JP4450127B2 - Internal pressure inspection method for sealed containers - Google Patents
Internal pressure inspection method for sealed containers Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP4450127B2 JP4450127B2 JP2000051039A JP2000051039A JP4450127B2 JP 4450127 B2 JP4450127 B2 JP 4450127B2 JP 2000051039 A JP2000051039 A JP 2000051039A JP 2000051039 A JP2000051039 A JP 2000051039A JP 4450127 B2 JP4450127 B2 JP 4450127B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- frequency
- peak
- internal pressure
- intensity
- sealed container
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 title claims description 34
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 23
- 238000009527 percussion Methods 0.000 claims description 29
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000004080 punching Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000010079 rubber tapping Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000013361 beverage Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000001066 destructive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008267 milk Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004080 milk Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 235000013336 milk Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000003672 processing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Landscapes
- Measuring Fluid Pressure (AREA)
- Examining Or Testing Airtightness (AREA)
Description
【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は、密封容器の内圧検査方法、特に2ピース缶の内圧検査のための打検時の打検周波数判定処理方法に関する。
【0002】
【従来の技術】
従来、密封容器、特に腐敗が起きやすいミルク入り飲料缶詰等の缶内圧を非破壊的に検査する方法として打検法が広く採用されている。打検法は、缶詰の蓋(2ピース缶では缶底部)に電磁的衝撃を与えたときに発する打検音をマイクロフォンで電気信号に変換し、それにより缶内圧の良否を判定する検査法である。打検音は、一般的に特定周波数成分からなり、缶の内圧(陰圧缶の場合には真空度)が高い場合に高く、内圧が低い場合に低くなる特徴がある。そこで、打検器では取り込んだ打検信号をデジタル化し、高速フーリエ変換の手法で周波数分析を行っている。周波数分析の結果、強度が最も高い周波数を打検周波数として扱っている。つまり、缶内圧と周波数の関係から打検周波数で缶内圧を判定できるので、一定範囲内の打検周波数を発する缶のみを良品とすれば、内圧が規格外の製品を不良品として除去することが可能である。
【0003】
3ピース缶の打検波形は、図7に示すように単一の正弦波からなる。このため周波数分析結果も、図8に示すように、単一ピークを有するスペクトルとなる。従って、そのピークを打検周波数として判定すれば良い。3ピース缶の場合、打検周波数と内圧とは、図9に示すように略連続的に変化しているので、打検周波数により缶内が分かり内圧の良否を判定することができる。ところが、2ピース缶の場合、打検波形は3ピース缶のそれと比べて複雑な波形が生じる。図10は、2ピース缶における特定の内圧での打検波形であり、2つの振動波形が合成されたような形状となっている。このときの周波数分析結果を見ると、図11に示すように、複数のピークを有するスペクトルが観測される。この例では、最大ピークを示す周波数は2382Hzであるので、これを打検周波数として処理するが、打検したときの状態によっては第2ピークの方が高く出る場合がある。つまり、同一の缶内圧であるにもかかわらず、大きく異なる2つの打検周波数が発生することになる。この第2ピークは常に観察される訳でなく、特定の内圧で発生することが多い。
【0004】
本発明者は、2ピース缶における缶内圧と打検周波数との関係を調べるために、種々の缶種について打検を行い、缶内圧と打検周波数のグラフを作成した。同様な実験を3ピース缶についても行った。3ピース缶の場合は、図9に示すように、内圧と打検周波数の関係はなめらかで、不連続な点は見られなかった。しかしながら、2ピース缶の場合は、図12に示すように、特定の内圧近傍で打検周波数と内圧の関係が不連続となる場合がある。図示の例では、0.02MPa 付近でその現象が見られる。
【0005】
打検器で良品と不良品を区別する際には、打検周波数の上限・下限設定で規定する。例えば、0.02MPaが最低内圧の時に、打検周波数2000Hzを下限値として設定したとする。このとき、図12において枠右下で囲まれた範囲の製品は、0.2MPa 以上だから打検周波数が2000Hz未満である。即ち、良品範囲にありながら不良品と判断されて排斥されてしまう。即ち、無駄排斥が起こる。一方、図中枠左上で囲まれた範囲の製品は、内圧が0.02MPa以下だが打検周波数が2000Hz以上の製品ある。これは、不良範囲だが良品として処理されてしまう。即ち、見逃してしまう。このような不具合は、内圧に対する周波数のバラツキが広い程多発する。
【0006】
【発明が解決しようとする課題】
以上のように、打検法は非破壊的に缶詰内圧を検査する方法して非常に有効であるが、2ピース缶の場合は、特定の内圧近傍で缶内圧との関係が不連続になる場合がある。そのため、無駄排斥又は見逃しが発生してしまうことがあり、従来打検法は主として3ピース缶の内圧検査に用いられており、2ピース缶の場合は、比較的内圧が高い缶体の場合にしか用いられていない。
【0007】
そこで、本発明は、低圧の2ピース缶であっても、良品の無駄排斥や不良品の見過ごしがなく、正確に打検検査ができ、且つ従来の打検装置に容易に適用できる密封容器の内圧検査方法を提供することを目的している。
【0008】
【課題を解決するための手段】
本発明者は、上記問題点を解決するための研究過程で、2ピース缶詰について、缶内圧を0.018〜0.026MPaまで変化させたときの周波数分析結果を調べてみた。その結果、缶内圧が0.018MPa、0.022MPa、0.026MPaのときのそれぞれの周波数と強度の関係は、図4〜図6のようになった。これらの図からみると、0.018MPaから0.022MPaに内圧変化しても、第1ピークの周波数はあまり変化してない。しかし、0.22MPaでは、2.1kHz付近に2つ目のピークが発生していることが分かる。つまり、0.22MPaの内圧の缶詰は、1.8kHz近傍と2.1kHz近傍の2つの打検周波数をもっている。従って、第1ピークの周波数をそのまま打検周波数とすると、内圧の変化が読み取れないことになる。これが打検周波数バラツキの大きな原因である。また、内圧の0.026MPaの缶詰は、図6に示すように、第1ピークが2.2kHz近傍で起り、第2ピークは1.9kHz近傍で起っている。つまり、第1ピークと第2ピークの強度の順番は常に一定でなく、僅かな条件で逆転することがある。
【0009】
本発明は、上記事実に着眼してさらに研究した結果、上記周波数分析結果における第1のピークの周波数と第2の周波数とをある一定の数式に基いて補正することにより、不連続点がなくなり、無駄排斥や見逃しを少なく抑えることができることを知見し、本発明に到達したものである。
【0010】
即ち、本発明の密封容器の内圧検査方法は、密封容器の内圧を打検により検査する密封容器の内圧検査方法において、密封容器の弾性壁に電磁的衝撃を与えることにより発生する音をマイクロフォンで電気信号に変換して得られる打検波形を周波数変換して打検音スペクトルを得、得られたスペクトルの第1ピークと第2ピークを抽出し、該第2ピークと前記第1ピークの強度比が所定範囲以内のときは前記第1ピークの周波数を打検周波数とし、所定範囲外のときは前記第1ピークと第2ピークから得られる補正周波数を打検周波数として判定処理することを特徴とするものである。
【0011】
前記補正周波数fpは、次式を用いて算出する。
fp=(f1×M1+f2×M2)/(M1+M2)
但し、f1:第1ピークの周波数
f2:第2ピークの周波数
M1:第1ピークの強度
M2:第2ピークの強度
である。
そして、前記第2ピークの強度M2と前記第1ピークの強度M1との比M2/M1の値が0.3〜0.4の範囲で任意に選択される値以下の場合は、前記第1ピークの周波数を打検周波数とし、前記値以上の場合に前記補正周波数fpを打検周波数とする。
【0012】
【発明の実施の形態】
以下、本発明の実施形態を詳細に説明する。図1は、本発明の密封容器内圧検査を実施する内圧検査装置の一実施形態を示している。
図1の内圧検査装置において、コイル1とマイクロフォン2を有する打検ヘッド3を缶詰cが通過する経路の上方に設置してあり、缶が打検ヘッドの下に到ると光電スイッチ10で缶を検出し、パルス発生器5からコイル1にパルス状の電流を流して電磁衝撃を与える。それにより、蓋(2ピース缶では缶底部)が振動して音を発するので、その音をマイクロフォン2で電気信号に変換して打検信号を得る。該打検信号を増幅器・フィルター6を介してA/D変換器7でデジタル化し、波形メモリ8で記憶した打検波形をマイクロコンピュータ9に入力し、高速フーリエ変換の手法で周波数分析を行う。該周波数分析の結果を、マイクロコンピューターで以下に詳述するような条件で処理して打検周波数として扱う。決定された打検周波数と予め設定されている設定値と比較して、打検周波数が許容範囲であるならば合格と判定し、許容範囲外であると排斥装置12に信号を発して当該缶詰を内圧不良缶詰として排斥する。
【0013】
前述したように、特に、2ピース缶の場合は、打検音スペクトルでの強度ピークが複数生じ、特に、特定の内圧範囲では強度差が少ない強度ピークが2つの周波数に生じ、単に両者のうち強度が大きい周波数を打検周波数として認定した場合、前述したように良缶の無駄排斥や不良缶の見逃しが生じる。その問題点を解決する方策として、本実施形態では複数の強度ピークが発生した場合、図2に示すように、そのうちピークの大きい2つを選択して、その強度比が0.3あるいは0.4以上である場合、打検周波数を第1ピークの周波数とせずに、次式のように第2ピークの周波数と強度により補正して得られた周波数を打検周波数として採用するようにした。
【0014】
fp=(f1×M1+f2×M2)/(M1+M2) ・・・・(1)
但し、f1:第1ピークの周波数
f2:第2ピークの周波数
M1:第1ピークの強度
M2:第2ピークの強度
である。
【0015】
上記式中、M2/M1が略0.3〜0.4の範囲で任意に選択される値以下の場合は、第1ピークと第2ピークの差が大きため、第1ピークの周波数をそのまま打検周波数として採用しても、内圧−打検周波数との間に不連続部は殆ど生じないことが確認された。そのため、その場合は上記式による補正を行わなくて、第1ピークをそのまま打検周波数として採用する。強度比M2/M1が上記の選定した値以上であると式(1)で補正した周波数fpを打検周波数とする。打検周波数として、補正した周波数fpを採用するか第1ピークの周波数f1を採用するか、その判定基準値は、本発明者の実験によれば、常に一定値でなく密封容器の種類によって若干ずれがあるが、M2/M1の値が0.3〜0.4の範囲の任意に選択される特定の値を基準にして、上記のように判定すれば、全ての缶種について正確に内圧の良否を判定できることができることが確認された。
【0016】
上記補正式をマイクロコンピュータ9に演算式として組み込んで上記条件により打検周波数を補正しながら、缶内圧が0.01MPaから0.09MPaの範囲の2ピース缶について、図1に示す装置により打検した。その結果、内圧と打検周波数の結果は、図3に示すような結果が得られた。該図は、前述した図12に対応するものであり、図のように、不連続点がなくなり、内圧に対する周波数は連続的に変化している。その結果、不良缶と良缶が特定周波数で存在することがなくなり、無駄排斥や見逃しを防止することができた。
【0017】
以上、本発明の好適な実施形態について説明したが、本発明は上記実施形態に限るものではない。例えば、本発明の内圧検査方法は、特に2ピース缶体の打検方法に有効であるが、2ピース缶に限らず、3ピース缶での打検において複数の強度ピークが生じる場合は本発明を採用することによって良好に打検することができる。また、その他の密封容器の内圧検査方法にも適用可能である。
【0018】
【発明の効果】
以上の説明から明らかなように、本発明によれば、打検検査による強度ピークが複数発生する2ピース缶であっても、内圧に対する周波数が連続に変化する関係を創出することができるので、良品の無駄排斥や不良品の見過ごしをすることがなく、打検法により正確に缶内圧を検査することができる。また、従来の打検装置に簡単に適用することができるので、経済的である。
【図面の簡単な説明】
【図1】本発明の密封容器の内圧検査方法を実施するための打検装置の実施例の模式図である。
【図2】本発明の原理説明図である。
【図3】本発明の実施形態における2ピース缶の内圧と打検周波数との関係を示すグラフである。
【図4】内圧が0.018MPaの2ピース缶打検音スペクトルである。
【図5】内圧が0.022MPaの2ピース缶打検音スペクトルである。
【図6】内圧が0.026MPaの2ピース缶打検音スペクトルである。
【図7】3ピース缶の打検波形線図である。
【図8】図7の打検線図を周波数分析した打検音スペクトルである。
【図9】3ピースの内圧と打検周波数との関係を示すグラフである。
【図10】2ピース缶の打検波形図である。
【図11】図10の打検波形図を周波数分析した打検音スペクトルである。
【図12】2ピースの内圧と打検周波数との関係を示すグラフである。
【符号の説明】
3 打検ヘッド 5 パルス発生器
6 増幅器・フイルタ 7 A/D変換器
8 波形メモリ 9 マイクロコンピュータ
10 光電スイッチ 11 設定器・表示器[0001]
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an internal pressure inspection method for a sealed container, and more particularly to a percussion frequency determination processing method at the time of percussion for internal pressure inspection of a two-piece can.
[0002]
[Prior art]
Conventionally, the percussion method has been widely adopted as a method for nondestructively inspecting the internal pressure of sealed containers, particularly canned milk-containing beverages that are susceptible to spoilage. The percussion method is an inspection method that converts the percussion sound generated when electromagnetic shock is applied to the can lid (can bottom of a two-piece can) into an electrical signal using a microphone, thereby judging whether the internal pressure of the can is good or not. is there. The percussion sound is generally composed of a specific frequency component, and has a characteristic that it is high when the internal pressure of the can (in the case of a negative pressure can) is high and low when the internal pressure is low. Therefore, the percussion instrument digitizes the captured percussion signal and performs frequency analysis using a fast Fourier transform technique. As a result of frequency analysis, the frequency with the highest intensity is handled as the tapping frequency. In other words, the internal pressure of the can can be determined at the inspection frequency from the relationship between the internal pressure of the can and the frequency. Is possible.
[0003]
The punching waveform of the 3-piece can consists of a single sine wave as shown in FIG. Therefore, the frequency analysis result is also a spectrum having a single peak as shown in FIG. Therefore, the peak may be determined as the tapping frequency. In the case of a three-piece can, the punching frequency and the internal pressure change substantially continuously as shown in FIG. 9, so that the inside of the can can be known from the punching frequency and the quality of the internal pressure can be determined. However, in the case of a two-piece can, the percussion waveform is more complicated than that of a three-piece can. FIG. 10 shows a punching waveform at a specific internal pressure in a two-piece can, and has a shape in which two vibration waveforms are synthesized. Looking at the frequency analysis result at this time, a spectrum having a plurality of peaks is observed as shown in FIG. In this example, since the frequency indicating the maximum peak is 2382 Hz, this is processed as the percussion check frequency, but the second peak may be higher depending on the state when the percussion is performed. That is, despite the same internal pressure of the can, two significantly different taping frequencies are generated. This second peak is not always observed and often occurs at a specific internal pressure.
[0004]
In order to investigate the relationship between the can internal pressure and the punching frequency in the two-piece can, the present inventor performed various can types and created a graph of the can internal pressure and the punching frequency. A similar experiment was performed on a three-piece can. In the case of the three-piece can, as shown in FIG. 9, the relationship between the internal pressure and the punching frequency was smooth, and no discontinuous points were found. However, in the case of a two-piece can, as shown in FIG. 12, the relationship between the inspection frequency and the internal pressure may be discontinuous near a specific internal pressure. In the illustrated example, the phenomenon is observed around 0.02 MPa.
[0005]
When discriminating between non-defective products and defective products with a percussion instrument, the upper and lower limits of the percussion frequency are specified. For example, when 0.02 MPa is the minimum internal pressure, the inspection frequency of 2000 Hz is set as the lower limit value. At this time, since the products in the range surrounded by the lower right of the frame in FIG. 12 are 0.2 MPa or more, the inspection frequency is less than 2000 Hz. That is, it is judged as a defective product while being in the non-defective range, and is rejected. That is, wasteful elimination occurs. On the other hand, products in the range enclosed in the upper left of the frame in the figure are products whose internal pressure is 0.02 MPa or less but the percussion frequency is 2000 Hz or more. This is a defective range but is treated as a good product. That is, it is missed. Such problems occur more frequently as the frequency variation with respect to the internal pressure increases.
[0006]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
As described above, the percussion method is very effective as a non-destructive method for inspecting the can internal pressure, but in the case of a two-piece can, the relationship with the internal pressure of the can becomes discontinuous near a specific internal pressure. There is a case. For this reason, waste rejection or oversight may occur, and the conventional percussion inspection method is mainly used for the internal pressure inspection of a three-piece can. In the case of a two-piece can, the case of a can body having a relatively high internal pressure. Only used.
[0007]
Therefore, the present invention provides a sealed container that can be accurately applied to a conventional inspection device without causing wasteful rejection of defective products or overlooking of defective products even in a low-pressure two-piece can. The purpose is to provide an internal pressure inspection method.
[0008]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
In the course of research for solving the above problems, the present inventor examined the frequency analysis result when the can internal pressure was changed from 0.018 to 0.026 MPa for the two-piece can. As a result, the relationship between the frequency and intensity when the internal pressure of the can was 0.018 MPa, 0.022 MPa, 0.026 MPa was as shown in FIGS. From these figures, even if the internal pressure changes from 0.018 MPa to 0.022 MPa, the frequency of the first peak does not change much. However, at 0.22 MPa, it can be seen that a second peak occurs in the vicinity of 2.1 kHz. In other words, a can with an internal pressure of 0.22 MPa has two taping frequencies near 1.8 kHz and 2.1 kHz. Therefore, if the frequency of the first peak is directly used as the inspection frequency, the change in the internal pressure cannot be read. This is a major cause of variations in the inspection frequency. Further, as shown in FIG. 6, in the canned product having an internal pressure of 0.026 MPa, the first peak occurs in the vicinity of 2.2 kHz, and the second peak occurs in the vicinity of 1.9 kHz. That is, the order of the intensity of the first peak and the second peak is not always constant, and may be reversed under slight conditions.
[0009]
As a result of further investigations focusing on the above facts, the present invention eliminates discontinuities by correcting the frequency of the first peak and the second frequency in the frequency analysis result based on a certain mathematical formula. The present inventors have found that wasteful evacuation and oversight can be suppressed to a minimum, and have reached the present invention.
[0010]
That is, the method for inspecting the internal pressure of the sealed container according to the present invention is a method for inspecting the internal pressure of the sealed container by percussion. The sound generated by applying an electromagnetic shock to the elastic wall of the sealed container is detected with a microphone. The percussion waveform obtained by converting to an electrical signal is frequency converted to obtain a percussion sound spectrum, the first peak and the second peak of the obtained spectrum are extracted, and the intensity of the second peak and the first peak. When the ratio is within a predetermined range, the frequency of the first peak is determined as a tapping frequency, and when the ratio is outside the predetermined range, the correction frequency obtained from the first peak and the second peak is determined as a tapping frequency. It is what.
[0011]
The correction frequency fp is calculated using the following equation.
fp = (f 1 × M 1 + f 2 × M 2 ) / (M 1 + M 2 )
Here, f 1 : frequency of the first peak f 2 : frequency of the second peak M 1 : intensity of the first peak M 2 : intensity of the second peak.
When the following values the second peak value of the ratio M 2 / M 1 of the intensity M 2 and the intensity M 1 of the first peak of arbitrarily selected in the range of 0.3 to 0.4 is The frequency of the first peak is set as a check frequency, and the correction frequency fp is set as a check frequency when the frequency is equal to or higher than the value.
[0012]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail. FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of an internal pressure inspection apparatus for carrying out a sealed container internal pressure inspection of the present invention.
In the internal pressure inspection apparatus shown in FIG. 1, a
[0013]
As described above, in particular, in the case of a two-piece can, a plurality of intensity peaks in the percussion sound spectrum occur, and in particular, an intensity peak with a small intensity difference occurs at two frequencies in a specific internal pressure range. When a frequency with a high intensity is recognized as the inspection frequency, as described above, wasteful disposal of good cans and oversight of defective cans occur. As a measure for solving the problem, in the present embodiment, when a plurality of intensity peaks occur, as shown in FIG. 2, two of the peaks having the largest peak are selected, and the intensity ratio is 0.3 or 0.3. In the case of 4 or more, the frequency obtained by correcting with the frequency and intensity of the second peak as shown in the following equation is adopted as the frequency of the test without setting the frequency of the test as the frequency of the first peak.
[0014]
fp = (f 1 × M 1 + f 2 × M 2 ) / (M 1 + M 2 ) (1)
Here, f 1 : frequency of the first peak f 2 : frequency of the second peak M 1 : intensity of the first peak M 2 : intensity of the second peak.
[0015]
In the above formula, when M 2 / M 1 is equal to or less than a value arbitrarily selected within the range of about 0.3 to 0.4, the difference between the first peak and the second peak is large, and thus the frequency of the first peak It was confirmed that a discontinuity hardly occurred between the internal pressure and the inspection frequency even when the above was adopted as the inspection frequency as it was. Therefore, in that case, the first peak is directly adopted as the inspection frequency without performing the correction by the above formula. If the intensity ratio M 2 / M 1 is greater than or equal to the above selected value, the frequency fp corrected by the equation (1) is set as the tapping test frequency. Whether the corrected frequency fp or the first peak frequency f 1 is used as the percussion frequency is determined according to the experiment of the present inventor, and is not always a constant value, depending on the type of the sealed container. Although there is a slight deviation, if it is judged as described above based on a specific value arbitrarily selected within the range of M 2 / M 1 in the range of 0.3 to 0.4, all can types It was confirmed that the quality of the internal pressure can be accurately determined.
[0016]
The two-piece can whose internal pressure is in the range of 0.01 MPa to 0.09 MPa is tested by the apparatus shown in FIG. 1 while incorporating the correction formula as an arithmetic expression in the microcomputer 9 and correcting the test frequency according to the above conditions. did. As a result, the results shown in FIG. 3 were obtained for the internal pressure and the inspection frequency. The figure corresponds to FIG. 12 described above. As shown in the figure, the discontinuity disappears and the frequency with respect to the internal pressure continuously changes. As a result, defective cans and good cans do not exist at a specific frequency, and wasteful elimination and oversight can be prevented.
[0017]
The preferred embodiment of the present invention has been described above, but the present invention is not limited to the above embodiment. For example, the internal pressure inspection method of the present invention is particularly effective for a method of punching a two-piece can body. However, the present invention is not limited to a two-piece can. By adopting, it is possible to make a good test. It can also be applied to other methods for inspecting the internal pressure of sealed containers.
[0018]
【The invention's effect】
As is clear from the above description, according to the present invention, even in a two-piece can in which a plurality of intensity peaks due to percussion inspection occurs, a relationship in which the frequency with respect to the internal pressure continuously changes can be created. The internal pressure of the can can be accurately inspected by the percussion method without wasteful disposal of non-defective products and oversight of defective products. Moreover, since it can be easily applied to a conventional percussion inspection apparatus, it is economical.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an embodiment of a percussion inspection apparatus for carrying out an internal pressure inspection method for a sealed container according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating the principle of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the relationship between the internal pressure of a two-piece can and an inspection frequency in the embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a two-piece can sound detection spectrum with an internal pressure of 0.018 MPa.
FIG. 5 is a two-piece can sound detection spectrum with an internal pressure of 0.022 MPa.
FIG. 6 is a two-piece can tap sound spectrum with an internal pressure of 0.026 MPa.
FIG. 7 is a waveform diagram of a three-piece can.
8 is a percussion sound spectrum obtained by frequency analysis of the percussion line diagram of FIG.
FIG. 9 is a graph showing the relationship between the internal pressure of three pieces and the inspection frequency.
FIG. 10 is a waveform diagram of a 2-piece can.
11 is a tap sound spectrum obtained by frequency analysis of the tap waveform diagram of FIG.
FIG. 12 is a graph showing the relationship between the internal pressure of two pieces and the inspection frequency.
[Explanation of symbols]
3
Claims (3)
fp=(f 1 ×M 1 +f 2 ×M 2 )/(M 1 +M 2 )
但し、f 1 :第1ピークの周波数
f 2 :第2ピークの周波数
M 1 :第1ピークの強度
M 2 :第2ピークの強度である。 In a method for inspecting the internal pressure of a sealed container by inspecting the internal pressure of the sealed container, the frequency of the percussion waveform obtained by converting the sound generated by applying an electromagnetic shock to the elastic wall of the sealed container into an electrical signal using a microphone The percussion sound spectrum is obtained by conversion, the first peak and the second peak of the obtained spectrum are extracted, and when the intensity ratio of the second peak and the first peak is within a predetermined range, the first peak A method for inspecting an internal pressure of a sealed container, wherein the frequency is set as a check frequency, and when the frequency is outside the predetermined range, the correction frequency fp obtained by the following equation is used as the check frequency.
fp = (f 1 × M 1 + f 2 × M 2 ) / (M 1 + M 2 )
Where f 1 is the frequency of the first peak
f 2 : second peak frequency
M 1 : intensity of the first peak
M 2 is the intensity of the second peak.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2000051039A JP4450127B2 (en) | 2000-02-28 | 2000-02-28 | Internal pressure inspection method for sealed containers |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2000051039A JP4450127B2 (en) | 2000-02-28 | 2000-02-28 | Internal pressure inspection method for sealed containers |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2001242029A JP2001242029A (en) | 2001-09-07 |
| JP4450127B2 true JP4450127B2 (en) | 2010-04-14 |
Family
ID=18572745
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2000051039A Expired - Fee Related JP4450127B2 (en) | 2000-02-28 | 2000-02-28 | Internal pressure inspection method for sealed containers |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP4450127B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2007086016A (en) * | 2005-09-26 | 2007-04-05 | Toyo Seikan Kaisha Ltd | Can shaking twister system capable of enhancing hammering test characteristic |
| JP6701891B2 (en) * | 2016-03-31 | 2020-05-27 | 東洋製罐株式会社 | Percussion device and percussion method |
-
2000
- 2000-02-28 JP JP2000051039A patent/JP4450127B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2001242029A (en) | 2001-09-07 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US10953440B2 (en) | Sound-pressure analyzer and a method in the high-intensity acoustic field, and an ultrasonic cleaner and an ultrasonic processor | |
| RU2011122813A (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ANALYSIS OF VIBRATIONS, AND ALSO THE DATABASE OF IMAGE DATA FOR THEM AND APPLICATION OF THE DATABASE OF IMAGE DATA | |
| US5861548A (en) | Apparatus and method utilizing signal modulation detection for analyzing the internal pressure of containers | |
| US4212205A (en) | Container defect detection apparatus | |
| US5675074A (en) | Analyzing internal pressure of a closed container | |
| JP4450127B2 (en) | Internal pressure inspection method for sealed containers | |
| US4187725A (en) | Method for ultrasonic inspection of materials and device for effecting same | |
| JP2001272385A (en) | Percussion inspection method and percussion inspection device using linear prediction coefficient method | |
| JP2002148133A (en) | Method and device for inspecting internal pressure in sealed container | |
| JPH04320958A (en) | Method for inspecting product acoustically | |
| JPH11166875A (en) | Internal pressure inspection method and internal pressure inspection device for sealed container | |
| JPS6229023B2 (en) | ||
| JPS58182530A (en) | Method and device for determining whether the internal pressure of a sealed container is good or bad | |
| JPH0389132A (en) | Inspection device for vacuum closed container | |
| JP3085853B2 (en) | Transformer insulation condition monitoring device | |
| JPH01248050A (en) | Leakage magnetic flux flaw detection device | |
| JPH02263135A (en) | Method and device for inspecting sealed container | |
| JPH0560732A (en) | Ultrasonic device for judging adhesion and peeling | |
| JPH1082767A (en) | Method and apparatus for measuring ripeness of fruits and vegetables | |
| JPS6223804B2 (en) | ||
| JPH11173941A (en) | Lid for sealed container | |
| JP2000131291A (en) | Casting material inspection equipment | |
| JP2019007920A (en) | Non-contact inspection system | |
| JPS59176629A (en) | Method and device for inspecting timbre of acoustic generating equipment | |
| JPH0225163Y2 (en) |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20070115 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20090803 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20090930 |
|
| A521 | Written amendment |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20091127 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20100106 |
|
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20100119 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130205 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130205 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| S531 | Written request for registration of change of domicile |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130205 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140205 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| S533 | Written request for registration of change of name |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140205 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| S111 | Request for change of ownership or part of ownership |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313111 |
|
| R350 | Written notification of registration of transfer |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |