JP4166251B2 - Design drawing inspection program and design drawing inspection device - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a design drawing inspection program for detecting, for example, inconsistencies in drawings representing structures such as buildings.

When building various buildings such as buildings or condominiums, various drawings relating to the design of the building (hereinafter referred to as design drawings) and design documents such as specifications are required. In addition to the design book, a construction drawing that shows the details of the storage of the components of the building determined based on the design book and the joint portion is required. Therefore, before starting construction, it is common for designers such as design offices and construction companies to create design books, and for contractors who perform further construction to create construction drawings based on the design books. .
JP 2002-342383 A

  The above-mentioned design books include a large number of various design drawings, and the necessary information such as the dimensions necessary for identifying the structure of the building and the members used are described in the many design drawings. However, due to the error of the designer who created the design document, the information that should be the same information is often different for each design drawing. Thus, if there are many contradictions in each design drawing, a lot of incorrect information will be included, and the construction drawing created based on the design drawing cannot be completed, and the construction work cannot be performed. Therefore, conventionally, humans have detected inconsistencies by manual operations such as comparing each design drawing with each other, and corrected erroneous information to correct information. However, enormous time (number of days) is required to detect contradictions by comparing a large amount of information shown in each design drawing with each other.

  In addition, there is a similar problem even when the design object is a structure such as an industrial product other than a building, and a large number of design drawings are created to produce the structure.

  The present invention has been made to solve the above-described problems, and shortens the inspection time for detecting inconsistencies (inconsistent information) described in a plurality of design drawings showing design objects. The purpose is to provide a design drawing inspection program capable of

In order to solve the above-described problems, the design drawing inspection program according to the present invention includes a column for describing information relating to reinforcing bars in members constituting a building by a figure and a column for describing the number of reinforcing bars in the member by characters. In order to detect contradictions in the design drawing constituted by the electronic data, the computer is described by the information and characters related to the reinforcing bar described by the figure from the design drawing based on the description rule of the design drawing. The description information recognizing means for recognizing the number of reinforcing bars, and the number of reinforcing bars for acquiring the number of reinforcing bars in the member based on the information related to the reinforcing bars described by the graphic recognized by the description information recognizing means. Means, the number of reinforcing bars in the member obtained by the reinforcing bar number acquiring means, and the described information recognition means Comparing the number of reinforcing bars described by the character recognized me, based on the comparison result, to function as inconsistencies detection means for detecting discrepancies of the design drawing.

In the design drawing inspection program according to the invention, the column described by the graphic shows a cross section of a reinforcing bar in a pillar constituting the building, and the reinforcing bar number acquisition means counts the number of cross sections of the reinforcing bar. By doing, you may be comprised so that the number of the reinforcing bars in the said pillar may be acquired.

Further, in the design drawing inspection program according to the above invention, the column described by the figure includes the cross section of the upper and lower bars in the beam constituting the building, and the column described by the character indicates the upper bar of the beam. And the number of bottom bars, respectively, the number of reinforcing bars acquiring means obtains the number of top and bottom bars in the beam by counting the number of cross sections of the top and bottom bars, The contradiction point detection means compares the number of upper end bars in the beam obtained by the reinforcing bar number acquisition means with the number of upper end bars described by the characters recognized by the description information recognition means, and The number of the lower streaks in the beam obtained by the number acquisition means and the number of the lower streaks described by the characters recognized by the written information recognition means And compare, based on the comparison result, it may be configured to detect discrepancies of the design drawing.

In the design drawing inspection program according to the invention, the column described by the graphic further includes a cross section of the abdominal muscles in the beam constituting the building, and the column described by the characters further includes the number of abdominal muscles in the beam. , The reinforcing bar number acquiring means further acquires the number of abs in the beam by counting the number of cross sections of the abdominal muscles, and the contradiction point detecting means further includes the reinforcing bar number acquiring means. The number of abdominal muscles in the beam obtained by the above is compared with the number of abdominal muscles described by the characters recognized by the written information recognition means, and a contradiction in the design drawing is detected based on the comparison result It may be configured as follows.

Furthermore, in the design drawing inspection program according to the above invention, the description information recognition means describes the number of reinforcing bars to be described using information or characters relating to reinforcing bars to be described using figures in the design drawing. When there is not, it is recognized based on the description rule of the design drawing that the information on the reinforcing bar or the number of reinforcing bars is not described, and the contradiction point detecting means is recognized by the written information recognition means You may be comprised so that it may detect that the information regarding a reinforcing bar or the number of the said reinforcing bars is not described.

Further, the design drawing inspection apparatus of the present invention is configured by electronic data provided with a column for describing information on reinforcing bars in members constituting a building by a figure and a column for describing the number of reinforcing bars in the member by characters. A design drawing inspection apparatus for detecting a contradiction in a design drawing, wherein the number of rebars described by characters and information on the reinforcing bars described by figures from the design drawing based on a description rule of the design drawings Recognizing information recognizing means, rebar number acquiring means for acquiring the number of rebars in the member based on information on the rebar described by the graphic recognized by the description information recognizing means, and the reinforcing bar According to the number of reinforcing bars in the member obtained by the number acquisition means and the characters recognized by the written information recognition means. Comparing the number of the described rebar, based on the comparison result, and a contradiction point detecting means for detecting discrepancies of the design drawing.

  The present invention has the configuration described above, and a design drawing inspection that can shorten the inspection time for detecting inconsistencies (conflicting information) described in a plurality of design drawings showing a design object. There is an effect that a program can be provided.

  Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

  FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a design drawing inspection apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. This design drawing inspection apparatus includes a CPU 1, a first memory 2 made of a rewritable nonvolatile memory, a second memory 3 made of RAM such as SRAM or DRAM, a data input unit 4, a display 5, A printer 6 and an operation input unit 7 are provided.

  The CPU 1 executes a computer program 2a including a design drawing inspection program stored in the first memory 2, thereby controlling each hardware (3 to 7) described later and inspecting a design book. The second memory 3 is composed of, for example, SRAM or DRAM, and stores temporary data generated when the CPU 1 executes the computer program 2a.

  The data input unit 4 reads data from a DVD (Digital Video Disc or Digital Versatile Disc) or a floppy (registered trademark) disc on which design book data created in, for example, DXF (Drawing eXchange Format) is recorded. Device. The display 5 is a display device composed of a CRT or LCD. The printer 6 is a general printing device. The operation input unit 7 includes a keyboard and a mouse, and is used by an operator to give various instructions to the design drawing inspection apparatus.

  The first memory 2 stores a computer program 2a and a design book recognition dictionary 2b necessary for the operation of the design drawing inspection apparatus. The design book recognition dictionary 2b is composed of information necessary for recognizing the description contents of each design book. The design book description rules, terms such as phrases and collocations used for each design book are displayed. Includes a glossary of design books being acquired.

  In addition, the design document includes each member list, each core diagram, each axis assembly diagram, each column's column guide diagram, each floor's beam plan, each floor's floor plan, each elevation, each floor's plan There are a figure, a cross-sectional view showing a cross-section of a building, a quadrangle figure, a finishing table, a joinery table, etc., which are generally collectively referred to as a design book, but in this embodiment, each is a separate member list And drawings are also called design books (design drawings). In the design drawing inspection apparatus of the present embodiment, design book data in which these design books are configured by electronic data, for example, design book data created in the DXF format using CAD or the like is input, and the design book data is Check the contents of each design document being expressed.

  Next, the operation of the design drawing inspection apparatus of this embodiment will be described. 2 to 5 are flowcharts showing the operation of the design drawing inspection apparatus realized by the CPU 1 executing the design drawing inspection program included in the computer program 2a. Here, a design book of a three-story building made of reinforced concrete will be described as an example of an inspection object by the design drawing inspection apparatus. Therefore, first, an example of the schematic structure of the building and a design book showing the building will be described.

  FIG. 6 is a perspective view schematically showing main skeleton parts (columns and beams) of the building of this example. Reference numerals C1, C2, C3, and C4 are pillars, reference numerals G1 and G11 are large beams (beams that connect the pillars and the pillars) used on the second floor, the third floor, and the R floor (the roof floor). FG11 and FG12 are foundation beams. FIG. 7 to FIG. 13 show examples of design books that are the design books of the building shown in FIG. 6 and are expressed by the design book data that is input from the data input unit 4 and is the inspection target.

  FIG. 7 is a street line diagram showing a street core that is a reference line used as a reference for positioning the pillars, walls, and the like of the building shown in FIG. In FIG. 7, circled symbols (X1, X2, X3, Y1, Y2) are for specifying the core, and in the following description, the circled symbols (X1, X2, X3, Y1) , Y2) are simply written as X1, X2, X3, Y1, Y2.

  FIG. 8 is a third floor pillar core guide diagram, which is a plan view showing the arrangement of the third floor pillars with reference to the core. Similarly, there are a first-floor pillar core guide map and a second-floor pillar core guide map, but the illustration is omitted here.

  FIG. 9 is a floor plan view of the R floor, which is a view showing the arrangement of the beams on the R floor with reference to the core, looking up from the first floor below the R floor (the third floor in this example). Similarly, there are a third-story beam plan, a second-story beam plan, and a foundation beam plan (however, the base beam plan is a look-down view), but the illustration is omitted here. In addition, in FIG. 9, the small beam B1 which is a beam which connects a large beam and a large beam other than the large beams G1 and G11 is also shown.

  FIG. 10 is an X2 axis diagram, and is a vertical projection diagram showing a building axis (columns, beams, etc.) on the line X2-X2 (X2) in FIG. Similarly, there are X1 axis group diagrams and X3 axis group diagrams, which are not shown here.

  FIG. 11 is a Y2 axis diagram, and is a vertical projection showing a building axis (columns, beams, etc.) on the line Y2-Y2 (Y2) in FIG. Similarly, there are Y1 axis diagrams, but the illustration is omitted here.

  FIG. 12 is a diagram showing a column list that is one of the member lists. For each column (columns indicated by the same reference numerals on each floor), a column (hereinafter referred to as a cross section) in which column cross-sectional views are written in order from the top column. Column), a column describing the number and diameter of the main bars (hereinafter referred to as main bar column), and a column describing the diameter and pitch of the hoop (hereinafter referred to as hoop column). The section column is a column in which information about member constituent materials such as reinforcing bars (main bars, hoops) is described using figures, and the main bar column and the hoop column are described using letters (including numbers). It is a column.

  For example, for the column C4 on the first floor, the sectional view described in the section column shows that both the column width (dimension in the X direction) and depth (dimension in the Y direction) are 800 (mm). ing. In the cross-sectional view, the main bars 31 are indicated by circles, and the hoops 32 that are reinforcing reinforcing bars wound around the main bars at a predetermined interval (pitch) are indicated by lines. “18-D25” described in the main muscle column below indicates that 18 main muscles are used and the diameter (D) thereof is 25 (mm). In addition, “D13” described in the hoop column below indicates that the diameter (D) of the hoop is 13 (mm), and the hoop is indicated by “at” and “100” described after “D13”. It shows that the winding pitch is 100 (mm). In addition, the quadrilateral described via a hyphen before “D13” in the hoop column indicates that the hoop is wound around the quadrangular ring of the main bar arrangement shape. In addition, the circle described in the hoop column of the column C2 on the first floor indicates that the hoop is wound around a circular shape of the main bar arrangement shape. In addition, when the square or the circle is not described in the hoop column and only the diameter and the pitch are described, the hoop winding method is a spiral. This is described as a designated item 33 in the title column 26.

  FIG. 13 is a diagram showing a girder list which is one of the member lists. For each girder (the girder indicated by the same reference numeral on each floor), the cross-sectional view and the reinforcing bars used for the girder for each position. The numbers, diameters, etc. of (upper end muscles that are main muscles arranged at the upper end portion, lower end muscles that are main muscles arranged at the lower end portion, stirrup and abdominal muscles) are described. In FIG. 13, for each girder, in order from the top column, a column indicating the position of which part of the girder (hereinafter referred to as a position column), and a column describing the cross-sectional view of that part (position) (hereinafter referred to as a cross-sectional column) A column describing the number and diameter of the upper streak (hereinafter referred to as the upper streak column), a column describing the number and diameter of the lower streak (hereinafter referred to as the lower streak column), the number of stirrups, the diameter and the pitch. A column to be described (hereinafter referred to as a stirrup column) and a column to describe the number and diameter of abdominal muscles (hereinafter referred to as abdominal muscle column) are provided. The section field is a field in which information about member constituent materials such as reinforcing bars is described using figures, and the upper end bar field, the lower bar field, the stirrup field, and the abdominal bar field have the same information including letters (including numbers). It is a column described by using.

  For example, for the large beam G11 on the R floor, “end portion” and “center” are described in the position column, and the configuration about the end portion and the central portion of the large beam is described in the column below. Indicates that Therefore, in the section section below, a cross-sectional view of the end and center of the large beam is shown, the width of the end of the large beam is 400 (mm), and the beam back (height dimension) is 600 ( mm), and the width of the central portion and the beam back are the same as those of the end portions, and the description thereof is omitted. In the cross-sectional view, the main muscles of the upper and lower muscles 34 and 35 are shown as large circles, and the abdominal muscle 36, which is a reinforcing bar for reinforcing these main muscles, is shown as a small circle. A stirrup 37, which is a reinforcing steel bar that is surrounded and wound at a constant interval (pitch), is indicated by a line. Further, in the upper bar column, the lower bar column, and the abdominal bar column, the number and diameter of reinforcing bars are described in the same manner as the main bar column of the column list of FIG. Also, in the star wrap column, the number and diameter of reinforcing bars (star wraps) are described in the same manner as the main bar column of the column list in FIG. 12, and subsequently, the winding pitch is the same as in the column list hoop. It is written with an at sign and a number. In addition, for the stirrup and abdominal muscles, the configuration of the end and the central part of the beam is the same, so in the stirrup and abdominal muscles, the configuration is described in the center of the column without distinguishing the end and the central part. Yes. In the example of FIG. 13, each beam is shown divided into an end portion and a center position. However, if the configurations of the end portion and the center are exactly the same, the positions are not divided. For example, “total cross section” is described in the position column, only one cross-sectional view is shown in the cross-sectional column, and only one number and diameter are shown in the upper and lower streak columns.

  In addition, as a list of other beams, a base beam list (a list of base beams FG1, FG11, FG12) or a small beam (for example, a small beam B1 shown in FIG. 9) shown in the same manner as the large beam list. These lists are omitted for simplicity of explanation. The list of other members includes a wall list, a slab list, a foundation (base) list, a pile list, etc., which are omitted for the sake of simplification of description.

  As shown in FIGS. 7 to 13, each design book has title columns 21 to 27 describing what kind of design book it is. These title columns 21 to 27 are provided in the upper part of the outer frame of each design book, but may be provided in the lower part, or may be provided in both the upper part and the lower part.

  In addition to these, the design books include various drawings as described above, but these are omitted for the sake of simplification of description.

  Here, the design book recognition dictionary 2b stored in the first memory 2 will be described. The description rule of each design book included in the design book recognition dictionary 2b is how each information included in each design book is described as described in the explanation of FIGS. It is information which shows. Based on this description rule, the CPU 1 recognizes information included in each design book (design book file 3b) described later, that is, information described in each design book. For example, as a method of describing the core in the design book, one direction is described as X1, X2,... And the other direction is described as Y1, Y2,. The direction may be described by circled symbols 1, 2, 3,..., And the other direction may be described by circled symbols A, B, C,. It is registered in the description rule. In addition, as a method for describing dimensions, for example, a line segment with black circles or the like attached to both end points of the line segment is defined as a dimension line, and a dimension (dimension value) is described in the vicinity of the dimension line. . It is registered in the description rule that dimensions are described in this way. Each member constituting the building, for example, a pillar is described by a symbol composed of a combination of C and a number, a large beam is described by a symbol composed of a combination of G and a number, and a foundation beam is composed of a combination of FG and a number. The slab is described with a symbol consisting of a combination of S and a number, and the basis is described with a symbol consisting of a combination of F and a number. In this way, the fact that each member is described is also registered in the description rule. The description rules are created for each design book, and it is clear that there are different description rules for the axis diagram as shown in FIG. 8 and the column list as shown in FIG. 12, but in each design book, It is also clear that the same description rules exist, such as dimensions and description rules for each member.

  The glossary of design books included in the design book recognition dictionary 2b is described in the design books when the CPU 1 recognizes information written in each design book based on the description rule of each design book. This is used to recognize a character or the like as a word or a phrase.

  Note that even if the same information is indicated, the way of description in the design book may differ depending on the designer, and in order to cope with this, there are various descriptions in the description rules included in the design book recognition dictionary 2b. It is desirable to register the method. For example, in the member list shown in FIGS. 12 and 13, the reinforcing bars such as the main bars are described with white circles, but may be described with black circles. Also, it is desirable to be able to add a description rule at any time in order to cope with a description method not included in the existing description rule. Similarly, in the design book glossary included in the design book recognition dictionary 2b, it is desirable that terms can be added as needed. In the present embodiment, the first memory 2 storing the design book recognition dictionary 2b is a rewritable memory.

  FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a schematic operation of the design drawing inspection apparatus of the present embodiment. This operation is realized by the CPU 1 executing the computer program 2a (design drawing inspection program).

  First, in step S <b> 1, for example, design book data created in the DXF format is input from the data input unit 4 and stored in the second memory 3. The design book data in the DXF format is data that can distinguish and recognize figures, characters (including numbers), and the like. In the case of the present embodiment, it is assumed that the design book data 3a stored in the second memory 3 is not classified (classified) by each design book. When the data is classified as each file for each design book, the next step S2 may be skipped and the process may proceed to step S3.

  Next, in step S2, the design book data 3a stored in the second memory 3 is classified for each design book. Here, referring to the design book recognition dictionary 2b stored in the first memory 2, what design book each design book included in the design book data 3a is (for example, a column list, The data is extracted for each design book by determining whether it is a shaft diagram, etc., and by creating a file for each extracted data, a data file 3b for each design book is created and stored in the second memory 3. Remember. Specifically, for example, the title column of each design book (for example, the title columns 21 to 27 in FIGS. 7 to 13) is recognized based on each description rule in the dictionary 2b, and at the same time, the characters described in the title column Etc., by referring to the glossary of design books in the dictionary 2b, each member list such as a column list, a core diagram, each axis diagram, a column core guide map of each floor, Recognize it as a design document such as beam plan, floor plan of each floor, elevation of each surface, plan view of each floor, cross-sectional view, quadrature diagram, finishing table, joinery table. For example, in a state where the screen is displayed on the display 5 or printed out by the printer 6 (that is, as shown in FIGS. 7 to 13), the outer frame of each design book and the inner side surrounded by the outer frame It is determined that the data corresponding to the description content is the data of each design book, and each file 3b is created. In this way, each design book file 3b composed of the data classified for each design book is created and stored in the second memory 3.

  The data of each design book file 3b stored in the second memory 3 is subjected to a calibration process described below.

  When recognizing the contents described in the title column, proofreading processing (detection and correction processing of typographical characters, detection processing and correction processing of duplicate data, etc.) is also performed. In the process of detecting and correcting typographical errors, for example, when the word used in the individual column is not in the design book glossary in the dictionary 2b, the word most similar to the used word is extracted from the design book glossary. Select and correct to the selected word. Here, corrections such as missing characters are also included. For example, in the designation item 33 in the title column 26 of the column list in FIG. 12, there is a description that “the hoop is a spiral”. However, if “spiral” is described as “sparal”, “spiral” To "". Further, in the duplicate data detection and correction process, data such as characters and lines that are duplicated in the same location on the drawing is detected, and when such duplicate data is detected, only one data is left, Remove other duplicate data. Such duplicate data cannot be recognized by human eyes on the screen displayed on the display 5 or on the paper printed out by the printer 6. For example, the data of other drawings is copied several times. This often occurs due to the creation of drawings.

  Next, in step S3, the contents of each member list file among the design book files 3b stored in the second memory 3 are checked. Here, for all the members constituting the building, that is, for all the members shown in each member list, incomplete points and contradictions are detected with respect to the description content of each member, and the detection result is the first. The result is stored in the second memory 3 as the inspection result file 3c.

  Next, in step S4, the consistency check between each design book classified and stored as each design book file 3b in the second memory 3 is performed. In the consistency check between the design books, it is checked whether or not the dimensions for the same part of the building in each design book match, and the member codes for the same part of the building in each design book match. If the contents do not match, the contents that do not match are stored in the second memory 3 as the second inspection result file 3d.

  Next, in step S5, the check results (contents of inspection result files 3c and 3d) stored in steps S3 and S4 are output. For example, the CPU 1 reads the contents of the inspection result files 3 c and 3 d, outputs them to the display 5, and displays them on the screen of the display 5. It is also possible to operate the operation input unit 7 to print the check result on the printer 6 and output it. FIG. 14A shows an example of the check result when the check result in step S3 is displayed on the screen or printed out. FIG. 14B shows the check result in step S4 displayed on the screen or printed out. It is a figure which shows an example of the check result in a case. It should be noted that the check result column of the member list confirmation table shown in FIG. 14A is blank, indicating that there are no deficiencies and inconsistencies. Further, the numbers in the dimension confirmation table shown in FIG. 14B are assigned in order from 1 for convenience and have no special meaning.

  Hereinafter, step S3 and step S4 will be described in detail.

  First, the process of step S3 will be described in detail. FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing detailed processing of step S3.

  First, in step S21, based on a predetermined list selection method, one member list is selected from all member lists such as a column list, a large beam list, a small beam list, and the like in the selected member list. Recognize the existence of each member described and a column (individual column) where information about each member is described. In this list selection method, there is no particular priority order for each member list, and the order in which the member list is appropriately selected is determined in advance. For example, it is determined that the column list, the large beam list, the small beam list, the foundation beam list, the wall list, the slab list, the foundation list, and the pile list are selected in this order. If there is no member list to be selected, it is determined that the member list is skipped and the member list in the next order is selected.

  The recognition of the existence of each member and each individual column described in the selected member list is performed based on the description rule of the selected member list in the design book recognition dictionary 2b. For example, in the case of the column list of FIG. 12, based on the description rules for the column list, each column (each member), that is, the third column C1, the second column C1, the first column C1, 3 Recognize floor pillar C2, second floor pillar C2, first floor pillar C2, third floor pillar C3,... First floor pillar C4, and separate columns for each of these pillars (section field, main field field) And the presence of the hoop column). Here, the description rule for the column list indicates that information about each column is described in a table format, and each item in the row direction of the table (3rd floor, 2nd floor, 1st floor, (Cross section, main line, hoop) is recognized based on the glossary of design books, and the contents of each item (C1, C2, C3, C4) in the column direction are recognized based on the description rules for the column list. Since it is described in the notation, it recognizes the existence of each pillar and the existence of individual columns of each pillar. This is also the case with the large beam list in FIG.

  Next, in step S22, one member is selected from the member list selected in step S21 based on a member selection method in a predetermined list. The member selection method here is, for example, when the individual column in which information about each member is described is a member list arranged in a matrix (matrix) like the column list of FIG. It may be determined that the members in the left column are selected in order, and the members in the same column are selected in order from the member in the upper side. For example, in the case of the pillar list in FIG. 12, the third floor pillar C1, the second floor pillar C1, the first floor pillar C1, the third floor pillar C2, the second floor pillar C2, the first floor pillar C2, the third floor. Columns C3,... Are selected in the order of the pillar C4 on the first floor. Note that it is only necessary to finally select all the members described in the arbitrary member list, and the member selection method is not limited to the above-described method.

  Next, in step S23, the member selected in step S22 is checked to see if there are any deficiencies or inconsistencies in the description in the member list. 1 in the inspection result file 3c.

  Next, in step S24, when all the members in the member list selected in step S21 are not selected, the process returns to step S22, the next member is selected, and step S23 is performed. If all the members in the member list selected in step S21 are selected, the process proceeds to step S25. In step S25, when all the member lists have not been selected in step S21, the process returns to step S21, the next member list is selected, and steps S22 to S24 are performed. If all the member lists have been selected, the process of step S3 ends. In this way, the process of step S23 is performed for all members in all the member lists.

  The process of step S23 will be described more specifically. FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing details of step S23 when the member list is a column list, a large beam list, a small beam list, a foundation beam list, or the like. Steps S31 to S36 are detailed processing of step S23.

  For example, when the column list (FIG. 12) is selected in step S21, the contents described in the column list are recognized for each column, and it is checked whether there are any deficiencies or inconsistencies in the description. For example, when the third floor column C1 is selected in step S22, in step S23, first, in step S31, the individual column, that is, the section column, of the third floor column C1 selected based on the design book recognition dictionary 2b is selected. Recognize the contents of the main line and hoop column. When recognizing the description contents of these individual columns, the same proofreading process (detection and correction process of typographical characters, detection and correction process of duplicate data, etc.) as in step S2 is also performed. In step S31, association processing for recognized information is performed. In this association process, for example, information indicating that the description content in the individual column of the third-floor pillar C1 and the third-floor pillar C1 are related is stored in the pillar list file 3b.

  For example, in the case of the column C1 on the third floor of the column list of FIG. 12, based on the description rules for the column list, the description content of the cross-section column is the column width (dimension in the X direction) and depth (dimension in the Y direction). ) Are 700 (mm), and a plurality of circles described in the cross-sectional view are recognized as main bars, and a substantially quadrangle surrounding these circles (main bars) and surrounding these circles is recognized as a hoop. Moreover, about the description content of the main bar column of the column C1, it recognizes that 18 main bars are used and the diameter of these main bars is 25 (mm). Moreover, about the description content of the hoop column of the column C1, the hoop has a diameter of 13 (mm) and a winding pitch of 100 (mm). In addition, in the proofreading process when recognizing the description in the individual column here, when the square or circle described in the hoop column is described as character data, it is modified so that it is unified with graphic data The process to perform is also included.

  Next, in step S32, it is determined whether or not the description content recognized in step S31 has an incomplete point (for example, omission of necessary items), and if there is an incomplete point, information indicating that is present. Created and stored in the first inspection result file 3c (step S35). For example, when recognizing the description of the individual column for the column C2 on the third floor of the column list of FIG. 12, it is found that there is no description of the diameter and pitch in the hoop column (description is omitted). In this case, information indicating that there is no description of the diameter and pitch of the hoop of the pillar C2 on the third floor is created and stored in the first inspection result file 3c. The check result stored here is displayed in step S5 as content such as the check result of the column C2 on the third floor of the member list confirmation table shown in FIG.

  In addition, for example, when the girder list (FIG. 13) is selected in step S21, the contents described in the girder list are recognized for each beam, and there are no incomplete points and inconsistencies in the described contents. Check whether or not. For example, when the R beam O1 G1 is selected in step S22, in step S23, first, in step S31, the individual column, that is, the position column, of the R beam O1 selected on the basis of the design book recognition dictionary 2b. Recognize the description contents of the cross-section column, the top bar column, the bottom bar column, the stirrup column, and the abdominal muscle column. When recognizing the description contents of these individual columns, the same proofreading process (detection and correction process of typographical characters, detection and correction process of duplicate data, etc.) as in step S2 is also performed. In step S31, association processing for recognized information is performed. In this associating process, for example, information indicating that the description in the individual column of the R beam O-beam G1 and the R beam O-beam G1 are associated is stored in the O-beam list file 3b.

  For example, in the case of the large beam G1 on the R floor of the large beam list in FIG. The contents of each of the columns listed separately on the left and right corresponding to the lower part of those characters (the cross-sectional views on the left and right of the cross-section column, the top and bottom lines) The contents described separately on the left and right) are recognized as information corresponding to the end and center positions of the large beam G1, respectively. Regarding the description in the section column of the large beam G1, it is recognized from the left cross-sectional view that the width of the end of the large beam is 600 (mm) and the beam back is 1000 (mm), and those dimensions are omitted. It is recognized that the width of the central portion of the large beam is 600 (mm) and the beam back is 1000 (mm). Also, a plurality of large circles described in each cross-sectional view are recognized as main muscles (upper and lower muscles), small circles are recognized as abdominal muscles, and these circles (main and abdominal muscles) are in contact with these circles. Recognize the approximate rectangle surrounding the as a star wrap. In addition, regarding the description in the upper end bar column of the same beam G1, it is recognized that there are eight upper bar bars used at the ends of the beam, and the diameter of these upper bar bars is 25 (mm). It is recognized that there are five upper streaks used for the central portion, and the diameter of these upper streaks is 25 (mm). Similarly, the description content of the lower streak column of the same beam G1 is also recognized. In addition, regarding the description in the stirrup column of the same beam G1, two star wraps are used at both the end and the center of the beam, the diameter thereof is 13 (mm), and the winding pitch is 200 (mm). ). Moreover, about the description content of the abdominal muscle column of the same girder G1, it recognizes that the abs used is four and the diameter of these abs is 10 (mm). In the present embodiment, the main bars are recognized without distinguishing the upper and lower bars from the cross-sectional view, but the upper and lower bars are recognized separately from the region where they are arranged. May be.

  The next step S32 is also performed in the same manner as in the case of the column list, and it is determined whether or not there are any incomplete points (for example, omission of necessary items) in the recognition contents in step S31, and if there are incomplete points. Information indicating this is created and stored in the first inspection result file 3c (step S35).

  Next, the process after step S33 is demonstrated. In step S33, the number of reinforcing bars shown in the sectional view of the section column is counted, and in step S34, it is determined whether or not the counted value in step S33 matches the number of reinforcing bars specified in other columns. If they do not match, information indicating this is created and stored in the first inspection result file 3c (step S36).

  For example, when the column list in FIG. 12 is selected, in step S33, the number of main bars indicated by circles in the cross-sectional view is counted. In step S34, the count value of the number of main muscles calculated in step S33 is compared with the number of main muscles described in the main muscle column recognized in step S31, and it is determined whether or not they match. For example, if steps S33 and S34 are performed for the column C2 on the first floor of the column list of FIG. 12, the number of main bars indicated by circles in the cross-sectional view is counted as 20, but “18− It is recognized from the description of “D25” that the number is 18, and it is found that the count value does not match 20. As a result, information indicating that the number of main bars of the pillar C2 on the first floor does not match is created and stored in the first inspection result file 3c (step S36). The check result stored here is displayed in step S5 as content such as the check result of the column C2 on the first floor of the member list confirmation table shown in FIG.

  In addition, for the beam list such as the large beam list, the number of main bars (upper and lower bars) indicated by circles (large circles) in the cross-sectional view of the cross-section column of the selected beam is counted. The total number of the lines described in the top line and the number described in the bottom line are compared to determine whether or not they match. Also, the number of abdominal muscles indicated by circles (small circles) in the cross-sectional view of the cross-section column of the selected beam is counted, and the count value is compared with the number described in the abdominal muscle column to determine whether they match. Determine. In this embodiment, the main bars are recognized from the sectional view without distinguishing the upper and lower bars, and the total number of these is counted, but the upper and lower bars are arranged. The number of lines is counted, and the numbers corresponding to the numbers listed in the upper and lower streak columns are compared with each other to determine whether they match. May be. In this case, detailed information on whether the number of main muscles of the upper and lower muscles does not match is obtained as the inspection result.

  For example, if steps S33 and S34 are performed on the beam G11 on the R floor of the large beam list shown in FIG. 13, the number of main bars (upper and lower bars) whose positions are indicated by circles in the cross-sectional view of the end portion is obtained. If counted, the number will be 8. However, the upper end bar has four upper end bars from the description of “4-D25”, and the lower end bar has three lower end bars from the description of “3-D25”. It is recognized that the total is 7, and it is found that the count value does not coincide with 8. As a result, information indicating that the number of main bars at the end of the beam G11 on the R floor does not match is created and stored in the first inspection result file 3c (step S36). Furthermore, regarding the beam G11 on the R floor, if the number of abdominal muscles whose positions are indicated by circles in the end and center cross-sectional views are counted, both will be two, but the description of “4-D10” in the abdominal muscle column Thus, it is recognized that the number of abdominal muscles is 4, and it is found that the count value does not agree with 2. As a result, information indicating that the number of abs of the beam G11 on the R floor does not match is created and stored in the first inspection result file 3c (step S36). The two check results stored here are displayed in step S5 as contents such as the check result of the beam G11 on the R floor of the member list confirmation table shown in FIG.

  Further, if steps S33 and S34 are performed on the beam G11 on the third floor, the number of main bars (upper and lower bars) whose positions are indicated by circles in the central cross-sectional view is eight. From the description of “3-D25” in the line, it is recognized that there are three upper lines from the description of “3-D25” in the lower line, and it is recognized that there are three lower lines. It turns out that it does not correspond with eight count values. As a result, information indicating that the number of main bars in the center of the beam G11 on the third floor does not match is created and stored in the first inspection result file 3c (step S36). Further, regarding the beam G11 on the third floor, if the number of abdominal muscles whose positions are indicated by circles in the end and center sectional views are counted, the number becomes two, but the description of “4-D10” in the abdominal muscle column Thus, it is recognized that the number of abdominal muscles is 4, and it is found that the count value does not agree with 2. As a result, information indicating that the number of abdominal muscles of the beam G11 on the third floor does not match is created and stored in the first inspection result file 3c (step S36). The two check results stored here are displayed in step S5 as contents such as the check result of the beam G11 on the third floor of the member list confirmation table shown in FIG.

  Next, the process of checking the consistency between the design books in step S4 will be described in detail. FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing detailed processing of step S4.

  First, in step S40, the contents described in each design book other than the member list are recognized. The contents of each member list are already recognized when the above-described member list inspection (step S3) is performed. Here, each design book other than the member list is based on the design book recognition dictionary 2b. In step S2, description contents other than those already recognized are recognized. When recognizing these descriptions, the same proofreading process (detection and correction processing of typographical characters, detection and correction processing of duplicate data, etc.) as in step S2 is also performed. In step S40, association processing is performed on the recognized information. In this association processing, if, for example, one member and a dimension related thereto are recognized in a certain design book, information indicating that the one member is related to a dimension related thereto is stored in the file 3b of the design book. Remembered.

  In step S40, when a plurality of different recognition results, that is, contradictions are obtained for the description content that should be the same in any one design book, information indicating the contradiction is created and the second inspection is performed. Store in the result file 3d. For example, in the third-floor column guide diagram of FIG. 8, there is no problem because the dimension between the street cores Y1 and Y2 is the same as “10050” in two places on the left and right, but there is no problem. When the dimensions between the cores Y1 and Y2 are different, when recognizing the description, two different recognition results are obtained as the dimensions between the cores Y1 and Y2. In this case, Information indicating that the dimensions between the cores Y1 and Y2 do not match or is indefinite is created and stored in the second inspection result file 3d.

  In step S40, for example, with respect to the third-order column core guide diagram of FIG. 8, the cores of X1, X2, X3, Y1, and Y2 are recognized, and the six symbols C1, C2, C3, and C4 are attached. Recognize the presence and position of each column, and further measure the dimensions between the cores, the widths in the X and Y directions of each column, and the layout dimensions of each column with respect to the core (the distance from the core to each side of the column) ) Here, for the recognition of the presence and position of each column, for example, a quadrangle that is in the vicinity of the column code C2 and includes the intersection position of the X1 and Y2 streets is recognized as the column C2, and this column C2 Recognizes that it exists at the intersection of X1 and Y2 on the 3rd floor. Here, the fact that the pillar C2 exists on the third floor indicates that the contents of the title column 22 when the design book data is classified in step S2 of FIG. 2 ("third floor" of the "third floor pillar core guide map"). ) Is recognized based on the recognition result. The presence and position of the other five pillars are recognized in the same manner. Regarding the recognition of the dimension between the cores, the dimension between the cores Y1 and Y2 is 10050 (mm), and the dimension between the cores X1 and X2 and the dimension between the cores X2 and X3 are 5400 (mm). It is recognized that the dimension between the cores X1 and X3 is 10800 (mm). Regarding the recognition of the arrangement dimension with respect to the core of the column, for example, for the column C2, the arrangement dimension with respect to the core X1 is 350 (mm) and 350 (mm), and the arrangement dimension with respect to the core Y2 is 300 (mm). It recognizes that it is 400 (mm). Here, two arrangement dimensions with respect to any one core are recognized separately. Similarly, the arrangement dimensions with respect to the cores of other pillars are also recognized. In FIG. 8, for example, regarding the central column C1 and the right column C4 on Y1 (on the Y1-Y1 line), the arrangement dimension with respect to the core Y1 is not described. This is omitted because it is the same as the arrangement dimension with respect to the core Y1 of the left column C1 on the same Y1, and the description of the dimension having the same value is often omitted. Are omitted in the description rules of each design book. Therefore, the arrangement dimension with respect to the core Y1 of the central column C1 and the right column C4 in the Y1 way is recognized as the same value as the arrangement dimension with respect to the core Y1 of the left column C1 in the same Y1 way. In the case of FIG. 8, the description of the arrangement dimension with respect to the core X1 of the column C2 in Y2 is the same as the arrangement dimension with respect to the core X1 of the column C1 in Y1 and may be omitted. . Similarly, the description of the arrangement dimensions with respect to the cores X2 and X3 of the two columns C3 on the center and the right side of the Y2 may be omitted. As described above, the contents described in the third-floor pillar core guide map are recognized.

  Similarly, with respect to the R floor plan view of FIG. 9, the cores of X1, X2, X3, Y1, and Y2 are recognized, and three large beams G1, four large beams G11, and four small beams B1 are recognized. And the position between the cores are recognized. Here, with regard to the recognition of the existence and position of each beam, for example, in the case of one beam G1 on X1, the two parallel line segments in the vicinity of G1 of the large beam code are recognized as the large beam G1. The large beam G1 is recognized to exist between the Y1 street and the Y2 street on the X1 street on the R floor. Here, the fact that the large beam G1 exists on the R floor indicates that the description contents of the title column 23 when the design book data is classified in step S2 of FIG. 2 (“R floor” of the “R floor beam floor plan”). Is recognized based on the recognition result.

  In addition, for the X2 axis group diagram of FIG. 10, the cores of Y1 and Y2 are recognized, and the total is composed of three columns C1 from the first floor to the third floor and three columns C3 from the first floor to the third floor. Recognize the existence and position of six pillars, three large beams G1 from the second floor to the R floor, and one foundation beam FG1, and further, the dimension between the cores, the width in the Y direction of each pillar, And the arrangement | positioning dimension with respect to the core Y1, Y2 as a pillar is recognized. Furthermore, the depth from the ground line (design GL) to the bottom of the foundation, the height from the ground line (design GL) to the first floor line (1FL), and the height direction such as the floor height of each floor are also recognized. . Here, for the recognition of the presence and position of each pillar, for example, the pillar code of C1 attached corresponding to the core of Y1 and the letters 1FL, 2FL, 3FL, RFL indicating the floor line of each floor The first floor pillar C1, the second floor pillar C1, and the third floor pillar C1 are recognized by the two line segments parallel to the core Y1 existing between the floor lines of each floor, and these three pillars are recognized. Recognize that C1 exists at the intersection of X2 and Y1. Here, the fact that the three pillars C1 exist on X2 is that the contents of the title column 24 when the design book data is classified in step S2 of FIG. 2 ("X2 axis diagram" Are recognized based on the recognition result of “X2 ways”). The other three columns C3 are recognized in the same manner. As for the recognition of the presence and position of the beam, for example, in the case of the R-level girder G1, the R-floor floor line RFL and two line segments in the vicinity of the girder code G1 and parallel to the floor line RFL Based on the above, the two parallel line segments are recognized as a large beam G1 on the R floor, and the large beam G1 is recognized to exist between the Y1 street and the Y2 street on the X2 street. Here, the fact that the girder G1 exists on the X2 street is that, as described above, the recognition result of the description contents of the title column 24 in the step S2 of FIG. Recognized based on In addition, regarding the description of the sign of the large beam, the sign of the lower floor is usually omitted when the large beam of each floor having the same horizontal position but different vertical positions has the same sign. Since such omissions are described in the description rules of each design book, the floor line 3FL on the third floor and the two line segments under the R beam G1 and parallel to the floor line 3FL Based on the above, the two parallel line segments are recognized as the third floor girder G1, and similarly, the second floor girder G1 is also recognized. In the case of the foundation beam FG1, based on the ground line (design GL) and two line segments in the vicinity of the foundation beam code FG1 and parallel to the ground line, the two parallel line segments are used as a basis. Recognized as a beam FG1. Further, it is recognized that the third and second floor beams G1 and the foundation beam FG1 are present at the same position as the beam G1 on the R floor (between the Y1 street and the Y2 street on the X2 street). The description of the Y2 axis group diagram of FIG. 11 is recognized in the same manner as the X2 axis group diagram of FIG.

  Further, the description contents of other design books (not shown) are recognized in the same manner.

  Next, in step S41, one member list is selected from all member lists such as a column list, a large beam list, and a small beam list based on a predetermined list selection method. The list selection method here is the same as in step S21 of FIG.

  Next, in step S42, one member is selected from the member list selected in step S41 based on a member selection method in a predetermined list. The member selection method here is the same as in step S22 of FIG.

  Next, in step S43, the same member as the member selected in step S42 (for example, a column indicated by the same reference numeral on the same floor) is searched from the files 3b of all design books, and the position of the searched member And all dimensional data relating to the member are extracted.

  Next, in step S44, for the members searched in step S43, whether or not the signs of the members attached to the same part of the building (members having the same position data) in each design book match. Determine. For those that do not match the determination result, information indicating where the code of which member is arranged where does not match what design book and what design book is created and stored in the second inspection result file 3d. To do.

  Next, in step S45, the dimension data corresponding to the dimension of the same part of a building is compared about the dimension extracted by step S43, and it is determined whether it corresponds. And about what does not correspond, the information which shows which dimension does not correspond by what design book and what design book is produced, and it memorize | stores in the 2nd test result file 3d.

  Next, in step S46, when all the members in the member list selected in step S41 are not selected, the process returns to step S42, the next member is selected, and steps S43 to S45 are performed. If all the members in the member list selected in step S41 are selected, the process proceeds to step S47. In step S47, when all the member lists have not been selected in step S41, the process returns to step S41, the next member list is selected, and steps S42 to S46 are performed. If all the member lists are selected, the process proceeds to step S48. In this way, the processes in steps S43 to S45 are performed for all members in all the member lists.

  Through the processes in steps S41 to S47, the member code attached to the same part is checked and the dimensions related to the members described in the same part are checked between the respective design books.

  Next, in step S48, the dimensions other than the dimensions related to the members checked in the processes in steps S41 to S47 (hereinafter referred to as “outside member dimensions”) are checked between the respective design books. That is, as for the dimensions outside the member, the dimensions of the same part described in each design book are compared with each other, and if there is a mismatch, the information is stored in the second inspection result file 3d. Here, the dimension outside the member includes a dimension between cores in the X direction, a dimension between cores in the Y direction, a dimension in the height direction, and the like.

  For example, for the core diagram as shown in FIG. 7, the third-floor pillar guide diagram of FIG. 8, and the R floor plan view of FIG. 9, the dimension between the cores X1 and X2 is 5400 (mm) as the dimension between the cores in the X direction. ), 5400 (mm) of the dimension between the cores X2 and X3 and 10800 (mm) of the dimension between the cores X1 and X3 are recognized, and the dimension between the cores Y1 and Y2 as the dimension between the cores in the Y direction. 10050 (mm) are recognized, and these dimensions are extracted from the file 3b of each figure. In addition, with respect to the X2 assemblage diagram of FIG. 10, 10050 (mm) of the dimension between the cores Y1 and Y2 is recognized as the dimension between the cores in the Y direction, and the ground line (design) is measured as the dimension in the height direction. 2200 (mm) from the GL) to the bottom of the foundation, 200 (mm) from the ground line (design GL) to the 1st floor line (1FL), and 4000 (mm) from each floor. Is recognized. In addition, in the Y2 axis assembly diagram of FIG. 11, the dimension between the cores X1 and X2 is 5400 (mm) and the dimension between the cores X2 and X3 is 5400 (mm) as the dimension between the cores in the X direction. Recognized height dimensions are 2200 (mm) from the ground line (design GL) to the bottom of the foundation, and 200 (height from the ground line (design GL) to the first floor line (1FL). mm) and 4000 (mm) of the height of each floor are recognized. These dimensions are extracted from the file 3b of each figure, and the dimensions of the same part among them are compared to determine whether or not they match. There is no dimension that does not match between these design books. For example, the dimension between the cores Y1 and Y2 is 10080 (mm) instead of 10050 (mm) in the X2 axis diagram of FIG. If this is described, the dimensions of this part do not match the dimensions described in the core diagram as shown in FIG. 7, the third-floor column guide diagram of FIG. 8, and the R-floor beam plan of FIG. . If they do not match, information indicating which dimension does not match what design book and what design book is created and stored in the second inspection result file 3d. In step S5, the check result stored here is displayed in the check result column of the dimension confirmation table shown in FIG. 14B, for example, “The dimension between the cores Y1 and Y2 is the X2 axis diagram. , Street core line map, 3rd floor column core guide map, and R floor beam plan map do not match. "

  Note that the processing in step S48 may be performed after step S40, and thereafter, the processing in steps S41 to S47 may be performed.

  Next, the processing of steps S41 to S47 described above will be described more specifically. For example, if the column list (FIG. 12) is selected in step S41 and the column C1 on the third floor is selected in step S42, the column C1 on the third floor is searched from the files 3b of all design books in step S43. Then, the data of the dimensions and positions regarding all the searched third-floor pillars C1 are extracted. For example, 700 mm is extracted as the dimension data of the width (dimension in the X direction) and the depth (dimension in the Y direction) of the pillar C1 on the third floor from the column list file 3b of FIG. Further, from the file 3b of the third-floor pillar guide map of FIG. 8, two pillars, that is, the third-floor pillar C1 (hereinafter referred to as pillar C1 (3F-X1,. Y1)) and the third floor column C1 (hereinafter referred to as column C1 (3F-X2 · Y1)) at the intersection of the X2 and Y1 streets. And as dimension data regarding the column C1 (3F-X1 · Y1), the width in the X direction is 700 (mm), the arrangement dimensions with respect to the core X1 are 350 (mm) and 350 (mm), and the width in the Y direction is 700 ( mm) and 400 (mm) and 300 (mm) of the arrangement dimensions with respect to the core Y1 are extracted. Similarly, as dimension data regarding the column C1 (3F-X2 · Y1), the width in the X direction is 700 (mm), the arrangement dimensions with respect to the core X2 are 350 (mm) and 350 (mm), and the width in the Y direction is 700. (Mm), 400 (mm) and 300 (mm) of the arrangement dimension with respect to the core Y1 are extracted. Other design books showing the column C1 (3F-X1 · Y1) include X1 axis group diagrams (not shown), Y1 axis group diagrams (not shown), and these design books. Similarly, the column C1 on the third floor is retrieved and its dimension data is extracted. In addition, as the design books showing the pillar C1 (3F-X2 · Y1), there are other X2 axis group diagrams (FIG. 10), Y1 axis group diagrams (not shown), etc. Similarly, the column C1 on the third floor is searched from the books, and its dimension data is extracted. For example, from the file 3b of the X2 axis diagram (FIG. 10), the dimension data relating to the column C1 (3F-X2 · Y1) is 700 (mm) in the width in the Y direction and 350 (mm) in the arrangement dimension with respect to the core Y1. ) And 350 (mm).

  Next, in step S44, it is determined whether or not the signs retrieved for the same member of the building in each design book match for the member searched in step S43. For example, the column C1 (3F-X2 · Y1) is retrieved from the third-floor column guide diagram of FIG. 8, and the column C1 (3F-X2 · Y1) is retrieved from the X2 axis diagram of FIG. If it is, it is determined that the codes match. Here, if the sign of the column on the Y2 axis in the X2 axis group diagram of FIG. 10 is C4, this column C4 is searched when the column C4 on the third floor is searched, for example. Thus, when the third floor pillar C1 is searched, it is not searched. As described above, when the column C1 (3F-X2 · Y1) searched in the third-floor column guide map is not searched from the X2 axis diagram, the third floor at the intersection of the X2 street and the Y1 street is displayed. It will be determined that the column codes do not match between the third-floor column core guide map and the X2 axis diagram. In such a case, that is, that is, information that the sign of the third-floor column at the intersection of the X2 and Y1 streets does not match between the third-floor column core guide map and the X2 frame assembly diagram. Is stored in the second inspection result file 3d. The check result stored here is stored in the check result column of the dimension confirmation table shown in FIG. 14B in step S5, for example, “3rd floor arranged at the intersection of X2 and Y1. The sign of the column does not match between the 3rd floor column core guide map and the X2 axis group map. " Such a code mismatch often occurs due to omission of correction when each design book is created and then corrected.

  Next, in step S45, the dimension data corresponding to the dimension of the same part of a building is compared about the dimension extracted by step S43, and it is determined whether it corresponds. For example, the dimension data corresponding to the dimension of the same part of the building with respect to the dimension data relating to the column C1 (3F-X1 · Y1) and the dimension data relating to the pillar C1 (3F-X2 · Y1) extracted in step S43. Judge by checking. For example, regarding the column C1 (3F-X2 · Y1), the width in the X direction and the width in the Y direction match in the respective design books, but the column C1 (3F) in the third-order column core guide diagram (FIG. 8). -X2 · Y1) arrangement dimensions with respect to the core Y1 400 (mm) and 300 (mm), and X2 axis arrangement diagram (FIG. 10) column C1 (3F-X2 · Y1) arrangement dimensions with respect to the core Y1 350 (mm) and 350 (mm) do not match. Therefore, information indicating that the arrangement dimension of the column C1 (3F-X2 · Y1) with respect to the core Y1 does not match between the third-floor column core guide map and the X2 axis group diagram is created, and is stored in the second inspection result file 3d. Remember. The check result stored here is displayed in step S5 with the content like the check result of No. 1 in the dimension confirmation table shown in FIG.

  When checking each column, for example, each column is checked in the order described in the column list. For example, after checking the third floor pillar C1, the second floor pillar C1, then the first floor pillar C1, then the third floor pillar C2, the second floor pillar C2, the first floor pillar C2,... In this order, the processes in steps S43 to S45 are performed.

  As described above, if the third floor column C3 (hereinafter referred to as column C3 (3F-X2, Y2)) at the intersection of the X2 and Y2 streets is checked, the column C3 (3F-X2, With regard to Y2), the width in the X direction and the width in the Y direction are the same in the respective design books, but the core Y2 of the column C3 (3F-X2 · Y2) in the third-floor column core guide diagram (FIG. 8) 300 (mm) and 400 (mm) of the arrangement dimensions with respect to X, and the arrangement dimensions 350 (mm) and 350 (mm) with respect to the core Y2 as shown in the column C3 (3F-X2 · Y2) of the X2 axis group diagram (FIG. 10) ) Does not match. Therefore, information indicating that the arrangement dimension with respect to the core Y2 of the column C3 (3F-X2 · Y2) does not match between the third-floor column core guide map and the X2 axis group diagram is created, and is stored in the second inspection result file 3d. Remember. The check result stored here is displayed in step S5 as content such as the check result of number 2 in the dimension confirmation table shown in FIG. 14B.

  As described above, when the consistency check between the design books related to the columns is completed, for example, the consistency check between the design books related to the large beam is performed in the same manner. The order of the types of members to be checked is determined in advance in the order of, for example, columns, large beams, foundation beams, small beams, walls,.

  For example, if the large beam list is selected in step S41 and the R beam O1 G1 (FIG. 13) is selected in step S42, the R beam O1 G1 is searched from all design book files 3b in step S43. Then, the dimension data described with respect to all the searched R beams O1 are extracted. For example, from the large beam list file 3b of FIG. 13, 600 (mm) of the dimension data of the width of the large beam G1 on the R floor and 1000 (mm) of the dimension data of the beam back (dimension in the height direction) are extracted. Further, from the file 3b of the R-floor beam map of FIG. 9, the large beam G1 between the Y1 and Y2 of X1 (hereinafter referred to as the large beam G1 (RF-X1-Y1 · Y2)) is described as the large beam G1 on the R floor. ) And a large beam G1 between Y1 and Y2 in X2 (hereinafter referred to as large beam G1 (RF-X2-Y1 • Y2)). Here, the dimension data is not extracted because it is not described. Further, the large beam G1 (RF-X1-Y1, Y2) and the large beam G1 (RF-X2-Y1, Y2) are searched from the file 3b of the other design book, and all the dimensional data regarding each searched large beam are obtained. Extract. For example, as dimension data relating to the large beam G1 (RF-X2-Y1, Y2), for example, 1000 (mm) of the beam back is extracted from the file 3b of the X2 axis group diagram (FIG. 10). Of the extracted dimension data, the same dimension data is compared to determine whether or not they match. About the dimension data extracted from the file 3b of the large beam list (FIG. 13) and the X2 axis group diagram (FIG. 10), the dimension data of the beam back is related to the large beam G1 (RF-X2-Y1 · Y2). Match. If there is dimension data that does not match, information to that effect is created and stored in the second inspection result file 3d. For example, when the beam back dimension of the large beam G1 (RF-X1-Y1 · Y2) does not match between the large beam list and the X1 axis group diagram, information to that effect is created and the second inspection result file 3d To remember.

  When checking each beam, for example, each beam is checked in the order described in the beam list. For example, after checking the R-beam G1, the third-floor G1, the second-floor G1, the R-floor G11, the third-floor G11, the second-floor G11, and so on. Processing in steps S43 to S45 is performed.

  Similarly, other members are checked using the data of the respective member lists and other design books.

  After the process up to step S4 in FIG. 2 is completed as described above, in step S5, the member list confirmation table as shown in FIG. 14A and the member list confirmation table as shown in FIG. Display the dimension confirmation table on the screen. Further, by operating the operation input unit 7, it is possible to print and output with the printer 6.

  By looking at the member list confirmation table and the dimension confirmation table, designers and the like can correct errors and deficiencies to correct contents.

  Further, by operating the operation input unit 7 after the inspection is completed, each design book can be displayed on the screen of the display 5 or printed and output by the printer 6. In this case, when the operator performs an operation for displaying or printing out the design book on the operation input unit 7, the CPU 1 causes each design book file 3b based on a signal input from the operation input unit 7. Is read out and output to the display 5 or the printer 6, the design book is displayed on the screen of the display 5 or printed out on the printer 6.

  In addition to outputting the inspection result as a member list confirmation table and a dimension confirmation table, the inspection result is directly reflected in each design document when the screen is displayed on the display 5 or printed out on the printer 6. You can also In this case, when the operator performs an operation for displaying or printing out the design book with the inspection result on the operation input unit 7, the CPU 1 performs each operation based on the signal input from the operation input unit 7. The data of the design book file 3b and the inspection result files 3c and 3d are read, and the data of the inspection result files 3c and 3d and the data of the design book file 3b are synthesized so that the design book with the inspection results is displayed on the screen or printed out. Then, by outputting to the display 5 or the printer 6, the design book with the inspection result is displayed on the screen of the display 5 or printed out on the printer 6. In this case, the check result of the member list confirmation table is displayed on the screen or printed out with the check result written in the individual column of the member that is the target of the check result. For example, as shown in FIG. 15, in the case of a column list, “the column hoop diameter and pitch are not written” in the individual column of the column C2 on the third floor that is the target of the check result. Similarly, in the individual column of the column C2 on the first floor, the indication “the number of main bars of the columns does not match” is displayed on the screen or printed out. The same applies to other member lists such as a large beam list. As for the check result of the dimension confirmation table, the check result is displayed on a screen or printed out, for example, in a blank area or a title column of a drawing such as an axis diagram that is the target of the check result.

  In the present embodiment, deficiencies and contradictions in a design document consisting of a large number of drawings and the like can be automatically detected without human manual work, and the design book inspection time is greatly reduced. be able to. For example, in human manual work, the inspection time, which took tens of days or months, is reduced to several tens of minutes, although there is a slight difference depending on the data amount of the design book and the processing capacity of the CPU 1. It becomes possible. In addition, there are no oversights due to human manual work.

  In the present embodiment, a program for inspecting a building design book has been described. However, the present invention can be applied to a design drawing inspection program for structures other than buildings, for example, various industrial products. In this case, if there is no member list such as a building design book, for example, instead of step S3 and step S4, between the design drawings, the same design object described in each design drawing is used. The dimensions corresponding to the portions are compared with each other, and if there is a mismatch, the information may be stored in the inspection result file.

  The CPU 1 and the memories 2 and 3 are configured by a calculation device such as a microcomputer. However, this calculation device does not necessarily need to be configured by a single calculation device, and a plurality of calculation devices are distributedly arranged. , They may be configured to cooperate to execute the process of the design drawing inspection apparatus.

  The design drawing inspection program according to the present invention is useful as a design drawing inspection program used in an apparatus for automatically detecting inconsistencies in design drawings of structures such as buildings and industrial products.

It is a block diagram which shows the structure of the design drawing inspection apparatus of embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the operation | movement of the outline of the design drawing inspection apparatus of embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the process of step S3 of FIG. 2 in detail. It is a flowchart which shows an example of the detailed process of step S23 of FIG. It is a flowchart which shows the process of step S4 of FIG. 2 in detail. It is a perspective view which shows typically the main frame | skeleton part of the building shown by the design book of an example of the test object by the design drawing test | inspection apparatus of embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows a core diagram which is one of the design books which make the building of FIG. 6 a design object. It is a figure which shows the 3rd-floor pillar core guide map which is one of the design books which make the building of FIG. 6 a design object. It is a figure which shows the R floor beam plan which is one of the design books which make the building of FIG. 6 a design object. It is a figure which shows an X2 axis-set figure which is one of the design books which make the building of FIG. 6 a design object. It is a figure which shows a Y2 way axis group figure which is one of the design books which make the building of FIG. 6 a design object. It is a figure which shows the pillar list | wrist which is one of the design books which make the building of FIG. 6 a design object. FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a large beam list which is one of design books for which the building of FIG. 6 is designed. (A) is a figure which shows the example of an output display by step S5 of the check result by step S3 of FIG. 2, (b) is a figure which shows the output display example by step S5 of the check result by step S4 of FIG. is there. It is a figure which shows the example by which the check result was directly described and output to the column list.

Explanation of symbols

1 CPU
2 First memory 3 Third memory 4 Data input unit 5 Display 6 Printer 7 Operation input unit

Claims (6)

In order to detect contradictions in a design drawing composed of electronic data provided with a column for describing information relating to reinforcing bars in members constituting the building by figures and a column for describing the number of reinforcing bars in the members by letters Computer
Description information recognition means for recognizing information on the reinforcing bar described by a graphic and the number of reinforcing bars described by characters from the design drawing based on a description rule of the design drawing;
Reinforcing bar number acquisition means for acquiring the number of reinforcing bars in the member based on information on the reinforcing bars described by the graphic recognized by the description information recognition means;
The number of reinforcing bars in the member obtained by the reinforcing bar number acquisition means is compared with the number of reinforcing bars described by the characters recognized by the description information recognition means, and the design drawing is based on the comparison result. A design drawing inspection program for functioning as a contradiction detection means for detecting a contradiction in a program. In the column described by the figure, the cross section of the reinforcing bar in the pillar constituting the building is shown.
The design drawing inspection program according to claim 1, wherein the reinforcing bar number acquisition unit acquires the number of reinforcing bars in the column by counting the number of cross sections of the reinforcing bars. In the column described by the figure, the cross sections of the upper and lower bars in the beam constituting the building are shown, and in the column described by the letters, the numbers of the upper and lower bars in the beam are shown, respectively. ,
The reinforcing bar number acquisition means acquires the number of upper and lower bars in the beam by counting the number of cross sections of the upper and lower bars.
The contradiction point detecting unit compares the number of upper end bars in the beam obtained by the reinforcing bar number acquiring unit and the number of upper end bars described by the characters recognized by the description information recognition unit, and The number of the bottom bars in the beam obtained by the reinforcing bar number acquisition means is compared with the number of the bottom bars described by the characters recognized by the description information recognition means, and the design drawing is based on the comparison result. The design drawing inspection program according to claim 1, wherein a contradiction is detected. The column described by the graphic further shows the cross section of the abdominal muscles in the beam constituting the building, and the column described by the letters further shows the number of the abdominal muscles in the beam,
The reinforcing bar number acquisition means further acquires the number of abs in the beam by counting the number of cross sections of the abs.
The contradiction point detecting means further compares the number of abs in the beam obtained by the reinforcing bar number acquisition means and the number of abs described by the characters recognized by the description information recognition means, and the comparison result The design drawing inspection program according to claim 3, wherein an inconsistency in the design drawing is detected based on the design drawing. The description information recognizing means is based on the description rule of the design drawing when the number of reinforcing bars to be described using information or characters related to the reinforcement to be described using graphics in the design drawing is not described. Recognizing that the information on the reinforcing bars or the number of reinforcing bars is not described,
5. The design drawing inspection program according to claim 1, wherein the contradiction point detecting unit detects that information on the reinforcing bars recognized by the description information recognition unit or the number of reinforcing bars is not described. . A design drawing for detecting a contradiction in a design drawing constituted by electronic data provided with a column for describing information relating to reinforcing bars in members constituting the building by a figure and a column for describing the number of reinforcing bars in the members by characters An inspection device,
Description information recognition means for recognizing information on the reinforcing bar described by a graphic and the number of reinforcing bars described by characters from the design drawing based on a description rule of the design drawing;
Reinforcing bar number acquisition means for acquiring the number of reinforcing bars in the member based on information on the reinforcing bars described by the graphic recognized by the description information recognition means;
The number of reinforcing bars in the member obtained by the reinforcing bar number acquisition means is compared with the number of reinforcing bars described by the characters recognized by the description information recognition means, and the design drawing is based on the comparison result. A design drawing inspection apparatus comprising: a contradiction detecting means for detecting a contradiction of

Images