JP4325451B2 - Method for detecting surface defect of continuous cast slab and removing method thereof - Google Patents
Method for detecting surface defect of continuous cast slab and removing method thereof Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP4325451B2 JP4325451B2 JP2004082431A JP2004082431A JP4325451B2 JP 4325451 B2 JP4325451 B2 JP 4325451B2 JP 2004082431 A JP2004082431 A JP 2004082431A JP 2004082431 A JP2004082431 A JP 2004082431A JP 4325451 B2 JP4325451 B2 JP 4325451B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- mold
- slab
- defects
- flow velocity
- defect
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Continuous Casting (AREA)
Description
本発明は、連続鋳造法による鋳造中に発生する介在物に起因した表面欠陥の発生を検知し、さらにはその検知結果に基づいて鋳片における表面欠陥部分を除去する方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for detecting occurrence of surface defects caused by inclusions generated during casting by a continuous casting method, and further removing a surface defect portion in a slab based on the detection result.
一般に、連続鋳造機の操業では、良質の鋳片を得るために、連続鋳造鋳型内の流動状態がある一定の範囲内となるように、各種の方法を採用している。例えば、溶鋼流動状態の指標として、非特許文献1に示される、鋳型内の溶鋼流速測定などが行われている。 Generally, in the operation of a continuous casting machine, in order to obtain a high quality slab, various methods are adopted so that the flow state in the continuous casting mold is within a certain range. For example, as an indicator of the molten steel flow state, the molten steel flow velocity measurement in the mold shown in Non-Patent Document 1 is performed.
また、特許文献1には、鋳型冷却板内の湯面直下の位置に水平方向に測温素子を埋設し、ここから得られた温度情報と溶鋼温度および鋳造速度とから、凝固潜熱分を算出し溶鋼流動による熱伝達量を抽出し、伝熱工学的方法によって変換することにより好適な溶鋼流速を得る技術が開示されている。
これらの技術は、どちらかというと連続鋳造の最適条件を見出すことが目標である。
In Patent Document 1, a temperature measuring element is embedded in a horizontal direction at a position directly below the molten metal surface in the mold cooling plate, and the solidification latent heat is calculated from the temperature information obtained from the temperature, the molten steel temperature, and the casting speed. A technique for obtaining a suitable molten steel flow velocity by extracting a heat transfer amount by molten steel flow and converting it by a heat transfer engineering method is disclosed.
The goal of these techniques is to find the optimum conditions for continuous casting.
さらに、特許文献2には、湯面変動を検知する一方、電磁力を利用して鋳型内の溶鋼を制御し、最適条件での鋳造を実現するという制御技術が開示されている。 Further, Patent Document 2 discloses a control technique for detecting molten metal level fluctuations and controlling molten steel in a mold using electromagnetic force to realize casting under optimum conditions.
上記の3つの技術はいずれも、鋳造条件をある範囲内に制御することを主眼としているが、鋳造中に主に浸漬ノズルの詰まりによって発生する、異常流動や湯面変動を完全に抑制するまでには至っていないため、介在物に起因する表面欠陥を含む鋳片が、熱間圧延工程や、さらには冷間圧延工程に送り出され、その結果として製品欠陥の発生を招いていた。このような製品欠陥が発生すると、その欠陥部分を切断して除去しなければならないため製品歩留まりが著しく低下する。また、場合によっては代替素材を再圧延して全てを製造し直すことが必要となることがあり、製品の納期にまで影響が出る場合もあった。 The above three technologies are all aimed at controlling the casting conditions within a certain range, but until the abnormal flow and fluctuations in the molten metal level, which are mainly caused by clogging of the immersion nozzle during casting, are completely suppressed. Therefore, a slab containing surface defects caused by inclusions is sent to a hot rolling process and further to a cold rolling process, resulting in the occurrence of product defects. When such a product defect occurs, the defective part must be cut and removed, so that the product yield is significantly reduced. In some cases, it may be necessary to re-roll the alternative material and re-manufacture everything, which may affect the delivery date of the product.
一方、鋳片表面欠陥の検知技術については、特許文献3および4に開示された、鋳片表面疵による検知方法が知られている。しかしながら、これらの開示技術は、表面割れに伴う鋳片表面の凹凸を検知しているに過ぎず、いわゆる鋳片表面に介在物が捕捉された欠陥を検知する技術ではない。
また、特許文献5には、鋳型の温度変化からモールドフラックスが鋳片の外側に食い込んだ箇所を特定する技術が開示されているが、高速鋳造全盛の今日、ほとんどの表面欠陥が凝固シェルの内側に捕捉されていると考えられるため、すでに実用性を失った技術と考えられる。
Further,
連続鋳造における鋳片の表面欠陥発生位置を鋳片鋳造時にオンラインで検知するためには、鋳型内の溶鋼流動の指標として、溶鋼の流速や湯面変動等の情報を得た後、製品欠陥発生位置との対応関係を精査することが必須であるところ、上記した各従来技術は、鋳造条件を制御して介在物に起因した欠陥の発生を抑制する方法であり、発生した欠陥の位置の特定およびそれの除去に関してまで検討したものではない。また、その他の上記欠陥検出技術についても、検出が比較的容易な鋳片表面における割れ、あるいはモールドフラックスの食い込みによる欠陥が対象であり、製鋼工程で発生する介在物に起因した欠陥の検出には効果を発揮できないところに、課題が残されていた。 In order to detect the surface defect occurrence position of the slab in continuous casting at the time of slab casting, the product defect occurs after obtaining information such as the molten steel flow velocity and molten metal surface level as an index of molten steel flow in the mold. Where it is essential to closely examine the correspondence with the position, each of the above-described conventional techniques is a method for controlling the casting conditions to suppress the occurrence of defects caused by inclusions. And it has not been studied until now regarding its removal. In addition, other defect detection techniques described above are also for cracks on the slab surface that are relatively easy to detect, or defects due to the biting of the mold flux, and for detecting defects caused by inclusions generated in the steelmaking process. The problem was left where the effect could not be demonstrated.
そこで、本発明の目的は、正確で即時性の高い鋳片表面の介在物起因欠陥の検出方法および介在物起因欠陥の除去方法を提案することにある。 Therefore, an object of the present invention is to propose a method for detecting an inclusion-induced defect on a slab surface and a method for removing an inclusion-induced defect, which are accurate and have high immediacy.
発明者らは、従来技術が抱えている上述した問題を有利に解決するため、鋳型内の溶鋼流速と製品欠陥発生の対応関係について、調査研究を行い、本発明を開発するに至った。すなわち、本発明の要旨構成は、以下に示すとおりである。 In order to advantageously solve the above-described problems of the prior art, the inventors have conducted research on the correspondence between the molten steel flow velocity in the mold and the occurrence of product defects, and have developed the present invention. That is, the gist of the present invention is as follows.
鋳型上部から溶融金属を注入し、鋳型下方から鋳造鋳片を連続的に引き抜く連続鋳造に当たり、鋳型内湯面直下における溶融金属の流速を、鋳型の幅方向に300mmを超えない間隔で離間した複数箇所で、10秒を超えない時間間隔で測定し、その測定値が0.13m/sを下回ったときに、介在物に起因した表面欠陥が発生したものと判定することを特徴とする連続鋳造鋳片の表面欠陥検知方法。 In continuous casting in which molten metal is injected from the upper part of the mold and the cast slab is continuously pulled out from the lower part of the mold, the flow rate of the molten metal immediately below the molten metal surface in the mold is spaced apart at intervals not exceeding 300 mm in the mold width direction. The continuous casting casting is characterized in that it is determined that surface defects caused by inclusions occur when the measurement value is measured at a time interval not exceeding 10 seconds and the measured value falls below 0.13 m / s. A method for detecting surface defects on a piece.
上記に記載の表面欠陥検知方法において、介在物に起因した表面欠陥が発生したものと判定した後、この表面欠陥発生該当個所を含む鋳片表面部分を研削もしくは溶削して除去することを特徴とする連続鋳造鋳片の表面欠陥除去方法。 In the surface defect detection method described above , after determining that a surface defect caused by inclusions has occurred, the surface portion of the slab containing the surface defect occurrence corresponding portion is removed by grinding or welding. A method for removing surface defects from continuously cast slabs.
本発明によれば、鋳型内の凝固界面近傍の流速値を評価して介在物に起因した欠陥の発生を精度良く検知し、さらに、この検知結果に基づいて欠陥の該当位置を的確に除去することができる。 According to the present invention, the flow velocity value in the vicinity of the solidification interface in the mold is evaluated to accurately detect the occurrence of a defect due to inclusions, and the corresponding position of the defect is accurately removed based on the detection result. be able to.
以下に、本発明の構成の詳細、とくに発明者らの知見した内容について説明する。
発明者らの行った連続鋳造実験において、鋳型内の凝固界面近傍における溶鋼の流速を測定するとともに、鋳造後の鋳片欠陥を観察したところ、流速が低下したときに、その流速低下位置に対応する鋳片(冷延製品)の位置に、欠陥が発生していることがわかった。
図1は、鋳片長手方向位置と凝固界面流速ならびに鋳片上の製品欠陥発生相当位置の関係を開示したものであるが、この図に示すように、鋳型の幅方向に離間した位置Aおよび位置Bでの凝固界面流速を測定するとともに、鋳造後の鋳片上の欠陥を観察した。その結果、位置Bでの流速低下時に、鋳片の欠陥が発生していることがわかった。
The details of the configuration of the present invention, particularly the contents found by the inventors will be described below.
In continuous casting experiments conducted by the inventors, the flow rate of molten steel near the solidification interface in the mold was measured, and slab defects after casting were observed. It was found that a defect occurred at the position of the cast slab (cold rolled product).
FIG. 1 discloses the relationship between the position of the slab in the longitudinal direction, the solidification interface flow velocity, and the position corresponding to the occurrence of product defects on the slab. As shown in FIG. While measuring the solidification interface flow velocity in B, the defects on the slab after casting were observed. As a result, it was found that a slab defect occurred when the flow velocity at position B decreased.
ここで、位置Aとは鋳型内、短辺寄りの、一般に流速の大きい箇所であり、位置Bとは浸漬ノズル近傍でその影響から溶鋼流動が滞りやすい箇所であり、とくに位置Bにおける流速が0.13m/sを下廻るときに、多くの欠陥が発生した。このことは、凝固シェル界面での流速が、この値を超える場合には、介在物あるいは気泡が容易に凝固シェルに付着し、留まることができなくなる一方で、0.12m/sを下まわるときは確実にシェルに捕捉されることを意味するものである。 Here, the position A is a portion in the mold near the short side, where the flow velocity is generally large, and the position B is a portion where the molten steel flow is likely to stagnate in the vicinity of the immersion nozzle, and the flow velocity at the position B is particularly 0.13. Many defects occurred when below m / s. This means that when the flow velocity at the solidified shell interface exceeds this value, inclusions or bubbles easily adhere to the solidified shell and cannot stay, but when it falls below 0.12 m / s. It means that it is surely captured by the shell.
また、上記の流速測定位置は、鋳型内湯面直下の凝固界面とするが、それはメニスカス直下の−50 mm程度(付近)の位置とする。この位置と限定する理由は、凝固シェル厚みがおよそ1mmとなり、鋼板製造工程で発生するスケールを考慮すると、この厚みの部分に捕捉される介在物・気泡が最も表面欠陥になりやすいためである。 The flow velocity measurement position is the solidification interface just below the mold surface in the mold, but it is about -50 mm (near) just below the meniscus. The reason for limiting to this position is that the solidified shell thickness is about 1 mm, and the inclusions / bubbles trapped in this thickness portion are most likely to be surface defects in consideration of the scale generated in the steel plate manufacturing process.
次に、この知見を得るに到った実験結果を統計的に処理し、調査全欠陥数を対象として、欠陥に対応する流速値を0.01m/s単位で求めた。ここで求めた流速値の構成を累積度数率で表したものを、その構成比率を縦軸として、凝固界面での溶鋼の流速を横軸として、図2に示した。この図に示したように、閾値となる流速が0.13m/s未満の場合には、欠陥の検出率は95%以上となることがわかる。 Next, the experimental results to obtain this knowledge were statistically processed, and the flow velocity value corresponding to the defect was determined in units of 0.01 m / s for the total number of defects investigated. FIG. 2 shows the composition of the flow velocity value obtained here in terms of the cumulative frequency rate, with the composition ratio as the vertical axis and the flow velocity of the molten steel at the solidification interface as the horizontal axis. As shown in this figure, it can be seen that when the flow velocity serving as the threshold is less than 0.13 m / s, the defect detection rate is 95% or more.
さらに、図2中に、流速の閾値を横軸に示した数値とした各場合について、対応する欠陥が存在しない、すなわち誤検知となる比率を破線で示した。ここで示したように、閾値となる流速が0.13m/sを超えると、実際には欠陥がないにもかかわらず欠陥ありの判定をしてしまう、いわゆる過検知が急激に増加する。従って、欠陥を検知する際の流速の閾値は、0.13m/s、より好ましくは0.12 m/sとした。 Further, in FIG. 2, in each case where the threshold value of the flow velocity is a numerical value indicated on the horizontal axis, the ratio at which the corresponding defect does not exist, that is, erroneous detection is indicated by a broken line. As shown here, when the flow velocity serving as the threshold exceeds 0.13 m / s, so-called overdetection that causes the determination of the presence of a defect despite the fact that there is no defect is abruptly increased. Therefore, the threshold value of the flow velocity at the time of detecting the defect is set to 0.13 m / s, more preferably 0.12 m / s.
次に、発明者らは、流速の測定位置について調査研究を進めたところ、測定は鋳型の幅方向に間隔を置いた複数点、具体的には、熱電対Tを図3に示すような位置に埋設した測定点にて行うことが好ましい。ただし、この間隔は、最大で300mmまでとする。その理由は、この間隔であれば、鋳片における欠陥のほぼ全てを検出することが可能だからである。とくに、発明者らの研究によると、300mmを超えると、欠陥位置を見逃す割合が30%を超えることを確認した。したがって、流速の測定位置は、鋳型の幅方向に間隔を置いた複数点とし、その間隔を300mm以下とすることが好ましい。一方、測定点が増加することはコストの増加につながるため、この間隔を40 mm以上とするのがよい。
また、この測定点は、金属型(M)の厚み方向については、たとえばモールド鋼板の内面から13 mmの位置で、鋳型の引抜き方向については、たとえばメニスカスから50 mm程度下の位置に埋設することが好ましい。
なお、上記測定点の位置は、鋳型の構造、例えば、冷却スリットの間隔、測温素子を固定するためのボルト等を考慮して適宜に定めることが好ましい。
Next, the inventors conducted research on the measurement position of the flow velocity. As a result, the measurement was performed at a plurality of points spaced in the width direction of the mold, specifically, the position of the thermocouple T as shown in FIG. It is preferable to perform the measurement at a measurement point embedded in. However, this interval is up to 300 mm. The reason is that it is possible to detect almost all defects in the slab at this interval. In particular, according to the study by the inventors, it has been confirmed that when it exceeds 300 mm, the rate of missing the defect position exceeds 30%. Therefore, it is preferable that the measurement position of the flow velocity is a plurality of points spaced in the width direction of the mold, and the distance is 300 mm or less. On the other hand, an increase in the number of measurement points leads to an increase in cost, so this interval should be 40 mm or more.
The measurement point is embedded in the thickness direction of the metal mold (M), for example, at a position of 13 mm from the inner surface of the molded steel plate, and in the mold drawing direction, for example, at a position about 50 mm below the meniscus. Is preferred.
The position of the measurement point is preferably determined appropriately in consideration of the structure of the mold, for example, the interval between the cooling slits, the bolt for fixing the temperature measuring element, and the like.
さらに、流速値を測定する際の時間間隔は、10秒を超えない程度とすることが好ましい。すなわち、10秒を超えた場合には、やはり25%の欠陥の見逃しが生じるからである。ここで、流速測定時間間隔は、10秒以下、短いほど欠陥見逃しを防止する上で有利となるが、0.5秒より短かくしても検出精度の向上は見込めない。なぜなら、後述のように、望ましい流速測定方法には鋳型銅板温度を用いていることから、温度検出の時定数(立ち上がり、下がり時間)が0.5sより大きくなり、それより短い周期の変動が検出できないからである。 Furthermore, it is preferable that the time interval at the time of measuring the flow velocity value not exceed 10 seconds. That is, when 10 seconds are exceeded, 25% of defects are still missed. Here, as the flow velocity measurement time interval is shorter than 10 seconds, it is more advantageous in preventing defects from being overlooked. However, even if it is shorter than 0.5 seconds, improvement in detection accuracy cannot be expected. Because, as will be described later, the mold copper plate temperature is used for the desired flow velocity measurement method, the temperature detection time constant (rise time, fall time) is greater than 0.5 s, and fluctuations with a shorter period cannot be detected. Because.
以上述べた方法により検出した鋳片に含まれる介在物起因欠陥は、検出時に鋳型該当箇所が移動する速度から、機内を計算で追跡することによって求めた。欠陥に該当する鋳片位置をマーキングし、該当箇所が少ない場合にはその部分だけを研削し、また該当箇所数が多い場合には欠陥発生面全体を一律に研削または溶削して除去する。従って、その後の工程で介在物起因の欠陥が発生することをほぼ抑制できるようになる。 Inclusion-related defects contained in the slabs detected by the method described above were obtained by tracking the inside of the machine by calculation from the speed at which the mold-corresponding part moves at the time of detection. The position of the slab corresponding to the defect is marked, and when the number of corresponding parts is small, only that part is ground, and when the number of the corresponding parts is large, the entire defect occurrence surface is uniformly ground or melted and removed. Accordingly, it is possible to substantially suppress the occurrence of defects due to inclusions in subsequent processes.
ところで、介在物に起因する欠陥は、介在物そのものが多く存在することでその発生率が増加することは勿論であるが、介在物が鋼中に留まり凝固殻に補足されることが必ず必要とされる条件である。本発明で明らかとしたのは、従来定性的に流速が小さい場合に介在物補足の確率が増加し、逆に十分な流速を凝固界面に与えてやることで介在物補足を抑制できるとする、いわゆる洗浄効果について、より具体的にその閾値が0.13〜0.12m/sの範囲にあるという点である。 By the way, the defect caused by inclusions increases the occurrence rate due to the presence of many inclusions themselves, but it is always necessary that the inclusions remain in the steel and be captured by the solidified shell. Is a condition. It was clarified in the present invention that the probability of inclusion supplementation increases when the flow rate is small qualitatively, and inclusion supplementation can be suppressed by giving a sufficient flow rate to the solidification interface. More specifically, the so-called cleaning effect has a threshold value in the range of 0.13 to 0.12 m / s.
なお、流速測定の方法については特に限定する必要はないが、たとえば非特許文献1に記載された方法よりも、鋳造中に鋳型の幅方向に多数同時かつ一定時間間隔で連続的に流速を測定することが可能である、特許文献1記載の鋳型銅板温度による推定流速の求め方がより好適である。 The method for measuring the flow velocity is not particularly limited, but, for example, the flow velocity is continuously measured at a certain time interval in the mold width direction during casting more than the method described in Non-Patent Document 1. It is more preferable to obtain the estimated flow velocity based on the temperature of the mold copper plate described in Patent Document 1.
最終製品が冷延鋼板あるいはその表面処理製品となる、低炭素〜極低炭素鋼(0.0002〜0.04 mass%C)を、粘度0.4〜4.O Poiseのモールドフラックスを用いて、鋳造速度1.5〜3.0m/minで連続鋳造するに当たり、鋳片表面欠陥の検知および除去を行った。ここで、溶鋼の流速測定は、特許文献1に記載の方法に従って、鋳型の幅方向に200 mm間隔8点で行い、その計測結果を自動的に判定し、その判定結果に基づいて決定した、鋳片上欠陥判定位置にマーキシグし、その欠陥該当位置を鋳片厚み方向に1.5mm研削除去した。 Low carbon to ultra low carbon steel (0.0002 to 0.04 mass% C), the final product of which is a cold-rolled steel sheet or its surface-treated product, using a mold flux with a viscosity of 0.4 to 4.O Poise, casting speed of 1.5 to 3.0 In continuous casting at m / min, slab surface defects were detected and removed. Here, the flow velocity measurement of the molten steel was performed at 200 points at 8 points in the width direction of the mold according to the method described in Patent Document 1, and the measurement result was automatically determined and determined based on the determination result. Marking was performed at the defect determination position on the slab, and the defect corresponding position was ground and removed by 1.5 mm in the slab thickness direction.
ここで、研削除去する厚みは、流速測定位置と鋳造速度から判断し1〜2mmの範囲とし、平均値で1.5 mmとした。また、流速測定位置間隔を短くすることは、欠陥見逃しを防止する上で有利となるが、一方で測定点が増加することはコスト増加につながるため、経済的理由から200 mmとした。流速測定時間間隔は、0.5秒周期の流速測定を実施した。 Here, the thickness to be removed by grinding was determined in the range of 1 to 2 mm based on the flow velocity measurement position and the casting speed, and the average value was 1.5 mm. In addition, shortening the flow velocity measurement position interval is advantageous in preventing missed defects, but increasing the number of measurement points leads to an increase in cost, so it was set to 200 mm for economic reasons. For the flow rate measurement time interval, flow rate measurement with a period of 0.5 seconds was performed.
また、比較として、特許文献5に開示されている方法による欠陥の検出と、対応位置鋳片の欠陥除去を行った(従来例)。いずれの場合も、冷間圧延後おける欠陥の発生を調査したところ、本発明に従って欠陥の検知ならびに除去を行うと、従来に比べて、冷間圧延鋼板における欠陥発生が1/10に激減した。
For comparison, defects were detected by the method disclosed in
Claims (2)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004082431A JP4325451B2 (en) | 2004-03-22 | 2004-03-22 | Method for detecting surface defect of continuous cast slab and removing method thereof |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004082431A JP4325451B2 (en) | 2004-03-22 | 2004-03-22 | Method for detecting surface defect of continuous cast slab and removing method thereof |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2005262305A JP2005262305A (en) | 2005-09-29 |
| JP4325451B2 true JP4325451B2 (en) | 2009-09-02 |
Family
ID=35087380
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004082431A Expired - Lifetime JP4325451B2 (en) | 2004-03-22 | 2004-03-22 | Method for detecting surface defect of continuous cast slab and removing method thereof |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP4325451B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP5617293B2 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2014-11-05 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Slab surface state prediction method and slab surface state prediction apparatus |
| CN115069776B (en) * | 2021-03-16 | 2024-12-10 | 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 | A process online adjustment method based on hot rolling roll iron sheet classification |
-
2004
- 2004-03-22 JP JP2004082431A patent/JP4325451B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2005262305A (en) | 2005-09-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP3386051B2 (en) | Method for estimating flow pattern of molten steel in continuous casting, temperature measuring device for mold copper plate, method for determining surface defects of continuous cast slab, method for detecting molten steel flow, method for evaluating non-uniformity of heat removal in mold, method for controlling molten steel flow, Quality control method in continuous casting, continuous casting method of steel, estimation method of molten steel flow velocity | |
| CN101985166B (en) | A Method for Predicting Longitudinal Cracks of Continuous Casting Slabs | |
| Thomas et al. | Investigation of strand surface defects using mould instrumentation and modelling | |
| CN104392107B (en) | A kind of method that continuous casting billet initial crack is predicted based on force analysis | |
| JP2003181609A (en) | Method and apparatus for estimating and controlling flow pattern of molten steel in continuous casting | |
| CN102941330A (en) | Control method for online predication of surface crack of continuous casting sheet billet | |
| JP4259164B2 (en) | Quality monitoring device and quality monitoring method for continuous cast slab | |
| KR20180014367A (en) | Apparatus for predicting abnormality of continuous casting | |
| JP5779949B2 (en) | Breakout detection method in continuous casting | |
| US20130211738A1 (en) | Device and method for diagnosing cracks in a solidified shell in a mold | |
| JP6119640B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining surface defects in continuously cast slabs | |
| JP4325451B2 (en) | Method for detecting surface defect of continuous cast slab and removing method thereof | |
| KR20120110586A (en) | Method for predicting quality of slab using defect index of impurities comeing off submerged entry nozzle | |
| JP5867703B2 (en) | Prediction method of constraining breakout of cast slab in continuous casting and continuous casting method of slab using the prediction method | |
| JP2013111603A (en) | Method of evaluating mold powder in continuous casting and continuous casting method using the same | |
| Jenkins et al. | Investigation of Strand surface defects using Mold instrumentation and Modelling | |
| JP4802718B2 (en) | Method for predicting surface defect occurrence risk region in continuous cast slab and method for producing continuous cast slab | |
| JP3952580B2 (en) | Online quality judgment method and equipment for surface quality of slabs and steel slabs in continuous casting and ingot rolling | |
| CN116490301B (en) | Casting methods and related equipment | |
| JP5593801B2 (en) | Breakout prediction method for continuous casting | |
| JP5413054B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining surface maintenance of slab during continuous casting | |
| JP5915463B2 (en) | Breakout prediction method | |
| JP7001074B2 (en) | Prediction method of restrictive breakout and continuous casting method of steel | |
| JP3856686B2 (en) | Casting status monitoring system for continuous casting | |
| JP2006021218A (en) | Method for determining the amount of slab cutting |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20070301 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20070724 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20090217 |
|
| A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20090416 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20090519 |
|
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20090601 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120619 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 4325451 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120619 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130619 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140619 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
| EXPY | Cancellation because of completion of term |