Deprecated: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in /home/zhenxiangba/zhenxiangba.com/public_html/phproxy-improved-master/index.php on line 456
JP4493083B2 - High-performance copper alloy for electronic equipment with excellent strength and conductivity and method for producing the same - Google Patents
[go: Go Back, main page]

JP4493083B2 - High-performance copper alloy for electronic equipment with excellent strength and conductivity and method for producing the same - Google Patents

High-performance copper alloy for electronic equipment with excellent strength and conductivity and method for producing the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4493083B2
JP4493083B2 JP2004348167A JP2004348167A JP4493083B2 JP 4493083 B2 JP4493083 B2 JP 4493083B2 JP 2004348167 A JP2004348167 A JP 2004348167A JP 2004348167 A JP2004348167 A JP 2004348167A JP 4493083 B2 JP4493083 B2 JP 4493083B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
less
strength
precipitates
conductivity
minor axis
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2004348167A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2006152413A (en
Inventor
雅俊 衛藤
光浩 大久保
智 遠藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Mining Holdings Inc
Original Assignee
Nippon Mining and Metals Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Mining and Metals Co Ltd filed Critical Nippon Mining and Metals Co Ltd
Priority to JP2004348167A priority Critical patent/JP4493083B2/en
Publication of JP2006152413A publication Critical patent/JP2006152413A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4493083B2 publication Critical patent/JP4493083B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Conductive Materials (AREA)

Description

本発明は、高強度、高導電性の電子機器部品用銅合金に関するものであり、特に小型、高集積化された半導体機器リード用及び端子コネクター用銅合金において、曲げ加工性を損なうことなく特に強度、導電性に優れた電子部品用銅合金に関する。   The present invention relates to a high-strength, high-conductivity copper alloy for electronic device parts, particularly in a small-sized and highly integrated copper alloy for semiconductor device leads and terminal connectors, without particularly reducing bending workability. The present invention relates to a copper alloy for electronic parts having excellent strength and conductivity.

銅及び銅合金は、コネクター、リード端子等の電子部品及びフレキシブル回路基板用として多用途に渡って幅広く利用されている材料であり、急速に展開するIT化は、情報機器の高機能化及び小型化・薄肉化に対応して更なる特性(強度、曲げ性、導電性)の向上を要求している。
電子電機部品に用いられる端子やコネクターは、電子電気機器等の小型化、軽量化に伴い、高強度、高導電性、良好な曲げ加工性が要求されている。又、ICの高集積化に伴い、消費電力の高い半導体素子が多く使用されるようになり、半導体機器のリードフレーム材には、放熱性(導電性)の良いCu−Ni−Si系やCu−Fe−P,Cu−Cr−Sn,Cu−Ni−P系等の析出型合金が使用されるようになった。しかし、一般にIC等のリードフレーム加工では、原材料をスタンピング法、或いはエッチング法等によりリード端子部、ICとの導電接続部等を成形した後にリード端子部を直角に折り曲げる。したがって、リードフレームには、導電性に加えて強度、とりわけ曲げ加工性が要求されるが、強度と曲げ加工性は一般に両立しない。
Copper and copper alloys are widely used materials for electronic parts such as connectors and lead terminals, and flexible circuit boards, and the rapid development of IT has led to higher functionality and smaller size of information equipment. There are demands for further improvements in properties (strength, bendability, conductivity) in response to the reduction in thickness and thickness.
Terminals and connectors used in electronic electrical components are required to have high strength, high conductivity, and good bending workability as electronic and electrical devices become smaller and lighter. In addition, with the high integration of ICs, many semiconductor elements with high power consumption are used, and the lead frame material of semiconductor devices has a good heat dissipation (conductivity) such as Cu-Ni-Si or Cu. Precipitation alloys such as -Fe-P, Cu-Cr-Sn, and Cu-Ni-P have come to be used. However, in general, in lead frame processing of an IC or the like, the lead terminal portion is bent at a right angle after forming the lead terminal portion and the conductive connection portion with the IC by stamping or etching the raw material. Therefore, the lead frame is required to have strength, in particular bending workability, in addition to conductivity, but strength and bending workability are generally incompatible.

従来技術では、Cu−Ni−P系合金中のNi,P,Mg成分量を調整し、強度及び導電性、耐応力緩和性を備えた合金が知られている。(例えば、特許文献1)。しかしこの特許文献1記載の発明は、電気接続端子やコネクターに用いることを目的とし、耐応力緩和特性に優れた合金であるものの、曲げ加工性を確保するために、十分な強度を具備するものではなかった。   In the prior art, alloys having strength, conductivity, and stress relaxation resistance are known by adjusting the amounts of Ni, P, and Mg components in a Cu—Ni—P alloy. (For example, patent document 1). However, the invention described in Patent Document 1 is intended to be used for electrical connection terminals and connectors, and although it is an alloy having excellent stress relaxation resistance, it has sufficient strength to ensure bending workability. It wasn't.

特開2000−273562号公報JP 2000-273562 A

そこで、本発明はCu−Ni−P−Mg系合金の優れた導電性を損なうことなく、ばね材及び半導体機器のリードフレーム材として十分な強度とを有し、曲げ加工性も兼備した銅合金を目的とした。   Accordingly, the present invention provides a copper alloy that has sufficient strength as a lead material for a spring material and a semiconductor device, and also has bending workability, without impairing the excellent conductivity of the Cu—Ni—P—Mg alloy. Aimed.

本発明者らは上記の目的を達成すべく、研究を重ねた結果、Cu−Ni−P−Mg系合金について、成分調整を行った上で、析出物の形態(形状、大きさ及び面積率)を規定範囲に調整することで高導電性と曲げ加工性を損なうことなく、従来にない高強度を有する銅合金が得られることを見出した。   As a result of repeated studies to achieve the above object, the present inventors have adjusted the components of the Cu—Ni—P—Mg based alloy, and then the morphology of the precipitate (shape, size and area ratio). ) Was adjusted to a specified range, and it was found that a copper alloy having unprecedented high strength can be obtained without impairing high conductivity and bending workability.

すなわち、本発明は以下の通りである。
(1)質量割合にて、Ni:1.0%を超え2.0%以下、P:0.1%以上0.5%以下、Mg:0.01%以上0.20%以下を含有し、NiとPの含有量比率Ni/P:4.0以上6.5以下で、残部がCu及び不可避的不純物から成るCu−Ni−P−Mg系合金において、導電率:40%IACS以上を有し、Ni−P−Mg系析出物の大きさと形状について、長径:a、短径:bとした時、少なくもアスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmとなる析出物を有し、左記析出物とアスペクト比a/bが2未満でかつ短径bが20〜50nmとなる析出物との面積の総和が銅合金中の全析出物の面積の総和に対して80%以上を占めることを特徴とする優れた強度、導電性及び曲げ加工性を兼備した電子部品用高強度高導電性銅合金。
That is, the present invention is as follows.
(1) By mass ratio, Ni: more than 1.0% and 2.0% or less, P: 0.1% or more and 0.5% or less, Mg: 0.01% or more and 0.20% or less In a Cu—Ni—P—Mg alloy in which the content ratio of Ni and P is Ni / P: 4.0 or more and 6.5 or less and the balance is Cu and inevitable impurities , the conductivity is 40% IACS or more. As for the size and shape of the Ni—P—Mg-based precipitates, when the major axis is a and the minor axis is b, at least the aspect ratio a / b is 2 to 50 and the minor axis b is 10 to 25 nm. The sum of the areas of the left deposit and the precipitate having an aspect ratio a / b of less than 2 and a minor axis b of 20 to 50 nm is the sum of the areas of all precipitates in the copper alloy. High strength for electronic parts with excellent strength, conductivity and bending workability characterized by occupying 80% or more Whenever highly conductive copper alloy.

)上記()に記載のCu−Ni−P−Mg系合金において、Zn、Sn及びInのうち1種以上を合計で0.01%以上1.0%以下含むことを特徴とする優れた強度、導電性及び曲げ加工性を兼備した電子部品用高強度高導電性銅合金。 ( 2 ) The Cu—Ni—P—Mg alloy as described in ( 1 ) above, wherein one or more of Zn, Sn and In are contained in a total of 0.01% to 1.0%. High-strength, high-conductivity copper alloy for electronic parts that combines excellent strength, conductivity and bending workability.

(3)引張強さ:700MPa以上950MPa以下である上記(1)または(2)のいずれかに記載された電子部品用高強度高導電性銅合金。
)引張強さ:750MPa以上1000MPa以下である上記()に記載された電子部品用高強度高導電性銅合金。
(3) Tensile strength: The high-strength, high-conductivity copper alloy for electronic parts described in either (1) or (2) above, which is 700 MPa or more and 950 MPa or less.
( 4 ) Tensile strength: The high-strength, high-conductivity copper alloy for electronic components described in ( 2 ) above, which is 750 MPa or more and 1000 MPa or less.

質量割合にて、Ni:1.0%を超え2.0%以下、P:0.1%以上0.5%以下、Mg:0.01%以上0.20%以下を含有し、NiとPの含有量比率Ni/P:4.0以上6.5以下で、残部がCu及び不可避的不純物から成るCu−Ni−P−Mg系合金のインゴットを熱間圧延し、熱間圧延終了時に材料温度600〜850℃から水冷を行って溶体化処理後、300〜550℃で0.1〜24時間の時効処理をして、Ni−P−Mg系析出物の大きさと形状について、長径:a、短径:bとした時、アスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmとなる析出物の面積の総和が銅合金中の全析出物の面積の総和に対して80%以上を占め中間材を製造し、この中間材を冷間圧延す請求項1〜のいずれかに記載された電子部品用高強度高導電性銅合金の製造方法。



( 5 ) By mass ratio, Ni: more than 1.0% and 2.0% or less, P: 0.1% or more and 0.5% or less, Mg: 0.01% or more and 0.20% or less , Ni / P content ratio Ni / P: 4.0 to 6.5, the remainder of the Cu-Ni-P-Mg alloy ingot consisting of Cu and inevitable impurities is hot-rolled, after performing the water cooling from the material temperature 600 to 850 ° C. at the end of rolling the solution treatment, and aging treatment of 0.1 to 24 hours at 300 to 550 ° C., the size and shape of the Ni-P-Mg-based precipitates When the major axis is a and the minor axis is b, the total area of the precipitates having an aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50 and a minor axis b of 10 to 25 nm is the total precipitate area in the copper alloy. to produce an intermediate material, which accounts for 80% or more based on the sum, either the intermediate material according to claim 1-4 you cold rolling The manufacturing method of the high intensity | strength highly electroconductive copper alloy for electronic components described in (2).



なお、本明細書においては、アスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmとなる析出物とアスペクト比a/bが2未満でかつ短径bが20〜50nmとなる析出物との面積の総和が銅合金中全析出物の面積の総和に対する割合を「面積率C」と表現する。また、アスペクト比a/bが2〜50なる析出物を「繊維状の析出物」、アスペクト比a/bが2未満での「球状の析出物」と表現する。   In the present specification, a precipitate having an aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50 and a minor axis b of 10 to 25 nm and an aspect ratio a / b of less than 2 and a minor axis b of 20 to 50 nm. The ratio of the total area with precipitates to the total area of all precipitates in the copper alloy is expressed as “area ratio C”. A precipitate having an aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50 is expressed as a “fibrous precipitate”, and a “spherical precipitate” having an aspect ratio a / b of less than 2.

本発明の銅合金は、従来のCu−Ni−P−Mg系銅合金として優れた熱伝導、導電性を損なうことなく、これまでにない優れた強度を備え、良好な曲げ加工性を兼備する。したがって、急速に展開するIT化に対応し、特に小型、高集積化されたリードフレーム、端子及びコネクター等の各種電気電子部品に適切な材料として提供することが可能となる。   The copper alloy of the present invention has excellent strength and unprecedented strength as a conventional Cu—Ni—P—Mg based copper alloy, and has excellent bending workability. . Therefore, it can be provided as an appropriate material for various electric and electronic parts such as lead frames, terminals, connectors and the like that are compatible with rapidly developing IT and are particularly small and highly integrated.

次に、本発明において銅合金の成分組成、析出物の形態(形状、大きさ、面積率)等の数値範囲を限定した理由をその作用と共に説明する。
[Ni]
Niは合金の強度及び耐熱性を確保する作用があると共に後述するP及びMgとの化合物を析出させ、合金の強度上昇に寄与する。しかし、その含有量が1.0%以下であると所望の強度が得られず、一方、2.0%を超えてNiを含有させると熱間圧延時の加工性が低下すると共に製品の曲げ加工性及び導電率の低下が顕著となる。更に、粗大化した析出物が発生するようになって、大きさが特許請求の範囲から外れる析出物が多くなり、面積率Cを低下させることとなり好ましくない。従って本発明の合金のNi含有量は1.0%超え2.0%以下、好ましくは1.1%以上1.8%以下である。
Next, the reason why the numerical range of the composition of the copper alloy, the form of the precipitates (shape, size, area ratio) and the like are limited in the present invention will be described together with the operation thereof.
[Ni]
Ni has the effect of ensuring the strength and heat resistance of the alloy and precipitates a compound with P and Mg, which will be described later, and contributes to an increase in the strength of the alloy. However, if the content is 1.0% or less, the desired strength cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if Ni is contained in excess of 2.0%, the workability during hot rolling deteriorates and the product is bent. A decrease in workability and electrical conductivity is significant. Further, coarse precipitates are generated, and there are many precipitates whose sizes are out of the scope of claims, and the area ratio C is lowered. Therefore, the Ni content of the alloy of the present invention is more than 1.0% and not more than 2.0%, preferably not less than 1.1% and not more than 1.8%.

[P]
Pは、Ni及びMgとの化合物を析出して合金の強度及び耐熱性を向上させる。P含有量が0.1%未満であると化合物の析出が不十分であるため、所望の強度が得られない。一方、P含有量が0.5%を超えて含有させると熱間圧延時の加工性が低下すると共に導電率の低下が顕著となる。更にその上、粗大化した析出物が発生するようになって、大きさが特許請求の範囲から外れる析出物が多くなり、面積率Cを低下させることとなり好ましくない。従って本発明の合金のP含有量は0.1%以上0.5%以下、好ましくは0.2%以上0.4%以下である。
[P]
P precipitates a compound with Ni and Mg to improve the strength and heat resistance of the alloy. If the P content is less than 0.1%, precipitation of the compound is insufficient, so that the desired strength cannot be obtained. On the other hand, when the P content exceeds 0.5%, the workability during hot rolling is lowered and the conductivity is significantly lowered. In addition, coarse precipitates are generated, and the number of precipitates whose size is out of the scope of claims increases, and the area ratio C decreases, which is not preferable. Therefore, the P content of the alloy of the present invention is 0.1% to 0.5%, preferably 0.2% to 0.4%.

[Mg]
Mgは、Ni及びPとの化合物を析出して合金の強度及び耐熱性を向上させる。
また、Cu−Ni−P系合金を後述する本発明の製造方法にて製造すると、アスペクト比a/bが1〜5の粒状に近い析出物が得られるに対して、Mgを添加すると、後述する本発明の製造方法においてはアスペクト比a/bが2〜50の繊維状の析出物が得られる。この場合、Ni、Pが同量のCu−Ni−P系合金に比べより高強度が得られる。さらに、その効果は、Mgが固溶して得られる強度の上昇より大きい。
ただし、Mg含有量が0.01%未満であると所望の強度及び耐熱性が得られない。一方、Mg含有量が0.20%を超えて含有させると熱間圧延時の加工性が著しく低下すると共に導電率の低下が顕著となる。また、粗大化した析出物が発生するように、大きさが特許請求の範囲から外れる析出物が多くなり、面積率Cを低下させることとなり好ましくない。
従って本発明の合金のMg含有量は0.01%以上0.20%以下、好ましくは0.02%以上0.15%以下である。
[Mg]
Mg precipitates a compound with Ni and P to improve the strength and heat resistance of the alloy.
Further, when a Cu—Ni—P-based alloy is produced by the production method of the present invention described later, precipitates having an aspect ratio a / b close to 1 to 5 are obtained. In the production method of the present invention, a fibrous precipitate having an aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50 is obtained. In this case, higher strength can be obtained as compared with Cu-Ni-P alloys having the same amount of Ni and P. Furthermore, the effect is greater than the increase in strength obtained when Mg is dissolved.
However, when the Mg content is less than 0.01%, desired strength and heat resistance cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if the Mg content exceeds 0.20%, the workability during hot rolling is remarkably lowered and the conductivity is significantly lowered. Moreover, the amount of precipitates whose size is out of the scope of claims increases so that coarse precipitates are generated, which is not preferable.
Therefore, the Mg content of the alloy of the present invention is 0.01% or more and 0.20% or less, preferably 0.02% or more and 0.15% or less.

[Ni/P]
NiとPの含有量が上記の限定範囲内にあってもNiとPの含有比率Ni/Pが4.0未満且つ6.5を超えると、析出物の適切な組成比から外れるために4.0未満の場合にはP、6.5を超えた場合にはNiの固溶する量が増大してしまい、導電率の低下が顕著となり好ましくない。また4.0未満、及び6.5を超えたいずれの場合もMgが合金中に固溶する量が増大するために熱間圧延時の加工性が著しく低下すると共に導電率の低下が顕著となる。
従って本発明の合金のNi/P比は4.0以上6.5以下、好ましくは4.5以上6.0以下である。
[Ni / P]
If the Ni / P content ratio Ni / P is less than 4.0 and more than 6.5, even if the Ni and P contents are within the above-mentioned limited range, the precipitates deviate from an appropriate composition ratio. If it is less than 0.0, P is exceeded, and if it exceeds 6.5, the amount of Ni dissolved increases, and the decrease in conductivity becomes remarkable, which is not preferable. Also, in both cases of less than 4.0 and more than 6.5, the amount of Mg dissolved in the alloy increases, so that the workability during hot rolling is significantly reduced and the decrease in conductivity is remarkable. Become.
Therefore, the Ni / P ratio of the alloy of the present invention is 4.0 or more and 6.5 or less, preferably 4.5 or more and 6.0 or less.

[O]
OはPやMgと合金中で反応しやすく、合金中に酸化物の状態で存在するとNi−P−Mg系の化合物の析出を阻害し、強度向上が低下すると共に曲げ加工性が劣化する。従って、本発明の合金のO含有量は、0.0050%以下、好ましくは0.0030%以下である。
[O]
O easily reacts with P and Mg in the alloy, and when present in the alloy in an oxide state, the precipitation of Ni-P-Mg compounds is hindered, resulting in a decrease in strength and bending workability. Therefore, the O content of the alloy of the present invention is 0.0050% or less, preferably 0.0030% or less.

[Zn、Sn、In]
Zn、Sn及びInは、いずれも合金の導電性を大きく低下させずに主として固溶強化により強度を向上させる作用を有している。従って必要によりこれらの金属を1種類以上添加するが、その含有量が総量で0.01%未満であると固溶強化による強度向上の効果が得られず、一方、総量で1.0%以上を添加すると合金の導電率及び曲げ加工性低下が顕著になる。このため、単独添加又は2種類以上の複合添加されるZn、Sn及びIn量は、0.01%以上1.0%以下、好ましくは総量で0.05%以上0.8%以下である。なお、これらの元素は本発明においては、意図的に添加される元素であり、総量で0.01%以上の場合には、不可避的不純物とはみなさない。
[Zn, Sn, In]
Zn, Sn and In all have the effect of improving the strength mainly by solid solution strengthening without greatly reducing the conductivity of the alloy. Accordingly, if necessary, one or more of these metals are added, but if the total content is less than 0.01%, the effect of improving the strength by solid solution strengthening cannot be obtained, while the total amount is 1.0% or more. When adding, the conductivity and bending workability of the alloy are significantly reduced. For this reason, the amount of Zn, Sn and In added individually or in combination of two or more types is 0.01% or more and 1.0% or less, preferably 0.05% or more and 0.8% or less in total. In the present invention, these elements are intentionally added elements, and when the total amount is 0.01% or more, they are not regarded as inevitable impurities.

[析出物の形態(形状、大きさ、面積率)]
析出硬化型銅合金においては、一般に小さい析出物をより多く分散させるとともに、各析出物の分散間隔を小さくすることで高強度化を図ることが知られている。
本発明において、発明者らは、Cu−Ni−P−Mg系合金において析出物の形態について着目し、高強度化を図る上で、アスペクト比a/bが2以上の繊維状の析出物が存在することが、アスペクト比a/bが2未満の球状の析出物が単独で存在するよりも高強度化の効果が大きいことを見出したのである。すなわち、Cu−Ni−P−Mg系合金において、アスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmの析出物が存在することが高強度化に大きく寄与することがわかった。
[Form of precipitates (shape, size, area ratio)]
In precipitation hardening type copper alloys, it is generally known to increase the strength by dispersing more small precipitates and reducing the dispersion interval of each precipitate.
In the present invention, the inventors pay attention to the form of precipitates in the Cu-Ni-P-Mg alloy, and in order to increase the strength, fibrous precipitates having an aspect ratio a / b of 2 or more are obtained. It has been found that the presence of the presence of spherical precipitates having an aspect ratio a / b of less than 2 has a greater effect of increasing the strength than the presence of a single precipitate. That is, in the Cu—Ni—P—Mg based alloy, it was found that the presence of precipitates having an aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50 and a minor axis b of 10 to 25 nm greatly contributes to the increase in strength. .

上記の要件を満たすCu−Ni−P−Mg系合金は、インゴット鋳造、熱間圧延、溶体化処理、中間冷間圧延、溶体化処理、時効処理、最終冷間圧延の順で行われる製造工程において、最終冷間圧延前の溶体化処理、時効処理にて以下に説明する析出物の形態を作りこむことで、最終冷間圧延後に得られる。
さらに、上記の製造工程で得られたものに熱処理を施して得られたもの、本発明を中間冷間圧延に利用して最終冷間圧延で得られたものも本発明に含まれる。
以下に各製造工程の析出物の形態を詳細に説明する。
A Cu—Ni—P—Mg alloy satisfying the above requirements is a manufacturing process performed in the order of ingot casting, hot rolling, solution treatment, intermediate cold rolling, solution treatment, aging treatment, and final cold rolling. In the above, it is obtained after the final cold rolling by forming the form of the precipitate described below by the solution treatment and the aging treatment before the final cold rolling.
Furthermore, what was obtained by heat-processing what was obtained by said manufacturing process, and what was obtained by the last cold rolling using this invention for intermediate | middle cold rolling are also contained in this invention.
Below, the form of the precipitate of each manufacturing process is demonstrated in detail.

(a)最終冷間圧延後の析出物の形態
本発明における溶体化処理、時効処理を施して最終冷間圧延後に得られる析出物の形態は、アスペクト比a/bが2以上の繊維状であるが、短径bが10nm未満はほとんど存在しない。本発明のCu−Ni−P−Mg系合金においては、短径bが10nm以上の析出物は、冷間圧延前と冷間圧延後においてほとんど変化しないが、短径bが10nm未満の冷間圧延前の析出物については、冷間圧延にて再固溶して消滅するためである。
(A) Form of the precipitate after the final cold rolling The form of the precipitate obtained after the solution treatment and the aging treatment in the present invention and after the final cold rolling is a fiber having an aspect ratio a / b of 2 or more. Although there is almost no minor axis b less than 10 nm. In the Cu—Ni—P—Mg-based alloy of the present invention, precipitates having a minor axis b of 10 nm or more are hardly changed before and after the cold rolling, but are cold having a minor axis b of less than 10 nm. This is because the precipitate before rolling is dissolved again by cold rolling and disappears.

一方、短径bが25nmを超える析出物は、析出物の分散間隔が大きくなり過ぎるために、25nm以下と比べると強度が低下してしまう。
また、アスペクト比a/bが50を超えて存在する場合には、短径bも25nmを超えることが多く、短径bが10〜25nmで50を超えて存在することは少ない。しかしながら、アスペクト比a/bが50を超えて存在すると析出物の分散間隔が大きくなり、強度が低下してしまう。
従って、高強度化に寄与する好ましい繊維状の析出物(アスペクト比a/bが2以上)の短径bを10〜25nmとし、アスペクト比a/bは50以下とした。
On the other hand, a precipitate having a minor axis “b” exceeding 25 nm has an excessively large dispersion interval, resulting in a decrease in strength as compared to 25 nm or less.
Further, when the aspect ratio a / b exceeds 50, the minor axis b often exceeds 25 nm, and the minor axis b rarely exceeds 50 at 10 to 25 nm. However, if the aspect ratio a / b exceeds 50, the dispersion interval of the precipitates becomes large, and the strength is lowered.
Therefore, the short diameter b of a preferable fibrous precipitate (aspect ratio a / b is 2 or more) contributing to high strength is 10 to 25 nm, and the aspect ratio a / b is 50 or less.

一方、析出物のすべてを上記規定の短径bおよびアスペクト比a/bの範囲内に制御することは難しいため、上記規定の範囲内となる析出物の全析出物に対する割合が重要である。そこで、合金中の全析出物の面積総和に対して、上記限定範囲にある析出物の面積総和の割合を面積率Cとし、本発明では面積率Cを規定した。例えば200nmを超える析出物や溶解鋳造時に生じた晶出物が熱間圧延や溶体化処理で十分に再固溶することなく、冷間圧延後に短径bが25nmを超えかつアスペクト比a/bが2を超える析出物が多く存在し、面積率Cが80%未満となってしまう場合がある。この場合には、析出物の分散間隔が大きくなり所望の強度は得られないこととなる。したがって、面積率Cは80%以上とした。   On the other hand, since it is difficult to control all of the precipitates within the range of the above-specified minor axis b and aspect ratio a / b, the ratio of the precipitates within the above-specified range to the total precipitates is important. Therefore, the ratio of the total area of the precipitates in the above-mentioned limited range to the total area of all precipitates in the alloy is defined as area ratio C, and the area ratio C is defined in the present invention. For example, precipitates exceeding 200 nm and crystallized substances generated during melt casting are not sufficiently re-solidified by hot rolling or solution treatment, and the minor axis b exceeds 25 nm after cold rolling and the aspect ratio a / b There are cases where there are many precipitates exceeding 2 and the area ratio C is less than 80%. In this case, the dispersion interval of the precipitates becomes large and the desired strength cannot be obtained. Therefore, the area ratio C is 80% or more.

(b)最終冷間圧延後に熱処理した場合の析出物の形態
本発明の繊維状(アスペクト比a/bが2〜50)の析出物は高強度化には有効であるが、冷間圧延において、例えば圧延歪=2以上の圧延を行うと、繊維状の析出物の一部が再固溶し、導電率の低下は少なからず生じる。ここで、圧延歪は、圧延前の板厚をt、圧延後の板厚をtとした場合、圧延歪=ln(t/t)で表される。
(B) Form of precipitate when heat-treated after final cold rolling Although the fibrous precipitate (aspect ratio a / b is 2 to 50) of the present invention is effective for increasing the strength, For example, when rolling with a rolling strain of 2 or more is performed, a part of the fibrous precipitate is re-dissolved, and a decrease in conductivity is caused. Here, the rolling strain, the plate thickness before rolling t 0, when the plate thickness after rolling was t, is expressed by the rolling strain = ln (t 0 / t) .

そこで、本発明においては最終冷間圧延後に熱処理をすることで、析出物が再固溶した元素を析出させ、導電率の向上を図ることができる。この場合、析出物が再固溶した元素は球状(アスペクト比a/bが2未満)で析出物を形成する。一方、すでに析出している繊維状の析出物(アスペクト比a/bが2〜50)で短径bが10〜25nmであるものは、ほとんど変化せず、存在する。この結果、高強度が維持されつつ、高導電性が得られる。ただし、この熱処理において球状の析出物の短径bが50nmを超えるようなものを析出させてしまうと、強度は低下してしまう。したがって、アスペクト比a/bが2未満については、析出物の短径bが50nm以下とする。さらに、後述する本発明を中間冷間圧延に利用した場合に圧延後の熱処理によって析出する析出物のアスペクト比a/bが2未満で、短径bが20nm未満である場合、最終冷間圧延において再固溶してしまうことを考慮し、短径bは20nm以上が好ましいとした。
なお、この状態においても(a)で説明したような理由で、面積率Cは80%以上とした。
Therefore, in the present invention, by conducting a heat treatment after the final cold rolling, the element in which the precipitate is re-dissolved can be precipitated, and the conductivity can be improved. In this case, the element in which the precipitate is re-dissolved is spherical (aspect ratio a / b is less than 2) and forms the precipitate. On the other hand, the fibrous deposits (aspect ratio a / b is 2 to 50) that have already been deposited and the minor axis b is 10 to 25 nm are almost unchanged. As a result, high conductivity is obtained while maintaining high strength. However, if the spherical precipitates having a minor axis b exceeding 50 nm are precipitated in this heat treatment, the strength is lowered. Therefore, when the aspect ratio a / b is less than 2, the minor axis b of the precipitate is 50 nm or less. Furthermore, when the present invention described later is used for intermediate cold rolling, when the aspect ratio a / b of the precipitates precipitated by the heat treatment after rolling is less than 2 and the minor axis b is less than 20 nm, the final cold rolling In consideration of re-dissolving in, the short diameter b is preferably 20 nm or more.
Even in this state, the area ratio C was set to 80% or more for the reason described in (a).

最終冷間圧延後に熱処理を施す場合、高強度化及び高導電性に寄与する好ましい析出物は、アスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmの析出物及びアスペクト比a/bが2以下でかつ短径bが20〜50nmとなる析出物である。
したがって、最終冷間圧延でアスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmの析出物の面積率Cが80%以上となったものを熱処理を施すことで、a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmとなる析出物を有し、左記析出物とアスペクト比a/bが2以下でかつ短径bが20〜50nmとなる析出物との面積の総和が銅合金中の全析出物の面積の総和に対して80%以上とすることも本発明である。
When heat treatment is performed after the final cold rolling, preferable precipitates contributing to high strength and high conductivity are precipitates having an aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50 and a minor axis b of 10 to 25 nm, and an aspect ratio a This is a precipitate in which / b is 2 or less and the minor axis b is 20 to 50 nm.
Therefore, by subjecting the final cold rolling to heat treatment on the precipitate having an aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50 and a minor axis b of 10 to 25 nm and an area ratio C of 80% or more, a / b Having a precipitate with a short diameter b of 10 to 25 nm and a deposit with the aspect ratio a / b of 2 or less and a short diameter b of 20 to 50 nm. It is also the present invention that the total sum is 80% or more with respect to the total sum of the areas of all precipitates in the copper alloy.

(c)最終冷間圧延前の析出物の形態及び製造方法
上述したように本発明における冷間圧延前の短径b10nm以上の繊維状の析出物アスペクト比a/bが2以上)の大きさは、冷間圧延してもほとんど変化しないことから、最終冷間圧延後にアスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmの析出物の面積率Cが80%以上を得るためには、最終冷間圧延前にアスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmの析出物の面積率Cが80%以上であればよいことがわかる。
具体的には、最終冷間圧延前に、溶体化処理に引き続き時効処理し、Ni−P−Mg系析出物においてアスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmの析出物の面積率Cが80%以上を占めさせた後、最終冷間圧延することで製造することができる。
(C) Form of precipitate before final cold rolling and manufacturing method As described above, the size of the fibrous precipitate aspect ratio a / b of 10 nm or more of the minor axis b of 10 nm or more before cold rolling in the present invention is 2 or more) Since it hardly changes even when cold-rolled, the area ratio C of precipitates having an aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50 and a minor axis b of 10 to 25 nm after the final cold rolling is 80% or more. Therefore, it can be seen that the area ratio C of the precipitate having an aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50 and a minor axis b of 10 to 25 nm may be 80% or more before the final cold rolling.
Specifically, prior to the final cold rolling, an aging treatment is performed subsequent to the solution treatment, and the Ni—P—Mg-based precipitate has an aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50 and a short diameter b of 10 to 25 nm. After the area ratio C of the object occupies 80% or more, it can be manufactured by final cold rolling.

(d)本発明を中間冷間圧延に利用した場合の最終圧延後の析出物の形態
中間冷間圧延前に溶体化処理に引き続き時効処理し、Ni−P−Mg系析出物においてアスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmの析出物の面積率Cが80%以上を占めさせた後、中間冷間圧延をした場合には、中間冷間圧延後の析出物は、アスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmの析出物の面積率Cが80%以上の状態のものが得られる。これを時効処理や歪取り等の熱処理をした後、最終冷間圧延を実施すると析出物においてアスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmの析出物とアスペクト比a/bが2未満でかつ短径bが50nm以下の析出物との面積率Cが80%以上を有しつつ、高強度、高導電性を有する銅合金が得られる。
(D) Form of precipitates after final rolling when the present invention is used for intermediate cold rolling Aging treatment is performed subsequent to solution treatment before intermediate cold rolling, and the aspect ratio a in Ni-P-Mg based precipitates / B is 2 to 50 and the minor axis b is 10 to 25 nm, and after the intermediate cold rolling is performed after the area ratio C is 80% or more, the precipitate after the intermediate cold rolling Can be obtained in a state where the area ratio C of the precipitate having an aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50 and a minor axis b of 10 to 25 nm is 80% or more. When this is subjected to a heat treatment such as aging treatment and strain removal, and then subjected to final cold rolling, the precipitate has an aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50 and a minor axis b of 10 to 25 nm and an aspect ratio a / b. A copper alloy having high strength and high conductivity can be obtained while the area ratio C with a precipitate having a length of less than 2 and a short diameter of b of 50 nm or less is 80% or more.

中間冷間圧延前に、溶体化処理に引き続き時効処理し、Ni−P−Mg系析出物においてアスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmの析出物の面積率Cが80%以上を占めさせた後、中間冷間圧延、熱処理、最終圧延後にa/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmとなる析出物を有し、左記析出物とアスペクト比a/bが2以下でかつ短径bが20〜50nmとなる析出物との面積の総和が銅合金中の全析出物の面積の総和に対して80%以上とすることも本発明である。   Prior to intermediate cold rolling, solution treatment is followed by aging treatment, and the area ratio C of Ni—P—Mg based precipitates having an aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50 and a minor axis b of 10 to 25 nm. 80% or more, and after intermediate cold rolling, heat treatment, and final rolling, the precipitate has an a / b of 2 to 50 and a minor axis b of 10 to 25 nm. It is also the present invention that the total area of precipitates with a / b of 2 or less and the minor axis b of 20 to 50 nm is 80% or more with respect to the total area of all precipitates in the copper alloy. .

以上より、本発明の合金は優れた電気及び熱伝導性、強度、ばね性、曲げ加工性を兼備し、引張強さが好ましくは700〜950MPa、更に好ましくは750〜1000MPa、導電率が好ましくは45〜65%IACSの特性値を示す。   From the above, the alloy of the present invention has excellent electrical and thermal conductivity, strength, springiness, and bending workability, and preferably has a tensile strength of 700 to 950 MPa, more preferably 750 to 1000 MPa, and preferably conductivity. The characteristic value of 45-65% IACS is shown.

試料の製造
電気銅或いは無酸素銅を主原料とし、ニッケル、Cu−P母合金、銅マグネシウム母合金、亜鉛、錫、インジウムを副原料とし、高周波溶解炉にて真空中又はアルゴン雰囲気中で溶製し、25×50×150mmのインゴットに鋳造した。次にインゴットを熱間圧延及び溶体化処理、時効処理、最終冷間圧延の順に実施し、厚さ0.15mmの平板とした。
得られた板材各種の試験片を採取して試験を行い、「強度」、「導電率」、「曲げ加工性」の評価を行った。
Sample preparation Electro-copper or oxygen-free copper as the main raw material, nickel, Cu-P master alloy, copper-magnesium master alloy, zinc, tin, and indium as auxiliary raw materials, dissolved in vacuum or argon atmosphere in a high-frequency melting furnace And then cast into a 25 × 50 × 150 mm ingot. Next, the ingot was subjected to hot rolling, solution treatment, aging treatment, and final cold rolling in this order to obtain a flat plate having a thickness of 0.15 mm.
Various test pieces of the obtained plate material were collected and tested, and “strength”, “conductivity”, and “bending workability” were evaluated.

目的の析出物を製造するための方法
目的の析出物を製造するための方法の一例を次の通り示す。
(a)析出物の大きさが特許請求の範囲内の場合
インゴットを650〜950℃に0.5〜24時間加熱し、鋳造時に生じたNi−P−Mg系晶出物を固溶させた後、熱間圧延を行う。熱間圧延終了時に材料温度600〜850℃、好ましくは700〜850℃から水冷を行う。熱間圧延終了時に600℃以上の材料温度が得られない場合は、再度700〜950℃に0.5時間以上加熱後、水冷し溶体化を十分に行う。その後300〜550℃で0.1〜24時間の時効処理を行う。
(b)析出物の短径bが特許請求の範囲より小さい場合
熱間圧延は上記(a)と同様に行い、250〜400℃で0.1〜24時間の時効処理を行う。
(c)析出物の短径bが特許請求の範囲より大きい場合
熱間圧延前のインゴットの加熱は上記(a)と同様に行い、熱間圧延後の積極的な冷却は行わず、放冷(空冷)する。その後500〜700℃で0.1〜24時間の時効処理を行う。
Method for producing target precipitate An example of a method for producing the target precipitate is shown as follows.
(A) When the size of the precipitate is within the scope of the claims The ingot was heated to 650 to 950 ° C. for 0.5 to 24 hours to dissolve the Ni—P—Mg-based crystallized material generated during casting. Thereafter, hot rolling is performed. Water cooling is performed at a material temperature of 600 to 850 ° C, preferably 700 to 850 ° C at the end of hot rolling. When a material temperature of 600 ° C. or higher cannot be obtained at the end of hot rolling, after heating again to 700 to 950 ° C. for 0.5 hour or longer, water cooling is performed sufficiently. Thereafter, an aging treatment is performed at 300 to 550 ° C. for 0.1 to 24 hours.
(B) When the minor axis b of the precipitate is smaller than the claims, hot rolling is performed in the same manner as in the above (a), and an aging treatment is performed at 250 to 400 ° C. for 0.1 to 24 hours.
(C) When the minor axis b of the precipitate is larger than the claims, the ingot before hot rolling is heated in the same manner as in the above (a), and the positive cooling after hot rolling is not performed, and it is allowed to cool. (Air cooling). Thereafter, an aging treatment is performed at 500 to 700 ° C. for 0.1 to 24 hours.

析出物の評価
走査型電子顕微鏡及び透過型電子顕微鏡を使用して、最終冷間圧延前の合金条を圧延方向に平行に厚み直角に切断し、断面の析出物を10視野観察した。析出物の大きさ(長径b)が5〜50nmの場合は50万倍〜70万倍の倍率の視野(約1.4×1010〜2.0×1010nm)、100〜2000nmの場合は5〜10万倍の視野(約1.0×1013〜2.0×1013nm)で撮影を行った。撮影した写真の画像を画像解析装置(株式会社ニレコ製、商品名ルーゼックス)を用いて大きさが5nm以上の析出物のすべてについて個々に長径a、短径b,及び面積を測定した。これら析出物のうちランダムに100個取り出し、長径aが5nm以上の全析出物の面積総和に対して、アスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmの析出物の面積とアスペクト比a/bが2未満でかつ短径bが50nm以下の析出物の面積総和の割合を面積率C(%)として算出した。
なお、最終冷間圧延(通常は圧延歪=2以上)により、冷間圧延前の析出物の短径bが10nmより小さいNi−P−Mg系析出物は固溶してしまうが、短径bが10nm以上の析出物は最終冷間圧延後もその長径、短径b及びアスペクト比a/bを保つことを確認した。又、析出物の面積率Cも同様に最終冷間圧延後もほとんど変化しない。
Evaluation of Precipitates Using a scanning electron microscope and a transmission electron microscope, the alloy strips before the final cold rolling were cut parallel to the rolling direction at right angles to the thickness, and the precipitates in the cross section were observed in 10 fields. When the size of the precipitate (major axis b) is 5 to 50 nm, the field of view (approximately 1.4 × 10 10 to 2.0 × 10 10 nm 2 ) at a magnification of 500,000 to 700,000 times, 100 to 2000 nm In this case, the image was taken with a field of view of about 5 to 100,000 times (about 1.0 × 10 13 to 2.0 × 10 13 nm 2 ). The image of the photograph taken was measured for the major axis a, the minor axis b, and the area of each of the precipitates having a size of 5 nm or more using an image analysis apparatus (trade name Luzex, manufactured by Nireco Corporation). 100 of these precipitates are taken out randomly, and the area of the precipitate having an aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50 and a minor axis b of 10 to 25 nm with respect to the total area of all precipitates having a major axis a of 5 nm or more. The ratio of the total area of precipitates having an aspect ratio a / b of less than 2 and a minor axis b of 50 nm or less was calculated as an area ratio C (%).
In addition, although Ni-P-Mg based precipitates in which the minor axis b of the precipitate before cold rolling is smaller than 10 nm are dissolved by final cold rolling (usually rolling strain = 2 or more), the minor axis It was confirmed that the precipitate having b of 10 nm or more maintains its major axis, minor axis b and aspect ratio a / b even after the final cold rolling. Similarly, the area ratio C of the precipitates hardly changes even after the final cold rolling.

試験片の物性評価
「強度」については、JIS Z 2241に規定された引張試験に従って13号B試験片を用いて行い、引張強さを測定した。
「導電率」は4端子法を用いて試験片の電気抵抗を測定し、標準軟銅(体積抵抗率が1.7241μΩcmのもの)との電導度の比を百分率で表し、%IACSで表示した。
「曲げ加工性」については、W曲げ試験機で10mm幅の試験片を曲げ半径0.15mmの金型で50kNの荷重で曲げ試験した曲げ部表面を光学顕微鏡(100倍)で観察することにより割れの有無を調査評価し、割れ発生のない場合を○、割れが発生した場合を×で表示した。
About physical property evaluation "strength" of a test piece, it carried out using the No. 13 B test piece according to the tensile test prescribed | regulated to JISZ2241, and measured the tensile strength.
“Conductivity” was measured by measuring the electric resistance of a test piece using a four-terminal method, and the electric conductivity ratio with standard annealed copper (having a volume resistivity of 1.7241 μΩcm) was expressed as a percentage and expressed in% IACS.
Regarding “bending workability”, the surface of a bending part obtained by bending a test piece having a width of 10 mm with a W bending tester using a die having a bending radius of 0.15 mm and a load of 50 kN was observed with an optical microscope (100 times). The presence / absence of cracks was investigated and evaluated. The case where no cracks occurred was indicated by ○, and the case where cracks occurred was indicated by ×.

本発明に係る高強度高導電性銅合金の実施例を、表1に示す成分組成の銅合金について、比較例と共に説明する。
実施例1〜7と比較例8〜12とは本発明の合金組成の範囲について比較するものであり、比較例8〜12は、本発明の合金組成の範囲から外れた成分での合金である。そこで、冷間圧延後では短径b及びアスペクト比a/bについて請求の範囲を満たし、面積率Cは、実施例1〜7、比較例8〜12とも、80%以上とした。
The Example of the high intensity | strength highly conductive copper alloy which concerns on this invention is described with a comparative example about the copper alloy of the component composition shown in Table 1. FIG.
Examples 1-7 and Comparative Examples 8-12 compare the range of the alloy composition of the present invention, and Comparative Examples 8-12 are alloys with components outside the range of the alloy composition of the present invention. . Thus, after cold rolling, the claims for the minor axis b and the aspect ratio a / b were satisfied, and the area ratio C was 80% or more in both Examples 1 to 7 and Comparative Examples 8 to 12.

Figure 0004493083
Figure 0004493083

Figure 0004493083
Figure 0004493083

実施例及び比較例の強度、導電性、曲げ加工性の結果を表2に示す。
実施例1〜7は、本発明の合金組成の範囲であるため、優れた強度、導電率及び曲げ加工性を具備していた。一方、比較例8〜12までの結果を検討すると、比較例8は、Niの添加量が1.0%未満となっているために、Ni−P−Mg系析出物の析出量が少なくなるため、充分な強度が得られない。比較例9は、Pの添加量が0.5%を超えるため、Pの固溶量が増してしまい導電率の低下を生じ、かつ曲げ加工性が劣る。比較例10は、Ni/P比が析出物の適切な組成比から外れるために、Niの固溶する量が増大して導電率の低下が生じ、又Ni−P−Mg系析出物の析出量が少なくなるため、十分な強度が得られない。比較例11は、副成分としてZn,Sn,Inの添加量が総じて1.0%を超えているため、これらの固溶により強度は高いものの、固溶によって導電率が低下し、又曲げ加工性が劣る。なお、比較例11でのZn,Sn,Inは不可避的不純物ではないので、比較例11は発明例に該当しない。比較例12は、Mgの添加量が0.2%を超えるため、Mgの固溶量が増してしまい導電率の低下を生じ、かつ曲げ加工性が劣る。
Table 2 shows the results of the strength, conductivity, and bending workability of the examples and comparative examples.
Since Examples 1 to 7 were within the range of the alloy composition of the present invention, they had excellent strength, electrical conductivity, and bending workability. On the other hand, when the results of Comparative Examples 8 to 12 are examined, in Comparative Example 8, the amount of Ni—P—Mg-based precipitates decreases because the amount of Ni added is less than 1.0%. Therefore, sufficient strength cannot be obtained. In Comparative Example 9, since the addition amount of P exceeds 0.5%, the solid solution amount of P increases, resulting in a decrease in electrical conductivity and poor bending workability. In Comparative Example 10, since the Ni / P ratio deviates from the appropriate composition ratio of the precipitates, the amount of Ni dissolved increases, resulting in a decrease in conductivity, and the precipitation of Ni—P—Mg based precipitates. Since the amount is small, sufficient strength cannot be obtained. In Comparative Example 11, the added amount of Zn, Sn, and In as subcomponents generally exceeds 1.0%. Therefore, although the strength is high due to these solid solutions, the conductivity is lowered due to the solid solutions, and bending work is also performed. Inferior. In addition, since Zn, Sn, and In in Comparative Example 11 are not inevitable impurities, Comparative Example 11 does not fall under the invention example. In Comparative Example 12, since the added amount of Mg exceeds 0.2%, the solid solution amount of Mg increases, resulting in a decrease in electrical conductivity and poor bending workability.

実施例1〜7と比較例13〜17とは析出物の状態(析出物の短径b及びアスペクト比a/b)が異なることによる面積率Cを比較する例であり、比較例13〜17については、本発明の面積率Cをから外れる例である。なお、発明例の合金組成は表1、比較例の合金組成は表3に示すように特許請求の範囲内である。   Examples 1-7 and Comparative Examples 13-17 are the examples which compare the area ratio C by the state (the minor axis b of a precipitate, and aspect ratio a / b) differing, and Comparative Examples 13-17 Is an example that deviates from the area ratio C of the present invention. The alloy compositions of the invention examples are within the scope of the claims as shown in Table 1, and the alloy compositions of the comparative examples are shown in Table 3.

Figure 0004493083
Figure 0004493083

Figure 0004493083
Figure 0004493083

Figure 0004493083
Figure 0004493083

析出物の面積率Cと強度、導電性、曲げ加工性の結果を実施例は表4に、比較例は表5に示す。なお、比較例については、面積率Cのみでは、析出物の状態がわかりにくいため、参考として平均短径と平均のアスペクト比を示しておく。ここで、平均短径は、各析出物の短径の平均値であり、平均のアスペクト比は各析出物の長径の総和を短径の総和で除した値である。
実施例は、面積率Cが80%以上であるため、優れた強度、導電率及び曲げ加工性を具備している。
The results are shown in Table 4 for the examples and Table 5 for the comparative examples. In addition, about the comparative example, since the state of precipitates is difficult to understand only by the area ratio C, the average minor axis and the average aspect ratio are shown for reference. Here, the average minor axis is the average value of the minor axis of each precipitate, and the average aspect ratio is a value obtained by dividing the sum of the major axis of each precipitate by the sum of the minor axes.
Since the area ratio C is 80% or more, the examples have excellent strength, conductivity, and bending workability.

比較例13は、冷間圧延前の析出物の短径bが規定範囲より小さく、規定を満たす析出物の面積率Cが0%であるため、析出物が冷間圧延中に固溶してしまい、冷間圧延後には析出物が観察されなかった。したがって、冷間圧延後の強度は、固溶強化によって高いが導電率が著しく低下し、曲げ加工性が劣る。
比較例14では、冷間圧延前いおいて、短径bは25nm以下であるがアスペクト比a/bが50を超える析出物、アスペクト比a/bが50以下であるが短径bは25nmを超える析出物、短径bが25nmを超えアスペクト比a/bも50を超える析出物が多く存在する面積率Cが80%未満である。冷間圧延後、析出物の大きさ(短径b及びアスペクト比a/b)はほとんど変化せず、析出物の固溶も見られず、面積率Cは冷間圧延前とはほとんど変化しない。そのため導電率は十分であるが、この析出物の大きさでは析出物による加工硬化は小さく、所望の強度が得られない。
In Comparative Example 13, since the minor axis b of the precipitate before cold rolling is smaller than the specified range and the area ratio C of the precipitate satisfying the specification is 0%, the precipitate is dissolved in the cold rolling. Thus, no precipitate was observed after cold rolling. Therefore, the strength after cold rolling is high due to solid solution strengthening, but the conductivity is remarkably lowered and the bending workability is inferior.
In Comparative Example 14, before cold rolling, the minor axis b is 25 nm or less, but the precipitate has an aspect ratio a / b exceeding 50, and the aspect ratio a / b is 50 or less, but the minor axis b is 25 nm. The area ratio C in which a large number of precipitates with a minor axis b exceeding 25 nm and an aspect ratio a / b exceeding 50 is present is less than 80%. After cold rolling, the size of the precipitate (minor axis b and aspect ratio a / b) hardly changes, no solid solution of the precipitate is observed, and the area ratio C hardly changes from that before cold rolling. . For this reason, the electrical conductivity is sufficient, but with the size of the precipitate, work hardening due to the precipitate is small, and a desired strength cannot be obtained.

比較例15は、冷間圧延前におけるアスペクト比a/bが2〜50であるが短径bが25nmを超える粗大な析出物が多く見られ、面積率Cは極端に低い。冷間圧延後、析出物の大きさはほとんど変化せず、固溶も見られず、導電率は高いが、面積率Cが極端に低いため、加工硬化が非常に小さく、強度が著しく低くなった。
比較例16は、10〜25nmの短径bで、アスペクト比a/bが50超える大きい析出物が多く見られ、面積率Cは極端に低い。比較例15と同様に固溶は見られず導電率は高いが、加工硬化が小さく、強度が十分ではない。
比較例14、15、16から本発明を構成する繊維状の析出物の上限規定が、短径b25nm以下かつアスペクト比a/bが50以下であることがわかる。
比較例17は、5〜15nmの短径bで、アスペクト比a/bが4〜6の微細な析出物が多く見られ、面積率Cが低い。10nm未満の析出物は冷間圧延中に析出物が固溶してしまう。この場合には、10nm以上の析出物はそのまま、残るため面積率Cは,100%となるが、固溶強化により強度は十分なものの、導電率が著しく低下する。また、比較例13と同様に曲げ加工性が悪い。
In comparative example 15, the aspect ratio a / b before cold rolling is 2 to 50, but many coarse precipitates having a minor axis b exceeding 25 nm are observed, and the area ratio C is extremely low. After cold rolling, the size of the precipitates hardly changes, no solid solution is seen, and the conductivity is high, but the area ratio C is extremely low, so the work hardening is very small and the strength is extremely low. It was.
In Comparative Example 16, a large precipitate having a minor axis b of 10 to 25 nm and an aspect ratio a / b exceeding 50 is observed, and the area ratio C is extremely low. As in Comparative Example 15, no solid solution is observed and the electrical conductivity is high, but the work hardening is small and the strength is not sufficient.
From Comparative Examples 14, 15, and 16, it can be seen that the upper limit of the fibrous precipitate constituting the present invention is a minor axis b of 25 nm or less and an aspect ratio a / b of 50 or less.
In Comparative Example 17, many fine precipitates having a minor axis b of 5 to 15 nm and an aspect ratio a / b of 4 to 6 are observed, and the area ratio C is low. Precipitates of less than 10 nm are solid-dissolved during cold rolling. In this case, since the deposits of 10 nm or more remain as they are, the area ratio C becomes 100%. However, although the strength is sufficient by the solid solution strengthening, the conductivity is remarkably lowered. Further, like the comparative example 13, bending workability is poor.

表4及び表5の下欄には、冷間圧延後の実施例7及び比較例13に熱処理を施した例及び熱処理後にさらに冷間圧延を施した例である。冷間圧延後に熱処理すると、固溶している元素が球状の析出物として析出し、導電率を上げることができるが、圧延後の導電率が47.1%である実施例No.7を熱処理した実施例No.18では、導電率が55.2%と向上する。この場合、冷間圧延で一部固溶している元素が、短径bが20〜50nmでアスペクト比a/bが2未満の球状の析出物として析出する。そして、短径b10nm〜25nmかつアスペクト比a/bが2〜50である析出物との総和の面積率Cが95%となり、80%以上となっている。 The lower column of Table 4 and Table 5 shows an example in which heat treatment was applied to Example 7 and Comparative Example 13 after cold rolling, and an example in which cold rolling was further performed after heat treatment. When the heat treatment is performed after cold rolling, the solid solution element is precipitated as a spherical precipitate and the electrical conductivity can be increased, but the electrical conductivity after rolling is 47.1%. Example No. 7 was heat-treated. 18, the conductivity is improved to 55.2%. In this case, elements that are partly dissolved in cold rolling are deposited as spherical precipitates having a minor axis b of 20 to 50 nm and an aspect ratio a / b of less than 2. And the area ratio C of the sum total with the precipitate whose minor axis b10-25nm and aspect ratio a / b is 2-50 is 95%, and is 80% or more.

一方、析出物が全て固溶した比較例No.13を熱処理した比較例No.19では、球状の析出物(アスペクト比a/bが2未満)が析出し、短径bが20〜50nmのものが80%以上である。しかしながら、比較例No.19は繊維状の析出物(アスペクト比a/bが2〜50)が存在しないことから、繊維状の析出物(アスペクト比a/bが2〜50)を有する実施例No.18と比較すると強度が劣る。さらに50nmを超える析出物が多く存在する比較例20では明らかに十分な強度が得られていない。   On the other hand, Comparative Example No. in which all precipitates were dissolved. Comparative Example No. 13 was heat-treated. In No. 19, spherical precipitates (aspect ratio a / b is less than 2) are precipitated, and those having a minor axis b of 20 to 50 nm are 80% or more. However, Comparative Example No. No. 19 has no fibrous precipitate (aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50), so Example No. 19 having a fibrous precipitate (aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50). Compared with 18, the strength is inferior. Further, in Comparative Example 20 where there are many precipitates exceeding 50 nm, it is apparent that sufficient strength is not obtained.

さらに、冷間圧延後に熱処理を施した実施例No.18をさらに冷間圧延を施した実施例21で高導電率を有しながら実施例No.18よりも高い強度を得ることができる。
一方、比較例22に圧延を施した比較例は、圧延しても50nmを超える析出物はほとんど変化せず、球状で50nm超える析出物として存在するため、十分な強度が得られない。





Furthermore, Example No. which heat-processed after cold rolling. No. 18 was further cold-rolled in Example 21, while having high conductivity, Example No. A strength higher than 18 can be obtained.
On the other hand, in the comparative example in which the comparative example 22 is rolled, the precipitates exceeding 50 nm hardly change even when rolled, and a sufficient strength cannot be obtained because the precipitates exist in a spherical shape exceeding 50 nm.





Claims (5)

質量割合にて、Ni:1.0%を超え2.0%以下、P:0.1%以上0.5%以下、Mg:0.01%以上0.20%以下を含有し、NiとPの含有量比率Ni/P:4.0以上6.5以下で、残部がCu及び不可避的不純物から成るCu−Ni−P−Mg系合金において、導電率:40%IACS以上を有し、Ni−P−Mg系析出物の大きさと形状について、長径:a、短径:bとした時、少なくもアスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmとなる析出物を有し、左記析出物とアスペクト比a/bが2未満でかつ短径bが20〜50nmとなる析出物との面積の総和が銅合金中の全析出物の面積の総和に対して80%以上を占めることを特徴とする優れた強度、導電性及び曲げ加工性を兼備した電子部品用高強度高導電性銅合金。 Ni: more than 1.0% and 2.0% or less, P: 0.1% or more and 0.5% or less, Mg: 0.01% or more and 0.20% or less, In a Cu-Ni-P-Mg alloy in which the P content ratio Ni / P is 4.0 or more and 6.5 or less, and the balance is Cu and inevitable impurities , the conductivity is 40% IACS or more, With regard to the size and shape of the Ni-P-Mg based precipitate, when the major axis is a and the minor axis is b, the precipitate has an aspect ratio a / b of 2 to 50 and a minor axis b of 10 to 25 nm. The sum of the areas of the precipitates on the left and those having an aspect ratio a / b of less than 2 and a minor axis b of 20 to 50 nm is 80% of the total area of all precipitates in the copper alloy. High strength and high strength for electronic parts with excellent strength, conductivity and bending workability Conductive copper alloy. 請求項に記載のCu−Ni−P−Mg系合金において、Zn、Sn及びInのうち1種以上を合計で0.01%以上1.0%以下含むことを特徴とする優れた強度、導電性及び曲げ加工性を兼備した電子部品用高強度高導電性銅合金。 The Cu-Ni-P-Mg-based alloy according to claim 1 , wherein the Cu-Ni-P-Mg-based alloy includes at least one of Zn, Sn, and In in a total content of 0.01% to 1.0%, High-strength, high-conductivity copper alloy for electronic parts that has both conductivity and bending workability. 引張強さ:700MPa以上950MPa以下である請求項1または2のいずれかに記載された電子部品用高強度高導電性銅合金。 Tensile strength: 700 MPa or more and 950 MPa or less, The high-strength high-conductivity copper alloy for electronic components described in any one of Claim 1 or 2. 引張強さ:750MPa以上1000MPa以下である請求項に記載された電子部品用高強度高導電性銅合金。 Tensile strength: 750 MPa or more and 1000 MPa or less, The high-strength, high-conductivity copper alloy for electronic components described in Claim 2 . 質量割合にて、Ni:1.0%を超え2.0%以下、P:0.1%以上0.5%以下、Mg:0.01%以上0.20%以下を含有し、NiとPの含有量比率Ni/P:4.0以上6.5以下で、残部がCu及び不可避的不純物から成るCu−Ni−P−Mg系合金のインゴットを熱間圧延し、熱間圧延終了時に材料温度600〜850℃から水冷を行って溶体化処理後、300〜550℃で0.1〜24時間の時効処理をして、Ni−P−Mg系析出物の大きさと形状について、長径:a、短径:bとした時、アスペクト比a/bが2〜50でかつ短径bが10〜25nmとなる析出物の面積の総和が銅合金中の全析出物の面積の総和に対して80%以上を占め中間材を製造し、この中間材を冷間圧延す請求項1〜のいずれかに記載された電子部品用高強度高導電性銅合金の製造方法。 Ni: more than 1.0% and 2.0% or less, P: 0.1% or more and 0.5% or less, Mg: 0.01% or more and 0.20% or less, P content ratio Ni / P: 4.0 or more and 6.5 or less, hot-rolling a Cu—Ni—P—Mg-based alloy ingot consisting of Cu and inevitable impurities, and at the end of hot rolling After cooling to water from a material temperature of 600 to 850 ° C. and solution treatment, aging treatment is performed at 300 to 550 ° C. for 0.1 to 24 hours, and the size and shape of the Ni—P—Mg-based precipitates are determined as follows : a, when the minor axis is b, the sum of the areas of the precipitates having an aspect ratio a / b of 2-50 and a minor axis b of 10-25 nm is the sum of the areas of all the precipitates in the copper alloy. an intermediate member which accounts for 80% or more to produce Te, serial this intermediate material to one of the claims 1-4 you cold rolling Process for the preparation of an electronic component for high strength and high conductivity copper alloy.
JP2004348167A 2004-12-01 2004-12-01 High-performance copper alloy for electronic equipment with excellent strength and conductivity and method for producing the same Expired - Fee Related JP4493083B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004348167A JP4493083B2 (en) 2004-12-01 2004-12-01 High-performance copper alloy for electronic equipment with excellent strength and conductivity and method for producing the same

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004348167A JP4493083B2 (en) 2004-12-01 2004-12-01 High-performance copper alloy for electronic equipment with excellent strength and conductivity and method for producing the same

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006152413A JP2006152413A (en) 2006-06-15
JP4493083B2 true JP4493083B2 (en) 2010-06-30

Family

ID=36631045

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004348167A Expired - Fee Related JP4493083B2 (en) 2004-12-01 2004-12-01 High-performance copper alloy for electronic equipment with excellent strength and conductivity and method for producing the same

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4493083B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008056974A (en) * 2006-08-30 2008-03-13 Nikko Kinzoku Kk Copper alloy with excellent hot workability
JP4950734B2 (en) * 2007-03-30 2012-06-13 Jx日鉱日石金属株式会社 High strength and high conductivity copper alloy with excellent hot workability
JP5101149B2 (en) * 2007-03-30 2012-12-19 Jx日鉱日石金属株式会社 High strength and high conductivity copper alloy with excellent hot workability
JP6099080B2 (en) * 2012-10-18 2017-03-22 大塚テクノ株式会社 Non-energized breaker

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH04231433A (en) * 1990-12-27 1992-08-20 Nikko Kyodo Co Ltd Electrifying material
JPH04311544A (en) * 1991-04-08 1992-11-04 Nikko Kyodo Co Ltd Electrically conductive material
JPH1136056A (en) * 1997-07-16 1999-02-09 Hitachi Cable Ltd Manufacturing method of copper alloy material for electronic equipment
JP3807475B2 (en) * 1998-07-08 2006-08-09 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Copper alloy plate for terminal and connector and manufacturing method thereof
JP2000273562A (en) * 1999-03-24 2000-10-03 Kobe Steel Ltd High strength and high electrical conductivity copper alloy excellent in stress relaxation resistance
JP3729733B2 (en) * 2000-12-27 2005-12-21 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Copper alloy plate for lead frame

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2006152413A (en) 2006-06-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3699701B2 (en) Easy-to-process high-strength, high-conductivity copper alloy
TWI382097B (en) Cu-Ni-Si-Co-Cr alloy for electronic materials
JP5261500B2 (en) Cu-Ni-Si-Mg alloy with improved conductivity and bendability
CN101646792B (en) Cu-Ni-Si alloys for electronic materials
JP4950734B2 (en) High strength and high conductivity copper alloy with excellent hot workability
JP5097970B2 (en) Copper alloy sheet and manufacturing method thereof
JP4100629B2 (en) High strength and high conductivity copper alloy
CN101784684B (en) High-strength, high-conductivity copper alloy with excellent hot workability
JPH10195562A (en) Copper alloy for electrical and electronic equipment excellent in punching workability and method for producing the same
JP4971856B2 (en) Precipitation type copper alloy
JP4493083B2 (en) High-performance copper alloy for electronic equipment with excellent strength and conductivity and method for producing the same
JP4916206B2 (en) Cu-Cr-Si alloy and Cu-Cr-Si alloy foil for electric and electronic parts
JP5101149B2 (en) High strength and high conductivity copper alloy with excellent hot workability
JP4175920B2 (en) High strength copper alloy
CN101275190A (en) Copper alloy excellent in hot workability and manufacturing method thereof
JP5079574B2 (en) High strength and high conductivity copper alloy with excellent hot workability
JP4750602B2 (en) Copper alloy with excellent hot workability
JP4679040B2 (en) Copper alloy for electronic materials
KR100994651B1 (en) High Strength High Conductivity Copper Alloy With Excellent Hot Workability
JP7133326B2 (en) Copper alloy plates with excellent strength and conductivity, electrical parts, electronic parts for heat dissipation
JP2008056974A (en) Copper alloy with excellent hot workability

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A711 Notification of change in applicant

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A712

Effective date: 20060427

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20070914

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20100120

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20100202

RD02 Notification of acceptance of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422

Effective date: 20100219

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20100222

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20100308

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20100405

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20100405

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130416

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130416

Year of fee payment: 3

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313111

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130416

Year of fee payment: 3

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees