JP4490879B2 - Repair material for magnesia dry spraying construction - Google Patents
Repair material for magnesia dry spraying construction Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP4490879B2 JP4490879B2 JP2005191921A JP2005191921A JP4490879B2 JP 4490879 B2 JP4490879 B2 JP 4490879B2 JP 2005191921 A JP2005191921 A JP 2005191921A JP 2005191921 A JP2005191921 A JP 2005191921A JP 4490879 B2 JP4490879 B2 JP 4490879B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- particles
- particle size
- magnesia
- less
- mass
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Landscapes
- Ceramic Products (AREA)
- Curing Cements, Concrete, And Artificial Stone (AREA)
Description
本発明は、工業窯炉の吹付け補修に使用されるマグネシア質乾式吹付け施工用補修材に関するものである。 The present invention relates to a magnesia dry spraying repair material used for spray repair of an industrial kiln.
工業用窯炉炉壁に対する吹付け補修方法は、乾式法と湿式法とに大別される。乾式法は、耐火性原料粉および結合剤等の粉体混合物よりなる吹付け補修材をエアーで搬送し、ノズル部で、別配管で供給した水と混和させ、被施工面に吹付ける。一方、湿式法は予め混練した吹付け補修材を圧送管を介してノズルに送り、必要によってはノズル部で急結剤を添加し、吹付ける。 Spray repair methods for industrial furnace walls are roughly classified into dry methods and wet methods. In the dry method, a spray repair material made of a powder mixture such as a refractory raw material powder and a binder is conveyed by air, mixed with water supplied by a separate pipe at a nozzle, and sprayed onto a work surface. On the other hand, in the wet method, a spray repair material kneaded in advance is sent to a nozzle through a pressure feed pipe, and if necessary, a quick setting agent is added and sprayed at the nozzle portion.
乾式法は湿式法に比べて、事前の混練作業が不要、ノズル詰りが生じ難い、施工装置の操作が簡単等の利点がある。しかし、乾式法では吹付け材への水の添加がノズル部であるため、次の問題がある。 Compared to the wet method, the dry method has advantages such as no need for prior kneading work, nozzle clogging hardly occurring, and easy operation of the construction apparatus. However, the dry method has the following problems because water is added to the spray material at the nozzle.
1)吹付け補修材の水との混和が不十分であり、発塵が生じやすく、作業環境において好ましくない。 1) The spray repair material is not sufficiently mixed with water, and dust generation is likely to occur, which is not preferable in the work environment.
2)吹付け補修材の水との混和が不十分である分、付着性に劣る。そこで、付着性の確保のために多量の水添加が必要であり、結果として施工体の組織がポーラスになる
3)また、吹付け補修材と水の混和不足は、吹付け時のリバウンドロスや材料輸送配管内でのセグレーションの原因となり、施工体組織の不均一化の原因となる。
2) Adhesion is inferior due to insufficient mixing of spray repair material with water. Therefore, it is necessary to add a large amount of water to ensure adhesion, and as a result, the structure of the construction body becomes porous. 3) Insufficient mixing of the spray repair material and water can cause rebound loss during spraying, It causes segmentation in the material transport piping and causes non-uniform construction body structure.
乾式吹付け方法におけるこの問題解決のために、吹付け補修材を構成する粉体を分散剤(界面活性剤)あるいは結合剤にて予め造粒し、微粉を無くした吹付け補修材が提案されている。この場合の造粒方法は、耐火原料のうち粗粒を液状分散剤または液状結合剤にて濡らし、その表面に耐火原料微粉を付着させている(特許文献1)。 In order to solve this problem in the dry spray method, a spray repair material in which the powder constituting the spray repair material is pre-granulated with a dispersant (surfactant) or a binder to eliminate fine powder has been proposed. ing. In the granulation method in this case, coarse particles of the refractory raw material are wetted with a liquid dispersant or a liquid binder, and the refractory raw material fine powder is adhered to the surface (Patent Document 1).
一方、耐火原料粉に対してシリカゾルまたはアルミナゾルを添加し、混練して造粒する方法も提案されている(特許文献2)。
前記従来の乾式吹付け方法では、造粒した吹付け補修材(以下、造粒吹付け材と称する。)を使用することで発塵防止が図られる。しかし、付着性と施工体の緻密性においては依然十分なものではない。 In the conventional dry spraying method, dust generation is prevented by using a granulated spray repair material (hereinafter referred to as a granulated spray material). However, the adhesion and the compactness of the construction body are still not sufficient.
本発明は、乾式吹付け方法に使用するこの造粒吹付け材において、付着性および施工体の緻密性を改善することを課題とする。 This invention makes it a subject to improve adhesiveness and the compactness of a construction body in this granulated spray material used for the dry-type spray method.
本発明の特徴とするところは、粒度0.5mm以下の粒子が少なくとも70質量%含まれるマグネシア粉を液状分散剤をもって3mm以下に造粒後、乾燥して得たマグネシア造粒子60〜90質量%と、粒度5〜1mmのマグネシア粉5〜35質量%およびアルミナセメントを耐火性配合組成とするマグネシア質乾式吹付け施工用補修材である。 The feature of the present invention is that magnesia powder 60 to 90 mass% obtained by granulating magnesia powder containing at least 70 mass% of particles having a particle size of 0.5 mm or less to 3 mm or less with a liquid dispersant and then drying. And magnesia powder having a particle size of 5 to 1 mm and a magnesia dry-type repair material having a fireproof blend composition of 5 to 35% by mass and alumina cement.
また、粒度0.5mm以下の粒子が少なくとも70質量%、粒度0.075mm以下で0.045mm超の粒子が10質量%以下、粒度0.045mm以下の粒子が30〜60質量%含まれるマグネシア粉を液状分散剤をもって3mm以下に造粒後、乾燥して得たマグネシア造粒子60〜90質量%と、粒度5〜1mmのマグネシア粉5〜35質量%およびアルミナセメントを耐火性配合組成とするマグネシア質乾式吹付け施工用補修材である。 Further, magnesia powder containing at least 70% by mass of particles having a particle size of 0.5 mm or less, 10% by mass or less of particles having a particle size of 0.075 mm or less and more than 0.045 mm, and 30 to 60% by mass of particles having a particle size of 0.045 mm or less. Of magnesia particles obtained by granulating the powder to a size of 3 mm or less with a liquid dispersant and drying, magnesia powder containing 5 to 35 mass% of magnesia powder having a particle size of 5 to 1 mm, and alumina cement as a fireproof blend composition It is a repair material for quality dry spraying construction.
吹付け補修材の耐火原料粉は、緻密な施工体を得るために粗粒、中粒、微粒に適宜粒度調整されている。従来技術においては、先に説明したように粗粒に微粒を付着させて造粒するか、あるいは粗粒・中粒・微粒を一括して特定の粒度に造粒している。 The refractory raw material powder of the spray repair material is appropriately adjusted in particle size to coarse particles, medium particles, and fine particles in order to obtain a dense construction body. In the prior art, as described above, granulation is performed by attaching fine particles to coarse particles, or coarse particles, medium particles, and fine particles are collectively granulated to a specific particle size.
これに対し、本発明の吹付け補修材は、微粒主体のマグネシア粉を造粒し、これに粒度5〜1mmのマグネシア粉を組み合わせたものである。この本発明の吹付け補修材は、付着性と施工体の緻密性において優れた効果を発揮するが、その理由は以下のとおりと考えられる。 On the other hand, the spray repair material of the present invention is obtained by granulating magnesia powder mainly composed of fine particles and combining it with magnesia powder having a particle size of 5 to 1 mm. The spray repair material of the present invention exhibits excellent effects in adhesion and the compactness of the construction body, and the reason is considered as follows.
すなわち、造粒子は被施工面上で砕け、微粒にならなければ付着性と施工体の緻密性の向上が期待できないが、本発明の吹付け補修材は、造粒子と共に粒度5〜1mmのマグネシア粉の存在により、被施工面上に到達した造粒子が粒度5〜1mmの粗粒の衝突で壊れ、微粉化が促進される。 That is, the granulated particles are crushed on the surface to be constructed, and improvement in adhesion and compactness of the construction body cannot be expected unless they become fine particles. However, the spray repair material of the present invention has a magnesia particle size of 5 to 1 mm together with the granulated particles. Due to the presence of the powder, the particles formed on the work surface are broken by the collision of coarse particles having a particle size of 5 to 1 mm, and the pulverization is promoted.
また、造粒子を構成するマグネシア粉はその造粒結合に使用した分散剤が、吹付け施工時に供給される水との反応で瞬時にゲル化し、造粒子は粘性を帯びたゲル状組織となる。粒度5〜1mmの粗粒は造粒子の微粉化と同時に、このゲル状の微粉組織へ次々と刺さり込み、リバウンドロスが軽減される。その結果、吹付け補修材の付着性が格段に向上し、しかも微粒、粗粒間の相対的な偏析が防止され、施工体は均一かつ密充填組織となる。 In addition, the magnesia powder that composes the particles is instantly gelled by the reaction of the dispersant used for the granulation bond with the water supplied during spraying, and the particles form a viscous gel-like structure. . Coarse particles having a particle size of 5 to 1 mm are stabbed one after another into the gel-like fine powder structure simultaneously with pulverization of the granulated particles, thereby reducing rebound loss. As a result, the adhesion of the spray repair material is remarkably improved, and the relative segregation between fine particles and coarse particles is prevented, and the construction body has a uniform and tightly packed structure.
また、アルミナセメントは造粒されておらず、吹付け補修材組織において造粒子および粗粒の表面にのみ存在する。その結果、アルミナセメントは施工水と早期に且つ確実に接触し、セメント水和反応が促進され、施工体組織は高強度なものとなる。 Alumina cement is not granulated and exists only on the surface of the granulated and coarse particles in the spray repair material structure. As a result, the alumina cement comes into contact with the construction water quickly and reliably, the cement hydration reaction is promoted, and the construction body structure becomes high strength.
これに対し、従来のように粗粒に対する微粒の付着によって得た造粒子、あるいは粗粒・中粒・微粒を一括して特定の粒度とした造粒子の使用では、吹付け施工時に造粒子が容易に砕けず、被施工面上において均一組織が得られ難い。これが原因し、付着性、施工体の緻密性共に本発明の吹付け補修材より大きく劣る。 On the other hand, when using granulated particles obtained by adhering fine particles to coarse particles as in the past, or using granulated particles with a specific particle size of coarse particles, medium particles, and fine particles, It does not break easily and it is difficult to obtain a uniform structure on the work surface. For this reason, both the adhesion and the compactness of the construction body are greatly inferior to the spray repair material of the present invention.
本発明において造粒子を構成するマグネシア粉には粒度0.5mm以下の粒子が少なくとも70質量%含まれるようにする。また、造粒子の粒度は3mm以下とする。更に好ましくは、2mm以下である。造粒子の粒度が大きすぎると吹付け施工時にリバウンドロスが多くなる。また、造粒子を構成するマグネシア粉における粒度0.5mm以下の粒子の割合が70質量%未満になると、粉体単位で既に粒度が大きいことで、3mm以下の造粒子が得られ難い。 In the present invention, the magnesia powder constituting the granulated particles contains at least 70% by mass of particles having a particle size of 0.5 mm or less. Further, the particle size of the particles is 3 mm or less. More preferably, it is 2 mm or less. If the particle size of the particles is too large, rebound loss increases during spraying. Further, when the ratio of particles having a particle size of 0.5 mm or less in the magnesia powder constituting the particle formation is less than 70% by mass, it is difficult to obtain particles having a particle size of 3 mm or less because the particle size is already large in powder units.
また、造粒子を構成するマグネシア微粉の粒度は、前記粒度の範囲において、さらに0.075以下で0.045mm超の粒度割合が10質量%以下、且つ0.045mm以下の粒度割合が30〜60質量%とした場合、造粒子の製造が容易となる。これは、微粉の造粒は核となる粒子に他の粒子がコーティングされる工程を経るため、微粉部の粒度構成において中間粒度を少なくし、粒度間にギャップを与えることで、核となる粒子に他の粒子がコーティングされやすくなるためである。 The particle size of the magnesia fine powder constituting the particle-forming is within the above particle size range, and the particle size ratio of 0.075 mm or less and more than 0.045 mm is 10 mass% or less, and the particle size ratio of 0.045 mm or less is 30 to 60. In the case of mass%, it is easy to produce particles. This is because the granulation of fine powder goes through a process in which other particles are coated on the core particles, so that the intermediate particle size is reduced in the particle size structure of the fine powder portion, and the core particles are given by providing a gap between the particle sizes. This is because other particles are more easily coated.
この造粒子における粒度間のギャップにより、粗粒の衝突で造粒子がさらに壊れやすくなり、微粒化しやすくなって吹付け補修材の付着性を一段と向上させる。 Due to the gap between the particle sizes in the particles, the particles are more easily broken by the collision of coarse particles, and are easily atomized to further improve the adhesion of the spray repair material.
本発明の吹付け補修材は、造粒子を用いたことによる発塵防止等に加えて、付着性、施工体の緻密性において優れた効果が得られる。その結果、乾式吹付け法が持つ事前混練が不要、施工設備が簡単である等の効果を十分に発揮することができる。 The spray repair material of the present invention provides excellent effects in adhesion and the compactness of the construction body, in addition to dust generation prevention and the like by using particles. As a result, the pre-kneading that the dry spraying method has is unnecessary, and the effects such as simple construction equipment can be sufficiently exhibited.
本発明の吹付け補修材に使用される耐火性原料は、焼結あるいは電融のマグネシア粉である。また、焼結マグネシア粉としては、海水マグネシアあるいは天然マグネシアが挙げられる。マグネシア粉は高融点物質であり、溶融金属に対して優れた耐食性を示す。 The refractory raw material used for the spray repair material of the present invention is sintered or electrofused magnesia powder. In addition, examples of the sintered magnesia powder include seawater magnesia and natural magnesia. Magnesia powder is a high melting point material and exhibits excellent corrosion resistance against molten metal.
マグネシア造粒子の製造に使用するマグネシア粉は、粒度0.5mm以下の粒子が少なくとも70質量%含まれるものとする。粒度0.5mm以下の粒子が70質量%未満では、前記のとおり3mm以下の造粒子が得られ難いのに加え、微粉部の不足で吹付け補修材全体の粒度構成のバランスが崩れ、密充填組織の施工体が得られない。 The magnesia powder used for the production of the magnesia particles is assumed to contain at least 70% by mass of particles having a particle size of 0.5 mm or less. If particles with a particle size of 0.5 mm or less are less than 70% by mass, it is difficult to obtain particles with a particle size of 3 mm or less as mentioned above. The construction body of the organization cannot be obtained.
造粒子を構成するこのマグネシア粉の粒度は、前記粒度の範囲において、さらに0.075以下で0.045mm超の粒度割合が10質量%以下、且つ0.045mm以下の粒度割合が30〜60質量%であることが好ましい。これにより、造粒子を構成するこのマグネシア粉のうち中間粒度域の割合が少なくなって、核となる部分と造粒されていく微粉部の粒度構成にギャップが生じ、前記のとおり核となる部分に微粉部がコーティングされ、造粒子が得られやすい。また、この造粒子における粒度間のギャップにより、粗粒の衝突で造粒子がさらに壊れやすくなり、微粒化しやすくなって吹付け補修材の付着性を一段と向上させる。 The particle size of the magnesia powder constituting the particles is within the above particle size range, and the particle size ratio of 0.075 mm or less and more than 0.045 mm is 10 mass% or less, and the particle size ratio of 0.045 mm or less is 30 to 60 mass. % Is preferred. As a result, the ratio of the intermediate particle size region of the magnesia powder constituting the granulated particles is reduced, and a gap is generated in the particle size structure of the fine powder portion to be granulated and the fine powder portion to be granulated. The fine powder part is coated on the surface, making it easy to obtain particles. Further, due to the gap between the particle sizes of the particles, the particles are further broken by the collision of coarse particles, and are easily atomized to further improve the adhesion of the spray repair material.
造粒子を構成するこのマグネシア微粉の粒度は、最大2mmとする。2mmを超える粒子を使用すると、造粒子の運動エネルギーが大きくなりリバウンドロスが多くなる。 The particle size of the magnesia fine powder constituting the particles is 2 mm at maximum. When particles exceeding 2 mm are used, the kinetic energy of the particles is increased and the rebound loss is increased.
造粒子の粒度は、前記のとおりリバウンドロスを少なくするために3mm以下、好ましくは2mm以下とする。造粒子の粒度の下限は、造粒操作によって自ずと一定の粒度となる。限定するものではないが、好ましい下限粒度は0.5mmである。 As described above, the particle size of the particles is 3 mm or less, preferably 2 mm or less in order to reduce the rebound loss. The lower limit of the particle size of the granulated particles becomes a certain particle size by the granulating operation. Although it does not limit, a preferable minimum particle size is 0.5 mm.
造粒で使用する分散剤の具体例は、不定形耐火物の分散剤として知られているものを使用することができる。例えばヘキサメタリン酸ソーダ、トリポリリン酸ソーダ等の縮合リン酸塩、β−ナフタレンスルホン酸塩ホルマリン縮合物、メラミンスルホン酸塩ホルマリン縮合物、アミノスルホン酸およびその塩、リグニンスルホン酸およびその塩、ポリアクリル酸およびその塩、ポリカルボン酸およびその塩、オキシカルボン酸およびその塩等である。中でもポリアクリル酸のような減水効果が高く、水溶液状態で粘性の高くなるものが好ましい。 As a specific example of the dispersant used for granulation, a known dispersant for an amorphous refractory can be used. For example, condensed phosphates such as sodium hexametaphosphate, sodium tripolyphosphate, β-naphthalene sulfonate formalin condensate, melamine sulfonate formalin condensate, amino sulfonic acid and its salt, lignin sulfonic acid and its salt, polyacrylic acid And salts thereof, polycarboxylic acids and salts thereof, oxycarboxylic acids and salts thereof, and the like. Among them, those having a high water reducing effect such as polyacrylic acid and having a high viscosity in an aqueous solution are preferable.
分散剤を液状にするための溶媒は水が好ましい。質量比で分散剤1に対し、2〜4倍の水をもって溶解させた液状分散剤を使用する。 The solvent for making the dispersant liquid is preferably water. A liquid dispersant dissolved with 2 to 4 times as much water as the dispersant 1 in terms of mass ratio is used.
マグネシア造粒子は、マグネシア粉に対してこの液状分散剤を外掛けで5〜10質量%程度滴下して傾転法にて造粒して得ることができる。造粒後は乾燥する。 The magnesia particles can be obtained by dropping about 5 to 10% by mass of this liquid dispersant on the outside of the magnesia powder and granulating it by a tilting method. Dry after granulation.
造粒手段としては他に、シリカゾルあるいはアルミナゾルをバインダーとして使用することが考えられる。しかし、シリカゾルあるいはアルミナゾルの使用は乾燥後の造粒子の強度が大きく、吹付け施工時において造粒子が砕けず、吹付け補修材のリバウンドロスが多くなって、本発明の付着性の効果が得られない。 As another granulation means, it is possible to use silica sol or alumina sol as a binder. However, when silica sol or alumina sol is used, the strength of the particles after drying is large, the particles are not crushed during spraying, and the rebound loss of the spray repair material increases, so that the adhesion effect of the present invention is obtained. I can't.
造粒子とは別に配合する粒度5〜1mmの粗粒(マグネシア粉)の割合は、5〜35質量%とする。5質量%未満では吹付け施工時において造粒子を十分に砕けないためか、付着性、緻密性の効果に劣る。35質量%を超えると吹付け補修材全体に占める粗粒の割合が大きくなりすぎて、この場合も付着性、緻密性の効果に劣る。さらに好ましくは20〜30質量%である。 The ratio of coarse particles (magnesia powder) having a particle size of 5 to 1 mm to be blended separately from the particles is 5 to 35% by mass. If it is less than 5% by mass, the particles are not sufficiently crushed at the time of spraying, or the effects of adhesion and denseness are inferior. If it exceeds 35% by mass, the proportion of coarse particles in the entire spray repair material becomes too large, and in this case, the effect of adhesion and denseness is also inferior. More preferably, it is 20-30 mass%.
造粒子とは別に配合するマグネシア粉は、前記のとおり粒度5〜1mmの粗粒を5〜35質量%必要とするが、本発明の効果を損なわない範囲において粒度1mm未満のマグネシア粉を組み合わせ使用してもよい。例えば粒度1mm未満のマグネシア粉を5質量%以下組み合わせてもよい。粒度1mm未満のマグネシア粉の割合が多くなり過ぎると発塵防止の効果が得られない。 The magnesia powder blended separately from the granulated particles requires 5 to 35% by mass of coarse particles having a particle size of 5 to 1 mm as described above, but a combination of magnesia powder having a particle size of less than 1 mm is used as long as the effects of the present invention are not impaired. May be. For example, 5% by mass or less of magnesia powder having a particle size of less than 1 mm may be combined. If the proportion of magnesia powder having a particle size of less than 1 mm is too high, the effect of preventing dust generation cannot be obtained.
アルミナセメントは吹付け補修材全体のバインダーとしての役割をもつ。その好ましい割合は、1〜10質量%である。 Alumina cement serves as a binder for the entire spray repair material. The preferable ratio is 1 to 10% by mass.
本発明の吹付け補修材は以上の配合物以外にも、必要によってはさらに、消石灰、ファイバー類、金属粉、乳酸アルミニウムなどを添加してもよい。ファイバー類の具体例は、ビニロン、PVA、紙繊維、セピオライトなどである。 In addition to the above blend, the spray repair material of the present invention may further contain slaked lime, fibers, metal powder, aluminum lactate and the like as necessary. Specific examples of the fibers are vinylon, PVA, paper fiber, sepiolite and the like.
本発明による吹付け補修材は、製鋼転炉、真空脱ガス炉を始めとして、各種工業窯炉等の炉壁補修に使用することができる。 The spray repair material according to the present invention can be used for repairing furnace walls of various industrial kilns such as steelmaking converters and vacuum degassing furnaces.
以下に本発明の実施例およびその比較例を示す。 Examples of the present invention and comparative examples thereof are shown below.
表1は各例に使用したマグネシア造粒子の組成と造粒状況である。ポリアクリル酸を3倍の水をもって溶解した液状分散剤を滴下し、傾転法にて造粒した。液状分散剤の滴下量はマグネシア粉全体に対して外掛け7質量%とした。
粒度はJISふるい目開きの篩をもって調整した。例えば1mm以下では通常、その中に0.075mm以下の粒度のものも一部含まれていることから、0.075mm以下、0.075mm以下〜0.045mm超、0.045mm以下の各割合を併せて示す。 The particle size was adjusted with a JIS sieve opening sieve. For example, since 1 mm or less usually includes a part of particles having a particle size of 0.075 mm or less, 0.075 mm or less, 0.075 mm or less to more than 0.045 mm, and 0.045 mm or less. Also shown.
造粒子径は、各種粒度の原料を組み合わせて造粒し、最終的に得られた造粒子の粒径を示す。造粒の容易度は、各種粒度の原料を組み合わせて造粒作業を行い、造粒子が製造されるか確認を行った結果を示し、○は造粒子の製造が容易、△は容易に造粒せず、造粒子を得るまでに相当な時間を要したことを示す。 The granulated particle diameter indicates the particle diameter of the finally obtained granulated particles by combining raw materials of various particle sizes. The degree of granulation is the result of confirming whether granulated particles are produced by combining granulated raw materials with various particle sizes, ○ is easy to produce, Δ is easy to granulate It shows that it took considerable time to obtain particles.
A〜Eは本発明に適合するマグネシア造粒子である。このうち、C〜Eは造粒子を構成するマグネシア粉の中間粒度の割合を少なくした例である。C〜Eの粒子はA〜Bの粒子に比べて短時間で造粒子が得られ、造粒子の生産性において好ましい。また、Fは造粒子を構成するマグネシア粉について粒度0.5mm以下の割合が約50質量%と少ない。Gは、造粒子を構成するマグネシア粉の粒径が大きい。 A to E are magnesia particles suitable for the present invention. Among these, C to E are examples in which the proportion of the intermediate particle size of the magnesia powder constituting the particles is reduced. The particles C to E can be formed in a shorter time than the particles A to B, which is preferable in the productivity of the particles. In addition, F has a small proportion of about 50% by mass of a particle size of 0.5 mm or less with respect to magnesia powder constituting the particle-forming. G has a large particle size of magnesia powder constituting the particle-forming.
表2は、表1に示した各造粒子を配合した吹付け補修材の配合組成とその試験結果である。各例はピッコラガンを使用した乾式法にて吹付け施工し、各物性値を測定した。吹付け条件は、粉体搬送空気圧力0.2MPaにおいて、被施工面とノズル先端の距離300mmをもって、吹付け補修材30kgを吹付け、厚さ約50〜100mmの施工体を得た。被施工面は、窯炉耐火物の補修を想定してアルミナ質キャスタブル耐火物とした。
施工水分量は、各例の吹付け補修材毎に適宜調整した。水分量が少ないと施工面に付着せず、多すぎると付着後に流れ落ちる。 The amount of construction water was appropriately adjusted for each spray repair material in each example. If the amount of moisture is small, it will not adhere to the construction surface, and if it is too much, it will flow down after attachment.
発塵防止試験は、発塵の程度を目視のより判定した。付着性は付着率から求めた。 In the dust prevention test, the degree of dust generation was determined by visual inspection. Adhesion was determined from the adhesion rate.
施工体強度、見掛気孔率、かさ比重の試験では施工体を切り出し、試験片として測定した。施工体強度は曲げ強さにて測定した。施工体強度は見掛気孔率と共に、施工体組織の均一性、緻密性に影響される。 In the test of the strength of the construction body, the apparent porosity, and the bulk specific gravity, the construction body was cut out and measured as a test piece. The construction strength was measured by bending strength. The strength of the construction body is affected by the uniformity and the denseness of the construction body structure together with the apparent porosity.
本発明実施例を用いた吹付け施工においては、発塵防止の効果はもちろん、施工体強度、付着性にも優れる。また、見掛気孔率が低く、緻密且つ均一な施工体が得られた。 In the spray construction using the embodiment of the present invention, not only the effect of preventing dust generation but also the construction body strength and adhesion are excellent. In addition, a compact and uniform construction body having a low apparent porosity was obtained.
これに対し、比較例1は造粒子における0.5mmを超える粒度の割合が多いため、造粒子の効果が十分に発揮されず、付着性が低下する。比較例2は造粒子における0.5mmを超える粒度の割合が多く、しかもマグネシア骨材との組み合わせも無いことから、付着性、施工体強度、見掛気孔率のいずれにおいても劣る。比較例3は造粒子の割合が少ないため、付着性に劣る。比較例4はマグネシア骨材の組み合わせが無く、付着性、見掛気孔率に劣る。比較例5はマグネシア骨材の粒度が大きいため、付着性に劣る。比較例6はマグネシア骨材の粒度が小さいため、施工水分が増え、粉塵が発生し、また造粒子が施工において壊れにくいため、付着性、施工体強度、見掛気孔率いずれにおいても劣る。 On the other hand, in Comparative Example 1, since the ratio of the particle size exceeding 0.5 mm in the granulated particles is large, the effect of the granulated particles is not sufficiently exhibited and the adhesion is deteriorated. Since Comparative Example 2 has a large proportion of the particle size exceeding 0.5 mm in the particle-forming, and there is no combination with magnesia aggregate, it is inferior in any of adhesion, construction strength, and apparent porosity. Since Comparative Example 3 has a small proportion of particles, it has poor adhesion. Comparative Example 4 has no combination of magnesia aggregates and is inferior in adhesion and apparent porosity. In Comparative Example 5, since the magnesia aggregate has a large particle size, the adhesion is poor. In Comparative Example 6, since the magnesia aggregate has a small particle size, the construction moisture is increased, dust is generated, and the particles are not easily broken in the construction. Therefore, the adhesion, construction strength, and apparent porosity are inferior.
Claims (2)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2005191921A JP4490879B2 (en) | 2005-06-30 | 2005-06-30 | Repair material for magnesia dry spraying construction |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2005191921A JP4490879B2 (en) | 2005-06-30 | 2005-06-30 | Repair material for magnesia dry spraying construction |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2007008766A JP2007008766A (en) | 2007-01-18 |
| JP4490879B2 true JP4490879B2 (en) | 2010-06-30 |
Family
ID=37747736
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2005191921A Expired - Fee Related JP4490879B2 (en) | 2005-06-30 | 2005-06-30 | Repair material for magnesia dry spraying construction |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP4490879B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP6420920B1 (en) * | 2018-03-23 | 2018-11-07 | 黒崎播磨株式会社 | Method for spraying irregular refractories and spraying materials used therefor |
| JP6393438B1 (en) * | 2018-03-23 | 2018-09-19 | 黒崎播磨株式会社 | Method of spraying irregular refractories for coke oven carbonization chamber and spraying material used therefor |
| JP6393437B1 (en) * | 2018-03-23 | 2018-09-19 | 黒崎播磨株式会社 | Method for spraying irregular refractories and spraying materials used therefor |
| EP3770540A4 (en) * | 2018-03-23 | 2021-12-29 | Krosakiharima Corporation | Monolithic refractory spray application method, and spray material used therein |
| CN108409302B (en) * | 2018-04-02 | 2020-11-27 | 武汉重远炉窑工程技术服务有限公司 | Refractory brick repairing material |
| CN115650702A (en) * | 2022-11-04 | 2023-01-31 | 海城利尔麦格西塔材料有限公司 | Environment-friendly continuous casting tundish dry material and preparation method thereof |
| CN117187478A (en) * | 2023-09-07 | 2023-12-08 | 海城利尔麦格西塔材料有限公司 | Electric furnace gunning mix |
| JP7749100B1 (en) * | 2024-12-13 | 2025-10-03 | 美濃窯業株式会社 | Monolithic refractory for dry spraying and dry spraying construction method using the same |
-
2005
- 2005-06-30 JP JP2005191921A patent/JP4490879B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2007008766A (en) | 2007-01-18 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP5865200B2 (en) | Method of spraying powder accelerating agent and irregular refractory | |
| JP4490879B2 (en) | Repair material for magnesia dry spraying construction | |
| US5602063A (en) | Lightweight sprayable tundish lining composition | |
| TW202019858A (en) | Hot dry spraying material and method for hot dry spraying work | |
| JP4116806B2 (en) | Spraying method for heat insulating irregular refractories for industrial kilns | |
| JP3873426B2 (en) | Refractories for spray repair and spray repair method | |
| JP2005029419A (en) | Thermal insulation refractory spraying method and thermal insulation refractory for spraying construction used therefor | |
| TW201446707A (en) | Amorphous refractory for spraying | |
| CA2201992C (en) | Set modifying admixtures for refractory shotcreting | |
| JP3995169B2 (en) | Method of spraying dense and irregular shaped refractories | |
| JP6280427B2 (en) | Refractory for spray construction | |
| JPH0948675A (en) | Irregular refractory for spraying | |
| JP2005194119A (en) | Method of wet-spraying premix material | |
| JP2006220348A (en) | Spraying method for irregular refractory material | |
| JP2965957B1 (en) | Amorphous refractory composition for wet spraying | |
| JP3790621B2 (en) | Refractory spraying method | |
| JP2020055731A (en) | Hot dry spraying material and hot dry spraying method | |
| JP2001002477A (en) | Wet spraying method and spray material used in this method | |
| JP7441103B2 (en) | Spraying material | |
| JP2002048481A (en) | Wet spraying method for irregular refractories | |
| JP4456193B2 (en) | Refractory spraying method | |
| JPH1192241A (en) | Irregular refractories | |
| WO2006106879A1 (en) | Method of applying castable refractory material by spraying | |
| JPH11310470A (en) | Indeterminate refractory for wet spraying | |
| JP6420920B1 (en) | Method for spraying irregular refractories and spraying materials used therefor |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20080117 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20100224 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20100305 |
|
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20100402 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130409 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |