明器101からの光を帯域通過フィルタ102により波長制限して被検体に照射し、被検体表面から反射する回折光(または干渉光)をレンズ103により結像してCCDカメラ104により電気信号に変換する。この電気信号は画像入力ボード105を通してデジタル化され、演算用のメモリ106に取り込まれ、これが被検体111の検査画像となる。図2は、このような検査画像130の一例を模式的に示す図である。検査画像130には、概して連続したショット欠陥131やムラ欠陥132等が含まれている。   Details of the defect classification method according to the present embodiment will be described below with reference to the drawings. In this defect classification apparatus, the wavelength of light from the illuminator 101 is limited by the band-pass filter 102 to irradiate the subject, and diffracted light (or interference light) reflected from the subject surface is imaged by the lens 103 to form a CCD. It is converted into an electric signal by the camera 104. This electrical signal is digitized through the image input board 105 and is taken into the calculation memory 106, which becomes an inspection image of the subject 111. FIG. 2 is a diagram schematically illustrating an example of such an inspection image 130. The inspection image 130 generally includes continuous shot defects 131, uneven defects 132, and the like.

次に、欠陥領域抽出手段107は、取得した検査画像130から欠陥領域を抽出する。抽出の方法には以下の2通りの方法が考えられる。第1の方法では、図3(A)に示すような検査画像130において、良品レベルの輝度範囲となるしきい値を設定しておき、このしきい値を超える輝度を持つ画素の領域を欠陥抽出画像131として抽出する(図3(B))。ここで、良品レベルの輝度範囲を示す閾値は、PC120内に予め設定しておいても良いし、画像内の輝度ヒストグラムを基に適応的に決定しても良い(東京大学出版会:画像解析ハンドブック:高木幹夫、下田陽久、監修:502P、2値化、を参照)。   Next, the defect area extraction unit 107 extracts a defect area from the acquired inspection image 130. The following two methods can be considered as extraction methods. In the first method, in the inspection image 130 as shown in FIG. 3A, a threshold value that is within a non-defective level luminance range is set, and a pixel region having a luminance exceeding this threshold value is determined as a defect. Extracted as an extracted image 131 (FIG. 3B). Here, the threshold value indicating the brightness range of the non-defective product level may be preset in the PC 120 or may be determined adaptively based on the brightness histogram in the image (The University of Tokyo Press: Image Analysis). (See Handbook: Mikio Takagi, Yoshihisa Shimoda, Supervision: 502P, Binarization).

第2の方法では、図22(B)に示すような良品ウェハ画像704(または図4(A)の上部に示すような良品となる一定区画の画像140)を保持しておき、この画像と図4(A)に示すような検査画像130(または検査画像内の対応区画)を位置合わせし、重なり合う画素間の輝度差を求めて差分画像132(図4(B))を作成し、この差分画像132を用いて上記第1の方法と同様の閾値処理により欠陥領域を抽出する。   In the second method, a non-defective wafer image 704 as shown in FIG. 22B (or an image 140 of a certain section that becomes a non-defective product as shown in the upper part of FIG. 4A) is held, and this image and An inspection image 130 (or a corresponding section in the inspection image) as shown in FIG. 4A is aligned, a luminance difference between overlapping pixels is obtained, and a difference image 132 (FIG. 4B) is created. Using the difference image 132, a defective area is extracted by threshold processing similar to the first method.

このようにして欠陥領域を抽出した後、欠陥領域連結手段108において欠陥領域を連結する。このときの連結にはモルフォロジー処理の一つであるclosingを用いる(モルフォロジー処理の詳細については、コロナ社:モルフォロジー:小畑秀文著を参照)。   After extracting the defective areas in this way, the defective areas are connected by the defective area connecting means 108. For the connection at this time, closing which is one of the morphological processes is used (for details of the morphological processes, see Corona: Morphology: Hidefumi Obata).

以下に、モルフォロジー処理について簡単に説明する。モルフォロジー処理の基本は、dilation及びerosionの2つの処理であり、それぞれ対象領域Aに対して構造要素Bと呼ばれる基準図形(基準画像)を用いて行われる。各処理を式で表すと以下のようになる。

Figure 0004027905
Hereinafter, the morphology processing will be briefly described. The basis of the morphological process is two processes, dilation and erosion, which are performed on the target area A using a reference graphic (reference image) called a structural element B, respectively. Each process is expressed as follows.
Figure 0004027905

以下に、dilation処理及びerosion処理のそれぞれについて図を参照して説明する。図5は、dilation処理について説明するための図である。構造要素Bの原点B1を対象領域A内で平行移動させた際に構造要素Bが覆うことのできる領域を処理結果Cとして出力する。   Hereinafter, each of the dilation process and the erosion process will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining dilation processing. An area that can be covered by the structural element B when the origin B1 of the structural element B is translated in the target area A is output as a processing result C.

図6は、erosion処理について説明するための図である。構造要素Bを対象領域A内で平行移動した際に構造要素Bの原点B1が覆うことのできる領域を処理結果Cとして出力する。   FIG. 6 is a diagram for explaining the erosion process. An area that can be covered by the origin B1 of the structural element B when the structural element B is translated in the target area A is output as a processing result C.

上記したdilation処理とerosion処理との組み合わせからなる処理としてclosing処理がある。この処理を式で表すと以下のようになる。

Figure 0004027905
There is a closing process as a process that is a combination of the above-described dilation process and erosion process. This process is expressed as follows.
Figure 0004027905

図7は、closing処理の手順を説明するための図である。図7に示すclosing処理では、構造要素Bを対象領域Aの外側から外接させて移動した際に構造要素Bが囲む領域を出力する。   FIG. 7 is a diagram for explaining the procedure of the closing process. In the closing process shown in FIG. 7, when the structural element B is moved from the outside of the target area A, the area surrounded by the structural element B is output.

図8は、図3で説明した欠陥抽出領域150(図8の(A))を、矩形の構造要素151を用いてclosing処理した結果(図8の(B))を示している。また、図9は、図3で説明した欠陥抽出領域150(図9の(A))を、円形構造要素152を用いてclosing処理した結果(図9の(B))を示している。   FIG. 8 shows a result of closing processing of the defect extraction area 150 (FIG. 8A) described in FIG. 3 using a rectangular structural element 151 (FIG. 8B). FIG. 9 shows a result (FIG. 9B) obtained by closing the defect extraction region 150 (FIG. 9A) described with reference to FIG.

図10は、隣接チップ間の幅と構造要素サイズの関係を説明するための図である。ウェハ内において隣接するチップの間(ダイシングライン付近)に相当する領域は、通常のチップ内パターンとは異なるパターン状態のため、検査画像内でもチップ内とは異なる輝度になり、欠陥領域抽出の際に欠陥領域を分断する主要な領域となる。そこで、図10に示すように、構造要素のサイズ161をこの隣接チップ間の幅160より大きく設定することで、効果的に欠陥領域の連結を行うことができる。   FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining the relationship between the width between adjacent chips and the structural element size. The area corresponding to the area between adjacent chips in the wafer (near the dicing line) has a different pattern state from the normal in-chip pattern. Therefore, the brightness in the inspection image is different from that in the chip. It becomes a main area that divides the defective area. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 10, by setting the size 161 of the structural element to be larger than the width 160 between the adjacent chips, the defect regions can be effectively connected.

このようにして欠陥領域を連結した後は、露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段109において、連結した欠陥領域の輪郭のうち、露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を算出する。以下にこの算出手順を説明する。   After the defective areas are connected in this way, the exposure section-dependent contour ratio calculating unit 109 calculates the ratio of the contours along the exposure section sides among the connected contours of the defective areas. This calculation procedure will be described below.

1) まず、連結欠陥領域の輪郭を抽出する。輪郭抽出には様々な方法があるが、ここでは、欠陥領域の輝度値=1、他の画素の輝度値=0となる2値画像を用いた場合の方法を示す。この場合、欠陥領域内の任意の注目画素位置において、図11に示すような、注目画素170の周囲の4近傍に位置する画素171−1〜171−4の積を求め、この値が0となる位置の注目画素を抽出することで、輪郭部を得る。上記の方法により図12の(A)(図9の(B)に対応)に示す連結欠陥領域の輪郭を抽出すると、図12の(B)に示すような結果が得られる。 1) First, the outline of the connected defect area is extracted. There are various methods for contour extraction. Here, a method in the case of using a binary image in which the luminance value of the defective area = 1 and the luminance value of other pixels = 0 is shown. In this case, the product of the pixels 171-1 to 171-4 located in the vicinity of 4 around the target pixel 170 as shown in FIG. 11 is obtained at an arbitrary target pixel position in the defect area. By extracting the target pixel at the position, a contour portion is obtained. When the outline of the connection defect region shown in FIG. 12A (corresponding to FIG. 9B) is extracted by the above method, the result shown in FIG. 12B is obtained.

2)次に、露光区画辺に沿う輪郭を求める。画像内での露光区画の位置は予め設定しておく。検査画像が撮像の度にずれる場合には、位置基準となる代表画像での露光区画位置を設定しておき、代表画像に対して各検査画像を位置合わせした後に、設定された露光区画位置を取得する。次に、露光区画辺を中心とした幅Xの範囲を示す画像を作成する(図13の(A))。この画像と図13の(B)(図12の(B)に対応)に示す輪郭画像のANDをとることで、図13の(C)に示すような露光区画辺に沿う輪郭を求めることができる。幅Xは、X=αד露光区画サイズ“のように区画サイズを基に決定すると、区画サイズに適応的に決定できる。 2) Next, a contour along the exposure partition side is obtained. The position of the exposure section in the image is set in advance. If the inspection image is shifted every time it is imaged, the exposure section position in the representative image serving as a position reference is set, and after aligning each inspection image with the representative image, the set exposure section position is set. get. Next, an image showing the range of the width X around the exposure partition side is created ((A) of FIG. 13). By taking the AND of this image and the contour image shown in FIG. 13B (corresponding to FIG. 12B), the contour along the exposure partition side as shown in FIG. 13C can be obtained. it can. If the width X is determined based on the section size such as X = α × “exposure section size”, it can be determined adaptively to the section size.

3) 各連結欠陥領域の輪郭のうち、露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を求める。 3) Of the contours of each connected defect area, the ratio of the contours along the exposure partition side is obtained.

以上により求められた割合値は、欠陥外形が露光区画に類似する欠陥、つまり露光機起因の欠陥ほど高くなる。露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合値が算出された後は、分類手段110において求めた割合値を基に欠陥領域を分類する。ここでは、露光機起因の欠陥を分類する。これは、算出した割合値に対して所定の閾値を設定し、この閾値より割合値が大きければ露光機起因の欠陥とし、小さければその他に分類することで実現される。   The ratio value obtained as described above becomes higher for a defect whose defect outline is similar to that of the exposure section, that is, a defect caused by the exposure machine. After the ratio value of the contour along the exposure section side is calculated, the defect area is classified based on the ratio value obtained by the classification unit 110. Here, defects caused by the exposure machine are classified. This is realized by setting a predetermined threshold value for the calculated ratio value, and if the ratio value is larger than this threshold value, the defect is attributed to the exposure apparatus, and if the ratio value is smaller, it is classified into others.

図14は、上記した欠陥分類方法の手順を示すフローチャートである。まず、CCDカメラ104により被検体を撮像して検査画像を取得する(ステップS1)。次に、取得した検査画像から欠陥領域抽出手段107により欠陥領域を抽出する(ステップS2)。次に、抽出した欠陥領域を欠陥領域連結手段108により連結する(ステップS3)。次に、露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段109により、連結した欠陥領域の輪郭を抽出する(ステップS4)とともに、抽出した欠陥領域の輪郭のうち、露光区画辺に沿う輪郭を抽出する(ステップS5)。次に、露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段109により、連結欠陥領域の輪郭長のうち、露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合、すなわち、露光区画辺に沿う輪郭長/全輪郭長、を求める(ステップS6)。次に、求めた割合値を基に分類手段110によって欠陥領域を分類する(ステップS7)。最後に分類結果を出力する(ステップS8)。   FIG. 14 is a flowchart showing the procedure of the defect classification method described above. First, the subject is imaged by the CCD camera 104 to obtain an inspection image (step S1). Next, a defect area is extracted from the acquired inspection image by the defect area extraction means 107 (step S2). Next, the extracted defect areas are connected by the defect area connecting means 108 (step S3). Next, the contour of the connected defect area is extracted by the exposure section dependent contour ratio calculating means 109 (step S4), and the contour along the exposure section side is extracted from the extracted defect area contour (step S5). . Next, the exposure section dependent contour ratio calculating means 109 obtains the ratio of the contour along the exposure section side out of the contour lengths of the connected defect areas, that is, the contour length along the exposure section side / the total contour length (step S6). ). Next, the defect area is classified by the classification means 110 based on the obtained ratio value (step S7). Finally, the classification result is output (step S8).

上記した第1実施形態によれば、欠陥領域を連結し、その領域の輪郭と露光区画辺との関係を基に欠陥を分類することにより、連続する露光機起因の欠陥に対しても、精度の高い分類を行うことができる。   According to the first embodiment described above, the defect areas are connected, and the defects are classified based on the relationship between the outlines of the areas and the exposure partition sides, so that even with respect to the defects caused by successive exposure machines, the accuracy can be improved. Classification can be performed.

(第2実施形態)
以下に、本発明の第2実施形態について説明する。本発明の第2実施形態に係る欠陥分類装置は、第1実施形態の欠陥分類装置と同様な方法で抽出された欠陥領域を、露光区画を細分した区画に集約して連結し、その輪郭と露光区画との関係を基に欠陥を分類するものである。
(Second Embodiment)
The second embodiment of the present invention will be described below. The defect classification apparatus according to the second embodiment of the present invention consolidates and connects defect areas extracted by the same method as the defect classification apparatus of the first embodiment into sections obtained by subdividing the exposure sections. The defect is classified based on the relationship with the exposure section.

図15は、本発明の第2実施形態に係る欠陥分類装置の構成を示す図である。図15に示す201〜207、211の構成は、第1実施形態の欠陥分類装置を示す図1の101〜107、111と同様であるのでここでの説明は省略する。第2実施形態の欠陥分類装置はさらに、抽出された欠陥領域を露光区画を細分した区画に集約する欠陥領域集約手段208と、欠陥領域を集約した欠陥区画を連結する欠陥区画連結手段209と、連結した欠陥区画の輪郭のうち露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を算出する露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段210と、前記割合を基に欠陥を分類する分類手段212とを備えている。   FIG. 15 is a diagram showing the configuration of the defect classification apparatus according to the second embodiment of the present invention. The configurations of 201 to 207 and 211 shown in FIG. 15 are the same as those of 101 to 107 and 111 of FIG. 1 showing the defect classification apparatus of the first embodiment, so description thereof will be omitted here. The defect classification apparatus according to the second embodiment further includes a defect area aggregating unit 208 for aggregating the extracted defect areas into areas obtained by subdividing the exposure areas, a defect area linking unit 209 for linking defect areas obtained by aggregating defect areas, An exposure section-dependent contour ratio calculating unit 210 that calculates the ratio of the contours along the exposure section side in the contours of the connected defect sections, and a classification unit 212 that classifies the defects based on the ratio.

第1実施形態の欠陥分類装置において、抽出した欠陥領域を画素単位で連結したり、輪郭抽出するのは時間がかかる処理である。そこで、第2実施形態の欠陥分類装置では、抽出された欠陥領域を、欠陥領域集約手段208において露光区画を細分した区画に集約することで以後の計算量を削減する。   In the defect classification apparatus according to the first embodiment, it is a time consuming process to connect extracted defect regions in units of pixels or to extract contours. Therefore, in the defect classification apparatus according to the second embodiment, the extracted defect areas are aggregated into areas obtained by subdividing the exposure areas in the defect area aggregating unit 208, thereby reducing the subsequent calculation amount.

ここでの集約の方法としては図16に示すように、露光区画250を1/N(ここでは1/16)に細分した細分区画を考える。次に、図17に示すように、内部に欠陥領域260が存在する細分区画を欠陥区画とすることで集約する。図17(B)は抽出した欠陥領域を細分区画に集約した結果を示す図である。   As an aggregation method here, as shown in FIG. 16, a subdivision section obtained by subdividing the exposure section 250 into 1 / N (here, 1/16) is considered. Next, as shown in FIG. 17, subdivisions in which the defect area 260 exists are aggregated by making them into defect divisions. FIG. 17B is a diagram showing the result of collecting the extracted defect areas into subdivisions.

欠陥領域を集約して欠陥区画を求めた後は、欠陥区画連結手段209により欠陥区画を連結する。これは上下左右の方向に隣接する欠陥区画を1つの連結欠陥区画と看做すことで処理される。欠陥区画の連結後は、露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段210において、連結欠陥区画の輪郭のうち露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を算出する。手順としては、第1実施形態で行った処理と同様の処理を、細分区画を1画素と看做して行う。   After the defect areas are aggregated and the defect sections are obtained, the defect sections are connected by the defect section connecting means 209. This is dealt with by regarding a defective section adjacent in the vertical and horizontal directions as one connected defective section. After the defective sections are connected, the exposure section-dependent contour ratio calculation unit 210 calculates the ratio of the contours along the exposure section sides of the connected defective section contours. As a procedure, the same processing as that performed in the first embodiment is performed by regarding the subdivision as one pixel.

図18(A)は、図17(B)に示す集約結果より求めた輪郭抽出結果を示しており、図18(B)は、露光区画に沿う輪郭の抽出結果を示している。   18A shows a contour extraction result obtained from the aggregation result shown in FIG. 17B, and FIG. 18B shows a contour extraction result along the exposure section.

求められた割合値は、欠陥外形が露光区画に類似する欠陥、つまり露光機起因の欠陥ほど高くなる。割合値が算出された後は、分類手段212において、露光機起因の欠陥を分類する。これは、算出した割合値に対して所定の閾値を設定し、この閾値より割合値が大きければ露光機起因の欠陥とし、小さければその他に分類することで実現される。なお、欠陥区画連結時に、連結した欠陥区画の面積を求め、この値が露光区画サイズより大きな場合には本方法による分類を用い、小さな場合には特開2003−168114に示す相関値による分類を用いることで、更に精度良く、露光機起因の欠陥を分類することが可能である。   The obtained ratio value is higher for a defect having a defect profile similar to that of the exposure section, that is, a defect caused by the exposure machine. After the ratio value is calculated, the classifier 212 classifies the defects caused by the exposure machine. This is realized by setting a predetermined threshold value for the calculated ratio value, and if the ratio value is larger than this threshold value, the defect is attributed to the exposure apparatus, and if the ratio value is smaller, it is classified into others. At the time of connecting defect sections, the area of the connected defect sections is obtained. If this value is larger than the exposure section size, the classification according to this method is used, and if the value is smaller, the classification based on the correlation value shown in JP-A-2003-168114 is used. By using it, it is possible to classify defects caused by the exposure machine with higher accuracy.

図19は、上記した欠陥分類方法の手順を示すフローチャートである。まず、CCDカメラ204により被検体を撮像して検査画像を取得する(ステップS11)。次に、欠陥領域抽出手段207により取得した検査画像から欠陥領域を抽出する(ステップS12)。   FIG. 19 is a flowchart showing the procedure of the defect classification method described above. First, the subject is imaged by the CCD camera 204 to obtain an inspection image (step S11). Next, a defect area is extracted from the inspection image acquired by the defect area extraction unit 207 (step S12).

次に、欠陥領域集約手段208において、欠陥領域を露光区画を細分した区画に集約する(ステップS13)。次に、欠陥区画連結手段209において、欠陥が集約された区間(欠陥区画)を連結する(ステップS14)。次に、露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段210において、連結した欠陥区画の輪郭を抽出し(ステップS15)、この抽出した輪郭のうち露光区画辺に沿う輪郭を求める(ステップS16)。さらに、露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段210において、“露光区画辺に沿う輪郭長/全輪郭長”を求める(ステップS17)。次に、分類手段212において、求めた値を基に欠陥領域を分類する(ステップS18)。最後に、分類結果を出力する(ステップS19)。   Next, the defect area aggregating means 208 aggregates the defect area into sections obtained by subdividing the exposure sections (step S13). Next, in the defect section connecting means 209, sections (defect sections) in which defects are aggregated are connected (step S14). Next, the exposure section dependent contour ratio calculating means 210 extracts the contours of the connected defect sections (step S15), and obtains the contour along the exposure section side from the extracted contours (step S16). Further, the exposure section dependent contour ratio calculating means 210 calculates “contour length along the exposure section side / total contour length” (step S17). Next, the classifying unit 212 classifies the defect area based on the obtained value (step S18). Finally, the classification result is output (step S19).

本発明の第2実施形態によれば、欠陥領域を露光区画を細分した区画に集約して連結し、その領域の輪郭と露光区画辺との関係を基に欠陥を分類することにより、処理速度を向上しながら、連続する露光機起因の欠陥の分類を行うことができる。   According to the second embodiment of the present invention, the defect area is aggregated and connected to sections obtained by subdividing the exposure section, and the defects are classified based on the relationship between the outline of the area and the exposure section side, thereby processing speed. While improving the above, it is possible to classify defects caused by successive exposure machines.

(第3実施形態)
本発明の第3実施形態に係る欠陥分類装置は、第1及び第2実施形態の欠陥分類装置と同様な方法で得た検査画像に対し、露光区画を細分した区画単位で検査を行い欠陥区画を求め、これら欠陥区画を連結して、その輪郭と露光区画との関係を基に欠陥を分類するものである。
(Third embodiment)
The defect classification apparatus according to the third embodiment of the present invention inspects an inspection image obtained by the same method as the defect classification apparatus according to the first and second embodiments, and inspects the defect section by subdividing the exposure section. These defect sections are connected, and the defects are classified based on the relationship between the contour and the exposure section.

図20は、本発明の第3実施形態に係る欠陥分類装置の構成を示す図である。図20に示す301〜306、311の構成は、第1実施形態の欠陥分類装置を示す図1の101〜106、111と同様であるのでここでの説明は省略する。   FIG. 20 is a diagram showing the configuration of the defect classification apparatus according to the third embodiment of the present invention. The configurations of 301 to 306 and 311 shown in FIG. 20 are the same as 101 to 106 and 111 of FIG. 1 showing the defect classification apparatus according to the first embodiment, and a description thereof will be omitted here.

第3実施形態の欠陥分類装置は、第2実施形態の欠陥分類装置での、欠陥領域を抽出してから露光区画を細分した区画に集約するという処理を簡略化する構成となっている。つまり第3実施形態では、欠陥区画検出手段307により、露光区画を細分した区画単位で検査を行って異常が存在する区画を欠陥区画として検出し、検出した欠陥区画を欠陥区画連結手段308により連結し、連結した欠陥区画の輪郭のうち露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段309により算出し、算出した割合を基に分類手段310により欠陥を分類する。   The defect classification apparatus according to the third embodiment has a configuration that simplifies the process of extracting the defect area and consolidating the exposure sections into subdivided sections in the defect classification apparatus according to the second embodiment. That is, in the third embodiment, the defect section detection unit 307 performs inspection in units of subdivisions of the exposure section, detects a section having an abnormality as a defect section, and connects the detected defect section by the defect section connection unit 308. Then, the ratio of the contours along the exposure section side among the contours of the connected defect sections is calculated by the exposure section-dependent contour ratio calculation means 309, and the defect is classified by the classification means 310 based on the calculated ratio.

ここで、欠陥区画連結手段308、露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段309、分類手段310はそれぞれ、第2実施形態(図15)における欠陥区画連結手段209、露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段210、分類手段212と同等のものである。   Here, the defect section connecting means 308, the exposure section dependent contour ratio calculating means 309, and the classifying means 310 are the defect section connecting means 209, the exposure section dependent contour ratio calculating means 210, and the classifying means in the second embodiment (FIG. 15), respectively. This is equivalent to 212.

なお、欠陥区画の検出の方法としては、予め良品となる細分区画の画像統計量(平均輝度、輝度標準偏差、輝度ヒストグラム、輝度勾配ヒストグラムなど)を保持しておき、この統計量と、位置的に対応する被検査対象の細分区画の画像統計量を比較し、差が規定値を超える区画を欠陥区画とする方法がある。この時、露光区画内の細分区画間にパターンの共通性があれば、統計量を共通化することが可能である。このため、1ショットの露光区画内に4×4以上程度のチップ区画が存在する場合には、細分区画をチップ区画に合わせることで更に処理の簡略化が図れる。   As a method for detecting a defective section, image statistics (average brightness, brightness standard deviation, brightness histogram, brightness gradient histogram, etc.) of subdivided sections that are non-defective products are stored in advance. There is a method in which image statistics of subdivisions to be inspected corresponding to the above are compared, and a section whose difference exceeds a specified value is defined as a defective section. At this time, if there is a pattern commonality between the subdivision sections in the exposure section, it is possible to share the statistics. For this reason, when there are about 4 × 4 or more chip sections in one shot exposure section, the processing can be further simplified by matching the sub-section sections with the chip sections.

図21は、上記した欠陥分類方法の手順を示すフローチャートである。まず、CCDカメラ304により被検体を撮像して検査画像を取得する(ステップS21)。次に、欠陥区画検出手段307において、欠陥区画を検出する(ステップS22)。以下のステップS23〜S28は、第2実施形態である図19のステップS14〜S19と同様である。   FIG. 21 is a flowchart showing the procedure of the defect classification method described above. First, the subject is imaged by the CCD camera 304 to obtain an inspection image (step S21). Next, the defect section detection means 307 detects the defect section (step S22). The following steps S23 to S28 are the same as steps S14 to S19 of FIG. 19 which is the second embodiment.

以上、本発明の第3実施形態によれば、検査画像を基に直接欠陥となる細分区画を検出して連結し、その領域の輪郭と露光区画辺との関係を基に欠陥を分類することにより、処理速度を向上しながら、連続する露光機起因の欠陥の分類を行うことができる。   As described above, according to the third embodiment of the present invention, the subdivisions that are directly defective are detected and connected based on the inspection image, and the defects are classified based on the relationship between the contour of the region and the exposure side. Thus, it is possible to classify defects caused by successive exposure machines while improving the processing speed.

本発明の第1実施形態に係る欠陥分類装置の構成を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the structure of the defect classification apparatus which concerns on 1st Embodiment of this invention. 検査画像130の一例を模式的に示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the test | inspection image 130 typically. 2値化による欠陥領域抽出について説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating the defect area extraction by binarization. 検査画像内同一パターン区画の比較による差分画像作成について説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating the difference image creation by the comparison of the same pattern division in a test | inspection image. dilation処理について説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating dilation processing. erosion処理について説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating erosion processing. closing処理について説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating a closing process. 図3で説明した欠陥抽出領域を、矩形の構造要素を用いて連結処理する手順を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining the procedure which connects the defect extraction area | region demonstrated in FIG. 3 using a rectangular structural element. 図3で説明した欠陥抽出領域を、円形の構造要素を用いて連結処理する手順を説明する図である。It is a figure explaining the procedure which connects the defect extraction area | region demonstrated in FIG. 3 using a circular structural element. 隣接チップ間の幅と構造要素サイズの関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between the width | variety between adjacent chips, and structural element size. 注目画素の4近傍画素について説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating the 4 neighboring pixel of an attention pixel. 連結欠陥領域の輪郭を抽出する手順を説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating the procedure which extracts the outline of a connection defect area | region. 露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の抽出手順を説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating the extraction procedure of the outline along an exposure division edge. 本発明の第1実施形態に係る欠陥分類処理の流れを説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating the flow of the defect classification | category process which concerns on 1st Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第2実施形態に係る欠陥分類装置の構成を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the structure of the defect classification device which concerns on 2nd Embodiment of this invention. 図2に示す検査画像の露光区画を1/16に細分した区画を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the division which subdivided the exposure division of the test | inspection image shown in FIG. 2 into 1/16. 抽出した欠陥領域を細分区画に集約した結果を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the result of having condensed the extracted defect area | region into the subdivision division. 図17の集約結果に基づく処理結果を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the processing result based on the aggregation result of FIG. 本発明の第2実施形態に係る欠陥分類処理の流れを説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating the flow of the defect classification | category process which concerns on 2nd Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第3実施形態に係る欠陥分類装置の構成を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the structure of the defect classification device which concerns on 3rd Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の第3実施形態に係る欠陥分類処理の流れを説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating the flow of the defect classification | category process which concerns on 3rd Embodiment of this invention. 従来の欠陥分類装置の原理を説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating the principle of the conventional defect classification device. 連続発生したショット欠陥に対する従来手法の適用例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example of application of the conventional method with respect to the shot defect which generate | occur | produced continuously.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

101…照明器、102…帯域通過フィルタ、103…レンズ、104…CCDカメラ、105…画像入力ボード、106…メモリ、107…欠陥領域抽出手段、108…欠陥領域連結手段、109…露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段、110…分類手段、120…PC。 DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 101 ... Illuminator, 102 ... Band pass filter, 103 ... Lens, 104 ... CCD camera, 105 ... Image input board, 106 ... Memory, 107 ... Defect area extraction means, 108 ... Defect area connection means, 109 ... Exposure zone dependent contour Ratio calculation means, 110 ... classification means, 120 ... PC.

Claims (10)

配線パターンを形成するための露光が行われた被検体における欠陥を分類する欠陥分類装置において、
前記露光が行われた後の前記被検体表面の画像を撮像する撮像手段と、
前記画像より欠陥領域を抽出する欠陥領域抽出手段と、
前記抽出した欠陥領域をモルフォロジー処理によって連結欠陥領域として連結する欠陥領域連結手段と、
前記連結欠陥領域の輪郭のうち前記画像内での位置が予め設定されている露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を連結した各連結欠陥領域について算出する露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段と、
前記割合を基に欠陥を分類する分類手段と、
を具備することを特徴とする欠陥分類装置。
In a defect classification apparatus for classifying defects in a subject that has been exposed to form a wiring pattern,
Imaging means for capturing an image of the subject surface after the exposure is performed;
A defect area extracting means for extracting a defect area from the image;
Defect region connecting means for connecting the extracted defect regions as connected defect regions by morphological processing;
An exposure section-dependent contour ratio calculating means for calculating each connected defect area connecting the ratios of the contours along the exposure section side where the position in the image is set in advance among the contours of the connected defect areas;
A classifying means for classifying defects based on the ratio;
A defect classification apparatus comprising:
前記欠陥領域連結手段での連結は、隣接チップ間の幅より大きなサイズの構造要素を用いたモルフォロジー処理によることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の欠陥分類装置。 The defect classification apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the connection by the defect area connecting means is based on a morphological process using a structural element having a size larger than the width between adjacent chips. 配線パターンを形成するための露光が行われた被検体における欠陥を分類する欠陥分類装置において、
前記露光が行われた後の前記被検体表面の画像を撮像する撮像手段と、
前記画像より欠陥領域を抽出する欠陥領域抽出手段と、
前記抽出した欠陥領域を露光区画を細分した区画に集約する欠陥領域集約手段と、
前記欠陥領域を集約した欠陥区画のうち隣接する欠陥区画を連結欠陥区画として連結する欠陥区画連結手段と、
前記連結欠陥区画の輪郭のうち前記画像内での位置が予め設定されている露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を連結した各連結欠陥区画について算出する露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段と、
前記割合を基に欠陥を分類する分類手段と、を備えることを特徴とする欠陥分類装置。
In a defect classification apparatus for classifying defects in a subject that has been exposed to form a wiring pattern,
Imaging means for capturing an image of the subject surface after the exposure is performed;
A defect area extracting means for extracting a defect area from the image;
A defect area aggregating means for aggregating the extracted defect area into sections obtained by subdividing an exposure section;
A defect section connecting means for connecting adjacent defect sections as a connected defect section among the defect sections in which the defect areas are aggregated; and
An exposure section-dependent contour ratio calculating means for calculating, for each connected defect section, the ratio of the contours along the exposure section side where the position in the image is preset among the contours of the connected defect sections;
A defect classifying apparatus comprising: classifying means for classifying defects based on the ratio.
配線パターンを形成するための露光が行われた被検体における欠陥を分類する欠陥分類装置において、
前記露光が行われた後の前記被検体表面の画像を撮像する撮像手段と、
前記画像を露光区画を細分した区画単位で検査し、欠陥が存在する区画を欠陥区画として検出する欠陥区画検出手段と、
前記欠陥区画のうち隣接する欠陥区画を連結欠陥区画として連結する欠陥区画連結手段と、
前記連結欠陥区画の輪郭のうち前記画像内での位置が予め設定されている露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を連結した各連結欠陥区画について算出する露光区画依存輪郭割合算出手段と、
前記割合を基に欠陥を分類する分類手段と、
を具備することを特徴とする欠陥分類装置。
In a defect classification apparatus for classifying defects in a subject that has been exposed to form a wiring pattern,
Imaging means for capturing an image of the subject surface after the exposure is performed;
A defect section detection means for inspecting the image in units of subdivisions of the exposure section, and detecting a section where a defect exists as a defect section;
A defect section connecting means for connecting adjacent defect sections among the defect sections as a connected defect section;
An exposure section-dependent contour ratio calculating means for calculating, for each connected defect section, the ratio of the contours along the exposure section side where the position in the image is preset among the contours of the connected defect sections;
A classifying means for classifying defects based on the ratio;
A defect classification apparatus comprising:
前記露光区画を細分した区画をチップ区画に合わせることを特徴とする請求項3または4に記載の欠陥分類装置。 5. The defect classification apparatus according to claim 3, wherein a section obtained by subdividing the exposure section is matched with a chip section. 配線パターンを形成するための露光が行われた被検体における欠陥を分類する欠陥分類方法において、
前記露光が行われた後の前記被検体表面の画像を撮像し、
前記画像より欠陥領域を抽出し、
前記抽出した欠陥領域をモルフォロジー処理によって連結欠陥領域として連結し、
前記連結欠陥領域の輪郭のうち前記画像内での位置が予め設定されている露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を連結した各連結欠陥領域について算出し、
前記割合を基に欠陥を分類することを特徴とする欠陥分類方法。
In a defect classification method for classifying defects in a subject that has been exposed to form a wiring pattern,
Taking an image of the subject surface after the exposure has been performed,
Extracting a defect area from the image,
Connecting the extracted defect regions as connected defect regions by morphological processing;
Calculated for each connected defect region that connects the proportions of the contours along the exposure division side where the position in the image is preset in the contour of the connected defect region,
A defect classification method, wherein defects are classified based on the ratio.
前記抽出した欠陥領域の連結は、隣接チップ間の幅より大きなサイズの構造要素を用いたモルフォロジー処理によることを特徴とする請求項6に記載の欠陥分類方法。 The defect classification method according to claim 6, wherein the extracted defect regions are connected by a morphological process using a structural element having a size larger than the width between adjacent chips. 配線パターンを形成するための露光が行われた被検体における欠陥を分類する欠陥分類方法において、
前記露光が行われた後の前記被検体表面の画像を撮像し、
前記画像より欠陥領域を抽出し、
前記抽出した欠陥領域を露光区画を細分した区画に集約し、
前記欠陥領域を集約した欠陥区画のうち隣接する欠陥区画を連結欠陥区画として連結し、
前記連結欠陥区画の輪郭のうち前記画像内での位置が予め設定されている露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を連結した各連結欠陥区画について算出し、
前記割合を基に欠陥を分類することを特徴とする欠陥分類方法。
In a defect classification method for classifying defects in a subject that has been exposed to form a wiring pattern,
Taking an image of the subject surface after the exposure has been performed,
Extracting a defect area from the image,
Aggregating the extracted defect areas into subdivided exposure sections,
The adjacent defect sections of the defect sections aggregated with the defect areas are connected as connected defect sections,
Calculated for each connected defect section connecting the proportion of the contour along the exposure section side where the position in the image is preset among the outline of the connected defect section,
A defect classification method, wherein defects are classified based on the ratio.
配線パターンを形成するための露光が行われた被検体における欠陥を分類する欠陥分類方法において、
前記露光が行われた後の前記被検体表面の画像を撮像し、
前記画像を露光区画を細分した区画単位で検査し、欠陥が存在する区画を欠陥区画として検出し、
前記欠陥区画のうち隣接する欠陥区画を連結欠陥区画として連結し、
前記連結欠陥区画の輪郭のうち前記画像内での位置が予め設定されている露光区画辺に沿う輪郭の割合を連結した各連結欠陥区画について算出し、
前記割合を基に欠陥を分類することを特徴とする欠陥分類方法。
In a defect classification method for classifying defects in a subject that has been exposed to form a wiring pattern,
Taking an image of the subject surface after the exposure has been performed,
Inspecting the image in units of subdivisions of the exposure section, detecting a section where a defect exists as a defect section,
Connecting adjacent defect sections among the defect sections as connected defect sections;
Calculated for each connected defect section connecting the proportions of the contours along the exposure section side where the position in the image is preset among the contours of the connected defect sections,
A defect classification method, wherein defects are classified based on the ratio.
前記露光区画を細分した区画をチップ区画に合わせることを特徴とする請求項8または9に記載の欠陥分類方法。 10. The defect classification method according to claim 8, wherein a section obtained by subdividing the exposure section is matched with a chip section.
JP2004108179A 2004-03-31 2004-03-31 Defect classification apparatus and defect classification method Expired - Fee Related JP4027905B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004108179A JP4027905B2 (en) 2004-03-31 2004-03-31 Defect classification apparatus and defect classification method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004108179A JP4027905B2 (en) 2004-03-31 2004-03-31 Defect classification apparatus and defect classification method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005291953A JP2005291953A (en) 2005-10-20
JP4027905B2 true JP4027905B2 (en) 2007-12-26

Family

ID=35325038

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004108179A Expired - Fee Related JP4027905B2 (en) 2004-03-31 2004-03-31 Defect classification apparatus and defect classification method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4027905B2 (en)

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2005291953A (en) 2005-10-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4095860B2 (en) Defect inspection method and apparatus
US7894659B2 (en) Methods for accurate identification of an edge of a care area for an array area formed on a wafer and methods for binning defects detected in an array area formed on a wafer
CN112740383B (en) System, computer-implemented method, and readable medium for detecting defects on a wafer
JP2011007728A (en) Method, apparatus and program for defect detection
CN115698687B (en) Inspection of noisy patterned features
CN112150460A (en) Detection method, detection system, device, and medium
CN112461839A (en) Appearance inspection method and appearance inspection device
CN112669272B (en) AOI rapid detection method and rapid detection system
JPH11337498A (en) Apparatus and method for inspecting printed circuit board
JP3752849B2 (en) Pattern defect inspection apparatus and pattern defect inspection method
Anitha et al. Solder joint defect detection in PCBA chip components based on the histogram analysis
CN108039326B (en) The Method of Setting Scanning Threshold Based on Circuit Design Graphics
JP2840347B2 (en) Board mounting inspection equipment
JP5257063B2 (en) Defect detection method and defect detection apparatus
JP4027905B2 (en) Defect classification apparatus and defect classification method
JP3536884B2 (en) Semiconductor wafer defect classification method and apparatus
CN112229853B (en) Method and system for detecting droplet type defect
JP2711649B2 (en) Surface scratch detection method for inspection object
JP2006113073A (en) Pattern defect inspection apparatus and pattern defect inspection method
JP3753234B2 (en) Defect detection method
JP4599980B2 (en) Failure analysis method and failure analysis apparatus for multilayer wiring structure
JPH11352073A (en) Foreign matter inspection method and apparatus
CN115861259A (en) Lead frame surface defect detection method and device based on template matching
JP2003203218A (en) Appearance inspection apparatus and method
JP2002277409A (en) Inspection device for pattern of printed board

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20060508

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20060829

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20061030

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20070320

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20070521

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20070703

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20070831

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20071002

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20071010

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101019

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101019

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101019

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111019

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111019

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121019

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131019

Year of fee payment: 6

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees