JP4519680B2 - Accelerated testing method for stress corrosion cracking - Google Patents
Accelerated testing method for stress corrosion cracking Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP4519680B2 JP4519680B2 JP2005045895A JP2005045895A JP4519680B2 JP 4519680 B2 JP4519680 B2 JP 4519680B2 JP 2005045895 A JP2005045895 A JP 2005045895A JP 2005045895 A JP2005045895 A JP 2005045895A JP 4519680 B2 JP4519680 B2 JP 4519680B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- corrosion cracking
- stress corrosion
- test
- stress
- test piece
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Testing Resistance To Weather, Investigating Materials By Mechanical Methods (AREA)
Description
本発明は、応力腐食割れ試験方法に関し、詳細には応力腐食割れ試験を比較的短期間で行うべく、応力腐食割れ試験を加速して行うための応力腐食割れの加速試験方法に関するものである。 The present invention relates to a stress corrosion cracking test method, and more particularly, to a stress corrosion cracking acceleration test method for accelerating a stress corrosion cracking test in order to perform the stress corrosion cracking test in a relatively short period of time.
応力腐食割れ(Stress Corrosion Cracking)は、環境の腐食作用と負荷される応力の機械的作用とが重畳されて、金属材料が破壊に至る現象である。応力腐食割れは、金属材料、環境及び応力の三者がある特定の条件を満足する時に発生するものであり、様々な組み合わせで発生することが知られている。 Stress corrosion cracking is a phenomenon in which the corrosion of the environment and the mechanical action of the stress applied are superimposed, leading to the destruction of the metal material. It is known that stress corrosion cracking occurs when the metal material, environment, and stress satisfy certain conditions, and are generated in various combinations.
応力腐食割れは、その作用応力が金属材料の強度(=実環境ではなく実験室などで通常評価される破壊の限界)以下であっても発生する。従って、構造物の設計強度を定める場合には、応力腐食割れの限界応力を正確に把握する必要があり、その特性評価技術は実用上極めて重要である。また、応力腐食割れの抑止策を講じる場合にも、応力腐食割れの実験室的な特性評価技術が必要不可欠である。 Stress corrosion cracking occurs even when the working stress is less than the strength of the metal material (= the limit of fracture normally evaluated in a laboratory, not in the actual environment). Therefore, when determining the design strength of a structure, it is necessary to accurately grasp the critical stress of stress corrosion cracking, and its characteristic evaluation technique is extremely important in practice. In addition, laboratory characterization techniques for stress corrosion cracking are indispensable when taking measures to prevent stress corrosion cracking.
応力腐食割れの試験方法としては、定荷重法や定ひずみ法などが知られており、JISやASTM(American Society for Testing Material)などで規格化されている。例えば、アルミニウム合金の応力腐食割れ試験方法はJIS H8711に規格されている。 As a test method for stress corrosion cracking, a constant load method, a constant strain method, and the like are known, and are standardized by JIS, ASTM (American Society for Testing Material), and the like. For example, a stress corrosion cracking test method for an aluminum alloy is specified in JIS H8711.
一方、特開2002−333399号公報(特許文献1)には、被試験部材又はその模擬材より切断して鏡面研磨加工を施した板状部材に、一方の上面端部を同一面上に密着するまでほぼ180度折り返してなる塑性変形部(高応力部)と、前記板状部材と同一素材よりなるくさび状部材を前記上面端部と前記上面との密着面間に挿入してなる弾性変形部(低応力部)と、を設けた応力腐食割れ試験片を用いる応力腐食割れ試験方法が開示されている。
ところで、JISやASTMなどで規格化されている応力腐食割れ試験方法による応力腐食割れ試験では、試験期間が長く、特に長い場合には数万時間と非常に長い期間が必要である。このため、構造物設計に必要な限界負荷応力の把握に時間がかかりすぎるという問題があり、迅速な材料開発の妨げにもなっていた。 By the way, in the stress corrosion cracking test by the stress corrosion cracking test method standardized by JIS, ASTM, etc., the test period is long, and especially when it is long, a very long period of tens of thousands of hours is required. For this reason, there is a problem that it takes too much time to grasp the critical load stress necessary for the structure design, which has hindered rapid material development.
また、上記特許文献1に提案の応力腐食割れ試験方法では、試験片を構成する板上部材を折り返し、上面同士が近接する小さな隙間部分を生じるように形成し、腐食環境を厳しく構成しているので、試験時間を短縮し得ることが期待できるが、前記試験片では材料に塑性変形領域が形成されて金属組織が変化するため、弾性領域の負荷応力で使用する場合の応力腐食割れ特性とは必ずしも相関しないという問題がある。 Further, in the stress corrosion cracking test method proposed in Patent Document 1 above, the plate member constituting the test piece is folded back to form a small gap portion where the upper surfaces are close to each other, and the corrosive environment is strictly configured. Therefore, it can be expected that the test time can be shortened, but in the test piece, since the plastic deformation region is formed in the material and the metal structure changes, what is the stress corrosion cracking property when used with the load stress in the elastic region? There is a problem that it does not necessarily correlate.
本発明は、上記の事情に鑑みてなしたものであって、その目的は、塩化物に起因して大気中あるいは水溶液などで発生する応力腐食割れに対して、その特性を短期間で評価し得る応力腐食割れの加速試験方法を提供するものである。 The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and its purpose is to evaluate the characteristics in a short period of time against stress corrosion cracking caused in the atmosphere or in an aqueous solution due to chloride. The present invention provides an accelerated test method for obtaining stress corrosion cracking.
上記の目的を達成するために、本発明(請求項1)に係る応力腐食割れの加速試験方法は、孔食を抑制する作用を持つ薬剤と塩化物イオンCl−とを含み、かつpHが4〜9である水溶液中に、応力を負荷した試験片を設置し、当該試験片に通電し電解作用により試験片が破断するまでの時間を測定することで応力腐食割れ試験を加速して行うものである。 To achieve the above object, the accelerated test method for stress corrosion cracking according to the present invention (Claim 1) includes an agent having the action of suppressing pitting chloride ion Cl - and a, and the pH is 4 A test piece loaded with stress is placed in an aqueous solution of ~ 9, and the stress corrosion cracking test is accelerated by measuring the time until the test piece breaks due to electrolysis when the test piece is energized It is.
本発明(請求項2)に係る応力腐食割れの加速試験方法は、上記請求項1記載の応力腐食割れの加速試験方法において、試験片をアルミニウム合金とするものである。ここで言うアルミニウム合金とは、1000系、2000系、3000系、4000系、5000系、6000系、7000系、8000系、及び前記以外の系統のアルミニウム合金を意味するものである。 The accelerated stress corrosion cracking test method according to the present invention (Claim 2) is the stress corrosion cracking accelerated test method according to Claim 1, wherein the test piece is an aluminum alloy. The aluminum alloy mentioned here means 1000 series, 2000 series, 3000 series, 4000 series, 5000 series, 6000 series, 7000 series, 8000 series, and other series of aluminum alloys.
本発明(請求項3)に係る応力腐食割れの加速試験方法は、上記請求項1又は2記載の応力腐食割れの加速試験方法において、孔食を抑制する作用を持つ薬剤が、
NO3 −:0.1〜10%、
SO4 2−:0.1〜10%、
CrO4 2−:0.1〜10%、
CH3COO−:0.1〜10%、
H2O2:0.1〜10%
より選ばれる1種又は2種以上とするものである。
The stress corrosion cracking acceleration test method according to the present invention (Claim 3) is the stress corrosion cracking acceleration test method according to
NO 3 − : 0.1 to 10%,
SO 4 2− : 0.1 to 10%,
CrO 4 2− : 0.1 to 10%,
CH 3 COO − : 0.1 to 10%,
H 2 O 2: 0.1~10%
One type or two or more types selected from the above.
本発明(請求項4)に係る応力腐食割れの加速試験方法は、上記請求項1〜3のいずれか記載の応力腐食割れの加速試験方法において、通電を、電流密度0.1〜10mA/cm2で10分間以上定電流通電を行った後、0.001〜0.1mA/cm2に電流密度を変更して通電するものである。 The stress corrosion cracking acceleration test method according to the present invention (Claim 4) is the stress corrosion cracking acceleration test method according to any one of Claims 1 to 3, wherein the current density is 0.1 to 10 mA / cm. 2 is applied for 10 minutes or more, and then the current density is changed to 0.001 to 0.1 mA / cm 2 and the current is supplied.
本発明に係る応力腐食割れの加速試験方法によれば、短期間で応力腐食割れを評価できるため、応力腐食割れが懸念される環境における構造物設計や材料開発の迅速化が可能となる。 According to the accelerated test method for stress corrosion cracking according to the present invention, stress corrosion cracking can be evaluated in a short period of time, so that it is possible to speed up the structure design and material development in an environment where stress corrosion cracking is a concern.
以下、本発明の実施形態に係る応力腐食割れの加速試験方法を図面を参照して説明する。図1は、本発明に係る応力腐食割れの加速試験方法に適用される装置の概念図である。 Hereinafter, an accelerated test method for stress corrosion cracking according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a conceptual diagram of an apparatus applied to an accelerated test method for stress corrosion cracking according to the present invention.
容器1には、詳細を後記する、孔食を抑制する作用を持つ薬剤と塩化物イオンCl−とを含み、かつpHが4〜9である水溶液2が収容されている。この水溶液2中に、応力腐食割れ試験片となる応力を負荷した試験片3と当該試験片3の対極となる電極4とを挿入し、これら試験片3と電極4とを電源5に接続する。この接続により試験片3は電解作用を受け、応力腐食割れが加速される。
The container 1 contains an
以下、本発明に係る応力腐食割れの加速試験方法について詳細に説明する。 Hereinafter, an accelerated test method for stress corrosion cracking according to the present invention will be described in detail.
(1)水溶液中の孔食を抑制する作用を持つ薬剤について
孔食を抑制する作用を持つ薬剤とは、当該薬剤を添加した塩化物水溶液中に応力腐食割れ試験片を浸漬した場合の孔食個数もしくは最大孔食深さのいずれかが、単味の塩化物水溶液中に比べて20%以上低減し得る薬剤のことである。例えば、アルミニウム合金を応力腐食割れ試験片とする場合には、当該薬剤を添加した30℃の3%NaCl水溶液中に試験片を100時間浸漬した場合の孔食個数もしくは最大孔食深さのいずれかが、単味の3%NaCl水溶液中に比べて20%以上低減される薬剤のことである。これに該当する薬剤としては、NO3 −:0.1〜10%、SO4 2−:0.1〜10%、CrO4 2−:0.1〜10%、CH3COO−:0.1〜10%、H2O2:0.1〜10%などが挙げられ、これらの中ではNO3 −およびH2O2が、孔食抑制作用が大きいことから最も好ましく、その理由は、孔食が起ったサイトを不動態化させて孔食の進展を効果的に抑制するためと思われる。また、これらの薬剤は、塩化物イオンによる応力腐食割れの発生および進展を助長する作用を有し、1種又は2種以上を複合で用いることができる。
(1) About a drug having an action of suppressing pitting corrosion in an aqueous solution A drug having an action of suppressing pitting corrosion is pitting corrosion when a stress corrosion cracking specimen is immersed in an aqueous chloride solution to which the chemical is added. Either the number or the maximum pitting depth is a drug that can be reduced by 20% or more compared to a simple aqueous chloride solution. For example, when an aluminum alloy is used as a stress corrosion cracking test piece, either the number of pitting corrosion or the maximum pitting corrosion depth when the test piece is immersed in a 3% NaCl aqueous solution at 30 ° C. to which the agent is added for 100 hours. However, it is a drug that is reduced by 20% or more compared to a simple 3% NaCl aqueous solution. Examples of such drugs include NO 3 − : 0.1 to 10%, SO 4 2− : 0.1 to 10%, CrO 4 2− : 0.1 to 10%, CH 3 COO − : 0. 1 to 10%, H 2 O 2 : 0.1 to 10%, and the like. Among these, NO 3 - and H 2 O 2 are most preferable because they have a large pitting corrosion inhibitory effect. It seems that the site of pitting corrosion is passivated to effectively suppress the progress of pitting corrosion. Moreover, these chemical | medical agents have the effect | action which promotes generation | occurrence | production and progress of the stress corrosion cracking by a chloride ion, and can use 1 type (s) or 2 or more types in combination.
水溶液中に上記薬剤を含ませる理由は、応力腐食割れ試験片の応力腐食を加速し破断するまでの時間を早めるためには、粒界を早くたくさん生じさせる必要があるが、孔食が生じると粒界が生じなくなる。そこで、粒界を生じさせるために、孔食を抑制する作用を持つ薬剤を含ませ、試験片に粒界を早くたくさん生じさせるためである。 The reason why the above chemicals are included in the aqueous solution is that, in order to accelerate the stress corrosion of the stress corrosion cracked specimen and accelerate the time to break, it is necessary to generate many grain boundaries early. Grain boundaries are not generated. Therefore, in order to generate grain boundaries, a drug having an action of suppressing pitting corrosion is included so that many grain boundaries are generated in the test piece quickly.
(2)水溶液中の塩化物イオンCl−について
応力腐食割れは様々な材料と環境の組み合わせで発生することが知られているが、特に塩化物イオンを含む環境で発生する場合が多い。塩化物イオンは、海洋・海浜環境は言うまでもなく、海岸から遠く離れた田園地帯においても海塩粒子として飛来するし、融雪剤などにも含有されているため、広範囲において構造物を形成する構造材料は塩化物と接触して、応力腐食割れの危険性に曝されることが不可避である。塩化物イオンは水分を媒介して多くの金属材料に接触すると、金属塩化物を形成して、その金属塩化物の加水分解反応によって塩酸(HCl)が生成して、材料を浸食し、破壊に至らしめると考えられる。
(2) About chloride ion Cl − in aqueous solution Although stress corrosion cracking is known to occur in various combinations of materials and environments, it often occurs especially in an environment containing chloride ions. Chloride ions, as well as marine and beach environments, fly as sea salt particles in rural areas far from the coast and are also contained in snow melting agents, etc., so structural materials that form structures in a wide range Is inevitable to be exposed to the risk of stress corrosion cracking in contact with chloride. When chloride ions come into contact with many metal materials through water, they form metal chlorides, and hydrochloric acid (HCl) is generated by the hydrolysis reaction of the metal chlorides. It is thought that it will be achieved.
上記のようなことから、水溶液中には塩化物イオンCl−を含ませるものであるが、その水溶液中の塩化物イオンの濃度は、Cl−として0.5%〜10%が推奨される。その理由は、Cl−が0.5%未満では、加水分解反応によるHCl生成量が少ないので、溶液中の水分で容易に中和されてしまい、応力腐食割れが再現できない。Cl−が10%を越えると、試験片表面での金属塩化物濃度が局所的に飽和濃度を超えて、表面に析出し、析出した金属塩化物が腐食の電気化学反応の障壁となって逆に応力腐食割れが起こりにくくすることが懸念されるためである。 In view of the above, chloride ions Cl − is contained in the aqueous solution. The concentration of chloride ions in the aqueous solution is recommended to be 0.5% to 10% as Cl − . The reason is that if Cl − is less than 0.5%, the amount of HCl produced by the hydrolysis reaction is small, so that it is easily neutralized with moisture in the solution, and stress corrosion cracking cannot be reproduced. If Cl − exceeds 10%, the metal chloride concentration on the surface of the test piece locally exceeds the saturation concentration and precipitates on the surface, and the deposited metal chloride acts as a barrier to the electrochemical reaction of corrosion. This is because there is a concern that stress corrosion cracking will hardly occur.
(3)水溶液のpHについて
水溶液のpHが低くなる、すなわちH+イオン濃度が高くなると試験片への水素原子の侵入が起こって、水素脆化割れを生じるため、試験片の応力腐食割れ特性を正確に評価できない場合がある。応力腐食割れの評価において、このような水素脆化割れの影響をなくすためにはpHが4以上であることが好ましい。また、pHが高すぎるとアルカリ脆性割れを生じて、材料の応力腐食割れ特性を正確に評価できない場合がある。このようなアルカリ脆性割れの影響をなくすためにはpHが9以下であることが好ましい。このような理由から、水溶液のpHは4〜9が推奨される。
(3) pH of the aqueous solution When the pH of the aqueous solution becomes low, that is, when the H + ion concentration becomes high, hydrogen atoms enter the test piece and cause hydrogen embrittlement cracking. It may not be possible to evaluate accurately. In the evaluation of stress corrosion cracking, the pH is preferably 4 or more in order to eliminate the influence of such hydrogen embrittlement cracking. If the pH is too high, alkali brittle cracking may occur, and the stress corrosion cracking characteristics of the material may not be accurately evaluated. In order to eliminate the influence of such alkali brittle cracking, the pH is preferably 9 or less. For these reasons, the pH of the aqueous solution is recommended to be 4-9.
(4)試験片の材質と応力負荷について
試験片は、応力腐食割れを生じる金属材が対象であればその材質は特に限定されるものではないが、本発明を成すに至った開発過程では主にアルミニウム合金を対象として開発しており、鋼などの他の応力腐食割れを生じる金属材にも十分適用可能と考える。なお、本実施形態における定量的な条件については、アルミニウム合金を対象としては十分適用可能である。
(4) Material of test piece and stress load The material of the test piece is not particularly limited as long as it is a metal material that causes stress corrosion cracking, but it is mainly used in the development process leading to the present invention. It is developed for aluminum alloy and is considered to be applicable to other metal materials that cause stress corrosion cracking such as steel. In addition, about the quantitative condition in this embodiment, it can apply enough for aluminum alloy.
試験片への応力負荷方法についても特に限定されるものではない。この応力負荷方法については、従来一般的に使用されているU字曲げ試験片、Cリング試験片、3点曲げ試験片、4点曲げ試験片などにボルト締め付けで所定の応力を負荷する応力付加方法を用いることが可能である。また、必要に応じて切り欠きを形成した丸棒や板状試験片に引張試験器などの荷重負荷装置によって応力を負荷することも可能である。 There is no particular limitation on the stress loading method to the test piece. About this stress loading method, stress is applied to a U-bend test piece, C-ring test piece, 3-point bend test piece, 4-point bend test piece, etc., which are generally used in the past, by applying a predetermined stress by bolt tightening. It is possible to use a method. Moreover, it is also possible to apply stress to a round bar or plate-shaped test piece in which a notch is formed as required by a load loading device such as a tensile tester.
(5)試験片への通電方法について
試験片への通電方法は、電解作用が得られる構成であれば特に限定されるものではないが、複数回の試験を行って結果を比較する場合の条件統一として、適当な不溶性対極(例えば、白金など)を用いて定電流電解する方法か、あるいは照合電極(例えば、銀−塩化銀電極など)を用いて定電位電解する方法が推奨される。
(5) Method for energizing the test piece The method for energizing the test piece is not particularly limited as long as the electrolysis can be obtained, but the conditions for comparing the results by conducting a plurality of tests are as follows. As a standard, a method of constant current electrolysis using a suitable insoluble counter electrode (for example, platinum) or a method of constant potential electrolysis using a reference electrode (for example, a silver-silver chloride electrode) is recommended.
上記試験片への通電方法において、定電流電解時の電流は、試験片の材質によって推奨値は異なるが、0.001〜10mA/cm2程度の値が好適である。また、定電位電解時の電位も、試験片の材質によって推奨値は異なるが、定常腐食電位+50〜500mV程度の値が好適である。また、前記定電流電解の場合、初期に0.1〜10mA/cm2と比較的大きな電流密度で定電流電解を行った後に0.001〜0.1mA/cm2に電流密度を変更して行うことが望ましく、応力腐食割れがさらに促進される。これは、初期の高電流による電解で表面が局部的に活性化されるためである。このような局部的な活性化には10分間以上の時間が必要である。あまり長時間にわたって高電流で電解すると、試験片全面が活性化されて全面腐食が顕著となってかえって応力腐食割れが発生しにくくなるので、電解時間は2時間以内が推奨される。 In the energization method for the test piece, the recommended value for the current during constant current electrolysis varies depending on the material of the test piece, but a value of about 0.001 to 10 mA / cm 2 is suitable. Further, the recommended value of the potential during constant potential electrolysis varies depending on the material of the test piece, but a value of about steady corrosion potential +50 to 500 mV is preferable. In the case of the constant current electrolysis, the current density is changed to 0.001 to 0.1 mA / cm 2 after performing constant current electrolysis at a relatively large current density of 0.1 to 10 mA / cm 2 in the initial stage. Desirably, stress corrosion cracking is further promoted. This is because the surface is locally activated by electrolysis with an initial high current. Such local activation requires more than 10 minutes. If electrolysis is performed for a long time at a high current, the entire surface of the test piece is activated and the overall corrosion becomes conspicuous, and stress corrosion cracking hardly occurs. Therefore, an electrolysis time of 2 hours or less is recommended.
(6)水溶液の温度について
水溶液の温度は特に限定されるものではないが、実機相当の温度もしくは室温〜50℃が推奨される。水溶液の温度が、低すぎる場合には応力腐食割れのき裂進展が遅いので促進には不利であるが、高すぎる場合には溶液の蒸発などの問題があるため冷却を要することになる。
(6) About temperature of aqueous solution Although the temperature of aqueous solution is not specifically limited, The temperature equivalent to a real machine or room temperature-50 degreeC is recommended. When the temperature of the aqueous solution is too low, the stress corrosion cracking progresses slowly, which is disadvantageous for promotion. However, when the temperature is too high, cooling is required due to problems such as evaporation of the solution.
以下、上述した本発明に係る応力腐食割れの加速試験方法の実施例を比較例と共に説明する。 Examples of the stress corrosion cracking acceleration test method according to the present invention will be described below together with comparative examples.
(実施例1)
7000系アルミニウム合金(Al−4.5%Zn−1.5%Mg)を試験材料として、JIS H8711に記載されているJ2BのCリング試験片(板厚3.04mm、外径38mm)を作成し、ボルト締め付けにより種々の応力を負荷した応力腐食割れ試験片を準備した。この試験片では頂点(応力最大点)を挟んで幅10mm以外はシリコンシーラントで被覆し、ボルトナットなどが電解されないようにした。この試験片を、図1に示す構成を備える試験装置を用いて応力腐食割れの加速試験を行った。試験は、8%NaCl+3%Na2CrO4を含む水溶液(温度:30℃、pH:5.0)中において、電流密度5mA/cm2にて定電流電解を行い、試験面に割れが認められるまでの時間を測定して行った。水溶液のpH調整にはHClを用いた。試験結果は図2に示す通りで、負荷応力が350MPaと高い場合には1000s以内と非常に短時間で破断に至り、割れ限界応力は約200MPaであった。ただし、試験は105sを過ぎた時点で終了とした。
Example 1
Using a 7000 series aluminum alloy (Al-4.5% Zn-1.5% Mg) as a test material, a J2B C-ring specimen (plate thickness: 3.04 mm, outer diameter: 38 mm) described in JIS H8711 was prepared. Then, stress corrosion cracking specimens loaded with various stresses by bolt tightening were prepared. This test piece was covered with a silicon sealant except for a width of 10 mm across the apex (maximum stress point) so that bolts and nuts were not electrolyzed. This test piece was subjected to an accelerated test for stress corrosion cracking using a test apparatus having the configuration shown in FIG. In the test, constant current electrolysis was performed at a current density of 5 mA / cm 2 in an aqueous solution containing 8% NaCl + 3% Na 2 CrO 4 (temperature: 30 ° C., pH: 5.0), and cracks were observed on the test surface. The time until was measured. HCl was used to adjust the pH of the aqueous solution. The test results are as shown in FIG. 2. When the load stress was as high as 350 MPa, the fracture occurred in a very short time within 1000 s, and the crack limit stress was about 200 MPa. However, the test was terminated when 10 5 s was passed.
また、比較のため上記と同じ試験片を大気暴露試験(神戸市、海岸からの距離約5km)に供し、破断までの時間を測定した。試験結果は図3に示す通りである。この大気暴露試験では割れに至るまでに長時間を要しており、上記本発明が評価期間の点で短く有利であることがわかる。また、本発明の試験で求められる割れ限界応力は大気暴露試験で求められるそれと同じ値を示し、本発明の応力腐食割れ試験で設計に必要である限界応力を評価できることが明らかである。 For comparison, the same test piece as described above was subjected to an air exposure test (Kobe City, distance of about 5 km from the coast), and the time to break was measured. The test results are as shown in FIG. In this atmospheric exposure test, it takes a long time to crack, and it can be seen that the present invention is advantageous in terms of the evaluation period. Moreover, the crack limit stress obtained by the test of the present invention shows the same value as that obtained by the atmospheric exposure test, and it is clear that the limit stress required for the design can be evaluated by the stress corrosion crack test of the present invention.
(実施例2)
2種類の2000系アルミニウム合金(材料A:Al−4.3%Cu−0.80%Si−0.65%Mn、材料B:Al−5.5%Cu−0.30%Pb−0.25%Bi)と2種類の7000系アルミニウム合金(材料C:Al−5.2%Zn−0.80%Mg−0.20%Cr、材料D:5.5%Zn−2.6%Mg−1.8%Cu)を用いて、本発明の応力腐食割れ試験および大気暴露試験により割れ限界応力を測定した。試験片は上記(実施例1)と同じ要領で作成したものである。電解条件は、10%NaCl+2%NaNO3+1%CH3COONaを含む水溶液(温度:40℃、pH:7.5)を用い、電流密度は初期に10mA/cm2にて定電流電解を30分間行い、その後電流密度を0.1mA/cm2に変更して定電流電解を継続して、試験面に割れが認められるまでの時間を測定した。水溶液のpH調整にはNaOHを用いた。大気暴露試験は上記(実施例1)と同じ暴露場(神戸市、海岸からの距離約5km)にて行った。試験結果は図4に示す通りである。
(Example 2)
Two types of 2000 series aluminum alloys (Material A: Al-4.3% Cu-0.80% Si-0.65% Mn, Material B: Al-5.5% Cu-0.30% Pb-0. 25% Bi) and two types of 7000 series aluminum alloys (material C: Al-5.2% Zn-0.80% Mg-0.20% Cr, material D: 5.5% Zn-2.6% Mg) -1.8% Cu) was used to measure the crack limit stress by the stress corrosion cracking test and the atmospheric exposure test of the present invention. The test piece was prepared in the same manner as described above (Example 1). The electrolysis conditions were an aqueous solution (temperature: 40 ° C., pH: 7.5) containing 10% NaCl + 2% NaNO 3 + 1% CH 3 COONa, and the current density was initially 10 mA / cm 2 for 30 minutes. Then, the current density was changed to 0.1 mA / cm 2 and constant current electrolysis was continued, and the time until cracks were observed on the test surface was measured. NaOH was used to adjust the pH of the aqueous solution. The air exposure test was performed in the same exposure field (Kobe City, distance from the coast of about 5 km) as described above (Example 1). The test results are as shown in FIG.
図4より明らかなように、試験片のそれぞれの割れ限界応力は非常に良く相関しており、本発明の応力腐食割れ試験で短時間(105s以内)で評価した材料間の序列は大気暴露によるそれと一致し、実環境における応力腐食割れ特性(優劣)を正しく判定できることがわかる。 As is clear from FIG. 4, the crack limit stresses of the test pieces are very well correlated, and the order of the materials evaluated in a short time (within 10 5 s) in the stress corrosion cracking test of the present invention is atmospheric. It can be seen that the stress corrosion cracking property (superior or inferiority) in the real environment can be correctly judged in accordance with that by exposure.
1:容器 2:水溶液 3:試験片
4:電極 5:電源
1: Container 2: Aqueous solution 3: Test piece 4: Electrode 5: Power supply
Claims (4)
NO3 −:0.1〜10質量%(以下、単に%と記す)、
SO4 2−:0.1〜10%、
CrO4 2−:0.1〜10%、
CH3COO−:0.1〜10%、
H2O2:0.1〜10%
より選ばれる1種又は2種以上である請求項1又は2記載の応力腐食割れの加速試験方法。 Drugs that suppress pitting corrosion
NO 3 − : 0.1 to 10% by mass (hereinafter simply referred to as “%”),
SO 4 2− : 0.1 to 10%,
CrO 4 2− : 0.1 to 10%,
CH 3 COO − : 0.1 to 10%,
H 2 O 2: 0.1~10%
The accelerated test method for stress corrosion cracking according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the method is one or more selected from two or more.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2005045895A JP4519680B2 (en) | 2005-02-22 | 2005-02-22 | Accelerated testing method for stress corrosion cracking |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2005045895A JP4519680B2 (en) | 2005-02-22 | 2005-02-22 | Accelerated testing method for stress corrosion cracking |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2006234421A JP2006234421A (en) | 2006-09-07 |
| JP4519680B2 true JP4519680B2 (en) | 2010-08-04 |
Family
ID=37042262
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2005045895A Expired - Fee Related JP4519680B2 (en) | 2005-02-22 | 2005-02-22 | Accelerated testing method for stress corrosion cracking |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP4519680B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP4690279B2 (en) * | 2006-09-22 | 2011-06-01 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Evaluation method of stress corrosion cracking resistance of aluminum alloy materials |
| JP5081138B2 (en) * | 2008-11-27 | 2012-11-21 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Method for evaluating spalling resistance of steel |
| JP5495322B2 (en) * | 2009-07-15 | 2014-05-21 | ライオン株式会社 | Liquid detergent composition for kitchen |
| CN111398001A (en) * | 2020-04-01 | 2020-07-10 | 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二五研究所 | A method for preparing corrosion pits on metal material samples |
| CN113005457B (en) * | 2021-02-25 | 2023-03-17 | 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二五研究所 | Metallographic corrosive agent of aluminum alloy shear band, corrosion method and application |
Family Cites Families (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP3358216B2 (en) * | 1992-11-27 | 2002-12-16 | 栗田工業株式会社 | Water-based metal corrosion suppression method |
| JP3401909B2 (en) * | 1994-05-18 | 2003-04-28 | 栗田工業株式会社 | Water-based metal corrosion inhibitor |
| JPH11174016A (en) * | 1997-12-09 | 1999-07-02 | Kobe Steel Ltd | Al-mg base aluminum alloy capable of assuring local corrosion characteristics and local corrosion characteristic evaluation method for al-mg base aluminum alloy |
| JP2001099812A (en) * | 1999-10-01 | 2001-04-13 | Kobe Steel Ltd | Method for evaluating intergranular corrosion resistance of aluminum alloy material, and aluminum alloy material of superior intergranular corrosion resistance |
| JP2001153789A (en) * | 1999-11-25 | 2001-06-08 | Hitachi Ltd | Crack growth test equipment |
| JP2002001353A (en) * | 2000-06-21 | 2002-01-08 | Kurita Water Ind Ltd | Cooling water treatment method |
| JP2002294382A (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2002-10-09 | Kobe Steel Ltd | High strength and high toughness aluminum forging having excellent corrosion resistance |
| JP2003183899A (en) * | 2001-12-19 | 2003-07-03 | Fujikura Ltd | Surface finishing method of aluminum or aluminum alloy material |
| JP4417033B2 (en) * | 2003-06-04 | 2010-02-17 | 株式会社四国総合研究所 | How to prevent stress corrosion cracking in stainless steel |
-
2005
- 2005-02-22 JP JP2005045895A patent/JP4519680B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2006234421A (en) | 2006-09-07 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Harandi et al. | Influence of bovine serum albumin in Hanks' solution on the corrosion and stress corrosion cracking of a magnesium alloy | |
| JP5700673B2 (en) | Method for measuring amount of hydrogen penetrating into metal and method for monitoring amount of hydrogen penetrating into metal part of moving body | |
| JP7149242B2 (en) | Hydrogen permeation test device | |
| Makhlouf | Intelligent stannate-based coatings of self-healing functionality for magnesium alloys | |
| ZHANG | Anisotropy of localized corrosion in 7050–T7451 Al alloy thick plate | |
| JP6287917B2 (en) | Method for evaluating delayed fracture characteristics of metal material and metal material | |
| Bayoumi | The mechanics and mechanisms of fracture in stress corrosion cracking of aluminium alloys | |
| JP2004309197A (en) | Evaluation method for delayed fracture resistance | |
| JP2013044712A (en) | Method for measuring amount of hydrogen penetrated into metal and method for monitoring amount of hydrogen penetrated into metal portion of moving body | |
| Fujii et al. | Growth characteristics of stress corrosion cracking in high-strength 7075 aluminum alloy in sodium chloride solutions | |
| JP6128102B2 (en) | Method for evaluating delayed fracture characteristics of metal material and metal material | |
| JP4519680B2 (en) | Accelerated testing method for stress corrosion cracking | |
| JP2008292408A (en) | Temporal evaluation method of crevice corrosion occurrence of stainless steel. | |
| JP2001264240A (en) | Method for evaluating hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of steel and steel excellent in hydrogen embrittlement resistance | |
| JP2018159701A (en) | Hydrogen embrittlement resistance evaluation method | |
| JP5888692B2 (en) | Method for measuring amount of hydrogen penetrating into metal and method for monitoring amount of hydrogen penetrating into metal part of moving body | |
| Tani et al. | Stress corrosion cracking growth rates of candidate canister materials for spent nuclear fuel storage in chloride-containing atmosphere | |
| Guennec et al. | Analysis of Zr55Al10Cu30Ni5 bulk metallic glass pitting behavior in distilled water environment leading to fatigue-corrosion rupture | |
| Braun | Investigation of the SCC behaviour of alloy 2024 using the slow strain rate technique | |
| JP4872407B2 (en) | Zinc plating solution, galvanizing method, and evaluation method for hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of steel | |
| Klein et al. | Electrochemical-controlled characterization of the corrosion fatigue behavior of creep-resistant magnesium alloys DieMag422 and AE42 | |
| Dantas et al. | Effect of seawater corrosion on the mechanical behaviour of S690 steel | |
| Raymond | The susceptibility of fasteners to hydrogen embrittlement and stress corrosion cracking | |
| Maclins | Tensile behavior of aluminium alloy 6063-T6 in sea water | |
| Gjerding-Smith et al. | Wire fractures in locked coil cables |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20071226 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20100430 |
|
| TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20100518 |
|
| A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 |
|
| A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20100519 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130528 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
| R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 4519680 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
| FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140528 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |