Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4101922B2 - Method for determining filter cloth abnormality and estimating filter cloth deterioration in dry gas cleaning equipment - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4101922B2 - Method for determining filter cloth abnormality and estimating filter cloth deterioration in dry gas cleaning equipment - Google Patents

Method for determining filter cloth abnormality and estimating filter cloth deterioration in dry gas cleaning equipment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4101922B2
JP4101922B2 JP08678498A JP8678498A JP4101922B2 JP 4101922 B2 JP4101922 B2 JP 4101922B2 JP 08678498 A JP08678498 A JP 08678498A JP 8678498 A JP8678498 A JP 8678498A JP 4101922 B2 JP4101922 B2 JP 4101922B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
filter cloth
dust
gas
gas cleaning
pipe
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP08678498A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH11276830A (en
Inventor
洋一 山本
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Nisshin Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Nisshin Steel Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nisshin Steel Co Ltd filed Critical Nisshin Steel Co Ltd
Priority to JP08678498A priority Critical patent/JP4101922B2/en
Publication of JPH11276830A publication Critical patent/JPH11276830A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4101922B2 publication Critical patent/JP4101922B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Filtering Of Dispersed Particles In Gases (AREA)
  • Blast Furnaces (AREA)

Description

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は、乾式ガス清浄設備の濾布異常判定及び濾布劣化を推定する方法に関するものである。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
一般に、高温反応炉でのガスエネルギーを回収するために乾式ガス洗浄設備が設けられているが、例えば高炉での反応ガスを回収する設備の概略は図5のように高炉1の炉頂からガスの上昇管1aおよび下降管1bを経て、先ず第1段の集塵装置であるダストキャツチャー2に接続される。ついでダストキャツチャー2から乾式集塵系統3と湿式集塵系統4の2系統に別れ乾式系統3にバグフィルタなどの乾式ガス清浄設備3a,3bが接続されている。また湿式集塵系統4には散水式の湿式集塵装置4a,4bが接続されており、この2系統は下流側で合流され、さらにその下流にエネルギー回収設備として炉頂発電機5を備えている。
【0003】
前述したように乾式ガス清浄設備として、バグフィルタが用いられ、該フィルタはスクリーン形式のものがあるが、大部分は円筒容器状のバッグ形式である。その直径は10〜50cm程度で、長さ数m以下のものが鉛直に吊るされ、内側へ気流を通過させ、その内側に粉塵が堆積するように構成されている。また、この円筒容器は上部を閉じて粉塵気流が下方より入るものと、上部より入るものとがある。
いずれも濾過堆積粉塵を払い落とし受けると円筒容器内を下方へ重力によって落下し集塵室へ溜まるようになっている。
溜まった粉塵の払い落としが不十分で有れば、圧力損失が増大し、動力費が嵩むか、処理ガス量が減少するかして、使用が困難となる。
【0004】
乾式ガス清浄設備の出側煤塵量の測定方法としては、ガスを定流量吸収し、エキサイタに衝突させることにより発生する摩擦帯電電荷を検出する連続煤塵濃度計による測定、ガスを等速吸引してフィルタに付着したダスト質量と測定ガス量により濃度を測定する排ガス中のダスト濃度測定方法「JISZ8808」に準拠した測定方法、さらに、フィルタにガスを通過させて、色の濃さにより異常の有無を判定する簡易フィルタチェック法が挙げられる。
【0005】
また、他の濾布の破れを検出する装置としては、濾布の表面に近接して濾布の通気度および又は吸引音を検出する検出器を配置し、その検出器を濾布表面に対し相対的に移動させることで通気音の変化に基づいて濾布の破れを検出する装置が特開昭60−110316号公報に開示されている。更に別な方法として、パルスエア式ダスト払い落とし機構を備えたバグフィルタの破損を検出する際に、濾布に沿って配管されてエアパージする管路をガス吸引管として用い、このガス吸引管から吸引されたダスト量を測定することで濾布の破れ個所を特定する方法が特開平7−328363号公報に開示されている。
【0006】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
従来の濾布のチェック方法は、以上のように構成されているため、次のような課題が存在していた。すなわち、集塵機性能維持のためには、定期的な集塵機出側ダスト濃度測定が必要であるが、信頼性の高い方法として、直接測定しようとするダスト等の管路に測定装置である吸引管を装着して、排ガス中の単位当たりのダスト量を求める排ガス中のダスト濃度測定方法「JISZ8808(1986)」がある。
しかし、本方式は一般的な環境下での測定方法を規定したもので、乾式で高温ガス清浄設備を通過した、例えば高炉炉頂ガスの清浄設備においては、測定に際して十分な注意が必要となる。
これは、ガス成分と温度によるもので、清浄設備を通過するガスは高温状態であるが、管路に測定器具を挿入して測定するため、測定器具の温度とガス温度とに開きがあり、測定器具に装着したダスト採取用の濾布が測定時は低温状態であり、温度低下により塩化アンモニウムや塩化鉄等の化合物が析出してしまう。
この濾布に付着したダストの重量を測定する本方法では、当然この塩化物もダストとして計量してしまうため、温度を低下させない測定が必要となり、予熱等の作業が必要となる(すなわち、測定器具の温度が低い1回目の測定は信頼性が低い)。
【0007】
また、濾布に付着したダストを測定するため、低濃度のダストを測定する場合は、計量誤差を考慮した量のダストを採取する必要があり、最低30分/回、理想的には60分/回以上の時間をかける必要があり、この測定を最低3回は実施する必要がある。
さらに、濾布の乾燥が必要となるため、測定してから結果が出るまで最低でも5〜6時間は必要となっていた。
そこで、測定のための専門知識と技能を有する必要がある本方法は、高頻度で実施することは困難なため、他の方法として、簡易フィルタチェックという方法がある。
この方法は、ほぼ一定の流量速度で、一定時間濾布にガスを通過させ、この濾布の色の濃さで、集塵機の異常(濾布方式の場合は破れ)を検知するものであるが、判断は人間の視覚に頼るものであり、定量評価の方法として濾布の明度を測定する方法を試みた。
【0008】
しかし、この方法においても、塩化鉄の析出という問題は、JISZ8808(I型)と同様であり、さらに下記の問題が発生した。
高炉ガス自体は、基本的に酸素を含まないが、簡易フィルタチェック用のサンプリング管は、非測定時に大気中にさらされているため、多量の酸化鉄が配管内面に析出しており、測定時にこの酸化鉄が徐々に混入して濾布に付着する。
塩化アンモニウムは無色のため色に反映されず、重量法と比べてこの点では優れているが、酸化鉄や塩化鉄の影響分を除去しなければ、濾布明度だけでは集塵機の異常判断方法として使用できないことがわかった。
【0009】
図4は従来の乾式ガス清浄設備で主濾布11を通過したガスをガス管12から分岐して簡易フィルタチェック用にバルブ15を介して分岐管路13を設け、この管路13の途中に管内を流れるダストを捕集する試験用の濾布14を設けて、該濾布14にガス管12からのガスを流し、ダストを付着させた。明度計で測定した装着前の濾布14の明度をL1*(エルワンスター)として、ダストの付着した濾布14を明度計で測定した測定値をL2*とし、使用前後の明度差と頻度のヒストグラムを図3に示す。
図3では、濾布14の正常、異常の傾向は伺えるが明度差の数値の大きい方にも、濾布14が異常とする値が出て十分な基準でないことが判明した。
【0010】
従って、簡易的に明度計で新品の濾布と使用後の濾布の白黒の明度差だけではガス管路を通過するダストの管理ができない事が明らかとなった。これは前述したようにガス清浄設備を通過したガス中に含まれる成分によって明度計が影響を受けているためである。
【0011】
本発明は以上のような課題を解決するためになされたもので、特に、ガス清浄設備を通過したガスを色彩色差計で測定して、明度差を色補正することにより前記設備の濾布の正常・異常の判定を簡単にするようにした乾式ガス清浄設備の濾布異常判定及び濾布劣化を推定する方法を提供することを目的とする。
【0012】
【課題を解決するための手段】
本発明による乾式ガス清浄設備の濾布異常判定方法は、乾式ガス清浄設備の主濾布の下流側のガス管に分岐管路を設け、該分岐管路にダスト捕集用の濾布を設け、前記ガス管内を通過するガス中のダストを前記濾布に付着させ、該濾布に付着したダストを色彩色差計にて赤色と明度について測定する方法であり、さらに、本発明による乾式ガス清浄設備の濾布劣化を推定する方法は、乾式ガス清浄設備の主濾布の下流側のガス管に分岐管路を設け、該分岐管路にダスト捕集用の濾布を設け、前記ガス管内を通過するガス中のダストを、前記濾布に付着させ、該濾布を色彩色差計にて濾布の明度について測定し、次の1式の相対ダスト濃度比(n)からガス清浄設備の濾布の劣化を推定する方法である。
n=[ln(△L*/L1*+1)−β・a*]/γXo ・・・(1)
△L*=L2*−L1*
ここに、
L1*;ダスト付着前濾布の明度
L2*;ダスト付着後濾布の明度
a*;ダスト付着後濾布の赤色度
β;色成分定数
Xo;主濾布通過許容ダスト濃度(mg/Nm3
γ;ダスト濃度定数
n;相対ダスト濃度比
【0013】
【発明の実施の形態】
以下、図面と共に本発明による乾式ガス清浄設備の濾布異常判定及び濾布劣化を推定する方法の好適な実施の形態について説明する。
なお、本発明において用いる装置としては前述の図4の構成を用いるため、ここで再度図4の構成について述べる。すなわち、図4における乾式ガス清浄設備の濾布11を通過したガスをガス管12から分岐して簡易フィルタチェック用に分岐管路13を設け、管路の途中に管内を流れるダストを捕集する試験用の濾布14を設けて、バルブ15を介して濾布14にガス管12からのガスを流し、ダストを付着させる。試験は予め装着前の新しい濾布14の明度エルスター(L1*)を測定した後、該濾布14を装着して分岐管路13のバルブ15を開き分岐管路13へ5分間だけガスを流した。その後に濾布14を外し酸化鉄を主体としたダストの付着した濾布14の赤色エイスター(a*)と明度エルスター(L2*)を図示しない色彩色差計にて測った。
尚、本発明で言う明度(L*:エルスター)および赤色(a*:エイスター)はCIE1976L*a*b*表色系で表現した場合の、L*およびa*を言う。
この色彩色差計の明るさL*は明るい方の最大値を100として暗い最低値を0としているが、ダストが付着していない新品の濾布14ではL*は97であったので最大値を97に補正した。
ダストの付着した濾布14を色彩色差計で測定して、赤色を表すa*値(エイスター)と前記したダスト付着前後の明度差△L*の関係を図2に表すと、濾布14の色彩の赤と明度との関係が明確であることが分かり、この関係から濾布14の正常・異常が管理できる。すなわち、図2の如く−△L*、a*座標に色彩色差計で濾布14を測定し続ければ正常時と異常時が層別された図となり、a*が小さい数値にかかわらず−△L*が大きい値の時異常が判定できる。
【0014】
さらに、図1のように正常値と異常値の境界Fを作成して、前述の図4の濾布14で管理すると相対ダスト濃度比nを用いて異常判定ができる。
すなわち、試験用の分岐管路13で測定した使用前後の濾布14に付着したダスト色彩色差計で測定し、主濾布通過許容ダスト濃度(正常時のダスト濃度に相当)に対する相対ダスト濃度比(n)で表すと1式となる。
n=[ln(△L*/L1*+1)−β・a*]/γXo ・・・(1)
△L*=L2*−L1*
ここに、
L1*;ダスト付着前濾布の明度
L2*;ダスト付着後濾布の明度
a*;ダスト付着後濾布の赤色度
β;色成分定数
Xo;主濾布通過許容ダスト濃度(mg/Nm3
γ;ダスト濃度定数
n;相対ダスト濃度比
なお、Xoは、主濾布通過許容ダスト濃度(mg/Nm3)であり、濾布正常時のダスト濃度を使用したり、集塵機設計時の仕様値を使用してもよく、正常とする基準条件を用いれば良い。赤色エイスターa*は0〜100の測定数値であり、色成分定数β<0で、ダスト濃度定数γ<0である。
このように1式を用いて測定結果を相対ダスト濃度比nで表すと、正常時はn=1となり、n>1が異常値でnが大きい程、主濾布の劣化が著しくその劣化程度を定量的に推定することができる。
図2に1式を逆算し求めた本発明の推定結果を示す。ここで+印は通常のダスト濃度を基準とした相対ダスト濃度比nを1としたときの値であって、×印はn=5(正常時の5倍相当)としたときの数値を表している。この結果から正常・異常を前記1式を用いれば確実に層別でき、かつ、nの大きさで主濾布の劣化程度を推定できることがわかる。
【0015】
このようにして得たデータを整理した図が前述の図1で相対ダスト濃度と頻度とを表しているが、相対ダスト濃度の管理でガス清浄設備の濾布14の管理ができる。
【0016】
【発明の効果】
本発明による乾式ガス清浄設備の濾布異常判定及び濾布劣化を推定する方法は、以上のように構成されているため、次のような効果を得ることができる。すなわち、請求項1の発明を実施することによって、濾布を色彩色差計で測定して赤色と明度について見ることにより簡単に濾布の異常判定が可能となった。
請求項2の発明を実施することによって、相対ダスト濃度比に基づきガス清浄設備に設けられている濾布の劣化を容易に推定できる。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】本発明による濾布異常判定時の濾布正常・異常時の明度のヒストグラムである。
【図2】色彩色差計で測定したエイスターと明度差の関係を表す特性図である。
【図3】相対ダスト濃度比と頻度との関係を表す特性図である。
【図4】簡易フィルタチェックで測定した分岐管路の構成である。
【図5】高炉におけるガスエネルギー回収設備の概略構成図である。
【符号の説明】
1 高炉
2 ダストキャツチャー
3 乾式集塵系統
4 湿式集塵系統
5 炉頂発電機
11 主濾布
12 ガス管
13 分岐管路
14 濾布
15 バルブ
[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a filter cloth abnormality determination and a filter cloth deterioration estimation method for a dry gas cleaning facility.
[0002]
[Prior art]
In general, a dry gas cleaning facility is provided for recovering gas energy in the high temperature reactor. For example, an outline of the facility for recovering the reaction gas in the blast furnace is gas from the top of the blast furnace 1 as shown in FIG. First, it is connected to a dust catch 2 which is a first-stage dust collector through the ascending pipe 1a and the descending pipe 1b. Next, the dust catcher 2 is divided into two systems, a dry dust collection system 3 and a wet dust collection system 4, and dry gas cleaning facilities 3 a and 3 b such as bag filters are connected to the dry system 3. Further, the wet dust collection system 4 is connected with water spray type wet dust collection devices 4a and 4b. The two systems are joined downstream, and further, a furnace top generator 5 is provided downstream as an energy recovery facility. Yes.
[0003]
As described above, a bag filter is used as a dry gas cleaning facility, and there is a screen type filter, but most of the filter is a cylindrical container bag type. The diameter is about 10 to 50 cm, and a thing with a length of several m or less is suspended vertically to allow airflow to pass inward and to deposit dust on the inside. Moreover, this cylindrical container has a thing which closes an upper part and a dust airflow enters from the downward | lower direction, and a thing entered from the upper part.
In any case, when the filtered accumulated dust is removed, the inside of the cylindrical container falls downward due to gravity and accumulates in the dust collecting chamber.
If the accumulated dust is not sufficiently removed, the pressure loss increases, the power cost increases, or the amount of processing gas decreases, making it difficult to use.
[0004]
The measurement method of the amount of dust on the outlet side of dry gas cleaning equipment is a continuous dust concentration meter that detects the frictional charge generated by absorbing the gas at a constant flow rate and colliding with the exciter. Measurement method based on dust concentration measurement method “JISZ 8808” for measuring concentration based on dust mass and measurement gas amount adhering to the filter, and passing the gas through the filter to check whether there is any abnormality due to color density A simple filter check method for judging is mentioned.
[0005]
As another device for detecting the breakage of the filter cloth, a detector for detecting the air permeability and / or suction sound of the filter cloth is arranged close to the surface of the filter cloth, and the detector is attached to the filter cloth surface. Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 60-110316 discloses an apparatus for detecting breakage of a filter cloth based on a change in ventilation sound by relatively moving. As another method, when detecting breakage of a bag filter equipped with a pulse air type dust removal mechanism, a pipe lined along the filter cloth and purged with air is used as a gas suction pipe, and suction is performed from this gas suction pipe. Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 7-328363 discloses a method for identifying a broken portion of a filter cloth by measuring the amount of dust.
[0006]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
Since the conventional filter cloth checking method is configured as described above, the following problems exist. In other words, in order to maintain the performance of the dust collector, it is necessary to measure the dust concentration on the outlet side of the dust collector regularly. However, as a reliable method, a suction pipe, which is a measuring device, is connected to the pipeline of dust or the like to be measured directly. There is a method “JISZ8808 (1986)” for measuring dust concentration in exhaust gas, which is attached to determine the amount of dust per unit in exhaust gas.
However, this method stipulates the measurement method under a general environment. For example, in a blast furnace top gas cleaning facility that has passed through a high-temperature gas cleaning facility in a dry type, sufficient caution is required for measurement. .
This is due to the gas component and temperature, and the gas passing through the cleaning equipment is in a high temperature state, but since the measurement instrument is inserted into the pipe and measured, there is a difference between the temperature of the measurement instrument and the gas temperature, The dust collecting filter cloth attached to the measuring instrument is in a low temperature state at the time of measurement, and compounds such as ammonium chloride and iron chloride are precipitated due to a decrease in temperature.
In this method of measuring the weight of dust adhered to the filter cloth, naturally this chloride is also measured as dust, so measurement without reducing the temperature is necessary, and work such as preheating is required (that is, measurement) The first measurement when the temperature of the instrument is low is unreliable).
[0007]
In addition, in order to measure dust adhering to the filter cloth, when measuring low-concentration dust, it is necessary to collect an amount of dust in consideration of measurement errors, and a minimum of 30 minutes / time, ideally 60 minutes. It is necessary to spend at least 3 times / time, and this measurement needs to be performed at least 3 times.
Furthermore, since it is necessary to dry the filter cloth, it took 5 to 6 hours at least from the measurement until the result was obtained.
Therefore, the present method, which needs to have expertise and skills for measurement, is difficult to be performed with high frequency, and there is a method called simple filter check as another method.
In this method, gas is passed through the filter cloth for a certain period of time at a substantially constant flow rate, and the dust collector's abnormality (breaking in the case of the filter cloth method) is detected by the darkness of the color of the filter cloth. The judgment relies on human vision, and an attempt was made to measure the lightness of the filter cloth as a quantitative evaluation method.
[0008]
However, even in this method, the problem of precipitation of iron chloride is the same as that of JISZ8808 (type I), and the following problem has occurred.
The blast furnace gas itself basically does not contain oxygen, but the sampling pipe for simple filter check is exposed to the atmosphere during non-measurement, so a large amount of iron oxide is deposited on the inner surface of the pipe. This iron oxide is gradually mixed and adheres to the filter cloth.
Ammonium chloride is colorless and is not reflected in color, and is superior to the gravimetric method in this respect. However, if the influence of iron oxide and iron chloride is not removed, the filter cloth brightness alone can be used as a method for judging the dust collector abnormality. It turned out that it cannot be used.
[0009]
In FIG. 4, the gas that has passed through the main filter cloth 11 in a conventional dry gas cleaning facility is branched from the gas pipe 12 and a branch pipe 13 is provided via a valve 15 for simple filter check. A test filter cloth 14 for collecting dust flowing in the pipe was provided, and the gas from the gas pipe 12 was passed through the filter cloth 14 to adhere the dust. The lightness of the filter cloth 14 before installation measured with a lightness meter is L1 * (Elwan Star), the measurement value of the filter cloth 14 with dust measured with a lightness meter is L2 *, and the difference in brightness and frequency before and after use are A histogram is shown in FIG.
In FIG. 3, it can be seen that the filter cloth 14 tends to be normal or abnormal, but the value that makes the filter cloth 14 abnormal is also given to the larger value of the brightness difference, and it has been found that the filter cloth 14 is not a sufficient standard.
[0010]
Therefore, it was clarified that the dust passing through the gas pipe cannot be managed only by the difference in brightness between the new filter cloth and the filter cloth after use with a lightness meter. This is because the brightness meter is affected by the components contained in the gas that has passed through the gas cleaning facility as described above.
[0011]
The present invention has been made to solve the above-described problems. In particular, the gas passing through the gas cleaning equipment is measured with a color difference meter, and the lightness difference is color-corrected to correct the brightness of the filter cloth of the equipment. It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for estimating the filter cloth abnormality and the filter cloth deterioration of a dry gas cleaning facility that makes the determination of normality / abnormality simple.
[0012]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
According to the dry gas cleaning equipment filter cloth judging method according to the present invention, a branch pipe is provided in the gas pipe downstream of the main filter cloth of the dry gas cleaning equipment, and a filter cloth for collecting dust is provided in the branch pipe. The dust in the gas passing through the gas pipe is attached to the filter cloth, and the dust attached to the filter cloth is measured for red color and lightness with a color difference meter, and further the dry gas cleaning according to the present invention The method for estimating the deterioration of the filter cloth of the equipment is to provide a branch pipe in the gas pipe on the downstream side of the main filter cloth of the dry gas cleaning equipment, and to provide a filter cloth for collecting dust in the branch pipe. The dust in the gas passing through the filter is attached to the filter cloth, the filter cloth is measured for the lightness of the filter cloth with a color difference meter, and from the relative dust concentration ratio (n) of the following equation (1), This is a method for estimating the deterioration of the filter cloth.
n = [ln (ΔL * / L1 * + 1) −β · a *] / γXo (1)
ΔL * = L2 * -L1 *
here,
L1 *; lightness of filter cloth before dust adhesion L2 *; lightness of filter cloth after dust adhesion a *; redness of filter cloth after dust adhesion β; color component constant Xo; allowable dust concentration through main filter cloth (mg / Nm 3) )
γ: Dust concentration constant n; Relative dust concentration ratio
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of a method for determining filter cloth abnormality determination and filter cloth deterioration of a dry gas cleaning facility according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
Since the configuration shown in FIG. 4 is used as the apparatus used in the present invention, the configuration shown in FIG. 4 will be described here again. That is, the gas that has passed through the filter cloth 11 of the dry gas cleaning facility in FIG. 4 is branched from the gas pipe 12 to provide a branch pipe 13 for simple filter check, and dust flowing in the pipe is collected in the middle of the pipe. A test filter cloth 14 is provided, and the gas from the gas pipe 12 is caused to flow through the filter cloth 14 through the valve 15 to adhere dust. In the test, after measuring the brightness Elster (L1 *) of the new filter cloth 14 before installation, the filter cloth 14 is installed, the valve 15 of the branch line 13 is opened, and gas is supplied to the branch line 13 for 5 minutes. Washed away. Thereafter, the filter cloth 14 was removed, and the red aster (a *) and lightness elster (L2 *) of the filter cloth 14 with dust mainly composed of iron oxide were measured with a color difference meter (not shown).
In addition, the brightness (L *: Elster) and red (a *: Aster) referred to in the present invention refer to L * and a * when expressed in the CIE 1976 L * a * b * color system.
The brightness L * of this color difference meter has a maximum value of 100 on the bright side and a minimum value of 0 on the dark side. However, L * was 97 on a new filter cloth 14 with no dust attached. It was corrected to 97.
When the dust-attached filter cloth 14 is measured with a color difference meter and the relationship between the a * value (Aster) representing red and the brightness difference ΔL * before and after dust attachment is shown in FIG. It can be seen that the relationship between the red color and the brightness is clear, and the normality / abnormality of the filter cloth 14 can be managed from this relationship. That is, as shown in FIG. 2, if the filter cloth 14 is continuously measured with a color difference meter at -ΔL * and a * coordinates, the normal time and the abnormal time are stratified. An abnormality can be determined when L * is a large value.
[0014]
Further, when the boundary F between the normal value and the abnormal value is created as shown in FIG. 1 and managed by the filter cloth 14 shown in FIG. 4, the abnormality can be determined using the relative dust concentration ratio n.
That is, the ratio of the relative dust concentration to the main filter cloth passage allowable dust concentration (corresponding to the normal dust concentration) is measured with a dust color difference meter attached to the filter cloth 14 before and after use measured in the test branch pipe 13. When represented by (n), it becomes one set.
n = [ln (ΔL * / L1 * + 1) −β · a *] / γXo (1)
ΔL * = L2 * -L1 *
here,
L1 *; lightness of filter cloth before dust adhesion L2 *; lightness of filter cloth after dust adhesion a *; redness of filter cloth after dust adhesion β; color component constant Xo; allowable dust concentration through main filter cloth (mg / Nm 3) )
γ: Dust concentration constant n; Relative dust concentration ratio Xo is the allowable dust concentration through the main filter cloth (mg / Nm 3 ). Use the dust concentration when the filter cloth is normal, or the specification value when designing the dust collector May be used, and a normal reference condition may be used. The red aster a * is a measured numerical value of 0 to 100, the color component constant β <0, and the dust concentration constant γ <0.
Thus, when the measurement result is expressed in terms of relative dust concentration ratio n using Formula 1, n = 1 in the normal state, and as n> 1 is an abnormal value and n is larger, the deterioration of the main filter cloth becomes more remarkable. Can be estimated quantitatively.
FIG. 2 shows the estimation result of the present invention obtained by calculating back one equation. Here, the + mark is a value when the relative dust density ratio n is 1 based on the normal dust density, and the x mark is a numerical value when n = 5 (corresponding to 5 times normal). ing. From this result, it can be seen that normality / abnormality can be reliably stratified by using the above-mentioned formula 1, and the deterioration degree of the main filter cloth can be estimated by the magnitude of n.
[0015]
FIG. 1 shows the relative dust concentration and frequency in FIG. 1 described above. The filter cloth 14 of the gas cleaning facility can be managed by managing the relative dust concentration.
[0016]
【The invention's effect】
Since the method for estimating the filter cloth abnormality and the filter cloth deterioration of the dry gas cleaning equipment according to the present invention is configured as described above, the following effects can be obtained. That is, by carrying out the invention of claim 1, it is possible to easily determine the abnormality of the filter cloth by measuring the filter cloth with a color difference meter and looking at the red color and the brightness.
By carrying out the invention of claim 2, it is possible to easily estimate the deterioration of the filter cloth provided in the gas cleaning facility based on the relative dust concentration ratio.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a histogram of lightness when a filter cloth is normal / abnormal when a filter cloth abnormality is determined according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a characteristic diagram showing a relationship between an aster measured by a color difference meter and a brightness difference.
FIG. 3 is a characteristic diagram showing the relationship between relative dust concentration ratio and frequency.
FIG. 4 is a configuration of a branch pipe measured by a simple filter check.
FIG. 5 is a schematic configuration diagram of gas energy recovery equipment in a blast furnace.
[Explanation of symbols]
1 Blast Furnace 2 Dust Catcher 3 Dry Dust Collection System 4 Wet Dust Collection System 5 Furnace Top Generator 11 Main Filter Cloth 12 Gas Pipe 13 Branch Pipe 14 Filter Cloth 15 Valve

Claims (2)

乾式ガス清浄設備の主濾布(11)の下流側のガス管(12)に分岐管路(13)を設け、該分岐管路(13)にダスト捕集用の濾布(14)を設け、前記ガス管(12)内を通過するガス中のダストを前記濾布(14)に付着させ、該濾布(14)に付着したダストを色彩色差計にて赤色(a*)と明度(L*)について測定することを特徴とする乾式ガス清浄設備の濾布の異常を判定方法。A branch pipe (13) is provided in the gas pipe (12) on the downstream side of the main filter cloth (11) of the dry gas cleaning equipment, and a filter cloth (14) for collecting dust is provided in the branch pipe (13). The dust in the gas passing through the gas pipe (12) is attached to the filter cloth (14), and the dust attached to the filter cloth (14) is red (a *) and brightness ( L *) is measured for a filter cloth abnormality in a dry gas cleaning facility. 乾式ガス清浄設備の主濾布(11)の下流側のガス管(12)に分岐管路(13)を設け、該分岐管路(13)にダスト捕集用の濾布(14)を設け、前記ガス管(12)内を通過するガス中のダストを、前記濾布(14)に付着させ、該濾布(14)を色彩色差計にて濾布(14)の明度(L*)と赤色(a*)について測定し、次の1式の相対ダスト濃度比(n)から前記ガス清浄設備の濾布(14)の劣化を推定することを特徴とする乾式ガス清浄設備の濾布劣化を推定する方法。
n=[ln(△L*/L1*+1)−β・a*]/γXo ・・・(1)
△L*=L2*−L1*
ここに、
L1*;ダスト付着前濾布の明度
L2*;ダスト付着後濾布の明度
a*;ダスト付着後濾布の赤色度
β;色成分定数
Xo;主濾布通過許容ダスト濃度(mg/Nm3
γ;ダスト濃度定数
n;相対ダスト濃度比
A branch pipe (13) is provided in the gas pipe (12) downstream of the main filter cloth (11) of the dry gas cleaning equipment, and a filter cloth (14) for collecting dust is provided in the branch pipe (13). The dust in the gas passing through the gas pipe (12) is attached to the filter cloth (14), and the lightness (L *) of the filter cloth (14) is attached to the filter cloth (14) with a color difference meter. And red (a *), and the deterioration of the filter cloth (14) of the gas cleaning equipment is estimated from the relative dust concentration ratio (n) of the following equation (1): A method of estimating degradation.
n = [ln (ΔL * / L1 * + 1) −β · a *] / γXo (1)
ΔL * = L2 * -L1 *
here,
L1 *; lightness of filter cloth before dust adhesion L2 *; lightness of filter cloth after dust adhesion a *; redness of filter cloth after dust adhesion β; color component constant Xo; allowable dust concentration through main filter cloth (mg / Nm 3) )
γ: Dust concentration constant n: Relative dust concentration ratio
JP08678498A 1998-03-31 1998-03-31 Method for determining filter cloth abnormality and estimating filter cloth deterioration in dry gas cleaning equipment Expired - Fee Related JP4101922B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP08678498A JP4101922B2 (en) 1998-03-31 1998-03-31 Method for determining filter cloth abnormality and estimating filter cloth deterioration in dry gas cleaning equipment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP08678498A JP4101922B2 (en) 1998-03-31 1998-03-31 Method for determining filter cloth abnormality and estimating filter cloth deterioration in dry gas cleaning equipment

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH11276830A JPH11276830A (en) 1999-10-12
JP4101922B2 true JP4101922B2 (en) 2008-06-18

Family

ID=13896390

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP08678498A Expired - Fee Related JP4101922B2 (en) 1998-03-31 1998-03-31 Method for determining filter cloth abnormality and estimating filter cloth deterioration in dry gas cleaning equipment

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4101922B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4535889B2 (en) * 2005-01-20 2010-09-01 Necエンジニアリング株式会社 Air filter clogging detection device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH11276830A (en) 1999-10-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
TWI537551B (en) Particle detector and method for operating the same
KR101540913B1 (en) Device for characterizing a size distribution of electrically-charged airborne particles in an air flow
US11543331B2 (en) Brake dust measurement system and brake dust measurement method
CN104897536A (en) Filter bypass
JPH06507240A (en) How to measure dust emissions from hazardous substance generating equipment
US10286349B2 (en) Air filter use indicators
JP4101922B2 (en) Method for determining filter cloth abnormality and estimating filter cloth deterioration in dry gas cleaning equipment
RU2509596C2 (en) Method and device for test for and control over hydrogen fluoride removal from process gas
JPS63134933A (en) Instrument for measuring descending dust
CN108765854A (en) A kind of fire detecting system
CN109238908A (en) The method for detecting the dust content of coal gas in blast-furnace top gas recovery turbine generator
JPH0552972U (en) Underwater debris particle detector
CN117288507B (en) Intelligent automatic diagnosis method and diagnosis system for dust removal
JPS60242341A (en) Measuring instrument of corpuscles density in exhaust gas of internal-combustion engine
JPH08258980A (en) METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR JUDGING CONDITION OF CONCENTRATION OF POWDER IN HOPPER
JP2978930B1 (en) Maskman test device Dew condensation prevention device in sampling hose
Gaboury et al. Workplace protection factor evaluation of respiratory protective equipment in a primary aluminum smelter
JPH09209009A (en) Method for preventing damage to recovery turbine in blast furnace top pressure recovery power generation and continuous monitoring device for dust concentration and mist concentration in wet gas
JPS58223737A (en) Sampling pipe
JP2001124692A (en) Particle measurement device
JP3327743B2 (en) Dust collection device
JP4301632B2 (en) Dry gas seal integrity management method
JP2000206012A (en) Gas sampling device
JPH056524Y2 (en)
JPH04203413A (en) Exhaust gas dust purifying device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20050329

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20070402

RD02 Notification of acceptance of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422

Effective date: 20070611

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20080304

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20080321

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110328

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110328

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120328

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130328

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140328

Year of fee payment: 6

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees