JP4093995B2 - Method for manufacturing magnetic recording medium substrate - Google Patents
Method for manufacturing magnetic recording medium substrate Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP4093995B2 JP4093995B2 JP2004208735A JP2004208735A JP4093995B2 JP 4093995 B2 JP4093995 B2 JP 4093995B2 JP 2004208735 A JP2004208735 A JP 2004208735A JP 2004208735 A JP2004208735 A JP 2004208735A JP 4093995 B2 JP4093995 B2 JP 4093995B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- substrate
- wafer
- core
- substrates
- diameter
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K26/00—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
- B23K26/36—Removing material
- B23K26/40—Removing material taking account of the properties of the material involved
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K2101/00—Articles made by soldering, welding or cutting
- B23K2101/36—Electric or electronic devices
- B23K2101/40—Semiconductor devices
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K2103/00—Materials to be soldered, welded or cut
- B23K2103/50—Inorganic materials other than metals or composite materials
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Manufacturing Of Magnetic Record Carriers (AREA)
Description
本発明は、磁気記録の記録媒体基板、好ましくは55mm径以下、より好ましくは50mm径以下の小口径基板として最適な磁気記録の記録媒体基板に関する。 The present invention relates to a magnetic recording medium substrate suitable for a magnetic recording medium substrate, preferably a small-diameter substrate having a diameter of 55 mm or less, more preferably 50 mm or less.
磁気記録の記録密度(面密度)の向上は非常に急激で、ここ10年間の間、年率50%〜200%の急激な向上が継続的に進んできた。量産レベルで70 Gbit/inch2の製品が出荷され、実験室レベルではその倍以上の160 Gbit/inch2の面記録密度が報告されている。量産レベルの面記録密度は、3.5"(「"」はインチを表す。)HDDで1プラッター当たり80 Gbyteに相当し、2.5"HDDでいうと1プラッター当たり40 Gbyteに相当する。この記録容量は、通常のデスクトップパソコン(3.5"HDD搭載)やノートブックパソコン(2.5"HDD搭載)の使用用途では、1プラッターの記録メディア搭載で十分な容量である。 The increase in recording density (surface density) of magnetic recording is very rapid, and during the last 10 years, the rapid increase of 50% to 200% per annum has progressed continuously. A product of 70 Gbit / inch 2 is shipped at the mass production level, and a surface recording density of 160 Gbit / inch 2 which is more than double that at the laboratory level is reported. The surface recording density at the mass production level is equivalent to 80 Gbytes per platter in a 3.5 "HDD (""" represents an inch), and equivalent to 40 Gbytes per platter in a 2.5 "HDD. This recording capacity is sufficient when a recording medium of one platter is installed in a use application of a normal desktop personal computer (3.5 "HDD installed) or a notebook personal computer (2.5" HDD installed).
記録密度は今後も向上が期待されている。ただ、従来の水平磁気記録方式は熱揺らぎの記録限界が迫っており、100 Gbit/inch2〜200 Gbit/inch2の記録密度に到達するところで、垂直磁気記録に順次移行していくものと考えられている。垂直磁気記録の記録限界がどの当たりにあるかは現時点では定かではないが、1000 Gbit/inch2(1Tbit/inch2)は達成可能と考えられている。このような高記録密度が達成できると、2.5" HDD1プラッター当たり600〜700 Gbyteの記録容量が得られることになる。 Recording density is expected to continue to improve. However, the conventional horizontal magnetic recording method is approaching the limit of thermal fluctuation recording, and when it reaches a recording density of 100 Gbit / inch 2 to 200 Gbit / inch 2 , it is considered that it will gradually shift to perpendicular magnetic recording. It has been. Although it is not certain at this time which recording limit of perpendicular magnetic recording is present, 1000 Gbit / inch 2 (1 Tbit / inch 2 ) is considered achievable. If such a high recording density can be achieved, a recording capacity of 600 to 700 Gbytes per 2.5 "HDD platter can be obtained.
パソコンの通常の用途でここまでの大容量は使い切れない可能性が高いため、2.5"よりも小口径の記録メディアが徐々に使われ始めている。代表的には1.8"基板、1"基板であり、過去には1.3"HDDが発売されたこともある。2"以下のHDDは現時点では量的に非常に僅かであるが、今後磁気記録密度が向上すれば、1.8"HDDでパソコン(特にノートパソコン)では十分な記録容量が確保できる。また、1"HDDの記録容量は現在では1〜4Gbyte程度であるが、容量が数倍大きくなればデジタルカメラなどのみならず、パソコンやデジタルビデオカメラ・情報端末や携帯音楽機器・携帯電話など幅広いモバイル用途に使える可能性が出てくる。2"以下の小口径HDDと小口径記録メディア・基板は今後の有望な用途である。 Since there is a high possibility that the large capacity up to this point will not be used up in ordinary PC applications, recording media with a smaller diameter than 2.5 "are gradually being used. "Board, 1.3" HDDs have been released in the past. Currently, HDDs of 2 "or less are very small in quantity. However, if the magnetic recording density is improved in the future, a 1.8" HDD can secure a sufficient recording capacity in a personal computer (especially a notebook personal computer). The recording capacity of a 1 "HDD is currently about 1 to 4 Gbytes, but if the capacity increases several times, not only digital cameras, but also PCs, digital video cameras, information terminals, portable music devices, mobile phones, etc. There is a possibility that it can be used in mobile applications. Small-diameter HDDs of 2 "or less and small-diameter recording media / substrates are promising applications in the future.
HDDの記録メディアの基板としては、3.5"基板には主にAl合金基板、2.5"には主にガラス基板が使用されている。ノートブックパソコンのようなモバイル用途ではHDDが衝撃を受ける可能性が高く、これらに搭載される2.5"HDDは、ヘッドの面打ちで記録メディアやヘッドが傷つき、データ破壊の可能性が高いため、硬度の高いガラス基板が使用されるようになった。したがって、2"以下の小口径基板においてもガラス基板が使用される可能性が高い。 As a substrate for HDD recording media, an Al alloy substrate is mainly used for the 3.5 "substrate, and a glass substrate is mainly used for the 2.5" substrate. In mobile applications such as notebook computers, HDDs are highly susceptible to shocks, and the 2.5 "HDDs mounted on them are highly susceptible to data destruction due to scratching of the recording media and heads due to head hitting. Therefore, a glass substrate having high hardness has been used. Therefore, a glass substrate is likely to be used even in a small-diameter substrate of 2 "or less.
しかし、2"以下の小口径基板はモバイル用途として主に用いられるため、ノートブックパソコンに搭載されている2.5"基板以上に、耐衝撃性が重要である。また、より小型にする必要から基板を含めた部品全体の小型化・薄型化が求められる。2.5"基板の標準厚みである0.635mmより更に薄い板厚が、2"以下の基板では求められる。このような小口径基板に要求される仕様から、ヤング率が高く薄板でも十分な強度が得られ、製作しやすい基板が求められている。この点でガラス基板には幾つか問題がある。 However, since small-diameter substrates of 2 "or less are mainly used for mobile applications, impact resistance is more important than 2.5" substrates mounted on notebook computers. In addition, in order to reduce the size, it is required to reduce the size and thickness of the entire component including the board. A board thickness thinner than 0.635 mm, which is the standard thickness of a 2.5 "substrate, is required for a substrate of 2" or less. From the specifications required for such a small-diameter substrate, a substrate having a high Young's modulus and sufficient strength even with a thin plate and easy to manufacture is desired. There are several problems with glass substrates in this regard.
まず、現行用いられている結晶化ガラス基板では、0.635mm以下の板厚ではヤング率が十分でなく、回転時の共振周波数が実用回転域に存在してしまう。したがって、これ以上の薄板化がしにくい。また、ガラス原板は概ね0.8mm台の板厚のものを使用するが、HDD用原板に要求されるガラス組成では製作上これ以上の薄板化はしにくい。そのため、0.8mm台の板厚から0.5mm台や更にそれ以下の板厚まで、ラップ研磨で調厚する必要がある。調厚するため、研磨時間がかなり長くなり、加工時間や加工コストの上昇を招き望ましくない。 First, in the currently used crystallized glass substrate, the Young's modulus is not sufficient when the plate thickness is 0.635 mm or less, and the resonance frequency during rotation exists in the practical rotation range. Therefore, it is difficult to reduce the thickness further. In addition, a glass plate having a thickness of about 0.8 mm is used. However, it is difficult to make the plate further thinner in production with the glass composition required for the HDD plate. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the thickness by lapping from a thickness of 0.8 mm to a thickness of 0.5 mm or less. Since the thickness is adjusted, the polishing time becomes considerably long, which causes an increase in processing time and processing cost.
また、ガラス基板は当然非導電体であるため、スパッタ成膜において基板上のチャージアップの問題があるため、磁性膜との良好なコンタクトを確保するため、基板と磁性膜との間にバッファ金属膜を入れる必要がある。この技術課題は基本的に克服されているが、スパッタ成膜過程でガラス基板の使用を難しいものにしている要因の1つである。そのため、基板に導電性が付与できるのであればそれに越したことはないが、ガラス基板では難しい。 In addition, since the glass substrate is naturally a non-conductor, there is a problem of charge-up on the substrate in sputter deposition, so that a buffer metal is provided between the substrate and the magnetic film in order to ensure good contact with the magnetic film. It is necessary to put a membrane. Although this technical problem has been basically overcome, it is one of the factors that make it difficult to use a glass substrate in the sputter deposition process. Therefore, if conductivity can be imparted to the substrate, it will not be over, but a glass substrate is difficult.
2.5"HDDでも主にガラス基板が使用されているように、Al合金基板はモバイル用途には全く不向きである。基板の硬度が足りないことは既に述べたが、また基板剛性の不足のため共振周波数を実用回転域より上にするには板厚を厚くするしかなく、モバイル用途には全く候補基板となり得ない。 As glass substrates are mainly used in 2.5 "HDDs, Al alloy substrates are completely unsuitable for mobile applications. As mentioned above, the substrate hardness is insufficient, but the substrate rigidity is insufficient. Therefore, the only way to make the resonance frequency higher than the practical rotation range is to increase the plate thickness, and it cannot be a candidate substrate for mobile applications.
その他のサファイアガラス、SiC基板、エンジニアリングプラスティック基板、カーボン基板などの代替基板が幾つも提案されたが、強度・加工性・コスト・表面平滑性・成膜親和性などの評価基準から、小口径基板の代替基板としては何れも不十分である。 Several other alternative substrates such as sapphire glass, SiC substrate, engineering plastic substrate and carbon substrate have been proposed, but small-diameter substrates have been evaluated based on evaluation criteria such as strength, workability, cost, surface smoothness, and film formation affinity. Any of these alternative substrates is insufficient.
Si単結晶基板をHDD記録膜基板として使用することが提唱されている(特許文献1)。Si単結晶基板は、基板平滑性や環境安定性、信頼性に優れ、剛性もガラス基板と比較して高いため、HDD基板として優れている。ガラス基板とは異なり、導電性は少なくとも半導体特性である。また、通常のウェハでは何等かのP型もしくはN型のドーパントが含まれていることが多いため、導電性は更に高い。したがって、ガラス基板のようなスパッタ成膜時のチャージアップ問題はなく、金属膜のSi基板上への直接スパッタ成膜が可能である。また、熱伝導性も良好であるため、基板加熱も容易で、300℃以上の高温でも成膜が可能であり、スパッタ成膜工程との親和性も大変良好である。Si単結晶基板は半導体IC用に、直径100mmから300mmまでのウェハが量産されている。 It has been proposed to use a Si single crystal substrate as an HDD recording film substrate (Patent Document 1). The Si single crystal substrate is excellent as an HDD substrate because it is excellent in substrate smoothness, environmental stability, and reliability, and has higher rigidity than a glass substrate. Unlike glass substrates, conductivity is at least a semiconductor property. Further, since ordinary wafers often contain some P-type or N-type dopant, the conductivity is even higher. Therefore, there is no charge-up problem at the time of sputtering film formation as in the case of a glass substrate, and it is possible to directly deposit a metal film on a Si substrate. In addition, since the thermal conductivity is good, the substrate can be easily heated, the film can be formed even at a high temperature of 300 ° C. or higher, and the affinity with the sputter film forming process is very good. Si single crystal substrates are mass-produced for semiconductor ICs with a diameter of 100 mm to 300 mm.
しかし、100mm径以下の小口径ウェハは、現在では入手が困難である。したがって、現在流通量の多い6"ないし8"ウェハからコア抜きにより、所望の小口径基板を切り抜くのが実際的である。Si単結晶基板の価格は廉価ではないため、ウェハ1枚当たりからできるだけ多くのHDD基板を切り抜くことが重要である。
本発明は、コア抜き加工の生産性を向上する方法を提供する。
However, it is difficult to obtain a small diameter wafer having a diameter of 100 mm or less at present. Therefore, it is practical to cut out a desired small-diameter substrate from a 6 "to 8" wafer with a large circulation volume by core extraction. Since the price of the Si single crystal substrate is not inexpensive, it is important to cut out as many HDD substrates as possible from one wafer.
The present invention provides a method for improving the productivity of core cutting.
本発明は、直径150mm以上で300mm以下の単結晶シリコンウェハをコア抜き加工して外径55mm以下、好ましい内径20mm以下、より好ましい内径12mm以下のドーナツ状基板を得るコア抜き工程を含んでなる磁気記録媒体用基板の製造方法であって、該コア抜き工程において、抜き出された複数の基板以外の残ウェハが一体となるようにコア抜きされる磁気記録媒体用基板の製造方法を提供する。
本発明によれば、コア抜き工程において、カップ砥石加工を用い砥石送り速度をコアを抜き切る前に落とし、抜き出される複数の基板以外の残ウェハが一体となり、複数コア抜き後の残ウェハ表面の一番短い幅が、ウェハ厚みの3倍以上5倍以下の間隔となるようにコア抜きされ、また、レーザ加工又はウォータージェット加工を用い、抜き出される複数の基板以外の残ウェハが一体となり、該残ウェハ表面の一番短い幅が、上記ウェハ厚みの1.2倍以上5倍以下の間隔となるようにコア抜きされる。また、コア抜き工程は、単結晶シリコン基板にカップ砥石加工よりもコア抜き圧がかかりにくい方法が好ましい。コア抜き工程は、好ましくは、レーザ加工又はウォータージェット加工を用い、複数コア抜き後の残ウェハ表面の一番短い幅が、ウェハ厚みの1.5倍以上2.5倍以下の間隔となるようにコア抜きされる。
The present invention provides a magnetic core comprising a core-cutting process in which a single crystal silicon wafer having a diameter of 150 mm to 300 mm is cored to obtain a donut-shaped substrate having an outer diameter of 55 mm or less, a preferable inner diameter of 20 mm or less, and a more preferable inner diameter of 12 mm or less. There is provided a method for manufacturing a recording medium substrate, wherein in the core extraction step, a core for magnetic recording medium is cored so that remaining wafers other than the plurality of extracted substrates are integrated.
According to the present invention, in the coring process, to overlooked before as possible disconnect the core grinding wheel feed rate using a cup grinding machining, a plurality of the remaining wafers other than the substrate withdrawn come together, the remaining wafer after multiple cored The core is cored so that the shortest surface width is 3 to 5 times the wafer thickness, and the remaining wafers other than the multiple substrates to be extracted are integrated using laser processing or water jet processing. Thus, the core is cored so that the shortest width of the remaining wafer surface is at least 1.2 times and not more than 5 times the wafer thickness. In addition, the core removal step is preferably a method in which the core pressure is less likely to be applied to the single crystal silicon substrate than the cup grindstone processing. The core removal step preferably uses laser processing or water jet processing so that the shortest width of the remaining wafer surface after core removal is at an interval of 1.5 to 2.5 times the wafer thickness. To be cored.
本発明によれば、残ウェハであるカレットを破損することなく一体で残すことにより、コア抜き加工の生産性が向上される。 According to the present invention, by leaving the cullet which is the remaining wafer as one body without damaging it, the productivity of the core removal process is improved.
本発明は、HDD記録膜用基板において、Si単結晶ウェハからコア抜き加工により、できるだけ多くの小口径基板を効率よくコア抜きする製造方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a manufacturing method for efficiently coring as many small-diameter substrates as possible from an Si single crystal wafer by coring from an HDD recording film substrate.
図1は、Si単結晶ウェハを原板として使用し、HDD用磁気記録媒体基板を製作する一例を示す概略工程である。
単結晶シリコン棒1をスライスして直径200mm単結晶Siウェハ2を得た後、コア抜き工程において外径55mm以下の複数のドーナツ状基板3を得る。
ドーナツ基板3は、好ましくは、内周端面と外周端面を面取りされ、端面研磨される。その後、通常は、アルカリエッチング工程、両面研磨工程及び洗浄工程を経て、小口径基板が製造される。
好ましくは、コア抜き工程の前又は後、例えば、コア抜き工程の前、コア抜き工程と面取り工程との間、面取り工程と端面研磨工程との間、又は端面研磨工程の後に、より好ましくは、コア抜き工程の前、面取り工程と端面研磨工程との間、又は端面研磨工程の後に、単結晶シリコンウェハ又はドーナツ状基板の表面を好ましくは10μm〜100μm研削除去するラップ工程とを含んでもよい。
FIG. 1 is a schematic process showing an example of manufacturing a magnetic recording medium substrate for HDD using a Si single crystal wafer as an original plate.
After slicing the single crystal silicon rod 1 to obtain a single
The doughnut substrate 3 is preferably chamfered on the inner peripheral end face and the outer peripheral end face, and the end face is polished. Thereafter, a small-diameter substrate is usually manufactured through an alkali etching process, a double-side polishing process, and a cleaning process.
Preferably, before or after the coring step, for example, before the coring step, between the coring step and the chamfering step, between the chamfering step and the end surface polishing step, or more preferably after the end surface polishing step, Before the core removal step, between the chamfering step and the end surface polishing step, or after the end surface polishing step, a lapping step of grinding and removing the surface of the single crystal silicon wafer or the doughnut-shaped substrate preferably by 10 μm to 100 μm may be included.
コア抜き工程に用いられる単結晶シリコンウェハは、好ましくは、面方位(100)であって、直径150mm以上で300mm以下、厚み0.4〜1mmである。
半導体グレードSi単結晶ウェハは高価であり、該単結晶原板を使用して65mm径基板を製作しても、ガラス基板の数倍から10倍近くのコストになってしまう。幾らSi単結晶基板の特性が優れていたとしても、これだけのコスト差があっては実用化が難しい。
The single crystal silicon wafer used for the core removal step preferably has a plane orientation (100), a diameter of 150 mm or more and 300 mm or less, and a thickness of 0.4 to 1 mm.
A semiconductor grade Si single crystal wafer is expensive, and even if a 65 mm diameter substrate is manufactured using the single crystal original plate, the cost is several times to nearly 10 times that of a glass substrate. No matter how excellent the characteristics of the Si single crystal substrate are, it is difficult to put it to practical use with such a cost difference.
コア抜き工程において、例えば図2に示すように、8"ウェハから2.5"HDD基板を7枚コア抜きできる。この方法については、特許文献2に提案している技術を用いることで可能となる。この場合、2.5"基板コア抜き時の加工取り代部分が、隣接コア抜き基板間で重なるようにすることにより、8"ウェハより最大7枚の2.5"基板がコア抜きできるようになった。しかし、7枚のコア抜きをした残りの残部分(以下、「カレット」と呼ぶ。)は、お互い連結しておらず、加工時にバラバラになってしまう。ウェハからのコア抜き枚数を可能なかぎり多くしたいが、カレットが加工過程でバラバラになってしまうと、作業上の工程が複雑で面倒なものになってしまい、また、バラバラになったカレットがディスクに衝突してチッピングの原因になったり、基板表面を傷つけてしまうといった不都合が生じる。
In the coring step, for example, as shown in FIG. 2, seven 2.5 "HDD substrates can be cored from an 8" wafer. This method can be achieved by using the technique proposed in
まず、基板下面をエア吸着することはウェハ保持に有効であるが、2.5"基板以下ではカレット部は小さく、エア吸着だけで飛び散らないように抑えることは難しい。物理的に後から抑えるか、取り除けば問題はないが、人力の手間がかかる。ロボットなどによる自動化も可能ではあるが、連結されていないカレットは加工時に動いてしまうため、取り除くのは容易でない。 First, air adsorption to the lower surface of the substrate is effective for holding the wafer, but the cullet part is small below 2.5 "substrate, and it is difficult to suppress it from being scattered only by air adsorption. If it is removed, there is no problem, but it takes a lot of human power, but it can be automated by a robot or the like, but it is not easy to remove because the unconnected cullet moves during processing.
また、コア抜きする小口径基板の枚数を少なくすれば、カレット同士は連結しており、コア抜き後も一体として扱える。したがって、ウェハの最低3箇所を固定しておけばカレットはバラバラになることなく保持できるので、コア抜きの製造工程が非常に簡略化できる。しかし、コア抜き枚数の減少は小口径基板のコストを上げてしまうため望ましくない。コア抜き工程でのカレット処理は、相反する要素を如何に両立させるかが大きな問題となっている。 Further, if the number of small-diameter substrates to be cored is reduced, the cullets are connected to each other and can be handled as a single unit even after the cores are removed. Accordingly, if at least three locations of the wafer are fixed, the cullet can be held without falling apart, so that the manufacturing process without core can be greatly simplified. However, a decrease in the number of cores is not desirable because it increases the cost of a small-diameter substrate. The cullet process in the core removal process is a big problem on how to make conflicting elements compatible.
従来のカップ砥石によるコア抜きでは、コア抜き時に原板ウェハに圧力がかかるため、カレットが破損せず一体で残存するためには、コア抜き後の隣接コア間のカレット最短幅が5mm程度(ウェハ厚の6倍以上)はどうしても必要であった。それ以下では一定比率でカレットが割れてしまう。コア抜き後においても、一体カレットとし、かつ最短幅をできるだけ小さくすることを考案した。なお、最短幅は、カットレット表面の最短幅をいい、コア間の距離やコアと原板ウェハとの距離のうち最短のものである。コア間の距離がコアと原板ウェハとの距離より短いとき、三つのコア間の距離d1が同一幅である図3では最短幅はd1であるが、同一幅でなければそのうちの最も短い幅である。
本発明者らは、コア抜き法にレーザによる加工法やウォータージェット加工法を適用することにより、カレット最短幅がウェハの5倍以下でもカレットを一体に保ってコア抜きを完了できることを見出した。
In the case of core removal using a conventional cup grindstone, pressure is applied to the original wafer during core removal. Therefore, in order for the cullet to remain intact without being damaged, the minimum cullet width between adjacent cores after core removal is about 5 mm (wafer thickness It was absolutely necessary. Below that, the cullet breaks at a constant rate. Even after the core was devised, it was devised to make it an integral caret and make the shortest width as small as possible. The shortest width refers to the shortest width of the cutlet surface, and is the shortest of the distance between the cores and the distance between the core and the original wafer. When the distance between the cores is shorter than the distance between the core and the original wafer, the shortest width is d1 in FIG. 3 where the distance d1 between the three cores is the same width. is there.
The present inventors have found that by applying a laser processing method or a water jet processing method to the core removal method, the core removal can be completed while keeping the cullet integral even if the shortest width of the cullet is 5 times or less of the wafer.
レーザ加工は、CO2ガスレーザ、YAGレーザ、レーザダイオード等の発振器からのレーザ光を集光して加工を行なう方法である。
レーザ加工のような熱的コア加工の場合、ウェハ基板に圧力は生じないため、最短幅は望ましくはウェハ厚の1.5倍以上2.5倍以下でよいことが分かった。
ただ、圧力の代わりにレーザ照射部が昇温するため、最短幅がウェハ厚の1倍未満ではヒートショックに耐えられない場合があるため、1倍以上であることが好ましい。また、最短幅がウェハ厚の5倍を超えると、コア抜き枚数の減少によりコストを上げてしまうため好ましくない。レーザ加工法においても、CO2レーザを光源にする場合は、トータルパワーが大きいわりに、パワー密度は低いので、コア抜き基板やカレットに熱が加わり易く、ヒートショックによる割れを起こし易い。パワー密度の高い固体レーザ(YAGレーザなど)の方が、レーザパワーがコア抜きそのものに使用され、回りの部材への熱流出が少なくより望ましい。
Laser processing is a method of processing by condensing laser light from an oscillator such as a CO 2 gas laser, YAG laser, or laser diode.
In the case of thermal core processing such as laser processing, since no pressure is generated on the wafer substrate, it has been found that the shortest width may be 1.5 to 2.5 times the wafer thickness.
However, since the temperature of the laser irradiation part is raised instead of the pressure, if the shortest width is less than one time of the wafer thickness, it may not be able to withstand the heat shock. Further, if the shortest width exceeds 5 times the wafer thickness, the cost increases due to the decrease in the number of cores, which is not preferable. Also in the laser processing method, when the CO 2 laser is used as the light source, the power density is low although the total power is large, so that heat is easily applied to the cored substrate and cullet, and cracking due to heat shock is likely to occur. A solid-state laser (such as a YAG laser) having a high power density is more desirable because the laser power is used for core removal itself, and heat flows out to surrounding members.
ウォータージェット加工は、100MPa以上の高圧水に、平均粒径20〜200μmのガーネット等の研磨材を混合させて照射し加工方法である。ウォータージェット加工は、加工幅は小さく、基板には大きな圧力はかからず、また熱影響は殆ど無いので有利である。カレット最短部の幅は、レーザ加工法とほぼ同じでよく、好ましくはウェハ厚の1倍以上5倍以下、より好ましくはウェハ厚の1.5倍以上2.5倍以下でもよい。 The water jet processing is a processing method in which high pressure water of 100 MPa or more is mixed with an abrasive such as garnet having an average particle diameter of 20 to 200 μm and irradiated. Water jet processing is advantageous because the processing width is small, no large pressure is applied to the substrate, and there is almost no thermal effect. The width of the shortest part of the cullet may be substantially the same as that of the laser processing method, and is preferably 1 to 5 times the wafer thickness, more preferably 1.5 to 2.5 times the wafer thickness.
もちろん、従来のカップ砥石でも、加工工程の工夫をすることにより、最短幅5倍以下でも一体カレットとして残すことは可能である。例えば、カップ切断ではコアを抜き切る直前が一番カレット最短部に歪みがかかり割れ易くなるので、抜き切る直前(例えば厚みで0.1mm〜0.2mm程度加工厚が残っている段階)から、砥石送り速度を2分の1以下に落とし、切断圧力を大きく低減することにより、生産性は著しく低下するが、一体カレット処理が可能である。しかし、レーザ加工法のような圧力フリーではないため、最短幅を2.5倍以下まで小さくすることはできない。 Of course, even with a conventional cup grindstone, it is possible to leave it as an integral cullet even with a minimum width of 5 times or less by devising the processing process. For example, in cup cutting, the shortest part of the cullet is distorted immediately before the core is cut out, and it is easy to break. Therefore, from the point immediately before the cutting (for example, a thickness of about 0.1 mm to 0.2 mm is left), By reducing the grindstone feed rate to less than one half and greatly reducing the cutting pressure, the productivity is significantly reduced, but an integrated cullet processing is possible. However, since it is not pressure-free like the laser processing method, the shortest width cannot be reduced to 2.5 times or less.
カレットが一体で残せることにより、原板ウェハは少なくとも3点で固定してやれば、加工最後まで余分な工程を入れる必要はない。また、コア抜きする基板径が2“以下の小口径基板では、残カレットの各部の大きさがより小さくなる。エア吸着などの手法もより使用しにくくなるため、カレット一体化による、加工工程の簡略化は非常に有利となる。 Since the cullet can be left integrally, it is not necessary to add an extra process until the end of processing if the original wafer is fixed at least at three points. In addition, in the case of a small-diameter substrate having a core diameter of 2 "or less, the size of each part of the remaining cullet becomes smaller. Since a method such as air adsorption becomes difficult to use, the cullet integration makes it possible to Simplification is very advantageous.
コア抜き工程には、外径コア抜き(外周コア抜き)と内径コア抜き(内周コア抜き)が含まれる。内径コア抜きと外径コア抜きは、どちらを先に行なってもよい。 The core removal step includes outer diameter core removal (outer peripheral core removal) and inner diameter core removal (inner peripheral core removal). Either the inner diameter core removal or the outer diameter core removal may be performed first.
コア抜き工程前後のどちらでも構わないが、ウェハ表面を好ましくは10μmから100μm研削除去するラップ工程を設けることが好ましい。コア抜き工程後としては、例えば、コア抜き工程と面取り工程との間、面取り工程と端面研磨工程との間、又は端面研磨工程の後にラップ工程も設け、好ましくは、面取り工程と端面研磨工程との間、又は端面研磨工程の後にラップ工程を設ける。
ラップ工程により、ウェハ原板又はドーナツ状円形基板のそりやうねりを抑制でき、また、後工程の適切な研磨量を設定するための調厚をすることができる。
It may be either before or after the core removal process, but it is preferable to provide a lapping process for grinding and removing the wafer surface preferably by 10 to 100 μm. After the core removal step, for example, a lapping step is also provided between the core removal step and the chamfering step, between the chamfering step and the end surface polishing step, or preferably after the end surface polishing step, and preferably the chamfering step and the end surface polishing step. A lapping step is provided during or after the end surface polishing step.
By the lapping process, warpage and undulation of the wafer original plate or the donut-shaped circular substrate can be suppressed, and the thickness can be adjusted to set an appropriate polishing amount in the subsequent process.
図1に示すHDD用基板製作において、ウェハ等の原板に対するコア抜き工程後、内外周端面の面取り工程及び端面研磨工程を設けてもよい。
面取り角度や寸法は標準寸法として概ね規定されている。通常は、面取り工程により製品とすることができる。しかし、端面に付着した砥粒や加工屑などが基板強度低下の原因として働き、基板破壊の起点となる可能性があるので、面取り工程後に端面研磨を行い、その後エッチング処理により歪み層を取り除くことが好ましい。端面は、ドーナツ状基板の内径側面と外径側面の部分をいう。
In the manufacture of the HDD substrate shown in FIG. 1, a chamfering process and an end surface polishing process for the inner and outer peripheral end faces may be provided after the core removal process for the original plate such as a wafer.
Chamfer angles and dimensions are generally defined as standard dimensions. Usually, it can be made into a product by a chamfering process. However, abrasive grains and processing debris attached to the end face can cause the substrate strength to decrease and may cause the substrate to break down, so the end face is polished after the chamfering process, and then the strained layer is removed by etching. Is preferred. The end face refers to the inner diameter side face and the outer diameter side face portion of the donut-shaped substrate.
端面研磨工程の後、又は端面研磨工程後のラップ工程の後に、好ましくは、更に、上記基板をアルカリエッチングする工程と、アルカリエッチングされた基板の表裏面を研磨する工程と、その後の洗浄工程とを含んでもよい。
アルカリエッチング工程は、ラップ工程、端面研磨工程の加工歪を除去するために、例えば40〜60℃にした2〜60重量%NaOH水溶液に浸漬することにより行なわれる。
アルカリエッチングされた基板の表裏面を研磨する工程は、公知の方法で行なえば良い。例えば、キャリアに装着した基板を、上定盤と下定盤で挟み回転させて、コロイダルシリカを砥粒として研磨すれば良い。
洗浄工程は、公知の方法で行なえば良い。例えば、ブラシ洗浄、アルカリ及び/又は酸溶液に薬液洗浄等である。
After the end surface polishing step or after the lapping step after the end surface polishing step, preferably, further, a step of alkali etching the substrate, a step of polishing the front and back surfaces of the alkali etched substrate, and a subsequent cleaning step, May be included.
The alkali etching step is performed by immersing in an aqueous solution of 2 to 60% by weight NaOH adjusted to 40 to 60 ° C., for example, in order to remove processing distortion in the lapping step and the end surface polishing step.
The step of polishing the front and back surfaces of the alkali-etched substrate may be performed by a known method. For example, a substrate mounted on a carrier may be sandwiched and rotated between an upper surface plate and a lower surface plate and polished using colloidal silica as abrasive grains.
The cleaning step may be performed by a known method. For example, brush cleaning, alkali and / or acid solution cleaning.
本発明の磁気記録媒体用基板は、従来の基板と同様に扱うことかでき、例えば、軟磁性層と記録層を設けて垂直磁気記録媒体とすることができる。軟磁性層の密着性を高めるため、軟磁性層の形成に先立って下地層を設けてもよい。
記録層の上には、保護層と潤滑層を設けてよい。
The magnetic recording medium substrate of the present invention can be handled in the same manner as a conventional substrate. For example, a soft magnetic layer and a recording layer can be provided to form a perpendicular magnetic recording medium. In order to improve the adhesion of the soft magnetic layer, an underlayer may be provided prior to the formation of the soft magnetic layer.
A protective layer and a lubricating layer may be provided on the recording layer.
以下、本発明を実施例に基づき説明するが、本発明はこれに限定されるものではない。
以下は、実施例の概要である。
大口径単結晶シリコン棒よりスライスが行われ、ウェハが形成される。次に、ウェハの厚みと表面を整えるために砥粒を用いてラップを行う。次に、YAGレーザ発振装置からのレーザ光により、または、カップ砥石加工により、ウェハからドーナツ状の円形基板を切り出す。以上により、複数枚の基板が形成される。次に、基板の内周端面と外周端面の砥石による面取りが行われる。引き続き基板の表裏面の研磨加工が行われ、所望の基板ができ上がる。次に、洗浄工程で基板に付着した研磨剤等を除去し基板の製造を完了する。
EXAMPLES Hereinafter, although this invention is demonstrated based on an Example, this invention is not limited to this.
The following is an overview of the examples.
Slicing is performed from a large-diameter single crystal silicon rod to form a wafer. Next, lapping is performed using abrasive grains to adjust the thickness and surface of the wafer. Next, a donut-shaped circular substrate is cut out from the wafer by laser light from the YAG laser oscillation device or by cup grindstone processing. Thus, a plurality of substrates are formed. Next, chamfering of the inner peripheral end surface and the outer peripheral end surface of the substrate with a grindstone is performed. Subsequently, the front and back surfaces of the substrate are polished, and a desired substrate is completed. Next, the polishing agent and the like attached to the substrate in the cleaning process are removed to complete the manufacture of the substrate.
実施例1
大口径単結晶シリコンインゴットをスライスして、直径200mmのウェハを得た。カップ砥石加工装置により直径48mm、内径12mmのドーナツ状円形基板を11枚得た。この時、各ドーナツ状円形基板間の最短幅d1をウェハ厚みの5倍とし、コアを抜き切る0.2mm前に、砥石送り速度を2分の1に落としたところ、残ウェハであるカレットは、破損することなく一体で残った。引き続き、コア抜きを行い、ウェハを5枚加工するのに400分かかり、55枚の基板が得られた。得られた基板は、カレットによるチッピング、表面の損傷は見られず、短時間に多くの基板が得られた。
Example 1
A large-diameter single crystal silicon ingot was sliced to obtain a wafer having a diameter of 200 mm. Eleven doughnut-shaped circular substrates having a diameter of 48 mm and an inner diameter of 12 mm were obtained with a cup grindstone processing apparatus. At this time, the shortest width d1 between each doughnut-shaped circular substrate was set to 5 times the wafer thickness, and the grinding wheel feed speed was reduced by half before 0.2 mm before the core was pulled out. Remained in one piece without damage. Subsequently, the core was removed, and it took 400 minutes to process five wafers, and 55 substrates were obtained. The obtained substrate was free from chipping due to cullet and surface damage, and many substrates were obtained in a short time.
実施例2
最短幅d1をウェハ厚みの3倍とした他は、実施例1と同様の処理を行い、残ウェハであるカレットは、破損することなく一体で残った。引き続き、コア抜きを行い、ウェハを5枚加工するのに440分かかり、60枚の基板が得られた。
得られた基板は、カレットによるチッピング、表面の損傷は見られず、短時間に多くの基板が得られた。
Example 2
Except that the shortest width d1 was set to 3 times the wafer thickness, the same process as in Example 1 was performed, and the cullet as the remaining wafer remained integrally without being damaged. Subsequently, core removal was performed, and it took 440 minutes to process five wafers, and 60 substrates were obtained.
The obtained substrate was free from chipping due to cullet and surface damage, and many substrates were obtained in a short time.
参考例3
最短幅d1をウェハ厚みの8倍とし、砥石送り速度を通常のままとした他は、実施例1と同様の処理を行い、残ウェハであるカレットは、破損することなく一体で残ったが、得られたドーナツ状円形基板は8枚と少なかった。引き続き、コア抜きを行い、ウェハを5枚加工するのに370分かかり、40枚の基板が得られた。得られた基板は、カレットによるチッピング、表面の損傷は見られなかった。
Reference example 3
Although the shortest width d1 was set to 8 times the wafer thickness and the grindstone feed rate was kept normal, the same processing as in Example 1 was performed, and the cullet that was the remaining wafer remained integrally without breakage, The number of doughnut-shaped circular substrates obtained was as few as eight. Subsequently, core removal was performed, and it took 370 minutes to process five wafers, and 40 substrates were obtained. The obtained substrate did not show chipping or surface damage due to cullet.
比較例1
最短幅d1をウェハ厚みの0.5倍とした他は、実施例1と同様の処理を行い、残ウェハであるカレットは破損し、バラバラになった。破損したカレットを取り除き、引き続き、コア抜きを行ったが、ウェハを5枚加工するのに560分かかり、60枚の基板が得られたが、カレット破損時に基板も傷つき実際に使用できるのは、40枚であった。
Comparative Example 1
The same processing as in Example 1 was performed except that the shortest width d1 was set to 0.5 times the wafer thickness, and the cullet that was the remaining wafer was damaged and broken apart. The damaged cullet was removed, and then the core was removed. However, it took 560 minutes to process 5 wafers, and 60 substrates were obtained. There were 40 sheets.
以上のように、カップ砥石加工では最短幅をウェハ厚みの2.5倍から5倍にした場合、カレットが一体で残り、効率よく基板を得ることができることが判る。 As described above, it can be seen that when the shortest width is increased from 2.5 times to 5 times the wafer thickness in the cup grindstone processing, the cullet remains integrally and the substrate can be obtained efficiently.
実施例4
大口径単結晶シリコン棒1を用いて、直径200mmのウェハを得た。YAGレーザ加工装置(YAGレーザ)により直径48mm、内径12mmのドーナツ状円形基板3を12枚得た。この時、各ドーナツ状円形基板間の最短幅d1をウェハ厚みの2倍とし、残
ウェハであるカレットは、破損することなく一体で残った。引き続き、コア抜きを行い、ウェハを5枚加工するのに50分かかり、60枚の基板が得られた。
得られた基板は、カレットによるチッピング、表面の損傷は見られず、短時間に多くの基板が得られた。
Example 4
Using a large-diameter single crystal silicon rod 1, a wafer having a diameter of 200 mm was obtained. Twelve doughnut-shaped circular substrates 3 having a diameter of 48 mm and an inner diameter of 12 mm were obtained with a YAG laser processing apparatus (YAG laser). At this time, the shortest width d1 between the doughnut-shaped circular substrates was made twice the wafer thickness, and the cullet as the remaining wafer remained integrally without being damaged. Subsequently, core removal was performed, and it took 50 minutes to process five wafers, and 60 substrates were obtained.
The obtained substrate was free from chipping due to cullet and surface damage, and many substrates were obtained in a short time.
実施例5
大口径単結晶シリコン棒を用いて、直径200mmのウェハを得た。YAGレーザ加
工装置(YAGレーザ)により直径26mm、内径7mmのドーナツ状円形基板を30枚得た。この時、各ドーナツ状円形基板間の最短幅d1をウェハ厚みの3倍とし、残ウェハであるカレットは、破損することなく一体で残った。引き続き、コア抜きを行い、ウェハ2を5枚加工するのに60分かかり、150枚の基板が得られた。
得られた基板は、カレットによるチッピング、表面の損傷は見られず、短時間に多くの基板が得られた。
Example 5
A wafer having a diameter of 200 mm was obtained using a large-diameter single crystal silicon rod. Thirty doughnut-shaped circular substrates having a diameter of 26 mm and an inner diameter of 7 mm were obtained with a YAG laser processing apparatus (YAG laser). At this time, the shortest width d1 between the doughnut-shaped circular substrates was set to three times the wafer thickness, and the cullet as the remaining wafer remained integrally without being damaged. Subsequently, core removal was performed, and it took 60 minutes to process five
The obtained substrate was free from chipping due to cullet and surface damage, and many substrates were obtained in a short time.
実施例6
最短幅d1をウェハ厚みの1.2倍とした他は、実施例5と同様の処理を行い、残ウェハであるカレットは、破損することなく一体で残った。引き続き、コア抜きを行い、ウェハを5枚加工するのに70分かかり、180枚の基板が得られた。
得られた基板は、カレットによるチッピング、表面の損傷は見られず、短時間に多くの基板が得られた。
Example 6
The same processing as in Example 5 was performed except that the shortest width d1 was set to 1.2 times the wafer thickness, and the cullet that was the remaining wafer remained integrally without being damaged. Subsequently, core removal was performed, and it took 70 minutes to process five wafers, and 180 substrates were obtained.
The obtained substrate was free from chipping due to cullet and surface damage, and many substrates were obtained in a short time.
比較例2
コア抜きをカップ砥石で行った他は、実施例5と同様の処理を行い、大口径単結晶シリコン棒を用いて、直径200mmのウェハを得た。カップ砥石加工装置により直径26mm、内径7mmのドーナツ状円形基板を30枚得ようとしたが、ウェハが破損し、バラバラになり基板は得られなかった。
Comparative Example 2
A wafer having a diameter of 200 mm was obtained using a large-diameter single crystal silicon rod, except that the core was removed with a cup grindstone, and the same treatment as in Example 5 was performed. An attempt was made to obtain 30 doughnut-shaped circular substrates having a diameter of 26 mm and an inner diameter of 7 mm using a cup grindstone processing apparatus. However, the wafers were broken and separated, and no substrate was obtained.
比較例3
最短幅d1をウェハ厚みの0.5倍とした他は、実施例5と同様の処理を行い、残ウェハであるカレットは一部破損した。破損したカレットを取り除き、引き続き、コア抜きを行ったが、ウェハを5枚加工するのに100分かかり、200枚の基板が得られたが、カレット破損時に基板も傷つき実際に使用できるのは、140枚であった。
Comparative Example 3
The same process as in Example 5 was performed except that the shortest width d1 was set to 0.5 times the wafer thickness, and the cullet that was the remaining wafer was partially damaged. The damaged cullet was removed, and then the core was removed, but it took 100 minutes to process 5 wafers, and 200 substrates were obtained. However, when the cullet was damaged, the substrate was damaged and could actually be used. It was 140 sheets.
以上のように、レーザ加工により最短幅をウェハ厚みの1倍から2.5倍にした場合、カレットが一体で残り、更に効率よく基板を得ることができることが判る。 As described above, it can be seen that when the shortest width is made 1 to 2.5 times the wafer thickness by laser processing, the cullet remains integrally and a substrate can be obtained more efficiently.
実施例7
大口径単結晶シリコン棒を用いて、直径200mmのウェハを得た。ウォータージェット加工装置(ガーネット粒子#220)により直径48mm、内径12mmのドーナツ状円形基板を11枚得た。この時、各ドーナツ状円形基板間の最短幅d1をウェハ厚みの3倍とし、残ウェハであるカレットは、破損することなく一体で残った。引き続き、
コア抜きを行い、ウェハを5枚加工するのに40分かかり、55枚の基板が得ら
れた。
得られた基板は、カレットによるチッピング、表面の損傷は見られず、短時間に多くの基板が得られた。
Example 7
A wafer having a diameter of 200 mm was obtained using a large-diameter single crystal silicon rod. Eleven doughnut-shaped circular substrates having a diameter of 48 mm and an inner diameter of 12 mm were obtained by a water jet processing apparatus (garnet particle # 220). At this time, the shortest width d1 between the doughnut-shaped circular substrates was set to three times the wafer thickness, and the cullet as the remaining wafer remained integrally without being damaged. Continue,
It took 40 minutes to remove the core and process five wafers, and 55 substrates were obtained.
The obtained substrate was free from chipping due to cullet and surface damage, and many substrates were obtained in a short time.
実施例8
最短幅d1をウェハ厚みの1.2倍とした他は、実施例7と同様の処理を行い、残ウェハであるカレットは、破損することなく一体で残った。引き続き、コア抜きを行い、ウェハを5枚加工するのに45分かかり、60枚の基板が得られた。
得られた基板は、カレットによるチッピング、表面の損傷は見られず、短時間に多くの基板が得られた。
Example 8
The same processing as in Example 7 was performed except that the shortest width d1 was set to 1.2 times the wafer thickness, and the cullet that was the remaining wafer remained integrally without breakage. Subsequently, the core was removed, and it took 45 minutes to process 5 wafers, and 60 substrates were obtained.
The obtained substrate was free from chipping due to cullet and surface damage, and many substrates were obtained in a short time.
比較例4
最短幅d1をウェハ厚みの0.5倍とした他は、実施例6と同様の処理を行い、残ウェハであるカレットは一部破損した。破損したカレットを取り除き、引き続き、コア抜きを行ったが、ウェハを5枚加工するのに60分かかり、56枚の基板が得られたが、カレット破損時に基板も傷つき実際に使用できるのは、50枚であった。
Comparative Example 4
The same process as in Example 6 was performed except that the shortest width d1 was set to 0.5 times the wafer thickness, and the cullet that was the remaining wafer was partially damaged. The damaged cullet was removed and then the core was removed. However, it took 60 minutes to process 5 wafers, and 56 substrates were obtained. However, when the cullet was damaged, the substrate was damaged and could actually be used. It was 50 sheets.
以上のように、ウォータージェット加工により最短幅をウェハ厚みの1倍から2.5倍にした場合、カレットが一体で残り、更に効率よく基板を得ることができることが判る。 As described above, it can be seen that when the shortest width is made 1 to 2.5 times the wafer thickness by water jet processing, the cullet remains integrally and a substrate can be obtained more efficiently.
1 単結晶シリコン棒
2 単結晶Siウェハ
3 ドーナツ状基板
1 Single
Claims (3)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004208735A JP4093995B2 (en) | 2003-07-15 | 2004-07-15 | Method for manufacturing magnetic recording medium substrate |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2003197119 | 2003-07-15 | ||
| JP2004208735A JP4093995B2 (en) | 2003-07-15 | 2004-07-15 | Method for manufacturing magnetic recording medium substrate |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2005050507A JP2005050507A (en) | 2005-02-24 |
| JP4093995B2 true JP4093995B2 (en) | 2008-06-04 |
Family
ID=34277313
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004208735A Expired - Fee Related JP4093995B2 (en) | 2003-07-15 | 2004-07-15 | Method for manufacturing magnetic recording medium substrate |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP4093995B2 (en) |
-
2004
- 2004-07-15 JP JP2004208735A patent/JP4093995B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2005050507A (en) | 2005-02-24 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP2009035461A (en) | Manufacturing method of glass substrate for magnetic disk | |
| JP2006079800A (en) | Silicon substrate for magnetic recording medium, manufacturing method thereof, and magnetic recording medium | |
| JPWO2013145503A1 (en) | Manufacturing method of glass substrate for HDD | |
| CN104081457B (en) | Manufacturing method of glass substrate for HDD | |
| JP4905238B2 (en) | Polishing method of glass substrate for magnetic recording medium | |
| JP4093995B2 (en) | Method for manufacturing magnetic recording medium substrate | |
| CN107004431B (en) | Manufacturing method of substrate for magnetic disk and grindstone for grinding | |
| JP2006085887A (en) | Silicon substrate for magnetic recording medium, manufacturing method thereof, and magnetic recording medium | |
| JP4072142B2 (en) | Method for manufacturing substrate for magnetic recording medium | |
| JP2005050506A (en) | SUBSTRATE FOR MAGNETIC RECORDING MEDIUM, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, AND MAGNETIC RECORDING MEDIUM | |
| CN100385511C (en) | Manufacturing method of glass substrate for magnetic disk and manufacturing method of magnetic disk | |
| JP2008310897A (en) | Method for manufacturing substrate for magnetic recording medium | |
| JP4024724B2 (en) | Method for manufacturing substrate for magnetic recording medium | |
| JP2005225713A (en) | Method of manufacturing glass substrate for magnetic disk and method of manufacturing magnetic disk | |
| US20050012245A1 (en) | Method for manufacturing magnetic recording medium substrates | |
| JP2006114198A (en) | Silicon substrate for magnetic recording medium and magnetic recording medium | |
| US20050029687A1 (en) | Method for manufacturing magnetic recording medium substrates | |
| JP4411314B2 (en) | Silicon substrate for magnetic recording medium and manufacturing method thereof | |
| US20050011860A1 (en) | Substrate for magnetic recording medium, method for manufacturing the same and magnetic recording medium | |
| JP6247878B2 (en) | Glass substrate for HDD | |
| JP2009093758A (en) | Method for manufacturing silicon substrate for magnetic recording medium and magnetic recording medium | |
| JP5111818B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of glass substrate for magnetic disk and manufacturing method of magnetic disk | |
| JP2011138589A (en) | Method for manufacturing glass substrate for magnetic disk and magnetic recording medium | |
| CN102473421B (en) | The manufacture method of glass substrate for disc and disk | |
| JP2011138590A (en) | Method for manufacturing glass substrate for magnetic disk and magnetic recording medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20050712 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20070907 |
|
| A521 | Written amendment |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20071029 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20071221 |
|
| A521 | Written amendment |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20080118 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20080205 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20080304 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110314 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |