Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4292091B2 - Joined rebar and rebar joining method - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4292091B2 - Joined rebar and rebar joining method - Google Patents

Joined rebar and rebar joining method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4292091B2
JP4292091B2 JP2004038433A JP2004038433A JP4292091B2 JP 4292091 B2 JP4292091 B2 JP 4292091B2 JP 2004038433 A JP2004038433 A JP 2004038433A JP 2004038433 A JP2004038433 A JP 2004038433A JP 4292091 B2 JP4292091 B2 JP 4292091B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
reinforcing bar
rebar
flame
joining method
joint
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP2004038433A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2005224856A (en
Inventor
徹 茂木
寿二 天野
敏 山下
浩二 神谷
修 山口
茂樹 宮口
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tokyo Gas Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Tokyo Gas Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tokyo Gas Co Ltd filed Critical Tokyo Gas Co Ltd
Priority to JP2004038433A priority Critical patent/JP4292091B2/en
Publication of JP2005224856A publication Critical patent/JP2005224856A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4292091B2 publication Critical patent/JP4292091B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Pressure Welding/Diffusion-Bonding (AREA)

Description

本発明は接合鉄筋と鉄筋接合方法に関し、特に、建築現場でコンクリート埋込用の鉄筋などを接合しながら配筋していくときになどに形成される接合鉄筋とその鉄筋接合方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a bonded reinforcing bar and a reinforcing bar bonding method, and more particularly to a bonded reinforcing bar formed when a reinforcing bar for embedding concrete and the like is arranged at a construction site and the like, and a reinforcing bar bonding method thereof.

建築現場などで鉄筋を繋ぎ合わせることが行われる。継手の形態として、ガス圧接継手、溶接継手、機械式継手などが挙げられる。ガス圧接継手は、2本の鉄筋を端部同士で突き合わせ、圧縮力を加えながら当該突き合わせ部を火炎で加熱し、接合端面を溶かすことなく赤熱状態となった加熱部分を膨らみ部として接合する継手形態である。従来、加熱源には酸素−アセチレン炎が用いられており、酸素−アセチレン燃焼は強還元炎であり高温であることから、接合面(密着面)は酸化膜の残留のきわめて少ない良好な接合面となり、満足な圧接継手が得られている。また、酸素−アセチレン炎を用いた圧接では、加熱用バーナーに低酸素比条件で還元炎を形成し、突き合わせ部を加熱して赤熱状態として密着面を形成するいわゆる前期加熱の後、作業者は後期加熱として、燃焼酸素比を増加させて還元炎を中性炎に切り換え、加熱用バーナーを左右に振って巾焼きを行いながらさらに圧縮することにより、なだらかな丸みをおびた膨らみ部を接合部に形成するようにしている。   Connecting rebars at construction sites. Examples of the joint form include a gas pressure joint, a weld joint, and a mechanical joint. A gas pressure welding joint is a joint in which two rebars are butted together at the ends, the butted portion is heated with a flame while applying a compressive force, and the heated portion that is in a red-hot state is melted without melting the joining end face It is a form. Conventionally, an oxygen-acetylene flame has been used as a heat source, and since oxygen-acetylene combustion is a strong reducing flame and is high temperature, the bonding surface (adhesion surface) is a good bonding surface with very little oxide film residue. Thus, a satisfactory pressure welded joint is obtained. In addition, in the pressure welding using an oxygen-acetylene flame, after the so-called pre-heating, in which a reducing flame is formed on a heating burner under a low oxygen ratio condition, and a butted portion is heated to form a contact surface in a red hot state, As the latter heating, the combustion oxygen ratio is increased and the reducing flame is switched to the neutral flame, and the heating burner is shaken to the left and right for further compression while performing further compression, so that the gently rounded bulge is joined. To be formed.

しかしながら、アセチレンガスは高価でありまた火力が強いため、被接合部の表面と中心部の温度に差ができ圧接性能に悪影響を受け易かった。また、一般的にアセチレンガスは危険度が高く取り扱いに慎重さが要求されると共に、アセチレン炎は逆火が起こりやすく、特に後期加熱で使用する中性炎では逆火が起き易い問題がある。   However, since acetylene gas is expensive and has a strong heating power, the temperature between the surface of the bonded portion and the center portion is different, and the pressure contact performance is easily affected. In general, acetylene gas has a high risk and requires careful handling, and acetylene flame is prone to backfire. In particular, a neutral flame used in later heating has a problem that backfire is likely to occur.

その問題に対処するための1つの方法として、特許文献1(特開2001−47255号公報)には、突き合せ面が密着されるまでアセチレンガスを使用して前期加熱を行い、その後、プロパンガス、LNG、エチレンガス、ブタンガス、メタンガス、エタンガス、プロピレンガス、水素ガスなどの1つ、またはそれらの混合ガスと切り換えて後期加熱を行うガス圧接方法が提案されている。   As one method for dealing with the problem, Patent Document 1 (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2001-47255) discloses that acetylene gas is used for the previous heating until the butted surfaces are brought into close contact, and then propane gas is used. , LNG, ethylene gas, butane gas, methane gas, ethane gas, propylene gas, hydrogen gas and the like, or a gas pressure welding method in which late heating is performed by switching to a mixed gas thereof.

特開2001−47255号公報JP 2001-47255 A

鉄筋のガス圧接において、特許文献1に記載のように前期加熱と後期加熱とで燃料ガス種を切り換えることにより、安全性の向上などいくつかの効果がもたらされる。しかし、一連の圧接工程中に燃料ガスの切り換えを行うことは大きな作業負担を伴い、また装置も複雑となる。天然ガスやプロパンガスなどはアセチレンガスに比べて安全性が高く、またアセチレンガスと比較して炭酸ガスの発生量も少なく環境面からも好ましいことから、前期加熱の段階から、天然ガスやプロパンガスのような飽和炭化水素燃料の使用が求められる。しかし、これらの燃料ガスは、アセチレンガスに比べて還元作用が弱く、接合面に酸化物が生成され易いために、接合品質上の問題から、前期加熱の熱源としてはこれまで使用に至っていないのが現状である。   In gas pressure welding of a reinforcing bar, as described in Patent Document 1, by switching the fuel gas type between the early heating and the latter heating, several effects such as improvement of safety are brought about. However, switching the fuel gas during a series of pressure welding processes entails a large work burden and complicates the apparatus. Natural gas, propane gas, etc. are safer than acetylene gas, and produce less carbon dioxide than acetylene gas, which is preferable from the environmental point of view. The use of saturated hydrocarbon fuel is required. However, these fuel gases are weaker in reducing action than acetylene gas, and oxides are likely to be generated on the joint surfaces. Therefore, these fuel gases have not been used as a heat source for the previous heating due to problems in the joint quality. Is the current situation.

本発明は、上記のような事情に鑑みてなされたものであり、接合のための熱源として当初から天然ガスのような飽和炭化水素系の燃料ガスを用いながら良好な接合面が形成されるようにした接合鉄筋、および該接合鉄筋の鉄筋接合方法を提供することを目的とする。   The present invention has been made in view of the circumstances as described above, and a good joining surface is formed while using a saturated hydrocarbon fuel gas such as natural gas from the beginning as a heat source for joining. It is an object of the present invention to provide a jointed reinforcing bar and a method for joining the reinforcing bars.

本発明者らは上記の課題を解決すべく、飽和炭化水素系の燃料ガスとして特に圧縮天然ガス(都市ガス)を用いて鉄筋の端面同士を接合する実験を、天然ガス−酸素予混合ガスの酸素比、火炎の形状、端面同士を衝接した鉄筋の圧接時の圧縮量(アップセット量と呼ばれている)などをいろいろと変えながら行った。その結果、燃焼条件およびまたは鉄筋の圧縮量を適切に選定することにより、前期加熱の段階から天然ガスを燃料ガスとして用いて接合を行っても、アセチレンガスを用いて接合した場合と同等の接合強度を持つ接合鉄筋を得られることを知った。また、その条件を満たして造られた接合鉄筋は、接合部に形成される膨らみ部の形状が、アセチレンガス圧接による従来の方法により造られた接合鉄筋での膨らみ部の形状と比較して、急峻な立ち上がりを持つ、いわばつば型形状をなすことも知った。   In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present inventors conducted an experiment in which the end surfaces of reinforcing bars were joined using a compressed natural gas (city gas) as a saturated hydrocarbon fuel gas. The oxygen ratio, the shape of the flame, and the amount of compression (referred to as the upset amount) at the time of pressure welding of the rebar where the end surfaces were in contact with each other were varied. As a result, by appropriately selecting the combustion conditions and / or the amount of compression of the reinforcing bars, even when joining using natural gas as the fuel gas from the previous heating stage, joining equivalent to joining using acetylene gas I learned that I could get a strong joint. In addition, the joint rebar made to meet that condition has a shape of the bulge part formed in the joint part, compared with the shape of the bulge part in the joint rebar made by the conventional method by acetylene gas pressure welding, I also learned that it has a so-called brim shape with a steep rise.

本発明は上記の知見に基づいてなされたものであり、本発明による端部同士を接合した接合鉄筋は、その接合部の膨らみ部の長さをA、直径をB、鉄筋径をDとしたときに、A/D≦1.30およびB/D≧1.75の条件を膨らみ部が満たしていることを特徴とする。後の実施例に示すように、圧縮天然ガス流量と酸素流量とを同じ条件で同種の鉄筋の接合を行っても、膨らみ部の形状がA/D≦1.30およびB/D≧1.75の条件を満たさないものは、曲げ試験の合格率がきわめて低いものとなった。   The present invention has been made on the basis of the above findings, and in the joined rebar that joins the end portions according to the present invention, the length of the swollen portion of the joined portion is A, the diameter is B, and the rebar diameter is D. Sometimes, the bulging portion satisfies the conditions of A / D ≦ 1.30 and B / D ≧ 1.75. As shown in the following examples, even when the same kind of reinforcing bar is joined under the same conditions of the compressed natural gas flow rate and the oxygen flow rate, the shape of the bulge portion is A / D ≦ 1.30 and B / D ≧ 1. Those not satisfying the condition of 75 had a very low pass rate of the bending test.

膨らみ部の形状が上記条件を満たすようにするには、従来のアセチレン火炎での圧接のように後期加熱時に接合部近傍を巾焼きすることなく、狭い範囲(接合面部分)に火炎を集中させておけばよく、それにより、容易につば型形状の膨らみ部が形成される。そして、膨らみ部の形状が上記の条件となった時点で、圧縮力を開放すればよい。   In order for the shape of the bulging part to satisfy the above conditions, the flame should be concentrated in a narrow area (joint surface area) without baking the vicinity of the joint during late heating, as in the case of pressure welding with a conventional acetylene flame. It suffices to form a bulge portion having a collar shape. Then, the compression force may be released when the shape of the bulging portion satisfies the above conditions.

すなわち、本発明は、2本の鉄筋を端部同士が衝接した状態とし、該衝接した部分とその近傍を加熱軟化させて2本の鉄筋を接合する鉄筋の接合方法であって、接合部の膨らみ部の鉄筋軸線方向の幅をA、軸線に直交する方向の最大直径をB、鉄筋径をDとしたときに、A/D≦1.30およびB/D≧1.75の条件を膨らみ部が満足するように、加熱条件を制御して接合を行うことを特徴とする鉄筋接合方法、および、前記の条件を膨らみ部が満足するように、鉄筋の圧縮量を制御して接合を行うことを特徴とする鉄筋接合方法をも開示する。A/D≦1.30およびB/D≧1.75の条件を膨らみ部が満足するように加熱条件と鉄筋の圧縮量の双方を制御して鉄筋の接合を行うことはさらに好ましい態様となる。後の実施例に示すように、後者の鉄筋接合方法の場合、鉄筋の圧縮量をα、鉄筋径をDとしたときに、α/D≧1.1の条件を満たすように鉄筋の圧縮量を制御して接合を行うことにより、十分な接合強度を備えた接合鉄筋を確実に得ることができる。   That is, the present invention is a method for joining reinforcing bars in which two reinforcing bars are brought into contact with each other and the two parts are joined by heating and softening the contacted portion and the vicinity thereof. The condition of A / D ≦ 1.30 and B / D ≧ 1.75, where A is the width of the bulge portion of the bulge portion in the rebar axis direction, B is the maximum diameter in the direction perpendicular to the axis, and D is the rebar diameter The reinforcing bar joining method is characterized in that the heating condition is controlled so as to satisfy the bulging part, and the compression amount of the reinforcing bar is controlled so that the bulging part satisfies the above conditions. There is also disclosed a reinforcing bar joining method characterized in that: It is a more preferable aspect to join the reinforcing bars by controlling both the heating conditions and the amount of compression of the reinforcing bars so that the bulging part satisfies the conditions of A / D ≦ 1.30 and B / D ≧ 1.75. . As shown in the following examples, in the case of the latter reinforcing bar joining method, when the reinforcing bar compression amount is α and the reinforcing bar diameter is D, the reinforcing bar compression amount so as to satisfy the condition of α / D ≧ 1.1. By performing the control while controlling, it is possible to reliably obtain a bonded reinforcing bar having sufficient bonding strength.

いずれの場合も、火炎を端部同士の衝接面を含む仮想平面内に実質的に固定した状態で鉄筋の加熱を行うことにより、安定して上記条件を満たす膨らみ部を持つ接合鉄筋を得ることができる。   In any case, by heating the reinforcing bar in a state where the flame is substantially fixed in a virtual plane including the contact surface between the end portions, a bonded reinforcing bar having a bulging portion that satisfies the above conditions stably is obtained. be able to.

膨らみ部の形状が、A/D≦1.30およびB/D≧1.75の条件を満たす形状、すなわち、つば型形状であることにより、接合部の曲げ強度が大きくなる理由は必ずしも明らかでないが、後期加熱により接合面近傍が局所的な加熱を受けかつ赤熱した面が加圧されて外側に膨出するように移動するときに、前期加熱時に接合面に発生した酸化膜は細かくちぎれながら徐々に外側に向けて押し出されていき、結果的に酸化膜の残留のない状態で、対向する端面の接合が完了した結果と推測される。   The reason why the bending strength of the joint portion increases due to the shape of the bulging portion satisfying the conditions of A / D ≦ 1.30 and B / D ≧ 1.75, that is, the collar shape is not necessarily clear. However, when the surface of the bonding surface is subjected to local heating by the latter heating and the red-heated surface is pressed and bulges outward, the oxide film generated on the bonding surface during the first heating is broken finely It is presumed that this is the result of gradually pushing outward, and as a result, the joining of the opposing end faces has been completed with no oxide film remaining.

しかし、前期加熱の過程で、接合面に酸化膜が形成されないようにすることは、より強い曲げ強度を備えた接合鉄筋を得るのに好ましい。前記したように、加熱を天然ガスのように飽和炭化水素を主成分とする燃料ガスと酸素の予混合気で行う場合、アセチレン−酸素火炎に比べて火炎の還元性は弱く、接合面が酸化されやすい。それを解消する方法として、本発明の好ましい態様では、少なくとも衝接した端部同士が密着するまでの前期加熱を、火炎と鉄筋とが接触しない状態で行うようにする。この加熱方法をとることにより、接合面に酸化膜が形成されるのを抑制することができ、接合部の曲げ強度が一層大きい接合鉄筋を得ることができる。後の実施例に示すように、燃焼条件によって最適値は異なるが、火炎先端と鉄筋表面との距離を10mm以下の範囲に保持することにより、酸化膜の殆どない接合面が得られることを確認した。   However, it is preferable that an oxide film is not formed on the joint surface in the course of the previous heating in order to obtain a joint rebar having a higher bending strength. As described above, when heating is performed with a premixed gas of oxygen and a fuel gas mainly composed of saturated hydrocarbons such as natural gas, the reducibility of the flame is weaker than that of the acetylene-oxygen flame, and the joint surface is oxidized. Easy to be. As a method for solving this problem, in a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the preheating until at least the contacted end portions are brought into close contact with each other is performed in a state where the flame and the reinforcing bar are not in contact with each other. By adopting this heating method, it is possible to suppress the formation of an oxide film on the joint surface, and it is possible to obtain a joint rebar having a greater bending strength at the joint. As shown in the following examples, the optimum value varies depending on the combustion conditions, but it is confirmed that a bonded surface with almost no oxide film can be obtained by maintaining the distance between the flame tip and the reinforcing bar surface within a range of 10 mm or less. did.

本発明によれば、燃料ガスとして、メタン、エタン、プロパン、ブタンなどの飽和炭化水素燃料、例えば圧縮天然ガスを用いて鉄筋の接合を行っても、アセチレンガスを燃料ガスとした接合鉄筋と同様の接合強度を持つ接合鉄筋を得ることができる。天然ガスのような飽和炭化水素燃料はアセチレンと比較して取り扱いも容易であり安全性も高くかつ環境にも優しいことから、本発明は新たな鉄筋の接合技術としてきわめて有効である。   According to the present invention, even when the reinforcing bars are joined using a saturated hydrocarbon fuel such as methane, ethane, propane, or butane, for example, compressed natural gas, as the fuel gas, the same as the joined reinforcing bars using acetylene gas as the fuel gas. It is possible to obtain a bonded reinforcing bar having a bonding strength of. Since saturated hydrocarbon fuels such as natural gas are easier to handle than acetylene, and are safer and environmentally friendly, the present invention is extremely effective as a new technique for joining reinforcing bars.

以下、図面を参照しながら本発明を実施の形態に基づき説明する。図1は本発明による鉄筋接合方法を実施するための装置の模式図であり、図2および図3はそこで用いるバーナー火口の2つの例を示す断面図である。また、図4は本発明による接合鉄筋の接合部の一例を示す図であり、図5は従来の圧接法により造られる接合鉄筋の接合部を示す図である。   Hereinafter, the present invention will be described based on embodiments with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an apparatus for carrying out a reinforcing bar joining method according to the present invention, and FIGS. 2 and 3 are sectional views showing two examples of burner craters used therein. FIG. 4 is a view showing an example of the joint portion of the joint rebar according to the present invention, and FIG. 5 is a view showing the joint portion of the joint rebar made by the conventional pressure welding method.

図1において、2本の鉄筋1a,1bは、圧接機2のクランプ3a,3bにより把持された状態で、その先端面同士を衝接させた姿勢に保持される。衝接面4を含む仮想平面内にバーナー火口5が位置するようにしてリング状のバーナー6が配置され、バーナー6には燃料ガス供給源7から、制御された量の圧縮天然ガスと酸素との予混合気が供給される。各バーナー火口5の火炎吹き出し方向は2本の鉄筋1a,1bの軸線Lに向かうようにされている。   In FIG. 1, the two reinforcing bars 1 a and 1 b are held in a posture in which their tip surfaces are brought into contact with each other while being gripped by the clamps 3 a and 3 b of the pressure welding machine 2. A ring-shaped burner 6 is arranged so that the burner crater 5 is located in a virtual plane including the abutting surface 4, and a controlled amount of compressed natural gas and oxygen are supplied to the burner 6 from a fuel gas supply source 7. The premixed gas is supplied. The flame blowing direction of each burner crater 5 is directed to the axis L of the two reinforcing bars 1a and 1b.

接合初期時(すなわち、前期加熱時)には、予混合気量およびバーナー火口形状などを調整することにより、燃焼火炎の先端が鉄筋1a,1bの表面に接しない状態とされる。鉄筋表面と火炎先端との距離は10mm以下とすることが熱効率の点から推奨される。前記の条件を満たすことを条件に、バーナー火口5は任意の形状とすることができる。しかし、本発明者らの実験では、後の実施例に示すように、バーナー火口5を図2または図3に示すようなメイン炎孔11の周囲に複数個のパイロット炎孔12を配置したタイプの構造とする場合に、メイン火炎はパイロット火炎により火口に保炎されて高い安定燃焼が実現できること、結果として良好な接合状態を得ることを確認した。従って、図2または図3に示すメイン炎孔11の周囲に複数個のパイロット炎孔12を配置したタイプのバーナー火口5を持つバーナー6を用いることが本発明の実施には推奨される。   At the initial stage of joining (that is, during the previous heating), the tip of the combustion flame is not brought into contact with the surfaces of the reinforcing bars 1a and 1b by adjusting the amount of premixed gas and the shape of the burner crater. It is recommended from the viewpoint of thermal efficiency that the distance between the reinforcing bar surface and the flame tip is 10 mm or less. The burner crater 5 can have an arbitrary shape provided that the above conditions are satisfied. However, in the experiments by the present inventors, as shown in a later embodiment, the burner crater 5 is a type in which a plurality of pilot flame holes 12 are arranged around the main flame hole 11 as shown in FIG. 2 or FIG. In the case of this structure, it was confirmed that the main flame was held in the crater by the pilot flame and high stable combustion could be realized, and as a result, a good joined state was obtained. Therefore, it is recommended to use the burner 6 having the burner crater 5 of the type in which a plurality of pilot flame holes 12 are arranged around the main flame hole 11 shown in FIG. 2 or FIG.

なお、図2のものは全体が1ピース構造であり、図3のものは製作の容易性から外筒5a内に内筒5bを嵌入した2ピース構造とされている。バーナー火口としての機能は両者とも同じである。   2 has a one-piece structure as a whole, and FIG. 3 has a two-piece structure in which the inner cylinder 5b is inserted into the outer cylinder 5a for ease of manufacture. Both functions as a burner crater.

図1に示すように2本の鉄筋1a,1bをセットし、圧接機2により衝接面4に所要の圧力をかける。その状態でバーナー火口5からの火炎により衝接面4およびそのごく近傍のみを加熱する。2本の鉄筋1a,1bの端面は平面加工されていることが好ましいが、施工現場に持ち込まれた状態の単なる切断面であっても差し支えない。平面加工がなされていれば衝接面はほぼ密着した面となり、単なる切断面の場合は通常隙間が存在する。いずれの場合も、火炎先端が鉄筋表面に接しない状態で鉄筋を加熱するので、アセチレン燃焼と比較して還元性の低い天然ガス燃焼による火炎であっても、衝接面に酸化膜が形成されるのを抑制できる。火炎からの熱により衝接面近傍は赤熱状態となり軟化する。鉄筋の衝接面4には圧接機2により所要の圧力をかけられており、軟化した部分は圧縮量(アップセット量)α分だけ圧縮され、接合部は次第に外側に押し出されるようにして移動し、図4に示すような膨らみ部20を形成する。   As shown in FIG. 1, two rebars 1 a and 1 b are set, and a required pressure is applied to the abutting surface 4 by the pressure welding machine 2. In this state, only the abutting surface 4 and its immediate vicinity are heated by the flame from the burner crater 5. The end surfaces of the two reinforcing bars 1a and 1b are preferably flat-finished, but may be a simple cut surface brought into the construction site. If flattening is performed, the abutting surface is almost a tight surface, and in the case of a simple cut surface, there is usually a gap. In either case, the rebar is heated in a state where the flame tip is not in contact with the surface of the rebar, so an oxide film is formed on the abutting surface even in the case of natural gas combustion, which is less reducible than acetylene combustion. Can be suppressed. Due to the heat from the flame, the vicinity of the contact surface becomes red hot and softens. The required pressure is applied to the abutting surface 4 of the reinforcing bar by the pressure welding machine 2, and the softened part is compressed by the amount of compression (upset amount) α, and the joint is gradually pushed outward. Then, a bulging portion 20 as shown in FIG. 4 is formed.

本発明の鉄筋接合方法において、リング状のバーナー6は加熱開始から終了まで図1で説明した位置に保持される。すなわち、従来のアセチレンガスによる圧接工法でのように、バーナーを横移動していわゆる巾焼きを行うことをしない。そのために、火炎による赤熱領域は狭い範囲となり、端面同士の圧縮によって生じる膨らみ部20の形状は立ち上がりが急峻なつば状の形状となる。それにより、衝接面が密着面となるまでの前期加熱段階で、接合面に酸化膜が形成された場合でも、それ以降のいわゆる後期加熱の段階で、接合面に形成された酸化膜は細かくちぎれながら徐々に外側に向けて押し出されるようになり、結果的に酸化膜の残留のない状態での接合部が完成する。実際の接合作業においても、巾焼きを要しないために作業者の負担も低減され、また、作業者が巾焼き技量を修得することも不要となる。さらに、巾焼きの作業工程を行わずに良好な接合鉄筋が得られることは、仮に鉄筋の接合を自動化する場合においては、巾焼き工程に相当する機構もしくは制御を必要としないこととなり、従来の自動ガス圧接装置と比較して、装置を簡略化できるメリットももたらされる。   In the reinforcing bar joining method of the present invention, the ring-shaped burner 6 is held at the position described with reference to FIG. 1 from the start to the end of heating. That is, as in the conventional pressure welding method using acetylene gas, the burner is not moved laterally so as to perform so-called “drawing”. Therefore, the red-hot region due to the flame becomes a narrow range, and the shape of the bulging portion 20 generated by the compression of the end surfaces becomes a brim shape with a steep rise. As a result, even if an oxide film is formed on the bonding surface in the early heating stage until the abutting surface becomes a close contact surface, the oxide film formed on the bonding surface in the later so-called later heating stage is fine. While being torn off, it is gradually pushed out toward the outside, and as a result, the joined portion without the oxide film remaining is completed. Even in the actual joining operation, the burden on the operator is reduced because no baking is required, and it is not necessary for the operator to acquire the skill of the baking. Furthermore, the fact that a good joint rebar can be obtained without performing the work process of the stake is that, in the case of automating the joining of the rebar, a mechanism or control corresponding to the stake process is not required, Compared to an automatic gas pressure welding apparatus, there is also an advantage that the apparatus can be simplified.

後の実施例に示すように、本発明者らの実験では、接合部の膨らみ部の長さをA、直径をB、鉄筋径をDとしたときに、A/D≦1.30およびB/D≧1.75の条件を膨らみ部が満たす場合に、アセチレンガス圧接での場合に求められる曲げ強度と同等の曲げ強度を持つ接合鉄筋が得られることが確認された。   As shown in the following examples, in the experiments of the present inventors, when the length of the bulge portion of the joint portion is A, the diameter is B, and the rebar diameter is D, A / D ≦ 1.30 and B When the bulging part satisfies the condition of /D≧1.75, it was confirmed that a bonded reinforcing bar having a bending strength equivalent to that required in the case of acetylene gas pressure welding can be obtained.

ちなみに、図5はアセチレンガス圧接での安全基準を満足する接合鉄筋を示しており、ここでの膨らみ部はまるみをおびたこぶ状であり、A/Dは1.14程度であり、B/Dは1.68程度となっている。   Incidentally, FIG. 5 shows a joining rebar that satisfies the safety standard in acetylene gas pressure welding, and the bulge portion here has a rounded hump-like shape, A / D is about 1.14, B / D is about 1.68.

以下、実施例により本発明を説明する。
[実施例1]
図1に基づき説明したガス接合装置と図2に示したバーナー火口を用いて、22個の試験体(鉄筋)について接合試験を行った。試験条件と結果を表1に示す。表1での実験条件の欄の図に示すように、試験環境をより過酷なものとする目的で、試験体の端面を斜めに切断し、端部同士を衝接したときにほぼ5mmの隙間が上縁部に形成されるようにした。すべての試験において、天然ガス流量は4.00Nm/h、酸素流量4.45Nm/hとした(酸素比:0.48)。火炎の先端と試験体表面との間には、試験開始時において約5mmの隙間が形成されるように火炎長の調節を行った。
Hereinafter, the present invention will be described by way of examples.
[Example 1]
Using the gas bonding apparatus described based on FIG. 1 and the burner crater shown in FIG. 2, a bonding test was performed on 22 specimens (rebars). Table 1 shows the test conditions and results. As shown in the figure in the column of the experimental conditions in Table 1, a gap of about 5 mm is obtained when the end surfaces of the specimen are cut obliquely and the ends are brought into contact with each other for the purpose of making the test environment more severe. Was formed at the upper edge. In all tests, natural gas flow rate was 4.00Nm 3 / h, the oxygen flow rate 4.45Nm 3 / h (oxygen ratio: 0.48). The flame length was adjusted so that a gap of about 5 mm was formed between the tip of the flame and the surface of the test body at the start of the test.

試験体1〜10は比較例に相当するものであり、膨らみ部の形状を従来のアセチレンガス圧接での接合鉄筋の膨らみ部の形状に近似するようにした。そのために、接合面が密着(前期加熱)後に、リング状のバーナーを横移動して巾焼きを行った。試験体11〜22は実施例に相当するものであり、加熱開始から終了までリング状のバーナーの位置を固定して加熱した。   The test bodies 1 to 10 correspond to comparative examples, and the shape of the bulge portion was approximated to the shape of the bulge portion of the jointed rebar in the conventional acetylene gas pressure welding. For this purpose, after the bonded surfaces were in close contact (heating in the previous period), the ring-shaped burner was moved laterally to perform baking. The test bodies 11 to 22 correspond to the examples, and were heated by fixing the position of the ring-shaped burner from the start to the end of heating.

試験体11〜22でのA/Dは1.17から1.30の範囲で、平均は1.26であり、B/Dは1.75から1.90の範囲で、平均は1.83である。接合完了後の試験体11〜22について、膨らみ部を研削して落とし90°曲げ試験(JIS G3112に準じた試験)を行ったところ、すべて合格品(接合部に破断が生じない)であった。   The A / D in the test bodies 11 to 22 is in the range of 1.17 to 1.30, the average is 1.26, the B / D is in the range of 1.75 to 1.90, and the average is 1.83. It is. About the test bodies 11-22 after completion of joining, when the bulging part was ground and dropped and subjected to a 90 ° bending test (test according to JIS G3112), all were acceptable products (no breakage occurred in the joined part). .

試験体1〜10でのA/Dは1.41から1.55の範囲で、平均は1.45であり、B/Dは1.67から1.72の範囲で、平均は1.68である。接合完了後の試験体1〜10について、試験体11〜22と同様にして90°曲げ試験を行ったところ、7個は不合格品(接合部に破断が生じた)であった。   The A / D in the test bodies 1 to 10 is in the range of 1.41 to 1.55, the average is 1.45, the B / D is in the range of 1.67 to 1.72, and the average is 1.68. It is. About the test bodies 1-10 after completion of joining, when the 90 degree bending test was done similarly to the test bodies 11-22, seven were unacceptable goods (a fracture | rupture produced in the junction part).

上記のことから、接合部の膨らみ部の形状が特定の形状(接合部の膨らみ部の長さをA、直径をB、鉄筋径をDとしたときに、A/D≦1.30およびB/D≧1.75の条件を満たす形状)となるように、接合部のバーナーによる加熱条件を設定することにより、燃料ガスとして天然ガスを用いて接合した本発明の接合鉄筋は、アセチレンガス圧接と同等の曲げ強度を持つ接合鉄筋が得られることがわかる。   From the above, the shape of the bulge portion of the joint is a specific shape (when the length of the bulge portion of the joint is A, the diameter is B, and the diameter of the reinforcing bar is D, A / D ≦ 1.30 and B /D≧1.75), the joining rebar of the present invention joined by using natural gas as the fuel gas by setting the heating condition by the burner of the joining portion is acetylene gas pressure welding. It can be seen that a bonded reinforcing bar with the same bending strength can be obtained.

Figure 0004292091
Figure 0004292091

[実施例2]
火炎の先端が鉄筋の表面に接する場合と隙間がある場合とでの接合面の良否を、実施例1と同じ装置および鉄筋を用いて試験した。天然ガス流量および酸素流量は実施例1と同じとし、火炎の先端が鉄筋表面に接している条件(表面から−5mmまで入り込む状態)、距離10mmの条件、距離23mmの条件、の3態様で、衝接面が密着するまで加熱を行った(前期加熱)。
[Example 2]
Using the same apparatus and rebar as in Example 1, the quality of the joint surface when the flame tip was in contact with the surface of the rebar and when there was a gap was tested. The natural gas flow rate and the oxygen flow rate are the same as those in Example 1, and in three modes: a condition in which the flame tip is in contact with the reinforcing bar surface (a state of entering from −5 mm from the surface), a distance condition of 10 mm, and a distance condition of 23 mm, Heating was performed until the impingement surface was in close contact (pre-heating).

それぞれの試験体の接合面をカッターにより切り込みを入れ、曲げ破断させて、破面の状況を目視により観察し、酸化層面積の割合を測定した。その結果を図6のグラフに示す。図6に示すように、火炎が鉄筋に接することにより酸化層面積は大きくなっており、火炎先端が鉄筋表面に接しない条件で接合作業を行うことにより、より安定した接合面が得られることを示している。   The joint surface of each specimen was cut with a cutter, bent and fractured, the state of the fracture surface was visually observed, and the ratio of the oxide layer area was measured. The result is shown in the graph of FIG. As shown in FIG. 6, the oxide layer area is increased by the flame coming into contact with the rebar, and a more stable joint surface can be obtained by performing the joining work under the condition that the flame front does not contact the reinforcing bar surface. Show.

[実施例3]
実施例1では、天然ガス流量:4.00Nm/h、酸素流量:4.45Nm/h(酸素比:0.48)の割合の予混合ガスを加熱用ガスとして用いて、良好な接合鉄筋を得ることができた。そこで、酸素比が与える接合面への影響を観察すべく、(a)天然ガス流量:4.03Nm/h、酸素流量:3.70Nm/h(酸素比:0.40)の割合の予混合ガス、(b)天然ガス流量:4.03Nm/h、酸素流量:4.10Nm/h(酸素比:0.44)の割合の予混合ガス、(c)天然ガス流量:4.03Nm/h、酸素流量:4.60Nm/h(酸素比:0.50)の割合の予混合ガス、3種の予混合ガスを燃料ガスとして、実施例1での試験体11〜22と同じようにして鉄筋の前期加熱を行い、接合試験を行った。
[Example 3]
In Example 1, a premixed gas at a ratio of natural gas flow rate: 4.00 Nm 3 / h, oxygen flow rate: 4.45 Nm 3 / h (oxygen ratio: 0.48) was used as a heating gas, and good bonding was achieved. I could get a reinforcing bar. Therefore, in order to observe the influence of the oxygen ratio on the joint surface, the ratio of (a) natural gas flow rate: 4.03 Nm 3 / h, oxygen flow rate: 3.70 Nm 3 / h (oxygen ratio: 0.40) Premixed gas, (b) natural gas flow rate: 4.03 Nm 3 / h, oxygen flow rate: 4.10 Nm 3 / h (oxygen ratio: 0.44) ratio of premixed gas, (c) natural gas flow rate: 4 0.03 Nm 3 / h, oxygen flow rate: 4.60 Nm 3 / h (oxygen ratio: 0.50) ratio of premixed gas, three premixed gases as fuel gas, and specimens 11 to 11 in Example 1 In the same manner as in No. 22, the reinforcing bars were heated in the previous period, and a joining test was conducted.

接合完了後の接合鉄筋の接合部に強制的に切り込みを入れ、接合鉄筋を曲げて破断し、その破面を目視により観察して、酸化層面積の割合を測定した。(a)ではほぼ20%であり、(b)ではほぼ0%であり、(c)ではほぼ1%以下%であった。(a)では酸素比が小さいことから火炎温度が低く作業時間の長期化を招き、大気中の酸素接触時間が長くなり酸化層面積が大きくなったと考えられる。(b)、(c)では実施例2の火炎が鉄筋表面に接しない場合とほぼ同程度である。このことから、酸素比は接合鉄筋の良否に影響を与えることがわかり、好ましくは、酸素比0.44程度以上で本発明による鉄筋接合方法を実施することにより、より安定した接合鉄筋が得られることがわかる。   A cut was forcibly made in the joined portion of the joined rebar after the joining was completed, the joined rebar was bent and broken, and the fracture surface was visually observed to measure the ratio of the oxide layer area. In (a), it was almost 20%, in (b) it was almost 0%, and in (c) it was almost 1% or less. In (a), since the oxygen ratio is small, the flame temperature is low and the working time is prolonged, and it is considered that the oxygen contact time in the atmosphere is increased and the oxide layer area is increased. In (b) and (c), it is almost the same as the case where the flame of Example 2 does not contact the reinforcing bar surface. From this, it can be seen that the oxygen ratio has an effect on the quality of the bonded rebar, and more preferably, a more stable bonded rebar can be obtained by carrying out the reinforcing bar bonding method according to the present invention at an oxygen ratio of about 0.44 or more. I understand that.

[実施例4]
接合強度と圧縮量(アップセット量)との関係を検討した。実施例1と同じガス接合装置を用い、3本を1グループとした7つのグループについて、鉄筋の圧縮量(アップセット量)αを変えながら接合試験を行った。試験条件と結果を表2に示す。実施例1と同様に、試験体の端面を斜めに切断し、端部同士を衝接したときにほぼ5mmの隙間が上縁部に形成されるようにした。鉄筋は外形直径D:32mmのものを用い、端面が衝接した2本の鉄筋の合計長さをL、接合処理終了後の鉄筋の合計長さをL−αとしたときの、αを鉄筋の圧縮量(アップセット量)αとした。
[Example 4]
The relationship between the bonding strength and the compression amount (upset amount) was examined. Using the same gas bonding apparatus as in Example 1, a bonding test was performed on seven groups in which three pieces were made into one group while changing the compression amount (upset amount) α of the reinforcing bars. The test conditions and results are shown in Table 2. In the same manner as in Example 1, the end face of the test body was cut obliquely so that a gap of about 5 mm was formed at the upper edge when the ends were brought into contact with each other. Reinforcing bars have an outer diameter D of 32 mm. When the total length of the two reinforcing bars whose end faces are in contact with each other is L, and the total length of the reinforcing bars after the joining process is L-α, α is the reinforcing bar. The amount of compression (upset amount) was.

すべての試験において、天然ガス流量は4.00Nm/h、酸素流量4.59Nm/hとした(酸素比:0.50)。また、火炎の先端と試験体表面との間には、試験開始時において約5mmの隙間が形成されるように火炎長の調節を行った。 In all tests, natural gas flow rate was 4.00Nm 3 / h, the oxygen flow rate 4.59Nm 3 / h (oxygen ratio: 0.50). Further, the flame length was adjusted so that a gap of about 5 mm was formed between the tip of the flame and the surface of the test body at the start of the test.

Figure 0004292091
Figure 0004292091

表2からわかるように、グループ1〜3は90°曲げ試験に合格したものはない。これは、いずれも、A/D≦1.30およびB/D≧1.75の条件を膨らみ部が満足していないことに原因があると考えられる。グループ4〜7はすべてが90°曲げ試験に合格している。これは、いずれのものも、膨らみ部がA/D≦1.30およびB/D≧1.75の条件を満足しているからと考えられ、そのときにα/Dの値はすべて1.1以上となっている。このことから、鉄筋の圧縮量(アップセット量)をα、鉄筋径をDとしたときに、α/D≧1.1の条件を満たすように鉄筋の圧縮量を制御して接合を行うことにより、十分な接合強度を備えた接合鉄筋が得られることがわかる。   As can be seen from Table 2, Groups 1-3 do not pass the 90 ° bending test. This is considered to be caused by the fact that the bulging part does not satisfy the conditions of A / D ≦ 1.30 and B / D ≧ 1.75. Groups 4-7 all passed the 90 ° bend test. This is presumably because the bulging portion satisfies the conditions of A / D ≦ 1.30 and B / D ≧ 1.75 in all cases, and the values of α / D are all 1. 1 or more. From this, when the reinforcing bar compression amount (upset amount) is α and the reinforcing bar diameter is D, the reinforcing bar compression amount is controlled so as to satisfy the condition of α / D ≧ 1.1. Thus, it can be seen that a bonded reinforcing bar having sufficient bonding strength can be obtained.

本発明による鉄筋接合方法を実施するための装置の一例を示す模式図。The schematic diagram which shows an example of the apparatus for enforcing the reinforcing bar joining method by this invention. バーナー火口の一例を示す断面図。Sectional drawing which shows an example of a burner crater. バーナー火口の他の例を示す断面図。Sectional drawing which shows the other example of a burner crater. 本発明による接合鉄筋の接合部の一例を示す図。The figure which shows an example of the junction part of the joining rebar by this invention. 従来の圧接法により造られる接合鉄筋の接合部を示す図。The figure which shows the junction part of the joining rebar made by the conventional press-contact method. 火炎先端と鉄筋表面との距離の違いによる酸化層面積の割合示すグラフ。The graph which shows the ratio of the oxide layer area by the difference in the distance of a flame front and a reinforcing bar surface.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1a,1b…鉄筋、2…圧接機、3a,3b…クランプ、4…衝接面、5…バーナー火口、6…バーナー、7…燃料ガス供給源、11…メイン炎孔、12…パイロット炎孔、α…鉄筋の圧縮量(アップセット量)   DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1a, 1b ... Rebar, 2 ... Pressure welding machine, 3a, 3b ... Clamp, 4 ... Contact surface, 5 ... Burner crater, 6 ... Burner, 7 ... Fuel gas supply source, 11 ... Main flame hole, 12 ... Pilot flame hole , Α: Rebar compression amount (upset amount)

Claims (6)

端部同士を接合した接合鉄筋であって、接合部の膨らみ部の長さをA、直径をB、鉄筋径をDとしたときに、A/D≦1.30およびB/D≧1.75の条件を膨らみ部が満足し、かつ、鉄筋の圧縮量をαとしたときに、α/D≧1.1の条件を満たしていることを特徴とする接合鉄筋。 A joint rebar in which ends are joined, where A / D ≦ 1.30 and B / D ≧ 1. Where A is the length of the bulge of the joint, B is the diameter, and D is the diameter of the rebar. A jointed reinforcing bar characterized by satisfying the condition of α / D ≧ 1.1 when the bulging portion satisfies the condition of 75 and the compression amount of the reinforcing bar is α . 2本の鉄筋を端部同士が衝接した状態とし、該衝接した部分とその近傍を加熱軟化させて2本の鉄筋を接合する鉄筋の接合方法であって、接合部の膨らみ部の鉄筋軸線方向の幅をA、軸線に直交する方向の最大直径をB、鉄筋径をDとしたときに、A/D≦1.30およびB/D≧1.75の条件を膨らみ部が満足し、かつ、鉄筋の圧縮量をαとしたときに、α/D≧1.1の条件を満たすように、加熱条件を制御して接合を行うことを特徴とする鉄筋接合方法。 A rebar joining method in which two rebars are brought into a state where the ends are in contact with each other, the contacted part and the vicinity thereof are heated and softened, and the two rebars are joined. the width of the axial a, the maximum diameter in a direction orthogonal to the axis B, and rebar diameter is D, the conditions of the a / D ≦ 1.30 and B / D ≧ 1.75 bulge is satisfied And the reinforcing bar joining method is characterized by controlling the heating conditions so as to satisfy the condition of α / D ≧ 1.1 when the compression amount of the reinforcing bars is α . 2本の鉄筋を端部同士が衝接した状態とし、該衝接した部分とその近傍を加熱軟化させて2本の鉄筋を接合する鉄筋の接合方法であって、接合部の膨らみ部の鉄筋軸線方向の幅をA、軸線に直交する方向の最大直径をB、鉄筋径をDとしたときに、A/D≦1.30およびB/D≧1.75の条件を膨らみ部が満足し、かつ、鉄筋の圧縮量をαとしたときに、α/D≧1.1の条件を満たすように、鉄筋の圧縮量を制御して接合を行うことを特徴とする鉄筋接合方法。 A rebar joining method in which two rebars are brought into a state where the ends are in contact with each other, the contacted part and the vicinity thereof are heated and softened, and the two rebars are joined. the width of the axial a, the maximum diameter in a direction orthogonal to the axis B, and rebar diameter is D, the conditions of the a / D ≦ 1.30 and B / D ≧ 1.75 bulge is satisfied And the reinforcing bar joining method is characterized by controlling the amount of compression of the reinforcing bar so as to satisfy the condition of α / D ≧ 1.1, where α is the compression amount of the reinforcing bar. 火炎を端部同士の衝接面を含む仮想平面内に実質的に固定した状態で鉄筋の加熱を行うことを特徴とする請求項2または3に記載の鉄筋接合方法。 The reinforcing bar joining method according to claim 2 or 3 , wherein the reinforcing bar is heated in a state where the flame is substantially fixed in a virtual plane including a contact surface between end portions. 加熱を飽和炭化水素燃料と酸素の予混合気で行い、衝接した端部同士が密着するまでの前期加熱は火炎と鉄筋とが接触しない状態で行うことを特徴とする請求項2または3に記載の鉄筋接合方法。 Subjected to heat in the premixed gas of the saturated hydrocarbon fuel and oxygen, year heating to abutment the ends are in close contact to the claim 2 or 3, characterized in that in a state in which no contact between the flame and rebar The reinforcing bar joining method described. 燃料が天然ガスであることを特徴とする請求項に記載の鉄筋接合方法。 The reinforcing bar joining method according to claim 5 , wherein the fuel is natural gas.
JP2004038433A 2004-02-16 2004-02-16 Joined rebar and rebar joining method Expired - Lifetime JP4292091B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004038433A JP4292091B2 (en) 2004-02-16 2004-02-16 Joined rebar and rebar joining method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004038433A JP4292091B2 (en) 2004-02-16 2004-02-16 Joined rebar and rebar joining method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005224856A JP2005224856A (en) 2005-08-25
JP4292091B2 true JP4292091B2 (en) 2009-07-08

Family

ID=34999970

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004038433A Expired - Lifetime JP4292091B2 (en) 2004-02-16 2004-02-16 Joined rebar and rebar joining method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4292091B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114559215A (en) * 2022-03-01 2022-05-31 中国化学工程第十四建设有限公司 Improved steel bar joint gas pressure welding method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2005224856A (en) 2005-08-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR101873126B1 (en) Friction stir welding method for steel sheets and method of manufacturing joint
CN106232279B (en) Step Design Weld Joint Groove
JP5415896B2 (en) Indirect spot welding method
KR102194358B1 (en) Friction stir welding method for steel sheets and method of manufacturing joint
JP2004306084A (en) Combined welding method of laser welding and arc welding
KR20140142226A (en) Method of welding structural steel and welded steel structure
JP4292091B2 (en) Joined rebar and rebar joining method
JP4139375B2 (en) Resistance welding electrode and resistance welding method
JP3702216B2 (en) Manufacturing method for inner and outer surface submerged arc welded steel pipes with excellent seam weld toughness
JP5625423B2 (en) Indirect spot welding method
US3071852A (en) Method of fusion bonding with a nitrogen trifluoride flame
JP6702135B2 (en) Method of joining dissimilar metal plates
JPH0557450A (en) Method for welding dissimilar metal
JP2010149142A (en) Gas pressure welding method
KR20120135966A (en) A spot welding electrode
JP4369763B2 (en) Gas pressure welding method using saturated hydrocarbon fuel gas and heating burner used therein
CN107914094A (en) Improve the device of welding uniformity
JPS643596B2 (en)
JPH10193164A (en) Method for improving fatigue characteristics of lap welded joint
JPH09277058A (en) Welding wire joining method
Yamamoto Advances in gas pressure welding technology for rails
JPH0550111A (en) Hot joining method for steel materials
JPH10249534A (en) Welding wire joining method
JP5825997B2 (en) Repair welding method for electroslag welding
US9156102B2 (en) Pressure welding using propylene

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20050909

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20080314

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20081111

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20090113

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20090324

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20090406

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4292091

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120410

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120410

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130410

Year of fee payment: 4

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130410

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140410

Year of fee payment: 5

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term