Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4400166B2 - Method for removing non-metallic inclusion defect in metal strip - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4400166B2 - Method for removing non-metallic inclusion defect in metal strip - Google Patents

Method for removing non-metallic inclusion defect in metal strip Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4400166B2
JP4400166B2 JP2003349185A JP2003349185A JP4400166B2 JP 4400166 B2 JP4400166 B2 JP 4400166B2 JP 2003349185 A JP2003349185 A JP 2003349185A JP 2003349185 A JP2003349185 A JP 2003349185A JP 4400166 B2 JP4400166 B2 JP 4400166B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
defect
customer
marking
ultrasonic
inclusion
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2003349185A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2005114554A (en
Inventor
拓也 山崎
寧男 戸村
誠 荒谷
嘉秀 山本
英雄 久々湊
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Priority to JP2003349185A priority Critical patent/JP4400166B2/en
Publication of JP2005114554A publication Critical patent/JP2005114554A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4400166B2 publication Critical patent/JP4400166B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/02Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
    • G01N2291/023Solids
    • G01N2291/0234Metals, e.g. steel
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/04Wave modes and trajectories
    • G01N2291/042Wave modes
    • G01N2291/0427Flexural waves, plate waves, e.g. Lamb waves, tuning fork, cantilever
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/04Wave modes and trajectories
    • G01N2291/048Transmission, i.e. analysed material between transmitter and receiver

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)

Description

本発明は、鋼板等の帯状の金属帯を搬送しながら、当該金属帯に内在する欠陥を連続的に検出する探傷装置で得られた欠陥情報を基に欠陥部分を除去する方法に関する。なお、本発明は金属帯の荷姿がコイルおよびシートのどちらにも適用できる。   The present invention relates to a method for removing a defective portion based on defect information obtained by a flaw detection apparatus that continuously detects defects inherent in the metal band while conveying a band-shaped metal band such as a steel plate. The present invention can be applied to both a coil and a sheet in which the metal strip is loaded.

従来から、微細な非金属介在物欠陥等の金属帯内部の欠陥を検出し、合否判定を行って不良製品を顧客へ出荷しないようにすることが行われている。   Conventionally, defects inside a metal band such as fine non-metallic inclusion defects are detected, and a pass / fail judgment is made so that defective products are not shipped to customers.

金属帯内部の非金属介在物をはじめとする欠陥をオンラインで検出する代表的な探傷装置としては、漏洩磁束法による探傷装置と、超音波を利用した探傷装置をあげることができる。   As a typical flaw detection apparatus that detects defects such as non-metallic inclusions in the metal band online, a flaw detection apparatus using a leakage magnetic flux method and a flaw detection apparatus using ultrasonic waves can be given.

ところで、漏洩磁束法では、金属帯が厚くなると、磁束が表面に漏洩しにくくなり、金属帯の一種である鋼板への適用の場合、板厚が約0.5mm 以上の検査は不可能であるとされている。しかも、漏洩磁束は、鋼板表面からの距離に反比例して急激に減衰するために、鋼板の搬送パスラインの上下変動を±0.1mm 以内に制御する必要があると共に検出部と鋼板表面との隙間を 0.5mm以内に管理する必要があり、搬送中の鋼板への適用、特に搬送速度が速い状態での連続的な探傷への適用は困難である。さらに、ノイズ要因が多いという問題もある。   By the way, in the leakage magnetic flux method, when the metal band becomes thick, it becomes difficult for the magnetic flux to leak to the surface, and when it is applied to a steel plate that is a kind of metal band, it is impossible to inspect the plate thickness of about 0.5 mm or more. Has been. Moreover, since the magnetic flux leakage attenuates abruptly in inverse proportion to the distance from the steel plate surface, it is necessary to control the vertical fluctuation of the conveyance path line of the steel plate to within ± 0.1 mm and the gap between the detector and the steel plate surface. Must be controlled within 0.5 mm, and it is difficult to apply it to steel plates being transported, especially for continuous flaw detection with a high transport speed. There is also a problem that there are many noise factors.

以下では、対象とする金属帯として鋼板を例示して説明を行う。また、探傷装置としては、漏洩磁束法に比べて鋼板の板厚が厚い場合にも容易に適用が可能な超音波法を適用した例について説明する。ただし、本発明は、金属帯一般に広く適用できるものであり、また、探傷方法を漏洩磁束法等としてもよいことは言うまでもない。   Below, a steel plate is illustrated and demonstrated as an object metal strip. As an example of the flaw detection apparatus, an example in which an ultrasonic method that can be easily applied even when the steel plate is thicker than the leakage magnetic flux method will be described. However, the present invention is widely applicable to metal bands in general, and it goes without saying that the flaw detection method may be a leakage magnetic flux method or the like.

ここで、超音波探傷装置としては、板波UT(Ultrasonic Testing)法、集束ビームUT法、透過型配置での反射型超音波探傷法(以下、超音波ラインセンサとも称す。)等があげられる。   Here, examples of the ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus include a plate wave UT (Ultrasonic Testing) method, a focused beam UT method, a reflection type ultrasonic flaw detection method in a transmissive arrangement (hereinafter also referred to as an ultrasonic line sensor), and the like. .

板波UT法は、タイヤ型音響プローブ(検出部)を鋼板表面に転がり接触して探傷を行うものであるが、板厚方向での不感帯を有すると共に、接触式であるので、鋼板表面へのタイヤの接触圧を調整する必要がありタイヤがバウンドするなど、鋼板の搬送速度が速いほど不利である。また、タイヤがバーストする心配がある。   In the plate wave UT method, a tire type acoustic probe (detection unit) rolls and contacts the surface of the steel sheet to detect flaws, but has a dead zone in the thickness direction and is a contact type. The higher the conveyance speed of the steel sheet, the more disadvantageous it is, for example, that the tire contact pressure needs to be adjusted and the tire bounces. There is also a concern that the tires burst.

この点、集束ビームUT法や超音波ラインセンサは、非接触で検査を行うために、上記のような問題はなく、また、鋼板の搬送の際のパスライン変動による影響も小さく有利である。ここで、集束ビームUT法は、厚板や溶接部の欠陥探傷に使われており理論も確立している。しかし、超音波ラインセンサと比較して、超音波ビームを点状に収束(例えば、1mmφ)させるので、探傷面積に応じた数のプローブ(検出部)が要求され、探傷のための部品点数が多くなると共に探傷効率が悪くなる。また、鋼板表面直下に不感帯ができるという欠点もある。   In this respect, the focused beam UT method and the ultrasonic line sensor are advantageous in that they do not have the above-mentioned problems because they perform non-contact inspection, and are less affected by fluctuations in the pass line when the steel sheet is conveyed. Here, the focused beam UT method is used for defect inspection of thick plates and welds, and the theory has been established. However, compared with an ultrasonic line sensor, the ultrasonic beam is converged in a dot shape (for example, 1 mmφ), so the number of probes (detection units) corresponding to the flaw detection area is required, and the number of parts for flaw detection is small. As the number increases, the flaw detection efficiency deteriorates. In addition, there is a drawback that a dead zone is formed directly under the steel plate surface.

このようなことから、鋼板内部の微細な欠陥(非金属介在物)を検出する超音波探傷装置としては、検出部を非接触で且つ透過型配置(鋼板を挟んで送信部及び受信部を配置)とし、反射型探傷を行う超音波ラインセンサを利用したものが好適に適用される(特許文献1等参照)。   For this reason, as an ultrasonic flaw detector that detects fine defects (non-metallic inclusions) inside a steel plate, the detection unit is non-contact and transmissive arrangement (the transmission unit and the reception unit are arranged across the steel plate) And using an ultrasonic line sensor that performs reflective flaw detection is suitably applied (see Patent Document 1 and the like).

ところで、非金属介在物欠陥は、特に、アルミ酸化物の比率が大きいことが問題とされている。アルミ酸化物の比率が大きいと、スラブ凝固時にもその角張った形状がほとんどそのままの形状で残り、また、変形抵抗が大きいことから、熱間圧延でも変形されず、角張った形状のものが鋼板の表層にそのまま残存することがプレス割れ等の原因となるのである。   By the way, the non-metallic inclusion defect is particularly problematic in that the ratio of aluminum oxide is large. If the ratio of aluminum oxide is large, the angular shape remains almost unchanged even during slab solidification, and since the deformation resistance is large, it is not deformed even by hot rolling. Remaining as it is on the surface layer causes press cracks and the like.

ここで、超音波ラインセンサの構成や原理は、本発明者らが、特許文献2や特許文献3等で開示したもので、送信部から、一方向に集束した帯状の超音波ビームを送信し、そのビームを鋼板幅方向に配列した複数個の短冊型超音波振動子からなる受信部で受信するものである。すなわち、搬送される鋼板を挟んでラインフォーカス型送信アレイプローブ(送信部)とラインフォーカス型受信アレイプローブ(受信部)とを対向配列(配列の方向は被検材である鋼板の板幅方向)させて配置し、送信アレイプローブから送信された超音波によって生起された内部欠陥からの反射波を送信アレイプローブと対向配置した受信アレイプローブによって受信することにより、被検材の内部欠陥を表裏面直下の不惑帯なしに検出するものである(図3、4参照)。   Here, the configuration and principle of the ultrasonic line sensor are those disclosed by the present inventors in Patent Document 2 and Patent Document 3, etc., and a band-shaped ultrasonic beam focused in one direction is transmitted from the transmission unit. The beam is received by a receiving unit composed of a plurality of strip type ultrasonic transducers arranged in the width direction of the steel plate. That is, the line focus type transmission array probe (transmission unit) and the line focus type reception array probe (reception unit) are opposed to each other across the steel plate to be conveyed (the direction of arrangement is the plate width direction of the steel plate as the test material). The internal defects of the test material are detected by receiving the reflected waves from the internal defects generated by the ultrasonic waves transmitted from the transmitting array probe by the receiving array probe arranged opposite to the transmitting array probe. The detection is performed without a direct sneaking zone (see FIGS. 3 and 4).

また、このラインセンサは、1つの検出部で探傷できる範囲が広いので、搬送中の鋼板の欠陥検出に好ましい。なお、超音波探傷装置による探傷は、超音波プローブと鋼板との良好な音響結合を維持するため、つまり検出精度を上げるために、液体中、好適には、水中で行うことが好ましい。   Moreover, since this line sensor has a wide range in which flaw detection can be performed by one detection unit, it is preferable for detecting defects in a steel sheet being conveyed. Note that flaw detection by the ultrasonic flaw detector is preferably performed in a liquid, preferably in water, in order to maintain good acoustic coupling between the ultrasonic probe and the steel plate, that is, in order to increase detection accuracy.

図2に示すように、超音波探傷装置10は、テンションレベラ3と出側ブライドルロール5との間に配設される。テンションレベラ3は、探傷前に鋼板1の板形状を矯正して平坦にするものである。また、超音波探傷装置10前後にあるブライドルロール2、5は、探傷位置において鋼板1に長手方向(搬送方向に一致する。)の引張力を付与して探傷位置の板部分を平坦に矯正する働きを有し、探傷のための形状矯正手段を兼ねるものである。   As shown in FIG. 2, the ultrasonic flaw detector 10 is disposed between the tension leveler 3 and the exit side bridle roll 5. The tension leveler 3 corrects and flattens the plate shape of the steel plate 1 before flaw detection. Further, the bridle rolls 2 and 5 in front of and behind the ultrasonic flaw detector 10 apply a tensile force in the longitudinal direction (corresponding to the conveying direction) to the steel plate 1 at the flaw detection position to flatten the plate portion at the flaw detection position. It has a function and also serves as a shape correction means for flaw detection.

超音波探傷装置10の水槽20の入側には、第1の搬送ロール11が配置され、その第1の搬送ロール11と水中に全没の第2の搬送ロール12によって鋼板1の搬送路が例えば垂直下方に変更され水槽20内の水中に誘導される。なお、水槽20中の水21には、鋼板1の錆を防止するための防錆剤等が添加されていることがある。   A first transport roll 11 is arranged on the entrance side of the water tank 20 of the ultrasonic flaw detector 10, and the transport path of the steel plate 1 is formed by the first transport roll 11 and the second transport roll 12 that is completely submerged in water. For example, it is changed vertically downward and guided into the water in the water tank 20. In addition, the water 21 in the water tank 20 may be added with a rust preventive agent or the like for preventing the steel plate 1 from being rusted.

上記水中に浸漬された鋼板1は、水中に全没の第2及び第3の搬送ロール12、13によって水平方向に搬送方向が曲げられ、続いて第3の搬送ロール13及び水面上方に位置する第4の搬送ロール14によって、垂直方向に搬送方向が曲げられて水中、つまり水槽20から出る。続けて、鋼板1は、第4の搬送ロール14によって下流側ブライドルロール5側に誘導される。   The steel sheet 1 immersed in the water is bent in the horizontal direction by the second and third transfer rolls 12 and 13 that are fully immersed in water, and then positioned above the third transfer roll 13 and the water surface. The fourth transport roll 14 is bent in the transport direction in the vertical direction and exits from the water tank 20. Subsequently, the steel plate 1 is guided to the downstream bridle roll 5 side by the fourth transport roll 14.

また、第2の搬送ロール12と第3の搬送ロール13との間に超音波探傷装置10の検出部である超音波ラインセンサ22が配置されている。この超音波ラインセンサ22の探傷方式は、特許文献2等に記載されている原理に基づくもので、概念図である図3に示すように、それぞれ一次元アレイ型プローブからなる送信部22a と受信部22b が、鋼板1を挟んで当該鋼板1の板厚方向で対向配置されるものである。図3中、符号23a はラインフォーカスした送信超音波ビームを、符号23b は受信超音波ビームを示す。   An ultrasonic line sensor 22 that is a detection unit of the ultrasonic flaw detector 10 is disposed between the second transport roll 12 and the third transport roll 13. The flaw detection method of the ultrasonic line sensor 22 is based on the principle described in Patent Document 2 and the like. As shown in FIG. 3 which is a conceptual diagram, the transmitter 22a and the receiver each composed of a one-dimensional array probe are used. The portion 22b is disposed opposite to the steel plate 1 with the steel plate 1 interposed therebetween. In FIG. 3, reference numeral 23a indicates a line-focused transmission ultrasonic beam, and reference numeral 23b indicates a reception ultrasonic beam.

上記のような構成の超音波ラインセンサ22(22a 、22b )が、図4に示すように、鋼板1の幅方向に沿って複数個、連続して配置され、配列した送信部22a 及び受信部22b が、コの字状の枠体としたラインセンサ用架台25に支持されている。これによって、少ない検出部で鋼板1の全幅の欠陥検出を可能とできる。ここで、各送信部22a 及び受信部22b をそれぞれ千鳥状に配置しているのは、隣り合う超音波ラインセンサ22間での不要な干渉を避けつつ鋼板1の幅方向全面の検査を可能とするためである。   As shown in FIG. 4, a plurality of ultrasonic line sensors 22 (22a, 22b) configured as described above are continuously arranged and arranged along the width direction of the steel sheet 1, and the transmitter 22a and the receiver are arranged. 22b is supported by a line sensor mount 25 which is a U-shaped frame. Thereby, it is possible to detect the defect of the full width of the steel plate 1 with a small number of detection units. Here, the transmission units 22a and the reception units 22b are arranged in a staggered manner, so that the entire surface in the width direction of the steel sheet 1 can be inspected while avoiding unnecessary interference between the adjacent ultrasonic line sensors 22. It is to do.

各超音波ラインセンサ22は探傷信号処理装置24に接続されている。そして、検出信号が所定レベル以上である場合に、欠陥反射波があるとして介在物欠陥検出とするのである。   Each ultrasonic line sensor 22 is connected to a flaw detection signal processing device 24. When the detection signal is equal to or higher than a predetermined level, the inclusion defect is detected as a defect reflected wave.

上記の探傷設備を採用することで、搬送速度 300〜1000m/分程度の高速搬送下であっても、全幅連続探傷が可能である。なお、上記では、検出精度を上げるために水浸漬法を採用したが、大気中で探傷してもよい。また、超音波ラインセンサに代えて集束ビームUT法による超音波探傷装置を採用しても良い。
特開2000-210717 号公報 特開平7-253414号公報 特開平11-83815号公報
By adopting the above flaw detection equipment, full-width continuous flaw detection is possible even under high-speed conveyance at a conveyance speed of about 300 to 1000 m / min. In the above description, the water immersion method is employed to increase the detection accuracy, but flaw detection may be performed in the air. Further, an ultrasonic flaw detector using the focused beam UT method may be employed instead of the ultrasonic line sensor.
Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2000-210717 JP 7-253414 A Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-83815

ところで、上記の探傷設備において従来から適用されてきた合否判定の基準はあまり明確なものではなく試行錯誤的であり、顧客に不良品を出荷することのないようにするため、非金属介在物でない検出も非金属介在物として判定するようにしていた。そのため、本来良品である鋼板を不良品として判定する傾向があった。   By the way, the criteria for pass / fail judgment that has been applied in the above-described flaw detection equipment are not so clear and are trial and error, and are not non-metallic inclusions so as not to ship defective products to customers. Detection was also determined as non-metallic inclusions. For this reason, there is a tendency that a steel plate, which is originally a good product, is determined as a defective product.

例えば、ツナ缶に使われるDRD缶(Drawn and Redrawn Can )用鋼板では、一次冷間圧延および焼鈍後に、20〜30%の圧下率による二次冷間圧延を施し、板厚0.170mm の高強度・極薄缶用鋼板として仕上げる。すなわち、2回圧延、DR(double cold-reducing)圧延を行い、その高強度・極薄缶用鋼板を用いて2回プレス加工法で仕上げている。この製罐法において、例えば、500kg の鋼板中から1缶(DRD缶1缶の重量は、22g程度である。)でも欠陥が検出されると、そのロットはすべてスクラップになるという厳しいものである。なお、ロット重量は約10トン程度であり、ロット単位にスクラップになると経済的および納期的不利益は非常に大きい。   For example, the steel sheet for DRD cans (Drawn and Redrawn Can) used in tuna cans is subjected to secondary cold rolling with a rolling reduction of 20 to 30% after primary cold rolling and annealing, resulting in high strength and thickness of 0.170 mm. Finish as a steel sheet for ultra-thin cans. That is, twice rolling and DR (double cold-reducing) rolling are performed, and the steel sheet for the high strength and ultrathin can is finished by a twice pressing method. In this iron making method, for example, even if one can out of a steel plate of 500 kg (the weight of one DRD can is about 22 g), if a defect is detected, all the lots become scrap. . The lot weight is about 10 tons, and when it comes to scrap in lot units, the economic and delivery time disadvantages are very large.

本発明者らは、上記の様々な欠陥の検出についてサンプル採取を行い、検出部断面の顕微鏡観察をはじめとする種々の分析調査を重ねた結果、欠陥として検出された位置には、非金属介在物欠陥以外にも、色々な擬似信号が欠陥として検出されており、あるいはまた、無害な欠陥が検出されていることを明らかにした。   The present inventors sampled the detection of the various defects described above, and as a result of repeating various analysis investigations including microscopic observation of the cross section of the detection unit, the position detected as the defect is non-metallic intervening. In addition to physical defects, it was clarified that various pseudo signals were detected as defects, or harmless defects were detected.

特に、下流工程での再度の圧延処理等により、実際には最終工程で密着してしまって無害となる中心割れ(空孔)や鋼板表面の大きな凹み等は、金属帯の長手方向に一致する圧延方向や金属帯の幅方向に一致する圧延方向90度方向に連続した欠陥信号、すなわち、長手方向に所定長以上、例示的には0.1〜数m連続的に検出される欠陥信号および/または幅方向に所定長以上、例示的には1〜数10mm連続的に検出される欠陥信号となり、無害にもかかわらず、金属帯における欠陥密度(個/m2 )を見かけ上大きくし、結局、不良品となって格下げ・転用処置あるいはスクラップ化につながることになる。そのため、再度のスラブ製造の手配等を特急で進めるなどの納期対応を図る必要に迫られる。また、工程混乱も甚だしくなり、更に、工程進捗を遅らされることになる他の鋼板の納期への影響も大きく、経済的打撃は計り知れない。 In particular, center cracks (holes) and large dents on the surface of the steel sheet that are harmless in the final process due to re-rolling in the downstream process, etc., coincide with the longitudinal direction of the metal strip. Defect signal that is continuously detected in the rolling direction and the 90-degree rolling direction that coincides with the width direction of the metal strip, that is, a defect signal that is continuously detected in the longitudinal direction by a predetermined length or more, illustratively 0.1 to several meters, and / or It becomes a defect signal that is continuously detected in the width direction by a predetermined length or more, for example, 1 to several tens of millimeters continuously, and apparently increases the defect density (pieces / m 2 ) in the metal band despite harmlessness. It becomes defective and leads to downgrade, diversion or scrapping. For this reason, there is a need to meet the delivery date by, for example, expediting arrangements for manufacturing slabs again. In addition, the process disruption becomes severe, and further, the impact on the delivery date of other steel sheets that are delayed in the process progress is great, and the economic impact is immeasurable.

本発明は、上記課題の解決を目的とするものであり、微細な非金属介在物欠陥を探傷装置で検出するに際し、非金属の介在物でない検出結果を消去し、かつ、顧客と合意した判定基準による合否判定処理で合格した金属帯からさらに欠陥部分の除去処理を行うこと、すなわち、過剰な不合格品の発生を是正し、かつ、顧客の要求品質を満たしながら、さらに高品質の金属帯の提供を可能とするものである。   The present invention aims to solve the above-mentioned problems, and when detecting a fine non-metallic inclusion defect with a flaw detection device, the detection result that is not a non-metallic inclusion is erased, and the determination agreed with the customer The metal band that passed the pass / fail judgment process according to the standard is further processed to remove the defective part, that is, the quality of the metal band is improved while correcting the occurrence of excessive rejects and satisfying the customer's required quality. Can be provided.

本発明は、下記記載の非金属介在物欠陥部分の除去方法によって上記課題を解決した。   The present invention has solved the above problems by a method for removing a defect portion of a nonmetallic inclusion described below.

すなわち、金属帯の非金属介在物欠陥部分を、金属帯における当該欠陥の長手方向位置、幅方向位置に対応させて表した展開図情報に基づいて除去する方法であって、検出される非金属介在物欠陥の欠陥信号が、前記金属帯の長手方向および/または幅方向に、それぞれ所定長以上連続する場合に、該欠陥信号を消去し、そうでない場合には非金属介在物欠陥と判定して該欠陥信号を前記展開図情報に編集する工程、該展開図情報と顧客と合意した判定基準と対比して前記金属帯を合否判定する工程、該合否判定する工程で、不合格の場合は不合格品とする工程、該合否判定する工程で、合格の場合は、下記の(A)ないし(C)いずれかの工程を採用して処理することを特徴とする非金属介在物欠陥部分の除去方法。
(A)該当する欠陥の位置にマーキングし、当該マーキングのマークを読取って該当欠陥部分を除去した後に顧客に出荷する工程。
(B)該当する欠陥の位置にマーキングして出荷し、顧客側で当該マーキングのマークを読取り、または、前記展開図情報に基づき、該当欠陥部分を除去する工程。
(C)前記の展開図情報を顧客に提供して出荷し、前記展開図情報に基づき顧客側で該当欠陥部分を除去する工程。
That is, a non-metallic inclusion defect portion of a metal strip is removed based on development information corresponding to the longitudinal position and width direction position of the defect in the metal strip , and the detected non-metal When the defect signal of the inclusion defect continues in the longitudinal direction and / or the width direction of the metal strip for a predetermined length or more, the defect signal is erased. Otherwise, it is determined as a non-metallic inclusion defect. In the step of editing the defect signal into the development view information, the step of judging the acceptance / rejection of the metal band in comparison with the development plan information and the judgment standard agreed with the customer, In the process of making a rejected product and the pass / fail judgment step, in the case of a pass, the following (A) to (C) any one of the following steps is adopted and processed. Removal method.
(A) A step of marking the position of the corresponding defect, reading the marking mark, removing the corresponding defective portion, and shipping to the customer.
(B) A step of marking and shipping at the position of the corresponding defect and reading the mark of the marking on the customer side or removing the corresponding defective portion based on the development view information.
(C) A step of providing the developed map information to the customer and shipping it, and removing the corresponding defective portion on the customer side based on the developed map information.

本発明によって、金属帯の非金属介在物欠陥の検出において従来問題となっていた過剰な不合格品の発生を是正し、かつ、顧客の要求品質を満たせるようになった。さらに、有害な非金属介在物欠陥を含まない高品質の金属帯を提供できるようになった。   According to the present invention, it has become possible to correct the occurrence of an excessively rejected product, which has been a problem in the conventional detection of non-metallic inclusion defects in a metal strip, and to satisfy the customer's required quality. Furthermore, it has become possible to provide a high-quality metal strip that does not contain harmful non-metallic inclusion defects.

図1に従い、本発明の非金属介在物欠陥(以下、断りない限り、非金属介在物を単に介在物と、非金属介在物欠陥を単に介在物欠陥という。)の合否判定と欠陥部分の除去フローについて説明する。   According to FIG. 1, pass / fail judgment and removal of defective portions of non-metallic inclusion defects of the present invention (unless otherwise noted, non-metallic inclusions are simply referred to as inclusions and non-metallic inclusion defects are simply referred to as inclusion defects). The flow will be described.

図1において、まず、超音波ラインセンサに代表される探傷装置からの探傷信号が、当該探傷装置の探傷信号処理装置である介在物判定処理装置に入力されて格納される(110 )。 In FIG. 1, first, a flaw detection signal from a flaw detection apparatus represented by an ultrasonic line sensor is input and stored in an inclusion determination processing apparatus which is a flaw detection signal processing apparatus of the flaw detection apparatus (110).

介在物判定処理装置では、格納した探傷信号から検出される欠陥信号が金属帯の長手方向に所定長(αm)以上連続する信号であるか、および/または、幅方向に所定長(βmm)以上連続する信号であるかの判定を行う(120 )。ここで、そうであれば、介在物欠陥ではないと判定し、検出した欠陥信号を消去する処理を行う(140 )。一方、そうでない場合には、介在物欠陥と判定し、以降の処理を行う。 In the inclusion determination processing apparatus, the defect signal detected from the stored flaw detection signal is a signal that continues for a predetermined length (αm) or more in the longitudinal direction of the metal band, and / or is a predetermined length (βmm) or more in the width direction. It is determined whether the signal is continuous (120). If so, it is determined that the defect is not an inclusion defect, and the detected defect signal is erased (140). On the other hand, if not, it is determined as an inclusion defect and the subsequent processing is performed.

ここで、介在物欠陥と判定した場合は、更に欠陥信号を編集処理して展開図情報とする(150 )。具体的には、少なくとも金属帯における当該欠陥の長手方向位置、幅方向位置と、好ましくはさらに、当該欠陥の幅、長さ、厚み、厚さ方向位置、等の情報を編集する。さらに具体的には、対象とする金属帯における介在物欠陥の欠陥密度(個/m2)を算出することを含んでもよい。 Here, if it is determined that the defect is an inclusion defect, the defect signal is further edited to be developed view information (150). Specifically, at least the information on the longitudinal position and the width direction position of the defect in the metal band, and preferably the width, length, thickness, thickness direction position of the defect, and the like are edited. More specifically, it may include calculating the defect density (inclusions / m 2 ) of inclusion defects in the target metal band.

以上の展開図情報を、顧客データベースに格納(蓄積)する(220 )。   The above development map information is stored (accumulated) in the customer database (220).

次に、当該金属帯の合否判定を判定基準(210)と対比して行う(160 )。その判定基準(210 )は、顧客データベースに予め登録された、顧客と合意した判定基準であって、具体的には介在物欠陥の許容密度(単位:個/m2 )が挙げられ、金属帯の該介在物欠陥の欠陥密度が該許容密度を超えると不合格(NG)と判定し、当該金属帯は不合格品とする(170)。 Next, the pass / fail judgment of the metal strip is performed in comparison with the judgment standard (210) (160). The criterion (210) is a criterion that is pre-registered in the customer database and agreed with the customer, and specifically includes the allowable density of inclusion defects (unit: pieces / m 2 ). When the defect density of the inclusion defect exceeds the allowable density, it is judged as rejected (NG), and the metal band is rejected (170).

一方、合格(OK)の場合は、そのまま、次工程の最終検査ラインに移送する。   On the other hand, if it is acceptable (OK), it is transferred to the final inspection line of the next process as it is.

最終検査ラインでは、出荷姿がコイルかシートかによってフローを分ける(310 )。   In the final inspection line, the flow is divided according to whether the shipment is a coil or a sheet (310).

先に、出荷姿がシートである場合を説明する。まず、既に顧客データベースに蓄積した、当該シートに対応する展開図情報を最終検査ラインに提供する(320 )。この展開図には、介在物欠陥のシート上の位置が明らかにされており、同時に、その介在物欠陥の大きさ等の詳細情報が紐付けられている。   First, the case where the shipment form is a sheet will be described. First, development map information corresponding to the sheet already stored in the customer database is provided to the final inspection line (320). In the developed view, the position of the inclusion defect on the sheet is clarified, and at the same time, detailed information such as the size of the inclusion defect is linked.

続いて、当該展開図情報に基づき、シート上の介在物欠陥の位置に刻印などの欠陥マーキングを行う(330 )。マーキングする位置は欠陥が検出された位置あるいは、同位置に対応するシート上の端部であり、後述するコイルでも同様である。そして、引き続きマーク読取装置でその欠陥マークを読み取って(340 )、欠陥部分を除去する(350 )。除去にあたっては、欠陥が検出された部分をパンチング等で打ち抜いてもよいし、シートの幅全体にわたりシャーで除去してもよい。後述するコイルでも同様である。   Subsequently, based on the development information, defect marking such as engraving is performed at the position of the inclusion defect on the sheet (330). The marking position is a position where a defect is detected or an end portion on the sheet corresponding to the same position, and the same applies to a coil described later. Then, the defect mark is continuously read by the mark reading device (340), and the defective portion is removed (350). In the removal, the part where the defect is detected may be punched out by punching or the like, or may be removed with a shear over the entire width of the sheet. The same applies to coils described later.

このように、各シート中の介在物欠陥を除去して顧客Aに製品出荷する(410 )。言うまでも無く、介在物欠陥の除去にあたっては、シートにマーキングせずに展開図情報のみを用いてもよい。ただし、図1中には、展開図情報のみを用いるフローは示していない。上記の方法では、介在物欠陥を除去した製品は介在物密度等の合否判定で合格となっているのみならず、さらに介在物欠陥部分を除去したので、非常に高品質となる。   In this way, the inclusion defect in each sheet is removed and the product is shipped to customer A (410). Needless to say, in removing the inclusion defect, only the development information may be used without marking the sheet. However, FIG. 1 does not show a flow using only the development map information. In the above method, the product from which the inclusion defect is removed not only passes the pass / fail judgment such as the inclusion density, but also the inclusion defect portion is removed, so that the quality is very high.

次に、出荷姿がコイルである場合を説明する。図1では、顧客にマーク読取装置があるか否かで処理フローが異なる(360 )具体例を示している。ここで説明する例では、顧客Bはマーク読取装置を有しており、顧客Cは有していないものとする。   Next, a case where the shipment form is a coil will be described. FIG. 1 shows a specific example in which the processing flow differs depending on whether or not the customer has a mark reading device (360). In the example described here, it is assumed that customer B has a mark reading device and customer C does not.

マーク読取装置がある顧客Bに出荷する場合は、まず、上記のシートの場合と同様に作成したコイルの展開図情報(370 )に基づき、シートの場合と同様の欠陥マーキングを行い(380 )、客先に出荷する。   When shipping to a customer B with a mark reading device, first, based on the coil development information (370) created in the same manner as in the case of the above sheet, the same defect marking as in the case of the sheet is performed (380), Ship to customer.

顧客B側では、コイルを巻き戻して加工処理を行うに際し、はじめにマーク読取装置で欠陥マークを読み取って(510 )、対応する欠陥部分を除去する(520 )。なお、この場合、マーク読取装置の不調などのトラブルに備え、顧客Bにネットワークを介するなどして展開図情報を併せて提供しておくことを好適とする。   On the customer B side, when the coil is rewound and processed, the defect mark is first read by the mark reading device (510), and the corresponding defective portion is removed (520). In this case, in order to prepare for troubles such as malfunction of the mark reading device, it is preferable to provide development map information to the customer B via a network.

最後に、客先にマーク読取装置がない顧客Cの場合は、マーキングしないままコイルを出荷し、一方、ネットワークを介するなどして展開図情報の提供を行う(610 )。そして、顧客C側で、その展開図情報に基づいてコイルの欠陥部分をシャー切断するなどして除去を行う(620 )。なお、この除去は、自動で行うようにしてもよいし、また、オペレータが手動で行ってもよい。   Finally, in the case of customer C who does not have a mark reading device at the customer, the coil is shipped without marking, and on the other hand, development map information is provided via a network (610). Then, on the customer C side, the defective portion of the coil is removed by shear cutting or the like based on the development information (620). This removal may be performed automatically, or may be performed manually by an operator.

以上のようにすることで、顧客B、Cに対しても、展開図情報に基づく高品質の製品を提供することが可能となるのである。   By doing so, it becomes possible to provide high-quality products based on the development map information to the customers B and C as well.

本発明の非金属介在物欠陥部分の除去方法を熱延鋼板(板厚:2.0mm 、板幅:1000mm、長さ:1000m)に適用した。なお、本発明例では、超音波ラインセンサにより検出される欠陥信号が熱延鋼板の長手方向に0.15m以上、または、幅方向に30mm以上連続する場合には検出した探傷信号を消去する処理を適用した。そして、そのような欠陥信号の消去処理を行わない従来例との比較を同一の熱延鋼板に対して行い、両者の介在物欠陥の欠陥密度(個/m2)を対比した。 The method for removing a non-metallic inclusion defect portion of the present invention was applied to a hot-rolled steel plate (plate thickness: 2.0 mm, plate width: 1000 mm, length: 1000 m). In the present invention embodiment, a defect signal detected Ri by the ultrasonic line sensor are hot-rolled steel sheet longitudinally 0.15m or more, or to erase a flaw detection signal detected in the case of continuous or 30mm in width direction Treatment applied. And the comparison with the prior art example which does not perform such an erasure | elimination process of a defect signal was performed with respect to the same hot-rolled steel plate, and the defect density (piece / m < 2 >) of both inclusion defects was contrasted.

その結果、本発明例では欠陥密度が0.059 (個/m2 )となり、検出部の分析結果と対比してほとんど過検出がなかったのに対し、従来例では欠陥密度が0.209 (個/m2 )であり、検出部の分析結果と対比すると本発明との差分だけ過検出であった。なお、顧客要求の許容欠陥密度は、0.2 (個/m2 )であった。 As a result, in the example of the present invention, the defect density was 0.059 (pieces / m 2 ), and compared with the analysis result of the detection part, there was almost no overdetection, whereas in the conventional example, the defect density was 0.209 (pieces / m 2). In comparison with the analysis result of the detection part, the difference from the present invention was overdetected. The allowable defect density requested by the customer was 0.2 (pieces / m 2 ).

引き続き、鋼板の端部へのマーキング、展開図情報に基づく欠陥部分のシャーによる除去を出荷前に実施した。   Subsequently, marking on the end of the steel plate and removal of the defective portion by the shear based on the development information were carried out before shipment.

そのため、金属帯の品質検査において、従来例では過剰な不合格品が発生するのに対し、本発明例では顧客の要求する品質を満たしながら、さらに高品質の金属帯を提供することができた。   Therefore, in the quality inspection of the metal band, excessive reject products are generated in the conventional example, whereas in the present invention example, it is possible to provide a higher quality metal band while satisfying the quality required by the customer. .

本発明の合否判定と欠陥部分の除去方法を説明するフロー図である。It is a flowchart explaining the acceptance / rejection determination of this invention, and the removal method of a defective part. 本発明の合否判定と欠陥部分の除去方法を適用する探傷ラインの側面図である。It is a side view of the flaw detection line to which the acceptance / rejection determination and defect removal method of the present invention is applied. 鋼板の非金属介在物を検出する超音波ラインセンサの模式配置図である。It is a model arrangement drawing of an ultrasonic line sensor which detects a nonmetallic inclusion of a steel plate. 本発明の合否判定方法を適用する探傷装置における超音波ラインセンサの配置図である。It is an arrangement view of an ultrasonic line sensor in a flaw detection apparatus to which the pass / fail judgment method of the present invention is applied.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 金属帯(鋼板)
2 入側ブライドルロール
3 テンションレベラ
5 出側ブライドルロール
10 超音波探傷装置
11〜14 搬送ロール
20 水槽
21 水
22 超音波ラインセンサ(検出部)
22a 送信部
22b 受信部
23a 送信超音波ビーム
23b 受信超音波ビーム
24 介在物判定処理装置(探傷信号処理装置)
25 ラインセンサ用架台
1 Metal strip (steel plate)
2 Incoming bridle roll 3 Tension leveler 5 Outgoing bridle roll
10 Ultrasonic flaw detector
11-14 Transport roll
20 aquarium
21 water
22 Ultrasonic line sensor (detector)
22a Transmitter
22b Receiver
23a transmit ultrasonic beam
23b Receive ultrasonic beam
24 Inclusion determination processor (Flaw detection signal processor)
25 Line sensor mount

Claims (1)

金属帯の非金属介在物欠陥部分を、金属帯における当該欠陥の長手方向位置、幅方向位置に対応させて表した展開図情報に基づいて除去する方法であって、
検出される非金属介在物欠陥の欠陥信号が、前記金属帯の長手方向および/または幅方向に、それぞれ所定長以上連続する場合に、該欠陥信号を消去し、そうでない場合には非金属介在物欠陥と判定して該欠陥信号を前記展開図情報に編集する工程、
該展開図情報と顧客と合意した判定基準と対比して前記金属帯を合否判定する工程、
該合否判定する工程で、不合格の場合は不合格品とする工程、
該合否判定する工程で、合格の場合は、下記の(A)ないし(C)いずれかの工程を採用して処理することを特徴とする非金属介在物欠陥部分の除去方法。
(A)該当する欠陥の位置にマーキングし、当該マーキングのマークを読取って該当欠陥部分を除去した後に顧客に出荷する工程。
(B)該当する欠陥の位置にマーキングして出荷し、顧客側で当該マーキングのマークを読取り、または、前記展開図情報に基づき、該当欠陥部分を除去する工程。
(C)前記の展開図情報を顧客に提供して出荷し、前記展開図情報に基づき顧客側で該当欠陥部分を除去する工程。
It is a method of removing a non-metallic inclusion defect portion of a metal band based on development view information represented in correspondence with a longitudinal position and a width direction position of the defect in the metal band ,
When the defect signal of the detected nonmetallic inclusion defect is continuous for a predetermined length or more in the longitudinal direction and / or the width direction of the metal strip, the defect signal is erased. Otherwise, the nonmetallic inclusion defect is erased. A step of determining an object defect and editing the defect signal into the development view information;
A step of determining whether or not the metal band is accepted or not in comparison with the development plan information and a criterion agreed with the customer;
In the pass / fail judgment step, if it is rejected,
In the pass / fail judgment step, if it is acceptable, the following (A) to (C) any one of the steps (A) to (C) is adopted and processed.
(A) A step of marking the position of the corresponding defect, reading the marking mark, removing the corresponding defective portion, and shipping to the customer.
(B) A step of marking and shipping at the position of the corresponding defect and reading the mark of the marking on the customer side or removing the corresponding defective portion based on the development view information.
(C) A step of providing the developed map information to the customer and shipping it, and removing the corresponding defective portion on the customer side based on the developed map information.
JP2003349185A 2003-10-08 2003-10-08 Method for removing non-metallic inclusion defect in metal strip Expired - Fee Related JP4400166B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003349185A JP4400166B2 (en) 2003-10-08 2003-10-08 Method for removing non-metallic inclusion defect in metal strip

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003349185A JP4400166B2 (en) 2003-10-08 2003-10-08 Method for removing non-metallic inclusion defect in metal strip

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005114554A JP2005114554A (en) 2005-04-28
JP4400166B2 true JP4400166B2 (en) 2010-01-20

Family

ID=34541117

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2003349185A Expired - Fee Related JP4400166B2 (en) 2003-10-08 2003-10-08 Method for removing non-metallic inclusion defect in metal strip

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4400166B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4878485B2 (en) * 2006-03-17 2012-02-15 三菱日立製鉄機械株式会社 Cold continuous rolling equipment
JP2011237210A (en) * 2010-05-07 2011-11-24 Yokogawa Electric Corp Position measurement system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2005114554A (en) 2005-04-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU760280B2 (en) Method and apparatus for detecting flaws in strip, method of manufacturing cold-rolled steel sheet and pickling equipment for hot-rolled steel strip
US5866820A (en) Coil volumetric and surface defect detection system
WO2005016566A1 (en) Method of manufacturing steel strip or surface-treated steel strip
JP4269860B2 (en) Pass / fail judgment apparatus and method for non-metallic inclusion defects in metal strip
JP2000210717A (en) Steel plate manufacturing method and manufacturing equipment
JP3747664B2 (en) Steel plate inspection method, manufacturing method, and cold rolled steel plate manufacturing equipment
JP4400166B2 (en) Method for removing non-metallic inclusion defect in metal strip
JP2006218505A (en) Marked metal strip
JP5104247B2 (en) Manufacturing method of continuous cast slab
JP4552680B2 (en) Metal strip manufacturing method and marking metal strip
JP4289341B2 (en) Steel sheet inspection method, manufacturing method, and hot rolled steel sheet manufacturing equipment
JP4332983B2 (en) Internal defect detection device
JP4345734B2 (en) Quality inspection method for welded steel pipe welds
JPH11319943A (en) Defect marking method and apparatus, and method of operating coil with defect marking
JP2010025835A (en) Acceptance decision method of steel strip
JP2005059070A (en) Steel strip manufacturing method
KR20000047762A (en) Method and apparatus for detecting flaws in strip, method of manufacturing cold-rolled steel sheet and pickling equipment for hot-rolled steel strip
JP3610847B2 (en) Internal defect detection device
JP3603804B2 (en) Internal defect detection method
JP2001347315A (en) Method for manufacturing coil with defect marking, method for marking defect, and method for working coil with defect marking
JPH0611489A (en) ERW pipe defect discrimination method
JP2002148242A (en) Ultrasonic flaw detector and flaw detection method
JP2002296249A (en) Internal defect detection method
JP2005195526A (en) Defect detection method due to leakage magnetic flux and line for detecting defects in steel sheet
JP2009031094A (en) Non-metallic inclusion defect acceptance / rejection determination method and acceptance / rejection determination apparatus

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20060929

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20090213

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20090714

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20090911

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20091006

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20091019

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121106

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131106

Year of fee payment: 4

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees